Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Cloning and Expression of Phytase appA Gene from Shigella sp. CD2 in Pichia pastoris and Comparison of Properties with Recombinant Enzyme Expressed in E. coli

Cloning and Expression of Phytase appA Gene from Shigella sp. CD2 in Pichia pastoris and Comparison of Properties with Recombinant Enzyme Expressed in E. coli

  • Moushree Pal Roy, 
  • Deepika Mazumdar, 
  • Subhabrata Dutta, 
  • Shyama Prasad Saha, 
  • Shilpi Ghosh


The phytase gene appAS was isolated from Shigella sp. CD2 genomic library. The 3.8 kb DNA fragment contained 1299 bp open reading frame encoding 432 amino acid protein (AppAS) with 22 amino acid signal peptide at N-terminal and three sites of N-glycosylation. AppAS contained the active site RHGXRXP and HDTN sequence motifs, which are conserved among histidine acid phosphatases. It showed maximum identity with phytase AppA of Escherichia coli and Citrobacter braakii. The appAS was expressed in Pichia pastoris and E. coli to produce recombinant phytase rAppAP and rAppAE, respectively. Purified glycosylated rAppAP and nonglycosylated rAppAE had specific activity of 967 and 2982 U mg-1, respectively. Both had pH optima of 5.5 and temperature optima of 60°C. Compared with rAppAE, rAppAP was 13 and 17% less active at pH 3.5 and 7.5 and 11 and 18% less active at temperature 37 and 50°C, respectively; however, it was more active at higher incubation temperatures. Thermotolerance of rAppAP was 33% greater at 60°C and 24% greater at 70°C, when compared with rAppAE. Both the recombinant enzymes showed high specificity to phytate and resistance to trypsin. To our knowledge, this is the first report on cloning and expression of phytase from Shigella sp.


Phytic acid (myo-inositol 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-hexakis phosphate) is the major storage form of phosphorous in cereals, legumes, oil seeds and nuts [1]. Monogastric animals are incapable of digesting phytate phosphorous. Phytate also acts as an antinutritional agent, since it forms insoluble complexes with proteins and nutritionally important metal ions, such as calcium, copper and zinc and thus decreases nutrient bioavailability. The ingested phytate is largely excreted causing nutritional deficiencies and environmental pollution [1, 2].

Phytic acid is hydrolysed by phytase (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate hydrolase) to inorganic phosphate (Pi) and less phosphorylated myo-inositol derivatives [2, 3]. Phytase supplementation in animal feed increases the bioavailability of phosphorous in monogastric animals besides reducing the level of phosphorous output in their manure [4]. The enzyme is wide spread in nature, occurring in plants, animals and microorganisms. Phytases from these sources exhibit variations in structure and catalytic mechanism and consequently, have been categorized into cysteine phytases, histidine acid phosphatases (HAPs), β-propeller phytases and purple acid phosphatases [3]. Moreover, the ExPASy enzyme database ( classifies phytases into three different groups: 3-phytase (alternative name, 1-phytase; EC, 4-phytase (alternative name, 6-phytase; EC, and 5-phytase (EC This classification is based on the carbon ring position where removal of phosphate groups from phytate is initiated [24].

A number of phytases have been characterized from various microorganisms such as Aspergillus species, Citrobacter braakii, Obesumbacterium proteus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Pichia anomala, Erwinia carotovora and Yersinia intermedia and corresponding genes have been isolated, cloned and expressed in different hosts [512].

Phytases belonging to HAP family have been used successfully as a feed additive. Although, the commercial production of phytase is currently focused on the fungal HAP from Aspergillus species, studies have suggested bacterial phytases as more promising because of their thermostability, higher substrate specificity, greater resistance to proteolysis and better catalytic efficiency. The substrate specificity property of the enzyme is highly desirable to prevent hydrolysis of other phosphate compounds so that they remain available for animal uptake [1, 2, 4].

The methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris has been successfully used as a host for heterologous gene expression, producing high level of recombinant proteins, including phytase. P. pastoris can grow in simple defined media, reach a very high cell density, and accumulates extremely high concentration of intra- or extracellular protein under the control of the AOX1 promoter. In addition, P. pastoris, as a eukaryotic expression system, can carry out protein processing, folding, and posttranslational modifications [13, 14].

In our previous communication, we reported purification and characterization of phytase from Shigella sp. CD2 [15]. We herein report molecular cloning and sequencing of the phytase gene from Shigella sp. CD2 and its extracellular expression in P. pastoris strain GS115. The characteristic properties of the enzyme were compared with that expressed in E. coli strain BL21 (DE3).

