Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genome Wide Expression Profiling of Cancer Cell Lines Cultured in Microgravity Reveals Significant Dysregulation of Cell Cycle and MicroRNA Gene Networks

  • Prasanna Vidyasekar,

    Affiliation Stem cell and Molecular Biology laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

  • Pavithra Shyamsunder,

    Affiliation Stem cell and Molecular Biology laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

  • Rajpranap Arun,

    Affiliation Stem cell and Molecular Biology laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

  • Rajalakshmi Santhakumar,

    Affiliation Stem cell and Molecular Biology laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

  • Nand Kishore Kapadia,

    Affiliation Department of cardiothoracic Surgery, Global Hospital, Perumbakkam, Chennai, India

  • Ravi Kumar,

    Affiliation Department of cardiology, Fortis Malar Hospital, Adyar, Chennai, India

  • Rama Shanker Verma

    Affiliation Stem cell and Molecular Biology laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India


Zero gravity causes several changes in metabolic and functional aspects of the human body and experiments in space flight have demonstrated alterations in cancer growth and progression. This study reports the genome wide expression profiling of a colorectal cancer cell line-DLD-1, and a lymphoblast leukemic cell line-MOLT-4, under simulated microgravity in an effort to understand central processes and cellular functions that are dysregulated among both cell lines. Altered cell morphology, reduced cell viability and an aberrant cell cycle profile in comparison to their static controls were observed in both cell lines under microgravity. The process of cell cycle in DLD-1 cells was markedly affected with reduced viability, reduced colony forming ability, an apoptotic population and dysregulation of cell cycle genes, oncogenes, and cancer progression and prognostic markers. DNA microarray analysis revealed 1801 (upregulated) and 2542 (downregulated) genes (>2 fold) in DLD-1 cultures under microgravity while MOLT-4 cultures differentially expressed 349 (upregulated) and 444 (downregulated) genes (>2 fold) under microgravity. The loss in cell proliferative capacity was corroborated with the downregulation of the cell cycle process as demonstrated by functional clustering of DNA microarray data using gene ontology terms. The genome wide expression profile also showed significant dysregulation of post transcriptional gene silencing machinery and multiple microRNA host genes that are potential tumor suppressors and proto-oncogenes including MIR22HG, MIR17HG and MIR21HG. The MIR22HG, a tumor-suppressor gene was one of the highest upregulated genes in the microarray data showing a 4.4 log fold upregulation under microgravity. Real time PCR validated the dysregulation in the host gene by demonstrating a 4.18 log fold upregulation of the miR-22 microRNA. Microarray data also showed dysregulation of direct targets of miR-22, SP1, CDK6 and CCNA2.


Microgravity on space flights has been shown to affect the physiology of a cell considerably [1]. Normal gravity (1 g) affects 2-Dimensional culture by depositing cells on the surface of the tissue culture plate (TCP) where anchorage-dependent cells adhere and proliferate as a monolayer with very limited cell–cell interactions. The weightlessness and reduced acceleration (less than 1 g) in space, removes the effect of gravity, allowing cell cultures in space to have unhindered movement of the culture medium, a shear free environment and, as cells are not bound by any directional force, unrestricted movement of cells within the medium. Under such conditions cells tend to coalesce and form aggregates creating three dimensional (3D) environments where they interact on multiple planes [2]. The effect of reduced gravity is not restricted to changes in culture conditions as the unique environment can produce changes in the fundamental physiology of the cell. While the mechanism of action of how gravity, or the lack of it, affects molecular and cellular functions is still unclear, it has been established that microgravity or zero gravity affects vital processes of the cell and importantly, microgravity has been shown to alter cancer growth and progression [35]. However, different cancers respond differently to microgravity by losing or enhancing cellular processes and functions. In this study we cultured cell lines representative of solid and hematological tumors—DLD-1, MOLT-4 and HL-60 in a rotating cell culture system (RCCS) that simulated microgravity. The RCCS is a mechanical system that simulates reduced gravity on earth by canceling the directional vector through constant rotation of a High Aspect Ratio Vessel (HARV). This maintains cells in a constant free fall and a shear free environment allowing cells to coalesce and form 3D aggregates [2]. These aggregates are maintained in free fall and experience conditions of reduced gravity for the remainder of the culture period. We hypothesized that physiological changes to the cell functions such as cell proliferation and viability could be corroborated with changes in fundamental processes of the cell such as gene expression. To relate physiological changes such as an altered cell cycle profile with dysregulation of gene expression, real time PCR analysis for cell cycle genes, oncogenes and cancer development and progression markers was carried out. Genome wide expression profiling by DNA microarray of these cell lines cultured under microgravity revealed the dysregulation of several pathways in cancer and importantly, corroborated with observed physiological changes to the cell. We also used the gene expression profile to investigate dysregulation in pathways central to cancer such as the Notch signaling system and dysregulation in post transcriptional gene silencing machinery. The gene expression profile also revealed dysregulation of microRNA host genes in microgravity including the significant tumor suppressor, miR-22 in DLD-1.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

DLD-1 is an epithelial, adherent cell line derived from a colorectal adenocarcinoma (Dukes type C). MOLT-4 is a T lymphoblast, suspension cell line derived from an acute lymphoblastic leukemia while the HL-60 cell line is a promyeloblast derived from acute promyelocytic leukemia. Cell lines were procured from the National centre for cell science, Pune, India and were maintained in DMEM-F12 (DLD-1) or RPMI1640 (MOLT-4, HL-60) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, USA) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator in 25mm3 tissue culture plates (TCP) and in 10ml3 high aspect ratio vessels (HARV) within a rotating cell culture system (RCCS). The cell lines were introduced into the 10ml HARV through 5ml syringes and a rotating speed of 27 revolutions per minute (RPM) was standardized based on the aggregation of DLD-1 cells loaded at 0.5 x 106 cells within 24 to 48 hours. Cells were grown in HARV for a maximum of 72 hours with additional medium injected into the HARV every 16 to 24 hrs to prevent foaming or air bubbles. Contents of the HARV were transferred to 60mm TCP, without dissociating cell aggregates, for routine micrographic observation and other cell based assays by using 10ml pipettes. 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA was used for dissociation of cell aggregates and monolayer cultures when required.

Total RNA extraction and cDNA conversion

Total RNA was extracted from cells using RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germany). 2 × 106 cells were centrifuged and washed twice with PBS. RNA was isolated from these cells as per the manufacturer's instructions. 1.5 μg of total RNA was converted to cDNA using MMLV-RT (Thermo scientific, USA) and Oligo-dT primers (NEB, USA). miRNA conversion to cDNA was carried out using stem-loop reverse transcriptase (RT) primers without dithiothreitol (DTT) and the RNA denaturation step to maintain integrity of the stem-loop primer.

