Figures
Abstract
Background & Aims
The utility of transient elastography (FibroScan) is well studied in adults but not in children. We sought to assess the feasibility of performing FibroScans and the characteristics of FibroScan-based liver profiles in Japanese obese and non-obese children.
Methods
FibroScan examinations were performed in pediatric patients (age, 1–18 yr) who visited Osaka City University Hospital. Liver steatosis measured by controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), and hepatic fibrosis evaluated as the liver stiffness measurement (LSM), were compared among obese subjects (BMI percentile ≥90%), non-obese healthy controls, and non-obese patients with liver disease.
Results
Among 214 children examined, FibroScans were performed successfully in 201 children (93.9%; median, 11.5 yr; range, 1.3–17.6 yr; 115 male). CAP values (mean±SD) were higher in the obese group (n = 52, 285±60 dB/m) compared with the liver disease (n = 40, 202±62, P<0.001) and the control (n = 107, 179±41, P<0.001) group. LSM values were significantly higher in the obese group (5.5±2.3 kPa) than in the control (3.9±0.9, P<0.001), but there were no significant differences in LSM between the liver disease group (5.4±4.2) and either the obese or control group. LSM was highly correlated with CAP in the obese group (ρ = 0.511) but not in the control (ρ = 0.129) or liver disease (ρ = 0.170) groups.
Conclusions
Childhood obesity carries a high risk of hepatic steatosis associated with increased liver stiffness. FibroScan methodology provides simultaneous determination of CAP and LSM, is feasible in children of any age, and is a non-invasive and effective screening method for hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis in Japanese obese children.
Citation: Cho Y, Tokuhara D, Morikawa H, Kuwae Y, Hayashi E, Hirose M, et al. (2015) Transient Elastography-Based Liver Profiles in a Hospital-Based Pediatric Population in Japan. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0137239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137239
Editor: Han-Chieh Lin, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TAIWAN
Received: April 26, 2015; Accepted: August 13, 2015; Published: September 23, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Cho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (to H.M.) and the TANITA Healthy Weight Community Trust (to D.T.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Introduced commercially in 2002, transient elastography (FibroScan) can be used to evaluate liver stiffness and hepatic fat deposition in the absence of liver biopsy. To date, more than 300 accumulated studies have demonstrated the feasibility and usefulness of FibroScan methodology in adult patients with various liver conditions, including chronic hepatitis B and C, liver transplantation, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [1–11]. Although non-invasiveness is a key feature of effective evaluation methods not only for adults but also children, few studies have addressed the feasibility and usefulness of FibroScan specifically in pediatric populations [12–16].
One of the most important indications for the use of FibroScan methodology is in the evaluation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which can vary in presentation from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a leading cause of chronic liver disease in both adults and children [17–26]. The prevalence of NAFLD ranges from 2.6% to 9.6% [20–23] in children overall and from 22.5% to 44.0% in obese children in particular [20,21,24]. Because pediatric NAFLD can progress to cirrhosis, which has serious outcomes if left untreated [27,28], using FibroScan to effectively and non-invasively discriminate between simple fatty liver and NASH in obese children would be beneficial.
In this study, we sought to clarify the feasibility and usefulness of FibroScan in Japanese children, especially focusing on differences in the resulting liver profile (i.e., liver stiffness and hepatic fat deposition) between obese and non-obese pediatric populations.
Patients and Methods
Patients
The study population comprised pediatric patients (age, 1–18 years) who were examined by using FibroScan at the Department of Pediatrics at Osaka City University Hospital (Osaka, Japan) between April 2013 and August 2014. Patients in whom FibroScan evaluations were successful according to the criteria described later were divided into three groups: obese group; liver disease group; and control group (Fig 1). The obese group comprised patients whose body-mass index (BMI) was in the 90th percentile or higher and who lacked an underlying liver disease. Among patients whose BMI was lower than the 90th percentile, control subjects were defined as having normal serum liver enzyme levels, an aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) score below 0.5, a normal-appearing liver on abdominal ultrasonography (AUS), and no episodes of liver disease (Fig 1). Because APRI is a reliable negative predictive value for advanced liver disease [14,15,29,30], we included it in the determination of the control group. The remaining non-obese pediatric patients were defined as the liver disease group (Fig 1).
