Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

An Efficient Approach for the Development of Locus Specific Primers in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Its Application to Re-Sequencing of Genes Involved in Frost Tolerance

  • Steve Babben,

    Affiliation Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance, Quedlinburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany

  • Dragan Perovic ,

    Affiliation Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance, Quedlinburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany

  • Michael Koch,

    Affiliation Deutsche Saatveredelung AG (DSV), Lippstadt, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

  • Frank Ordon

    Affiliation Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance, Quedlinburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany

An Efficient Approach for the Development of Locus Specific Primers in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Its Application to Re-Sequencing of Genes Involved in Frost Tolerance

  • Steve Babben, 
  • Dragan Perovic, 
  • Michael Koch, 
  • Frank Ordon


Recent declines in costs accelerated sequencing of many species with large genomes, including hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Although the draft sequence of bread wheat is known, it is still one of the major challenges to developlocus specific primers suitable to be used in marker assisted selection procedures, due to the high homology of the three genomes. In this study we describe an efficient approach for the development of locus specific primers comprising four steps, i.e. (i) identification of genomic and coding sequences (CDS) of candidate genes, (ii) intron- and exon-structure reconstruction, (iii) identification of wheat A, B and D sub-genome sequences and primer development based on sequence differences between the three sub-genomes, and (iv); testing of primers for functionality, correct size and localisation. This approach was applied to single, low and high copy genes involved in frost tolerance in wheat. In summary for 27 of these genes for which sequences were derived from Triticum aestivum, Triticum monococcum and Hordeum vulgare, a set of 119 primer pairs was developed and after testing on Nulli-tetrasomic (NT) lines, a set of 65 primer pairs (54.6%), corresponding to 19 candidate genes, turned out to be specific. Out of these a set of 35 fragments was selected for validation via Sanger's amplicon re-sequencing. All fragments, with the exception of one, could be assigned to the original reference sequence. The approach presented here showed a much higher specificity in primer development in comparison to techniques used so far in bread wheat and can be applied to other polyploid species with a known draft sequence.


Genomic resources in wheat

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the cereal with the largest acreage worldwide [1]. It belongs to the family Poaceae and has a complex allohexaploid genome of about 17 Giga-base pairs (Gbp). The repeat content is approximately 80% which consists primarily of retroelements. The gene density is between 1 per 87 Kilo-base pairs (Kbp) and 1 per 184 Kbp [2, 3]. During evolution wheat became an alohexaploid organism (2n = 6x = 42) with the A, B and D genome. In brief, 300.000–500.000 years ago the first hybridisation between the wild diploid wheat (Triticum urartu, 2n = 2x = 14, genome AuAu) and an ancestor closest related to goat grass (Aegilops speltoides, 2n = 2x = 14, genome SS) took place [4, 5] leading to the generation of wild emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides, 2n = 4x = 28, genome AuAuBB) [6]. Tribal communities formerly making a living of gathering and hunting began to cultivate the wild emmer about 10,000 years ago. Human selection led to cultivated emmer (Triticum dicoccum). By a spontaneous hybridisation of cultivated emmer with another goat grass (Aegilops tauschii 2n = 2x = 14, genome DD) in combination with a natural mutation, bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, 2n = 6x = 42, genome AABBDD) was created [7]. Due to the hexaploid genome and a very high homology of the three sub-genomes in wheat, the genome sequence information has an inestimable value for molecular breeding, comparative genomics and association studies.

Nowadays, the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, database is a key virtual library of genomic, transcriptional and protein sequence data for more than 33,000 organisms [8]. NCBI serves as a web-platform for the identification of target gene sequences in organisms of interest, e.g. Triticum aestivum, Triticum monococcum, Hordeum vulgare etc. An additional wheat database is the CerealsDB web page created by members of the Functional Genomics Group at the University of Bristol (, which includes online resources of genomic information, i.e. varietal SNPs, DArT markers, and EST sequences all linked to a draft genome sequence of the cultivar Chinese Spring [9]. Another web based portal is URGI, which includes datasets such as chromosome survey sequences, reference sequences, physical maps, genetic maps, polymorphisms, genetic resources, many phenotypic data and various genomic arrays ( The chromosomal sequence information is granted by the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC). All mentioned databases are suitable for the identification of homologous chromosome sequences in bread wheat. In addition to these resources, an important tool for wheat is the upcoming Genome Zipper of wheat ( In the past few years, a lot of sequence information of wheatsorted chromosome arms [1012], T. urartu [13] and Ae. tauschii [14] became available and was integrated in the above mentioned databases.

Function and structure of frost tolerance genes

Low temperature is one of the most important limiting factors of wheat cultivation in North America and Eastern Europe. To ensure high yields in these areas, introduction of efficient frost tolerance alleles into elite cultivars is a prerequisite. Cold stress inhibits metabolic reactions and prevents wheat from fulfilling its genetic potential. To avoid yield losses, wheat needs acclimatisation to low temperatures, which prevents premature transition to the reproductive phase. This must happen before the threat of freezing stress during winter has passed [15]. Frost tolerance is a complex system involving many genes out of which six gene families/groups have been analysed in this study. According to their function, these genes belong to two separated metabolic pathways. The Ppd and Vrn genes are responsible for flowering, whereas the Cbfs, Ices, Tacr7, Dem, Cab and Dhn genes are involved directly in frost tolerance. Regarding copy number, the analysed genes could be assigned as follows: Dem and Tacr7 are single copy; Ppd, Vrn and Ice are low copy, while Cbfs, Cab and Dhn are high copy genes.

A high number of low temperature-induced genes was identified and characterized in plants [16, 17]. These are referred to as LATE EMBRYOGENESIS-ABUNDANT (LEA), Dehydrin (Dhn), Responsive to Abscisic Acid (RAB), Low Temperature–Responsive (LT) and Cold-Responsive (COR) genes. Several of the COR genes are dehydrins, which are a distinct biochemical group of LEA proteins [1820] for which 54 different unigenes are described, of which 23 are involved in frost tolerance [21]. Dehydrins have either one but mostly two exons [22]. Cab genes or CAM-like (CML) genes, encoding proteins composed mostly of EF-hand Ca2+-binding motifs, may contain one to six exons [23]. Cbf genes are very important in the induction of COR genes through binding of C-repeat/dehydration-responsive elements (CRT/DRE) [15]. The complex Cbf gene family consists of 27 paralogs with 1–3 homologous copies per sub-genome. In total, the family contains at least 65 Cbf gene family members [24]. Knox et al. [25] detected that approximately half of the eleven Cbf orthologues at the FR-H2 locus in barley are duplicated. In addition, they reported that the variation in Cbf genes, which do not carry any introns, is widespread in the Triticeae [26]. This gene family is regulated by two wheat specific Ice genes under cold conditions [27, 28]. Both Ice genes have four exons [29, 30]. Tacr7 belongs to the group of LT genes [31]. The Dem genes have an important role in the development of apical meristems and are thereby involved in the vegetative/reproductive transition of the shoot apex [27].