Microarray analysis

Microarray analysis was performed with RNA samples from DLD-1 and MOLT-4 cell lines grown under microgravity and under static conditions in replicates. Expression data for each sample was obtained on the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Primeview Array. Hybridization was carried out for a duration of 16 hours at 60 rpm at 48°C and scanned on the GeneChip microarray Scanner 3000 7G. Raw data was extracted after scanning of slides and raw data sets were analyzed using GeneSpring GX 12.6 software followed by differential gene expression (DE), fold change & cluster analysis.

Gene ontology analysis

The DE genes were studied for their overabundance in different Gene ontology (GO) terms as well as pathways using the microarray analysis software DAVID (The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery) [6]. Two tools in the DAVID program were used, gene functional classification tool and the functional annotation clustering tool. The DAVID functional annotation tool was used to highlight relevant GO terms associated with the submitted gene list by grouping similar, redundant, and heterogeneous annotation contents from the same or different resources into annotation groups based on the hypothesis that similar annotations should have similar gene members. Gene enrichment is based on set of submitted genes that are highly associated with certain terms, which is statistically measured by Fisher Exact in DAVID system. In this study, we used the group enrichment score which is the geometric mean of all p-values of individual members in a corresponding annotation cluster. A higher score indicates a highly enriched cluster which in turn indicates the biological significance of the cluster in the list.

Real time PCR amplification

Real time PCR was carried out using SYBR green Real time PCR kit from Qiagen on an Eppendorf mastercycler, ep realplex (Eppendorf, Germany). Relative mRNA expression was determined by normalization to the expression of a housekeeping gene, beta-actin and U6 for microRNA gene expression. Primer list is provided in S1 Table.

Western blotting

Cells were lysed with Radio Immuno Precipitation Assay (RIPA) buffer, mixed with Laemmli sample buffer (1×) and boiled. Proteins were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto BioRad, 0.22 μM nitrocellulose membrane (BioRad Laboratories, USA). Membrane was blocked with Tris-buffered saline plus 0.2% Tween 20 (TBS-T) containing 3% BSA (Sigma Aldrich, USA) followed by primary antibody incubation overnight and washing with TBS-T buffer. Secondary antibody (anti-mouse, HRP conjugate, 1:10000 Sigma Aldrich USA) diluted in blocking buffer was incubated for 1 h at room temperature and washed again with TBS-T. Antibody-reactive proteins were detected by means of enhanced chemiluminescence, Amersham ECL Plus western blotting detection reagents (GE health care, UK). Antibody details are provided in S1 Table.

Flow cytometry for cell cycle analysis

The cells were harvested and washed in PBS before fixation in cold 70% ethanol which was added drop wise to the pellet while vortexing. Cells were fixed for 30 min at 4°C. Fixed cells were washed twice in PBS and spun at 250g in a centrifuge. Cells were incubated with 50 μl of a 100 μg/ml stock of RNase and 200 μl Propidium Iodide (from 50 μg/ml stock solution). A BD FACSCalibur (USA) flow cytometer was used to analyze the cell population for cell cycle changes.

CFU- assay

Cells were cultured in methyl cellulose at 10X of final concentration (0.3 mL of cells to 3 mL of Methyl cellulose). Tubes were vortexed to ensure cells and components were thoroughly mixed. Methyl cellulose was dispensed using a 3cc syringe and evenly spread in the dish by gentle swirling. Cultures were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 in air and ≥95% humidity. Colonies were then stained with crystal violet (0.5mg/ml in 1% methanol) for 20 minutes and air dried after washing in distilled water. Stained colonies were visualized under a Nikon eclipse Ti phase contrast microscope.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were carried out in replicates and results were expressed as mean ± S.D. Statistical significance was calculated by using student t-test with the Prism 5 program (GraphPad software, USA).

Results and Discussion

Culture of cells in microgravity

Availability of a surface to adhere for cells on the TCP is a stimulus for growth for adherent cells such as DLD-1 and therefore, static cultures in TCP were confluent (Fig 1A). Slow rotations per minute (RPM) of the HARV (16 RPM, Fig 1B) did not allow the cells to coalesce but cells could form aggregates at 27 RPM (Fig 1C). Staining with AO/EB demonstrated no cell death in static TCP cultures (Fig 1D) but revealed cell death in microgravity cultures of DLD1 at 16 RPM (Fig 1E). Cell viability was improved when cells aggregated at 27 RPM (Fig 1F). When these cell aggregates were enzymatically dissociated and cultured in a TCP after 48 hours in microgravity, cells took 48 hours to adhere (Fig 1G, Day 2) while cells from static cultures adhered within 24 hours (Fig 1G, Day 1) and produced confluent cultures by day 4. Microgravity has been shown to affect several cell functions [7] and the expression or functioning of cell adhesion molecules could be affected [8] reducing the number of DLD-1 cells that could adhere to the TCP. When such cell aggregates were plated in TCP without enzymatic dissociation, the morphology of DLD-1 cells was altered (Fig 1H and 1I). Crystal violet staining of cells grown in static monolayer culture shows the typical morphology of DLD-1 cells (Fig 1H) while cell aggregates assume a growth pattern similar to an explant culture and peripheral cells contained a large cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig 1I). The enlarged cell maybe due to the cytoskeletal changes during growth in microgravity [9] or cells, having lost control over the cell cycle, may accumulate pre-mitotic protein in the cytoplasm with polyploidy in the nucleus [9] increasing in size. A colony forming assay (CFA) on DLD-1 cultures in microgravity shifted to static TCP after enzymatic dissociation (Fig 1J and 1K) revealed the reduced potential of DLD-1 cells to form colonies (Fig 1K) as compared to static cells (Fig 1J). The reduced proliferative capacity of cultures in microgravity was confirmed by a cell viability assay using MTT. Static cultures were 41% more viable than 27 RPM cultures and 75% more viable than 16 RPM cultures in microgravity (Fig 2A). When these results are taken together, microgravity appears to significantly affect the viability and proliferation of DLD-1 cells. Flow cytometry analysis of PI loaded DLD-1 cells cultured under microgravity was compared to the cell cycle profile of cultures in static TCP and static suspension on agar underlay (Fig 2B, 2C and 2D). From lack of anchorage, static suspension cell cultures on agar also aggregate similar to the RCCS, however the simulation of microgravity is absent. DLD-1 cultures in microgravity had a substantial population of cells in the sub G0 phase although a large population of cells was still viable in microgravity (Fig 2C). Static monolayer, TCP cultures were completely viable (Fig 2B) and significantly, the static suspension cultures did not demonstrate a sub G0 phase and had profile similar to the static control (Fig 2D). Fig 2E shows the average sub G0 phase population across the three culture conditions in replicates of cell cycle analysis, which confirmed that reduced viability was an exclusive effect of microgravity in DLD-1 cell aggregates. The MOLT-4 cell line grows as a suspension culture and it did not aggregate favorably in microgravity at high or low RPMs, showing individual cells in the HARV (Fig 2F, 16 RPM HARV). However, cell viability was reduced by 20% as compared to the static control in both RPM at 48 hours (Fig 2G) which correlated with reduced cell numbers under microscopic observation after 48 hours (Fig 2F, 16 RPM HARV). Flow cytometry detected a small apoptotic population (Sub G0 stage) in cell cycle analysis of MOLT-4 cultures in microgravity at 16 RPM (Fig 2H and 2I).