Patients who were examined by using FibroScan at a success rate of greater than 60% with 10 valid measurement and an interquartile range (IQR) of 30% or less than 30% of the median LSM value were analyzed for the study. Patients whose body mass index (BMI) was at the 90th percentile or higher and without underlying liver diseases were included in the obese group. Patients whose BMI was lower than the 90th percentile were divided into 2 groups: control group or liver disease group. The control group was defined as having normal serum liver enzyme levels, an aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) score below 0.5, a normal-appearing liver on abdominal ultrasonography, and no episodes of liver disease. The remaining patients were included in the liver disease group.
The Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine Ethics Committee specifically approved this study (the approved number: 2610). Written informed consent was obtained from each child’s parent or legal guardian, and written assent was obtained from children who were at least 6 years old, after children and each child’s parent or legal guardian were given, in writing, a full explanation of the aims of the study, its possible hazards, discomfort, and inconvenience. The ethics committee approved this consent procedure.
Evaluation of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP)
Values for LSM, a marker for liver fibrosis, and CAP, an indicator of hepatic fat deposition, were obtained by using FibroScan according to the manufacturer’s instructions [4]. All patients were evaluated by using the 3.5-MHz standard M probe (diameter, 7 mm), which can be used to measure both LSM and CAP. Although FibroScan’s S probe (5 MHz; diameter, 5 mm) is designed for small children [14], it can only be used to measure LSM. In addition, our preliminary study comparing the difference in LSM value between S and M probe demonstrated no significant difference (S1 Table). Because our study focused on the significance of simultaneous determination of LSM and CAP in children, we used the M probe in all of the pediatric patients in this study.
With the patient lying in the dorsal decubitus position, AUS was used to identify a region of the liver that was free of large vascular structures; the tip of the FibroScan transducer was then placed on the skin between the ribs over the right lobe of the liver, and the LSM value was recorded. The final LSM result was expressed in kilopascals (kPa) and was the median value of 10 individual valid measurements. CAP is a measure of the attenuation of ultrasound waves in the liver at 3.5 MHz that was measured at the same time as LSM by using the M probe. The final CAP value, which ranges from 100 to 400 decibels per meter (dB/m), is the median of 10 individual valid measurements. For each patient, the success rate was calculated as the ratio of the number of successful measurements to the total number attempted (expressed as a percentage). An examination was considered successful when 10 valid measurements with a success rate of at least 60% were taken and the interquartile range (IQR) was 30% or less than 30% of the median LSM value. Subjects with unsuccessful examinations were excluded from the analyses.
Clinical and biochemical parameters
Clinical parameters (height, body weight, and BMI) were collected on the same day that the FibroScan examination was performed. Biochemical parameters (serum AST, aspartate aminotransferase [ALT], triglycerides [TG], total cholesterol [T-Cho], hyaluronic acid [HA], and type IV collagen 7S [7S collagen] concentrations and APRI score) were measured within 3 months before or after the FibroScan examination [1,5]. APRI score was calculated by using the following formula: (AST / upper limit of normal × 100) / platelet count [29,30].
Liver ultrasonography
Liver ultrasonography was performed and evaluated by three experienced ultrasonographers. Fatty liver was diagnosed when the patient had a fatty liver infiltration score of 3 or greater on a scale of 6, as described previously [20]. Briefly, the infiltration score was the sum of the subscores for the following 3 criteria: (1) The contrast between the liver and kidney parenchyma (L–K contrast). Patients received a subscore of 2 when the L–K contrast was markedly increased, a subscore of 1 when there was a slight increase, and a subscore of 0 when there was a homogenous echo level and unclear L–K contrast; (2) The attenuation of echogenicity in the deep regions of the liver (deep attenuation). Patients received a subscore of 2 when deep attenuation was marked, a subscore of 1 when deep attenuation was modest, and a subscore of 0 when deep attenuation was absent; and (3) The blurring of liver blood vessel structures (vascular blurring). Patients received a subscore of 2 when vascular blurring was pronounced, a subscore of 1 when vascular blurring was moderate, and a subscore of 0 in the absence of vascular blurring.
