Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Estimating the Burden of Leptospirosis among Febrile Subjects Aged below 20 Years in Kampong Cham Communities, Cambodia, 2007-2009

  • Sopheak Hem ,

    hsopheak@pasteur-kh.org

    Affiliation Institut Pasteur in Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Sowath Ly,

    Affiliation Institut Pasteur in Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Irene Votsi,

    Affiliation Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

  • Florian Vogt,

    Affiliation Masters of Science in Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • Nima Asgari,

    Affiliation World Health Organization, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Philippe Buchy,

    Affiliation Institut Pasteur in Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Seiha Heng,

    Affiliation Institut Pasteur in Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Mathieu Picardeau,

    Affiliation Institut Pasteur, National Reference Center and WHO Collaborating Center for Leptospirosis, Paris, France

  • Touch Sok,

    Affiliation Communicable Diseases Control Department of the Ministry of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Sovann Ly,

    Affiliation Communicable Diseases Control Department of the Ministry of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Rekol Huy,

    Affiliation National Dengue Control Program, National Center for Entomology, Parasitology, and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Bertrand Guillard,

    Affiliation Institut Pasteur in Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Simon Cauchemez,

    Affiliation Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

  • Arnaud Tarantola

    Affiliation Institut Pasteur in Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

Abstract

Background

Leptospirosis is an emerging but neglected public health challenge in the Asia/Pacific Region with an annual incidence estimated at 10–100 per 100,000 population. No accurate data, however, are available for at-risk rural Cambodian communities.

Method

We conducted anonymous, unlinked testing for IgM antibodies to Leptospira spp. on paired sera of Cambodian patients <20 years of age between 2007–2009 collected through active, community-based surveillance for febrile illnesses in a convenience sample of 27 rural and semi-rural villages in four districts of Kampong Cham province, Cambodia. Leptospirosis testing was done on paired serological samples negative for Dengue, Japanese encephalitis and Chikungunya viruses after random selection. Convalescent samples found positive while initial samples were negative were considered as proof of acute infection. We then applied a mathematical model to estimate the risk of fever caused by leptospirosis, dengue or other causes in rural Cambodia.

Results

A total of 630 samples are coming from a randomly selected subset of 2358 samples. IgM positive were found on the convalescent serum sample, among which 100 (15.8%) samples were IgM negative on an earlier sample. Seventeen of these 100 seroconversions were confirmed using a Microagglutination Test. We estimated the probability of having a fever due to leptospirosis at 1. 03% (95% Credible Interval CI: 0. 95%–1. 22%) per semester. In comparison, this probability was 2. 61% (95% CI: 2. 55%, 2. 83%) for dengue and 17. 65% (95% CI: 17. 49%, 18. 08%) for other causes.

Conclusion

Our data from febrile cases aged below 20 years suggest that the burden of leptospirosis is high in rural Cambodian communities. This is especially true during the rainy season, even in the absence of identified epidemics.

Introduction

Leptospirosis is an endemic infectious disease found predominantly in rural regions of industrialized and developing countries worldwide [13]. Its prevalence is high in rural tropical areas [46]. Infection typically occurs during the rainy season [710]. Human infection is accidental, usually following exposure of non-intact skin or of mucosa to water contaminated with urine of carrier animals [11]. The natural reservoirs are mainly rodents [1214] and other animals such as dogs, pigs and cattle [1517]. Agricultural workers, veterinarians, butchers, fishermen, construction workers, miners, soldiers and older children / young adults are at higher risk of infection [1,1820]. Leptospirosis infection may be asymptomatic [21,22], or may present as mild and self-limiting febrile illness resembling influenza, scrub typhus, malaria or dengue [23,24]. A small proportion of patients develop a potentially fatal illness characterized by jaundice, thrombocytopenia, haemorrhage and multiple organ dysfunctions [2527] associated with fatality rates estimated up to 40% [28,29]. Leptospirosis is thus often underdiagnosed [13], especially in children living in areas of high Dengue endemicity [30]. Tens of millions of people are estimated to be affected by this pathogen annually [31], resulting in more than one million severe cases with approximately 60,000 deaths per year [3234]. Early diagnosis helps guide treatment and reduce duration of hospital stay and the case fatality rate, [35]. Laboratory confirmation of leptospirosis is also challenging due to difficulties in isolating the spirochetes, in interpreting serological evidence, compounded with limitations of molecular technique, since more than 250 serovars are associated with this disease [36,37]. Antibodies are not protective and there is no cross-protective immunity to other leptospira serovars [38].

