Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Titin Truncating Variants in Dilated Cardiomyopathy – Prevalence and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Titin Truncating Variants in Dilated Cardiomyopathy – Prevalence and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

  • Maria Franaszczyk, 
  • Przemyslaw Chmielewski, 
  • Grazyna Truszkowska, 
  • Piotr Stawinski, 
  • Ewa Michalak, 
  • Malgorzata Rydzanicz, 
  • Malgorzata Sobieszczanska-Malek, 
  • Agnieszka Pollak, 
  • Justyna Szczygieł, 
  • Joanna Kosinska
PLOS
x

Abstract

TTN gene truncating variants are common in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), although data on their clinical significance is still limited. We sought to examine the frequency of truncating variants in TTN in patients with DCM, including familial DCM (FDCM), and to look for genotype-phenotype correlations. Clinical cardiovascular data, family histories and blood samples were collected from 72 DCM probands, mean age of 34 years, 45.8% FDCM. DNA samples were examined by next generation sequencing (NGS) with a focus on the TTN gene. Truncating mutations were followed up by segregation study among family members. We identified 16 TTN truncating variants (TTN trunc) in 17 probands (23.6% of all cases, 30.3% of FDCM, 17.9% of sporadic DCM). During mean 63 months from diagnosis, there was no difference in adverse cardiac events between probands with and without TTN truncating mutations. Among relatives 29 mutation carriers were identified, nine were definitely affected (31%), eight probably affected (27.6%) one possibly affected (3.4%) and eleven were not affected (37.9%). When relatives with all affected statuses were combined, disease penetrance was still incomplete (62.1%) even after exclusion of unaffected relatives under 40 (82%) and was higher in males versus females. In all mutation carriers, during follow-up, 17.4% had major adverse cardiac events, and prognosis was significantly worse in men than in women. In conclusion, TTN truncating variants were observed in nearly one fourth of young DCM patient population, in vast majority without conduction system disease. Incomplete penetrance suggests possible influence of other genetic and/or environmental factors on the course of cardiotitinopathy. Counseling should take into account sex and incomplete penetrance.

Introduction

Whereas mutations in numerous loci have been known to predispose to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) [1], recently titin gene (TTN) emerged as a major DCM locus with truncating mutations found in one fifth to one fourth of patients, especially those with familial forms of the disease [24]. However, some doubt about pathogenicity of TTN truncating variants was raised by their presence in 1% of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients and in 3% of controls [2], and by their co-occurrence with additional known disease-causing variants in the patients [5]. Recently, an exhaustive analysis of TTN truncated transcripts expression in the heart muscle was published showing that unlike in controls, TTN truncating mutations in DCM patients were predominantly located in the sarcomeric A-band region of the protein, occurred closer to the protein’s carboxyl terminus and were present in exons that were abundantly transcribed in the heart muscle [6].

Our aims were: (1) to identify genetic background in a cohort of DCM patients referred for clinical genetic diagnosis with a focus on TTN truncating mutations, and (2): to examine genotype-phenotype correlations.

Materials and Methods

Patient population

All patients and relatives signed written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by local Bioethics Committee of Institute of Cardiology with approval number 1276.

The study cohort was drawn from all index patients referred for clinical genetic testing to Unit for Screening Studies in Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases with the diagnosis of DCM from 2012 to 2014. The cohort comprised of 72 unrelated DCM probands, all were Caucasian, 48 were male (66.7%). In addition, we performed segregation study among available 44 relatives of TTN truncating mutation positive probands. DCM was defined according to ESC (European Society of Cardiology) criteria, with left ventricular ejection fraction below 45% and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter >117% of the predicted value corrected for age and body surface area [7]. In all probands, coronary angiography, or more recently coronary computed tomography angiography was performed. Data concerning the heart transplant recipients were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of DCM prior to heart transplantation. The disease was considered as familial when two subjects in the family met the same diagnostic criteria for DCM as proband. Diagnostic criteria in relatives were defined based on position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases published by Pinto et al [8], with definite disease in relatives who met criteria for DCM. Definitely affected status was only assigned when systolic dysfunction was present with LVEF≤50% and LVEDD>117% in patients who had no other known causes (including coronary artery disease (CAD)) leading to systolic dysfunction. Probable disease was diagnosed in the relatives, carriers of causative mutation in the proband, whenever one major criterion that is unexplained decrease of LVEF ≤50% but >45%, or unexplained LVED dilatation was present while possible disease, in the same population, was diagnosed when one minor criterion was present, e.g. unexplained ventricular arrhythmia (>100 ventricular premature beats per hour in 24h monitoring or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia ≥3 beats at a rate ≥120 beats per minute). However, similarly as in probands, we used the method of Henry [9] in relation to indexation of left ventricular enddiastolic dimension as widely published and easy to make comparisons with other publications. Medical records of relatives diagnosed in our center, who were hospitalized and/or died earlier, were analyzed to ascertain familial form of the disease. Genetic testing was offered to all probands and they all agreed to participate in the study. The informed and consenting relatives of the probands underwent a clinical examination, 12-lead electrocardiography, two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography, 24-hour Holter electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring, serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) examination and blood sampling for genetic testing. Cardiac magnetic resonance study was performed based on clinical decision.

