Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Muscle Carnosine Is Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Humans

Muscle Carnosine Is Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Humans

  • Barbora de Courten, 
  • Timea Kurdiova, 
  • Maximilian P. J. de Courten, 
  • Vitazoslav Belan, 
  • Inge Everaert, 
  • Marek Vician, 
  • Helena Teede, 
  • Daniela Gasperikova, 
  • Giancarlo Aldini, 
  • Wim Derave



Carnosine is a naturally present dipeptide abundant in skeletal muscle and an over-the counter food additive. Animal data suggest a role of carnosine supplementation in the prevention and treatment of obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease but only limited human data exists.

Methods and Results

Samples of vastus lateralis muscle were obtained by needle biopsy. We measured muscle carnosine levels (high-performance liquid chromatography), % body fat (bioimpedance), abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adiposity (magnetic resonance imaging), insulin sensitivity (euglycaemic hyperinsulinemic clamp), resting energy expenditure (REE, indirect calorimetry), free-living ambulatory physical activity (accelerometers) and lipid profile in 36 sedentary non-vegetarian middle aged men (45±7 years) with varying degrees of adiposity and glucose tolerance. Muscle carnosine content was positively related to % body fat (r = 0.35, p = 0.04) and subcutaneous (r = 0.38, p = 0.02) but not visceral fat (r = 0.17, p = 0.33). Muscle carnosine content was inversely associated with insulin sensitivity (r = -0.44, p = 0.008), REE (r = -0.58, p<0.001) and HDL-cholesterol levels (r = -0.34, p = 0.048). Insulin sensitivity and physical activity were the best predictors of muscle carnosine content after adjustment for adiposity.


Our data shows that higher carnosine content in human skeletal muscle is positively associated with insulin resistance and fasting metabolic preference for glucose. Moreover, it is negatively associated with HDL-cholesterol and basal energy expenditure. Intervention studies targeting insulin resistance, metabolic and cardiovascular disease risk factors are necessary to evaluate its putative role in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.


Type 2 diabetes is a global health problem [1]. This is largely due to increasing rates of obesity underpinned by obesogenic lifestyle. The increasing prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes contributes to high morbidity and mortality from diabetes complications and cardiovascular diseases with considerable associated health care costs [1,2].

Carnosine (β-alanyl-L-histidine) is a dipeptide present in mammalian tissues particularly abundant in skeletal muscle, heart muscle and central nervous system. It is available as an over-the-counter food additive and appears safe in human trials [38]. In animal studies, carnosine has been shown to suppress many biochemical processes that accompany aging and age related chronic diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes and diabetes complications, cardiovascular diseases, cancer and dementia. The mechanisms proposed have been a decrease in chronic low-grade inflammation [9,10], oxidative stress and advanced glycation endproducts [(AGEs)/advanced lipoxidation end products (ALEs) formation [1115]. There is evidence that both chronic low-grade inflammation [9,10,16] as well as AGEs play an important role in pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes [17,18]. An increasing number of animal studies have suggested a role for carnosine supplementation in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes and its complications as well as cardiovascular risk factors (adverse lipid profile and hypertension) and disease [19,20] [1315,21] [2231].

Beneficial effects of carnosine supplementation in humans have been shown in small clinical trials in exercise physiology, psychology, psychiatry and recently in heart failure [38,32]. Only two cross-sectional studies on muscle carnosine content are available in diabetes. One demonstrated increased muscle carnosine content in drug naïve patients with type 2 diabetes but not type 1 diabetes compared to controls [33]. Another study showed that muscle carnosine content is lower in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring anti-diabetic therapy compared to healthy controls [34]. We have recently shown that higher muscle carnosine was associated with progressive impairment of glucose tolerance, with the highest levels found in individuals with type 2 diabetes [35]. Given the compelling animal data on benefits of carnosine in metabolic as well as cardiovascular disease and risk factors and the limited human data in this area of research, we aimed to explore the relationships between human muscle carnosine content and anthropometry, energy expenditure, insulin resistance and daily free-living physical activity as well as cardiovascular risk factors.