The burden of leptospirosis has been evaluated in some parts of Asia and the Pacific region [7,24,24,3941] but detailed assessment still lacks in certain countries such as Cambodia, with a population estimated at about 13.4 million inhabitants of whom 80% are rural, working in paddy fields and small-scale cattle farming. Although leptospirosis is known to be endemic in the country [3], data on this disease remain scare. In Cambodia, leptospirosis is not a notifiable disease and laboratory testing is not available at the community level. In 2002, a study in Phnom Penh found 3% positive by MAT or PCR among children hospitalized for haemorrhagic fever [39]. Another study conducted in 2003 in Takeo provincial hospital identified 11 cases of confirmed leptospirosis in 121 inpatient and outpatient with suspected leptospirosis: 4 cases by MAT and 7 by PCR, 3 cases being positive for both MAT and PCR [42]. Another hospitalized leptospirosis study found signs of recent leptospira infection and past leptospira infection in 14.4% and 15.5% of subjects, respectively [43]. A recent study in South-Central Cambodia on undifferentiated fevers in ambulatory patients in a rural healthcare setting found 20.8% seroprevalence of IgM leptospirosis [44]. All available data in Cambodia was therefore collected in the healthcare setting.

Thanks to funding from the World Health Organization (WHO), we undertook our study to estimate the burden of Leptospirosis at community level by determining the percentage of antibody positivity and the frequency of leptospirosis seroconversion in samples taken from febrile cases in a study conducted from 2007 to 2009 in rural Cambodian communities.

Materials and Methods

This study bore on anonymized samples already collected in past Dengue studies and stored at a biobank at the Institut Pasteur in Cambodia (IPC). Furthermore leptospirosis is a highly prevalent, endemo-epidemic disease in Cambodia. Finally, antibodies are not long—lasting and there is no cross-immunity.

For all these reasons, there was no informed subjects/guardians consent included in the protocol, which was submitted to and was approved by the National Ethic Committee for Health Research (NECHR) in Cambodia on April 8th, 2011 (#NEHCR35-2011)

Dengue study site and population

From 2007 to 2009, inclusive, a total of 24,928 subjects (at study midpoints) aged < 20 years were recruited and prospectively followed up in the community, for varying periods of time but always including the rainy seasons which usually last from June to October. A total of 8,295 samples were collected at home during fever episodes. Serology testing was done on initial samples collected at days 0–7 and on the second sample at days 14–21 after symptom onset. Sera were aliquoted in the laboratory of the provincial hospital, transported to Institut Pasteur in Cambodia (IPC) and stored at -80°C until testing.

Selection of the sample subset for Leptospirosis testing

Among these 8,295 samples, those already found positive by MAC-ELISA and RT-PCR for the dengue, Japanese encephalitis (JEV), Chikungunya virus, influenza, Respiratory Syncitial Virus and Human Metapneumovirus [45] were excluded, as the fevers observed were considered to be due to those virus (Fig 1). Of the remaining 7,162 samples which tested negative, 2,358 paired samples taken for fever were randomly selected and tested for leptospirosis. Furthermore, no malaria is suspected in this region and it is in a phase of elimination by 2020, as indicated in the district operational plan against malaria.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Study flowchart for febrile episodes, 2007–2009 rainy seasons, Kampong Cham province, Cambodia.

Note: Dotted lines indicate when subsequent tests were performed on different samples for the same febrile episode.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151555.g001

Serology testing

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) test.

Paired acute and convalescent sera were tested for IgM anti-leptospira antibodies by using the microplate IgM-ELISA [37,46] according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Leptospira IgM ELISA, Panbio)[47] at IPC. Briefly, serum samples, triple cut-off calibrators, positive and negative control sera were diluted at 1:100 in serum diluents and 100 μL added to microwells coated by Leptospira antigens and then incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline containing Tween 20 and preservative (0.1% Proclin), 100 μL of HRP conjugated anti-human IgM was added and incubated for another 30 minutes at 37°C. After further washing, 100μL of tetramethylbenzidine substrate was added and incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes. We used 100μL of 1M phosphoric acid to stop the reaction. The absorbance of each well was read at wavelength of 450nm with Bio-Rad Ultramark plate reader (Bio-Rad Ultramark, Microplate Imaging System). The result was expressed in units calculated by the ratio of sample absorbance to the mean cut off absorbance multiplied by 10. A positive result was defined by values >11 Panbio units and < 9 Panbio units defined negativity, as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Panbio unit values between 9 and 11 were considered in the ‘gray zone’, requiring further testing by an alternate method or renewed sampling [48]. Patients who were positive for IgM antibodies on the convalescent sample and negative on the acute sample were defined as having seroconverted. All cases of seroconversion were selected for additional testing using MAT.

