Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Toll-like receptor 9 suppresses lupus disease in Fas-sufficient MRL Mice

Toll-like receptor 9 suppresses lupus disease in Fas-sufficient MRL Mice

  • Kevin M. Nickerson, 
  • Yujuan Wang, 
  • Sheldon Bastacky, 
  • Mark J. Shlomchik
PLOS
x

Abstract

Genetic deficiency in TLR9 accelerates pathogenesis in the spontaneous polygenic MRL.Faslpr murine model of systemic lupus erythematosus, despite the absence of anti-nucleosome autoantibodies. However, it could be argued that this result was dependent on Fas-deficiency rather than lupus-promoting genes in the MRL genetic background. Here we report the effects of TLR9 deficiency on autoimmune disease independent of the lpr mutation in Fas by characterizing Tlr9-/- and Tlr9+/+ mice on the Fas-intact MRL/+ genetic background. By 30 weeks of age, Tlr9-deficient MRL/+ had more severe renal disease, increased T cell activation, and higher titers of anti-Sm and anti-RNA autoantibodies than Tlr9-intact animals, as had been the case in the MRL.Faslpr model. In addition, Tlr9-deficient MRL/+ mice had increased numbers of germinal center phenotype B cells and an increase in splenic neutrophils and conventional dendritic cell populations. Thus, the disease accelerating effects of Tlr9 deficiency are separable from those mediated by the Fas mutation in the lupus-prone MRL genetic background. Nonetheless, disease acceleration in Tlr9-deficient MRL/+ mice was phenotypically distinct from that in Fas-deficient counterparts, which has important implications.

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the production of autoantibodies, especially against nucleic acid associated self-antigens. The current paradigm for why nucleic acid containing self-antigens are highly prone to break self-tolerance is that these antigens are able to directly activate autoantigen-specific B cells via co-ligation of the autoreactive B cell receptor together with a nucleic acid responsive Toll-like receptor, TLR7 or TLR9 [1, 2]. Although autoreactive B cell receptors are generated at a high frequency as a consequence of V(D)J recombination, and B cells do express TLR7 and TLR9, most individuals do not make significant titers of autoantibodies or progress to end-organ disease due to self-tolerance mechanisms including those that delete, edit or functionally inhibit autoreactive clones prior to entry into the mature B cell repertoire [35].

SLE in most patients is driven by the additive or synergistic effects of multiple lupus susceptibility alleles that individually confer low disease risk [6]. Similarly, animal models of SLE can be categorized as spontaneous polygenic models (for example, MRL.Faslpr, NZBxW, or the NZM series) driven by multiple alleles, spontaneous monoallelic models (such as B6.yaa) driven by single high penetrance alleles on an otherwise non-autoimmune genetic background, or inducible models such as the SLE-like disease produced by i.p. provision of pristane in mice that are otherwise non-autoimmune [7].

Previously we showed that Tlr9, the endosomal sensor for DNA, is necessary for anti-nucleosome autoantibody production in the spontaneous polygenic MRL.Faslpr (or MRL/lpr) mouse model of SLE [810]. Similarly, Tlr7, the endosomal sensor for RNA, was necessary for production of anti-Sm and anti-RNA autoantibodies [9, 10]. Mice deficient in both Tlr7 and Tlr9, or deficient in Myd88, did not produce autoantibodies of either specificity [10]. MRL.Faslpr deficient in Myd88 or Tlr7 had reduced clinical disease, while those deficient in Tlr9 unexpectedly had significantly exacerbated disease, suggesting that Tlr9 suppresses development of clinical pathology in lupus [810] despite its paradoxical role in breaking tolerance in anti-nucleosome and anti-DNA B cells. The exacerbation of disease in Tlr9-/- MRL.Faslpr was dependent on both Tlr7 and Ifnar1, suggesting that intact Tlr9 inhibits a proinflammatory signaling axis on the lupus-prone genetic background [10, 11]. Deletion of Myd88 specifically in B cells or dendritic cells subsequently demonstrated distinct roles for innate immune signaling in different cell lineages [12]. Genetic deletion of non-endosomal Tlr2 and Tlr4 resulted in a reduction of disease in the monoallelic B6.MRL-Faslpr (B6/lpr) model but did not affect disease on the MRL.Faslpr genetic background [13, 14]. Targeting the TLR pathways is an area of active investigation in human SLE and other rheumatic diseases [15].

Acceleration of disease in the absence of Tlr9 has been demonstrated in several other spontaneous models of SLE, all of which so far reported were monoallelic models derived from the C57BL/6 background. B6.MRL-Faslpr mice lacking Tlr9 had more severe splenomegaly, proteinuria and glomerulonephritis and displayed a shift in autoantibody profiles from homogenous to nucleolar HEp-2 antinuclear antibody (ANA) staining [16]. Similarly, B6.Nba2 and B6.Nba2.yaa mice had decreased anti-nucleosome IgG titers but more severe renal disease when Tlr9 was absent [17]. B6.FcgrIIb-/- mice lacking Tlr9 had reduced anti-nucleosome autoantibodies and accelerated mortality [18]. B6.Plcg2Ali5/Ali5 bearing a gain of function mutation in phospholipase c gamma 2 had decreased anti-nucleosome autoantibodies and more frequent nucleolar ANA patterns with more severe glomerulonephritis when Tlr9 was absent [19]. Discordant regulation of RNA and DNA autoantibodies and disease by B-cell specific Tlr7 and Tlr9 was also recently demonstrated in a B6.Was-/- B cell chimeric model in which the Wiscott-Aldrich protein deficiency promotes lupus-like disease [20]. Tlr9 deficiency also accelerated pristane-induced disease on the BALB/c background [21] but either prevented induction of lupus disease [22] or had no effect [23] when pristane was administered to relatively resistant C57BL/6 mice, likely reflecting both the importance of genetic background as well as different routes to inflammation in an inducible rather than a spontaneous disease model.