Flowering genes may be involved in frost the tolerance pathway because the flowering pathway contains vernalization and photoperiod response genes at crucial positions [32]. This pathway is regulated by five major Vrn genes (Vrn1, Vrn2, Vrn3, Vrn4 and Vrn5) and two Ppd genes (Ppd1 and Ppd2) [33]. The gene structure of the five vernalization genes varies from Vrn1 having eight exons [34], via Vrn3 with three exons [35] and Vrn2 with two exons [36] to Vrn4 and Vrn5 of which the structure is unknown. The Ppd1 gene shows eight exons [37], while the structure of Ppd2 is unknown. The interaction between the flowering and the frost tolerance pathway is based on Vrn1 and Cbf genes. The Vrn1 gene may reduce transcript levels of Cbfs and COR genes under long day conditions.

The draft wheat sequence and development of genomic markers

Nowadays, molecular markers, i.e. marker-assisted selection (MAS), are basic tools in plant breeding during germplasm characterization and cost efficient selection of important traits/genes. Furthermore, after gene isolation re-sequencing of specific fragments allows efficient allele mining [38]. However, the development of gene specific primers in wheat is hampered by the large genome size of 17 Gbp, the high repeat content of about 80% [2, 3], by the close homology of the three genomes (A, B and D) and by the high rate of similarity within genes and gene family members [10]. Comparative analysis of wheat sub-genomes shows high sequence homology and structural conservation and no significant differences in the rate of duplications between the sub-genomes are observed [11]. Recent efforts of the scientific community and the IWGS in sequencing of the 3 donor genomes as well as of the hexaploid wheat offer a solution in deciphering the intron-exon-structure of genes. By using differences of intron sequences among the homologous and paralogous copies of the various genes, it is possible to reconstruct the gene structure and identify differences between homologues. Continuous improvements of BLAST algorithms enhance the use of the above mentioned wheat genomic resources facilitating efficient primer development.Furthermore, specific primers are the basis for the development of molecular marker assays based on SNPsi.e. cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) [39], pyrosequencing [40] or competitive allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (KASP) [41], which are the base for marker assisted selection (MAS) procedures, anchoring physical and sequence contigs [12], germplasm characterization [42].

Material and Methods

Plant material and DNA extraction

In this study three cultivars (`Chinese Spring`, `Moskovskaya 39`and `VAKKA`) were used in initial testing of designed primer pairs, while a set of 24 genotypes, comprising two spring and 22 winter wheat cultivars, was used for re-sequencing of amplicons of frost tolerance genes (Table 1). For the physical assignment to chromosomes and chromosome segments 21 NT-lines [43] and 46 deletion-lines [44] were used (S1 Table) having the genetic background of ‘Chinese Spring’. The DNA was extracted at the three leaf stage according to Stein et al. [45].

Sequence retrieval of genes involved in frost tolerance

As a starting point a set of 27 genes involved in frost tolerance was selected. 9 Triticum aestivum sequences together with 9 sequences from Triticum monococcum and 9 from Hordeum vulgare, known to be involved in frost tolerance from previous studies, served as a back bone for the identification of bread wheat frost tolerance candidate gene sequences (Table 2). If only the coding regions (mRNA-, EST- or protein-sequences) were available, the data bases of the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC, and/or the Bristol Wheat Genomics ( were used for the identification of the full genomic sequence and subsequent reconstruction of the gene structure. The BLAST algorithm parameters were set as default.

Reconstruction of intron-exon-structure and gene specific primer development

The reconstruction of the gene intron-exon-structure was performed using the internet platform ‘Spidey’ ( from NCBI, which allowsalignment of mRNA to genomic sequence. The intron/UTR regions sequences were used for primer development. The next step was the identification of the best hits to the three different wheat genomes on the IWGSC and/or the Bristol Wheat Genomics website via BLASTn. After collecting three homologue sequences of each targeted gene the gene structure was reconstructed for each one separately and then used for multiple alignments. Multiple alignments were constructed by using Sequencer 5.1 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, USA) and CLC Main Workbench 7.6 (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark) software and visually inspected for unique stretches among three homologues. The polymorphisms between the three homologous genomes of each gene were detected and used for specific primer development. The primers were developed by using ‘Primer3’ (v. 0.4.0) [46, 47]. Parameters utilized for primer development were set to a maximal 3`stability of 50, primer size between 19 and 28 bp and primer melting temperature between 57° and 63°Celsius. The maximal fragment length was set up to 1200 bp, while optimal fragment length was 900 bp. Other parameters remained as default. Specificity of primers was based on two nucleotide differences within the primer binding site or one difference within the last seven nucleotides at the 3`end of the primer based on the analyses of the three homologue target sequences [48]. All primers were designed to bind locus specific sequences within the introns/UTR regions of selected genes. At least one primer of a primer pair had to be locus specific for single band amplification.

PCR amplification and fragment analysis

Newly designed PCR primers were amplified in two different reaction volumes i.e. firstly, in a volume of 10 μl for functionality testing and chromosomal assignment, and secondly in a 20 μl reaction volume for re-sequencing. The PCR reactions comprised two different polymerases, FIREPol® DNA polymerase (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia), in a first round of testing, and MyTaq™ DNA polymerase (BIOLINE, Luckenwalde, Germany), in a second round of testing in case the FIREPol product was very weak, with 50 ng of genomic DNA. The master mix for one PCR reaction comprised 0.4 U FIREPol® DNA Polymerase, 1 x Buffer B, 2.5 mM MgCl2 (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia), 0.2 mM dNTPs (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) and 0.25 pmol primers (Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland) or 0.4 U MyTaq™ DNA Polymerase, 1 x My Taq Reaction Buffer B (that comprised 1 mM dNTPs and 3 mM MgCl2) (BIOLINE, Luckenwalde, Germany) and 0.25 pmol primers. The fragment amplification was conducted in a thermal cycler GeneAmp® PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany) under various PCR profiles (S2 Table). PCR fragments were separated by using agarose gel electrophoreses and analysed using the imaging system Gel Doc™ XR and the Quantity One® 1-D analysis software (4.6.2) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA).