Microagglutination test (MAT).

We first tested for IgM ELISA on the second (convalescent) sample. If positive, we then went back and tested the first [22] sample for IgM antibodies. Patients found IgM ELISA-positive on the convalescent sample and negative on the initial sample were defined as seroconverters. Convalescent samples from all seroconverters were tested by MAT to describe titers and serogroup distribution at the National Reference Center for Leptospirosis, Institut Pasteur in Paris with a panel of 24 serovars from 22 serogroups using the following antigens: serogroups Australis(serovar Australis), Autumnalis (serovar Autumnalis), Bataviae (serovar Bataviae), Ballum (serovar Castellonis), Canicola (serovar Canicola), Cynopteri (serovar Cynopteri), Celledoni (serovar Celledoni), Djasiman (serovar Djasiman), Grippotyphosa (serovar Grippotyphosa), Hebdomadis (serovar Hebdomadis), Icterohaemorrhagiae (serovar Copenhageni and icterohaemorarhagiae), Javanica (serovar Javanica), Louisiana (serovar Louisiana), Mini (serovar Mini), Panama (serovar Panama), Pomona (serovar Pomona), Pyrogenes (serovar Pyrogenes), Sejroe (serovars Hardjo and Sejroe), Sermin (serovar Sermin), Sermani (serovar Sermani), Semaranga (serovar Patoc) and Tarassovi (serovar Tarassovi). Sera were screened at a dilution of 1/50 and positive sera were titrated to endpoint using standard methods. Agglutination reactions between the serum tested and leptospira antigens were read after incubation at room temperature during 1.5 hours. High rates of agglutination of the serum with one particular antigen were used to identify the presumptive serogroup of the infecting bacterium [48]. MAT-positive leptospirosis cases were defined as having a febrile illness (consistent with leptospirosis) with evidence of seroconversion in paired sera (from a negative titre to a MAT titre ≥1/100) against any pathogenic serogroup.

Statistical analysis

Data from the successive studies were aggregated and database field formats were standardized using Stata 11 (StataCorp, Collegestation, TX, USA). The age structure for the samples dataset was built to match the 0 < 20 age structure of the population in Kampong Cham documented for 2008 [49]. The same software package was used to randomly select the number of samples from each age group. Samples—rather than patients—were randomly selected to reduce the effect of any particular risk factor which may have artificially increased or decreased the risk of seroconversion in one patient with several febrile illnesses and therefore samples. Laboratory data were entered using Excel (Microsoft Office 2007, Microsoft, Redmond, WA., USA).

Modeling

Date of onset and dengue testing results were available for each of the 2,358 occurrences of fever in this analysis. However, diagnosis for leptospirosis was only available for a subset of fevers. We therefore developed a statistical framework to correct for this imperfect observation and estimate individual hazards of fever caused by leptospirosis, dengue or by another cause (i.e. other than leptospirosis or dengue) from these data. The occurrence of fever during the study period was modeled with an inhomogeneous Poisson process in which each child was exposed to competitive hazards of having a fever caused by leptospirosis, dengue or another cause. Inference relied on the following assumptions: i) these hazards were constant during the three seasons under study (01/06/07-31/12/07, 01/04/08-31/12/08, 01/01/09-31/12/09) and this assumption was relaxed in a sensitivity analysis; ii) once a child was infected by dengue, the risk of further fever due to dengue was reduced by a factor 1 ‒ ρD for the rest of the season; iii) fever due to another cause did not lead to a reduction in the subsequent risk of fever; iv) fever caused by leptospirosis did not confer immunity. The probability of having a fever per semester was derived from the hazard of having a fever for presentation purposes (see S1S3 Tables). To check the adequacy of the model, we compared predictions made by the model for simple proportions with observed values. The technical details of the model and the estimation method are presented in S1S3 Tables.

Ethical considerations

This study protocol was approved by the National Ethic Committee for Health Research in Cambodia NECHR on April 8th, 2011(# NEHCR 35–2011).

Results

Descriptive analysis

The febrile subjects from which samples were selected during the 3-year period were male in 1,235 (52.4%) of cases. Their median age was 9 years (range 0–19; IQR 4–13; mean 8.85 ± 5 years). Their mothers had completed primary school only in 70% of cases and had completed secondary education or higher in 8.2% of cases while 21.7% had had no schooling). In all, 2,130 (90.3%) samples originated from subjects in rural areas and 228 from semi-rural areas.