Materials and Methods

Strains, plasmids and chemicals

The bacterial strain used in this study Shigella sp. CD2 (Accession no. FR745402) was isolated from wheat rhizosphere. The pUC18 vector, pGEM-T vector system, E. coli XL1 Blue and PCR reagents were purchased from Promega, USA. Restriction enzymes, Endo H deglycosylase and T4 DNA ligase were from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). E. coli BL21(DE3) and pET-20b(+) vector (Novagen, Madison, WI) and MagicMediaTM E.coli Expression Medium (Invitrogen, San Diego,CA) were used for bacterial expression. The expression medium has two components, (a) Ready to use medium and (b) IPTG solution. For expression in eukaryotic system, P. pastoris GS115(his4) and pPIC9 expression vector were purchased from Invitrogen, San Diego, CA. Plasmid pPIC9 contains the promoter and terminator of the P. pastoris AOX1 gene, the α-mating factor prepro-secretion signal from S. cerevisiae and the HIS4 auxotrophic selection marker for transforming P. pastoris GS115. Regeneration dextrose base (RDB), buffered glycerol-complex (BMGY), and buffered methanol-complex (BMMY) media were prepared according to the manual of the Pichia Expression kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). All other chemicals and microbiological media were from Sigma Chemical Company, USA; E. Merck, Germany; and HiMedia Laboratory, India.

Cloning of the phytase gene and nucleotide sequence analysis

Genomic DNA isolated from Shigella sp. CD2 [16] was partially digested with EcoRI to obtain 3 to 6 Kb fragments. The fragments were cloned in EcoRI site of pUC18 vector and transformed into E.coli XL1 Blue. The transformants were screened for phytase activity on LB-agar plates containing 100 μg mL-1 ampicillin and 1% sodium phytate. Phytase positive clones formed phytate clearance zone around the colony. The recombinant plasmid (pUCphy) was isolated from phytase positive clone with highest clearance zone; the 3.8kb insert in the plasmid was sequenced by using vector specific M13-pUC forward (5’- GTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC-3’) and reverse (5’-CAGGAAACAGCTATG-3’) primers and putative phytase encoding ORF was identified. The amino acid sequence encoded by the ORF was analyzed for the presence of signal peptide by SignalP 4.1 Server( [17] and for disulphide bond in the tertiary structure by using Softberry CYS_REC online services ( Mature phytase gene without the signal sequence was amplified from pUCphy by using internal primers, PhyF (5’-ATGAATTCGCTCAGAGTGAGCCGGAG-3’ with 5’ EcoRI restriction site) and PhyR (5’GATGCGGCCGCCAAACTGCACGCCGGTATG-3’ with 5’ NotI site). The PCR product was cloned in pGEM-T vector following manufacturer’s instruction and sequenced using T7 and SP6 universal primers. Homology search in GenBank was done using the BLAST server ( [18]. The amino acid sequence of the cloned gene was deduced and then aligned by ClustalW program ( [19]. The phylogenetic analysis of the protein was performed by neighbour joining method using MEGA 4 [20]. Bootstrap analysis was used to evaluate the tree topology of the neighbour joining data by performing 500 replicates. The tree was drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The recombinant pGEM-T vector harboring the phytase gene was named pGEMT-appAS.

Construction of P. pastoris and E. coli expression plasmids and transformation

Two different plasmids were constructed for expression of appAS in P. pastoris GS115 and E. coli BL21(DE3). For P. pastoris expression, the pGEMT-appAS plasmid was cut with EcoRI and NotI. The resulting 1.2 kb DNA fragment was ligated into pPIC9 digested with EcoRI and NotI to generate pPIC9-appAS. The pPIC9-appAS linearized with BspE1 was transformed into P. pastoris GS115 by the spheroplasting protocol according to the manual of the Pichia Expression kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and transformants were selected for ability to grow on histidine-deficient medium. The his+ transformants were further screened for Mut+ and MutS phenotypes. The integration of the expression cassette into the genome of P. pastoris GS115 was ascertained by PCR using the 5’ AOX1 and 3’ AOX1 primers. For expression in E. coli, the 1.2 kb fragment released from the pGEMT-appAS plasmid was ligated into pET-20b(+) to generate the construct pET-20b(+)-appAS, which was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) and transformants were selected in presence of 100 μg mL-1 ampicillin.

Expression of appAS in P. pastoris GS115

The Mut+, pPIC9-appAS transformed P. pastoris GS115 was inoculated into 10 mL of YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone and 2% dextrose) and incubated overnight at 30°C and 300 rpm shaking. 1mL of starter culture was transferred to 100 mL of BMGY medium and grown at 30°C and 300 rpm shaking until culture reached an OD600 of 1. Cells were subsequently harvested by centrifugation at 2100×g for 5 min and used to inoculate 100 mL of BMMY medium containing 0.5% methanol as inducer. The culture was incubated at 30°C and 300 rpm shaking for 96 h and the induction was maintained by adding 0.5% (v/v) methanol at every 24 h intervals. Extracellular and periplasmic phytase activity and medium pH were monitored at every 12 h intervals. For isolation of extracellular fraction, the culture was centrifuged at 2100×g for 5 min and the cell free medium was concentrated and diafiltered by Vivaspin-20 (30 kDa cutoff) sample concentrator (GE Healthcare, UK). For periplasmic fraction isolation, cell pellet was submitted to 5 cycles of freezing (-20°C for 2 h) and thawing (28°C for 1 h), followed by extraction with 100 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.5) at 28°C in a rotatory shaker (100 rpm). The extracted sample served as periplasmic fraction. Induction of appAS expression was determined by 12% SDS-PAGE analysis of the extracellular fraction. P. pastoris GS115 transformed with pPIC9 vector served as control. Recombinant protein produced by appAS in P. pastoris GS115was named rAppAP.

