Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Tinman Regulates NetrinB in the Cardioblasts of the Drosophila Dorsal Vessel

  • Jamshid Asadzadeh,

    Current address: Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, New York, New York, United States of America

    Affiliations Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

  • Niamh Neligan,

    Affiliation Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

  • Sunita G. Kramer,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America

  • Juan-Pablo Labrador

    Affiliations Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland


Morphogenesis of the Drosophila dorsal vessel (DV) shares similarities with that of the vertebrate heart. Precursors line up at both sides of the embryo, migrate towards the midline and fuse to form a tubular structure. Guidance receptors and their ligands have been implicated in this process in vertebrates and invertebrates, as have been a series of evolutionarily conserved cardiogenic transcriptional regulators including Tinman, the Drosophila homolog of the transcription factor Nkx-2.5. NetrinB (NetB), a repulsive ligand for the Unc-5 receptor is required to preserve the dorsal vessel hollow. It localizes to the luminal space of the dorsal vessel but its source and its regulation is unknown. Here, using genetics together with in situ hybridization with single cell resolution, we show how tin is required for NetrinB expression in cardioblasts during DV tubulogenesis and sufficient to promote NetB transcription ectopically. We further identify a dorsal vessel-specific NetB enhancer and show that it is also regulated by tin in a similar fashion to NetB.


Heart organogenesis begins with the migration of bilaterally paired groups of cardiac precursors and the formation of a linear tube after they meet [1, 2]. Guidance receptors and their ligands have been implicated at different steps in this process in vertebrates [35] and invertebrates [610]. In Drosophila two rows of bilaterally lined up cardioblasts (CBs) and pericardial cells (PCs) migrate towards the dorsal midline (Fig 1, Stage 15). After migration, the tubular heart (dorsal vessel, DV) forms as CBs fuse, leaving a central luminal space (Fig 1, Stage 17). This complex process is mediated at least through the actions of two guidance systems; the Slit and its Robo receptors [68] and NetB behaving as a repulsive cue for the Unc-5 receptor localized at the luminal side of the CBs [9, 10] (Fig 1, stage 17). However, several questions remain unanswered. While NetB is present in the DV lumen it is not clear if it is actually produced by cardiac cells [9, 11, 12]. How these guidance systems are regulated in the DV is also largely unknown. A core network of evolutionary conserved transcription factors (TFs) that regulates heart morphogenesis in both vertebrates and invertebrates, including Nkx2.5 and its Drosophila homolog, tinman (tin), [13] may coordinate their expression playing a later role after cardiac precursor specification. This situation would be analogous to the neuromuscular system where guidance receptors for Slit and Netrin are regulated by TFs that play an earlier role in motoneuron specification [1416]. In this respect we have recently shown how the Unc-5 receptor is specifically regulated in cardioblasts by tin [17].

Fig 1. Schematic representation of the Drosophila dorsal vessel’s cellular composition and organization.

Top, presents Drosophila DV at embryonic stage 15 while cardiac progenitors are migrating towards the dorsal midline. Bottom is an schematic representation of the embryonic heart proper at stage 17 when the DV lumen has formed. Aortic portion (right) is oriented anteriorly and the beating (heart) portion (left), posteriorly. Based on the expressed marker TFs, different cell types are colored. CBs are divided into Tin-(green) or Svp-expressing SMCs (light green) subtypes. SMCs of the last three posterior segments of DV make the future ostial cells (inflow valves). CBs are surrounded by pericardial cells (PCs; blue) on their ventrolateral side. PCs are divided into Tin-positive (blue) or Tin-negative PCs (not pictured). Bottom right, is a schematic representation of cross-section view of the DV lumen at stage 17. CBs on the opposite sides assume a crescent-like shape by contacting each other at the two dorsal and ventral apical sides, avoiding contact at the luminal domains, therefore making a hollow space in between. Unc-5 and NetB have been proposed to play a role in the formation of the hollow space between each CB on each row and its counterpart on the opposite row [9].