Liver histology
A subset of 8 patients underwent liver biopsy. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections of biopsy specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin stains and Azan stain. The histologic features of the liver biopsies were scored according to the NAFLD activity scoring system proposed by Kleiner et al. [31] as follows: 0, no fibrosis; 1, periportal or perisinusoidal fibrosis; 2, perisinusoidal and portal or periportal fibrosis; 3, bridging fibrosis; and 4, cirrhosis. Fibrosis yielding a score of 2 or greater was considered clinically significant. Liver biopsy samples were then classified as definitive NASH, borderline NASH, or simple steatosis, as described [15].
Statistical analyses
The 3 groups were compared by using the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables. When the Kruskal–Wallis test identified a significant difference (P < 0.05), the Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction was used to identify the source of difference. Two-sided P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Correlations between variables were described by using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Spearman’s ρ values > 0.4 were considered indicative of positive correlation. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors affecting liver stiffness.
Results
FibroScan is feasible irrespective of age in children
Among the 214 children (1.3–17.6 years; 121 male) examined, 201 children (93.9%; median age, 11.5 years; range, 1.3–17.6 years; 115 male) were successfully evaluated by using FibroScan (Figs 1 and 2). Evaluations were unsuccessful in the remaining 13 children (6.1%; median age, 13.1 years; range, 2.0–17.2 years; 6 male) (S2 Table) due to excessive thickness of subcutaneous adipose tissue in 5 obese children (BMI percentile [mean ± 1 SD], 99.6 ± 2.2), poor cooperation in 4 young children (2.0, 3.7, 4.0, and 6.2 years), and no obvious reason in 4 non-obese and cooperative children (Figs 1 and 2 and S2 Table). These results demonstrate that FibroScan evaluation is feasible in children of all ages.
A total of 214 children and adolescents (age, 1.3–17.6 years; 121 male) were examined by using FibroScan. A total of 201 patients (93.9%; median age, 11.5 years; range, 1.3–17.6 years) (black bars) were examined successfully; the evaluation was unsuccessful in the remaining 13 patients (6.1%; median age, 13.1 years; range, 2.0–17.2 years) (gray bars) due to excessive thickness of subcutaneous adipose tissue in 5 obese children (BMI percentile [mean ± 1 SD], 99.6 ± 2.2), poor cooperation in 4 young children (2.0, 3.7, 4.0, and 6.2 years), and no obvious reason in 4 non-obese and cooperative children.
Childhood and adolescent obesity is associated with elevated levels of AST, ALT, TG, and APRI
The clinical and biochemical profiles of each group are summarized in Table 1. AST, ALT, TG, and APRI values were significantly (P < 0.001 for AST, ALT and TG; P = 0.006 for APRI) higher in obese patients compared with the control group; these parameters did not differ between the obese and liver disease groups (Table 1). HA and 7S collagen concentrations were not statistically different among the three groups (Table 1).
FibroScan results correlate highly with histologic and ultrasonographic grading
Although the reliability of FibroScan has been well studied in adults [1–11], its reliability specifically in children needed to be verified. We therefore compared the FibroScan results with the histologic findings and AUS fatty liver infiltration scores of our pediatric study population (Fig 3). Because of the invasiveness of the procedure, only 8 of our subjects (S3 Table) underwent liver biopsy. The underlying conditions in this patient subset were simple obesity in 4 patients, type C hepatitis in 2 patients, type B hepatitis associated with obesity in 1 patient, and liver transplantation for treatment of congenital biliary atresia in 1 patient (S3 Table). Among the 5 obese patients (CAP, 314 ± 56 dB/m; LSM, 7.9 ± 3.9 kPa), 4 patients (CAP, 337 ± 30 dB/m; LSM, 8.9 ± 3.6 kPa) were diagnosed with NASH; the remaining patient (CAP, 225 dB/m; LSM, 3.8 kPa) was diagnosed with simple steatosis (S3 Table). Comparison of the biochemical data, the FibroScan data and histologic assessment revealed that HA and 7S collagen were mildly correlated (ρ = 0.690 and ρ = 0.423, respectively) with the fibrosis stage, whereas the LSM value was highly correlated (ρ = 0.920) with the fibrosis stage and the CAP value was highly correlated (ρ = 0.792) with the steatosis grade (Fig 3). In addition, the CAP values were highly correlated (ρ = 0.713) with the fatty liver infiltration score calculated from AUS findings (Fig 3).
