Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Piscirickettsia salmonis Imbalances the Innate Immune Response to Succeed in a Productive Infection in a Salmonid Cell Line Model

  • Claudio A. Álvarez,

    Affiliation Laboratorio de Genética e Inmunología Molecular, Instituto de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile

  • Fernando A. Gomez,

    Affiliation Laboratorio de Genética e Inmunología Molecular, Instituto de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile

  • Luis Mercado,

    Affiliations Laboratorio de Genética e Inmunología Molecular, Instituto de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile, Fraunhofer Chile Research Foundation, Center for Systems Biotechnology, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile

  • Ramón Ramírez,

    Affiliations Laboratorio de Genética e Inmunología Molecular, Instituto de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile, Fraunhofer Chile Research Foundation, Center for Systems Biotechnology, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile

  • Sergio H. Marshall

    sergio.marshall@pucv.cl

    Affiliations Laboratorio de Genética e Inmunología Molecular, Instituto de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile, Fraunhofer Chile Research Foundation, Center for Systems Biotechnology, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile

Piscirickettsia salmonis Imbalances the Innate Immune Response to Succeed in a Productive Infection in a Salmonid Cell Line Model

  • Claudio A. Álvarez, 
  • Fernando A. Gomez, 
  • Luis Mercado, 
  • Ramón Ramírez, 
  • Sergio H. Marshall
PLOS
x

Abstract

Piscirickettsia salmonis is a facultative intracellular bacterium that causes the disease called “salmon rickettsial syndrome”. Attempts to control this disease have been unsuccessful, because existing vaccines have not achieved the expected effectiveness and the antibiotics used fail to completely eradicate the pathogen. This is in part the product of lack of scientific information that still lacks on the mechanisms used by this bacterium to overcome infected–cell responses and survive to induce a productive infection in macrophages. For that, this work was focused in determining if P. salmonis is able to modify the expression and the imbalance of IL-12 and IL-10 using an in vitro model. Additionally, we also evaluated the role the antimicrobial peptide hepcidin had in the control of this pathogen in infected cells. Therefore, the expression of IL-10 and IL-12 was evaluated at earlier stages of infection in the RTS11 cell line derived from Oncorhynchus mykiss macrophages. Simultaneously, the hepcidin expression and location was analyzed in the macrophages infected with the pathogen. Our results suggest that IL-10 is clearly induced at early stages of infection with values peaking at 36 hours post infection. Furthermore, infective P. salmonis downregulates the expression of antimicrobial peptide hepcidin and vesicles containing this peptide were unable to merge with the infective bacteria. Our results suggest that P. salmonis is able to manipulate the behavior of host cytokines and likely might constitute a virulence mechanism that promotes intracellular bacterial replication in leukocytes cells lines of trout and salmon. This mechanism involves the generation of an optimum environment for the microorganism and the downregulation of antimicrobial effectors like hepcidin.

Introduction

Piscirickettsia salmonis is a Gram-negative bacterium and the causative agent of piscirickettsiosis, which produces chronic systemic infection and generally affects seawater-reared salmonids [1]. This pathogen is a non-motile, facultative, intracellular organism classified within the recently denominated Piscirickettsiaceae family of the Thriotrichales order. Although characterized as pleomorphic, P. salmonis is usually coccoid in shape and presents a diameter ranging from 0.1–1.5 μm [2,3]. This bacterium can grow in different cell-free media supplemented with either hemoglobin or Fe+2, and it can also infect different fish cell lines, including salmon macrophages and monocytes [47]. However, the mechanisms by which P. salmonis overcomes the antimicrobial activities of fish macrophages is unknown, just as is the case for other fish pathogens, including Edwardsiella ictaluri, Edwardsiella tarda, Vibrio anguillarum, Yersinia ruckeri, and Mycobacterium marinum [8].

The arrest of phagosome maturation or acidification processes is one of the most common mechanisms used by intracellular bacteria to replicate into phagocytes [9]. It was recently reported that P. salmonis can inhibit phagosome-lysosome fusion by secreting virulence effectors via the Dot/Icm secretion system [10,11]. Therefore, while it is clear that this mechanism is among the strategies employed by P. salmonis to survive inside infected cells, it is still completely unclear how this pathogen is able to avoid and control the immune response of the infected host.

In fish, as well as in other vertebrates, the first line of defense against pathogen invasion is the innate immune system, a system in which macrophages play a pivotal role in triggering immune responses [12]. Macrophages primarily act as antigen-presenting cells, but these cells are also responsible for most phagocytic activity, in addition to regulating the immune system cascade triggered by the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines [12]. These proinflammatory cytokines include interleukin (IL)-12, which are key components for the efficient performance of phagocytes in teleost fish, similar to the roles played by IL homologs in mammals [13,14]. In higher vertebrates, bacterial pathogens manipulate the responses of host cytokines inside macrophages as a survival strategy.

