Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase (SAGA) Complex in Plants: Genome Wide Identification, Evolutionary Conservation and Functional Determination

  • Rakesh Srivastava,

    Affiliations Plant Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India, School of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

  • Krishan Mohan Rai,

    Affiliation Plant Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

  • Bindu Pandey,

    Affiliation Plant Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

  • Sudhir P. Singh,

    Affiliation National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute (DBT), Mohali, Panjab, India

  • Samir V. Sawant

    Affiliation Plant Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase (SAGA) Complex in Plants: Genome Wide Identification, Evolutionary Conservation and Functional Determination

  • Rakesh Srivastava, 
  • Krishan Mohan Rai, 
  • Bindu Pandey, 
  • Sudhir P. Singh, 
  • Samir V. Sawant


The recruitment of RNA polymerase II on a promoter is assisted by the assembly of basal transcriptional machinery in eukaryotes. The Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex plays an important role in transcription regulation in eukaryotes. However, even in the advent of genome sequencing of various plants, SAGA complex has been poorly defined for their components and roles in plant development and physiological functions. Computational analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa genomes for SAGA complex resulted in the identification of 17 to 18 potential candidates for SAGA subunits. We have further classified the SAGA complex based on the conserved domains. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the SAGA complex proteins are evolutionary conserved between plants, yeast and mammals. Functional annotation showed that they participate not only in chromatin remodeling and gene regulation, but also in different biological processes, which could be indirect and possibly mediated via the regulation of gene expression. The in silico expression analysis of the SAGA components in Arabidopsis and O. sativa clearly indicates that its components have a distinct expression profile at different developmental stages. The co-expression analysis of the SAGA components suggests that many of these subunits co-express at different developmental stages, during hormonal interaction and in response to stress conditions. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of SAGA component genes further confirmed their expression in different plant tissues and stresses. The expression of representative salt, heat and light inducible genes were affected in mutant lines of SAGA subunits in Arabidopsis. Altogether, the present study reveals expedient evidences of involvement of the SAGA complex in plant gene regulation and stress responses.


The regulation of gene expression is accomplished by the coordinated action of multiple events to ensure a perfect synchrony of cellular activities from chromatin modification to mRNA formation [14]. Gene regulation in eukaryotes requires association of pre-initiation complex (PIC), transcription factors and activators at promoters [1, 5, 6]. One well-known mechanism for transcriptional activation suggests that activator proteins interact with promoter to recruit the components of transcriptional machineries and co-activators such as Transcription Factor II D (TFIID) complex, SAGA and mediator complexes [79]. The SAGA complex, a group of multi-protein complex, is important to induce the transcription of a subset of RNA polymerase II-dependent genes [1012]. Indeed, the SAGA complex is a perfect archetype for multi-subunit histone modifying complexes and co-activator which regulates transcription by RNA polymerase II [1315]. The first member of the SAGA complex family was isolated in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [16]. The 1.8 megadalton S. cerevisiae SAGA complex is composed of 20 conserved proteins and contains different classes of transcriptional co-activator proteins such as SPT (Suppressor of Ty insertions), ADA (alteration/deficiency in activation), GCN5 (general control non-depressive), TAF (TBP-associated factors) proteins and DUBm (deubiquitylation module) [17]. These proteins are organized into different functional and structural sub-modules and thereby executing several cellular functions: nucleosomal histone acetyltransferase (HAT), histone deubiquitinylation, TATA-binding protein (TBP) binding and activator binding [10, 13, 18].

Interestingly, the SAGA complex is engaged in several transcription regulatory processes, for instance, facilitating recruitment of the RNA polymerase II, transcription elongation, promoting nucleosome eviction and replication-coupled nucleosome assembly [15, 1921]. In addition, the SAGA complex is associated with nuclear export of transcribed mRNA, co-transcriptional spliceosome assembly and transcriptional silencing at telomere region [2225]. Albeit, extensive evidences about the SAGA complex coding proteins in human, S. cerevisiae and other metazoan species are present, the knowledge about plants SAGA complex still needs to be elucidated. However, functions of few individual proteins of the SAGA complex are reported in plants, which have been shown to be involved in light signaling, stress response and histone modification [2631].