a and b. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) values from FibroScan evaluations were compared with histologic fibrosis stage and steatosis grade. Liver biopsy was performed in 8 pediatric patients, in which the underlying disease was simple obesity in 4 patients, type C hepatitis in 2 patients, type B hepatitis associated with obesity in 1 patient, and liver transplantation for treatment of congenital biliary atresia in 1 patient. Among the 5 obese patients, four patients were diagnosed with NASH, and the remaining patient was diagnosed with simple steatosis. a. Correlation between LSM value and histologic fibrosis stage. LSM was highly correlated with fibrosis stage (Spearman’s ρ = 0.920). b. Correlation between CAP value and histologic steatosis grade. CAP value was highly correlated with steatosis grade (ρ = 0.792). c. Correlation between CAP and fatty liver infiltration score calculated according to AUS findings. CAP was highly correlated with AUS fatty liver infiltration score (ρ = 0.713).
Obese children have more liver stiffness and fat deposition than do non-obese children
The CAP value was significantly higher in the obese group (285 ± 60 dB/m) than in both the control group (179 ± 41, P < 0.001) and the liver disease group (202 ± 62, P < 0.001) (Fig 4). The LSM value was significantly higher in the obese group (5.5 ± 2.3 kPa) than in the control group (3.9 ± 0.9, P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in LSM between the liver disease group (5.4 ± 4.2) and either the obese or control group (Fig 4). When the correlation of CAP and LSM was evaluated among the 3 groups, LSM was highly correlated with CAP in the obese group (ρ = 0.511) but did not show significant correlation in the control (ρ = 0.129) or liver disease (ρ = 0.170) group (Fig 5). These results indicate that childhood obesity is highly associated with hepatic fat deposition and liver stiffness and that hepatic fat deposition correlates with liver stiffness in the obese pediatric population.
a. CAP was significantly higher in the obese group (mean ± 1 SD, 285 ± 60 dB/m) compared with both the control group (179 ± 41 dB/m; P < 0.001) and the liver disease group (202 ± 62 dB/m; P < 0.001). b. LSM was significantly higher in the obese group (5.5 ± 2.3 kPa) than in the control group (3.9 ± 0.9 kPa, P < 0.001) but did not differ between the liver disease group (5.4 ± 4.2 kPa) and either the obese or control group.
LSM was positively correlated with CAP in the obese group (Spearman’s ρ = 0.511) but not in the control (ρ = 0.129) or liver disease (ρ = 0.170) group.
ALT correlates positively with LSM and CAP in obese children
Among the biochemical markers shown in Table 2 (AST, ALT, TG, T-Cho, APRI, 7S collagen, and HA), the CAP value was positively correlated (ρ = 0.446) with ALT in the obese group but was not significantly correlated with any biochemical marker in either the control or liver disease group. The LSM value was positively correlated with AST (ρ = 0.730), ALT (ρ = 0.772), and APRI (ρ = 0.788) in the obese group but was not significantly correlated with any biochemical marker in either the control or liver disease group. In multivariate analysis, APRI, age, BMI percentile, and ALT levels were the independent predictors of liver stiffness in all subjects, whereas ALT and age were the independent predictors of liver stiffness in the obese group (S4 Table).
Discussion
FibroScan simultaneously obtains both LSM and CAP data, thus achieving rapid quantification of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis, respectively [4,5] and allowing noninvasive discrimination between simple steatosis and NASH in patients with NAFLD. However, the suitability of FibroScan for use in the pediatric population and reliable indicators for its application remained to be clarified because fewer studies have been conducted in children than in adults [12–15]. The present study clarified the feasibility of FibroScan in Japanese children. In addition, we disclosed that Japanese obese children, particularly those with elevated ALT levels, are at risk for both hepatic steatosis and fibrosis and therefore are good candidates for FibroScan screening.
