Bacterial Community Associated with Organs of Shallow Hydrothermal Vent Crab Xenograpsus testudinatus near Kuishan Island, Taiwan

Shan-Hua Yang; Pei-Wen Chiang; Tin-Chang Hsu; Shuh-Ji Kao; Sen-Lin Tang

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150597

Abstract

Shallow-water hydrothermal vents off Kueishan Island (northeastern Taiwan) provide a unique, sulfur-rich, highly acidic (pH 1.75–4.6) and variable-temperature environment. In this species-poor habitat, the crab Xenograpsus testudinatus is dominant, as it mainly feeds on zooplankton killed by sulfurous plumes. In this study, 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon pyrosequencing was used to investigate diversity and composition of bacteria residing in digestive gland, gill, stomach, heart, and mid-gut of X. testudinatus, as well as in surrounding seawater. Dominant bacteria were Gamma- and Epsilonproteobacteria that might be capable of autotrophic growth by oxidizing reduced sulfur compounds and are usually resident in deep-sea hydrothermal systems. Dominant bacterial OTUs in X. testudinatus had both host and potential organ specificities, consistent with a potential trophic symbiotic relationship (nutrient transfer between host and bacteria). We inferred that versatile ways to obtain nutrients may provide an adaptive advantage for X. testudinatus in this demanding environment. To our knowledge, this is the first study of bacterial communities in various organs/tissues of a crustacean in a shallow-water hydrothermal system, and as such, may be a convenient animal model for studying these systems.

Citation: Yang S-H, Chiang P-W, Hsu T-C, Kao S-J, Tang S-L (2016) Bacterial Community Associated with Organs of Shallow Hydrothermal Vent Crab Xenograpsus testudinatus near Kuishan Island, Taiwan. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0150597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150597

Editor: Tzen-Yuh Chiang, National Cheng-Kung University, TAIWAN

Received: October 22, 2015; Accepted: February 16, 2016; Published: March 2, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All sequence files are available from the GeneBank database (accession number: SRA SRP064140).

Funding: The authors thank the Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taiwan for financial support.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

A deep-sea hydrothermal vent is one of the most extreme environments on earth, due to its poorly oxygenated, oligotrophic and toxic ecosystem [1]. In such ecosystems, chemolithotrophic bacteria are common residents [2]. Bacteria associated with host animals (e.g., Crustacea), are believed to support their hosts and enable them to adapt to their extreme environment, including high toxicity and limited nutrients [3–4].

Some chemolithotrophic bacteria have been identified and characterized in deep-sea hydrothermal vent shrimp Rimicaris exoculata [5–7] and in crabs, including Kiwa spp. [8–9] and Shinkaia crosnieri [10]. In addition, some Crustacea-associated bacteria in hydrothermal vents not only have host specificity, but also site specificity within the host’s gut or gill chamber [5–7], consistent with important roles in nutrient supply [11] and detoxification [6] for their hosts, which live in oligotrophic and toxic hydrothermal vent environments [5,12].

Shallow-water hydrothermal vents are usually near active coastal or submarine volcanoes and also provide an oligotrophic and toxic environment for animals and microorganisms [1]. The crab Xenograpsus testudinatus predominates in shallow-water, sulfur-rich/highly acidic hydrothermal (pH 1.75–4.6) [13] vents near Kueishan Island, northeastern Taiwan. This crab is one of the few known vent-endemic species at depths < 200 m [13]. Unlike the deep-sea hydrothermal system, there is no chemolithoautotrophic food-web in the shallow-water hydrothermal vent off Kueishan [13]. Because the biodiversity of shallow-water hydrothermal vent is relatively low compared to deep-sea hydrothermal vents, X. testudinatus has a unique opportunistic feeding style; when the current is weak, they eat zooplankton killed by the vent’s sulfurous plumes [13]. Despite some recent studies regarding nutrient acquisition by X. testudinatus, there are apparently few reports characterizing X. testudinatus-associated bacteria.

Due to differences in food-webs between shallow-water and deep-sea hydrothermal systems, Crustacea-associated bacteria in a shallow-water thermal vent might differ from those in a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Therefore, the objective was to characterize the bacterial community in organs of X. testudinatus in the vicinity of sulphur-rich hydrothermal vents in shallow water near Taiwan.

Materials and Methods

Sampling site and sample collection

The sampling site was located near Kueishan Island (121°57’E, 24°50’N), Taiwan. The dominant species Xenograpsus testudinatus and seawater samples were collected at the hydrothermal venting area, approximately 8–20 m from the island [13]. The surface of X. testudinatus is covered by a filamentous biofilm [14]. Two crabs (one male and one female) were collected (SCUBA-diving) in depths ranging from 10 to 15 m, in May 2009. After sampling, crabs were kept in an aerated cooling box, directly transported to the laboratory, and frozen at -20°C before assaying (interval from collection to freezing was < 12 h). A seawater sample (50 ml) was also collected from the sampling place of the shallow-water hydrothermal vent. The target species X. testudinatus in this study is not listed as endangered or protected and was not collected from national parks or natural reserves in Taiwan, thus no specific permission was required for sampling.

Total DNA extraction

The entire dissection procedure was performed in a biological safety cabinet. Before dissection, crabs were washed twice with sterile seawater. All dissection instruments were sterilized over an open flame to eliminate residual DNA and washed with 75% ETOH to prevent cross-contamination. After removing upper carapaces, the digestive gland, gill, stomach, heart and mid-gut from each crab were excised for DNA extraction (Fig 1). Total genomic DNA was extracted according to a modified standard phenol–chloroform procedure incorporating a grinding step in liquid nitrogen to mechanically lyse cells [15]. After extraction, DNA samples of various body parts were denoted as D (digestive gland), S (stomach), H (heart), G (gill), and M (mid-gut). Bacterioplankton from seawater samples were filtered on cellulose acetate membranes (pore size, 0.2 μm; ADVANTEC, Tokyo, Japan). Microbial biomass was removed from membranes by washing with TE buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Suspensions were collected in microtubes and total DNA was extracted by the same method as described. The DNA from seawater samples was denoted as SW. All DNA samples were stored at -20°C.

