The emergence of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations has mainly been linked to the duration and composition of antiretroviral treatment (ART), as well as the level of adherence. This study reports the incidence and pattern of acquired antiretroviral drug resistance mutations and long-term outcomes of ART in a prospective cohort from Northwest Ethiopia. Two hundred and twenty HIV-1C infected treatment naïve patients were enrolled and 127 were followed-up for up to 38 months on ART. ART initiation and patients’ monitoring was based on the WHO clinical and immunological parameters. HIV viral RNA measurement and drug resistance genotyping were done at baseline (N = 160) and after a median time of 30 (IQR, 27–38) months on ART (N = 127). Viral suppression rate (HIV RNA levels ≤ 400 copies/ml) after a median time of 30 months on ART was found to be 88.2% (112/127), which is in the range for HIV drug resistance prevention suggested by WHO. Of those 15 patients with viral load >400 copies/ml, six harboured one or more drug resistant associated mutations in the reverse transcriptase (RT) region. Observed NRTIs resistance associated mutations were the lamivudine-induced mutation M184V (n = 4) and tenofovir associated mutation K65R (n = 1). The NNRTIs resistance associated mutations were K103N (n = 2), V106M, Y181S, Y188L, V90I, K101E and G190A (n = 1 each). Thymidine analogue mutations and major drug resistance mutations in the protease (PR) region were not detected. Most of the patients (13/15) with virologic failure and accumulated drug resistance mutations had not met the WHO clinical and/or immunological failure criteria and continued the failing regimen. The incidence and pattern of acquired antiretroviral drug resistance mutations is lower and less complex than previous reports from sub Saharan Africa countries. Nevertheless, the data suggest the need for virological monitoring and resistance testing for early detection of failure. Moreover, adherence reinforcement will contribute to improving overall treatment outcomes.
Citation: Mulu A, Maier M, Liebert UG (2015) Low Incidence of HIV-1C Acquired Drug Resistance 10 Years after Roll-Out of Antiretroviral Therapy in Ethiopia: A Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 10(10): e0141318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141318
Editor: Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein, University of Rome Tor Vergata, ITALY
Received: December 1, 2014; Accepted: October 7, 2015; Published: October 29, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Mulu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file. All sequence data files are available from the NCBI database (accession number: KF026059-KF026220; KT020928-KT020935).
Funding: This work was partly supported by German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), Association of Sponsors and Friends of Leipzig University, and HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control Office of Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The rapid scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited countries has dramatically reduced HIV-related mortality and therefore improved quality of life [1, 2]. Contrary to the initial fears, a number of reports have documented successful short-term outcomes of ART [3, 4] due to many factors such as improved adherence [5–7]. Nevertheless, scaling up of ART programs have also led to the emergence of antiretroviral drug resistance . The exclusive use of clinical and immunological parameters to initiate and monitor ART in this region and the use of drugs with low genetic barrier that only require single point mutation to confer resistance, such as abacavir (ABC), lamivudine (3TC), tenofovir (TDF) and didanosine (ddI) have been associated with the emergence and accumulation of HIV-1 drug-resistant variants [7–9]. Consequently, early virological failure remains undetected and patients continue to be on inadequate (or insufficient) regimen until either clinical or immunological failure occurs [8, 9]. In the meantime, resistance mutations may accumulate in the viral pool and in-turn limit future treatment options , enhance disease progression [11, 12] and may be transmitted to other individuals . High level and complex profile of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations including Q151M and thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) in individuals with first-line ART failure [8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16] and increased prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) mutations have been reported in recent years [17, 18, 19, 20, 21], despite more promising initial observations from Africa [4, 6, 13].
In Ethiopia increasing prevalence of TDR with time after the roll-out of ART [18, 19], the late presentation of patients in the course of HIV infection and the use of WHO clinical and immunological parameter without HIV viral-load monitoring and drug resistance testing could be associated with delayed switching and consequent accumulation of resistance mutations, as it has been observed in other African countries [1, 8, 9]. This study therefore aimed to determine and characterize the incidence and pattern of acquired drug resistance mutations after a median time of 30 months (IQR, 27–38) on ART in a prospective cohort of HIV-1 subtype C infected patients with known baseline data .
