Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

StCDPK3 Phosphorylates In Vitro Two Transcription Factors Involved in GA and ABA Signaling in Potato: StRSG1 and StABF1

  • Carolina Grandellis,

    Current address: Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Rosario (IBR) Ocampo 210 bis CONICET-Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina

    Affiliation Institute of Genetic Engineering and Molecular Biology (INGEBI), National Research Council (CONICET) Vuelta de Obligado, 2do piso, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Elisa Fantino,

    Affiliation Institute of Genetic Engineering and Molecular Biology (INGEBI), National Research Council (CONICET) Vuelta de Obligado, 2do piso, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • María Noelia Muñiz García,

    Affiliation Institute of Genetic Engineering and Molecular Biology (INGEBI), National Research Council (CONICET) Vuelta de Obligado, 2do piso, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Magalí Graciela Bialer,

    Affiliation Institute of Genetic Engineering and Molecular Biology (INGEBI), National Research Council (CONICET) Vuelta de Obligado, 2do piso, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Franco Santin,

    Affiliation Institute of Genetic Engineering and Molecular Biology (INGEBI), National Research Council (CONICET) Vuelta de Obligado, 2do piso, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Daniela Andrea Capiati,

    Affiliations Institute of Genetic Engineering and Molecular Biology (INGEBI), National Research Council (CONICET) Vuelta de Obligado, 2do piso, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Biochemistry Department, School of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Rita María Ulloa

    rulloa@dna.uba.ar, ulloa.rita@gmail.com

    Affiliations Institute of Genetic Engineering and Molecular Biology (INGEBI), National Research Council (CONICET) Vuelta de Obligado, 2do piso, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Biochemistry Department, School of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

StCDPK3 Phosphorylates In Vitro Two Transcription Factors Involved in GA and ABA Signaling in Potato: StRSG1 and StABF1

  • Carolina Grandellis, 
  • Elisa Fantino, 
  • María Noelia Muñiz García, 
  • Magalí Graciela Bialer, 
  • Franco Santin, 
  • Daniela Andrea Capiati, 
  • Rita María Ulloa
PLOS
x

Abstract

Calcium-dependent protein kinases, CDPKs, decode calcium (Ca2+) transients and initiate downstream responses in plants. In order to understand how CDPKs affect plant physiology, their specific target proteins must be identified. In tobacco, the bZIP transcription factor Repression of Shoot Growth (NtRSG) that modulates gibberellin (GA) content is a specific target of NtCDPK1. StCDPK3 from potato is homologous (88% identical) to NtCDPK1 even in its N-terminal variable domain. In this work, we observe that NtRSG is also phosphorylated by StCDPK3. The potato RSG family of transcription factors is composed of three members that share similar features. The closest homologue to NtRSG, which was named StRSG1, was amplified and sequenced. qRT-PCR data indicate that StRSG1 is mainly expressed in petioles, stems, lateral buds, and roots. In addition, GA treatment affected StRSG1 expression. StCDPK3 transcripts were detected in leaves, petioles, stolons, roots, and dormant tubers, and transcript levels were modified in response to GA. The recombinant StRSG1-GST protein was produced and tested as a substrate for StCDPK3 and StCDPK1. 6xHisStCDPK3 was able to phosphorylate the potato StRSG1 in a Ca2+-dependent way, while 6xHisStCDPK1 could not. StCDPK3 also interacts and phosphorylates the transcription factor StABF1 (ABRE binding factor 1) involved in ABA signaling, as shown by EMSA and phosphorylation assays. StABF1 transcripts were mainly detected in roots, stems, and stolons. Our data suggest that StCDPK3 could be involved in the cross-talk between ABA and GA signaling at the onset of tuber development.

Introduction

Plant signaling involves the interaction of several components and second messengers such as calcium (Ca2+). The multigene family of calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) encodes Ca2+ sensor/protein kinase effectors, that are ideal candidates for perceiving intracellular changes in Ca2+ concentration and translating them into specific phosphorylation events [1]. Substrate identification represents a critical task for understanding any protein kinase-based signal transduction pathway. CDPKs exhibit overlapping and distinct expression patterns, subcellular localizations, substrate specificities, and Ca2+ sensitivities. These kinases regulate the activity, localization, and lifetime of enzymes, channels, and transcription factors (TFs) by phosphorylating specific serine and threonine residues on their target sequences [2,3]. The first level of substrate specificity arises from the interaction between the active site of the kinase and the amino acid sequences surrounding the phosphorylation site of the substrate [4]. Since the catalytic domains of CDPK isoforms are highly conserved, it seems unlikely that CDPKs would have distinguishable substrate specificities. However, CDPK isoforms from different species were reported to play distinct physiological functions [512]. As an example, four CPKs from Arabidopsis have significant differences in substrate specificity [13]. In addition, the N-terminal variable (NTV) domain of NtCDPK1 was shown to play an essential role in the specific recognition of the substrate [14].

Several TFs are CDPK targets and often become phosphorylated in the plant cell thus activating or inactivating downstream responses [1517]. TFs are classified according to their DNA binding domains. In particular, basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP) TFs have a region that binds DNA and a leucine zipper dimerization motif. In plants, bZIP TFs regulate several processes including pathogen defense, light and stress signaling, seed maturation, and flower development [18]. The tobacco bZIP TF Nicotiana tabacum Repression of Shoot Growth (NtRSG) regulates the morphology of plants by controlling the endogenous amounts of gibberellins (GAs) [19]. NtRSG binds to the NtGA20ox1 promoter in vivo in response to a decrease in GA levels and this binding is abolished within 3 h after GA treatment [20]. Besides, NtRSG is negatively regulated by 14-3-3 signaling proteins [21]. The 14-3-3 proteins emerged as phosphorylation-dependent regulators of hormone and light signaling in plants [2224]. The interaction between 14-3-3s and target proteins generally occurs at a conserved 14-3-3 binding motif (RSXpSXP and RXY/FXpSXP) where pT and pS denote phosphorylated threonine or serine residues. The 14-3-3 protein binds to NtRSG depending on the phosphorylation status of Ser-114, and sequesters NtRSG in the cytoplasm so that it is unable to regulate its target genes [21,25]. NtCDPK1 interacts with NtRSG both in vivo and in vitro, and specifically phosphorylates Ser-114 of NtRSG in vitro [16].

CDPKs have also been implicated in abscisic acid (ABA) signaling, and overexpression of CDPKs has been shown to activate ABA-regulated promoters [26]. The bZip TFs ABRE-binding factors (ABFs) bind to ABA-responsive elements (ABRE), present in the promoters of ABA-responsive genes, and upregulate their transcription [27]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, ABA induced the activation of two homologous CDPKs (CPK4 and CPK11) that phosphorylate ABF1 and ABF4 in vitro. Double mutants of the two CDPK genes had stronger ABA- and salt-responsive phenotypes than the single mutants suggesting that these kinases may regulate ABA signaling through these TFs [6].

ABA and GAs antagonistically mediate numerous physiological processes, and their optimal balance is essential for normal plant development. In potato, GA is a dominant negative regulator that promotes stolon elongation and inhibits tuber formation [2831]. In contrast, ABA acts as a tuberization-promoting factor; its application accelerates tuberization in some potato varieties [30,32]. ABA content and ABA/GA ratio increased, and stolon apical growth was retarded, in andigena potato leaves grown under tuber-inducing conditions [33]. The function of ABA in tuber development is not clear, and it has been proposed that it promotes tuberization by counteracting the inhibitory effect of GAs [30,34]. Antagonism often involves crosstalk points, where two signaling pathways are interconnected. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying ABA/GA antagonism are not completely elucidated. In Arabidopsis, the AP2/ERF transcription factor ABA-INSENSITIVE 4 (ABI4) is a central factor in GA/ABA homeostasis [35,36]. Also, reactive oxygen species and ascorbic acid were reported to mediate this antagonism during seed germination in rice [37].

