Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

25-Hydroxivitamin D Serum Concentration, Not Free and Bioavailable Vitamin D, Is Associated with Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients

Abstract

We aim to evaluate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and investigate the association between total, free and bioavailable vitamin D serum concentrations and disease activity. Patients with SLE (ACR 1997) consecutively seen at UNIFESP’s outpatient’s clinics had disease activity measured after clinical and laboratory evaluation using SLEDAI (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index). 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) serum concentrations measured by chemiluminescence and vitamin D binding protein (DBP) measured by ELISA were used to calculate free and bioavailable vitamin D. Healthy blood donors were used as controls. A total of 142 patients (71.4%) had 25(OH)D serum concentrations below 30 ng/mL. Total 25(OH)D serum concentration was associated with disease activity categorized in 5 continuous groups of SLEDAI. 25(OH)D serum concentrations were higher among patients with SLEDAI 1–5 and lower in those with severe activity (SLEDAI≥20) (p <0.05). On the other hand, no statistically significant difference was observed for DBP, free and bioavailable vitamin D measurements in the disease activity subgroups evaluated. Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent among patients with SLE and was associated with higher disease activity. DBP serum level and calculation of free and bioavailable vitamin D were not associated with SLE disease activity.

Citation: Eloi M, Horvath DV, Ortega JC, Prado MS, Andrade LEC, Szejnfeld VL, et al. (2017) 25-Hydroxivitamin D Serum Concentration, Not Free and Bioavailable Vitamin D, Is Associated with Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0170323. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170323

Editor: Massimo Ciccozzi, National Institute of Health, ITALY

Received: November 10, 2016; Accepted: January 3, 2017; Published: January 13, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Eloi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic multisystem inflammatory autoimmune disease [1]. Several studies have reported that vitamin D deficiency is more prevalent in SLE patients than in the general population [2–6]. One possible explanation for the association between SLE and vitamin D deficiency is the universal recommendation that these patients should avoid sunlight exposure [7]. Moreover, many drugs used in SLE management, such as glucocorticoids and hydroxychloroquine, may interfere with vitamin D metabolism and 25-hidroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) serum levels [8]. It has also been suggested that vitamin D deficiency might be a risk factor for the development of the disease, although vitamin D intake was not associated with the risk of SLE development in a prospective study [9].

Vitamin D deficiency seems to be associated with immunological abnormalities in SLE. Some in vitro evidence implies that vitamin D modulates the differentiation and activity of T and B-lymphocytes and, therefore, the production of autoantibodies [10]. On the other hand, the association between vitamin D serum concentration with disease activity and prognosis in SLE remains controversial. In spite of some studies with interesting results [11], the literature still lacks of convincing proof demonstrating that vitamin D supplementation in patients with SLE can modify disease progression.

An association between high disease activity in SLE with low vitamin D serum concentrations has been reported, but these results are controversial [12]. In children and adolescents with SLE no correlation was found between glucocorticoid or hydroxychloroquine use, cumulative dose of glucocorticoid and vitamin D serum concentration [13]. Other authors have also failed to demonstrate association between vitamin D and SLE disease activity [14]. An inverse correlation between vitamin D serum concentration and disease activity in children with juvenile SLE has been reported [15]. In spite of such association, a causal relationship between vitamin D serum concentration and disease activity in SLE patients could not be established [16].

Part of the disagreement regarding a potential role for vitamin D in SLE disease activity [9,12,15,13] may be due to the fact that these studies have not evaluated the free and bioavailable fractions of vitamin D. It is possible that bioavailable and free vitamin D might be more reliable biological markers of vitamin D status than the total 25(OH)D serum concentration measurement. In the present study we assess the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in a cohort of patients with SLE and examine the association between total, free and bioavailable vitamin D serum measurements with disease activity.

Patients and Methods

The study included a total of 199 patients diagnosed with SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 classification criteria [17]. All participants agreed to participate in the study. The inclusion of patients from the Rheumatology Outpatient Clinics at UNIFESP, São Paulo–Brazil, was done by convenience in consecutive clinical appointments from February 2014 to January 2016. A total of 350 patients were evaluated and 199 met inclusion criteria described below.