PCR fragment mapping by using NT- and deletion lines

All specific and single banded PCR fragments were assigned to chromosomes by using 21 nullisomic-tetrasomic (NT) lines [43] and by a set of 46 deletion-lines [44]. The information about chromosomal localisation of these gene specific amplicons was compared to published results. The map of specific PCR fragments was printed via LaTeX 4.4.1 software (freeware).

In silico analysis of primer sub-genome specificity

A set of98 primers used for amplification of 65 PCR fragments with correct chromosomal localisation were in silico validated for sub-genome specificity by aligning to the draft sequence of wheat. The primers were aligned via Multiple Alignment using Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT,, CLC and Sequencher. Parameters for the Sequencher based alignment were as follows: clean data with minimum overlap of 19 nucleotides and minimum match percentage of 90%, while CLC and MAFFT parameters were as default. The differences between the sub-genome sequences and designed primers were manually inspected. Primers with sub-genome specificity were those having two or more differences in binding site or at least one difference at the last seven nucleotide bases at 3`end of primer.

Re-sequencing of frost tolerance candidate genes and BLAST verification

Sequencing of PCR fragments was performed by Microsynth AG (Balgach, Switzerland) using the Sanger sequencing method [49]. First sequencing reactions were performed with primers used for amplification and if quality was lower than 70% an optimisation with redesigned oligos was conducted. Subsequently all fragment sequences were compared to reference sequences and/or candidate genes of related species by using NCBI MegaBlast function [50]. The results were limited to five hits, minimum expect threshold of e-100 and minimum identity of 85%. All other parameters remained as default. The haplotype diversity (Hd), the nucleotide diversity and the average number of nucleotide diversity in a set of 24 analysed wheat cultivars were calculated using the DnaSP 5.1 freeware software [51, 52].


Alignment of candidate gene sequences with corresponding genomic sequences retrieved from the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium, the Bristol Wheat Genomics and NCBI allowed the identification of exon-intron splicing positions, and the identification of coding and non coding regions. Therefore, reconstruction of the intron-exon structure by using newly available genomic sequences is the basic step towards the development of gene specific primers in polyploid plants such as hexaploid wheat.

Reconstruction of intron-exon-structure and development of gene specific primers

The workflow for the development of gene specific primers and validation regarding PCR specificity, chromosomal localisation and sequence homology contains four steps (Fig 1). In short, the procedure starts with collecting sequences of candidate genes, followed by the reconstruction of intron and exonstructure and sub-genome sequence identification, until primer development and PCR fragment testing. Functionality and correctness of PCR fragments were assessed by NT mapping, sequencing and BLASTing by using three databases, six tools (‘Spidey’, ‘Primer3’, BLASTn, BLASTx, CLC Main Workbench and Sequencer) and two cytological stocks of wheat.

Fig 1. Workflow of development gene specific primers and PCR fragments in wheat.

The method comprises four steps, i.e. (i) identification of genomic and coding sequences (CDS) of candidate genes, (ii) intron- and exon-structure reconstruction, (iii) identification of wheat A, B and D sub-genome sequences and primer development on sequence differences between the three sub-genomes, and (iv); primer and PCR fragment testing for functionality, correct size and localisation. The dashed lines show optional applications.

For all of the 27 candidate genes we were able to re-construct the gene structure or at least a part of it. A set of 119 PCR products was obtained from 157 primers pairs designed in this study. 13 of them have recently been published in Keilwagen et al. [53]. Additional 12 primers from literature were used for the amplification of targeted genes. By combining the primers from this study and the 12 primers from literature a total of 169 primers were analysed. As an example the reconstruction of the three copies of the Vrn1 gene structure, primer positions, intron length differences and exon SNPs are shown in Fig 2.

Fig 2. Example for an intron-exon structure, intron length differences, exon SNPs and primer position of the three copies of the Vrn1 gene.

(I) A, B and D on the left border stand for the three different wheat sub-genomes and I1 to I7 on the top for the seven introns of Vrn1. The arrows which bend to the right are forward primers and the arrows which bend to the left are reverse primers. The red vertical lines show SNPs between the three gene copies. A I1 has a length of 8518 bp, B I1 2821 bp, D I1 8625bp, A I2 1475 bp, B I2 1246 bp, D I2 1504 bp, A I3 90 bp, B I3 92 bp, D I3 90 bp, A I4 192 bp, B I4 196 bp, D I4 188 bp, A I5 152 bp, B I5 156 bp, D I5 156 bp, A I6 93 bp, B I6 91 bp, D I6 91 bp, A I7 166 bp, B I7 168 bp and D I7 168 bp. (II) This figure shows the SNPs between the three sub-genomes and their coding sequences (CDS) position.

Testing primers for specificity and chromosomal assignment of PCR products

In total, a set of 169 primers representing 119 PCR products from 27 candidate genes was tested for functionality and specificity. A set of 86 primer combinations from 23 candidate genes showed single band amplification (72.27%).

Chromosomal localisation via Nulli-tetrasomic (NT)-lines of Chinese Spring [43] of a set of 86 single band PCR amplicons revealed that 65 fragments were located on expected chromosomes according to the literature. Out of these 65 fragments, six were products of combination of already published and newly designed primers. The remaining 19 fragments showed an incorrect localisation (literature vs. NT-lines) or no localisation was possible as all NT-lines showed a fragment. Correctly assigned amplicons originated from 19 genes and were located on 11 wheat chromosomes (Table 3, Fig 3). A set of 10 out of 19 analysed genes were located on wheat chromosome group 5, out of 119 PCR fragments 65 single bands were correctly localised. That is equivalent to a success rate of 54.6%. These 65 amplicons represent 19 frost tolerance genes, are gene specific and were therefore selected for further studies (Table 4, S2 Table).

Fig 3. Map of gene specific PCR fragments by using wheat NT- and deletion lines.

In this figure only wheat chromosomes are shown harbouring mapped PCR fragments. The white bar is the chromosome, the constriction symbolised the centromere, on the left side of chromosomes deletion break points are listed and the black bars are the regions of mapped PCR fragments with appended candidate gene.

Table 3. Overview of chromosome localisation of candidate genes (PCR fragment) via NT-lines, deletion-lines and literature.

Furthermore, a set of 40 amplicons was physically assigned using a set of 46 available deletion-lines [44] (Fig 3, Table 3). All six genes, which are localised on chromosome 5A via NT-lines, are map to a large cluster between sector AL-12 and AL-17 on the long arm of chromosome 5.

