Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Parasitological Clearance Rates and Drug Concentrations of a Fixed Dose Combination of Azithromycin-Chloroquine in Asymptomatic Pregnant Women with Plasmodium Falciparum Parasitemia: An Open-Label, Non-Comparative Study in Sub-Saharan Africa

Parasitological Clearance Rates and Drug Concentrations of a Fixed Dose Combination of Azithromycin-Chloroquine in Asymptomatic Pregnant Women with Plasmodium Falciparum Parasitemia: An Open-Label, Non-Comparative Study in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Kamija Phiri, 
  • Joshua Kimani, 
  • George A. Mtove, 
  • Qinying Zhao, 
  • Ricardo Rojo, 
  • Jeffery Robbins, 
  • Stephan Duparc, 
  • Ayman Ayoub, 
  • Pol Vandenbroucke



Malaria remains one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in pregnant women and their newborn babies in sub-Saharan Africa. Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to reduce the burden of disease and improve maternal and neonatal survival and general health. Due to the growing resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), the current WHO-recommended drug for IPTp, identification of new and effective drugs is an urgent priority.

Methods and Findings

This was an open-label, non-comparative study (NCT01103713) in 5 countries in East and sub-Saharan Africa (Benin, Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda) to assess parasitological response and drug concentrations of a single, 3-day course of four tablets of a fixed-dose combination of azithromycin-chloroquine (AZCQ) 250/155 mg given during the second or third trimester to women with asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia in their first or second pregnancy. Parasitemia was determined by microscopy and molecular genotyping was performed to characterize parasites relative to the baseline infection. Weekly follow-up visits took place until day 42 after first dose and additional follow-up occurred after delivery. Systemic concentrations of azithromycin (AZ), chloroquine (CQ), and the CQ metabolite, desethyl CQ (DECQ) were evaluated at Day 0 (pre-dose), at Day 2 (pre-dose, 2 and 8 hours) and randomly at Days 7 and 14. Systemic concentrations of CQ and DECQ were also measured randomly at Day 21 and Day 28. In total, 404 women were screened for eligibility and 168 were treated, 155 of whom completed the study. PCR-adjusted parasitological response in the modified intent-to-treat population at day 28 (the primary efficacy endpoint) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method as 99.35% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 97.76, 100.00). PCR-adjusted parasitological response remained high at day 42 (95.19%; 95% CI: 91.35, 99.03). In general, the mean concentrations of serum AZ, plasma CQ, and plasma DECQ showed large CV% values (ranges of 33–156%, 42–228%, and 57–109%, respectively). There were 157 live births, three stillbirths, and eight pregnancies of unknown outcome: 7 due to withdrawal of participant consent and 1 lost to follow-up. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were vomiting (20.8%) and dizziness (19.6%).


These results suggest that a 3-day course of AZCQ can lead to an adequate 28-day parasitological response.


Malaria is a serious infection caused by protozoan parasites of the Plasmodium species that are transmitted when infected female anopheline mosquitoes bite a human host to consume a blood meal [1]. The characteristic clinical signs and symptoms of malaria include recurrent attacks of fever, paroxysm, hemolytic anemia, and jaundice [2]. Asymptomatic malaria, in which individuals are infected but exhibit few signs and symptoms of disease presents substantial challenges in terms of eradication or control strategies [3].

Although malaria cases occur in all the major tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world, Africa has the greatest number of people at risk of contracting the disease and has the greatest number of deaths related to malaria [4]. The World Health Organization (WHO) World Malaria Report 2013 states that there were an estimated 207 million cases of malaria worldwide in 2012, with 80% of these estimates attributed to Africa [4]. There were 627,000 estimated deaths due to malaria, 90% of which were estimated to occur in Africa. Approximately 482,000 of these deaths were estimated to occur in children below 5 years of age, representing 77% of all global malaria deaths [4]. Within Africa, the majority of malaria cases occur in sub-Saharan countries, and while some malaria infection control measures are in place across most of the region, transmission and mortality rates remain high and this results in an enormous burden on health care systems [4].