The potato CDPK isoforms Solanum tuberosum StCDPK1, 2, and 3 are differentially expressed in tuberizing stolons [3843]. These three isoforms are closely related, and belong to group IIa of CDPKs [44]; however, they differ in their kinetic parameters. StCDPK3 recombinant protein (6xHisStCDPK3) displays higher affinity for ATP, and while its kinase activity is Ca2+-dependent, autophosphorylation is Ca2+ independent [43]. StCDPK3 promoter∷GUS transgenic potato lines indicated that StCDPK3 is expressed in actively growing organs; StCDPK3 expression was positively modulated by ABA (ABREs are present in its promoter) while a reduction in StCDPK3 transcripts was observed within 6h of GA application to in vitro grown potato plants [43]. In this report, we show that 6xHisStCDPK3 phosphorylates the potato bZIP TFs StRSG1 and StABF1 in a Ca2+-dependent manner suggesting that StCDPK3 could be an important point of cross-talk between the ABA and GA signaling pathways mediated by both TFs.

Results

RSG family and genomic context in potato

In order to identify the RSG TF family in potato, the tobacco NtRSG coding sequence was blasted against the Solanum phureja database (http://potato.plantbiology.msu.edu/cgi-bin/gbrowse/potato/). Specific oligonucleotides were designed to amplify the complete coding sequence of the potato homolog using a S. tuberosum cDNA library as template. The open reading frame (1014 bp) encodes a slightly acidic (pI = 6.46) protein of 340 amino acids with a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) conserved domain (positions 182 to 245) that was designated StRSG1 (GenBank HQ335343.1).

StRSG1 protein sequence was blasted (BLASTP 2.2.26) against the PGSC DM v3.4 pep.fasta database (http://solanaceae.plantbiology.msu.edu/pgsc_download.shtml). As observed, PGSC0003DMP400001527 is 100% identical to StRSG1, while three other bZIP transcriptional activator RSG proteins also present high identity. In addition, other six TFs (two RF2a, two RF2b, one VSF-1, and a DNA binding protein) share 56 to 47% identity with StRSG1 (Q coverage: 27 to 92%). When the blast search was conducted using only the bZIP domain as query, Q coverage was 100%, and identity increased from 50 to 78% (S1 Table).

StRSG1 transcripts share 99% identity with PGSC0003DMT400002100 (identities = 1013/1014, gaps = 1/1014) corresponding to gene PGSC0003DMG400000799 (StRSG1) that is localized in chromosome 4 at position 59170 kbp and is 6300 bp long (S2 Table). By overlapping the coding sequence with the genomic scaffold, we identified four exons and three introns, as well as the common and conserved splicing sites. Exons 1, 2, and 3 compose the conserved bZIP domain (64 amino acids, Fig 1A). Only 1.5 kbp upstream StRSG1, there is a putative cytochrome P450 (CYP450) gene sequence (PGSC0003DMG400000798) in the same orientation, and further upstream a putative serine decarboxylase (SDC) gene sequence (PGSC0003GMG400000785) in tail to tail (TT) orientation. While, 13.6 kbp downstream, there is a putative gene sequence encoding a U3 small nucleolar RNA-associated protein, in the same orientation as StRSG1 (S1A Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Structure and phylogenetic analysis of RSG proteins.

(A) Schematic model of StRSG proteins indicating the region spanned by each exon (E1-4: exons 1–4.); arrows indicate intron positions. The grey box indicates the bZIP domain. Exons lengths are scaled. Intron lengths are indicated in S2 Table. (B) Evolutionary relationships of RSGs full amino acid sequences from S. tuberosum StRSG1 (HQ335343.1; PGSC0003DMP400001527), StRSG2 (PGSC0003DMP400050715), and StRSG3 (PGSC0003DMP400030704), Solanum lycopersicum SlVIP1-like (XP_004237777.1), Nicotiana tabacum NtRSG (BAA97100.1), Capsicum annuum stress-induced protein 21 (AHI85726.1), Arabidopsis thaliana VirE2-interacting protein VIP1 (AAM63070.1), Brassica napus TF VIP1-like (NP_001303096.1), Glycine max bZIP TF bZIP131 (NP_001237194.1), Medicago truncatula bZIP (XP_013451804.1), Oryza sativa Os_12g0162500 Japonica Group, a hypothetical protein (OsI_37568) belonging to Indica Group, Hordeum vulgare predicted protein (BAK03813.1), and Sorghum bicolor hypothetical protein SORBIDRAFT (XP_002441871.1). Amino acid sequences were aligned using ClustalW. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method. The tree was constructed after a bootstrap test (n = 500), the percentage of replicate trees are shown next to the branches. The evolutionary distances were computed using the JTT matrix-based method and are in the units of the number of amino acid substitutions per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted with MEGA6.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167389.g001

As mentioned, two other gene sequences encoding RSG transcriptional activators were identified (S2 Table). StRSG2 also maps in chromosome 4 (position 59453 kbp) and is very similar (Identities 95%, Q coverage 93%) to StRSG1. According to the PGSC, two transcripts can be generated from StRSG2; one is predicted to encode a basic protein (pI = 9.47) of 261 amino acid (StRSG2), and the other one is slightly shorter and lacks the fourth exon (S2 Table). Moreover, 1.6 kbp downstream to StRSG2, there are two putative gene sequences (PGSC003DMG400041269 and PGSC003DMG400029122) encoding a CYP450, and a SDC respectively. CYP450 is in the same orientation as StRSG2, while SDC is in a TT orientation. Additionally, several actin genes are located 20 kbp upstream (S1B Fig). Alignment of the 100 kb sequences surrounding StRSG1 and StRSG2 using blast2seq (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) show that an inverted duplication (96% identity) of a 31.2 kb region encompassing RSG, CYP450, and SDC genes occurred in chromosome 4. These inverted repeats are separated by a 273 kbp spacer region (S1 Fig, upper panel). On the other hand, StRSG3 gene, localized on chromosome 6, encodes another RSG bZIP protein of 326 amino acids (pI = 7.15) (S2 Table). The three RSG genes and the genes encoding RF2a, RF2b, and VSF-1 TFs present the four exons/three introns organization of group I of bZIP TFs [45] and share common intron positions (Fig 1A, S2 Table).

The potato RSGs were compared with those from other monocots and dicots. As observed in the phylogenetic tree generated from the alignments of the full-length protein sequences (Fig 1B), the potato RSGs cluster with those from other solanaceae such as tobacco, tomato, and pepper. StRSG1 and the predicted TF VIP1-like from tomato, SlRSG, only differ in eight amino acids. On the other hand, RSGs from A. thaliana and Brassica napus cluster together, as well as RSGs from Glycine max and Medicago truncatula. Moreover, RSG from monocots (sorghum, barley, and rice) are clustered in a different group. This suggests that RSGs are strongly conserved among species from the same family and to a lesser extent in higher groups as dicots and monocots.

StCDPK3 phosphorylates NtRSG and StRSG in vitro

StRSG1 and NtRSG TFs share 86% protein identity and 89% similarity, and both contain a conserved serine residue at positions 114 (NtRSG) or 107 (StRSG1) in the context PLNHFRSLSVDA predicted to be a phosphorylation site for CDPKs (LXHXRXXS/T). Phosphorylation of Ser-114 by NtCDPK1 promotes 14-3-3 binding to NtRSG [46]. The other members of the potato RSG family also contain the conserved serine at positions 30 for StRSG2 or 104 for StRSG3 in the same context. In addition, NetPhos.2 [47] predicted 19 serines, 8 threonines and 1 tyrosine phosphorylation sites in StRSG1 sequence. Five serine residues (Ser-39, Ser-71, Ser-141, Ser-159 and Ser-236) had higher scores than 0.9 while among threonines, Thr-125 had the highest score (0.798). However, NetPhos.2 did not detect Ser-107 as a probable phosphorylation site.