Mean age of probands at diagnosis was 33.8±13.6 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction at diagnosis was 24%. Of 72 probands, 33 (45.8%) were with familial DCM (FDCM), and 39 (54.2%) with sporadic DCM.

DNA sequencing and TTN mutation analysis

DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood by phenol extraction. Genetic testing in probands was performed using next generation sequencing (NGS). 44 patients were analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES), in 22 TruSight One (TSO) sequencing panel and in 6 sequencing of a custom panel of 35 genes involved in cardiomyopathies (ABCC9, ACTC1, ACTN2, ANKRD1, BAG3, CRYAB, CSRP3, DES, EMD, ILK, LAMA4, LDB3, LMNA, MYBPC3, MYH6, MYH7, MYL2, MYL3, MYPN, PDLIM3, PLN, PSEN1, PSEN2, RBM20, SCN5A, SGCD, TAZ, TCAP, TMPO, TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2, TPM1, TTN, VCL) were performed. The detailed NGS approach for each proband with TTN truncating variant found is given in S1 Table. WES libraries were constructed using TruSeq Exome Enrichment Kit (Illumina) or Nextera Rapid Capture Exome Kit (Illumina) as described previously [10]. Except for the different set of enrichment probes TSO sequencing was performed similarly to WES. Targeted sequencing of the 35 genes was performed using a custom design SeqCap EZ Choice Library (Roche NimbleGen) of ~0.17 Mb target genomic sequences. Whole procedure was carried out according to SeqCap EZ Library SR User’s Guide v.3.0. All libraries were pair-end sequenced on Illumina HiSeq 1500 with minimum depth of 10 reads (ge10) for at least 80% of respective NGS target regions and for 88.4% for the entire coding region of TTN defined as TTN N2BA transcript NM_001256850.1. Mean ge10 was 97.5±1.99 for N2BA TTN transcript. The mean coverage was 61.5±43.1 for NGS target regions and 66.6±41.0 for N2BA transcript NM_001256850.1. The NGS parameters are given for N2BA transcript as we considered only variants in cardiac TTN transcript NM_001256850.1.

TTN truncating variants identified with NGS were followed-up in probands and relatives with Sanger sequencing using a 3500xL Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results were analyzed with Variant Reporter 1.1 Software (Life Technologies). List of primers specific to each TTN truncating variant is available in S2 Table. The frequencies of variants were compared to genomic databases: Phase 3 of 1000 Genomes (http://www.1000genomes.org/), NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) 6500 (https://esp.gs.washington.edu/drupal/) and Version 0.3 of ExAC (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/).

Statistical analysis

All results for categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages and for continuous variables as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median. The Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of categorical variables. All tests were two-sided with the significance level of p<0.05. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared with log-rank test. Statistical analyses were performed with statistical package STATISTICA v6.

Results

Molecular findings in the DCM cohort

We identified 16 different TTN truncating variants (TTN trunc, one identified twice) in 17 (23.6%) of 72 subjects (Table 1). Ten of 33 FDCM probands (30.3%) carried a TTN truncating variant (TTN trunc) compared to seven of 39 sporadic DCM cases (17.9%). There were ten nonsense and six frameshift mutations but no splice variants. Of the 16 variants, 3 were described before—two were found in large population study by Roberts et al. [11] (p.Arg31056* in end stage of DCM and p.Arg21009* in the UK prospective DCM cohort) and one (p.Ser28693Ilefs*2) in a family with adult-onset DCM [12]. Fourteen variants (87.5%) were localized in the A-band region, one (6.25%) was in the I-band, and one (6.25%) was located in the Z disc. (Fig 1, S3 Table). All of these TTN mutations were located in symmetric exons. The majority of probands (15/17, 88.2%) had mutations localized in the A-band. The only variant found outside A-band and adjacent region of I-band was found in a family where cosegregation was nearly full with only one of 6 family members, 18 years old woman, being unaffected (see S2 Fig, family DCM097).

thumbnail
Fig 1. The distribution of TTN truncating variants found in this study.

