The effects of streets on biodiversity is an important aspect of urban ecology, but it has been neglected worldwide. Several vegetation attributes (e.g. street tree density and diversity) have important effects on biodiversity and ecological processes. In this study, we evaluated the influences of urban vegetation—represented by characteristics of street trees (canopy size, proportion of native tree species and tree species richness)—and characteristics of the landscape (distance to parks and vegetation quantity), and human impacts (human population size and exposure to noise) on taxonomic data and functional diversity indices of the bird community inhabiting streets. The study area was the southern region of Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais, Brazil), a largely urbanized city in the understudied Neotropical region. Bird data were collected on 60 point count locations distributed across the streets of the landscape. We used a series of competing GLM models (using Akaike's information criterion for small sample sizes) to assess the relative contribution of the different sets of variables to explain the observed patterns. Seventy-three bird species were observed exploiting the streets: native species were the most abundant and frequent throughout this landscape. The bird community's functional richness and Rao's Quadratic Entropy presented values lower than 0.5. Therefore, this landscape was favoring few functional traits. Exposure to noise was the most limiting factor for this bird community. However, the average size of arboreal patches and, especially the characteristics of street trees, were able to reduce the negative effects of noise on the bird community. These results show the importance of adequately planning the urban afforestation process: increasing tree species richness, preserving large trees and planting more native trees species in the streets are management practices that will increase bird species richness, abundance and community functional aspects and consequently improve human wellbeing and quality of life.
Citation: Pena JCdC, Martello F, Ribeiro MC, Armitage RA, Young RJ, Rodrigues M (2017) Street trees reduce the negative effects of urbanization on birds. PLoS ONE 12(3): e0174484. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174484
Editor: Maura (Gee) Geraldine Chapman, University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Received: December 18, 2016; Accepted: March 9, 2017; Published: March 23, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Pena et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico (http://www.cnpq.br/) [MCR (grant number 312045/2013-1) and MR]; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (http://www.capes.gov.br/) (JCCP and FM); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, grant number 2013/50421-2 (http://www. fapesp.br/) (MCR); and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (http://www.fapemig.br/) (MR). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The expansion of urban landscapes is happening at an accelerated rate. By the year 2050, two-thirds of the human population will live in cities , and about 60% of all the infrastructure intended to improve cities by 2030 has yet to be built . The replacement of natural habitats by artificial elements—such as houses, buildings and streets—leads to disturbances and negative impacts on different biological taxa. To persist within cities, organisms need to adapt to the direct and indirect effects of environmental changes such as habitat loss and fragmentation, destruction of freshwater resources and introduction of exotic species . Therefore, it is necessary to understand how these environmental changes affect the biodiversity and ecological processes essential for maintaining human quality of life and the functioning of urban ecosystems.
Birds are a highly diverse taxon and are sensitive to environmental changes in anthropogenic landscapes , wherein some species are more capable than others to occupy urban landscapes [5–7]. Characteristics of the urban vegetation, such as street trees, gardens and natural habitat patches, are important for the maintenance of bird populations in cities . Actions such as planting native tree species , planning an ecological network connecting habitat patches  and ensuring the availability of resources for native fauna  increase bird species richness, abundance and diversity as well as reducing the negative effects of the urbanization process, such as biotic homogenization .
Despite the considerable amount of information about the effects of urban green elements, the urban matrix , and roads on birds , little is known about how birds are influenced by disturbances and vegetation characteristics of streets. Traffic volume and the size of the vegetation gap affects the movement of songbirds  and traffic noise has an influence on antipredator behavior , causing changes in song patterns . However, when the urban vegetation is properly managed, streets need not be completely negative to urban birds. Species can use street trees to move between urban parks and habitat patches . Streetscapes that contain predominantly native tree species, increase native bird species richness and abundance, and the bird community is more similar to that in natural habitat patches than in streetscapes, which are composed mainly of exotic tree species .
Since different bird species can use urban vegetation to different degrees , such species differences must be taken into consideration when evaluating how urbanization affects bird communities. In recent decades, functional diversity approaches have been widely used to understand the influences of human activities on biodiversity. In general, this can be defined as the range and the value of functional traits (such as body mass and foraging substrate) of a determined community that influence ecosystem functioning , thus incorporating the differences between species. Indices derived from this approach have the potential to reveal the processes that shape communities, and can help in understanding how biodiversity interacts with environmental constraints . The use of different indices has been considered a better strategy to assess all the functional aspects of a community, rather than try to represent them in a single value, such as functional diversity per se [21,22]. Thus, the union between these indices and taxonomic information about the community makes it possible to identify groups of organisms that are sensitive to anthropogenic disturbances, as well as organisms that are able to live and exploit human-dominated landscapes.