Fig 1. Effect of microgravity on cell morphology and cell viability of DLD-1 cell cultures.

A DLD-1 cell cultures; Static culture (control) B DLD-1 Microgravity culture at 16 RPM C DLD-1 Microgravity culture at 27RPM Differential staining to detect apoptotic population D DLD-1Static monolayer cultures E Microgravity cultures of DLD1 at 16 RPM F Microgravity cultures of DLD1 at 27 RPM G Cell adhesion and proliferation assay Top panel—static cultures, bottom panel—microgravity cultures shifted to static TCP H Morphological changes in DLD-1; Crystal violet staining of DLD-1 cells in static monolayer culture I Crystal violet staining of DLD-1 cells after transfer of cell aggregates from microgravity to TCP J Colony forming ability assay; Static cultures K Colony forming ability assay; DLD-1 cells after transfer of cell aggregates from microgravity to TCP

Fig 2. Effect of microgravity on cell viability and cell cycle of DLD-1 and MOLT-4 cell lines.

A Cell viability assay for DLD-1 cells; Viability measured for microgravity cultures (16 RPM and 27 RPM) and static cultures using MTT B Cell cycle analysis for DLD-1 cells; Static C Cell cycle analysis; Microgravity D Cell cycle analysis; Static suspensions on agar underlays E The average sub G0 population in replicates of cell cycle analysis for microgravity, static and static suspension cultures of DLD-1 cells F MOLT-4 cell culture Static and Microgravity cultures of MOLT-4 G Cell viability assay Viability measured for microgravity cultures (16 RPM and 27 RPM) and static cultures using MTT H Cell cycle analysis; Static I Cell cycle analysis; Microgravity cultures of MOLT-4.

Real Time PCR for gene expression analysis

To affect central processes of cancer such as cell proliferation and cell cycle, microgravity must significantly influence fundamental functions of the cell such as gene expression. We measured the mRNA levels of significant genes involved in cell cycle and cancer progression to check for their dysregulation under microgravity. Cyclin gene expression levels significantly influence cancer progression and metastasis as they can direct cell proliferation or apoptosis. Cdk are essential for G1/S and G2/M phase transitions of the cell cycle and their dysregulated gene expression can affect the progression of the cell cycle. The transcription of CDK1 is regulated such that it functions during the mitotic prophase and metaphase [10]. CDK1 expression was down regulated in MOLT-4 and upregulated in DLD-1 (5-fold over static control) (Fig 3A). The expression of genes fundamental to cancer development and progression, which include oncogenes and potential cancer stem cell markers, were dysregulated in microgravity. CD117 (receptor tyrosine kinase—c-kit) expression was upregulated by 11.2 fold in MOLT-4 and downregulated by 0.2 fold in DLD-1 under microgravity (Fig 3A). High c-kit expression protects colon carcinoma cells against apoptosis and enhances their invasive potential [11]; therefore, c-kit downregulation in DLD-1 under microgravity may be significant. DLD-1 constitutively over expresses the MYC gene [12] under normal conditions. Overexpression of MYC sensitizes cells to apoptosis and under microgravity MYC gene expression was further increased in DLD-1 by 3 fold (Fig 3A). MOLT4 expressed lowered levels of MYC (0.4 fold) in microgravity (Fig 3A). JUNB encodes a transcriptional regulator of cell proliferation genes and is part of the immediate early gene family [13]. One of the most significant genes to be dysregulated in both cell lines in microgravity, JUNB is upregulated in microgravity by 2.1 and 1.2 fold in MOLT-4 and DLD-1 respectively (Fig 3A).

Fig 3. Quantitative PCR analysis for changes in mRNA expression of significant, candidate genes involved in cell proliferation and cancer.

A CDK1—Cell cycle kinase gene, CD117—proto-oncogene, JUNB—transcription factor and immediate early gene, MYC—proto-oncogene expression in DLD-1 and MOLT-4 B Real time PCR analysis in HL-60 CCNE1 and CDK2, CCNB1 and CDK1, Oncogenes: CD117 and MYC, Cancer prognostic markers CD105, CD90 and CD71.

Gene expression analysis in HL-60, a promyelocytic leukemia cell line

As an additional control for blood tumor (and suspension) cultures, we checked the gene expression levels of the cell cycle genes and oncogenes in a promyelocytic leukemia cell line, HL-60. Real time PCR revealed the up regulation of CCNE1 and CDK2 in HARV cultures with CDK2 being significantly up-regulated (1.1 and 1.8 fold respectively) (Fig 3B). CCNB1 and CDK1 gene expression was dysregulated with CDK1 being up regulated 1.5 fold and CCNB1 down regulated by 0.8 fold (Fig 3B). Significantly, the proto oncogenes CD117 and MYC were highly up regulated in microgravity by 4.7 fold and 10.8 fold respectively (Fig 3B). Similar to the DLD-1 cell line, HL-60 also over expresses the MYC gene constitutively under standard conditions. The prognostic markers CD71, CD105 and CD90 were dysregulated under microgravity by 0.75 fold (downregulated), 1.4 fold (upregulated) and 2.1 fold (upregulated) respectively (Fig 3B). Endoglin (CD105) aids neovascularization in cancer [14] and CD90 expression indicates a positive prognosis as leukemic progenitor cells in AML that are capable of maintaining the disease in vitro and in vivo do not express CD90 [15]. Real time PCR analysis of a candidate cell cycle, oncogene, transcription factor and cancer progression marker showed both upregulation and downregulation. As the cell cycle is regulated by a multitude of factors many of which could be affected by microgravity, a ‘collective’ downregulation or dysregulation of processes associated with cell cycle could validate the observed physiological halt or reduction in cell proliferation under microgravity. Towards this aim, a genome wide expression profiling using DNA microarray was carried out. The genomic profiling also allowed us to speculate on the effect of microgravity on central pathways in cancer such as the Notch signaling system, and expression levels of novel regulators such as microRNA.

