Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Lactobacillus casei Shirota Supplementation Does Not Restore Gut Microbiota Composition and Gut Barrier in Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Pilot Study

  • Vanessa Stadlbauer ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Vanessa Stadlbauer, Bettina Leber

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graz, Austria

  • Bettina Leber ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Vanessa Stadlbauer, Bettina Leber

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Division of Transplantation Surgery, Graz, Austria

  • Sandra Lemesch,

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graz, Austria

  • Slave Trajanoski ,

    slave.trajanoski@medunigraz.at

    Affiliation Centre for Medical Research, Graz, Austria

  • Mina Bashir,

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Graz, Austria

  • Angela Horvath,

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graz, Austria

  • Monika Tawdrous,

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graz, Austria

  • Tatjana Stojakovic,

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Graz, Austria

  • Günter Fauler,

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Graz, Austria

  • Peter Fickert,

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graz, Austria

  • Christoph Högenauer,

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graz, Austria

  • Ingeborg Klymiuk,

    Affiliation Centre for Medical Research, Graz, Austria

  • Philipp Stiegler,

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Division of Transplantation Surgery, Graz, Austria

  • Manfred Lamprecht,

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Centre for Physiological Medicine, Graz, Austria

  • Thomas R. Pieber,

    Affiliations Medical University of Graz, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Graz, Austria, Centre for Biomarker Research in Medicine (CBmed), Graz, Austria

  • Norbert J. Tripolt,

    Affiliation Medical University of Graz, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Graz, Austria

  •  [ ... ],
  • Harald Sourij

    Affiliations Medical University of Graz, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Graz, Austria, Centre for Biomarker Research in Medicine (CBmed), Graz, Austria

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

Lactobacillus casei Shirota Supplementation Does Not Restore Gut Microbiota Composition and Gut Barrier in Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Pilot Study

  • Vanessa Stadlbauer, 
  • Bettina Leber, 
  • Sandra Lemesch, 
  • Slave Trajanoski, 
  • Mina Bashir, 
  • Angela Horvath, 
  • Monika Tawdrous, 
  • Tatjana Stojakovic, 
  • Günter Fauler, 
  • Peter Fickert
PLOS
x

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome is associated with disturbances in gut microbiota composition. We aimed to investigate the effect of Lactobacillus casei Shirota (LcS) on gut microbiota composition, gut barrier integrity, intestinal inflammation and serum bile acid profile in metabolic syndrome. In a single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled pilot study, 28 subjects with metabolic syndrome received either LcS for 12 weeks (n = 13) or no LcS (n = 15). Data were compared to healthy controls (n = 16). Gut microbiota composition was characterised from stool using 454 pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes. Serum bile acids were quantified by tandem mass spectrometry. Zonulin and calprotectin were measured in serum and stool by ELISA. Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio was significantly higher in healthy controls compared to metabolic syndrome but was not influenced by LcS. LcS supplementation led to enrichment of Parabacteroides. Zonulin and calprotectin were increased in metabolic syndrome stool samples but not influenced by LcS supplementation. Serum bile acids were similar to controls and not influenced by LcS supplementation. Metabolic syndrome is associated with a higher Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio and gut barrier dysfunction but LcS was not able to change this. LcS administration was associated with subtle microbiota changes at genus level.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01182844

Introduction

The obesity epidemic is a challenging threat to public health in the 21st century. The World Health Organisation states that by 2014 approximately 1.9 billion adults are overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2), and more than 600 million are obese (BMI 30 kg/m2 or more). [1] Obesity and insulin resistance are major risk factors for the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and conditions such as cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. [2, 3]

The pathogenesis of obesity is multifactorial and is seen as interplay between individual phenotype and environmental factors. However, recent preclinical and clinical studies show an important influence of the intestinal microbiota on obesity and associated metabolic disorders (MetS, T2DM, metabolic liver diseases, cardiovascular diseases). [4] The cecum microbiota of obese mice was found to be significantly different with a higher prevalence of Firmicutes and a corresponding lower prevalence of Bacteroidetes (lower Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio) in obese compared to lean mice. [5] This finding of altered gut microbiota was then confirmed and extended to humans. [6] However, others did not find this association in obesity or MetS. [710] Further studies have shown an association of gut microbiota changes with insulin resistance and diabetes. [11, 12] This suggests that the microbiota might be involved in the pathogenesis of obesity, insulin resistance and T2DM, possibly by having an impact on gut barrier integrity and inflammation. [4] Also, hydrophobic bile acids have been proposed as a novel mechanism for high fat diet induced gut barrier dysfunction. [13, 14] Probiotic interventions have been shown to be effective in modulating gut barrier integrity and gut microbiota in animals and thereby modulating chronic inflammation and metabolic disorders in animal models. [15, 16] Despite several mechanistic studies and encouraging results in animals [17, 18] interventional data on probiotics use in humans with MetS are rare. [19]

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of Lactobacillus casei Shirota (LcS) on gut microbiota composition, gut barrier integrity, intestinal inflammation and the serum bile acid profile in MetS.