Patient’s inclusion and exclusion criteria have already been described . Briefly, HIV-1 chronically infected treatment naïve patients above 18 years of age and seeking care and treatment were consecutively recruited at Gondar University Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia in 2008/2009. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant or had taken single dose nevirapine (NVP) for prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) or patients with known chronic illness or any previous ART use. In this prospective cohort study the long term clinical, immunological and virological outcomes of ART was examined and incidence of acquired drug resistance mutations was determined by the median time of 30 months on ART.
Treatment and patients monitoring
Patients were evaluated with a standardized form at enrolment and diagnosed based on the WHO criteria of AIDS-defining conditions as described earlier . The patients received care and treatment according to the national HIV treatment guideline and were monitored according to the WHO recommendations. First line ART included zidovudine (ZDV), 3TC, stavudine (D4T), nevirapine (NVP), and efavirenz (EFV), permitting four alternative treatment regimens: D4T+3TC+NVP; D4T+3TC+EFV; ZDV+3TC+NVP; or ZDV+3TC+EFV. For second line therapy, the nucleoside backbone waschanged to ABC, TDF, ddI or ZDV (if not used in first-line therapy); and, in addition, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) NVP or EFV was replaced by one of the boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) lopinavir (LPV/r), saquinavir (SQV/r) or indinavir (IND/r). Although D4T has been omitted from ART recommendations because of its side effects in 2008, it is still used extensively in Ethiopia.
Assessment of adherence
As per the routine clinical practice and the protocol of this cohort each patient underwent an adherence counselling before initiation of ART and at their health care visits every three months. Consecutively, self-reported adherence to ART was assessed by asking the last time the patient forgot to take therapy in four weeks time (response options include “never,” “yesterday,” “last week,” and “more than 1 week but less than three weeks ago”). Then, an estimate of patient's current adherence to antiretroviral therapy (as “optimal,” “suboptimal,” and “absent”) was made. Patients who reported that they had not forgotten a dose the day prior to their visit and never forget doses were categorized as optimal (theoretical adherence level of at least 95%) .
Blood samples was collected in vacutainer tubes containing ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) at baseline, every 6 months (for CD4+ T cells count only) and at last by a median time of 30 months on ART (IQR, 27–38). Plasma was separated by centrifugation and stored at-40°C utile used.
Sample collection and preparation, CD4+ T cells count, HIV-1 RNA extraction, pol gene amplification and sequencing were done as described previously . In brief, CD4+ T cells count was measured every 6 months using the FACSCount flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. Immunological failure was defined as failure to achieve a CD4+ T cells gain of at least 50 cells above pre-therapy level or having an absolute CD4+ T cells count of less than 100 cells/mm3 after one year of therapy. HIV viral load was measured at baseline (N = 220) and after a median time of 30 months on ART (N = 127) using Abbott m2000rt Quantitative RealTime HIV-1 assay (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA) with a lower detection limit of 40 copies/ml.
Although, WHO defines virological failure using viral load cut-offs of >1000 copies/ml based on two consecutive viral load measurement after 3 months with adherence support, there is no standardized reporting of virologic failure since 3 months may not enough for full viral suppression, and since resistance mutations could be detected in samples with VL of as low as 300 copies/mL and not in patients with viral load of >1000 copies/ml. Thus, in this study, virological failure is defined as HIV RNA > 400 copies/mL in single plasma sample and viral load between 40 and 400 copies/ml was defined as low-level viraemia (LLV). HIV genotyping for detection of drug resistance was done at baseline and after a median time of 30 months on ART (N = 127). Viral cDNA was amplified by nested PCR using outer primers yielding a 1757 base pairs (bp) amplicon and subsequently by the inner primers yielding a 1389 bp amplicon covering the entire protease (PR) and partial (76%) reverse transcriptase (RT) enzymes following an in-house protocol. The amplified HIV-1 viral gene was sequenced using BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosytems, Waltham, MA, USA). Genotypic drug resistance mutations were interpreted according to the Stanford University drug resistance database (http://hivdb.stanford.edu) and the 2014 IAS mutation list . HIV-1 subtype was determined by using the REGA HIV-1 Automated Subtyping Tool version 2 (http://www.bioafrica.net). Nucleotide sequences are deposited in National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), USA GenBank (Accession Number before initiation of ART: KF026059-KF026220; By the end of 30 months on ART: KT020928-KT020935).
