LKB1 and Notch Pathways Interact and Control Biliary Morphogenesis

Pierre-Alexandre Just; Alexis Poncy; Sara Charawi; Rajae Dahmani; Massiré Traore; Typhanie Dumontet; Valérie Drouet; Florent Dumont; Hélène Gilgenkrantz; Sabine Colnot; Benoit Terris; Cédric Coulouarn; Frédéric Lemaigre; Christine Perret

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145400

Abstract

Background

LKB1 is an evolutionary conserved kinase implicated in a wide range of cellular functions including inhibition of cell proliferation, regulation of cell polarity and metabolism. When Lkb1 is inactivated in the liver, glucose homeostasis is perturbed, cellular polarity is affected and cholestasis develops. Cholestasis occurs as a result from deficient bile duct development, yet how LKB1 impacts on biliary morphogenesis is unknown.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We characterized the phenotype of mice in which deletion of the Lkb1 gene has been specifically targeted to the hepatoblasts. Our results confirmed that lack of LKB1 in the liver results in bile duct paucity leading to cholestasis. Immunostaining analysis at a prenatal stage showed that LKB1 is not required for differentiation of hepatoblasts to cholangiocyte precursors but promotes maturation of the primitive ductal structures to mature bile ducts. This phenotype is similar to that obtained upon inactivation of Notch signaling in the liver. We tested the hypothesis of a functional overlap between the LKB1 and Notch pathways by gene expression profiling of livers deficient in Lkb1 or in the Notch mediator RbpJκ and identified a mutual cross-talk between LKB1 and Notch signaling. In vitro experiments confirmed that Notch activity was deficient upon LKB1 loss.

Conclusion

LKB1 and Notch share a common genetic program in the liver, and regulate bile duct morphogenesis.

Citation: Just P-A, Poncy A, Charawi S, Dahmani R, Traore M, Dumontet T, et al. (2015) LKB1 and Notch Pathways Interact and Control Biliary Morphogenesis. PLoS ONE 10(12): e0145400. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145400

Editor: Gianfranco Alpini, Texas A&M Health Science Center, UNITED STATES

Received: July 28, 2015; Accepted: December 3, 2015; Published: December 21, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Just et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: Our microarray data have been deposited to GEODATASET. The public link for the GEO dataset: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE75564.

Funding: Core fundings came from INSERM, CNRS, grants from Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer LNCC (France) “Equipe labélisée Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer” (CP), INCA, ANR and LABEX Who am I? grants (CP). PAJ was a recipient of Poste d’accueil AP-HP-CNRS/CEA. This work was also supported by the Interuniversity Attraction Pole Programme (Belgian Science Policy (BELSPO), grant PVII-47; http://www.belspo.be/) (FL), the D.G. Higher Education and Scientific Research of the French Community of Belgium (grant 10/15-029) (FL), the Alphonse and Jean Forton Fund (grant 2011-R10150-004; http://www.kbs.frb.be/fund.aspxid=293586&langtype=2060) (FL), and the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Médicale (grant 3.4536.10F; http://www.fnrs.be/) (FL). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations: PDS, primitive ductal structure; RbpJκ, Recombination signal binding protein immunoglobulin J kappa

Introduction

The liver is a vital organ with many functions, one of which is bile production for lipid adsorption [1]. Bile ducts lined by cholangiocytes carry bile produced by the hepatocytes to the intestinal tract. During liver development, hepatoblasts differentiate into hepatocyte and cholangiocyte precursors which progressively mature to adult hepatocytes organized as cords and to cholangiocytes organized as ducts. Cholangiocyte precursors initially surround the portal vein mesenchyme, and form a ductal plate. The latter subsequently undergoes morphogenesis and remodelling to generate the bile ducts [2–4]. Defects in bile duct formation can impair bile duct flow eventually leading to cholestasis.

Human genetic diseases and mutant mouse models have illustrated the importance of Notch signaling in the development of bile ducts [5]. Alagille syndrome is an inherited disorder characterized by bile duct paucity and variable degree of cholestasis [6]. Nearly 80% of patients have mutations in JAGGED1 which encodes for a Notch receptor ligand; less frequently the gene encoding for the Notch receptor NOTCH2 is mutated [7–9]. Upon ligand binding the Notch receptor undergoes sequential proteolysis releasing the intracellular domain (NICD) that translocates to the nucleus and associates with RbpJκ (Recombination signal binding protein immunoglobulin J kappa) to convert the RbpJκ corepressor complex into a coactivator complex that stimulates gene transcription [5]. Mouse studies showed that Notch signaling controls differentiation of bipotential hepatoblasts towards cholangiocytes as well as bile duct morphogenesis [10–17].

LKB1 is a tumor suppressor encoded by the STK11 gene. It is an evolutionary conserved serine/threonine protein kinase implicated in a wide range of cellular functions including inhibition of cellular proliferation, regulation of cellular polarity and metabolism [18–20]. It is a multi-task kinase that acts upstream of AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) and 12 AMPK-related kinases [21]. LKB1 is a crucial regulator of apical epithelial cell polarity [19], and is able to polarize intestinal epithelial cells [19,22,23]. However, this effect of LKB1 may be cell-type specific, as deletion of LKB1 does not alter polarity of lung epithelial and pancreatic cells [24]. In the adult liver, LKB1 controls glucose and lipid metabolism [20,25,26]. In vitro studies showed that LKB1 is required for hepatocyte polarization and establishment of the canalicular network [27]. Bile duct paucity was observed in mice bearing a deletion of LKB1 in the liver [28]. However, a developmental cause for the biliary defect was not investigated.

Here, we characterized the phenotype of mice in which the LKB1 gene has been specifically deleted in the hepatoblasts. Mutant mice were strongly cholestatic and lacked bile ducts. Studies at the prenatal stage showed that LKB1 is not required for differentiation of cholangiocyte progenitors and for ductal plate formation, but is required for bile duct morphogenesis by promoting the maturation of the primitive ductal structures. At the molecular level, we showed that LKB1 and Notch share a common genetic program in the liver, identifying a cross-talk between LKB1 and Notch that likely regulates biliary morphogenesis.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Mice carrying two floxed alleles on the exons III to VI of the Lkb1 gene (Stk11^lox/lox) [29] were interbred with AlfP-Cre in which Cre is under the control of Albumin regulatory elements and α-feto-protein enhancer [30] to generate mice with LKB1 deletion in the hepatoblasts (LKB1^livemb). Inactivation of the Notch pathway was carried out by crossing AlfP-Cre animals with mice carrying floxed allele of RbpJκ [31], an essential co-factor of NICD. All animal procedures were carried out according to French legal regulations and approved by an ethical committee, “Comité National de Réflexion Ethique sur l’Expérimenation Animale” under the registered number: CEEA34.CP.077.12. All mice were kept in well-controlled animal housing facilities.