A total of 2,358 convalescent samples from 2,044 febrile subjects were initially randomly selected for leptospirosis testing (Table 1). Of these, 630 (26.7%) samples from febrile episodes in 576 subjects were found IgM positive on the convalescent serum sample (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Year-specific and study samples enrolment and results of lpetospirosis, febrile episodes, 2007–2009 rainy seasons, Kampong Cham province, Cambodia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151555.t001

One-hundred (15.8%) of these positive samples were negative for IgM on the acute sample and were therefore considered seroconversions in 97 patients (3 patients seroconverted twice during the study). The percentage of seroconversion in various age groups remained somewhat stable, between 4% and 4.9% (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Leptospira immunological profiles by febrile patient age group, 2007–2009, Kampong Cham province, Cambodia.

Percentages of samples found seronegative, seropositive (IgM positive on convalescent and initial sample) and observed seroconversion (IgM positive on convalescent sample but not initial sample).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151555.g002

Of the 100 sample pairs showing seroconversion, 17 were found MAT-positive on the convalescent sample. Ten different leptospira serogroups were identified among these 17 MAT-positive samples (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Leptospira microscopic agglutination (MAT) titres obtained in 17 positive convalescent samples, febrile episodes, 2007–2009 rainy seasons, Kampong Cham province, Cambodia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151555.t002

Patients whose successive samples showed seroconversion by ELISA IgM had a median age of 10 years (range 2 months -18 years) and were male in 57 (57%) cases. However, the 17 samples MAT-positive for leptospirosis seroconversion came from subjects with a median age of 12 years (range 3–17 years), and 14 (82.4%) were male.

Modeling results

We estimated that the probability of having a fever caused by leptospirosis was 1.03% (95% Credible Interval CI: 0.95% -1.22%) per semester. In comparison, it was 2.61% (95% CI: 2. 55%–2.3%) for dengue and 17.65% (95% CI: 17.49% -18.08%) for other causes (Table 3). The risk of fever caused by dengue was found to be reduced by 95% (95% CI: 84%–98%) following the occurrence of a fever caused by dengue. The risk of fever caused by leptospirosis or by other causes was relatively constant across seasons, unlike the risk of fever caused by dengue which varied from 1.06% in 2008 to 4.85% in 2007.

thumbnail
Table 3. Semestrial probability of having a fever caused by leptospirosis, by dengue or by another cause.

We provide the posterior mean and 95% Credible Intervals (95% CI). Technical details are presented in S1, S2 and S3 Tables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151555.t003

Discussion

In our successive community studies in rural Kampong Cham, Cambodia, randomly selected samples taken in the community from febrile children and young adults in whom Dengue and other common infections were excluded were IgM positive for Leptospira spp. in 26.7% of cases. This is a conservative estimate as samples in the “grey zone” could not be tested further. This high proportion of positive samples can be attributed in part to the persistence of antibodies: IgM antibodies against leptospires develop approximately 4 to 7 days after the onset of symptoms [50,51]. Elevated IgM titers are most often found after 10 to 60 days [52]. IgM antibodies can be detected in 100% of patients up to the 5th month following infection, in 66.7% up to the 7th month and in 50% up to the 12th month after the onset of symptoms [53]. In the rare event of severe leptospirosis, IgM antibodies can persist for several years [54]. The high proportion of positive samples, however, can also largely be explained by a high incidence of leptospirosis: of these positive samples from febrile children and young adults, 15.8% had initially negative samples, indirectly bearing witness to incident infection by Leptospira spp. and seroconversion. Our study shows that the semestrial probability of having a fever caused by leptospirosis in these Cambodian villages is at 1% of all fevers (Table 3).

Other available data from Cambodia mostly come from limited studies in hospital patients [39,42,43] and do not reflect the disease burden in the community. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to document leptospirosis in a strictly community setting in Cambodia. Our seroprevalence data are consistent with those found in ambulatory patients Cambodia [44] and other high-endemicity settings in the region. An ELISA-based community study in Southern Vietnam found an IgG prevalence of 12.8% in participants aged 7 to 12 years [41]. Studies using MAT in randomly selected healthy subjects from Southwestern province of the Mekong Delta in Vietnam found a seroprevalence ranging from 11.2% to 20.5% between the ages of 15 and 60 years, for an overall prevalence of 18.8% [55] while another study documented a seroprevalence of 23.9% in rural Lao PDR in participants aged 15 to 78 years [40]. Other MAT-based studies in a community setting conducted in Trinidad, Barbados or India found seroprevalence levels ranging between 9.5% and 23.6% among 6–8 year-olds and 20–40 year-olds, respectively [56,57].