Despite these several examples in which Tlr9 deficiency exacerbated lupus disease in monoallelic models, we are unaware of any other examples of Tlr9 deficiency in a spontaneous polygenic lupus model. The MRL.Faslpr model meets all of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for a clinical SLE diagnosis, including skin and renal involvement and production of autoantibodies against both DNA and RNA components—including a high frequency of autoantibodies against the Sm antigen, which are not observed or rarely observed in many monogenic and even some polygenic lupus models [24]. Nonetheless, the MRL.Faslpr model has often been criticized due to the presence of the lpr mutation in Fas, which significantly accelerates disease, resulting in appearance of autoantibodies as early as 8 weeks of age with 50% mortality by 4–5 months [2527].

Fas signaling is complex, promoting outcomes that may include not only apoptosis but also in some cases proliferation or inflammatory cytokine production, via pathways that could conceivably interact directly or indirectly with TLR signaling [28, 29]. Further, Fas is expressed on multiple cell types, many of which have been directly implicated in immune activation when Fas is deleted or inactive [30]. For example, we recently demonstrated that Fas and FasL expression on T cells, promoted by cDCs, regulates the autoreactive extrafollicular B cell response to TLR9-containing IC ligands by culling extrafollicular helper T cells; this mechanism of autoreactive B cell regulation would be unavailable in Fas-deficient animals such as the MRL.Faslpr strain [31]. Although in some cases others and we have found that key genetic deletions in autoimmune models that were accelerated by Fas deficiency had overall similar phenotypes in Fas-sufficient congenic animals [3234], this has mainly not been investigated. Particularly considering that TLR signaling and Fas could interact, either directly or indirectly, we could not exclude the real possibility that some of the disease-modulating effects of Tlr9 deficiency were due to genetic interactions with and immune dysregulation mediated by the lpr mutation of Fas. Therefore, we generated Tlr9-/- mice on the congenic MRL/+ background. MRL/+ mice have functional Fas but do develop autoantibodies and clinical pathology, albeit at a later age than MRL.Faslpr. Here we show that Tlr9-/- MRL/+ have significantly accelerated clinical pathology and a shift toward RNA-reactive autoantibody profiles without anti-nucleosome autoantibodies, recapitulating all of the major phenotypes observed in the MRL.Faslpr model. In addition, we observed an increase in the frequency of germinal center B cells and an expansion of splenic neutrophils and conventional dendritic cells. Thus, Tlr9 regulates lupus autoantibody production and disease in a spontaneous polygenic lupus model independent of the disease-accelerating effects of the Faslpr mutation.

Materials and methods

Mice

Previously described Tlr9-/- MRL.Faslpr mice [10] were crossed for one generation to Fas-sufficient MRL/MpJ (Jackson labs stock #000486). These F1 progeny were intercrossed to generate experimental cohorts that included both Faslpr/+ and Fas+/+ mice that included all possible Tlr9 genotypes; Fas+/+ progeny of this generation were further intercrossed to generate additional experimental cohorts of Fas+/+ animals. Except where noted, no evidence of a Fas haploinsufficient phenotype was observed and thus data are pooled from both cohorts. Experimental cohorts were analyzed at 30 weeks of age. Since the kinetics of disease progression differs with gender in the MRL/+ and MRL.Faslpr lupus models, only female mice were included in the analysis.

This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and the policies and procedures of the University of Pittsburgh Division of Laboratory Animal Resources. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Pittsburgh under protocol number 13102426. All efforts were made to minimize suffering. Mice were housed under specific pathogen free conditions. Animals were monitored daily by an experienced observer. Early humane endpoints as predetermined in the experimental protocol included any of the following criteria: animals which a) are hunched and do not move on gentle prodding; b) have severe skin lesions (autoimmune dermatitis) covering more than approximately 1/2 of the back or 1/4 of the body; c) are otherwise judged to be pre-moribund by the observer. No animals in this experimental cohort met these criteria or died of any cause prior to the experimental endpoint. Anesthesia or analgesia were not required. Animals were euthanized by CO2 inhalation followed by cervical dislocation and/or removal of a vital organ(s).

Evaluation of clinical disease and autoantibodies

Proteinuria, glomerulonephritis, interstitial renal disease, and dermatitis were evaluated exactly as previously described [11] by individuals blinded to the genotypes of the animals.

HEp-2 antinuclear antibody assays were performed using Kallestad HEp-2 slides (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) as a substrate. Serum samples were diluted to 1/100 in 1x PBS, 1% BSA, 0.05% sodium azide, and bound autoantibodies were detected using goat anti-mouse IgG-FITC (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL). Samples were scored for the dominant staining pattern, presence or absence of mitotic chromatin staining, and relative cytoplasmic staining intensity by an individual blinded to the genotypes of the samples.

Autoantibody and total IgM and IgG ELISAs were performed essentially as previously described [11]. Samples were assayed over a total of eight three-fold dilutions starting at 1/100 for anti-nucleosome and anti-Sm ELISAs, four three-fold dilutions starting at 1/100 for anti-RNA and anti-IgG2a rheumatoid factor ELISAs, and eight three-fold dilutions starting at 1/5000 for total IgM ELISA or 1/50000 for total IgG ELISA. ELISA standards were purified PL2-3 and BWR4 antibodies, hybridoma supernatants from Y2 and 400tμ23 cultures, or purified unconjugated IgM,κ and IgG1,κ isotype control antibodies (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ).

Flow cytometry

Single cell splenocyte suspensions were prepared and stained in ice-cold PBS with Ghost Dye Violet 510 (Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA) to exclude dead cells. Surface staining was subsequently performed in PBS containing 3% FCS and 5 mM EDTA in the presence of unconjugated anti-CD16/32 clone 2.4G2 (purified in-house). Antibody clones used for staining were directed against CD45R (RA3-6B2), CD23 (B3B4), CD19 (1D3), CD11c (HL3) and TCRß (H57-597) (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ); CD62L (Mel-14), CD138 (281–2), CD11b (M1/70), TCRß (H57-597) and I-A/I-E (M5/114.15.2) (BioLegend, San Diego, CA); SiglecH (eBio440c) (eBioScience, San Diego, CA); and Ly6G (1A8), CD45R (RA3-6B2), CD19 (1D3), CD21/35 (7G6), CD317 (927), CD44 (Pgp1), CD8 (TIB105), and CD4 (GK1.5) (purified and fluorophore-conjugated in-house). Peanut agglutinin (PNA) was from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA). All antibodies and PNA were titered prior to experimental use. Cells were fixed with 1xPBS 1% paraformaldehyde. Flow cytometry data was collected on a BD LSRII or BD Fortessa and analyzed in FlowJo (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).

