Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Social Structure and Genetic Distance Mediate Nestmate Recognition and Aggressiveness in the Facultative Polygynous Ant Pheidole pallidula

  • Denis Fournier ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Denis Fournier, Jean-Christophe de Biseau

    Affiliation Evolutionary Biology & Ecology, CP 160/12, Université libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

  • Jean-Christophe de Biseau ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Denis Fournier, Jean-Christophe de Biseau

    Affiliation Evolutionary Biology & Ecology, CP 160/12, Université libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

  • Sophie De Laet,

    Affiliation Evolutionary Biology & Ecology, CP 160/12, Université libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

  • Alain Lenoir,

    Affiliation IRBI, Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR CNRS 7261, Université François Rabelais, Parc Grandmont, 37200, Tours, France

  • Luc Passera,

    Affiliation Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale—UMR 5169, Université Paul-Sabatier, 31062, Toulouse, France

  • Serge Aron

    Affiliation Evolutionary Biology & Ecology, CP 160/12, Université libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050, Brussels, Belgium


In social insects, the evolutionary stability of cooperation depends on the privileged relationships between individuals of the social group, which is facilitated by the recognition of relatives. Nestmate recognition is based on genetically determined cues and/or environmentally derived chemical components present on the cuticle of individuals. Here, we studied nestmate recognition in the ant Pheidole pallidula, a species where both single-queen (monogyne) and multiple-queen (polygyne) colonies co-occur in the same population. We combined geographical, genetic and chemical analyses to disentangle the factors influencing the level of intraspecific aggressiveness. We show that encounters between workers from neighbouring colonies (i.e., nests less than 5 m away) are on average less aggressive than those between workers from more distant colonies. Aggressive behaviour is associated with the level of genetic difference: workers from monogyne colonies are more aggressive than workers from polygyne colonies, and the intensity of aggressiveness is positively associated with the genetic distance between colonies. Since the genetic distance is correlated with the spatial distance between pairs of colonies, the lower level of aggression toward neighbours may result from their higher relatedness. In contrast, the analysis of overall cuticular hydrocarbon profiles shows that aggressive behaviour is associated neither with the chemical diversity of colonies, nor with the chemical distances between them. When considering methyl-branched alkanes only, however, chemical distances differed between monogyne and polygyne colonies and were significantly associated with aggressiveness. Altogether, these results show that the social structure of colonies and the genetic distances between colonies are two major factors influencing the intensity of agonistic behaviours in the ant P. pallidula.


Kin selection, i.e. the preferential treatment of genetic relatives [1, 2], has been extremely successful in explaining the evolution of altruistic behaviours, ranging from cells giving up their own survival to help other cells’ dispersal in slime moulds, to worker sterility or suicidal defence in social insect colonies [37]. However, kin selection also applies to competition when relatives compete less with each other [8]. In this situation, individuals increase their direct fitness by not spending resources on competition and their indirect fitness by not reducing the fitness of kin. Recognition of relatives from strangers therefore greatly facilitates kin selection, since it allows differential treatment of conspecifics according to their relatedness thereby reducing the costs of positive interactions [9, 10].

Social insects, especially ants, are valuable biological models for investigating the recognition systems that operate in a social context, for at least two reasons. First, recognition and discrimination of nestmates from non-colony members are well-documented traits of ants. Workers typically defend their nest and territory against foreign conspecifics, which helps maintain the genetic integrity of the colony and the safeguarding of resources from competitors, robbers or social parasites [1114]. Nestmate recognition is based on the perception of non-volatile olfactory cues that are contained in the lipid layer covering the insect cuticle. Their chemical composition can be affected by the genetic makeup of the colony [1517], environmental factors (diet, habitat, nest material) [18, 19] or both [20]. The colony-specific odour results from the homogenization of cues among workers through trophallaxis and allogrooming [15, 2125] and it is thought to be used as a recognition template against which to compare labels of other individuals [12, 2629]. Empirical evidence has shown the central role of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) as the main cues in intraspecific discrimination in ant species [13, 14, 27, 30, 31]. Aggression probabilities and the intensity of agonistic behaviours correlate with dissimilarity in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles and/or the chemical distance between colonies [19, 3234]. In addition, aggressive behaviour may depend on the variation in the CHC profile within colonies [26, 3537]. Workers from colonies with greater odour-cue diversity (e.g., due to the co-existence of several nestmate queens) are expected to be more tolerant toward intruders than workers from colonies with less diversity, because their acceptance threshold is likely to be higher [26, 38]. Second, the kin structure of colonies may vary greatly both between and within species, allowing exploration of the level of aggression as a function of genetic relatedness between individuals. Ants indeed show large variations in their social organization. For example, colonies of a given species may differ in the number of reproductive queens, which may vary from one (monogyny) to several dozen (polygyny) in the same population [3942]. Although polygyny reduces intra-colony relatedness, hence worker fitness benefits, adoption of new reproductive females may result from nest site limitation or high risks associated with independent colony founding. It may also be selected for if the occurrence of multiple queens enhances colony productivity, longevity or resistance to pathogens due to increased genetic diversity [35, 4353]. Social polymorphism brings an additional level of complexity to the study of nestmate recognition, because it is often associated with changes in dispersal behaviour and colony foundation [43, 44, 46]. Usually, monogyny involves long-range nuptial flights and independent colony foundation (without the help of workers), whereas colony reproduction under polygyny proceeds by budding, a process whereby freshly mated queens leave their natal nest with a worker force to found new colonies nearby. Budding typically results in population viscosity in which aggressiveness of workers from neighbouring colonies can be affected by both their common origin (genetic similarity) and/or their spatial proximity (environmental cues similarity).

When nestmate recognition involves genetically based recognition cues, two general predictions can be made. Firstly, workers are expected to respond more aggressively toward genetically divergent individuals, because they are chemically less similar [54, 55]. Secondly, variation in the colony kin structure is expected to be associated with differences in the level of aggression shown toward intruders. This is because a greater genetic diversity within colonies, due to the occurrence of multiple queens, is likely to result in a broader blend of cues characteristic of the colony odour. This may decrease the accuracy of nestmate recognition and, ultimately, compromise the workers’ ability to discriminate against non-nestmate conspecifics [3537]. In line with this, workers from polygyne colonies have been shown, on average, to be more tolerant of and less aggressive toward non-nestmates than workers from monogyne colonies in some ants [43, 5659]. However, workers’ aggressive behaviour does not always co-vary with genetic divergence and/or colony kin structure [23, 6063]. This may result from colony-level selection on genetically diverse colonies to reduce within-colony aggression, if it reduces overall productivity, for example by producing a uniform colony recognition odour.

