Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

AvrRxo1 Is a Bifunctional Type III Secreted Effector and Toxin-Antitoxin System Component with Homologs in Diverse Environmental Contexts

  • Lindsay R. Triplett ,

    lindsay.triplett@ct.gov

    Affiliation Department of Plant Pathology and Ecology, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT, United States of America

  • Teja Shidore,

    Affiliation Department of Plant Pathology and Ecology, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT, United States of America

  • John Long,

    Affiliation Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management and Program in Plant Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America

  • Jiamin Miao,

    Affiliation Department of Horticulture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America

  • Shuchi Wu,

    Affiliation Department of Horticulture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America

  • Qian Han,

    Affiliations Department of Biochemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America, Laboratory of Tropical Veterinary Medicine and Vector Biology, College of Agriculture, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China

  • Changhe Zhou,

    Affiliation Department of Horticulture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America

  • Hiromichi Ishihara,

    Affiliation Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management and Program in Plant Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America

  • Jianyong Li,

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America

  • Bingyu Zhao,

    Affiliation Department of Horticulture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America

  • Jan E. Leach

    Affiliation Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management and Program in Plant Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America

AvrRxo1 Is a Bifunctional Type III Secreted Effector and Toxin-Antitoxin System Component with Homologs in Diverse Environmental Contexts

  • Lindsay R. Triplett, 
  • Teja Shidore, 
  • John Long, 
  • Jiamin Miao, 
  • Shuchi Wu, 
  • Qian Han, 
  • Changhe Zhou, 
  • Hiromichi Ishihara, 
  • Jianyong Li, 
  • Bingyu Zhao
PLOS
x

Abstract

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are ubiquitous bacterial systems that may function in genome maintenance and metabolic stress management, but are also thought to play a role in virulence by helping pathogens survive stress. We previously demonstrated that the Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola protein AvrRxo1 is a type III-secreted virulence factor that has structural similarities to the zeta family of TA toxins, and is toxic to plants and bacteria in the absence of its predicted chaperone Arc1. In this work, we confirm that AvrRxo1 and its binding partner Arc1 function as a TA system when expressed in Escherichia coli. Sequences of avrRxo1 homologs were culled from published and newly generated phytopathogen genomes, revealing that avrRxo1:arc1 modules are rare or frequently inactivated in some species and highly conserved in others. Cloning and functional analysis of avrRxo1 from Acidovorax avenae, A. citrulli, Burkholderia andropogonis, Xanthomonas translucens, and Xanthomonas euvesicatoria showed that some AvrRxo1 homologs share the bacteriostatic and Rxo1-mediated cell death triggering activities of AvrRxo1 from X. oryzae. Additional distant putative homologs of avrRxo1 and arc1 were identified in genomic or metagenomic sequence of environmental bacteria with no known pathogenic role. One of these distant homologs was cloned from the filamentous soil bacterium Cystobacter fuscus. avrRxo1 from C. fuscus caused watersoaking and triggered Rxo1-dependent cell collapse in Nicotiana benthamiana, but no growth suppression in E. coli was observed. This work confirms that a type III effector can function as a TA system toxin, and illustrates the potential of microbiome data to reveal new environmental origins or reservoirs of pathogen virulence factors.

Introduction

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are bacterial stress-management modules consisting of an antibacterial protein toxin and a neutralizing protein or RNA antitoxin. TA systems were first recognized as a mechanism for plasmid maintenance, and were proposed to use a post-segregational killing mechanism: when plasmid encoding a TA system is lost, the antitoxin would be degraded and the remaining toxin kills the plasmid-free cell [1]. Analyses of bacterial genomes later revealed that TA systems are ancient and ubiquitous among free-living bacteria. They are diverse, with over 20 families of TA systems in five major classes, and highly abundant, with up to 97 systems in a single genome [2,3]. Bacterial genomes have also revealed that the vast majority of TA systems reside on bacterial chromosomes [2], demonstrating that plasmid maintenance is not the only role for these modules. TA systems are now understood to play an important role in managing bacterial responses to environmental stress [4]; stress conditions may regulate TA system expression directly or indirectly [5,6]. Some TA modules have been associated with an increased prevalence of persister cells, or cells that survive antibiotic treatments [7]. Finally, it has been found that TA systems may play a critical role in host-pathogen interactions. Deletion of the sehAB TA system from Salmonella typhimurium [8] or one of three TA systems from uropathogenic Escherichia coli [9] partially or fully compromises virulence in mouse models, hypothetically due to the loss of stress resistance advantages conferred by the TA systems. The release of a TA toxin after lysis of intracellular Rickettsia bacteria was connected to early apoptosis in the host cells [10]. However, direct secretion of a TA system toxin into a eukaryotic host has never been demonstrated.

AvrRxo1-ORF1 is a secreted effector of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola (Xoc), the causal agent of bacterial leaf streak of rice. It triggers a type III secretion-dependent hypersensitive resistance response (HR) in maize or transgenic rice plants expressing the resistance protein Rxo1 [11,12]. AvrRxo1-ORF1 is encoded upstream of a second open reading frame encoding AvrRxo1-ORF2, which was hypothesized to be a secretion chaperone. Recently, we reported the solved structure of AvrRxo1-ORF1 in complex with AvrRxo1-ORF2, and found that AvrRxo1-ORF1 has a structure and catalytic sites conserved among T4 polynucleotide kinase domain proteins [13]. Inactivation of kinase catalytic sites disrupted the virulence effect of AvrRxo1-ORF1 during Xanthomonas infection of rice, and inhibited the watersoaking phenotype caused by transient expression of AvrRxo1-ORF1 in plant leaves. AvrRxo1-ORF2 has a structure atypical of type III secretion chaperones and binds to AvrRxo1-ORF1 in a way predicted to occlude the ATP-binding site [13].