However, knowledge about the effects of urbanization on birds is geographically biased—although Neotropical cities are undergoing one of the most rapid and intense urbanization processes , they remain understudied . Following the global trend, Neotropical cities are concentrated within and near highly productive areas such as coastal zones and major riverine systems . Although Neotropical cities are highly urbanized, they suffer from some of the world’s largest social and economic inequalities, which pose a threat to several biodiversity hotspots .
Considering the importance of understanding biodiversity in urban ecosystems, particularly on streets, this study aimed to assess how human impacts and urban vegetation—represented by characteristics of street trees (canopy size, tree species richness and the proportion native tree species) and characteristics of the landscape (amount of vegetation and distance to parks)–influence bird species inhabiting the streets of a largely urbanized Neotropical city. We hypothesized that the negative effects of urbanization on birds  from human impacts will have the strongest effect on taxonomic data and functional diversity indices of the urban bird community, followed by the characteristics of street trees (we expected this patterns since birds are highly influenced by the availability of resources—such as food and nesting places ) and then the characteristics of the landscape (Fig 1A). We also hypothesized that variables related to human impacts and the distance to parks will have negative influences on the taxonomic data and functional diversity indices (Fig 1B), while the remaining characteristics of urban vegetation will have positive influences (Fig 1C). Finally, we hypothesized that when urban vegetation and human impacts are considered in the same model, the former will influence positively the taxonomic data and functional diversity indices, despite the strongest negative effect of the human impacts (Fig 1D). However, we expected that the distance to parks will negatively affect the urban bird community (Fig 1E).
Material and methods
The study area was the southern region of Belo Horizonte city (W 19° 55' 37", S 43° 56' 34") one of the first planned cities in Brazil and the Minas Gerais state capital (Fig 2). The southern region of Belo Horizonte covers 31.7 km2, which includes the oldest part of the city (est. 1897), an area of approximately 9 km2. According to the land use/land cover map developed by Pena et al. , almost half of the study area is occupied by arboreal and herbaceous vegetation, concentrated at the southern portion of the study area within urban parks (Fig 2). The rest of the landscape is composed of scattered green areas and public squares, and street trees composed mainly of exotic species . In our study area, it is possible to find Cerrado and Atlantic Forest remnants, as well as campos rupestres (rocky fields) and campos de altitude (high altitude fields) patches, typical mountain grasslands, located in the higher portions of the city (1300 to 1400 meters a.s.l.), which are located in the southern part of our study area (Fig 2).
The circles represent 140m radius buffers around each sampling point. Urban vegetation elements and census sectors are highlighted within one of the 140m radius buffers. Arboreal and herbaceous vegetation data was obtained from Pena et al. .
Point counts selection and bird community data
We selected 60 point count locations  distributed in streets through the southern region of Belo Horizonte. Point selection aimed to represent the variation of the influences of the streets and arboreal and herbaceous vegetation within the study area. We sampled points that, within a 50 meters radius, have large amounts of arboreal and herbaceous vegetation but low street density, as well as points within the city center, with high street density, and small amount of herbaceous or arboreal vegetation (S1 Text, S1 Fig). Point counts were at least 200 meters away from each other.
We conducted a pilot study to define the number of visits and the duration of the point counts, and we observed that three 20-minute visits were sufficient to obtain information about bird species richness in the streets of the study area. Fieldwork started 30 minutes after sunrise and extended during the first three hours of daylight on days with favorable weather (sunny and non-windy days). To define the point sampling order, the first point count was randomly selected. After 20 minutes of sampling, the observer walked to the next nearest sample point. This process was repeated during the first three hours of the day. Point counts were conducted only on working days to avoid great variation in people and vehicles in circulation.
Point counts were conducted by one trained ornithologist (J.C.C. Pena) between September 2014 and January 2015. This period coincides with birds’ breeding season, during which different migratory species visit Belo Horizonte [28,29]. All bird species (breeding and non-breeding birds) within a 50 m radius around the center of the point count were recorded visually or acoustically and counted. Monospecific flocks were considered to be up to a number of 20 individuals. The following behaviors were recorded: flying, resting or performing activities (e.g.: feeding, nesting). Birds suspected of being captive or pets were not included.
To analyze the effects of human impacts and urban vegetation on the urban bird community, we only considered species and individuals registered resting, feeding or nesting in the point count locations. Therefore, we excluded from our analysis species and individuals that were recorded only flying—they could be only moving through the urban landscape—and singing—they could be within an urban park or habitat patch nearby the point count. Thus, our analysis was limited to species that actually use the urban landscape. Individuals which were observed only flying or singing were recorded for inventory purposes only.
We used two taxonomic variables—species abundance (SAbund) and richness (SRich)–and two functional diversity indices—Rao’s Quadratic Entropy (RaoQ) and Functional Richness (FRic) as response variables. FRic represents the amount of functional space occupied by species in a community . It is independent of species abundance, being a representation of functional trait space filled by the community . Low functional richness indicates that some of the resources potentially available to the community are unused . RaoQ incorporates species relative abundances and pairwise functional differences between species . This index is an indirect measure of functional evenness, since the higher the value of RaoQ, the greater the dissimilarity between species, hence high functional evenness. To calculate the functional diversity indices aquatic species (we registered only one individual of great egret Ardea alba) and species that were not fully identified were not considered.