In this work, we show how NetB mRNA specifically localizes in CBs within the DV as does a membrane tethered NetB knocked into the NetB locus. NetB is regulated in CBs by tin since its mRNA and protein levels are strongly reduced in tin deficient CBs. Furthermore, tin is sufficient to induce ectopic NetB expression when misexpressed in the ectoderm. Finally, we identify a NetB DV enhancer that drives expression specifically in CBs within the DV, show that its activity is strictly dependent on Tinman and that Tinman can bind to phylogenetically conserved sites within the enhancer. Together our data shows that tin regulates NetB in CBs and strongly suggests that tin may orchestrate DV assembly, at least partially, through the regulation of a NetB autocrine loop in CBs.


NetrinB protein is expressed by Tin-positive cardioblasts in the Drosophila dorsal vessel

The Unc-5 receptor and its NetB ligand have been shown to play a role late in tubulogenesis during DV morphogenesis in Drosophila [9, 10]. While the receptor is expressed by CBs and present at their luminal side in the DV, NetB accumulates in the lumen from stage 15 onwards [9]. However, NetB transcripts were not detected in CBs [9], although other groups have reported its presence in the cardiac mesoderm [11, 12]. In order to determine if cardiac cells produce NetB, we took advantage of NetB knock-in Drosophila lines [18]. These lines have been engineered to replace the endogenous NetB gene with either a V5-tagged membrane-bound NetB (NetB-tm) or a myc-tagged secreted one. These lines are very useful tools to determine NetB localization and, in particular, the cells where NetB is produced as NetB-tm labels the membranes of NetB expressing cells. In our experiments, we can specifically detect secreted NetB predominantly within the heart lumen in live dissected embryos at late stage 16 (Fig 2A and 2B) as previously reported [9]. When we analyzed NetB-tm expression pattern we could detect it homogeneously expressed in all Tin+ CB membranes but not in Tin–Svp-expressing cells (SMCs) along the DV (Fig 2C and 2D and S1 Fig). Thus, our results show that NetB is produced in CBs, strongly suggesting that CBs are the source of NetB protein in the DV.

Fig 2. NetB is expressed by CBs and can be detected in the luminal space after dorsal vessel closure.

(A and B) Myc staining of embryos expressing a secreted Myc-tagged NetB knock-in [18] (magenta, luminal space) reveals secretion of NetB into the luminal space. CBs and PCs are labeled with a-Mef2 (green) and a-Zfh1 (cyan), respectively. Two cross sections taken from two points numbered 1 and 2 (places of which indicated in A and B) are shown on the right. The cross section at the point 1 is depicted schematically on the right and also in E. Note that due to secretion from CBs, NetB-Myc is mainly concentrated in the luminal space. (C and D) Co-staining for Tin (magenta) and a transmembrane V5-tagged NetB knock-in [18] (green) reveals NetB expression in Tin-positive cardioblasts. Note the regular gaps in NetB-tm expression corresponding to Tin-negative SMCs (arrowheads). All panels are dorsal views with anterior to the left. A magnification of the regions delineated by insets is shown for each panel in A and B.

NetB mRNA expression in cardioblasts is regulated by tin

To confirm that NetB was transcribed in CBs, we performed in situ hybridization in Drosophila embryos at late stage 16, which is the onset of DV tube assembly. At this stage, NetB mRNA can be readily detected within CBs in the posterior, beating portion of the DV (heart proper) and also, at lower levels within the aorta (Fig 3A and 3A’), which contrasts with the homogeneous expression seen for NetB-tm along the DV (Fig 2). Given that these CBs specifically express the transcription factor Tinman and that we had previously detected NetB in Tin+ CB membranes we wondered if tin would be controlling NetB expression. tin mutants are characterized by their lack of DV, as tin is required for early specification of cardiac precursors [19, 20]. Nevertheless, tin mutants where tin’s expression is restored everywhere except in the DV (tin-ABD;tin346/ tin346) are able to form a DV and hatch as adults [21]. To determine whether tin regulates NetB, we took advantage of these mosaic tin mutants to analyze NetB mRNA expression through mRNA in situ hybridization (3B, B’). NetB mRNA was significantly reduced when compared with tin heterozygous DVs (compare Fig 3A and 3A’ with 3B and 3B’). Thus, not only NetB mRNA is transcribed in Tin+ CBs, but also its specific expression pattern matching that of the transcription factor is a consequence of its regulation by tin in these cells during DV tubulogenesis.