Some bacteria achieve cytokine manipulation via virulence effectors released by secretion systems. These effectors alter the balance between cytokines by increasing the expression of soluble IL-10 or by harboring this IL in the cell membrane via lipopolysaccharides [1518]. As a result, the activation of macrophages is impaired, and IL-10 overexpression counteracts the expected responses of the innate immune system. This strategy is used by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a well-studied intracellular bacterium that triggers an early response secretion of IL-10 in host macrophages, resulting in phagosome maturation arrest and the deactivation of additional microbicidal activities [19]. Related to this, host production of the prostaglandin E2 is involved in the induction of IL-10 as an effector of immune evasion mechanisms for important human pathogens such as Salmonella typhi, M. tuberculosis, Legionella pneumophila, and Francisella tularensis [18]. Furthermore, L. pneumophila and F. tularensis induce the expression of IL-12 by decreasing the pathogen levels of the p40 mRNA subunit [20,21]. Notwithstanding these advances, knowledge on the role that cytokines play in fish macrophages in avoiding or modulating intracellular pathogen infection is still limited.

Therefore, the aim of the present work was to determine if P. salmonis is able to modify and imbalance the expression of IL-12 and IL-10 in an in vitro fish model, specifically the permissive RTS11 cell line derived from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) macrophages. Additionally, the antimicrobial peptide hepcidin was evaluated to determine its activity during the pathogenic infection of macrophages. The obtained results suggest that P. salmonis is able to manipulate the behavior of host cytokines by increasing IL-10 expression in the RTS11 cell line. Concomitantly, hepcidin was downregulated in infected macrophages, in contrast with that observed in cells infected with the inactivated pathogen. Therefore, it appears that P. salmonis is able to selectively modulate host innate immune signaling through synergistic complementary alternatives that prevent cell interference in successful infection. In summary, this complex modulation process was observed to involve an imbalance between two target cytokines, IL-10 and IL-12, as well as the downregulation of the antibacterial peptide hepcidin. This is the first report to approximate the strategies employed by a fish bacterium to overwhelm the cell immune response, thus providing novel information which could be applied towards developing control alternatives for P. salmonis in the field.

Materials and Methods

Peptide Synthesis, Purification, and Characterization

Peptides were designed based on the available O. mykiss IL-10 sequence (GenBank Accession Number: NP_001232028.1). To define the best antigenic epitopes, the Kolaskar and Tongaonkar method was used in the bioinformatics server of the Immunomedicine Group of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid [http://imed.med.ucm.es/Tools/antigenic.pl] [22]. The ExPASy ProtScale tool was used to analyze the physicochemical behavior of the antigenic sequences and to identify regions of high hydrophilicity and mean flexibility [23]. The antigenic regions along the entire molecule were automatically modeled using a human homology model in the SWISS-MODEL server [24] (Fig A in S1 File). The best epitope peptides were synthesized by the solid phase multiple peptide system using Fmoc amino acids (0.65 meq/g Rink-Resin; Iris Biotech) [25], cleaved with trifluoroacetic acid/triisopropylsilane/ultrapure water (95/2.5/2.5; Novabiochem, Merck Millipore), and purified through reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with a 0–70% acetonitrile-water mixture gradient for 30 min at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The peptides were lyophilized and analyzed by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry to confirm molecular mass (Fig B in S1 File).

Antibody Production and Characterization

Polyclonal antibodies were generated against the IL-10 epitope peptide in six week-old female CF-1 mice as previously reported [26,27]. Antiserum specificities were evaluated through an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblotting by seeding each peptide (at 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 μg) onto a nitrocellulose membrane (0.45 μm; Thermo Scientific) (Fig C and D in S1 File). The membranes were blocked and washed as previously reported [28], and then incubated with the anti-IL-10 antiserum and pre-immune antiserum for 1 h. After this, the membranes were washed and incubated with anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Thermo Scientific) at a 1:7000 dilution. The membranes were revealed with the Enhanced Chemiluminescence Western Blotting Substrate (Pierce, Thermo Scientific). Evaluations of hepcidin were performed using a previously reported specific antiserum [27,28].

P. salmonis Growth Conditions

The P. salmonis strain LF-89 (ATCC VR-1361) was routinely grown on sheep blood agar plates supplemented with 0.1% L-cysteine and 1% glucose at 23°C, as previously reported [5,10].

P. salmonis Infection Kinetics in RTS-11 Cell Line

The RTS11 monocyte/macrophage cell line of O. mykiss (kindly donated by Dr. Niels Bols, University of Waterloo, Canada) was cultured at 20°C in the Leibovitz’s L-15 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), as previously reported [2,29,30]. Infection kinetics were assessed at the earlier stages of infection (1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h) since this is the time required by P. salmonis to generate a replicative vacuole [10,31] (S1 Fig). For this, a single P. salmonis colony grown in agar plates was used to inoculate 3 ml of the BM3 medium [6], incubated at 23°C and centrifuged at 100 rpm until reaching an optical density at 600 nm of 0.3 (≈12–16 h). Then, 200 μL of the P. salmonis medium was used to infect the RTS11 cell line, with one cell flask used for every kinetic time point and including biological duplicates. For RNA extraction, the cells were scraped from the flask and centrifuged at 300 x g for 10 min. The cellular pellet was processed for RNA purification with the TRIzol LS Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA concentration was measured with a Nanodrop-1000 spectrophotometer.

For protein extraction, the cells were scraped, resuspended directly in 250 μl of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6; 0.3 M NaCl; 0.5% Triton x-100; 0.5M EDTA and 0.2% protease inhibitor cocktail), and incubated for 30 min on ice. The mixture was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was transferred to a new tube. Total protein concentration was determined using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Thermo Scientific).