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from mouse tissues and cell lines with Trizol Reagent (Life technologies) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription was performed from 1 μg of total RNA using Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics) and random hexamer as primers. Quantitative PCR reactions were run using the Light Cycler 480 Sybr Green I Master kit (Roche) and specific primers (Eurogentec) on a Light Cycler 480 thermocycler (Roche). Values were normalized with 18S ribosomal RNA. Primer sequences are indicated in S1 Table.

Immunoblot analysis

Total protein extracts from mouse liver were obtained from 100–200 mg of frozen tissue that was bead-mill homogeneized in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM AEBSF, 1% Triton X-100), supplemented with a mixture of protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche) in a 10μl/μg ratio using a TissueLyser disruption system (Qiagen, Hilder, Germany). Samples were centrifuged at 13.000 g for 10 min at 4°C and supernatant was collected and kept at -80°C until analysis. Proteins were resolved by SDS–PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose and blocked with 5% BSA or 5% milk. Blots were incubated with specific primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, washed, incubated with the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling) and developed by enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Images were recorded using a super CCD camera of 3.2 megapixels driven by the LAS 4000 mini device (GE Healthcare). LKB1 antibody (clone D60C5), AMPK and anti-phospho-AMPKαT172 were from Cell Signaling Technologies. β-actin antibody was from Sigma Aldrich.

Blood biochemistry

Bilirubin levels were measured from plasma using the Bilirubin SF kits from Diasys according to the manufacturer instructions. ALAT levels were measured from plasma using the ALATSF kit from Diasys and according to the manufacturer instructions

Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence

Mouse liver were minced in 3mm-thick sections and fixed in 10% formalin for 12 hours and embedded in paraffin. For morphological analysis, dewaxed 2μm sections were stained with hemalun and eosin.

CK19 and CD10 immunostaining procedures were performed on 5μm thick dewaxed tissue section, boiled in pH6 citrate buffer for 40 minutes and incubated for 1h at room temperature with primary antibody. After incubation with biotinylated secondary antibody, an avidin-biotin amplification step was performed (Jackson laboratories) followed by a diaminobenzidine-based revelation (Jackson laboratories) and counterstaining in hemalun. Anti-CD10 immunohistochemistry was performed using the MOM kit (Vector Laboratories). Anti-CK19 was a gift from Sylvie Germain and anti-CD10 was from Tebu-Novocastra. Immunofluorescence staining for aPKCζ was done on frozen sections. Antibody anti- aPKCζ was from Santa-Cruz.

For immunostaining of developing bile ducts, embryos were fixed at 4°C for 4h in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, washed overnight in PBS and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections were retrieved by boiling for 10 min in pH6 citrate buffer, permeabilized for 15 minutes with 0.3% Triton X-100-PBS, and blocked in 3% milk/10% BSA/0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 45 minutes at room temperature. Primary antibodies were purchased from Santa-Cruz (HNF4, HNF6 and HNF1β), BD biosciences (E-cadherin), Chemicon (Sox9), R&D systems (osteopontin). Anti-HES1 was provided by B. Stanger, and anti-Notch2 NICD developed by S. Artavanis-Tsakonas was obtained from the Developmental Study Hybridoma Bank, created by the NICHD of the NIH and maintained at the University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA 52242. Incubation of primary antibodies was performed in 3% milk/10% BSA/0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 hour at 37°C. Washes were done with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS three times for 5 minutes each. Secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor^® conjugated were purchased from LifeTechnologies. Washes were repeated with 0.1% Triton X-100-PBS three times for 5 minutes each and slides were mounted in Dako^® fluorescent mounting medium (Dako). Fluorescence was immediately observed with a Zeiss Axiovert 200 inverted fluorescence microscope. All the pictures were taken using a Coolpix 995 digital camera (Nikon).

Microarray analysis, statistical analysis and data mining

Three hundred ng of total RNA were reverse transcribed following the Genechip Whole transcript (WT) Sense Target labelling assay kit (Affymetrix). The resulting cDNA was used for in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase. After purification, 10 μg of cRNA was used for reverse transcription with random primers. The cDNA obtained was purified and fragmented. After control of fragmentation using 2100 Bioanalyzer, cDNA was end-labelled with biotin using Terminal Transferase (WT terminal labelling kit, Affymetrix). cDNA was then hybridized to GeneChip^® Mouse Gene (Affymetrix) at 45°C for 17 hours. Chips were washed on the fluidic station FS450 following specific protocols (Affymetrix) and scanned using the GCS3000 7G. The image was analyzed with Expression Console software (Affymetrix) to obtain raw data (cel files) and metrics for Quality Controls. Data have been deposited in GEO database (GSE75564).

Microarray data were analyzed using R-based BRB-Array Tools as previously described [32]. Briefly, differentially expressed genes were identified by a univariate two-sample t-test with a random variance model. Individual genes were selected on the basis of both statistical significance (p<0.001) and fold change (FC) difference between the compared groups (FC>1.5). False discovery rate (FDR)/q-value has been calculated as previously described [33].

Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) software (Mountain View, CA, USA) was used to examine the functional association between differentially expressed genes and to generate the most significantly altered molecular functions that were identified using the scoring system provided by IPA. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed by using the Java-tool developed at the Broad Institute (Cambridge, MA, USA).

Cell Culture and Transfections

The human cholangiocarcinoma Mz-ChA-1 [34], a gift of Laura Fouassier (Inserm UPMC UMRS-938, Paris France) and the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HUH7 were cultivated in Dubelcco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100U/ml penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C under 5% CO₂. For transfection, 0.5x10⁶ cells were seeded in each well of a 6-well plate. The Notch RBPJ reporter plasmid contains four copies of the RbpJκ-binding element cloned upstream of a SV40 promoter-driven luciferase reporter construct and was a kindly gift from Evelyne Lauret (Institut Cochin, Paris, France). The expression vector encoding Notch 1 intracellular domain (NICD) was a gift from Evelyne Lauret (Institut Cochin, Paris, France). The human LKB1 siRNA pool is a SMART selection designed from Thermo Fischer Scientific, Dharmacon Product. Human scrambled siRNA (ON-TARGETplus-Non-Targeting pool) was from Dharmacon. RSV-Renilla was used to normalize transfection efficiency. Cells were either co-transfected with increasing doses of NICD, 250 ng of RBPJ reporter and 10 ng of RSV-Renilla, or co-transfected with 50 or 100 pmol of siRNA, 250 ng of RBPJ reporter and 10 ng of RSV-Renilla. The transfection was done using the Lipofectamine^® RNAiMAX protocol according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Life Technologies). Forty-eight hours after transfection, Luciferase activity was measured with the Dual-Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI). Results were expressed as firefly luciferase activity normalized to Renilla luciferase activity of the same sample. Each point was done in triplicate.

