Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

New Data on the Clevosaurus (Sphenodontia: Clevosauridae) from the Upper Triassic of Southern Brazil


The sphenodontian fossil record in South America is well known from Mesozoic and Paleogene deposits of Argentinean Patagonia, mainly represented by opisthodontians, or taxa closely related to the modern Sphenodon. In contrast, the Brazilian fossil record is restricted to the Caturrita Formation, Late Triassic of Rio Grande do Sul, represented by several specimens of Clevosauridae, including Clevosaurus brasiliensis Bonaparte and Sues, 2006. Traditionally, Clevosauridae includes several Late Triassic to Early Jurassic taxa, such as Polysphenodon, Brachyrhinodon, and Clevosaurus, the latter well-represented by several species. The detailed description of the specimen MCN-PV 2852 allowed the first systematic revision of most Clevosaurus species. Within Clevosauridae, Polysphenodon is the most basal taxon, and an IterPCR analysis revealed Brachrhynodon as a possible Clevosaurus; C. petilus, C. wangi, and C. mcgilli as possibly distinct taxonomic entities; and the South African Clevosaurus sp. is not closely related to C. brasiliensis. These data indicate the need of a deep phylogenetic review of Clevosauridae, in order to discover synapomorphic characters among the diversity of these Triassic/Jurassic sphenodontians.


The sphenodontian fossil record in South America is well-known from the Mesozoic deposits of Argentinean Patagonia [14]. These are mainly represented in the Late Cretaceous, with Cenomanian-Turonian eilenodontine opisthodontians and Late Campanian fragmentary remains most likely related to opisthodontians [59], in addition to the Late Campanian to Early Maastrichtian record of a partial tooth bearing maxilla that closely resembles those of modern Sphenodon [10]. More recently, Sphenocondor gracilis from the Middle Jurassic of Patagonia was described as the first South American basal rhynchocephalian [2] and the first South American Paleogene sphenodontian, Kawasphenodon peligrensis, was described for the early Paleocene of Patagonia [4]. For the early Mesozoic (Late Triassic) of South American, sphenodontian opisthodontians are known from northern Argentina [3] and clevosaurs from south Brazil [11,12]. Traditionally, clevosaurs comprise the Late Triassic Polysphenodon (Germany) and Brachyrhinodon (UK) [1316] and the better-know genus Clevosaurus, represented by several Late Triassic–Early Jurassic species.

Late Triassic Clevosaurus record includes UK, Belgium, North America, China, and Brazil [11,17]; whereas Early Jurassic records of the genus includes North America, South Africa, UK, and Zimbabwe [17,18]. Currently there are six recognized Clevosaurus species: C. hudsoni (the type-species) [19,20], C. bairdi [21], C. convalis [18], C. latidens [22], C. minor [20], C. brasiliensis [11,12], whereas the Early Jurassic Chinese Clevosaurus from the Lufeng Formation (C. mcgilli, C. petilus, and C. wangi) described by Wu [23], were interpreted as Clevosaurus sp. [17]. It is noteworthy that, in a recent phylogenetic analysis, one specimen associated to C. latidens was considered a basal Opisthodontia, close to Ankylosphenodon from the Early Cretaceous of Mexico [24], forming the sister-group with all other opisthodontians, including Sphenotitan from the Late Triassic of Argentina [3].

The first sphenodontian formally described for the Late Triassic of Brazil was Clevosaurus brasiliensis Bonaparte and Sues, 2006 [11], with several specimens attributed to this taxon [12], including that shortly described by Ferigolo [2528]. At that time, Ferigolo [2528] only briefly discussed the probable affinities of this specimen. Here, we present its full description and reevaluate the systematic position and affinities of Clevosaurus brasiliensis Bonaparte and Sues, 2006 [11]. We expect that this contribution will help to understand the taxonomic diversity of these Triassic/Jurassic sphenodontians.

Geological Setting

The material was collected at Linha São Luiz locality (53°30’23"W, 29°34’08"S) (Fig 1), an abandoned quarry in the Faxinal do Soturno municipality, central region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The massive, fine-grained sandstone beds belong to the basal portion of the Late Triassic Caturrita Formation [29,30]. Sequence-stratigraphy schemes refer these strata to the upper part of ‘Sequence II’ of Faccini [31], or the highstand systems tract of the Santa Maria 2 Sequence [32]. The “Faxinal do Soturno Local Fauna” [33] shows a conspicuous small vertebrate assemblage, also including brasilodont [3336] and tritheledontid cynodonts [33,34,37], and the procolophonid Soturnia [38]. Recent discoveries also include an undetermined non-rhynchocephalian lepidosaur [33]. Moreover, other sites referred to the Caturrita Formation have hielded the kannemeyerid dicynodont Jachaleria [39], the dinosauriform Sacisaurus [40], the basal saurischian Guaibasaurus [4144], the “prosauropod” Unaysaurus [45], besides indeterminate sauropodomorph [46], phytosaur [47], and stereospondyl amphibian [48].

Fig 1. Location map.

Sketch map of Rio Grande do Sul showing the outcrop area of the Santa Maria sequence (shaded) and approximate location of the type-locality (star) of Clevosaurus brasiliensis Bonaparte and Sues, 2006 [11].

The fossils collected in this geological unit belong to the Riograndia Assemblage Zone [4951]. Although a possible Early Jurassic age has been proposed [27], most authors agree on a Late Triassic age (possibly Norian) for the Caturrita Formation [41,43,46,50]. Records that indicate a Jurassic age includes a taphoflora composed of derived Bennettitales (Williamsonia potyporanae), conchostracans similar to the genus Carapacestheria, and footprints attributed to a large tridactyl theropod (Eubrontes isp). In sum, the “Faxinal do Soturno Local Fauna” may correspond to the latest Triassic or even the base of the Jurassic [5254].

Material and Methods


The sphenodontian clevosaur MCN-PV 2852 is housed at Museu de Ciências Naturais da Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul (MCN/FZBRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil; it corresponds to incomplete, but well-preserved skull and mandible. Comparative material from the Caturrita Formation includes the cranial specimens of Clevosaurus brasiliensis (holotype UFRGS-PV 0748T; and referred specimens: UFRGS-PV 0613T, 1152T, 0735T, 0746T, 0753T, 0974T, 0972T, 0849T, 0754T, 0755T, 0752T, 0750T, 0749T, 0855T, 0738T, 0739T, 0737T, 0741T, 0758T, 1153T, 0745T0831T, and ULGV 9726). Data from the literature on Brachyrhinodon taylori and Polysphenodon mulleri were taken from Fraser and Benton [13], on Clevosaurus hudsoni from Fraser [20]; on C. wangi, C. petilus and C. mcgilli from Wu [23,55] and Jones [17]; on C. bairdi from Sues et al. [21]; and on C. convallis from Säila [18]. The osteological nomenclature and description mainly follows Fraser [20], Wu [23], Säila [18], and Jones [17]. The systematic arrangement mainly follows Apesteguía et al. [4].

Tree search and support measurements.

The cladistic study was based on the most recent analysis in the literature [4]. The 74 employed characters are identical to those of the original analysis, unordered and equally weighted. Two characters (62 and 63) were scored as missing data (“?”) for all taxa in the original analysis. Here, these characters and scores are reproduced in order to keep the original enumeration. Regarding the OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) the Early Triassic lepidosauromorph Sophineta cracoviensis [56] was used to root the analysis intead of the basal Diapsida Youngina capensis (Late Permian of South Africa) [2,4,57]. The Squamata, represented only by the polychrotid extant lizard Pristidactylus in the original analysis, also includes Eichstaettisarus [58] from the Late Jurassic of Germany and Early Cretaceous of Spain and Italy, and a probably basal Gekkonomorpha [59] from the Early Cretaceous of Mongolia. The 30 original rhynchocephalians of the original analysis were maintained, with the addition of 11 new OTUs, codified based on the literature, namely: Polysphenodon mulleri [1316,21,23,24,55,60], Pelecymala robustus [1012], Sphenotitan leyesi [3], Clevosaurus bairdi [46,8], C. wangi [55], C. petilus and C. mcgilli [15,16,21,23,55,60], C. convalis [18], C. latidens (AUP 11192, formerly attributed to Pelecymala) [22,61], the South African Clevosaurus sp. (SAM K 7890) [62], and Clevosaurus brasiliensis [11]. The latter taxon was based on the holotype specimen (UFRGS-PV0748T, first hand examination) and the specimen of this present study (MCN-PV 2852), and their character states are scored in the single Clevosaurus brasiliensis used in the analysis. The present cladistic analysis was thus performed with 74 characters and 44 OTUs. The MPT heuristic search on TNT 1.1 [63,64] included 1000 replicates, with random addition sequences followed by tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch swapping, retaining 10 trees per replicate and using collapse trees after the search. If some replications overflowed after a first round, traditional search was again employed, this time on trees from RAM. The verification of the original analysis [4] indicates the same results (22 most parsimonious trees of 218 steps), although Gephyrosaurus and Pristidacylus were found as sister taxa, and this clade as considered the sister group of other rhynchocephalians. Considering that Gephyrosaurus [6567] is the most basal Rhynchocephalia, a constrain was incorporated into the cladistic analysis, enforcing the monophyly of that group. This latter analysis revealed the same number of most parsimonious trees (22), but with 219 steps. After all, the IterPCR protocol [68] was employed to identify unstable taxa and their possible phylogenetic position.