Patients with overlapping findings with other systemic autoimmune diseases, rituximab use or plasmapheresis six months before or during the course of the study, bone marrow transplantation, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), neoplastic disease (except basal cell carcinoma) and common variable immunodeficiency were excluded. Use of vitamin D supplements was not an exclusion criterion.

All patients were contacted for clarification on the nature of the study and gave written informed consent to participate in the study. Minors/children were not included in the present study. The UNIFESP’s Ethics Committee approved the study protocol.

Anthropometric, demographic and clinical data collected from the electronic medical charts or clinical interview included age, sex, race, weight, height, disease duration and medication in use. Disease activity was measured using Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) at the time that blood samples were collected. Nephritis was assessed taking into account the presence of the following parameters: urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (or 24-hour urine protein) representing 500 mg protein/24 hours or red blood cell casts or renal biopsy with abnormalities suggestive of lupus nephritis.

Potential differences in vitamin D serum concentrations in this sample of patients with SLE were examined using the categorization of disease activity in 5 distinct levels: Inactive disease (SLEDAI = 0), light activity (SLEDAI 1 to 5), moderate activity (SLEDAI 6 to 10), high activity (SLEDAI 11 to 19) and severe activity (≥20 SLEDAI), as previously published [18]. These categories of SLE disease activity have been established according to the relative risk of death.

A total of 150 healthy volunteers selected among blood donors without SLE were used as control group.

Blood samples were collected by intravenous puncture and serum aliquots were stored at -80°C for the biochemical analyses described below.

25(OH)D serum measurements were performed on a Siemens ADVIA Centaur apparatus using chemiluminescence technique. Total 25(OH)D measurement coefficient of variation using this method is 11.7%.

Vitamin D binding protein (DBP) was measured in SLE patients by monoclonal antibody ELISA (Cloud-Clone Corp. kit—USCN Life Science Inc.) using standard technique. The coefficient of variation (CV%) for DBP measurement is 4.8%. DBP measurements in the study were considered only when duplicate measures were available. In 39 SLE samples DBP was not performed in duplicate and so was not used in the analysis.

DBP measurements were used to calculate free and bioavailable vitamin D according to previously developed equation [19] further adapted [20]. Bioavailable vitamin D was calculated as the sum of free vitamin D with 25(OH)D bound to albumin.

Bone densitometry data was available for a total of 107 patients included in the present analysis. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements were performed at the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and proximal femur (neck and total hip) using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (DPX MD +, GE-Lunar, Madison, WI, USA). The coefficient of variation for BMD measurement was 1.5% and 2% at lumbar spine and total hip, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation for quantitative variables, and frequency and percentage for categorical variables) was used to characterize patients and their groups. Quantitative variables were compared between groups of independent samples using Student's t test for normally distributed variables and Mann-Whitney test for variables with non-normal distribution. For prospective analyses (dependent samples), quantitative variables were compared using ANOVA. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS software version 17.0 (Chicago, IL). Significance level was set as p <0.05.

Results

A total of 199 consecutive patients with SLE were included in the study. Demographic, clinical and laboratorial data for these patients and their healthy controls are shown in Table 1. SLE patients were 37.2 ± 11.1 years old (range 26 to 48 years old) and mainly women (96%). 25(OH)D serum concentrations were significantly lower in SLE patients as compared to healthy controls matched for age and BMI. Vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D lower than 20 ng/mL) and insufficiency (25(OH)D lower than 30 ng/ml) were highly prevalent in SLE patients. A total of 142 SLE patients (71.4%) had 25(OH)D serum concentrations below 30 ng/mL, significantly higher than that seen for healthy controls (p<0,001). Only 57 SLE patients (28.6%) had 25(OH)D serum concentrations exceeding 30 ng/mL (vitamin D sufficiency). DBP measurements were available for 160 patients with SLE. Free and bioavailable vitamin D was calculated in those patients.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Demographic, anthropometric, clinical and laboratorial parameters in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients and their healthy controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170323.t001