We report results from a multifactorial analysis investigating nestmate recognition in the socially polymorphic ant Pheidole pallidula. In this species, both single-queen and multiple-queen colonies coexist in close proximity in the same populations. Kinship among co-breeding queens varies across colonies, from full-sisters to unrelated queens [41, 6466]. We combined data from behavioural assays, genetic markers and cuticular hydrocarbon profiles to explore the association between genetic distance, chemical signature and nestmate recognition. First, we explored the effect of the social origin of the workers (monogyne or polygyne) on the level of aggressiveness. We examined whether workers originating from polygyne colonies are more tolerant toward foreign conspecifics than workers from monogyne colonies. We also tested for an association between kinship and nestmate recognition. Second, we tested the role of kinship on nestmate recognition by investigating whether the degree of genetic divergence between colonies predicts the level of aggressiveness. Third, we analysed the pattern of variation of worker cuticular hydrocarbons in relation to the social structure, and tested for a possible relationship between the genetic and chemical distances. To determine the potential role of these compounds as labels for nestmate recognition, we correlated levels of intraspecific aggression between colony pairs with the similarity of their cuticular lipid profiles. Finally, we tested for an association between the spatial distance between colonies, on the one hand, and workers’ aggressive behaviour, genetic distance and chemical distance between colonies, on the other.


Sampling and nest distribution

The study was conducted in April 2010 in a facultatively polygynous population of Pheidole pallidula located in Bruniquel (Tarn-et-Garonne, France; N44.05011 E1.65621; no specific permissions were required for this location, and the field studies did not involve endangered or protected species; [41]). Previous studies in this population showed no sign of genetic differentiation between monogyne and polygyne colonies, indicative of gene flow between both social forms [41, 65]. Moreover, colonies are genetically differentiated and form a population exhibiting low but significant isolation-by-distance, suggesting that some colonies originate through budding [41]. The site consists of relatively sparse vegetation composed mainly of grasses and a few junipers Juniperus communis and young downy oaks Quercus pubescens [67]. We mapped all nests in a 50 m x 50 m area to determine their spatial distribution, and collected a sample of workers from each nest (Fig 1). The distances between adjacent collection points ranged from 0.77 m to 41.24 m (mean ± SD = 17.58 ± 8.98 m, N = 36). A chi-square test was used to verify if colonies’ distribution differed from a simulated random spatial Poisson distribution. We computed a coefficient of dispersion (CD) equal to the observed variance divided by the observed mean to characterise the deviation of colonies distribution (CD ≈ 1 in an evenly colonies distribution, > 1 in clumped samples, and < 1 in cases of repulsion; [68]).

Fig 1. Map of the study area of Pheidole pallidula at Bruniquel (Tarn-et-Garonne, France; N44.05011 E1.65621).

Filled circles: monogynous colonies (n = 13). Filled squares: polygynous colonies (n = 22). Grey areas represent sparse vegetation composed mainly of grasses, as well as junipers (Juniperus communis) and downy oaks (Quercus pubescens) (S1 Table).

The Mediterranean ant Pheidole pallidula is characterized by a dimorphism of the sterile caste (with soldiers and minor workers), but because most of the sterile individuals exploring the soil surface and collecting food belong to the minor caste, we used only minor workers in our analyses [67, 69]. We collected a large sample of workers from each colony. A sub-sample of 50 minor workers from each nest was immediately used for chemical extraction (see below). From these, twelve individuals per nest were then randomly chosen and stored in ethanol for subsequent genetic analyses. The remaining workers were kept alive for behavioural assays.

Behavioural assays

Dyadic aggression tests were performed directly after collection. Assays were therefore conducted blind as the observer who recorded worker aggression levels could not know the social structure of the colonies. Intraspecific aggressiveness was quantified between pairs of minor workers according to previously described protocols [69, 70]. Behavioural interactions between the two individuals were observed and scored over 5 min according to escalating aggression on a scale from 0 to 4: 0—ignore, 1—short antennations (< 2 sec.), 2—prolonged antennations, 3—aggression (lunging, attempts at biting, pulling and mandible grasping) and 4—prolonged aggression and fighting. Categories 0 to 2 were regarded as non-aggressive while 3 and 4 were aggressive. Five trials were conducted for each pair of colonies but each worker was used only once. We averaged the highest score obtained in each of the five replicates to yield a mean aggression level. A posteriori, experimental assays consisted of confrontations between workers from monogyne colonies (M x M), from polygyne colonies (P x P) or from monogyne and polygyne colonies (M x P), while control experiments consisted of confrontations between nestmates from monogyne or polygyne colonies. We also set up encounters between majors from different nests to confirm that workers from both castes did not behave differently when confronted with non-colony members.

Microsatellite analysis

Colony genetic diversity and population genetic structure were examined by genotyping four statistically independent, highly polymorphic DNA-microsatellite loci (Ppal-03, Ppal-12, Ppal-84 and Ppal-01T; [41]). DNA was isolated through phenol/chloroform extractions and ethanol precipitation by following standard protocols [41, 71]. Multiplex PCRs were performed in a 10 μl mix containing 2x Qiagen Multiplex PCR Master Mix (Qiagen Inc.), 2 μM of each primer and 1 μl of genomic DNA (about 10 ng of DNA). PCR were carried out using a PTC-200 Peltier thermal cycler (MJ Research Inc.). After an initial denaturing step of 15 min at 95°C, the PCR consisted of 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 90 s at 61°C, and 90 s at 72°C, followed by a final extension step of 30 min at 72°C. Microsatellite loci were analysed using an ABI 3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA); the lengths of PCR products were determined using Genemapper software (Applied Biosystems) and used to construct a multilocus genotype for each individual.

We first examined whether the samples of workers collected at different locations belonged to the same colony or not. We performed genotypic tests of differentiation between all pairs of collection points by means of the log-likelihood (G) based exact test [72] as implemented in the program Genepop on the Web [73, 74] ( The overall significance was determined for each comparison using Fisher’s combined probability test. A Bonferroni correction based on the number of loci used was applied to account for multiple comparisons (α = 0.0125) [75].

The social structure (monogyne or polygyne) was determined by analysing the genotypes present within each colony. Genetic analyses of mother–offspring combinations and of the sperm stored in the spermatheca of queens has previously shown that queens of P. pallidula are strictly monandrous (effective paternity number per colony Me = 1 [41]); therefore, each queen was assumed to contribute two alleles to the allelic pool, and males one allele. The minimum number of queens per colony is therefore inferred from the number of alleles detected among twelve workers at each locus: 3 or fewer alleles = 1 queen, 4–6 alleles = 2 queens, etc. [60]. Genotypes were visually inspected, and the most parsimonious sibship reconstruction was kept for each colony. Since queens of P. pallidula are obligatorily singly mated, reconstruction of families in monogynous colonies was straightforward. The minimum number of matrilines per colony was confirmed by using the maximum-likelihood methods implemented in the program Colony 1.1 [76], assuming multiple singly-mated queen per nest. Five replicate runs yielded similar results.