Expression of appAS in E. coli BL21(DE3)

Expression of appAS in E.coli BL21(DE3) was analysed by using MagicMediaTM E.coli Expression Medium following manufacturer’s instruction. E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells transformed with pET-20b(+)-appAS was grown overnight in LB medium at 37°C and 200 rpm shaking. The culture at 1% (v/v) was inoculated into the MagicMedia (19:1, ready to use medium: IPTG solution) and grown overnight at 37°C and 300 rpm shaking. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 11,200×g for 10 min, suspended in 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.5), disrupted by sonication and centrifuged. The supernatant and the pellet dissolved in 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.5) served as soluble and pellet fractions, respectively. Induction of appAS expression in both the fractions was determined by 12% SDS-PAGE. Both the fractions were also checked for phytase activity. E. coli BL21 (DE3) transformed with pET-20b(+) vector was used as control. Recombinant protein produced by appAS in E.coli BL21 (DE3) was named rAppAE.

Protein estimation and SDS-PAGE analysis

Total protein concentration was determined by the dye binding assay of Bradford using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard [21]. SDS-PAGE analysis was performed with 12% polyacrylamide gel according to the method of Laemmli [22]. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with CBB R-250 reagent (0.1% Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 in 10% acetic acid and 40% methanol) and then destained. Broad range pre-stained protein standards were used as markers.

Purification of rAppAE and rAppAP

Recombinant rAppAP was purified from the cell free medium of pPIC9-appAS transformed P. pastoris GS115 culture induced with methanol for 60 h. The concentrated and diafiltered cell-free medium was loaded on to CM-cellulose column and bound proteins were eluted by 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.5) with linear gradient of 0–0.5 M NaCl. The active fractions were pooled for subsequent studies. For purification of rAppAE, the IPTG induced culture of pET-20b(+)-appAS transformed E.coli BL21 (DE3) was harvested by centrifugation at 11,200×g for 10 min. The cell pellet was suspended in 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.5), disrupted by sonication and centrifuged. The supernatant was loaded onto a Ni- Sepharose Fast Flow column (2 x 5 cm, GE Healthcare, UK) pre-equilibrated with 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.5) containing 10 mM imidazole. The bound proteins were eluted with 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.5) containing 100 mM imidazole. Fractions with phytase activity were pooled for subsequent studies.

Determination of phytase activity

Phytase activity was determined as described previously [15]. The reaction mixture in a final volume of 2 mL contained, acetate buffer (pH 5.5), 100 mM; sodium phytate, 2 mM; and 100 μL enzyme preparation. The reaction was carried out at 37°C for 30 min followed by termination of reaction by adding 2 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid. The released Pi was measured spectrophotometrically by adding 2 mL of ammonium molybdate (0.5%), sulphuric acid (5 N) and ascorbic acid (2%) solution. One unit (U) of phytase activity represents 1 μmol of Pi released min-1 under assay conditions.

Characterization of rAppAE and rAppAP

The pH optima was determined by measuring enzymatic activity at pH 2.5–8.5 in the following buffers (50 mM): glycine-HCl (pH 2.5 and 3.5), sodium acetate (pH 4.5 and 5.5), and Tris-HCl (pH 6.5, 7.5 and 8.5). The optimum temperature for activity was determined at temperatures ranging from 10 to 80°C. Thermostability of the enzyme was determined by preincubating the purified enzyme at 10 to 80°C for 30 min followed by measuring phytase activity under standard conditions. To study the effect of metal ions and salts (2 mM), phytase activity was monitored in presence of CaCl2, MnSO4, MgSO4, FeSO4, ZnSO4, CuSO4 and EDTA. To determine the susceptibility to digestive proteases, the 50 U of purified rAppAE or rAppAP was preincubated with pepsin and trypsin (30 U, Sigma) at 37°C and phytase activity was monitored 30 min later.

Substrate specificity of the enzyme was determined by replacing sodium phytate in the standard reaction mixture of various pH (pH 4.5–7.5) with an equal concentration (2 mM) of either of phosphorylated compounds, such as p-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP), ATP, ADP, disodium pyrophosphate (dSPP), D-glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) and D-fructose-6-phosphate (F6P). Km for phytate was determined using the Lineweaver-Burk plot. Kcat values for both the enzymes were also determined.