Bands/regions of TTN gene are shown as boxes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. List of TTN truncating variants identified in the study group annotated to transcript NM_001267550.2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.t001

To verify the possibility of relatedness of two probands sharing the same TTN truncating variant we have used WES data and compared rare (<0.01 in databases cited above) variants in coding sequence excluding sex chromosomes. After such filtering among 376 variants in proband from DCM082 family and 223 variants in proband from DCM102 family the only one shared variant between these patients was TTN truncating variant which suggest no relatedness. This conclusion is further supported by internal comparisons between samples from related and unrelated subjects analyzed by WES in our lab for other purposes (i.e. 1–3 shared variants found for 4 unrelated samples out of 296–335 variants, 34 variants shared between two 4th degree relatives out of 252 and 276 variants in a similar analysis as described above).

In our group of 72 probands we also found 41 missense variants in cardiac transcript N2BA– 10 in 17 TTN trunc carriers (58.8% of carriers), 30 in non-carriers (54.5% of non-carriers) and 1 shared between two probands one with and the other without TTN truncating variant. Full list of missense TTN variants in our cohort is shown in S4 Table. While we did not test if they are located on the same or the other allele as TTN truncating variants similar prevalence among carriers vs. non-carriers argues against significant effect among the latter.

Clinical characteristics of DCM probands.

Table 2 shows comparison of clinical data in TTN trunc positive (n = 17) versus TTN trunc negative DCM patients (n = 55). Conduction disease was defined as the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) and/or atrioventricular block (AVB). One TTN trunc positive proband had LBBB (5.9%) whereas among 55 TTN trunc negative probands 21 (38.2%) had conduction disease (13 had LBBB, 4 had LBBB and AVB, and 4 had AVB). However, the difference in prevalence of conduction disease between TTN trunc carriers and noncarriers was not significant after correction for number of comparisons (n = 21) (Table 2). There were no significant differences in age at diagnosis, sex, the presence of familial disease, symptoms and cardiac assessment between these groups.

thumbnail
Table 2. Comparison of clinical data on TTN trunc positive versus TTN trunc negative DCM probands.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.t002

During mean 63 months from diagnosis there were 22 (30.5%) major adverse cardiac events in the whole group (n = 72). Kaplan-Meier survival curve did not show difference in outcome in TTN trunc carriers versus noncarriers (p = 0.843, log-rank test = -0.198, Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curves for serious adverse events (SAE) (HF death, orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) or LVAD) in 72 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, carriers of TTN truncating variants and non-carriers, p = 0.843, log-rank test = -0.198.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.g002

Clinical characteristics of all TTN truncating mutations carriers.

Evaluation of probands’ relatives identified 29 mutation carriers and 15 subjects without the mutation. Of the total of 29 relatives with TTN mutations 9 relatives (31%) had definitely affected status, 8 (27.6%) had probably affected status and one (3.4%) had possibly affected status (Table 3). The remaining 11 relatives (37.9%) were categorized as not affected. Of the 8 relatives with probably affected status 6 had left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and 2 had left ventricular dilatation. One female relative was categorized as possible affected with bursts of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) on 24-hour Holter electrocardiographic monitoring. Pedigrees for 46 mutation carriers from 17 families of TTN trunc positive DCM families are shown in S1 and S2 Figs. Detailed combined clinical and genetic data of the 46 TTN truncating mutation carriers are available on request from the authors.

thumbnail
Table 3. Clinical characteristics of affected and not affected TTN trunc positive relatives.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.t003

S5 Table shows combined data on all TTN trunc positive carriers with DCM (n = 26) and comparison of TTN trunc positive probands (n = 17) with TTN trunc positive DCM relatives (n = 9). There was no difference in the severity of the disease at diagnosis (mean LVEF 24.5±9.0% in probands and 28.1±12.1% in relatives, p = 0.49) and outcome between these two DCM patients’ subgroups, namely major adverse cardiac events were present in 5/17 probands and in 3/9 affected DCM relatives, p = NS.