The NTV domain of NtCDPK1 plays an essential role in the specific recognition of NtRSG [46,48]. StCDPK3 is homologous (88% identity) to the tobacco NtCDPK1 isoform, even when comparing their NTV domains (identity 68/109; 62%). Thus, the heterologous NtRSG-GST recombinant protein (MW = 64.22 kDa; apparent MW~72kDa) was evaluated as a phosphate acceptor for 6xHisStCDPK3 [43]. As observed, StCDPK3 was able to phosphorylate NtRSG in the presence of Ca2+ (Fig 2A). The phosphorylated bands correspond to NtRSG since no band was observed in its absence (lanes 8 and 9). StCDPK3 undergoes autophosphorylation [43], however, the quantity used in the assay (50 ng) was not enough to detect it. In order to confirm that RSG phosphorylation was Ca2+-dependent, increasing amounts of NtRSG were incubated with StCDPK3 in the presence of Ca2+ or EGTA. As observed, NtRSG phosphorylation was very low in the presence of EGTA (Fig 2B).

thumbnail
Fig 2. StCDPK3 phosphorylates NtRSG and StRSG1 in vitro.

Phosphorylation assays (PA) with ATPγP32 were performed using NtRSG-GST (A, B) or StRSG1-GST (C, D, E) as substrates and 6xHisStCDPK3 (A-D) or 6xHisStCDPK1 (E) as the enzyme source. Samples were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE. StCDPK3 kinase activity was previously confirmed using Syntide-2 as a positive control and GST alone as a negative control [43]. A. Upper panel: different amounts of NtRSG (lanes 1 to 6) were incubated with 50 ng of 6xHisStCDPK3 (lanes 1 to 4) in the presence of 20 μM Ca2+ (lanes 1 to 5). Autophosphorylation of 6xHisStCDPK3 was performed in the presence or absence of Ca2+ (lanes 8 and 9 respectively). Lower panel: western blot revealed with an anti-GST antibody (1:4000, α-GST). B. Phosphorylation of NtSRG by StCDPK3 in the presence of 20 μM Ca2+ (lanes 1 and 2) or 1 mM EGTA (lanes 3 and 4). C. Upper panel: different amounts of StRSG1 (lanes 1 to 5 and 7) were incubated with 6xHisStCDPK3 (100 ng) in the presence of 20 μM Ca2+ (lanes 1 to 4 and 7) or 1 mM EGTA (lane 5). Additionally StCDPK3 was autophosphorylated in the presence of 20 μM Ca2+ (lane 6) or 1 mM EGTA (lane 8). Middle and lower panels: western blots revealed with anti-GST (1:4000) and anti-His (1:5000, α-His) antibodies, respectively. Image J Software was used to estimate band intensities (AU = arbitrary units). D. Phosphorylation of StRSG1 (0.5 μg) by StCDPK3 (50 ng) in the presence of 20 μM Ca2+ (lane 1) or 1 and 5 mM EGTA (lanes 2 and 3). E. StRSG1 (2 μg) was incubated with 6xHisStCDPK1 (100 ng) in the presence of 20 μM Ca2+ (lane 1) or 1 mM EGTA (lane 2) (left panel). Middle and right panels: western blot with anti-His and anti-GST antibodies, respectively. The same reaction mixture was used in all PAs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167389.g002

Then, we tested whether 6xHisStCDPK3 was able to phosphorylate the potato StRSG1-GST recombinant protein in vitro. Increasing amounts of StRSG1-GST and a constant amount of 6xHisStCDPK3 were used in the phosphorylation assay (Fig 2C, upper panel). Both proteins possess similar molecular weights (estimated MW for 6xHisStCDPK3 is 63 kDa, and for StRSG1-GST is 64.47 kDa), so anti-GST and anti-His antibodies were used to differentiate them (Fig 2C, middle and lower panels). As expected, StRSG1-GST phosphorylation was more intense with increasing amounts of the substrate (Fig 2C, lanes 1–4). StRSG1 was phosphorylated by StCDPK3 when Ca2+ was added to the reaction (Fig 2C and Fig 2D, lane 1), but no phosphorylation was detected in the presence of 1 or 5 mM EGTA (Fig 2D, lanes 2 and 3), further confirming the Ca2+ dependency. In addition, autophosphorylation of 6xHisStCDPK3 was more intense in the presence of StRSG1 (Fig 2C, lane 7) than in its absence (lanes 6 and 8), suggesting that the substrate could modulate the kinase autophosphorylation status. A similar phosphorylation assay was performed using 6xHisStCDPK1 [41] as the enzyme source. StCDPK1 is able to phosphorylate the hydrophilic loop of the auxin efflux carrier StPIN4 in vitro [49]. However, as observed in Fig 2E, StCDPK1 was unable to phosphorylate StRSG1; the band observed corresponds to the Ca2+-dependent autophosphorylation of StCDPK1. These results suggest that StRSG1 could be a specific substrate for StCDPK3.

StRSG1 and StCDPK3 expression analysis

RNA-seq data obtained from the PGSC (http://solanaceae.plantbiology.msu.edu/cgi-bin/gbrowse/potato) indicate that StRSG1 is expressed ubiquitously in the plant; however, a lower expression is observed in stolons, young and mature tubers, shoot apex, petals, and stems. qRT-PCR expression analysis of StCDPK3 and StRSG1 transcripts was performed in different tissues from soil-grown plants (Fig 3A and 3B). As observed, StCDPK3 expression was significantly higher in leaves than in all other tissues, and it was higher in petioles, roots, and tubers compared to stems, lateral buds, apical shoots, and stolons (Fig 3A). Previous results with proStCDPK3:GUS plants showed that, in tubers, StCDPK3 expression was restricted to tuber eyes [43]. On the other hand, StCDPK3 expression in stolons significantly differed from that in apical shoots (Fig 3A). StRSG1 transcripts were mainly detected in stems, petioles, lateral buds, and roots (Fig 3B). Although low, expression in stolons was statistically significant compared to dormant tubers and apical shoots. According to our data, both transcripts are co-expressed in some tissues and may serve a common pathway.

thumbnail
Fig 3. qRT-PCR analysis of StRSG1 and StCDPK3.

Expression analysis of StCDPK3 (A) and StRSG1 (B) in different plants tissues. Transcript levels were normalized using Elongation factor-1 α (EF-1α). Means ± SEM of three biological replicates each with three technical replicates were plotted. One-way ANOVA analysis was performed, and Tukey's HSD test was applied. Different letters (a-d) above the bars indicate significant differences in transcript levels between tissues (p<0.05). (C) Analysis of StCDPK3 and StRSG1 transcript levels in tubers treated with 5 mg/L GA. Controls were incubated with water; days after treatment (dat) are indicated. EF-1α was used for normalization. Means ± SEM of three biological replicates each, with three technical replicates were plotted. The significance of the fold-change in gene expression between the two time points (0 and 7 dat) was evaluated with Student t-test, (*) p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167389.g003

GA biosynthesis and catabolism play an important role in regulating developmental processes in plants. In potato, high concentrations of GA inhibit tuber development but promote tuber sprouting, thus its concentration must be strictly regulated during these processes [50,51]. We decided to evaluate if StRSG1 expression was affected by GA. To this end we analyzed the expression of clone STMDI34, encoding a RSG transcriptional activator, in a TIGR 10K microarray assay (GEO series accession number GSE10492) that was performed on tuber sprouts subjected to continuous darkness, continuous light or GA3 treatments [52]. STMDI34 expression was similar under dark or light conditions but it was significantly enhanced in sprouts grown under light conditions when GA3 was added to the media (x 1.44, p = 0.0024). In addition, non-dormant tubers were incubated for 5 min with water (control) or GA3 (treatment) and tubers were processed immediately (time 0) or maintained under long day photoperiod for 7 days after treatment (7dat) to promote sprouting. This time point was chosen based on previous reports [53]. At the moment of harvest (7dat), sprouting was observed in 42% of the GA3-treated tubers while only 8% of control tubers sprouted. StCDPK3 and StRSG1 expression was analyzed by qRT-PCR in GA-treated and control samples at both time points (0 and 7 dat). As can be observed in Fig 3C, StCDPK3 expression was significantly induced at 7 dat in response to GA (fold change ~2) compared to 0 dat (*p<0.05). On the other hand, StRSG1 expression was down-regulated (fold change ~0.4) compared to its expression at 0 dat (*p<0.05). These results indicate that GA modulates StCDPK3 and StRSG1 expression.