In silico analysis of primer sub-genome specificity

The draft sequence of wheat and related species allows detailed in silicio analysis of oligos used in this study by doing simple BLAST comparison. Out of 98 oligos that were used for the amplification of 65 PCR fragments, 54 turned out to be specific to one sub-genome, 21 specific to two sub-genomes, and 14 were unspecific. For 9 oligos the comparison could not be performed due to non availability of sub-genome sequences (S2 Table). 57 out of 65 amplicons comprise at least one sub-genome specific primer. For five PCR fragments (Cbf5, Dhn1, Cab b, Cab d and Dem) no wheat sub-genome sequences could be identified. Both primers of PCR fragments Cbf7, Ppd-B1f and Ppd-D1b showed no-specificity to one sub-genome in reference to Wu et al. [48]. Nevertheless, all three fragments showed single bands and correct chromosome localisation via NT-lines (S1 Fig). The primer sequences of Ppd-B1f and Ppd-D1b were derived from a specific sub-genome. At least one of the primers showed one or more differences to corresponding regions on the chromosomes in alignments with the other two sub-genomes. Special cases are the primers of fragment Cbf7. The forward primer has no sub-genome specificity and the reverse primer is specific to sub-genomes A and B (S3 Table).

Re-sequencing of genes involved in frost tolerance and homology validation via BLAST

Five out of 40 amplicons revealed a presence/absence polymorphisms (dominant) and were therefore not sequenced. These five dominant markers were directly used for genotyping of a Ppd-D1 deletion in the promoter and a transposable element (TE) in intron1 [54]. One PCR fragment (Cbf7) could not be sequenced due to very low quality. Finally, 34 amplicons, representing 18 frost tolerance genes, were selected for sequencing and all 34 obtained sequences were compared to retrieved gene models via MegaBlast. In case of Tacr7, Kocsy et al. [55] identified BQ659345 of Hordeum vulgare as reference, but the fragments of 24 sequenced genotypes of Tacr7 do not exceed an identity of 84% to the published wheat reference sequence L28093 for Tacr7[31]. The best BLAST hit of the 24 sequences is still the initial barley sequence BQ659345 with an identity of 92.3%, but the second best barley BLAST hit of 91.8% identity is to X97916, the barley low temperature gene 14.1 abbreviated as blt14.1. The rest of 33 BLAST results show very high identities from 88.8% to 100% to initial gene sequences (Table 5).

Table 5. BLASTn results of sequenced PCR fragments versus NCBI nucleotide collection (nr/nt) and NCBI candidate gene reference EST.

In 12 genes out ofa set of 18 sequenced candidate genes represented by 16 unique PCR amplicons, differences between the 24 genotypes were determined, revealing a high level of polymorphimsof 66.67%. The number of polymorphic sites ranged from 1 to 37, the haplotypes (h) from two to three, the haplotype diversity (Hd) from 0.08 to 0.61 and the nucleotide diversity (π) from 0.00008 to 0.00757 (Table 6).

Table 6. Nucleotide polymorphisms of coding and noncoding candidate gene regions.

The results of the workflow for locus specific primer development presented in this paper are very promising. The main workflow step is the identification of sub-genome sequences and the design of primers on sub-genome sequence differences. This is the essential step of this workflow and is crucial for the success of this approach. The primer amplification test for single bands and the fragment mapping via NT-lines are a simple way to verify locus specificity. The sequencing of selected locus specific amplicons and the BLAST analysis of these fragment sequences versus initial data bases is the last step of safe-guarding the correct amplification. The results of this BLAST search showed no critical differences to the initially selected sequences.


New bioinformatic platforms and data bases containing recent genomics data are a powerful resource for the development of tools for molecular plant breeding.

Gene specific primer development and chromosomal assignment of specific PCR fragments by using NT- and deletion lines

The rapid progress in sequencing of plant genomes leads to the accumulation of whole genome sequence data,allowing the fast development of locus/genome specific markers in complex plant genomes (e.g. wheat) with a high success rate. Up to now, high homology of the hexaploid wheat genome hampered the success in gene specific primer development. Gene structure is important for marker development, because wheat introns have more sequence differences between the homologous chromosomes than exons [56, 57]. Therefore, gene structure reconstruction and comparison of homologue sequences by using three genomes facilitate an improved development of molecular markers as well as re-sequencing of targeted genes/loci.

Specificity of developed primers

Specificity of primers is the non-recurring binding in the target genome. This is reflected in a single PCR and a correct or syntenically localised amplicon. Fig 4 shows an example of the Cbf1 amplicon localisation via NT- and deletion-lines.

Fig 4. Example of fragment localisation from Cbf1 via NT- and deletion-lines.

(A) The missing PCR fragment on NT-line N5D-T5B indicated the location on wheat chromosome 5D. (B) The missing PCR fragment on Csdel 5DL-1 indicated the location on wheat long arm of chromosome 5D between the deletion segments 1 and 5.

The inspection of primer functionality and single PCR product generation is a standard for the development of primers and therefore is the first necessary step of the presented approach. Via the first inspection step we have eliminated 27.73% of studied primer pair combinations. Most of these showed no PCR amplification probably due to non-binding of target sequences. The second important step of checking the amplicon specificity is the mapping of the PCR products via NT-lines to get information about the correct amplification on the correct target chromosome template and sub-genome. By using NT-mapping of PCR amplicons we have eliminated 18.49% of primer pair combinations. One part of the eliminated PCR products shows a chromosome localisation that differs from what has been reported in the literature. In this case, we assume a non-specific binding in the wheat genome. That can occur if primers are derived from related organisms and not from wheat itself. For seven of eight discarded candidate genes, sequences of related organisms (Triticum monococcum and Hordeum vulgare) were used for primer development.The other part of eliminated primer pair combinations showed a PCR product on all NT-lines which may be due to the fact that both primers (forward and reverse) bind at least to two sub-genomes.

By using the draft wheat chromosome arm sorted sequences [1012] and simple comparative methods we were able to develop gene specific primers in hexaploid wheat with a high success rate of 58.60%. Also a very high rate of 54.62% for specific fragment amplification confirmed the usefulness of wheat genomic sequence. To our knowledge such high rate is not yet described in literature for specific primer/marker development in polyploid plants. An overview of published success rates revealed a variation in microsatellite amplification in wheat between 22.88 and 45.0% [5861]. In cotton this rate was 23.3% [62]. Contrary, Wang et al. [63] describe the development of effectively derived primers for sequence tagged sites (STS) with 24.56% and for STS primer combinations of only 3.7% in wheat. Chen et al. [64] achieved a rate of 27.5% for STS marker development in wheat. In Brassica oleracea (which is a paleohexaploid plant) a success rate of 29.1% is described in allele specific PCR primer development [65]. The highest success rate reported in literature is for potato [56]. In this study a rate of 51.79% developed intron targeting (IT) markers was achieved. With the ongoing genome sequencing projects and subsequent development of genome-wide physical maps in wheat and related plants an increase in the success of specific primer development may be expected.