Vitamin D serum concentrations according to SLEDAI categories are shown in Table 2.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Serum 25(OH)D (ng/mL), D binding protein (DBP) (ng/mL), free (pg/mL) and bioavailable (ng/mL) vitamin D in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients, according to disease activity measured by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170323.t002

A statistically significant difference between 25(OH)D serum concentrations was observed between the categories of disease activity (p = 0.042; ANOVA, Table 2). It was demonstrated a statistically significant difference between 25(OH)D values between inactive disease (SLEDAI = 0) or light activity (SLEDAI 1–5) and severe activity (SLEDAI≥20) (p<0.001; Tukey test). On the other hand, mean values for DBP, free and bioavailable vitamin D did not differ significantly between the categories of disease activity.

The association between vitamin D serum concentration and disease activity in our sample was also tested by assessing the status of vitamin D, as defined by the US Endocrine Society [21]: deficiency (25(OH)D lower than 20 ng/mL), insufficiency (25(OH)D between 20 and 30 ng/mL) and sufficiency (25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL). Table 3 shows the prevalence of different status of vitamin D according to disease activity. Since there was no statistically significant difference between the statuses insufficiency and deficiency, these two strata were analyzed together and compared to the sufficiency status.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Vitamin D status (deficiency: 25(OH)D lower than 20 ng/mL; insufficiency: 25(OH)D between 20 and 30 ng/mL; and sufficiency (25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients, according to disease activity measured by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170323.t003

As shown in Table 3, the two groups (25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL versus ≥ 30 ng/mL) differ significantly in the proportions of disease activity (p = 0.001). The proportion of patients with vitamin D sufficiency (25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL) is significantly higher in the groups SLEDAI 0 and 1–5 when compared to 25(OH)D values below 30 ng/mL (p = 0.003). In patients with severe activity (SLEDAI ≥20) we observed the contrary: the proportion of patients with 25(OH)D serum concentration lower than 30 ng/mL was significantly higher as compared to values ≥ 30 ng/mL (p = 0.026).

Potential associations between vitamin D status and season, body mass index (BMI), Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and use of medication were also tested. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean serum concentrations of 25(OH)D (p = 0.179), free and bioavailable vitamin D (p = 0.441) between the different seasons (ANOVA) (S1 Table).

25(OH)D serum concentrations were not significantly associated with disease duration or BMI. Both free and bioavailable vitamin D was also not associated with those variables.

Spine and hip BMD did not correlate significantly with 25(OH)D, free or bioavailable vitamin D serum concentrations. Moreover, BMD did not differ significantly among the various vitamin D statuses (S2 Table).

Possible associations between 25(OH)D serum concentration and the use of medications were considered. Table 4 shows that vitamin D serum levels were not associated significantly with the use of medications commonly used for management of SLE. Only the use of cyclophosphamide was associated with lower 25(OH)D serum concentrations (p = 0.020). This association was not confirmed when the analysis was performed according to the statuses of vitamin D (sufficiency or insufficiency/deficiency) (p = 0.065). A total of 74 patients were in use of cholecalciferol (400 to 1000 IU/day). The data demonstrate that patients taking cholecalciferol had 25(OH)D serum concentrations higher than the others with no supplementation (p<0.001). Similarly, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency was significantly higher among patients without supplementation as compared to patients receiving cholecalciferol.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 4. Serum 25(OH)D (mean ± SD) and vitamin D status (deficiency: 25(OH)D lower than 20 ng/mL; insufficiency: 25(OH)D between 20 and 30 ng/mL; and sufficiency (25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients, according to medication use.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170323.t004

Discussion

In the present study we investigated the association between vitamin D serum concentration, its free and bioavailable fractions and disease activity in SLE patients. We have observed a very high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency among SLE patients. Only 28.6% of the patients were vitamin D sufficient (serum 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL). Vitamin D deficiency was significantly more frequent in SLE patients than in healthy controls. Vitamin D deficiency is then more prevalence in SLE patients as compared to the Brazilian general population without SLE [22–25]. Significantly lower prevalence of vitamin D deficiency has been reported in SLE patients in Brazil [14]. We have also found that disease activity in SLE was associated with lower 25(OH)D serum concentration. On the other hand, measuring DBP with a monoclonal ELISA in this clinical setting has not added information to the status of vitamin D: both free and bioavailable fractions of 25(OH)D did not differ between the various categories of SLE disease activity.

