Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Development of Gateway Binary Vector Series with Four Different Selection Markers for the Liverwort Marchantia polymorpha

  • Kimitsune Ishizaki ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Kimitsune Ishizaki, Ryuichi Nishihama

    Affiliations Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan

  • Ryuichi Nishihama ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Kimitsune Ishizaki, Ryuichi Nishihama

    Affiliation Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Minoru Ueda,

    Current address: Plant Genomic Network Research Team, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science (CSRS), Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

    Affiliation Department of Botany, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Keisuke Inoue,

    Affiliation Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Sakiko Ishida,

    Affiliation Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Yoshiki Nishimura,

    Affiliation Department of Botany, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Toshiharu Shikanai,

    Affiliation Department of Botany, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Takayuki Kohchi

    Affiliation Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan


We previously reported Agrobacterium-mediated transformation methods for the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha using the hygromycin phosphotransferase gene as a marker for selection with hygromycin. In this study, we developed three additional markers for M. polymorpha transformation: the gentamicin 3'-acetyltransferase gene for selection with gentamicin; a mutated acetolactate synthase gene for selection with chlorsulfuron; and the neomycin phosphotransferase II gene for selection with G418. Based on these four marker genes, we have constructed a series of Gateway binary vectors designed for transgenic experiments on M. polymorpha. The 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus and endogenous promoters for constitutive and heat-inducible expression were used to create these vectors. The reporters and tags used were Citrine, 3×Citrine, Citrine-NLS, TagRFP, tdTomato, tdTomato-NLS, GR, SRDX, SRDX-GR, GUS, ELuc(PEST), and 3×FLAG. These vectors, designated as the pMpGWB series, will facilitate molecular genetic analyses of the emerging model plant M. polymorpha.


Bryophytes, including liverworts, mosses, and hornworts, are the earliest diverging group of extant land plants. Liverworts are a key lineage for comparative genomic studies aimed at elucidating the fundamental and diverse gene regulatory networks in land plants [13]. The liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. is a widespread dioecious species that is easily cultivated in laboratory conditions. Previous research on Marchantia has focused on the genomes of organelles in cultured cells [4,5] and its Y chromosome [6]. Recently, the whole genome shotgun sequencing project of M. polymorpha was initiated under the Community Sequencing Program at the Joint Genome Institute (DOE-JGI: Our research group has been developing M. polymorpha as an experimental model organism, because it occupies a critical evolutionary position for studies on specific molecular and cellular developmental processes in detail [7].

We previously reported an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system using sporelings of the liverwort M. polymorpha. Hundreds of transformants carrying T-DNAs randomly inserted in the genome were obtained from a single sporangium [8]. An Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method has also become available using thallus explants in M. polymorpha, providing opportunities for genetic transformation without preparing spores [9]. Recently, these methods have been simplified so that all of the procedures can be conducted in a Petri dish [10,11]. These methods for genetic transformation have been used for functional molecular studies of M. polymorpha [1224]. Furthermore, a method for homologous recombination-mediated gene targeting has been established for M. polymorpha—this method uses positive/negative selection in combination with an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system [25]. To date, however, only the hygromycin phosphotransferase gene (hpt) has been available for use as a marker for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in M. polymorpha. Introduction of a transgene into pre-existing transgenic lines is an important method for analyses of transgene function and the localization of its product. For this purpose, additional selection markers that differ from those in pre-existing transgenic plants are required.

Here we describe three markers that have been developed for M. polymorpha transformation: the gentamicin 3'-acetyltransferase gene (aacC1) [26] for selection with gentamicin; a mutated acetolactate synthase gene (mALS) for selection with the sulfonylurea herbicide, 2-chloro-N-[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)aminocarbonyl]-benzenesulfonamide (chlorsulfuron; CS); and the neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) gene for selection with G418. Based on these marker genes, we have designed and constructed a series of Gateway binary vectors, the pMpGWB series, for transgenic experiments on M. polymorpha. Using a combination of different selection markers, multiple constructs can be introduced into M. polymorpha by a single transformation procedure. These pMpGWB vectors will facilitate transgenic research on the model plant M. polymorpha.

Materials and Methods

Plant material and growth conditions

Male and female accessions of M. polymorpha, Takaragaike-1 and Takaragaike-2, respectively, were asexually maintained as previously described [8]. Plants were cultured on half-strength Gamborg’s B5 medium [27] containing 0.5 g/L MES and 1% (w/v) agar under continuous white fluorescent light (50–60 μmol photons m-2 s-1) at 22°C. For transformation, we used F1 spores generated by crossing Takaragaike-1 and Takaragaike-2, prepared as previously described [28].

Vector construction

All the primers used in this study are listed in S1 Table. The PCR-amplified regions and ligation junctions were confirmed by sequence analysis for all vectors.