Materials and Methods

The study population

Thirty-six sedentary non-vegetarian, non-smoking, middle-age sedentary males were recruited (lean, obese, prediabetic and individuals with newly diagnosed yet untreated type 2 diabetes, n = 9 per group). Study population is identical to Stegen et al [35] and represents a subcohort of a population characterized in detail in [36]. Volunteers underwent a rigorous protocol employing measures of obesity and insulin resistance, glucose tolerance, lipid profile, blood pressure, daily free living ambulatory activity, basal energy expenditure, fasting state energy substrate preference, metabolic flexibility as well as an assessment of muscle carnosine and circulating carnosinase 1 content. Participants had neither clinical nor laboratory signs of acute or chronic infection and did not take any medication or illicit drugs at the time of the study.

The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Bratislava, Comenius University Bratislava and the Ethics Committee of the Bratislava Region Office (Permission Number CAR2010/33) and it conforms to the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki declaration. The participants provided both verbal and written consent and ethics committee approved the consent procedure.

Recruitment and metabolic examinations

All volunteers were recruited from the community by the Institute of Experimental Endocrinology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia between January and March 2010. Characteristics of the entire study population were published in [36]. After recruitment, volunteers underwent medical screening, including medical history & food preference questionnaire [37], physical examination and basic laboratory tests including fasting plasma lipid levels and liver function tests, an anthropometric assessment and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The study protocol was performed on two days that were separated by a 2-day interval: Day 1 consisted of the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp and indirect calorimetry, Day 2 comprised skeletal muscle biopsy, OGTT and MRI.

Prior to metabolic testing, participants were asked to abstain from strenuous exercise and caffeine for 3 days. All metabolic testing was performed after a 12-h overnight fast. Analyses of circulating carnosinase and muscle carnosine levels were performed retrospectively in stored muscle samples using available biological material from the completed study [36].

Anthropometric measurements

Body weight and height were measured and used to calculate body mass index (BMI) (kg.m−2). Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower border of the rib cage and the iliac crest. Quadrupedal bioelectric impedance was used to evaluate total fat and to estimate lean body mass (Omron BF511, Omron, Japan).

Abdominal fat distribution was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequence, TR: 134ms, TE: 2.38/5.24ms on 1.5 T Magnetom Symphony MRI scanner (Siemens, Germany). The area of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue depots was evaluated semi/automatically using the Siemens Syngo User interface (Siemens, Germany) by averaging the area of 5 consecutive slices (1 cm apart) centred between the L4 and L5 vertebrae.

Physical activity

Daily free-living ambulatory activity parameters such as activity related energy expenditure, total daily ambulatory activity, number of steps per hour (when used for more than 12 daylight hours) as well as intensity of ambulatory activity were assessed by accelerometers (Lifecorder Plus, Kenz, USA) during three consecutive working days. Medium and high intensity ambulatory activity was defined as an activity with the energy requirements exceeding 3-times the resting energy expenditure (>3 MET).

Metabolic studies

Two-hour 75-g oral glucose tolerance test was performed after a 12-h overnight fast and glucose tolerance was determined according to criteria from American diabetes association from 2007. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. In brief, two intravenous cannulas were inserted into antecubital veins of both arms: first for administration of insulin, 20% glucose with KCl and second for frequent blood sampling / glycemia detection (Super GL2 -SN1440 analyzer (Dr. Muller Geratebau, Germany). A primed (80mU.m-2.min−1) continuous (40mU.m-2.min−1) insulin (Actrapid 100 IU/ml, Novo Nordisk, Denmark) infusion was used to achieve hyperinsulinemia. Blood glucose was measured in 5-minute intervals and maintained at euglycemia (5 mmol/l+/-0.5mmol/l) using variable infusion rate of 20% glucose. The whole body insulin sensitivity (M-value) was calculated from the steady state plasma glucose infusion rate required to maintain euglycemia, expressed per kg body weight per minute (M-value) and normalized to the average steady state insulinemia (μU/ml) (M-value/Insulin) of four samples taken during the last 60 minutes of the 150 minute lasting clamp. Steady state insulinemia averaged at 58 μU/mL (range 54–63 μU/mL) and did not differ across the groups.

Resting energy expenditure (REE) and metabolic substrate preference (respiratory quotient, RQ) were measured after an overnight fast with the aid of indirect calorimetry. Thirty minute breath-by-breath measurement was initiated after the 30-minute bed rest at thermal comfort conditions with the Ergostik (Geratherm Respiratory, Germany). Delta RQ, the parameter of metabolic substrate preference, was calculated as ΔRQ = steady state RQ (EHC)–fasting RQ. Resting energy expenditure was normalized for the variability in the exhaled minute volume.