The present study aims at determining the genes encoding subunits of the SAGA complex across the plant species, mainly in the Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, using in silico approaches, and exploring their potential roles in the gene regulation. We have highlighted the functional annotation, co-expression profiles and possible interactome among different proteins of the plant SAGA complex. To better understand the plant SAGA complex, we investigated its roles in regulating the light and stress-induced gene expressions in Arabidopsis.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and treatment methods

Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0) seeds were grown on 0.5 x Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium, kept for 48 hr at 4°C, and then shifted for growth at 20°C ± 1 underneath white light (16 hr light/ 8 hr dark at 100–120 μmol·m−2·s−1). For the stress treatments, three-week-old Arabidopsis excised leaves were used. Excised leaves were placed either in 0.5 x MS medium (mock treatment) or in 0.5 x MS medium with 150 mM NaCl solution for 24 hr. For the heat/high temperature treatment, excised Arabidopsis Col-0 leaves were kept in 0.5 x MS medium and transferred into a 37°C incubator for 2 hr, whereas the control samples were kept at 22°C. The following mutants were used in the present study: gcn5‾ (Salk_030913c); sgf29b‾ (Salk_128344c); chr5‾ (Salk_020296c); tra1a‾ (Salk_087015c); taf12b‾ (Salk_132293c); sgf11‾ (Salk_088988c) and taf13‾ (Salk_024774c), which were acquired from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center [32].

Plant’s genome database search for identification of SAGA complex

National Centre of Biotechnology Information (NCBI); TAIR (The Arabidopsis Information Resource) and RAP (Rice Genome Annotation Project) databases were used for the screening of the SAGA complex in Arabidopsis, O. sativa and other plant genomes. Protein sequences of S. cerevisiae and human SAGA complex components (Table 1, S1 and S2 Tables) were used as queries to execute a BLASTP program against the protein sequences of Arabidopsis and O. sativa.

Alignment and phylogenetic analysis

Clustal-X version 1.83 software program was used for multiple sequence alignment of the protein sequences [33]. The aligned sequences were further used as input to create phylogenetic trees with the Neighbor-Joining method using a Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) model. Bootstrapping was performed, involving 1000 replicates, to represent the evolutionary history of the group analyzed. The evolutionary distance was computed in MEGA 6.06 version [34].

Domain analysis and chromosomal localization

The domain analysis was performed by CDD (Conserved Domain Database) and Pfam (protein families database) with an e-value 1.0. Chromosome Map Tool database was used to define the position of the SAGA complex genes on Arabidopsis chromosomes [35]. "Paralogous in Arabidopsis" were used for determining the gene duplications and their existence of duplicated segments on chromosome with parameters set to a threshold above 6 per block for paired proteins [36].

Conserved motif analysis

The cis-regulatory elements/motifs were analyzed in 1000 bp upstream from the transcription start site (TSS) by using web based database Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) and Plant Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements (PlantCARE) databases and portals [37, 38].

In silico microarray expression and protein interactome analysis

Microarray experiments data from Genevestigator database and analysis toolbox were employed to determine the gene expression profile of Arabidopsis and O. sativa SAGA complex genes in different tissue [39]. The cDNA signatures from Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing (MPSS) were used to count the number of corresponding mRNA molecules produced by each gene of Arabidopsis and O. sativa SAGA complex [40]. A protein-protein interaction network, for the prediction of functional associations within SAGA complex proteins, was prepared using the STRING database with a confidence threshold score of 0.6. [41]. The network was showed in the ‘evidence’ view, whereby lines linking proteins signify the category of evidence used in anticipating the association or interaction.

Functional annotation and co-expression analysis

Functional annotation and Gene Ontology analysis were performed from TAIR and agriGO [35, 42]. Co-expression analysis for gene pairs and co-expressed gene network analysis for each SAGA gene was acquired from ATTED-II (The Arabidopsis trans-factor and cis-element prediction database) version c4.1 [43].

RNA extraction and Real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the flowers, leaves, roots, seedlings, stems and siliques as well as from treated leaves by Sigma’s Spectrum plant total RNA isolation kit. The integrity of RNA, after DNase I treatment, was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Two microgram of total RNA was used as a template for first-strand cDNA synthesis using the Superscript-II RT kit (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) gene expression analysis was performed and detected by using an ABI’s 7500 Fast Real-time PCR machine [44]. Gene specific forward and reverse primers were designed by using ABI’s-Primer express v2.0 software (S3 Table). The transcripts were normalized using Ubiquitin-10 (Ubq10, At4g05320) transcripts that work as internal control. The relative expression level of target genes was analysed by ΔΔCt method.