Microscopy

Seven-micrometer sections of OCT-embedded frozen spleens were prepared and stained as previously described [35]. Sections were stained with fluorophore-conjugated anti-Bcl6 (clone K112-91, BD Bioscience, Franklin Hills, NJ); anti-IgD (clone 11-26c, eBioscience, San Diego, CA); and/or PNA, anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5), anti-CD19 (clone 1D3.2), anti-kappa (clone 187.1) and/or anti-F4/80 (clone F4/80) (purified and conjugated in-house).

Immunofluorescent images were acquired on an Olympus IX83 microscope with a 20x Plan Apo 0.75 NA objective and Hamamatsu ORCA-Flash4.0 CMOS monochrome camera in Cellsens Dimension software. Spleen images were obtained as tiled multifield images and were cropped and converted to 8-bit RGB in Cellsens software for display.

Statistical analysis

Horizontal lines on dot plots indicate the median value. Statistical comparisons were made by pairwise two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test or Fisher's exact test. Significance values were calculated by GraphPad Prism software.

Results

We first characterized clinical features of SLE. Tlr9-deficient MRL/+ mice had significantly more proteinuria than Tlr9-intact MRL/+ (Fig 1A). Tlr9-/- MRL/+ mice had notable glomerulonephritis at 30 weeks of age, a time point at which the majority of Tlr9+/+ MRL/+ mice had not yet developed any significant renal disease (Fig 1B). Small areas of lymphocytic infiltrates, restricted for the most part to perivascular regions, were observed in most experimental animals of either genotype by 30 weeks of age, but significant tubular interstitial infiltrates were observed only in the Tlr9-/- mice, especially those in which Fas was heterozygous for the lpr mutation (Fig 1C). Thus, the absence of Tlr9 significantly accelerates the onset of glomerular renal disease and interstitial nephritis in Fas-sufficient MRL lupus-prone mice. In contrast to the renal phenotype, by 30 weeks of age few MRL/+ animals of either Tlr9 genotype had developed significant dermatitis (Fig 1D; 1 of 26 Tlr9+/+ and 5 of 26 Tlr9-/- animals with skin score > = 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Renal disease is suppressed by Tlr9 in MRL/+ mice.

(A) Proteinuria was evaluated in 30 week old mice of the indicated genotypes by dipstick assay. (B) Severity of glomerular disease on H&E stained sections was evaluated by a pathologist on a 0–6 scale. (C) Perivascular and interstitial renal infiltrates were evaluated by a pathologist on a 0–4 scale. (D) Skin lesions were scored based on area with up to an additional 0.5 points for facial rash / loss of whiskers and 0.25 points for dermatitis of each ear. In all graphs, horizontal lines represent medians and each point represents an individual animal. ** p<0.01; **** p<0.0001 by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. Data are pooled from five experimental cohorts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173471.g001

Previously we observed that Tlr9-/- MRL.Faslpr mice had significantly worse splenomegaly compared to Tlr9+/+ MRL.Faslpr [810]. Splenomegaly in the MRL.Faslpr strain is dominated by the expansion of a population of CD3+B220+CD4-CD8- T cells (DN T cells) which may represent a population of activated T cells that escaped Fas/FasL-mediated activation induced cell death [36, 37] and that are not observed in the MRL/+ strain. Indeed, we did not observe significant numbers of DN T cells in Tlr9-/- MRL/+ spleens (not shown). Surprisingly, Tlr9-/- MRL/+ spleens were nonetheless larger than those in Tlr9+/+ animals (Fig 2A), independent of the Faslpr mutation. While the total number of T cells, B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells were unchanged with Tlr9 genotype, there was a modest expansion in total CD11c+ MHCII+ conventional dendritic cells and a roughly two-fold increase in Ly6G+CD11b+ neutrophil numbers in Tlr9-/- MRL/+ mice (Fig 2B and 2C, S1 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Increased spleen weight and T cell activation in Tlr9-/- MRL/+ mice.

(A) Spleens were weighed. (B) Ly6G+CD11b+ neutrophils and (C) CD19-CD11c+I-A/I-E+ dendritic cells were evaluated by FACS. (D-E) Naive (CD44-CD62L+) cells were evaluated by FACS among TCRß+CD4+ (B) and TCRß+CD8+ (C) populations. * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; **** p<0.0001 by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. Data are pooled from five (A) or four (B-E) experimental cohorts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173471.g002

There were also substantial differences in the activation status of both CD4+ and CD8+ compartments. Tlr9-/- MRL/+ had a significant decrease in the proportion of T cells with a CD44lowCD62Lhigh naive phenotype (Fig 2D and 2E), and a concomitant increase in the proportion of CD4 and CD8 cells with a CD44highCD62Llow effector memory phenotype (not shown). This shift in activation phenotypes was similar to that observed in MRL.Faslpr mice [10].

We tested the serum of Tlr9+/+ and Tlr9-/- MRL/+ for autoantibodies by first screening on HEp-2 cells. Tlr9+/+ MRL/+ mice displayed homogenous or speckled nuclear staining patterns consistent with the presence of anti-DNA autoantibodies (Fig 3A and 3B). In contrast, no Tlr9-/- MRL/+ animals had homogenous nuclear HEp-2 staining. Instead, Tlr9-/- MRL/+ serum produced only speckled (nucleolar), speckled with cytoplasmic, or cytoplasmic-only staining patterns, suggestive of anti-RNA specificities. Most Tlr9+/+ sera but no Tlr9-/- sera stained mitotic Figs in the HEp-2 ANA (Fig 3C). As was the case in MRL.Faslpr [10], both the frequency and relative intensity of cytoplasmic staining HEp-2 reactivities were increased when Tlr9 was absent in the MRL/+ mice (Fig 3D).

thumbnail
Fig 3. HEp-2 antinuclear antibody staining patterns are changed in Tlr9-/- MRL/+ mice.