Microarray analysis of DLD-1 and MOLT-4 cells cultured in microgravity

Microarray analysis revealed 1801 and 2542 genes up and down regulated more than 2 fold in DLD-1 cells cultured in microgravity compared to static control. MOLT-4 cultures under microgravity differentially expressed a total of 349 and 444 genes up and down regulated over 2 fold, respectively. Table 1 represents a short list of common genes deregulated among both cell lines. A complete list of highly deregulated genes among both cell lines is provided in S2, S3 and S4 Tables. The highly dysregulated genes represented in the supporting information tables contain interesting candidate genes such as the ribonucleotide reductase M2 (RRM2) subunit which is the most down regulated gene in DLD-1 under microgravity. RRM2 overexpression may be associated with Colo Rectal cancer (CRC) progression and may play an important role in the infiltration and metastasis of CRC [16]. It serves as a prognostic biomarker and predicts poor survival of colorectal cancers [17]. While both cell lines exhibited changes in cell cycle and cell viability, microgravity elicited a greater response from the solid tumor cell line DLD-1. Sub lethal stress can push a cell into a state that is similar to replicative senescence [18]. Stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS) can occur after DNA damage, oxidative stress and treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors [18]. The phenomenon of SIPS can explain the loss in cell viability in both cell lines. Microarray analysis revealed the downregulation of the retinoblastoma gene (RB1; -0.42 log fold change) in DLD-1 cells under microgravity and as the presence of the RB1 protein is necessary for SIPS [19], the response of DLD-1 cells to microgravity may not be through SIPS and its related pathways. Conversely MOLT-4 cells show upregulated RB1 expression (0.47 log fold change) under microgravity and the loss in cell viability may be attributed to SIPS. This could also explain the relatively lesser number of genes that were differentially expressed in MOLT-4 cells compared to the gene expression profile of DLD-1 cells under microgravity. Other biomarkers of SIPS, apolipoprotein J and fibronectin, which are overexpressed in replicative senescence and SIPS [19], were not differentially expressed in DLD-1 or MOLT-4 under microgravity. The mechanism of SIPS is not clearly understood as yet and whether microgravity can be a trigger for SIPS pathways needs to be confirmed. The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE69271 ( The differentially expressed genes from the microarray data were studied for their overabundance in different Gene Ontology (GO) terms as well as pathways using the microarray analysis software DAVID. The enrichment score of individual GO terms that the genes associated with was used to identify processes that were significantly dysregulated. GO or functional enrichment analysis was performed with over 2 fold-differentially expressed genes in both cell lines. Functional classification of genes based on similarity in function or family was carried out.

Table 1. Commonly deregulated genes in DLD-1 and MOLT-4 cells under microgravity.

Validation of candidate genes selected from microarray data

Microarray analysis revealed the upregulation of CCNB1 and the down regulation of ROMO1 and HES1 genes when MOLT-4 cells were cultured under microgravity (Fig 4A). Similarly, microarray analysis demonstrated the down regulation of CDK2 gene and the upregulation of STAT3 and HEY1 genes in DLD-1 cells cultured under microgravity (Fig 4B). Microarray analysis revealed that both cell lines commonly showed the down regulation of CCNE1 and the upregulation of CD71 and CD44 genes (Fig 4C, Fig 5A). Significantly, the deregulation of the microRNA-22 host gene and its targets was also under microgravity (Fig 5B). mRNA expression of these candidate genes representative of the cell cycle, transcriptional regulation and cancer progression were validated by quantitative real time PCR. Cyclin B1 which has been reported as constitutively overexpressed in human colorectal cancers [20] is over expressed in MOLT-4 cells which showed a 7.5 fold increase of CCNB1 mRNA expression under microgravity (Fig 4A). Lowered expression of ROMO1 leads to inhibition of cell growth [21] and MOLT-4 cells expressed 0.5 fold less ROMO1 than the static control (Fig 4A). Transcriptional and replication controllers regulate oncogenes and prognostic markers and influence cell cycle events. HES1 is a transcriptional repressor and is involved in DNA repair [22] and HES1 gene expression is controlled by the Notch and Jun signaling system [23]. HES1 gene expression is down regulated by 0.7 fold in MOLT-4 (Fig 4A) under microgravity. CDK2 gene expression in DLD-1 cells was 0.5 fold lower compared to static control (Fig 4B) while HEY1, a transcriptional regulator was highly up regulated by 10.3 fold (Fig 4B). Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is an oncogenic transcription factor which is activated and aberrantly expressed in many colorectal cancers [24] and the genes upregulation is validated by RT-PCR (Fig 4B). Cyclin E1 gene expression is down regulated in both cell lines under microgravity (Fig 4C). Cyclin E1 controls the progression of the cell cycle through the G1 phase by its interaction with cyclin dependent kinase 2 [25]. Similarly, both cell lines expressed lowered levels of CD71, which encodes a transmembrane glycoprotein that is responsible for cellular iron uptake (Fig 4C). DLD-1 expressed significantly lower levels (0.42 Fold) in microgravity. Higher expression of CD71 is associated with negative prognosis for many solid tumors and some lymphomas [26,27] and numerous studies have found a positive correlation between iron storage and the risk of tumors such as in colorectal carcinoma [28]. Significantly, the CD44 gene was upregulated in both cell lines (Fig 4C, Fig 5A). While most isoforms of CD44 are associated with the malignant form of the disease, some forms of CD44 prevent the tumor cells from spreading out of the primary site [29]. As CD44 is expressed in both colon and lymphoid cancers and as mRNA analysis would involve multiple variants, we investigated its protein levels in DLD-1 and MOLT-4 cultures in microgravity. Western blotting for standard isoform of CD44 shows higher levels of the protein in both cell lines over static control (Fig 5A). Densitometric analysis of the bands and normalization with β-actin values demonstrates significant up regulation of CD44 protein in microgravity. microRNA have been identified as potential oncogenes or tumor suppressors [30]. The miR-22 host gene, MIR22HG was highly upregulated in DLD-1 (Log fold 4.4) but not differentially expressed in MOLT-4 (Fig 5B). miR-22 functions as a tumor suppressor through post-transcriptional regulation of p21 to determine cell fate [31]. It represses cancer progression by inducing cellular senescence [32] and controls EVI-1 oncogene expression in metastatic breast cancer cells [33]. Some targets of miR-22 such as SP1, CDK6 and CCNA2 were also significantly downregulated (Fig 5B) while others such as p21 (CDKN1A) were not significantly dysregulated. The farnesoid X receptor regulates miR-22 which targets CCNA2 in colon and liver cancer cells [34]. Real time PCR for miR-22 microRNA also showed a 4.18 log fold upregulation in DLD-1 cells under microgravity (Fig 5B) confirming the fold change observed in microarray analysis. Real Time PCR for miR-22 targets—CCND1 and CDKN1A however, did not show significant dysregulation with -0.09 log fold (down regulation) and 0.11 log fold (up regulation) change, respectively (Fig 5B). Other micro RNA host genes including MIR17HG, was significantly downregulated in MOLT-4 while not differentially expressed in DLD-1 (Fig 5B). The MIR21HG is significantly downregulated in DLD-1 while it is not differentially expressed in MOLT-4 (Fig 5B). The MIR17HG or MiR-17-92 Cluster Host Gene encodes for six miRNAs that influence cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis [35]. miR-21 downregulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation and metastasis in colorectal cancer [36]. The downregulation of miR-21 also induces differentiation of chemoresistant colon cancer cells enhancing their susceptibility to therapy [37].

