Figures
Abstract
Background
Levothyroxine (LT4) and rifampin (RIF) are sometimes used together; however, no clinical studies have assessed the effects of these drugs on thyroid function or the need to adjust LT4 dose.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the records of 71 Korean patients who started RIF during LT4 treatment. Clinically relevant cases that required dose adjustment according to the American Thyroid Association (ATA)/American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) guidelines were identified, and risk factors of increased LT4 dose were analyzed.
Results
After administering RIF, median serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level (2.58 mIU/L, interquartile range [IQR] 0.21–7.44) was significantly higher than that before RIF (0.25 mIU/L, IQR, 0.03–2.62; P < 0.001). An increased LT4 dose was required for 50% of patients in the TSH suppression group for thyroid cancer and 26% of patients in the replacement group for hypothyroidism. Risk factor analysis showed that remaining thyroid gland (odds ratio [OR] 9.207, P = 0.002), the time interval between starting RIF and TSH measurement (OR 1.043, P = 0.019), and baseline LT4 dose per kg body weight (OR 0.364, P = 0.011) were clinically relevant variables.
Citation: Kim HI, Kim TH, Kim H, Kim YN, Jang HW, Chung JH, et al. (2017) Effect of Rifampin on Thyroid Function Test in Patients on Levothyroxine Medication. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0169775. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169775
Editor: Dongmei Li, University of Rochester, UNITED STATES
Received: September 28, 2016; Accepted: December 21, 2016; Published: January 12, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Levothyroxine (LT4) is widely used to replace thyroid hormone in patients with hypothyroidism and to suppress serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) for the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The primary pathway of LT4 metabolism is sequential deiodination. The main site of deiodination is the liver, although several other organs including the kidneys also metabolize LT4. LT4 is a substrate for CYP3A4, a member of the hepatic cytochrome P450 family of enzymes. Approximately 80% of LT4 is eliminated by the kidneys, and the remaining 20% is eliminated in the stool [1].
Rifampin (RIF) is used to treat active tuberculosis (TB) and latent TB infection (LTBI), as well as disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) such as Mycobacterium avium complex. These mycobacterial diseases require long-term RIF treatment. RIF is a potent inducer of hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes, especially CYP3A4, thus increasing the metabolism of many drugs that are metabolized by the liver [2,3].
In some patients undergoing LT4 treatment, elevated TSH leads to an increase in LT4 dose after administration of RIF. The American Thyroid Association (ATA)/American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) hypothyroidism guidelines recommend measuring TSH within 4–8 weeks after starting a drug that might influence LT4 dose, such as RIF [4]. However, only a few case reports have noted LT4 and RIF drug interactions leading to elevated TSH [5–7]. Furthermore, no retrospective or prospective clinical studies in the English language literature have evaluated elevated TSH level after administering RIF in patients receiving LT4.
In this study, we investigated the effect of RIF on thyroid function in patients undergoing LT4 therapy. We also analyzed risk factors of a clinically relevant change in thyroid function.
Materials and Methods
Study population
This study was a retrospective cohort study of adults who started RIF treatment during LT4 treatment between November 1994 and June 2014 at Samsung Medical Center (a 1,961-bed referral hospital in Seoul, South Korea). Patients 18 years or younger and those who took RIF for diseases other than TB, LTBI, or NTM infection were not included. We also excluded patients administered RIF for less than 4 weeks and patients with an obvious cause for a change in thyroid function, including LT4 discontinuation due to poor compliance or in preparation for radioiodine treatment. Seventy-one Korean patients were enrolled in this study. The study population was divided into two groups based on the reason for LT4 treatment: LT4 replacement to manage hypothyroidism and TSH suppression to manage DTC.
Study design and outcome measurement
The primary outcome of this study was change in thyroid function as measured by serum TSH and free thyroxine (fT4) after RIF administration. The secondary outcome was the percentage of patients with a clinically relevant change in thyroid function leading to a need for LT4 dose adjustment. A clinically relevant change in thyroid function was defined as a change that required LT4 dose adjustment according to the ATA/AACE guidelines. In the LT4 replacement group, a serum TSH level that exceeded the upper normal limit after starting RIF was classified as clinically relevant by 2012 ATA/AACE hypothyroidism guidelines [4]. For the suppression group, a clinically relevant change was defined as a serum TSH increase above the target TSH range according to the revised 2015 ATA guidelines for DTC after RIF administration [8,9].