Download:

Fig 1. Xenograpsus testudinatus and organs.

Organs selected for study are indicated (scale = mm).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150597.g001

Amplification of V6-V8 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA gene

The 16S ribosomal RNA gene was amplified by PCR, using a pair of bacterial universal primers: U968F (5’-AACGCGAAGAACCTTAC-3’) and U1391R (5’-ACGGGCGGTGWGTRC-3’), specially designed for the bacterial V6-V8 hypervariable region [16–17]. The total volume was 50 μl, including 4 μL of 2.5 mM dNTP, 1 μL of each primer (10 μM), 0.5 μL of 5U TaKaRa Ex Taq HS (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan), 5 μL of 10x Ex Taq buffer and 5 μL (10–20 ng) template DNA. The amplification program was conducted using a PxE Thermal Cycler (Thermo Electron Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The first cycle was initiated at 94°C for 5 min, and followed by 30 cycles; each cycle was 94°C for 30 s, 52°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 45 s. The last cycle was 72°C for 10 min, before cooling at 4°C. Thereafter, PCR products were separated (electrophoresis) and visualized with a UV trans-illuminator (ImageQuant 300, GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA).

DNA tagging PCR and massively parallel pyrosequencing

The DNA tagging PCR (five cycles) was used to tag 5′ ends of each V6-V8 amplicon [16]. For this, DNA amplified from the same parts of male and female crabs were pooled equally into a sample to provide a comprehensive bacterial community survey and ignore gender variation. Pooled lots of each tagged V6-V8 DNA samples (final DNA content ~ 0.5 μg) were sent to Mission Biotech (Taipei, Taiwan) for massively parallel pyrosequencing using a Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium System. A total of 37157 sequences were generated and sorted. Novel bacterial community sequences were deposited in GeneBank (SRA accession PRJNA296845).

Data analysis

After trimming, chimerical reads were detected by UCHIME (http://drive5.com/uchime) [18]. For operational taxonomic units (OTU) analysis, quality-filtered reads were pooled together and analyzed with the UPARSE pipeline [19] except the chimera removal step. In UPARSE, de-replication was done with the options “–derep_prefix” and “–minsize 2” and OTUs were generated at 97% identity. Each OTU was searched (with global alignment) against the Greegenes 13_5 database to find corresponding taxonomy of the best hit using USEARCH. Alignment was calculated using MOTHUR software to define operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a 3% cut off value in sequence dissimilarity. Defined OTUs were used to estimate the Shannon-Weaver diversity index, Chao1 estimator, and the Simpson index, as well as to construct rarefaction curves, and to calculate evenness and richness of the bacterial community. Unclassified OTUs were manually searched in NCBI using BLASTn.

Relative abundances of each classified bacterial classes in individual samples were incorporated into a matrix, with Bray-Curtis used to estimate a distance matrix. Results were presented in hierarchical clustering (CLUSTER) and non-Metric multi-Dimensional Scaling (nMDS) using Primer 6 software (PRIMER-E, Lutton, Ivybridge, UK) to analyze to relationships between bacterial communities among various samples.

Quantitative PCR

For the quantitative PCR assay, two primer sets were designed to target the dominant group OTU1 and OTU7, which were representative of Epsilonproteobacteria and Gammaproteobaceria respectively, by using Primer-BLAST tool on BLAST search (NCBI): Episilon-F (5'-CTCGTGTCGTGAGATGTTGG-3') and Episilon-R (5'-GCGAAGGCAGTCTCACTAGA-3'), Gamma-F (5'-TGTTGGGTTAAGTCCCGCAA-3') and Gamma-R (5'-CACCTTCCTCCGGTTTGTCA-3'). The hypervariable V6 region for 16S rRNA gene was used as an endogenous control, using a pair of primers: 967F (5'-CAACGCGAAGAACCTTACC-3') and 1046R (5'-CGACAGCCATGCANCACCT-3') [16]. Quantitative PCR reaction was performed in an ABI 7300 Real-Time PCR system. The PCR program consisted of 2 min at 95°C, 45 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, and followed by 30 s at 60°C, using Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). A dissociation stage was performed to confirm the specificity of the product and to avoid the production of primer dimers; the parameters consisted of 15 s at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C, 15 s at 95°C, and 15 s at 60°C. For all reactions, 2μl (10 ng) of template DNA was added to a reaction of 20μl. These reactions contained 10 μl of Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG (Invitrogen), 3.8 μl of sterilized nuclease-free water, 0.4 μl each of the forward and reverse primers, 0.4μl of 1X ROX Reference Dye, and 2 μl of DNA template. Each sample was performed in duplicate.

Results

The V6 to V8 hypervariable regions of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA genes were surveyed to determine bacterial community composition in various crab body parts/tissues (Fig 1). A total of 37157 sequences were generated; the number of V6-V8 sequences in each sample varied from 5287 to 7253 (Table 1). Rarefaction curves approached a plateau (S1 Fig), which indicated sequences adequately represented bacterial composition in crab samples. Shannon’s index of crab samples ranged from 0.866 to 2.184, whereas the surrounding seawater sample was 3.065. The Chao1 index ranged from 66 to 192 in crab samples and 246 in seawater. There was much lower bacterial diversity in crab than surrounding seawater. Within crabs, Shannon index of bacterial communities was least in the stomach, but greatest in the mid-gut.