Results

Liver cholestasis is induced in mice with LKB1 deletion in hepatoblasts

We specifically deleted Lkb1 in the liver using mice with floxed Lkb1^lox/lox alleles [29] and transgenic Alfp-Cre [30]. In the latter, Cre recombinase is active in hepatoblasts starting at E10.5. The mutant animals were named LKBKO^Livemb. After confirming that Lkb1 was efficiently deleted in the liver (Fig 1A), we studied the phenotype of these mice. LKBKO^Livemb mice were born at the expected Mendelian frequency, but showed severe growth retardation beginning at post-natal day 12 and leading to death between day 25 and day 30 (Fig 1B and 1C). The severity of the phenotype of LKBKO^Livemb mice differed from that observed in the work by Woods et al. [28]. In the latter, defective growth was detected at an earlier stage (post-natal day 4) while we observed growth defect at the suckling/weaning transition. Furthermore, Woods et al. detected cytolysis as assessed by elevated transaminase levels; in contrast, we found normal serum ALAT levels in LKBKO^Livemb mice. The difference in the liver phenotype between the two studies is likely explained by the genetic difference of the two models: Woods’ study was done using an hypomorphic floxed Lkb1 model harbouring strong reduction in LKB1 protein expression in Cre-negative mice [35] while no such decrease was observed in our Cre-negative mice (Fig 1A).

Download:

Fig 1. Phenotype of mice carrying Lkb1 deletion in the embryonic liver.

(A) LKBKO^livemb mouse model results in efficient inactivation of Lkb1 protein expression in the liver. Western blot analysis of Lkb1 and β-actin (loading control) of liver lysates from wild-type, control (LKB1^fl,fl, Cre-) designed WT and mutant (LKB1^fl,fl, Cre+) mice designed KO (2-week old mice). (B) Gross appearance of a control (WT) and mutant (KO) LKBKO^livemb mice at postnatal day 28. (C) Weight curves from birth to post-natal day 30 in the LKBKO^livemb model. Mice genotypes were determined at postnatal day 5. N = 15 control and 8 mutant mice. Error bars: standard deviations.* P<0.01, ** P<0.05, *** P<0.001. Deletion of Lkb1 in the embryonic liver causes postnatal growth retardation beginning at day 12. (D) Obstructive cholestasis in LKBKO^livemb mutant mice. Gross aspect of serum from a control (WT) and mutant (KO) LKBKO^livemb mice at postnatal day 15. Blood levels of conjugated bilirubin and ALAT in LKBKO^livemb control (WT) and mutant (KO) mice at postnatal day 15. n = 6 control and 4 mutant mice. Error bars: standard deviations. Statistical significance was evaluated using a two-sample unpaired Student’s t-test between KO and mutant animals. *** P<0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145400.g001

The LKBKO^Livemb mice were strongly cholestatic as shown by the yellow color of the serum and elevated serum bilirubin levels (Fig 1D). The high level of conjugated bilirubin and the normal ALAT levels indicated that cholestasis resulted from a biliary obstruction (Fig 1D). Bile canaliculi are channels formed by the juxtaposition of apical pole of adjacent hepatocytes. Using the apical marker aPKCζ to detect the bile canaliculi, we found, as expected, an elongated and bar-shaped bile canalicular network in control animals. In contrast, the aPKCζ staining was tortuous and dilated in LKBKO^Livemb mice (Fig 2A). Mutant mice failed to express the hepatocyte canalicular membrane, CD10 [36], reinforcing that bile canalicular network was defective (Fig 2A). Similar results were observed in the Wood’s study [28]. We then examined the intrahepatic bile ducts in LKBKO^Livemb mice. In control livers at postnatal day 15, one to two CK19-positive bile ducts were located in each portal tract (Fig 2B). In contrast, mutant animals showed CK19-positive cells organized around the portal tract like embryonic ductal plate structures, but failed to develop ducts (Fig 2B). Thus, LKBKO^Livemb mice revealed defects in hepatocytes with aberrant apical polarization leading to defective bile canaliculi, and defects in bile duct formation that all were responsible for the cholestasis.

Download:

Fig 2. Lkb1 is required for canaliculi formation and intrahepatic bile ducts morphogenesis.

(A) Top panel: representative images of 3-week old control and mutant LKBKO^livemb mice liver sections stained with the apical marker aPKCζ. Note the elongated canalicular network and the tortuous dilated bile canaliculi in control and mutant animal, respectively. Bottom panel: representative images of 3-week old control and mutant LKBKO^livemb mice liver sections stained with the anti-CD10 antibody. Immunohistochemistry evidences a delicate canalicular network at the apical pole of the hepatocytes of control animal. In KO mice, the staining was lost. Top: low magnification, middle and bottom: high magnification. (B) Top panel: Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stained sections of 3-week old control and mutant LKBKO^livemb mouse liver. Middle and bottom panels: Cytokeratin 19 (CK19)-stained sections of 3-week old control and mutant LKBKO^livemb mouse livers. Note the well-formed and mature bile ducts in the control mouse and the numerous ductal plate-like structures around the portal tract in mutant mice. Top two panels: high magnification, bottom panel: scanning magnification.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145400.g002

LKB1 promotes maturation of bile ducts during biliary morphogenesis

To determine how LKB1 deletion causes defective duct formation, we analyzed bile duct morphogenesis at prenatal stages. During normal embryonic development, hepatic progenitor cells adjacent to the portal vein form a structure composed of cholangiocyte precursors, called ductal plate. Then, prior to birth, tubulogenesis occurs at discrete areas along the ductal plate, giving rise to asymmetrical ducts, called primitive ductal structures (PDS) lined by Sox9+/HNF4- cholangiocytes and Sox9-/HNF4+ hepatoblast-like cells. Around embryonic day E17-E18, these structures mature to bile ducts entirely and symmetrically lined by Sox9+/HNF4- cholangiocytes [3,37]. Cholangiocyte precursors of the ductal plate not involved in duct formation give rise to periportal hepatocytes and to cells of the Hering’s canal [38].

In control animals, at E18.5, developing ducts were symmetrical and completely lined with Sox9+/HNF4- cells. In contrast, at that stage developing ducts of LKBKO^Livemb mice were still in an asymmetrical configuration typical of PDS: the duct lumina were surrounded on the portal side by Sox9+/HNF4- cholangiocytes and on the opposite, i.e. parenchymal side, by Sox9-/HNF4+ hepatoblasts (Fig 3A). We then tested the expression of key transcription factors of bile duct morphogenesis, namely HNF1β and HNF6 [39–41]. These factors were normally expressed on the parenchymal and portal sides of developing ducts, in wild-type livers and only in the portal side of the ducts of the LKBKO^Livemb livers (Fig 3B). As well, the nuclear location of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) and the expression of the Notch target gene Hes1 were asymmetrical in developing ducts of mutant embryos, in contrast to control animals revealing a symmetrical expression (Fig 3C). These data demonstrated that in the absence of LKB1, duct morphogenesis is arrested at the PDS stage and that Notch signaling is not functional on the parenchymal side of the developing ducts in the absence of LKB1. In mutant animals, the PDS do not mature to bile ducts and, together with the other cholangiocyte precursors not involved in duct formation, remain at an embryonic stage, explaining the ductal-plate-like structure observed in adult animals.

