Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Transcriptome-microRNA analysis of Sarcoptes scabiei and host immune response

  • Ran He,

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, China

  • Xiaobin Gu,

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, China

  • Weimin Lai,

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, China

  • Xuerong Peng,

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry, College of Life and Basic Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, China

  • Guangyou Yang

    guangyou1963@aliyun.com

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, China

Abstract

Scabies is a parasitic disease, caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabiei, and is considered one of the top 50 epidemic diseases and one the most common human skin disease, worldwide. Allergic dermatitis, including an intense itch, is a common symptom, however diagnosis is difficult and there is currently no effective vaccine. The goal of this study was to examine the immune interaction mechanism of both S. scabiei and infected hosts. mRNA-seq and microRNA-seq were conducted on the S. scabiei mite and on infected and uninfected hosts. We focused on differential expression of unigenes and microRNAs, as well as the real targets of unigenes in enriched immune signaling pathways. S. scabiei enhanced host immune function and decreased metabolism after infection, while the immune response of the host inhibited S. scabiei proliferation and metabolism signaling pathways. Differentially expressed unigenes of S. scabiei were enriched in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway and the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway. The differential expression analysis indicated that microRNAs of S. scabiei and hosts have major roles in regulating immune interactions between parasites and hosts.

Introduction

Scabies, caused by the parasitic mite Sarcoptes scabiei, is an allergic skin disease that affects millions of people and mammals worldwide[1]. S. scabiei has a broad host range, capable of infecting more than 100 species livestock and wild animals. It is listed as a neglected tropical disease by the World Health Organization[1, 2], and is considered one of the top 50 epidemic diseases worldwide. Additionally, it is one of the most common skin diseases in children[35]. Diagnosis is based on clinical characteristics; however, asymptomatic patients are often misdiagnosed[6]. Scabies presents a significant public health burden, particularly in economically disadvantaged populations. Additionally, scabies could cause secondary bacterial infections, which often followed by a series of other diseases, streptococcal infection for example, resulting in chronic kidney disease[79]. S. scabiei mite could burrow into skins and results in itching, epilation, and crusting of the wound for host[10, 11]. S. scabiei obtains nutrients from epidermal cells and serum of its host[1], and infection may lead to loss of appetite, weight loss and death of the host. S. scabiei also causes a global economic burden in animals[12].

Previous research has focused primarily on diagnostic methods, acaricidal drugs, recombinant protein antigen vaccines, and allergen proteins, such as cytokines and antibodies[8, 1230]. There is currently no effective vaccine for the scabies mite, and treatments for animals include application of chemical acaricides have resulted in resistance in target species and environmental pollution[31]. Research exploring the immunopathogenesis and allergens of the scabies mite, and host immunological protective mechanisms is warranted as these genes are potential targets for vaccine development or are potential markers for diagnostic tests[12, 31, 32].

In this study, we examined the transcriptome and microRNAs in response to infection with S. scabiei in order to resolve our understanding of the immune interaction between this mite and a host species. This study explored the immune response of S. scabiei and host with transcriptome and microRNA comprehensive analysis and provided a resource for the further research.

Methods

Host infection with Sarcoptes scabiei

New Zealand rabbits were provided by the Laboratory Animal Center of Sichuan Agricultural University (Ya’an, China). Nine New Zealand rabbits were separated into three groups randomly before infection, and all rabbits were housed under a barrier environment in sterile cages and provided with pelleted food and sterilized water ad libitum. Rabbits were acclimated to these conditions for one week prior to the experiment. Scabies mites (including adult, nymphs and larvae) were provided by Sichuan Agriculture University’s Parasitology Laboratory. Two groups of rabbits were infected with same weight mites (approximately 2000 live mites) on the surface of four feet and wrapped by gauze for 48h. For the first group, the mites were collected and held starved for 12 h before being stored in liquid nitrogen. For the second group, the mites, and the skin (with scraping) surrounding them, were collected and immediately stored in liquid nitrogen. The last group, uninfected rabbits were used as a negative control. Skin from the rabbits feet were collected and stored in liquid nitrogen (S1 Table).

All rabbits used in this study were 120 days old and weighed between 3–3·25 kg.

The Animal Ethics Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (AECSCAU; Approval No. 2011–028) had reviewed and approved this study. Animals were handled strictly according to the animal protection law of the People’s Republic of China (released on 09/18/2009) and the National Standards for Laboratory Animals in China (executed on 05/1/2002).

Isolation of total RNA

Total RNAs were extracted using a single step acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method with modifications. Samples (starved mites, embedded mites with infected host skin, uninfected host skin) were pulverized by fine grinding in liquid nitrogen and were transferred to an ice-chilled guanidinium thiocyanate mix. After a 5 min incubation on ice, followed by centrifugation at 4°C, the RNA-containing supernatants were transferred to a new tube and ethanol precipitation was conducted, followed by washing and dissolving in DEPC-treated water. The RNAs were further cleaned by two phenol-chloroform treatments. RNA was treated with RQ1 DNase (Promega) to remove DNA. Purity and integrity were assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%) and quantified by measuring the absorbance at 260/280 nm on a SmartSpec (Bio-rad).