The deglycosylation of rAppAP was carried out using Endo H deglycosylase (New England Biolabs) following manufacturer’s instruction. The reaction mix containing, 50 U of purified rAppAP, 600 μL of 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.0) and 10 U of Endo H in final volume of 1 mL, was incubated at 37°C for 2 h. N-glycosylation was determined by assessing the migration shift of Endo H treated rAppAP in 12% SDS-PAGE.

Western blot analysis

For immunoblot analysis, purified rAppAE and deglycosylated rAppAP proteins separated by 12% SDS-PAGE, were transferred to polyvinylidenedifluoride (PVDF) membrane by semi-dry method using Electroblotting apparatus (Atto, Japan). Purified rabbit antibody raised against E. coli phytase, diluted 1:1000 prior to application, was the primary antibody. The reacted polypeptide was visualised with a secondary antibody, goat anti-rabbit IgG-alkaline phosphatase conjugate using colorimetric based nitroblue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate-p-toluidine (NBT/BCIP) detection kit (Invitrogen, USA). Broad range prestained standards were used as markers.


Isolation of gene encoding phytase from the genomic library

For cloning of phytase gene, a size selected genomic library of Shigella sp. CD2 was constructed in pUC18 vector using EcoRI digested genomic DNA. The library was screened for phytase activity based on formation of clearance zone in phytate-agar medium. Among the six phytase positive clones, one with highest phytate clearance zone and phytase activity in the cell lysate was selected. The clone harbouring plasmid pUC18-phy had DNA insert of 3.8 kb. Sequence analysis of the insert indicated presence of an open reading frame (ORF) of 1299 bp, encoding a protein of 432 amino acids (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Nucleotide (1–1299) and deduced amino acid sequences (432) of the putative phytase gene appAS, from Shigella sp. CD2.

The conserved HAP family active site motifs are underlined. Stop codon is shown by asterisk.

Sequence and phylogenetic analysis

Homology analysis of deduced amino acid sequence by BLAST program revealed 98 and 62% similarity with AppA phytase of E. coli and C. braakii, respectively. Hence, Shigella sp. CD2 phytase ORF was named as appAS and the encoded protein as AppAS. The nucleotide sequence was deposited in the GenBank under accession number FR865899. AppAS contained three potential sites of N-glycosylation, a putative signal peptide of 22 amino acids at N-terminal end and 8 cysteine residues among which 99–130, 200–210, 404–413 were the most possible disulphide bond pairs. The calculated molecular mass of the protein with and without the signal sequence were about 47 and 45 kDa, respectively. Alignment of AppAS with other enteric bacterial phytases in the GenBank using ClustalW program showed presence of N-terminal RHGXRXP motif, C-terminal HDTN motif and five conserved cysteine residues. AppAS and E. coli AppA differed in sequence at six positions; AppAS contained P, Q, N, K, K, T in place of S, R, K, E, M, A in E. coli AppA at positions 102, 190, 202, 208, 298, 299, respectively (Fig 2). A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the alignment using the neighbour joining method. The topology of the phylogram also confirmed AppAS to be closely related to AppA phytase of E. coli and C. braakii (Fig 3).

Fig 2. Multiple alignment of homologs of the Shigella sp. CD2 phytase AppAS.

Conserved active site motifs are boxed and conserved cysteine residues are shown by arrows. The source and GenBank Accession Nos. of proteins are: Shigella sp. CD2, CCA94903; Escherichia coli AppA, EDX38944; Dickeya paradisiaca, ABW76125; Klebsiella pneumoniae ASR1, AAM23271; Yersinia intermedia, ABI95370; Citrobacter braakii, AAS45884; Obesumbacterium proteus, AAQ90419; Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, ABY76184.

Fig 3. Phylogenetic tree of homologs of the Shigella sp. CD2 phytase AppAS.

The bar represents 2 substitutions per 10 amino acids. GenBank Accession Nos. are as in Fig 2 legend.

Expression of appAS in P. pastoris G115

The appAS was cloned in EcoRI and NotI sites of P. pastoris expression vector pPIC9. The recombinant plasmid pPIC9-appAS carried the appAS-expression cassette consisting of 1.2 kb appAS gene in frame with S. cerevisiae α-factor secretion signal, flanked by AOX1 promoter and terminator sequences. Transformation of linearized pPIC9-appAS into P. pastoris GS115 gave about 20 his+ transformants. The integration of appAS-expression cassette into the host genome was ascertained by PCR using 5’ and 3’ AOX1 primers. PCR amplification products of about 0.5kb and 1.7 kb in pPIC9 transformed and pPIC9-appAS transformed P. pastoris GS115, respectively, indicated the integration of appAS-expression cassette into the genome of the later.