Download:

Table 1. Sequence information and diversity estimates as represented in 16S rRNA gene libraries.^{^a}

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150597.t001

At the phylum level, bacterial composition in the seawater and crab were similar, but seawater-associated bacterial communities were more diverse than any sample of crab (Fig 2). Epsilonproteobacteria was the most dominant bacterial class, accounting for 53.94% of total sequences in seawater. In crab samples (excluding heart), Epsilonproteobacteria was also the most dominant bacterial class in stomach (80.18%), gill (85.20%), and digestive gland (76.18%). There were a total of 221 OTUs in the study. Among total OTUs, five of the top 10 OTUs affiliated to Epsilonproteobacteria (Fig 3). Four of these epsilonproteobacterial OTUs (OTU1, 3, 6, and 24) were Sulfurovum-related sequences, clustered within Marine Group 1 (Fig 4) [20]. However, only OTU4 was a Sulfurospirillum-related sequence (Fig 4). Relative abundance of OTU1 was highest in samples of crab, but relatively low in seawater. In contrast, OTU6, the OTU with the highest relative abundance in the seawater, was relatively low in crab samples. Compared to the most abundant Gammaproteobacteria OTU (OTU7), relative folds of the most abundant Epsilonproteobacteria OTU (OTU1) in each sample obtained by qPCR corresponded to relative abundance of bacterial composition obtained by sequencing, which also supported dominance of Epsilonproteobacteria (S2 Fig). In qPCR, Epsilonproteobacteria was 140.45 and 157.51 times higher than Gammaproteobacteria in stomach and digestive gland, respectively (S2 Fig), and only 1.97 in seawater and 1.08 times in mid-gut. Similarly, in relative abundance of bacterial sequences, Epsilonproteobacteria was 443.23 times higher than Gammaproteobacteria in stomach and 284.21 times higher in digestive gland respectively, but only 2.46 times in seawater and 2.10 times in mid-gut (Fig 2).

Download:

Fig 2. Relative abundance of major bacterial taxa in crab organs and in seawater.

The X. testudinatus related samples are denoted as S (stomach), H (heat), G (gill), M (mid-gut) and D (digestive gland), whereas seawater is SW. Bacterial lineages without identifiable class names are indicated by phylum with N/A.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150597.g002

Download:

Fig 3. Relative abundances of the top 10 OTUs in the organs of X. testudinatus and seawater.

Taxa of each OTU are shown as α (Alphaproteobacteria), γ (Gammaproteobacteria), ε (Epsilonproteobacteria) and Bacteria (unclassified bacteria). Colors indicate X. testudinatus-related samples and seawater. OTU5 was present only in D sample; OTU6 and OTU9 were prevailing in SW and S sample, respectively. D = digestive gland; G = gill; H = heart; M = mid-gut; S = stomach; SW = seawater.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150597.g003

Download:

Fig 4. Neighbor-joining tree of Epsilonproteobacteria associated with X. testudinatus based on 16S rRNA gene sequences.

Robustness was tested using 1000 bootstraps for re-sampling of the tree.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150597.g004

Although Gammaproteobacteria was not as dominant as Epsilonproteobacteria, it was dispersed widely in all samples, particularly in seawater (21.94%) and mid-gut (23.65%). However, further comparison revealed distinct differences between crab parts and seawater with regards to Gammaproteobacteria. The dominant gammaproteobacterial OTU (OTU7) was most closely related (99% identity) to the phylotype reported in R. exoculata [7]. This OTU was dominant in digestive gland, gill, heart, mid-gut, and seawater. Additionally, in the mid-gut, and heart, two OTUs that belonged to Vibrio were also dominant. In the stomach, there was limited Gammaproteobacteria, whereas a Methylomonas-related sequence was only detected in seawater.

Alphaproteobacteria was also not as dominant as Epsilonproteobacteria, but it was detected in every sample (Fig 2). In particular, OTU5, which was affiliated to Alphaproteobacteria (86% in sequence identity), was only retrieved in the digestive gland, whereas OTU9, which was affiliated to Roseovarius tolerans (98% in sequence identity), mainly existed in the stomach of X. testudinatus (Fig 3).

In the heart sample, OTU2, which was affiliated to the class Mollicutes based on blast against the database at NCBI (sequence identity of 89%), was most dominant (relative abundance of 79.65%; Fig 2). Although OTU2 was also present in stomach, mid-gut and digestive gland, it was present in heart, but never retrieved in seawater (Fig 3).

Based on the clustering result (Fig 5), crab-associated bacterial communities appeared to be clustered together, which was distinctly different from the seawater bacterial community. In addition, bacterial composition of gill and mid-gut were more similar to each other, whereas digestive gland and stomach not sure congregated in clustering analysis.

Download:

Fig 5. Cluster analysis of organs of X. testudinatus and seawater.

Bray-Curis similarity index was calculated using relative percentage of each class in each sample, and hierarchical clustering was performed in PRIMER 6. The X. testudinatus-related samples were denoted as S (stomach), H (heat), G (gill), M (mid-gut) and D (digestive gland), whereas seawater is SW.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150597.g005

