Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The Early-Acting Peroxin PEX19 Is Redundantly Encoded, Farnesylated, and Essential for Viability in Arabidopsis thaliana

  • Margaret M. McDonnell,

    Current address: Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

    Affiliation Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Sarah E. Burkhart,

    Current address: Arizona Department of Public Safety, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America

    Affiliation Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Jerrad M. Stoddard,

    Current address: Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

    Affiliation Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Zachary J. Wright,

    Affiliation Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Lucia C. Strader,

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Washington University at St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America

  • Bonnie Bartel

    Affiliation Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America


Peroxisomes are single-membrane bound organelles that are essential for normal development in plants and animals. In mammals and yeast, the peroxin (PEX) proteins PEX3 and PEX19 facilitate the early steps of peroxisome membrane protein (PMP) insertion and pre-peroxisome budding from the endoplasmic reticulum. The PEX3 membrane protein acts as a docking site for PEX19, a cytosolic chaperone for PMPs that delivers PMPs to the endoplasmic reticulum or peroxisomal membrane. PEX19 is farnesylated in yeast and mammals, and we used immunoblotting with prenylation mutants to show that PEX19 also is fully farnesylated in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana plants. We examined insertional alleles disrupting either of the two Arabidopsis PEX19 isoforms, PEX19A or PEX19B, and detected similar levels of PEX19 protein in the pex19a-1 mutant and wild type; however, PEX19 protein was nearly undetectable in the pex19b-1 mutant. Despite the reduction in PEX19 levels in pex19b-1, both pex19a-1 and pex19b-1 single mutants lacked notable peroxisomal β-oxidation defects and displayed normal levels and localization of peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins. The pex19a-1 pex19b-1 double mutant was embryo lethal, indicating a redundantly encoded critical role for PEX19 during embryogenesis. Expressing YFP-tagged versions of either PEX19 isoform rescued this lethality, confirming that PEX19A and PEX19B act redundantly in Arabidopsis. We observed that pex19b-1 enhanced peroxisome-related defects of a subset of peroxin-defective mutants, supporting a role for PEX19 in peroxisome function. Together, our data indicate that Arabidopsis PEX19 promotes peroxisome function and is essential for viability.


Peroxisomes are eukaryotic organelles that house critical oxidative reactions and sequester harmful reactive oxygen species to prevent damage to other cellular compartments. Peroxisomal enzymes participate in diverse metabolic processes, including photorespiration and fatty acid β-oxidization (reviewed in [1]). Additionally, peroxisomal enzymes convert the auxin precursor indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) to the active auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) by β-oxidization [26]; IAA derived from IBA contributes to seedling cell expansion [5, 7] and lateral root production [5, 8, 9]. Dysfunctional plant peroxisomes can cause a variety of physiological defects, including reduced germination, stunted growth, poor fertility, and lethality (reviewed in [1, 10]). Defects in human peroxisomes underlie congenital peroxisome biogenesis disorders that result in a spectrum of dysfunctions that often are fatal (reviewed in [11]).

Peroxin (PEX) proteins function in de novo peroxisome biogenesis, division, and matrix protein import. Peroxisome matrix proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and usually are targeted to the peroxisome by a carboxyl-terminal three-amino acid peroxisome-targeting signal 1 (PTS1), which is recognized by the cytosolic PTS1 receptor, PEX5 [12]. A less common targeting mechanism uses an N-terminal nine-amino acid PTS2, which is recognized by the cytosolic PTS2 receptor, PEX7 [13, 14]. Cargo-bound PEX5 and PEX7 associate with the docking proteins, PEX13 and PEX14, residing in the peroxisome membrane (reviewed in [15]). PEX5 forms part of a transient pore that facilitates cargo entry into the peroxisome [16], after which PEX5 is recycled with the assistance of PEX4, a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, and the ubiquitin-protein ligases PEX2, PEX10, and PEX12 (reviewed in [15]). Ubiquitinated PEX5 is retrotranslocated out of the peroxisome by the PEX1 and PEX6 ATPases [15], deubiquitinated, and released into the cytosol to be used for additional import. Inefficiently retrotranslocated PEX5 can be poly-ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome [15].

Peroxisomes can multiply by fission of pre-existing peroxisomes and by budding from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; reviewed in [1]). Three peroxins, PEX19, PEX3, and PEX16 are implicated in de novo biogenesis of peroxisomes (reviewed in [17]). In mammals and plants, PEX16 resides in the ER membrane and recruits PEX3 [18, 19], which in turn docks PEX19 [20]. Some organisms, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, lack PEX16 and PEX3 appears to target to the ER directly (reviewed in [21]). Budding of pre-peroxisomes from the ER and PMP insertion require PEX3 and PEX19 in yeast [22]; pex3 and pex19 mutants appear to lack peroxisomes [23, 24]. PEX19 acts as a chaperone for peroxisome membrane proteins (PMPs), binding PMPs near their transmembrane domains [25] and allowing transfer to PEX3 and insertion in the membrane [26, 27]. PEX19 promotes PMP targeting to peroxisomes in human fibroblasts [28]; nuclear localization of PEX19 results in mislocalization of PMPs to the nucleus [29].

The PEX19 C-terminus is farnesylated in yeast [23] and mammals [30]; this post-translational modification increases the strength of PEX19-PMP interactions [31, 32], suggesting that the farnesyl moiety might assist peroxisome biogenesis. Although farnesylation can promote membrane association of some proteins (reviewed in [33]), PEX19 is cytosolic in yeast [34], humans [29], and plants [35].

Although plants have homologs of the three early-acting peroxins [36], neither pex3 nor pex19 mutants has emerged from forward-genetic screens for mutants with defective peroxisome (reviewed in [10]), perhaps because PEX3 and PEX19 each have two isoforms in Arabidopsis. However, Arabidopsis RNAi lines targeting PEX3, PEX16, or PEX19 have enlarged peroxisomes that display reduced matrix protein import [37], confirming a role in plant peroxisome biology for the early-acting peroxin homologs. Moreover, Arabidopsis PEX19 binds to PEX10 [35] and PXA1 [38] in vitro, consistent with a PMP chaperone function. In this work, we explore the roles of PEX19 in Arabidopsis and reveal that Arabidopsis PEX19 is redundantly encoded, farnesylated, and essential for embryogenesis.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Arabidopsis thaliana accession Columbia (Col-0) was used as wild type. pex19a-1 (SALK_020100), pex19b-1 (SAIL_76_C06), ggb-3 (SALK_015072), and plp-4 (GABI-KAT 386C07) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (Ohio State University). era1-2 [39], pex2-1 [40], pex7-2 [41], pex10-2 [40], pex13-4 [42], and pex14-2 [43] were previously described. Mutations were followed in segregating populations by using PCR-based genotyping (S1 Table) and antibiotic resistance.

Seeds were surface-sterilized with 30% (v/v) commercial bleach, 0.01% (v/v) Triton X-100 and stratified for 1–3 days at 4°C in 0.1% agar. For experiments that included era1-2, 10 μM gibberellin (GA3) was included in the stratification medium for all lines. Stratified seeds were plated on plant nutrient (PN) medium [44] or on PN supplemented with 0.5% sucrose (PNS), with or without IBA. IBA was dissolved in ethanol at 100 mM and control media were normalized to the same ethanol content. Seedlings transferred from plates to soil were grown at 22°C under continuous illumination.