Acetolactate synthase (ALS) is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of the branched-chain amino acids leucine, isoleucine, and valine. Sulfonylurea herbicides, e.g. CS, bind reversibly to the ALS-FAD-thiamine pyrophosphate-Mg2+-decarboxylated pyruvate complex and also compete for the second pyruvate binding site in ALS [29]. Mutagenesis at these sites in ALS confers tolerance to sulfonylurea herbicides. For example, mALSs containing mutations at P197H, R198S, and W574L conferred resistance to CS in Arabidopsis [30]. To generate a CS-resistance marker gene for use in M. polymorpha, its ALS sequence was mutagenized to contain corresponding mutations (P207S/R208S/W582L) to those described above, as follows. First, M. polymorpha ALS cDNA was amplified by RT-PCR with the primer set ALS-P1 and ALS-P2 using first-strand cDNA synthesized from a 10-day-old thallus. The resultant ALS cDNA was cloned into the pENTR/D-TOPO vector (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). A point mutation at W582L in the ALS sequence was introduced by PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis with the primer pair ALS-W582L-F and ALS-W582L-R, using the ALS cDNA plasmid as the template. The PCR product was digested with DpnI, and the digested PCR product was transformed into Escherichia coli competent cells (DH5α). The mutation in ALS was confirmed by sequencing the resultant plasmid. The mALS was prepared by repeating the same procedure with the primer set ALS-P207S-R208S-F and ALS-P207S-R208S-F using the W582L-mutated ALS as a template. The mALS cDNA was cloned into pCAMBIA1300 to replace the hpt gene, generating the plasmid pCAMBIA1300-mALS.

The marker cassettes pro35S×2:hpt:ter35S, pro35S×2:aacC1:ter35S, pro35S×2:mALS:ter35S, and pro35S×2:nptII:ter35S were prepared by PCR with the primer set Marker_LinF and Marker_RinF using pCAMBIA1300, pPZP221, pCAMBIA1300-mALS, and pCAMBIA2301, respectively, as the template. The marker cassettes were cloned into EcoRI-digested pGWB400 [31] using an In-Fusion HD cloning kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) to replace the proNOS:nptII:terNOS cassette, generating pMpGWB100, pMpGWB200, pMpGWB300, and pMpGWB400, respectively. The E. coli DH5α cells harboring these plasmids were selected on LB medium containing 100 mg/l spectinomycin.

The Gateway-compatible binary vectors pMpGWBs were constructed using the same strategy as that used by Nakagawa et al. to construct pGWBs [31,32]. Detailed procedures of pMpGWBs construction are described in S1 Text. The E. coli (strain DB3.1) cells harboring pMpGWBs were selected on LB media containing 100 mg/l spectinomycin and 30 mg/l chloramphenicol.

The vector for expression of TagRFP-LTI6b was constructed as follows: the GFP-LTI6b coding sequence was PCR-amplified using the primers GFP-LTI6b_GW_L1 and GFP-LTI6b_GW_R1 and cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO. The GFP coding sequence flanked by two NotI sites in this plasmid was replaced with the TagRFP-coding sequence with two similarly flanking NotI sites, which was PCR-amplified using the primers pENTRD_NotI_TagRFP_F and TagRFP_NotI_R. This plasmid was used for LR recombination with pMpGWB103 to generate pMpGWB103-TagRFP-LTI6b.

To construct the vector for expression of SP-GFP-HDEL, the SP-GFP-HDEL-coding sequence [33] was PCR-amplified using the primers SP_Lc and HDEL_R and cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO. The resulting vector was used for LR recombination with pMpGWB303 to generate pMpGWB303-SP-GFP-HDEL.

To construct the vectors for expression of tdTomato-NLS and GUS under the endogenous ELONGATION FACTOR1α promoter (proEF), the 1,729-bp promoter sequence of MpEF1α [34] was amplified by PCR using the primers MpEF-P_L1 and MpEF-P_R1 and cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO. The resulting vector was used for LR recombination with pMpGWB216 and pMpGWB404 to generate pMpGWB216-proEF and pMpGWB404-proEF, respectively.

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of M. polymorpha

Transformation of M. polymorpha was performed as described previously [8]. For simultaneous transformation with multiple vectors, the respective Agrobacterium cultures were mixed at a 1:1 ratio. Half-strength Gamborg’s B5 medium containing 0.5 g/L MES and 1% (w/v) agar and supplemented with hygromycin B (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan), gentamicin sulfate (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), CS (kindly provided by Dupont, Wilmington, DE, USA), or G418 (Nacalai Tesque) was used to select transformants. The stock solution of CS (50 mM) was prepared with DMSO.

Fluorescence microscopy

TagRFP, GFP, and chlorophyll were excited with a laser at 488 nm and 543 nm, and fluorescence was detected at 500–530 nm (GFP), 580–600 nm (TagRFP), and 655–755 nm (chlorophyll) using a confocal microscope (FV1000; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

GUS staining

Histochemical staining of GUS was performed as described previously [13,35].