Among TTN truncating mutation carriers disease penetrance and risk of major adverse cardiac events are higher in males than females.

Overall disease penetrance among relatives carrying TTN truncating mutations was 62.1% and did not clearly increase with age being 60% by age 50 (n = 20), 56% by age 60 (n = 25) and 62% by age 70 (n = 29). After excluding all unaffected TTN trunc relatives younger than 40 years the penetrance was 82%. However, we noted that in TTN trunc relatives older than 59 years (n = 5, 3 females) the penetrance was 100%.

We observed that the penetrance was sex dependent. Fig 3 presents Kaplan-Meier curves for freedom from combined affected statuses (age at diagnosis for affected and age at genetic inquest for not affected patients) in all TTN trunc carriers stratified by sex. Median age of onset in males was estimated as 28 years (range from 26 to 30) and in females as 56 years (range from 33 to 79) (p = 0.004, log-rank test = -2.91). Though we believe that there is no reason to exclude probands, as the criterion used in this analysis is age of onset, which is independent from patient’s proband/relative status, when the analysis was restricted to TTN trunc relatives the effect was still statistically significant (p = 0.029, log-rank test = -2.18). Furthermore, according to Kaplan-Meier analysis based on all TTN trunc individuals the estimated cumulative risk of DCM was 60.8% at the age of 33 and 95.1% at 61 years in males, and 17.6% and 53.9% in females, respectively.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Kaplan-Meier curves showing the freedom from disease for TTN trunc carriers (n = 46) for female (n = 21) and male (n = 25), p = 0.004, log-rank test = -2.91.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.g003

The incidence of major adverse cardiac events among those with TTN mutations was also sex dependent. In all mutation carriers (n = 46), during 45.3±56.3 months of follow-up, 8 (17.4%) had major adverse cardiac events. Fig 4 shows Kaplan-Meier survival curve indicating worse prognosis in male carriers of TTN truncating variants in comparison to female carriers. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.018, log-rank test = -2.37).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curves for SAE (HF death, OHT or LVAD) in 46 carriers of TTN truncating variants, males and females, p = 0.018, log-rank test = -2.37.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.g004

Additional possible disease causing variants.

In 8/17 (47%) of TTN trunc positive probands additional rare (frequency lower than 0.005 in 1000Genomes, ESP, and ExAC databases) variants in known cardiomyopathies’ genes were found, namely ACTN2, DSP, LDB3, MYH6, MYH7, PKP2, SCN5A, TNNI3. All of them were missense variants with variable bioinformatics predictions of pathogenicity and clinical significance (S6 Table). Two of them were described before: DSP variant as unclassified in proband with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy [13] and MYH7 variant as possibly pathogenic but coexisting with another possibly pathogenic variant in LDB3 gene in proband with familial dilated cardiomyopathy [12]. The segregation of additional variants in studied families is included in S1 and S2 Figs.

Identification of additional variants in nearly half of probands carrying the TTN trunc raised a question about their possible influence on outcome. Among 9 affected relatives of these probands, 7 (78%) had also additional variants, there were only 2 affected TTN trunc positive relatives in whom additional variant was not present whereas none of the affected relatives carried only the additional variant. Taken together these data are consistent with the hypothesis that in these families DCM is caused by TTN trunc but the numbers are too small for definite conclusions.

Discussion

While studying 72 DCM patients we identified 16 different TTN truncating variants, 13 of them novel. An important feature of our study is the examination of young DCM patient population with a mean age of 34 years.

The observed frequency of TTN truncating variants among our unselected young DCM patient population (23.6%) is similar as in previously published cohorts, i.e. between 11 and 22% [2, 5, 6, 14, 15]. We found even higher (30.3%) frequency of TTN trunc variants in familial DCM again similar to previous reports (between 18 and 27%). Our young DCM cohort was characterized by advanced heart failure with nearly half of the patients with documented familial disease. This is in agreement with current guidelines recommending genetic testing mainly in patients with clear-cut phenotype. As in the study by Herman et al. [2], subjects with DCM, both with and without TTN truncating variants, had generally similar clinical manifestations including the risk of major cardiac events. Similarly, as in the study by Herman et al., we found that in our patients DCM caused by TTN trunc is usually unaccompanied by conduction disease (in particular none of the TTN trunc carriers had AVB).