Seroconversions were observed in 100 (15.8%) of 630 paired samples in our study. A community-based cohort study in Southern Vietnam found that 22 (10.4%) of 211 children seroconverted for IgG over a three-year period [58]. In outbreak settings, seroconversion rates may be much higher, reaching 30% of 221 children over a two-month period in India [57].

In our study, seroconversion was found mainly in samples taken from male febrile patients (57%) while MAT positive samples were found in males in 82% of cases. Other authors have shown that antibody-positive children are more likely to be male than females, perhaps due to differences in activities and lifestyles [59]. This male predominance was also found by authors in Thailand [60] or India [61].

We identified serogroups Icterohaemorrhagiae, Canicola and Sejroe which were also found during a hospital-based study in Thai children in which 19% of the non-Dengue acute febrile illnesses during the rainy season were due to Leptospirosis [30].

Our study suffers from biases and limitations which may alter our approximation of the true incidence. First, the samples were not optimally collected as the studies from which they originate were conducted over varying periods of three consecutive years, but always including the rainy season during which peak transmission is thought to occur [5,57]. Therefore the reported levels of transmission are those measured during the study months, and not the overall annual incidence to include months other than the rainy season. Water bodies, however, remain present beyond the rainy season in Cambodia, where paddy fields are remain dry for approximately 2–3 months.

Second, samples were collected only in a limited number of villages in one province, Kampong Cham. These villages, however, are located in the most populated province in the country. Given the diversity of epidemiological situations in Cambodia (i.e. forest, flooding areas, slums.), similar investigations on the causes of undifferentiated fevers are needed. This could help to better understand what is occurring in the whole country.

Third, complementary testing by MAT confirmed seroconversion in only 17% of the 100 cases found using ELISA. Low positivity by MAT might be explained by the fact that a large number of serogroups were found, and MAT may have failed to detect antibodies when specific serogroups were not used [62] and since ELISA IgM detects antibodies earlier than MAT [52]. As reported in a study in Thailand [63], some serogroups circulating in Cambodia may not have been detected in the antigen panel used in this study. The degree of correlation between MAT and ELISA also depends on the duration of disease [63]. The possibility cannot be ruled out that most of the cases detected by ELISA and MAT-negative were false positives, as ELISA kits often have low sensitivity and specificity. However, the ELISA tests we used are the ones used by other authors [52], and our percentage of positive samples were comparable. Otherwise, ELISA IgM testing detects antibodies earlier than MAT, which could also explain the observed discrepancy between the numbers of positives by using each of these two techniques.

Conclusion

This large study identified a high burden of symptomatic leptospirosis among blood samples from febrile cases aged below 20 in rural settings in Cambodia, estimated to be about 40% of that of dengue in the region. Our results are the first truly community-based data available in this rural country, being conducted outside of the health care system. Based on these results, local physicians should be aware of leptospirosis as a frequent cause of acute febrile illness in Cambodia. Early diagnosis and appropriate antibiotic therapy should be initiated, especially in severe cases.

Further research should focus on the development of inexpensive, reliable and rapid diagnostics suitable for storage and applicable in field conditions to guide management of undifferentiated fevers. More work is also needed to document the true health and economic burden of leptospirosis in rural Cambodia, including among adults. We also hope to further our research efforts to fill the knowledge gap by focusing on asymptomatic infection and improving knowledge on the environmental, socio-economic and eco-epidemiological risk factors in different areas of the country.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Posterior means and 95% credible intervals (95% CI) for model parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151555.s001

(TIF)

S2 Table. Posterior means and 95% credible intervals (95% CI) for model parameters for each season.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151555.s002

(TIF)

S3 Table. Model validation.

Observed and predicted values for simple summary statistics. Predictions are provided both for the model that assumes parameters are constant across seasons (Model 1) and the model where this assumption is relaxed (Model 2).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151555.s003

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Sirenda Vong who was the principal investigator of the PVDI project (European Union and Pediatric Vaccine Dengue Initiative Project) and Dr. Bob Taylor for his invaluable editorial assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: S. Hem NA AT. Performed the experiments: S. Hem S. Heng BG AT. Analyzed the data: IV FV SC AT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: Sowath Ly PB MP AT. Wrote the paper: S. Hem Sowath Ly NA MP IV FV TS Sovann Ly RH SC AT.