Nucleotide accession numbers and distribution of pMpGWBs

The complete nucleotide sequences of the pMpGWBs have been deposited in the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases under the accessions nos. LC057442 to LC057589. pMpGWB plasmids can be obtained from Addgene (; plasmid numbers 68062 and 68555–68701).

Results and Discussion

Selection of transformants using gentamicin, CS, and G418

To explore the possibility of using gentamicin, CS, and G418 to select transformed M. polymorpha, we first investigated whether these substances suppressed plant growth. M. polymorpha gemmae were grown on agar medium containing various concentrations of gentamicin, CS, and G418. Thalli showed severe growth defects when grown on medium containing 50 mg/l or higher concentrations of gentamicin, 0.05 μM or higher concentrations of CS, and 2.5 mg/l or higher concentrations of G418 (S1 Fig).

To facilitate the selection of transformants on medium containing these antibiotics/herbicide, chimeric marker gene cassettes were introduced into the binary vector pGWB400 [31]. The backbone of this vector was pPZP221, harboring ColE1 and pVS1 plasmid origins for replication in E. coli and Agrobacterium, respectively [36]. In the case of hygromycin selection, the nopaline synthase gene promoter did not drive expression of the hpt marker gene as strongly as did the CaMV 35S promoter in M. polymorpha. Consequently, the nopaline synthase gene promoter resulted in a lower transformation efficiency. To ensure efficient expression of the resistance genes in M. polymorpha, a double-enhancer version of the CaMV 35S promoter (pro35S×2) in the pCAMBIA vector (, which was derived from the pPZP vector [36,37], was used to drive the expression of the marker genes. Thus, the constructed binary vectors were pMpGWB100, pMpGWB200, pMpGWB300, and pMpGWB400, carrying pro35S×2-driven hpt, aacC1, mALS, and nptII, respectively (S2 Fig).

The vectors pMpGWB100, pMpGWB200, pMpGWB300, and pMpGWB400 were used to transform M. polymorpha using Agrobacterium. Sporelings co-cultured with Agrobacterium harboring the respective plasmids gave rise to antibiotic/herbicide-resistant plantlets on medium containing 10 mg/l hygromycin, 100 mg/l gentamicin, 0.5 μM CS, or 5 mg/l G418, respectively (Fig 1A, 1C, 1E and 1G), whereas the sporelings co-cultured with Agrobacterium carrying no binary plasmid did not (Fig 1B, 1D, 1F and 1H). The transformation efficiencies obtained via gentamicin/pro35S×2::aacC1::ter35S, CS/pro35S×2::mALS::ter35S, and G418/pro35S×2::nptII::ter35S selection were comparable to that obtained by hygromycin/pro35S×2::hpt::ter35S selection (Fig 2). The antibiotic/herbicide-resistance traits were transmitted through asexual reproduction of gemmae in multiple rounds of subculture.

Fig 1. Transformation of M. polymorpha using pMpGWB vectors developed in this study.

Sporelings co-cultivated with A. tumefaciens strain GV2260 containing the binary vector pMpGWB100 (A), pMpGWB200 (C), pMpGWB300 (E), pMpGWB400 (G), or no binary vector (B, D, F, and H) at 7 d after transfer onto selection medium containing 10 mg/l hygromycin (Hyg; A, B), 100 mg/l gentamicin (Gen; C, D), 0.5 μM chlorsulfuron (CS; E, F), or 5 mg/l G418 (G, H). Insets show magnified view of antibiotic/herbicide-resistant transformants. Bars = 1 mm.

Fig 2. Comparison of transformation efficiencies of M. polymorpha among four vectors with different selection markers and selective antibiotics/herbicide.

Hyg, hygromycin; Gen, gentamicin; CS, chlorsulfuron. Values are means ± SD from three independent experiments.

Gateway binary vectors pMpGWBs

In functional genetic studies, the construction of fusion genes is valuable for analyses of expression, protein localization, and protein–protein interactions in vivo. We have constructed Gateway binary vectors (pMpGWBs) for M. polymorpha based on the four binary vectors pMpGWB100, pMpGWB200, pMpGWB300, and pMpGWB400. The pMpGWB vectors allow genes to be fused to a variety of reporters and tags through a simple and uniform procedure using Gateway cloning technology [38]. The structure of the pMpGWBs is shown in Fig 3. The pMpGWB100 series carry the hygromycin-resistance marker (pro35S×2:hpt:ter35S). Similarly, the pMpGWB200, pMpGWB300, and pMpGWB400 series carry the gentamicin-resistance marker (pro35S×2:aacC1:ter35S), the CS-resistance marker (pro35S×2:mALS:ter35S), and the G418-resistance marker (pro35S×2:nptII: ter35S), respectively. All markers were placed in the tail-to-tail orientation in relation to the gene cloned by the LR reaction.

Fig 3. Schematic illustrations of pMpGWBs.