(A) Representative HEp-2 staining patterns from Tlr9+/+ MRL/+ (top) and Tlr9-/- MRL/+ (bottom) serum. (B) Proportion of sera with the indicated dominant staining pattern from Tlr9+/+ MRL/+ (left) or Tlr9-/- MRL/+ (right). (C) Percentage of sera of indicated genotypes which stained positive for mitotic bodies in the HEp-2 ANA assay. **** p<0.0001 by two-tailed Fisher's exact test. (D) Relative intensity of cytoplasmic staining in the HEp-2 ANA assay. * p<0.05 by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173471.g003

We next evaluated MRL/+ serum by ELISA for specific autoantibodies. Consistent with the ANA results, Tlr9-/- MRL/+ sera were negative for anti-nucleosome autoantibodies at 30 weeks of age, a timepoint by which 16 of 26 Tlr9-sufficient MRL/+ had anti-nucleosome titers greater than 10 μg/mL PL2-3 equivalents (Fig 4A). Thus, Tlr9 is necessary for anti-nucleosome autoantibody production in both the MRL.Faslpr and MRL/+ models.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Autoantibody production in Tlr9-/- MRL/+ mice.

(A) Serum anti-nucleosome IgG autoantibodies were measured by ELISA and are expressed relative to a PL2-3 standard. (B) Serum anti-Sm IgG autoantibodies were measured by ELISA and are expressed relative to a Y2 standard. (C) Serum anti-RNA IgG autoantibodies were measured by ELISA and are expressed relative to a BWR4 standard. (D) Serum kappa anti-IgG2a rheumatoid factor autoantibodies were measured by ELISA and are expressed relative to a 400tμ23 standard. * p<0.05; *** p<0.001; **** p<0.0001 by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173471.g004

In contrast, Tlr9-/- MRL/+ mice were more likely than Tlr9+/+ MRL/+ to have detectable anti-Sm titers (Fig 4B), a Tlr7-dependent specificity [9, 10]. 20 of 26 samples in the Tlr9-/- MRL/+ group were anti-Sm-positive (titer of 50 μg/mL Y2 equivalents or greater) compared to 12 of 25 Tlr9+/+ MRL/+ mice (p = 0.0448 by two-tailed Fisher's exact test). Intriguingly, the median anti-Sm titer among only the Sm-positive animals was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.7021 by two-tailed Mann-Whitney), suggesting that Tlr9 only affects the likelihood of becoming anti-Sm positive without affecting the actual magnitude of anti-Sm autoantibody production once tolerance to this self-antigen has been broken. Tlr9-/- MRL/+ mice also had higher titers of anti-RNA than Tlr9+/+ MRL/+ at 30 weeks of age (Fig 4C). In contrast, and consistent with observations in MRL.Faslpr mice [10], the absence of Tlr9 had no effect on anti-IgG2a rheumatoid factor titers (Fig 4D).

MRL.Faslpr mice have significant hypergammaglobulinemia compared to non-autoimmune strains, which was elevated still further in the absence of Tlr9 [10]. We measured the titer of total IgM and IgG in serum from MRL/+. Tlr9 did not affect the overall titer of IgM (Fig 5A). However, Tlr9-/- MRL/+ mice had significantly elevated IgG titers compared to Tlr9+/+ MRL/+ (Fig 5B).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Tlr9-/- MRL/+ have increased spontaneous germinal centers.

(A-B) Total serum IgM (A) and IgG (B) were measured by ELISA. ** p<0.01 by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. (C-D) CD19+TCRß-CD44+CD138+ plasmablasts (C) and CD19+TCRß-PNA+CD95+ germinal centers (D) were measured by FACS. **** p<0.0001 by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. Data in (C) and (D) are pooled from three experimental cohorts including Fas+/+ mice only. (E) Representative sections from Tlr9+/+ MRL/+ (left) and Tlr9-/- MRL/+ (right) mice were stained for PNA (red), Bcl6 (white), CD19 (green) and CD4 (blue). Scale bar represents 100 microns.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173471.g005

MRL.Faslpr and MRL/+ mice produce autoantibodies via an extrafollicular (EF) plasmablast response and also have small spontaneous germinal centers (GCs) [38, 39]. Although we were able to detect a robust EF plasmablast population in MRL/+ mice by FACS (Fig 5C) and in histological sections (S2 and S3 Figs), the proportion of CD19+ cells with a plasmablast phenotype did not differ with the Tlr9 genotype on the MRL/+ background (Fig 5C).

Recent reports have suggested that Tlr7 signals promote the GC pathway in non-autoimmune and autoimmune-prone strains [20, 4044]. Since we observed an increase in the titer of several Tlr7-dependent autoantibody specificities in Tlr9-deficient MRL/+, we next asked whether there were differences in spontaneous GCs in MRL/+. Indeed there was a significant increase in both the proportion (Fig 5D) and absolute number (not shown) of PNA+ CD95+ GC-phenotype cells in the spleens of Tlr9-deficient MRL/+ compared to Tlr9+/+ MRL/+ mice, suggesting that intact Tlr9 inhibits the spontaneous formation of GCs in the MRL/+ model. We were able to identify bona fide CD19dim PNA+ Bcl6+ GCs in histological cross sections of spleens of both Tlr9 genotypes (Fig 5E).

Discussion

Tlr9 deficiency exacerbates autoimmune disease phenotypes on several lupus-prone backgrounds, though the exact mechanisms remain unclear and are likely to involve complex interactions among multiple cell lineages. Here, by examining Tlr9 deficiency on the MRL/+ background, we determined that the acceleration of disease observed in the absence of Tlr9 is independent of the Faslpr mutation. This is important because, though Tlr9 deficiency had been reported to accelerate disease in some other spontaneous lupus models, they were all driven by mutations in single alleles carried on the B6 background. Monoallelically driven models can be criticized for lack of generality as lupus in humans is polygenically driven. MRL.Faslpr mice have lupus-like disease that is polygenically driven, yet the presence of the Fas mutation could have in principle altered the Tlr9-dependency of disease.