For assays of light-grown seedlings, seeds were stratified for 1–3 days and plated on the indicated media. After 8 days of growth at 22°C under continuous light filtered through yellow long-pass filters, which slow the breakdown of indolic compounds [45], seedling roots were measured. For assays of dark-grown seedlings, seeds were stratified for 1–2 days, plated on the indicated media, placed under yellow light for one day, and then placed in darkness for 4 days. Hypocotyls of germinated seedlings were measured following the 4-day dark period.

Statistical analysis

One-way ANOVA analysis followed by Duncan’s test was performed using the SPSS Statistics software program (version For each treatment condition (e.g., no sucrose, IBA), mean root or hypocotyl lengths that were not significantly (P < 0.001) different from each other are designated with the same letter above the bar.

PEX19 fusion protein expression

The PEX19A (G66139) and PEX19B (G13403) cDNAs were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (Ohio State University) and recombined into the pEG104 (N-terminal YFP tag, driven by the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter) and pEG201 (N-terminal HA tag, driven by the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter) vectors [46] using LR Clonase (Invitrogen) to form 35S:YFP-PEX19A, 35S:YFP-PEX19B, 35S:HA-PEX19A, and 35S:HA-PEX19B. Plasmids were electroporated into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 (pMP90) [47] and used to transform wild-type Col-0 using the floral dip method [48]; transformants were selected on 7.5 μg/mL glufosinate ammonium (Basta). Homozygous lines were obtained from the progeny of transformants by following Basta resistance in subsequent generations.

To obtain pex19a-1 pex19b-1 35S:YFP-PEX19A and pex19a-1 pex19b-1 35S:YFP-PEX19B, we crossed a PEX19A/pex19a-1 pex19b-1/pex19b-1 plant to Col-0 transformed with 35S:YFP-PEX19A or 35S:YFP-PEX19B. Lines homozygous for both pex19 mutations and the YFP transgene were isolated using PCR-based genotyping and confirmed using resistance to kanamycin (conferred by the pex19a-1 T-DNA), YFP fluorescence, and immunoblotting.

Immunoblot analysis

Protein was extracted by grinding frozen tissue and adding two volumes of 2x sample buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Samples were centrifuged, and a 15 μL aliquot of supernatant was transferred to a new tube with 1.6 μL of 0.5 M dithiothreitol and heated at 100°C for 5 minutes. Samples were loaded in 10% or 12% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen) next to prestained protein markers (P7708S, New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) and Cruz Markers (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). After electrophoresis using NuPAGE MOPS-SDS running buffer (Invitrogen), proteins were transferred for 45 minutes at 24 V to a Hybond ECL nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) using NuPAGE transfer buffer (Invitrogen). After transfer, membranes were rocked for 1 hour at 4°C in blocking buffer (8% non-fat dry milk [w/v], 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer: 1:1,000 rabbit α-APX3 [49, 50], 1:100 rabbit α-GFP (Clontech 632376), 1:100 rabbit α-PEX5 [51], 1:800 rabbit α-PEX7 [41], 1:500 rabbit α-PEX10 [40], 1:10,000 rabbit α-PEX14 (Agrisera AS08 372), 1:500 or 1:2000 rabbit α-PEX19 (generated and affinity purified by Proteintech Group using a recombinant protein that included the full amino acid sequence of PEX19B), 1:2,000 rabbit α-PMDH2 [52], 1:5,000 rabbit α-thiolase [53], 1:50,000 or 1:100,000 mouse α-HSC70 (StressGen Bioreagents SPA-817), or 1:2,000 mouse α-mito ATP synthase (MitoScience MS507). Membranes were rinsed twice with blocking buffer followed by a 4–5 hour incubation with horseradish peroxidase-linked goat α-rabbit or α-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1:5,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, SC2030 or SC2031). After rinsing in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20, horseradish peroxidase activity was visualized using WesternBright ECL reagent (Advansta, Menlo Park, CA) and exposure to autoradiography film. Membranes were reblocked with blocking buffer and sequentially probed with additional indicated antibodies.

Confocal microscopy

The import of PTS2 proteins was observed using plants expressing 35S:PTS2-GFP, which encodes a GFP extended with the N-terminal 49 amino acid residues from the PED1 isoform of thiolase [54]. Fluorescence in plants expressing 35S:YFP-PEX19A and 35S:YFP-PEX19B were compared to plants expressing 35S:YFP-ECH2, which marks the peroxisome matrix [5], 35S:ER-YFP-HDEL (ER-yk), which marks the ER lumen [55], and 35S:YFP [46], which marks the cytoplasm. For confocal imaging, cotyledons from 5-day-old light-grown seedlings were mounted in water under a cover slip. Images of epidermal cells were collected using a Carl Zeiss LSM 710 laser scanning confocal microscope equipped with a Meta detector. GFP samples imaged through a 40x oil immersion objective were excited with a 488-nm argon laser; emission was collected between 494 and 560 nm. Each image averaged 8 exposures using a 23-μm pinhole corresponding to a 0.7 μm optical slice. YFP samples imaged through a 63x oil immersion objective were excited with a 488-nm argon laser; emission was collected between 493 and 555 nm. Each image averaged 4 exposures using a 44.8-μm pinhole corresponding to a 0.8 μm optical slice.


Fractionation of seedling extracts into organellar and cytosolic fractions was modified from Burkhart et al., 2014. Seeds (1 mg) were plated on PNS medium and incubated under white light for 5 days. Seedlings were minced with scissors in 1 mL ice-cold fractionation buffer [150 mM Tris pH 7.6, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 100 mM sucrose, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NEM, 1x plant protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma P9599)]. Minced samples were transferred to a 1 mL Dounce homogenizer, homogenized for 20 strokes, and filtered through Miracloth (Millipore). Samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 640 rpm at 4°C to pellet unlysed cells, giving the homogenate fraction. Homogenate (200 μL) was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4°C, giving the supernatant fraction. The pellet was washed once with 200 μL fractionation buffer and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4°C, giving the wash fraction. The pellet was resuspended in fractionation buffer equal to the homogenate volume, giving the pellet fraction. Following fractionation, an aliquot of each fraction was added to equal volume of NuPAGE 2x sample buffer (Invitrogen), and 15 μL of each sample was processed for immunoblotting.


PEX19 is encoded by two genes in Arabidopsis

There are two isoforms of PEX19 in Arabidopsis thaliana [35] and closely related plants (Fig 1A). Although PEX19 duplications appear to have occurred more than once in the plant lineage, some plants carry only a single PEX19 gene (Fig 1B). The two Arabidopsis PEX19 genes were initially named AtPEX19-1 (At3g03490) and AtPEX19-2 (At5g17550) [35]. For clarity in describing mutant alleles, in this work we refer to AtPEX19-1 as PEX19A and AtPEX19-2 as PEX19B. PEX19A and PEX19B are 84% identical at the amino acid level (Fig 1A) and are encoded by mRNAs that are 79% identical at the nucleotide level. To characterize the in vivo roles of the two PEX19 isoforms, we obtained two T-DNA alleles, one containing an insert in the third exon of PEX19A (SALK_020100), which we named pex19a-1 (Fig 1C), and one containing an insert in the first intron of PEX19B (SAIL_76_C06), which we named pex19b-1 (Fig 1C).

Fig 1. PEX19 is encoded by two genes in Arabidopsis.