Some cross-sectional studies have shown an inverse correlation between vitamin D serum concentration and disease activity in SLE patients [5,6,12]. On the other hand, in 159 SLE patients in the city of Rio de Janeiro, 25(OH)D serum concentration measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) did not correlate with activity or duration of the disease, sunlight exposure, vitamin D supplementation, glucocorticoid use or renal function [14].

The importance of free and bioavailable vitamin D has been tested in other clinical scenarios. Low 25(OH)D serum levels have been associated with high risk of multiple sclerosis [26]. Free and bioavailable vitamin D did not differ between multiple sclerosis patients and their healthy controls [27]. In pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease, both free and bioavailable vitamin D were significantly lower than in healthy controls [28]. Additionally, it was demonstrated that vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) or D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation in hip fracture patients resulted in no significant differences in free and bioavailable vitamin D [29].

It was recently demonstrated that DBP measurements using monoclonal ELISA are biased by DBP genotype and race [30]. DBP values varied significantly when measured by monoclonal or polyclonal ELISA or tandem mass spectrometry and that had implication on free and bioavailable vitamin D calculations. Based on those findings, one could speculate that measuring DBP with polyclonal or tandem mass spectrometry would render different results and that is a limitation of our present study.

Vitamin D serum concentrations did not correlate with the seasons in sample of patients with SLE, unlike what has been observed in the general population [21]. This is probably the result of the universal recommendation that SLE patients should use continuous photo protection and avoid sun exposure, regardless of the season.

In this study, vitamin D supplementation was associated with increased 25(OH)D serum concentrations. The reported doses of 400 to 1000 IU/day do not seem to be sufficient to ensure adequate levels of vitamin D. About 35% of patients using cholecalciferol still presented vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency, suggesting that higher doses are required for proper supplementation in these patients.

Due to its cross-sectional nature, our study cannot establish a causal relationship between vitamin D serum concentration and disease activity in SLE patients. If low vitamin D serum concentrations are causal co-factor in the immunological disturbances that characterize SLE or if, on the contrary, the inflammatory disease process and low sun exposure causes reduction in vitamin D serum concentrations will still require further studies [26]. It is also possible that the sample size may have affected our results. Perhaps larger samples may establish better relationship between vitamin D measurements and disease activity in SLE patients.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a very high frequency of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency among patients with SLE. In this clinical scenario, disease activity was associated with lower serum concentrations of 25(OH)D. DBP measurements with monoclonal ELISA and free and bioavailable vitamin D calculations did not differ among different categories of SLE disease activity. Prospective studies are needed to investigate and establish a potential causal relationship between vitamin D status and disease activity in SLE.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. 25(OH)D, free and bioavailable vitamin D (mean ± standard deviation) serum concentration in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients, according to season.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170323.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients, according to vitamin D status (deficiency: 25(OH)D lower than 20 ng/mL; insufficiency: 25(OH)D between 20 and 30 ng/mL; and sufficiency (25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170323.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to all patients and volunteers that agreed to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: CHMC.
  2. Data curation: ME DVH JCO.
  3. Formal analysis: ME CHMC.
  4. Funding acquisition: CHMC.
  5. Investigation: ME DVH JCO MSP.
  6. Methodology: VLS CHMC.
  7. Project administration: CHMC.
  8. Resources: MSP LECA VLS CHMC.
  9. Software: ME DVH JCO.
  10. Supervision: CHMC.
  11. Validation: ME DVH JCO.
  12. Visualization: ME CHMC.
  13. Writing – original draft: ME.
  14. Writing – review & editing: VLS CHMC.