In our group 82.2% TTN truncating mutations were located in the symmetric exons of an A-band region. The A-band region, critical for biomechanical sensing and signaling, is organized in repeats containing numerous FN-III domains interspersed with Ig domains providing repetitive binding sites for myosin and thick filament associated proteins [16]. Our findings are consistent with the recent study by Roberts et al. who demonstrated that in end-stage DCM TTN truncating mutations occur predominantly in the A-band [6].

Only one proband had TTN truncating variant in the Z-disc region which confirms that this region is rarely mutated in patients with DCM. To our best knowledge only a few TTN variants located in Z-disc have been published so far in patients with DCM. These include three missense mutations [14, 17] and two truncating variants [6]. As penetrance was nearly full in our family with Z-disc variant we did not exclude the family from survival analyses.

TTN truncating mutations are more likely to be disease-causing when they occur in exons which are abundantly transcribed and located closer to the carboxyl end of the protein [6]. Our results suggest that TTN truncating variants, even when they meet the criteria mentioned above, are characterized by incomplete and sex-related penetrance. We found incomplete penetrance in TTN trunc relatives carriers that was 62.1% when all affected statuses were combined and 82% after exclusion of unaffected relatives under 40. In the study by Akinrinade et al. disease penetrance increased from 53.8% at age 50 to 84.6% at age 60 and 100% at age 70 [3]. In the study by Jansweijer et al, the penetrance of DCM in TTN relatives was 29% at the age of 50 (n = 49), had increased to 58% at the age of 60 (n = 43), and further to 83% at the age of 70 (n = 36) [18]. The varied and incomplete penetrance suggests a potential role of other genetic/environmental factors in the disease onset in DCM related titinopathy. It was shown by Cheng et al. that levels of genes’ expression can vary even among individuals of the same family and in this way influence the penetrance of mutation [19]. Furthermore, manifestation of clinical symptoms of pathogenic mutations is more likely to appear with increasing age of individual which, again, was showed for HCM and MYBPC3 mutations [20] or Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and LMNA [21]. Our data show for the first time strong sex related difference with regard to estimated median age of disease onset in men (median 28 years) and women (median 56 years, p = 0.004). Furthermore, we found better prognosis (lower incidence of serious adverse cardiac events) in women than in men carrying TTN truncating mutations which is similar as in LMNA mutation carriers [22], and consistent with the report of Herman et al. [2]. The sex related difference in disease severity is interesting as it suggests a potential for interventions ameliorating DCM course in males. In particular, it would be interesting to study whether the higher disease severity in males could be related to the recently demonstrated link between TTN phosphorylation and increased oxidative stress [23].

Of note, severity of the disease and rates of major adverse cardiac events defined as cardiac transplantation, implantation of a left ventricular assist device and death from cardiac causes, were not different when comparing DCM probands and relatives affected with DCM.

Limitations

Our population drawn from patients referred for clinical genetic testing introduces some bias towards more severely ill, with prominent family history. Also our Institute is one of leading cardiac transplant centers in Poland, patients with more advanced diseases are referred here, and patients with familial background are more willing to have their disease thoroughly clarified. Furthermore, we acknowledge that our findings should be interpreted with caution due to small patient numbers.

During a long period of time when probands were tested NGS procedures were improved and refined which led to wide ranges of NGS parameters like ge10 or sequencing depth. The minimum coverage of sequencing was showed as mean ge10 instead of widely used mean ge20 because this parameter was more stable than ge20.

Conclusions

TTN truncating variants were observed in nearly one fourth of young DCM probands with sex-related differences in disease penetrance and severity which should be taken into account in genetic counselling.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Pedigrees of first 9 of 17 families with TTN truncating mutations.

Squares represent males and circles represent females. An arrowhead denotes the proband. A diagonal line marks deceased individuals. Solid symbols denote affected status, half blackened symbols denote probably affected, quarter blackened symbols denote possibly affected status, open symbols with “N” denote not-affected individuals. Grey symbols denote individuals treated for heart failure but not tested at the reference center. The presence or absence of TTN mutation is indicated by a + or − symbol respectively. The presence or absence of additional variants are noted in parenthesis (+) or (-) respectively. DCM008: TTN p.Arg31056*, DCM019: TTN p.Arg21009*, DCM023: TTN p.Gly18918Valfs*17 (and TNNI3 p.His34Gln), DCM029: TTN p.Gln27004*, DCM033: TTN p.Ile26829Metfs*15, DCM036: TTN p.Lys27131*, DCM075: TTN p.Arg22817*, DCM078: TTN p.Lys14528* (and LDB3 p.Gly19Ala and SCN5A p.Ala572Asp), DCM081: TTN p. Ser28693Ilefs*2 (and MYH6 p.Arg204His).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Pedigrees of remaining 8 of 17 families with TTN truncating mutations.