Fieldwork permit and repository information.

All necessary permits were obtained for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations. The field work and fossil collection was previously communicated to the Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral ─ DNPM, based on ordinance n° 4.146 from March 4th, 1942. The specimens described in this work are housed in permanent collections: Coleção de Paleovertebrados do Museu de Ciências Naturais da Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul (MCN-PV, Porto Alegre, Brazil); Coleção de Paleovertebrados da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS-PV, Porto Alegre, Brazil); Museu sobre a História Geológica do Rio Grande do Sul da Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (ULGV, São Leopoldo, Brazil).

Results and Discussion

Systematic paleontology

Lepidosauria Dumeril and Bibron, 1839 [69] (sensu Evans, 1984) [70]

Rhynchocephalia Günther, 1867 [71] (sensu Gauthier et al., 1988) [72]

Sphenodontia Williston, 1925 [73] (sensu Benton, 1985) [74]

Clevosauridae Bonaparte and Sues, 2006 [11]

Comments. Clevosauridae was first formalized by Bonaparte and Sues [11] to include “the last common ancestor of Polysphenodon, Brachyrhinodon and Clevosaurus, and all of its descendants”, based on previous phylogenetic studies of Wu [23] and Reynoso [1416], which informally called that taxon as “clevosaurs group”. We define Clevosauridae as a branch-based group, composed by all taxa more closely related to Clevosaurus than to Sphenodon. Clevosaurids share an antorbital region forming ¼ of the skull length (reversed to between 1/3 to ¼ in C. brasiliensis, C. wangi and C. petilus), a narrow and elongated dorsal process of the jugal, and palatine teeth forming a single row plus one isolated tooth.

Clevosaurus Swinton, 1939 [75]

Commented diagnosis. According to some authors [3,5,1315], Clevosaurus can be diagnosed based on the following features: suborbital fenestra bounded solely by the ectopterygoid and palatine; a dorsally expanded lateral process of the premaxilla; a high, steeply inclined coronoid process of the dentary; flanged teeth; a broad maxillary-jugal contact; maxilla excluded from the posterior margin of external naris. It is noteworthy that these characters are found in all Clevosaurus, but not restricted to the genus [17,18].

Type species. Clevosaurus hudsoni Swinton, 1939 [75]

Included species. C. minor Fraser, 1988 [20]; C. latidens Fraser, 1993 [22], C. wangi, C. mcgilli and C. petilus Wu, 1994 [23]; C. bairdi Sues et al., 1994 [21]; C. convalis Säila, 2005 [18]; and C. brasiliensis Bonaparte and Sues, 2006 [11]

Clevosaurus brasiliensis Bonaparte and Sues, 2006 [11]

1999 gen. et. sp. indet. Ferigolo 1997: 24–25. [25]

1999 gen. et. sp. indet. Ferigolo et al. 1999: 60–60. [26]

2000 gen. et. sp. indet. Ferigolo 2000: 236–245, Figs four to six [27]

2009 gen. et. sp. indet. Ferigolo 2009: 89–105, Figs five and six [28]

Holotype. UFRGS-PV 0748 T, an incomplete but well-preserved skull, with mandibles attached. The specimen is housed at Coleção de Paleovertebrados da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (UFRGS-PV).

Type horizon and locality. Linha São Luiz locality, Faxinal do Soturno Municipality, Caturrita Formation, Late Triassic, Late Norian-Rhaetian age [16].

Emended diagnosis. Clevosaurus brasiliensis is a clevosaurid sphenodontian distinct from other Clevosauridae by a posterior parietal edge slightly incurved inward, a parietal foramen at the same level of supratemporal fenestra, angle between anterior margin and the longitudinal axis of mandible less than 120º in lateral view, and absent or inconspicuous posteromedial flanges on the posterior maxillary teeth and anterolateral flanges on the mandibular teeth.

Referred specimen. MCN-PV 2852, well-preserved skull with associated mandibles (Figs 24). The specimen is housed at the Coleção de Paleovertebrados do Museu de Ciências Naturais da Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (MCN-PV).

Fig 2. Clevosaurus brasiliensis Bonaparte and Sues, 2006 [11] MCN-PV 2852, skull.

Photographs (A-C) in dorsal (A), palatal (B), and lateral (C) views. Scale bar equals 5 mm.

Fig 3. Clevosaurus brasiliensis Bonaparte and Sues, 2006 [11] MCN-PV 2852, skull.

Schematic drawings (A-C) in dorsal (A), palatal (B), and lateral (C) views. Scale bar equals 5 mm. Abbreviations: bo, basiocciopital; bs, basisphenoid; ect, ectopterygoid; exoccipital; f, frontal; j, jugal; m, maxilla; n, nasal; p, parietal; pal, palatine; pf, postfrontal; pm, premaxilla; pmt, premaxilla tooth; po, postorbital; prf, prefrontal; pt, pterygoid; q, quadrate; sb, secondary bone; sbf, suborbital fenestra; so, supraoccipital; sq, squamosal; st, supratemporal.

Fig 4. Clevosaurus brasiliensis Bonaparte and Sues, 2006 [11] MCN-PV 2852, right dentary.

Photographs (A and C) and schematic drawings (B and D), in lateral (A-B) and lingual (C-D) views. Scale bar equals 5 mm. Abbreviations: a, angular; d, dentary; mfo, mandibular foramen; mgr, Meckel’s groove; par, prearticular; sb, sencondary bone.

Stratigraphic and geographic range. The material MCN-PV 2852 was recovered from the same type locality of the holotype of C. brasiliensis Bonaparte and Sues, 2006 [11], at Linha São Luiz locality, Faxinal do Soturno Municipality, Caturrita Formation, Late Triassic (Late Norian-Rhaetian age, sensu [50].

Description of Clevosaurus brasiliensis based on MCN-PV 2852

General features of the skull.

The skull of MCN-PV 2852 is nearly 25.5 mm long. It is slightly compressed on the left side, some bones are crushed (basioccipital, exoccipital), or very damaged (supraoccipital, prootic, opisthotic) (Figs 2 and 3). Other bones, as epipterygoid and stapes are missing. Few cervical vertebrae superpose posteriorly over the braincase. The lower jaw is almost complete and 26.8 mm long. The antorbital region (snout) of MCN-PV 2852 is relatively short, between ⅓ and ¼ of the total skull length, as in the holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis. The supratemporal fenestra is more than ¼ of the skull length, same pattern seen as in C. wangi, C. petilus, and Polysphenodon (¼ or less). The temporal region is broad as in most Clevosaurus species, except from the narrow temporal region of C. hudsoni, [23], and from C. bairdi, in which this region is incomplete.