Patients and Methods

Patients and Controls

The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Graz (20–037 ex 08/09). The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01182844). Due to an unexpected organizational delay in the registration process of the study the initial release of the protocol in ClinicalTrials.gov took place after the first patient was randomized. The authors confirm that they have not performed and are not conducting any other trials with this intervention (Lactobacillus casei Shirota). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The primary and parts of the secondary outcomes were already published [20, 21]. The gut microbiome analysis was delayed due to lack of funding. The Ethics Committee of the Medical University was informed about the delay in analysis and about all changes in the study protocol. These changes were methodological changes since the methods for gut microbiome analysis and gut permeability analysis have advanced since the start of the study. Furthermore the analysis of bile acids has been added to the protocol and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University.

According to the modified NCEP-ATP-III-guidelines [22] patients with MetS were identified from the outpatient clinic at the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism at the Medical University of Graz. Patients treated with antibiotics within the previous 7 days, with current anti-hyperglycemic treatment, any immunomodulatory therapy 1 month prior to study entry, concomitant use of pre-, pro-, or synbiotics, inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn`s disease, ulcerative colitis) or celiac disease or those with clinical signs of infectious diseases were excluded from participation. We performed a single-centre, permuted-block randomised controlled 12 weeks prospective intervention trial. Patients were randomised to receive either food supplementation with a milk drink containing LcS (3 bottles a day, à 65ml, containing LcS at a concentration of 108/ml, Yakult light®, Yakult Austria, Vienna, Austria) for twelve weeks (n = 13, LcS group) or no intervention (n = 15, standard therapy group).

Patients were randomised with the “Randomizer®” software using permutated blocks (Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Austria). All patients were advised to consume no other probiotic supplements during the study period and received a list of probiotic products available in Austria, which they had to avoid for the study period. Participants were also advised not to change their diet and physical activity pattern while being in the study. A food frequency questionnaire was used to confirm unchanged diet habits. [20] Subjects of the LcS group were provided with a pack of the milk drink every two weeks. At these time points intervention adherence was assessed.

Stool and serum samples were collected at baseline and after 12 weeks. Stool samples from 16 healthy, lean controls without evidence of metabolic syndrome were used as a comparison for gut microbiota analysis and zonulin levels. For stool calprotectin established reference ranges from the kit description were used. Serum samples from 11 healthy, lean controls were used to compare bile acid profiles, zonulin, and calprotectin levels in serum.

DNA-isolation, 454 library preparation and sequencing

Stool samples were immediately frozen and stored at -80°C until semi-automated DNA isolation. Approximately 175mg of stool was homogenized in MagnaLyser Green Bead tubes by using the MagnaLyser Instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Total genomic DNA was isolated with the MagNA Pure LC DNA Isolation Kit III (Bacteria, Fungi) in a MagNA Pure LC 2.0 Instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Enzyme cocktail II (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) with 100μg lysozyme (Karl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) per 100μl sample was used according to manufacturer’s instructions.

The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using FLX 454 one way read (Lib-L kit, Primer A, Primer B, Roche 454 Life Science, Branford, CT, USA) (S1 Table) fusion primers with the template specific sequence F27—AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG and R534—ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGGC targeting the V1-V3 hypervariable regions [23, 24] as described previously in Kump et al. 2013. [25]

Zonulin and calprotectin

A ready-to-use solid-phase sandwich ELISA (Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany) was used to detect zonulin (zonulin Serum or Stool ELISA) and calprotectin (PhiCal® calprotectin Serum or Stool ELISA) in serum and stool samples. The tests were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For stool sampling the Stool Sample Application System (Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany) was used according to the manufacturer’s manual.

Bile acids

All bile acids (cholic acid, CA; deoxycholic acid, DCA; chenodeoxycholic acid, CDCA; lithocholic acid, LCA; ursodeoxycholic acid, UDCA) were assessed as unconjugated acids and as taurine and glycine conjugates using a tandem mass spectrometry method as described previously. [26] All sub-fractions of bile acids (free acids and their corresponding conjugates) were analysed by three different multiple-reaction monitoring experiments within one HPLC run. HPLC was performed on a reversed-phase (C18) column that used a methanol/water gradient for chromatographic solution of isobaric bile acids. Deuterated internal standards and correlation of peak area ratios in linear regression were used for quantification of all sub-fractions of bile acids.

Data analysis.