Fig 4. Effect of microgravity on gene expression levels in DLD-1 and MOLT-4 cell cultures; Validation of microarray analysis by real time PCR and western blotting.

A Log fold change of CCNB1, ROMO1 and HES1 deregulation in MOLT-4 cells under microgravity as observed by microarray analysis validated by real time PCR B Log fold change of CDK2, HEY1 and STAT3 deregulation in DLD-1 cells under microgravity as observed by microarray analysis validated by real time PCR C Log fold change of commonly up and downregulated genes CCNE1, TFRC (CD71) and CD44 as observed by microarray analysis validated by real time PCR forCCNE1 and TFRC (CD71).

Fig 5. Dysregulation of stem cell marker CD44 and tumor suppressor microRNA under microgravity.

A Validation of microarray data for CD44 by Western blotting for CD44 protein and beta-actin in static and Microgravity (μG) cultures of DLD1 and MOLT-4 and Densitometric analysis of western blots. B MIR22HG expression under microgravity; Overexpressed MIR22HG, host gene of miR-22 microRNA in DLD-1 cells under microgravity, MOLT-4 cells show no differential expression; Levels of dysregulation of direct targets of miR-22 microRNA CDK6, CCNA2, SP1 and CDKN1A in microarray data; RT-PCR validation of microRNA miR-22 levels and target genes in DLD-1 shows over expressed microRNA miR-22 in DLD-1 cells under microgravity confirming upregulation in microarray data. No significant dysregulation of direct targets CDKN1A (similar to expression levels in microarray data) and CCND1A C GO analysis (by DAVID) of microarray data to depict other dysregulated microRNA host genes in DLD-1 and MOLT-4 cells under microgravity.

Dysregulation of genes involved with the Notch signaling system and microRNA processing

The Notch signaling system plays an important role in the mechanical unloading of bone in microgravity, and changes to the mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cell compartments. The Notch pathway is also significant in cancer progression and microRNA processing. As one of the highly deregulated genes observed in the microarray analysis is a tumor suppressor microRNA, we looked at other genes and pathways in the Notch signaling system that could be deregulated. GO analysis revealed multiple genes that were functionally clustered under processes associated with the Notch system (Fig 6A, 6B and 6C). Significantly dysregulated genes involved in transcriptional regulation include HDAC1, HDAC3, HEY1, MAML2, MESP1, SPEN, TBL1X and TLE1 (Fig 6A). The HDAC1 and HDAC3 genes are potential tumor suppressors that interact with retinoblastoma 1 and p53 proteins respectively [38] while MAML2 is a potential oncogene [39] that is down regulated in DLD-1 by more than 2 log fold and upregulated in MOLT-4 (Fig 6A). Major genes involved in post transcriptional gene silencing were dysregulated under microgravity (Fig 6B) such as EIF2C2 which was dysregulated only in DLD-1 while EIF2C1 and EIF2C3 were significantly downregulated and upregulated in both cell lines (Fig 6B). The human eukaryotic initiation factor 2C1 (EIF2C1) and EIF2C2 are components of the core RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and are members of the argonaute protein family [40] that are potential biomarkers for human colon cancer [41]. DLL1 was significantly up regulated in the process of Notch signaling pathway by 2.46 log fold among other genes in DLD-1 (Fig 6C) but the gene was not differentially expressed in MOLT-4. DLL4 and JAG1 were differentially expressed in DLD-1 while JAG2 was expressed only in MOLT-4 (Fig 6C). Epigenetic regulation of DLL1 controls Notch1 activation in gastric cancer and along with DLL4; DLL1 is required for homeostasis of intestinal stem cells [42,43]. Significantly, all the NOTCH genes were up regulated in both cell lines (Fig 6C) and these genes encode receptors for membrane-bound ligands Jagged1/2 and Delta1. JAG1 is involved in cell-fate decisions during hematopoiesis while JAG2 is overexpressed in malignant myeloma plasma cells [44,45]. TLE1, TLE2 and FBXW7 genes, which have the conserved WD40 repeat domain, were dysregulated (S1A Fig) in both cell lines while TLE3 is highly upregulated in DLD-1 and not differentially expressed in MOLT-4. FBXW7 is a potential tumor suppressor gene [46] involved in ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of cyclin E and MYC. The ribosomal Protein S27a (RPS27A) promotes proliferation, regulates cell cycle progression and inhibits apoptosis of leukemia cells. RPS27A was significantly dysregulated only in DLD-1 and not in MOLT-4 (S1B Fig). APH1B and the presenilin protein encoding genes, PSEN2 and PSENEN were dysregulated only in the DLD-1 cell line (S1B Fig). APH1B encodes a subunit of the gammasecretase complex that catalyzes the cleavage of proteins such as Notch receptors and APP (beta-amyloid precursor protein) while PSEN2 and PSENEN regulate APP processing through gamma-secretase [46] and are involved in Alzheimer’s disease [47]. A substantial number of genes involved in microRNA processing and regulation were dysregulated (Fig 6D) such as DROSHA, which is the core nuclease that executes the initiation step of miRNA processing in the nucleus [48] and DICER, the endoribonuclease that cleaves naturally occurring long dsRNAs and short hairpin pre-microRNAs (miRNA) into short interfering RNAs (siRNA) and mature microRNAs [49]. The SMAD proteins control DROSHA-mediated microRNA maturation [50] and the SMAD1 gene is upregulated in DLD-1 while SMAD2 is downregulated in MOLT-4 (Fig 6D). SMAD3 is downregulated in both cell lines (Fig 6D). Micro RNA host genes including MIR17HG, was significantly downregulated in MOLT-4 while not differentially expressed in DLD-1 (Fig 6D). The MIR21HG is significantly downregulated in DLD-1 while it is not differentially expressed in MOLT-4 (Fig 6D). The MIR17HG or MiR-17-92 Cluster Host Gene encodes for six miRNAs that influence cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis [35]. miR-21, miR-17 and miR-19a are directly involved in the proliferation and metastasis of colon cancer [51]. miR-21 downregulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation and metastasis in colorectal cancer [36]. The downregulation of miR-21 also induces differentiation of chemoresistant colon cancer cells enhancing their susceptibility to therapy [37].