The following factors were investigated for possible biological and/or pharmacological associations with LT4 dose adjustment: age, sex, reason for LT4 treatment, LT4 dose, reason for RIF treatment, RIF dose, time interval between starting RIF and serum TSH measurement, underlying liver disease, and underlying renal disease [10,11].
Statistical analysis
All variables including baseline characteristics are presented as number with percentage for categorical variables, mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables following a normal distribution, and median with interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables not following a normal distribution. Changes in serum TSH and serum free T4 were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test (Wilcoxon matched pairs test). Bivariate analysis of variables between clinically relevant and clinically irrelevant changes in thyroid function were performed with the Student’s t-test for continuous variables following a normal distribution, Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables not following a normal distribution, Chi-square test for categorical variables, and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables with an expected frequency less than five. Age, sex, liver disease, renal disease, RIF-TSH duration, remnant thyroid, etiology of RIF, RIF dose, and LT4 dose were used as covariates of multivariable analysis. Binary logistic regression with likelihood ratio test and backward elimination was used for multivariable analysis. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Statistical Software package version 22.
Ethics
The data used in this study were made available in an anonymized format, and the need for informed consent was waived. This retrospective observational study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center (IRB No. 2015-08-101), and full permission was granted to review and publish information obtained from patient records.
Results
The study population (N = 71) was divided into a TSH suppression group who received LT4 to suppress DTC recurrence (N = 46) and a TSH replacement group who took LT4 to replace thyroid hormone (N = 25). Baseline characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. Most patients were female (N = 58, 82%) and the median age was 52 years (IQR, 46–60 years). Median LT4 dose was 2.00 μg/kg/day (IQR, 1.49–2.54). The suppression group had a higher LT4 dose than did the replacement group. The most common reason to administer RIF was TB (N = 49, 69%). The median time between the start of RIF and serum TSH measurement was 32 weeks (IQR, 20–42 weeks). Baseline serum TSH level before administering RIF was 0.25 mIU/L (median, IQR, 0.03–2.62 mIU/L), and baseline serum fT4 level was 1.34 ng/dL (median, IQR, 1.12–1.61 ng/dL). Some patients had underlying liver disease (N = 11, 15%) or kidney disease (N = 5, 7%).
Table 2 shows serum TSH and fT4 levels before and after administering RIF. Median serum TSH levels before and after administering RIF were 0.25 mIU/L (IQR, 0.03–2.62 mIU/L) and 2.58 mIU/L (IQR, 0.21–7.44 mIU/L), respectively. Serum TSH levels after administering RIF were significantly higher than those before administering RIF (P < 0.001). Conversely, median serum fT4 levels decreased significantly after RIF was administered (1.34 ng/dL [IQR 1.12–1.61] to 1.01 [0.90–1.28], P < 0.001). Fifty percent of patients in the TSH-suppression group (23/46) and 24% in the simple replacement group (6/25) experienced changes in TSH that required an increase in LT4 dose according to ATA/AACE guidelines.
When patients with clinically relevant and irrelevant changes were compared, remnant thyroid (P = 0.002, Chi-square test), reason for LT4 treatment (P = 0.04, Chi-square test), and time between starting RIF and TSH measurement (P = 0.005, Mann-Whitney U test) were significantly different (Table 3). Other variables such as age, sex, LT4 dose, reason for administering RIF, RIF dose, underlying liver disease, and underlying renal disease did not differ significantly between groups. In multivariate analysis, lack of remnant thyroid (hazard ratio [OR] 9.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.28–37.17, P = 0.002), time between starting RIF and serum TSH measurement (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00–1.08, P = 0.019), and LT4 dose per kg body weight (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16–0.79, P = 0.011) were clinically significant (Table 4, Model 2). More detailed statistical values for each statistics in Tables 2–4 could be found in S1 Table. For every one-week increase in the time between the start of RIF and TSH measurement, the odds of an LT4 dose increased 1.04 times. However, the odds were no longer clinically significant beyond 40 weeks after the start of RIF when logistic regression was performed stepwise according to time interval.