Discussion

X. testudinatus associated Gamma- and Epsilonproteobacteria

The major bacterial group associated with inside X. testudinatus was Epsilonproteobacteria, a common bacterial group in hosts of deep sea hydrothermal systems [21]. Since there was much less diversity of bacteria in crabs than in sea water in this study, we inferred that there was potential host specificity of Epsilonproteobacteria in X. testudinatus. Furthermore, although composition of bacterial classes in both sea water and crab were dominated by Epsilonproteobacteria, the dominant epsilonproteobacterial OTUs in crab and sea water differed. Notably, OTUs of Epsilonproteobacteria had distinct preferences to host and seawater. In this regard, OTU1, which was predominant in X. testudinatus, was closely related to Epsilonproteobacterum ectosymbiont of deep sea hydrothermal vent shrimp Rimicaris exoculata (i.e., 99% in sequence identity); however, OTU6, closely related to genus Sulfurovum sp., was only dominant in seawater. Epsilonproteobacteria were widely present in other crustaceans dwelling in hydrothermal vent, including crabs (Kiwa hirsute and Shinkaia crosnieri) [8, 10] and shrimp (Rimicaris exoculata) [20]. A symbiotic relationship between bacterial epibions and Rimicaris exoculata has been proposed [5–7], and a mutualistic relationship between R. exoculata and epibions was reported [11]. Epsilonproteobacteria in R. exoculata might be capable of autotrophic growth by oxidizing reduced sulfur compounds [11, 20]. In this regard, Epsilonproteobacteria is able to assimilate inorganic carbon and directly transfer nutrients to the host R. exoculata through the shrimp integument rather than via the digestive tract [11]. In addition to Epsilonproteobacteria, there was also Thiotrichaceae, a chemolithoautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria frequently recovered from various deep-sea invertebrates of hydrothermal environments [9]. In the present study, two Thiotrichaceae genera, Thiothrix and Thioploca, were detected from X. testudinatus. Based on this study, X. testudinatus-associated dominant bacteria were similar to bacteria from crustaceans in deep-sea hydrothermal environments.

We inferred that there was some host specificity for the bacterial community in X. testudinatus, which is highly mobile and can live in either vent or non-vent environments [14]. Unlike deep-sea hydrothermal environments, some upper sublittoral vents are considered mixed photosynthetic-chemosynthetic systems [22]. Based on gut contents, Wang et al. [14] suggested that X. testudinatus not only feed on the plankton killed by vent plumes [13], but they also eat dead crustacean bodies and detritus. Thus, X. testudinatus may be a generalist omnivore [14]. Moreover, fatty acid profiles in X. testudinatus mid-gut glands included high concentrations of vaccenic (18:1(n-7)) and palmitoleic (16:1(n-7)) acids [23]. Therefore, in addition to phytoplankton [13], bacteria could be a nutrient source of X. testudinatus. Although the feeding strategy of the X. testudinatus was apparently different from that of crabs or shrimps in deep-sea hydrothermal vents, we inferred that X. testudinatus associated Epsilonproteobacteria might constitute a nutrient source for X. testudinatus in this shallow-water hydrothermal system.

The bacterial community might also benefit the host by detoxification of potential metabolic inhibitors in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments [6]. For example, by converting H₂S to elemental sulfur by Gamma- and Epsilonproteobacteria, Rimicaris exoculata would benefit from access to less toxic products [6]. Water around shallow-water hydrothermal vents in Kueishan Island contains considerable carbon dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen, sulphur dioxide, hydrogen sulphide [24] and other metal ions, including Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, Fe²⁺, Cu²⁺, Al³⁺ and Mn³⁺ [25], making this a relatively toxic environment for X. testudinatus and its prey [23]. Therefore, perhaps X. testudinatus associated Gamma- and Epsilonproteobacteria have an essential role for their host, namely detoxification.

Some Epsilonproteobacteria may be autotrophic denitrifiers in the hydrothermal system [26]. Among the Epsilonproteobacteria in the deep sea hydrothermal environment, R. exoculata related epibiontic Epsilonproteobacteria have potential to produce ammonium. Therefore, Epsilonproteobacteria might uptake ammonium from the environment or host when they are free living [6]. Perhaps X. testudinatus associated Epsilonproteobacteria derive benefits from the host, similar to R. exoculata-associated Epsilonproteobacteria.

Bacterial diversity and potential organ specificity bacteria in X. testudinatus

Bacterial diversity in the gill seems to be high, because gill is the first organ in direct contact with water and suspended particles. However, in this study, bacterial diversity in mid-gut was higher than that in gill. One potential reason is accumulation of trace metals in gill; concentrations of dissolved metals may be increased by the acidic environment and high temperature, accumulating in the gill of X. testudinatus by respiration [27]. Concentrations of Al, Cd, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn were higher in gill than in exoskeleton, hepatopancreas or muscle [27]. Although the relationship between bacteria and the accumulated metals was not clear, those specific metals might influence composition of bacteria in the gill of X. testudinatus. In addition, Hu et al. [23] reported that enzymes, including trypsin-like enzymes and proteinases, in the mid-gut glands of X. testudinatus had significantly greater thermal tolerance. The microenvironment for the activity of these enzymes might also influence bacterial community structure in the mid-gut of the host.

Interestingly, unlike other parts of crabs, the predominant bacterial OTU (OTU2) in the heart was Mollicutes (in the phylum Tenericutes), not Gamma- or Epsilonproteobacteria. The class Mollicutes is classified by an absence of a cell wall. Many Mollicutes are parasites of insects, plants and crustacean [28]. In previous studies, OTUs belong to Mollicutes were present in the gut of hydrothermal shrimp Rimicaris exoculata [5] and crab X. testudinatus [29]. Because this OTU was mainly in the heart, we inferred that this was a different microenvironment from other parts of crab, and also organ specificity for X. testudinatus-related bacteria. Although it is difficult to get further taxonomic information regarding OTU2 and the potential relationship of these bacteria and host, based on heart-associated bacteria discovered in this study, we speculated that there might be a specific role for these bacteria in X. testudinatus.

Alphaproteobacterial OTUs were only detected in the stomach or digestive gland of X. testudinatus. Although further taxonomic information of OTU5 was not readily available, OTU5 which was only present in the digestive gland was close to an alphaproteobacterial sequence from the digestive gland of European shore crab Carcinus maenas [30]. Perhaps the digestive gland of X. testudinatus provided a unique environment for these bacteria. In addition, Roseobacter is usually present in macroalgae [31] and marine snow [32]. In this study, OTU9, which prevailed in the stomach of X. testudinatus, was affiliated to a strain of Roseovarius tolerans from macroalgae [33]. Perhaps these were algae- or marine snow-associated bacteria and eaten by the host.