References

  1. 1. Bharti AR, Nally JE, Ricaldi JN, Matthias MA, Diaz MM, Lovett MA, et al. Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3: 757–71. pmid:14652202
  2. 2. Victoriano AF, Smythe LD, Gloriani-Barzaga N, Cavinta LL, Kasai T, Limpakarnjanarat K, et al. Leptospirosis in the Asia Pacific region. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9: 147. pmid:19732423
  3. 3. Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Siozopoulou V, Christou L, Akritidis N. The globalization of leptospirosis: worldwide incidence trends. Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12: 351–7. pmid:18055245
  4. 4. WHO. Leptospirosis situation in the South-East Asia Region. 2009; Available: http://www.searo.who.int/entity/emerging_diseases/topics/Communicable_Diseases_Surveillance_and_response_SEA-CD-216.pdf
  5. 5. Lau CL, Dobson AJ, Smythe LD, Fearnley EJ, Skelly C, Clements AC, et al. Leptospirosis in American Samoa 2010: epidemiology, environmental drivers, and the management of emergence. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86: 309–19. pmid:22302868
  6. 6. Senior K. Leptospirosis and Weil’s syndrome: cause for concern? Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10: 823–4. pmid:21155160
  7. 7. Amilasan AS, Ujiie M, Suzuki M, Salva E, Belo MC, Koizumi N, et al. Outbreak of leptospirosis after flood, the Philippines, 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18: 91–4. pmid:22257492
  8. 8. Dechet AM, Parsons M, Rambaran M, Mohamed-Rambaran P, Florendo-Cumbermack A, Persaud S, et al. Leptospirosis outbreak following severe flooding: a rapid assessment and mass prophylaxis campaign; Guyana, January-February 2005. PLoS One. 2012;7: e39672. pmid:22808049
  9. 9. Goarant C, Laumond-Barny S, Perez J, Vernel-Pauillac F, Chanteau S, Guigon A. Outbreak of leptospirosis in New Caledonia: diagnosis issues and burden of disease. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14: 926–9. pmid:19552660
  10. 10. Douglin CP, Jordan C, Rock R, Hurley A, Levett PN. Risk factors for severe leptospirosis in the parish of St. Andrew, Barbados. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3: 78–80. pmid:9126452
  11. 11. Phraisuwan P, Whitney EAS, Tharmaphornpilas P, Guharat S, Thongkamsamut S, Aresagig S, et al. Leptospirosis: Skin Wounds and Control Strategies, Thailand, 1999. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8: 1455–9. pmid:12498663
  12. 12. Koizumi N, Muto M, Tanikawa T, Mizutani H, Sohmura Y, Hayashi E, et al. Human leptospirosis cases and the prevalence of rats harbouring Leptospira interrogans in urban areas of Tokyo, Japan. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58: 1227–30. pmid:19528143
  13. 13. Picardeau M. Diagnosis and epidemiology of leptospirosis. Med Mal Infect. 2013;43: 1–9. pmid:23337900
  14. 14. Navegantes de Araújo W. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Leptospirosis among Urban Slum Residents in Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;Feb;88(2):359–63. pmid:23269657
  15. 15. Vijayachari P, Sugunan AP, Shriram AN. Leptospirosis: an emerging global public health problem. J Biosci. 2008;33: 557–69. pmid:19208981
  16. 16. Kariv R, Klempfner R, Barnea A, Sidi Y, Schwartz E. The changing epidemiology of leptospirosis in Israel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7: 990–2. pmid:11747726
  17. 17. Sugunan AP, Vijayachari P, Sharma S, Roy S, Manickam P, Natarajaseenivasan K, et al. Risk factors associated with leptospirosis during an outbreak in Middle Andaman, India. Indian J Med Res. 2009;130: 67–73. pmid:19700804
  18. 18. Chaudhry R, Premlatha MM, Mohanty S, Dhawan B, Singh KK, Dey AB. Emerging leptospirosis, North India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8: 1526–7. pmid:12498680
  19. 19. Spichler A, Athanazio D, Seguro AC, Vinetz JM. Outpatient follow-up of patients hospitalized for acute leptospirosis. Int J Infect Dis. 2011;15: e486–90. pmid:21616696
  20. 20. WHO. Human leptospirosis: guidance for diagnosis, surveillance and control. 2003; Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/WHO_CDS_CSR_EPH_2002.23.pdf