To calculate the functional diversity indices, we constructed a matrix containing two continuous traits and three categorical (fuzzy) traits (Table 1). The selected functional traits represent bird phenotypic characteristics which are influenced by environmental changes . Data for the functional traits were collected from published literature [28,33,34].
Prior to calculating the functional diversity indices, we converted the fuzzy variables to proportional variables . This was done using the prep.fuzzy function of the R  package ade4 . Subsequently, the trait matrix was converted to a distance matrix using the dist.ktab function. This final matrix was used to calculate the functional diversity indices in R using the function dbFD of the FD package .
The information about human impacts and street trees and landscape characteristics were extracted from a buffer defined around the 60 point counts (Fig 2). The buffer radius definition aimed to find a balance between the size of the area and the amount of information about the urban landscape. Thus, we used the average variety function of the zonal statistics tool of ArcGIS 10.4.1 software to evaluate the amount of information of the land use/ land cover map  within buffers of different sizes (50 to 180m radius). We observed that 140m radius buffer size was the most informative (Fig 2, S2 Fig). Therefore, instead of using the 50m radius used to collect information about the urban bird community, we decided to use the 140m radius buffer to extract the following eight predictor variables (Table 2), since it provided more information about this urban landscape. For more information about the predictor variables definition see S2 Text.
The human impact related variables were exposure to noise and the number of inhabitants (Table 2). A decibel meter (model Instrutherm DEC-490) was used to measure the sound pressure level at each point count location simultaneously with the bird sampling data. The decibel meter was calibrated (model Instrutherm CAL-4000) every day before data collection. An Equivalent Continuous Sound Level (Leq) index was calculated each sampling day for each point count, and the exposure to noise was measured through the calculation of the average Leq. This index is a measure of the overall level of exposure to sound in the environment. The human population (Hpop) inside each buffer was estimated through data from the population census of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics from the year 2010 . The proportion of people living inside of the area of the census sectors that overlapped the area of each buffer was calculated (Fig 2).
The landscape characteristics were the average arboreal patch size (Arbpatch), the average herbaceous patch size (Herbpatch), and the average distance to parks (Distparks) (Table 2). Vegetation patches were comprised by clusters of pixels that were composed of arboreal or herbaceous vegetation in the land use/land cover map of the study area  (Fig 2). The average distance to parks for each point count was calculated using average Euclidian distance from all urban parks located within the study area (Fig 2).
The characteristics of street trees were the average diameter of the trees’ canopies (Tcanopy), tree species richness, (Trich), and the proportion of the abundance of native tree species (Tnative) (Table 2). This information was acquired from Belo Horizonte’s Tree Information System (SIIA-BH), which was designed to register information on street trees to promote the creation of a management tool . Belo Horizonte municipal government consider these trees to be part of its ecological, landscape and cultural patrimony . Approximately 90,000 street trees of 475 species were inventoried and georeferenced through the southern region of Belo Horizonte. We extracted only the street trees that were located within the 140m radius buffers around the point counts (Fig 2).
We generated Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) between the response variables (species abundance, species richness, FRic and RaoQ) and the predictor variables. First, we performed a sensitivity analysis through the src function in R—a sensitivity package—to identify the influence of each predictor variable on the response variables; those predictor variables explaining less than 5% of variation were excluded from following analyses (S3 Fig). Therefore, each response variable has a distinct set of candidate models, composed of the most relevant combinations of predictor variables (S1 Table, S3 Fig). Most models were univariate, but we also compared multivariate additive models combining human impacts with landscape and street trees characteristics. To verify if the models were better than would be expected by chance, we included a null model representing the absence of effect of predictor variables. For the functional diversity indices, GLMs were generated with Gaussian distribution. For species richness and species abundance, Poisson distribution was used. Average arboreal patch size, average herbaceous patch size and human population were log-transformed.
We used a competing model selection approach to select the most plausible models . For each model, we calculated Akaike’s information criterion for small sample sizes (AICc), and the difference in AICc between each model and the model with the lowest AICc (ΔAICc). Models with ΔAICc < 2.0 were considered to have substantial support , and then equally plausible. Furthermore, predicted relationships between response variables and the predictor variables included in the models with the lowest AICc value were plotted. Considering all combinations, we generated 15 candidate models for species richness, 8 models for FRic and 12 models for species abundance and RaoQ (S1 Table). Statistical analyses were carried out using the R packages AICcmodavg, MuMin, sensitivity and vegan [42–44].