A. Outline of pMpGWBs (pMpGWB101-136, pMpGWB201-236, pMpGWB301-336, and pMpGWB401-436 containing selection markers for Hyg, Gen, CS, and G418, respectively). Markers were placed in tail-to-tail orientation in relation to genes cloned by LR reaction. B. Structures of “Gateway” regions shown in (A). Only general structures are shown for vectors harboring fusion construct; i.e., no promoter and C-fusion (No pro/C), CaMV 35S promoter and C-fusion (pro35S/C), CaMV 35S promoter and N-fusion (pro35S/N), EF promoter and C-fusion (proEF/C), EF promoter and N-fusion (proEF/N), MpHSP17.8A1 promoter and C-fusion (proHSP/C). C. Reporters and tags used in pMpGWBs illustrated in (B). Vector number corresponds to combination of reporter/tag and fusion type. Citrine, synthetic yellow fluorescent protein; 3×Citrine, three repeats of Citrine fluorescent protein; TagRFP, tag red fluorescent protein; tdTomato; tandem dimer Tomato fluorescent protein; GR, ligand-binding domain of rat glucocorticoid receptor; SRDX, modified EAR motif plant-specific repression domain with strong repression activity; SRDX-GR, SRDX fused with GR; 3×FLAG, three repeats of FLAG tag; GUS, β-glucuronidase; ELuc(PEST), Emerald Luc (luciferase from click beetle) fused with PEST sequence; Citrine-NLS, Citrine fused with nuclear localization signal sequence; tdTomato-NLS, tdTomato fused with nuclear localization signal sequence. RB, right border; LB, left border; sta, region conferring stability in Agrobacterium; rep, broad host-range replication origin; bom, cis-acting element for conjugational transfer; ori, ColE1 replication origin. Cmr, chloramphenicol-resistance marker (chloramphenicol acetyl transferase) used to select bacteria; aadA, spectinomycin-resistance marker (Spcr) used to select bacteria; ccdB, negative selection marker.

The last two digits of the plasmid names indicate the structures around the Gateway cassette that are common to the pMpGWBs. For example, pMpGWB101, pMpGWB201, pMpGWB301, and pMpGWB401 are simple cloning vectors with neither promoters nor reporters/tags. These vectors can be used in various experiments, for example, for complementation of mutations with genomic fragments.

pMpGWB102, pMpGWB202, pMpGWB302, and pMpGWB402 carry a standard CaMV 35S promoter (pro35S) for constitutive expression in plants. pMpGWB103, pMpGWB203, pMpGWB303, and pMpGWB403 carry the endogenous EF1α promoter (proEF), which drives constitutive expression in M. polymorpha plants [34]. pMpGWB132, pMpGWB232, pMpGWB332, and pMpGWB432 carry the endogenous MpHSP17.8A1 promoter (proHSP) for heat-inducible expression in M. polymorpha [35].

Fusion genes of promoter–GUS are usually used in histochemical and quantitative expression analyses, while promoter–luciferase fusions are useful for monitoring transcriptional responses in living cells. pMpGWB104, pMpGWB204, pMpGWB304, and pMpGWB404 are suitable for promoter analysis with the GUS reporter gene. pMpGWB131, pMpGWB231, pMpGWB331, and pMpGWB431 contain a luciferase gene from click beetle (Photinus pyralis) [39] fused to the mouse ornithine decarboxylase PEST sequence at the C-terminus. The ELuc(PEST) fusion gene was constructed to produce a promoter–luciferase assay with enhanced response dynamics [40]. pMpGWB115-116, pMpGWB215-216, pMpGWB315-316, and pMpGWB415-416 contain sequences encoding fluorescent proteins, Citrine or tdTomato, fused to a short amino acid sequence that contains the nuclear localization signal sequence (PKKKRKV) from the SV40 large T antigen [41]. These vectors were designed for monitoring promoter activity in planta. For promoter analysis, one would assume that the double-enhancer version of the CaMV 35S promoter, which drives marker genes in these pMpGWB vectors, might affect promoter activity in the same T-DNA. However, this does not appear to be the case in M. polymorpha as shown previously [13, 35].

Multiple fusion types are available for most reporters/tags. There are vectors for constitutive expression, driven by the CaMV 35S promoter, of proteins fused with reporters at the C-terminus (pro35S/C) or at the N-terminus (pro35S/N). There are vectors for expression of C-terminal fusion proteins driven by their own promoters (No pro/C). There are also vectors for the endogenous EF1α promoter-driven expression of proteins that are fused with a reporter at the C-terminus (proEF/C) or at the N-terminus (proEF/N), and those for the endogenous MpHSP17.8A1 promoter-driven expression of proteins that are fused with a reporter at the C-terminus (proHSP/C).