The pPIC9-appAS transformed P. pastoris GS115 colonies were screened for Mut phenotypes, and for extracellular and periplasmic phytase activity. A Mut+ colony with highest extracellular phytase activity was selected for shake flask expression. At 60 h of methanol induction, the selected transformant showed maximum extracellular recombinant phytase (rAppAP) production of 62 U mL-1 with specific activity 477 U mg-1 and an extracellular protein concentration of 0.13 mg mL-1. SDS-PAGE analysis of concentrated and diafiltered cell-free extract showed two protein bands of approximate molecular mass 59 and 65 kDa (Fig 4A). Deglycosylation of rAppAP by Endo H deglycosylase resulted in single band of apparent molecular mass 45kDa (Fig 4B).

Fig 4. (a) SDS-PAGE analysis of rAppAP expressed in P. pastoris GS115. Lane, M-molecular weight markers, 1-extracellular fraction of P. pastoris GS115 transformed with pPIC9-appAS, 2- extracellular fraction of P. pastoris GS115 transformed with pPIC9. (b) SDS-PAGE analysis of glycosylated and deglycosylated rAppAP.

Lane, 1- glycosylated rAppAP, 2- deglycosylated rAppAP, M- molecular weight markers.

Expression of appAS in E. coli BL21(DE3)

The mature appAS was cloned into E. coli expression vector pET-20b(+) and the recombinant plasmid pET-20b(+)-appAS was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). The transformant was induced in MagicMedia supplemented with IPTG and after overnight induction cells were disrupted by sonication. Recombinant phytase (rAppAE) overexpression in the soluble and pellet fractions of sonicated cells was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. As shown in the results of Fig 5A, the soluble fraction of the induced cell exhibited protein overexpression band of approximately 45kDa, which agrees with the predicted molecular weight deduced from the amino acid sequence of AppAS. Phytase activity in the soluble fraction was 176 U mL-1 (specific activity 568 U mg-1), whereas negligible activity was detected in the pellet fraction. The results thus indicate a correlation of rAppAE overexpression with phytase activity. Western blot analysis of rAppAE and deglycosylated rAppAP using rabbit polyclonal antibody against E. coli AppA further demonstrated that the specific band with apparent molecular mass of 45 kDa was recombinant phytase (Fig 5B).

Fig 5. (a) SDS-PAGE analysis of rAppAE expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3). Lane, M-molecular weight markers, 1- soluble fraction of induced BL21 transformed with pET20b(+), 2-pellet fraction of induced BL21 transformed with pET20b(+), 3- soluble fraction of induced BL21 transformed with pET-appAS, 4- pellet fraction of induced BL21 transformed with pET-appAS. (b) Western blot analysis.

Lane, M- Molecular weight marker, 1- purified rAppAE, 2-purified and deglycosylated rAppAP.

Purification and properties of rAppAE and rAppAP

Recombinant rAppAP was purified by cation exchange chromatography of diafiltered extracellular fraction of methanol induced P. pastoris GS115 culture transformed with pPIC9-appAS and rAppAE was purified from the soluble fraction of pET-20b(+)-appAS transformed E. coli BL21 (DE3) using Ni-Sepharose Fast Flow affinity chromatography. Purified rAppAP and rAppAE had specific activities of 967 and 2982 U mg-1, with recovery of 75 and 83%, respectively. The results of biochemical properties of rAppAP and rAppAE are shown in Table 1. Compared with the glycosylated rAppAP, the nonglycosylated rAppAE was more active at pH 3.5–7.5. Both the enzymes had more than 50% activity in the pH range 3.5 to 6.5 with pH optima at 5.5 (Fig 6A). Both rAppAE and rAppAP had temperature optima of 60°C. Compared with rAppAP, rAppAE had 11 and 18% greater relative activity at 37 and 50°C, respectively, whereas at higher incubation temperature rAppAP was more active than rAppAE (Fig 6B). For determination of thermal stability, the purified rAppAE or rAppAP were pre-incubated at 10 to 80°C for 30 min and then assayed for enzymatic activity. Although, the two enzymes didn’t differ in their thermostability in the temperature range 10 to 50°C, rAppAP was more thermotolerant at higher temperature. Consequently, at 60 and 70°C rAppAP had 33 and 24% higher activity in comparison to rAppAE, respectively (Fig 6C). Km values for phytate as determined by Lineweaver-Burk plot were 0.18 and 0.22 mM for rAppAE and rAppAP, respectively (Table 1). The Kcat value for rAppAE was 2.23×103 sec-1and for rAppAP was 0.72×103 sec-1.

Fig 6. Characterization of purified rAppAE and rAppAP.

(a) pH profile (b) Temperature profile and (c) Thermal stability. Results of phytase activity represent the mean of three independent values.