Genetic variation was assessed through the mean gene diversity He [77] over loci within colonies using Fstat [78]. The genetic distances between pairs of colonies were estimated by the pairwise FST values [79], as implemented in the computer program GenAlEx 6 [80].

Chemical analyses

Groups of 50 workers per colony were killed at -20°C and deposited in 1 ml of cyclohexane for five minutes. The solvent was then evaporated until 10 μl remained. Three μl were injected into a FID gas-chromatograph (VGM250Q system, Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) equipped with a split/splitless injector and flame ionization detector that used a DB-5 fused silica capillary column (30 m by 0.25 mm; film thickness 0.10 μm). The temperature was kept at 150°C during the initial splitless 2 min, raised from 150°C to 300°C at 5°C/min, and held at 300°C for the last 10 min. Helium was used as carrier gas, with a constant flow rate of 2.0 ml/min. The non-volatile cuticular lipids were identified with the same GC coupled to a Perkin-Elmer MS operating at 70 EV. Standards made up of a ladder of linear alkanes (C20, C22, C24… to C40) dissolved in cyclohexane were injected between every few samples to provide a reference set of retention times. We also injected one cuticular extract into a high temperature column (DB-5HT) at 370°C to check if some hydrocarbons with high molecular weights appeared [27]. As no more hydrocarbons were detected, we subsequently used the normal DB-5 column. The areas of peaks were measured by peak integration with a Perkin Elmer Turbo-Chrome Workstation.

Chemical diversity of cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles were assessed using the Gini-Simpson index HGS = 1−Σpi2 (where pi is the relative proportion of the i-th peak over all chemical peaks identified as cuticular lipids, and i ranges from 1 to the total number of peaks present) and the chemical richness Cr, i.e. the number of compounds in an individual sample. Chemical similarity of CHC profiles between colonies was estimated from the relative proportion of each compound using the Euclidian distance E [81]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to transform the variables into uncorrelated components, and discriminant analysis (DA) was carried out on principal components to visualize the variations among colonies (by maximizing the between-colony variation and minimizing intra-colony variation). Because the percentage abundance of each compound depends on the relative abundance of other compounds present, peak areas were standardized following Aitchison’s formula: Zi,j = ln[Yi,j/g(Yj)], where Zi,j is the standardized peak area i for colony j, Yi,j is the peak area i for colony j, and g(Yj) is the geometric mean of all peaks for colony j [82]. To apply the transformation formula on profiles with non-detectable components, the constant 3 (one-tenth of the smallest area measured) was added to all peak areas. Two-group statistical comparisons for each compound were performed using Mann-Whitney U-tests with the significance level set at 0.0008 (i.e. 0.05 divided by the number of peaks).

Statistical analyses

Multiple tests were performed with each focal colony. To avoid pseudoreplication, we treated each colony as a statistical unit. We then used between-nest mean values per colony and mean comparison tests for independent samples to compare monogyne and polygyne colonies [83]. Because colonies are not independent from each other, pairwise relationships were measured through correlation matrices, with the significance of the association tested using Mantel tests in GenAlEx with 999 permutations. Deviations of the variables from normality were tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. When logarithmic or angular transformations did not suffice to normalize the data, we used nonparametric statistics [68]. Statistical tests were carried out with the computer program SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., 1989–2011). Post hoc power analyses for p-values between 0.05 and 0.20 were conducted to estimate the probability of a Type II error (not rejecting a false null hypothesis) using the computer program G*Power [84, 85] and the package biotools (function mantelPower, [86]) in R version 3.1.3 [87].


Our genetic analyses confirmed that the four DNA-microsatellite loci under study were unlinked and segregating independently, and that allelic frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The DNA-microsatellite loci Ppal-03, Ppal-12, Ppal-84 and Ppal-01T had 17, 13, 11 and 14 alleles, respectively, and a level of observed heterozygosity ranging from 0.809 to 0.846. Two collection points located 1.09 m apart were not significantly differentiated (they probably represented two samplings of the same colony); one of these was therefore discarded at random from the set of data. Of the remaining 35 colonies sampled, close examination of workers’ genotypes revealed 3 or fewer alleles at all four loci in 13 colonies, indicating they were headed by a single queen, and more than three alleles at at least one locus in 22 colonies, consistent with the occurrence of multiple reproductive queens. For the 22 multiple-queen colonies, maximum-likelihood methods detected a number of matrilines per colony ranging from 2 to 8. The spatial distribution of the colonies differed significantly from a random Poisson distribution (Chi-square test: χ2 = 3286.12, df = 26, p < 0.001). The coefficient of dispersion CD was 0.71, indicating that colonies were more evenly distributed.


Across the 523 pairwise encounter tests, the intensity of aggression ranged from tolerance (i.e. score = 0) to fierce fights (i.e. score = 4). Workers showed no aggressive behaviour when confronted with nestmates (mean aggression score ± SD: 1.19 ± 0.17; min-max: 1–1.33; median = 1.33), whatever their social origin (monogyne: 1.17 ± 0.19, median = 1.17, N = 4 pairs of colonies; polygyne: 1.21 ± 0.17, median = 1.33, 8 pairs) (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 14, p = 0.808). Aggression scores from these experiments were therefore pooled for comparisons with encounters between non-nestmates. In contrast, 63% of interactions between workers from different colonies resulted in aggressive responses (mean ± SD = 2.95 ± 1.11; min-max: 0.40–4; median = 3.40). Individuals often engaged in fights with biting and pulling, which could result in the death of one antagonist. The level of aggressiveness was significantly higher during encounters between non-nestmates than between nestmates (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 516.5, p < 0.001). Encounters between two minors or two majors yielded similar behavioural responses, confirming that workers from both castes did not behave differently when confronted with non-nestmates (111 tests on 13 pairs of colonies; minors: mean ± SD = 2.87 ± 1.42, median = 3.80; soldiers: 2.92 ± 1.22, median = 3.80; related-samples Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test, W = 13.5, p = 0.932).