Library construction and transcriptome sequencing

For each sample, 10 μg of total RNA was used for RNA-seq library preparation. Polyadenylated mRNAs were purified and concentrated with oligo (dT)-conjugated magnetic beads (Invitrogen) before used in directional RNA-seq library preparation. Purified mRNAs were iron fragmented at 95°C followed by end repair and 5' adaptor ligation. Then reverse transcription was performed with RT primers harboring 3' adaptor sequence and a randomized hexamer. The cDNAs were purified and amplified and PCR products corresponding to 200–500 bps were purified, quantified and stored at -80°C until used for sequencing. The libraries were prepared with a RNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit for Whole Transcriptome Discovery (GnomeGen, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions and sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 2000 system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using 2x100-bp paired-end sequencing.

The total RNA (3 μg) was used for microRNA cDNA library preparation with a Balancer NGS Library Preparation Kit for small/microRNA (GnomeGen, San Diego, CA, USA) following manufacturer's instruction. RNAs were ligated to 3' and 5' adaptor sequentially, reverse transcribed to cDNA and PCR amplified. Whole library was applied to 10% native PAGE gel electrophoresis and bands corresponding to microRNA insertion were cut and eluted. After ethanol precipitation and washing, the purified small RNA libraries were quantified with Qubit Fluorometer (Invitrogen) and used for cluster generation and 36 nt single end sequencing analysis through the Illumina GAIIx (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

RNA-seq data processing

Raw reads were discarded if they contained more than 2-N bases, then were processed by removing the adaptor sequence and low quality bases, and discarding reads less than 16nt using FASTX-Toolkit v 0.0.13 FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc)[33]. Sequences obtained from rabbit samples were aligned to the European rabbit’s (Oryctolagus cuniculus) genome from Genbank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/taxonomyhome.html/index.cgi?chapter=howcite) using TopHat2[34]. Reads obtained from starved and skin-embedded S. scabiei were combined for analysis. S. scabiei sequences were assembled using Trinity[35] and annotation of the assembled transcript sequences was performed using BLASTX algorithm and non-redundant protein database on NCBI, Nt and the COG databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). An e-value of 1e-5 was designated as the cutoff[36]. S. scabiei clean reads were aligned to unigenes and aligned reads with more than one genome location were considered ambiguous and discarded. Uniquely localized reads were used to calculate read number and RPKM value (reads per kilobase and per million) for each gene based on reads and location of genes within the genome. Gene coverage and depth, and read distribution around start codon and stop codon, were determined.

Functional enrichment analysis

Differentially expressed genes and unigenes were submitted to the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID:https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) for enrichment analysis[37]. Enrichment clusters were sorted by the enrichment score in descending order and categories within clusters were sorted by p-value in descending order. Fold enrichment with Bonferroni, Benjamini, and FDR corrected p-values were calculated for each category of each cluster.

MicroRNA-seq data processing

Raw reads were discarded if they contained more than 2-N bases, and were processed by removing the adaptor, low quality bases, and reads less than 12nt using FASTX-Toolkit v 0.0.13. FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) was used to verify post-filtering read quality[38].

MicroRNA-seq clean reads were aligned to the RNA family database (Rfam, v 11.0)[39] and the microRNA database (miRBase, v19)[40] using Bowtie[41] with no more than 2-nt mismatch. Only sequences in this study were selected. Both mature and hairpin microRNA reference sequences were used. First reads were aligned to mature microRNA sequences, and then unmapped reads were aligned to reference hairpin sequences. Read number and tag per million (TPM) values were obtained from the alignment. For each microRNA, we predicted the target unigene using mature microRNA sequences and whole mRNA sequences (include coding sequences and untranslated regions) with the program Miranda[42].

Differentially expressed genes

Differentially expressed genes (DEG) and unigenes from both RNA and microRNA sequences were analyzed to compare infected rabbit test samples and uninfected rabbit control samples, using the R package, edgeR[43] based on the negative binomial distribution. Thresholds of p < 0.01 and a 2-fold change were set to define DEGs.

RNA-seq and microRNA-seq comprehensive analysis

Using the predicted target unigenes from microRNA sequences and the differentially expressed unigenes, we filtered the target unigenes using Miranda[42]. The potential target unigenes and mRNA-seq DEG overlap were analyzed for possible real target unigene. In order to understand the function of DE-microRNA target unigenes, we used the DAVID (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) online platform[37].

Allergen and hydrolase genes

To examine homologous allergen gene sequences between S. scabiei and three other mite species, 287 allergen genes from Dermatophagoides farina, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, and Euroglyphus mayne, were downloaded from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Additionally, we compared our mRNA-seq results with hydrolase genes by building a S. scabiei hydrolase gene library with the best match of homologous sequences.