Premaxillae and maxillae (Figs 2 and 3). Only the left premaxilla is complete. The anterodorsal and posterodorsal processes are thin and form the ventral, the posterior, and half of the anterior margins of the oval-shaped external naris. The anterodorsal process is slightly prominent, and does not contact between the nasal bones; whereas the posterodorsal process extends dorsally between nasal and maxilla. Both maxillae are well preserved. Anteriorly, the maxilla is excluded from the external naris by the posterodorsal process of premaxilla, a feature shared with all Clevosaurus [14,17,21,23], but also present in Godavisaurus, Opisthias and Priosphenodon [17,18]. The large dorsal process is deep and rounded, and its posterior border seems to be overlapping the anterior margin of the ventral process of the prefrontal, except at the anteroventral corner of the orbit. At this point, the broad contact between the maxilla and jugal (seen in all Clevosaurs species, but also in some other sphenodontians) [17,76] form the lateral margin of the small and dorsally open lacrimal foramen. The long posterior process, with a rounded caudal margin, forms most of the ventral edge of the orbit, overlapping the anterior process of jugal in all its extension. In ventromedial view, the maxilla seems to be included in the suborbital fenestra, which closes part of the anterior side wall of the suborbital fenestra. However, in dorsal view it is excluded, with the suborbital fenestra limited only by the palatine and ectopterygoid, without participation of maxilla (also observed in Clevosaurus bairdi, C. hudsoni, and C. minor) [20,21], and considered exclusive to Clevosaurus [17]. The palatine process is narrow and small, and contributes to form the posterior margin of the internal naris. There are at least five supralabial foramina (on the left side) just above the secondary bone or secondary dentine “lip” of the maxilla [20].

Nasals, prefrontals, and frontals (Figs 2 and 3). Despite the poor preservation of both nasals some important features can be noted. The nasal is fused to the frontal and broader at the level of the anterior margin of prefrontals, as in the holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis. It also forms the anterior half and the entire dorsal margin of the external naris.

The large semilunar prefrontal forms all anterodorsal margin of the orbit. In the intraorbital surface, the ventral process of the prefrontal contacts the palatine. The triangular and pointed frontal process overlaps the lateral margin of palatine, whereas the ventral process (although slightly disarticulated) is overlapped by the anterodorsal process of maxilla. The prefrontal contributes together with the jugal to form the medial margin of the lacrimal foramen. Only in Clevosaurus hudsoni the contact between the prefrontal and the jugal is not visible, although Sues et al. [21] based on isolated maxillae of C. hudsoni interpreted that the articular facets for the prefrontal and jugal could indicate that the infraorbital process of the jugal closely approaches the ventral portion of the prefrontal. Both frontals are complete, fused to nasals, but not fused with parietals.

The frontal contributes with the middle portion of the dorsal margin of the orbit, where it largely overlaps the postfrontal, almost touching laterally the postorbital. The posteromedial process is short and narrow. Right and left frontals are wedged between the anterior processes of parietals, whereas the posterolateral process is longer and wider, with a convex lateral margin covering the postfrontal. At the interorbital region there is a pair of small vascular foramina.

Postfrontal and postorbital (Figs 2 and 3). Only the left postfrontal is preserved and the exposed area is slightly wide at both extremities: anteriorly participating in the medial margin of the orbit, and posteriorly forming the anteromedial margin of the supratemporal fenestra. It is distinct from the holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis where it is broad with a large medial contact with the parietal and anteriorly participating in the most posterior margin of the orbit, as well as the anteromedial border of the supratemporal fenestra [11]. The postfrontal morphology resembles the condition observed in Clevosaurus hudsoni, with a shorter posterior process overlaping the anterolateral margin of the parietal [20].

Although incomplete, the postorbital has a Y-shape and contributes to form the margin of the orbit and the supratemporal fenestra. The postorbital has short medial and ventral processes, but possesses a long posterior projection. The medial process widely overlaps the postfrontal, and forms all the posterior margin of the orbit, as well as the anterolateral margin of the supratemporal fenestra. The ventral process forms more than half of the posterior margin of the orbit, and the posterior process (incomplete) possibly formed all the anterior half of the lateral margin of the supratemporal fenestra.

Jugal (Figs 2 and 3). The right jugal is almost complete. Although largely overlapped by the posterior process of the maxilla, medially it is a long anterior process that reaches the anterior edge of the orbit, participating with the prefrontal in the medial margin of the lacrimal foramen. According to Wu [23], the jugal of C. petilus is distitinct from other Clevosaurus, because this bone has an anterior process that forms only a small portion of the posteroventral margin of orbit. The long and backward oriented dorsal process, contacts anteriorly the ventral and dorsally the posterior process of the postorbital, and also meets anteriorly the squamosal, as observed in Clevosaurus hudsoni, C. bairdi, Brachyrhinodon, and Polysphenodon [17]. The jugal forms the ventral half of the posterior margin of the orbit, and almost one third of the dorsal margin of the lower temporal fenestra; its ventral margin is formed by the long posterior process (which in the holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis is fragmented). This process, although anterior and medially displaced, still contacts the quadrate complex, and it appears that the lower temporal bar is complete (as in Clevosaurus hudsoni, C. minor, and C. bairdi) [20,21]. According to Jones [17] this character is also found in basal rhynchocephalians, however, the difference between the condition seen in clevosaurs and basal forms could be due to the larger postorbital area, as well as in Sphenodon, where the postorbital area the jugal does not extend posteriorly to meet the squamosal.

Squamosal (Figs 2 and 3). Only part of the left squamosal was preserved. The entire posterior border of the bone contacts the supratemporal. The anterior process of the squamosal displays two articular facets: the lateral one for the jugal (dorsal process), and the medial one for the postorbital. The bone forms one third of the lateral margin of the supratemporal fenestra, as well as the posterior one third of the dorsal margin of the lower temporal fenestra. Only a small portion of the descending process was preserved, which is also dorsally displaced.

Parietals (Figs 2 and 3). The parietals are almost complete, and the interparietal suture displays an interdigitating pattern. The parietal region is wide, as in Brachyrhinodon, Polysphenodon, Chinese Clevosaurus, and the holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis, but distinct from Clevosaurus hudsoni and C. bairdi, where it is relatively narrower than the interorbital region. The condition found in MCN-PV 2852 and in the holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis resembles the parietal table morphology of C. hudsoni: the tendency to form a median ridge [20]. However, it is different from the condition seen in Palaeopleurosaurus, Kallimodon, Sapheosaruus, and Sphenodon, where a prominent parietal crest, or a “true” median ridge, is present [20,23]. In MCN-PV 2852 and the holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis, the anterior margin of the large and oval parietal foramen reaches the level of the anterior margin of the supratemporal fenestra. The anterior process is large, triangular, and wedged between the posteromedial/posterolateral processes of frontal. The very long posterior process of parietal contributes with more than half of the posterior margin of the skull, and tapers abruptly at the contact with supratemporal, but a discrete contact with the squamosal perhaps occurs only at the internal surface of these bones.

Supratemporal (Figs 2 and 3). Only the left supratemporal was preserved, lacking the posterolateral edge, and its anterior margin contacts the squamosal. Its medial margin tapers anteriorly to contact with the posterior process of parietal bone, where it seems not participate in the margin of supratemporal fenestra. The bone forms about one third of the posterior margin, and probably the posterior edge of the skull. Regarding the presence of this bone in Clevosaurus, this character has often been interpreted as being exclusive to this taxon [17]. However, several other derived sphenodontians display the supratemporal bone, including Zapatadon and in the hatchling Sphenodon skull [6,1517,77].

Vomer (Figs 2 and 3). Only a small posterior portion of the left vomer was preserved. Anteriorly, the vomer contacts dorsally the anterior process of pterygoid, more laterally and posteriorly it contacts the anterior process of palatine, including its very delicate semilunar (ventral) process. The preserved part of the vomer participates in the middle portion of the medial margin of the internal naris. There are two vomerine rows of small conical teeth, a medial one with three, and a lateral one with two teeth. These small teeth are similar in size to that of the pterygoid teeth or even smaller.

Palatines (Figs 2 and 3). Both enlarged and slightly curved palatines are preserved. This bone in the holotype of Clevosaurus brasilensis is partially hidden by the lower jaws and for this reason a detailed description is not possible. However, MCN-PV 2852 displays all palatal region exposed. Anteriorly, a triangular vomerine process shows ventrally a very small semilunar projection to joint with the vomer. Posterior to this facet, the process forms with the palatine process of the maxilla the posterior margin of the internal naris, as well as a little part of the medial margin of this opening. The semilunar tooth-bearing portion has a very particular morphology. It is wider anteriorly, where there is a small, but deep medial rounded process, which together with the vomerine process recovers the most anterior and toothless part of the palatal shelf of the pterygoid bone. MCN-PV 2852 possesses a shorter contact between the pterygoid and palatine, resembling a vacuity between these two bones, whereas in the holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis the contact is broad.