Identification and classification of SAGA complex subunits in plants

The SAGA complex is a multiple subunit protein complex and is highly conserved among human, S. cerevisiae and Drosophila [13, 17]. The putative SAGA genes were identified in Arabidopsis and O. sativa genomes using protein sequences of S. cerevisiae and human SAGA genes as queries against the protein databases of Arabidopsis and O. sativa (NCBI, TAIR and RAP) (S1 and S2 Tables).

We identified four protein subunits in the ADA group of the SAGA complex, viz. ADA1, ADA2b, ADA3 and GCN5 (ADA4) (Table 1 and S2 Table). ADA2b (At4g16420) and GCN5 (At3g54610) have been previously studied in plants [7, 28, 30, 45, 46]; however, ADA1 and ADA3 proteins are yet to be characterized in plants. Two ADA1 proteins were identified each in Arabidopsis (At2g14850 and At5g67410) and O. sativa (Os12g39090 and Os03g55450) genome as homologs of S. cerevisiae and human ADA1 (Table 1 and S2 Table). Similarly, Arabidopsis (At4g29790) and O. sativa (Os01g73620) ADA3 were identified as homologs of S. cerevisiae and human ADA3 (Table 1 and S2 Table).

S. cerevisiae and human SAGA complex contain four proteins in DUBm group, which mainly participate in the histone deubiquitylation and mRNA export [47], however, we identified three out of four proteins in Arabidopsis and O. sativa (Table 1). Arabidopsis USP22 (At5g10790) and O. sativa UBP22 (Os04g55360) proteins were found as homologs of S. cerevisiae UBP8 and human USP22, respectively (S2 Table). Arabidopsis (At5g58575) and O. sativa (Os05g28370) SGF11 proteins were identified as homologs of human ATXN7L3 and S. cerevisiae SGF11 (Table 1 and S2 Table). Notably, S. cerevisiae SGF11 and human ATXN7L3 (S. cerevisiae SGF11 homolog) share low (15.3%) similarity between their protein sequences [48]. Arabidopsis (At3g27100) and O. sativa (Os01g69110) SUS1 showed significant homology with the corresponding S. cerevisiae SUS1 and human ENY2.

In S. cerevisiae and human, three to four proteins- SPT3, SPT7, SPT8 (not present in humans) and SPT20, have been reported in the SPT group of the SAGA complex (Table 1). Our study identified SPT3 and SPT20 proteins in Arabidopsis and O. sativa. Interestingly, the human SPT3 displays extensive sequence similarity to the histone fold motifs of TAF13 in its N-terminal region [49, 50]. We found conserved domain TAF13 in Arabidopsis At1g02680 and O. sativa Os01g23630 (Table 1 and S2 Table). The SPT20 domain was found to be conserved in Arabidopsis At1g72390 and O. sativa Os01g02860 proteins (Table 1 and S2 Table). In earlier studies, a low level of similarity was reported between SPT3 (30%) and SPT20 (32.5%) homologs of S. cerevisiae and human (S2 Table) [51, 52]. The SPT7 protein contains Bromo-domain, a motif found in several transcription factors and co-activators, which is responsible for the acetylation of histones and transcriptional activation [5355]. In Arabidopsis, 29 Bromo-domain-containing proteins are reported [56]. The BLAST analysis suggested that Arabidopsis At1g32750 (e-value 3e-07) and O. sativa Os06g43790/Os02g38980 (e-value 2e-07/1e-07 and protein similarity 29 /25%, respectively) have the highest protein sequence similarity to S. cerevisiae SPT7 and particularly to its Bromo-domain region. However, human STAF65/SUPT7L (homolog of yeast Spt7) BLAST analysis revealed extremely low protein similarity and insignificant e-value of the search Spt7 homolog in Arabidopsis and rice genome. SPT8 protein of S. cerevisiae contains WD40 domain repeats and facilitates TBP interaction [8]. Arabidopsis and other plants encompass more than 200 putative WD40 domain containing proteins [57]. Arabidopsis At5g08390 and At5g23430 displayed protein similarity with corresponding S. cerevisiae SPT8. However, in plant genome, a large number of plant proteins comprising either Bromo-domain or WD40 domain, exhibited a substantial level of similarity with the Bromo-domain for SPT7 and the WD40 domain for SPT8, henceforth, further biochemical evidence is required to validate these subunits of the SAGA complex in the two plant species, Arabidopsis and O. sativa.