Muscle biopsy

Muscle biopsies of vastus lateralis muscle were performed on a separate day using standard aseptic technique and local anaesthesia in the fasted state. In brief, prior to a percutaneous muscle biopsy of vastus lateralis muscle, a scalpel blade was used to make skin incision and to cut the fascia. A side cutting muscle biopsy (Bergstrom) needle was passed through the incision to obtain approximately 100 mg of muscle tissue (aspiration). The muscle samples were immediately processed, frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen.

Blood samples analysis

Blood samples were drawn using standard phlebotomy techniques. The tubes were centrifuged at (1,500 x g, 20 min, 4°C), and the serum stored at -20°C (glycemia, lipid profile, insulinemia) or -80°C (carnosinase 1) until analyses. During the clamp, blood glucose was immediately measured with Super GL2 -SN1440 analyzer (Dr Muler Geratebau, GmbH, Germany). Serum glucose was later reanalyzed at the certified laboratory using glucose-hexokinase 3 kit (Siemens health care diagnostics USA). Insulin was determined with IRMA (Immunotech, France), total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides with diagnostic kits from Roche (Germany). Friedewald formula was used to estimate LDL-Cholesterol & atherogenic index was calculated with the formula (Total cholesterol-HDL-cholesterol)/HDL-cholesterol [38]. Free fatty acids were measured by a colorimetric assay kit (Randox, UK) and high sensitivity CRP with an immunoturbidimetric method (Randox, UK).

Muscle carnosine and carnosinase measurements

Skeletal muscle carnosine levels were quantified by means of reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as previously described [35].

Serum carnosinase concentrations were determined by a sandwich ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) developed by Adelmann [39] as previously described [36].

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS Jump Statistics Software (SAS, USA). Results are given as mean+/-SEM (unless indicated otherwise). Power analysis for the overall study was based on our preliminary data on interaction between glucose intolerance and intramyocellular lipid content which showed that 15% change could be revealed with the power of 80% at the significance level of 0.05 by using at least 18 individuals per group. The current analyses were not based on a power calculation using human muscle carnosine data as they were unavailable at that moment.

The relationship between muscle carnosine content, anthropometric and metabolic variables were examined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients. Multiple linear regression models were used to examine the relationships after adjusting for covariates as well as explore potential interactions. Stepwise regression was employed to determine a relative contribution of each of the variables to the model. The variables that were significant in the univariable analyses (p<0.05) or known to be associated with muscle carnosine content from existing literature were included in the multivariable analyses. ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test was used to compare clinical chatractristics in 4 groups of patients (Table 1). Statistical significance was assumed when p<0.05.


The anthropometric, metabolic, biochemical and behavioural characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1.

Relationships between muscle carnosine levels and measures of obesity, energy expenditure and physical activity

Muscle carnosine content was positively associated with BMI (r = 0.469, p = 0.007), waist circumference (r = 0.35, p = 0.03), % body fat, subcutaneous adipose tissue content (Fig 1A and 1B) but not visceral adipose tissue content (r = 0.166, p = 0.331) or lean body mass (r = 0.247, p = 0.152).

Fig 1. Relationship of muscle carnosine with anthropometric or metabolic parameters.

• Lean, ▲Obese, □ IGT, Δ T2D, LBM—lean body mass; Respiratory quotient measured in the fasted state represents metabolic substrate preference. Insulin sensitivity—M value (mg of Glucose/kg of Body Weight/minute).

Muscle carnosine content was not correlated with the overall volume of the every day free living ambulatory activity (steps per hour, Table 1) but was inversely associated with the dynamic parameter of ambulatory activity i.e. percentage of high and moderate intensity ambulation (Table 1, association presented in [35]). There was also a negative association between muscle carnosine content and REE (Fig 1C). The relationship between muscle carnosine content and energy expenditure was independent of age and BMI (p = 0.031) and was significant after additional adjustment for level of ambulatory physical activity (p<0.05). Moreover, muscle carnosine correlated positively with metabolic substrate preference for glucose as inidicated by fasting respiratory quotient RQ (Fig 1D), and negatively with delta RQ, a parameter defining the whole body metabolic flexibility (an increase in RQ in response to the experimental euglycemic hyperinsulinemia, the state of maximal insulin-induced glucose uptake) (r = -0.421, p = 0.031).