The trapezoid and well developed maxillary process projects anterolaterally from the anterior half of the tooth-bearing portion, and it is as wide in this point. It displays a deep and wide wear groove for the occlusion of the lower jaw, laterally limited by a parallel rounded low crest [78]. Due to the large maxillary process, the tooth-row is much more medial in position than usual, as is the semilunar tooth-bearing portion as a whole, which posteriorly tapers to wedge between the pterygoid shelf and the flange of ectopterygoid. Its posterior half contacts laterally the palatine shelf of the ectopterygoid, between the posterior margin of the suborbital fenestra and the posterior contact of the palatine with the transverse flange of the pterygoid. The pterygoid shelf is almost semilunar and tapers both anterior and posterior portions: anteriorly wedged between the rounded medial process, and the medial tooth-row of the pterygoid; and posteriorly wedged between the lateral tooth row of the pterygoid and tooth row of the palatine. The palatine contributes to the margins of the suborbital fenestra: the anterior one is formed by the maxillary process, whereas the middle part of the tooth-bearing portion forms the anterior half of its medial margin. This fenestra, due to the large maxillary process of the palatine and the relationship of this bone with the ectopterygoid, is nearly fusiform-shaped and relatively short. Also due to the width of the maxillary process, the tooth row of the palatine is unusually medial, so that the posteriormost tooth is only a few millimeters more lateral than the anteriormost one.

The tooth row bears seven (right side) and six (left side) conical teeth: the first two are the largest ones and the other teeth reduce their size posteriorly, so that the last ones are similar in size to the largest pterygoid tooth. The first teeth have large wear facets. In the right pterygoid shelf, medial to the fourth tooth in the row, there is an isolated tooth, similar in size to those in the row. In the rounded medial projection of the tooth-bearing portion there are three very small conical teeth posteromedially directed. On the left side, there is another isolated tooth (completely worn-out) inside the wear groove, in a level just anterior to the first tooth in the row. Most sphenodontians has a single palatine tooth row, where the teeth are conical and unflanged, but they bear small posterolateral flanges in Godavarisaurus [76], while there are also small flanges on the anterior palatine teeth of C. hudsoni [18].

Pterygoids (Figs 2 and 3). Both pterygoids are almost complete. The central region is rectangular and barely longer than wide, bearing a median sulcus, which is the very evident interpterygoid groove. From the lateral portion of the central area projects ventrally a thick semilunar process, just anterior and ventrally to the basipterygoid joint. The central area and the semilunar process are continuous, projects laterally the rod-like transverse process, which anteriorly contacts the posterior corner of the tooth-bearing portion of palatine (more medially) and the posterior limit of the palatine shelf of ectopterygoid (more laterally). From the lateral limit of its contact with the ectopterygoid flange, the transverse process continues by a delicate blade (seen in oblique views), that contacts ventrally the dorsal border of the posterior process of ectopterygoid. Only the left side the proximal portion of the quadrate process was preserved. The semilunar socket for the basipterygoid process can be observed in the palatal view, between the posterior border of the central area and the basis of the quadrate process, just dorsal to the semilunar process.

The most conspicuous feature observed in the palatal shelf of the pterygoid is the presence of three tooth rows on the palatal shelf. The most lingual (medial) row bears 13 teeth at the right side, and 10 at the left side, all them of similar size. The intermediary row bears eight teeth of different size; and the very small buccal (lateral) row has five teeth, all of similar size. Although Bonaparte and Sues [11] have described the third row as an “extra pterygoid teeth”, our observations suggest the presence of the well-developed third pterygoid buccal tooth row, including seen in the complete specimens of Clevosaurus brasiliensis (ULGV 9726, UFRGS PV 0746 T, UFRGS PV 1152 T). It is noteworthy that extra pterygoid teeth rows are also seen in basal rhynchocephalian forms, such as Gephyrosarus and Dyphydontosaurus [65,79], while derived forms have no tooth row in the pterygoid shelf [6,17], although the opistodonthian Sphenotitan has four pterygoid tooth row [3]. The available information about the pterygoid tooth row in Clevosaurus shows that most of them have two pterygoid teeth rows parasagitally aligned with each other. As observed in some Chinese Clevosaurus specimens [17], whereas Clevosaurus brasiliensis displays another pterygoid tooth row aligned to the most posterior portion of the palatine, but not a posterior continuation of the palatal tooth row. According to Jones [17] the specimen attributed to C. wangi (IVPPV 82710) apparently has more than two pterygoid tooth row, but was not figured in the original article of Wu [23], resembling the condition observed in C. brasiliensis.

The very long interpterygoid groove extends between the two lingual rows until the level of the most posterior pterygoid teeth of the intermediary row. In other words, both sides of the palatal shelves of the lingual row are sutured each other forming a clear and evident groove. The interpterygoid groove is totally closed by the posterior facet of the lingual row of each side in MCN-PV 2852 and ULGV 9726, but its widely open in the holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis and another specimen (UFRGS PV 0746 T), which could be interpreted as an intraspecific variation trait.

Ectopterygoids (Figs 2 and 3). The right ectopterygoid is preserved. The anterolateral process is narrow and long forming the posterior margin of the suborbital fenestra, and posteriorly the ectopterygoid contacting laterally two-thirds of transverse process of the pterygoid. Medially, contacts by all its extension the posterior half of the tooth-bearing area of the palatine. The lateral process lacks its rod-shaped portion, and is reduced to its lateral extremity. From this point, there is an anterior thin and long ramus, projecting from the lateral limit of the flange and extending (as seen inside the orbit) alongside of the medial surface of the maxilla (lateral margin of the suborbital fenestra) to contact more anteriorly the delicate posterior extremity of the maxillary process of the palatine. The lateroposterior ramus is robust, and is directed towards the posteromedial corner (posterior to the last tooth) surface of maxilla, a position related to the markedly inset position of the posterior extremity of the tooth-bearing portion. The crescent-shaped, robust and long posterior process is markedly concave laterally, having the ventral and distal end borders rounded.


Parabasisphenoid and basioccipital (Figs 2 and 3). The limits between parasphenoid and basisphenoid can be partially distinguished. The fusion of the hexagonal basisphenoid with the parasphenoid is clearly at the posterior margin of internal carotid artery foramina, whose margins are formed by parasphenoid (anterior and medially), and basisphenoid (posteriorly), and the medial basis of the basipterygoid process (laterally). A thin and long cultriform process broadens posteriorly by means of the lateral (right/left) narrow alae; between which, at the midline, there is a relatively thick and rounded (ventral) crest. The long and deep basipterygoid process projects from the anterolateral border of the basisphenoid, laterally to the sulcus for the carotid artery. It is ventrally directed to articulate with the pterygoid, just medial to the quadrate process. Its ball-and-socket joint, exposed in ventral view, seems to have been a movable joint. Between the basisphenoid and the exoccipitals it is possible to see a V-shaped line, marking the previous suture; a line that is open at the apex, by a delicate transverse sulcus, evincing the previous contact between the basisphenoid and basioccipital bones. From the contact-line with the basisphenoid, the exoccipital widens posterolaterally, but the condyle cannot be distinguished. Between the exoccipitals there is a depression, anteriorly convex, perhaps pointing out the limit of these bones with the basioccipital. Although badly preserved, it is possible to see a laterodorsal projection from the basioccipital. Other portions of basioccipital and exoccipitals, supraoccipital and prootic/opisthotic are too crushed.


Quadrate (Figs 2 and 3). The quadrate complex is incomplete in both sides, and the quadratojugal could not be distinguished from the quadrate, possibly being fused to each other. Due to the skull compression, at the right side there is only a partial contact between the quadrate and the pterygoid due to the fact that the respective processes are anteromedially displaced. At left side, the quadrate articular facet for the pterygoid can be observed, on account of the fact that the posterior portion of the jugal is missing. The facet of the condyle is wide but relatively short, markedly concave ventrally from side to side, with a convex anterior and a slightly concave posterior margin. The medial extremity of the condyle projects strongly ventrally, whereas its lateral extremity is almost horizontally flat. At the right side it is possible to observe the medial half of the conch-like basin, which is part of the quadratojugal foramen, and the column of the quadrate, but the head and the tympanic crest are missing.

Mandible (Fig 4). The tooth-bearing portion of the lower jaws are short so that the postcoronoid portion is longer than the precoronoid one. The coronoid process is high, triangular, and well-developed. In occlusion, the long retroarticular process surpasses the posterior limit of the skull, and is formed dorsally by the articular and ventrally by the angular, which tapers anteriorly almost to the mandibular incisure. There are eight small mentalia foramina at the shallow lateral longitudinal sulcus. From the apex of the coronoid process, a well-marked crest extends posteriorly until the posterior limit of the retroarticular process; whereas ventrally it is prolonged by a rounded and strong crest that together with the prominent ventral margin of the dentary forms a shallow V-shaped depression. Laterally, at the dentary-surangular suture, there is a large, horizontal, oval mandibular foramen.