To identify potential risk factors associated with virologic failure, a bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted by the end of 30 months. Variables included were age, sex, baseline CD4+ T cells count, baseline HIV viral load, WHO clinical stage, baseline drug resistance mutations, level of adherence and the type of ART (NVP versus EFV containing). Differences between viraemic and non-viraemeic groups were tested using the Pearson Chi-square test, the student’s t-test and the Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The study protocol and design including the consent procedures were approved by the University of Gondar Ethical Review Committee (RPO/55/291/00). Patients were managed following the national guideline. Written informed consent was obtained from all study subjects and documented in Research Office of the University.
The baseline characteristics of the patients at enrolment were described earlier . In brief, HIV genotypic drug resistance testing was performed in 160 pre-ART plasma samples and on the basis of the WHO transmitted drug resistance surveillance mutations list (S1 Table), transmitted HIV drug resistance mutations were identified in 21 (13.12%) of the samples. All except to 2 isolates were found to be HIV-1C. Of 220 patients enrolled, 140 patients were on ART by median time of 30 months (IQR, 27–38) but this study has end viral load result for 127 patients. Thus, the results below are for these 127 patients. The cohort profile is summarized in Fig 1.
Of the 220 subjects enrolled in the study 63.6% (140/220) were on ART and blood collection for HIV DR was successful in 127 patients; Confirmed death: 12.7% (28/220); overall death including true loss: 27.3% (60/220); True loss: 14.5% (32/220).
By on treatment analysis (including patients with both baseline and median time of 30 months virological data), 88% (112/127) of the patients achieved viral suppression with HIV RNA levels ≤ 400 copies/ml of whom 74% (83/112) had undetectable HIV RNA level (Table 1). The median (IQR) baseline HIV viral load for 127 patients was 27, 137 copies/ml (4273–133319). Among the 15 patients with viral loads of above 400 copies/ml, 11 met the WHO virological failure criteria of viral loads of >1000 copies/ml. However, most of the patients (13/15) with virological failure and accumulated drug resistance mutations had not met the WHO clinical and immunologic failure criteria and continued the failing regimen. Moreover, in 2 patients with viral loads < 5000 copies/ml, drug resistance associated mutations were detected. In two patients with HIV RNA of 21, 878 and 97, 724 copies/ml, accumulated drug resistance mutations were not observed (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with baseline CD4+ T cells counts of > 200 cells/mm3 with virological failure compared with those with a baseline CD4+ T cells count of ≤ 200 cells/mm3. The median HIV RNA level among viremic patients at 30 months was not significantly different among those on NVP and EFV (906 copies/ml (525–42986) versus 2198 copies/ml (1545–23389); P > 0.05).
HIV genotyping drug resistance
Genotyping was successfully determined in 8 of the 15 patients with HIV RNA ≥ 400 copies/ml. Amplification failures were due to low viral loads (ranging from 442 to 1886 copies/ml) probably representing virological blips. Accumulation of drug resistance mutations in RT region selected during treatment was observed in 6 of 8 patients (Table 2). Briefly, 6/8 patients on 3TC developed resistance to 3TC, 2/3 patients on EFV developed resistance to EFV and NVP, 3/5 patients on NVP developed resistance to NVP and 2/5 patients on NVP developed resistance to EFV within 30 months of ART exposure. The most frequent NRTIs resistance associated mutations were the lamivudine-induced M184V mutation (n = 4) and K65R (n = 1). The NNRTIs resistance associated mutations V106M and K103N conferring resistance to EFV and NVP were found in 1 and 2 patient/s, respectively. Other NNRTIs associated mutations Y181S, Y188L, V90I, K101E and G190A were observed in one patient each. Dual-class resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs were detected in 4 patients with frequent combination of M184V and NNRTI resistance associated mutations. Despite the extensive use of thymidine analogues (TA) like AZT or D4T, TAMs and mutation at codon 151 (Q151M) were not observed. Moreover, major drug resistance mutations on PR region were not detected. However, in all the 8 patients, naturally occurring minor mutations/polymorphic changes at PR region (positions M36I, R41K, H69K, L89M, and I93L) were observed. These mutations already existed in the baseline sequence data.