Fluorescent proteins and epitope tags are also useful for co-purification and immuno-detection experiments. Various kinds of fluorescent proteins with different spectral properties have been developed, and used to analyze the dynamics of protein localization in planta. The following vectors are suitable for expressing proteins in planta as protein-fusions with fluorescent reporters (Citrine, 3×Citrine, TagRFP, and tdTomato) [4244]: pMpGWB105-108, pMpGWB123-130, pMpGWB133, pMpGWB135-136, pMpGWB205-208, pMpGWB223-230, pMpGWB233, pMpGWB235-236, pMpGWB305-308, pMpGWB323-330, pMpGWB333, pMpGWB335-336, pMpGWB405-408, pMpGWB423-430, pMpGWB433, and pMpGWB435-436. The vectors pMpGWB109-111, pMpGWB209-211, pMpGWB309-311, and pMpGWB409-411 are suitable for expressing proteins labeled with the 3×FLAG epitope tag at the C-terminus.

The vectors pMpGWB112-114, pMpGWB134, pMpGWB212-214, pMpGWB234, pMpGWB312-314, pMpGWB334, pMpGWB412-414, and pMpGWB434 were designed for expressing nuclear proteins, i.e. transcriptional regulators, as protein-fusions with the ligand-binding domain of the rat glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Using these constructs, the activity of transcription factors can be made conditional on the presence of steroid ligands, such as dexamethasone, as shown in previous studies [4547].

The vectors pMpGWB117-119, pMpGWB217-219, pMpGWB317-319, and pMpGWB417-419 were designed for expressing transcriptional regulators tagged with the modified EAR motif plant-specific repression domain (SRDX; amino acid sequence LDLDLELRLGFA), which shows strong repression activity, at the C-terminus [48]. A chimeric repressor that is produced by fusing a transcription factor to SRDX suppresses the target genes of the transcription factor dominantly over the activity of endogenous and functionally redundant transcription factors [48]. pMpGWB120-122, pMpGWB220-222, pMpGWB320-322, and pMpGWB420-422 were designed for expressing transcriptional regulators tagged with both SRDX and GR at the C-terminus. Using these constructs, the activity of the chimeric transcriptional repressor can be made conditional on the presence of steroid ligands.

Simultaneous transformation with multiple constructs

To test the performance of these vectors, we made two types of binary vectors: one designed to express a plasma membrane-localized fluorescent protein, TagRFP-LTI6b [49], under the control of proEF using pMpGWB103; and the other designed to express an endoplasmic reticulum-localized fluorescent protein, SP-GFP-HDEL [32], under the control of proEF using pMpGWB303. These binary vectors were separately introduced into Agrobacterium cells, and the respective transformant clones were used together to transform M. polymorpha sporelings. Sporelings co-cultured with the mixed Agrobacterium culture were subjected to hygromycin selection first, and then, to CS selection. Approximately 30% of transformants that passed the first hygromycin selection were resistant also to CS. Transgenic plants that survived selection with both hygromycin and CS were found to express the two proteins at their predicted subcellular locations (Fig 4A). We also examined triple and quadruple transformation using the two plasmids used above plus proEF-introduced pMpGWB216 (for expression of tdTomato-NLS) or proEF-introduced pMpGWB404 (for expression of GUS), or both. A portion (10–20%) of transformants that passed the first hygromycin selection showed resistance to either of the following combinatorial second selections: (i) hygromycin, gentamicin, and CS; (ii) hygromycin, CS, and G418; or (iii) all the four antibiotics/herbicide. As expected, expression of all transgenes in quadruple transformants was observed at predicted locations (Fig 4B).

Fig 4. Simultaneous transformation with multiple pMpGWB vectors.

A. Two binary vectors, pMpGWB103-TagRFP-LTI6b and pMpGWB303-SP-GFP-HDEL, were used simultaneously for Agrobacterium-mediated sporeling transformation with double selection. B. Four binary vectors, pMpGWB103-TagRFP-LTI6b, pMpGWB216-proEF, pMpGWB303-SP-GFP-HDEL, and pMpGWB404-proEF, were used simultaneously for transformation with quadruple selection. Separate and merged images for fluorescence from TagRFP or TagRFP/tdTomato, GFP, and chlorophyll autofluorescence of thallus epidermal cells and a micrograph for GUS staining in a representative line from each transformation are shown. Bars = 10 μm for fluorescence; 1 cm for GUS.

Thus, the pMpGWB series are capable of driving proper expression. In addition, the four kinds of selection markers available in the pMpGWB system should provide options for transformation with multiple constructs simultaneously.


We have developed a series of binary vectors for transformation of M. polymorpha. Four kinds of selection markers are now available for transgenesis of M. polymorpha. The pMpGWBs constructed in this study will be useful for efficient cloning in transgenic research, and will be particularly powerful for the construction of fusion genes and simultaneous introduction of multiple constructs. We have used various reporters and tags suitable for Marchantia research in these pMpGWBs.