In addition to establishing that Tlr9 regulates lupus-like disease in a fully polygenic lupus model independently of Fas-deficiency, we revealed additional features regulated by Tlr9 that may have been obscured by the global immune disregulation mediated by the Fas mutation. One striking example of this was the expansion of the myeloid compartment in the spleen of Tlr9-/- MRL/+ mice, most notably the Ly6G+ CD11b+ neutrophils and to a lesser extent the CD11c+ dendritic cells. This contributed to a moderate Fas-independent splenomegaly in the absence of Tlr9. While splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy are major features of the MRL.Faslpr strain, they are driven predominantly by the expansion of a TCRß+ B220+ CD4- CD8- "DN T cell" population not observed in Fas-sufficient MRL/+. The myeloid expansion observed here is consistent with reports of enhanced myelopoiesis in mice engineered to transgenically overexpress Tlr7 [45] and of monocytosis in aged male BXSB mice [46], a lupus model in which disease is driven by the yaa translocation that increases gene dosage of Tlr7 among others [47]. A similar myeloid expansion has also been reported in C57BL/6 mice expressing the 564Igi IgH/IgL transgenes that encode a poorly-tolerized anti-RNA Ig [48]. Our genetic data, the serologic data here and that previously reported for MRL.Faslpr mice, as well as some in vitro data, indicate a stronger or qualitatively different outcome of Tlr7 signaling in the absence of Tlr9 in B cells [17, 49]. Since Tlr9-/- MRL/+ also produce high titers of anti-RNA antibodies (as do Tlr7-overexpressing animals) it is unclear whether the increase in neutrophils is due to enhanced Tlr7 signals in the absence of Tlr9 in myeloid precursors or is an indirect consequence of autoantibody immune complex ligation of Fc receptors on myeloid cells [45, 48].

One proposed mechanism for enhanced TLR7 signaling in the absence of TLR9 is preferential endosomal delivery of TLR9 over other endosomal TLRs by Unc93b1 in cells expressing TLR7, TLR8 and/or TLR9; when TLR9 is absent, more TLR7 may enter the endosome to change the signaling threshold in response to RNA-containing antigens or immune complexes [50]. Precisely why TLR7 signaling leads to more severe disease outcomes than signaling mediated by TLR9 nonetheless remains unclear. Our data and that of others indicates that TLR7 and TLR9 control different subcategories of autoantibody, which could result in the uptake and presentation of qualitatively different antigens either by B cells directly or via FcR-mediated uptake in the myeloid compartment, as well as differentially affecting antigen clearance. Importantly, genetic deletion of both Tlr7 and Tlr9, deletion of Myd88, or mutation of Unc93b1 each reduce disease and autoantibody production in murine models [10, 51].

An unresolved question in autoimmune disease is the relative importance of GCs versus EF plasmablasts as the source of autoantibodies, and how TLR signaling might affect the decision between these two outcomes. Tlr9-dependent activation of anti-nucleosome 3H9/Vλ1 B cells on the MRL.Faslpr background proceeds via an EF route; similarly, AM14 rheumatoid factor B cells stimulated by host-derived immune complexes on the MRL.Faslpr background or by exogenously provided anti-chromatin (PL2-3) or anti-RNA (BWR4) antibodies on MRL.Faslpr or BALB/c backgrounds produce primarily Id+ EF plasmablasts [35, 5254]. In contrast, AM14 B6.Sle1.Sle2.Sle3 congenic mice have both GCs and EF Id+ responses in response to PL2-3 [55]. Here we find that the deletion of Tlr9 did not abrogate the EF pathway on a repertoire-unrestricted genetic background. Although the number of cells with a plasmablast phenotype did not change in the absence of TLR9, and histologically EF plasmablasts were observed in both TLR9 genotypes, the antigen specificity of those cells was likely different, as anti-chromatin and nuclear-staining ANA were absent and anti-RNA responses were increased in the Tlr9 deficient group. Thus, the remaining EF plasmablasts were likely generated in response to Tlr9-independent autoantigens, perhaps including Tlr7-dependent anti-RNA; we infer this due to the near-absence of EF plasmablasts in MRL.Faslpr mice lacking Myd88 in B cells [12].

While the number of EF B cells was not changed, the number of B cells with a GC phenotype approximately doubled in the absence of Tlr9. Other groups have demonstrated that Tlr9-/- mice on the C57BL/6 background have an increase in "spontaneous" GCs in specific pathogen free housing, which depend upon the presence of intact Tlr7 [40, 43]. Mice that overexpress Tlr7, either as a transgene or in the context of the yaa mutation, have increased GCs on lupus-prone B6.Sle1 or B6.Sle1b backgrounds [41, 42]. In two mixed chimera systems, Tlr7-transgene overexpressing B cells or Tlr9-deficient B cells each preferentially entered GCs versus WT competitors [20, 44]. While these mixed chimera experiments suggest a B cell intrinsic role of the TLRs in regulating GC formation, our previous results suggested that MyD88 signals in CD11c+ dendritic cells actually suppressed formation of spontaneous GCs and favored the EF response in MRL.Faslpr mice, and another group found that GCs in B6.Sle1.Sle3 mice were dependent on functional plasmacytoid dendritic cells [12, 42]. Hence, the roles of TLR- and MyD88-dependent signaling are indeed complex in a variety of systems and operate differently in specific cell types, emphasizing the need for ongoing dissection of this important aspect of autoimmune disease.