Negative controls of RTS11 cells infected with heat-inactivated P. salmonis were used. Piscirickettsia salmonis bacteria were inactivated at 50°C for 15 min, and cell viability was determined using the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The infection assays were performed as previously described.

SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting

For SDS-PAGE analyses, 25 μg of total protein were heated at 90°C for 10 min in a Laemmli Sample Buffer and electrophoresed on a 15% Tris-glycin polyacrylamide gel at 100 V for 2 h. After electrophoresis, the gels were transferred to a 0.45 μm polyvinylidene fluoride membrane and run at 100 V for 1 h. The membranes were then incubated in 5% bovine serum albumin in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) on a shaker for 1 h at 20°C. The membranes were incubated with anti-IL-10, anti-hepcidin immune sera or commercial monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), diluted to 1:2000, and stored overnight at 20°C. The secondary anti-IgG mouse-HRP antibody (1:7000; Pierce, Thermo Scientific) was added, and the membranes were incubated at 20°C for 60 min. The membranes were revealed with the Enhanced Chemiluminescence Western Blotting Substrate (Pierce, Thermo Scientific).

Confocal Laser-Scanning Microscopy

Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy was used to localize hepcidin in the RTS11 cell lines infected with P. salmonis. The cells were fixed on glass slides with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS. Then, the cells were incubated with anti-hepcidin rabbit antiserum (1:500) and the presence of P. salmonis was determined mouse-specific antiserum for 1 h at 20°C [27,28,32]. The samples were thoroughly washed with PBS and incubated with a 1:1000 dilution of the anti-rabbit IgG Alexa-555 conjugated antibody and anti-mouse IgG Alexa-643 conjugated antibody (Invitrogen) for 1 h at room temperature. For membrane staining, samples were exposed to Wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)- Alexa-488 conjugated (Invitrogen) for 5 min at room temperature and then washed five times with PBS.

The images were analyzed by the Leica Application Suite Advanced Fluorescence software.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR of Hepcidin, Cytokine and Phagosomal Components mRNA Levels

Real-time PCR assays were carried out using the BioRad Real-Time PCR System. Specific primers were used to amplify IL-10, IL-12, hepcidin, cathepsin D, and the p65 guanylate-binding protein 1 (GBP1) [10,3336] (S1 Table). In all cases, individual cDNAs were synthesized from 2 μg of RNA pre-treated with RNase-Free DNase RQ1, (Promega), using Oligo(dT) and the M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase Enzyme (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The qRT-PCR was performed using a total reaction volume of 20 μl for each sample, containing 2X Brilliant III SYBR Green qRT-PCR Master Mix (Agilent), 300 nM of each primer, and 1 μl of each template (1:10 dilution, in triplicate). The real-time PCRs were carried out in the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad) using the following parameters: 95°C for 3 min for initial denaturation, 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 35 s for 40 cycles. Negative controls without cDNA were also included for every time-point. Relative mRNA expressions in the RTS11 cell line were evaluated using the 2-ΔΔCt method [37]. Elongation factor 1α (ELF) was used as the housekeeping gene, using the forward and reverse GIM-ELF2 primers [38] and the same PCR conditions described above.

Results and Discussion

P. salmonis Infection Induces IL-10 Expression in the RTS-11 Cell Line

Previous research has established that P. salmonis is able to survive in different fish cell lines, including those derived from immune cells [10,30], and that the inhibition of phagosome maturation is a possible mechanism used by this pathogen to survive and replicate into immune cells [10]. Consequently, P. salmonis might be able to modulate cellular signaling to inactivate the host antimicrobial response. The selective induction of host cytokines that inhibit protective antimicrobial functions could represent a virulence mechanism that effectively deceives the host response to create an optimal environment for invading intracellular bacteria.

In vitro infection models are valuable for defining the effects of individual cytokines on specific cell types. The present study was carried out in a relevant in vitro model based on the monocyte/macrophage RTS-11cell line, which is derived from rainbow trout spleen. Infection assays were performed using a low multiplicity of infection to mimic fish infections under field conditions, where a low bacterial inoculum arrives at a presumably naïve site.

Th1 helper cells are the host immunity effectors against intracellular bacteria and they are triggered by IL-12, but a T-helper cell type 2 cytokine profile that includes IL-10 expression promotes pathogen proliferation [39]. These important macrophage-derived cytokines are usually expressed after the phagocytosis of microorganisms, thereby maintaining a balance in the antimicrobial process.

Considering the key roles of ILs in the immune response, the expressions of IL-10 and IL-12 were evaluated over the course of early P. salmonis infection of the RTS-11cell line. Results obtained through qRT-PCR showed that IL-10 mRNA was clearly induced during the early stages of infection, with values peaking at 36 h post infection (Fig 1). Consequently, IL-12 expression was not significantly altered in cells infected with virulent P. salmonis. The increase of IL-10 expression was confirmed at the protein level using a laboratory-developed anti-IL-10 antiserum (Fig 2 and S1 Fig). In contrast, IL-10 expression was undetectable at the protein level in cells infected with heat-inactivated P. salmonis (Fig 2). This result indicates that P. salmonis may manipulate the host cytokine response to upregulate IL-10, thus deactivating macrophages to permit enhanced microbial growth and, ultimately, survival within macrophages.

thumbnail
Fig 1. IL-12/IL-10 mRNA expression in RTS-11 cell line infected with P. salmonis.