Interestingly, several TAFs subunits are shared by several complexes like TFIID, SAGA, SLIK (SAGA-like complex), and STAGA (SAGA altered, SPT8 absent) as earlier reported in S. cerevisiae and human [58]. Lago et al., 2004 explained about different TAFs and their conserved domain structures in Arabidopsis [59]. The TAF proteins in the SAGA complex include- TAF5, TAF6, TAF9, TAF10 and TAF12. However, our genome-wide similarity search analysis identified two candidate proteins representing TAF12 in O. sativa (Table 1), unlike only one protein reported previously [59].

Apart from these four groups, some other components also present in the SAGA complex, such as CHD1 (chromo-domain helicase DNA binding protein 1), TRA1 (Transcription-associated protein 1) and SGF29 (SAGA-associated factor 29) (Table 1). The CHD subfamily-I chromatin remodeling proteins, S. cerevisiae CHD1 and human CHD2, share 45% protein similarity (S2 Table) [60]. BLAST searches identified Arabidopsis CHR5 (At2g13370) and O. sativa CHD (OsJ_25446) as homologs of S. cerevisiae CHD1 and human CHD2 (Table 1 and S2 Table). Further, we also identified two proteins, At3g27460 and At5g40550 in Arabidopsis encoding SGF29, as reported recently [61] and one protein in O. sativa (Os12g19350) (Table 1 and S2 Table). TRA1 is a representative of a group of proteins that include DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit, ATM (Ataxia telangiectasia mutated) and TRRAP (transformation/transcription domain-associated protein), with the carboxyl-terminal regions related to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases [62]. We identified two TRA1 protein orthologs in Arabidopsis (At2g17930 and At4g36080) and one in O. sativa (Os07g45064) with the corresponding S. cerevisiae TRA1 and human TRRAP (Table 1 and S2 Table). In some reports, RTG2 protein has been considered as a subunit of the SAGA complex [47], whereas sometimes it has been suggested as a variant of the SAGA complex, SLIK [1, 17, 63]. Further biochemical evidences are required to validate the presence of RTG2 in Arabidopsis and O. sativa SAGA/SLIK complex.

Conserved domains in plant SAGA complex

The protein domains of Arabidopsis and O. sativa SAGA subunits, identified with the corresponding domains of S. cerevisiae and human SAGA subunits, is presented in Fig 1 and S1 Fig Intriguingly, numerous known structural features of protein domains in Arabidopsis and O. sativa SAGA complexes are common with S. cerevisiae and human SAGA complexes. These include HAT module, WD repeat domain, histone fold domains, DUBm, interaction and structural integrity protein domains. The protein similarity of each domain of the SAGA complex shows evolutionary conservation across the species (Table 2). The domains of plant SAGA components share moderate (30–50%) to the high (50% and above) similarity with their counterparts in S. cerevisiae and human excluding FAT-domain and chromo-domain (Table 2 and S1 Fig).

Table 2. Domain similarities in SAGA complex protein among Arabidopsis, human, O. sativa and S. cerevisiae.

Fig 1. Domain organization of representative SAGA complex proteins in Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa.

The positions of conserved domains which are typical for SAGA are shown. Domain abbreviations are: BR: Bromodomain; NAT_SF: N-Acyltransferase superfamily; ZZ_ADA: ZZ-type Zinc finger; SANT: SWI3, ADA2, N-CoR and TFIIIB DNA-binding domains; SAGA-TAD1: Transcriptional regulator of RNA pol II, SAGA, subunit; ADA3: ADA3 superfamily Histone acetyltransferases subunit 3; TRRAP: TRansformation/tRanscription domain-Associated Protein (TRRAP), pseudokinase domain; FAT: FRAP, ATM and TRRAP domain; FATc: FRAP, ATM, TRRAP C-terminal; TAF5-NTD2: N-terminal region of TATA Binding Protein (TBP) Associated Factor 5; WD-40: Trp-Asp (W-D) dipeptide 40 amino acid motifs; TFIID-18: Transcription factor II D 18kDa subunit; PEPTIDASE C19D: Peptidase C19 contains ubiquitinyl hydrolases; Zn-UB: Zn-finger in ubiquitin-hydrolases; ENy2: enhancer of yellow; DEXDc: DEAD-like helicases superfamily; CHROMO: Chromatin organization modifier (chromo) domain; HELICc: Helicase superfamily c-terminal domain; SGF11: SaGa associated Factor 11; SWIRM: SWI3, RSC8 and MOIRA. The number represents the amino acids in domain and protein.

Phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis of the SAGA complex family among different organisms

To investigate the evolutionary association among Arabidopsis and O. sativa SAGA complex proteins, phylogenetic trees were made from the alignments of their full-length protein sequences together with SAGA complex proteins of mammals (Homo sapiens, Mus musculus and Rattus norvegicus), an arthropod (Drosophila melanogaster), fungi (S. cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe), dicot plants (A. thaliana, A. lyrata, Glycine max, Medicago truncatula, Populus trichocarpa, Ricinus communis, and Vitis vinifera), monocot plants (Brachypodium distachyon, O. sativa, Sorghum bicolor and Zea mays), a tracheophyte (Selaginella lepidophylla), a bryophyte (Physcomitrella patens) and algae (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Ostreococcus lucimarinus). In order to evaluate the molecular evolutionary relationship and conservation among SAGA protein components in different organisms, we aligned the different SAGA subunits and constructed a phylogenetic tree for each group. The phylogenetic tree analysis inferred immense conservation among the SAGA protein domains in S. cerevisiae, mammals, Arabidopsis, O. sativa, algae, bryophyte and Drosophila (Figs 2 and 3; Table 3 and S2 Fig). In the case of ADA group, three clades were exhibited for each SAGA subunit. The first and second clades comprised GCN5 (ADA5) and ADA1 proteins, respectively, while the third clade further divided into sub groups- ADA3 and ADA2b (Fig 2). In the phylogenetic analysis of ADA proteins from various organisms fall in a similar clade, excluding SpADA3 and DmADA3, which were close to the ADA1 clade (Fig 2). Similar to ADA group, other groups made several clades based on their similar protein domain specific phylogenetic tree analyses (Fig 3). In the phylogenetic tree of TAFs group, CrTAF5 and OlTAF12 proteins were present in different clades (S2 Fig). The phylogenetic tree constructed from plant SAGA proteins revealed that these proteins diverge into monocots and dicots (Figs 2 and 3). Based on the phylogenetic tree analysis, most protein domains in the SAGA subunits were remained extremely conserved in S. cerevisiae, mammals, Arabidopsis, O. sativa, algae, lycopsida, bryophyte and Drosophila during the course of evolution (Table 3).

Table 3. Putative SAGA complex genes in higher and lower plant organisms.

Fig 2. Phylogenetic relationship of the ADAs protein of the SAGA complex.

ADAs protein sequences were used from At, Arabidopsis thaliana (red circle); Dm, Drosophila melongaster; Hs, Homo sapiens (red square); Os, Oryza sativa (red diamond shape); Mm, Mus musculus; Rs, Rattus norvegicus; Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (red triangle); Sp, Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Zm, Zea mays; Rc, Ricinus communis; Pt, Populus trichocarpa; Vv, Vitis vinifera; Al, Arabidopsis lyrta; Mt, Medicago truncatula; Bd, Brachypodium distachyon; Sb, Sorgum bicolor; Sm, Selaginella moellendorffii; Pp, Physcomitrella patens; Cr, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Ol, Ostreococcus lucimarinus. Phylogeny reconstruction was analysed by neighbour-joining statistical method. Test of phylogeny was analysed by the bootstrap method (1,000 replicates).

Fig 3. Phylogenetic relationship of DUBm, SPTs and other subunits of the SAGA complex.