The posterior process of the dentary is high and long and almost reaching the glenoid level. The symphyseal area is oval, almost vertical, having three portions: a dorsal semilunar gap, separated from an oval symphysis by a shallow Meckel’s groove, ventrally to which there is another smaller gap (as in Sphenodon) that is just above a small symphyseal process. As seen in all Clevosaurus, the symphyseal spur sensu [2], is reduced and roudend. The Meckel’s groove runs from the symphyseal area until the posterior limit of the basis of the coronoid process. Also departing from this sulcus, but dorsal to it, a very thin groove ends at the anterior limit of the mandibular incisure. The surangular is long and rod-like where it forms the dorsal margin of the adductor fossa, its ventral margin being formed by a rod-like prearticular which is slightly larger posteriorly. The articular facet (glenoid fossa or cavity) for the quadrate, located posterior to the surangular-articular contact, is relatively complex, with lateral and medial portions. The articular facet is a few millimeters anterior to the medial one, being slightly larger, concave and nearly oval in transverse section. It faces dorsally, and its posterior limit lies in a low transverse crest (there is no anterior limit). The medial portion, slightly smaller and posterior to the lateral one, is tilted towards the midline, is also nearly oval but its concavity is oriented longitudinally. Between both portions there is a low and rounded longitudinal crest. Posterior to the articular facet, a low crest runs over, ending at the well-developed posterior extremity of the retroarticular process. The angular contacts the articular near the lateral limit of the articular facet, and extends to the posterior margin of the retroarticular process.


Teeth (Figs 24). The premaxillary tooth is ~2.0mm high and 1.3mm long at the base. As seen in the holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis (UFRGS PV 0748 T), each premaxilla of the MCN-PV 2852 only has a single tusk-like ‘incisor’ tooth, as in Clevosaurus bairdi [11,21] and Chinese Clevosaurus [17,23]. On the other hand, C. hudsoni and C. convalis have 3–4 premaxillary teeth [18]. The maxilla shows seven to eight teeth of the hatchling dentition, all conical, small, with an alternating size. Hatchling teeth are followed by other three teeth of the additional series: the first one is buco-lingually compressed, following the “clevosaurs tendency” [80] being larger than the other two, which are much smaller and conical. There are no anterolateral flanges on the maxillary teeth of MCN-PV 2852, and is also shared by Brachyrhynodon and all others Clevosaurus. However, the presence of large posteromedial flanges is seen in the additional teeth of the maxilla in all Clevosaurus [76], including C. hudsoni and C. convalis [18], but are not seen in MCN-PV 2852 and the holotype of C. brasiliensis. According to Bonaparte and Sues [11] the maxillary dentition of the holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis has two large flanged teeth, however, these features cannot be seen in more detail due to the close position of the mandibles with the skull. Probably, MCN-PV 2852 and UFRGS PV 0748 T (holotype of Clevosaurus brasiliensis) are old adults, evidenced by the high degree of wear [78]. Probably due to this reason they do not show any evidence of flanges on the dentary, maxillary or palatine dentition, although there is a subtle parallel vertical sulcus in the lower jaw, which could be related to a precision shear bite (orthal shear), contra [27].

The dentary possesses a slightly larger first tooth, this is followed by nine small, alternating teeth, eight of them corresponding to the hatchling dentition. The last tooth is larger than the others, corresponding to an additional tooth. According to Säila [18], there are enlarged anterolateral flanges on the dentary of Clevosaurus [20], but not observed in MCN-PV 2852 and holotype of C. brasiliensis (UFRGS PV 0748 T).

Maxillary and dentary heavy tooth wear indicates an adult stage. Hatchling dentition and additional series of maxilla shows important wear at the lingual side, due to occlusion with the lower jaw. In the palatine bone, wear is at the labial side of the first, second and third teeth at the right side; and at the first and second teeth at the left side. A conspicuous wear is also present inside the wear groove for the lower jaw; where at the left side an isolated tooth is now completely worn-out. The lower jaw teeth shows important wear at the labial side (maxillary occlusion), at the lingual side (palatine tooth row occlusion), and occlusal surface (wear groove of the palatine). Wear is also present at the labial side of the dentary, made by the maxillary teeth, and possibly at the lingual side of the maxilla, made by dentary teeth, just below the basis of the teeth.

Phylogenetic Relationships

According to Wu [23] and Reynoso [14] the “clevosaurs group” comprises Brachyrhinodon, Polysphenodon, and Clevosaurus, although other authors did not found such support for this clade [13,76,81]. Previous works have suggested that the “clevosaurs” are more derived than pleurosaurs [14,16,23], although more recent studies with different, but not necessarily more comprehensive, taxon sampling, suggest the opposite [17,21,22,82].

Regarding the monophyly of the “clevosaurs group”, Bonaparte and Sues [11] defined the family Clevosauridae, but did not perform a cladistic analysis. Arantes et al. [12] ascribed rhynchocephalian post-cranial materials from the same locality to Clevosaurus brasiliensis and, based on the Bonaparte and Sues [11], conducted a phylogenetic analysis that corroborated the monophyly of Clevosauridae. The group was regarded as “basal forms” among sphenodontians. The data matrix of [12] is mainly based on Apesteguía and Novas [6], which lack several Clevosaurus species. The present phylogenetic analysis includes most (seven) species of Clevosaurus (except for C. minor, based on uninformative material) [20], two other taxa of the “clevosaurs group” (Brachyrhinodon and Polysphenodon), and the possible Clevosaurus from South Africa (SAM K-7890) [62].

The results reveal 1400 most parsimonious trees, with 255 steps. The strict consensus (Fig 5) shows Diphydontosaurus as most basal Sphenodontia. The others rhynchocephalians form a polytomy with only few clades revealed. Opisthodontia is recovered and better resolved than in the original analysis, probably because of the inclusion of Sphenotitan. This clade is composed by two groups: Eilenodontinae (Sphenotitan as most basal, with Priosphenodon as sister group of a clade that includes Toxolophosaurus and Eilenodon), and a clade composed by Opisthias and the two species of Kawasphenodon. In addition, sister group relationships are found between Theretairus and Sphenovipera; Pleurosaurus ginsburgi and P. goldfussi; and Homeosaurus cf. maximiliani and Homeosaurus maximiliani.

Fig 5. Results of cladistic analysis, recovered 14000 most parsimonius tress with 255 steps.

A, Strict Consensus Tree. B, Tree obtained by iterPCR protocol (a-m indicate the unstable taxa pruned from cladogram and their possible positions).

The Clevosauridae also is recovered as monophyletic, including Polysphenodon, Brachyrhinodon and Clevosaurus. Three characters support this clade: antorbital region forming ¼ of the skull length (character 1; reversed to a length between 1/3 and ¼ of that of te skull in C. brasiliensis, C. wangi and C. petilus, convergent with Sphenotitan and Oenesaurus); dorsal process of the jugal narrow and elongate (character 10; convergent with Priosphenodon, Sphenodon, and Ankylosphenodon); and palatine teeth forming a single row plus one isolated tooth (character 52; convergent with Sphenotitan and Homoeosaurus cf. maxiliani). Polysphenodon is the basalmost member of the group, with the other clevosaurids (Clevosaurus species and Brachyrhinodon) included in a polytomy. This clade is supported by two unambiguous synapomorphies: supratemporal fenestra 75% of the length or longer than orbit (character 3; convergent to Sphenodon, Sapheosaurus, Kallimodon, Paleopleurosaurus, Pleurosaurus, Sphenotitan and Priosphenodon) and supratemporal fenestra more than ¼ of the skull length (character 4; convergent with Ankylosphenodon, Sapheosaurus, Kallimodon, Paleopleurosaurus, Homeosaurus cf. maxilmiliani, and Sphenotitan).