The first important finding of the current study is that Japanese obese children and adolescents showed increased CAP and LSM values compared with those in non-obese subjects as well as significant correlation of these values. Because liver stiffness correlates with the histologic stage of liver fiborosis, our results indicate that childhood obesity is highly associated with hepatic fat deposition and fibrosis and that hepatic fat deposition is correlated with liver fibrosis in the obese pediatric population. Therefore, FibroScan offers the advantage of simultaneously determining CAP and LSM values and thus may play an important role in hepatic evaluations, especially in obese children. In contrast, LSM values in the obese population need to be interpreted carefully, because several factors in addition to liver fibrosis influence liver stiffness [32, 33]. In other studies, liver stiffness increased with the central venous pressure in patients with congestive heart failure [32], and the LSM was mildly elevated in patients with steatohepatitis, perhaps secondary to inflammation [33]. Obesity in the children in our study was highly associated with hepatic fat deposition and increased serum aminotransferase. Because steatohepatitis might affect the LSM values in an obese population, the significance of the LSM value in obese children merits investigation in a future study.
The second important aspect of our current findings is the value of the ALT measurement prior to FibroScan screening. Our results showed that, although childhood and adolescent obesity were associated with elevated levels of AST, ALT, TG, and APRI, only ALT positively correlated with both LSM and CAP values in the obese group. Because NAFLD is the major chronic liver disease of obese children, effective screening for NAFLD is an important task in the management of obesity. In this regard, an elevated ALT level is the primary laboratory abnormality in patients with NAFLD [34], but not all patients with NAFLD have elevated levels of ALT [26,35], and the diagnostic sensitivity of serum ALT for NASH is only about 40% [36]. Together our current results and previous findings indicate that ALT is an important biomarker that is suggestive of but not diagnostic of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Therefore, although FibroScan screening to evaluate liver stiffness and steatosis is a priority for obese children with elevated ALT levels, this imaging method should be considered even for obese children with normal ALT concentrations.
Another important feature of FibroScan is its feasibility in children. Our study showed that FibroScan can be performed highly successfully in patients representing a wide age range (1 to 18 years). However, 6.1% of measurements were invalid in 214 consecutive examinations. Previous studies using FibroScan have reported a failure rate of 5%~11% in adults [11, 37, 38], and one pediatric study [14] reported a failure rate of 15% in healthy children. Factors independently associated with FibroScan measurement failure in adult subjects include female sex, high BMI, and metabolic syndrome [11]. In addition, BMI and central obesity were independent risk factors for unreliable LSM in Chinese adult patients [38]. In a pediatric study [14], the highest failure rate was recorded for children younger than 6 years.
In our study, 2 important reasons for measurement failure were the excessive thickness of the subcutaneous adipose tissue in obese adolescents and the poor cooperation of young children (2.0, 3.7, 4.0, and 6.2 years). Because patients must be immobile during FibroScan imaging, we speculate that young children may require sedation for the procedure. In addition, because the region of interest for the measurement of liver stiffness with the M probe lies 2.5 cm below the skin surface, excessively thick subcutaneous adipose tissue is an important risk factor for measurement failure. In this regard, the differences in body composition associated with different ethnicities may influence obesity-induced measurement failure, and additional studies should be accumulated. Overall, previous findings and our current results indicate that FibroScan methodology is feasible in pediatric subjects of diverse ages, but poor cooperation in young children and the degree of obesity should be weighed as risk factors for measurement failure.
The ‘gold standard’ for the evaluation of NAFLD and chronic hepatitides B and C is a liver biopsy [26]; however, this painful, invasive procedure is associated with several complications and therefore is unsuitable for routine screening or repeated examination in children. Alternatively AUS is a first-line screening tool for fatty liver [20,26,39,40], but results can vary depending on the skill of the examiner. Although computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are both reliable techniques for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis [41,42], CT exposes the patient to radiation, and both modalities are time-consuming and expensive, and require sedation. Furthermore, there is no consensus regarding the quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis, although a few studies have shown potential benefits of CT or MRI [43,44]. Given that non-invasiveness is a key feature of diagnostic modalities for children, the non-radiative and painless characteristics of FibroScan combined with its applicability to a broad age range make this methodology particularly suitable for pediatric patients and may encourage its use by pediatricians.