Relative mRNA expression of IL-12 and IL-10 in RTS-11 cell line infected with P. salmonis for 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h. mRNA expression is expressed as a fold-change over the control (0 h). Data are presented as the mean ± standard error, with n = 4. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163943.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Overexpression of IL-10 during P. salmonis infection.

Western blotting analysis showed upregulated IL-10 protein expression in the RTS-11 cell line 12 h after P. salmonis infection or treatment with inactivated P. salmonis. Protein bands were quantified and normalized to β-actin using the ImageJ software. Relative expression is shown as a fold-change over the uninfected cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163943.g002

The inactivation of phagocytes by IL-10 induction has been previously demonstrated in other intracellular pathogens [18,4042]. Indeed, IL-10 is a potent inhibitor of macrophage functions [43], apoptosis, cytokine synthesis, and respiratory bursts [4446]. Additionally, the exogenous administration of IL-10 to macrophage or monocyte cultures infected with Coxiella burnetii or L. pneumophila promotes the replication of these intracellular bacteria [41,42]. Therefore, macrophage inactivation through the overexpression of IL-10 prevents induction of the inflammatory response, thus allowing the survival and multiplication of P. salmonis. However, the bacterial effector proteins implicated in this process remain completely unknown.

Many Gram-negative bacteria use the secretion system to deliver effectors into host cells, thereby altering the physiological functions of phagocytes [47]. The Shigella flexneri effector protein OspF can dephosphorylate nucleus-located mitogen-activated protein kinases that are necessary for histone H3 phosphorylation. This increases accessibility to the transcription factor NF-κB, which consequently uses the bacterial effector proteins to repress the innate immune response [48]. Another case is Bortedella spp., which translocates the BopN effector into the host cell via the type III secretion system, where it induces enhanced IL-10 production through the downregulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases [15]. Likewise, pathogenic Aeromonas and Yersiniae species possess a functional type III secretion system that delivers proteins into the cytoplasm of host cells [49]. Therefore, bacterial pathogens use effector proteins to enable survival against and dominance of the host innate immune.

Interestingly, P. salmonis possesses a functional Dot/Icm type IV-B secretion system as well as associated effector proteins [10]. Additionally, phagosome acidification induces the intracellular overexpression of the P. salmonis dot/icm genes. Considering this, it is possible that phagosome acidification triggers the events that secrete protein effectors via the Dot/Icm system, ultimately favoring intracellular bacterial replication [10]. Furthermore, a Dot/Icm effector of P. salmonis is likely secreted before lysosome-phagosome fusion takes place and, consequently, could participate in regulating the cellular signals of bacteria-infected phagocytes. This would finally prevent pathogen destruction by phagocytes, but further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

P. salmonis Infection Modulates the Expression of Phagosomal Components

The initial morphological event in the host-bacteria interaction is the internalization of the bacterial pathogen. This event involves GTPases that participate in moving pathogen-containing vesicles (phagosomes) and in relocating antimicrobial molecules so that the pathogen can exert its actions [50,51]. To determine whether P. salmonis could alter the expression of phagosomal components during the early stages of infection, the mRNA expressions of GBP1 GTPase, cathepsin D protease, and hepcidin, an antimicrobial peptide, were determined in the RTS-11 cell line.

The results of qRT-PCR analysis showed increased GBP1 expression 12 h post infection (Fig 3A). These results suggest that GBP1 mRNA expression is regulated by P. salmonis after bacterial internalization. In L. pneumophila, GBPs are necessary for the recognition of cytoplasmic lipopolysaccharides derived from this intracellular bacterial pathogen [52]. Additionally, GBP1 participates in the vesicle trafficking processes required for phagosomal movement, probably by inducing actin remodeling via globular actin sequestering and/or filament capping [53]. Related to this, it was recently found that P. salmonis can exploit actin monomers to disorganize the cytoskeleton and to de novo synthesize actin [31]. Therefore, GBP1 is probably involved in the macrophage cytoskeleton disruption promoted by P. salmonis.

thumbnail
Fig 3. mRNA expression of phagosomal components in RTS-11 cell line infected with P. salmonis.

Relative mRNA expression of (A) GBP1, (B) Cathepsin D, and (C) hepcidin in RTS-11 cell line infected with P. salmonis for 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h. mRNA expression is expressed as a fold-change over the control (0 h). Data are presented as the mean ± standard error, with n = 4. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163943.g003

On the other hand, cathepsin D mRNA was increase at minor level by P. salmonis (Fig 3B). This protease is needed for the destruction of microorganisms in the phagolysosome. However, P. salmonis is able to inhibit phagosome-lysosome fusion, possibly through the targeted expression and effector secretion of the Dot/Icm system and/or through another virulence mechanism, thereby ensuring pathogenic multiplication in the infected cells [10]. Additionally, IL-10 decreases the expression of cathepsin D in monocytes, resulting in the decreased delivery of cathepsin D to lysosomes [54].