Relationship between muscle carnosine levels and measures of glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk factors

Muscle carnosine content was associated with serum fasting (r = 0.393, p = 0,018) and 2-hour glucose levels (r = 0.566, p = 0,001) as well as an area under the glycemic curve (oGTT, r = 0.554, p = 0.002). Muscle carnosine levels were also associated with 2-hour C-peptide (oGTT, r = 0.422, p = 0.023) and trend to associate was found with 2-hour insulin (oGTT, r = 0.317, p = 0.084), as well as with fasting C-peptide levels (r = 0.320, p = 0.061) and insulinemia (r = 0.310, p = 0,065). The relationship between muscle carnosine levels and C-peptide were not significant after adjustment for insulin sensitivity (M value) and adiposity (all p>0.5) possibly indicating that there is no relationship between muscle carnosine and insulin secretion independent of insulin sensitivity.

Overall, muscle carnosine content was inversely associated with insulin sensitivity (Fig 1G) and there was also a negative relationship with insulin sensitivity in non-diabetics (Fig 1H) but not in diabetics (r = 0.37, p = 0.3, p = 0.004 for interaction). Insulin sensitivity (dependent variable) was inversely associated with muscle carnosine levels (p = 0.04) after adjustment for age (p = 0.2) and % body fat (p = 0.002, r2 of the model = 0.49, p = 0.0004). Conversely, insulin sensitivity was a significant determinant of muscle carnosine content (p = 0.04) after adjustment for age (p = 0.7) and % body fat (p = 0.8). In the stepwise regression analysis insulin sensitivity and moderate and high levels of physical activity were the most significant determinants of muscle carnosine levels contributing to 36% of variance (p = 0.0089).

Muscle carnosine levels were negatively associated with HDL (Fig 1E) and positively with atherogenic index (Fig 1F). There were no correlations with plasma levels of total and LDL cholesterol (p = 0.7) and triglycerides (p = 0.2). There were no correlations with systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.5; p = 0.3, respectively).

Lack of relationships of muscle carnosine with circulating carnosinase 1 content and/or dietary preference

Muscle carnosine levels were not associated with plasma levels of carnosinase 1 (p = 0.6). Plasma levels of carnosinase 1 did not differ across the groups (Table 1) and were not related to any of the anthropometric or metabolic parameters (data not shown). None of the relationships between muscle carnosine and anthropometric or metabolic parameters changed after adjustment for plasma carnosinase 1 levels (data not shown). Muscle carnosine levels were not associated with dietary preference as assessed by standardized food preference questionnair (data not shown).


In our study we show that human muscle carnosine content is positively associated with measures of adiposity and subcutaneous adipose tissue, respiratory quotient (parameter of metabolic substrate preference) and negatively with baseline energy expenditure. Furthermore, high muscle carnosine content was associated with insulin resistance independently of age and obesity. These results extend our previous findings that muscle carnosine content increases with progression of glucose intolerance and is negatively associated with dynamic physical activity in sedentary obese individuals [35]. Muscle carnosine was also related to HDL-cholesterol and atherogenic index.

In our previous report, we described a tendency towards an increase of muscle carnosine in obese individuals [35]. Apart from this, the relationship between muscle carnosine and obesity has not been previously described in humans. Here, we show that high muscle carnosine content is associated with different measures of anthropometry, decreased energy expenditure and increased metabolic preference for glucose, indicating relatively higher reliance on utilization of carbohydrates. Carnosine is present in brain tissue [39] and has been also shown in animals to regulate appetite [25] Intraperitoneal injection of carnosine has been shown to increase sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity at both the peripheral and central nervous system in rodents [25,40]., a potential mechanism for the interaction between carnosine and obesity via increased energy expenditure. Possible effects on thermogenesis or lipolysis of carnosine have also been described in animal studies [25]. It is plausible that carnosine may have effects on both body weight and energy expenditure in rodents and our current findings progress this understanding with human data. Human intervention studies investigating carnosine supplementation and its effects on SNS activity, energy expenditure and body weight are necessary to see if this effect is present in humans.