Sequencing of frost tolerance candidate genes and BLAST based verification

In this study 18 out of 19 (94.74%) frost tolerance genes were sequenced using the same primers used for PCR amplification. For gene Cbf7, for which initial sequencing failed, a set of newly designed sequencing primers improved the sequencing, therefore optimisation for single band products could be recommended as a part of the verification procedure. Concerning the gene Tacr7, Kocsy et al. [55] claimed BQ659345 of Hordeum vulgare is identical to the Tacr7 gene in wheat. However, the analysis of the generated sequences presented in this paper showed an identity of 84% to the reference sequence L28093 for Tacr7 of wheat and 92% to BQ659345. In contrast, our sequences reveal an identity of 92% to X97916 of Hordeum vulgare which is annotated as the barley low temperature gene 14.1 (Blt14.1). BLT14.1 shows a considerable homology to WLT10, as described by Ohno et al. [66]. Matching BQ659345 against X97916 results in an identity of 99%. Furthermore Tacr7, Blt14.1 and Wlt10 are located on chromosome 2 of barley and wheat, respectively [55, 66, 67]. We also mapped PCR fragments derived from Tacr7 on chromosome 2B. Further BLAST results indicate that the sequence of our Tacr7 is with 92% the initial sequence BQ659345. Furthermore, it was shown recently that the newest sequence of Tacr7 [55] is very similar to the sequences of the genes Blt14.1 and Wlt10, in contrast to the L28093 sequence (described also as Tac7 [31]). The nucleotide identity of 99% between Blt14.1 (X97916) and the initial reference sequence (BQ659345), which is published as Tacr7 [55], backed this hypothesis. All other PCR fragment sequences have shown a very good sequence identity to the original gene of interest (97.5%).

The sequencing of single bands and correct chromosome assigned PCR amplicons followed by BLAST based verification is the last check-up step in the workflow presented in this study. The results of the BLAST based verification demonstrate that the selection of PCR single products and the assignment to the correct chromosomes of the PCR amplicons is an efficient instrument of locus specific primer selection. The combination of sequencing and BLAST based verification using the presented approach leads to very robust results with an error rate tending to zero.

The identified SNPs at 11 polymorphic candidate genes can be used for developing SNP based marker. Also the InDels in eight candidate genes are suited for marker development based on size polymorphisms. Based on these PCR amplicons can be employed for genetic mapping of correspondingcandidate genes in biparental mapping populations, thereby allowing for the first time their genetic localization.

This paper describes an efficient approach for the development of locus specific primers in wheat. With the aid of this locus specific primers are necessary for locus specific sequencing and detection of genes specific polymorphisms (SNPs and InDels) between genotypes of interest. The detected polymorphisms can follow up the use for genetic mapping, but also for gene editing via sequence information for transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) [6870] or clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR/Cas) systems [71]. Therefore our approach of development of locus specific primers is a base for many downstream applications i.e. detection of new polymorphisms, development of new markers, genetic mapping and gene editing in wheat.


It is still difficult to develop molecular markers in Triticum aestivum due to the very complex genome. In this study we presented anefficient approach for gene and genome specific primer development by using sequence data of wheat. Altogether, we have developed specific primers for 19 out of 27 selected frost candidate genes. For 27 candidate genes 119 primer pairs were generated of which 65 were specific. Out of candidate gene specific primer fragments 36 fragments were selected, corresponding to 19 genes, for validation via sequencing. Finally, 35 amplicons could be successfully sequenced and only one specific sequence showed a low identity of approximately 83% to the original reference sequence.

By using the presented approach for gene specific primer/PCR development, it is possible to sequence and analyse interesting candidate genes in wheat by using gene information of related sequenced plant species. The wheat genome sequences currently available, in combination with the wheat physical map, are well suited for the development of specific primers. The approach for primer design, developed within this study turned out to be very efficient by using available wheat genomic resources and it is expected to perform even better once new versions of wheat genomic sequences will be available.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Chromosome localisation and cycler programs of the PCR fragments Cbf7, Ppd-B1f and Ppd-D1b via NT-lines.


S1 Table. Plant material of NT- and Deletion-lines.


S2 Table. Candidate gene specific primers, primer specificity, PCR fragments, used polymerases, cycler programs and primers for fragment re-sequencing.

Primer names with are developed in course of this work but published from Keilwagen et al. [53]. Primer names with * as already published were used in combination with primers with and without labels. 1[86]; 2[73]; 3[87]; 4[81]; 5[37]; 6 [53]. Primers published in Keilwagen et al. [53]. *Already published primers


S3 Table. Primer specificity and mismatches to compared the three sub-genomes of functional and correct localised PCR fragments via in silico alignments.

Primers assigned are developed in course of this study and published in Keilwagen et al. [54]. Already published primers with * assigned were used in combination with primers in green and black. The column differences describe the numbers of SNPs/InDels between primers at sequence level of A, B and D genomes. The columns position of InDels and SNPs in 5' to 3`direction describes the position of the differences between primers at sub-genomes (InDels and SNP) from primer 5´ to 3´ end direction. 1[86]; 2[73]; 3[87]; 4[81]; 5[37]; 6 [53]. Primers published in Keilwagen et al. [53]. *Already published primers.



The authors thank the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for funding the project FROWHEAT (0315953). This work was bioinformatically supported by Dr. Jens Keilwagen and Thomas Berner. Special thanks to Katy Niedung for technical support.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DP FO. Performed the experiments: SB. Analyzed the data: SB DP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DP MK FO. Wrote the paper: SB DP FO. Read and approved the final manuscript: SB DP MK FO.