Raw sequencing data generated on the Genome Sequencer FLX system were de-noised with Acacia 1.52. Afterwards reads were pre-processed with several quality parameters to trim primer and barcode sequences and filter low quality reads according to suggestions described in Huse et.al. [27]. Data analysis was performed in QIIME 1.7.0 [28] and included following steps: clustering of high quality reads into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using UCLUST [29] and similarity of 0.97; taxonomy assignment of the OTUs with RDP classifier [30] and confidence score of 0.8 based on GreenGenes [31]16S rRNA database; representative sequence alignment with PyNAST [32]; detection and removal of chimeric sequences with ChimeraSlayer; [33] generating a phylogenetic tree with FastTree [34]. Additionally singletons (OTUs with one read present only in one sample) were removed to avoid overestimation of the sample richness and diversity. Finally, the resulting OTU table and accompanied phylogenetic tree were further used for calculation of alpha and beta diversity. Alpha diversity indices were determined with the R statistical programming language extended with Vegan and BiodiversityR community ecology packages whereas beta diversity was done in QIIME involving data rarefaction to the smallest sample size and selecting two distance measurements, weighted UniFrac and Bray-Curtis distance for the Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) diagrams and between samples comparisons. Testing whether groups of the samples were significantly different was assessed with the non-parametric MANOVA method implemented in the Vegan package (Adonis) or with Student’s t-Test and ANOVA as implemented in R environment.

We searched for Lactobacilli, because sequencing only a fragment of the 16S rRNA gene does not allow us to determine species with a high confidence.

Searching for Akkermansia was done using taxonomic information in the OTU table.

All other statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago). The Mann-Whitney-U test or the unpaired student’s t-test were used for the comparison of differences between groups and the paired student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the before and after treatment measurements, as appropriate for normally and not-normally distributed variables, respectively. Differences with a p-value below 0.05 were considered statistically significant and for multiple tests we used Benjamini & Hochberg correction.

Results

Patients

Thirty-five subjects were screened for the study between January and August 2010; 30 patients were finally included, whereof 28 finished the study (2 dropped out due to withdrawal of informed consent). Five patients did not fulfill the inclusion criterion of fasting glucose above 100 mg/dl at the day of screening any more. Thirteen patients were randomized to the probiotic group and 15 to the standard therapy group (Fig 1). Baseline characteristics of patients with MetS and a healthy control group are shown in Table 1.

Gut microbiota

We generated 539,934 raw sequences with a mean length of 362bp. After de-noising and quality filtering, 390,021 reads (mean length 393bp) remained for downstream analysis. Chimeric sequences (18.5%) and singletons (2.71%, reads occurring only once in a single sample) were removed and not used for further analysis. The average number of reads per sample was 5,208 (SD 1,786; range 1,716–11,252). Rarefaction curves confirmed that sequencing effort was not sufficient to cover all rare taxa, but still the curve trends were approaching saturation, and did not show any specific group dependent characteristics.

Comparison between MetS patients and healthy controls.

Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio was significantly lower in patients with MetS (median: 0.75; quartiles: 0.44–1.00; p<0.0001) compared to healthy controls (median: 1.77; quartiles: 0.89–2.42; Fig 2A). We could recognize two groups of samples, where Bacteroides (68%) or Prevotella (15%) was most abundant as well as different other genera making the rest of the samples (17%). No statistical differences in the Bacteroides and Prevotella groups’ distribution between patients and controls were detected. No significant differences in UniFrac (p = 0.70) or Bray-Curtis (p = 0.48) distances between baseline and end of therapy were found. Evenness and diversity (Shannon and Simpson Index) of gut microbiota in MetS showed similar distribution compared to healthy controls (Table 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Gut microbiota composition in MetS patients and controls.

Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio (a) PCoA Plot (Weighted UniFrac, b) and abundance of Parabacteroides (c) concerning LcS supplementation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141399.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. Evenness and diversity of gut microbiota in MetS and healthy controls.

Data are given as median (quartiles).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141399.t002

Akkermansia, a possibly relevant genus in the pathophysiology of MetS, was detectable in higher abundance in only one individual in the standard therapy group at baseline and at the end of the study (21.40% and 24.28%, respectively).

Effect of supplementation of LcS in MetS.

Variations (UniFrac distances) in microbiota composition found in the LcS group between baseline and end of the study were similar to variations in the standard therapy group. Diversity of gut microbiota in MetS was not influenced by LcS supplementation. We also could not detect any significant changes in microbiota between the LcS and standard therapy group at any time point using Adonis multivariate analysis. Weighted UniFrac PCoA plots showed no clear separation of the groups between the two time points and in comparison with the healthy controls (Fig 2B).

By looking at the most abundant genera however (present with more than 1% in at least 50% of the samples) we found a significantly increased proportion of Parabacteroides at the end of the study when compared to baseline in the LcS group (p = 0.002). (Fig 2C)

Lactobacillus genus was not detectable with our method.