StCDPK3 interacts with StABF1 and phosphorylates StABF1 in vitro

StABF1 shows all the features of a typical group A bZIP TF of the ABF/AREB family, and binds to the ABRE element in vitro. Its expression is induced in response to ABA, drought, salt stress, and cold, and increased during tuber development [54]. StABF1 presents five serine and two threonine residues in an RXXS/T context that could be targeted by kinases and is phosphorylated in response to ABA and salt stress in a calcium-dependent manner. Moreover, StABF1 calcium-dependent phosphorylation is stimulated by tuber-inducing conditions and is inhibited by GA. The potato StCDPK2 isoform phosphorylates StABF1 in vitro [54]. Since StCDPK3 expression was enhanced by ABA [43], it was worth testing the ability of 6xHisStCDPK3 to phosphorylate StABF1, as an alternative substrate to StRSG1. As depicted in Fig 4A, StCDPK3 phosphorylates StABF1 in vitro in a Ca2+-dependent way (EGTA addition resulted in no phosphorylation, lanes 4 and 5). The intensity of ABF phosphorylation was stronger with increasing amounts of the kinase (Fig 4A, lanes 1–3) and no signal was detected when StCDPK3 was not included in the mix (lane 7).

thumbnail
Fig 4. StABF1 is phosphorylated by StCDPK3 and interacts with it.

(A) StABF1 phosphorylation assay (PA) was performed using 6xHisStCDPK3 as enzyme source (ng used are indicated in each lane), 6xHisStABF1 (0.5 μg) as phosphate acceptor, and ATPγP32 as phosphate donor. Assays were conducted in the presence of 20 μM Ca2+ (lanes 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7) or EGTA (lanes 4 and 5). Middle and lower panels: western blot with anti-His (1:5000) and anti-StCDPK3 (NTV, 1:1000) antibodies, respectively. (B) EMSA. The ABRE element was used as a radiolabeled probe. 6xHisStABF1 (1 μg) or 6xHisStCDPK3 (125 ng) were added when indicated. Lane 1: probe alone, lane 2: probe + StABF1 + StCDPK3, lane 3: probe + StCDPK3, lane 4: probe + StABF1, lane 5: probe + StABF1 + anti-His antibody. Shift and super-shift bands are indicated by arrows. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of StABF1 in different plants tissues. Transcript levels were normalized using EF-1α. Means ± SEM of three biological replicates each with three technical replicates were plotted. One-way ANOVA analysis was performed and Tukey's HSD test was applied. Different letters (a-c) above the bars indicate significant differences in transcript levels between tissues (p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167389.g004

In addition, an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed with the ABRE element and the recombinant proteins 6xHisStABF1 and 6xHisStCDPK3. As expected, StABF1 was capable of binding to the ABRE element (Fig 4B, lane 4) and the anti-His antibody bound to StABF1 delayed the migration of the StABF1-ABRE complex inducing a super-shift (Fig 4B, lane 5). 6xHisStCDPK3 alone did not bind to the ABRE element (Fig 4B, lane 3); however, when 6xHisStCDPK3 and StABF1 were both present in the reaction, a super-shift was observed confirming an interaction between these proteins (Fig 4B, lane 2). This interaction was independent of StABF1 initial phosphorylation state (data not shown). qRT-PCR expression analysis of StABF1 transcripts was performed in different tissues from soil-grown plants (Fig 4C). StABF1 expression was significantly higher in roots, stems, and stolons compared to leaves, petioles, lateral buds, apical shoots, and dormant tubers (Fig 4C).

Discussion

Protein phosphorylation is a dynamic post-translational modification that permits adaptation to the plant environment. CDPKs are involved in numerous signaling pathways triggered in response to exogenous or endogenous stimuli that result in the activation or inhibition of TFs, which control the expression of downstream genes modulating plant responses [13]. In this work, two potato bZIP TFs, StRSG1 and StABF1, were analyzed as downstream targets of StCDPK3.

There are 13 groups (A-L and S) of bZIP TF homologs in angiosperms that represent 34 Possible Groups of Orthologues (PoGOs) [45]. Potato RSGs, RF2a, RF2b, and VSF-1 genes can be included in the four POGOs identified in group I. Each PoGO represents a group of genes that diverged from an ancestral gene through speciation and duplication [45]. The potato RSG family comprises three closely related members; StRSG1 and StRSG2 probably originated from gene duplication. It was reported that Group I contains more genes per PoGO than the average, a fact that suggests that these genes were particularly important for establishing angiosperm-specific physiological or functional characteristics [45].

The mechanisms that regulate GA biosynthesis and catabolism in plants are extremely complex [55]. In Arabidopsis and tobacco, NtRSG contributes to the GA feedback regulation by activating the transcription of genes encoding GA biosynthetic enzymes [19,20]. NtRSG is translocated into the nucleus in response to a reduction in GA levels and GA treatment could reverse this nuclear accumulation [25]. The GA-dependent cytoplasmic migration of RSG requires 14-3-3 binding and Ca2+ dependent phosphorylation mediated by NtCDPK1 [16,25]. NtCDPK1 formed a heterotrimer with RSG and 14-3-3 and was postulated as a scaffolding kinase [46]. In this work, we show that 6xHisStCDPK3 was able to phosphorylate NtRSG and StRSG1 in vitro in the presence of Ca2+. StRSG1 appears to be a specific substrate for StCDPK3 since StCDPK1 was unable to phosphorylate it. StRSG1 contains a serine in position 107 in the same context as Ser-114 in NtRSG [16]. If we infer that in potato, RSG localization is controlled by phosphorylation as in tobacco, Ser-107 should be an interaction site for 14-3-3s. StRSG1 analysis in PredictProtein indicates that Ser-107 is buried when considering solvent accessibility; however, if Ser-107 is replaced by a negatively charged amino acid such as aspartic or glutamic acid, it would be exposed. Based on this in silico prediction, we can suggest that when phosphorylated, Ser-107 would be able to interact with a 14-3-3 protein.

Autophosphorylation and substrate phosphorylation are both phosphotransfer reactions catalyzed by StCDPK3; however, while StCDPK3 requires Ca2+ for kinase activity, it undergoes autophosphorylation in the absence of Ca2+. This is an exception because autophosphorylation is calcium dependent in most CDPKs [56]. Autophosphorylation is a fundamental reaction in eukaryotic protein kinases; activation-loop autophosphorylation (Treo-197 is the site phosphorylated in PKA) is crucial in protein kinases that contain an arginine–aspartic acid (RD) motif within their catalytic loop [57]. StCDPK3 is an RD kinase and when subjected to 2D-gel analysis, multiple autophosphorylation states were revealed [43]. Analysis of StCDPK3 activation loop revealed that it contains Asp in the position equivalent to Treo-197, a feature shared with most CDPKs. However, it presents two potential autophoshorylation sites that are conserved in CDPKs: site I in the activation loop and site II in the CLD [56]. Due to its proximity to the active site, Site I may be important for activation, substrate specificity, or other novel effects on catalysis [56]. It was reported that 14-3-3 binds to the catalytic domain of NtCDPK1 in an autophosphorylation-dependent manner [46]. On the other hand, Site II is located in a loop between EF-hands 1 and 2 and it is unlikely to affect Ca2+ binding though it may serve for other function in vivo [56]. The paradox is that, in an inactive state, kinases are able to catalyze autophosphorylation [57]. An interesting observation is that StCDPK3 autophosphorylation increased in the presence of StRSG1, suggesting a positive modulation of the kinase by its target. The occurrence of autophosphorylation in different and multiple residues of StCDPK3 could lead to different conformational changes that might alter the binding to specific targets, thus broadening the ability to participate in many signaling pathways.

GAs are negative regulators of tuber induction; environmental stimuli that induce tuberization downregulate GA levels in stolon tips [30,31,58]. StCDPK3 transcripts were detected in early elongating stolons prior to tuber swelling while StCDPK1 expression was stronger in swollen stolons [38,49]. According to our qRT-PCR data (Fig 3), both StCDPK3 and StRSG1 are present in stolons, thus it is possible to speculate that StCDPK3 could control GA endogenous levels at the onset of tuberization through StRSG1 phosphorylation. StCDPK1 cannot phosphorylate StRSG1 in vitro suggesting that both kinases are involved in different signaling cascades. In fact, we recently showed that StCDPK1 is strongly associated with the vascular system and is able to phosphorylate the hydrophilic loop of the auxin transporter StPIN4 in vitro [49]. It remains to be confirmed whether StCDPK3 and StRSG1 interact in vivo.