Validation of mRNA-seq and microRNA-seq results by RT-PCR

According to the comprehensive analysis of mRNA and microRNA results, we validated the unigenes and microRNAs which were enriched in immune signaling pathways, by RT-PCR (Table 1). Although the differential expression of microRNA mmu-miR-146a-5p, mmu-miR-181-5p have no corresponding immune pathways, they play an important role in the immune system[44, 45]. We also validated the unigenes enriched in the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway. RT-PCR were conducted with an MX300P Spectrofluorometric Thermal cycler (Stratagene, US) and QPCRMasterMix SybrGreen (DBI, US), initiated with a 2 min incubation at 95℃, followed by 40 cycles of 94℃ for 20 s; 58℃ for 20 s. The relative RNA expression levels were normalized by GAPDH.

thumbnail
Table 1. The immune pathways—Related microRNA of Sarcoptes scabiei.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.t001

Results

A total of 47,866,350 raw sequence reads were generated from the starved S. scabiei with 43,425,649 clean reads after filtering. S. scabiei embedded in host skin and infected host skin samples resulted in 69,307,202 raw reads, and 63,528,716 clean reads after filtering. Skin from uninfected rabbits resulted in 41,684,036 raw reads, and 38,114,803 clean reads after filtering. A total of 51,694 unigenes were detected after assembly (Fig 1) and compared, using cluster analysis, to 9,290 reference unigenes obtained from the Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COGs) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (S1 Fig). Of these, 14,198 (27.5%) clustered with known gene functions (S1 Fig). The majority of reads, 62.99% and 64.87%, mapped to coding sequences for both infected and uninfected rabbits, respectively (S2A and S2B Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Distribution of the number of unigenes and read length in S.scabiei samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.g001

Of the effective microRNA 81–84% mapped to the reference genome (S2 Table) with an average of 36% constituting uniquely mapped reads, and the majority mapping to intergenic regions (S2C and S2D Fig). The clean reads of microRNA were compared to Rfam database using bowtie program, and classified the result according to the type of RNA, the clean reads compared to 55–58%microRNA.

The transcriptome and microRNA datasets (raw reads) are available at the NCBI Bio Project with the ID: PRJNA320671 and Sequence Read Archive under the following accession numbers: SRS1432790, SRS1424964, SRS1432788.

Differential expression analysis

We identified 4,276 differentially expressed unigenes in S. scabiei, with 3,215 up-regulated and 1061 down-regulated (S3A Fig). The gene function clustering results of S. scabiei showed that unigenes related to development, such as mitotic cycle and embryonic development, were up-regulated (S3 Table), and protein kinase activity and ATP combination, phosphorylation and redox enzyme activity were down-regulated.

Between infected and uninfected host rabbits there were a total of 467 differentially expressed genes, with 295 up-regulated and 172 down-regulated (S3B Fig). The gene function clustering results of infected and uninfected rabbit hosts demonstrated that cell adhesion, cell surface receptors, cytokine production, interaction between cells, immune system regulation, T cell proliferation differentiation, leukocyte proliferation differentiation and lymphocyte activatation, and ion related unigenes were up-regulated (S4 Table). Cytokine activation, immunoglobulin, signal peptide synthesis related genes were up-regulated and host energy metabolism related genes were down-regulated.

MicroRNA

A total of 2,286,338 raw microRNA reads of starved S. scabiei resulted in 1,868,405 clean reads after filtering. Host embedded S. scabiei and infected host skin samples resulted in 6,419,608 raw reads, and 4,703,417 after filtering. Uninfected rabbit skin samples resulted in 6,307,144 raw reads, with 4,219,963 clean reads.

A comparison of uninfected host microRNAs to starved mite microRNAs revealed low similarity and 18 and 16 microRNAs were the same between host and parasite, respectively. There were 447 differentially expressed S. scabiei microRNAs, with 358 were up-regulated and 89 were down-regulated, and 18 differentially expressed host microRNAs, with five up-regulated and 13 down-regulated (S5 Table).

RNA-seq and microRNA-seq comprehensive analysis

Using the predicted target unigenes of microRNA and differentially expressed microRNAs, we filtered target unigenes of S. scabiei. A total of 3,703 microRNA target genes were down-regulated, while 17,111 were up-regulated. Additionally, the potential target unigenes and mRNA-seq DEG overlap were analyzed and functional clustering results demonstrated that S. scabiei down-regulated microRNAs corresponding to up-regulated target unigenes were enriched in sugar and protein hydrolases, cell morphological differentiation, actin filament, and post-embryonic development signaling pathways (S6 Table). While hydrolytic enzymes play an important role in feeding and invasion of S. scabiei, indicating that the microRNAs are very important in regulating invasion and feeding of S. scabiei. Host down-regulated microRNAs corresponding to up-regulated target genes were enriched in synthesis of cell surface receptors and signal transduction, regulation of leukocyte, lymphocyte, T cell activation, and regulation of immune system signaling pathways (S7 Table).

Validation of mRNA-seq and microRNA-seq results by RT-PCR

The results of RT-PCR indicated differential expression of the analyzed microRNA and unigenes (Fig 2), consistent with the results of mRNA-seq and microRNA-seq data. This results validated expression data and verified the reliability and accuracy of our mRNA-seq and microRNA-seq analysis. Immune signaling pathway-related microRNAs and unigenes corresponding to Toll-like receptors signaling pathway were validated by RT-PCR (Table 1, S8 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 2. RT-PCR validation of the differentially expressed unigenes and microRNAs from Illumina sequencing.