Seventy three bird species were registered (almost 20% of all species registered in Belo Horizonte territory, which includes wetlands and natural habitat patches such as Atlantic Forest and Cerrado remnants—), distributed in 26 families and 12 orders (Table 3). The most diverse family in terms of number of species was Tyrannidae, which represented almost 30% of the observed species (Table 3). The number of species registered in each point count location varied between 1 to 25 ( = 12.75, sd±4.47); 3143 individuals were counted, and varied from 2 to 143 per point count ( = 52.38, sd±30.93). The point count with a single species was excluded from our analysis, as it was not possible to calculate the functional diversity indices.
Scientific names and taxonomic order according to Piacentini et al. .
The most abundant species was the ruddy ground-dove Columbina talpacoti (423 individuals; 13% of all individuals), followed by two exotic species, the rock dove Columba livia (357 individuals; 11%) and the house sparrow Passer domesticus (268 individuals; 8.5%) (Table 3). Summed they represented 33% of all registered individuals. Most species (64 species, 87%) were represented by less than 100 individuals (Table 3). The tropical kingbird Tyrannus melancholicus was the most widely observed species in 88% of the point counts, followed by the Picazuro pigeon Patagioenas picazuro, the great kiskadee Pitangus sulphuratus and the ruddy ground-dove, which were recorded at c.a. 75% of the point counts (Table 3). Most species were observed in few point counts, there were 42 species (58%) registered in less than five point counts (Table 3).
RaoQ and FRic index scores were generally low, varying from 0.042 to 0.161 and from 0.001 to 0.409, respectively. Exposure to noise was included in all the best ranked models (Table 4), negatively affecting species richness, species abundance, FRic and RaoQ (Table 4, Figs 3 and 4). The univariate model containing exposure to noise was the most plausible model for species richness (wAICc = 0.292), FRic (wAICc = 0.390) and RaoQ (wAICc = 0.419) (Table 4, Fig 3). Five different patterns were found in the multivariate models with the exposure to noise (Fig 4). In general, the street trees and landscape characteristics had positive effects on the response variables, even with the negative effects of the exposure to noise (Table 4, Fig 4). However, average distance to parks had positive effects on RaoQ (Fig 4C) and the average size of the canopy of street trees had negative effects on FRic (Fig 4D), contradicting our expectations. The remaining models of FRic, RaoQ and species richness presented similar patterns to the ones shown in Fig 4A, 4C and 4E, respectively (S4 Fig). Human population and the average herbaceous patch size did not contribute to explaining patterns in the response variables (S1 Table).
Tnative: proportion of the abundance of native street tree species; Trich: street tree species richness; Tcanopy: average diameter of street trees canopy; Distparks: average distance to parks.
Street trees reduced the negative effects of the exposure to noise on the urban bird community inhabiting the streets of a Neotropical city. Urban areas with higher proportion of native street tree species and higher street tree species richness had a greater number of bird species and higher functional richness, even with the negative effects of the exposure to noise. Regions with larger trees had a greater number of birds across all species and less dominance of functional traits. Therefore, the urban bird community was more influenced by characteristics of street trees than characteristics of the landscape.
The lack of influence of the average herbaceous patch size is probably related to the reduced amount of native open habitat patches through this landscape. The majority of herbaceous vegetation patches were composed of cultivated lawns, squares and gardens, and utilized by open habitat generalist species such as the shiny cowbird (Molothrus bonariensis), the cattle tyrant (Machetornis rixosa) and the saffron finch (Sicalis flaveola). These species are commonly found in Belo Horizonte and other urban landscapes in southeastern Brazil [28,29]. Moreover, human population was not significant in any of the most plausible models, indicating that even in highly populated and dynamic urban centers it is possible to find a considerable amount of native biodiversity.
Effects on species and taxonomic variables
On the streets of the southern region of Belo Horizonte it was possible to find 20% of all bird species recorded in the city’s territory . To persist within the urban matrix, bird species need to adapt to an intense interaction with humans and different environmental impacts . Therefore, only few species—defined as “urban exploiters” and “suburban adapters” —will be able to exploit the reduced amount of resources and stressful conditions of streets. The environmental filter caused by the urbanization process [47,48], makes the most sensitive species locally extinct and generalist species, especially omnivorous species become dominant . However, bird communities have different responses to urbanization worldwide. While in temperate urban landscapes urban bird communities are composed mostly of omnivorous and seed eaters [7,49–52], in Neotropical urban centers (as observed in Belo Horizonte), omnivorous and insectivorous species are dominant [53–56]. Urban bird communities are shaped by the availability of resources . Unlike temperate urban landscapes, warmer temperatures of most Neotropical cities probably allow for larger populations of insects and the presence of a larger number of insectivirous birds species. Different groups of arthropods are abundant in urban landscapes, such as generalist ground arthropods, plant-feeding arthropods and generalist pollinating arthropods . Domestic wastes also provide opportunities for insectivorous birds to feed on insects such as flies and mosquitoes . Furthermore, the high diversity of tyrant flycatchers (Tyrannidae) in Neotropical cities [53–56,59], probably have a positive effect on the larger number of insectivorous species that occupy Neotropical urban landscapes.