Aggressiveness vs. social structure and colony genetic diversity

Regarding non-nestmate encounters, the mean level of aggressiveness was significantly higher between workers from monogyne colonies (M x M) (mean ± SD = 2.97 ± 1.07, median = 3.4, N = 59 pairs) than between workers from polygyne colonies (P x P) (2.58 ± 1.18, median = 2.4, N = 212) (p = 0.049, Dunn's multiple comparison test following significant Kruskal-Wallis test) (Fig 2). Aggression scores during encounters between individuals from monogyne and polygyne colonies (M x P) (3.26 ± 0.94, median = 3.8, N = 240) were also significantly higher than scores between workers originating from polygyne colonies (p < 0.001), but not higher than scores between workers from monogyne colonies (M x M) (p = 0.313) (Fig 2). Finally, confrontation of each colony against all the others showed that the average aggression level was significantly higher for workers from the monogyne colonies (3.15 ± 0.47; median = 3.20) than for workers from the polygyne colonies (2.83 ± 0.36; median = 2.81) (unpaired t-test, t30, p = 0.035). Thus, encounters between non-nestmates involving workers from monogyne colonies were always more aggressive.

Fig 2. Aggressiveness between workers from monogyne colonies (M x M), from polygyne colonies (P x P) and from monogyne and polygyne colonies (M x P).

The closed square indicates the mean of the highest score per replicate, the black bar corresponds to the median, the box is the interquartile range (IQR) and the whiskers represent the lowest datum still within 1.5*IQR of the lower quartile, and the highest datum still within 1.5*IQR of the upper quartile (S2 and S3 Tables).

As expected, multiple-queen colonies were genetically more diverse than single-queen colonies (gene diversity: 0.77 ± 0.07 and 0.48 ± 0.09, respectively; Mann-Whitney U test: U = 286, p < 0.001; Fig 3). Aggressiveness of workers was negatively associated with the genetic diversity within colonies (Spearman rank correlation: rS = -0.38, p = 0.031); the higher the within-colony genetic diversity, the lower the workers’ aggressive behaviour.

Fig 3. Genetic (gene diversity He and pairwise distances FST; top) and chemical (chemical richness Cr, Gini-Simpson index HGS and the Euclidian distances E; bottom) differences between monogyne and polygyne colonies.

See Fig 2 for the legend of the box-plot diagram (S3 and S4 Tables).

Aggressiveness vs. genetic distances

The genetic distance between colonies was found a good predictor of aggressive behaviour. Mean genetic differentiation between colonies ranged from 0.01 to 0.45. Monogyne colonies were on average significantly more genetically distant from other colonies than polygyne ones (0.20 ± 0.03 and 0.11 ± 0.02, respectively; Mann-Whitney U test: U = 1, p < 0.001; Fig 3). Aggressive behaviour increased with the genetic distance between colonies (Mantel test: r = 0.224, p = 0.009), with ants from unrelated pairs of nests being more aggressive than those from related nests. This suggests that the level of intraspecific aggression is determined by genetic differences between the protagonists.

Consistent with colony reproduction by budding under polygyny, we found a significant positive correlation between the spatial distance and the genetic distance of colonies (Mantel test: r = 0.305, p = 0.001). Such an association between the spatial and genetic distances also occurred for monogyne colonies (Mantel test: r = 0.303, p = 0.012). This indicates that neighbouring nests tend to be more closely genetically related than distant nests in both social structures. A series of Mantel tests in which distant and neighbouring colonies are encoded according to an increasing threshold (i.e., neighbouring colonies are those below 1 m apart, 1.5 m, 2 m, 2.5 m… up to 40 m apart) showed that up to a radius of 6.0 m around a focal colony, the workers were significantly more related than beyond this value (Mantel tests, p < 0.033 for distances below 6.0 m, otherwise p > 0.058).

Aggressiveness vs. spatial distance between colonies

We tested whether the spatial distance between colonies (ranging from 0.77 m to 41.24 m) influenced nestmate recognition. A series of Mantel tests (see above) concluded that up to a radius of 5.0 m, the responses were significantly less aggressive than beyond this value (Mantel tests, p < 0.049 for distance below 5.0 m, otherwise p > 0.240).

When considering colonies according to their social origin, aggressiveness was positively associated with spatial distance for polygyne colonies (Mantel tests: polygyne colonies: r = 0.217, p = 0.015), but not for monogyne colonies (r = -0.134, p = 0.193), suggesting that for polygyne colonies, workers from neighbouring nests behaved less aggressively than workers from distant nests.

Aggressiveness vs. chemical diversity and distances

The cuticular profile of P. pallidula was characterized by 61 different hydrocarbons, ranging in size from C25 to C36. Analyses revealed the presence of lipids including alkanes (26%), mono-methylalkanes (27%), di-methylalkanes (12%), tri-methylalkanes (4%), and alkenes (23%). Identification of peaks and their relative proportion (mean percentage and standard deviation) are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Compounds and their mean percentages (± SD) over all colonies, in monogyne and polygyne colonies.

Comparisons between monogyne and polygyne colonies were assessed using Mann–Whitney test; after applying Bonferroni correction, the significance level is set at 0.0008 (i.e., α = 0.05/61 peaks) (S4 Table).

A principal component analysis of all cuticular profiles reduced the dimensionality of the data from 61 variables to 13 principal component (PC) factors accounting for 86.86% of the overall variance (only factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 were retained). The chemical profiles of monogyne and polygyne colonies were not differentiated through the discriminant analysis on the 13 PCs: only 58.8% of the colonies were correctly classified according to their social structure (monogyne or polygyne).

We did not find significant difference (after Bonferroni correction) between monogyne and polygyne colonies in relative peak areas (Table 1). Accordingly, the chemical diversity within colonies did not differ between the two social forms (HGS: monogyne colonies: mean ± SD = 0.95 ± 0.02; polygyne colonies: 0.95 ± 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test: U = 102, p = 0.232; Cr: monogyne colonies: mean ± SD = 0.73 ± 0.21; polygyne colonies: 0.78 ± 0.02; Mann-Whitney U test: U = 146, p = 0.753; Fig 3) and it was not associated with the genetic diversity within colonies (HGS: rS = -0.12, p = 0.500; Cr: rS = 0.21, p = 0.238). Likewise, the distribution of chemical distances E was similar across categories of breeding systems (monogyne colonies: 0.11 ± 0.02; polygyne colonies: 0.11 ± 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test: U = 121, p = 0.868; Fig 3). Moreover, we found no association between the chemical distance and the genetic distance between colonies (Mantel test: r = 0.115, p = 0.108, type II error: ß = 0.515), or between the chemical distance and the aggression level between colonies (Mantel test: r = 0.100, p = 0.065, ß = 0.557). Thus, the level of intraspecific aggression between colony pairs was not correlated with the similarity of their cuticular lipid profiles.

Chemical distance was also not correlated with spatial distance, neither in polygyne nor in monogyne colonies (Mantel tests: all colonies: r = 0.104, p = 0.084, ß = 0.661; monogyne colonies: r = 0.224, p = 0.056, ß = 0.527; polygyne colonies: r = 0.032, p = 0.314).