For Fig legend see S1 Fig. DCM082: TTN p.Ala29119Leufs*17, DCM092: TTN p.Ser29255Alafs*18, DCM097: TTN p.Ser493* (and DSP p.Ala566Thr), DCM102: TTN p.Ala29119Leufs*17, DCM109: TTN p.Asn30734Glnfs*17 (and PKP2 p.Pro7Ser), DCM113: TTN p.Arg17736* (and ACTN2 p.Arg298His), DCM132: TTN p.Glu23514*, DCM134: TTN p.Gln26147* (and MYH7 p.Arg237Trp).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.s002

(TIF)

S1 Table. The NGS approach applied to probands with TTN truncating variants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.s003

(DOC)

S2 Table. List of primers specific to TTN truncating variants found in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.s004

(DOC)

S3 Table. Molecular characteristics of TTN truncating variants in our study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.s005

(DOC)

S4 Table. List of missense variants found in our study group.

Variants annotated to NM_001267550.2 transcript.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.s006

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Comparison of TTN trunc positive DCM probands with TTN trunc positive DCM relatives.

For Table Legend see Table 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.s007

(DOC)

S6 Table. Bioinformatics predictions of pathogenicity of additional variants found in probands carrying TTN truncating mutations.

Legend: PolyPhen2: D-probably damaging, P-possibly damaging, B-benign; MutationTaster: D-disease casing, N-polymorphism.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169007.s008

(DOCX)

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: MF RP ZTB.
  2. Data curation: MF PC GT PS EM MR A. Pollak JS JK TS MMM BFN AS MK.
  3. Formal analysis: MF PC GT PS EM MR MSM A. Pollak JS JK A. Parulski TS AT MMM AS MK.
  4. Investigation: MF PC GT EM MR MSM A. Pollak JS JK A. Parulski TS AT MMM BFN MS AS MK.
  5. Methodology: MF PC RP ZTB.
  6. Project administration: ZTB MF RP.
  7. Resources: MF PC GT PS EM MR MSM A. Pollak JS JK A. Parulski TS AT MMM BFN MS AS MK JG TZ ZTB.
  8. Software: PS MF GT.
  9. Supervision: ZTB RP JG TZ.
  10. Validation: MF ZTB RP PC RP GT PS MS.
  11. Visualization: MF ZTB RP EM.
  12. Writing – original draft: MF ZTB RP MMM.
  13. Writing – review & editing: MF ZTB RP JG TZ.