In Arabidopsis, the Gateway vector series developed by Nakagawa et al. have been widely used and have accelerated the construction of transgenes [31,32,50]. It should be noted that the pMpGWBx00 binary vectors have unique HindIII/SacI sites next to the nopaline synthase terminator sequence (terNOS). Consequently, the HindIII/SacI fragments in the pGWB and R4pGWB series [31,32,50] that harbor Gateway cassettes and reporter/tag genes can be transferred into pMpGWBs by a single-step cloning procedure. Therefore, various Gateway cassettes and reporter/tags in the pGWB and R4GWB series (i.e., sGFP, G3GFP, mRFP, 6×His, 3×HA, 4×Myc, 10×Myc, GST, T7, and TAP) can be easily transferred into the pMpGWB series as needed. Similarly, the original Gateway cassette and reporters/tags in pMpGWBs (Citrine, 3×Citrine, Citrine-NLS, tdTomato, tdTomato-NLS, GR, SRDX, SRDX-GR, ELuc(PEST), and 3×FLAG) can be readily transferred into pGWBs. Although the pMpGWBs were developed for transgenesis experiments in M. polymorpha, they could also be used for other plants in which the pro35S×2-driven selection markers are effective, such as monocots.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Dose-dependent effect of antibiotics/herbicide on growth of M. polymorpha.

Wild-type (Takaragaike-1) gemmae were plated on medium containing 0–200 mg/l gentamicin (Gen; A), 0–1 μM chlorsulfuron (CS; B), or 0–10 mg/l G418 (C), and incubated for 10 d at 22°C under continuous light.


S2 Fig. Schematic illustration of pMpGWB vector backbones.

Restriction enzyme sites available for linearization of respective plasmids are indicated. RB, right border; LB, left border; sta, region conferring stability in Agrobacterium; rep, broad host-range replication origin; bom, cis-acting element for conjugational transfer; ori, ColE1 replication origin. aadA, spectinomycin-resistance marker (Spcr) used for bacterial selection.



We thank Tsuyoshi Nakagawa (Shimane University) for inspiring this project and for providing pGWBs and their intermediate plasmids pUGWs, Roger Y. Tsien (University of California, San Diego) for providing Citrine and tdTomato, Ian Moore (Oxford University) for providing the LhGR plasmid, Seiji Takeda (Kyoto Prefectural University) for providing the LTI6b plasmid, and Ikuko Hara-Nishimura (Kyoto University) for providing SP-GFP-HDEL. We also thank Sachihiro Matsunaga (Tokyo University of Science), Kentaro Tamura (Kyoto University), and Makoto Shirakawa (Kyoto University) for assistance with vector design.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KIs, RN, TK. Performed the experiments: KIs, RN, MU, KIn, SI. Analyzed the data: KIs, RN, TK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KIs, RN, MU, YN, TS, TK. Wrote the paper: KIs, RN, MU, TK.