(A) Alignment of PEX19A and PEX19B from various plants (green) with the zebra fish (Danio rerio) and human (Homo sapiens) homologs (red), highlighting the carboxyl-terminal CaaM farnesylation motif (purple) and the domains implicated in PEX3 (brown) and PMP (blue) binding in human PEX19 [5658]. Sequences were aligned using MegAlign program (DNAStar) and the Clustal W method. Residues identical in at least seven sequences are boxed in black, chemically similar residues are boxed in gray. The sites of the T-DNA insertions in the pex19a-1 and pex19b-1 are indicated by triangles above the sequences. (B) Phylogenetic tree showing relationships of proteins in panel A generated by the MegAlign program. The Arabidopsis PEX19A and PEX19B duplication is found in closely related plants, such as Arabidopsis lyrata and Capsella rubella, but not in more distantly related plants, such as Medicago or Brachypodium. (C) PEX19A and PEX19B gene diagrams showing T-DNA insertion sites with triangles, introns as lines, and exons as boxes.

Arabidopsis PEX19 is farnesylated

PEX19 is farnesylated in yeast and mammals [30, 32]. Farnesylation is a post-translational modification in which a 15-carbon hydrophobic moiety is attached to the Cys (C) residue in the carboxyl-terminal CaaX motif, where “a” is an aliphatic residue and “X” is Ser, Met, Ala, Gln, or Cys (reviewed in [33, 59]; Fig 2A). Similarly, geranylgeranylation attaches a 20-carbon hydrophobic moiety to the Cys residue of a carboxyl-terminal CaaL (Fig 2B). Both prenylation variants can facilitate protein-membrane or protein-protein interactions [33]. The conservation of a PEX19 farnesylation motif (CaaM) across several distantly related organisms (Fig 1A) suggests that this sequence is important for PEX19 function.

Fig 2. Arabidopsis PEX19 is farnesylated.

(A) Proteins with a C-terminal CaaX motif (Cys-aliphatic-aliphatic-X; where X can be Ser, Met, Ala, Asn, or Cys) can be farnesylated by a protein farnesyl-transferase complex composed of PLP and ERA1, cleaved of the three carboxyl-terminal residues, and methylated (me) on the carboxyl group of the prenylated Cys residue [59]. (B) Proteins with a C-terminal a CaaL motif (Cys-aliphatic-aliphatic-Leu) can be geranylgeranylated by protein geranylgeranyl-transferase complex composed of PLP and GGB [59]. (C) PEX19 is farnesylated in vivo. Protein from 8-day-old light-grown seedlings was separated using 12% PAGE and processed for immunoblotting with antibodies recognizing PEX19 and HSC70 (loading control). The positions of the molecular mass markers (in kDa) are indicted at the right. The positions of unfarnesylated (u) and farnesylated (f) PEX19 are indicated at the left. An asterisk marks a protein that cross-reacts with the PEX19 antibody. (D) HA-PEX19 expression decreases farnesylation of endogenous PEX19. Protein extracted from 4-day-old light-grown seedlings was separated using 12% PAGE and processed for immunoblotting with antibodies recognizing PEX19 (top panel), the HA epitope (middle panel), and HSC70 (bottom panel; loading control). The positions of the molecular mass markers (in kDa) are indicted at the left. The positions of unfarnesylated (u), farnesylated (f), and HA-tagged PEX19 are indicated at the right. An asterisk marks a protein that cross-reacts with the PEX19 antibody.

To determine if PEX19 is farnesylated in Arabidopsis, we generated an antibody to PEX19B and used immunoblotting to examine protein extracts prepared from three prenylation-defective mutants. We assayed a mutant (era1-2) with a fast-neutron induced deletion of the ENHANCED RESPONSE TO ABSCISIC ACID gene, which encodes the β-subunit of protein farnesyltransferase (Fig 2A) [39], a mutant (ggb-3) carrying a T-DNA insertion in the GERANYLGERANYLTRANSFERASE BETA (GGB) gene, which encodes the β-subunit of protein geranylgeranyltransferase (Fig 2B) [60], and a mutant (plp-4) disrupted in both types of prenylation because of a T-DNA insertion in the PLURIPETALA gene, which encodes the common α-subunit of both prenylation enzymes (Fig 2A and 2B) [61]. The anti-PEX19 antibody detected an approximately 30-kDa protein in wild-type seedling extracts that migrated more slowly in the plp-4 mutant (Fig 2C), implying that PEX19 is fully prenylated in wild type and that prenylation increases the electrophoretic mobility of the PEX19 protein. We also observed the more slowly migrating form of PEX19 in the era1-2 mutant, implying that PEX19 is largely farnesylated in wild-type Arabidopsis (Fig 2C). In contrast, PEX19 migration resembled wild type in ggb-3 (Fig 2C), indicating that Arabidopsis PEX19 is not appreciably geranylgeranylated. We concluded that Arabidopsis PEX19 is farnesylated in vivo through the action of ERA1 and PLP.

To determine whether our PEX19B antibody also detected PEX19A, we expressed N-terminally HA-tagged PEX19A or PEX19B from the 35S cauliflower mosaic virus promoter. Both lines expressed PEX19 protein that was detected by an anti-HA antibody and by our anti-PEX19B antibody (Fig 2D), indicating that our antibody detected both PEX19A and PEX19B. The anti-HA antibody revealed that the 35S:HA-PEX19A line accumulated more HA-PEX19 than did the 35S:HA-PEX19B line (Fig 2D). The apparently similar HA-PEX19 levels in the two lines detected by our anti-PEX19B antibody (Fig 2D) indicate that our antibody detects PEX19B more effectively than PEX19A. Interestingly, expression of HA-PEX19A or HA-PEX19B appeared to reduce farnesylation of native PEX19, as bands migrating with the mobility of both unfarnesylated and farnesylated PEX19 were detected in the 35S:HA-PEX19 lines (Fig 2D). This finding implies that the farnesylation machinery can be overwhelmed by PEX19 overexpression.

An insertional allele disrupting PEX19B accumulates reduced levels of PEX19 protein

To examine the functions of Arabidopsis PEX19, we isolated mutants carrying disrupted PEX19A or PEX19B alleles (Fig 1C) from publically available T-DNA insertion collections [62]. We found that PEX19 levels were dramatically reduced in 8-day-old seedlings of the pex19b-1 mutant (Fig 2C), which has a T-DNA inserted in the first intron of PEX19B (Fig 1C). In contrast, the pex19a-1 mutant, which has a T-DNA in the third exon of PEX19A (Fig 1C), appeared to accumulate normal levels of PEX19 protein (Fig 2C). This analysis suggested that PEX19B is more abundant in seedlings than PEX19A.

To determine where PEX19A and PEX19B proteins accumulated, we compared PEX19 levels in various tissues from pex19a-1 to detect PEX19B and tissues from pex19b-1 to detect PEX19A. We examined PEX19 levels in roots and shoots from 8-day-old seedlings and from rosette leaves, cauline leaves, flowers, and green siliques from 31-day-old plants. In wild-type plants, PEX19 protein was detected in all examined tissues except mature rosette leaves, with highest accumulation in seedling shoots (Fig 3). PEX19 protein accumulation resembled wild type in the pex19a-1 mutant (Fig 3). In pex19b-1, we only detected PEX19 protein in seedlings aerial tissues, suggesting that PEX19B is the predominant isoform in many tissues but that PEX19A may function along with PEX19B in seedling aerial tissues. However, because our antibody detects PEX19A less effectively than PEX19B (Fig 2D), we cannot rule out the possibility that PEX19A is present in tissues in addition to seedling shoots. We compared PEX19 protein accumulation patterns to peroxisomal malate dehydrogenase (PMDH) and found that PMDH accumulated more uniformly than PEX19 in various aerial tissues (Fig 3). The relatively higher PEX19 to PMDH ratio in seedlings versus mature leaves (Fig 3) suggests that PEX19, and perhaps peroxisome biogenesis, might be more important in rapidly growing leaves than in mature leaves.