The AvrRxo1-ORF1 structure showed a strong similarity to the Streptococcus pyogenes plasmid pSM19035-encoded zeta (ζ) toxin [13], which forms a TA pair with its cognate antitoxin epsilon (ε). Members of the zeta/epsilon family of TA system were originally found on multiple resistance plasmids in human pathogenic Enterococcus and Streptococcus species [14,15], but homologs have since been shown to reside in diverse bacterial phyla and on chromosomes [3,16]. Unlike the majority of characterized TA toxins, which inhibit proteins involved in polynucleotide replication or translation, zeta toxins are small molecule kinases that inhibit bacterial cell wall synthesis through inactivating phosphorylation of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine [17]. A zeta toxin locus is strongly associated with virulence in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates, although the basis for this connection is unknown (reviewed in [18]). Consistent with a potential role as a TA toxin, AvrRxo1-ORF1 suppressed bacterial growth when expressed in the absence of AvrRxo1-ORF2 in E. coli [13]. However, this study did not demonstrate suppression of AvrRxo1-ORF1 activity by -ORF2 expression from a separate complementary vector, and thus did not conclusively identify AvrRxo1-ORF1 as a TA system toxin. Furthermore, AvrRxo1-ORF1 activity has been reported in other phytopathogenic species [19], and it is not known whether homologous genes in these organisms may also form functional toxins.

In this study, we rename AvrRxo1-ORF1 and -ORF2 as AvrRxo1 and Arc1 (AvrRxo1 required chaperone), respectively. Using comparative structural modeling and a TA system validation experiment, we demonstrate that AvrRxo1 and Arc1 comprise a functional TA system similar to members of the zeta-epsilon family. Bacterial genomic sequence was used to analyze and clone homologs of X. oryzae AvrRxo1 from other Xanthomonas, Burkholderia, and Acidovorax species. Although homologs have divergent sequences, genomic contexts, and bacterial growth suppression activities, all but one were able to trigger a rapid Rxo1-dependent cell death in Nicotiana benthamiana. We also examine avrRxo1:arc1 –like modules revealed through recent genome and metagenome studies of environmental microorganisms, and demonstrate that an avrRxo1 homolog from the soil myxobacterium Cystobacter fuscus is able to trigger AvrRxo1-like watersoaking and Rxo1-dependent defense responses when expressed in tobacco. This study supports recent findings that effectors may have environmental roles outside the host-pathogen context, and suggests that the increasing availability of whole-genome microbiome data is likely to yield new insights regarding effector origins.

Results

AvrRxo1 has a structure and predicted catalytic residues conserved with Zeta toxins, and functions with Arc1 as a toxin-antitoxin system in E. coli

Our previous study demonstrated that AvrRxo1 has structural similarity to zeta toxin of Streptococcus pyogenes [13]. Here, we superimposed the two structures to determine the extent of similarity between AvrRxo1 and zeta toxin (Fig 1A). Five key zeta toxin kinase catalytic residues are conserved or similar in AvrRxo1: AvrRxo1 K166 (K46 in zeta toxin), T167 (T47), D193 (D67), K196 (K70), and R287 (R158) (Fig 1B). These features suggest AvrRxo1 may have a catalytic activity similar to that of zeta toxin, which phosphorylates the peptidoglycan precursor UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) to form inactive UDP-GlcNAc -3P [17]. However, the UDP-GlcNAc binding residues of zeta toxin [17] (E100, T118, R120, T121 and T128) and the corresponding putative substrate binding residues in AvrRxo1 (G227, R247, S249, R250, and Y257) share little identity (Fig 1C). These observations are consistent with our previous findings that AvrRxo1 does not phosphorylate the UDP-GlcNAc substrate [13], and suggest that AvrRxo1 could have a different target or molecular activity.

thumbnail
Fig 1. AvrRxo1:Arc1 form a novel toxin-antitoxin system in the zeta:epsilon superfamily.

A) Alignment of the structures of AvrRxo1 (teal) and zeta toxin (magenta) demonstrate a conserved architecture. B) Alignment of ATP-binding domain shows complete conservation of functional residues, while C) only one of five residues predicted to coordinate the substrate are identical. D) Growth curves of E. coli BL21(DE3) co-transformed with pBAD33-avrRxo1 and either pDEST-arc1 or a pDEST control vector (pDESTcv) under conditions of avrRxo1 induction (arabinose) or repression (glucose). Data points and error bars represent the means and standard deviations of nine cultures. Growth experiments were performed three times on separate days with similar results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.g001

We previously demonstrated that a clone carrying the avrRxo1 gene suppresses the growth of E. coli, while a clone carrying a longer fragment encompassing avrRxo1:arc1 is not growth suppressive. However, because this assay compared two separate avrRxo1 constructs, it was not sufficient to conclude that Arc1 expression is the factor suppressing the bacteriostatic phenotype of AvrRxo1 and confirm AvrRxo1:Arc1 as a TA system. To confirm this, we employed a standard validation assay in which AvrRxo1 and Arc1 from Xoc were expressed from separate plasmids, pBAD33 and pDEST527, under control of arabinose and IPTG-inducible promoters, respectively. In E. coli co-transformed with the pBAD33- avrRxo1(Xoc) and a control vector, growth was repressed in arabinose-amended induction media compared with in glucose-amended repressing media (Fig 1D). However, in E. coli co-transformed with pBAD33-avrRxo1 and pDEST-arc1, there was no difference between the growth curves in avrRxo1-inducing and repressing media (Fig 1D). These results demonstrate that Arc1 acts as an antitoxin suppressing the bacteriostatic effects of AvrRxo1, establishing that AvrRxo1 and Arc1 function as a TA toxin-antitoxin system in E. coli.

AvrRxo1:Arc1 distribution and genomic context in plant pathogenic species

TA systems are thought to function in prevention of their own loss, so we hypothesized that the AvrRxo1:Arc1 system might be broadly distributed in related species. A BLAST search using the sequence of avrRxo1 from Xoc (henceforth avrRxo1-Xoc) as a query identified annotated homologs in the sequenced genomes of X. translucens, X. euvesicatoria, X. alfalfae, Acidovorax avenae, and A. citrulli. To determine the avrRxo1 sequence from the Rxo1-triggering strain Burkholderia andropogonis Ba3549, we sequenced and assembled a draft genome of this strain, then resequenced the predicted open reading frame with the closest homology to avrRxo1. avrRxo1 homologs from complete genomes are all encoded upstream of a small open reading frame similar in size similar to that of arc1 in Xoc (Table 1), with predicted products sharing 61 to 83% amino acid identity to arc1. All avrRxo1 homologs have a GC content lower than that of the respective host genomes, and have differing flanking genes (Table 1), suggesting that the avrRxo1 homologs were obtained through horizontal transfer after species diversification.