The negative effects of the exposure to noise on urban birds has been evaluated in many studies [14,15,59]. However, our study is the first to assess, at the landscape level, how the exposure to noise influences the bird community occurring in the streets of an urban landscape. Noise intensity can be considered as a proxy for other negative effects within streets: the higher the exposure to noise, the greater the impacts associated with urbanization, and therefore, the smaller the number and abundance of bird species able to occupy streets. Our results show that, in addition to helping species conservation within protected areas [9,60], the appropriate planning and management of the urban afforestation process—such as increase the number of large and native tree species in the streets—is able to mitigate the negative effects of the urbanization on birds that occupy the urban matrix. Urban bird species richness is positively influenced by the amount of native street tree species [9,18,53,61,62]. This is related to birds’ preferences for native tree species as nesting sites  and the availability of resources, such as arthropods, which is higher in native trees . Larger trees increase canopy complexity and provide critical resources for the native fauna inhabiting urban landscapes, such as a large contribution to flower, fruit and seed production and provision of cavities . Therefore, large trees have a strong positive effect on different taxa, increasing species abundance and richness, and are considered keystone ecological structures in urban landscapes [62,64–66]. Furthermore, trees also can act as sound barriers causing sound to disperse and dissipate .
The reduced influence of the distance to urban parks on bird species richness and number of individuals is probably related to the high efficiency of the local avifauna in exploring this urban landscape—the most frequent species in our landscape were native bird species, such as the ruddy ground-dove, the great kiskadee and the Picazuro pigeon. Bird species inhabiting streets may efficiently move through the landscape, perceiving the urban matrix as a continuum of habitats, and are influenced by local conditions such as the characteristics of street trees . However, species composition change with the distance to urban parks, and this is confirmed by the functional diversity results.
Effects on functional diversity indices
Community’s functional aspects presented low values across the streets of the southern region of Belo Horizonte, which corroborates the results for the taxonomic richness. Probably, the resources available across the landscape are low , filtering species that have specific ecological requirements. Most bird species found in this study are omnivorous, feeding on invertebrates and/or using human-made structures as nesting substrates, leading to a reduction in the community’s functional richness. This result is confirmed through the low RaoQ index scores, showing that species with similar functional traits are dominant. The urbanization process leads to a reduction in the amount of bird species’ traits, particularly in traits related to resource use and nesting substrate [52,68]. However, our results are in accordance with another study, in which the increase in the amount of arboreal vegetation led to an increase in the community’s functional aspects . The increase in the proportion of native street tree species influence the presence of a larger amount of bird feeding guilds in urban landscapes [9,18], and consequently had positive influences on community’s functional richness.
Urban landscapes have large quantities of resources for a portion of the avifauna with similar functional traits [52,68]—which is related to the general low functional richness and RaoQ index scores. Since synanthropic species are negatively influenced by the amount of habitat within urban landscapes , urban areas with more available habitat will allow the presence of species with functional traits related to the most preserved areas, leading to changes in the functional diversity indices. The average canopy size of the street trees increases community’s RaoQ and leads to a reduction in the community’s functional richness. Probably, the increase in canopy size reduces the richness and abundance of a larger number of species that have functional traits related to more urbanized areas; the increase in number of birds, probably, is related to an increase in the abundance of fewer species, which have functional traits related to more preserved areas. This process increases community’s functional evenness with a lower number of functional traits. The proximity to parks can reduce the total number of individuals for many bird species, which have functional characteristics related to the more urbanized areas [25,68]. However, species that need a greater amount of habitat, probably, are favored, reducing taxonomic evenness without changing the taxonomic and functional richness, consequently reducing RaoQ. Therefore, despite the bird community inhabiting streets being composed mostly of species adapted to the conditions related to the urbanization process, it is possible to increase the number of species with functional traits related to most preserved environments.
We demonstrated that the urban environmental filter has negative effects on urban avifauna. However, human impacts can be mitigated by the appropriate planning and management of urban vegetation, especially related to the urban afforestation process. The maintenance of large trees, increasing street tree richness and planting of a larger amount of native tree species are management practices able to increase urban biodiversity and ecosystem functionality within the urban matrix.
“We need nature as much in the city as in the countryside” was written by Ian McHarg in 1969 in his book Design with nature . Fifty years later, we still need to learn how to enhance, preserve and live with biodiversity within urban landscapes. With the current planning and management practices, Belo Horizonte is only able to retain 20% of its rich and diverse bird community within the urban matrix. Therefore, we need to change the current focus on a purely aesthetic and utilitarian view of the urban afforestation process ; decisions must consider the functionality of the urban landscape and the green elements as interconnected units [72,73]. Considering that bird species can be used as indicators of urban ecological integrity , planning and management practices, especially those related to street trees identified here and in other studies [e.g.: 9,11,18,50,51,57,63] are able to reduce the negative effects of urbanization on biodiversity and consequently enhance human wellbeing and quality of life.