Gut wall integrity and inflammation

Zonulin and calprotectin were studied as markers of gut barrier disruption and intestinal inflammation. Serum levels of zonulin and calprotectin were not elevated in patients compared to healthy controls. However, zonulin and calprotectin were significantly higher in stool samples of patients compared to controls (p<0.001) or compared to the median of healthy controls from the kit description (p = 0.017). Both zonulin and calprotectin levels were not influenced by LcS administration. Baseline data for zonulin and calprotectin are shown in Table 3.

thumbnail
Table 3. Zonulin and Calprotectin concentrations in serum and stool of MetS patients and controls.

Data are given as median (quartiles).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141399.t003

Bile acids

Total bile acids in serum were within the normal range in 26 out of 28 patients. In two patients, total bile acids were slightly elevated (8.2 and 6.9μmol/l; upper limit of normal: 6.5μmol/). No difference in individual bile acids or total bile acids was found between patients with MetS and healthy controls. Proportions of primary (cholic acid, CA; chenodeoxycholic acid, CDCA) and secondary (deoxycholic acid, DCA; litocholic acid, LCA; ursodeoxycholic acid, UDCA) as well as proportions of taurine- or glycine conjugated bile acids were unaltered in MetS when compared to healthy controls. Absolute and relative amounts of individual bile acids, primary, secondary or proportions of taurine- or glycine conjugated bile acids did not change after consumption of LcS for 12 weeks. No compelling evidence for a correlation between serum bile acids and markers of gut barrier disruption and inflammation was found.

Discussion

We found that the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio, markers of gut barrier disruption and inflammation of patients with MetS differ significantly from healthy controls. Supplementation with LcS increased the abundance of Parabacteroides but did not influence any other markers investigated in this study. Serum bile acid profile in MetS was not different to healthy controls.

We could confirm previously published findings of increased Firmicutes and decreased Bacteroidetes in obesity and MetS. [3538] The gut microbiota has been shown to influence energy extraction from diet, regulation of lipogenesis and innate immunity and therefore plays an important role in the pathogenesis of MetS. [39] We could find the presence of two genera (Bacteroides and Prevotella) remaining stable over the study period and not influenced by LcS. This confirms previous findings, showing no changes of the two genera, that other authors defined as enterotypes, during a 6-months controlled diet intervention. [9, 40]

An interesting species–Akkermansia muciniphila–has been associated with weight gain, insulin resistance and inflammatory changes. [41, 42] In our study we were not able to reproduce this finding.

The supplementation with LcS led to a significant increase in Parabacteroides (phylum Bacteroidetes). From our data we cannot explain this finding, we can only hypothesize that LcS might lead to ecological rearrangements in gut microbiota leading to this increase in Parabacteroides. Parabacteroides derive energy mainly from fermentation from carbohydrates or proteins, however the amount of carbohydrates in the milk drink is probably too small to be responsible for this increase. It is unclear, if an increase of Parabacteroides is beneficial. A shift from Firmicutes towards Bacteroidetes could be seen as beneficial in metabolic disorders [43] and dietary supplementation of resistant starch has been shown to increase Parabacteroides [44], whereas a reduction was associated with recurrence in Crohn´s disease. [45] Contrary, in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, a higher abundance of Parabacteroides was observed. [46] Since we previously published that supplementation with LcS did not influence clinical and biochemical parameters of glucose metabolism, inflammation and innate immune response [20, 21], the relevance of our observation is unclear and cannot be answered by our study design. For more detailed information concerning abundance of gut microbiota see S2 Table.

We have chosen to study Lactobacillus casei Shirota for several reasons. This commercially available milk drink delivers a relatively high bacterial number in a relatively small volume. LcS has been proven to survive the passage through the stomach and is still present in the lower intestinal tract [4749]. Within previous studies LcS appeared to be effective in modulating natural killer cell [50] and neutrophil function [51]. Previous studies detected LcS in stool (both by PCR and culture) already after 7 days of ingestion of an LcS containing milk drink [5254]. In those studies, different milk drinks with 5–15 times higher daily concentrations of LcS compared to our study were used. LcS was also detected in stool of European subjects, taking the same product we used in our study, using culture techniques for LcS detection. [55, 56] With the methodology we used we could not detect an increase in Lactobacillus genera by probiotic supplementation in stool samples. This is not unexpected considering the number of reads, the concentration of the product (6.5 x 109 per day) and the dilution of the probiotic milk drink in the gut with a bacterial count of about 1014 cells. Therefore methodological limitations (limited number of reads per sample), differences in patient population and/or in the product can explain the different findings between our study and previous data.