Fig 3. tin regulates NetB mRNA expression in vivo.

A and A’ represent NetB mRNA (magenta) expression in CBs (green), labeled with Tau-Myc driven by TinC-Gal4 to label CBs, in heterozygous tinABD; tin346/+ embryos (arrowheads). NetB expression dramatically drops in homozygous tinABD;tin346/tin346 late stage 16 embryos (B and B’; open arrowhead-asterisks in B’ point to where CBs are positioned in B). All panels are dorsal views with anterior to the left. A magnification of the regions delineated by insets is shown for each panel. C, quantification of the in situ signal in cardioblast from the anterior, aorta region (A) or the posterior, heart proper (P) region of the dorsal vessel compared to transversal epidermal signal (Ep) in tinABD; tin346/+ and tinABD;tin346/tin346 embryos (***p<0.003 and **p<0.01).

NetB protein expression is reduced in tin mutants

To determine if NetB mRNA reduction in tin mutants would be reflected in NetB protein expression, we analyzed NetB-tm levels in tin mutants. As readout of mRNA translation we detected NetB in tin heterozygous or mutant CBs and compared its expression levels with NetB expression in muscles. tin is not expressed in muscles; therefore muscle levels should remain constant. As expected, NetB-tm is virtually absent in CBs of tin mutants (compare Fig 4A and 4A’ with 4B and 4B’) while muscle expression remains unchanged (Fig 4C).

Fig 4. NetB protein expression, in tin mutants is downregulated in CBs.

As NetB mRNA is almost absent in CBs of tin-ABD; tin346/tin346 mutants (Fig 3), we tested the NetB-tm protein expression in this background using the transmembrane V5-tagged NetB knock-in [18]. A and A’ represent NetB expression in tinABD; tin346/+ heterozygous embryos (full confocal stack in S1 Fig). There is no significant difference in the NetB-tm levels between wild-type and heterozygotes. However, in tin-ABD; tin346/tin346mutants, NetB-tm expression level is dramatically reduced (B, B’, full confocal stack in S2 Fig) while its expression in the muscles [M] is unaffected (C). CBs are labeled with a-Mef2 (Magenta) and NetB is labeled with a-V5 (green). All panels are dorsal views with anterior to the left. A magnification of the regions delineated by insets is shown for each panel (***p<2.6x10-5).

Misexpression of tin in the ectoderm can induce NetB ectopically

Given that tin is required for NetB expression in the DV, we investigated tin’s requirement for its expression in vivo. We misexpressed tin with an engrailed-Gal4 driver on a striped pattern in the ectoderm, where neither Tin nor NetB are expressed (Fig 5A and 5A’). Subsequently, we analyzed the induction of NetB and confirmed that ectopic expression of tin is sufficient to induce NetB expression (Fig 5B and 5B’) in the characteristic engrailed (en) striped pattern. These results show that even when Tinman is expressed outside its normal endogenous context it is sufficient to induce expression of NetB. Together, the fact that NetB mRNA or protein are almost undetectable in tin mutant CBs and tin’s ability to induce their expression ectopically in the ectoderm, suggest a direct role of Tinman in the regulation of this ligand.

Fig 5. Ectopic expression of Tin induces NetB ectopic expressions in vivo.

In a wild-type background, staining for NetB protein (magenta), displays little or no NetB expression in the Engrailed stripes (A and A’). However, in an engrailed-Gal4>UAS-tin background, NetB is strongly induced in Engrailed stripes which now ectopically express Tin (B and B’, arrowheads). For NetB protein staining, the transmembrane V5-tagged NetB-tm knock-in [18] was used. All panels are lateral views with anterior to the left and dorsal side up. A magnification of the regions delineated by insets is shown for each panel.