Pregnant women are more susceptible to malaria, and susceptibility is greatest in the first and second pregnancy [57]. Malaria in pregnancy is, therefore, one of the most common causes of preventable mortality and morbidity in pregnant women and infants in sub-Saharan Africa [8]. There are an estimated 30 million pregnancies that are at risk of malaria infection across the region each year; and approximately 200,000 infants and 10,000 women die of complications related to malaria in pregnancy annually [9,10].

Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) is an important means of reducing the detrimental health impact of malaria on pregnant mothers and their unborn children [11]. The WHO recommends IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) at each ante-natal visit after the first trimester in moderate and high-malaria transmission regions [11]. Nevertheless, resistance to SP is widespread, especially in East Africa, and evidence from a study in Burkina Faso has shown that the use of SP in IPTp led to an increase in the prevalence of resistant infections from 1.3% in 2000 to 35.3% in 2009, and 54.3% in 2011 (p≤0.001) [12]. An additional concern is that SP is unsafe for administration during the first trimester of pregnancy [1315]. There is, therefore, a need for new drugs for IPTp.

The combination of azithromycin (AZ) and chloroquine (CQ) was evaluated as a potential alternative to SP for IPTp in another study (NCT01103063) [9]. AZ and CQ have been used extensively in pregnant women during all trimesters. AZ has been used for the treatment and prevention of sexually transmitted infections including Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections [16]. The combination of AZ and CQ (AZCQ) has been shown to produce synergistic reductions in malaria parasite burden in vitro and in animal model studies [17,18].

Co-administration of AZ and CQ has demonstrated efficacy, safety, and tolerability in the treatment of symptomatic uncomplicated malaria in two multi-country Phase 3 clinical studies in non-pregnant adults (NCT00082576 and NCT00367653) [19] and one study in children (NCT00677833) [20].

The study we describe here (NCT01103713) was designed to assess weekly parasitological response and drug concentrations of a single fixed-dose combination of AZCQ administered over 3 days in women with asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia, in their first or second pregnancy, in sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to determine if AZCQ could clear the malaria parasites from the blood during pregnancy with a similar efficacy as that demonstrated in previous adult treatment studies. However, unlike typical treatment studies that rely on demonstrating adequate clinical and parasitological response as a primary endpoint [21], the trial was designed to provide supportive data in asymptomatic, parasitemic women for a Phase 3 IPTp companion study (NCT01103063). An out-patient design was used to reflect normal antenatal care conditions for IPTp programs.


Study Design and Patients

This was an open-label, non-comparative out-patient study in primi- or secundigravidae women ≥16 to ≤35 years of age in the second or third trimesters of pregnancy with asymptomatic peripheral P. falciparum parasitemia (counts of 80–100,000 cells/μl). Study participants received a single 3-day course of AZCQ IPTp therapy after providing informed consent.

Women were excluded if they were revealed to have multiple gestations as per ultrasound screening, had any chronic illness that might have adversely affected fetal growth or viability, or had evidence of current obstetric complications that could adversely impact the pregnancy or fetal outcomes, including presence of congenital anomalies, placenta previa, or abruption. Additionally, women were excluded if they had clinical signs and symptoms of malaria, history of fever within prior 24 h, baseline hemoglobin <8 g/dl, or had used antimalarial drugs in the previous 4 weeks. An inability to tolerate oral treatment in tablet form, or a known allergy to the study drugs (AZ, CQ, and SP, as these treatments are continued after study completion) or to any macrolides or sulfonamides, use of any medication that may have interfered with the evaluation of the study drug or that was contra-indicated during pregnancy, a current history of smoking or alcohol/drug abuse, or severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality (e.g., clinically-assessed symptomatic HIV infection, sickle-cell disease, renal, or hepatic disease) were also reasons for exclusion.

A fixed-dose AZCQ combination (four fixed dose combination tablets of AZ 250 mg/CQ 155 mg) was used in this study [22]. Two tablets of this formulation had previously been shown to result in comparable systemic exposures of AZ and CQ to those achieved by administration of standalone tablets of AZ (Zithromax® 500 mg) and CQ (Aralen® 300 mg) [20]). The first dose on Day 0 and the third dose on Day 2 were administered under supervision during the antenatal care visit; while the second dose on Day 1 was administered at home by a field worker. After administration of study drug, weekly follow-up visits took place until day 42 and additional follow-up took place at or after delivery. Long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets were provided on day 0 and their installation was verified during a day 1 home visit by field workers.