Our study has several limitations. First, because we were unable to collect a large number of cases in which liver biopsy was performed, we were unable to define cut-off values of LSM and CAP for determining the degree of liver fibrosis and hepatic fat deposition. However we were able to verify high correlation between FibroScan parameters and liver histology scores (Fig 3). A second limitation is that the subjects in our study were not enrolled from the general population but from pediatric patients who visited our hospital; therefore FibroScan results may differ between the control patients in our study and healthy individuals in general population. In addition, liver disease group comprised of patients with very different etiologies or no underlying hepatologic disease, thus the etiology-based characteristics of FibroScan results is uncertain in liver disease group. However our study focused on differences in the liver profile between obese patients and non-obese patients with or without liver disease, and revealed that FibroScan screening should focus on the liver stiffness for the non-obese patients with liver disease in spite of the etiology, whereas screening should focus on the evaluation of both liver stiffness and steatosis for the obese patients. Our findings have contributed to showing the usefulness of FibroScan screening in a hospital-based pediatric population.
In conclusion, the present study revealed that FibroScan was feasible irrespective of age in Japanese children. Therefore FibroScan imaging, which provides simultaneous determination of CAP and LSM, is a non-invasive and effective screening method for hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis in Japanese obese children, particularly those with elevated serum ALT.
Supporting Information
S1 Table. Comparison of LSM values obtained by using the S and M probes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137239.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Profiles of the 13 patients with measurement failure.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137239.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Profiles of the 8 patients who had liver biopsy.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137239.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Table. Multivariate regression analysis for factors associated with liver stiffness.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137239.s004
(DOCX)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: YC DT HS. Performed the experiments: YC DT. Analyzed the data: YC DT YK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YC DT HM EH MH TH AT TK NK. Wrote the paper: YC DT HM NK HS.
References
- 1. Takeda T, Yasuda T, Nakayama Y, Nakaya M, Kimura M, Yamashita M, et al. Usefulness of noninvasive transient elastography for assessment of liver fibrosis stage in chronic hepatitis C. World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12: 7768–7773. pmid:17203518
- 2. Kawamoto M, Mizuguchi T, Katsuramaki T, Nagayama M, Oshima H, Kawasaki H, et al. Assessment of liver fibrosis by a noninvasive method of transient elastography and biochemical markers. World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12: 4325–4330. pmid:16865773
- 3. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003; 29: 1705–1713. pmid:14698338
- 4. Myers RP, Pollett A, Kirsch R, Pomier-Layrargues G, Beaton M, Levstik M, et al. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a noninvasive method for the detection of hepatic steatosis based on transient elastography. Liver Int. 2012; 32: 902–910. pmid:22435761
- 5. Sasso M, Tengher-Barna I, Ziol M, Miette V, Fournier C, Sandrin L, et al. Novel controlled attenuation parameter for noninvasive assessment of steatosis using Fibroscan: validation in chronic hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat. 2012; 19: 244–253. pmid:22404722
- 6. de Lédinghen V, Vergniol J, Foucher J, Merrouche W, le Bail B. Non-invasive diagnosis of liver steatosis using controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and transient elastography. Liver Int. 2012; 32: 911–918. pmid:22672642