Fig 3. The pex19b-1 mutant lacks detectable PEX19 protein in various tissues.

8-day-old wild-type, pex19a-1, and pex19b-1 seedlings were separated into roots and aerial tissues (shoots); other tissues were collected from 31-day-old plants: rosette leaf (beginning to senesce), oldest cauline leaf, open flowers, and green siliques (third elongated silique from the apex). Extracts were separated using 10% PAGE and processed for immunoblotting with antibodies recognizing PEX19, PMDH, and HSC70. The positions of the molecular mass markers (in kDa) are indicted at the right. An asterisk marks a protein that cross-reacts with the PEX19 antibody.

pex19 single mutants lack marked peroxisome-associated defects

Plant peroxisomes house enzymes catalyzing β-oxidation of fatty acids (reviewed in [63]) and conversion of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) to the active auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) [26]. Consequently, peroxisome-defective mutants often display growth defects that are ameliorated by provision of sucrose and resistance to the inhibitory effects of IBA on root or hypocotyl elongation [2, 40, 43, 51, 54, 64, 65]. For example, pex7-2 [41] displays IBA-resistant root elongation in the light (Fig 4A) and IBA-resistant hypocotyl elongation in the dark (Fig 4B). Unlike typical pex mutants, we found that the pex19a-1 and pex19b-1 mutants grew normally in the absence of sucrose (Fig 4B) and responded to IBA similarly to wild type (Fig 4A and 4B). Moreover, the 35:HA-PEX19A and 35S:HA-PEX19B lines also resembled wild type in these assays (Fig 4A and 4B), confirming that seedling peroxisome function is not highly sensitive to PEX19 dosage. In addition, we found that the prenylation mutants era1-2, ggb-3, and plp-4 were sucrose independent and IBA sensitive (Fig 4A and 4B), indicating that prenylation in general and PEX19 farnesylation in particular are not required for efficient seedling peroxisome function.

Fig 4. PEX19 farnesylation is not required to maintain peroxisome function.

(A) Light-grown pex19a-1, pex19b-1, and seedlings expressing HA-PEX19 display wild-type IBA sensitivity. The era1-2, ggb-3, and plp-4 prenylation mutants also are IBA sensitive. pex7-2 is an IBA-resistant control. Error bars show standard deviations of mean 8-day-old root lengths (n ≥ 7). Different letters above bars indicate significantly different means (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.001). (B) Dark-grown pex19a-1, pex19b-1, and seedlings expressing HA-PEX19 display wild-type IBA sensitivity and sucrose independence. The prenylation mutants are also IBA sensitive and sucrose independent. pex7-2 is an IBA-resistant control. Error bars show standard deviations of mean 5-day-old hypocotyl lengths (n ≥ 8). Different letters above bars indicate significantly different means (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.001). (C) pex19a-1, pex19b-1, prenylation mutants, and seedlings expressing HA-PEX19 display wild-type levels of several PMPs. Protein extracted from 4-day-old light-grown seedlings was separated using 10% PAGE and processed for immunoblotting. The membrane was serially probed with antibodies recognizing the indicated proteins. (D) pex19a-1, pex19b-1, prenylation mutants, and wild-type seedlings expressing HA-PEX19 fully process the PTS2 region of PMDH. Protein from 8-day-old light-grown seedlings was separated using 10% PAGE and processed for immunoblotting with antibodies recognizing PMDH or HSC70 (loading control). The positions of the molecular mass markers (in kDa) are indicted at the left. PMDH is synthesized as a precursor (p) with a cleavable PTS2 signal that is processed into the mature (m) protein in the peroxisome; this processing is impaired in the pex7-2 mutant. (E) The pex19b-1 mutant displays normal import of peroxisomally-targeted GFP. GFP fluorescence of cotyledon epidermal cells from 5-day-old light-grown seedlings carrying the 35S:PTS2-GFP construct was imaged using confocal microscopy.

We indirectly examined peroxisomal matrix protein import using the PTS2 protein PMDH to determine if the pex19a-1 or pex19b-1 displayed compromised PTS2-protein processing. The N-terminal PTS2-containing region is cleaved inside the peroxisome matrix following import, resulting in a molecular mass shift that can be detected by immunoblotting. The pex7-2 mutant displays a clear PTS2-processing defect [41] (Fig 4D) whereas pex19a-1, pex19b-1, the prenylation mutants, and the 35:HA-PEX19 lines all appeared to process PMDH similarly to wild type in seedlings (Fig 4D), where PEX19 is particularly abundant (Fig 3). Moreover, PMDH processing resembled wild type in various tissues and growth stages of the pex19 mutants (Fig 3), suggesting efficient import of matrix proteins in the pex19 mutants at additional developmental time points.

We used confocal microscopy to directly examine PTS2 protein import in pex19b-1. Wild-type seedlings expressing 35S:PTS2-GFP [54] displayed the expected punctate pattern, indicating efficient matrix protein import, whereas pex7-2 displayed extensive cytosolic fluorescence [41] (Fig 4E). In pex19b-1, PTS2-GFP fluorescence resembled wild type (Fig 4E), again indicating successful import of PTS2-targeted proteins in this mutant.

PEX19 is implicated in inserting PMPs into membranes, and yeast pex19 mutants display reduced PMP levels [34]. Therefore, we examined levels of three PMPs, peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase (APX3) and the membrane peroxins PEX10 and PEX14 in pex19 mutants. We found that the levels of these PMPs were similar to wild type in pex19a-1, pex19b-1, the prenylation mutants, and the 35:HA-PEX19 lines (Fig 4C), suggesting that altering PEX19 levels or prenylation did not dramatically alter PMP stability in Arabidopsis.

Because PMP levels were not altered in pex19 mutants, we examined whether membrane associations of PMPs were altered by using centrifugation to fractionate wild-type and mutant seedling extracts. We found PEX14 and APX3 in the pellet fraction in wild type, pex19a-1, and pex19b-1 (Fig 5), suggesting that these PMPs remain membrane-associated despite the low PEX19 protein levels in the pex19b-1 mutant. In addition, we detected PEX19 in the soluble fraction in wild-type and pex19a-1 seedlings (Fig 5), confirming previous reports that PEX19 is cytosolic in Arabidopsis [35] as it is in yeast [34] and mammals [29]. Moreover, the peroxisomal matrix protein receptor, PEX5, was distributed similarly between the soluble and pellet fraction of wild type, pex19a-1, and pex19b-1 (Fig 5), suggesting that PEX5 localized normally in pex19a-1 and pex19b-1.

Fig 5. PEX19 is a soluble protein, and PMPs remain membrane-associated in pex19 mutants.

Homogenates (H) from 5-day-old light-grown seedlings were fractionated using centrifugation to give a supernatant (S) containing soluble proteins, a wash (W) fraction, and a pellet (P) containing membrane-associated proteins. Fractions were separated using 10% PAGE and processed for immunoblotting with antibodies recognizing the indicated proteins. The positions of the molecular mass markers (in kDa) are indicted at the right. Antibodies recognizing HSC70 (a cytosolic protein) and mitochondrial ATP synthase (a membrane protein) were used to monitor fractionation.