  1. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Divisions [Internet]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2014 [cited 03.02.2015]. Available from:
  2. 2. Smith DB, Flavell RB. CHARACTERIZATION OF WHEAT GENOME BY RENATURATION KINETICS. Chromosoma. 1975;50(3):223–42. pmid:WOS:A1975AC44200001.
  3. 3. Choulet F, Wicker T, Rustenholz C, Paux E, Salse J, Leroy P, et al. Megabase Level Sequencing Reveals Contrasted Organization and Evolution Patterns of the Wheat Gene and Transposable Element Spaces. Plant Cell. 2010;22(6):1686–701. pmid:WOS:000280505300005.
  4. 4. Huang S, Sirikhachornkit A, Su XJ, Faris J, Gill B, Haselkorn R, et al. Genes encoding plastid acetyl-CoA carboxylase and 3-phosphoglycerate kinase of the Triticum/Aegilops complex and the evolutionary history of polyploid wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(12):8133–8. pmid:WOS:000176217700061.
  5. 5. Dvorak J, Akhunov ED. Tempos of gene locus deletions and duplications and their relationship to recombination rate during diploid and polyploid evolution in the aegilops-triticum alliance. Genetics. 2005;171(1):323–32. pmid:WOS:000232494400028.
  6. 6. Feldman M, Kislev ME. Domestication of emmer wheat and evolution of free-threshing tetraploid wheat. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences. 2007;55(3–4):207–21. pmid:WOS:000261664500003.
  7. 7. Peng JHH, Sun DF, Nevo E. Domestication evolution, genetics and genomics in wheat. Mol Breed. 2011;28(3):281–301. pmid:WOS:000294505400001.
  8. 8. Pruitt K, Tatusova T, Brown G, Maglott D. NCBI Reference Sequences (RefSeq): current status, new features and genome annotation policy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012:D130—D5. pmid:22121212
  9. 9. Wilkinson P, Winfield M, Barker G, Allen A, Burridge A, Coghill J, et al. CerealsDB 2.0: an integrated resource for plant breeders and scientists. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13(1):219.
  10. 10. Brenchley R, Spannagl M, Pfeifer M, Barker GLA, D'Amore R, Allen AM, et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature. 2012;491(7426):705–10. pmid:23192148
  11. 11. Consortium TIWGS. A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome. Science. 2014;345(6194). pmid:25035500
  12. 12. Raats D, Frenkel Z, Krugman T, Dodek I, Sela H, Simkova H, et al. The physical map of wheat chromosome 1BS provides insights into its gene space organization and evolution. Genome Biology. 2013;14(12). pmid:WOS:000331376200006.
  13. 13. Ling H-Q, Zhao S, Liu D, Wang J, Sun H, Zhang C, et al. Draft genome of the wheat A-genome progenitor Triticum urartu. Nature. 2013;496(7443):87–90. doi: pmid:23535596
  14. 14. Jia JZ, Zhao SC, Kong XY, Li YR, Zhao GY, He WM, et al. Aegilops tauschii draft genome sequence reveals a gene repertoire for wheat adaptation. Nature. 2013;496(7443):91–5. pmid:WOS:000316993400031.
  15. 15. Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu JK. Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends in Plant Science. 2007;12(10):444–51. pmid:WOS:000250457800004.
  16. 16. Tsuda K, Tsvetanov S, Takumi S, Mori N, Atanassov A, Nakamura C. New members of a cold-responsive group-3 Lea/Rab-related Cor gene family from common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genes & Genetic Systems. 2000;75(4):179–88. pmid:WOS:000165516800002.
  17. 17. Zhang CZ, Fei SZ, Warnke S, Li LJ, Hannapel D. Identification of genes associated with cold acclimation in perennial ryegrass. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2009;166(13):1436–45. pmid:WOS:000269165200010.
  18. 18. Winfield MO, Lu CG, Wilson ID, Coghill JA, Edwards KJ. Plant responses to cold: transcriptome analysis of wheat. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2010;8(7):749–71. pmid:WOS:000280661200001.
  19. 19. Allagulova CR, Gimalov FR, Shakirova FM, Vakhitov VA. The plant dehydrins: Structure and putative functions. Biochemistry-Moscow. 2003;68(9):945–51. pmid:WOS:000186120800001.
  20. 20. Close TJ. Dehydrins: A commonality in the response of plants to dehydration and low temperature. Physiologia Plantarum. 1997;100(2):291–6. pmid:WOS:A1997XF12400010.
  21. 21. Wang YZ, Xu HB, Zhu HL, Tao Y, Zhang GX, Zhang LX, et al. Classification and expression diversification of wheat dehydrin genes. Plant Sci. 2014;214:113–20. pmid:WOS:000328725700013.
  22. 22. Perdiguero P, Barbero MC, Cervera MT, Soto A, Collada C. Novel conserved segments are associated with differential expression patterns for Pinaceae dehydrins. Planta. 2012;236(6):1863–74. pmid:WOS:000311398100015.
  23. 23. McCormack E, Braam J. Calmodulins and related potential calcium sensors of Arabidopsis. New Phytologist. 2003;159(3):585–98. pmid:WOS:000184616400007.
  24. 24. Mohseni S, Che H, Djillali Z, Dumont E, Nankeu J, Danyluk J. Wheat CBF gene family: identification of polymorphisms in the CBF coding sequence. Genome. 2012;55(12):865–81. pmid:WOS:000312383400006.
  25. 25. Knox AK, Dhillon T, Cheng HM, Tondelli A, Pecchioni N, Stockinger EJ. CBF gene copy number variation at Frost Resistance-2 is associated with levels of freezing tolerance in temperate-climate cereals. Theor Appl Genet. 2010;121(1):21–35. pmid:WOS:000277716800003.
  26. 26. Skinner JS, von Zitzewitz J, Szucs P, Marquez-Cedillo L, Filichkin T, Amundsen K, et al. Structural, functional, and phylogenetic characterization of a large CBF gene family in barley. Plant MolBiol. 2005;59(4):533–51. pmid:WOS:000232795800001.
  27. 27. Keddie JS, Carroll BJ, Thomas CM, Reyes MEC, Klimyuk V, Holtan H, et al. Transposon tagging of the Defective embryo and meristems gene of tomato. Plant Cell. 1998;10(6):877–87. pmid:WOS:000074567500002.
  28. 28. Chinnusamy V, Ohta M, Kanrar S, Lee B-h, Hong X, Agarwal M, et al. ICE1: a regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes & Development. 2003;17(8):1043–54. pmid:12672693
  29. 29. Skinner J, Szucs P, von Zitzewitz J, Marquez-Cedillo L, Filichkin T, Stockinger EJ, et al. Mapping of barley homologs to genes that regulate low temperature tolerance in Arabidopsis. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;112(5):832–42. pmid:WOS:000235751700006.