  21. 21. Ashford DA, Kaiser RM, Spiegel RA, Perkins BA, Weyant RS, Bragg SL, et al. Asymptomatic infection and risk factors for leptospirosis in Nicaragua. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;63: 249–54. pmid:11421372
  22. 22. Agampodi SB, Nugegoda DB, Thevanesam V. Determinants of leptospirosis in Sri Lanka: study protocol. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10: 332. pmid:21087520
  23. 23. LaRocque RC, Breiman RF, Ari MD, Morey RE, Janan FA, Hayes JM, et al. Leptospirosis during dengue outbreak, Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11: 766–9. pmid:15890136
  24. 24. Wuthiekanun V, Sirisukkarn N, Daengsupa P, Sakaraserane P, Sangkakam A, Chierakul W, et al. Clinical diagnosis and geographic distribution of leptospirosis, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13: 124–6. pmid:17370525
  25. 25. Ellis T, Imrie A, Katz AR, Effler PV. Underrecognition of leptospirosis during a dengue fever outbreak in Hawaii, 2001–2002. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8: 541–7. pmid:18447625
  26. 26. Jansen A, Luge E, Guerra B, Wittschen P, Gruber AD, Loddenkemper C, et al. Leptospirosis in urban wild boars, Berlin, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13: 739–42. pmid:17553254
  27. 27. Papa A, Theoharidou D, Antoniadis A. Pulmonary involvement and leptospirosis, Greece. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15: 834–5. pmid:19402988
  28. 28. Rajapakse S, Rodrigo C, Haniffa R. Developing a clinically relevant classification to predict mortality in severe leptospirosis. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3: 213–9. pmid:20930963
  29. 29. Trubo R. Leptospira brings fresh challenge to adventure sports. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1: 73. pmid:11871475
  30. 30. Libraty DH, Myint KS, Murray CK, Gibbons RV, Mammen MP, Endy TP, et al. A comparative study of leptospirosis and dengue in Thai children. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007;1: e111. pmid:18160980
  31. 31. Cachay ER, Vinetz JM. A global research agenda for leptospirosis. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51: 174–8. pmid:16333188
  32. 32. Hartskeerl R. Leptospirosis: Current status and future trends. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006;24(4): 309. pmid:17185862
  33. 33. Hagan JE, Costa F, Calcagno J, Kane M, Torgerson P, Martinez-Silveira MS, et al. Global Morbidity and Mortality of Leptospirosis.
  34. 34. Fukuoka. Leptospirosis Society Scientific Meeting. 2013;
  35. 35. Binder WD, Mermel LA. Leptospirosis in an urban setting: case report and review of an emerging infectious disease. J Emerg Med. 1998;16: 851–6. pmid:9848699
  36. 36. Ooteman MC, Vago AR, Koury MC. Evaluation of MAT, IgM ELISA and PCR methods for the diagnosis of human leptospirosis. J Microbiol Methods. 2006;65: 247–57. pmid:16253361
  37. 37. Effler PV, Bogard AK, Domen HY, Katz AR, Higa HY, Sasaki DM. Evaluation of eight rapid screening tests for acute leptospirosis in Hawaii. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40: 1464–9. pmid:11923374
  38. 38. Izurieta R, Galwankar S, Clem A. Leptospirosis: The “mysterious” mimic. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2008;1: 21–33. pmid:19561939
  39. 39. Laras K, Cao BV, Bounlu K, Nguyen TK, Olson JG, Thongchanh S, et al. The importance of leptospirosis in Southeast Asia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67: 278–86. pmid:12408667
  40. 40. Kawaguchi L, Sengkeopraseuth B, Tsuyuoka R, Koizumi N, Akashi H, Vongphrachanh P, et al. Seroprevalence of leptospirosis and risk factor analysis in flood-prone rural areas in Lao PDR. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78: 957–61. pmid:18541776
  41. 41. Thai KT, Nga TT, Phuong HL, Giao PT, Hung le Q, Binh TQ, et al. Seroepidemiology and serological follow-up of anti-leptospiral IgG in children in Southern Vietnam. Acta Trop. 2008;106: 128–31. pmid:18395178
  42. 42. Seng H, Sok T, Tangkanakul W, Petkanchanapong W, Kositanont U, Sareth H, et al. Leptospirosis in Takeo Province, Kingdom of Cambodia, 2003. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90: 546–51. pmid:17427534
  43. 43. Berlioz-Arthaud A, Guillard B, Goarant C, Hem S. Hospital-based active surveillance of human leptospirosis in Cambodia. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2010;103: 111–8. pmid:20306241