Discussion
In this retrospective analysis, we investigated the effects of RIF on the thyroid function of patients who were taking LT4. Our data showed that serum TSH level significantly increased and serum fT4 level significantly decreased after starting RIF treatment. Furthermore, 50% of patients in the TSH-suppression group and 26% of patients in the replacement group required an LT4 dose increase to maintain target serum TSH according to the ATA/AACE guidelines. Our results support recommendation 16 of the ATA/AACE hypothyroidism guidelines, which recommends measuring TSH within 4–8 weeks after starting a drug, such as RIF, that might influence LT4 dose [4].
In contrast, Christensen et al. reported no significant change in serum TSH or fT4 in 13 healthy volunteers who took RIF for 28 days [12]. In their study, thyroid volume and antipyrine clearance increased significantly, but there were no significant changes in serum TSH and fT4 levels. This result implies that RIF increased T4 clearance in the liver, but did not change serum TSH or fT4 due to compensation by the normal thyroid gland. This discrepancy likely reflects differences in study populations. Patients who take LT4 in normal clinical practice usually have little or no remaining thyroid function to compensate for increases in LT4 clearance. In fact, a lack of remaining thyroid and lower LT4 dose upon starting RIF were risk factors of clinically relevant changes in thyroid function in our study.
LT4 dose per kg body weight at the time of RIF administration was a significant risk factor in multivariate analysis, but not in bivariate analysis. This result could be explained by the confounding effect of remaining thyroid gland. The clinically irrelevant group contained more patients with remaining thyroid who were taking lower doses of LT4 and patients who were already taking a relatively high dose of LT4 before starting RIF compared with the clinically relevant group. Use of the mean LT4 dose in bivariate analysis might have masked any differences in LT4 dose. However, when we adjusted for remaining thyroid (see methods), LT4 dose per kg body weight became a significant risk factor.
The time between starting RIF and measuring serum TSH was a risk factor of LT4 dose adjustment in both bivariate and multivariate analyses; however, this effect disappeared 40 weeks after starting RIF. RIF induces CYP3A4 in approximately 3 days. However, when another drug (i.e., a CYP3A4 substrate) is added, the new equilibrium depends on the second drug, an effect known as drug-drug interaction (DDI). For example, a combination of steroid and RIF requires 2 weeks to reach a new equilibrium. Dynamic DDI modeling with RIF revealed that the new equilibrium time is proportional to the half-life of the substrate [10,13]. The half-life of prednisolone is 12–36 hours and reaches a new equilibrium with RIF in about 2 weeks. The exact equilibrium time of RIF and LT4 has not been determined, but more than 4–8 weeks might be required to reach a new equilibrium because the half-life of LT4 (approximately 190 hours) is much longer than that of prednisolone. Our data suggest that TSH level should be checked periodically at 4–8 weeks as recommended by 2012 ATA/AACE hypothyroidism guidelines, but also at about 40 weeks.
Past studies have documented that isoniazide (INH) is the substrate of N-acetyltransferase. The slow-acetylator phenotype (poor metabolizers) is prone to INH side effects due to increased blood INH concentration. INH inhibits CYP3A, contrary to RIF, and thus RIF might have a weaker effect on CYP3A in slow acetylators. In this study, most patients took INH and RIF together, but all patients were Korean and only 10–15% of Koreans are expected to be slow acetylators [14–16]. In contrast, in Caucasians and African Americans, the prevalence of slow acetylators is approximately 50% [17–19]. Considering that the prevalence of slow acetylators is only 10–15% in Koreans while there are 50% in Caucasians and African Americans, the effect of RIF with con-concomitant INH on LT4 clearance might have been more prominent in this study population than other ethnicities.
The small study population from a single tertiary referral center is a limitation of this study, and a further study in a larger population is warranted. In addition, quality of life (for example, symptoms of hypothyroidism such as general weakness or weight gain) was not investigated because of the weakness of the retrospective design.
In conclusion, serum TSH increased and fT4 decreased significantly after the start of RIF treatment in patients taking LT4 for either hormone replacement for hypothyroidism or TSH suppression to manage DTC. Therefore, clinicians should closely monitor thyroid function when RIF is administered, particularly in patients without remaining thyroid gland and those taking a low dose of LT4. Further studies are needed to confirm these results, especially in populations where slow acetylators are more prevalent, such as in Caucasians and African Americans.
Author Contributions
- Conceptualization: HIK SWK WJK.
- Data curation: HIK.
- Formal analysis: HIK THK HSK YNK HWJ JHC SMM BWJ HL WJK SWK.