The intraspecies distribution of avrRxo1 has previously been examined by amplification or gene sequencing studies in Asian strains of Xoc ([12], 40 positives of 40 strains tested), African strains of Xoc ([20], 2 of 16 tested), and global strains of Acidovorax citrulli ([21], present in 22 of 22 strains, but inactivated by a single site mutation in 14 strains). Since the publication of these studies, the draft sequences of 74 additional strains of X. euvesicatoria, X. oryzae, and X. translucens have been published. We also accessed unpublished genomes of 12 strains of A. avenae including 10 isolated from turf (Quan Zeng, personal communication). A search against all draft (wgs) genome sequences in the families Burkholderiaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Xanthomonadaceae revealed that X. alfalfae and some X. axonopodis pathovars also have avrRxo1. In the 99 whole and draft genomes available for these pathogen species or pathovars, 59 avrRxo1 homologs were identified (S1 Table). Genome analysis was supplemented by PCR screening of additional isolates in our collection of B. andropogonis, A. avenae, X. euvesicatoria, X. translucens, and 31 strains of A. citrulli not tested in previous studies. Genome sequences and PCR analysis demonstrated that intact avrRxo1 open reading frames are completely distributed among strains of X. euvesicatoria and strains from the Asian clade of X. oryzae pv. oryzicola (Table 2, S1 Table). However, in the maize and cereal pathogens B. andropogonis, A. avenae, and X. translucens, only a minority of strains have an avrRxo1 gene. Many or all strains of A. citrulli, X. alfalfae, and other clades of X. oryzae harbor avrRxo1, but these are inactivated by a single-site mutation or transposon inactivation in some strains (Table 2, S1 Table). The arc1 gene is intact downstream of all avrRxo1 homologs, including pseudogenes. In strains of A. citrulli and X. oryzae in which avrRxo1 is inactivated by a transposon insertion, the avrRxo1 portion has accumulated numerous mutations upstream of the transposon, but none downstream (S1 Fig). This suggests that while avrRxo1 is frequently inactivated in some species, that there may be selective pressure favoring conservation of the gene module, perhaps in order to preserve expression of arc1. The avrRxo1:arc1 module shares flanking genes within each species (S1 Table), suggesting genomic context of the module is stable within species.

thumbnail
Table 2. Summary of distribution analysis of avrRxo1 in plant pathogenic bacteria.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.t002

In inoculation tests on Rxo1 (B73) and non-Rxo1 (Mo17) maize, using Acidovorax and Burkholderia strains, only B. andropogonis produced either HR or watersoaking on maize. A subset of B. andropogonis strains were also tested for avrRxo1 presence by PCR; while all strains carrying avrRxo1 triggered HR on B73 maize, three B. andropogonis strains in which no avrRxo1 could be detected also caused HR in maize (S2 Table). A Southern blot using a B. andropogonis avrRxo1 probe in one of these strains, B7a, also failed to detect avrRxo1 (S2 Fig). This suggests that some strains of B. andropogonis have divergent homologs of avrRxo1 or an alternate mechanism of triggering Rxo1. Alternately, these strains might be triggering a second resistance mechanism present in B73 but absent in Mo17. The Southern blot also revealed the presence of two copies of avrRxo1 in strain Ba3549, something not evident from the draft genome assembly.

Plant pathogen homologs of AvrRxo1 share bacteriostatic activity and plant toxicity functions.

We previously reported that AvrRxo1-Xoc suppresses bacterial growth when expressed in E. coli cultures [13]. Here, we cloned homologs from four additional species (X. translucens, avrRxo1-Xt; X. euvesicatoria, avrRxo1-Xe; B. andropogonis, avrRxo1-Ba, and A. citrulli, avrRxo1-Ac) into the pDEST527 IPTG-inducible expression vector to determine whether their products had the same activities. In several attempts, no colonies lacking inactivating mutations could be obtained after transformation of the pDEST-avrRxo1-Ac clone into the expression E. coli strain BL21(DE3). The other four cloned AvrRxo1 homologs suppressed E. coli growth compared with a vector control upon IPTG-inducible expression (Fig 2A and 2B). Growth suppression phenotypes were more pronounced in cultures induced from a lower initial density (106 CFU/mL, Fig 2B) than from a higher density (107 CFU/mL, Fig 2A). avrRxo1 genes from X. translucens and B. andropogonis delayed log phase longer than the genes from X. euvesicatoria or X. oryzae, suggesting that the homologs from the Xanthomonas clade may have lost features required for maximum growth suppressing activity.

thumbnail
Fig 2.

Homologs of AvrRxo1 from multiple species suppress E. coli growth (A,B) and induce Rxo1-dependent cell death when transiently expressed in tobacco (C, D). A) Growth of BL21(DE3) carrying pDEST-AvrRxo1-Xoc, -Xe, -Ba, or -Xt, or pDESTcv, starting at 107 CFU/mL. B) Growth of the same strains starting at 106 CFU/mL. Error bars represent the standard deviation of 16 replicate cultures. Experiments were repeated three times on different days. C) N. benthamiana leaves four days after infiltration with Agrobacterium expressing YFP fusions of AvrRxo1-Xoc (1), -Ba(2), -Ac (3), and Xe (4), or YFP alone (5). D) N. benthamiana leaf in which the homologs from C were co-expressed with a YFP fusion of Rxo1, imaged two days after agroinfiltration.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.g002