References

  1. 1. Gordon C, Bertsias G, Ioannidis JP, Boletis J, Bombardieri S, Cervera R, Dostal C, Font J, Gilboe IM, Houssiau F, Huizinga TW, Isenberg D, Kallenberg CG, Khamashta MA, Piette JC, Schneider M, Smolen JS, Sturfelt G, Tincani A, Van Vollenhoven R, Boumpas DT (2009) EULAR points to consider for conducting clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 68 (4):470–476. pmid:18388158
  2. 2. Monticielo OA, Teixeira Tde M, Chies JA, Brenol JC, Xavier RM (2012) Vitamin D and polymorphisms of VDR gene in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clinical rheumatology 31 (10):1411–1421. pmid:22692397
  3. 3. Cutolo M (2009) Vitamin D and autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology 48 (3):210–212. pmid:18930963
  4. 4. Borba VZ, Vieira JG, Kasamatsu T, Radominski SC, Sato EI, Lazaretti-Castro M (2009) Vitamin D deficiency in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 20 (3):427–433.
  5. 5. Amital H, Szekanecz Z, Szucs G, Danko K, Nagy E, Csepany T, Kiss E, Rovensky J, Tuchynova A, Kozakova D, Doria A, Corocher N, Agmon-Levin N, Barak V, Orbach H, Zandman-Goddard G, Shoenfeld Y (2010) Serum concentrations of 25-OH vitamin D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are inversely related to disease activity: is it time to routinely supplement patients with SLE with vitamin D? Annals of the rheumatic diseases 69 (6):1155–1157. pmid:20439290
  6. 6. Yeap SS, Othman AZ, Zain AA, Chan SP (2012) Vitamin D levels: its relationship to bone mineral density response and disease activity in premenopausal Malaysian systemic lupus erythematosus patients on corticosteroids. International journal of rheumatic diseases 15 (1):17–24. pmid:22324943
  7. 7. Ruiz-Irastorza G, Egurbide MV, Olivares N, Martinez-Berriotxoa A, Aguirre C (2008) Vitamin D deficiency in systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence, predictors and clinical consequences. Rheumatology 47 (6):920–923. pmid:18411213
  8. 8. Sakthiswary R, Raymond AA (2013) The clinical significance of vitamin D in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. PloS one 8 (1):e55275. pmid:23383135
  9. 9. Costenbader KH, Feskanich D, Holmes M, Karlson EW, Benito-Garcia E (2008) Vitamin D intake and risks of systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis in women. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 67 (4):530–535. pmid:17666449
  10. 10. Ritterhouse LL, Crowe SR, Niewold TB, Kamen DL, Macwana SR, Roberts VC, Dedeke AB, Harley JB, Scofield RH, Guthridge JM, James JA (2011) Vitamin D deficiency is associated with an increased autoimmune response in healthy individuals and in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 70 (9):1569–1574. pmid:21586442
  11. 11. Abou-Raya A, Abou-Raya S, Helmii M (2013) The effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory and hemostatic markers and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. The Journal of rheumatology 40 (3):265–272. pmid:23204220
  12. 12. Bonakdar ZS, Jahanshahifar L, Jahanshahifar F, Gholamrezaei A (2011) Vitamin D deficiency and its association with disease activity in new cases of systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 20 (11):1155–1160. pmid:21680639
  13. 13. Peracchi OA, Terreri MT, Munekata RV, Len CA, Sarni RO, Lazaretti-Castro M, Hilario MO (2014) Low serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus. Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas / Sociedade Brasileira de Biofisica [et al] 47 (8):721–726
  14. 14. Souto M, Coelho A, Guo C, Mendonca L, Argolo S, Papi J, Farias M (2011) Vitamin D insufficiency in Brazilian patients with SLE: prevalence, associated factors, and relationship with activity. Lupus 20 (10):1019–1026. pmid:21646315
  15. 15. Wright TB, Shults J, Leonard MB, Zemel BS, Burnham JM (2009) Hypovitaminosis D is associated with greater body mass index and disease activity in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. J Pediatr 155 (2):260–265. pmid:19446841