- 7. Goyal R, Mallick SR, Mahanta M, Kedia S, Shalimar , Dhingra R, et al. Fibroscan can avoid liver biopsy in Indian patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 28: 1738–1745. pmid:23808910
- 8. Kim SU, Jang HW, Cheong JY, Kim JK, Lee MH, Kim DJ, et al. The usefulness of liver stiffness measurement using FibroScan in chronic hepatitis C in South Korea: a multicenter, prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 26: 171–178. pmid:21175811
- 9. Sánchez Antolin G, Garcia Pajares F, Vallecillo MA, Fernandez Orcajo P, Gómez de la Cuesta S, Alcaide N, et al. FibroScan evaluation of liver fibrosis in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2009; 41: 1044–1046. pmid:19376422
- 10. Friedrich-Rust M, Hadji-Hosseini H, Kriener S, Herrmann E, Sircar I, Kau A, et al. Transient elastography with a new probe for obese patients for non-invasive staging of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 2390–2396. pmid:20526777
- 11. de Lédinghen V, Vergniol J, Capdepont M, Chermak F, Hiriart JB, Cassinotto C, et al. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for the diagnosis of steatosis: a prospective study of 5323 examinations. J Hepatol. 2014; 60: 1026–1031. pmid:24378529
- 12. Goldschmidt I, Streckenbach C, Dingemann C, Pfister ED, di Nanni A, Zapf A, et al. Application and limitations of transient liver elastography in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013; 57: 109–113. pmid:23539048
- 13. de Lédinghen V, Le Bail B, Rebouissoux L, Fournier C, Foucher J, Miette V, et al. Liver stiffness measurement in children using FibroScan: feasibility study and comparison with Fibrotest, aspartate transaminase to platelets ratio index, and liver biopsy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007; 45: 443–450. pmid:18030211
- 14. Engelmann G, Gebhardt C, Wenning D, Wühl E, Hoffmann GF, Selmi B, et al. Feasibility study and control values of transient elastography in healthy children. Eur J Pediatr. 2012; 171: 353–60. pmid:21861093
- 15. Alkhouri N, Sedki E, Alisi A, Lopez R, Pinzani M, Feldstein AE, et al. Combined paediatric NAFLD fibrosis index and transient elastography to predict clinically significant fibrosis in children with fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2013; 33: 79–85. pmid:23146095
- 16. Lee CK, Perez-Atayde AR, Mitchell PD, Raza R, Afdhal NH, Jonas MM. Serum biomarkers and transient elastography as predictors of advanced liver fibrosis in a United States cohort: the Boston Children’s Hospital experience. J Pediatr. 2013; 163: 1058–1064. pmid:23759423
- 17. Farrell GC, Larter CZ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2006; 43: S99–S112. pmid:16447287
- 18. Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, Torres DM, Shaw J, Contreras M, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2011; 140: 124–131. pmid:20858492
- 19. Loomba R, Sirlin CB, Schwimmer JB, Lavine JE. Advances in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2009; 50: 1282–1293. pmid:19637286
- 20. Tominaga K, Kurata JH, Chen YK, Fujimoto E, Miyagawa S, Abe I, et al. Prevalence of fatty liver in Japanese children and relationship to obesity. An epidemiological ultrasonographic survey. Dig Dis Sci. 1995; 40: 2002–2009. pmid:7555456
- 21. Schwimmer JB, Deutsch R, Kahen T, Lavine JE, Stanley C, Behling C. Prevalence of fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2006; 118: 1388–1393. pmid:17015527
- 22. Strauss RS, Barlow SE, Dietz WH. Prevalence of abnormal serum aminotransferase values in overweight and obese adolescents. J Pediatr. 2000; 136: 727–733. pmid:10839867
- 23. Park HS, Han JH, Choi KM, Kim SM. Relation between elevated serum alanine aminotransferase and metabolic syndrome in Korean adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 82: 1046–1051. pmid:16280437
- 24. Sartorio A, Del Col A, Agosti F, Mazzilli G, Bellentani S, Tiribelli C, et al. Predictors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in obese children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007; 61: 877–883. pmid:17151586
- 25. Ekstedt M, Franzén LE, Mathiesen UL, Thorelius L, Holmqvist M, Bodemar G, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology. 2006; 44: 865–873. pmid:17006923