PEX19 is essential for embryogenesis

Because we did not detect peroxisome-defective phenotypes in either pex19 single mutant, we explored whether PEX19A and PEX19B act redundantly by attempting to isolate a pex19a-1 pex19b-1 double mutant. Although PEX19A and PEX19B are on different chromosomes, we failed to recover homozygous pex19a-1 pex19b-1 double mutants from more than 100 F2 seedlings from a cross of pex19a-1 to pex19b-1. Therefore, we plated seeds from three PEX19A/pex19a-1 pex19b-1/pex19b-1 plants and genotyped PEX19A in 50 individual seedlings. A homozygous pex19a-1/pex19a-1 pex19b-1/pex19b-1 double mutant was not isolated. The genotype ratios were consistent with the hypothesis that the pex19a-1 pex19b-1 double mutant is embryo lethal (Table 1).

To enable rescue of the pex19a-1 pex19b-1 lethality, we transformed wild-type plants with constructs expressing N-terminally YFP-tagged PEX19A or PEX19B from the CaMV 35S promoter (35S:YFP-PEX19A and 35S:YFP-PEX19B). We found that both YFP-PEX19 proteins were localized similarly in a pattern that was neither punctate as exhibited by the YFP-ECH2 peroxisomal matrix protein [5] (Fig 6A) nor reticulated as exhibited by a marker of the ER lumen [55] (Fig 6B). Instead, YFP-PEX19A (Fig 6D; S1 Fig) and YFP-PEX19B (Fig 6E; S1 Fig) fluorescence resembled that of untagged cytosolic YFP (Fig 6C), again suggesting that Arabidopsis PEX19 is predominantly cytosolic, as previously reported [35] and consistent with the fractionation of PEX19 with soluble proteins (Fig 5).

Fig 6. YFP-PEX19 is cytosolic and rescues the embryo lethality of the pex19a-1 pex19b-1 double mutant.

(A-E) YFP-PEX19 is mostly cytosolic. Cotyledon epidermal cells from 5-day-old light-grown seedlings carrying various YFP-tagged constructs were imaged using confocal microscopy. YFP directed to the peroxisome (YFP-ECH2) displays punctate fluorescence (A) and ER-directed YFP (ER-YFP-HDEL) displays reticulated fluorescence (B). YFP-PEX19A (D) and YFP-PEX19B (E) fluorescence patterns are neither punctate nor reticulated but resemble untagged YFP fluorescence (C), suggesting cytosolic localization. Each pair of images captures the same cells imaged through the middle (left column) or subcortical region (right column) of the cells. See S1 Fig for corresponding bright-field images. (F) Seedlings relying on YFP-PEX19A or YFP-PEX19B as the sole source of PEX19 respond to IBA similarly to wild-type seedlings. Error bars show standard deviations of mean 8-day-old light-grown root lengths (n ≥ 9). (G) Expression of YFP-PEX19B confers slight PTS2-processing defects. Protein extracted from 8-day-old light-grown seedlings was separated in triplicate using 10% PAGE and processed for immunoblotting with antibodies recognizing PEX19 or GFP (to detect YFP-PEX19; top and middle panels) and PMDH (bottom panels). Membranes were subsequently probed with α-HSC70 (loading control). The positions of the molecular mass markers (in kDa) are indicted at the left. PMDH is synthesized as a precursor (p) with a cleavable PTS2 signal that is processed into the mature (m) protein in the peroxisome.

To determine if the embryo lethality observed in the pex19a-1 pex19b-1 double mutant was due to the loss of PEX19 function rather than unrelated mutations in these lines, we crossed wild type carrying the 35S:YFP-PEX19A or 35S:YFP-PEX19B construct to plants heterozygous for pex19a-1 and homozygous for pex19b-1 and sought plants homozygous for pex19a-1, pex19b-1, and the reporter transgene in the progeny from the cross. We obtained such lines, indicating that the lethality of pex19a-1 pex19b-1 double mutant was restored by either YFP-PEX19A or YFP-PEX19B. Because these lines were viable, we assessed peroxisome function in the rescue lines. Both wild type and the pex19a-1 pex19b-1 double mutant expressing YFP-PEX19A or YFP-PEX19B responded to IBA similarly to wild type (Fig 6F). However, we did observe a slight impairment in processing of PMDH in lines expressing YFP-PEX19B (Fig 6G), suggesting that expressing YFP-tagged PEX19 (unlike HA-tagged PEX19; Fig 4D) was slightly detrimental to peroxisome function. We concluded that the lethality of the pex19a-1 pex19b-1 double mutant (Table 1) was indeed caused by loss of PEX19 function and that both PEX19 isoforms encode functional PEX19.

pex19b-1 alters the physiological and molecular defects of pex mutants defective in docking complex peroxins

To examine genetic interactions of PEX19 with other peroxins, we crossed pex19b-1 to four mutants defective in various membrane peroxins: the docking complex peroxins (PEX13 and PEX14) and two RING-finger complex peroxins (PEX2 and PEX10). pex13-4 is a partial loss-of-function missense allele altering the C-terminal domain of PEX13 [42], and pex14-2 is a null allele disrupted by a T-DNA in the first exon of PEX14 [43]. Both pex13-4 and pex14-2 exhibit sucrose dependence, IBA resistance, and PTS2-processing defects that reflect matrix protein import defects [42, 43]. pex10-2 is a partial loss-of-function splicing allele that confers IBA resistance and PTS2 processing defects, and pex2-1 is a partial loss-of-function missense allele with minor physiological defects but notable PTS2 processing defects [40]. We found that pex19b-1 enhanced the PMDH and thiolase processing defects of pex13-4 (Fig 7C) without significantly altering the severe physiological defects of this mutant (Fig 7A and 7B). In addition, pex19b-1 worsened the sucrose dependence of pex14-2 (Fig 7B) without notably altering PTS2-processing defects (Fig 7C). In contrast, pex19b-1 did not significantly worsen the IBA responsiveness, sucrose dependence, or PTS2-processing defects of pex2-1 or pex10-2 (Fig 7).

Fig 7. Reduced PEX19 function modulates defects of other peroxin mutants.

(A) pex19b-1 does not markedly alter the IBA responsiveness of pex13-4, pex14-2, pex2-1, or pex10-2. Error bars show standard deviations of mean 8-day-old light-grown root lengths of germinated seedlings (n ≥ 7). Different letters above bars indicate significantly different means (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.001). (B) pex19b-1 exacerbates the sucrose dependence of dark-grown pex14-2 seedlings. Error bars show standard deviations of mean 5-day-old hypocotyl lengths of germinated seedlings (n ≥ 5). No pex13-4 or pex19b-1 pex13-4 seeds germinated on medium lacking sucrose (n = 15). Different letters above bars indicate significantly different means (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.001). (C) pex19b-1 worsens the PTS2-processing defect of light-grown pex13-4 seedlings. Protein extracted from 8-day-old light-grown seedlings was separated using 10% PAGE and processed for immunoblotting with antibodies recognizing the indicated proteins. PMDH and thiolase are synthesized as precursors (p) with a cleavable PTS2 signals that are processed into the mature (m) proteins in the peroxisome.