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, adopted by the General Assembly of the World Medical Association (1996), and was conducted in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guideline on Good Clinical Practice (GCP), and applicable local regulatory requirements and laws. The study protocol was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) of London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and the following local Institutional Review Board (IRB)/IECs: the Comité National d’Ethique pour la recherché en Sante in Cotonou, Benin; the Kenyatta National Hospital—University of Nairobi Ethics Review Committee in Nairobi, Kenya; the College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee in Blantyre, Malawi; the Medical Research Coordinating Committee in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; and the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology, the School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee of Makerere University, and the Mulago Hospital Research and Ethics Committee in Kampala, Uganda. An independent External Data Monitoring Committee (EDMC) oversaw the conduct of the study. Written informed consent (or assent from participants <18 years of age) was obtained from all study participants or their legally-acceptable representatives prior to any study-related procedure.

Primary and Secondary Endpoints

Parasitological response was assessed by analysis of peripheral blood smears (thick and thin) stained by standard Giemsa staining for parasite identification. Parasite numbers were counted using the white blood cell counting method on thick smears. Each blood smear was read by two microscopists blinded to the reading of each other. In the event of any discrepancies, a third microscopist read the blood smear and the average of the two most concordant results was used. A positive blood smear had a P. falciparum count 80–100,000 μl upon examination of 100 high power fields on thick smear. A blood slide was considered negative when the examination of 100 high power fields on the thick smear do not show the presence of any P. falciparum parasites.

Molecular testing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to verify the genotype of asexual P. falciparum parasites [23]. Analysis of PCR-adjusted data allowed the differentiation between the reappearance of the same genotypic parasite as present at baseline (considered a treatment failure, recrudescence) and re-infection with genotypically different P. falciparum after parasitological cure of the baseline infection. Conversely, analysis of PCR-unadjusted data made no distinction between reappearance of the baseline infection or re-infection with a genotypically distinct parasite, both of which would be considered treatment failures. The primary endpoint was the PCR-adjusted parasitological cure rate on day 28 following a single 3-day dosing regimen of AZCQ in asymptomatic pregnant women with P. falciparum parasitemia. Secondary endpoints included PCR-adjusted and unadjusted parasitological cure rates on days 7, 14, 21, 28 (unadjusted), 35, and 42 post first dose of study drug, and parasite counts (number of asexual P. falciparum parasites per μl of blood) at each visit.

Safety Endpoints

Adverse events (AEs), reported in mothers and neonates, were analyzed. Additionally, temperature, physical examinations, hemoglobin concentrations, and exposure in utero were recorded. An AE with onset after the first dose of study drug was to be counted as a treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) if it occurred on or before 35 days post last dose. If the onset was prior to the first dose of study drug and the severity increased thereafter, the event was also to be counted as a TEAE.

Statistical Analysis

Study populations were defined as follows. The intent to treat (ITT) analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had baseline blood smears positive for P. falciparum monoinfection. The modified ITT (MITT) comprised a subset of the ITT population who had P. falciparum monoinfection (confirmed by microscopy) with parasite counts in the range of 80–100,000/μl on thick blood smears. The per protocol (PP) analysis population comprised a subset of MITT participants who received all 3 days of study drug. Safety analysis data included all mothers who received at least one dose of study drug, while for neonates it consisted of all liveborn babies. Parasite counts were summarized descriptively using the sample mean, standard deviation (SD), standard error (SE), median, minimum, and maximum. Primary and secondary parasitological endpoints were estimated from the Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve (primary analysis), with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), based on time to the first occurrence of parasitological failure. If, at a given time point, no parasitological failures had yet occurred, resulting in a missing variance estimate, an exact CI derived from the binomial distribution was computed. A subject was a parasitological responder if she had a zero parasite count on the day 7 visit without subsequent recurrence through the day of consideration (PCR adjusted or unadjusted as applicable), otherwise she was a parasitological failure. Participants who did not experience the defined event (parasitological failure) were considered censored. Crude incidence of parasite cure was also calculated for days 28 and 42. A sensitivity analysis was also performed considering study discontinuations as failures. Data were pooled across all sites for analysis. No statistical hypothesis was tested.