A NetB enhancer drives expression in cardioblasts

In order to understand how is NetB regulated in the developing DV, we analyzed several enhancers within its locus. Screening the available Gal4 lines from the Janelia collection [22], we identified a fragment (~4kb) within the first NetB intron that can drive expression in the DV at late stages of migration and tubulogenesis (NetB-M, Fig 6A). Given the size of the NetB locus and the regions analyzed, this is one potential enhancer element, and we do not exclude the presence of other, potentially more significant, enhancer elements in the locus driving expression in the DV. Nevertheless, the identified enhancer drives expression in mesodermal cells including muscles, pericardial cells and cardioblast at earlier stages (Fig 6B–6C’) and its expression gets restricted at later stages to CBs within the DV (Fig 6B and 6B’). Our UAS-tau-myc-GFP is driven by NetB-M-Gal4 therefore its expression persists to slightly later stages than the endogenous NetB but faithfully replicates NetB transcript and protein expression within the DV (Fig 2C and 2D and Fig 3A and 3A’).

Fig 6. The NetB-M reporter is expressed in CBs and weakly in muscles.

(A) Schematic representation of the positions and the relative sizes of the available Gal4 reporters for NetB locus. We screened Gal4 from the Janelia collection [22] for DV expression. The line expressing Gal4 efficiently in the DV is shown in magenta. (B-C’) Gal4 expression pattern was examined using a UAS-Tau-Myc-GFP construct. Co-staining of embryos with a-Myc (green) and a-Mef2 (magenta) revealed Gal4 expression in muscles and the DV at stage 13 (B, B’) and 15 (C, C’). Co-staining of these embryos with a-Myc (green), a-Mef2 (red) and a-Zfh1 (magenta) reveals a reduction in the expression in other in muscles and pericardial cells while expression in CBs persists at late stage 16–17 (D, D’). All panels are dorsal views with anterior to the left. A magnification of the regions delineated by insets is shown for each panel.

The NetB DV enhancer requires tin for its induction in cardioblasts

Given that tin is required for NetB expression in the DV we argued that the NetB-M enhancer may be regulated by tin in vivo. To test if tin was required to promote transcription through the NetB enhancer, we examined if it was able to promote transcription in tin-ABD; tin346/tin346 mutant embryos (Fig 7). We analyzed the expression of Gal4 mRNA under the control of the NetB-M enhancer. While Gal4 was specifically expressed in tin heterozygous CBs, we could not detect any mRNA signal in tin-ABD; tin346/tin346 CBs (Compare Fig 7A and 7A” with 7B–7B” and 7C). Importantly, reporter expression was not affected in tin mutants within the CNS where tin is not expressed and therefore, not required.

Fig 7. NetB-M enhancer element is regulated by Tin in vivo.

In situ hybridization for Gal4 mRNA driven by the NetB-M enhancer (Gal4, magenta) reveals Gal4 mRNA expression in some cells in the CNS and in the DV in tin-ABD; tin346/+ heterozygous background (A and A’). However, in tin-ABD; tin346/tin346 mutant embryos Gal4 mRNA expression is exclusively absent from the CBs, while CNS cells have the same signal intensity as in heterozygous embryos (B and B’). Reporter driven UAS-tau-myc-GFP is used as a counterstain as it shows a persistent broad expression pattern within the CNS, muscles and DV (myc, green) at stage 15 (A-B”) while the Gal4 mRNA is clearly absent at this stage. Quantification of Gal4 mRNA expression driven by NetB-M element in CBs in tin-ABD; tin346/+ heterozygous versus tin-ABD; tin346/tin346 mutant embryos. Fluorescence of Gal4-expressing CNS cells is used as internal control (C). While in situ signal in the CNS of heterozygous and mutant embryos remains unchanged (2.15 ± 0.22 s.e.m and 1.83 ± 0.164 s.e.m, in heterozygous or tin mutants, respectively), the signal in CBs is significantly dropped from 1.24 ± 0.169 (***p<6.8 x 10−8) in tin-ABD; tin346/+ heterozygous embryos to 0.0036 ± 0.032 in tin-ABD; tin346/tin346 mutants. All panels are views with dorsal side to the left and anterior to the top. A magnification of the regions delineated by insets in A and A’ or B and B’ is shown in A” and A”‘ or B” and B”‘ respectively.