In recent years we have become aware of criticism of the MRL.Faslpr model as being an artificial or poor model of lupus due to the Faslpr mutation. Fas mutation in humans leads to autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS), which is clinically distinct from SLE but may be co-incident with SLE in some patients and often includes ANA [56]. Indeed, the B6.MRL-Faslpr (B6/lpr) model produces some autoantibodies but has mild renal disease [57]. Nonetheless, both MRL.Faslpr mice and the Fas-intact MRL/+ congenic strain meet all of the ACR criteria for lupus and have similar autoantibody profiles, though with different kinetics of disease onset. Here we demonstrated that all of the major phenotypes observed in the Tlr9-/- MRL.Faslpr strain are recapitulated in the MRL/+ background. Tlr9-/- mice progressed more rapidly to anti-Sm and anti-RNA autoantibody production, but had no anti-nucleosome autoantibodies. Naive phenotype CD4 and CD8 T cells were decreased in Tlr9-/- animals and renal pathology was present at an earlier age. Indeed, for selected other genes, others and we have analyzed deficiency in both the MRL.Faslpr and MRL/+ backgrounds and in each case found similar phenotypes. These include mutations which accelerate or modify the disease course, such as Cd274-/- (PD-L1-/-) [32], as well as those which delay or prevent disease such as B lineage or αß T lineage deletion [33, 34]. Recently we demonstrated that Fas and FasL expression on T cells, induced by cDCs, mediates the culling of extrafollicular T helper cells that support the EF plasmablast response; it is likely that the absence of this regulatory pathway at least partially contributes to the accelerated onset of autoantibody production and disease in MRL.Faslpr mice compared to Fas-sufficient MRL [31]. Altogether, these data validate the MRL.Faslpr model as a polygenic spontaneous lupus model that primarily differs from MRL/+ in kinetics but not quality. As more rapid kinetics makes for more efficient and economical experiments, we conclude that the MRL.Faslpr is a preferred polygenic model of lupus for certain applications.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Enumeration of splenic lymphocyte and myeloid populations in MRL/+ mice.

Cell populations were evaluated in the spleens of Tlr9-intact or -deficient MRL/+ mice by flow cytometry. (A) CD19- TCRß+ T cells. (B) CD4+ cells expressed as a percentage of total T cells. (C) CD8+ cells expressed as a percentage of total T cells. (D) CD19+ B cells (E) CD19+ CD23/35dim CD23+ follicular B cells. (F) CD19+ CD21/35+ CD23- marginal zone B cells. (G) CD19-CD11c+I-A/I-E+ dendritic cells. (H) SiglecH+ CD317+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells. (I) Ly6G+ CD11b+ neutrophils.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173471.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Extrafollicular plasmablasts in Tlr9+/+ MRL/+ spleen.

Immunofluorescence microscopy image of representative MRL/+ spleen. Extrafollicular plasmablasts are kappa-bright (green) but IgD-negative (red) and localized within the F4/80-positive red pulp (blue). Scale bar is 50 microns.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173471.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Extrafollicular plasmablasts in Tlr9-/- MRL/+ spleen.

Immunofluorescence microscopy image of representative Tlr9-/- MRL/+ spleen. Extrafollicular plasmablasts are kappa-bright (green) but IgD-negative (red) and localized within the F4/80-positive red pulp (blue). Scale bar is 100 microns.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173471.s003

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the University of Pittsburgh Division of Laboratory Animal Resources for superior animal husbandry.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: KMN MJS.
  2. Data curation: KMN.
  3. Formal analysis: KMN.
  4. Funding acquisition: MJS SB.
  5. Investigation: KMN YW SB.
  6. Methodology: KMN YW SB MJS.
  7. Project administration: KMN MJS.
  8. Resources: KMN YW SB MJS.
  9. Supervision: KMN MJS.
  10. Validation: KMN MJS.
  11. Visualization: KMN MJS.
  12. Writing – original draft: KMN.
  13. Writing – review & editing: KMN YW SB MJS.