Drug Concentrations

Concentrations of serum AZ, plasma CQ, and the CQ metabolite, desethyl-CQ (DECQ) were evaluated with sparse pharmacokinetic sampling on day 0 predose, day 2 predose, 2 h (as close to 2 h as possible), and 8 h (time window: 4–12 h) post dose, and at a random time point on days 7 and 14. In addition, due to the long half-life of CQ, plasma concentrations of CQ and DECQ were measured at a random time point on days 21 and 28.

Blood samples were centrifuged at 1700 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C. Serum for AZ or plasma for CQ and DECQ samples were stored within 1 hour of collection at -20°C until shipped for assay. AZ, CQ, and DECQ concentrations were analyzed using validated, sensitive, and specific high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric methods in compliance with Pfizer standard operating procedures. AZ assays were performed by Bioanalytical Laboratory (BASi) (USA) and CQ/DECQ assays were performed by Bioanalytical Laboratory WuXi appTec (China).


Patients Characteristics and Populations Analyzed

The study was conducted between March 2011 and October 2013 in six study sites in five countries: Benin, Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda. In total, 404 women were screened, of whom, 168 were treated and 155 completed the study (Fig 1). The site by site breakdown of study completion is as follows: in Kenya, 62/67 (92.5%) participants completed the study; in Tanzania (2 sites), 1/1 (100.0%) participant; in Benin, 1/1 (100.0%) participant; in Uganda, 46/49 (93.9%) participants; and in Malawi, 45/50 (90.0%) participants.

Fig 1. Study Design.

ITT, intent-to-treat; MITT, modified ITT; PP, per protocol.

Reasons for discontinuation included unwillingness to continue study participation (eight women), lost to follow-up (two women), termination of the study (two women), and another due to relocation (one woman). The safety analysis set comprised all 168 women who were treated and 157 live-born neonates. There were three stillbirths recorded, and eight pregnancy outcomes were not recorded because 7 participants withdrew consent and 1 was lost to follow-up. Drug concentrations were assessed from samples from 166 participants. The MITT population comprised 163 women who had a P. falciparum monoinfection (confirmed by microscopy) with parasite counts between 80 and 100,000 per μl (one subject in Tanzania who had a parasite count of 500,000 per μl was incorrectly included in the study) and who received at least one dose of study drug. In addition, two participants were found to have been improperly consented and were, therefore, excluded from the efficacy analysis. The PP analysis set comprised 158 participants in the MITT population who received all three daily doses of study drug.

Baseline demographics for the safety population are shown in Table 1. For 124 (73.8%) women this was the first pregnancy, while 43 (25.6%) women had one previous pregnancy resulting in a live birth, and one woman had a previous pregnancy that resulted in a spontaneous abortion (Table 1). One woman had two prior pregnancies (a protocol deviation), both resulting in a live birth. Most women with one or more prior pregnancies reported vaginal deliveries (40 [23.8%] women in the group with one prior pregnancy and one [0.6%] woman in the group with two prior pregnancies). A cesarean section was reported for two (1.2%) women in the group with one prior pregnancy. No participant reported previous stillbirth, elective terminations, ectopic or molar pregnancies, history of subfertility, risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes due to environmental/occupational exposures, or a family history of congenital abnormality/genetic diseases. Long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets were installed for 164/165 participants in the ITT population. The median baseline asexual parasite count for all participants in the ITT population was 1240 per μl (Table 2).

Table 1. Baseline demographics and summary of obstetric medical history in the safety population.

CQ Resistance

In the ITT population, 100 (60.6%) participants had infections with parasites carrying a mutant version of either one or both of the P. falciparum CQ resistance transporter (PfCRT) or P. falciparum multidrug resistance 1 (Pfmdr1) genes. The remaining 65 (39.4%) participants had wild-type infections.