S1 Fig. The 60 point counts selected within 20 categories of influences of herbaceous and arboreal vegetation and streets through the southern region of Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais, Brazil).
S2 Fig. Variation of the average variety of land use types of the southern region of Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais, Brazil) within buffers with different sizes.
S3 Fig. Sensitivity analysis performed for species richness, species abundance, Functional Richness (FRic) and Rao’s Quadratic Entropy (RaoQ) of the bird community inhabiting the streets of the southern region of Belo Horizonte. Only predictor variables located outside the range of 0.05 and -0.05 (black lines) were considered. It is possible to observe the large effect of the exposure to noise on the taxonomic and functional aspects of the urban bird community.
AP: average arboreal patch size; HP: average herbaceous patch size; DC: average size of the canopy of street trees; AL: average Equivalent Continuous Sound Level; TR: street tree richness; DP: average distance to parks; PT: human population; NT: proportion of the abundance of native tree species in the streets.
S4 Fig. Multivariate additive models showing the influences of urban environmental variables on taxonomic data and functional diversity indices of the bird community inhabiting the streets of the southern region of Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais, Brazil).
SRic: Species richness; SAbund: Species abundance; FRic: Functional richness; RaoQ: Rao’s Quadratic Index; Leq: Average Equivalent Continuous Sound Level; Tnative: proportion of the abundance of native street tree species; Trich: street tree species richness; Tcanopy: the average diameter of street tree canopy; Arbpatch: the average arboreal patch size; Distparks: the average distance to parks.
S1 Table. Candidate models defined for the response variables related to the bird community inhabiting the streets of the southern region of Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais, Brazil), highlighting models with ΔAICc < 2.0.
We would like to thank the Belo Horizonte Municipal Government for providing the SIIA-BH data, and two anonymous referees and the editor for their valuable comments and suggestions that have significantly improved this manuscript. J.C.C. Pena thanks friends, colleagues and undergraduate students for fieldwork assistance.
- Conceptualization: JCCP FM MCR RAA RJY MR.
- Data curation: JCCP FM.
- Formal analysis: JCCP FM MCR RAA.
- Investigation: JCCP.
- Methodology: JCCP FM MCR MR.
- Project administration: JCCP.
- Resources: JCCP MCR RJY MR.
- Software: JCCP FM MCR.
- Supervision: JCCP MR.
- Visualization: JCCP.
- Writing – original draft: JCCP.
- Writing – review & editing: JCCP FM MCR RAA RJY MR.
- 1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World urbanization prospects [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2014.
- 2. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Cities and biodiversity outlook: action and policy. Montreal; 2012.
- 3. McDonald RI, Marcotullio PJ, Güneralp B. Urbanization and global trends in biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio PJ, McDonald RI, et al., editors. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2013. pp. 31–52.
- 4. Morante-Filho JC, Faria D, Mariano-Neto E, Rhodes J. Birds in anthropogenic landscapes: the responses of ecological groups to forest loss in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0128923. pmid:26083245
- 5. Aronson MFJ, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, et al. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc B. 2014;281.
- 6. Blair RB. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl. 1996;6: 506–519.
- 7. Chace JF, Walsh JJ. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan. 2006;74: 46–69.
- 8. Litteral J, Wu J. Urban landscape matrix affects avian diversity in remnant vegetation fragments: evidence from the Phoenix metropolitan region, USA. Urban Ecosyst. 2012;15: 939–959.
- 9. Ikin K, Knight E, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Manning AD. The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves. Divers Distrib. 2013;19: 294–306.
- 10. Hong S-H, Han B-H, Choi S-H, Sung CY, Lee K-J. Planning an ecological network using the predicted movement paths of urban birds. Landsc Ecol Eng. 2012;9: 165–174.
- 11. Young KM, Daniels CB, Johnston G. Species of street tree is important for southern hemisphere bird trophic guilds. Austral Ecol. 2007;32: 541–550.
- 12. McKinney ML. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv. 2006;127: 247–260.
- 13. van der Ree R, Jaeger JAG, van der Grift EA, Clevenger AP. Effects of roads and traffic on wildlife populations and landscape function: road ecology is moving toward larger scales. Ecol Soc. 2011;16: 48. Available: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art48/
- 14. Tremblay MA, St. Clair CC. Factors affecting the permeability of transportation and riparian corridors to the movements of songbirds in an urban landscape. J Appl Ecol. 2009;46: 1314–1322.
- 15. Meillere A, Brischoux F, Angelier F. Impact of chronic noise exposure on antipredator behavior: an experiment in breeding house sparrows. Behav Ecol. 2015;26: 569–577.