References

  1. 1. Hershberger RE, Hedges DJ, Morales A. Dilated cardiomyopathy: the complexity of a diverse genetic architecture. Nature reviews Cardiology. 2013;10(9):531–47. pmid:23900355
  2. 2. Herman DS, Lam L, Taylor MR, Wang L, Teekakirikul P, Christodoulou D, et al. Truncations of titin causing dilated cardiomyopathy. The New England journal of medicine. 2012;366(7):619–28. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3660031. pmid:22335739
  3. 3. Akinrinade O, Ollila L, Vattulainen S, Tallila J, Gentile M, Salmenpera P, et al. Genetics and genotype-phenotype correlations in Finnish patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. European heart journal. 2015;36(34):2327–37. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4561350. pmid:26084686
  4. 4. Morales A, Hershberger RE. The Rationale and Timing of Molecular Genetic Testing for Dilated Cardiomyopathy. The Canadian journal of cardiology. 2015;31(11):1309–12. pmid:26518443
  5. 5. Haas J, Frese KS, Peil B, Kloos W, Keller A, Nietsch R, et al. Atlas of the clinical genetics of human dilated cardiomyopathy. European heart journal. 2015;36(18):1123–35a. pmid:25163546
  6. 6. Roberts AM, Ware JS, Herman DS, Schafer S, Baksi J, Bick AG, et al. Integrated allelic, transcriptional, and phenomic dissection of the cardiac effects of titin truncations in health and disease. Science translational medicine. 2015;7(270):270ra6. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4560092. pmid:25589632
  7. 7. Elliott P, Andersson B, Arbustini E, Bilinska Z, Cecchi F, Charron P, et al. Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the European Society Of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. European heart journal. 2008;29(2):270–6. pmid:17916581
  8. 8. Pinto YM, Elliott PM, Arbustini E, Adler Y, Anastasakis A, Böhm M, et al. Proposal for a revised definition of dilated cardiomyopathy, hypokinetic non-dilated cardiomyopathy, and its implications for clinical practice: a position statement of the ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(23):1850–8. Epub 2016/01/19. pmid:26792875
  9. 9. Henry WL, Gardin JM, Ware JH. Echocardiographic measurements in normal subjects from infancy to old age. Circulation. 1980;62(5):1054–61. pmid:7418156
  10. 10. Ploski R, Pollak A, Muller S, Franaszczyk M, Michalak E, Kosinska J, et al. Does p.Q247X in TRIM63 cause human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy? Circulation research. 2014;114(2):e2–5. pmid:24436435
  11. 11. Akinrinade O, Koskenvuo JW, Alastalo TP. Prevalence of Titin Truncating Variants in General Population. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145284. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4689403. pmid:26701604
  12. 12. Hershberger RE, Parks SB, Kushner JD, Li D, Ludwigsen S, Jakobs P, et al. Coding sequence mutations identified in MYH7, TNNT2, SCN5A, CSRP3, LBD3, and TCAP from 313 patients with familial or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Clin Transl Sci. 2008;1(1):21–6. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2633921. pmid:19412328
  13. 13. Cox MG, van der Zwaag PA, van der Werf C, van der Smagt JJ, Noorman M, Bhuiyan ZA, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: pathogenic desmosome mutations in index-patients predict outcome of family screening: Dutch arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy genotype-phenotype follow-up study. Circulation. 2011;123(23):2690–700. pmid:21606396
  14. 14. Gerull B, Gramlich M, Atherton J, McNabb M, Trombitas K, Sasse-Klaassen S, et al. Mutations of TTN, encoding the giant muscle filament titin, cause familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Nature genetics. 2002;30(2):201–4. pmid:11788824
  15. 15. Pugh TJ, Kelly MA, Gowrisankar S, Hynes E, Seidman MA, Baxter SM, et al. The landscape of genetic variation in dilated cardiomyopathy as surveyed by clinical DNA sequencing. Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2014;16(8):601–8.
  16. 16. Granzier HL, Labeit S. The giant protein titin: a major player in myocardial mechanics, signaling, and disease. Circulation research. 2004;94(3):284–95. pmid:14976139
  17. 17. Itoh-Satoh M, Hayashi T, Nishi H, Koga Y, Arimura T, Koyanagi T, et al. Titin mutations as the molecular basis for dilated cardiomyopathy. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2002;291(2):385–93. pmid:11846417
  18. 18. Jansweijer JA, Nieuwhof K, Russo F, Hoorntje ET, Jongbloed JD, Lekanne Deprez RH, et al. Truncating titin mutations are associated with a mild and treatable form of dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016.
  19. 19. Cheng WC, Shu WY, Li CY, Tsai ML, Chang CW, Chen CR, et al. Intra- and inter-individual variance of gene expression in clinical studies. PloS one. 2012;7(6):e38650. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3377725. pmid:22723873
  20. 20. Page SP, Kounas S, Syrris P, Christiansen M, Frank-Hansen R, Andersen PS, et al. Cardiac myosin binding protein-C mutations in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: disease expression in relation to age, gender, and long term outcome. Circulation Cardiovascular genetics. 2012;5(2):156–66. pmid:22267749
  21. 21. Vytopil M, Ricci E, Dello Russo A, Hanisch F, Neudecker S, Zierz S, et al. Frequent low penetrance mutations in the Lamin A/C gene, causing Emery Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscular disorders: NMD. 2002;12(10):958–63. pmid:12467752
  22. 22. Taylor MR, Fain PR, Sinagra G, Robinson ML, Robertson AD, Carniel E, et al. Natural history of dilated cardiomyopathy due to lamin A/C gene mutations. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2003;41(5):771–80. pmid:12628721
  23. 23. Beckendorf L, Linke WA. Emerging importance of oxidative stress in regulating striated muscle elasticity. Journal of muscle research and cell motility. 2015;36(1):25–36. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4352196. pmid:25373878