Since nestmate recognition may be mediated by few cuticular compounds, notably methyl-branched alkanes [88] or alkenes [89], we repeated statistical analyses separately for each of these classes of cuticular hydrocarbons. Similar results were obtained for all analyses, except three: for unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, there was a positive and significant association between the chemical richness and the genetic diversity (Cralkenes: rS = 0.359, p = 0.037); for branched alkanes, chemical distances differed between monogyne and polygyne colonies (monogyne colonies: 0.13 ± 0.10; polygyne colonies: 0.10 ± 0.02; Mann-Whitney U test: U = 69, p = 0.016) and were significantly positively associated with aggressiveness (Mantel test: r = 0.192, p = 0.017).


This study shows that variation in aggressive behaviour toward foreign conspecifics is associated with the level of genetic difference in the ant P. pallidula. Both the social structure and the genetic distance between colonies are significant predictors of aggression. Workers from monogyne colonies are more aggressive than workers from polygyne colonies. Aggressiveness decreases as genetic diversity within colonies with multiple queens increases. Furthermore, the level of aggression increases with the genetic distance between colonies. The influence of a genetic component on recognition cues and aggressive behaviour has been previously documented in a number of ant species. For example, it has been shown that workers from monogyne colonies are more aggressive toward foreign conspecifics than those from polygyne colonies (e.g., Solenopsis invicta, [57, 90, 91]; Myrmica rubra, [38]) and aggressiveness increases as the genetic distance between colonies gets larger (e.g., Formica polyctena, [92]; Formica pratensis, [93]; Crematogaster scutellaris, [94]). In contrast, such a genetic contribution in discrimination of non-colony members is less apparent, or even absent, in other species where neither the social structure (Rhytidoponera confusa, [95]; Leptothorax ambiguus, [96]; Pheidole xerophylla, [60]; Formica selysi, [61]; Formica fusca, [63]) nor the genetic distance between colonies (Pheidole xerophylla, [60]; Plagiolepis pygmaea, [16]; Acromyrmex lobicornis, [97]; F. exsecta, [98]) were found to affect the level of aggression against intruders.

Our data also show that workers behave less aggressively toward individuals coming from nests located within a radius of about 5 m than toward individuals from more distant nests. Similar results were reported in two other Pheidole species, P. tucsonica and P. gilvescens, where neighbours (i.e., workers from colonies less than 2.6 m away) are treated less aggressively than workers from more distant nests [99]. This pattern of aggression is consistent with a “dear-enemy” phenomenon, which predicts that individuals are more aggressive toward strangers than neighbours [100]. In P. tucsonica and P. gilvescens, the “dear-enemy” phenomenon is mediated by recognition learning [99]: workers habituate to cues provided by individuals from colonies that they regularly encounter (neighbours) and become less aggressive toward them than toward ants with unknown cues (strangers). In an elegant set of experiments, these authors showed that workers from different colonies exposed repeatedly to each other become less aggressive than pairs of workers that were never exposed. The mechanism of habituation would then become predominant for recognition and more significant than other discrimination cues like genetic and environmental ones [99]. One may not completely exclude the possibility of a “dear-enemy” phenomenon based on habituation in P. pallidula, since this hypothesis has not been explicitly tested. However, the use of genetically based recognition cues is a more parsimonious explanation to account for the lower level of aggression toward neighbours found in this species. In our study population, the genetic distance between pairs of colonies is positively correlated with their spatial distance; this relationship holds for polygyne colonies, as well as for monogyne colonies. Thus, workers from a focal colony are more closely related to neighbours than to individuals from more distant nests. Given that workers’ aggressive behaviour increases with the genetic distance between colonies, the low level of aggression toward neighbours can merely result from their higher relatedness. Consistent with this explanation, partial Mantel tests show that the aggression level is positively associated with the genetic distances between colonies (r = 0.224, p = 0.009) when controlling for geographic distances, but not with geographic distances between colonies (r = -0.013, p = 0.447) when controlling for genetic distances.

The pattern of genetic isolation-by-distance uncovered in the monogyne social form of P. pallidula is somewhat surprising. Previous studies showed that dispersion of colonies in this species can proceed in two ways [41, 65, 101]: (1) long-range nuptial flights and independent colony foundation, and (2) budding, whereby queens mate close to their natal nest and disperse on foot with workers to initiate new colonies nearby. In ants, polygyny is often associated with colony reproduction by budding, which results in populations being genetically structured, whereas monogyny is linked with independent colony foundation and no population structuration (but see [102]). The occurrence of a pattern of genetic isolation-by-distance in the monogyne form of P. pallidula suggests that a proportion of monogyne colonies may arise by budding from polygyne colonies.

Our chemical analyses did not allow us to show a link between variation in the overall CHC profile and the level of aggression between colonies. We found no difference in the chemical composition, relative peak areas and within-colony chemical diversity between monogyne and polygyne colonies. In addition, we detected no relationship between (i) the workers’ aggressive behaviour and the chemical diversity of colonies, (ii) the level of aggressiveness and the chemical distance between colonies, (iii) the chemical and the genetic distances between colonies, or (iv) the genetic diversity of colonies and their chemical richness. Similar results were obtained when considering unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons (alkenes) only, with the exception of a positive correlation between genetic diversity and chemical richness of colonies. Although our study was based on a reasonable sample size, we cannot rule out the likelihood that it lacked sufficient power to detect significant effects (post hoc power analyses indeed showed that there were nearly equal chances of incorrectly accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis). Interestingly enough, when considering methyl-branched alkanes only, we found that chemical distances (i) differed between monogyne and polygyne colonies, and (ii) were significantly associated with aggressiveness. This is consistent with other studies showing that methyl-branched alkanes are key recognition cues in some ant species [29, 88, 103]. Clearly, further studies are needed to confirm these results, notably to elucidate the role of methyl-branched alkanes in nestmate recognition.