The interPCR protocol [68] identified Brachyrhinodon, C. hudsoni, C. convalis, and Clevosaurus sp. (SAM-K7890) as unstable taxa within Clevosauridae (Fig 5). Brachyrhinodon could be the sister group of the clade including all Clevosaurus species, or closer to C. bairdi. Likewise, C. hudsoni could also have these two positions. Other Clevosaurus could also be closer to C. bairdi: Clevosaurus sp. (SAMP K-7890) and C. convalis. The iterPCR protocol also indicates that the South African Clevosaurus is not closer to C. brasiliensis, contradicting the expectation of a Gondwanan component in the evolution of Clevosaurus. This specimen could be closer to C. bairdi or to C. wangi. The possible position of C. convalis is closer to C. bairdi, or as sister group of C. brasiliensis.

In all trees of the analysis, C. latidens (AUP 11192) is not close to other Clevosaurus, and a position closer to Opistodontia, as proposed by Fraser [61] and Martínez et al. [3], was revealed by the iterPCR protocol. Among the Chinese Clevosaurus (C. wangi, C. mcgilli, and C. petilus), the iterPCR analysis indicates that they could correspond to distinct taxonomic entities. An elongate central region of the pterygoid (character 25) is only observed in C. wangi [23] among Clevosauridae. C. wangi also has a small mandibular foramen (character 37), shared with SAM K-7890 and C. bairdi, distinct from large foramen of C. petilus and C. mcgilli. The posterovental process of the jugal is well-developed (character 21) in most clevosaurids, except for C. petilus [23]. An antorbital region ranging between 1/3 and ¼ of the skull length (character 1) is shared only by C. petilus and C. wangi. Among clevosaurids, a posterior end of the palatine that widens posteriorly (character 22) is only observed in C. petilus, as well as the quadrate-quadratojugal foramen restricted to quadrate bone (character 28). Accordingly, although Jones [17] questioned the taxonomic validity of the Chinese Clevosaurus described by Wu [23], due to the poor preservation of the specimens, each of them have an unique condition among clevosaurids and share derived conditions with other Clevosaurus, indicating that they are possibly distinct and identifiable taxonomic entities.


In this paper we report a new specimen of the clevosaurid sphenodontian Clevosaurus brasiliensis Bonaparte and Sues [11] from the Caturrita Formation, Late Triassic of Southern Brazil. The full comprehensive and detailed description of the specimen MCN-PV 2852 shortly studied by Ferigolo [2528], allowed a better understanding of the skull morphology of C. brasiliensis compared to other Clevosaurus. The phylogenetic analysis, even with low resolution, reveals a monophyletic Clevosauridae, supported by the three synapomorphies: antorbital region one quarter or less of the skull length; narrow and elongate dorsal process of the jugal; and a single row of palatine teeth, plus one isolated tooth. The five exclusive characteristics present in C. brasiliensis among Clevosauridae, supports its taxonomic uniqueness: posterior edge of parietal slightly incurved inward (character 18); parietal foramen at the same level of the supratemporal fenestra (character 19); angle between the anterior margin and the longitudinal axis of the mandible less than 120° in lateral view (character 35), absent or inconspicuous posteromedial flanges on the posterior maxillary teeth (character 50); and absent of anterolateral flanges on the mandibular teeth (character 56). Analysing the cladistics results, it is evident the necessity of deeper morphological and cladistics studies to elucidate Rhynchocephalia (including Clevosaurus) evolution.

Together with the recent record of a basal sphenodontian in the Middle Triassic of Germany [83] and a basal opisthodontian in the Late Triassic of northern Argentina [3], the presence of Clevosaurus in the Late Triassic of Brazil suggests a great diversity of sphenodontians in the early Mesozoic, as shown by several other sphenodontians from the Late Triassic of Brazil still to be studied [84,85]. Additionally, the “Faxinal do Soturno Local Fauna” also includes a non-rhynchocephalian Lepidosauria, Cargninia enigmatica [33], as well as a questionable record of Lepidosauriformes [86]. Most fossils found in this locality are small tetrapods except for the basal saurischian Guaibasaurus [4144]. According to Bonaparte et al. [33] the most significant contribution of the “Faxinal do Soturno Local Fauna” is to provide comprehensive information on the presence of very small Late Triassic tetrapods, not recorded in other coeval faunas from Argentina, Africa, India, and Australia. In this way, the “Faxinal do Soturno Local Fauna” shows that, as with medium and large sized tetrapods, there was a varied cast of small tetrapods of diverse phylogenetic significance [33].

Supporting Information

Note Added in Proof

After the submission and, consequently, the acceptance of this manuscript, Klein et al. (2015) described a new species of Clevosaurus, C. sectumsemper, from the Rhaetian (Late Triassic) fissure fill in Lower Carboniferous Limestone, Fissure 1 in Woodleaze Quarry, South Gloucestershire, UK. Following these authors, C. sectumsemper is distinguished from other species of the genus by five characters: (1) the additional teeth bases on the dentary are more ventrally positioned with the final tooth base close to the upper edge of the Meckelian groove; (2) the pronounced antero-lateral flanges do not overlap or barely overlap the posterior flanges of the preceding tooth on the dentary; (3) the premaxillae each have two or three teeth, compared to the three or four of C. hudsoni; (4) a premaxillary chisel structure is not observed in any specimen; and (5) all the bones are small, no more than 80% the size of those in C. hudsoni. Although comparative analyses with other species of Clevosaurus were performed, is not clear if C. sectumsemper is a distinct taxon from C. hudsoni (Fraser, 1988) or C. convalis (Saila, 2005). Perhaps the inclusion of C. sectumsempes in the future cladistics analyses may resolve these issues on the phylogenetic affinities of this Clevosaurus taxon.

Klein CG, Whiteside DI, de Lucas VS, Viegas PA., Benton MJ. A distinctive Late Triassic microvertebrate fissure fauna and a new species of Clevosaurus (Lepidosauria: Rhynchocephalia) from Woodleaze Quarry, Gloucestershire, UK. Proc Geol Assoc. The Geologists’ Association. 2015; 126: 402–416. doi:10.1016/j.pgeola.2015.05.003


The authors are grateful to Dr. Ana Maria Ribeiro for her curatorial assistance at the Paleontology Collection of MCN/FZBRS (Porto Alegre, Brazil), and Dr. Mariana Bento Soares, and Dr. Tânia Dutra to allow the study of sphenodontian specimens housed at the Paleontological Collections of UFRGS (Porto Alegre, Brazil) and UNISINOS (São Leopoldo, Brazil). We wish to thank to Dr. Juan C. Cisneros (UFPI, Teresina, Brazil), Dr. Max C. Langer (USP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil), and MSc. Pedro L. Godoy (University of Birmingham, London, United Kingdom), they have helped with various aspects of developing ideas and reading earlier drafts. Comments and revisions by Sebastian Apesteguía, Jack L. Conrad, and an anonymous reviewer were much appreciated. This contribution used TNT v.1.1, a program made freely available thanks to a subsidy by the Willi Hennig Society.

Author Contributions

Analyzed the data: ASH MAGF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MAGF. Wrote the paper: ASH MAGF JF.