Clinical and immunological outcomes
By the median time of 30 months on ART, 18 out of 127 patients (14.2%) were non-adherent at least once. The main reasons for non-adherence were health related problems (9/18) and drug side effects (5/18). Accordingly, treatment switching was made (3 due to clinical failure, 6 due to immunological failure and 4 due to drug associated toxicity: 3 patients stopped AZT due to anaemia, 1 stopped EFV due to neuropsychiatric disorder and 1 stopped d4T due to neuropathy and lipodystrophy) at a median time of 61 days after initiation of ART. All the patients were on appropriate ART regimen as per the National ART guideline and were clinically asymptomatic. The median CD4+ T cells count of the 127 patients at baseline was 194 (IQR, 25–229) cells/mm3 and progressively increased over time (Fig 2). The rate of CD4+ T cells count increased significantly in the first 12 months period (+183 cells/mm3) exceeding the rate of the following 24 months (+81 cells/mm3, P <0.01, 95% CI, 69–91). The rate of CD4+ T cells recovery was not different among patients who were taking NVP versus EFV based regimen (+211 vs + 217 cells/mm3; P = 0.14).
Factors associated with virological failure
In both bivariable and multivariable analyses, baseline severe immunosuppression (defined as CD4+ T cells count of < 50 cells/mm3) and baseline HIV RNA of >100,000 copies/ml were not identified as risk factors for virological failure at 30 months. The presence of baseline transmitted drug resistance mutations was not a risk factor for virological failure by the median time of 30 months on ART, either. However, 14 of 21 patients with baseline transmitted drug resistance associated mutations were lost to follow-up and only 7 out of 21 achieved viral suppression. Other demographic predicting factors (age, sex, WHO clinical stages, type of ART regimen) were also not significant risk factors for virological failure at 30 months (Table 3). However, treatment non-adherence was identified as significant risk factor for virological failure at 30 months (OR 5.11:95%CI; 2.11–21.00, P = 0.02).
This is the first report describing the incidence and pattern of acquired antiretroviral drug resistance mutations among HIV-1C infected patients in a prospective cohort study from the Horn of Africa with in a median time of 30 months on ART. The 12% virological failure (≥400 copies/ml) in the current study is comparable with recent cross-sectional studies from the region [4, 8, 13, 23] and WHO suggested targets of virological suppression were achieved in at least 70% of patients 12 months after ART initiation . However, recent studies from some African countries had reported a high level of virological failure after a weighted median time of 25 months on ART [13, 24, 25]. Thus, compared with the few available data on the long term effect of ART our finding showed low rate of virological failure which could be due to the optimal adherence level of the patients (85.8%) and in the setting  and suggests that ART in the setting can sustain virological efficacy for a substantial length of time if an optimal adherence on treatment is achieved. However, these results may not fully represent other public HIV clinics in Ethiopia.
The emergence and accumulation of acquired antiretroviral drug resistance mutations in 6 of 8 patients (Table 2) reflect the expected pattern of acquired drug resistance while using the standard first line ART attributed to the 3TC, NVP or EFV pressure. The findings were similar to that of subtype C sub Saharan African isolates [3, 13] and other subtypes in resource-limited settings [26, 27]. The K65R known to be selected faster in subtype C was observed in one patient who has been taking 3TC, D4T and EFV. This is very low compared to similar studies among subtype C isolates from six sub Saharan African countries  but consistent with recent study from South Africa . This could be due to the recent availability of TDF in Ethiopia [4, 18] and because of the fact that none of the patients were under TDF. Among the NNRTIs mutations, K103N, V106M, and G190A conferring resistance to EFV and NVP; EFV, NVP and ETR; and EFV and NVP, respectively were observed in 2 and 1 patient each similar to recent data from various African countries [4, 13, 18, 25]. Four out of six patients failed as a result of M184V and NNRTIs mutation. Five out of 6 patients had NNRTIs mutations probably suggesting that resistance to NNRTIs are the initial event in failure of regimens containing EFV or NVP in the setting. Despite the extensive use of thymidine analogues like AZT or D4T in Ethiopia and unlike previous similar studies [3, 13, 27–29], TAMs characterized by the mutations M41L, L210W, T215Y (TAM-path 1) and D67N, K70R, T215F, K219Q/E (TAM-path 2) were lacking in the current study indicating a recent period of virological failure. This also supports previous reports that mutations correlated with TAMs pathways are infrequent in non B subtypes compared to subtype B [4, 17–25, 26–29]. The absence of major drug resistance mutations in PR region might be a reflection of late introduction and limited access of this drug class in the country [4, 18].