  16. 16. Casella CB, Seguro LP, Takayama L, Medeiros D, Bonfa E, Pereira RM (2012) Juvenile onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a possible role for vitamin D in disease status and bone health. Lupus 21 (12):1335–1342. pmid:22833435
  17. 17. Hochberg MC (1997) Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis and rheumatism 40 (9):1725.
  18. 18. Cook RJ, Gladman DD, Pericak D, Urowitz MB (2000) Prediction of short term mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus with time dependent measures of disease activity. The Journal of rheumatology 27 (8):1892–1895 pmid:10955329
  19. 19. Bikle DD, Gee E, Halloran B, Kowalski MA, Ryzen E, Haddad JG (1986) Assessment of the free fraction of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum and its regulation by albumin and the vitamin D-binding protein. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 63 (4):954–959. pmid:3745408
  20. 20. Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM (1999) A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 84 (10):3666–3672. pmid:10523012
  21. 21. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, Murad MH, Weaver CM, Endocrine S (2011) Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 96 (7):1911–1930. pmid:21646368
  22. 22. Saraiva GL, Cendoroglo MS, Ramos LR, Araujo LM, Vieira JG, Maeda SS, Borba VZ, Kunii I, Hayashi LF, Lazaretti-Castro M (2007) [Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, insufficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly inpatients and living in the community of the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil]. Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia 51 (3):437–442 pmid:17546243
  23. 23. Lopes JB, Fernandes GH, Takayama L, Figueiredo CP, Pereira RM (2014) A predictive model of vitamin D insufficiency in older community people: from the Sao Paulo Aging & Health Study (SPAH). Maturitas 78 (4):335–340. pmid:24985066
  24. 24. Arantes HP, Kulak CA, Fernandes CE, Zerbini C, Bandeira F, Barbosa IC, Brenol JC, Russo LA, Borba VC, Chiang AY, Bilezikian JP, Lazaretti-Castro M (2013) Correlation between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and latitude in Brazilian postmenopausal women: from the Arzoxifene Generations Trial. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 24 (10):2707–2712.
  25. 25. Bandeira F, Griz L, Freese E, Lima DC, The AC, Diniz ET, Marques TF, Lucena CS (2010) Vitamin D deficiency and its relationship with bone mineral density among postmenopausal women living in the tropics. Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia 54 (2):227–232 pmid:20485913
  26. 26. Autier P, Boniol M, Pizot C, Mullie P (2014) Vitamin D status and ill health: a systematic review. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology 2 (1):76–89.
  27. 27. Behrens JR, Rasche L, Giess RM, Pfuhl C, Wakonig K, Freitag E, Deuschle K, Bellmann-Strobl J, Paul F, Ruprecht K, Dorr J (2015) Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D, but not the bioavailable fraction of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, is a risk factor for multiple sclerosis. European journal of neurology.
  28. 28. Denburg MR, Kalkwarf HJ, de Boer IH, Hewison M, Shults J, Zemel BS, Stokes D, Foerster D, Laskin B, Ramirez A, Leonard MB (2013) Vitamin D bioavailability and catabolism in pediatric chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol 28 (9):1843–1853. pmid:23728936
  29. 29. Glendenning P, Chew GT, Inderjeeth CA, Taranto M, Fraser WD (2013) Calculated free and bioavailable vitamin D metabolite concentrations in vitamin D-deficient hip fracture patients after supplementation with cholecalciferol and ergocalciferol. Bone 56 (2):271–275. pmid:23792937
  30. 30. Denburg MR, Hoofnagle AN, Sayed S, Gupta J, de Boer IH, Appel LJ, Durazo-Arvizu R, Whitehead K, Feldman HI, Leonard MB, Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort study i (2016) Comparison of Two ELISA Methods and Mass Spectrometry for Measurement of Vitamin D-Binding Protein: Implications for the Assessment of Bioavailable Vitamin D Concentrations Across Genotypes. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 31 (6):1128–1136.