The relative expression levels of toll like receptor signaling pathway related unigenes and immune signaling pathways related microRNAs were determined by RT-PCR using cDNA as template.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.g002

Allergen and hydrolase genes

A total of 287 allergen genes from three species of mites were investigated for homologous sequences. We found 17 homologous sequences from E. mayne (S9A Table), 141 from D. pteronyssinus (S9B Table), and 580 from D. farinae (S9 Table). Additionally, we found 264 hydrolase unigenes of S. scabiei (S10 Table).

Discussion

Differential expression of genes

Scabies mites, S. scabiei, are obligate parasites that infect their host by burrowing into the skin. It is in the skin where they obtain their nutrients and undergo cell mitosis and embryonic development[15].

Mites burrow into skin and cause an intensely pruritic rash, crusted scabies may weaken the immunity of hosts, lead to skin damage on a large scale. S.scabiei can also facilitate secondary infection such as bacterial infections[46, 47]. Diagnosis depending on clinical symptoms is hard to distinguish scabies from hairless tinea, lice, crab lice and eczema because of the similar symptoms[48, 49]. Recent researches on immunity response among scabies mites and host have mainly focused on cytokines and antibodies[5052], and high-throughput sequencing has not been applied to the analysis of the skin immune response. Since the affiliation between parasites and their hosts, and a significant a public health concern, this study explored the immune response of S. scabiei and host with transcriptome and microRNA comprehensive analysis.

After infection, host species exhibit loss of appetite, listlessness, inflammation, itching and crusting at the site of invasion[1, 7, 8]. We found that glycolysis, metabolic, and oxidation capacity-related genes of infected hosts were down-regulated, which may lead to some clinical symptoms. However, proliferation and differentiation of T cell and leukocyte, and activation of lymphocyte related unigenes were up-regulated, indicating that the host generates an immune response to resist invasion by the mite. The up-regulation of cytokine activation, immunoglobulin synthesis, and signal peptide synthesis related genes in infected hosts would lead to an increase secretion of cytokines and immunoglobulin in host serum.

We found that infection leading to up-regulation of S. scabiei unigenes related to increased cell proliferation and division, which would cause faster growth of the mite. Host immune response to infection are likely leading to down-regulation of the ATP combination, phosphorylation, redox enzyme activity and protein kinase activity related unigenes of S. scabiei. These unigenes are related to metabolism, membrane transport and intracellular signal transduction, suggesting that the metabolism and the body proliferation related genes of S. scabiei are inhibited by the immune response of the host.

Additionally, epidermal growth, vesicle mediated transport, and protein kinase mediated related unigenes were up-regulated, indicating that S. scabiei absorbs nutrients and excretes metabolic product related unigenes which are up-regulated due to S. scabiei feeding and grow within the host skin. S. scabiei secretions, feces, and the mites themselves, can be a trigger to the host immune response after invasion.

Differential expression of microRNA

At the posttranscriptional level, microRNA plays a major role in the regulation of genome expression, regulating a variety of biological processes, such as maintenance of immune homeostasis and normal immune function[53]. MicroRNAs make a great importance in controlling the physiological, development and pathological processes, including cell proliferation, cellular differentiation and tumor generation[5457]. MicroRNAs influence both innate and adaptive immune response[54] and may regulate the interaction of parasite and host, or drug resistance[58, 59]. MicroRNA impact the target gene in different ways, the immune pathway corresponding microRNA differential expression, immune pathway corresponding target genes differentially expression simultaneously according to the transcriptome and microRNA comprehensive analysis. Of the target unigenes of microRNAs enriched in immune signaling pathways we listed, three microRNAs were down-regulated. It showed that the expression of microRNA affects the expression of a target gene, which played a role in the activation or inhibition pathway. Indicating that microRNA play an important role in S.scabiei and host immune interactions in this study. The differential expression analysis of microRNAs provide a better understanding of the interaction between S. scabiei and host.

Immune signaling pathway

In this study, S. scabiei and host DEGs were enriched in immune-related signaling pathways. S. scabiei DEGs were also enriched in JAK-STAT pathways, but neither in the immune deficiency pathway nor the toll signaling pathway, in spite of their role in the innate immune response[38, 6062]. The JAK-STAT pathway influences, neutrophils and macrophages activation, inflammatory response and wound repair controlling has been indicated in the adaptive immune system by regulating the differentiation of B cells and T cells[63] and has been reported to be the main signaling pathway of the insect innate immune system. We found that eleven unigenes of toll-like receptors signaling pathway had been up-regulated, which indicated that this pathway is triggered upon infection and may be the main pathway in innate immune response. The expression of the eleven unigenes were validated by RT-PCR, the results showed that consistent unigenes expression has increased after infection, which has also indicated that the immune response was triggered because of the immune response of host. Our analysis of immune pathway in response to infection with S. scabiei has resulted in a better understanding of immune interaction of this parasite and host.