Despite the small number of sequences, the spectrum of drug resistance mutations observed in this study was not complex which is consistent with a recent study from Rwanda . However, the occurrence of virological failure and resistance mutations in most of the patients without reaching the WHO clinical and immunological criteria that presently apply to Ethiopia and other developing countries suggests the need for virological monitoring and targeted drug resistance testing in the region. These patients also continued the failing regimen which would limit future treatment option and may result in deleterious consequences if transmission to newly infected individuals occurs. The low level viraemia (40–400 copies/ml) observed in a single sample of 23 clinically asymptomatic patient with immune recovery, supports previous findings that reported transient episodes of low level viraemia do not generally reflect negative clinical consequence [4, 31, 32] and show the presence of virological blips rather than virological failure. However, some may remain suppressed and others may develop virological failure if tested later.
In this prospective cohort, progressive immune restoration was observed over time similar to previous reports [4, 33–34]. It is, to be noted however, that after nearly 3 years of ART about one fifth of the patients remained below the lower threshold level (less than 350 CD4+ T cells/mm3). This could be due to the natural low CD4+ T cells count among Ethiopians [4, 35, 36], late ART initiation with low baseline CD4+ T cells count, slow recovery rate of CD4+ T cells among Africans  or may also be due to immune activation which results in CD4+ T cells count depletion independent of HIV RNA load [38, 39].
In conclusion, despite the obvious small number of sequences the findings suggest that in resource limited settings ART can sustain virological efficacy for a substantial length of time and also enhance immunological recovery if supplemented with adherence counselling ensuring an optimal adherence level. However, the 12% virological failure and resistance mutations observed in the absence of the WHO clinical and immunological criteria that presently apply to developing countries suggest the need for affordable virological monitoring and targeted drug resistance testing assays in the region.
The authors would like to thank all study participants. Expert technical assistance by Sandra Bergs and Janka Rätzke is gratefully acknowledged. This work was partly supported by German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), Association of Sponsors and Friends of Leipzig University, and HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control Office of Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia.
Conceived and designed the experiments: AM MM UGL. Performed the experiments: AM. Analyzed the data: AM MM UGL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: UGL. Wrote the paper: AM MM UGL.
- 1. Gilks CF, Crowley S, Ekpini R, Gove S, Perriens J, Souteyrand Y,et al. The WHO public-health approach to antiretroviral treatment against HIV in resource-limited settings. Lancet 2006 Aug 5; 368(9534).
- 2. World Health Organization. Towards universal access: scaling up priority HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector (2010): progress report. Available: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/2010progressreport/report/en/index.html
- 3. Ivers LC, Kendrick D, Doucette K. Efficacy of antiretroviral therapy programs in resource-poor settings: a meta-analysis of the published literature. Clin Infect Dis 2005 Jul 15; 41(2).
- 4. Mulu A, Liebert UG, Maier M. Virological efficacy and immunological recovery among Ethiopian HIV-1 infected adults and children. BMC Infect Dis 2014 Jan 14; 14(28).
- 5. Tessema B, Biadglegne F, Mulu A, Getachew A, Emmrich , Sack U,. Magnitude and determinants of non-adherence and non-readiness to highly active antiretroviral therapy among people living with HIV/AIDS in Northwest Ethiopia: a cross—sectional study. AIDS Res Ther Jan 14; 7 (2).
- 6. Hamers RL, Derdelinckx I, van Vugt M, Stevens W, Rinke de Wit TF, Schuurman R, et al. The status of HIV-1 resistance to antiretroviral drugs in sub-Saharan Africa. Antivir Ther 2008; 13(5).
- 7. Gupta RK, Hill A, Sawyer AW, Cozzi-Lepri A, von Wyl V, Yirly S, et al. Virological monitoring and resistance to first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy in adults infected with HIV-1 treated under WHO guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2009 Jul; 9(7).