We also analyzed the effect of GA on the expression of StRSG1 and StCDPK3. Previously, we observed a decline in StCDPK3 transcript levels within 6 h of GA3 application to in vitro grown potato plants [43]. However, when tubers were treated with GA3 for 5 min to promote sprouting, an increase in StCDPK3 transcripts and a decline in RSG1 expression were observed (Fig 3C). Moreover, microarray data indicate that GA positively modulates RSG1 expression in sprouting tubers. Our results show that GA differentially affects the expression of both StCDPK3 and StRSG1 in different developmental backgrounds of the potato life cycle. It is interesting that in potato, GA modulates the expression of genes that could regulate its own biosynthesis.

Several reports established a correlation between ABA signaling and CDPK activity or expression. For example, OsCPK9 transcription was induced by ABA and overexpression of OsCPK9 resulted in enhanced ABA sensitivity in shoot and root elongation [11]. In Arabidopsis, overexpression of ZmCPK4 enhanced ABA sensitivity in seed germination, seedling growth, and stomatal movement [59]. On the other hand, Arabidopsis CPK12 is a negative regulator of ABA signaling in seed germination and post-germination growth; CPK12-RNAi lines resulted in ABA-hypersensitivity [60]. According to previous results, StABF1 TF mediates the function of ABA during tuberization [54]. Transgenic potato plants that overexpress ABF4 or ABF2 from Arabidopsis show increased tuber induction. Under tuber-inducing conditions, ABF4 overexpression triggers a significant rise in ABA levels and a transcriptional deregulation of GA metabolism genes in stolons [61]. Thus, it could be suggested that ABF TFs function in potato ABA-GA signaling crosstalk during tuberization. In vitro, StABF1 is phosphorylated by StCDPK2 [54] and by StCDPK3 (Fig 4). StCDPK2 and 3 differ in their expression pattern, in their kinetic parameters, and in the Ca2+ concentration required for full activation [42,43]. Thus, both kinases could target this TF according to the Ca2+ signature received. We also show the formation of a StCDPK3-StABF1-ABRE element interaction complex in vitro, reinforcing the hypothesis that these proteins are involved in the same molecular pathway, most likely associated with ABA signaling. Our findings are in accordance with the involvement of CDPKs in signaling pathways triggered by ABA and in the activation of bZIP TFs [60,6264].

StCDPK3 belongs to a multigene family associated with stress responses and developmental processes; it plays an active role by phosphorylating downstream targets, which in turn activate/repress specific genes. Taken together, our results suggest that StRSG1 is a substrate for StCDPK3, as well as StABF1. Phosphorylation of other ABFs in rice and Arabidopsis was shown to be essential to mediate the ABA signal [65,66]; however, we still do not know how does StABF1 Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation affect its activity. It was suggested that the phosphorylation of bZIP TFs in multiple sites can modulate their capability to regulate downstream target genes, allowing the fine-tuning at the DNA-protein interaction level [67]. Recently it was shown that the phosphorylation of AtbZIP63, a bZIP TF from group C, was crucial for its dimerization with different partners and activity in planta [68]. Interestingly, bZIP63 is targeted by SnRK1 and AtCPK3 [68]. This TF is an important metabolic regulator of the starvation response and could be a potential point of cross-talk between stress and developmental signals. Considering the effect of ABF genes on GA metabolism [61], it is tempting to speculate that StCDPK3 could modulate GA levels in tuberizing stolons by regulating StABF1 and StRSG1. Understanding the complex transcriptional and proteomics dynamics of S. tuberosum at the onset of tuber development will enlighten the intricate signaling pathways associated to tuberization, and will help to develop new strategies for crop yield improvement in the future.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

S. tuberosum L. cv Desirée wild-type plants were used in this study. In vitro plants were micropropagated on a semi solid modified Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium supplemented with 2% (w/v) sucrose and 0.7% (w/v) agar. Soil-grown-plants were maintained in the greenhouse, natural light was supplemented 16 h per day by sodium lamps providing 100–300 μmol s-1 m-2,, the temperature was set at 23°C during day and 19°C in the night. Tissues from 1-month-old-soil-grown- plants were used for RNA isolation.

Phylogenetic tree construction

Multiple sequence alignments of RSGs full amino acid sequences were made by ClustalW. Potato StRSG1, 2, and 3 (PGSC0003DMP400001527, PGSC0003DMP400050715, and PGSC0003DMP400030704), tomato SlVIP1-like (XP_004237777.1), tobacco NtRSG (BAA97100.1); pepper stress-induced protein 21 (AHI85726.1), A. thaliana VirE2-interacting protein VIP1 (AAM63070.1), rapeseed TF VIP1-like (NP_001303096.1), soybean and barrel clover (M. truncatula) bZIP TFs, bZIP131 (NP_001237194.1) and bZIP (XP_013451804.1), rice Os_12g0162500 (Japonica Group) and OsI_37568 (Indica Group), barley predicted protein (BAK03813.1), and sorghum hypothetical protein SORBIDRAFT (XP_002441871.1) were analyzed. A Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree was constructed after bootstrap test (n = 500) using the MEGA6 program [69].

Purification of NtRSG

Dr. Yohsuke Takahashi kindly provided the vector pGEX-4t-NtRSG-GST containing the TF fused to Glutathione S-transferase (GST) for ulterior purification. 100 μl of a starter culture (LB ampicillin 100 mg/L) was used to induce bacterial growth at 37°C to OD 0.4. After adding 1mM IPTG for protein induction, the culture was incubated for 16 h. Cells were collected by centrifugation (15 min at 4,000 x g), and the pellet was resuspended in cold PBS and sonicated. 0.01% Triton X-100 was added and incubated for 30 min, followed by centrifugation (15 min at 10,000 x g) at 4°C. The supernatant containing NtRSG-GST-tagged recombinant protein was incubated for 30 min with 0.5 ml of Glutathione Sepharose® 4B Reduced glutathione resin (GSH 4B 50% GE HealthCare). The column was washed three times and eluted afterward.

Identification, sub-cloning and purification of StRSG1 recombinant protein

NtRSG sequence was blasted against the Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium database (http://potato.plantbiology.msu.edu/cgi-bin/gbrowse/potato/). Oligonucleotides StRSG1-FP1 (5´ATGGACCCGAAGTTCACCGG3´) and StRSG1-RP1 (5´ TTAGTTGAAGTTCATGAAGC 3´) were used to amplify the complete coding sequence of StRSG1 from a cDNA library constructed using Genome Walker Universal Kit. The amplicon obtained was sub-cloned into a pGEX-6p-1 vector (GE, HealthCare) using BamHI and XhoI cloning sites, and sequenced (GenBank Accession number HQ335343.1). E. coli BL21 codon plus competent cells were transformed with the construct. The bacterial culture was induced with 1 mM IPTG and culture conditions were adjusted to 25°C for 16 h for optimal protein production. The supernatant containing the recombinant GST-tagged protein was obtained and purified as described above. Western Blot analysis of four eluates was performed with a commercial polyclonal anti-GST antibody (1: 4000, GE HealthCare). Protein content was estimated by [70].

Purification of 6xHisStCDPK3 and 6xHisStCDPK1

StCDPK3 and StCDPK1 coding sequences were cloned in pDEST 17 Vector (Invitrogen) to obtain the His-tagged recombinant proteins [41,43]. 6xHisStCDPK3 and 6xHisStCDPK1 proteins were efficiently produced after overnight induction of E. coli BL21 codon plus cells with 1 mM IPTG at 25°C. The tagged proteins were purified by affinity chromatography, using a nickel agarose column (Ni-NTA agarose, QIAGEN) according to manufacturer’s procedures, as already described [43].