For assessment of in planta activity, four of the homologs were transiently expressed as YFP fusions in N. benthamiana. Expression of the AvrRxo1-Xoc YFP fusion caused a clear watersoaking phenotype followed by cell collapse after four days, consistent with previous reports of phytotoxic activity [22], but expression of YFP fusions of AvrRxo1-Ba, -Ac, and–Xe did not (Fig 2C). When co-infiltrated with a binary construct expressing the corresponding resistance gene Rxo1, the AvrRxo1-Xoc YFP fusion elicited a strong rapid cell collapse visible after 24 h. This response was clearly differentiated from the N. benthamiana response to AvrRxo1-Xoc alone in its severity and rapid appearance, indicating that Rxo1-mediated cell death can be reconstituted in N. benthamiana. This phenotype was shared by the constructs expressing fusions of AvrRxo1-Ba and–Xe, but not by AvrRxo1-Ac (Fig 2D). Confocal images were taken to confirm that all fusions were expressed in planta (S3 Fig). Together, these results indicate that avirulence activity is conserved in diverse homologs of AvrRxo1, but that AvrRxo1 bacterial growth suppressing activity is not directly correlated to phytotoxicity in plant cells.

avrRxo1-like and arc1-like predicted genes from environmental bacteria share TA system gene organization.

A protein BLAST search using the sequence of AvrRxo1-Xoc revealed predicted proteins sharing at least 38% positive substitutions over at least 65% of the length of AvrRxo1 in the genomes of six species of bacteria from diverse environments, including a filamentous Myxobacterium and two unculturable bacteria characterized through metagenome sequencing (Table 3). The genes from candidate metagenome genera Saccharimonas and Parcubacteria are predicted to encode proteins significantly longer than AvrRxo1, with the AvrRxo1 similarity focused in the central domain. Interestingly, these longer homologs are also predicted to contain C-terminal Fic/Doc domains, adenylation domains associated with the Doc family of type II toxin-antitoxin systems. The putative avrRxo1 genes from C. fuscus, Methylibium sp. CF468, and Parcubacteria sp. SG8_24 are each followed immediately by a short open reading frame in the same direction, consistent with the organization of the avrRxo1:arc1 toxin-antitoxin system. Candidatus S. aalborgensis also has an arc1-like short open reading frame downstream of the putative avrRxo1 gene, although there is another open reading frame separating these. The products of these short ORFs are predicted to share >20% identity to arc1-Xoc or to the C. fuscus homolog (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Putative distant homologs of avrRxo1 and arc1 from environmental bacteria.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.t003

BLAST searches using Arc1-Xoc also identified predicted proteins from the fruiting myxobacterium Corallococcus coralloides, the soil actinomycete Nocardia rhamnosiphila, and the human pathogen Leptospira broomii as putative Arc1 homologs (Table 3). All predicted Arc1-like proteins from plant pathogens and environmental strains share a short size (most are 81 to 98 amino acids, with S. aalborgensis at 121 aa), a secondary structure predicted by Jpred to consist of 3 to 4 short helices, and a novel conserved double tyrosine motif: KExFD(x25-27)(Y/L)ExxYY. The motif is not found in the epsilon antitoxin of the AvrRxo1 structural homolog PezT. In the published structure of Arc1-Xoc [13], the motif side chains occupy an internal Arc1 interface between the second helix and the coil connecting the first and second helices, which is not close to an AvrRxo1 binding site and might instead be involved in Arc1 folding. Although putative distant homologs from Leptospira, Nocardia, and Corallococcus are all encoded immediately upstream or downstream of larger predicted genes of unknown function, these predicted genes have no detectable similarity to avrRxo1. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic analysis of AvrRxo1 and Arc1 homologs shows that plant pathogen homologs form a clade separate from the homologs from environmental strains, with the exception that the Methylibium and Leptospira proteins fall within the plant pathogen clade (Fig 3). In both AvrRxo1 and Arc1 based trees, the Burkholderia and Acidovorax sequences group seperately from the X. oryzae and X. euvesicatoria homologs, with X. translucens homologs falling between the two groups (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Phylogeny of predicted AvrRxo1-like and Arc1-like proteins in plant pathogenic and environmental bacteria.

Neighbor-Joining tree of aligned amino acid sequences from 12 AvrRxo1 homologs (A) and 16 Arc1 homologs (B). Sequence accessions and strains are listed in Tables 1 and 3. The datasets consisted of 260 (A) and 74 (B) amino acids after gap elimination. Bootstrap percentages for 1000 replicates are shown next to branches. Units represent the number of amino acid substitutions per site.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.g003

The putative distant homolog of AvrRxo1 from the myxobacterium Cystobacter fuscus triggers watersoaking and Rxo1-mediated cell collapse in plants

Our above results show that AvrRxo1 homologs from plant pathogens function in bacterial growth suppression, plant toxicity, and Rxo1-mediated hypersensitive response. Given the similarities between these and putative homologs from environmental sequencing projects, we hypothesized that environmental AvrRxo1 homologs might share some or all of these functions. Cystobacter fuscus DSMZ2262 was chosen for this study as the only publicly available, non-metagenome-derived environmental strain with a putative avrRxo1 homolog. We cloned a 1134 nt open reading frame with an alternate GTG start codon, predicted to encode the protein EPX56639, into IPTG and arabinose-inducible expression systems. The gene did not suppress growth of E. coli under inducing conditions in the arabinose-inducible pBAD expression system (S4 Fig), nor from the IPTG-inducible pDEST527 expression vector. Furthermore, the cloned arc1-Cf gene did not relieve the growth suppression of AvrRxo1-Xoc (S4 Fig). However, when transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves, a YFP fusion of AvrRxo1-Cf caused watersoaking within three days (Fig 4A). When co-expressed with Rxo1, AvrRxo1-Cf triggered a rapid cell collapse within one day, consistent with the collapse seen after co-infiltration with AvrRxo1-Xoc (Fig 4B). These results demonstrate that, when expressed at high levels in planta, a myxobacterial effector homolog is capable of causing a resistance gene-mediated cell collapse.

thumbnail
Fig 4. An AvrRxo1 homolog from the myxobacterium Cystobacter fuscus causes watersoaking and Rxo1-mediated cell collapse after transient expression in N. benthamiana.