- 8. Hosseinipour MC, van Oosterhout JJ, Weigel R, Phiri S, Kamwendo D, Parkin N, et al. The public health approach to identify antiretroviral therapy failure: high-level nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance among Malawians failing first-line antiretroviral therapy. AIDS2009 Jun 1; 23(9).
- 9. Sigaloff KC, Hamers RL, Wallis CL, Kityo C, Siwale M, IVe P, et al. Unnecessary antiretroviral treatment switches and accumulation of HIV resistance mutations; two arguments for viral load monitoring in Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011 Sep 1; 58(1).
- 10. Kantor R, Shafer RW, Follansbee S, Taylor J, Shilane D, Hurley L, et al. Evolution of resistance to drugs in HIV-1-infected patients failing antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2004 Jul 23; 18(11).
- 11. Hogg RS, Bangsberg DR, Lima VD, Alexander C, Bonner S, Yip B, et al. Emergence of drug resistance is associated with an increased risk of death among patients first starting HAART. PLoS Med 2006 Sep; 3(9).
- 12. Kozal MJ, Hullsiek KH, Macarthur RD, Berg-Wolf Mv, Peng G, Xiang Y, et al. The Incidence of HIV drug resistance and its impact on progression of HIV disease among antiretroviral-naive participants started on three different antiretroviral therapy strategies. HIV Clin Trials 2007 Nov-Dec; 8(6).
- 13. Barth RE, van der Loeff MF, Schuurman R, Hoepelman AL, Wensing AM. Virological follow-up of adult patients in antiretroviral treatment programmes in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2010 Mar; 10(3).
- 14. Marconi VC, Sunpath H, Lu Z, Gordon M, Koranteng-Apeagyei K, Hompton J, et al. Prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance after failure of a first highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. Clin Infect Dis 2008 May 15; 46(10).
- 15. Wallis CL, Mellors JW, Venter WD, Sanne I, Stevens W. Varied patterns of HIV-1 drug resistance on failing first-line antiretroviral therapy in South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010 Apr 1; 53(4).
- 16. Koyalta D, Charpentier C, Beassamda J, Rey E, Si-Mohamed A, Djemadji-Oudjeil N, et al. High Frequency of Antiretroviral Drug Resistance among HIV-Infected Adults Receiving First-Line Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in N’Djamena, Chad. Clin Infect Dis 2009 Jul 1; 49(1).
- 17. World Health Organization (2012) WHO HIV Drug Resistance Report 2012 (Available: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75183/1/9789241503938_eng.pdf)
- 18. Mulu A, Lange T, Liebert UG, Maier M. Clade homogeneity and Pol gene polymorphisms in chronically HIV-1 infected antiretroviral treatment naive patients after the roll out of ART in Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis 2014 Mar 22;14:158 pmid:24655349
- 19. Huruy K, Maier M, Mulu A, Liebert UG. Limited increase in primary HIV-1C drug resistance mutations in treatment naïve patients in Ethiopia. J Med Virol 2015 Jun;87(6).
- 20. Kiwelu IE, Novitsky V, Kituma E, Margolin L, Baca J, Manongi R, et al. HIV-1 pol diversity among female bar and hotel workers in Northern Tanzania. PLoS One 2014 Jul 8; 9(7).
- 21. Hamers R, Sigaloffa K, Kityob C, Mugyenyib P and de Wit TF. Emerging HIV-1 drug resistance after roll-out of antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2013 Jan; 8(1).
- 22. Wensing AM, Calvez V, Günthard HF, Johnson VA, Paredes R, Pillay D, et al. Update of the Drug Resistance Mutations in HIV-1: International AIDS Society–USA. Top Antivir Med 2014 Jun-Jul;22(3).
- 23. Abdissa A, Yilma D, Fonager J, Audelin AM, Christensen LH, Olsen MF, et al. Drug resistance in HIV patients with virological failure or slow virological response to antiretroviral therapy in Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis 2014 Apr 4; 14 (181).
- 24. Muwonga J, Edidi S, Butel C, Vidal N, Monleau M, Okenge A, et al. Resistance to Antiretroviral Drugs in Treated and Drug-Naive Patients in the Democratic Republic of Congo. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011 Jul 1;57 Suppl 1:S27–33. pmid:21857282
- 25. Hamers RL, Sigaloff KC, Wensing AM, Wallis CL, Kityo C, Siwale M, et al. Patterns of HIV-1 Drug Resistance after first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) failure in 6 sub-Saharan African countries: Implications for second-line ART strategies. Clin Infect Dis 2012 Jun; 54(11).