Different subunits of the SAGA complex protein sequences were used from At, Arabidopsis thaliana (red circle); Dm, Drosophila melongaster; Hs, Homo sapiens (red square); Os, Oryza sativa (red diamond shape); Mm, Mus musculus; Rs, Rattus norvegicus; Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (red triangle); Sp, Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Zm, Zea mays; Rc, Ricinus communis; Pt, Populus trichocarpa; Vv, Vitis vinifera; Al, Arabidopsis lyrta; Mt, Medicago truncatula; Bd, Brachypodium distachyon; Sb, Sorgum bicolor; Sm, Selaginella moellendorffii; Pp, Physcomitrella patens; Cr, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Ol, Ostreococcus lucimarinus. Phylogeny reconstruction was analysed by neighbour-joining statistical method. Test of phylogeny was analysed by the bootstrap method (1,000 replicates). (A) DUBm protein; (B) SPTs protein; (C) CHDs protein; (D) SGF29 protein; (E) TRA1 protein.

The phylogenetic trees were also constructed using the representative domain sequences of each protein of the SAGA complex of Arabidopsis, D. melanogaster, mammals (H. sapiens and M. musculus), O. sativa and S. cerevisiae (S3 Fig). The analysis of phylogenetic tree from different domain of ADA protein groups of the SAGA complex showed two clades, the first clade comprised of ADA3, GCN5, SWRIM-ADA2b and SANT-ADA2b that represents HAT modules of the SAGA complex. However, the ZZ-ADA2b domain, which is involved in interaction with GCN5, presented with ADA1 domains in the second clade (S3A Fig). The phylogenetic tree analysis of full length protein sequences indicated that ADA1 forms a different group from other ADA protein groups (Fig 2). The apparent reason behind the presence of two ZZ-ADA2b and ADA1 domains in one group might be that both protein domains are involved in protein-protein interactions. The phylogenetic tree constructed from each domain of the DUBm SAGA complex subunits suggested that SGF11 and Peptidase C19D-UBP domains were present in the same clade (S3C Fig), which is against the result obtained in the phylogenetic tree with full length protein (Fig 3A). TAFs domain grouped according to their domain features, for example, histone-fold domain containing TAF6, TAF9 and TAF12 domain were present in the same clade, in which TAF6 and TAF9 contains similar histone-fold domain (S3G Fig) [59]. TAF5 and TAF10 proteins were present in the same sub-group (S2 Fig) and their domains (NTD-TAF5 and TAF10) also showed a close relation (S3G Fig).

Notably, several paralogs were found for SAGA complex components in selected plants, mainly in G. max and P. trichocarpa (Table 3). Moreover, a variation was observed in the total number of SAGA complex components among dicots, as compared to monocots (Table 3). The variation in the number of the SAGA complex subunits suggested that these components could have been executed to accomplish the distinct and specialized roles in plants.

Chromosomal distribution and functional annotation of plant SAGA complex

The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative provides the opportunity to identify the instances of chromosomal block duplication in the genome [64]. We intended to investigate, whether proteins encoding for the SAGA complex are associated with chromosomal block duplication in Arabidopsis. We used TAIR chromosome map viewer and Paralogons in Arabidopsis for the localization of the SAGA components across the five chromosomes (S4 Fig). Most of these SAGA complex proteins were in the duplicated segmental regions of Arabidopsis chromosome [36]. Moreover, we also identified that some of the Arabidopsis and O. sativa SAGA subunits were found in more than one copy such as ADA1, TAF6, TAF9, SFG29 and TRA1. Thus, it seems that some of the SAGA proteins were duplicated during evolution.

The functional characterization analysis showed that Arabidopsis and O. sativa SAGA complex components play a key role in gene expression, transcription initiation, complex assembly and several metabolic and cellular processes (Fig 4). Gene Ontology predicted that plant SAGA complex components also participate in a transcription regulator activity, binding, catalytic activity as well as in the development of cell and organelle parts (S4 Table). Recent studies suggest participation of some of the plant SAGA complex subunits, for example Arabidopsis ADA2B, SGF29 and GCN5, in the light- [29], cold- [28, 65] and salt-induced [61] gene expression, flower development [66], histone acetylation [30, 45]. The functional characterization analysis also indicated that their involvement in auxin, cytokinin, ethylene and jasmonic acid mediated signaling pathways (S4 Table). In sum, functional and GO analysis predicated the involvement of the plant SAGA complex not only in chromatin remodeling, but also in abiotic and biotic processes.

Fig 4. Functional annotation of plant SAGA complex components.