A growing body of evidence from animal studies indicates a protective role of carnosine supplementation in diabetes due to its ability to affect glycaemic control but also to prevent/ameliorate diabetes complications [23,25,27,29,30]. Data from diabetic rodents indicate that supplementation of carnosine—in a dose dependent manner—reduced glucose, HbA1c, increased insulin secretion and β-cell mass [14,23,25,29,30]. Importantly, in db/db mice carnosine supplementation was able to delay the development of type 2 diabetes [29]. We recently showed that muscle carnosine content increased with worsening of glucose tolerance [35]. Here, we show that the relationship between muscle carnosine content and insulin resistance was independent of obesity. Interestingly, there was a negative relationship with insulin sensitivity in non-diabetics but no (tendency for positive) relationship in drug naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. This is consistent with previous results from 2 human studies. The first study showed increased muscle carnosine content in drug naïve patients with type 2 diabetes compared to healthy controls [33]. Whereas muscle carnosine levels were lower in patients with type 2 diabetes who have progressed to require anti-diabetic therapy compared to controls [34]Together with our data, this suggests that an increase in carnosine levels might be an adaptive mechanism counteracting increased chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, which develops in obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes. This pathophysiological model is similar to hyperinsulinemia that develops secondary to insulin resistance.

Putative mechanisms by which carnosine affects glucose metabolism, include anti-inflammatory, anti-AGEs, anti-ALEs, and anti-oxidant effects in addition to effects on the autonomic nervous system [11,1315,25]. Other hypotheses should be considered. Among others it could be hypothesized that carnosine can act as a physiological substrate of some metabolic pathways derangement of which would result in a reduced consumption of carnosine and accumulation of carnosine. A role of carnosine as a substrate is partially supported by a very recent proteomic study demonstrating that metabolic changes in gastrocnemius muscle following serine/threonine kinase Akt1 activation include significant reductions of serine and histidine containing dipeptides (anserine and carnosine). Moreover Akt1 activation and carnosine consumption was associated to improved glucose metabolism and regression of age-related fat accumulation in old animals [41] Another possibility is that the association of muscle carnosine with measures of obesity, metabolic substrate preference and metabolic flexibility but also insulin sensitivity may be explained by fibre type composition. It is well-known that baseline carnosine levels are higher in fast-twitch compared to slow-twitch muscle fibers [42]. We [35] and others [43] have shown that muscle of type 2 diabetic or insulin resistant individuals expresses higher markers of fast oxidative type IIa fibres or fast glycolytic type IIx fibres.

With regards to cardiovascular risk factors, carnosine has been shown to improve lipid metabolism [23,44] and reduce blood pressure [19,23,45] in animal models. Specifically, carnosine has been shown to reduce lipid peroxidation [20], atherogenic ApoB containing lipoproteins (oxidized LDL and VLDL)[46], triglycerides and extracellular lipid in the plaque in rodents [47]. Here, we show that muscle carnosine is related to HDL as well as atherogenic index but not to total cholesterol, LDL and triglycerides. This could be due to relatively normal lipid profile in our study population. Further studies in dyslipidemic populations may show relationships with other lipid parameters. The anti-hypertensive effect of carnosine has been described in various mammalian species and has been attributed to direct vasorelaxing effects of carnosine [19,23] which is dose dependent [45]. Suggested mechanisms of anti-hypertensive effects of carnosine have been effects of carnosine on histamine/histidine pathway [48], nitric oxide/cGMP mechanism [45] and the effect on autonomic nervous system [19,25]. In addition, long-term effects on atherosclerosis could also be responsible for effects of carnosine on blood pressure. In our study, we did not see a relationship between muscle carnosine content and blood pressure. This was likely due to relatively small range of blood pressure and young study population studied as well as relatively small samples size, with larger studies needed. A promising beneficial effect of carnosine in humans are highlighted by a recent intervention study carried out in patients with chronic heart failure [32]A daily dose of 500 mg of carnosine for 6 months was associated to beneficial effects on exercise performance and quality of life [32].

Here, we report no relationship between muscle carnosine content and carnosinase in circulation. This is in agreement with our previous studies [3,49].

Limitations: Firstly, the cross-sectional nature of the study cannot delineate the cause-and-effect relationships between muscle carnosine and insulin resistance. Secondly, the sample size is small, and, hence, the results should be interpreted with caution. However, the strength of the correlations and their robustness in various adjusted models and use of gold standard methods for assessment of insulin resistance attests to the validity of our findings. Thirdly, it should be noted that metabolism of carnosine in humans differs from rodents because of presence of serum carnosinase 1 which quickly hydrolyses carnosine into its amino acids. However, clinical effects of carnosine have been described with chronic supplementation hence it is plausible that chronic supplementation might saturate carnosinase resulting in increased circulating carnosine levels [38,49]


In conclusion, we have demonstrated that muscle carnosine content is linked to obesity and insulin resistance, energy expenditure, dynamic physical activity, respiratory quotient as well as HDL and atherogenic index. Intervention studies with supplementation of carnosine targeting obesity, insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk factors in individuals at risk of and with type 2 diabetes are necessary to investigate the putative role of carnosine in prevention and management of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: BdC JU BU DG. Performed the experiments: TK VB IE MV GA WD JU BU. Analyzed the data: BdC VB IE GA WD JU BU. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BU JU WD. Wrote the paper: BdC MdC HT WD GA JU BU.