PEX19 is an early-acting peroxin that binds and delivers a variety of PMPs to PEX3 for membrane insertion (reviewed in [17]). We found that Arabidopsis PEX19 accumulated most abundantly in aerial seedling tissues and was present at much reduced levels in mature rosette leaves (Fig 3), implying that PEX19 could be particularly important in early stages of plant development when peroxisomes are necessary to metabolize fatty acids and convert IBA to IAA. Despite a marked reduction in PEX19 levels in the pex19b-1 mutant (Fig 3), we found that Arabidopsis pex19a-1 and pex19b-1 single mutants displayed wild-type β-oxidation phenotypes (Fig 4A and 4B). Similarly, reducing levels of PEX19A or PEX19B via RNAi does not impart notable β-oxidation defects [37]. Moreover, we found that both pex19a-1 and pex19b-1 processed PTS2 proteins normally and displayed wild-type levels and membrane association of tested PMPs (Figs 35). Therefore, we attempted to isolate a pex19a-1 pex19b-1 double mutant, but double mutant seedlings were not recovered (Table 1). This lethality could be rescued by either YFP-PEX19A or YFP-PEX19B, indicating that the two PEX19 isoforms function redundantly and that the nearly undetectable amount of PEX19A remaining in the pex19b-1 mutant is sufficient to provide PEX19 function in our growth conditions. Like the pex19a-1 pex19b-1 double mutant, embryo lethality has been reported for null alleles of most membrane peroxins in Arabidopsis (reviewed in [1]), and PEX19 mutations in the human peroxisome deficiency disease, Zellweger Syndrome, can result in death in infancy [66, 67].

PEX19 is farnesylated in yeast [23] and mammals [30]. Although farnesylation increases the strength of PEX19-PMP interactions [31, 32], farnesylation is not strictly required for PEX19 function in yeast or mammalian cells as overexpression of PEX19 derivatives that cannot be farnesylated rescues pex19 mutant defects [68]. Using prenylation mutants, we observed that PEX19 is largely farnesylated in Arabidopsis (Fig 2). Like era1-1, the Arabidopsis farnesyltransferase β-subunit mutant, the yeast ram1 farnesyltransferase β-subunit mutant accumulates unprenylated PEX19 [32]. Interestingly, yeast ram1 mutants display reduced levels of several PMPs [32]. In contrast, the robust IBA responses of era1-2 and the plp-4 prenylation mutant (Fig 4A and 4B) and the normal levels of PMPs (Fig 4C) and PTS2 processing (Fig 4D) that we observed in these mutants suggests that farnesylation of Arabidopsis PEX19 is not essential for peroxisome biogenesis or function in our growth conditions, even when unfarnesylated PEX19 is present at wild-type levels (Fig 2C). Thus a functional role for PEX19 prenylation, which is implied by the evolutionary conservation of this modification (Fig 1A), is not revealed in our general physiological and molecular assays for peroxisome function.

Because reducing PEX19B levels did not seem to impact peroxisome function in an otherwise wild-type background, we constructed various double mutants with pex19b-1 to assess peroxisome function in sensitized backgrounds. The pex2-1 and pex10-2 partial loss-of-function mutants display relatively minor peroxisome-related defects that are dramatically enhanced in a pex2-1 pex10-2 double mutant [40]. In contrast to this enhancement, the pex19b-1 pex2-1 and pex19b-1 pex10-2 double mutant resembled the respective pex2-1 and pex10-2 single mutants in IBA resistance and sucrose independence (Fig 7), despite the documented interaction between PEX19 and PEX10 in Arabidopsis [35], yeast [69], and mammalian cells [31]. In contrast, pex19b-1 worsened the PTS2-processing defect of the pex13-4 partial loss-of-function allele and exacerbated the sucrose dependence of the pex14-2 null allele (Fig 7). This double mutant analysis is consistent with the possibility that the early steps in matrix protein import carried out by the receptor-docking peroxins PEX13 and PEX14 are more sensitive to PEX19 levels than are the PEX5-recycling steps carried out by the PEX2 and PEX10 RING-finger peroxins. Alternatively, it is possible that the more severe initial defects of the pex13 and pex14 alleles used in these experiments rendered these mutants more sensitive to reduced PEX19B levels. Future experiments with weaker pex13 [70] and pex14 [71] alleles might resolve this question.

In summary, we found that Arabidopsis PEX19 is farnesylated and essential for embryonic viability and that PEX19B encodes the predominant PEX19 isoform in Arabidopsis. The reduced PEX19 levels in the pex19b-1 mutant do not markedly impair peroxisome function in isolation but negatively impact peroxisome function in two mutants with existing defects. The mutants and reporters developed in this work will enable future examination of PEX19 function in plants.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. YFP-PEX19 is mostly cytosolic.

Cotyledon epidermal cells from 5-day-old light-grown seedlings carrying various YFP-tagged constructs were imaged using confocal microscopy. YFP directed to the peroxisome (YFP-ECH2) displays punctate fluorescence (A) and ER-directed YFP (ER-YFP-HDEL) displays reticulated fluorescence (B). YFP-PEX19A (D) and YFP-PEX19B (E) show fluorescence patterns that are neither punctate nor reticulated but that resemble untagged YFP fluorescence (C), suggesting cytosolic localization. For each construct, each row of images captures the same cells imaged through the middle (top row) or subcortical region (bottom row) of the cells. Columns show YFP fluorescence (left), bright field (middle), and merged images (right).


S1 Table. PCR-based markers used for genotyping mutant alleles.



We thank Steven Smith for the PMDH2 antibody and Richard Trelease for the APX3 antibody. We are grateful to Adrianne Stone for technical assistance in isolating YFP-PEX19 transgenic plant lines. We thank Peter McCourt for era1-2 seeds, Marta Paciorek for wild-type Col-0 transformed with pEG104 (35S:YFP), and the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center at Ohio State University for seeds and cDNA clones. We are grateful to Kim Gonzalez, Yun-Ting Kao, Mauro Rinaldi, and Pierce Young for critical comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LCS BB. Performed the experiments: MMM SEB JMS ZJW LCS BB. Analyzed the data: MMM SEB JMS ZJW LCS BB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JMS LCS. Wrote the paper: MMM BB.