P. salmonis Inhibits the Actions of Hepcidin in Macrophages

Antimicrobial peptides are an important component of the innate immune system and are necessary for eliminating pathogenic microorganisms. A previous report found that hepcidin, an antimicrobial peptide, is able to decrease P. salmonis growth [26]. Moreover, a low concentration of synthetic trout hepcidin can inhibit P. salmonis replication in a liquid medium by occupying a mechanism independent from bacteria-induced membrane disruption, probably by binding to an intracellular target [26].

Hepcidin is expressed in macrophages or cells with phagocytic capacity, and hepcidin expression increases after viral, fungal, or bacterial infection [55,56]. Particularly, infection of the RTS-11 cell line by the infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus results in increased hepcidin mRNA expression in the first hours post infection, but, interestingly, expression decreases over the course of infection [33]. In the present study, hepcidin mRNA was upregulated 12 h post infection with P. salmonis (Fig 3C). Therefore, hepcidin could be an important host defense effector against viral and bacterial infection in salmonids. To more clearly elucidate the role of hepcidin in the immune response of a salmonid species, the effect of P. salmonis infection on hepcidin expression in the RTS-11 cell line was compared against a control containing heat-inactivated P. salmonis.

A specific antiserum was used to assess the expression of hepcidin at the protein level [27,28], and relative expression was measured using actin as a housekeeping protein. Western blot analysis showed that P. salmonis infection increase the hepcidin expression more slowly than the RTS-11 cell line after exposure to heat-inactivated P. salmonis (Fig 4). Considering that intracellular pathogens can redirect the traffic of host vesicles using different mechanisms of host-defense evasion [57], focus was given to evaluating the localization of hepcidin in adherent cells of the RTS11 cell line 12 h post infection. The infected cells were stained with propidium iodide to detect bacterial and cell DNA. The infected cells were also stained with specific anti-P salmonis or anti-hepcidin antisera to evaluate possible co-localization with phagosome-containing bacteria. Samples were analyzed under a confocal laser-scanning microscope.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Effect of P. salmonis infection on hepcidin protein expression in RTS-11 cells.

Western blotting analysis evidenced a change in hepcidin protein expression in the RTS-11 cell line 12 h after P. salmonis infection or treatment with inactivated P. salmonis. Protein bands were quantified and normalized to β-actin using the ImageJ software. Relative expression is shown as a fold-change over uninfected cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163943.g004

The obtained confocal images revealed the co-localization of inactivated P. salmonis with hepcidin at 12 h post infection (Fig 5). Interestingly, when the RTS-11 cell lines were infected with infective P. salmonis, co-localization was not observed (Fig 5). The vesicles containing the antimicrobial peptide were unable to merge with the infective bacteria and were separately observed.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Localization of hepcidin and P. salmonis in the RTS-11 cell line.

(A) RTS-11 cell line infected with P. salmonis. (B) RTS-11 cell line infected with inactivated P. salmonis. Hepcidin was detected using rabbit specific antiserum and the anti-rabbit IgG Alexa-555 conjugated antibody (Red) and P. salmonis was detected with a mouse-specific antiserum and an anti-mouse IgG Alexa-643 conjugated antibody (Blue). Wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)- Alexa-488 conjugated was used for membrane staining (Green). Scale bar, 10 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163943.g005

Pathogens that are able to inhibit phagosome-lysosome fusion, such as P. salmonis, use different mechanisms to disrupt the traffic of host vesicles through cytoskeleton destabilization [58]. Many pathogenic bacteria have the ability to reorganize the actin cytoskeleton underlying the plasma membrane, which comes into contact with the pathogen [58]. Actin cytoskeleton rearrangement allows bacteria to persist in the macrophage cytosol. A recent study demonstrated that P. salmonis can disorganize the actin cytoskeleton of the SHK-1, RTS-11, and ASK cell lines, likely as a way to favor protected bacterial replication [31]. As a result of actin cytoskeleton disorganization, phagosome-containing bacteria are inaccessible by antimicrobial peptides since host vesicle traffic is destroyed.

However, this is not the only mechanism occupied by intracellular bacteria to evade the innate effectors present in phagocytic cells. For example, C. burnetii delivers different effector proteins directly into the host cell cytoplasm through a type IV B secretion system. These effector proteins generate outer membrane vesicles that act as decoys for sequestering by antimicrobial peptides [59]. In relation to P. salmonis, recent research demonstrated that the functional Dot/Icm secretion system in P. salmonis is similar to systems in closely related pathogens, including L. pneumophila and C. burnetii [10]. Nevertheless, future studies are needed to determine if outer membrane vesicle-forming effector proteins are present in P. salmonis.

Conclusions

Due to a lack of knowledge regarding the host innate immune system pathways modulated by P. salmonis, there has been little success in producing efficient vaccines and novel treatments against salmon rickettsial syndrome. Therefore, gaining insight into the signaling pathways and associated components that are mediated by P. salmonis during infection will greatly facilitate the development of new therapies and vaccines. In the present study, the observed upregulation of IL-10 might constitute a virulence mechanism used by P. salmonis to promote intracellular bacterial replication in salmonid macrophage cells lines. This mechanism optimized the cellular environment for the pathogenic microorganism and downregulated antimicrobial effectors, particularly hepcidin. The aims of future studies will be to replicate the currently presented assays in vivo using primary macrophage cultures and to analyze in vivo the effect of exogenous IL-10 on P. salmonis growth.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Growth of P. salmonis on RTS-11 line cell.

qRT-PCR expression analysis of P. salmonis ITS on RTS11 cell line after 24, 48 and 72 hours post infection. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error, with n = 4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163943.s001

(PDF)

S1 File. Antigenic peptide and antisera production against trout IL-10.