Allergens of Sarcoptes scabiei

The biological, chemical and structural properties of dust mite allergens have been widely studied, about 21 dust mite allergens has a known allergen structure and can produce recombinant proteins, which may be useful to new diagnostic methods, or development of new drugs or vaccines[12, 64]. Dust mite and scabies mites have antigenic cross-reactivity[65, 66], therefore identifying homologous allergen genes in dust mites will allow us to identify these allergen genes in S. scabiei. A number of scabies mite allergen genes have known sequences homologies to house dust mite allergens including tropomyosin[14], serine proteases and cysteine proteases[21], glutathione S-transferase and apolipoprotein M-177[17]. 61 allergen unigenes had been predicted in transcriptome of Sarcoptes scabiei canis[67], and groups of allergen genes had been selected from the draft genome of the scabies mite[9]. Here we compared the mRNA-seq results with dust mite allergen and found 738 homologous allergen unigenes.

Hydrolases of Sarcoptes scabiei

S. scabiei down-regulated microRNAs corresponding to up-regulated target unigenes which were enriched in sugar and protein hydrolase signaling pathways. This suggests that hydrolases are momentous in the immune interaction of S. scabiei and their hosts. Aspartic protease, produced by S. scabiei, plays a major role in the digestion of serum molecules and host skin[17]. Additionally, in Psoroptes ovis mites, a series of proteases are produced with anticoagulant effects that aid in degradation of fibrinogen, which ensures a continuous flow of host fluids during feeding[68]. Most of the house dust mite allergens are proteases, and the hydrolysis of these proteases promotes inflammation and aggravates allergic reactions[6972]. Consequently hydrolases may play an important role in S. scabiei invasion and survival. Here we have compared the mRNA-seq results of S. scabiei, and built a hydrolase gene library which includes 264 hydrolase unigenes of S. scabiei.

By comparing the transcriptome and microRNA data we obtained a large number of differentially expressed genes and microRNA and the target genes of microRNA. The screened allergen genes will provide a support for further study on allergen functional characterization. Furthermore when comparing them to the hydrolase gene, some unigenes were both allergen and hydrolases, future studies identifying these allergens are warranted.

Conclusion

With the comprehensive analysis of mRNA-seq and microRNA-seq results, we found that S.scabiei enhanced post-infected host immune function, decreased its metabolism. The immune response of host inhibited S.scabiei immune pathway, proliferation and metabolism signaling pathways. Simultaneously, we filtered a number of allergen and hydrolase unigenes, and it can be inferred that there existed unknown allergens in the hydrolase unigenes. Interestingly, it has been reported that the toll pathway, the immune deficiency pathway and JAK-STAT signaling pathway are the mainly signaling pathway of insect innate immune response. But in this study, the KEGG pathway analysis exhibited that the DEGs of S.scabiei enriched in JAK-STAT signaling pathway and Toll pathway but not in the immune deficiency pathway. Moreover the verification of the toll-like receptors signaling pathway indicated that it may be the mainly pathway in innate immune response of S.scabiei. The analysis of immune pathway, hydrolase and allergen will make a contribution to the research of S.scabiei pathogenesis, diagnosis and vaccines.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Cluster analysis of RNA-seq detected unigenes compared to reference unigene sequences obtained from the COG database.

A) Distribution of unigenes based on COG classifications, B) percent of sequences clustering based on biological processes, C) cellular components, and D) molecular function.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s001

(RAR)

S2 Fig. Distribution of host rabbit sequence reads aligning to the European rabbit reference genome.

Sequence reads from A) infected host rabbits, and B) uninfected rabbits, C) infected host rabbits, and D) uninfected host rabbits.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s002

(RAR)

S3 Fig. Identification of differentially expressed unigenes.

A) Embedded mites and starved mites; B) infected host skin and uninfected host skin. Comparison of DEG (DEG, red; not DEG, black) was performed in the R package, edgeR, with the.p-value set at p-value≤0.01; fold change≥2. The log concentration provides the overall concentration for a gene across the two groups being compared; the points on the left side signifies that genes were observed in only one group of replicate samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s003

(RAR)

S2 Table. Mapping of clean reads on the rabbit’s genome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s005

(DOCX)

S3 Table. GO term analysis of differentially expressed unigenes of starved mites vs. embedded mites.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s006

(DOCX)

S4 Table. GO term analysis of differentially expressed genes of infected host skin vs. uninfected host skin (DEG).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s007

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Total number of differentially expressed microRNA (fold change≥2 or ≤0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s008

(DOCX)

S6 Table. GO term analysis of differentially expressed microRNA’ target unigenes of Sarcoptes scabiei.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s009

(DOCX)

S7 Table. GO term analysis of differentially expressed microRNA’ target genes of host.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s010

(DOCX)

S8 Table. Unigenes enrichment to the Toll-like receptors signaling pathway.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s011

(DOCX)

S9 Table. Allergen homologous unigenes.