Download:

Fig 3. Lkb1 controls the maturation of bile duct during bile duct tubulogenesis.

(A) Immunofluorescence for Sox9, HNF4 and E-cadherin demonstrate that Lkb1 is required for the transition from an asymmetric primitive duct to a symmetric and mature bile duct in the developing liver. LKBKO^livemb (KO) embryos were sampled at E18.5 and liver sections were stained for the hepatoblast marker HNF4, and for the cholangiocyte markers Sox9. Note the symmetrical localization of Sox9 around the bile duct in control mice (Control) whereas Sox9 was only expressed in the portal layer of the asymmetric bile ducts in mutant embryos. High E-cadherin levels mark mature cholangiocytes. (B) Representative immunofluorescence for HNF1β and HNF6 in control and LKBKO^livemb livers in top and bottom panels respectively. Medium-high magnifications. (C) Notch-ICD and Hes-1 expression are restricted to the portal layer of asymmetrical bile duct in LKBKO^livemb mutant mice whereas Notch activation was evidenced in both layers of the biliary tubules in control animals. Medium magnification.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145400.g003

Cross-talk between LKB1 and Notch pathways in liver

The biliary phenotype of LKBKO^Livemb mice is reminiscent of that observed in mice with inactivation of Hes1, Jagged 1, or RbpJκ [11,15,17]: all these mice develop a ductal plate which fails to generate ducts. This suggested that LKB1 cross-talks with the Notch pathway in the liver. To check this hypothesis we analyzed Rbpj^lox/lox;Alfp-Cre (RBPJKO^livemb) mice which have a liver-specific inactivation of RbpJκ. Control, RBPJKO^livemb and LKBKO^Livemb mice were sacrificed 5 days after birth and the liver transcriptomes were analyzed using microarrays. 253 non redundant genes were differentially expressed between LKBKO^Livemb and control mice (see S2 Table); 237 genes were differentially expressed between RBPJKO^livemb and control mice (see S3 Table). Interestingly, numerous genes (54 out of 55 genes, i.e. 20–25% of each list, see S4 Table) were similarly deregulated in the liver of LKBKO^Livemb and RBPJKO^livemb mice (Fig 4A). Accordingly, Gene Set Enrichement Analysis (GSEA) revealed that the LKBKO^livemb gene signature was significantly enriched in the gene expression profile of RBPJKO^livemb livers, and vice versa (Fig 4B). Analysis of functional gene networks using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis highlighted the metabolic pathways as the main deregulated pathways in both the LKB1 and Notch gene datasets (Fig 4C).

Download:

Fig 4. Inactivation of Lkb1 and Notch in the liver share a common gene signature.

(A) RBPJKO^livemb and LKBKO^livemb models share a common gene expression signature. Upper part: Venn diagram of genes differentially expressed (p<0.001, fold change>1.5) between mutant and control mice in the LKBKO^livemb and RBPJKO^livemb (5-days old) models. Fifty-five genes were found to be deregulated in the two models. Lower part: Supervised hierarchical clustering analysis demonstrates that 54 (out of 55) common genes are similarly deregulated in the two models. (B) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) demonstrates that the Lkb1 and Notch pathways share a common transcriptional program. RBPJKO^livemb (upper part) and LKBKO^livemb (lower part) gene signatures were used for GSEA using the gene expression profiles of LKBKO^livemb (upper part) and RBPJKO^livemb (lower part) mice and their respective control (WT) counterparts. Up- and down-regulated genes in the RBPJKO^livemb signature were found to be specifically enriched in the gene expression profiles of LKBKO^livemb and control (WT) mice, respectively. Similarly, up- and down-regulated genes in the LKBKO^livemb signature were found to be specifically enriched in the gene expression profiles of RBPJKO^livemb and control (WT) mice, respectively. All gene sets were significantly enriched at nominal p-value<1%. (C) Most significantly altered functions revealed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). A dataset containing gene identifiers and corresponding values were uploaded to the Ingeniuty Pathway analysis software (IPA). The transcripts differentially expressed between KO and WT that met the cutoff criteria (FC > 1.5, p< 0.001) were considered for the analysis. Bars represent the logarithmic value of the significance level, the dashed line corresponds to the threshold of 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145400.g004

To confirm in vitro, the cross-talk between LKB1 and Notch signaling pathways the cholangiocarcinoma cell line Mz-ChA-I was used. A Notch-responsive luciferase reporter system containing RbpJκ binding sites [42] allowed us to monitor the level of Notch activation. Transfection of NICD induced a dose-dependent increase in luciferase activity, as expected (Fig 5A). More interestingly, we observed a decrease in luciferase activity after LKB1 inactivation by siRNA and not in cells transfected with a scrambled siRNA (Fig 5B and 5C). This result confirmed that Notch activation is deficient in the absence of LKB1. Similar results were obtained using the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HUH7 (Fig 5D), indicating that the dialog between LKB1 and Notch signaling extends beyond bile duct cells. We then search for an epistatic relation between the LKB1 and Notch signaling, and characterized the activation status of the Notch pathway in LKB1 mutant animals, and reciprocally, the level of LKB1 expression in Notch mutant livers. Expression of several Notch pathway targets (Hes1, Hey1, Heyl and Nrarp) was downregulated in the liver of LKBKO^Livemb mutant mice corroborating the results we obtained using the Mz-ChA-I cell line (Fig 5E). Reciprocally, Notch inactivation was associated with down-regulation of LKB1 protein and its downstream kinase, AMPK, as revealed by the level of phosphorylated AMPK (Fig 5F). These results showed a mutual cross-regulation between the LKB1 and Notch pathways without evidence that one is epistatic to the other.

Download:

Fig 5. Cross-talk between LKB1 and Notch signaling.