- 26. Vajro P, Lenta S, Socha P, Dhawan A, McKiernan P, Baumann U, et al. Diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: position paper of the ESPGHAN Hepatology Committee. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012; 54: 700–713. pmid:22395188
- 27. Feldstein AE, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Treeprasertsuk S, Benson JT, Enders FB,Angulo P. The natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children: a follow-up study for up to 20 years. Gut. 2009; 58: 1538–1544. pmid:19625277
- 28. Molleston JP, White F, Teckman J, Fitzgerald JF. Obese children with steatohepatitis can develop cirrhosis in childhood. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97: 2460–2462. pmid:12358273
- 29. Lebensztejn DM, Skiba E, Sobaniec-Lotowska M, Kaczmarski M. A simple noninvasive index (APRI) predicts advanced liver fibrosis in children with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2005; 41: 1434–1435. pmid:15915470
- 30. Forns X, Ampurdanès S, Llovet JM, Aponte J, Quintó L, Martínez-Bauer E, et al. Identification of chronic hepatitis C patients without hepatic fibrosis by a simple predictive model. Hepatology. 2002; 36: 986–992. pmid:12297848
- 31. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, Cummings OW, et al. Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005; 41: 1313–1321. pmid:15915461
- 32. Millonig G, Friedrich S, Adolf S, Fonouni H, Golriz M, Mehrabi A, Stiefel P, Pöschl G, Büchler MW, Seitz HK, Mueller S. Liver stiffness is directly influenced by central venous pressure. J Hepatol. 2010; 52: 206–10. pmid:20022130
- 33. Mueller S, Millonig G, Sarovska L, Friedrich S, Reimann FM, Pritsch M, Eisele S, Stickel F, Longerich T, Schirmacher P, Seitz HK. Increased liver stiffness in alcoholic liver disease: differentiating fibrosis from steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16: 966–72. pmid:20180235
- 34. Ratziu V, Giral P, Charlotte F, Bruckert E, Thibault V, Theodorou I, et al. Liver fibrosis in overweight patients. Gastroenterology. 2000; 118: 1117–1123. pmid:10833486
- 35. Mofrad P, Contos MJ, Haque M, Sargeant C, Fisher RA, Luketic VA, et al. Clinical and histologic spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease associated with normal ALT values. Hepatology. 2003; 37: 1286–1292. pmid:12774006
- 36. Kunde SS, Lazenby AJ, Clements RH, Abrams GA. Spectrum of NAFLD and diagnostic implications of the proposed new normal range for serum ALT in obese women. Hepatology. 2005; 42: 650–656. pmid:16037946
- 37. Roulot D, Czernichow S, Le Clesiau H, Costes J, Vergnaud A, Beaugrand M. Liver stiffness values in apparently healthy subjects: influence of gender and metabolic syndrome. J Hepatol. 2008; 48: 606–613. pmid:18222014
- 38. Wong GL, Wong VW, Chim AM, Yiu KK, Chu SH, Li MK, et al. Factors associated with unreliable liver stiffness measurement and its failure with transient elastography in the Chinese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 26: 300–305. pmid:21261720
- 39. Needleman L, Kurtz AB, Rifkin MD, Cooper HS, Pasto ME, Goldberg BB. Sonography of diffuse benign liver disease: accuracy of pattern recognition and grading. Am J Roentgenol. 1986; 146: 1011–1015.
- 40. Saverymuttu SH, Joseph AE, Maxwell JD. Ultrasound scanning in the detection of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis. Br Med J. (Clin Res Ed). 1986; 292: 13–15.
- 41. Pacifico L, Celestre M, Anania C, Paolantonio P, Chiesa C, Laghi A. MRI and ultrasound for hepatic fat quantification: relationships to clinical and metabolic characteristics of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Acta Paediatr. 2007; 96: 542–547. pmid:17306008
- 42. Bohte AE, van Werven JR, Bipat S, Stoker J. The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI, and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21: 87–97. pmid:20680289
- 43. Lewin M, Poujol-Robert A, Boëlle PY, Wendum D, Lasnier E, Viallon M. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2007; 46: 658–665. pmid:17663420
- 44. Ohtomo K, Baron RL, Dodd GD 3rd, Federle MP, Miller WJ, Campbell WL. Confluent hepatic fibrosis in advanced cirrhosis: appearance at CT. Radiology. 1993; 188: 31–5. pmid:8511316