Over the last decades, empirical studies have largely supported that cuticular hydrocarbons are responsible for encoding the nestmate discrimination system in ants [28, 29, 88, 89, 104108]. However, the association between variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles, chemical and/or genetic distances, and aggressive behaviour in ants remains somewhat ambiguous. Some studies showed that the level of aggression is positively correlated with the chemical distance between pairs of colonies (e.g., Myrmica rubra, [38]; Formica exsecta, [98]), whereas others found no such association (e.g., Pheidole megacephala, [69]). In the same vein, a positive relationship between the chemical distance and the genetic distance between colonies was reported in some species (M. rubra, [38]; Cataglyphis niger, [109]) but not in others (Crematogaster pygmaea, [110]; C. scutellaris, [94]). Comparison of the whole cuticular profile between colonies, though frequently performed, may be too rough an approach, since the CHCs extracted from workers are not all involved in nestmate discrimination [88, 98, 103, 107, 111]. In P. pallidula, the absence of a relationship between the level of aggression toward foreign conspecifics and the chemical profile of colonies might stem from a lack of knowledge about the cuticular compounds directly involved in nestmate discrimination. Identifying these key compounds would lead to an understanding of how aggressiveness of workers is linked to chemical recognition cues. In this respect, the role of methyl-branched alkanes in nestmate recognition in P. pallidula certainly merits further study.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Matrix of geographic distances between colonies (m).


S2 Table. Matrix of agressiveness between colonies.


S4 Table. Areas of peaks identified as cuticular lipids.



We thank O. Hardy for helpful discussions and B. Gassner for his comments on a first draft of the manuscript. Thanks to J. Liebig and D. Nash for advice and comments during the review process. This work was supported by grants from the Belgian FRS-FNRS (Fonds National pour la Recherche Scientifique) (FRFC 2.4516.11) and the Université libre de Bruxelles (ARC 2010–2015 #5).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DF SA. Performed the experiments: DF SDL AL LP SA. Analyzed the data: DF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DF SA. Wrote the paper: DF JCdB SA.