(A) The RBP-J luciferase reporter was transfected into Mz-Cha-1 cells either alone (0) or with increasing dose of NICD vector (ng) as indicated. (B) Silencing by 50 pmol -100 pmol of LKB1 siRNA (LKB) and scrambled siRNA (SC). LKB1 protein was revealed by western blot. β-actin was used as loading control. (C-D) LKB1 silencing led to decrease Notch activity. Luciferase activity was measured in the absence of siRNA (1), in the presence of either 50 pmol of LKB1 siRNA or scrambled siRNA (2) and the presence of 100 pmol of either LKB1 siRNA or scrambled siRNA (3). Transfections were done in Mz-ChA-1 cells (C) or in HUH7 cells (D). * P< 0.05. ** P<0.01. (E) LKB1 is required for full activation of Notch signaling in the developing liver. RT-qPCR of different Notch positive target genes (Hey1, Heyl, Hes1 and Nrarp) in 8- and 14-day old control and mutant LKBKO^livemb mice. N = 3–4 per group. Error bars: SEM. F: Notch negatively regulates LKB1 level measured by western blot analysis and the phosphorylation level of AMPK (pAMPK-T172). Statistical significance was evaluated using a two-sample unpaired Student’s t-test between KO and WT. * P< 0.05. ** P<0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145400.g005

Discussion

In the present work we identify a new role of LKB1 in bile duct development. In the absence of LKB1 differentiation of hepatoblasts to cholangiocyte precusors proceeds normally; the precursors organize as a ductal plate and generate PDS, but the latter fail to mature to ducts. A similar maturation defect has been observed in the absence of HNF1β [41]. We showed that Notch pathway activation was deficient in the absence of LKB1, by in vivo and in vitro approaches. Since Notch pathway deficiencies are associated with a biliary phenotype similar to that of LKBKO^Livemb mice, we suggest that LKB1 controls Notch signaling during bile duct development.

The failure of PDS to mature and generate ducts may reflect polarity defects in LKBKO^Livemb mice. When PDS mature to ducts, the cells on the parenchymal side become progressively more polarized and expressed higher level of E-cadherin [37]. A co-localization between LKB1 and E-cadherin has been described at the adherens junction and E-cadherin is required for the recruitment of active LKB1 complex to adherens junction in polarized epithelial cells [43]. Thus, a polarity clue mediated by LKB1 may be the signal that allows the transition of PDS to a symmetric bile duct. In addition, deficient apical polarization of hepatocytes was likely to explain the abnormal development of bile canaliculi in mutant mice. Therefore, polarization of hepatocytes and cholangiocytes may constitute a key function of LKB1 during liver development.

Hepatocytes have a marked anatomical polarity that plays an essential role for biliary secretion. Several bile acid transporters are localized at the canalicular apical pole. In vitro studies showed that formation and maintenance of bile canalicular network of the hepatocytes is regulated by the LKB1 and AMPK pathways [27]. Accordingly, we observed loss of the bile canalicular network in LKBKO^Livemb mice. Thus alterations in both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes explain the cholestatic phenotype of mutant mice which do not have mature bile ducts and present defective bile canalicular network.

At the molecular level, our in vivo and in vitro analyses showed that LKB1 loss led to a decrease in Notch activity, but the mechanism by which LKB1 controls Notch activation remains to be investigated. Interestingly, our results indicated that Notch-deficient mice displayed a decrease in the LKB1 activity highlighting a cross-regulation of LKB1 and Notch signaling. The liver is not the only organ in which LKB1 and Notch cross-talks. A connection between the LKB1 and Notch pathway has been recently described in the intestinal epithelium. Deletion of LKB1 in the epithelial cells of the intestine is associated with a modification of the differentiation of the intestinal lineage towards an increase in goblet and Paneth cell lineage known to be negatively controlled by Notch signaling [44]. Similar to our results, a decrease in Notch activation was evidenced in intestine of mice bearing specific deletion of LKB1 [45]. Therefore, our work and that of others point toward a combinatorial role of LKB1 and Notch in cell fate decision and organ morphogenesis.

Our gene expression profiling results further highlight that the Notch pathway has roles that extend beyond development and that it impacts on organ homeostasis [5]. Recent data show that Notch participates in liver glucose and lipid homeostasis [46,47]. Accordingly numerous genes linked to lipid metabolism were present in the shared LKB1-Notch dataset (see Fig 4A).

Conclusion

Liver-specific deletion of LKB1 in transgenic mice identified LKB1 as an actor of bile duct maturation during biliary morphogenesis. Our data suggest that a mutual cross-talk between LKB1 and the Notch pathway is involved in bile duct morphogenesis.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. List of primer sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145400.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. List of 253 non-redundant genes differentially expressed in KO vs WT LKB1 mice.

* p < .001; ** fold-change >1.5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145400.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Table. List of 237 non-redundant genes differentially expressed in KO vs WT RBPJ mice.

* p < .001; ** fold-change >1.5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145400.s003

(XLSX)

S4 Table. List of 54 non-redundant genes differentially expressed in both LKB1 and RBPJ KO vs WT mice.

* p < .001; ** fold-change >1.5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145400.s004

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Béatrice Romagnolo Anne-Françoise Burnol and Pascale Bossard (Institut Cochin, France), for their helpful discussions and to the animal facility of Institut Cochin for maintenance of mouse colonies.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CP PAJ FL. Performed the experiments: PAJ AP S. Charawi MT TD RD VD FD S. Colnot BT CC FL CP. Analyzed the data: PAJ AP CC FL CP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FD HG BT. Wrote the paper: PAJ HG CC FL CP.