Vibrio comprises more than 110 recognized species, of which many are pathogenic to humans and animals [34–35], although some isolates have probiotic properties [36]. Recently, the presence of virulence genes in a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Vibrio species was reported [37]. Those virulence genes were homologs of those in Vibrio species pathogenic to humans. Thus, it has been suggested that these pathogenicity genes serve a far more basic ecological role than only causation of human disease [37]. For example, in symbiosis between the squid Euprymna scolopes and luminous bacterium Vibrio fischeri [38], this bacterium helps the host by producing light in the organ, forming counterillumination to avoid predators. In the present study, these OTUs, which affiliated to Vibrio, were only present in the heart and mid-gut of X. testudinatus, and in seawater. Although the specific functions, pathogenicity, or probiotic properties of X. testudinatus associated Vibrio are unknown, the presence of Vibrio in the healthy host of shallow-water hydrothermal system in this study might provide impetus for further study regarding evolution of Vibrio and its genomic events.

Conclusions

Chemoautotrophic Gamma- and Epsilonproteobacteria were recovered from several crabs around hydrothermal vents and cold seep habitats. Although roles of Gamma- and Epsilonproteobacteria in X. testudinatus were not clear, we inferred that in these shallow-water, sulfur-rich/highly acidic hydrothermal vents, X. testudinatus acquired energy not only based on opportunistic feeding (consuming dead zooplankton killed by vent’s sulfurous plumes), but also from nutrient transfer from probable symbiotic Epsilonproteobacteria and/or Gammaproteobacteria.

Kueishan Island is subjected to the Kuroshio Current, one of the world’s fastest currents [39]. The Kuroshio Current is low in nutrients and plankton populations, but warm with rapid flow, running from tropical Philippines through subtropical Taiwan and Okinawa to the temperate region of Japan, transferring heat from equatorial regions to higher latitudes [40–43]. Thus, due to differences between environments of deep-sea and shallow-water hydrothermal vents, the way to obtain nutrients by crustaceans in shallow-water hydrothermal vent might be more complicated than in deep-sea hydrothermal vents, including chemosynthetic and photosynthetic primary productions and a heterotrophic system. Versatile ways to obtain nutrients may confer an adaptive advantage for the crab X. testudinatus in the shallow hydrothermal vent, and account for X. testudinatus being dominant in this environment. In addition, our study revealed a potential symbiotic relationship between X. testudinatus and X. testudinatus associated Gamma- and Epsilonproteobacteria, which may be similar to the relationship between deep-sea hydrothermal vent crustaceans and Gamma- and Epsilonproteobacteria bacteria. Therefore, X. testudinatus may provide a convenient animal model for hydrothermal systems.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. The rarefaction curve of bacterial 16S rRNA genes in organs of X. testudinatus and seawater.

Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were defined by a 3% cut off value in sequence dissimilarity. Related samples were denoted as S (stomach), H (heat), G (gill), M (mid-gut), D (digestive gland) and SW (seawater).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150597.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Relative fold change of 16S copy number of Gammaproteobacteria and Epsilonproteobacteria in organs of X. testudinatus.

Relative folds were calculated by the comparative 2^-ΔCт method. Related samples were denoted as S (stomach), H (heat), G (gill), M (mid-gut), D (digestive gland) and SW (seawater).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150597.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taiwan for financial support.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SLT. Performed the experiments: PWC. Analyzed the data: PWC SHY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TCH SJK. Wrote the paper: SHY SLT.