In animal models increased gut permeability is associated with increased translocation of bacterial products and contributes to insulin resistance. [17] In a previous study we could show that subjects with MetS have increased gastroduodenal and small intestinal permeability compared to healthy controls. [20] Zonulin is the only physiological mediator known to regulate intestinal permeability reversibly by modulating intercellular tight junctions [5759] and a positive correlation between zonulin, obesity and insulin resistance has been found recently. [60] Calprotectin, a protein expressed in neutrophil granulocytes, is a marker of intestinal inflammation. In accordance with our previous finding of increased gut permeability in MetS [20], zonulin and calprotectin levels were significantly elevated in stool but similar in serum of MetS patients compared to healthy controls. In contrast to animal and human studies that showed decreased faecal calprotectin levels by administration of a probiotic [61, 62], we could not find any influence of LcS supplementation on zonulin or calprotectin levels.

Bile acids have been proposed as potential modulators of gut permeability. In a mouse model high fat diet has been shown to decrease UDCA but increase DCA. In this model DCA increased gut permeability by a direct, non-inflammatory mechanism. [13, 14] Ex vivo data suggest that selected bile acids modulate intestinal permeability via rearrangement at the tight junction level.[63] In contrast to high fat diet models, genetically obese mice did not show increased gut permeability or bile acid pool hydrophobicity. [64] Furthermore, bile acids may directly impact on glucose metabolism. Dietary increase of bile acid pool size in a rat model resulted in a reduction of fat mass through an increase in energy expenditure. [65] A reduction of bile acid pool size increased body weight gain and worsened glucose intolerance induced by the high fat diet and led to a pronounced worsening of the changes in liver and adipose tissue. [66]

Human data are scarce. A biosynthetic bile acid precursor is increased in patients with MetS and T2DM, but this study did not investigate gut permeability. [67]. We could not find differences in the serum bile acid profiles between MetS patients and healthy controls. Bile acid composition was not influenced by LcS treatment. Unfortunately we were not able to analyze bile acids in stool due to lack of material.

Our study has some limitations: Due to the small sample size individual differences might have outweighed the effects of LcS administration. Furthermore our healthy controls were significantly younger than our patient cohort. Age impacts on gut microbiota composition, but during adulthood the microbiota composition is relatively stable. [68] The Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio decreases after infancy and rises again over the age of 70, but is reported to be stable in the age range of our controls and patients. [69]

This study suggests that investigating gut microbiota composition is challenging and interventions are difficult. Further studies are necessary to unravel the underlying mechanisms and find targeted therapeutic approaches for the complex interplay of gut microbiota and host metabolism.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Barcoded primer sequences used in this study.

Amplicons were sequenced from the Titanium A adaptor (CCATCTCATCCCTGCGTGTCTCCGAC), followed by a 4 bases key sequence (TCAG) and the 10 bases barcode. The reverse primer was used with the Titanium B adaptor (CCTATCCCCTGTGTGCCTTGGCAGTC), the key sequence and the target specific sequence but without barcode sequence (CCTATCCCCTGTGTGCCTTGGCAGTC TCAG ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141399.s003

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Abundance of gut microbiota concerning LcS supplementation.

Median abundance is given for each group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141399.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the technical help of Michaela Eder, Barbara Leopold, Daniela Blattl, Anja Sinnitsch, Maria Schäffer and all volunteers who participated in the study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: VS HS. Performed the experiments: BL MT AH IK SL MB NJT. Analyzed the data: VS BL SL ST AH MB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TS ST IK. Wrote the paper: VS BL SL ST MB AH MT TS GF PF CH IK PS ML TRP NJT HS.