At day 28, 153 of 154 participants in the PP population had a PCR-adjusted parasitological response (KM estimate: 99.35%; 95% CI: 97.76, 100.00) (Tables 3 and 4). Results for the MITT population (data not shown) were identical. Sensitivity analyses for PCR-adjusted parasitological response (in which study dropouts were considered failures) supported these results, with 153/160 participants (95.69% [CI: 92.26, 99.13]) assessed as parasitological responders on day 28 in the MITT population and 153/155 participants (98.72% [CI: 96.64, 100.00]) in the PP population. Results for the ITT analysis population (data not shown) were similar to those for the PP and MITT populations.

Table 3. Crude estimates of parasitological responders at days 28 and 42 in the PP analysis population.

Table 4. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage parasitological responders at days 7–42 in the PP analysis population.

Day 28 results for PCR-adjusted parasitological response in the PP population by site were: Kenya 100%, Benin 100%, Uganda 97.73%, Malawi 100%. Day 42 results for PCR-adjusted parasitological response in the PP population by site were: Kenya 96.35%, Benin 100%, Uganda 87.91%, and Malawi 100%.

Results for PCR-unadjusted data were identical to PCR-adjusted data until day 21, and were slightly lower, but still above 95%, at day 28. By days 35 and 42, PCR-unadjusted results were markedly lower, reaching approximately 78% at the end of the follow-up period (Table 4).


There were no deaths reported in the pregnant mothers participating in this study. There were four deaths in neonates due to AEs: two neonatal asphyxia, one sudden infant death syndrome, and one premature baby (no further details recorded). None of these were considered related to study drug.

No mothers experienced serious AEs (SAEs) and nine SAEs were reported in neonates. TEAEs were reported in 92 (54.8%) mothers and 27 (17.2%) neonates. The most common TEAEs, those occurring in at least 5 mothers, are listed in Table 5. The most frequent TEAEs were vomiting (20.8%) and dizziness (19.6%). No mothers and seven (4.5%) neonates experienced severe AEs. Treatment-related TEAEs were reported in 71 (42.3%) mothers, and none in neonates.

Table 5. All-causality treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in ≥5 mothers.

Drug Concentrations

Mean serum AZ concentrations were 194, 994, and 708 ng/ml at 0, 2, and 8 h on day 2, respectively, and 54.4 and 20.3 ng/ml on days 7 and 14, respectively (Table 6). Mean plasma CQ concentrations were: 306, 621, and 641 ng/ml at 0, 2, and 8 h on day 2, respectively; and 130, 43.1, 22.4, and 12.7 ng/ml on days 7, 14, 21, and 28, respectively. Mean plasma DECQ concentrations were: 184, 220, and 242 ng/ml at 0, 2, and 8 h on day 2, respectively; and 144, 55.5, 29.8, and 19.4 ng/ml on days 7, 14, 21, and 28, respectively (Table 6). In general, the mean concentrations of serum AZ, plasma CQ, and plasma DECQ showed large CV% values (ranges of 33–156%, 42–228%, and 57–109%, respectively).

Birth Outcomes

Of the 157 neonates, 66 (42.0%) were female and 91 (58.0%) were male. The mean birth length (SD) was 46.3 cm (3.6) and the mean birth weight (SD) was 3022.2 g (494.5), while nine of the 137 with recorded birth weight (6.6%) had low birth weight (LBW; <2500 g). There were 144 (91.7%) normal newborns. Congenital malformations or anomalies were reported for two (1.3%) newborns (one hypospadias and one polydactyly), and other neonatal problems or abnormalities were reported for nine (5.7%) newborns. The outcome for two (1.3%) newborns was unknown (Tables 7 and 8).

Table 8. Summary of neonate outcomes at birth in the safety population.


This open-label, out-patient study in five countries in sub-Saharan Africa was designed to assess parasitological cure rates up to 42 days following a single, 3-day dose of AZCQ given during the second or third trimester to pregnant women in their first or second pregnancy. In this study, a single, 3-day dose of AZCQ was well-tolerated and effective in reducing P. falciparum parasitemia in asymptomatic pregnant women with confirmed P. falciparum parasitemia.