Tinman can bind to the NetB-M enhancer

Tinman regulates NetB mRNA and protein expression specifically in CBs during tubulogenesis in the DV and it is able to induce its expression ectopically. In addition we have identified a NetB enhancer that drives expression in the DV that is under Tin control in CBs during tubulogenesis. In order to determine if Tin can bind to the NetB enhancer we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with followed by qPCR using overlapping primers covering the NetB-M enhancer (Fig 8A). We identified 4 peaks of enrichment in the immunoprecipitate indicating that Tin can bind to the NetB enhancer. Further analysis of the sequence revealed phylogenetically conserved Tin consensus binding sequences within each peak that have been preserved across > 107 years of evolution, strongly suggesting its functional relevance (Fig 8B).

Fig 8. Tin binds directly to NetB-M enhancer element.

(A) ChIP analysis of the NetB-M genomic loci in S2R+ cells transfected with pAct5C-GFP-tinman. The precipitated DNA fragments were amplified by real-time qPCR using overlapping primers (R1-R20) designed over the genomic region covering the NetB-M enhancer element. ChIP signal is also illustrated as a curve peaking at R1, R10/R11, R14 and R16. A schematic of NetB locus is also illustrated below the graph. Note that the schematic view represents only a ~2kb region (chrX:14,744,635–14,746,673) of the NetB-M enhancer that showed significant enrichment as no significant enrichment for the rest of the enhancer was detected above the background. Enrichment is presented as a percentage of total input. (B) Consensus Tin-binding motifs detected with JASPAR within the ChIP enriched region and their conservation in different Drosophila species (mel, melanogaster; sim, simulans; sec, sechellia; yak, yakuba; ere, erecta).

Taken together, our data demonstrates that Tinman regulates transcriptionally the NetB ligand and a DV enhancer present within its regulatory region specifically in CBs during tubulogenesis. Furthermore, our results also suggest that this regulation may be mediated through a direct interaction of Tin with NetB regulatory regions.


Early dorsal vessel specification events in Drosophila take place within the ventral mesoderm. A network of evolutionary conserved cardiogenic transcription factors, including Tinman, integrates their activity to promote DV morphogenesis in the cardiac mesoderm [2, 12]. While Tinman is essential for cardiac cell specification, a later role in the embryonic DV morphogenesis remains largely unexplored. Nevertheless, its function at later stages has been suggested by the defective arrangement of CBs within the DV in cardioblast-specific tin mutants [21]. Different guidance systems such as the Slit and its receptors [68] and NetB and its Unc-5 receptor [9, 10] are required in late DV morphogenesis for tube assembly. We provide several lines of evidence to demonstrate that tin is a regulator of NetB in CBs during DV tubulogenesis: 1- NetrinB is expressed in the DV by CBs and accumulates in a polarized fashion on their luminal side at late embryonic stages (Fig 2); 2- tin is required for NetB mRNA expression in CBs (Figs 3 and 4); 3- tin can induce NetB expression ectopically (Fig 5); and 4- tin regulates a NetB DV-specific enhancer in CBs (Figs 6 and 7).

NetrinB expression in the DV was not definitely described previously. Its mRNA had been detected in the DV by some groups [11, 12] while another failed to detect it [9] leading to the proposition that NetB was produced in non-cardiac cells and actively or passively transported to the DV lumen. We unambiguously show that NetB is specifically expressed by Tin+ CBs in the DV, strongly suggesting that the NetB source in the luminal side is actually the CBs and it may, therefore, work in an autocrine fashion.