  1. 1. Hu J, Baker A, Bartel B, Linka N, Mullen RT, Reumann S, et al. Plant peroxisomes: biogenesis and function. Plant Cell. 2012; 24: 2279–303. pmid:22669882
  2. 2. Zolman BK, Yoder A, Bartel B. Genetic analysis of indole-3-butyric acid responses in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals four mutant classes. Genetics. 2000; 156: 1323–37. pmid:11063705
  3. 3. Zolman BK, Nyberg M, Bartel B. IBR3, a novel peroxisomal acyl-CoA dehydrogenase-like protein required for indole-3-butyric acid response. Plant Mol Biol. 2007; 64: 59–72. pmid:17277896
  4. 4. Zolman BK, Martinez N, Millius A, Adham AR, Bartel B. Identification and characterization of Arabidopsis indole-3-butyric acid response mutants defective in novel peroxisomal enzymes. Genetics. 2008; 180: 237–51. pmid:18725356
  5. 5. Strader LC, Wheeler DL, Christensen SE, Berens JC, Cohen JD, Rampey RA, et al. Multiple facets of Arabidopsis seedling development require indole-3-butyric acid-derived auxin. Plant Cell. 2011; 23: 984–99. pmid:21406624
  6. 6. Strader LC, Bartel B. Transport and metabolism of the endogenous auxin precursor indole-3-butyric acid. Mol Plant. 2011; 4: 477–86. pmid:21357648
  7. 7. Strader LC, Culler AH, Cohen JD, Bartel B. Conversion of endogenous indole-3-butyric acid to indole-3-acetic acid drives cell expansion in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol. 2010; 153: 1577–86. pmid:20562230
  8. 8. Zolman BK, Silva ID, Bartel B. The Arabidopsis pxa1 mutant is defective in an ATP-binding cassette transporter-like protein required for peroxisomal fatty acid β-oxidation. Plant Physiol. 2001; 127: 1266–78. pmid:11706205
  9. 9. De Rybel B, Audenaert D, Xuan W, Overvoorde P, Strader LC, Kepinski S, et al. A role for the root cap in root branching revealed by the non-auxin probe naxillin. Nat Chem Biol. 2012; 8: 798–805. pmid:22885787
  10. 10. Bartel B, Burkhart SE, Fleming WA. Protein transport in and out of plant peroxisomes. In: Brocard C, Hartig A, editors. Molecular machines involved in peroxisome biogenesis and maintenance. Vienna: Springer; 2014. p. 325–45.
  11. 11. Wanders RJ, Waterham HR. Peroxisomal disorders I: biochemistry and genetics of peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Clin Genet. 2005; 67: 107–33. pmid:15679822
  12. 12. Brocard C, Kragler F, Simon MM, Schuster T, Hartig A. The Tetratricopeptide Repeat-Domain of the Pas10 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is essential for binding the Peroxisomal Targeting Signal-SKL. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994; 204: 1016–22. pmid:7980572
  13. 13. Osumi T, Tsukamoto T, Hata S, Yokota S, Miura S, Fujiki Y, et al. Amino-terminal presequence of the precursor of peroxisomal 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase is a cleavable signal peptide for peroxisomal targeting. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991; 181: 947–54. pmid:1764107
  14. 14. Swinkels BW, Gould SJ, Bodnar AG, Rachubinski RA, Subramani S. A novel, cleavable peroxisomal targeting signal at the amino-terminus of the rat 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase. EMBO J. 1991; 10: 3255–62. pmid:1680677
  15. 15. Platta HW, Hagen S, Reidick C, Erdmann R. The peroxisomal receptor dislocation pathway: to the exportomer and beyond. Biochimie. 2014; 98: 16–28. pmid:24345375
  16. 16. Meinecke M, Cizmowski C, Schliebs W, Kruger V, Beck S, Wagner R, et al. The peroxisomal importomer constitutes a large and highly dynamic pore. Nat Cell Biol. 2010; 12: 273–7. pmid:20154681
  17. 17. Theodoulou FL, Bernhardt K, Linka N, Baker A. Peroxisome membrane proteins: multiple trafficking routes and multiple functions? Biochem J. 2013; 451: 345–52. pmid:23581405
  18. 18. Kim PK, Mullen RT, Schumann U, Lippincott-Schwartz J. The origin and maintenance of mammalian peroxisomes involves a de novo PEX16-dependent pathway from the ER. J Cell Biol. 2006; 173: 521–32. pmid:16717127
  19. 19. Hua R, Gidda SK, Aranovich A, Mullen RT, Kim PK. Multiple domains in PEX16 mediate Its trafficking and recruitment of peroxisomal proteins to the ER. Traffic. 2015; 16: 832–52. pmid:25903784
  20. 20. Fang Y, Morrell JC, Jones JM, Gould SJ. PEX3 functions as a PEX19 docking factor in the import of class I peroxisomal membrane proteins. J Cell Biol. 2004; 164: 863–75. pmid:15007061
  21. 21. Kim PK, Mullen RT. PEX16: a multifaceted regulator of peroxisome biogenesis. Front Physiol. 2013; 4: 241. pmid:24027535
  22. 22. Hoepfner D, Schildknegt D, Braakman I, Philippsen P, Tabak HF. Contribution of the endoplasmic reticulum to peroxisome formation. Cell. 2005; 122: 85–95. pmid:16009135
  23. 23. Götte K, Girzalsky W, Linkert M, Baumgart E, Kammerer S, Kunau WH, et al. Pex19p, a farnesylated protein essential for peroxisome biogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 1998; 18: 616–28. pmid:9418908
  24. 24. Baerends RJ, Salomons FA, Faber KN, Kiel JA, Van der Klei IJ, Veenhuis M. Deviant Pex3p levels affect normal peroxisome formation in Hansenula polymorpha: high steady-state levels of the protein fully abolish matrix protein import. Yeast. 1997; 13: 1437–48. pmid:9434349
  25. 25. Rottensteiner H, Kramer A, Lorenzen S, Stein K, Landgraf C, Volkmer-Engert R, et al. Peroxisomal membrane proteins contain common Pex19p-binding sites that are an integral part of their targeting signals. Mol Biol Cell. 2004; 15: 3406–17. pmid:15133130
  26. 26. Chen Y, Pieuchot L, Loh RA, Yang J, Kari TM, Wong JY, et al. Hydrophobic handoff for direct delivery of peroxisome tail-anchored proteins. Nat Commun. 2014; 5: 5790. pmid:25517356
  27. 27. Yagita Y, Hiromasa T, Fujiki Y. Tail-anchored PEX26 targets peroxisomes via a PEX19-dependent and TRC40-independent class I pathway. J Cell Biol. 2013; 200: 651–66. pmid:23460677
  28. 28. Jones JM, Morrell JC, Gould SJ. PEX19 is a predominantly cytosolic chaperone and import receptor for class 1 peroxisomal membrane proteins. J Cell Biol. 2004; 164: 57–67. pmid:14709540
  29. 29. Sacksteder KA, Jones JM, South ST, Li X, Liu Y, Gould SJ. PEX19 binds multiple peroxisomal membrane proteins, is predominantly cytoplasmic, and is required for peroxisome membrane synthesis. J Cell Biol. 2000; 148: 931–44. pmid:10704444
  30. 30. Mayerhofer PU, Kattenfeld T, Roscher AA, Muntau AC. Two splice variants of human PEX19 exhibit distinct functions in peroxisomal assembly. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002; 291: 1180–6. pmid:11883941
  31. 31. Fransen M, Wylin T, Brees C, Mannaerts GP, Van Veldhoven PP. Human Pex19p binds peroxisomal integral membrane proteins at regions distinct from their sorting sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 2001; 21: 4413–24. pmid:11390669
  32. 32. Rucktäschel R, Thoms S, Sidorovitch V, Halbach A, Pechlivanis M, Volkmer R, et al. Farnesylation of Pex19p is required for its structural integrity and function in peroxisome biogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284: 20885–96. pmid:19451657
  33. 33. Crowell DN, Huizinga DH. Protein isoprenylation: the fat of the matter. Trends Plant Sci. 2009; 14: 163–70. pmid:19201644
  34. 34. Hettema EH, Girzalsky W, van Den Berg M, Erdmann R, Distel B. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pex3p and Pex19p are required for proper localization and stability of peroxisomal membrane proteins. EMBO J. 2000; 19: 223–33. pmid:10637226
  35. 35. Hadden DA, Phillipson BA, Johnston KA, Brown LA, Manfield IW, El-Shami M, et al. Arabidopsis PEX19 is a dimeric protein that binds the peroxin PEX10. Mol Membr Biol. 2006; 23: 325–36. pmid:16923726