pEG104-AvrRxo1-Cf was expressed alone (A) and co-expressed with Rxo1 (B). 1 = AvrRxo1-Cf (OD600 = 0.1), 2 = AvrRxo1-Cf (OD600 = 0.4), 3 = GFP (OD600 = 0.4), 4 = AvrRxo1-Cf (OD600 = 0.1) and Rxo1 (OD600 = 0.4), 5 = GFP (OD600 = 0.1) and Rxo1 (OD600 = 0.4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.g004

Discussion

Once regarded as DNA maintenance modules, TA systems are now thought to increase virulence through mechanisms that may include increased stress resistance, persister cell formation, or biofilm formation [8,23,24]. This study adds two further roles to the repertoire of TA systems, in that AvrRxo1:Arc1 is previously known to function as a type III-secreted virulence factor and as a trigger of effector-triggered immunity. Putative AvrRxo1-like TA systems were also identified in several environmental microbes, and a homolog cloned from the myxobacterium Cystobacter fuscus was shown to function as a trigger of the resistance gene Rxo1 in an N. benthamiana expression system. The identification of avrRxo1 homologs lacking a predicted T3S signal in environmental bacteria suggests that AvrRxo1 may have an endogenous bacterial role other than virulence.

In the avrRxo1:arc1 module, the antitoxin gene is encoded downstream of the toxin gene, a TA system feature found in relatively few other TA systems [25,26]. The encoding of the antitoxin upstream is thought to ensure that antitoxin expression precedes that of the toxin during translation, preventing unbound toxin from accumulating [27]; upstream toxins thus could potentially pose a selective disadvantage. Here, we find that avrRxo1 is inactivated in isolates of many species. More study is needed to determine whether avrRxo1:arc1 could be advantageous or disadvantageous to plant pathogenic bacteria outside of the host setting. Intriguingly, in our dataset avrRxo1 was never inactivated by gene truncation, but always by single site mutagenesis or transposon insertion that left the arc1 gene intact. Future studies will determine whether arc1 itself may have a selective advantage.

We observed a diversity of responses to cloned avrRxo1 homologs in E. coli and N. benthamiana. In bacteria, avrRxo1-Xoc had a relatively weak growth suppression phenotype compared to homologs from Burkholderia, X. euvesicatoria and X. translucens. No colonies resulted from transformation of the AvrRxo1-Ac expression vector into the expression strain after several attempts, leading us to hypothesize that leaky expression of the Acidovorax homolog could be particularly toxic to bacteria. Contrary to our expectations, the avrRxo1 homologs with the greatest bacteriostatic activity did not cause any watersoaking or phytotoxic effects in N. benthamiana in the absence of Rxo1, but rather only the two homologs with very weak to no bacteriostatic activity (-Xoc and–Cf) caused watersoaking. It may be that some aspect of strong avrRxo1 activity diminishes the watersoaking phenotype, or that toxicity in plants and bacteria is caused by two different mechanisms. All avrRxo1 homologs except avrRxo1-Ac caused a rapid cell collapse in the presence of Rxo1, suggesting that R-gene triggering activity is broadly conserved in diverse homologs. The basis of these phenotypic differences is not clear from the aligned sequences of AvrRxo1, as there are numerous points of diversity among the homologs (S5 Fig). While the five residues with predicted involvement in ATP binding are completely conserved among the homologs (Fig 1B, S5 Fig), four of the five residues predicted to face the substrate binding site vary among homologs (Fig 1C, S5 Fig). Alternatively, residues outside the active site could influence in planta activity by affecting unknown interactions.

Type III-secreted effectors (T3E) have been proposed to originate from the recombinatorial shuffling of domain modules, such as those containing regulatory sequences and secretion signals, onto previously existing genes [28]. However, little is known about the original function of the genes forming the template for new effectors. The structural and functional similarity of AvrRxo1:Arc1 to the zeta:epsilon system suggests that TA toxins could form one source of recombinatorial template for generation of T3E. This hypothesis has already been suggested by the crystal structure of the TA toxin Doc, which bears a strong structural similarity and hypothesized common ancestor with the T3E AvrB [29]. To our knowledge, T3Es have not been systematically tested for their endogenous bacterial function, nor have most TA toxins been tested for secretion activity, so there could be undiscovered functional parallels between the two groups.

Here, we show that an AvrRxo1 homolog cloned from soil myxobacterium can trigger a rapid cell death response in tobacco mediated by a canonical Nucleotide Binding-Leucine Rich Repeat resistance protein. Further study is needed to determine whether a secretion-enabled form of AvrRxo1-CF could trigger resistance in a native infection system. There are few known connections between phytopathogen virulence effectors and environmental bacteria, but advances in whole-genome metagenomics and single-cell sequencing are likely to change that in the near future. For example, studies have recently revealed proteins similar to Xanthomonas TAL effectors in unculturable marine organisms [30]. Of the environmental bacteria predicted to encode avrRxo1 and/or arc1-like genes, it is striking that the Methylibium strain is a root endophyte, Endozoicomonas and Nocardia species are marine symbionts, and the greatly reduced genomes of unculturable Parcubacteria and Saccharimonas spp. have hallmarks of ectosymbionts or ectoparasites [31,32]. It is tempting to think that the presence of avrRxo1-like genes in these organisms could be connected with a role in a symbiotic lifestyle.

Materials and Methods

Plasmid construction and generation of E. coli and Agrobacterium strains

Primers and plasmid constructs used in this work are listed in S3 Table. C. fuscus strain DSM2262 was obtained from the DSMZ collection (www.dsmz.de) and cultured on DSMZ medium 222 for three weeks; DNA was then extracted using the Dneasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen). avrRxo1 genes from Xoc strain BLS256 and C. fuscus were amplified for cloning into pBAD33 using primers XocBADF and R and CfBADF and R, respectively. PCR products were digested with XbaI and HindIII and cloned into the vector pBAD33, obtained from the Coli Genetic Stock Center (http://cgsc.biology.yale.edu/), to generate pBAD33 (avrRxo1-Xoc) and pBAD33 (avrRxo1-Cf). Positive clones were confirmed by insert sequencing.

arc1-Xoc and arc1-Cf were amplified using the primers XocArc1ENTR_F and R, and CfArc1ENTR_F and R. PCR products were cloned into pENTR-D-Topo (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturers’ instructions, and the inserts of confirmed constructs were recombined into pDEST527 (Addgene) using the LR Clonase II enzyme mix (Invitrogen) to generate the plasmids pDEST(arc1-Xoc) and pDEST(arc1-Cf).