A) Euroglyphus mayne allergen homologous unigenes; B) Dermatophagoides pteronyssinu allergen homologous unigenes (Only 20 of them are listed); C) Dermatophagoides farinae allergen homologous unigenes (Only 20 of them are listed).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s012

(DOCX)

S10 Table. Hydrolase homologous unigenes (Only 20 of them are listed).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177733.s013

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Research Fund for the Chengdu Research of Giant Panda Breeding (Project No. CPF2014-17). We would like to thank Hai Lin and Nengxing Shen (College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, China) for their help.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: RH GYY.
  2. Data curation: RH.
  3. Formal analysis: RH.
  4. Funding acquisition: RH.
  5. Investigation: RH.
  6. Methodology: RH.
  7. Project administration: RH.
  8. Resources: RH WML XRP XBG.
  9. Software: RH.
  10. Supervision: RH.
  11. Validation: RH.
  12. Writing – original draft: RH.
  13. Writing – review & editing: RH.

References

  1. 1. Holt DC, Burgess ST, Reynolds SL, Mahmood W, Fischer K. Intestinal proteases of free-living and parasitic astigmatid mites. Cell and tissue research. 2013;351(2):339–52. pmid:22427061
  2. 2. Engelman D, Kiang K, Chosidow O, McCarthy J, Fuller C, Lammie P, et al. Toward the global control of human scabies: introducing the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(8):e2167. pmid:23951369
  3. 3. Hay R, Steer A, Engelman D, Walton S. Scabies in the developing world—its prevalence, complications, and management. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2012;18(4):313–23. pmid:22429456
  4. 4. Andrews RM, Kearns T, Connors C, Parker C, Carville K, Currie BJ, et al. A regional initiative to reduce skin infections amongst aboriginal children living in remote communities of the Northern Territory, Australia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(11):e554. pmid:19936297
  5. 5. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. 2013;380(9859):2163–96.
  6. 6. Arlian LG, Feldmeier H, Morgan MS. The potential for a blood test for scabies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(10):e0004188. pmid:26492406
  7. 7. Hay RJ, Johns NE, Williams HC, Bolliger IW, Dellavalle RP, Margolis DJ, et al. The global burden of skin disease in 2010: an analysis of the prevalence and impact of skin conditions. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2014;134(6):1527–34. pmid:24166134
  8. 8. Liu X, Walton S, Mounsey K. Vaccine against scabies: necessity and possibility. Parasitology. 2014;141(06):725–32.
  9. 9. Rider SD Jr, Morgan MS, Arlian LG. Draft genome of the scabies mite. Parasites & vectors. 2015;8(1):1–14.
  10. 10. Levi A, Mumcuoglu KY, Ingber A, Enk CD. Assessment of Sarcoptes scabiei viability in vivo by reflectance confocal microscopy. Lasers in medical science. 2011;26(3):291–2. pmid:21318343
  11. 11. Reynolds SL, Pike RN, Mika A, Blom AM, Hofmann A, Wijeyewickrema LC, et al. Scabies mite inactive serine proteases are potent inhibitors of the human complement lectin pathway. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(5):e2872. pmid:24854034
  12. 12. Fischer K, Walton S. Parasitic mites of medical and veterinary importance–is there a common research agenda? International journal for parasitology. 2014;44(12):955–67. pmid:25218570
  13. 13. Gu X, Xie Y, Wang S, Peng X, Lai S, Yang G. Immune response induced by candidate Sarcoptes scabiei var. cuniculi DNA vaccine encoding paramyosin in mice. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 2014;63(3):401–12. pmid:24729069
  14. 14. Zhang R, Jise Q, Zheng W, Ren Y, Nong X, Wu X, et al. Characterization and evaluation of a Sarcoptes scabiei allergen as a candidate vaccine. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5(1):176.
  15. 15. Walton SF, Pizzutto S, Slender A, Viberg L, Holt D, Hales BJ, et al. Increased allergic immune response to Sarcoptes scabiei antigens in crusted versus ordinary scabies. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2010;17(9):1428–38. pmid:20631334
  16. 16. Rampton M, Walton SF, Holt DC, Pasay C, Kelly A, Currie BJ, et al. Antibody responses to Sarcoptes scabiei apolipoprotein in a porcine model: relevance to immunodiagnosis of recent infection. PloS one. 2013;8(6):e65354. pmid:23762351
  17. 17. Mahmood W, Viberg LT, Fischer K, Walton SF, Holt DC. An aspartic protease of the scabies mite Sarcoptes scabiei is involved in the digestion of host skin and blood macromolecules. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(11):e2525. pmid:24244770
  18. 18. Mika A, Goh P, Holt DC, Kemp DJ, Fischer K. Scabies mite peritrophins are potential targets of human host innate immunity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(9):e1331. pmid:21980545