Both rAppAE and rAppAP were highly specific to the substrate, sodium phytate. Activity with either of phosphorylated substrates, such as ATP, ADP, pNPP, dSPP, G6P or F6P was negligible. The relative phytase activities of rAppAE and rAppAP were enhanced up to 130% in presence of Ca2+, Mg2+ and Mn2+, whereas Cu2+, Fe2+, Zn2+ or EDTA showed inhibitory effect. To determine the protease resistance the purified recombinant phytases (50 U) were pre-incubated separately with 30U of either pepsin or trypsin at 37°C. The rAppAE and rAppAP retained 70 and 65% activity on treatment with trypsin, and 55 and 50% of activity on treatment with pepsin, respectively, indicating greater resistance to trypsin.


The phytase structural gene (appAS) from Shigella sp. CD2 had an ORF of 1299 bp encoding 432 amino acid protein (AppAS) containing N-terminal 22 amino acid signal peptide, three probable disulphide bridges and three sites of N-glycosylation. Presence of the signal peptide and disulphide bridges indicates the periplasmic localization of the native protein. AppAS showed significantly high homology with AppA phytase of E. coli and C. braakii suggesting that the proteins may have similar structure and mechanism of action. Moreover, all these AppA phytases form a separate branch in phylogenetic tree. As in the present study, phytase AppA from C. braakii was more closely related to the E. coli AppA than to other phytases [6]. AppAS contained the conserved N-terminal RHGXRXP and C-terminal HD active site motifs, and six conserved cysteine residues, which are characteristics of phytase belonging to the HAP family [23]. Till date, seven genera of family enterobacteriaceae have been reported to produce phytase, and relevant genes have been cloned and all of them belong to HAP family [6, 7, 11, 12, 23].

The expression of enzyme as secreted protein is one of the useful and important characteristics for its economical production in industry. P. pastoris has been successfully used as host organism for extracellular production of recombinant proteins at high level, including phytase [2, 5, 6, 10, 11]. Phytase appAS was expressed in P. pastoris to produce rAppAP as extracellular protein with highest activity (62 U mL-1) at 60 h of methanol induction, with specific activity of 477 U mg-1. The rAppAP activity is higher than that of phyC gene encoding neutral phytase expressed in P. pastoris (12.5 U mL-1) [2]. However, the yield is lower than that of AppA phytase of C. braakii (197 U mL-1) and E. coli (112.50 U mL-1) [6, 9]. The lower activity of rAppAP might be due to observed increase in the medium pH above 7 during cultivation of P. pastoris. This could be confirmed by significant decrease in activity of purified AppAP at pH >7 (Fig 6A). The expression level and activity of rAppAP could be increased further by optimization of bioprocess and control of medium pH at <7. Moreover, the reduced phytase activity could also be due to the variation in codon usage between Shigella sp. and P. pastoris. Previous studies have shown the effect of codon bias on expression and activity of recombinant phytase and other enzymes [14, 24]. Xiong et al. used P. pastoris preferred codons and modified signal sequences to improve the expression of heterologous phytase from Peniophora lycii by 13.6 fold [14]. Similarly, extracellular expression of phyC gene from B. subtilis WHNB02 in P. pastoris yielded 2.40 U mL-1 phytase. Synthesis of phyC according to P. pastoris codon usage without altering the protein sequence enhanced activity by about 8 folds to 18.50 U mL-1 [24]. The recombinant rAppAP was expressed as multiple proteins of higher molecular weights, which on deglycosylation produced protein of about 45 kDa, similar to that of rAppAE, indicating post translational glycosylation of the recombinant protein in Pichia system (Fig 4A and 4B). As in the present study, SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant AppA from E. coli expressed in P. pastoris appeared as diffused band of molecular size 55 kDa, however, a sharp band was observed after the purified phytase was deglycosylated [9]. Similarly, AppA from C. braakii expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae migrated as a broad diffusion band (110–160 kDa) in SDS-PAGE gel due to extensive N-linked glycosylation, while the same protein expressed in E. coli had molecular size of 49 kDa [6].

To examine the effect of glycosylation on enzymatic properties of rAppAP, appAS was also expressed in E. coli to produce rAppAE. The periplasmic signal sequence was removed for targeting the enzyme to the intracellular space in order to avoid the possibility of contamination of recombinant enzyme preparation with two native periplasmic AppA phytases in the host cell [25]. Phytase activity of nonglycosylated rAppAE was 176 U mL-1 (specific activity 568 U mg-1). The rAppAE activity is significantly higher than that of phyA gene of O. proteus (9.6 U mg-1) and appA gene of E. coli (17.1 U mg-1) expressed in E. coli as intracellular proteins [7]. Most of the other studies on expression of recombinant phytase in E. coli have shown accumulation of phytase as inclusion body in the cell [6, 26].