For expression in pDEST527 and comparative growth curves, avrRxo1 homologs from plant pathogens were amplified from bacterial DNA using primers XeENTR_F and -R (Xe strain Xcv85-10), XtENTR_F and -R (Xt strain UPB468), BaENTRF and R (Ba strain Ba3549), and AcENTR_F and -R (Ac strain AAC00-1), and CfENTR_F and R (Cf strain DSM2262). PCR products were cloned into pENTR-D-Topo (Life Technologies) and recombined into pDEST527 using the LR Clonase II enzyme mix according to manufacturers’ instructions. pDEST527 constructs were fully sequenced and transformed into E. coli strain BL21(DE3), and transformants were confirmed by PCR.

TA system validation assays

Chemically competent E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) was co-transformed with pBAD33-avrRxo1(Xoc) and either pDEST527-arc1(Xoc) or pDEST527cv. Transformation was confirmed using colony PCR of both inserts. For bacterial growth curve analysis, transformants were grown in three replicate starter cultures for approximately 6 h at 37°C in M9 medium (KH2PO4 (22 mM), Na2HPO4 (90 mM), NH4Cl (19 mM), NaCl (9 mM), MgCl2 (2mM), CaCl2 (0.1 mM)) supplemented with 1% casamino acids, 1% glucose, 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 25 μg/mL chloramphenicol. The bacterial cultures were then adjusted to 106 CFU/mL (OD 600 = 0.001) in M9 media amended with 1mM IPTG and 1% arabinose or glucose, and each culture was distributed into three wells of a 96-well plate for a total of nine wells per treatment. Cultures were grown in 200 uL volumes at 37°C under continuous orbital shaking in a Synergy H2 microplate reader (Biotek), and OD600 was measured every 15 min. The same procedure was used to study pBAD33-avrRxo1(Cf).

Sequencing and sequence analysis

The genome of B. andropogonis strain Ba3549 was sequenced in the same run and assembled using the same methods as previously reported for the USXo strain X11-5A [33]. The draft genome was deposited in NCBI under the accession number AYSW00000000.1. The avrRxo1 gene from Ba3549 was resequenced and deposited in NCBI under accession number KR139796. The avrRxo1 pseudogene from X. oryzae X11-5A was amplified using primers USXoF and USXoR, cloned into pCR4-Topo vector (Life Technologies) as per manufacturer’s instructions, and resequenced using the T7 primer to confirm the inactivating mutation.

BLASTP, BLASTn and PsiBLAST searches were conducted in January 2014 and repeated in December 2015. BLASTn was used to query avrRxo1-Aa and avrRxo1-Xo against the WGS database, limited by group identifiers Burkholderiaceae, Xanthomonadaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, or Myxococcales, using default settings. Psi-BLAST was run for two iterations; only hits with e-value = < 2e-40 and query coverage > 50% were further analyzed. Loci were examined for predicted gene organization using the NCBI genome browser for each draft genome. Sequence alignment and neighbor-joining phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA6 [34] with the default settings.

avrRxo1 homolog activity assays

Fresh overnight cultures of BL21(DE3) strains carrying pDEST527-based vectors were suspended at 107 CFU/mL or 106 CFU/mL (OD600 of 0.01 or 0.001, respectively) in four replicate tubes of LB broth containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 1 mM IPTG. Cultures were distributed into four wells each of a 96 well plate, totaling 16 replicate cultures per treatment. Cultures were incubated at 37°C with shaking, and OD600 was measured every two hours for 12 h.

PCR and Southern hybridization assays for distribution analysis

Xanthomonas strains for inoculation or transformation were grown at 28°C on PSA medium. Burkholderia and Acidovorax strains were grown for DNA extraction at 28° in Nutrient Broth. DNA was extracted from the bacterial strains shown in S1 Table using a standard CTAB extraction method [35]. Conserved primers XoampF and -R and were used to amplify the avrRxo1 open reading frames from X. oryzae and X. euvesicatoria DNA, primers XtENTR_F and–R were used for X. translucens, and primers BaampF and -R were used to amplify Acidovorax and Burkholderia DNA. Reactions were performed in a 25 μL solution containing 1x NEB Standard Taq buffer, 200 μM dNTPs, 0.5 μM forward and reverse primer, 20 ng genomic DNA template, and 1 unit Taq polymerase (NEB). After a 30 second initial denaturing step, reactions were cycled 30 times at 98°C for 15s, 57°C for 30s, and 72°C for 90s.

Southern hybridization probes were made using the DIG probe synthesis kit (Roche) according to manufacturer’s instructions, with probe amplification using Ac strain AAC00-1 and Ba strain Ba3549 DNA as templates and primers BaprobeF and–R. 2 μg DNA from selected strains was digested with EcoRI or HindIII as indicated, separated on a 1% agarose gel, and transferred to a nylon membrane (Roche) using a standard capillary transfer protocol [36]. Membranes were hybridized at 42°C for 18 h in 20 ng/mL probe solution in standard buffer, washed four times with standard buffer, and incubated with 1:200 solution of CDP-STAR substrate (Sigma). Membranes were exposed to X-ray film for 1 min before development.

Plant assays

B73 and Mo17 maize were grown to the five leaf stage in a growth chamber at 26°C. Fully expanded leaves were inoculated with cell suspensions of bacteria (approximately 1 × 108 CFU/ml) prepared from 48- to 72-h-old PSA plate cultures, by infiltration under the leaf with a needleless syringe as previously described [37].