  1. 1. Albino AM. Lepidosauromorpha. In: Gasparini Z, Salgado L, Coria R, editors. Patagonian Mesozoic Reptiles. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2007. pp. 87–115.
  2. 2. Apesteguía S, Gómez RO, Rougier GW. A basal sphenodontian (Lepidosauria) from the Jurassic of Patagonia: new insights on the phylogeny and biogeography of Gondwanan rhynchocephalians. Zool J Linn Soc. 2012; 166: 342–360.
  3. 3. Martínez RN, Apaldetti C, Colombi CE, Praderio A, Fernandez E, Malnis PS, Correa GA, et al. A new sphenodontian (Lepidosauria: Rhynchocephalia) from the Late Triassic of Argentina and the early origin of the herbivore opisthodontians. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013; 280:1–7.
  4. 4. Apesteguía S, Gómez RO, Rougier GW. The youngest South American rhynchocephalian, a survivor of the K Pg extinction. Proc R Soc B. 2014; 281: 1–6.
  5. 5. Simón ME, Kellner AWA. New sphenodontid (Lepidosauria, Rhynchocephalia, Eilenodontidae) from the Candeleros Formation, Cenomanian of Patagonia, Argentina. Bol do Mus Nac Nov Série, Geol Rio Janeiro. 2003; 68: 1–12.
  6. 6. Apesteguía S, Novas FE. Large Cretaceous sphenodontian from Patagonia provides insight into lepidosaur evolution in Gondwana. Nature. 2003; 425: 609–612. pmid:14534584
  7. 7. Apesteguía S. A Late Campanian sphenodontid (Reptilia, Diapsida) from northern Patagonia. Comptes Rendus—Palevol. 2005; 4: 663–669.
  8. 8. Apesteguía S, Rougier GW. A Late Campanian sphenodontid maxilla from Northern Patagonia. Am Museum Novit. 2007; 3581: 1–11.
  9. 9. Apesteguía S, Carballido JL. A new eilenodontine (Lepidosauria, Sphenodontidae) from the Lower Cretaceous of central Patagonia. J Vertebr Paleontol. 2014; 34: 303–317.
  10. 10. Apesteguía S, Jones MEH. A Late Cretaceous tuatara (Lepidosauria: Sphenodontinae) from South America. Cretac Res. Elsevier Ltd. 2012; 34: 154–160.
  11. 11. Bonaparte JF, Sues H-D. A new species of Clevosaurus (Lepidosauria: Rhynchocephalia) from the Upper Triassic of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Palaeontology. 2006; 49: 917–923.
  12. 12. Arantes B, Soares M, Schultz C. Clevosaurus brasiliensis (Lepidosauria, Sphenodontia) do Triássico Superior do Rio Grande do Sul: anatomina pós-craniana e relações filogenéticas. Rev Bras Paleontol. 2009; 12: 43–54.:
  13. 13. Fraser NC, Benton MJ. The Triassic reptiles Brachyrhinodon and Polysphenodon and the relationships of the sphenodontids. Zool J Linn Soc. 1989; 96: 413–445.
  14. 14. Reynoso V-H. A middle Jurassic Sphenodon-like sphenodontian (Diapsida: Lepidosauria) from Huizachal Canyon, Tamaulipas, Mexico. J Vertebr Paleontol. 1996; 16: 210–221.
  15. 15. Reynoso V-H. A “beaded” Sphenodontian (Diapsida: Lepidosauria) from the Early Cretaceous of Central Mexico. J Vertebr. 1997; 17: 52–59.
  16. 16. Reynoso V- H, Clark JM. A dwarf sphenodontian from the Jurassic La Boca Formation of Tamaulipas, México. J Vertebr Paleontol. 1998; 18: 333–339.
  17. 17. Jones MEH. The early Jurassic clevosaurs from China (Diapsida: Lepidosauria). New Mex Museum Nat Hist Sci Bull. 2006; 37: 548–562.
  18. 18. Säilä LK. A new species of the sphenodontian reptile Clevosaurus from the lower Jurassic of South Wales. Palaeontology. 2005; 48: 817–831.
  19. 19. Robinson PL. A problematic reptile from the British Upper Trias. J Geol Soc London. 1973; 129: 457–479.
  20. 20. Fraser NC. The osteology and relationships of Clevosaurus (Reptilia: Sphenodontida). Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 1988; 321: 125–178.
  21. 21. Sues AH, Shubin NH, Olsen PE. A new sphenodontian (Lepidosauria: Rhynchocephalia) from the Mccoy Brook Formation (Lower Jurassic) of Nova Scotia, Canada. J Vertebr Paleontol. 1994; 14: 327–340.
  22. 22. Fraser NC. A new sphenodontian from the early Mesozoic of England and North America: implications for correlanting early Mesozoic continental deposits. New Mex Museum Nat Hist Sci Bull. 1993; 3: 135–139.
  23. 23. Wu X-C. Late Triassic-Early Jurassic sphenodontians from China and the phylogeny of the Sphenodontia. In: Fraser NC, Sues H-D, editors. In the Shadow of the Dinosaurs: Early Mesozoic Tetrapods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. pp. 38–69
  24. 24. Reynoso V-H. An unusual aquatic sphenodontian (Reptilia: Diapsida) from the Tlayua Formation (Albian), Central Mexico. J Paleontol. 2000; 74: 133–148.
  25. 25. Ferigolo J. South American first record of a sphenodontian (Lepidosauria, Rhynchocephalia) from Late Triassic-Early Jurassic of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. In: Leanza H, editor. Abstracts VII International Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems. Buenos Aires: Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; 1999. pp. 24–25.
  26. 26. Ferigolo, J, Bonaparte, JF, Ribeiro A. Novos vertebrados no Triássico superior do RS, Brasil. Paleontologia em Destaque, Boletim Informativo da Sociedade Brasileira de Paleontologia. 1999. pp. 60–60.
  27. 27. Ferigolo J. Esfenodontídeos do Neo-triássico/?Jurássico do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. In: Holz M, De Ros L, editors. Paleontolgoia do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: CIGO/UFRGS; pp. 236–245.
  28. 28. Ferigolo J. Esfenodontes: répteis mais primitivos do mundo no Rio Grande do Sul. In: Da-Rosa A, editor. Vertebrados fósseis de Santa Maria e região. Santa Maria: Pallotti; 2009. pp. 89–105.
  29. 29. Andreis RR, Bossi GE, Montardo D. O Grupo Rosário do Sul (Triássico) no Rio Grande do Sul. Anais 310 Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia. Balneário de Camboriu: Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia; 1980. pp. 659–673.
  30. 30. Scherer CMS, Faccini UF, Lavina E. Arcabouço estratigráfico do Mesozóico da Bacia do Paraná. In: Holz M, De Ros L, editors. Geologia do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: UFRGS/Instituo Geociências; 2000. pp. 335–354.
  31. 31. Faccini U. O Permo-Triássico do Rio Grande do Sul. Uma análise sob o ponto de vista das sequencias deposicionais. M.Sc. Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. 1989.
  32. 32. Zerfass H, Lavina EL, Schultz CL, Garcia AJV, Faccini UF, Chemale F. Sequence stratigraphy of continental Triassic strata of Southernmost Brazil: a contribution to Southwestern Gondwana palaeogeography and palaeoclimate. Sediment Geol. 2003; 161: 85–105.
  33. 33. Bonaparte JF, Schultz CL, Soares MB, Martinelli AG. La fauna local de Faxinal do Soturno, Triásico tardío de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Rev Bras Paleontol. 2010; 13: 233–246.
  34. 34. Bonaparte JF, Ferigolo J, Ribeiro AM. A primitive Late Triassic “ictidosaur” from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Palaeontology. 2001; 44: 623–635.
  35. 35. Bonaparte JF, Martinelli AG, Schultz CL, Rubert R. The sister group of mammals: small cynodonts from the Late Triassic of Southern Brazil. Rev Bras Paleontol. 2003; 5: 5–27.
  36. 36. Bonaparte JF, Martinelli A. New information on Brasilodon and Brasilitherium (Cynodontia, Probainognathia) from the Late Triassic, Southern Brazil. Rev Bras Paleontol. 2005; 8: 25–46.
  37. 37. Martinelli AG, Bonaparte JF, Schultz CL, Rubert R. A new tritheledontid (Therapsida, Eucynodontia) from the Late Triassic of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) and its phylogenetic relationships among carnivorous non-mammalian eucynodonts. Ameghiniana. 2005; 42: 191–208.
  38. 38. Cisneros JC, Schultz C. Soturnia caliodon n. g. n. sp., a procolophonid reptile from the upper Triassic of southern Brazil. Neues Jahrb Fur Geol Und Palaontologie-Abhandlungen. 2003; 227: 365–380.
  39. 39. Araújo DC, Gonzaga TD. Uma nova espécie de Jachaleria (Therapsida, Dicynodontia) do Triássico do Brasil. Actas del II Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Biostratigrafía/I Congresso Latinoamericano de Paleontología. 1980; 1: 159–174.
  40. 40. Ferigolo J, Langer MC. A Late Triassic dinosauriform from south Brazil and the origin of the ornithischian predentary bone. Hist Biol. 2006; 19: 23–33.
  41. 41. Bonaparte JF, Ferigolo J, Ribeiro AM. A new early Late Triassic saurischian dinosaur from Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. In: Tomida Y, Rich TH, Vickers-Rich P, editors. Proceedings of the Second Gondwanan Dinosaur Symposium. Tokyo: National Science Museum Monographs; 1999. pp. 89–109.