Tissue-specific genome-wide ChIP studies of evolutionarily conserved cardiogenic transcriptional regulators, including Tin, have previously suggested that they may regulate NetB through their binding events close to this gene early in cardiac development [12]. Our work analyzes NetB regulation by tin at later stages when CBs and PCs have been fully specified and shows that tin regulates NetB and a NetB DV enhancer specifically in CBs where tin is also expressed. Additionally, we show that Tin can bind to the DV enhancer in phylogenetically conserved Tin binding sites. Full confirmation of their functional relevance would require their mutagenesis and analysis in vivo. Thus, our results suggest that Tin specific regulation in CBs may be mediated through a direct binding within the NetB locus as a vestige of their embryonic origin in the cardiac mesoderm.

Materials and Methods


The stocks used in this study were as follows: Tin-ABD; tin346/TM3, eve-lacZ, svp-lacZ [21], en-Gal4, TinC-Gal4 [23], UAS-tau-Myc, Bloomington stocks 49645 (NetB-M-Gal4), 49633, 49643, 49645, 49647,49524, 49521, 49346 [22], NetA NetBmyc, NetA NetBtm [18].

Immunohistochemistry and mRNA in situ hybridization

Embryo collection, immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization were performed as previously described [24]. The following antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry: rabbit a-Mef2 (1:2000), guinea pig a-Zfh1 (1:1500) [25], rabbit a-Tin (1:1000) [19], mouse a-V5 (1:1000) (Life technologies; R960-25), chicken a-GFP (1:2000) (Abcam, 13970), mouse a-Myc (1:50) (DSHB). Secondary antibodies: Alexa 555, Alexa 488-conjugated (Invitrogen) and Cy5-conjugated (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). For NetB in situ hybridization, digoxigenin-labeled probes were used as previously described [24]. Probe-hybridized embryos were stained with HRP-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody (Roche) overnight. The following day, embryos were incubated with Cy3-conjugated tyramide, as HRP substrate, for 20 (for NetB mRNA) or 45 (for Gal4 mRNA) minutes at room temperature. Zeiss Confocal LSM700 Microscope was used for obtaining stacks of images using 20X or 40X objectives. For fluorescent quantifications, samples were prepared using the same conditions and at the same time, when possible. Image J software was used for image analysis. Background correction was performed for all quantifications. The obtained values from the selected regions were then divided by the values in control areas for each embryo. The normalized values were finally averaged for each genotypic group.

The expression pattern of secreted NetB-Myc was revealed in live-dissected embryos following previously described procedures [18, 26] with minor modifications. Live embryos were staged and propped with their ventral side up, on poly L-lysine-coated glass slides (Fisher Scientific) and were dissected. Following dissection, embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at RT for 15 min and stained with rabbit anti-Mef2, guinea pig anti-Zfh1, and mouse anti-Myc antibodies.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

ChIP was performed and analyzed as described previously [17, 27]. Briefly, S2R+ cells transfected with either pAct5C-GFP-Tin or pAct5C (as mock control) were fixed at RT in 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes. Following cell lysis, the fixed nuclei were sonicated to obtain proper size sheared chromatin. Sonicated lysates were then incubated with rabbit anti-GFP (ab290; Abcam) at 4°C for 2 hours. Lysates were then incubated with protein A-sepharose (P9424; Sigma) for an additional 2 hours. Subsequently, sepharose beads were washed to remove unspecific binding. This step was followed by elution of antibody-GFP-Tin-chromatin from beads at 70°C overnight. The next day, DNA fragments were purified using phenol-chloroform method. The immunoprecipitated fragments were subsequently amplified by real-time qPCR and quantified by comparison to input.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean values ± s.e.m.. Two-tailed independent samples t-test was used for determining statistical significance for all comparisons between wild-type/heterozygous samples and mutant ones. Histograms were generated using Microsoft Excel 2013.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Full stack view of the DV in a tin-ABD;tin346/+ heterozygous NetB-tm knock-in embryo.