References

1. Tang K, Liu K, Jiao N, Zhang Y, Chen CT (2013) Functional metagenomic investigations of microbial communities in a shallow-sea hydrothermal system. PLOS ONE 8:e72958. pmid:23940820
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Martin W, Baross J, Kelley D, Russell MJ (2008) Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 805–814. pmid:18820700
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Dubilier N, Bergin C, Lott C (2008) Symbiotic diversity in marine animals: the art of harnessing chemosynthesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 725–740. pmid:18794911
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Watsuji TO, Yamamoto A, Motoki K, Ueda K, Hada E, Takaki Y, et al. (2015) Molecular evidence of digestion and absorption of epibiotic bacterial community by deep-sea crab Shinkaia crosnieri. ISME J 9: 821–831. pmid:25314318
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Durand L, Zbinden M, Cueff-Gauchard V, Duperron S, Roussel EG, Shillito B, et al. (2010) Microbial diversity associated with the hydrothermal shrimp Rimicaris exoculata gut and occurrence of a resident microbial community. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71: 291–303. pmid:19951370
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Jan C, Petersen JM, Werner J, Teeling H, Huang S, Glöckner FO, et al. (2014) The gill chamber epibiosis of deep-sea shrimp Rimicaris exoculata: an in-depth metagenomic investigation and discovery of Zetaproteobacteria. Environ Microbiol 16: 2723–2738. pmid:24447589
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Zbinden MI, Shillito B, Le Bris N, de Villardi de Montlaur C, Roussel E, Guyot F, et al. (2008) New insights on the metabolic diversity among the epibiotic microbial community of the hydrothermal shrimp Rimicaris exoculata. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 359:131–140.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Goffredi SK, Jones WJ, Erhlich H, Springer A, Vrijenhoek RC (2008) Epibiotic bacteria associated with the recently discovered Yeti crab, Kiwa hirsuta. Environ Microbiol 10: 2623–2634. pmid:18564185
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Goffredi SK (2010) Indigenous ectosymbiotic bacteria associated with diverse hydrothermal vent invertebrates. Environ Microbiol Rep 2: 479–488. pmid:23766219
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Tsuchida S, Suzuki Y, Fujiwara Y, Kawato M, Uematsu K, Yamanaka T, et al. (2011) Epibiotic association between filamentous bacteria and the vent-associated galatheid crab, Shinkaia crosnieri (Decapoda: Anomura). J Mar Biol Assoc U K 91:23–32.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Ponsard J, Cambon-Bonavita MA, Zbinden M, Lepoint G, Joassin A, Corbari L, et al. (2013) Inorganic carbon fixation by chemosynthetic ectosymbionts and nutritional transfers to the hydrothermal vent host-shrimp Rimicaris exoculata. ISME J 7:96–109. pmid:22914596
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Polz MF, Robinson JJ, Cavanaugh CM, Van Dover CL (1998) Trophic ecology of massive shrimp aggregations at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal vent site. Limnol Oceanogr 43:1631–1638.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Jeng MS, Ng NK, Ng PKL (2004) Feeding behaviour: hydrothermal vent crabs feast on sea ‘snow’. Nature 432:969. pmid:15616550
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Wang TW, Chan TY, Chan BKK (2014) Trophic relationships of hydrothermal vent and non-vent communities in the upper sublittoral and upper bathyal zones off Kueishan Island, Taiwan: a combined morphological, gut content analysis and stable isotope approach. Mar Biol 161: 2447–2463.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Tang SL, Hong MJ, Liao MH, Jane WN, Chiang PW, Chen CB, et al. (2011) Bacteria associated with an encrusting sponge (Terpios hoshinota) and the corals partially covered by the sponge. Environ Microbiol 13:1179–91. pmid:21265978
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Chen CP, Tseng CH, Tang SL (2011) The dynamics of microbial partnerships in the coral Isopora palifera. ISME J 5:728–740. pmid:20962876
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Jorgensen SL, Hannisdal B, Lanzén A, Baumberger T, Flesland K, Fonseca R, et al. (2012) Correlating microbial community profiles with geochemical data in highly stratified sediments from the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:2846–2855.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200. pmid:21700674
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998. pmid:23955772
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Hügler M, Petersen JM, Dubilier N, Imhoff JF, Sievert SM (2011) Pathways of carbon and energy metabolism of the epibiotic community associated with the deep-sea hydrothermal vent shrimp Rimicaris exoculata. PLOS ONE 6:e16018. pmid:21249205
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Campbell BJ, Engel AS, Porter ML, Takai K (2006) The versatile ε-proteobacteria: key players in sulphidic habitats. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:458–468. pmid:16652138
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Comeault A, Stevens CJ, Juniper SK (2010) Mixed photosynthetic-chemosynthetic diets in vent obligate macroinvertebrates at shallow hydrothermal vents on Volcano 1, South Tonga Arc-evidence from stable isotope and fatty acid analyses. Cah Biol Mar 51:351–359.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Hu MYA, Hagen W, Jeng MS, Saborowski E (2012) Metabolic energy demand and food utilization of the hydrothermal vent crab Xenograpsus testudinatus (Crustacea: Brachyura). Aquatic Biol 15:11–25.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Kuo FW. Preliminary investigation of the hydrothermal activities of Kueishantao Island. Dissertation, National Sun Yat-sen University. 2001. Available: http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/34467227286873776166
25. Chen CTA, Zeng Z, Kuo FW, Yang TF, Wang BJ, Tu YY (2005) Tide-influenced acidic hydrothermal system offshore NE Taiwan. Chem Geol 224:69–81.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Shao MF, Zhang T, Fang HHP (2010) Sulfur-driven autotrophic denitrification: diversity, biochemistry, and engineering applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 88:1027–1042. pmid:20809074
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Peng SH, Hung JJ, Hwang JS (2011) Bioaccumulation of trace metals in the submarine hydrothermal vent crab Xenograpsus testudinatus off Kueishan Island, Taiwan. Mar Pollut Bull 63:396–401. pmid:21658729
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Regassa LB, Gasparich GE (2006) Spiroplasmas: evolutionary relationships and biodiversity. Front Biosci 11:2983–3002. pmid:16720370
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Ho TW, Hwang JS, Cheung MK, Kwan HS (2015) Dietary analysis on the shallow-water hydrothermal vent crab Xenograpsus testudinatus using Illumina sequencing. Mar Biol 162:1787–1798.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Eddy F, Powell A, Gregory S, Nunan LM, Lightner DV, Dyson PJ, et al. (2007) A novel bacterial disease of the European shore crab, Carcinus maenas molecular pathology and epidemiology. Microbiology 153:2839–2849. pmid:17768229
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Singh RP, Reddy CR (2014) Seaweed-microbial interactions: key functions of seaweed-associated bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 88:213–230. pmid:24512602
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Buchan A, González JM, Moran MA (2005) Overview of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5665–5677. pmid:16204474
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Ziesche L, Bruns H, Dogs M, Wolter L, Mann F, Wagner-Döbler I, et al. (2015) Homoserine lactones, methyl oligohydroxybutyrates, and other extracellular metabolites of macroalgae-associated bacteria of the Roseobacter clade: identification and functions. Chembiochem 16:2094–2107. pmid:26212108
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Farmer JJ, Janda JM, Brenner FW, Cameron DN, Birkhead KM (2005) Genus I. Vibrio pacini 1854. In: Brenner DJ, Kreig NR, Staley JT, eds. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Springer: New York, Vol 2, pp 494–546.
35. Pruzzo C, Huq A, Colwell RR, Donelli G (2005) Pathogenic Vibrio species in the marine and estuarine environment. In: Belkin S, Colwell RR, eds. Ocean and Health Pathogens in the Marine Environment. Springer: New York. Pp 217–252.
36. Gullian M, Thompson F, Rodriguez J (2004) Selection of probiotic bacteria and study of their immunostimulatory effect in Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 233: 1–14.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Hasan NA, Grim CJ, Lipp EK, Rivera IN, Chun J, Haley BJ, et al. (2015) Deep-sea hydrothermal vent bacteria related to human pathogenic Vibrio species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: E2813–2819. pmid:25964331
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Nyholm SV, McFall-Ngai MJ (2004) The winnowing: establishing the squid-vibrio symbiosis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:632–642. pmid:15263898
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Chen CA, Keshavmurthy S (2009) Taiwan as a connective stepping-stone in the Kuroshio Triangle and the conservation of coral ecosystems under the impacts of climate change. Kuroshio Science 3:15–22.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Namias J (1970) Macroscale variations in sea-surface temperatures in the North Pacific. J Geophys Res 75:565–582.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Chu TY (1974) The fluctuations of the Kuroshio current in the eastern sea area of Taiwan. Acta Oceanogr Taiwan 4:1–12.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Hsin YC, Wu CR, Shaw PT (2008) Spatial and temporal variations of the Kuroshio east of Taiwan. 1982–2005: A numerical study. J Geophys Res 113: C04002.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Wu CR, Chang YL, Oey LY, Chang CWJ, Hsin YC (2008) Air-sea interaction between tropical cyclone Nari and Kuroshio. Geophys Res Lett 35:L12605.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Tang K, Liu K, Jiao N, Zhang Y, Chen CT (2013) Functional metagenomic investigations of microbial communities in a shallow-sea hydrothermal system. PLOS ONE 8:e72958. pmid:23940820
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Martin W, Baross J, Kelley D, Russell MJ (2008) Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 805–814. pmid:18820700
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Dubilier N, Bergin C, Lott C (2008) Symbiotic diversity in marine animals: the art of harnessing chemosynthesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 725–740. pmid:18794911
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Watsuji TO, Yamamoto A, Motoki K, Ueda K, Hada E, Takaki Y, et al. (2015) Molecular evidence of digestion and absorption of epibiotic bacterial community by deep-sea crab Shinkaia crosnieri. ISME J 9: 821–831. pmid:25314318
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Durand L, Zbinden M, Cueff-Gauchard V, Duperron S, Roussel EG, Shillito B, et al. (2010) Microbial diversity associated with the hydrothermal shrimp Rimicaris exoculata gut and occurrence of a resident microbial community. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71: 291–303. pmid:19951370
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Jan C, Petersen JM, Werner J, Teeling H, Huang S, Glöckner FO, et al. (2014) The gill chamber epibiosis of deep-sea shrimp Rimicaris exoculata: an in-depth metagenomic investigation and discovery of Zetaproteobacteria. Environ Microbiol 16: 2723–2738. pmid:24447589
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Zbinden MI, Shillito B, Le Bris N, de Villardi de Montlaur C, Roussel E, Guyot F, et al. (2008) New insights on the metabolic diversity among the epibiotic microbial community of the hydrothermal shrimp Rimicaris exoculata. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 359:131–140.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Goffredi SK, Jones WJ, Erhlich H, Springer A, Vrijenhoek RC (2008) Epibiotic bacteria associated with the recently discovered Yeti crab, Kiwa hirsuta. Environ Microbiol 10: 2623–2634. pmid:18564185
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Goffredi SK (2010) Indigenous ectosymbiotic bacteria associated with diverse hydrothermal vent invertebrates. Environ Microbiol Rep 2: 479–488. pmid:23766219
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Tsuchida S, Suzuki Y, Fujiwara Y, Kawato M, Uematsu K, Yamanaka T, et al. (2011) Epibiotic association between filamentous bacteria and the vent-associated galatheid crab, Shinkaia crosnieri (Decapoda: Anomura). J Mar Biol Assoc U K 91:23–32.
View Article
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Ponsard J, Cambon-Bonavita MA, Zbinden M, Lepoint G, Joassin A, Corbari L, et al. (2013) Inorganic carbon fixation by chemosynthetic ectosymbionts and nutritional transfers to the hydrothermal vent host-shrimp Rimicaris exoculata. ISME J 7:96–109. pmid:22914596
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] PubMed/NCBI