References

  1. 1. WHO. Obesity and overweight. Fact sheet. 2014;131.
  2. 2. Thomas GN, Schooling CM, McGhee SM, Ho SY, Cheung BM, Wat NM, et al. Metabolic syndrome increases all-cause and vascular mortality: the Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Study. Clinical endocrinology. 2007;66(5):666–71. pmid:17381490.
  3. 3. Prospective Studies Collaboration, Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1083–96. pmid:19299006; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2662372.
  4. 4. Esteve E, Ricart W, Fernandez-Real JM. Gut microbiota interactions with obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes: did gut microbiote co-evolve with insulin resistance? Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care. 2011;14(5):483–90. pmid:21681087.
  5. 5. Ley RE, Backhed F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Gordon JI. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(31):11070–5. pmid:16033867.
  6. 6. Backhed F, Ley RE, Sonnenburg JL, Peterson DA, Gordon JI. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science. 2005;307(5717):1915–20. pmid:15790844.
  7. 7. Duncan SH, Lobley GE, Holtrop G, Ince J, Johnstone AM, Louis P, et al. Human colonic microbiota associated with diet, obesity and weight loss. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(11):1720–4. Epub 2008/09/10. ijo2008155 [pii]. pmid:18779823.
  8. 8. Schwiertz A, Taras D, Schafer K, Beijer S, Bos NA, Donus C, et al. Microbiota and SCFA in lean and overweight healthy subjects. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18(1):190–5. Epub 2009/06/06. oby2009167 [pii]. pmid:19498350.
  9. 9. Zupancic ML, Cantarel BL, Liu Z, Drabek EF, Ryan KA, Cirimotich S, et al. Analysis of the gut microbiota in the old order Amish and its relation to the metabolic syndrome. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43052. Epub 2012/08/21. PONE-D-11-23689 [pii]. pmid:22905200; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3419686.
  10. 10. Zhang H, DiBaise JK, Zuccolo A, Kudrna D, Braidotti M, Yu Y, et al. Human gut microbiota in obesity and after gastric bypass. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(7):2365–70. Epub 2009/01/24. 0812600106 [pii]. pmid:19164560; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2629490.
  11. 11. Creely SJ, McTernan PG, Kusminski CM, Fisher M, Da Silva NF, Khanolkar M, et al. Lipopolysaccharide activates an innate immune system response in human adipose tissue in obesity and type 2 diabetes. American journal of physiologyEndocrinology and metabolism. 2007;292(3):E740–7.
  12. 12. Larsen N, Vogensen FK, van den Berg FW, Nielsen DS, Andreasen AS, Pedersen BK, et al. Gut microbiota in human adults with type 2 diabetes differs from non-diabetic adults. PLoS One. 2010;5(2):e9085. pmid:20140211; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2816710.
  13. 13. Stenman LK, Holma R, Eggert A, Korpela R. A novel mechanism for gut barrier dysfunction by dietary fat: epithelial disruption by hydrophobic bile acids. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2013;304(3):G227–34. Epub 2012/12/04. ajpgi.00267.2012 [pii]. pmid:23203158.
  14. 14. Stenman LK, Holma R, Korpela R. High-fat-induced intestinal permeability dysfunction associated with altered fecal bile acids. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(9):923–9. Epub 2012/03/13. pmid:22408351; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3297051.
  15. 15. Cani PD, Delzenne NM. The role of the gut microbiota in energy metabolism and metabolic disease. Current pharmaceutical design. 2009;15(13):1546–58. pmid:19442172.
  16. 16. Cani PD, Delzenne NM. Interplay between obesity and associated metabolic disorders: new insights into the gut microbiota. Current opinion in pharmacology. 2009;9(6):737–43. pmid:19628432.
  17. 17. Cani PD, Bibiloni R, Knauf C, Waget A, Neyrinck AM, Delzenne NM, et al. Changes in gut microbiota control metabolic endotoxemia-induced inflammation in high-fat diet-induced obesity and diabetes in mice. Diabetes. 2008;57(6):1470–81. pmid:18305141
  18. 18. Naito E, Yoshida Y, Makino K, Kounoshi Y, Kunihiro S, Takahashi R, et al. Beneficial effect of oral administration of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota on insulin resistance in diet-induced obesity mice. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;110(3):650–7. pmid:21281408
  19. 19. Andreasen AS, Larsen N, Pedersen-Skovsgaard T, Berg RM, Moller K, Svendsen KD, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM on insulin sensitivity and the systemic inflammatory response in human subjects. Br J Nutr. 2010;104(12):1831–8. pmid:20815975.
  20. 20. Leber B, Tripolt NJ, Blattl D, Eder M, Wascher TC, Pieber TR, et al. The influence of probiotic supplementation on gut permeability in patients with metabolic syndrome: an open label, randomized pilot study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(10):1110–5. pmid:22872030.
  21. 21. Tripolt NJ, Leber B, Blattl D, Eder M, Wonisch W, Scharnagl H, et al. Short communication: Effect of supplementation with Lactobacillus casei Shirota on insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, and markers of endothelial function and inflammation in subjects with metabolic syndrome-A pilot study. J Dairy Sci. 2012. Epub 2012/11/21. S0022-0302(12)00847-8 [pii] pmid:23164226.
  22. 22. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1640–5. pmid:19805654
  23. 23. Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J Microbiol Methods. 2003;55(3):541–55. pmid:14607398.
  24. 24. Watanabe K, Kodama Y, Harayama S. Design and evaluation of PCR primers to amplify bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA fragments used for community fingerprinting. J Microbiol Methods. 2001;44(3):253–62. pmid:11240048.