  30. 30. Peng PH, Lin CH, Tsai HW, Lin TY. Cold Response in Phalaenopsis aphrodite and Characterization of PaCBF1 and PaICE1. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014;55(9):1623–35. pmid:WOS:000342978300010.
  31. 31. Gana JA, Sutton F, Kenefick DG. cDNA structure and expression patterns of a low-temperature-specific wheat gene tacr7. Plant MolBiol. 1997;34(4):643–50. pmid:WOS:A1997XN40700008.
  32. 32. Kato K, Yamagata H. Method for evaluation of chilling requirement and narrow-sense earliness of wheat cultivars. Tokyo, JAPON: Nihon Ikushu Gakkai, c/o Tokyo Daigaku Nogakubu; 1988.
  33. 33. McIntosh RA, Ymazaki Y, Dubcovsky J, Rogers J, Morris C, Appels R, et al. Catalogue of Gene Sympols for Wheat. In: McIntosh RA, editor. Morphological and Physiological Traits2013. p. 45–51.
  34. 34. Fu DL, Szucs P, Yan LL, Helguera M, Skinner JS, von Zitzewitz J, et al. Large deletions within the first intron in VRN-1 are associated with spring growth habit in barley and wheat. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005;273(1):54–65. pmid:WOS:000228187500006.
  35. 35. Yan L, Fu D, Li C, Blechl A, Tranquilli G, Bonafede M, et al. The wheat and barley vernalization gene VRN3 is an orthologue of FT. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(51):19581–6. pmid:WOS:000243166600065.
  36. 36. Distelfeld A, Tranquilli G, Li CX, Yan LL, Dubcovsky J. Genetic and Molecular Characterization of the VRN2 Loci in Tetraploid Wheat. Plant Physiol. 2009;149(1):245–57. pmid:WOS:000262261500031.
  37. 37. Beales J, Turner A, Griffiths S, Snape JW, Laurie DA. A Pseudo-Response Regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2007;115(5):721–33. pmid:WOS:000249019700012.
  38. 38. Kaur N, Street K, Mackay M, Yahiaoui N, Keller B. Molecular approaches for characterization and use of natural disease resistance in wheat. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2008;121(3):387–97. pmid:WOS:000256080400018.
  39. 39. Perovic J, Silvar C, Koenig J, Stein N, Perovic D, Ordon F. A versatile fluorescence-based multiplexing assay for CAPS genotyping on capillary electrophoresis systems. Mol Breed. 2013;32(1):61–9. pmid:WOS:000320463000005.
  40. 40. Silvar C, Perovic D, Casas AM, Igartua E, Ordon F. Development of a cost-effective pyrosequencing approach for SNP genotyping in barley. Plant Breed. 2011;130(3):394–7. pmid:WOS:000291225100014.
  41. 41. Allen AM, Barker GLA, Berry ST, Coghill JA, Gwilliam R, Kirby S, et al. Transcript-specific, single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery and linkage analysis in hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2011;9(9):1086–99. pmid:WOS:000297941700015.
  42. 42. Kilian B, Graner A. NGS technologies for analyzing germplasm diversity in genebanks*. Briefings in Functional Genomics. 2012;11(1):38–50. pmid:WOS:000300439700005.
  43. 43. Sears ER. Nullisomictetrasomic combinations in hexaploid wheat. In: Riley R, Lewis KR, editors. Chromosome manipulations and plant genetics1966. p. 29–45.
  44. 44. Endo TR, Gill BS. The deletion stocks of common wheat. Journal of Heredity. 1996;87(4):295–307. pmid:WOS:A1996VE01400005.
  45. 45. Stein N, Herren G, Keller B. A new DNA extraction method for high-throughput marker analysis in a large-genome species such as Triticum aestivum. Plant Breed. 2001;120(4):354–6. pmid:WOS:000171356600015.
  46. 46. Koressaar T, Remm M. Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(10):1289–91. pmid:WOS:000247348300015.
  47. 47. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, et al. Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;40(15). pmid:WOS:000308958600003.
  48. 48. Wu JH, Hong PY, Liu WT. Quantitative effects of position and type of single mismatch on single base primer extension. J Microbiol Methods. 2009;77(3):267–75. pmid:WOS:000267084000003.
  49. 49. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA SEQUENCING WITH CHAIN-TERMINATING INHIBITORS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977;74(12):5463–7. pmid:WOS:A1977EH42100059.
  50. 50. Tan G-M, Xu L, Bu D-B, Feng S-Z, Sun N-H. Improvement of performance of MegaBlast algorithm for DNA sequence alignment. Journal of Computer Science and Technology. 2006;21(6):973–8. pmid:WOS:000242640200014.
  51. 51. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(18):2496–7. pmid:WOS:000187217700029.
  52. 52. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(11):1451–2. pmid:WOS:000266109500026.
  53. 53. Keilwagen J, Kilian B, Özkan H, Babben S, Perovic D, Mayer KFX, et al. Separating the wheat from the chaff–a strategy to utilize plant genetic resources from ex situ genebanks. Sci Rep. 2014;4.
  54. 54. Guo ZA, Song YX, Zhou RH, Ren ZL, Jia JZ. Discovery, evaluation and distribution of haplotypes of the wheat Ppd-D1 gene. New Phytologist. 2010;185(3):841–51. pmid:WOS:000273687900024.
  55. 55. Kocsy G, Athmer B, Perovic D, Himmelbach A, Szucs A, Vashegyi I, et al. Regulation of gene expression by chromosome 5A during cold hardening in wheat. Mol Genet Genomics. 2010;283(4):351–63. pmid:WOS:000275703000005.
  56. 56. Poczai P, Cernak I, Gorji AM, Nagy S, Taller J, Polgar Z. DEVELOPMENT OF INTRON TARGETING (IT) MARKERS FOR POTATO AND CROSS-SPECIES AMPLIFICATION IN SOLANUM NIGRUM (SOLANACEAE). American Journal of Botany. 2010;97(12):E142–E5. pmid:WOS:000284760800005.
  57. 57. Ishikawa G, Yonemaru J, Saito M, Nakamura T. PCR-based landmark unique gene (PLUG) markers effectively assign homoeologous wheat genes to A, B and D genomes. Bmc Genomics. 2007;8. pmid:WOS:000247744600001.
  58. 58. Roder MS, Plaschke J, Konig SU, Borner A, Sorrells ME, Tanksley SD, et al. ABUNDANCE, VARIABILITY AND CHROMOSOMAL LOCATION OF MICROSATELLITES IN WHEAT. Molecular & General Genetics. 1995;246(3):327–33. pmid:WOS:A1995QG77500007.
  59. 59. Bryan GJ, Collins AJ, Stephenson P, Orry A, Smith JB, Gale MD. Isolation and characterisation of microsatellites from hexaploid bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 1997;94(5):557–63. pmid:WOS:A1997WX38800002.