References

1. Jungermann K, Kietzmann T (1996) Zonation of parenchymal and nonparenchymal metabolism in liver. Annu Rev Nutr 16: 179–203. pmid:8839925
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Lemaigre F, Zaret KS (2004) Liver development update: new embryo models, cell lineage control, and morphogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 14: 582–590. pmid:15380251
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Raynaud P, Carpentier R, Antoniou A, Lemaigre FP (2011) Biliary differentiation and bile duct morphogenesis in development and disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 43: 245–256. pmid:19735739
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Takashima Y, Terada M, Kawabata M, Suzuki A (2015) Dynamic three-dimensional morphogenesis of intrahepatic bile ducts in mouse liver development. Hepatology 61: 1003–1011. pmid:25212491
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Geisler F, Strazzabosco M (2015) Emerging roles of Notch signaling in liver disease. Hepatology 61: 382–392. pmid:24930574
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Emerick KM, Rand EB, Goldmuntz E, Krantz ID, Spinner NB, et al. (1999) Features of Alagille syndrome in 92 patients: frequency and relation to prognosis. Hepatology 29: 822–829. pmid:10051485
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Li L, Krantz ID, Deng Y, Genin A, Banta AB, et al. (1997) Alagille syndrome is caused by mutations in human Jagged1, which encodes a ligand for Notch1. Nat Genet 16: 243–251. pmid:9207788
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. McDaniell R, Warthen DM, Sanchez-Lara PA, Pai A, Krantz ID, et al. (2006) NOTCH2 mutations cause Alagille syndrome, a heterogeneous disorder of the notch signaling pathway. Am J Hum Genet 79: 169–173. pmid:16773578
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Oda T, Elkahloun AG, Pike BL, Okajima K, Krantz ID, et al. (1997) Mutations in the human Jagged1 gene are responsible for Alagille syndrome. Nat Genet 16: 235–242. pmid:9207787
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. McCright B, Lozier J, Gridley T (2002) A mouse model of Alagille syndrome: Notch2 as a genetic modifier of Jag1 haploinsufficiency. Development 129: 1075–1082. pmid:11861489
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Kodama Y, Hijikata M, Kageyama R, Shimotohno K, Chiba T (2004) The role of notch signaling in the development of intrahepatic bile ducts. Gastroenterology 127: 1775–1786. pmid:15578515
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Loomes KM, Russo P, Ryan M, Nelson A, Underkoffler L, et al. (2007) Bile duct proliferation in liver-specific Jag1 conditional knockout mice: effects of gene dosage. Hepatology 45: 323–330. pmid:17366661
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Lozier J, McCright B, Gridley T (2008) Notch signaling regulates bile duct morphogenesis in mice. PLoS One 3: e1851. pmid:18365007
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Geisler F, Nagl F, Mazur PK, Lee M, Zimber-Strobl U, et al. (2008) Liver-specific inactivation of Notch2, but not Notch1, compromises intrahepatic bile duct development in mice. Hepatology 48: 607–616. pmid:18666240
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Zong Y, Panikkar A, Xu J, Antoniou A, Raynaud P, et al. (2009) Notch signaling controls liver development by regulating biliary differentiation. Development 136: 1727–1739. pmid:19369401
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Sparks EE, Huppert KA, Brown MA, Washington MK, Huppert SS (2010) Notch signaling regulates formation of the three-dimensional architecture of intrahepatic bile ducts in mice. Hepatology 51: 1391–1400. pmid:20069650
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Hofmann JJ, Zovein AC, Koh H, Radtke F, Weinmaster G, et al. (2010) Jagged1 in the portal vein mesenchyme regulates intrahepatic bile duct development: insights into Alagille syndrome. Development 137: 4061–4072. pmid:21062863
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Alessi DR, Sakamoto K, Bayascas JR (2006) LKB1-dependent signaling pathways. Annu Rev Biochem 75: 137–163. pmid:16756488
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Jansen M, Ten Klooster JP, Offerhaus GJ, Clevers H (2009) LKB1 and AMPK family signaling: the intimate link between cell polarity and energy metabolism. Physiol Rev 89: 777–798. pmid:19584313
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Shackelford DB, Shaw RJ (2009) The LKB1-AMPK pathway: metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 563–575. pmid:19629071
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Lizcano JM, Goransson O, Toth R, Deak M, Morrice NA, et al. (2004) LKB1 is a master kinase that activates 13 kinases of the AMPK subfamily, including MARK/PAR-1. Embo J 23: 833–843. pmid:14976552
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Baas AF, Kuipers J, van der Wel NN, Batlle E, Koerten HK, et al. (2004) Complete polarization of single intestinal epithelial cells upon activation of LKB1 by STRAD. Cell 116: 457–466. pmid:15016379
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Mirouse V, Billaud M The LKB1/AMPK polarity pathway. FEBS Lett 585: 981–985. pmid:21185289
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Lo B, Strasser G, Sagolla M, Austin CD, Junttila M, et al. (2012) Lkb1 regulates organogenesis and early oncogenesis along AMPK-dependent and -independent pathways. J Cell Biol 199: 1117–1130. pmid:23266956
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Shaw RJ, Lamia KA, Vasquez D, Koo SH, Bardeesy N, et al. (2005) The kinase LKB1 mediates glucose homeostasis in liver and therapeutic effects of metformin. Science 310: 1642–1646. pmid:16308421
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Patel K, Foretz M, Marion A, Campbell DG, Gourlay R, et al. (2014) The LKB1-salt-inducible kinase pathway functions as a key gluconeogenic suppressor in the liver. Nat Commun 5: 4535. pmid:25088745
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Fu D, Wakabayashi Y, Ido Y, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Arias IM (2010) Regulation of bile canalicular network formation and maintenance by AMP-activated protein kinase and LKB1. J Cell Sci 123: 3294–3302. pmid:20826460
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Woods A, Heslegrave AJ, Muckett PJ, Levene AP, Clements M, et al. (2011) LKB1 is required for hepatic bile acid transport and canalicular membrane integrity in mice. Biochem J 434: 49–60. pmid:21118154
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Bardeesy N, Sinha M, Hezel AF, Signoretti S, Hathaway NA, et al. (2002) Loss of the Lkb1 tumour suppressor provokes intestinal polyposis but resistance to transformation. Nature 419: 162–167. pmid:12226664
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Kellendonk C, Opherk C, Anlag K, Schutz G, Tronche F (2000) Hepatocyte-specific expression of Cre recombinase. Genesis 26: 151–153. pmid:10686615
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Han H, Tanigaki K, Yamamoto N, Kuroda K, Yoshimoto M, et al. (2002) Inducible gene knockout of transcription factor recombination signal binding protein-J reveals its essential role in T versus B lineage decision. Int Immunol 14: 637–645. pmid:12039915
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Coulouarn C, Cavard C, Rubbia-Brandt L, Audebourg A, Dumont F, et al. (2012) Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas exhibit progenitor features and activation of Wnt and TGFbeta signaling pathways. Carcinogenesis 33: 1791–1796. pmid:22696594
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Coulouarn C, Gomez-Quiroz LE, Lee JS, Kaposi-Novak P, Conner EA, et al. (2006) Oncogene-specific gene expression signatures at preneoplastic stage in mice define distinct mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatology 44: 1003–1011. pmid:17006931
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Knuth A, Gabbert H, Dippold W, Klein O, Sachsse W, et al. (1985) Biliary adenocarcinoma. Characterisation of three new human tumor cell lines. J Hepatol 1: 579–596. pmid:4056357