- 26. Bourgeois A, Laurent C, Mougnutou R, Nkoue N, lactuock B, Ciaffi L, et al. Field assessment of generic antiretroviral drugs: a prospective cohort study in Cameroon. Antivir Ther 2005; 10(2).
- 27. Ferradini L, Jeannin A, Pinoges L, Izopet J, Odhiambo D, Mankhambo L, et al. Scaling up of highly active antiretroviral therapy in a rural district of Malawi: an effectiveness assessment. Lancet 2006 Apr 22; 367(9519).
- 28. Wallis CL, Papathanasopolous MA, Fox M, Conrade , Ive P, Zeinecker J, et al. Low rates of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance in a well-monitored cohort in South Africa on antiretroviral therapy. Antivir Ther 2012; 17(2).
- 29. Kouanfack C, Montavon C, Laurent C, Aghokeng A, Kenfack A, Bourgeois A, et al. (2009) Low levels of antiretroviral resistant HIV infection in a routine clinic in Cameroon that uses the World Health Organization (WHO) public health approach to monitor antiretroviral treatment and adequacy with the WHO recommendation for second-line treatment. Clin Infect Dis 2009 May 1; 48(9).
- 30. Rusine J, Asiimwe-Kateera B, van de Wijgert J, Boer KR, Mukantwali E, Karita E, et al. Low Primary and Secondary HIV Drug-Resistance after 12 Months of Antiretroviral Therapy in Human Immune-Deficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1)-Infected Individuals from Kigali, Rwanda. PLoS ONE 2013 Aug 12; 8(8).
- 31. Doyle T and Geretti AM. Low-level viraemia on HAART: significance and management. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2012 Feb;25(1).
- 32. Geretti AM, Smith C, Haberl A, Garcia-Diaz A, Nebbia G, Johnson M, et al. Determinants of virological failure after successful viral load suppression in first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy. Antivir Ther 2008; 13(7).
- 33. Coetzee D, Hildebrand K, Boulle A, Maartens G, Louis F, Labatala V, et al. Outcomes after two years of providing antiretroviral treatment in Khayelitsha, South Africa. AIDS 2004 Apr 9; 18(6).
- 34. Ledergerber B, Lundgren JD, Walker AS, Sabin C, Justice A, Reiss P, et al. Predictors of trend in CD4-positive T-cell count and mortality among HIV-1-infected individuals with virological failure to all three antiretroviral-drug classes. Lancet 2004 Jul 3–9; 364(9428).
- 35. Messele T, Abdulkadir M, Fontanet AL, Petros B, Hamann D, Koot M, et al. Reduced naive and increased activated CD4 and CD8 cells in healthy adult Ethiopians compared with their Dutch counterparts. Clin Exp Immunol 1999 Mar; 115(3).
- 36. Kassu A, Tsegaye A, Wolday D, Wolday D, Hailu E, Sanders EJ, et al. Role of incidental and/or cured intestinal parasitic infections on profile of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets and activation status in HIV-1 infected and uninfected adult Ethiopians. Clin Exp Immunol 2003 Apr; 132(1).
- 37. Nakanjako D, Ssewanyana I, Mayanja-Kizza H, Kiragga A, Colebunders R, Manabe YC, et al. High T-cell immune activation and immune exhaustion among individuals with suboptimal CD4 recovery after 4 years of antiretroviral therapy in an African cohort. BMC Infect Dis 2011 Feb 8; 11(43).
- 38. Lederman MM, Kalish LA, Asmuth D, Fiebig E, Mileno M, Bush MP. ‘Modelling’ relationships among HIV-1 replication, immune activation and CD4+ T-cell losses using adjusted correlative analyses. AIDS 2000 May 26; 14(8).
- 39. Hazenberg MD, Otto SA, van Benthem BH, Roos MT, Coutinho RA, Lange JM, et al. Persistent immune activation in HIV-1 infection is associated with progression to AIDS. AIDS 2003 Sep 5; 17(13).