Phosphorylation assays

CDPK activity was assayed according to [42] in a reaction mixture containing 25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 20 μM CaCl2, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 10 μM [γ-32P]-ATP (specific activity 2,331 Bq pmol-1, New England Nuclear) and NtRSG-GST (0.6 to 6 μg), StRSG1-GST (0.5 to 2 μg), or 6xHisStABF1 (0.5 μg; GenBank accession number HM988989.1) as substrates. Purified 6xHisStCDPK3 or 6xHisStCDPK1 (50–150 ng) were used as kinase source. Reactions were incubated at 30°C for 5 minutes, and samples were resolved by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Autoradiographs were obtained and images were scanned. ImageJ was used to quantify the relative area of the phosphorylation signal. Western blots were performed using a polyclonal antibody against a specific sequence (KYTQQDANGYRAGRC) of StCDPK3 NTV domain (1:1000, produced by Genescript), or antibodies anti-His (1:5000; GE Healthcare, 27-4710-01) or anti-GST (1:4000; GE Healthcare 27-4577-01) as indicated.

Analysis of CDPK3 and TF transcripts levels

StCDPK3, StRSG1, and StABF1 transcript levels were determined by qRT-PCR. Different tissues were harvested from 1-month-old-soil-grown plants, and RNA was isolated by TRIzol (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was quantified, using a Nanodrop 1000 (Thermo Scientific), and checked by 1.4% agarose gels. Total RNA (1 μg) was treated with DNase (Promega) and used for cDNA synthesis using oligodT oligonucleotides. All qPCR reactions were performed on Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Real-Time PCR Systems using FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master mixture (Roche). For expression analysis, the following oligonucleotides were used: StCDPK3-FP 5´AGCCAGAAGGGCCATATCA3´, StCDPK3-RP 5´GTCCAGGCTGCACAGTAACA3´, StRSG1-FP 5´ACCTTGACCAGATGCCGG3´, StRSG1-RP 5´CGGCTGCATGTGGGTATC3´, StABF1-FP 5´AGTCAGCTGCTAGATCAAGAGC3´, StABF1-RP 5´AAGTCTGTAATATGGCTAATCCAC3´. StCDPK3 and StRSG1 reactions were carried out at 95˚C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95˚C for 15 s, and 60˚C for 1 min. StABF1 reactions were performed at 95˚C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95˚C for 15 s, 50°C for 20 s and 60˚C for 1 min. Elongation factor-1 α was used for normalization using EF-1α-FP (5´TGAGGCAAACTGTTGCTGTC 3´) and EF-1α-RP (5´TGGAAACACCAGCATCACAC3´) primers [71]. PCR specificity was checked by melting curve analysis and data was analyzed using the 2-(Ct gene of interest -Ct EF-1α) method [72]. Subsequently, one-way ANOVA analysis was performed and Tukey's HSD test was applied. Means ± SEM of three biological replicates each, with three technical replicates are plotted. Graphs were plotted using Graphpad Prism (6.07 version) software.

To analyze the effect of GA on StCDPK3 and StRSG1 transcript levels, in vitro 2-months-old post-harvest tubers were treated during 10 min with GA3 (5 mg/L) or water (control). One batch was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen (0 dat), and the other batch was placed in MS 2% sucrose medium and incubated in long day photoperiod (16:8 h) for 7 days (7 dat). Whole tubers were collected to isolate total RNA, and cDNA was obtained. Real Time qPCR was performed as mentioned before. Fold-changes in StCDPK3 and StRSG1 expression of GA-treated versus control samples were calculated using the 2-∆∆Ct method [73]. The significance of the fold-change in gene expression between the two time points (0 and 7 dat) was evaluated by the Student t-test (p<0.05). Means ± SEM of three biological replicates each, with three technical replicates were plotted.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)

Recombinant 6XHisStABF1 (1 μg), previously phosphorylated or not, was incubated with 6xHisStCDPK3 (125 ng) or with anti-His antibody. ABRE oligonucleotides sense and antisense (aattccGGACACGTGGCGtaagct) were used as probes. 100 pmol of oligonucleotides (probes) were annealed by heating at 100°C during 5 min, followed by slow cooling to facilitate interaction. The ABRE probe was labeled using dCTP[α32P] and T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). For interaction assays, 6xHisStABF1 was incubated during 15 min at 4°C with 1.5 μg of poly (dl-dC), in 30 μl buffer containing: 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 2 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 4% (v/v) glycerol, and 1 mM DTT. Then, 1.5 ng of ABRE probe was added to the reaction and incubated during 15 min at room temperature. Reactions were solved in 6% acrylamide gels in buffer TBE 0.5x (45 mM Tris Base, 45 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA). Gels were exposed during 1 h to a cassette with an amplifying signal screen, and signal was recorded using a Storm 820 PhosphorImager (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)

Supporting Information

S1 Fig.

Genomic context of StRSG1 (A) and StRSG2 (B) genes in chromosome 4. The chromosome region between 59 and 59.5 Mbp is depicted in the upper panel; the inverted repeats (stripped arrows) are separated by a 273 kbp spacer region. In A and B scale bars indicate the position of the genes according to PGSC (http://solanaceae.plantbiology.msu.edu/cgi-bin/gbrowse/potato/). Grey arrows represent StRSG1 and StRSG2 and the corresponding upstream and downstream genes. Gene orientation is indicated. Striped arrows span the regions of the duplicated inverted repeats. CYP450, cytochrome P450; SDC, serine decarboxylase.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167389.s001

(TIF)

S1 Table. StRSG1 blast hits in the PGSC database.

StRSG1 complete protein sequence (upper chart) or its bZIP domain (lower chart) were blasted (BLASTP 2.2.26) against the PGSC DM v3.4 pep.fasta database (http://solanaceae.plantbiology.msu.edu/blast.shtml.). Q coverage and identities are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167389.s002

(PDF)

S2 Table. Localization of StRSG1, 2 and 3 genes in the potato genome.

PGSC DMG, DMT, and DMP accessions for the potato RSG genes are indicated. Chromosome position, exon and intron length, and gene length are indicated in bp. The MW of the protein is indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167389.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

RMU, MNMG, and DAC are members of CONICET; RMU is Associate Professor at UBA. CG, EF, MB, and FS are fellows from CONICET. We thank Dr. Yohsuke Takahashi for kindly providing the vector pGEX-4t-NtRSG-GST and Dr. David Hannapel from Iowa State University (ISU) for helpful discussion.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: CG DAC RMU.
  2. Formal analysis: EF.
  3. Funding acquisition: RMU DAC.
  4. Investigation: CG EF MNMG MGB FS.
  5. Methodology: CG RMU.
  6. Project administration: CG RMU.
  7. Resources: RMU.
  8. Supervision: RMU DAC.
  9. Visualization: CG EF RMU.
  10. Writing – original draft: CG RMU.
  11. Writing – review & editing: DAC RMU.