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Sakamoto K, Zarrinpashneh E, Budas GR, Pouleur AC, Dutta A, et al. (2006) Deficiency of LKB1 in heart prevents ischemia-mediated activation of AMPKalpha2 but not AMPKalpha1. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 290: E780–788. pmid:16332922
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Xiao SY, Wang HL, Hart J, Fleming D, Beard MR (2001) cDNA arrays and immunohistochemistry identification of CD10/CALLA expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Pathol 159: 1415–1421. pmid:11583969
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Antoniou A, Raynaud P, Cordi S, Zong Y, Tronche F, et al. (2009) Intrahepatic bile ducts develop according to a new mode of tubulogenesis regulated by the transcription factor SOX9. Gastroenterology 136: 2325–2333. pmid:19403103
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Carpentier R, Suner RE, van Hul N, Kopp JL, Beaudry JB, et al. (2011) Embryonic ductal plate cells give rise to cholangiocytes, periportal hepatocytes, and adult liver progenitor cells. Gastroenterology 141: 1432–1438, 1438 e1431–1434. pmid:21708104
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Coffinier C, Gresh L, Fiette L, Tronche F, Schutz G, et al. (2002) Bile system morphogenesis defects and liver dysfunction upon targeted deletion of HNF1beta. Development 129: 1829–1838. pmid:11934849
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Clotman F, Lannoy VJ, Reber M, Cereghini S, Cassiman D, et al. (2002) The onecut transcription factor HNF6 is required for normal development of the biliary tract. Development 129: 1819–1828. pmid:11934848
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Raynaud P, Tate J, Callens C, Cordi S, Vandersmissen P, et al. (2011) A classification of ductal plate malformations based on distinct pathogenic mechanisms of biliary dysmorphogenesis. Hepatology 53: 1959–1966. pmid:21391226
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Lahmar M, Catelain C, Poirault S, Dorsch M, Villeval JL, et al. (2008) Distinct effects of the soluble versus membrane-bound forms of the notch ligand delta-4 on human CD34+CD38low cell expansion and differentiation. Stem Cells 26: 621–629. pmid:18055448
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Sebbagh M, Santoni MJ, Hall B, Borg JP, Schwartz MA (2009) Regulation of LKB1/STRAD localization and function by E-cadherin. Curr Biol 19: 37–42. pmid:19110428
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Noah TK, Shroyer NF (2013) Notch in the intestine: regulation of homeostasis and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Physiol 75: 263–288. pmid:23190077
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Shorning BY, Zabkiewicz J, McCarthy A, Pearson HB, Winton DJ, et al. (2009) Lkb1 deficiency alters goblet and paneth cell differentiation in the small intestine. PLoS One 4: e4264. pmid:19165340
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Pajvani UB, Shawber CJ, Samuel VT, Birkenfeld AL, Shulman GI, et al. (2011) Inhibition of Notch signaling ameliorates insulin resistance in a FoxO1-dependent manner. Nat Med 17: 961–967. pmid:21804540
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Pajvani UB, Qiang L, Kangsamaksin T, Kitajewski J, Ginsberg HN, et al. (2013) Inhibition of Notch uncouples Akt activation from hepatic lipid accumulation by decreasing mTorc1 stability. Nat Med 19: 1054–1060. pmid:23832089
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Jungermann K, Kietzmann T (1996) Zonation of parenchymal and nonparenchymal metabolism in liver. Annu Rev Nutr 16: 179–203. pmid:8839925
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Lemaigre F, Zaret KS (2004) Liver development update: new embryo models, cell lineage control, and morphogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 14: 582–590. pmid:15380251
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Raynaud P, Carpentier R, Antoniou A, Lemaigre FP (2011) Biliary differentiation and bile duct morphogenesis in development and disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 43: 245–256. pmid:19735739
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Takashima Y, Terada M, Kawabata M, Suzuki A (2015) Dynamic three-dimensional morphogenesis of intrahepatic bile ducts in mouse liver development. Hepatology 61: 1003–1011. pmid:25212491
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Geisler F, Strazzabosco M (2015) Emerging roles of Notch signaling in liver disease. Hepatology 61: 382–392. pmid:24930574
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Emerick KM, Rand EB, Goldmuntz E, Krantz ID, Spinner NB, et al. (1999) Features of Alagille syndrome in 92 patients: frequency and relation to prognosis. Hepatology 29: 822–829. pmid:10051485
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Li L, Krantz ID, Deng Y, Genin A, Banta AB, et al. (1997) Alagille syndrome is caused by mutations in human Jagged1, which encodes a ligand for Notch1. Nat Genet 16: 243–251. pmid:9207788
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. McDaniell R, Warthen DM, Sanchez-Lara PA, Pai A, Krantz ID, et al. (2006) NOTCH2 mutations cause Alagille syndrome, a heterogeneous disorder of the notch signaling pathway. Am J Hum Genet 79: 169–173. pmid:16773578
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Oda T, Elkahloun AG, Pike BL, Okajima K, Krantz ID, et al. (1997) Mutations in the human Jagged1 gene are responsible for Alagille syndrome. Nat Genet 16: 235–242. pmid:9207787
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. McCright B, Lozier J, Gridley T (2002) A mouse model of Alagille syndrome: Notch2 as a genetic modifier of Jag1 haploinsufficiency. Development 129: 1075–1082. pmid:11861489
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Kodama Y, Hijikata M, Kageyama R, Shimotohno K, Chiba T (2004) The role of notch signaling in the development of intrahepatic bile ducts. Gastroenterology 127: 1775–1786. pmid:15578515
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Loomes KM, Russo P, Ryan M, Nelson A, Underkoffler L, et al. (2007) Bile duct proliferation in liver-specific Jag1 conditional knockout mice: effects of gene dosage. Hepatology 45: 323–330. pmid:17366661
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Lozier J, McCright B, Gridley T (2008) Notch signaling regulates bile duct morphogenesis in mice. PLoS One 3: e1851. pmid:18365007
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Geisler F, Nagl F, Mazur PK, Lee M, Zimber-Strobl U, et al. (2008) Liver-specific inactivation of Notch2, but not Notch1, compromises intrahepatic bile duct development in mice. Hepatology 48: 607–616. pmid:18666240
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Zong Y, Panikkar A, Xu J, Antoniou A, Raynaud P, et al. (2009) Notch signaling controls liver development by regulating biliary differentiation. Development 136: 1727–1739. pmid:19369401
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Sparks EE, Huppert KA, Brown MA, Washington MK, Huppert SS (2010) Notch signaling regulates formation of the three-dimensional architecture of intrahepatic bile ducts in mice. Hepatology 51: 1391–1400. pmid:20069650
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Hofmann JJ, Zovein AC, Koh H, Radtke F, Weinmaster G, et al. (2010) Jagged1 in the portal vein mesenchyme regulates intrahepatic bile duct development: insights into Alagille syndrome. Development 137: 4061–4072. pmid:21062863
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Alessi DR, Sakamoto K, Bayascas JR (2006) LKB1-dependent signaling pathways. Annu Rev Biochem 75: 137–163. pmid:16756488
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Jansen M, Ten Klooster JP, Offerhaus GJ, Clevers H (2009) LKB1 and AMPK family signaling: the intimate link between cell polarity and energy metabolism. Physiol Rev 89: 777–798. pmid:19584313
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Shackelford DB, Shaw RJ (2009) The LKB1-AMPK pathway: metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 563–575. pmid:19629071