The purified rAppAP and rAppAE had specific activities of 967 and 2982 U mg-1, respectively. The difference in glycosylation between the two enzymes partially affected their biochemical properties. Both the recombinant enzymes had pH optima of 5.5 and more than 50% of activity was maintained between pH 3.5 to 6.5. The pH optimum of most of the enterobacterial phytase AppA is in the range of 4.5 to 5.5. The enzyme from E. coli, O. proteus, C. braakii, Y. intermedia, and E. carotovora showed optimum pH of 4.5, 4.9, 5.0, 4.5 and 5.5, respectively [6,7, 9,11,12]. Although rAppAP and rAppAE shared the same optimal temperature of 60°C, the former was more active at 70 and 80°C. As in the present study, the temperature optima of other reported bacterial AppA phytases were in the range of 40–65°C [7, 9,11,12]. Glycosylated rAppAP had improved thermotolerance, especially at higher temperatures of 60 and 70°C over that of rAppAE. The Km values of 0.18 mM for rAppAE and 0.22 mM for rAppAP are less than that of the phytases from O. proteus(0.34 mM), E. coli (0.55 mM), E. carotovora (0.25 mM), K. pneumoniae (0.28 mM) [7, 9,12, 27], but higher than that of the phytase from Y. intermedia (0.125 mM) [11]. The catalytic efficiency of rAppAE was found to be much higher than that of rAppAP as reflected by their Kcat values.

Glycosylaion is one of the most important post translational modifications that affects protein function and properties. Previous studies have shown the influence of N-glycosylation on biochemical properties of proteins, such as molecular mass, isoelectric point, surface charge distribution and thermotolerance [3, 28]. As in the present study, increased level of glycosylation of phytase from A. fumigatus expressed in P. pastoris improved the thermotolerance of the protein over the deglycosylated form [28]. Similarly, phytase from C. braakii expressed in S. cerevisiae retained 50% higher activity upon heat treatment at 70°C for 30 min as compared to E. coli expressed protein [6]. Although there are very few studies on effect of glycosylation on Km, recently Yao et al. reported an alteration in Km of recombinant E. coli AppA phytase on enhancement of glycosylation. The Km values for WT, Q258N mutant and Q258N/Q349N mutant were 0.48, 0.53 and 0.43 mM, respectively [29]. Phytase in the present study was highly specific to the substrate phytate as observed for AppA phytase from E. carotovora and Y. intermedia [11,12], whereas phytase from E. coli and O. proteus also cleaved phosphorus-containing organic compounds other than phytate at a slower rate [7, 9]. In contrast, phytases from Aspergillus fumigatus and Klebsiella pneumoniae showed broad specificity for phosphorylated substrates but relatively low specificity for phytate [27].

In conclusion, phytase AppAS expressed in P. pastoris (rAppAP) had biochemical properties similar to that expressed in E. coli (rAppAE), except for thermalstability. The enzyme has several advantageous properties, like substrate specificity, protease resistance, optimal activity at acidic pH and physiological temperature. Phytase AppA from Shigella sp. CD2 displayed 40–70% activity in the pH range 3.5 to 6.5, which can facilitate phytate degradation in salivary gland (pH 5.0–7.0), stomach (fed state pH 6.5, reducing to 3.5–4.5 upon stimulation of acid secretion) and upper part of duodenum (pH 4.0–6.0). Hence, the enzyme can be used as feed additive for improving the utilization of phytate phosphorus by monogastric animals like, swine, poultry and farm animals. Though production of rAppAP as secreted protein is advantageous for industry, its economical production requires improving its expression by using P. pastoris-preferred codons and optimization of bioprocess and scaling up when the cells are grown in a fermenter. Hence, there is a potential to increase the expression level even further, which is being pursued in the laboratory.


Financial support for SG from University Grant Commission, Govt. of India (F.No. 41–547/2012, SR) is gratefully acknowledged. DM acknowledges UGC for financial support as Research Fellow.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SG. Performed the experiments: MPR SD DM SPS. Analyzed the data: MPR SG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SG. Wrote the paper: SG MPR.