(A) The chosen epitope peptide (KKEIVQCRNYFSCKKPFDI) from rainbow trout IL-10. (B) The peptide was synthesized by a solid phase multiple peptide system, and the correct mass was obtained by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (Theoretical Molecular Weight: 2346.81 kDa). (C) Dot-blot analysis of peptide serum immunized in mice. (D) Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the synthetic peptide and peptide serum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163943.s002

(PDF)

S1 Table. Primer sequences used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163943.s003

(PDF)

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: CAA FG LM SM.
  2. Data curation: CAA FG.
  3. Formal analysis: CAA FG SM LM.
  4. Funding acquisition: CAA FG LM.
  5. Investigation: CAA FG RR.
  6. Methodology: CAA FG SM.
  7. Resources: CAA FG SM LM.
  8. Supervision: SM LM.
  9. Validation: CAA FG RR.
  10. Visualization: CAA RR.
  11. Writing – original draft: CAA FG SM LM.
  12. Writing – review & editing: CAA FG.

References

  1. 1. Cvitanich JD. Garate NO, Smith CE. The isolation of a rickettsia-like organism causing disease and mortality in Chilean salmonids and its confirmation by Koch’s postulate. J Fish Dis. 1991;14: 121–145.
  2. 2. Gómez F, Henríquez V, Marshall S. Additional evidence of the facultative intracellular nature of the fish bacterial pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis. Arch Med Vet. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile; 2009;41: 261–267.
  3. 3. Verónica Rojas M, Olivares PJ, del Río R, Marshall SH. Characterization of a novel and genetically different small infective variant of Piscirickettsia salmonis. Microb Pathog. 2008;44: 370–8. pmid:18166333
  4. 4. Mikalsen J, Skjaervik O, Wiik-Nielsen J, Wasmuth MA, Colquhoun CD. Agar culture of Piscirickettsia salmonis, a serious pathogen of farmed salmonid and marine fish. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;278: 43–47. pmid:18028392
  5. 5. Mauel MJ, Ware C, Smith PA. Culture of Piscirickettsia salmonis on enriched blood agar. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2008;20: 213–4. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18319435 pmid:18319435
  6. 6. Henríquez M, González E, Marshall SH, Henríquez V, Gómez FA, Martínez I, et al. A novel liquid medium for the efficient growth of the salmonid pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis and optimization of culture conditions. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2013;8: e71830. pmid:24039723
  7. 7. Yañez AJ, Valenzuela K, Silva H, Retamales J, Romero A, Enriquez R, et al. Broth medium for the successful culture of the fish pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis. Dis Aquat Organ. 2012;97: 197–205. pmid:22422090
  8. 8. Grayfer L, Hodgkinson JW, Belosevic M. Antimicrobial responses of teleost phagocytes and innate immune evasion strategies of intracellular bacteria. Dev Comp Immunol. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;43: 223–42. pmid:23954721
  9. 9. Flannagan RS, Cosío G, Grinstein S. Antimicrobial mechanisms of phagocytes and bacterial evasion strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol. Nature Publishing Group; 2009;7: 355–66. pmid:19369951
  10. 10. Gómez F, Tobar J, Henríquez V, Sola M, Altamirano C, Marshall SH. Evidence of the presence of a functional Dot/Icm type IV-B secretion system in the fish bacterial pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis. PLoS One. 2013;8: e54934. pmid:23383004
  11. 11. Labra Á, Arredondo-Zelada O, Flores-Herrera P, Marshall SH, Gómez FA. In sílico identification and characterization of putative Dot/Icm secreted virulence effectors in the fish pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis. Microb Pathog. 2015;92: 11–18. pmid:26706346
  12. 12. Dalmo RA, Ingebrigtsen K, Bogwald J. Non-specific defence mechanisms in fish, with particular reference to the reticuloendothelial system (RES). J Fish Dis. 1997;20: 241–273.
  13. 13. Nam BH, Moon JY, Park EH, Kim YO, Kim DG, Kong HJ, et al. Conserved Gene Structure and Function of Interleukin-10 in Teleost Fish. J Anim Vet Adv. 2014;13: 774–782. Available: http://www.medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=javaa.2014.774.782
  14. 14. Wang T, Husain M. The expanding repertoire of the IL-12 cytokine family in teleost fish: Identification of three paralogues each of the p35 and p40 genes in salmonids, and comparative analysis of their expression and modulation in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Dev Comp Immunol. 2014;46: 194–207. pmid:24759618
  15. 15. Nagamatsu K, Kuwae A, Konaka T, Nagai S, Yoshida S, Eguchi M, et al. Bordetella evades the host immune system by inducing IL-10 through a type III effector, BopN. J Exp Med. 2009;206: 3073–88. pmid:20008527
  16. 16. Chanteux H, Guisset AC, Pilette C, Sibille Y. LPS induces IL-10 production by human alveolar macrophages via MAPKinases- and Sp1-dependent mechanisms. Respir Res. 2007;8: 71. pmid:17916230