For in vitro expression assays, AvrRxo1-Xoc, -Xe, -Ba, -Ac, and -Cf were recombined from pENTR-D-Topo into pEarleygate 101 or 104 binary vectors for YFP fusion expression (S3 Table). Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV2260 was transformed with expression plasmids and cultured on LB medium with kanamycin for two days before resuspending in 10 mM MgCl2 at an OD600 of 0.1 or 0.4. Bacterial solutions were infiltrated into leaves of 6-week old N. benthamiana plants using a needleless syringe. Plants were incubated in 24 h daylight conditions for at least 48 h before imaging. To study interaction with Rxo1, the single-exon Rxo1 gene was amplified using the primers Rxo1F and Rxo1R from the genomic DNA of maize line B73, cloned into pENTR-D Topo, and recombined into the pEarleygate 101 vector. Rxo1 expression strains of Agrobacterium were infiltrated at OD600 = 0.4.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. The region downstream of avrRxo1-inactivating insertions does not accumulate mutations.

Match/mismatch graphs from tBLASTn output of AvrRxo1-Xoc sequence queries against subject genomes in which the avrRxo1 is activated by transposon insertional mutagenesis. A) AvrRxo1-Ac query against Acidovorax citrulli strain tw6 draft genome (sequence ID: JXDJ01000014); B) AvrRxo1-Xoc query against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola strain CFBP7342/BAI11 complete genome (sequence ID: CP007221).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.s001

(EPS)

S2 Fig. Insertional mutagenesis and absence of avrRxo1 gene in some strains revealed by Southern Blot.

Southern blots using avrRxo1 probe against DNA extracted from selected strains of Acidovorax avenae (A) and Burkholderia andropogonis (B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.s002

(EPS)

S3 Fig. Expression of AvrRxo1 in pEarleygate vectors visualized by confocal microscopy.

1 = pEG104-AvrRxo1-Xoc; 2 = pEG101-AvrRxo1-Ba; 3 = pEG101-AvrRxo1-Ac; 4 = pEG101-AvrRxo1-Xe; 5 = pEG104-AvrRxo1-Cf; and 6 = pEG101 vector.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.s003

(EPS)

S4 Fig.

AvrRxo1-Cf does not cause a decrease in growth of BL21(DE3) cells when expressed from pBAD33 (A), and Arc1-Cf does not complement the growth suppressive phenotype of AvrRxo1-Xoc (B). A. Growth of E. coli BL21(DE3) transformed with pBAD33-avrRxo1(Cf) or pBAD33 alone under conditions of avrRxo1 induction (arabinose) or repression (glucose). B. Growth of E. coli BL21(DE3) co-transformed with pBAD33-avrRxo1 (Xoc) and either pDEST-arc1 (Cf) or a pDEST control vector (cv) under the same conditions. Data points and error bars represent the means and standard deviations of 9 independent cultures grown from three starter cultures. Growth experiments were performed three times on separate days with similar results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.s004

(EPS)

S5 Fig. Alignment of AvrRxo1 homolog sequences with the secondary structure of AvrRxo1-Xoc.

The amino acid sequences of AvrRxo1-Xoc, -Xe, -Xt, -Ba, -Ac, and -Cf were aligned using T-Coffee (www.tcoffee.org) and visualized against secondary structural features using ESPript 3.0 (espript.ibcp.fr). Residues contacting ATP are boxed in red, and residues corresponding to the substrate-binding site of zeta toxin are highlighted in yellow.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.s005

(PDF)

S1 Table. Presence of avrRxo1 in sequenced bacterial genomes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.s006

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Responses of B73 (Rxo1+) and Mo17 (Rxo1-) maize to selected bacterial strains, and PCR presence/absence of the avrRxo1 gene.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.s007

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Primers and plasmid constructs used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158856.s008

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2014-67013-21564 of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture to L.R.T., and J.E.L. and National Science Foundation grant no. IOS-0845283 to B.Z.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LRT JEL BZ. Performed the experiments: LRT TS JL JM SW QH CZ HI. Analyzed the data: LRT TS QH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JL. Wrote the paper: LRT TS.