  36. 36. Mullen RT, Flynn CR, Trelease RN. How are peroxisomes formed? The role of the endoplasmic reticulum and peroxins. Trends Plant Sci. 2001; 6: 256–61. pmid:11378467
  37. 37. Nito K, Kamigaki A, Kondo M, Hayashi M, Nishimura M. Functional classification of Arabidopsis peroxisome biogenesis factors proposed from analyses of knockdown mutants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007; 48: 763–74. pmid:17478547
  38. 38. Nyathi Y, Zhang X, Baldwin JM, Bernhardt K, Johnson B, Baldwin SA, et al. Pseudo half-molecules of the ABC transporter, COMATOSE, bind Pex19 and target to peroxisomes independently but are both required for activity. FEBS Lett. 2012; 586: 2280–6. pmid:22710125
  39. 39. Cutler S, Ghassemian M, Bonetta D, Cooney S, McCourt P. A protein farnesyl transferase involved in abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Science. 1996; 273: 1239–41. pmid:8703061
  40. 40. Burkhart SE, Kao YT, Bartel B. Peroxisomal ubiquitin-protein ligases Peroxin2 and Peroxin10 have distinct but synergistic roles in matrix protein import and Peroxin5 retrotranslocation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2014; 166: 1329–44. pmid:25214533
  41. 41. Ramón NM, Bartel B. Interdependence of the peroxisome-targeting receptors in Arabidopsis thaliana: PEX7 facilitates PEX5 accumulation and import of PTS1 cargo into peroxisomes. Mol Biol Cell. 2010; 21: 1263–71. pmid:20130089
  42. 42. Woodward AW, Fleming WA, Burkhart SE, Ratzel SE, Bjornson M, Bartel B. A viable Arabidopsis pex13 missense allele confers severe peroxisomal defects and decreases PEX5 association with peroxisomes. Plant Mol Biol. 2014; 86: 201–14. pmid:25008153
  43. 43. Monroe-Augustus M, Ramón NM, Ratzel SE, Lingard MJ, Christensen SE, Murali C, et al. Matrix proteins are inefficiently imported into Arabidopsis peroxisomes lacking the receptor-docking peroxin PEX14. Plant Mol Biol. 2011; 77: 1–15. pmid:21553312
  44. 44. Haughn GW, Somerville C. Sulfonylurea-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet. 1986; 204: 430–4.
  45. 45. Stasinopoulos TC, Hangarter RP. Preventing photochemistry in culture media by long-pass light filters alters growth of cultured tissues. Plant Physiol. 1990; 93: 1365–9. pmid:16667626
  46. 46. Earley KW, Haag JR, Pontes O, Opper K, Juehne T, Song K, et al. Gateway-compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics. Plant J. 2006; 45: 616–29. pmid:16441352
  47. 47. Koncz C, Schell J, Rédei GP. T-DNA transformation and insertion mutagenesis. In: Koncz C, Chua N-H, Schell J, editors. Methods in Arabidopsis Research. Singapore: World Scientific; 1992. p. 224–73.
  48. 48. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998; 16: 735–43. pmid:10069079
  49. 49. Corpas FJ, Bunkelmann J, Trelease RN. Identification and immunochemical characterization of a family of peroxisome membrane proteins (PMPs) in oilseed glyoxysomes. Eur J Cell Biol. 1994; 65: 280–90. pmid:7720723
  50. 50. Lisenbee CS, Heinze M, Trelease RN. Peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase resides within a subdomain of rough endoplasmic reticulum in wild-type Arabidopsis cells. Plant Physiol. 2003; 132: 870–82. pmid:12805617
  51. 51. Zolman BK, Bartel B. An Arabidopsis indole-3-butyric acid-response mutant defective in PEROXIN6, an apparent ATPase implicated in peroxisomal function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 1786–91. pmid:14745029
  52. 52. Pracharoenwattana I, Cornah JE, Smith SM. Arabidopsis peroxisomal malate dehydrogenase functions in β-oxidation but not in the glyoxylate cycle. Plant J. 2007; 50: 381–90. pmid:17376163
  53. 53. Lingard MJ, Monroe-Augustus M, Bartel B. Peroxisome-associated matrix protein degradation in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 4561–6. pmid:19246395
  54. 54. Woodward AW, Bartel B. The Arabidopsis peroxisomal targeting signal type 2 receptor PEX7 is necessary for peroxisome function and dependent on PEX5. Mol Biol Cell. 2005; 16: 573–83. pmid:15548601
  55. 55. Nelson BK, Cai X, Nebenfuhr A. A multicolored set of in vivo organelle markers for co-localization studies in Arabidopsis and other plants. Plant J. 2007; 51: 1126–36. pmid:17666025
  56. 56. Schmidt F, Treiber N, Zocher G, Bjelic S, Steinmetz MO, Kalbacher H, et al. Insights into peroxisome function from the structure of PEX3 in complex with a soluble fragment of PEX19. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285: 25410–7. pmid:20554521
  57. 57. Schueller N, Holton SJ, Fodor K, Milewski M, Konarev P, Stanley WA, et al. The peroxisomal receptor Pex19p forms a helical mPTS recognition domain. EMBO J. 2010; 29: 2491–500. pmid:20531392
  58. 58. Sato Y, Shibata H, Nakatsu T, Nakano H, Kashiwayama Y, Imanaka T, et al. Structural basis for docking of peroxisomal membrane protein carrier Pex19p onto its receptor Pex3p. EMBO J. 2010; 29: 4083–93. pmid:21102411
  59. 59. Crowell DN. Functional implications of protein isoprenylation in plants. Prog Lipid Res. 2000; 39: 393–408. pmid:11082505
  60. 60. Johnson CD, Chary SN, Chernoff EA, Zeng Q, Running MP, Crowell DN. Protein geranylgeranyltransferase I is involved in specific aspects of abscisic acid and auxin signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005; 139: 722–33. pmid:16183844
  61. 61. Running MP, Lavy M, Sternberg H, Galichet A, Gruissem W, Hake S, et al. Enlarged meristems and delayed growth in plp mutants result from lack of CaaX prenyltransferases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 7815–20. pmid:15128936
  62. 62. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, Shinn P, et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003; 301: 653–7. pmid:12893945
  63. 63. Baker A, Graham IA, Holdsworth M, Smith SM, Theodoulou FL. Chewing the fat: β-oxidation in signalling and development. Trends Plant Sci. 2006; 11: 124–32. pmid:16490379
  64. 64. Zolman BK, Monroe-Augustus M, Silva ID, Bartel B. Identification and functional characterization of Arabidopsis PEROXIN4 and the interacting protein PEROXIN22. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 3422–35. pmid:16272432
  65. 65. Khan BR, Zolman BK. pex5 mutants that differentially disrupt PTS1 and PTS2 peroxisomal matrix protein import in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010; 154: 1602–15. pmid:20974890
  66. 66. Matsuzono Y, Kinoshita N, Tamura S, Shimozawa N, Hamasaki M, Ghaedi K, et al. Human PEX19: cDNA cloning by functional complementation, mutation analysis in a patient with Zellweger syndrome, and potential role in peroxisomal membrane assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 2116–21. pmid:10051604
  67. 67. Mohamed S, El-Meleagy E, Nasr A, Ebberink MS, Wanders RJ, Waterham HR. A mutation in PEX19 causes a severe clinical phenotype in a patient with peroxisomal biogenesis disorder. Am J Med Genet A. 2010; 152A: 2318–21. pmid:20683989
  68. 68. Vastiau IM, Anthonio EA, Brams M, Brees C, Young SG, Van de Velde S, et al. Farnesylation of Pex19p is not essential for peroxisome biogenesis in yeast and mammalian cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006; 63: 1686–99. pmid:16791427
  69. 69. Snyder WB, Faber KN, Wenzel TJ, Koller A, Luers GH, Rangell L, et al. Pex19p interacts with Pex3p and Pex10p and is essential for peroxisome biogenesis in Pichia pastoris. Mol Biol Cell. 1999; 10: 1745–61. pmid:10359594
  70. 70. Ratzel SE, Lingard MJ, Woodward AW, Bartel B. Reducing PEX13 expression ameliorates physiological defects of late-acting peroxin mutants. Traffic. 2011; 12: 121–34. pmid:20969679
  71. 71. Burkhart SE, Lingard MJ, Bartel B. Genetic dissection of peroxisome-associated matrix protein degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 2013; 193: 125–41. pmid:23150599