  19. 19. Mika A, Reynolds SL, Mohlin FC, Willis C, Swe PM, Pickering DA, et al. Novel scabies mite serpins inhibit the three pathways of the human complement system. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40489. pmid:22792350
  20. 20. Mika A, Reynolds SL, Pickering D, McMillan D, Sriprakash KS, Kemp DJ, et al. Complement inhibitors from scabies mites promote streptococcal growth–a novel mechanism in infected epidermis? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(7):e1563. pmid:22815998
  21. 21. Beckham SA, Boyd SE, Reynolds S, Willis C, Johnstone M, Mika A, et al. Characterization of a serine protease homologous to house dust mite group 3 allergens from the scabies mite Sarcoptes scabiei. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284(49):34413–22. pmid:19812030
  22. 22. Casais R, Millán J, Rosell JM, Dalton KP, Prieto JM. Evaluation of an ELISA using recombinant Ssλ20ΔB3 antigen for the serological diagnosis of Sarcoptes scabiei infestation in domestic and wild rabbits. Veterinary parasitology. 2015;214(3):315–21.
  23. 23. Gu X, Fang C, Yang G, Xie Y, Nong X, Zhu J, et al. Acaricidal properties of an Ailanthus altissima bark extract against Psoroptes cuniculi and Sarcoptes scabiei var. cuniculi in vitro. Experimental and applied acarology. 2014;62(2):225–32. pmid:24052400
  24. 24. Singh SK, Dimri U, Sharma B, Saxena M, Kumari P. Assessment of the cytokine profile in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of naturally Sarcoptes scabiei var. canis infested dogs. Veterinary parasitology. 2014;206(3):253–7.
  25. 25. Toet HM, Fischer K, Mounsey KE, Sandeman RM. Autoantibodies to iron-binding proteins in pigs infested with Sarcoptes scabiei. Veterinary parasitology. 2014;205(1):263–70.
  26. 26. Hamel D, Joachim A, Löwenstein M, Pfister K, Silaghi C, Visser M, et al. Treatment and control of bovine sarcoptic and psoroptic mange infestation with ivermectin long-acting injectable (IVOMEC® GOLD). Parasitology research. 2015;114(2):535–42. pmid:25399813
  27. 27. Zheng Y, He R, He M, Gu X, Wang T, Lai W, et al. Characterization of Sarcoptes scabiei cofilin gene and assessment of recombinant cofilin protein as an antigen in indirect-ELISA for diagnosis. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2016;16(1):1.
  28. 28. Fang F, Bernigaud C, Candy K, Melloul E, Izri A, Durand R, et al. Efficacy assessment of biocides or repellents for the control of Sarcoptes scabiei in the environment. Parasites & vectors. 2015;8(1):1–6.
  29. 29. Angelone-Alasaad S, Min AM, Pasquetti M, Alagaili AN, D’Amelio S, Berrilli F, et al. Universal conventional and real-time PCR diagnosis tools for Sarcoptes scabiei. Parasites & vectors. 2015;8(1):1–7.
  30. 30. Zhang R, Zheng W, Wu X, Jise Q, Ren Y, Xiang N, et al. Characterisation and analysis of thioredoxin peroxidase as a potential antigen for the serodiagnosis of sarcoptic mange in rabbits by dot-ELISA. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2013;13(1):336.
  31. 31. Terada Y, Murayama N, Ikemura H, Morita T, Nagata M. Sarcoptes scabiei var. canis refractory to ivermectin treatment in two dogs. Veterinary dermatology. 2010;21(6):608–12. pmid:20880016
  32. 32. Nong X, Li S-H, Wang J-H, Xie Y, Chen F-Z, Liu T-F, et al. Acaricidal activity of petroleum ether extracts from Eupatorium adenophorum against the ectoparasitic cattle mite, Chorioptes texanus. Parasitology research. 2014;113(3):1201–7. pmid:24464273
  33. 33. Andrews S. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Reference Source. 2010.
  34. 34. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14(4):R36. pmid:23618408
  35. 35. Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nature protocols. 2013;8(8):1494–512. pmid:23845962
  36. 36. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of molecular biology. 1990;215(3):403–10. pmid:2231712
  37. 37. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature protocols. 2009;4(1):44–57. pmid:19131956
  38. 38. Liu Q, Tuo W, Gao H, Zhu X-Q. MicroRNAs of parasites: current status and future perspectives. Parasitology research. 2010;107(3):501–7. pmid:20532562
  39. 39. Burge SW, Daub J, Eberhardt R, Tate J, Barquist L, Nawrocki EP, et al. Rfam 11.0: 10 years of RNA families. Nucleic acids research. 2012:gks1005.
  40. 40. Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic acids research. 2010:gkq1027.
  41. 41. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome biol. 2009;10(3):R25. pmid:19261174
  42. 42. Enright AJ, John B, Gaul U, Tuschl T, Sander C, Marks DS. MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome biology. 2004;5(1):R1–R.
  43. 43. Robinson MD, Mccarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):: 139–40. pmid:19910308
  44. 44. Schulte LN, Westermann AJ, Vogel J. Differential activation and functional specialization of miR-146 and miR-155 in innate immune sensing. Nucleic acids research. 2012:gks1030.
  45. 45. Sun X, Sit A, Feinberg MW. Role of miR-181 family in regulating vascular inflammation and immunity. Trends in cardiovascular medicine. 2014;24(3):105–12. pmid:24183793