- Investigation: HIK THK HSK YNK HYJ JHC SMM BWJ HL WJK SWK.
- Methodology: HIK THK HSK YNK HYJ JHC SMM BWJ HL WJK SWK.
- Resources: HIK THK HSK YNK HYJ JHC SMM BWJ HL WJK SWK.
- Supervision: WJK SWK.
- Visualization: HIK.
- Writing – original draft: HIK.
- Writing – review & editing: HIK THK HSK YNK HYJ JHC SMM BWJ HL WJK SWK.
References
- 1. Fish LH, Schwartz HL, Cavanaugh J, Steffes MW, Bantle JP, Oppenheimer JH. Replacement dose, metabolism, and bioavailability of levothyroxine in the treatment of hypothyroidism. Role of triiodothyronine in pituitary feedback in humans. N Engl J Med. 1987;316: 764–770. pmid:3821822
- 2. Baciewicz AM, Chrisman CR, Finch CK, Self TH. Update on rifampin and rifabutin drug interactions. Am J Med Sci. 2008;335: 126–136. pmid:18277121
- 3. Baciewicz AM, Chrisman CR, Finch CK, Self TH. Update on rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine drug interactions. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013;29: 1–12.
- 4. Garber JR, Cobin RH, Gharib H, Hennessey JV, Klein I, Mechanick JI, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults: cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Endocr Pract. 2012;18: 988–1028. pmid:23246686
- 5. Isley WL. Effect of rifampin therapy on thyroid function tests in a hypothyroid patient on replacement L-thyroxine. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107: 517–518. pmid:3631788
- 6. Nolan SR, Self TH, Norwood JM. Interaction between rifampin and levothyroxine. South Med J. 1999;92: 529–531. pmid:10342905
- 7. Takasu N, Kinjou Y, Kouki T, Takara M, Ohshiro Y, Komiya I. Rifampin-induced hypothyroidism. J Endocrinol Invest. 2006;29: 645–649. pmid:16957414
- 8. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26: 1–133. pmid:26462967
- 9. Kim TY, Kim WG, Kim WB, Shong YK. Current status and future perspectives in differentiated thyroid cancer. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2014;29: 217–225.
- 10. Hukkanen J. Induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes: a view on human in vivo findings. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2012;5: 569–585. pmid:23121279
- 11. Reitman ML, Chu X, Cai X, Yabut J, Venkatasubramanian R, Zajic S, et al. Rifampin's acute inhibitory and chronic inductive drug interactions: experimental and model-based approaches to drug-drug interaction trial design. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89: 234–242. pmid:21191377
- 12. Christensen HR, Simonsen K, Hegedus L, Hansen BM, Dossing M, Kampmamn JP, et al. Influence of rifampicin on thyroid gland volume, thyroid hormones, and antipyrine metabolism. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1989;121: 406–410.
- 13. Yamashita F, Sasa Y, Yoshida S, Hisaka A, Asai Y, Kitano H, et al. Modeling of rifampicin-induced CYP3A4 activation dynamics for the prediction of clinical drug-drug interactions from in vitro data. PLoS One. 2013;8: e70330. pmid:24086247
- 14. Jung JA, Kim TE, Lee H, Jeong BH, Park HY, Jeon K, et al. A proposal for an individualized pharmacogenetic-guided isoniazid dosage regimen for patients with tuberculosis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015;9: 5433–5438. pmid:26491254
- 15. Cho HJ, Koh WJ, Ryu YJ, Ki CS, Nam MH, Kim JW, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of NAT2 and CYP2E1 associated with antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity in Korean patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2007;87: 551–556.
- 16. Lee SY, Lee KA, Ki CS, Kwon OJ, Kim HJ, Chung MP, et al. Complete sequencing of a genetic polymorphism in NAT2 in the Korean population. Clin Chem. 2002;48: 775–777. pmid:11978608
- 17. Desta Z, Soukhova NV, Flockhart DA. Inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoforms by isoniazid: potent inhibition of CYP2C19 and CYP3A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45: 382–392. pmid:11158730
- 18. Relling MV. Polymorphic drug metabolism. Clin Pharm. 1989;8: 852–863. pmid:2689060
- 19. Sabbagh A, Darlu P, Crouau-Roy B, Poloni ES. Arylamine N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) genetic diversity and traditional subsistence: a worldwide population survey. PLoS One. 2011;6: e18507. pmid:21494681