NetB-tm is expressed in a broad pattern in muscles, gut and dorsal vessel. Individual slice view within a confocal stack reveals a homogeneous expression of NetB-tm along the DV (green). Note the specific expression of NetB-tm in CBs. Panels 1 and 1’ represent the most ventral slice and panels 12 and 12’ represent the most dorsal one. Top panels are double staining with a-Mef2 (magenta) and a-V5 (green). Bottom panels only show the NetB-tm pattern from the corresponding top panel. All panels are dorsal views with anterior to left.


S2 Fig. Full stack view of the DV in a tin-ABD;tin346/tin346 mutant NetB-tm knock-in embryo.

NetB-tm signal is almost absent from individual confocal slices of a tin mutant. Note the absence of V5 signal (green) in all CBs. Panels 1 and 1’ represent the most ventral slice and panels 12 and 12’ represent the most dorsal one. Top panels are double staining with a-Mef2 (magenta) and a-V5 (green). Bottom panels only show the NetB-tm pattern from the corresponding top panel. All panels are dorsal views with anterior to left.



Brian McCabe, Jim Skeath, Hanh Nguyen, Manfred Frasch and Matthew Wolf kindly provided us with stocks, antibodies and other various reagents. Funding sources of this work were as follows: SFI grants 07/IN.1/B913 and 08/ RFP/NSC1617 and a New Foundations Award from the IRC to JPL and a Trinity research award to JA.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JA JPL SGK. Performed the experiments: JA NN. Analyzed the data: JA JPL SGK. Wrote the paper: JA SGK JPL.