  1. 1. Chen L, Magliano DJ, Zimmet PZ (2012) The worldwide epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus–-present and future perspectives. Nat Rev Endocrinol 8: 228–236.
  2. 2. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Shaw J (2001) Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature 414: 782–787. pmid:11742409
  3. 3. Baguet A, Everaert I, Yard B, Peters V, Zschocke J, et al. (2014) Does low serum carnosinase activity favor high-intensity exercise capacity? J Appl Physiol 116: 553–559. pmid:24408989
  4. 4. Boldyrev A, Fedorova T, Stepanova M, Dobrotvorskaya I, Kozlova E, et al. (2008) Carnosine [corrected] increases efficiency of DOPA therapy of Parkinson's disease: a pilot study. Rejuvenation Res 11: 821–827. pmid:18729814
  5. 5. Chengappa KN, Turkin SR, DeSanti S, Bowie CR, Brar JS, et al. (2012) A preliminary, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of L-carnosine to improve cognition in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 142: 145–152. pmid:23099060
  6. 6. Chez MG, Buchanan CP, Aimonovitch MC, Becker M, Schaefer K, et al. (2002) Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of L-carnosine supplementation in children with autistic spectrum disorders. J Child Neurol 17: 833–837. pmid:12585724
  7. 7. del Favero S, Roschel H, Solis MY, Hayashi AP, Artioli GG, et al. (2012) Carnosyn supplementation in elderly subjects (60–80 years): effects on muscle carnosine content and physical capacity. Amino Acids 43: 49–56.
  8. 8. Slowinska-Lisowska M, Zembron-Lacny A, Rynkiewicz M, Rynkiewicz T, Kopec W (2014) Influence of l-carnosine on pro-antioxidant status in elite kayakers and canoeists. Acta Physiol Hung 101: 461–470. pmid:25201708
  9. 9. Vozarova B, Stefan N, Hanson R, Lindsay RS, Bogardus C, et al. (2002) Plasma concentrations of macrophage migration inhibitory factor are elevated in Pima Indians compared to Caucasians and are associated with insulin resistance. Diabetologia 45: 1739–1741. pmid:12552367
  10. 10. Vozarova B, Weyer C, Lindsay RS, Pratley RE, Bogardus C, et al. (2002) High white blood cell count is associated with a worsening of insulin sensitivity and predicts the development of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 51: 455–461. pmid:11812755
  11. 11. Aldini G, Carini M, Beretta G, Bradamante S, Facino RM (2002) Carnosine is a quencher of 4-hydroxy-nonenal: through what mechanism of reaction? Biochem Biophys Res Commun 298: 699–706. pmid:12419310
  12. 12. Boldyrev AA, Aldini G, Derave W (2013) Physiology and pathophysiology of carnosine. Physiol Rev 93: 1803–1845. pmid:24137022
  13. 13. Hipkiss AR, Michaelis J, Syrris P (1995) Non-enzymatic glycosylation of the dipeptide L-carnosine, a potential anti-protein-cross-linking agent. FEBS Lett 371: 81–85. pmid:7664889
  14. 14. Lee YT, Hsu CC, Lin MH, Liu KS, Yin MC (2005) Histidine and carnosine delay diabetic deterioration in mice and protect human low density lipoprotein against oxidation and glycation. Eur J Pharmacol 513: 145–150. pmid:15878720
  15. 15. Pavlov AR, Revina AA, Dupin AM, Boldyrev AA, Yaropolov AI (1993) The mechanism of interaction of carnosine with superoxide radicals in water solutions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1157: 304–312. pmid:8391845
  16. 16. Vozarova B, Weyer C, Hanson K, Tataranni PA, Bogardus C, et al. (2001) Circulating interleukin–6 in relation to adiposity, insulin action, and insulin secretion. Obesity Research 9: 414–417. pmid:11445664
  17. 17. Forbes JM, Sourris KC, de Courten MP, Dougherty SL, Chand V, et al. (2014) Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are cross-sectionally associated with insulin secretion in healthy subjects. Amino Acids 46: 321–326. pmid:23832534