  17. 17. Yoshizawa S, Tateda K, Matsumoto T, Gondaira F, Miyazaki S, Standiford TJ, et al. Legionella pneumophila evades gamma interferon-mediated growth suppression through interleukin-10 induction in bone marrow-derived macrophages. Infect Immun. American Society for Microbiology (ASM); 2005;73: 2709–17. pmid:15845473
  18. 18. Hunt D, Wilson JE, Weih K, Ishido S, Harton J, Roche P, et al. Francisella tularensis elicits IL-10 via a PGE₂-inducible factor, to drive macrophage MARCH1 expression and class II down-regulation. PLoS One. 2012;7: e37330. pmid:22615981
  19. 19. O’Leary S, O’Sullivan MP, Keane J. IL-10 blocks phagosome maturation in mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected human macrophages. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. American Thoracic Society; 2011;45: 172–80. pmid:20889800
  20. 20. Matsunaga K, Klein TW, Newton C, Friedman H, Yamamoto Y. Legionella pneumophila Suppresses Interleukin-12 Production by Macrophages Legionella pneumophila Suppresses Interleukin-12 Production by Macrophages. 2001;69. pmid:11179377
  21. 21. Ireland R, Wang R, Alinger JB, Small P, Bosio CM. Francisella tularensis SchuS4 and SchuS4 lipids inhibit IL-12p40 in primary human dendritic cells by inhibition of IRF1 and IRF8. J Immunol. 2013;191: 1276–86. pmid:23817430
  22. 22. Kolaskar AS, Tongaonkar PC. A semi-empirical method for prediction of antigenic determinants on protein antigens. FEBS Lett. 1990;276: 172–4. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1702393 pmid:1702393
  23. 23. Wilkins MR, Gasteiger E, Bairoch A, Sanchez JC, Williams KL, Appel RD, et al. Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Methods Mol Biol. 1999;112: 531–52. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027275 pmid:10027275
  24. 24. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T. The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics. 2006;22: 195–201. pmid:16301204
  25. 25. Houghten R. General Method for the Rapid Solid-Phase Synthesis of Large Numbers of Peptides: Specificity of Antigen—Antibody Interaction at the Level of Individual Amino Acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1985;82: 5131–5135. pmid:2410914
  26. 26. Alvarez CA, Guzmán F, Cárdenas C, Marshall SH, Mercado L. Antimicrobial activity of trout hepcidin. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014;41: 93–101. pmid:24794583
  27. 27. Álvarez C, Santana PA, Guzmán F, Marshall S, Mercado LA. Detection of the hepcidin prepropeptide and mature peptide in liver of rainbow trout. Dev Comp Immunol. 2013;41: 77–81. pmid:23603124
  28. 28. Santana P, Alvarez C, Guzmán F, Mercado L. Development of a sandwich ELISA for quantifying hepcidin in Rainbow trout. Fish Shellfish Immunol. Elsevier Ltd; 2013;35: 748–755. pmid:23791861
  29. 29. Ganassin RC, Bols NC. Development of a monocyte/macrophage-like cell line, RTS11, from rainbow trout spleen. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 1998;8: 457–476.
  30. 30. Rojas V, Galanti N, Bols NC, Marshall SH. Productive infection of Piscirickettsia salmonis in macrophages and monocyte-like cells from rainbow trout, a possible survival strategy. J Cell Biochem. 2009;108: 631–7. pmid:19681041
  31. 31. Ramírez R, Gómez FA, Marshall SH. The infection process of Piscirickettsia salmonis in fish macrophages is dependent upon interaction with host-cell clathrin and actin. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362: 1–8. pmid:25790493
  32. 32. Marshall SH, Conejeros P, Zahr M, Olivares J, Gómez F, Cataldo P, et al. Immunological characterization of a bacterial protein isolated from salmonid fish naturally infected with Piscirickettsia salmonis. Vaccine. 2007;25: 2095–102. pmid:17250933
  33. 33. Peter P, Lin C, Bols NC, Chen TT, Chiou PP. Characterization of virus/double-stranded RNA-dependent induction of antimicrobial peptide hepcidin in trout macrophages. Dev Comp Immunol. 2007;31: 1297–309. pmid:17498800
  34. 34. Salem M, Kenney PB, Rexroad CE, Yao J. Development of a 37 k high-density oligonucleotide microarray: a new tool for functional genome research in rainbow trout. J Fish Biol. 2008;72: 2187–2206.
  35. 35. Wang T, Husain M, Hong S, Holland JW. Differential expression, modulation and bioactivity of distinct fish IL-12 isoforms: implication towards the evolution of Th1-like immune responses. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44: 1541–51. pmid:24470165
  36. 36. Harun NO, Costa MM, Secombes CJ, Wang T. Sequencing of a second interleukin-10 gene in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss and comparative investigation of the expression and modulation of the paralogues in vitro and in vivo. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011;31: 107–17. pmid:21536138
  37. 37. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25: 402–8. pmid:11846609
  38. 38. Sepúlveda D, Bohle H, Labra A, Grothusen H, Marshall SH. Design and evaluation of a unique RT-qPCR assay for diagnostic quality control assessment that is applicable to pathogen detection in three species of salmonid fish. BMC Vet Res. 2013;9: 183. pmid:24040749