References

  1. 1. Schulz P, Herde M, Romeis T. Calcium-dependent protein kinases: hubs in plant stress signaling and development. Plant Physiol. 2013;163: 523–30. pmid:24014579
  2. 2. Boudsocq M, Sheen J. CDPKs in immune and stress signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18: 30–40. pmid:22974587
  3. 3. Simeunovic A, Mair A, Wurzinger B, Teige M. Know where your clients are: subcellular localization and targets of calcium-dependent protein kinases. J Exp Bot. Oxford University Press; 2016;67: 3855–72. pmid:27117335
  4. 4. Ubersax JA, Ferrell JE. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8: 530–41. pmid:17585314
  5. 5. Ma S-Y, Wu W-H. AtCPK23 functions in Arabidopsis responses to drought and salt stresses. Plant Mol Biol. 2007;65: 511–8. pmid:17541706
  6. 6. Zhu S-Y, Yu X-C, Wang X-J, Zhao R, Li Y, Fan R-C, et al. Two calcium-dependent protein kinases, CPK4 and CPK11, regulate abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19: 3019–36. pmid:17921317
  7. 7. Kobayashi M, Ohura I, Kawakita K, Yokota N, Fujiwara M, Shimamoto K, et al. Calcium-dependent protein kinases regulate the production of reactive oxygen species by potato NADPH oxidase. Plant Cell. 2007;19: 1065–80. pmid:17400895
  8. 8. Myers C, Romanowsky SM, Barron YD, Garg S, Azuse CL, Curran A, et al. Calcium-dependent protein kinases regulate polarized tip growth in pollen tubes. Plant J. 2009;59: 528–39. pmid:19392698
  9. 9. Zou J-J, Wei F-J, Wang C, Wu J-J, Ratnasekera D, Liu W-X, et al. Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK10 functions in abscisic acid- and Ca2+-mediated stomatal regulation in response to drought stress. Plant Physiol. 2010;154: 1232–43. pmid:20805328
  10. 10. Dubrovina AS, Kiselev K V, Khristenko VS. Expression of calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) genes under abiotic stress conditions in wild-growing grapevine Vitis amurensis. J Plant Physiol. 2013;170: 1491–500. pmid:23886738
  11. 11. Wei S, Hu W, Deng X, Zhang Y, Liu X, Zhao X, et al. A rice calcium-dependent protein kinase OsCPK9 positively regulates drought stress tolerance and spikelet fertility. BMC Plant Biol. BioMed Central; 2014;14: 133. pmid:24884869
  12. 12. Gravino M, Savatin DV, Macone A, De Lorenzo G. Ethylene production in Botrytis cinerea- and oligogalacturonide-induced immunity requires calcium-dependent protein kinases. Plant J. 2015;84: 1073–86. pmid:26485342
  13. 13. Curran A, Chang I-F, Chang C-L, Garg S, Miguel RM, Barron YD, et al. Calcium-dependent protein kinases from Arabidopsis show substrate specificity differences in an analysis of 103 substrates. Front Plant Sci. 2011;2: 36. pmid:22645532
  14. 14. Ito T, Nakata M, Ishida S, Takahashi Y. The mechanism of substrate recognition of Ca2+-dependent protein kinases. Plant Signal Behav. 2011;6: 924–6. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3257762&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract pmid:21633192
  15. 15. Kanchiswamy CN, Takahashi H, Quadro S, Maffei ME, Bossi S, Bertea C, et al. Regulation of Arabidopsis defense responses against Spodoptera littoralis by CPK-mediated calcium signaling. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10: 97. pmid:20504319
  16. 16. Ishida S, Yuasa T, Nakata M, Takahashi Y. A tobacco calcium-dependent protein kinase, CDPK1, regulates the transcription factor REPRESSION OF SHOOT GROWTH in response to gibberellins. Plant Cell. 2008;20: 3273–88. pmid:19106376
  17. 17. Choi H, Park H-J, Park JH, Kim SSY, Im M-Y, Seo H-H, et al. Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase AtCPK32 interacts with ABF4, a transcriptional regulator of abscisic acid-responsive gene expression, and modulates its activity. Plant Physiol. 2005;139: 1750–61. pmid:16299177
  18. 18. Jakoby M, Weisshaar B, Dröge-Laser W, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Tiedemann J, Kroj T, et al. bZIP transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7: 106–11. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11906833 pmid:11906833
  19. 19. Fukazawa J, Sakai T, Ishida S, Yamaguchi I, Kamiya Y, Takahashi Y. Repression of shoot growth, a bZIP transcriptional activator, regulates cell elongation by controlling the level of gibberellins. Plant Cell. 2000;12: 901–15. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=149092&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract pmid:10852936
  20. 20. Fukazawa J, Nakata M, Ito T, Yamaguchi S, Takahashi Y. The transcription factor RSG regulates negative feedback of NtGA20ox1 encoding GA 20-oxidase. Plant J. 2010;62: 1035–45. pmid:20345601
  21. 21. Igarashi D, Ishida S, Fukazawa J, Takahashi Y. 14-3-3 Proteins Regulate Intracellular Localization of the bZIP Transcriptional Activator RSG. Plant Cell. 2001;13: 2483–97. pmid:11701883
  22. 22. Ryu H, Kim K, Cho H, Park J, Choe S, Hwang I. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of BZR1 mediated by phosphorylation is essential in Arabidopsis brassinosteroid signaling. Plant Cell. 2007;19: 2749–62. pmid:17873094
  23. 23. Mayfield JD, Folta KM, Paul A-L, Ferl RJ. The 14-3-3 Proteins mu and upsilon influence transition to flowering and early phytochrome response. Plant Physiol. 2007;145: 1692–702. pmid:17951453
  24. 24. Schoonheim PJ, Costa Pereira DDA, De Boer AH. Dual role for 14-3-3 proteins and ABF transcription factors in gibberellic acid and abscisic acid signalling in barley (Hordeum vulgare) aleurone cells. Plant Cell Environ. 2009;32: 439–47. pmid:19143991
  25. 25. Ishida S, Fukazawa J, Yuasa T, Takahashi Y. Involvement of 14-3-3 signaling protein binding in the functional regulation of the transcriptional activator REPRESSION OF SHOOT GROWTH by gibberellins. Plant Cell. 2004;16: 2641–51. pmid:15377759
  26. 26. Sheen J. Ca2+-dependent protein kinases and stress signal transduction in plants. Science. 1996;274: 1900–2. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8943201 pmid:8943201
  27. 27. Fujita Y, Fujita M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. ABA-mediated transcriptional regulation in response to osmotic stress in plants. J Plant Res. 2011;124: 509–25. pmid:21416314
  28. 28. Smith OE, Rappaport L. Gibberellins, inhibitors, and tuber formation in the potato, Solanum tuberosum. Am Potato J. Springer-Verlag; 1969;46: 185–191.
  29. 29. Kumar D and Wareing PF. Factors Controlling Stolon Development in the Potato Plant on JSTOR. New Phytol. 1972;Vol. 71: 639–648. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2434713?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
  30. 30. Xu X, Vreugdenhil D, Lammeren AAM v. Cell division and cell enlargement during potato tuber formation. J Exp Bot. Oxford University Press; 1998;49: 573–582.
  31. 31. Kloosterman B, Navarro C, Bijsterbosch G, Lange T, Prat S, Visser RGF, et al. StGA2ox1 is induced prior to stolon swelling and controls GA levels during potato tuber development. Plant J. 2007;52: 362–73. pmid:17764503
  32. 32. Menzel CM. Tuberization in Potato at High Temperatures: Gibberellin Content and Transport from Buds. Ann Bot. Oxford University Press; 1983;52: 697–702.
  33. 33. Machackova I, Konstantinova TN, Sergeeva LI, Lozhnikova VN, Golyanovskaya SA, Dudko ND, et al. Photoperiodic control of growth, development and phytohormone balance in Solanum tuberosum. Physiol Plant. Munksgaard International Publishers; 1998;102: 272–278.
  34. 34. Rodríguez-Falcón M, Bou J, Prat S. Seasonal control of tuberization in potato: conserved elements with the flowering response. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57: 151–80. pmid:16669759
  35. 35. Shu K, Zhang H, Wang S, Chen M, Wu Y, Tang S, et al. ABI4 regulates primary seed dormancy by regulating the biogenesis of abscisic acid and gibberellins in arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2013;9: e1003577. pmid:23818868
  36. 36. Shu K, Chen Q, Wu Y, Liu R, Zhang H, Wang S, et al. ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE 4 negatively regulates flowering through directly promoting Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS C transcription. J Exp Bot. 2016;67: 195–205. pmid:26507894
  37. 37. Ye N, Zhu G, Liu Y, Zhang A, Li Y, Liu R, et al. Ascorbic acid and reactive oxygen species are involved in the inhibition of seed germination by abscisic acid in rice seeds. J Exp Bot. 2012;63: 1809–22. pmid:22200664