  18. 18. Mark AB, Poulsen MW, Andersen S, Andersen JM, Bak MJ, et al. (2014) Consumption of a diet low in advanced glycation end products for 4 weeks improves insulin sensitivity in overweight women. Diabetes Care 37: 88–95. pmid:23959566
  19. 19. Niijima A, Okui T, Matsumura Y, Yamano T, Tsuruoka N, et al. (2002) Effects of L-carnosine on renal sympathetic nerve activity and DOCA-salt hypertension in rats. Auton Neurosci 97: 99–102. pmid:12132650
  20. 20. Yapislar H, Taskin E (2014) L-carnosine alters some hemorheologic and lipid peroxidation parameters in nephrectomized rats. Med Sci Monit 20: 399–405. pmid:24614724
  21. 21. Aldini G, Granata P, Carini M (2002) Detoxification of cytotoxic alpha, beta-unsaturated aldehydes by carnosine: characterization of conjugated adducts by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and detection by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry in rat skeletal muscle. J Mass Spectrom 37: 1219–1228. pmid:12489081
  22. 22. Aldini G, Facino RM, Beretta G, Carini M (2005) Carnosine and related dipeptides as quenchers of reactive carbonyl species: from structural studies to therapeutic perspectives. Biofactors 24: 77–87. pmid:16403966
  23. 23. Aldini G, Orioli M, Rossoni G, Savi F, Braidotti P, et al. (2011) The carbonyl scavenger carnosine ameliorates dyslipidaemia and renal function in Zucker obese rats. J Cell Mol Med 15: 1339–1354. pmid:20518851
  24. 24. Baba SP, Hoetker JD, Merchant M, Klein JB, Cai J, et al. (2013) Role of aldose reductase in the metabolism and detoxification of carnosine-acrolein conjugates. J Biol Chem 288: 28163–28179. pmid:23928303
  25. 25. Nagai K, Tanida M, Niijima A, Tsuruoka N, Kiso Y, et al. (2012) Role of L-carnosine in the control of blood glucose, blood pressure, thermogenesis, and lipolysis by autonomic nerves in rats: involvement of the circadian clock and histamine. Amino Acids 43: 97–109. pmid:22367578
  26. 26. Orioli M, Aldini G, Benfatto MC, Facino RM, Carini M (2007) HNE Michael adducts to histidine and histidine-containing peptides as biomarkers of lipid-derived carbonyl stress in urines: LC-MS/MS profiling in Zucker obese rats. Anal Chem 79: 9174–9184. pmid:17979257
  27. 27. Pfister F, Riedl E, Wang Q, vom Hagen F, Deinzer M, et al. (2011) Oral carnosine supplementation prevents vascular damage in experimental diabetic retinopathy. Cell Physiol Biochem 28: 125–136. pmid:21865855
  28. 28. Riedl E, Pfister F, Braunagel M, Brinkkotter P, Sternik P, et al. (2011) Carnosine prevents apoptosis of glomerular cells and podocyte loss in STZ diabetic rats. Cell Physiol Biochem 28: 279–288. pmid:21865735
  29. 29. Sauerhofer S, Yuan G, Braun GS, Deinzer M, Neumaier M, et al. (2007) L-carnosine, a substrate of carnosinase–1, influences glucose metabolism. Diabetes 56: 2425–2432. pmid:17601992
  30. 30. Soliman KM, Abdul-Hamid M, Othman AI (2007) Effect of carnosine on gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity. Med Sci Monit 13: BR73–83. pmid:17325631
  31. 31. Szwergold BS (2005) Carnosine and anserine act as effective transglycating agents in decomposition of aldose-derived Schiff bases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 336: 36–41. pmid:16112643
  32. 32. Lombardi C, Carubelli V, Lazzarini V, Vizzardi E, Bordonali T, et al. (2015) Effects of oral administration of orodispersible levo-carnosine on quality of life and exercise performance in patients with chronic heart failure. Nutrition 31: 72–78. pmid:25287762
  33. 33. Srikanthan P, Singhal A, Lee CC, Nagarajan R, Wilson N, et al. (2012) Characterization of Intra-myocellular Lipids using 2D Localized Correlated Spectroscopy and Abdominal Fat using MRI in Type 2 Diabetes. Magn Reson Insights 5: 29–36. pmid:23471581