There were no deaths in the mother group, and the occurrence of SAEs was low, with no serious TEAEs or severe TEAEs in the mother group up to day 35. The most frequent treatment-related TEAEs in the mother group were vomiting (20.2%) and dizziness (19.6%). After day 35, there were four neonate deaths due to SAEs, none of which were considered to be treatment-related.

An accompanying Phase 3 pivotal clinical trial (NCT01103063) was designed to assess AZCQ versus SP for IPTp in East and Southern sub-Saharan Africa. This trial was terminated based on results of a pre-planned interim analysis, which showed that the futility boundary for efficacy had been crossed.

Despite the failure of the pivotal Phase 3 trial, our findings showed that parasitological cure rates to a single, 3-day dose of AZCQ were high throughout the long duration (42 days) of the study, which was consistent with previous studies and further confirmed by sensitivity analyses in which study drop-outs were considered to be treatment failures.

The reasons why this AZCQ IPTp treatment regimen failed to demonstrate superiority versus SP in the Phase 3 pivotal trial are beyond the scope of this article, but clearly, the data we present here did not appear to suggest that AZCQ IPTp treatment would not be a viable treatment option. Another potential alternative to SP IPTp, DHA-P, was recently described [24, 25]. Interestingly, a recent study on mefloquine versus SP IPTp, showed that although mefloquine reduced the incidence of maternal parasitemia at the time of birth, there was no difference versus SP in the prevalence of LBW [26]. The investigators postulated that the improved malaria control strategies in place throughout the trial led to overall reductions in malaria transmission rate, thereby reducing the potential impact of malaria on birth outcomes relative to other confounding factors [26]. Perhaps, in large-scale Phase 3 clinical trials, the improvements in malaria control and access to health care that are provided to all participants, in either treatment group, reduce the influence of malaria on birth outcomes, thereby reducing the statistical power to detect any difference between treatment interventions.


The authors would like to thank Qiang Wang of Pfizer Inc. for support with the drug concentration assays. Medical writing and editorial support was provided by Paul Hassan, PhD, of Engage Scientific and was funded by Pfizer.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: KP JK GAM QZ RR JR SD AA PV.
  2. Data curation: JR.
  3. Formal analysis: QZ JR.
  4. Funding acquisition: RR SD PV.
  5. Investigation: KP JK GAM QZ.
  6. Methodology: KP JK GAM QZ RR JR SD AA PV.
  7. Project administration: RR SD PV.
  8. Resources: KP JK GAM QZ RR JR SD AA PV.
  9. Validation: JR.
  10. Writing – review & editing: KP JK GAM QZ RR JR SD AA PV.