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Lizcano JM, Goransson O, Toth R, Deak M, Morrice NA, et al. (2004) LKB1 is a master kinase that activates 13 kinases of the AMPK subfamily, including MARK/PAR-1. Embo J 23: 833–843. pmid:14976552
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Baas AF, Kuipers J, van der Wel NN, Batlle E, Koerten HK, et al. (2004) Complete polarization of single intestinal epithelial cells upon activation of LKB1 by STRAD. Cell 116: 457–466. pmid:15016379
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Mirouse V, Billaud M The LKB1/AMPK polarity pathway. FEBS Lett 585: 981–985. pmid:21185289
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Lo B, Strasser G, Sagolla M, Austin CD, Junttila M, et al. (2012) Lkb1 regulates organogenesis and early oncogenesis along AMPK-dependent and -independent pathways. J Cell Biol 199: 1117–1130. pmid:23266956
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Shaw RJ, Lamia KA, Vasquez D, Koo SH, Bardeesy N, et al. (2005) The kinase LKB1 mediates glucose homeostasis in liver and therapeutic effects of metformin. Science 310: 1642–1646. pmid:16308421
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Patel K, Foretz M, Marion A, Campbell DG, Gourlay R, et al. (2014) The LKB1-salt-inducible kinase pathway functions as a key gluconeogenic suppressor in the liver. Nat Commun 5: 4535. pmid:25088745
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Fu D, Wakabayashi Y, Ido Y, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Arias IM (2010) Regulation of bile canalicular network formation and maintenance by AMP-activated protein kinase and LKB1. J Cell Sci 123: 3294–3302. pmid:20826460
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Woods A, Heslegrave AJ, Muckett PJ, Levene AP, Clements M, et al. (2011) LKB1 is required for hepatic bile acid transport and canalicular membrane integrity in mice. Biochem J 434: 49–60. pmid:21118154
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Bardeesy N, Sinha M, Hezel AF, Signoretti S, Hathaway NA, et al. (2002) Loss of the Lkb1 tumour suppressor provokes intestinal polyposis but resistance to transformation. Nature 419: 162–167. pmid:12226664
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Kellendonk C, Opherk C, Anlag K, Schutz G, Tronche F (2000) Hepatocyte-specific expression of Cre recombinase. Genesis 26: 151–153. pmid:10686615
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Han H, Tanigaki K, Yamamoto N, Kuroda K, Yoshimoto M, et al. (2002) Inducible gene knockout of transcription factor recombination signal binding protein-J reveals its essential role in T versus B lineage decision. Int Immunol 14: 637–645. pmid:12039915
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Coulouarn C, Cavard C, Rubbia-Brandt L, Audebourg A, Dumont F, et al. (2012) Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas exhibit progenitor features and activation of Wnt and TGFbeta signaling pathways. Carcinogenesis 33: 1791–1796. pmid:22696594
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Coulouarn C, Gomez-Quiroz LE, Lee JS, Kaposi-Novak P, Conner EA, et al. (2006) Oncogene-specific gene expression signatures at preneoplastic stage in mice define distinct mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatology 44: 1003–1011. pmid:17006931
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Knuth A, Gabbert H, Dippold W, Klein O, Sachsse W, et al. (1985) Biliary adenocarcinoma. Characterisation of three new human tumor cell lines. J Hepatol 1: 579–596. pmid:4056357
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Sakamoto K, Zarrinpashneh E, Budas GR, Pouleur AC, Dutta A, et al. (2006) Deficiency of LKB1 in heart prevents ischemia-mediated activation of AMPKalpha2 but not AMPKalpha1. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 290: E780–788. pmid:16332922
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Xiao SY, Wang HL, Hart J, Fleming D, Beard MR (2001) cDNA arrays and immunohistochemistry identification of CD10/CALLA expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Pathol 159: 1415–1421. pmid:11583969
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Antoniou A, Raynaud P, Cordi S, Zong Y, Tronche F, et al. (2009) Intrahepatic bile ducts develop according to a new mode of tubulogenesis regulated by the transcription factor SOX9. Gastroenterology 136: 2325–2333. pmid:19403103
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Carpentier R, Suner RE, van Hul N, Kopp JL, Beaudry JB, et al. (2011) Embryonic ductal plate cells give rise to cholangiocytes, periportal hepatocytes, and adult liver progenitor cells. Gastroenterology 141: 1432–1438, 1438 e1431–1434. pmid:21708104
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Coffinier C, Gresh L, Fiette L, Tronche F, Schutz G, et al. (2002) Bile system morphogenesis defects and liver dysfunction upon targeted deletion of HNF1beta. Development 129: 1829–1838. pmid:11934849
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Clotman F, Lannoy VJ, Reber M, Cereghini S, Cassiman D, et al. (2002) The onecut transcription factor HNF6 is required for normal development of the biliary tract. Development 129: 1819–1828. pmid:11934848
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Raynaud P, Tate J, Callens C, Cordi S, Vandersmissen P, et al. (2011) A classification of ductal plate malformations based on distinct pathogenic mechanisms of biliary dysmorphogenesis. Hepatology 53: 1959–1966. pmid:21391226
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Lahmar M, Catelain C, Poirault S, Dorsch M, Villeval JL, et al. (2008) Distinct effects of the soluble versus membrane-bound forms of the notch ligand delta-4 on human CD34+CD38low cell expansion and differentiation. Stem Cells 26: 621–629. pmid:18055448
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Sebbagh M, Santoni MJ, Hall B, Borg JP, Schwartz MA (2009) Regulation of LKB1/STRAD localization and function by E-cadherin. Curr Biol 19: 37–42. pmid:19110428
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Noah TK, Shroyer NF (2013) Notch in the intestine: regulation of homeostasis and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Physiol 75: 263–288. pmid:23190077
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Shorning BY, Zabkiewicz J, McCarthy A, Pearson HB, Winton DJ, et al. (2009) Lkb1 deficiency alters goblet and paneth cell differentiation in the small intestine. PLoS One 4: e4264. pmid:19165340
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Pajvani UB, Shawber CJ, Samuel VT, Birkenfeld AL, Shulman GI, et al. (2011) Inhibition of Notch signaling ameliorates insulin resistance in a FoxO1-dependent manner. Nat Med 17: 961–967. pmid:21804540
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Pajvani UB, Qiang L, Kangsamaksin T, Kitajewski J, Ginsberg HN, et al. (2013) Inhibition of Notch uncouples Akt activation from hepatic lipid accumulation by decreasing mTorc1 stability. Nat Med 19: 1054–1060. pmid:23832089
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] PubMed/NCBI

[188] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Background

Methodology/Principal Findings

Conclusion

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Animals

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

Immunoblot analysis

Blood biochemistry

Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence

Microarray analysis, statistical analysis and data mining

Cell Culture and Transfections

Results

Liver cholestasis is induced in mice with LKB1 deletion in hepatoblasts

LKB1 promotes maturation of bile ducts during biliary morphogenesis

Cross-talk between LKB1 and Notch pathways in liver

Discussion

Conclusion

Supporting Information

S1 Table. List of primer sequences.

S2 Table. List of 253 non-redundant genes differentially expressed in KO vs WT LKB1 mice.

S3 Table. List of 237 non-redundant genes differentially expressed in KO vs WT RBPJ mice.

S4 Table. List of 54 non-redundant genes differentially expressed in both LKB1 and RBPJ KO vs WT mice.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References