  42. 42. Langer MC, Benton MJ. Early dinosaurs: a phylogenetic study. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 2006; 4: 309–358.
  43. 43. Langer MC, Ribeiro AM, Schultz C, Ferigolo J. The continental tetrapod-bearing Triassic of south Brazil. Bull New Mex Museum Nat Hist Sci. 2007; 41: 201–218.
  44. 44. Langer MC, Bittencourt JS, Schultz C. A reassessment of the basal dinosaur Guaibasaurus candelariensis, from the Late Triassic Caturrita Formation of south Brazil. Earth Environ Sci Trans R Soc Edinburgh. 2010; 101: 301–332.
  45. 45. Leal LA, Azevedo SAK, Kellner AWA, Da Rosa AAS. A new early dinosaur (Sauropodomorpha) from the Caturrita Formation (Late Triassic), Paraná Basin, Brazil. Zootaxa. 2004; 690: 1–24.
  46. 46. Bittencourt JS, Leal LA, Langer MC, Azevedo SAK. An additional basal sauropodomorph specimen from the Upper Triassic Caturrita Formation,Southern Brazil, with comments on the biogeography of plateosaurids. Alcheringa An Australas J Palaeontol. 2012; 36:269–278.
  47. 47. Kischlat E-E, Lucas SG. A phytosaur from the Upper Triassic of Brazil. J Vertebr Paleontol. 2003; 23: 464–467.
  48. 48. Dias-da-Silva S, Dias EV, Schultz C. First record of stereospondyls (Tetrapoda, Temnospondyli) in the Upper Triassic of Southern Brazil. Gondwana Res. 2009; 15: 131–136.
  49. 49. Rubert RR, Schultz CL. Um novo horizonte de correlação para o Triássico Superior do Rio Grande do Sul. Pesquisas em Geociências. 2004; 31: 71–88.
  50. 50. Abdala F, Ribeiro AM. Distribution and diversity patterns of Triassic cynodonts (Therapsida, Cynodontia) in Gondwana. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. Elsevier B.V. 2010; 286: 202–217.
  51. 51. Soares MB, Abdala F, Bertoni-Machado C. A sectorial toothed cynodont (Therapsida) from the Triassic Santa Cruz do Sul fauna, Santa Maria Formation, Southern Brazil. Geodiversitas. 2011; 33: 265–278.
  52. 52. Silva RC, Carvalho IS, Schwanke C. Vertebrate dinoturbation from the Caturrita Formation (Late Triassic, Paraná Basin), Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Gondwana Res. 2007; 11: 303–310.
  53. 53. Barboni R, Dutra T. New “flower” and leaves of bennettitales from southern Brazil and their implication in the age of the lower mesozoic deposits. Ameghiniana. 2013; 50:14–32.
  54. 54. Langer MC, Hsiou AS, Dutra T, Silva RC, Rohn R, Cabral M, et al. Formação Caturrita: Triássico, Jurássico ou ambos? Paleontologia em Destaque: Boletim de Resumos do VIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Paleontologia de Vertebrados. Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; 2012. pp. 47–47.
  55. 55. Wu X-C. The comparative anatomy and systematics of Mesozoic sphenodontians. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University. 1991. p. 229.
  56. 56. Evans SE, Borsuk-Białynicka M. A small lepidosauromorph reptile from the early Triassic of Poland. Palaeontol Pol. 2009; 65: 179–202.
  57. 57. Rauhut OWM, Heyng AM, López-Arbarello A, Hecker A. A New Rhynchocephalian from the Late Jurassic of Germany with a dentition that is unique amongst Tetrapods. PLoS One. 2012; 7: 1–9.
  58. 58. Evans SE, Raia P, Barbera C. New lizards and rhynchocephalians from the Lower Cretaceous of southern Italy. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 2004; 49: 393–408.
  59. 59. Conrad JL, Norell MA. High-resolution X-ray computed tomography of an Early Cretaceous gekkonomorph (Squamata) from Öösh (Övörkhangai; Mongolia). Hist Biol. 2006; 18: 405–431.
  60. 60. Reynoso V-H. Early Cretaceous Lepidosaurs (Reptilia: Diapsida) from central México and the phylogeny of Lepidosauriformorphs. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University. 1996. p. 297.
  61. 61. Fraser C. New Triassic sphenodontids from South-West England and review of their classification. Palaeontology. 1986; 29: 165–186.
  62. 62. Sues H-D, Reisz RR. First record of the Early Mesozoic sphenodontian Clevosaurus (Lepidosauria: Rhynchocephalia) from the Southern Hemisphere. J Paleontol. 1995; 69: 123–126.
  63. 63. Goloboff PA. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics. 1999; 15: 415–428.
  64. 64. Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon K. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics. 2008; 24: 774–786.
  65. 65. Evans S. The skull of a new eosuchian reptile from the Lower Jurassic of South Wales. Zool J Linn Soc. 1980; 203–264.
  66. 66. Evans SE. Caudal autotomy in a Lower Jurassic Eosuchian. Copeia. 1981; 1981: 883–884.
  67. 67. Evans SE. Mandibular Fracture and Inferred Behavior in a Fossil Reptile. Copeia. 1983; 1983: 845–847.
  68. 68. Pol D, Escapa IH. Unstable taxa in cladistic analysis: identification and the assessment of relevalnt characters. Cladistics. 2009; 25: 515–527.
  69. 69. Duméril AMC, Bibron G. Erpétologie générale ou histoire naturelle complète des reptiles. Tome V. Paris: Librairie Encyclopedique de Roret; 1839.
  70. 70. Evans SE. The classification of the Lepidosauria. Zool J Linn Soc. 1984; 82: 87–100.
  71. 71. Günther A. Contribution to the anatomy of Halleria (Rhynchocephalus, Owen). Philos Trans R Soc London. 1867; 157: 595–629.
  72. 72. Gauthier J, Estes R, de Queiroz K. A phylogenetic analysis of Lepidosauromorpha. In: Estes R, Pregill G, editors. Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families. Stanford:, Stanford University Press; 1988. pp. 15–98.
  73. 73. Williston S. The osteology of the reptiles. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1925.
  74. 74. Benton MJ. Classification and phylogeny of the diapsid reptiles. Zool J Linn Soc. 1985; 84: 97–164.
  75. 75. Swinton WE. A new Triassic Rhynchocephalian from Gloucestershire. Journal of Natural History Series 11. 1939; 4: 37–41.
  76. 76. Evans SE, Prasad GVR, Manhas B. Rhynchocephalians (Diapsida : Lepidosauria) from the Jurassic Kota Formation of India. Zool J Linn Soc. 2001; 133: 309–334.
  77. 77. Rieppel O. The skull in the hatchling of Sphenodon punctatus. J Herpetol. 1992; 26: 80–84.
  78. 78. Martínez PRRV, Soares MB. Dentary Morphological Variation in Clevosaurus brasiliensis (Rhynchocephalia, Clevosauridae) from the Upper Triassic of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0119307. pmid:25793754
  79. 79. Whiteside DI. The head of the Rhaetian sphenodontid Diphydontosaurus avonis gen. et. sp. nov. and the modernizing of a living fossil. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 1986; 312: 597–597.
  80. 80. Jones MEH. Tooth diversity and function in the Rhynchocephalia (Diapsida: Lepidosauria). In: Barrett PM, Evans SE, editors. Ninth International Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biota. London: Natural History Museum; 2006. pp. 55–58.
  81. 81. Wilkinson M, Benton MJ. Sphenodontid phylogeny and the problems of multiple trees. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 1996; 351: 1–16.
  82. 82. Jones MEH. Skull shape and feeding strategy in Sphenodon and other Rhynchocephalia (Diapsida: Lepidosauria). J Morphol. 2008; 269: 945–966. pmid:18512698
  83. 83. Jones MEH, Anderson C, Hipsley C, Müller J, Evans SE, Schoch R. Integration of molecules and new fossils supports a Triassic origin for Lepidosauria (lizards, snakes, and tuatara). BMC Evol Biol. 2013; 2013 13:208. pmid:24063680
  84. 84. Arantes BA. Novos materiais de Rynchocephalia da Formação Caturrita (Triássico Superior) do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil: estudo anatômico e implicações filogenéticas. M.Sc. Thesis. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. 2011.
  85. 85. Martínez, PRRV. Um estudo sobre a variação morfológica no dentário de Clevosaurus brasiliensis Bonaparte e Sues, 2006 (Rhynchocephalia, Clevosauridae), do Triássico Superior do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, utilizando a morfometria geométrica. M.Sc. Thesis. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. 2014.
  86. 86. Martínez PRRV, Soares MB. Um novo registro de Lepidosauromorpha não-Rhynchocephalia do TriássicoSuperior do Rio Grande do Sul (Sequ\ncia Santa Maria 2, Cenozona de Riograndia). Paleontologia em Destaque, Boletim Informativo da Sociedade Brasileira de Paleontologia. 2013; 66: 67–68.