  25. 25. Kump PK, Grochenig HP, Lackner S, Trajanoski S, Reicht G, Hoffmann KM, et al. Alteration of intestinal dysbiosis by fecal microbiota transplantation does not induce remission in patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis. Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2013;19(10):2155–65. pmid:23899544.
  26. 26. Stojakovic T, Putz-Bankuti C, Fauler G, Scharnagl H, Wagner M, Stadlbauer V, et al. Atorvastatin in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and incomplete biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Hepatology. 2007;46(3):776–84. Epub 2007/08/03. pmid:17668874.
  27. 27. Huse SM, Welch DM, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12(7):1889–98. pmid:20236171; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2909393.
  28. 28. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature methods. 2010;7(5):335–6. pmid:20383131; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3156573.
  29. 29. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2460–1. pmid:20709691.
  30. 30. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(16):5261–7. pmid:17586664; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1950982.
  31. 31. McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, Probst A, et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 2012;6(3):610–8. pmid:22134646; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3280142.
  32. 32. Caporaso JG, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Knight R. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(2):266–7. pmid:19914921; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2804299.
  33. 33. Haas BJ, Gevers D, Earl AM, Feldgarden M, Ward DV, Giannoukos G, et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome research. 2011;21(3):494–504. pmid:21212162; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3044863.
  34. 34. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9490. pmid:20224823; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2835736.
  35. 35. Backhed F, Manchester JK, Semenkovich CF, Gordon JI. Mechanisms underlying the resistance to diet-induced obesity in germ-free mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(3):979–84. pmid:17210919
  36. 36. Ley RE. Obesity and the human microbiome. Current opinion in gastroenterology. 2010;26(1):5–11. pmid:19901833
  37. 37. Tilg H, Kaser A. Gut microbiome, obesity, and metabolic dysfunction. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2011;121(6):2126–32. pmid:21633181
  38. 38. Tremaroli V, Backhed F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature. 2012;489(7415):242–9. pmid:22972297.
  39. 39. Parekh PJ, Arusi E, Vinik AI, Johnson DA. The Role and Influence of Gut Microbiota in Pathogenesis and Management of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014;5:47. Epub 2014/04/30. pmid:24778627.
  40. 40. Roager HM, Licht TR, Poulsen SK, Larsen TM, Bahl MI. Microbial enterotypes, inferred by the prevotella-to-bacteroides ratio, remained stable during a 6-month randomized controlled diet intervention with the new nordic diet. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(3):1142–9. pmid:24296500; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3911217.
  41. 41. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2012;490(7418):55–60. pmid:23023125.
  42. 42. Fukuda S, Ohno H. Gut microbiome and metabolic diseases. Seminars in immunopathology. 2014;36(1):103–14. pmid:24196453.
  43. 43. Ley RE, Backhed F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Gordon JI. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(31):11070–5. pmid:16033867
  44. 44. Martinez I, Kim J, Duffy PR, Schlegel VL, Walter J. Resistant starches types 2 and 4 have differential effects on the composition of the fecal microbiota in human subjects. PLoS One. 2010;5(11):e15046. pmid:21151493; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2993935.
  45. 45. De Cruz P, Kang S, Wagner J, Buckley M, Sim WH, Prideaux L, et al. Specific Mucosa-Associated Microbiota in Crohn's Disease at the Time of Resection are Associated with Early Disease Recurrence: A Pilot Study. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2014.
  46. 46. Wong VW, Tse CH, Lam TT, Wong GL, Chim AM, Chu WC, et al. Molecular characterization of the fecal microbiota in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis—a longitudinal study. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62885. pmid:23638162; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3636208.
  47. 47. Shirota M, Aso K, Iwabuchi A. Studies on intestinal microflora. 1. Its constitution in healthy infants and the effect of oral administration of L. acidophilus strain Shirota. Nippon saikingaku zasshiJapanese journal of bacteriology. 1966;21(5):274–83.
  48. 48. Spanhaak S, Havenaar R, Schaafsma G. The effect of consumption of milk fermented by Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota on the intestinal microflora and immune parameters in humans. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998;52(12):899–907. pmid:9881885
  49. 49. Tuohy KM, Pinart-Gilberga M, Jones M, Hoyles L, McCartney AL, Gibson GR. Survivability of a probiotic Lactobacillus casei in the gastrointestinal tract of healthy human volunteers and its impact on the faecal microflora. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102(4):1026–32. pmid:17381746
  50. 50. Takeda K, Okumura K. Effects of a fermented milk drink containing Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota on the human NK-cell activity. The Journal of nutrition. 2007;137(3 Suppl 2):791S–3S. pmid:17311976