- 16. Arroyo-Solís A, Castillo JM, Figueroa E, López-Sánchez JL, Slabbekoorn H. Experimental evidence for an impact of anthropogenic noise on dawn chorus timing in urban birds. J Avian Biol. 2013;44: 288–296.
- 17. Fernandez-Juricic E. Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conserv Biol. 2000;14: 513–521.
- 18. White JG, Antos MJ, Fitzsimons JA, Palmer GC. Non-uniform bird assemblages in urban environments: the influence of streetscape vegetation. Landsc Urban Plan. 2005;71: 123–135.
- 19. Tilman D. Functional Diversity. Encycl Biodivers. 2001;3: 109–120.
- 20. Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D. Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct Ecol. 2010;24: 867–876.
- 21. Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB. Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos. 2005;111: 112–118.
- 22. Mouillot D, Graham NAJ, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Bellwood DR. A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trend Ecol Evol. 2013;28: 167–177.
- 23. Ortega-Álvarez R, MacGregor-Fors I. Spreading the word: the ecology of urban birds outside the United States, Canada, and Western Europe. Auk. 2011;128: 415–418.
- 24. Pauchard A, Barbosa O. Regional assessment of Latin America: rapid urban development and social economic inequity threaten biodiversity hotspots. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2013. pp. 589–608.
- 25. Concepción ED, Moretti M, Altermatt F, Nobis MP, Obrist MK. Impacts of urbanisation on biodiversity: The role of species mobility, degree of specialisation and spatial scale. Oikos. 2015;124: 1571–1582.
- 26. Pena JCDC, Marques de Magalhães D, Clara Mourão Moura A, Young RJ, Rodrigues M. The green infrastructure of a highly-urbanized Neotropical city: the role of the urban vegetation in preserving native biodiversity. Rev da Soc Bras Arborização Urbana. 2016;11: 66–78. Available: http://www.revsbau.esalq.usp.br/teste/ojs-2.3.7/index.php/REVSBAU/article/view/614/pdf
- 27. Bibby C, Jones M, Marsden S. Expedition field techniques: bird surveys. Cambridge: BirdLife International; 2000.
- 28. Sick H. Ornitologia Brasileira. Terceira. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira; 1997.
- 29. Rodrigues M, Dias DF. Aves do Campus. In: Starling HMM, editor. Cidade Universitária da UFMG: história e natureza. Belo Horizonte: UFMG; 2009. p. 207.
- 30. Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D. New multidimensionale functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology. 2008;89: 2290–2301. pmid:18724739
- 31. Botta-Dukát Z. Rao’s quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits. J Veg Sci. 2005;16: 533–540.
- 32. Luck GW, Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Lumb K. Improving the application of vertebrate trait-based frameworks to the study of ecosystem services. J Anim Ecol. 2012;81: 1065–1076. pmid:22435774
- 33. Del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Sargatal J, Christie DA. Handbook of the birds of the world. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions; 2004.
- 34. Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de la Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology. 2014;95: 2027–2027.
- 35. Pavoine S, Vallet J, Dufour AB, Gachet S, Daniel H. On the challenge of treating various types of variables: application for improving the measurement of functional diversity. Oikos. 2009;118: 391–402.
- 36. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. http://www.r-project.org/
- 37. Dray S, Dufour A-B, Thioulouse J. Package “ade4.” 2014. p. 409.
- 38. Laliberté E, Legendre P, Shipley B. Package “FD.” 2014. p. 28.
- 39. IBGE. Censo Demográfico 2010 [Internet]. 2010 [cited 25 Nov 2016]. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/
- 40. Belo Horizonte. Prefeitura Municipal de Belo Horizonte [Internet]. 2015 [cited 27 Jul 2015]. http://portalpbh.pbh.gov.br/pbh/
- 41. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach [Internet]. Second Edi. New York: Springer; 2002.
- 42. Mazerolle MJ. Package “AICcmodavg.” 2016. p. 158.
- 43. Pujol G, Iooss B, Janon A, Veiga D, Fruth J, Gilquin L, et al. Package “sensitivity.” 2016. p. 69.
- 44. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, Mcglinn D, et al. Package “vegan.” 2016. p. 291.
- 45. Melo-Júnior TA, Pedersoli G, Diniz MG, Mendes LG, Ouriques E. Avifauna do município de Belo Horizonte. In: Táxeus-Listas de espécies [Internet]. 2013 [cited 1 Oct 2015]. http://www.taxeus.com.br/lista/9
- 46. Piacentini V de Q, Aleixo A, Agne CE, Maurício GN, Pacheco JF, Bravo GA, et al. Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee. Rev Bras Ornitol. 2015;23: 91–298.
- 47. Meffert PJ, Dziock F. The influence of urbanisation on diversity and trait composition of birds. Landsc Ecol. 2013;28: 943–957.
- 48. Sandström UG, Angelstam P, Mikusiński G. Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landsc Urban Plan. 2006;77: 39–53.