  1. 1. Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol. 1964; 7: 1–16. pmid:5875341
  2. 2. Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol. 1964; 7: 17–52. pmid:5875340
  3. 3. Queller DC, Ponte E, Bozzaro S, Strassmann JE. Single-gene greenbeard effects in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Science. 2003; 299: 105–6. pmid:12511650
  4. 4. West S, Gardner A. Altruism, spite, and greenbeards. Science. 2010; 327: 1341–4. pmid:20223978
  5. 5. Šobotník J, Bourguignon T, Hanus R, Demianová Z, Pytelková J, Mareš M, et al. Explosive backpacks in old termite workers. Science. 2012; 337: 436. pmid:22837520
  6. 6. Abbot P, Abe J, Alcock J, Alizon S, Alpedrinha JAC, Andersson M, et al. Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature. 2011; 471: E1–E4. pmid:21430721
  7. 7. Bourke AFG. Principles of social evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. 288 p.
  8. 8. Axelrod R, Hamilton WD. The evolution of cooperation. Science. 1981; 211: 1390–6. pmid:7466396
  9. 9. Waldman B. The ecology of kin recognition. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1988; 19: 543–71.
  10. 10. Mateo JM. Kin recognition in ground squirrels and other rodents. J Mammal. 2003; 84: 1163–81.
  11. 11. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. The ants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990. 732 p.
  12. 12. Vander Meer RK, Breed MD, Espelie KE, Winston ML, editors. Pheromone communication in social insects: ants, wasps, bees, and termites. Boulder: Westview Press; 1998.
  13. 13. Lach L, Parr C, Abbott K, editors. Ant ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
  14. 14. Blomquist GJ, Bagnères A-G. Insect hydrocarbons: biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. 504 p.
  15. 15. Boulay R, Hefetz A, Soroker V, Lenoir A. Camponotus fellah colony integration: worker individuality necessitates frequent hydrocarbon exchanges. Anim Behav. 2000; 59: 1127–33. pmid:10877891
  16. 16. Thurin N, Aron S. Seasonal nestmate recognition in the polydomous ant Plagiolepis pygmaea. Anim Behav. 2008; 75: 1023–30.
  17. 17. Stuart RJ, Herbers JM. Nest mate recognition in ants with complex colonies: within- and between-population variation. Behav Ecol. 2000; 11: 676–85.
  18. 18. Buczkowski G, Kumar R, Suib SL, Silverman J. Diet-related modification of cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, diminishes intercolony aggression. J Chem Ecol. 2005; 31: 829–43. pmid:16124254
  19. 19. d'Ettorre P, Wenseleers T, Dawson J, Hutchinson S, Boswell T, Ratnieks FLW. Wax combs mediate nestmate recognition by guard honeybees. Anim Behav. 2006; 71: 773–9.
  20. 20. Zinck L, Hora RR, Châline N, Jaisson P. Low intraspecific aggression level in the polydomous and facultative polygynous ant Ectatomma tuberculatum. Entomol Exp Appl. 2008; 126: 211–6.
  21. 21. Lenoir A, Hefetz A, Simon T, Soroker V. Comparative dynamics of gestaldt odour formation in two ant species Camponotus fellah and Aphaenogaster senilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Physiol Entomol. 2001; 26: 275–83.
  22. 22. Soroker V, Vienne C, Hefetz A. Hydrocarbon dynamics within and between nestmates in Cataglyphis niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Chem Ecol. 1995; 21: 365–78. pmid:24234067
  23. 23. Stuart RJ. Collective cues as a basis for nestmate recognition in polygynous Leptothoracine ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988; 85: 4572–5. pmid:16593947
  24. 24. Vienne C, Soroker V, Hefetz A. Congruency of hydrocarbon patterns in heterospecific groups of ants: transfer and/or biosynthesis? Insectes soc. 1995; 42: 267–77.
  25. 25. Bagnères A-G, Blomquist GJ. Site of synthesis, mechanism of transport and selective deposition of hydrocarbons. In: Blomquist GJ, Bagnères A-G, editors. Insect hydrocarbons: biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 75–99.
  26. 26. Reeve HK. The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am Nat. 1989; 133: 407–35.
  27. 27. d'Ettorre P, Lenoir A. Nestmate recognition. In: Lach L, Parr C, Abbott K, editors. Ant ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 194–209.
  28. 28. Howard RW, Blomquist GJ. Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annu Rev Entomol. 2005; 50: 371–93. pmid:15355247
  29. 29. van Zweden JS, d'Ettorre P. Nestmate recognition in social insects and the role of hydrocarbons. In: Blomquist GJ, Bagnères A-G, editors. Insect hydrocarbons: biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 222–43.
  30. 30. Hefetz A. The evolution of hydrocarbon pheromone parsimony in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)—interplay of colony odor uniformity and odor idiosyncrasy. A review. Myrmecol News. 2007; 10: 59–68.
  31. 31. Martin S, Drijfhout F. A review of ant cuticular hydrocarbons. J Chem Ecol. 2009; 35: 1151–61. pmid:19866237
  32. 32. Nowbahari E, Lenoir A, Clément J-L, Lange C, Bagnères A-G, Joulie C. Individual, geographical and experimental variation of cuticular hydrocarbons of the ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): their use in nest and subspecies recognition. Biochem Syst Ecol. 1990; 18: 63–73.
  33. 33. Suarez AV, Holway D, Liang D, Tsutsui ND, Case TJ. Spatiotemporal patterns of intraspecific aggression in the invasive Argentine ant. Anim Behav. 2002; 64: 697–708.
  34. 34. Foitzik S, Sturm H, Pusch K, d'Ettorre P, Heinze J. Nestmate recognition and intraspecific chemical and genetic variation in Temnothorax ants. Anim Behav. 2007; 73: 999–1007.
  35. 35. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. The number of queens: an important trait in ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften. 1977; 64: 8–15.
  36. 36. Breed MD, Bennett B. Kin recognition in highly eusocial insects. In: Fletcher DJC, Michener CD, editors. Kin recognition in animals. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987. p. 209–42.
  37. 37. Vander Meer RK, Morel L. Nestmate recognition in ants. In: Vander Meer RK, Breed MD, Espelie KE, Winston ML, editors. Pheromone communication in social insects: ants, wasps, bees, and termites. Boulder: Westview Press; 1998. p. 79–103.
  38. 38. Fürst MA, Durey M, Nash DR. Testing the adjustable threshold model for intruder recognition on Myrmica ants in the context of a social parasite. Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol. 2012; 279: 516–22.
  39. 39. Deslippe RJ, Savolainen R. Sex investment in a social insect: the proximate role of food. Ecology. 1995; 76: 375–82.
  40. 40. Chapuisat M, Bocherens S, Rosset H. Variable queen number in ant colonies: no impact on queen turnover, inbreeding, and population genetic differentiation in the ant Formica selysi. Evolution. 2004; 58: 1064–72. pmid:15212387
  41. 41. Fournier D, Aron S, Milinkovitch MC. Investigation of the population genetic structure and mating system in the ant Pheidole pallidula. Mol Ecol. 2002; 11: 1805–14. pmid:12207730
  42. 42. Bargum K, Helanterä H, Sundström L. Genetic population structure, queen supersedure and social polymorphism in a social Hymenoptera. J Evol Biol. 2007; 20: 1351–60. pmid:17584230
  43. 43. Bourke AFG, Franks NR. Social evolution in ants. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1995. 529 p.
  44. 44. Crozier RH, Pamilo P. Evolution of social insect colonies: sex allocation and kin selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. 306 p.
  45. 45. Keller L, Vargo EL. Reproductive structure and reproductive roles in colonies of eusocial insects. In: Keller L, editor. Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 16–44.
  46. 46. Keller L. Social life: the paradox of multiple-queen colonies. Trends Ecol Evol. 1995; 10: 355–60. pmid:21237068
  47. 47. Pedersen JS, Boomsma JJ. Genetic diversity and variation of social structure in ant populations. Proceedings of the International Colloquia on Social Insects. 1997; 3–4: 157–72.
  48. 48. Herbers JM. Ecological determinants of queen number in ants. In: Keller L, editor. Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 262–93.
  49. 49. Helms Cahan S, Blumstein DT, Sundström L, Liebig J, Griffin A. Social trajectories and the evolution of social behavior. Oikos. 2002; 96: 206–16.
  50. 50. Dalecky A, Gaume L, Schatz B, McKey D, Kjellberg F. Facultative polygyny in the plant-ant Petalomyrmex phylax (Hymenoptera: Formicinae): sociogenetic and ecological determinants of queen number. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2005; 86: 133–51.
  51. 51. Nonacs P. The effects of polygyny and colony life history on optimal sex investment. In: Keller L, editor. Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 110–31.
  52. 52. Hughes WOH, Boomsma JJ. Genetic diversity and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ant societies. Evolution. 2004; 58: 1251–60. pmid:15266974
  53. 53. Boulay R, Arnan X, Cerdá X, Retana J. The ecological benefits of larger colony size may promote polygyny in ants. J Evol Biol. 2014; 27: 2856–63. pmid:25302869
  54. 54. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Grosberg RK. Genetic diversity, asymmetrical aggression, and recognition in a widespread invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 1078–83. pmid:12538869
  55. 55. Ydenberg RC, Giraldeau LA, Falls JB. Neighbours, strangers, and the asymmetric war of attrition. Anim Behav. 1988; 36: 343–7.