  51. 51. Stadlbauer V, Mookerjee RP, Hodges S, Wright GA, Davies NA, Jalan R. Effect of probiotic treatment on deranged neutrophil function and cytokine responses in patients with compensated alcoholic cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2008;48(6):945–51. pmid:18433921
  52. 52. Tiengrim S, Leelaporn A, Manatsathit S, Thamlikitkul V. Viability of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota (LcS) from feces of Thai healthy subjects regularly taking milk product containing LcS. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. 2012;95 Suppl 2:S42–7. Epub 2012/05/12. pmid:22574528.
  53. 53. Yuki N, Watanabe K, Mike A, Tagami Y, Tanaka R, Ohwaki M, et al. Survival of a probiotic, Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota, in the gastrointestinal tract: selective isolation from faeces and identification using monoclonal antibodies. International journal of food microbiology. 1999;48(1):51–7. Epub 1999/06/22. pmid:10375134.
  54. 54. Fujimoto J, Matsuki T, Sasamoto M, Tomii Y, Watanabe K. Identification and quantification of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota in human feces with strain-specific primers derived from randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. International journal of food microbiology. 2008;126(1–2):210–5. pmid:18573558.
  55. 55. Sakai T, Oishi K, Asahara T, Takada T, Yuki N, Matsumoto K, et al. M-RTLV agar, a novel selective medium to distinguish Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei from Lactobacillus rhamnosus. International journal of food microbiology. 2010;139(3):154–60. pmid:20385416.
  56. 56. Tilley L, Keppens K, Kushiro A, Takada T, Sakai T, Vaneechoutte M, et al. A probiotic fermented milk drink containing Lactobacillus cassei strain Shirota improves stool consistency of subjects with hard stools. International Journal of Probiotics and Prebiotics. 2014;9(1–2):23–30.
  57. 57. Fasano A. Regulation of intercellular tight junctions by zonula occludens toxin and its eukaryotic analogue zonulin. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;915:214–22. Epub 2001/02/24. pmid:11193578.
  58. 58. Wang W, Uzzau S, Goldblum SE, Fasano A. Human zonulin, a potential modulator of intestinal tight junctions. J Cell Sci. 2000;113 Pt 24:4435–40. Epub 2000/11/18. pmid:11082037.
  59. 59. Fasano A, Not T, Wang W, Uzzau S, Berti I, Tommasini A, et al. Zonulin, a newly discovered modulator of intestinal permeability, and its expression in coeliac disease. Lancet. 2000;355(9214):1518–9. Epub 2000/05/09. S0140-6736(00)02169-3 [pii] pmid:10801176.
  60. 60. Moreno-Navarrete JM, Sabater M, Ortega F, Ricart W, Fernandez-Real JM. Circulating zonulin, a marker of intestinal permeability, is increased in association with obesity-associated insulin resistance. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37160. Epub 2012/05/26. PONE-D-12-01867 [pii]. pmid:22629362; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3356365.
  61. 61. Goodrich KM, Fundaro G, Griffin LE, Grant A, Hulver MW, Ponder MA, et al. Chronic administration of dietary grape seed extract increases colonic expression of gut tight junction protein occludin and reduces fecal calprotectin: a secondary analysis of healthy Wistar Furth rats. Nutr Res. 2012;32(10):787–94. Epub 2012/11/14. S0271-5317(12)00186-8 [pii]. pmid:23146776.
  62. 62. Vulevic J, Juric A, Tzortzis G, Gibson GR. A mixture of trans-galactooligosaccharides reduces markers of metabolic syndrome and modulates the fecal microbiota and immune function of overweight adults. J Nutr. 2013;143(3):324–31. Epub 2013/01/11. jn.112.166132 [pii]. pmid:23303873.
  63. 63. Raimondi F, Santoro P, Barone MV, Pappacoda S, Barretta ML, Nanayakkara M, et al. Bile acids modulate tight junction structure and barrier function of Caco-2 monolayers via EGFR activation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;294(4):G906–13. Epub 2008/02/02. pmid:18239063.
  64. 64. Stenman LK, Holma R, Gylling H, Korpela R. Genetically obese mice do not show increased gut permeability or faecal bile acid hydrophobicity. Br J Nutr. 2013;110(6):1157–64. Epub 2013/02/28. pmid:23442231.
  65. 65. Liaset B, Hao Q, Jorgensen H, Hallenborg P, Du ZY, Ma T, et al. Nutritional regulation of bile acid metabolism is associated with improved pathological characteristics of the metabolic syndrome. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2011;286(32):28382–95. Epub 2011/06/18. pmid:21680746; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3151081.
  66. 66. Watanabe M, Horai Y, Houten SM, Morimoto K, Sugizaki T, Arita E, et al. Lowering bile acid pool size with a synthetic farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist induces obesity and diabetes through reduced energy expenditure. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2011;286(30):26913–20. Epub 2011/06/03. pmid:21632533; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3143650.
  67. 67. Steiner C, Othman A, Saely CH, Rein P, Drexel H, von Eckardstein A, et al. Bile acid metabolites in serum: intraindividual variation and associations with coronary heart disease, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e25006. Epub 2011/11/24. pmid:22110577; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3215718.
  68. 68. Voreades N, Kozil A, Weir TL. Diet and the development of the human intestinal microbiome. Frontiers in microbiology. 2014;5:494. pmid:25295033; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4170138.
  69. 69. Mariat D, Firmesse O, Levenez F, Guimaraes V, Sokol H, Dore J, et al. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio of the human microbiota changes with age. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:123. pmid:19508720; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2702274.