  34. 34. Gualano B, Everaert I, Stegen S, Artioli GG, Taes Y, et al. (2012) Reduced muscle carnosine content in type 2, but not in type 1 diabetic patients. Amino Acids 43: 21–24. pmid:22120670
  35. 35. Stegen S, Everaert I, Deldicque L, Vallova S, Ukropcova B, et al. (2015) Muscle histidine-containing dipeptides in relation to glucose intolerance Plos One in press
  36. 36. Kurdiova T, Balaz M, Vician M, Maderova D, Vlcek M, et al. (2014) Effects of obesity, diabetes and exercise on Fndc5 gene expression and irisin release in human skeletal muscle and adipose tissue: in vivo and in vitro studies. J Physiol 592: 1091–1107. pmid:24297848
  37. 37. Geiselman PJ, Anderson AM, Dowdy ML, West DB, Redmann SM, et al. (1998) Reliability and validity of a macronutrient self-selection paradigm and a food preference questionnaire. Physiol Behav 63: 919–928. pmid:9618017
  38. 38. Despres JP, Lemieux I, Dagenais GR, Cantin B, Lamarche B (2000) HDL-cholesterol as a marker of coronary heart disease risk: the Quebec cardiovascular study. Atherosclerosis 153: 263–272. pmid:11164415
  39. 39. Quinn PJ, Boldyrev AA, Formazuyk VE (1992) Carnosine: its properties, functions and potential therapeutic applications. Mol Aspects Med 13: 379–444. pmid:9765790
  40. 40. Nagai K, Niijima A, Yamano T, Otani H, Okumra N, et al. (2003) Possible role of L-carnosine in the regulation of blood glucose through controlling autonomic nerves. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 228: 1138–1145.
  41. 41. Cheng KK, Akasaki Y, Lecommandeur E, Lindsay RT, Murfitt S, et al. (2014) Metabolomic Analysis of Akt1-Mediated Muscle Hypertrophy in Models of Diet-Induced Obesity and Age-Related Fat Accumulation. J Proteome Res.
  42. 42. Tallon MJ, Harris RC, Maffulli N, Tarnopolsky MA (2007) Carnosine, taurine and enzyme activities of human skeletal muscle fibres from elderly subjects with osteoarthritis and young moderately active subjects. Biogerontology 8: 129–137. pmid:16967207
  43. 43. Stuart CA, McCurry MP, Marino A, South MA, Howell ME, et al. (2013) Slow-twitch fiber proportion in skeletal muscle correlates with insulin responsiveness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: 2027–2036. pmid:23515448
  44. 44. Kim MY, Kim EJ, Kim YN, Choi C, Lee BH (2011) Effects of alpha-lipoic acid and L-carnosine supplementation on antioxidant activities and lipid profiles in rats. Nutr Res Pract 5: 421–428. pmid:22125679
  45. 45. Ririe DG, Roberts PR, Shouse MN, Zaloga GP (2000) Vasodilatory actions of the dietary peptide carnosine. Nutrition 16: 168–172. pmid:10705070
  46. 46. Aydin AF, Kusku-Kiraz Z, Dogru-Abbasoglu S, Uysal M (2010) Effect of carnosine treatment on oxidative stress in serum, apoB-containing lipoproteins fraction and erythrocytes of aged rats. Pharmacol Rep 62: 733–739. pmid:20885014
  47. 47. Brown BE, Kim CH, Torpy FR, Bursill CA, McRobb LS, et al. (2014) Supplementation with carnosine decreases plasma triglycerides and modulates atherosclerotic plaque composition in diabetic apo E(-/-) mice. Atherosclerosis 232: 403–409. pmid:24468155
  48. 48. Greene SM, Margolis FL, Grillo M, Fisher H (1984) Enhanced carnosine (beta-alanyl-L-histidine) breakdown and histamine metabolism following treatment with compound 48/80. Eur J Pharmacol 99: 79–84. pmid:6723792
  49. 49. Everaert I, Mooyaart A, Baguet A, Zutinic A, Baelde H, et al. (2011) Vegetarianism, female gender and increasing age, but not CNDP1 genotype, are associated with reduced muscle carnosine levels in humans. Amino Acids 40: 1221–1229. pmid:20865290