Fig 6. Analysis of microarray data using Gene Functional Classification and Functional Annotation; Dysregulation of genes involved in the Notch signaling system and microRNA processing and regulation.

A Regulation of transcription B RNA mediated gene silencing (PTGS) C Notch signaling pathway D Dysregulated microRNA processors and regulators.

Overview of cellular processes and functions with deregulated genes under microgravity

Fig 7 shows a summary view of the functional annotation clustering of GO terms using DAVID, demonstrating processes or functions which the highly dysregulated genes (> 2 log fold) in the DNA microarray list associated with. Upregulated genes were involved in functions associated with transcriptional regulation, proteolysis and negative regulation of cell growth (Fig 7A). Prominently, correlating with the observations in gene expression analysis by real time PCR and experimental procedures on the cell cycle progression of DLD-1 cells, the most significant cluster of genes with the highest enrichment score were involved in cell cycle (Fig 7A). All genes that were associated with these GO terms were downregulated. Other clusters that were associated with downregulated genes included cytoskeleton, nucleoplasm and DNA repair; biological processes that are vital to cell cycle and proliferation. MOLT-4 cells showed similar results with lower enrichment scores. Upregulated genes again clustered in transcriptional regulation and programmed cell death (Fig 7B) and significantly, in pathways in cancer. DNA replication was an enriched GO term in the downregulated gene cluster with many associated processes such as DNA repair and nucleotide binding also being enriched. From the functional annotation clustering of the deregulated list of genes, it can be surmised that microgravity has a suppressive effect on the progression of cancer, particularly in the colorectal cancer cell line- DLD-1.

Fig 7. Functional annotation of microarray data using DAVID.

A Functional annotation of upregulated and downregulated genes of DLD-1 cells under microgravity B Functional annotation of upregulated and downregulated genes of MOLT-4 cells under microgravity.


Although the mechanism of action is still unclear, normal cells, stem cells and cancer cells have altered physiological properties under microgravity. The cytoskeleton and the plasma membrane of the cell may be sensitive to changes in gravity [52] and respond by altering vital intracellular signaling networks or the modulation of proto oncogene expression through intracellular signaling pathways could be a mechanism of action [53]. It is of significance that cancer cell proliferation and progression can be altered by microgravity in DLD-1 cells and to a lesser extent, in MOLT-4 cells, as demonstrated by this study. Simulated microgravity may affect solid tumor cell lines markedly such as DLD-1, which showed a higher percentage of dysregulated genes compared to the hematological tumor cell line, MOLT-4. The process of cell cycle in DLD-1 cells was markedly affected with reduced viability, reduced colony forming ability, an apoptotic population and dysregulation in cell cycle genes. Real time PCR and western blotting also demonstrated dysregulation of significant oncogenes and cancer progression markers such as JUNB, CD44, MYC and CD117. This was corroborated with the downregulation of the process of cell cycle as demonstrated by the functional clustering of DNA microarray data using GO terms by DAVID. This study also demonstrated for the first time, the dysregulation of the microRNA host genome, miR-22 in a colorectal cancer cell line, DLD-1. Due to the significant tumor suppressive role of microRNA-22, its upregulation under microgravity may contribute to the anti-proliferative effect of microgravity. Identifying mechanisms by which microgravity influences miR-22 expression and the other dysregulated microRNA host genes identified in this study, may provide potential candidates for cancer therapy.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Analysis of microarray data using Gene Functional Classification and Functional Annotation- Dysregulation of genes involved in the Notch signaling system.

A Conserved WD-40 domain (proteins involved in signal transduction, pre-mRNA processing and cytoskeleton assembly) B Regulators of ubiquitination of proteins and Membrane protein proteolysis involved in notch signaling.


S2 Table. > 2 log fold down regulated genes in microarray of DLD-1 cells under microgravity.


S3 Table. > 2 log fold upregulated genes in microarray of DLD-1 cells under microgravity.


S4 Table. > 2 log fold Up and down regulated genes in microarray of MOLT-4 cells under microgravity.


S5 Table. Microarray analysis reveals commonly deregulated genes under Microgravity in both cell lines.



This work was supported by a grant to R.S.V by the Defense Research Development Organization (DLS/81/48222/LSRB-189/ID/2009 and DLS/81/48222/LSRB-273/SH&DD/2013). P.V., P.S. wish to thank the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India for senior research fellowship, R.A., and R.S., wish to thank Indian Institute of Technology Madras for their fellowship.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PV PS RSV. Performed the experiments: PV PS RS RA. Analyzed the data: PV PS RSV NK RK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RSV. Wrote the paper: PV PS RSV.