- 49. Clergeau P, Savard JPL, Mennechez G, Falardeau G. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor. 1998;100: 413–425.
- 50. Lindsay AR, Gillum SS, Meyer MW. Influence of lakeshore development on breeding bird communities in a mixed northern forest. Biol Conserv. 2002;107: 1–11.
- 51. Blair RB, Johnson EM. Suburban habitats and their role for birds in the urban-rural habitat network: points of local invasion and extinction? Landsc Ecol. 2008;23: 1157–1169.
- 52. Jokimäki J, Suhonen J, Jokimäki-Kaisanlahti M-L, Carbó-Ramírez P. Effects of urbanization on breeding birds in European towns: Impacts of species traits. Urban Ecosyst. 2016;19: 1565–1577.
- 53. Reis E, López-Iborra GM, Pinheiro RT. Changes in bird species richness through different levels of urbanization: implications for biodiversity conservation and garden design in Central Brazil. Landsc Urban Plan. Elsevier B.V.; 2012;107: 31–42.
- 54. Ponço JV, Tavares PRDA, Gimenes MR. Riqueza, composição, sazonalidade e distribuição espacial de aves na área urbana de Ivinhema, Mato Grosso do Sul. Atualidades Ornitológicas. 2013;174: 60–67 [online]. Available: http://www.ao.com.br/download/AO174_60.pdf
- 55. de Toledo MCB, Donatelli RJ, Batista GT. Relation between green spaces and bird community structure in an urban area in Southeast Brazil. Urban Ecosyst. 2012;15: 111–131.
- 56. Ortega-Álvarez R, MacGregor-Fors I. Living in the big city: Effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landsc Urban Plan. 2009;90: 189–195.
- 57. Faeth SH, Warren PS, Shochat E, Marussich W. Trophic dynamics in urban communities. Bioscience. 2005;55: 399.
- 58. Gatesire T, Nsabimana D, Nyiramana A, Seburanga JL, Mirville MO. Bird diversity and distribution in relation to urban landscape yypes in northern Rwanda. Sci World J. 2014;2014: 1–12.
- 59. Fontana CS, Burger MI, Magnusson WE. Bird diversity in a subtropical South-American city: effects of noise levels, arborisation and human population density. Urban Ecosyst. 2011;14: 341–360.
- 60. Ikin K, Beaty RM, Lindenmayer DB, Knight E, Fischer J, Manning AD. Pocket parks in a compact city: how do birds respond to increasing residential density? Landsc Ecol. 2012;28: 45–56.
- 61. Shackleton CM. Do indigenous street trees promote more biodiversity than alien ones? Evidence using mistletoes and birds in South Africa. Forests. 2016;7.
- 62. Threlfall CG, Williams NSG, Hahs AK, Livesley SJ. Approaches to urban vegetation management and the impacts on urban bird and bat assemblages. Landsc Urban Plan. Elsevier B.V.; 2016;153: 28–39.
- 63. Bhullar S, Majer J. Arthropods on street trees: a food resource for wildlife. Pacific Conserv Biol. 2000;6: 171–173.
- 64. Lindenmayer DB, Laurance WF, Franklin JF, Likens GE, Banks SC, Blanchard W, et al. New policies for old trees: averting a global crisis in a keystone ecological structure. Conserv Lett. 2014;7: 61–69.
- 65. Stagoll K, Lindenmayer DB, Knight E, Fischer J, Manning AD. Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks. Conserv Lett. 2012;5: 115–122.
- 66. Le Roux DS, Ikin K, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD, Gibbons P. The future of large old trees in urban landscapes. PLoS One. 2014;9: e99403. pmid:24941258
- 67. Fan Y, Zhiyi B, Zhujun Z, Jiani L. The investigation of noise attenuation by plants and the corresponding noise-reducing spectrum. J Environ Health. 2010;72: 8–15.
- 68. Concepción ED, Götzenberger L, Nobis MP, de Bello F, Obrist MK, Moretti M. Contrasting trait assembly patterns in plant and bird communities along environmental and human-induced land-use gradients. Ecography (Cop). 2016; in press.
- 69. Schütz C, Schulze CH. Functional diversity of urban bird communities: effects of landscape composition, green space area and vegetation cover. Ecol Evol. 2015; n/a–n/a.
- 70. McHarg I. Design With Nature. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press; 1969.
- 71. Moro MF, Castro ASF. A check list of plant species in the urban forestry of Fortaleza, Brazil: where are the native species in the country of megadiversity? Urban Ecosyst. 2015;18: 47–71.
- 72. Herzog CP. A multifunctional green infrastructure design to protect and improve native biodiversity in Rio de Janeiro. Landsc Ecol Eng. Springer Japan; 2016;12: 141–150.
- 73. Herzog CP. Cidade para todos: (re) aprendendo a viver com a natureza. Rio de Janeiro: Mauad, Inverde; 2013.