  1. 1. Yao MZ, Zhang YH, Lu WL, Hu MQ, Wang W, Liang AH. Phytases: Crystal structures, protein engineering and potential biotechnological applications. J Appl Microbiol. 2012; 112:1–14. pmid:22017627
  2. 2. Olazaran MG, Blanco LR, Trevino JGC, Lopez JAG, Salvado JMV. Expression of a Bacillus phytase C gene in Pichia pastoris and properties of the recombinant enzyme. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010; 76: 5601–5608. pmid:20601512
  3. 3. Maldonado RF, Maller A, Bonneil E, Thibault P, Machado CB, Ward RJ et al. Biochemical properties of glycosylation and characterization of a histidine acid phosphatase (phytase) expressed in Pichia pastoris. Protein Expres Purif. 2014; 99: 43–49.
  4. 4. Lei XG, Porres JM, Mullaney EJ, Brinch PH. Industrial Enzyme: structure, function and applications. In: Polaina J, MacCabe AP, editors. Netherlands. Springer; 2007. pp.505–529.
  5. 5. Promdonkoy P, Tang K, Sornlake W, Harnpicharnchai P, Kobayashi RS, Ruanglek V, et al. Expression and characterization of Aspergillus thermostable phytases in Pichia pastoris. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009; 290: 18–24. pmid:19025560
  6. 6. Kim YO, Kim HW, Lee JH, Kim KK, Lee SJ. Molecular cloning of the phytase gene from Citrobacter braakii and its expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett. 2006; 28:33–38. pmid:16369872
  7. 7. Zinin NV, Serkina AV, Gelfand MS, Shevelev AB, Sineoky SP. Gene cloning,expression and characterization of novel phytase from Obesumbacterium proteus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004; 236:283–290. pmid:15251209
  8. 8. Sayari AH, Elgharbi F, Farhat A, Rekik H, Blondeau K, Bejar S. Overexpression and biochemical characterization of a thermostable phytase from Bacillus subtilis US417 in Pichia pastoris. Mol Biotechnol. 2014; 56:839–848. pmid:24859267
  9. 9. Tai HM, Yin LJ, Chen WC, Jiang ST. Overexpression of Escherichia coli phytase in Pichia pastoris and its biochemical properties. J Agri Food Chem. 2013; 61:6007–6015.
  10. 10. Joshi S, Satyanarayana T. Optimization of heterologous expression of the phytase (PPHY) of Pichia anomala in P. pastoris and its applicability in fractionating allergenic glycinin from soy protein. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 41: 977–987. pmid:24668018
  11. 11. Huang H, Luo H, Yang P, Meng K, Wang Y, Yuan T, et al. A novel phytase with preferable characteristics from Yersinia intermedia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006; 350: 884–889. pmid:17034758
  12. 12. Huang H, Luo H, Wang Y, Fu D, Shao N, Yang P, et al. Novel low-temperature-active phytase from Erwinia carotovora var. carotovota ACCC 10276. Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009; 19: 1085–1091.
  13. 13. Daly R, Hearn MTW. Expression of heterologous proteins in Pichia pastoris: a useful experimental tool in protein engineering and production. J Mol Recognit. 2005; 18: 119–138. pmid:15565717
  14. 14. Xiong A, Yao QH, Peng RH, Zhang Z, Xu F, Liu JG, et al. High level expression of a synthetic gene encoding Peniophora lycii phytase in methylotrphic yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006; 72: 1039–1047. pmid:16601989
  15. 15. Pal Roy M, Poddar M, Singh KK, Ghosh S. Purification, characterization and properties of phytase from Shigella sp. CD2. Ind J Biochem Biophys. 2012; 49:266–271.
  16. 16. Yates JR, Holmes DS. Two families of repeated DNA in Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. J Bacteriol. 1987; 169:1861–1870. pmid:3032898
  17. 17. Petersen TN, Brunak S, Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: Discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions, Natr Methods. 2011; 8: 785–786.
  18. 18. Astchul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990; 215:403–410. pmid:2231712
  19. 19. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plrwniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acid Res. 1997; 24: 4876–4882.
  20. 20. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24:1596–1599. pmid:17488738
  21. 21. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248–254. pmid:942051
  22. 22. Leammli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Natr.1970; 227: 680–685.
  23. 23. Oh BC, Choi WC, Park S, Kim YO, Oh TK. Biochemical properties and substrate specificities of alkaline and histidine acid phytases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004; 63: 362–372. pmid:14586576
  24. 24. Salvado JMV, Lopez JAG, Trevino JGC, Galvan MC, Domínguez AR, Olazaran MG. Design of thermostable β-propeller phytases with activity over a broad range of pHs and their overproduction by Pichia pastoris. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010; 76: 6423–6430. pmid:20693453
  25. 25. Rodriguez E, Han Y, Lei XG. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of an Escherichia coli acid phosphatase/phytase gene (appA2) isolated from pig colon. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999; 257: 117–123. pmid:10092520
  26. 26. Rao DE, Rao KV, Reddy VD. Cloning and expression of Bacillus phytase gene (phy) in Escherichia coli and recovery of active enzyme from the inclusion bodies. J Appl Microbiol. 2008; 105: 1128–1137. pmid:18479345
  27. 27. Sajidan A, Farouk A, Greiner R, Jungbult P, Muller EC, Borris R. Molecular and physiological characterization of a 3-phytase from the bacterium Klebsiella pneomoniae ASR1. J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004; 65: 110–118.
  28. 28. Guo M, Hang H, Zhu T, Zhuang Y, Chu J, Zhang S. Effect of glycosylation on biochemical chatacterization of recombinant phytase expressed in Pichia pastoris. Enz Microbe Technol. 2008; 42: 340–345.
  29. 29. Yao MZ, Wang X, Wang W, Fu YJ, Liang AH. Improving the thermostability of Escherichia coli phytase, appA, by enhancement of glycosylation. Biotechnol Lett. 2013; 35:1669–1676. pmid:23794051