[42] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Polz MF, Robinson JJ, Cavanaugh CM, Van Dover CL (1998) Trophic ecology of massive shrimp aggregations at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal vent site. Limnol Oceanogr 43:1631–1638.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Jeng MS, Ng NK, Ng PKL (2004) Feeding behaviour: hydrothermal vent crabs feast on sea ‘snow’. Nature 432:969. pmid:15616550
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Wang TW, Chan TY, Chan BKK (2014) Trophic relationships of hydrothermal vent and non-vent communities in the upper sublittoral and upper bathyal zones off Kueishan Island, Taiwan: a combined morphological, gut content analysis and stable isotope approach. Mar Biol 161: 2447–2463.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Tang SL, Hong MJ, Liao MH, Jane WN, Chiang PW, Chen CB, et al. (2011) Bacteria associated with an encrusting sponge (Terpios hoshinota) and the corals partially covered by the sponge. Environ Microbiol 13:1179–91. pmid:21265978
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Chen CP, Tseng CH, Tang SL (2011) The dynamics of microbial partnerships in the coral Isopora palifera. ISME J 5:728–740. pmid:20962876
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Jorgensen SL, Hannisdal B, Lanzén A, Baumberger T, Flesland K, Fonseca R, et al. (2012) Correlating microbial community profiles with geochemical data in highly stratified sediments from the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:2846–2855.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200. pmid:21700674
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998. pmid:23955772
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Hügler M, Petersen JM, Dubilier N, Imhoff JF, Sievert SM (2011) Pathways of carbon and energy metabolism of the epibiotic community associated with the deep-sea hydrothermal vent shrimp Rimicaris exoculata. PLOS ONE 6:e16018. pmid:21249205
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Campbell BJ, Engel AS, Porter ML, Takai K (2006) The versatile ε-proteobacteria: key players in sulphidic habitats. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:458–468. pmid:16652138
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Comeault A, Stevens CJ, Juniper SK (2010) Mixed photosynthetic-chemosynthetic diets in vent obligate macroinvertebrates at shallow hydrothermal vents on Volcano 1, South Tonga Arc-evidence from stable isotope and fatty acid analyses. Cah Biol Mar 51:351–359.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Hu MYA, Hagen W, Jeng MS, Saborowski E (2012) Metabolic energy demand and food utilization of the hydrothermal vent crab Xenograpsus testudinatus (Crustacea: Brachyura). Aquatic Biol 15:11–25.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Kuo FW. Preliminary investigation of the hydrothermal activities of Kueishantao Island. Dissertation, National Sun Yat-sen University. 2001. Available: http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/34467227286873776166