  1. 1. Greenwood B, Mutabingwa T (2002) Malaria in 2002. Nature 415: 670–672. pmid:11832954
  2. 2. Wright GJ, Rayner JC (2014) Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte invasion: combining function with immune evasion. PLoS Pathog 10: e1003943. pmid:24651270
  3. 3. Laishram DD, Sutton PL, Nanda N, Sharma VL, Sobti RC, Carlton JM, et al. (2012) The complexities of malaria disease manifestations with a focus on asymptomatic malaria. Malar J 11: 29. pmid:22289302
  4. 4. World Health Organization (2013) World Malaria Report 2013.
  5. 5. Menendez C (2006) Malaria during pregnancy. Curr Mol Med 6: 269–273. pmid:16515517
  6. 6. van Eijk AM, Ayisi JG, ter Kuile FO, Misore AO, Otieno JA, Rosen DH, et al. (2002) Risk factors for malaria in pregnancy in an urban and peri-urban population in western Kenya. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 96: 586–592. pmid:12625128
  7. 7. Rijken MJ, McGready R, Boel ME, Poespoprodjo R, Singh N, Syafruddin D, et al. (2012) Malaria in pregnancy in the Asia-Pacific region. Lancet Infect Dis 12: 75–88. pmid:22192132
  8. 8. Dellicour S, Tatem AJ, Guerra CA, Snow RW, ter Kuile FO (2010) Quantifying the number of pregnancies at risk of malaria in 2007: a demographic study. PLoS Med 7: e1000221. pmid:20126256
  9. 9. Chico RM, Pittrof R, Greenwood B, Chandramohan D (2008) Azithromycin-chloroquine and the intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy. Malar J 7: 255. pmid:19087267
  10. 10. World Health Organization Organization (2007) Malaria in pregnancy. Guidelines for measuring key monitoring and evaluation indicators. France: WHO.
  11. 11. World Health Organization Organization (2012) Updated WHO policy recommendation. Intermittent Preventive Treatment of malaria in pregnancy using Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP).
  12. 12. Geiger C, Compaore G, Coulibaly B, Sie A, Dittmer M, Sanchez C, et al. (2014) Substantial increase in mutations in the genes pfdhfr and pfdhps puts sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine-based intermittent preventive treatment for malaria at risk in Burkina Faso. Trop Med Int Health 19: 690–697. pmid:24674355
  13. 13. ter Kuile FO, van Eijk AM, Filler SJ (2007) Effect of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance on the efficacy of intermittent preventive therapy for malaria control during pregnancy: a systematic review. JAMA 297: 2603–2616. pmid:17579229
  14. 14. Spalding MD, Eyase FL, Akala HM, Bedno SA, Prigge ST, Coldren RL, et al. (2010) Increased prevalence of the pfdhfr/phdhps quintuple mutant and rapid emergence of pfdhps resistance mutations at codons 581 and 613 in Kisumu, Kenya. Malar J 9: 338. pmid:21106088
  15. 15. Karema C, Imwong M, Fanello CI, Stepniewska K, Uwimana A, Nakeesathit S, et al. (2010) Molecular correlates of high-level antifolate resistance in Rwandan children with Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54: 477–483. pmid:19841150
  16. 16. Chico RM, Chandramohan D (2011) Azithromycin plus chloroquine: combination therapy for protection against malaria and sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 7: 1153–1167. pmid:21736423
  17. 17. Ohrt C, Willingmyre GD, Lee P, Knirsch C, Milhous W (2002) Assessment of azithromycin in combination with other antimalarial drugs against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46: 2518–2524. pmid:12121927
  18. 18. Pereira MR, Henrich PP, Sidhu AB, Johnson D, Hardink J, Van Deusen J, et al. (2011) In vivo and in vitro antimalarial properties of azithromycin-chloroquine combinations that include the resistance reversal agent amlodipine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 3115–3124. pmid:21464242
  19. 19. Sagara I, Oduro AR, Mulenga M, Dieng Y, Ogutu B, Tiono AB, et al. (2014) Efficacy and safety of a combination of azithromycin and chloroquine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in two multi-country randomised clinical trials in African adults. Malar J 13: 458. pmid:25425434
  20. 20. Chandra R, Ansah P, Sagara I, Sie A, Tiono AB, Djimdé AA, et al. (2015) Comparison of azithromycin plus chloroquine versus artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in children in Africa: a randomized, open-label study. Malar J 14: 108. pmid:25881046
  21. 21. World Health Organization Organization (2003) Assessment and monitoring of antimalarial drug efficacy for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria.
  22. 22. Zhao Q, Purohit V, Cai J, RR L, Chandra R (2013) Relative bioavailability of a fixed-combination tablet formulation of azithromycin and chloroquine in healthy adult subjects. J Bioequiv Availab 5: 1–5.
  23. 23. Djimdé A, Doumbo OK, Cortese JF, Kayentao K, Doumbo S, Diourté Y, et al. (2001) A molecular marker for chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med 344: 257–263. pmid:11172152
  24. 24. Desai M, Gutman J, L'lanziva A, Otieno K, Juma E, Kariuki S, et al (2015) Intermittent screening and treatment or intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the control of malaria during pregnancy in western Kenya: an open-label, three-group, randomized controlled superiority trial. Lancet 386:2507–19. pmid:26429700
  25. 25. Kakuru A, Jagannathan P, Muhindo MK, Natureeba P, Awori P, Nakalembe M, et al. (2016) Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the prevention of malaria in pregnancy. N Engl J Med 374:928–39. pmid:26962728
  26. 26. Gonzalez R, Desai M, Macete E, Ouma P, Kakolwa MA, Abdulla S, et al. (2014) Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy with Mefloquine in HIV-Infected Women Receiving Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis: A Multicenter Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. PLoS Med 11: e1001735. pmid:25247995