  44. 44. Kasper MR. Infectious Etiologies of Acute Febrile Illness among Patients Seeking Health Care in South-Central Cambodia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(2): 246–253. pmid:22302857
  45. 45. Duong V, Andries AC, Ngan C, Sok T, Richner B, Asgari-Jirhandeh N, et al. Reemergence of Chikungunya virus in Cambodia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18: 2066–9. pmid:23171736
  46. 46. Winslow WE, Merry DJ, Pirc ML, Devine PL. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of immunoglobulin M antibody in diagnosis of human leptospiral infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35: 1938–42. pmid:9230359
  47. 47. E-LEP01M / E-LEP01M05: Leptospira IgM ELISA Cat No. Panbio Inc. Brisbane, Australia, 2009.
  48. 48. Postic D, Mérien F, Perolat P, Baranton G. Diagnostic biologique leptospirose—borréliose de Lyme / Biological diagnosis leptospirosis—Lyme borreliosis. Paris: Institut Pasteur; 2000.
  49. 49. Cambodia General Population Census. 2008; Available: http://celade.cepal.org/khmnis/census/khm2008/
  50. 50. Levett PN. Leptospirosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14: 296–326. pmid:11292640
  51. 51. Gussenhoven GC, van der Hoorn MA, Goris MG, Terpstra WJ, Hartskeerl RA, Mol BW, et al. LEPTO dipstick, a dipstick assay for detection of Leptospira-specific immunoglobulin M antibodies in human sera. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35: 92–7. pmid:8968886
  52. 52. Terpstra WJ, Ligthart GS, Schoone GJ. ELISA for the detection of specific IgM and IgG in human leptospirosis. J Gen Microbiol. 1985;131: 377–85. pmid:3981131
  53. 53. Silva MV, Camargo ED, Batista L, Vaz AJ, Brandao AP, Nakamura PM, et al. Behaviour of specific IgM, IgG and IgA class antibodies in human leptospirosis during the acute phase of the disease and during convalescence. J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;98: 268–72. pmid:7636924
  54. 54. Cumberland P, Everard CO, Wheeler JG, Levett PN. Persistence of anti-leptospiral IgM, IgG and agglutinating antibodies in patients presenting with acute febrile illness in Barbados 1979–1989. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17: 601–8. pmid:12086073
  55. 55. Van CT, Thuy NT, San NH, Hien TT, Baranton G, Perolat P (1998) Human leptospirosis in the Mekong delta, Viet Nam. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 92: 625–628. pmid:10326104
  56. 56. Everard CO, Hayes RJ, Edwards CN. Leptospiral infection in school-children from Trinidad and Barbados. Epidemiol Infect. 1989;103: 143–56. pmid:2789146
  57. 57. Sehgal SC, Vijayachari P, Murhekar MV, Sugunan AP, Sharma S, Singh SS. Leptospiral infection among primitive tribes of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India: low levels of morbidity and mortality among pre-exposed children during an epidemic. Epidemiol Infect. 1999;122: 423–8. pmid:10459645
  58. 58. Thai KT, Binh TQ, Giao PT, Phuong HL, Hung le Q, Van Nam N, et al. Seroepidemiology of leptospirosis in southern Vietnamese children. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11: 738–45. pmid:16640627
  59. 59. Zhang C, Wang H, Yan J. Leptospirosis prevalence in Chinese populations in the last two decades. Microbes Infect. 2012;14: 317–23. pmid:22155621
  60. 60. Gamage CD, Amarasekera J, Palihawadana P, Samaraweera S, Mendis D, Janakan N, et al. Analysis of hospital-based sentinel surveillance data on leptospirosis in Sri Lanka, 2005–2008. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2012;65: 157–61. pmid:22446124
  61. 61. Rajajee S, Shankar J, Dhattatri L. Pediatric presentations of leptospirosis. Indian J Pediatr. 2002;69: 851–3. pmid:12450292
  62. 62. Smythe LD. The Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) Is an Unreliable Predictor of Infecting Leptospira Serovar in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81(4): 695–7. pmid:19815889
  63. 63. Cumberland P, Everard CO, Levett PN. Assessment of the efficacy of an IgM-elisa and microscopic agglutination test (MAT) in the diagnosis of acute leptospirosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61: 731–4. pmid:10586903