References

  1. 1. Van Melderen L. Toxin–antitoxin systems: why so many, what for? Current Opinion in Microbiology 2010; 13: 781–785. pmid:21041110
  2. 2. Sberro H, Leavitt A, Kiro R, Koh E, Peleg Y, Qimron U, et al. Discovery of Functional Toxin/Antitoxin Systems in Bacteria by Shotgun Cloning. Mol Cell. 2013; 50: 136–148. pmid:23478446
  3. 3. Leplae R, Geeraerts D, Hallez R, Guglielmini J, Drèze P, Van Melderen L. Diversity of bacterial type II toxin–antitoxin systems: a comprehensive search and functional analysis of novel families. Nucl Acids Res. 2011; 39: 5513–5525. pmid:21422074
  4. 4. Schuster CF, Bertram R. Toxin–antitoxin systems are ubiquitous and versatile modulators of prokaryotic cell fate. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013; 340: 73–85. pmid:23289536
  5. 5. Christensen SK, Mikkelsen M, Pedersen K, Gerdes K. RelE, a global inhibitor of translation, is activated during nutritional stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001; 98: 14328–14333. pmid:11717402
  6. 6. Singletary LA, Gibson JL, Tanner EJ, McKenzie GJ, Lee PL, Gonzalez C., et al. An SOS-regulated type 2 toxin-antitoxin system. J Bacteriol. 2009; 191: 7456–7465. pmid:19837801
  7. 7. Maisonneuve E, Gerdes K. Molecular mechanisms underlying bacterial persisters. Cell 2014; 157: 539–548. pmid:24766804
  8. 8. Miguel A, Zhao W, Farenc C, Gimenez G, Raoult D, Cambillau C, et al. A toxin-antitoxin module of Salmonella promotes virulence in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2013; 9: e1003827. pmid:24385907
  9. 9. Norton JP, Mulvey MA. Toxin-antitoxin systems are important for niche-specific colonization and stress resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS Pathog. 2012; 8: e1002954. pmid:23055930
  10. 10. Audoly G, Vincentelli R, Edouard S, Georgiades K, Mediannikov O, Gimenez G, et al. Effect of rickettsial toxin VapC on its eukaryotic host. PloS ONE 2011; 6: e26528. pmid:22046301
  11. 11. Zhao B, Lin X, Poland J, Trick H, Leach J, Hulbert S. A maize resistance gene functions against bacterial streak disease in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005; 102: 15383–15388. pmid:16230639
  12. 12. Zhao B, Ardales E, Raymundo A, Bai J, Trick HN, Leach JE, et al. The avrRxo1 gene from the rice pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola confers a nonhost defense reaction on maize with resistance gene Rxo1. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2004; 17: 771–779. pmid:15242171
  13. 13. Han Q, Zhou C, Wu S, Liu Y, Triplett L, Miao J, et al. Crystal structure of Xanthomonas AvrRxo1-ORF1, a type III effector with a polynucleotide kinase domain, and its interactor AvrRxo1-ORF2. Structure. 2015; 23: 1900–1909. pmid:26344722
  14. 14. Zielenkiewicz U, Cegłowski P. The toxin-antitoxin system of the streptococcal plasmid pSM19035. J. Bacteriol. 2005; 187: 6094–6105. pmid:16109951
  15. 15. Sletvold H, Johnsen P, Hamre I, Simonsen G, Sundsfjord A, Nielsen KM. Complete sequence of Enterococcus faecium pVEF3 and the detection of an ω-ε-ζ toxin–antitoxin module and an ABC transporter. Plasmid 2008; 60: 75–85. pmid:18511120
  16. 16. Van Melderen L, De Bast MS. Bacterial toxin–antitoxin systems: more than selfish entities? PLoS Genet. 2009; 5: e1000437. pmid:19325885
  17. 17. Mutschler H, Gebhardt M, Shoeman RL, Meinhart A. A novel mechanism of programmed cell death in bacteria by toxin-antitoxin systems corrupts peptidoglycan synthesis. PLoS Biol. 2011; 9: e1001033. pmid:21445328
  18. 18. Mutschler H, Meinhart A. ε/ζ systems: their role in resistance, virulence, and their potential for antibiotic development. J. Mol. Medicine 2011; 89: 1183–1194.
  19. 19. Salomon D, Dar D, Sreeramulu S, Sessa G. Expression of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria type III effectors in yeast affects cell growth and viability. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2010; 24: 305–314.
  20. 20. Wonni I, Cottyn B, Detemmerman L, Dao S, Ouedraogo L, Sarra S, et al. Analysis of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola population in Mali and Burkina Faso reveals a high level of genetic and pathogenic diversity. Phytopathology. 2014; 104: 520–531. pmid:24199713
  21. 21. Eckshtain-Levi N, Munitz T, Živanović M, Traore SM, Spröer C, Zhao B, et al. Comparative analysis of Type III secreted effector genes reflects divergence of Acidovorax citrulli strains into three distinct lineages. Phytopathol. 2014; 104: 1152–1162.
  22. 22. Liu H, Chang Q, Feng W, Zhang B, Wu T, Ning L, et al. Domain dissection of AvrRxo1 for suppressor, avirulence and cytotoxicity functions. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e113875. pmid:25437277
  23. 23. Page R, Peti W. Toxin-antitoxin systems in bacterial growth arrest and persistence. Nat Chem Biol. 2016; 12: 208–214. pmid:26991085
  24. 24. Wang X, Wood TK. Toxin-antitoxin systems influence biofilm and persister cell formation and the general stress response. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 2011; 77: 5577–5583.
  25. 25. Brown BL, Grigoriu S, Kim Y, Arruda JM, Davenport A, Wood TK, et al. Three dimensional structure of the MqsR: MqsA complex: a novel TA pair comprised of a toxin homologous to RelE and an antitoxin with unique properties. PLoS Pathog. 2009; 5: e1000706. pmid:20041169
  26. 26. Makarova KS, Grishin NV, Koonin EV. The HicAB cassette, a putative novel, RNA-targeting toxin-antitoxin system in archaea and bacteria. Bioinformatics 2006; 22: 2581–2584. pmid:16895922
  27. 27. Yamaguchi Y, Park J-H, Inouye M. Toxin-antitoxin systems in bacteria and archaea. Annual Review of Genetics. 2011; 45: 61–79. pmid:22060041
  28. 28. McCann HC, Guttman DS. Evolution of the type III secretion system and its effectors in plant–microbe interactions. New Phytologist. 2008; 177: 33–47. pmid:18078471
  29. 29. Arbing MA, Handelman SK, Kuzin AP, Verdon G, Wang C, Min S, et al. Crystal structures of Phd-Doc, HigA, and YeeU establish multiple evolutionary links between microbial growth-regulating toxin-antitoxin systems. Structure. 2010; 18: 996–1010. pmid:20696400
  30. 30. de Lange O, Wolf C, Thiel P, Krüger J, Kleusch C, Kohlbacher O, et al. DNA-binding proteins from marine bacteria expand the known sequence diversity of TALE-like repeats. Nucl. Acids Res. 2015; 43: 10065–10080. pmid:26481363
  31. 31. Nelson WC, Stegen JC. The reduced genomes of Parcubacteria (OD1) contain signatures of a symbiotic lifestyle. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6: 713. pmid:26257709
  32. 32. He X, McLean JS, Edlund A, Yooseph S, Hall AP, Liu S, et al. Cultivation of a human-associated TM7 phylotype reveals a reduced genome and epibiotic parasitic lifestyle. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015; 112: 244–249. pmid:25535390
  33. 33. Triplett LR, Hamilton JP, Buell CR, Tisserat NA, Verdier V, Zink F, et al. Genomic analysis of Xanthomonas oryzae isolates from rice grown in the United States reveals substantial divergence from known X. oryzae pathovars. Appl Env Microbiol. 2011; 77: 3930–3937.
  34. 34. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30: 2725–9. pmid:24132122
  35. 35. Wilson K (1987) Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology: Wiley and Sons; 1987.
  36. 36. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: A Laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989.
  37. 37. Reimers PJ, Leach JE. Race-specific resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae conferred by bacterial blight resistance gene Xa-10 in rice Oryza sativa involves accumulation of a lignin-like substance in host tissues. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1991; 38: 39–55.