  38. 38. Raíces M, Gargantini PR, Chinchilla D, Crespi M, Téllez-Iñón MT, Ulloa RM. Regulation of CDPK isoforms during tuber development. Plant Mol Biol. 2003;52: 1011–24. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14558661 pmid:14558661
  39. 39. Raíces M, Ulloa RM, MacIntosh GC, Crespi M, Téllez-Iñón MT. StCDPK1 is expressed in potato stolon tips and is induced by high sucrose concentration. J Exp Bot. 2003;54: 2589–91. pmid:12966043
  40. 40. Raíces M, MacIntosh GC, Ulloa RM, Gargantini PR, Vozza NF, Téllez-Inón MT. Sucrose increases calcium-dependent protein kinase and phosphatase activities in potato plants. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2003;49: 959–64. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14656054
  41. 41. Gargantini PR, Giammaria V, Grandellis C, Feingold SE, Maldonado S, Ulloa RM. Genomic and functional characterization of StCDPK1. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;70: 153–72. pmid:19221880
  42. 42. Giammaria V, Grandellis C, Bachmann S, Gargantini PR, Feingold SE, Bryan G, et al. StCDPK2 expression and activity reveal a highly responsive potato calcium-dependent protein kinase involved in light signalling. Planta. 2011;233: 593–609. pmid:21132327
  43. 43. Grandellis C, Giammaria V, Bialer M, Santin F, Lin T, Hannapel DJ, et al. The novel Solanum tuberosum calcium dependent protein kinase, StCDPK3, is expressed in actively growing organs. Planta. 2012;236: 1831–48. pmid:22922879
  44. 44. Cheng S-H, Willmann MR, Chen H-C, Sheen J. Calcium signaling through protein kinases. The Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family. Plant Physiol. 2002;129: 469–85. pmid:12068094
  45. 45. Corrêa LGG, Riaño-Pachón DM, Schrago CG, dos Santos RV, Mueller-Roeber B, Vincentz M. The role of bZIP transcription factors in green plant evolution: adaptive features emerging from four founder genes. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2008;3: e2944. pmid:18698409
  46. 46. Ito T, Nakata M, Fukazawa J, Ishida S, Takahashi Y. Phosphorylation-independent binding of 14-3-3 to NtCDPK1 by a new mode. Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9: e977721. pmid:25517861
  47. 47. Blom N, Gammeltoft S, Brunak S. Sequence and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. J Mol Biol. 1999;294: 1351–62. pmid:10600390
  48. 48. Ito T, Nakata M, Fukazawa J, Ishida S, Takahashi Y. Alteration of substrate specificity: the variable N-terminal domain of tobacco Ca(2+)-dependent protein kinase is important for substrate recognition. Plant Cell. 2010;22: 1592–604. pmid:20442373
  49. 49. Santin F, Bhogale S, Fantino E, Grandellis C, Banerjee AK, Ulloa RM. Solanum tuberosum StCDPK1 is regulated by miR390 at the posttranscriptional level and phosphorylates the auxin efflux carrier StPIN4 in vitro, a potential downstream target in potato development. Physiol Plant. 2016;
  50. 50. Jackson S. Multiple signaling pathways control tuber induction in potato. Plant Physiol. 1999;119: 1–8. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1539201&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract pmid:9880339
  51. 51. Vreugdenhil D. Comparing potato tuberization and sprouting: Opposite phenomena? Am J Potato Res. 2004;81: 275–280.
  52. 52. Grandellis C, Giammaria V, Fantino E, Cerrudo I, Bachmann S, Santin F, et al. Transcript profiling reveals that cysteine protease inhibitors are up-regulated in tuber sprouts after extended darkness. Funct Integr Genomics. 2016;
  53. 53. Hartmann A, Senning M, Hedden P, Sonnewald U, Sonnewald S. Reactivation of meristem activity and sprout growth in potato tubers require both cytokinin and gibberellin. Plant Physiol. 2011;155: 776–96. pmid:21163959
  54. 54. Muñiz García MN, Giammaria V, Grandellis C, Téllez-Iñón MT, Ulloa RM, Capiati DA. Characterization of StABF1, a stress-responsive bZIP transcription factor from Solanum tuberosum L. that is phosphorylated by StCDPK2 in vitro. Planta. 2012;235: 761–78. pmid:22042328
  55. 55. Olszewski N, Sun T-P, Gubler F. Gibberellin signaling: biosynthesis, catabolism, and response pathways. Plant Cell. American Society of Plant Biologists; 2002;14 Suppl: S61–80. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12045270
  56. 56. Hegeman AD, Rodriguez M, Han BW, Uno Y, Phillips GN, Hrabak EM, et al. A phyloproteomic characterization of in vitro autophosphorylation in calcium-dependent protein kinases. Proteomics. 2006;6: 3649–64. pmid:16758442
  57. 57. Beenstock J, Mooshayef N, Engelberg D. How Do Protein Kinases Take a Selfie (Autophosphorylate)? Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;
  58. 58. Roumeliotis E, Kloosterman B, Oortwijn M, Lange T, Visser RGF, Bachem CWB. Down regulation of StGA3ox genes in potato results in altered GA content and affect plant and tuber growth characteristics. J Plant Physiol. 2013;170: 1228–34. pmid:23683509
  59. 59. Jiang S, Zhang D, Wang L, Pan J, Liu Y, Kong X, et al. A maize calcium-dependent protein kinase gene, ZmCPK4, positively regulated abscisic acid signaling and enhanced drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013;71: 112–120. pmid:23911729
  60. 60. Zhao R, Sun H-L, Mei C, Wang X-J, Yan L, Liu R, et al. The Arabidopsis Ca(2+) -dependent protein kinase CPK12 negatively regulates abscisic acid signaling in seed germination and post-germination growth. New Phytol. 2011;192: 61–73. pmid:21692804
  61. 61. Muñiz García MN, Stritzler M, Capiati DA. Heterologous expression of Arabidopsis ABF4 gene in potato enhances tuberization through ABA-GA crosstalk regulation. Planta. 2014;239: 615–31. pmid:24288009
  62. 62. Kawamoto N, Sasabe M, Endo M, Machida Y, Araki T. Calcium-dependent protein kinases responsible for the phosphorylation of a bZIP transcription factor FD crucial for the florigen complex formation. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 8341. pmid:25661797
  63. 63. Zhang H, Liu W-Z, Zhang Y, Deng M, Niu F, Yang B, et al. Identification, expression and interaction analyses of calcium-dependent protein kinase (CPK) genes in canola (Brassica napus L.). BMC Genomics. 2014;15: 211. pmid:24646378
  64. 64. Li A, Wang X, Leseberg CH, Jia J, Mao L. Biotic and abiotic stress responses through calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) signaling in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Signal Behav. Taylor & Francis; 2014;3: 654–656.
  65. 65. Kagaya Y, Hobo T, Murata M, Ban A, Hattori T. Abscisic acid-induced transcription is mediated by phosphorylation of an abscisic acid response element binding factor, TRAB1. Plant Cell. 2002;14: 3177–89. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12468735 pmid:12468735
  66. 66. Fujita Y, Yoshida T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Pivotal role of the AREB/ABF-SnRK2 pathway in ABRE-mediated transcription in response to osmotic stress in plants. Physiol Plant. 2013;147: 15–27. pmid:22519646
  67. 67. Kirchler T, Briesemeister S, Singer M, Schütze K, Keinath M, Kohlbacher O, et al. The role of phosphorylatable serine residues in the DNA-binding domain of Arabidopsis bZIP transcription factors. Eur J Cell Biol. 2010;89: 175–183. pmid:20047775
  68. 68. Mair A, Pedrotti L, Wurzinger B, Anrather D, Simeunovic A, Weiste C, et al. SnRK1-triggered switch of bZIP63 dimerization mediates the low-energy response in plants. Elife. eLife Sciences Publications Limited; 2015;4: 489–498.
  69. 69. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28: 2731–9. pmid:21546353
  70. 70. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72: 248–54. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/942051 pmid:942051
  71. 71. Nicot N, Hausman J-F, Hoffmann L, Evers D. Housekeeping gene selection for real-time RT-PCR normalization in potato during biotic and abiotic stress. J Exp Bot. 2005;56: 2907–14. pmid:16188960
  72. 72. Huang H, Cheng F, Wang R, Zhang D, Yang L. Evaluation of four endogenous reference genes and their real-time PCR assays for common wheat quantification in GMOs detection. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2013;8: e75850. pmid:24098735
  73. 73. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25: 402–8. pmid:11846609