  39. 39. Nandan D, Camargo de Oliveira C, Moeenrezakhanlou A, Lopez M, Silverman JM, Subek J, et al. Myeloid Cell IL-10 Production in Response to Leishmania Involves Inactivation of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Downstream of Phosphatidylinositol-3 Kinase. J Immunol. American Association of Immunologists; 2011;188: 367–378. pmid:22140263
  40. 40. Beamer GL, Flaherty DK, Assogba BD, Stromberg P, Gonzalez-Juarrero M, de Waal Malefyt R, et al. Interleukin-10 promotes Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease progression in CBA/J mice. J Immunol. 2008;181: 5545–50. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2728584&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract pmid:18832712
  41. 41. Ghigo E, Capo C, Raoult D, Mege JL. Interleukin-10 stimulates Coxiella burnetii replication in human monocytes through tumor necrosis factor down-modulation: role in microbicidal defect of Q fever. Infect Immun. 2001;69: 2345–52. pmid:11254592
  42. 42. Park DR, Skerrett SJ. IL-10 enhances the growth of Legionella pneumophila in human mononuclear phagocytes and reverses the protective effect of IFN-gamma: differential responses of blood monocytes and alveolar macrophages. J Immunol. 1996;157: 2528–38. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8805654 pmid:8805654
  43. 43. Bogdan C, Vodovotz Y, Nathan C. Macrophage deactivation by interleukin 10. J Exp Med. 1991;174: 1549–55. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2119047&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract pmid:1744584
  44. 44. Arai T, Hiromatsu K, Nishimura H, Kimura Y, Kobayashi N, Ishida H, et al. Endogenous interleukin 10 prevents apoptosis in macrophages during Salmonella infection. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;213: 600–7. pmid:7646518
  45. 45. Capsoni F, Minonzio F, Ongari AM, Carbonelli V, Galli A, Zanussi C. Interleukin-10 down-regulates oxidative metabolism and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of human neutrophils. Scand J Immunol. 1997;45: 269–75. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9122616 pmid:9122616
  46. 46. de Waal Malefyt R, Abrams J, Bennett B, Figdor CG, de Vries JE. Interleukin 10(IL-10) inhibits cytokine synthesis by human monocytes: an autoregulatory role of IL-10 produced by monocytes. J Exp Med. 1991;174: 1209–20. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2119001&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract pmid:1940799
  47. 47. Finlay BB, Cossart P. Exploitation of mammalian host cell functions by bacterial pathogens. Science. 1997;276: 718–25. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9115192 pmid:9115192
  48. 48. Arbibe L, Kim DW, Batsche E, Pedron T, Mateescu B, Muchardt C, et al. An injected bacterial effector targets chromatin access for transcription factor NF-kappaB to alter transcription of host genes involved in immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2007;8: 47–56. pmid:17159983
  49. 49. Rosenzweig JA, Chopra AK. Modulation of host immune defenses by Aeromonas and Yersinia species: convergence on toxins secreted by various secretion systems. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3: 70. pmid:24199174
  50. 50. Dupont CD, Hunter CA. Guanylate-binding proteins: niche recruiters for antimicrobial effectors. Immunity. 2012;37: 191–3. pmid:22921115
  51. 51. Guo P, Wang X. Rab GTPases act in sequential steps to regulate phagolysosome formation. Small GTPases. 2010;1: 170–173. pmid:21686272
  52. 52. Pilla DM, Hagar JA, Haldar AK, Mason AK, Degrandi D, Pfeffer K, et al. Guanylate binding proteins promote caspase-11-dependent pyroptosis in response to cytoplasmic LPS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111: 6046–51. pmid:24715728
  53. 53. Ostler N, Britzen-Laurent N, Liebl A, Naschberger E, Lochnit G, Ostler M, et al. Gamma interferon-induced guanylate binding protein 1 is a novel actin cytoskeleton remodeling factor. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34: 196–209. pmid:24190970
  54. 54. Barry AO, Mege J-L, Ghigo E. Hijacked phagosomes and leukocyte activation: an intimate relationship. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;89: 373–82. pmid:20720162
  55. 55. Layoun A, Santos MM. Bacterial cell wall constituents induce hepcidin expression in macrophages through MyD88 signaling. Inflammation. 2012;35: 1500–6. pmid:22544439
  56. 56. Armitage AE, Eddowes LA, Gileadi U, Cole S, Spottiswoode N, Selvakumar TA, et al. Hepcidin regulation by innate immune and infectious stimuli. Blood. 2011;118: 4129–39. pmid:21873546
  57. 57. Hackstadt T. Redirection of host vesicle trafficking pathways by intracellular parasites. Traffic. 2000;1: 93–9. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11208089 pmid:11208089
  58. 58. Dramsi S, Cossart P. Intracellular pathogens and the actin cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1998;14: 137–66. pmid:9891781
  59. 59. Stead CM, Omsland A, Beare PA, Sandoz KM, Heinzen RA. Sec-mediated secretion by Coxiella burnetii. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13: 222. pmid:24093460