References

  1. 1. Celhar T, Magalhaes R, Fairhurst AM. TLR7 and TLR9 in SLE: when sensing self goes wrong. Immunologic research. 2012;53(1–3):58–77. pmid:22434514
  2. 2. Rawlings DJ, Schwartz MA, Jackson SW, Meyer-Bahlburg A. Integration of B cell responses through Toll-like receptors and antigen receptors. Nature reviews Immunology. 2012;12(4):282–94. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3437941. pmid:22421786
  3. 3. Pillai S, Mattoo H, Cariappa A. B cells and autoimmunity. Current opinion in immunology. 2011;23(6):721–31. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3268048. pmid:22119110
  4. 4. Sang A, Zheng YY, Morel L. Contributions of B cells to lupus pathogenesis. Molecular immunology. 2014;62(2):329–38. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4053496. pmid:24332482
  5. 5. Khan WN, Wright JA, Kleiman E, Boucher JC, Castro I, Clark ES. B-lymphocyte tolerance and effector function in immunity and autoimmunity. Immunologic research. 2013;57(1–3):335–53. pmid:24293007
  6. 6. Relle M, Weinmann-Menke J, Scorletti E, Cavagna L, Schwarting A. Genetics and novel aspects of therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity reviews. 2015;14(11):1005–18. pmid:26164648
  7. 7. Nickerson KM, Shlomchik MJ. Animal Models of Autoimmunity. In: Ratcliffe MJH, editor. Encyclopedia of Immunobiology. 5. Oxford: Academic Press; 2016. p. 227–40.
  8. 8. Christensen SR, Kashgarian M, Alexopoulou L, Flavell RA, Akira S, Shlomchik MJ. Toll-like receptor 9 controls anti-DNA autoantibody production in murine lupus. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2005;202(2):321–31. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2212997. pmid:16027240
  9. 9. Christensen SR, Shupe J, Nickerson K, Kashgarian M, Flavell RA, Shlomchik MJ. Toll-like receptor 7 and TLR9 dictate autoantibody specificity and have opposing inflammatory and regulatory roles in a murine model of lupus. Immunity. 2006;25(3):417–28. pmid:16973389
  10. 10. Nickerson KM, Christensen SR, Shupe J, Kashgarian M, Kim D, Elkon K, et al. TLR9 regulates TLR7- and MyD88-dependent autoantibody production and disease in a murine model of lupus. Journal of immunology. 2010;184(4):1840–8. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4098568.
  11. 11. Nickerson KM, Cullen JL, Kashgarian M, Shlomchik MJ. Exacerbated autoimmunity in the absence of TLR9 in MRL.Fas(lpr) mice depends on Ifnar1. Journal of immunology. 2013;190(8):3889–94. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3622185.
  12. 12. Teichmann LL, Schenten D, Medzhitov R, Kashgarian M, Shlomchik MJ. Signals via the adaptor MyD88 in B cells and DCs make distinct and synergistic contributions to immune activation and tissue damage in lupus. Immunity. 2013;38(3):528–40. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3638041. pmid:23499488
  13. 13. Freeley SJ, Giorgini A, Tulone C, Popat RJ, Horsfield C, Robson MG. Toll-like receptor 2 or toll-like receptor 4 deficiency does not modify lupus in MRLlpr mice. PloS one. 2013;8(9):e74112. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3782491. pmid:24086313
  14. 14. Lartigue A, Colliou N, Calbo S, Francois A, Jacquot S, Arnoult C, et al. Critical role of TLR2 and TLR4 in autoantibody production and glomerulonephritis in lpr mutation-induced mouse lupus. Journal of immunology. 2009;183(10):6207–16.
  15. 15. Joosten LA, Abdollahi-Roodsaz S, Dinarello CA, O'Neill L, Netea MG. Toll-like receptors and chronic inflammation in rheumatic diseases: new developments. Nature reviews Rheumatology. 2016;12(6):344–57. pmid:27170508
  16. 16. Lartigue A, Courville P, Auquit I, Francois A, Arnoult C, Tron F, et al. Role of TLR9 in anti-nucleosome and anti-DNA antibody production in lpr mutation-induced murine lupus. Journal of immunology. 2006;177(2):1349–54.
  17. 17. Santiago-Raber ML, Dunand-Sauthier I, Wu T, Li QZ, Uematsu S, Akira S, et al. Critical role of TLR7 in the acceleration of systemic lupus erythematosus in TLR9-deficient mice. Journal of autoimmunity. 2010;34(4):339–48. pmid:19944565
  18. 18. Stoehr AD, Schoen CT, Mertes MM, Eiglmeier S, Holecska V, Lorenz AK, et al. TLR9 in peritoneal B-1b cells is essential for production of protective self-reactive IgM to control Th17 cells and severe autoimmunity. Journal of immunology. 2011;187(6):2953–65.
  19. 19. Yu P, Wellmann U, Kunder S, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Jennen L, Dear N, et al. Toll-like receptor 9-independent aggravation of glomerulonephritis in a novel model of SLE. International immunology. 2006;18(8):1211–9. pmid:16798839
  20. 20. Jackson SW, Scharping NE, Kolhatkar NS, Khim S, Schwartz MA, Li QZ, et al. Opposing impact of B cell-intrinsic TLR7 and TLR9 signals on autoantibody repertoire and systemic inflammation. Journal of immunology. 2014;192(10):4525–32. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4041708.
  21. 21. Bossaller L, Christ A, Pelka K, Nundel K, Chiang PI, Pang C, et al. TLR9 Deficiency Leads to Accelerated Renal Disease and Myeloid Lineage Abnormalities in Pristane-Induced Murine Lupus. Journal of immunology. 2016;197(4):1044–53.
  22. 22. Summers SA, Hoi A, Steinmetz OM, O'Sullivan KM, Ooi JD, Odobasic D, et al. TLR9 and TLR4 are required for the development of autoimmunity and lupus nephritis in pristane nephropathy. Journal of autoimmunity. 2010;35(4):291–8. pmid:20810248
  23. 23. Lee PY, Kumagai Y, Li Y, Takeuchi O, Yoshida H, Weinstein J, et al. TLR7-dependent and FcgammaR-independent production of type I interferon in experimental mouse lupus. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2008;205(13):2995–3006. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2605237. pmid:19047436
  24. 24. Eisenberg RA, Tan EM, Dixon FJ. Presence of anti-Sm reactivity in autoimmune mouse strains. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1978;147(2):582–7. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2184487. pmid:304883
  25. 25. Andrews BS, Eisenberg RA, Theofilopoulos AN, Izui S, Wilson CB, McConahey PJ, et al. Spontaneous murine lupus-like syndromes. Clinical and immunopathological manifestations in several strains. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1978;148(5):1198–215. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2185049. pmid:309911
  26. 26. Adachi M, Watanabe-Fukunaga R, Nagata S. Aberrant transcription caused by the insertion of an early transposable element in an intron of the Fas antigen gene of lpr mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1993;90(5):1756–60. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC45958. pmid:7680478
  27. 27. Watanabe-Fukunaga R, Brannan CI, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Nagata S. Lymphoproliferation disorder in mice explained by defects in Fas antigen that mediates apoptosis. Nature. 1992;356(6367):314–7. pmid:1372394
  28. 28. Blander JM. A long-awaited merger of the pathways mediating host defence and programmed cell death. Nature reviews Immunology. 2014;14(9):601–18. pmid:25145756
  29. 29. Brint E, O'Callaghan G, Houston A. Life in the Fas lane: differential outcomes of Fas signaling. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS. 2013;70(21):4085–99. pmid:23579628
  30. 30. Strasser A, Jost PJ, Nagata S. The many roles of FAS receptor signaling in the immune system. Immunity. 2009;30(2):180–92. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2956119. pmid:19239902