  46. 46. Karthikeyan K. Crusted scabies. Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology. 2009;75(4):71–8.
  47. 47. Berríos X, Lagomarsino E, Solar E, Sandoval G, Guzmán B, Riedel I. Post-streptococcal acute glomerulonephritis in Chile—20 years of experience. Pediatric Nephrology. 2004;19(3):306–12. pmid:14689289
  48. 48. Walton SF, Currie BJ. Problems in diagnosing scabies, a global disease in human and animal populations. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2007;20(2):268–79. pmid:17428886
  49. 49. Walton SF, Holt DC, Currie BJ, Kemp DJ. Scabies: new future for a neglected disease. Advances in Parasitology. 2004;57(57):309–76.
  50. 50. Lalor PF, Edwards S, McNab G, Salmi M, Jalkanen S, Adams DH. Vascular adhesion protein-1 mediates adhesion and transmigration of lymphocytes on human hepatic endothelial cells. The Journal of Immunology. 2002;169(2):983–92. pmid:12097405
  51. 51. Pearen MA, Ryall JG, Lynch GS, Muscat GE. Expression profiling of skeletal muscle following acute and chronic β 2-adrenergic stimulation: implications for hypertrophy, metabolism and circadian rhythm. BMC genomics. 2009;10(1):1.
  52. 52. Pearen MA, Ryall JG, Maxwell MA, Ohkura N, Lynch GS, Muscat GE. The orphan nuclear receptor, NOR-1, is a target of β-adrenergic signaling in skeletal muscle. Endocrinology. 2006;147(11):5217–27. pmid:16901967
  53. 53. Myllymäki H, Rämet M. JAK/STAT pathway in Drosophila immunity. Scandinavian journal of immunology. 2014;79(6):377–85. pmid:24673174
  54. 54. O'Shea JJ, Plenge R. JAK and STAT signaling molecules in immunoregulation and immune-mediated disease. Immunity. 2012;36(4):542–50. pmid:22520847
  55. 55. O'Shea JJ, Murray PJ. Cytokine signaling modules in inflammatory responses. Immunity. 2008;28(4):477–87. pmid:18400190
  56. 56. Darnell JE, Kerr IM, Stark GR. Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins. Science. 1994;264(5164):1415–21. pmid:8197455
  57. 57. Leonard WJ O'Shea JJ. Jaks and STATs: biological implications*. Annual review of immunology. 1998;16(1):293–322.
  58. 58. Tanji T, Hu X, Weber AN, Ip YT. Toll and IMD pathways synergistically activate an innate immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular and cellular biology. 2007;27(12):4578–88. pmid:17438142
  59. 59. De Gregorio E, Spellman PT, Tzou P, Rubin GM, Lemaitre B. The Toll and Imd pathways are the major regulators of the immune response in Drosophila. The EMBO journal. 2002;21(11):2568–79. pmid:12032070
  60. 60. Hoefig KP, Heissmeyer V. MicroRNAs grow up in the immune system. Current opinion in immunology. 2008;20(3):281–7. pmid:18554884
  61. 61. Han H, Peng J, Hong Y, Zhang M, Han Y, Fu Z, et al. Comparison of the differential expression miRNAs in Wistar rats before and 10 days after S. japonicum infection. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6(1):120.
  62. 62. Devaney E, Winter AD, Britton C. microRNAs: a role in drug resistance in parasitic nematodes? Trends in parasitology. 2010;26(9):428–33. pmid:20541972
  63. 63. Tanji T, Ip YT. Regulators of the Toll and Imd pathways in the Drosophila innate immune response. Trends in immunology. 2005;26(4):193–8. pmid:15797509
  64. 64. Thomas WR, Hales BJ, Smith W-A. House dust mite allergens in asthma and allergy. Trends in molecular medicine. 2010;16(7):321–8. pmid:20605742
  65. 65. Arlian L, Vyszenski-Moher D, Gilmore A. Cross-antigenicity between Sarcoptes scabiei and the house dust mite, Dermatophagoides farinae (Acari: Sarcoptidae and Pyroglyphidae). Journal of medical entomology. 1988;25(4):240–7. pmid:3136249
  66. 66. Arlian LG, Morgan MS. Serum antibody to Sarcoptes scabiei and house dust mite prior to and during infestation with S. scabiei. Veterinary parasitology. 2000;90(4):315–26. pmid:10856817
  67. 67. Hu L, Zhao Y, Yang Y, Niu D, Wang R, Cheng J, et al. De novo RNA-Seq and functional annotation of Sarcoptes scabiei canis. Parasitology Research. 2016;115(7):2661–70. pmid:26997341
  68. 68. Fischer K, Holt DC, Harumal P, Currie BJ, Walton SF, Kemp DJ. Generation and characterization of cDNA clones from Sarcoptes scabiei var. hominis for an expressed sequence tag library: identification of homologues of house dust mite allergens. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2003;68(1):61–4. pmid:12556150
  69. 69. Kenyon F, Knox D. The proteinases of Psoroptes ovis, the sheep scab mite—their diversity and substrate specificity. Veterinary parasitology. 2002;105(4):317–25. pmid:11983306
  70. 70. Aalberse RC. Structural biology of allergens. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2000;106(2):228–38. pmid:10932064
  71. 71. Arlian LG. Arthropod allergens and human health. Annual review of entomology. 2002;47(1):395–433.
  72. 72. Stewart G, Robinson C. The immunobiology of allergenic peptidases. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. 2003;33(1):3–6.