  56. 56. Keller L, Passera L. Influence of the number of queens on nestmate recognition and attractiveness of queens to workers in the Argentine ants, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Anim Behav. 1989; 37: 733–40.
  57. 57. Morel L, Vander Meer RK, Lofgren CS. Comparison of nestmate recognition between monogyne and polygyne populations of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1990; 83: 642–7.
  58. 58. Keller L, editor. Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
  59. 59. Starks PT, Watson RE, Dipaola MJ, Dipaola CP. The effect of queen number on nestmate discrimination in the facultatively polygynous ant Pseudomyrmex pallidus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology. 1998; 104: 573–84.
  60. 60. Tripet F, Fournier D, Nonacs P, Keller L. Kin recognition and the paradoxical patterns of aggression between colonies of a Mojave desert Pheidole ant. Insectes soc. 2006; 53: 127–35.
  61. 61. Rosset H, Schwander T, Chapuisat M. Nestmate recognition and levels of aggression are not altered by changes in genetic diversity in a socially polymorphic ant. Anim Behav. 2007; 74: 951–6.
  62. 62. Martin SJ, Helanterä H, Kiss K, Lee YR, Drijfhout FP. Polygyny reduces rather than increases nestmate discrimination cue diversity in Formica exsecta ants. Insectes soc. 2009; 56: 375–83.
  63. 63. Helanterä H, Lee YR, Drijfhout FP, Martin SJ. Genetic diversity, colony chemical phenotype, and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica fusca. Behav Ecol. 2011; 22: 710–6.
  64. 64. Aron S, Campan E, Boomsma JJ, Passera L. Social structure and split sex ratios in the ant Pheidole pallidula. Ethol Ecol Evol. 1999; 11: 209–27.
  65. 65. Fournier D, Keller L, Passera L, Aron S. Colony sex ratios vary with breeding system but not relatedness asymmetry in the facultatively polygynous ant Pheidole pallidula. Evolution. 2003; 57: 1336–42. pmid:12894941
  66. 66. Fournier D. Population genetic structure, mating system and conflicts in Pheidole ants [PhD thesis]. Brussels (Belgium): Université Libre de Bruxelles; 2004.
  67. 67. Passera L. Peuplement en Fourmis terricoles du rebord méridional des Causses Jurassiques du Quercy: la lande calcaire à buis. Vie et Milieu. 1967; 1: 189–205.
  68. 68. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1995. 887 p.
  69. 69. Fournier D, Tindo M, Kenne M, Mbenoun Masse PS, Van Bossche V, De Coninck E, et al. Genetic structure, nestmate recognition and behaviour of two cryptic species of the invasive big-headed ant Pheidole megacephala. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e31480. pmid:22371822
  70. 70. Roulston TH, Buczkowski G, Silverman J. Nestmate discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior. Insectes soc. 2003; 50: 151–9.
  71. 71. Sambrook J, Russell D. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Third edition ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001. 2231 p.
  72. 72. Goudet J, Raymond M, De Meeüs T, Rousset F. Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics. 1996; 144: 1933–40. pmid:8978076
  73. 73. Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered. 1995; 86: 248–9.
  74. 74. Rousset F. GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resources. 2008; 8: 103–6.
  75. 75. Rice WR. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution. 1989; 43: 223–5.
  76. 76. Wang J. Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics. 2004; 166: 1963–79. pmid:15126412
  77. 77. Nei M. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1987. 512 p.
  78. 78. Goudet J. Fstat, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. version 2.9.3 ed: Institute of Ecology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; 2001.
  79. 79. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984; 38: 1358–70.
  80. 80. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006; 6: 288–95.
  81. 81. Fournier D, de Biseau J-C, Aron S. Genetics, behaviour and chemical recognition of the invading ant Pheidole megacephala. Mol Ecol. 2009; 18: 186–99. pmid:19192175
  82. 82. Aitchison J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1982; 44: 139–77.
  83. 83. Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. Fifth Edition ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2010. 960 p.
  84. 84. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175–91. pmid:17695343
  85. 85. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41: 1149–60. pmid:19897823
  86. 86. Silva AR, Dias CTS, Cecon PR, Rêgo ER. An alternative procedure for performing a power analysis of Mantel's test. Journal of Applied Statistics. 2015; 42: 1984–92.
  87. 87. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013.
  88. 88. Guerrieri FJ, Nehring V, Jørgensen CG, Nielsen J, Galizia CG, d'Ettorre P. Ants recognize foes and not friends. Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol. 2009; 276: 2461–8.
  89. 89. Martin SJ, Vitikainen E, Helanterä H, Drijfhout FP. Chemical basis of nest-mate discrimination in the ant Formica exsecta. Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol. 2008; 275: 1271–8.
  90. 90. Vander Meer RK, Alonso LE. Queen primer pheromone affects conspecific fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) aggression. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2002; 51: 122–30.
  91. 91. Chirino MG, Gilbert LE, Folgarait PJ. Behavioral discrimination between monogyne and polygyne red fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in their native range. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2012; 105: 740–5.
  92. 92. Beye M, Neumann P, Moritz RFA. Nestmate recognition and the genetic gestalt in the mound-building ant Formica polyctena. Insectes soc. 1997; 44: 49–58.
  93. 93. Beye M, Neumann P, Chapuisat M, Pamilo P, Moritz RFA. Nestmate recognition and the genetic relatedness of nests in the ant Formica pratensis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1998; 43: 67–72.
  94. 94. Frizzi F, Ciofi C, Dapporto L, Natali C, Chelazzi G, Turillazzi S, et al. The rules of aggression: how genetic, chemical and spatial factors affect intercolony fights in a dominant species, the mediterranean acrobat ant Crematogaster scutellaris. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10: e0137919. pmid:26445245
  95. 95. Crosland MWJ. The influence of the queen, colony size and worker ovarian develoment on nestmate recognition in the ant Rhytidoponera confusa. Anim Behav. 1990; 39: 413–25.
  96. 96. Stuart RJ. Nestmate recognition in leptothoracine ants: testing for effects of queen number, colony size and species of intruder. Anim Behav. 1991; 42: 277–84.
  97. 97. Dimarco RD, Farji-Brener AG, Premoli AC. Dear enemy phenomenon in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis: behavioral and genetic evidence. Behav Ecol. 2010; 21: 304–10.
  98. 98. Martin SJ, Vitikainen E, Drijfhout FP, Jackson D. Conspecific ant aggression is correlated with chemical distance, but not with genetic or spatial distance. Behav Genet. 2012; 42: 323–31. pmid:21928047
  99. 99. Langen TA, Tripet F, Nonacs P. The red and the black: habituation and the dear-enemy phenomenon in two desert Pheidole ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2000; 48: 285–92.
  100. 100. Temeles EJ. The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they 'dear enemies'? Anim Behav. 1994; 47: 339–50.
  101. 101. Bontpart H. Recherches préliminaires sur la biologie de Pheidole pallidula Nyl. (Hyménoptère Formicoidea Myrmicidae) [PhD thesis]. Toulouse (France): Université de Toulouse; 1964.
  102. 102. Cronin AL, Molet M, Doums C, Monnin T, Peeters C. Recurrent evolution of dependent colony foundation across eusocial insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013; 58: 37–55. pmid:22934981
  103. 103. Krasnec MO, Breed MD. Colony-specific cuticular hydrocarbon profile in Formica argentea ants. J Chem Ecol. 2013; 39: 59–66. pmid:23297106
  104. 104. Singer TL. Roles of hydrocarbons in the recognition systems of insects. Am Zool. 1998; 38: 394–405.
  105. 105. Lahav S, Soroker V, Hefetz A, Vander Meer RK. Direct behavioral evidence for hydrocarbons as ant recognition discriminators. Naturwissenschaften. 1999; 86: 246–9.
  106. 106. Lenoir A, d'Ettorre P, Errard C. Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. Annu Rev Entomol. 2001; 46: 573–99. pmid:11112180
  107. 107. Akino T, Yamamura K, Wakamura S, Yamaoka R. Direct behavioral evidence for hydrocarbons as nestmate recognition cues in Formica japonica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Appl Entomol Zool. 2004; 39: 381–7.
  108. 108. Greene MJ, Gordon DM. Structural complexity of chemical recognition cues affects the perception of group membership in the ants Linepithema humile and Aphaenogaster cockerelli. J Exp Biol. 2007; 210: 897–905. pmid:17297148
  109. 109. Saar M, Leniaud L, Aron S, Hefetz A. At the brink of supercoloniality: genetic, behavioral, and chemical assessments of population structure of the desert ant Cataglyphis niger. Front Ecol Evol. 2014; 2: 13.
  110. 110. Hamidi R, Debout G, Heredia A, Fournier D, Quinet Y, de Biseau J-C. Multicoloniality in the highly polygynous ant Crematogaster pygmaea (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Eur J Entomol. 2012; 109: 95–102.
  111. 111. Martin SJ, Helanterä H, Drijfhout FP. Colony-specific hydrocarbons identify nest mates in two species of Formica ant. J Chem Ecol. 2008; 34: 1072–80. pmid:18563489