  31. 31. Ols ML, Cullen JL, Turqueti-Neves A, Giles J, Shlomchik MJ. Dendritic Cells Regulate Extrafollicular Autoreactive B Cells via T Cells Expressing Fas and Fas Ligand. Immunity. 2016;45(5):1052–65. ubMed Central PMCID: PMC5112117. pmid:27793595
  32. 32. Lucas JA, Menke J, Rabacal WA, Schoen FJ, Sharpe AH, Kelley VR. Programmed death ligand 1 regulates a critical checkpoint for autoimmune myocarditis and pneumonitis in MRL mice. Journal of immunology. 2008;181(4):2513–21. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2587295.
  33. 33. Chan OT, Madaio MP, Shlomchik MJ. B cells are required for lupus nephritis in the polygenic, Fas-intact MRL model of systemic autoimmunity. Journal of immunology. 1999;163(7):3592–6.
  34. 34. Peng SL, Cappadona J, McNiff JM, Madaio MP, Owen MJ, Hayday AC, et al. Pathogenesis of autoimmunity in alphabeta T cell-deficient lupus-prone mice. Clinical and experimental immunology. 1998;111(1):107–16. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1904839. pmid:9472669
  35. 35. Nickerson KM, Christensen SR, Cullen JL, Meng W, Luning Prak ET, Shlomchik MJ. TLR9 promotes tolerance by restricting survival of anergic anti-DNA B cells, yet is also required for their activation. Journal of immunology. 2013;190(4):1447–56. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3563726.
  36. 36. Martina MN, Noel S, Saxena A, Rabb H, Hamad AR. Double negative (DN) alphabeta T cells: misperception and overdue recognition. Immunology and cell biology. 2015;93(3):305–10. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4363250. pmid:25420721
  37. 37. D'Acquisto F, Crompton T. CD3+CD4-CD8- (double negative) T cells: saviours or villains of the immune response? Biochemical pharmacology. 2011;82(4):333–40. pmid:21640713
  38. 38. William J, Euler C, Christensen S, Shlomchik MJ. Evolution of autoantibody responses via somatic hypermutation outside of germinal centers. Science. 2002;297(5589):2066–70. pmid:12242446
  39. 39. Shlomchik MJ. Sites and stages of autoreactive B cell activation and regulation. Immunity. 2008;28(1):18–28. pmid:18199415
  40. 40. Desnues B, Macedo AB, Roussel-Queval A, Bonnardel J, Henri S, Demaria O, et al. TLR8 on dendritic cells and TLR9 on B cells restrain TLR7-mediated spontaneous autoimmunity in C57BL/6 mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(4):1497–502. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3910605. pmid:24474776
  41. 41. Hwang SH, Lee H, Yamamoto M, Jones LA, Dayalan J, Hopkins R, et al. B cell TLR7 expression drives anti-RNA autoantibody production and exacerbates disease in systemic lupus erythematosus-prone mice. Journal of immunology. 2012;189(12):5786–96. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3544945.
  42. 42. Sisirak V, Ganguly D, Lewis KL, Couillault C, Tanaka L, Bolland S, et al. Genetic evidence for the role of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2014;211(10):1969–76. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4172218. pmid:25180061
  43. 43. Soni C, Wong EB, Domeier PP, Khan TN, Satoh T, Akira S, et al. B cell-intrinsic TLR7 signaling is essential for the development of spontaneous germinal centers. Journal of immunology. 2014;193(9):4400–14. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4201954.
  44. 44. Walsh ER, Pisitkun P, Voynova E, Deane JA, Scott BL, Caspi RR, et al. Dual signaling by innate and adaptive immune receptors is required for TLR7-induced B-cell-mediated autoimmunity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(40):16276–81. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3479588. pmid:22988104
  45. 45. Buechler MB, Teal TH, Elkon KB, Hamerman JA. Cutting edge: Type I IFN drives emergency myelopoiesis and peripheral myeloid expansion during chronic TLR7 signaling. Journal of immunology. 2013;190(3):886–91. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3552021.
  46. 46. Wofsy D, Kerger CE, Seaman WE. Monocytosis in the BXSB model for systemic lupus erythematosus. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1984;159(2):629–34. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2187231. pmid:6363600
  47. 47. Subramanian S, Tus K, Li QZ, Wang A, Tian XH, Zhou J, et al. A Tlr7 translocation accelerates systemic autoimmunity in murine lupus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103(26):9970–5. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1502563. pmid:16777955
  48. 48. Han JH, Umiker BR, Kazimirova AA, Fray M, Korgaonkar P, Selsing E, et al. Expression of an anti-RNA autoantibody in a mouse model of SLE increases neutrophil and monocyte numbers as well as IFN-I expression. European journal of immunology. 2014;44(1):215–26. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3947137. pmid:24105635
  49. 49. Nundel K, Green NM, Shaffer AL, Moody KL, Busto P, Eilat D, et al. Cell-intrinsic expression of TLR9 in autoreactive B cells constrains BCR/TLR7-dependent responses. Journal of immunology. 2015;194(6):2504–12. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4382804.
  50. 50. Fukui R, Saitoh S, Kanno A, Onji M, Shibata T, Ito A, et al. Unc93B1 restricts systemic lethal inflammation by orchestrating Toll-like receptor 7 and 9 trafficking. Immunity. 2011;35(1):69–81. pmid:21683627
  51. 51. Kono DH, Haraldsson MK, Lawson BR, Pollard KM, Koh YT, Du X, et al. Endosomal TLR signaling is required for anti-nucleic acid and rheumatoid factor autoantibodies in lupus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(29):12061–6. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2715524. pmid:19574451
  52. 52. Herlands RA, William J, Hershberg U, Shlomchik MJ. Anti-chromatin antibodies drive in vivo antigen-specific activation and somatic hypermutation of rheumatoid factor B cells at extrafollicular sites. European journal of immunology. 2007;37(12):3339–51. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3516908. pmid:18034429
  53. 53. Sweet RA, Ols ML, Cullen JL, Milam AV, Yagita H, Shlomchik MJ. Facultative role for T cells in extrafollicular Toll-like receptor-dependent autoreactive B-cell responses in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(19):7932–7. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3093527. pmid:21518858
  54. 54. Sweet RA, Christensen SR, Harris ML, Shupe J, Sutherland JL, Shlomchik MJ. A new site-directed transgenic rheumatoid factor mouse model demonstrates extrafollicular class switch and plasmablast formation. Autoimmunity. 2010;43(8):607–18. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3818904. pmid:20370572
  55. 55. Sang A, Niu H, Cullen J, Choi SC, Zheng YY, Wang H, et al. Activation of rheumatoid factor-specific B cells is antigen dependent and occurs preferentially outside of germinal centers in the lupus-prone NZM2410 mouse model. Journal of immunology. 2014;193(4):1609–21. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4119566.
  56. 56. Shah S, Wu E, Rao VK, Tarrant TK. Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome: an update and review of the literature. Current allergy and asthma reports. 2014;14(9):462. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4148697. pmid:25086580
  57. 57. Izui S, Kelley VE, Masuda K, Yoshida H, Roths JB, Murphy ED. Induction of various autoantibodies by mutant gene lpr in several strains of mice. Journal of immunology. 1984;133(1):227–33.