  1. 1. Schatten H, Lewis ML, Chakrabarti A. Spaceflight and clinorotation cause cytoskeleton and mitochondria changes and increases in apoptosis in cultured cells. Acta astronautica 2001; 49(3), 399–418.
  2. 2. Becker JL, Souza GR. Using space-based investigations to inform cancer research on Earth. Nat Rev Cancer 2013; 13(5), 315–327. pmid:23584334
  3. 3. Jhala DV, Kale RK, Singh RP. Microgravity Alters Cancer Growth and Progression. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2014; 14(4), 394–406. pmid:24720362
  4. 4. Pisanu ME, Noto A, De Vitis C, Masiello MG, Coluccia P, Proietti S, et al. Lung cancer stem cell lose their stemness default state after exposure to microgravity. Biomed Res Int 2014; 3:470253.
  5. 5. Masiello MG, Cucina A, Proietti S, Palombo A, Coluccia P, D’Anselmi F, et al. Phenotypic Switch Induced by Simulated Microgravity on MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells. Biomed Res Int 2014; 3:652434.
  6. 6. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Zheng X, Yang J, Imamichi T, Stephens R, et al. Extracting biological meaning from large gene lists with DAVID. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2009; 13–11.
  7. 7. Ferrarini M, Steimberg N, Ponzoni M, Belloni D, Berenzi A, Girlanda S, et al. Ex-vivo dynamic 3-D culture of human tissues in the RCCS™ bioreactor allows the study of Multiple Myeloma biology and response to therapy. PloS one 2013; 8(8), e71613. pmid:23990965
  8. 8. Morabito C, Steimberg N, Mazzoleni G, Guarnieri S, Fanò-Illic G, Mariggiò MA. RCCS Bioreactor-Based Modelled Microgravity Induces Significant Changes on In Vitro 3D Neuroglial Cell Cultures. BioMed research international 2015; 2;2015:754283. pmid:25654124
  9. 9. Carlsson SI, Bertilaccio MT, Ballabio E, Maier JA. Endothelial stress by gravitational unloading: effects on cell growth and cytoskeletal organization. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2003; 6;1642(3):173–9. pmid:14572900
  10. 10. Castedo M, Perfettini J-LL, Roumier T, Kroemer G. Cyclin-dependent kinase-1: linking apoptosis to cell cycle and mitotic catastrophe. Cell Death Differ 2002; 9(12):1287–93. pmid:12478465
  11. 11. Bellone G, Carbone A, Sibona N, Bosco O, Tibaudi D, Smirne C, et al. Aberrant activation of c-kit protects colon carcinoma cells against apoptosis and enhances their invasive potential. Cancer research 2001; 2;61(5):2200–6. pmid:11280787
  12. 12. Augenlicht LH, Wadler S, Corner G, Richards C, Ryan L, Multani AS, et al. Low-level c-myc amplification in human colonic carcinoma cell lines and tumors: a frequent, p53-independent mutation associated with improved outcome in a randomized multi-institutional trial. Cancer research 1997; 2;57(9):1769–75. pmid:9135021
  13. 13. Iwaki K, Sukhatme VP, Shubeita HE, Chien KR. Alpha- and beta-adrenergic stimulation induces distinct patterns of immediate early gene expression in neonatal rat myocardial cells. fos/jun expression is associated with sarcomere assembly; Egr-1 induction is primarily an alpha 1-mediated response. The Journal of biological chemistry 1990; 265(23):13809–17. pmid:1696258
  14. 14. Calabrò L, Fonsatti E, Bellomo G, Alonci A, Colizzi F, Sigalotti L, et al. Differential levels of soluble endoglin (CD105) in myeloid malignancies. J. Cell. Physiol. 2003; 194: 171–175. pmid:12494455
  15. 15. Blair A, Hogge DE, Ailles LE, Lansdorp PM, Sutherland HJ. Lack of expression of Thy-1 (CD90) on acute myeloid leukemia cells with long-term proliferative ability in vitro and in vivo. Blood 1997; 2;89(9):3104–12. pmid:9129012
  16. 16. Lu A-GG, Feng H, Wang P-X-ZX, Han D-PP, Chen X-HH, Zheng M-HH. Emerging roles of the ribonucleotide reductase M2 in colorectal cancer and ultraviolet-induced DNA damage repair. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18(34):4704–13. pmid:23002339
  17. 17. Liu X, Zhang H, Lai L, Wang X, Loera S, Xue L, et al. Ribonucleotide reductase small subunit M2 serves as a prognostic biomarker and predicts poor survival of colorectal cancers. Clinical science 2013; 124(9):567–78. pmid:23113760
  18. 18. Gorbunova V, Seluanov A, Pereira-Smith O. Expression of Human Telomerase (hTERT) Does Not Prevent Stress-induced Senescence in Normal Human Fibroblasts but Protects the Cells from Stress-induced Apoptosis and Necrosis. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277(41):38540–9. pmid:12140282
  19. 19. Toussaint O, Royer V, Salmon M, Remacle J. Stress-induced premature senescence and tissue ageing. Biochem Pharmacol 2002; 64(5–6):10071009.
  20. 20. Wang A, Yoshimi N, Ino N, Tanaka T, Mori H. Overexpression of cyclin B1 in human colorectal cancers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1997; 123(2):124–7. pmid:9030252
  21. 21. Chung JS, Lee SB, Park SH, Kang ST, Na AR, Chang T-SS, et al. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species originating from Romo1 exert an important role in normal cell cycle progression by regulating p27(Kip1) expression. Free Radic Res. 2009; 43(8):729–37. pmid:19513905
  22. 22. Tremblay CS, Huang FF, Habi O, Huard CC, Godin C, Lévesque G, et al. HES1 is a novel interactor of the Fanconi anemia core complex Blood 2008; 112 (5) 2062–2070; pmid:18550849
  23. 23. Belandia B, Powell SM, García-Pedrero JM, Walker MM, Bevan CL, Parker MG. Hey1, a mediator of notch signaling, is an androgen receptor corepressor. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25(4), 1425–1436. pmid:15684393
  24. 24. Grivennikov S, Karin E, Terzic J, Mucida D, Yu G-YY, Vallabhapurapu S, et al. IL-6 and Stat3 are required for survival of intestinal epithelial cells and development of colitis-associated cancer. Cancer cell 2009; 15(2):103–13. pmid:19185845
  25. 25. Viallard JF, Lacombe F, Belloc F, Pellegrin JL, Reiffers J. Molecular mechanisms controlling the cell cycle: fundamental aspects and implications for oncology. Cancer Radiother. 2001; 5(2):109–29. pmid:11355576