  1. 1. Wickett NJ, Mirarab S, Nguyen N, Warnow T, Carpenter E, Matasci N, et al. Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E4859–68. pmid:25355905
  2. 2. Qiu YL, Li L, Wang B, Chen Z, Knoop V, Groth-Malonek M, et al. The deepest divergences in land plants inferred from phylogenomic evidence. Proc Natl AcadSci USA. 2006;103:15511–6. pmid:17030812.
  3. 3. Bowman JL, Floyd SK, Sakakibara K. Green genes-comparative genomics of the green branch of life. Cell. 2007;129:229–34. Epub 2007/04/24. pmid:17448980.
  4. 4. Ohyama K, Fukuzawa H, Kohchi T, Shirai H, Sano T, Sano S, et al. Chloroplast gene organization deduced from complete sequence of liverwort Marchantia polymorpha chloroplast DNA. Nature. 1986;322:572–4.
  5. 5. Oda K, Yamato K, Ohta E, Nakamura Y, Takemura M, Nozato N, et al. Gene organization deduced from the complete sequence of liverwort Marchantia polymorpha mitochondrial DNA. A primitive form of plant mitochondrial genome. J Mol Biol. 1992;223:1–7. pmid:1731062.
  6. 6. Yamato KT, Ishizaki K, Fujisawa M, Okada S, Nakayama S, Fujishita M, et al. Gene organization of the liverwort Y chromosome reveals distinct sex chromosome evolution in a haploid system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:6472–7. pmid:17395720.
  7. 7. Ishizaki K, Nishihama R, Yamato KT, Kohchi T. Molecular genetic tools for Marchantia polymorpha research. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016:pii: pcv097. pmid:26116421.
  8. 8. Ishizaki K, Chiyoda S, Yamato KT, Kohchi T. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the haploid liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L., an emerging model for plant biology. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;49:1084–91. pmid:18535011.
  9. 9. Kubota A, Ishizaki K, Hosaka M, Kohchi T. Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha using regenerating thalli. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2013;77:167–72. pmid:23291762.
  10. 10. Tsuboyama S, Kodama Y. AgarTrap: a simplified Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for sporelings of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014;55:229–36. pmid:24259681.
  11. 11. Tsuboyama-Tanaka S, Kodama Y. AgarTrap-mediated genetic transformation using intact gemmae/gemmalings of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. J Plant Res. 2015; 128: 337–44. pmid:25663453.
  12. 12. Era A, Tominaga M, Ebine K, Awai C, Saito C, Ishizaki K, et al. Application of Lifeact reveals F-actin dynamics in Arabidopsis thaliana and the liverwort, Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50:1041–8 pmid:19369273.
  13. 13. Ishizaki K, Nonomura M, Kato H, Yamato KT, Kohchi T. Visualization of auxin-mediated transcriptional activation using a common auxin-responsive reporter system in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. J Plant Res. 2012;125:643–51. pmid:22311005.
  14. 14. Ishizaki K, Mizutani M, Shimamura M, Masuda A, Nishihama R, Kohchi T. Essential role of the E3 ubiquitin ligase NOPPERABO1 in schizogenous intercellular space formation in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Cell. 2013;25:4075–84. pmid:24170128.
  15. 15. Kanazawa T, Ishizaki K, Kohchi T, Hanaoka M, Tanaka K. Characterization of four nuclear-encoded plastid RNA polymerase sigma factor genes in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha: blue-light- and multiple stress-responsive SIG5 was acquired early in the emergence of terrestrial plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013;54:1736–48. pmid:23975891.
  16. 16. Ueda M, Takami T, Peng L, Ishizaki K, Kohchi T, Shikanai T, et al. Subfunctionalization of sigma factors during the evolution of land plants based on mutant analysis of liverwort (Marchantia polymorpha L.) MpSIG1. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5:1836–48. pmid:24025801.
  17. 17. Sugano SS, Shirakawa M, Takagi J, Matsuda Y, Shimada T, Hara-Nishimura I, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014;55:475–81. pmid:24443494.
  18. 18. Komatsu A, Terai M, Ishizaki K, Suetsugu N, Tsuboi H, Nishihama R, et al. Phototropin encoded by a single-copy gene mediates chloroplast photorelocation movements in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Physiol. 2014;166:411–27. pmid:25096976.
  19. 19. Kubota A, Kita S, Ishizaki K, Nishihama R, Yamato KT, Kohchi T. Co-option of a photoperiodic growth-phase transition system during land plant evolution. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3668. pmid:24752248.
  20. 20. Nishihama R, Ishizaki K, Hosaka M, Matsuda Y, Kubota A, Kohchi T. Phytochrome-mediated regulation of cell division and growth during regeneration and sporeling development in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. J Plant Res. 2015;128:407–21. pmid:25841334.
  21. 21. Kato H, Ishizaki K, Kouno M, Shirakawa M, Bowman JL, Nishihama R, et al. Auxin-mediated transcriptional system with a minimal set of components is critical for morphogenesis through the life cycle in Marchantia polymorpha. PLOS Genet. 2015;11:e1005084. pmid:26020919.
  22. 22. Flores-Sandoval E, Eklund DM, Bowman JL. A simple auxin transcriptional response system regulates multiple morphogenetic processed in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. PLOS Genet. 2015:11:e1005207. pmid:26020649.
  23. 23. Kanazawa T, Era A, Minamino N, Shikano Y, Fujimoto M, Uemura T, et al. SNARE molecules in Marchantia polymorpha: unique and conserved features of the membrane fusion machinery. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015:pii: pcv076. pmid:26019268.