  1. 1. Harvey RP. Patterning the vertebrate heart. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3(7):544–56. pmid:12094232.
  2. 2. Bodmer R, Frasch M. Development and aging of the Drosophila heart. In: Rosenthal N, Harvey RP, editors. Heart Development and Regeneration. I. First ed. London: Academic Press; 2010. p. 47–86.
  3. 3. Fish JE, Wythe JD, Xiao T, Bruneau BG, Stainier DY, Srivastava D, et al. A Slit/miR-218/Robo regulatory loop is required during heart tube formation in zebrafish. Development. 2011;138(7):1409–19. pmid:21385766; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3050667.
  4. 4. Medioni C, Bertrand N, Mesbah K, Hudry B, Dupays L, Wolstein O, et al. Expression of Slit and Robo genes in the developing mouse heart. Dev Dyn. 2010;239(12):3303–11. pmid:20941780; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2996720.
  5. 5. Mommersteeg MT, Andrews WD, Ypsilanti AR, Zelina P, Yeh ML, Norden J, et al. Slit-roundabout signaling regulates the development of the cardiac systemic venous return and pericardium. Circ Res. 2013;112(3):465–75. pmid:23255421.
  6. 6. Qian L, Liu J, Bodmer R. Slit and Robo control cardiac cell polarity and morphogenesis. Curr Biol. 2005;15(24):2271–8. pmid:16360689.
  7. 7. Medioni C, Astier M, Zmojdzian M, Jagla K, Semeriva M. Genetic control of cell morphogenesis during Drosophila melanogaster cardiac tube formation. J Cell Biol. 2008;182(2):249–61. pmid:18663140; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2483531.
  8. 8. Santiago-Martinez E, Soplop NH, Patel R, Kramer SG. Repulsion by Slit and Roundabout prevents Shotgun/E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion during Drosophila heart tube lumen formation. J Cell Biol. 2008;182(2):241–8. pmid:18663139; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2483515.
  9. 9. Albrecht S, Altenhein B, Paululat A. The transmembrane receptor Uncoordinated5 (Unc5) is essential for heart lumen formation in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 2011;350(1):89–100. pmid:21094637.
  10. 10. Macabenta FD, Jensen AG, Cheng YS, Kramer JJ, Kramer SG. Frazzled/DCC facilitates cardiac cell outgrowth and attachment during Drosophila dorsal vessel formation. Dev Biol. 2013;380(2):233–42. pmid:23685255; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4137861.
  11. 11. Mitchell KJ, Doyle JL, Serafini T, Kennedy TE, Tessier-Lavigne M, Goodman CS, et al. Genetic analysis of Netrin genes in Drosophila: Netrins guide CNS commissural axons and peripheral motor axons. Neuron. 1996;17(2):203–15. pmid:8780645.
  12. 12. Junion G, Spivakov M, Girardot C, Braun M, Gustafson EH, Birney E, et al. A transcription factor collective defines cardiac cell fate and reflects lineage history. Cell. 2012;148(3):473–86. pmid:22304916.
  13. 13. Cripps RM, Olson EN. Control of cardiac development by an evolutionarily conserved transcriptional network. Dev Biol. 2002;246(1):14–28. pmid:12027431.
  14. 14. Santiago C, Labrador JP, Bashaw GJ. The homeodomain transcription factor Hb9 controls axon guidance in Drosophila through the regulation of Robo receptors. Cell reports. 2014;7(1):153–65. pmid:24685136; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4128229.
  15. 15. Zarin AA, Asadzadeh J, Hokamp K, McCartney D, Yang L, Bashaw GJ, et al. A transcription factor network coordinates attraction, repulsion, and adhesion combinatorially to control motor axon pathway selection. Neuron. 2014;81(6):1297–311. Epub Feb 20th. pmid:24560702; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4128230.
  16. 16. Zarin AA, Asadzadeh J, Labrador JP. Transcriptional regulation of guidance at the midline and in motor circuits. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71(3):419–32. pmid:23917723.
  17. 17. Asadzadeh J, Neligan N, Canabal-Alvear JJ, Daly AC, Kramer SG, Labrador JP. The Unc-5 Receptor Is Directly Regulated by Tinman in the Developing Drosophila Dorsal Vessel. PloS one. 2015;10(9):e0137688. pmid:26356221; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4565662.
  18. 18. Brankatschk M, Dickson BJ. Netrins guide Drosophila commissural axons at short range. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(2):188–94. pmid:16429137.
  19. 19. Azpiazu N, Frasch M. tinman and bagpipe: two homeo box genes that determine cell fates in the dorsal mesoderm of Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1993;7(7B):1325–40. pmid:8101173.
  20. 20. Bodmer R. The gene tinman is required for specification of the heart and visceral muscles in Drosophila. Development. 1993;118(3):719–29. pmid:7915669.
  21. 21. Zaffran S, Reim I, Qian L, Lo PC, Bodmer R, Frasch M. Cardioblast-intrinsic Tinman activity controls proper diversification and differentiation of myocardial cells in Drosophila. Development. 2006;133(20):4073–83. pmid:16987868.
  22. 22. Jenett A, Rubin GM, Ngo TT, Shepherd D, Murphy C, Dionne H, et al. A GAL4-driver line resource for Drosophila neurobiology. Cell reports. 2012;2(4):991–1001. pmid:23063364; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3515021.
  23. 23. Lo PCH, Frasch M. A role for the COUP-TF-related gene seven-up in the diversification of cardioblast identities in the dorsal vessel of Drosophila. Mechanisms of Development. 2001;104:49–60. pmid:11404079
  24. 24. Zarin AA, Daly AC, Hulsmeier J, Asadzadeh J, Labrador JP. A GATA/homeodomain transcriptional code regulates axon guidance through the Unc-5 receptor. Development. 2012;139(10):1798–805. pmid:22461564.
  25. 25. Ward EJ, Skeath JB. Characterization of a novel subset of cardiac cells and their progenitors in the Drosophila embryo. Development. 2000;127(22):4959–69. pmid:11044409.
  26. 26. Lee HK, Wright AP, Zinn K. Live dissection of Drosophila embryos: streamlined methods for screening mutant collections by antibody staining. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE. 2009;(34). pmid:20040910; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3149970.
  27. 27. Frank SR, Schroeder M, Fernandez P, Taubert S, Amati B. Binding of c-Myc to chromatin mediates mitogen-induced acetylation of histone H4 and gene activation. Genes Dev. 2001;15(16):2069–82. pmid:11511539; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC312758.