  26. 26. Habashy HO, Powe DG, Staka CM, Rakha EA, Ball G, Green AR, et al. Transferrin receptor (CD71) is a marker of poor prognosis in breast cancer and can predict response to tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 119(2), 283–293. pmid:19238537
  27. 27. Del Poeta G, Del Principe MI, Maurillo L, Rossi FM, Buccisano F, Ammatuna E, et al. Spontaneous apoptosis and proliferation detected by BCL-2 and CD71 proteins are important progression indicators within ZAP-70 negative chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2010; 51(1):95–106. pmid:20001236
  28. 28. Nelson RL, Davis FG, Sutter E, Sobin LH, Kikendall JW, Bowen P. Body iron stores and risk of colonic neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86(6):455–60. pmid:8120921
  29. 29. Naor D, Wallach-Dayan S, Zahalka M, Sionov R. Involvement of CD44, a molecule with a thousand faces, in cancer dissemination. Semin Cancer Biol. 2008; sciencedirect;18(4).
  30. 30. Li M, Li J, Ding X, He M, Cheng S-YY. microRNA and cancer. AAPS J 2010; 12(3):309–17. pmid:20422339
  31. 31. Tsuchiya N, Izumiya M, Ogata-Kawata H, Okamoto K, Fujiwara Y, Nakai M, et al. Tumor Suppressor miR-22 Determines p53-Dependent Cellular Fate through Post-transcriptional Regulation of p21. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(13):4628–39. pmid:21565979
  32. 32. Xu D, Takeshita F, Hino Y, Fukunaga S, Kudo Y, Tamaki A, et al. miR-22 represses cancer progression by inducing cellular senescence. J Cell Biol 2011; 193(2):409–24. pmid:21502362
  33. 33. Patel JB, Appaiah HN, Burnett RM, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Wang G, Mehta R, et al. Control of EVI-1 oncogene expression in metastatic breast cancer cells through microRNA miR-22. Oncogene 2011; 30(11): 1290–1301. pmid:21057539
  34. 34. Yang F, Hu Y, Liu H-XX, Wan Y-JYJ. MiR-22-silenced cyclin A expression in colon and liver cancer cells is regulated by bile acid receptor. J Biol Chem 2015; jbc-M114.
  35. 35. Mendell JT. miRiad roles for the miR-17-92 cluster in development and disease. Cell. 2008; 133(2):217–22. pmid:18423194
  36. 36. Asangani IA, Rasheed SA, Nikolova DA, Leupold JH, Colburn NH, Post S, et al. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) post-transcriptionally downregulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2008; 27(15):2128–36. pmid:17968323
  37. 37. Yu Y, Sarkar FH, Majumdar AP. Down-regulation of miR-21 Induces Differentiation of Chemoresistant Colon Cancer Cells and Enhances Susceptibility to Therapeutic Regimens. Transl Oncol 2013; 6(2):180–6. pmid:23544170
  38. 38. Thangaraju M, Carswell KN, Prasad PD, Ganapathy V. Colon cancer cells maintain low levels of pyruvate to avoid cell death caused by inhibition of HDAC1/HDAC3. Biochem J. 2009; 417(1):379–89. pmid:18789002
  39. 39. Behboudi A, Enlund F, Winnes M, Andrén Y, Nordkvist A, Leivo I, et al. Molecular classification of mucoepidermoid carcinomas—prognostic significance of the MECT1–MAML2 fusion oncogene. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2006; 45(5): 470–481. pmid:16444749
  40. 40. Sasaki T, Shiohama A, Minoshima S, Shimizu N. Identification of eight members of the Argonaute family in the human genome. Genomics 2003; 82(3):323–30. pmid:12906857
  41. 41. Liu L, Jiang Y, Zhang H, Greenlee AR, Yu R, Yang Q. miR-22 functions as a micro-oncogene in transformed human bronchial epithelial cells induced by anti-benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide. Toxicology in vitro 2010; 24(4):1168–75. pmid:20170724
  42. 42. Pellegrinet L, Rodilla V, Liu Z, Chen S, Koch U, Espinosa L, et al. Dll1- and dll4-mediated notch signaling are required for homeostasis of intestinal stem cells. Gastroenterology 2011; 140(4):1230–1240.e1–7. pmid:21238454
  43. 43. Piazzi G, Fini L, Selgrad M, Garcia M, Daoud Y, Wex T, et al. Epigenetic regulation of Delta-Like1 controls Notch1 activation in gastric cancer. Oncotarget 2012; 2(12):1291–301.
  44. 44. Houde C, Li Y, Song L, Barton K, Zhang Q, Godwin J, et al. Overexpression of the NOTCH ligand JAG2 in malignant plasma cells from multiple myeloma patients and cell lines. Blood 2004; 104(12): 3697–3704. pmid:15292061
  45. 45. Karanu FN, Murdoch B, Gallacher L, Wu DM, Koremoto M, Sakano S, et al. The notch ligand jagged-1 represents a novel growth factor of human hematopoietic stem cells. J Exp Med 2000; 192(9):1365–72. pmid:11067884
  46. 46. Mao J-H, Perez-losada J, Wu D, DelRosario R, Tsunematsu R, Nakayama KI, et al. Fbxw7/Cdc4 is a p53-dependent, haploinsufficient tumour suppressor gene. Nature 2004; 432(7018): 775–779. pmid:15592418
  47. 47. Borchelt DR, Ratovitski T, van Lare J, Lee MK, Gonzales V, Jenkins NA, et al. Accelerated amyloid deposition in the brains of transgenic mice coexpressing mutant presenilin 1 and amyloid precursor proteins. Neuron 1997; 19(4):939–45. pmid:9354339
  48. 48. Lee SB, Kim JJ, Kim TW, Kim BS, Lee M-S, Yoo YD. Serum deprivation-induced reactive oxygen species production is mediated by Romo1.Apoptosis 2010; 15(2): 204–218. pmid:19904609
  49. 49. Meister G, Tuschl T. Mechanisms of gene silencing by double-stranded RNA.Nature 2004; 431(7006): 343–349. pmid:15372041
  50. 50. Davis BN, Hilyard AC, Lagna G, Hata A. SMAD proteins control DROSHA-mediated microRNA maturation. Nature 2008; 454(7200):56–61. pmid:18548003
  51. 51. Zhang J, Xiao Z, Lai D, Sun J, He C, Chu Z, et al. miR-21, miR-17 and miR-19a induced by phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 promote the proliferation and metastasis of colon cancer. Br J Cancer 2012; 107(2):352–9. pmid:22677902
  52. 52. Cogoli-Greuter M, Cogoli A, Spano A, Sciola L, Pippia P. Influence of Microgravity on Mitogen Binding and Cytoskeleton in Jurkat Cells-Experiment on Maxus 2. European Rocket and Balloon Programmes and Related Research, 1997; 397;73.
  53. 53. Schwarzenberg MP, Pippia MAM, Cossu G, Cogoli-Greuter M, Cogoli A. Signal transduction in T lymphocytes—a comparison of the data from space, the free fall machine and the random positioning machine. Adv Space Res 1999; 24(6): 793–800. pmid:11542624