  24. 24. Flores-Sandoval E, Dierschke T, Fisher TJ, Bowman JL. Efficient and inducible use of artificial micro RNAs in Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015:pii: pcv068. pmid:25971256.
  25. 25. Ishizaki K, Johzuka-Hisatomi Y, Ishida S, Iida S, Kohchi T. Homologous recombination-mediated gene targeting in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1532. pmid:23524944.
  26. 26. Carrer H, Staub JM, Maliga P. Gentamycin resistance in Nicotiana conferred by AAC(3)-I, a narrow substrate specificity acetyltransferase. Plant Mol Biol. 1991;17:301–3. pmid:1650617.
  27. 27. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res. 1968;50:151–8. pmid:5650857.
  28. 28. Chiyoda S, Ishizaki K, Kataoka H, Yamato KT, Kohchi T. Direct transformation of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. by particle bombardment using immature thalli developing from spores. Plant Cell Rep. 2008;27:1467–73. pmid:18553085.
  29. 29. Kishore GM, Shah DM. Amino Acid Biosynthesis Inhibitors as Herbicides. Annu Rev Biochem. 1988;57:627–63. pmid:3052285.
  30. 30. Kawai K, Kaku K, Izawa N, Shimizu M, Kobayashi H, Shimizu T. Herbicide sensitivities of mutated enzymes expressed from artificially generated genes of acetolactate synthase. J Pestic Sci. 2008;33:128–37.
  31. 31. Nakagawa T, Suzuki T, Murata S, Nakamura S, Hino T, Maeo K, et al. Improved Gateway binary vectors: high-performance vectors for creation of fusion constructs in transgenic analysis of plants. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007;71:2095–100. pmid:17690442.
  32. 32. Nakagawa T, Kurose T, Hino T, Tanaka K, Kawamukai M, Niwa Y, et al. Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. J Biosci Bioeng. 2007;104:34–41. pmid:17697981.
  33. 33. Mitsuhashi N, Shimada T, Mano S, Nishimura M, Hara-Nishimura I. Characterization of organelles in the vacuolar-sorting pathway by visualization with GFP in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000;41:993–1001. 10.1093/pcp/pcd040 pmid:11100771.
  34. 34. Althoff F, Kopischke S, Zobell O, Ide K, Ishizaki K, Kohchi T, et al. Comparison of the MpEF1α and CaMV35 promoters for application in Marchantia polymorpha overexpression studies. Transgenic Res. 2014;23:235–44. pmid:24036909.
  35. 35. Nishihama R, Ishida S, Urawa H, Kamei Y, Kohchi T. Conditional gene expression/deletion systems for Marchantia polymorpha using its own heat-shock promoter and the Cre/loxP-mediated site-specific recombination. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016:pii: pcv102. pmid:26148498.
  36. 36. Hajdukiewicz P, Svab Z, Maliga P. The small, versatile pPZP family of Agrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol. 1994;25:989–94. pmid:7919218.
  37. 37. Timmermans MC, Maliga P, Vieira J, Messing J. The pFF plasmids: cassettes utilising CaMV sequences for expression of foreign genes in plants. J Biotechnol. 1990;14:333–44. pmid:1369289.
  38. 38. Walhout AJ, Temple GF, Brasch MA, Hartley JL, Lorson MA, van den Heuvel S, et al. GATEWAY recombinational cloning: application to the cloning of large numbers of open reading frames or ORFeomes. Methods Enzymol. 2000;328:575–92. pmid:11075367.
  39. 39. Viviani VR, Silva ACR, Perez GLO, Santelli RV, Bechara EJH, Reinach FC. Cloning and molecular characterization of the cDNA for the Brazilian larval click-beetle Pyrearinus termitilluminans luciferase. Photochem Photobiol. 1999;70:254–60. pmid:10461465.
  40. 40. Leclerc GM, Boockfor FR, Faught WJ, Frawley LS. Development of a destabilized firefly luciferase enzyme for measurement of gene expression. Biotechniques. 2000;29:590–1, 4–6, 8 passim. pmid:10997273.
  41. 41. Kalderon D, Roberts BL, Richardson WD, Smith AE. A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location. Cell. 1984;39:499–509. pmid:6096007.
  42. 42. Shaner NC, Steinbach PA, Tsien RY. A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods. 2005;2:905–9. pmid:16299475.
  43. 43. Merzlyak EM, Goedhart J, Shcherbo D, Bulina ME, Shcheglov AS, Fradkov AF, et al. Bright monomeric red fluorescent protein with an extended fluorescence lifetime. Nat Methods. 2007;4:555–7. pmid:17572680.
  44. 44. Day RN, Davidson MW. The fluorescent protein palette: tools for cellular imaging. Chemical Society reviews. 2009;38:2887–921. pmid:19771335.
  45. 45. Aoyama T, Dong CH, Wu Y, Carabelli M, Sessa G, Ruberti I, et al. Ectopic expression of the Arabidopsis transcriptional activator Athb-1 alters leaf cell fate in tobacco. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1773–85. pmid:8535134.
  46. 46. Lloyd AM, Schena M, Walbot V, Davis RW. Epidermal cell fate determination in Arabidopsis: patterns defined by a steroid-inducible regulator. Science. 1994;266:436–9. pmid:7939683.
  47. 47. Okushima Y, Fukaki H, Onoda M, Theologis A, Tasaka M. ARF7 and ARF19 regulate lateral root formation via direct activation of LBD/ASL genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19:118–30. pmid:17259263.
  48. 48. Mitsuda N, Matsui K, Ikeda M, Nakata M, Oshima Y, Nagatoshi Y, et al. CRES-T, an effective gene silencing system utilizing chimeric repressors. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;754:87–105. pmid:21720948.
  49. 49. Cutler SR, Ehrhardt DW, Griffitts JS, Somerville CR. Random GFP::cDNA fusions enable visualization of subcellular structures in cells of Arabidopsis at a high frequency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:3718–23. pmid:10737809.
  50. 50. Nakagawa T, Nakamura S, Tanaka K, Kawamukai M, Suzuki T, Nakamura K, et al. Development of R4 gateway binary vectors (R4pGWB) enabling high-throughput promoter swapping for plant tesearch. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008;72:624–9. pmid:18256458.