[ref25] 25. Chen CTA, Zeng Z, Kuo FW, Yang TF, Wang BJ, Tu YY (2005) Tide-influenced acidic hydrothermal system offshore NE Taiwan. Chem Geol 224:69–81.
View Article
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Shao MF, Zhang T, Fang HHP (2010) Sulfur-driven autotrophic denitrification: diversity, biochemistry, and engineering applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 88:1027–1042. pmid:20809074
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Peng SH, Hung JJ, Hwang JS (2011) Bioaccumulation of trace metals in the submarine hydrothermal vent crab Xenograpsus testudinatus off Kueishan Island, Taiwan. Mar Pollut Bull 63:396–401. pmid:21658729
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Regassa LB, Gasparich GE (2006) Spiroplasmas: evolutionary relationships and biodiversity. Front Biosci 11:2983–3002. pmid:16720370
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Ho TW, Hwang JS, Cheung MK, Kwan HS (2015) Dietary analysis on the shallow-water hydrothermal vent crab Xenograpsus testudinatus using Illumina sequencing. Mar Biol 162:1787–1798.
View Article
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Eddy F, Powell A, Gregory S, Nunan LM, Lightner DV, Dyson PJ, et al. (2007) A novel bacterial disease of the European shore crab, Carcinus maenas molecular pathology and epidemiology. Microbiology 153:2839–2849. pmid:17768229
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Singh RP, Reddy CR (2014) Seaweed-microbial interactions: key functions of seaweed-associated bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 88:213–230. pmid:24512602
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Buchan A, González JM, Moran MA (2005) Overview of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5665–5677. pmid:16204474
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Ziesche L, Bruns H, Dogs M, Wolter L, Mann F, Wagner-Döbler I, et al. (2015) Homoserine lactones, methyl oligohydroxybutyrates, and other extracellular metabolites of macroalgae-associated bacteria of the Roseobacter clade: identification and functions. Chembiochem 16:2094–2107. pmid:26212108
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Farmer JJ, Janda JM, Brenner FW, Cameron DN, Birkhead KM (2005) Genus I. Vibrio pacini 1854. In: Brenner DJ, Kreig NR, Staley JT, eds. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Springer: New York, Vol 2, pp 494–546.

[ref35] 35. Pruzzo C, Huq A, Colwell RR, Donelli G (2005) Pathogenic Vibrio species in the marine and estuarine environment. In: Belkin S, Colwell RR, eds. Ocean and Health Pathogens in the Marine Environment. Springer: New York. Pp 217–252.

[ref36] 36. Gullian M, Thompson F, Rodriguez J (2004) Selection of probiotic bacteria and study of their immunostimulatory effect in Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 233: 1–14.
View Article
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Hasan NA, Grim CJ, Lipp EK, Rivera IN, Chun J, Haley BJ, et al. (2015) Deep-sea hydrothermal vent bacteria related to human pathogenic Vibrio species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: E2813–2819. pmid:25964331
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Nyholm SV, McFall-Ngai MJ (2004) The winnowing: establishing the squid-vibrio symbiosis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:632–642. pmid:15263898
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Chen CA, Keshavmurthy S (2009) Taiwan as a connective stepping-stone in the Kuroshio Triangle and the conservation of coral ecosystems under the impacts of climate change. Kuroshio Science 3:15–22.
View Article
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Namias J (1970) Macroscale variations in sea-surface temperatures in the North Pacific. J Geophys Res 75:565–582.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Chu TY (1974) The fluctuations of the Kuroshio current in the eastern sea area of Taiwan. Acta Oceanogr Taiwan 4:1–12.
View Article
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Hsin YC, Wu CR, Shaw PT (2008) Spatial and temporal variations of the Kuroshio east of Taiwan. 1982–2005: A numerical study. J Geophys Res 113: C04002.
View Article
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Wu CR, Chang YL, Oey LY, Chang CWJ, Hsin YC (2008) Air-sea interaction between tropical cyclone Nari and Kuroshio. Geophys Res Lett 35:L12605.
View Article
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Sampling site and sample collection

Total DNA extraction

Amplification of V6-V8 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA gene

DNA tagging PCR and massively parallel pyrosequencing

Data analysis

Quantitative PCR

Results

Discussion

X. testudinatus associated Gamma- and Epsilonproteobacteria

Bacterial diversity and potential organ specificity bacteria in X. testudinatus

Conclusions

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. The rarefaction curve of bacterial 16S rRNA genes in organs of X. testudinatus and seawater.

S2 Fig. Relative fold change of 16S copy number of Gammaproteobacteria and Epsilonproteobacteria in organs of X. testudinatus.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References