  60. 60. Nicot N, Chiquet V, Gandon B, Amilhat L, Legeai F, Leroy P, et al. Study of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers from wheat expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109(4):800–5. pmid:WOS:000223957000015.
  61. 61. Song QJ, Shi JR, Singh S, Fickus EW, Costa JM, Lewis J, et al. Development and mapping of microsatellite (SSR) markers in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2005;110(3):550–60. pmid:WOS:000227049900015.
  62. 62. Han ZG, Wang CB, Song XL, Guo WZ, Gou JY, Li CH, et al. Characteristics, development and mapping of Gossypium hirsutum derived EST-SSRs in allotetraploid cotton. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;112(3):430–9. pmid:WOS:000234552400005.
  63. 63. Wang LH, Li GY, Pena RJ, Xia XC, He ZH. Development of STS markers and establishment of multiplex PCR for Glu-A3 alleles in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Cereal Science. 2010;51(3):305–12. pmid:WOS:000279062900011.
  64. 64. Chen J, Hu G, Zhang J, Chu C, Wu Y. Mapping of STS Markers Developed from Drought Tolerance Candidate Genes and Preliminary Analysis of their Association with Yield-related Traits in Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum). Cereal Research Communications. 2014;42(2):199–208. pmid:WOS:000336492100003.
  65. 65. Liu J, Huang SM, Sun MY, Liu SY, Liu YM, Wang WX, et al. An improved allele-specific PCR primer design method for SNP marker analysis and its application. Plant Methods. 2012;8. pmid:WOS:000311424000001.
  66. 66. Ohno R, Takumi S, Nakamura C. Expression of a cold-responsive Lt-Cor gene and development of freezing tolerance during cold acclimation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Exp Bot. 2001;52(365):2367–74. pmid:WOS:000172422800012.
  67. 67. Dunn MA, Hughes MA, Pearce RS, Jack PL. MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF A BARLEY GENE INDUCED BY COLD TREATMENT. J Exp Bot. 1990;41(232):1405–13. pmid:WOS:A1990EK16100007.
  68. 68. Boch J, Scholze H, Schornack S, Landgraf A, Hahn S, Kay S, et al. Breaking the Code of DNA Binding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors. Science. 2009;326(5959):1509–12. pmid:WOS:000272623600050.
  69. 69. Moscou MJ, Bogdanove AJ. A Simple Cipher Governs DNA Recognition by TAL Effectors. Science. 2009;326(5959):1501-. pmid:WOS:000272623600048.
  70. 70. Christian M, Cermak T, Doyle EL, Schmidt C, Zhang F, Hummel A, et al. Targeting DNA Double-Strand Breaks with TAL Effector Nucleases. Genetics. 2010;186(2):757–U476. pmid:WOS:000282807400025.
  71. 71. Upadhyay SK, Kumar J, Alok A, Tuli R. RNA-Guided Genome Editing for Target Gene Mutations in Wheat. G3-Genes Genomes Genetics. 2013;3(12):2233–8. pmid:WOS:000328334500013.
  72. 72. Jaglo KR, Kleff S, Amundsen KL, Zhang X, Haake V, Zhang JZ, et al. Components of the Arabidopsis C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element binding factor cold-response pathway are conserved in Brassica napus and other plant species. Plant Physiol. 2001;127(3):910–7. pmid:WOS:000172251200023.
  73. 73. Miller AK, Galiba G, Dubcovsky J. A cluster of 11 CBF transcription factors is located at the frost tolerance locus Fr-A(m)2 in Triticum monococcum. Mol Genet Genomics. 2006;275(2):193–203. pmid:WOS:000236030200009.
  74. 74. Badawi M, Danyluk J, Boucho B, Houde M, Sarhan F. The CBF gene family in hexaploid wheat and its relationship to the phylogenetic complexity of cereal CBFs. Mol Genet Genomics. 2007;277(5):533–54. pmid:WOS:000245888100007.
  75. 75. Knox AK, Li CX, Vagujfalvi A, Galilba G, Stockinger EJ, Dubcovsky J. Identification of candidate CBF genes for the frost tolerance locus Fr-A(m)2 in Triticum monococcum. Plant MolBiol. 2008;67(3):257–70. pmid:WOS:000255414000005.
  76. 76. Choi DW, Zhu B, Close TJ. The barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) dehydrin multigene family: sequences, allele types, chromosome assignments, and expression characteristics of 11 Dhn genes of cv Dicktoo. Theor Appl Genet. 1999;98(8):1234–47. pmid:WOS:000081124700007.
  77. 77. Zhang HN, Sreenivasulu N, Weschke W, Stein N, Rudd S, Radchuk V, et al. Large-scale analysis of the barley transcriptome based on expressed sequence tags. Plant Journal. 2004;40(2):276–90. pmid:WOS:000224066400009.
  78. 78. Yan L, Loukoianov A, Blechl A, Tranquilli G, Ramakrishna W, SanMiguel P, et al. The Wheat VRN2 Gene Is a Flowering Repressor Down-Regulated by Vernalization. Science. 2004;303(5664):1640–4. pmid:15016992
  79. 79. Michalek W, Weschke W, Pleissner KP, Graner A. EST analysis in barley defines a unigene set comprising 4,000 genes. Theor Appl Genet. 2002;104(1):97–103. pmid:WOS:000173851500012.
  80. 80. Kosova K, Prasil IT, Vitamvas P. The relationship between vernalization-and photoperiodically-regulated genes and the development of frost tolerance in wheat and barley. Biologia Plantarum. 2008;52(4):601–15. pmid:WOS:000260773600001.
  81. 81. Yan L, Helguera M, Kato K, Fukuyama S, Sherman J, Dubcovsky J. Allelic variation at the VRN-1 promoter region in polyploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109(8):1677–86. pmid:WOS:000225054800015.
  82. 82. Dubcovsky J, Lijavetzky D, Appendino L, Tranquilli G. Comparative RFLP mapping of Triticum monococcum genes controlling vernalization requirement. Theor Appl Genet. 1998;97(5–6):968–75. pmid:WOS:000076924400036.
  84. 84. Law CN, Sutka J, Worland AJ. GENETIC STUDY OF DAY-LENGTH RESPONSE IN WHEAT. Heredity. 1978;41(OCT):185–91. pmid:WOS:A1978FY98200006.
  86. 86. Li YL, Haseneyer G, Schon CC, Ankerst D, Korzun V, Wilde P, et al. High levels of nucleotide diversity and fast decline of linkage disequilibrium in rye (Secale cereale L.) genes involved in frost response. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11. pmid:WOS:000286815500001.
  87. 87. Vagujfalvi A, Aprile A, Miller A, Dubcovsky J, Delugu G, Galiba G, et al. The expression of several Cbf genes at the Fr-A2 locus is linked to frost resistance in wheat. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005;274(5):506–14. pmid:WOS:000233724700006.