(A) Arabidopsis (B) O. sativa. Functional annotations were performed by TAIR and agriGO databases. The percentage (%) associated with each annotation indicates the percentage of segments annotated to that category.

Protein-protein interactome analysis of Arabidopsis SAGA complex

To examine interactions among Arabidopsis SAGA complex components, we mapped the SAGA proteins over STRING interactome, a database of known and predicted protein interactions [41]. The analysis of Arabidopsis SAGA component proteins revealed an interconnected sub-network of 131-hub proteins (confidence score 0.6, Fig 5 and S5 Table). These analyses suggested that many hub proteins create a network which behaves as a functional module within the complex. Moreover, the protein-protein interaction analysis of S. cerevisiae SAGA proteins using the STRING database displayed 190-protein interactions with a confidence score of 0.6 (S6 Table). Interestingly, most of these protein-protein interactions were similar in the SAGA proteins of Arabidopsis and S. cerevisiae (S5 and S6 Tables). The mutation and biochemical characterization studies in S. cerevisiae and mammals established that these interactions are essential for SAGA structure and its stability. For instance, any alteration in SPT7, SPT20, TAF5, TAF10, or TAF12 affects the SAGA composition and integrity [6769].

Fig 5. Interactome of the SAGA complex subunits.

SAGA complex subunits interactomes were obtained from STRING database. Interactome between the protein pair is a confidence view where associations are represented by blue and black lines. Blue lines suggested the binding and black lines suggest a reaction between the proteins. The protein-protein network among SAGA component genes was analysed with high confidence of score 0.6.

In silico expression analysis of the SAGA complex encoding genes

Gene expression profiles of the SAGA complex components can provide significant evidences for their potential functional roles. The functional annotation of SAGA components in Arabidopsis and O. sativa revealed their diverse roles in plant development (Fig 4). To further validate, we examined the expression profile of the SAGA complex components in different tissues using Genevestigator microarray database and its expression meta-analysis tool [54], and MPSS database [55]. The expression profile of the SAGA complex encoding genes was examined in 9 different plant organs of Arabidopsis and O. sativa (Fig 6). AtTaf10, AtGcn5 and AtChr5 were expressed at low levels in all the examined developmental stages (Fig 6A). However, the expression of AtAda1a, AtTaf12b, AtTaf6b and AtTra1a was higher in the aforesaid developmental stages. In the case of O. sativa, SAGA subunit genes were found highly expressed in booting, seedling, milk, flower and stem elongation stages (Fig 6B). During germination, transcript accumulation was observed at higher levels for AtTaf6/6b, AtTra1a, AtAda2b, AtTaf1a, AtTaf12b and AtUbp22 genes in Arabidopsis, whereas, for OsAda2b, OsAda3, OsTaf5, OsTaf12/12b, OsTaf1a, OsUbp22, OsSus1, OsSgf11 and OsTaf9 genes in O. sativa. In the booting stage of O. sativa, OsTaf5, OsTaf13, OsTaf12/12b, OsGcn5, OsAda2b, OsAda1a, OsSgf29, OsAda3, and OsSgf11 were among the highly expressed genes, whereas, OsSus1, OsSgf29, OsUbp22, OsTaf6 and OsSgf11 were the genes that highly expressed during dough developmental stages. The meta-analysis displayed an enhanced expression of SAGA component genes in the endosperm (micropylar, peripheral and chalazal), seed coat, suspensor callus and primary cells of Arabidopsis (Fig 7A), whereas in callus, sperm cells, panicle, leaf, pistil, stigma, ovary and root tip of O. sativa (Fig 7B). The results suggest a diverse role of SAGA component genes being expressed throughout different developmental phases in distinct plant organs and tissues.

Fig 6. In silico expression patterns of the SAGA complex genes in developmental tissues.

The expression patterns in different developmental tissues for SAGA genes were obtained from the Genevestigator microarray database tool. (A) Arabidopsis developmental tissues; (B) O. sativa developmental tissues.

Fig 7. In silico expression patterns of the SAGA complex genes in anatomical tissues.

The expression patterns in different anatomical tissues for SAGA genes were obtained from the Genevestigator microarray database tool. (A) Arabidopsis anatomical tissues; (B) O. sativa anatomical tissues.

Data was extracted from the MPSS database library (17 and 20 bases), representing 12 and 13 different anatomical parts of Arabidopsis and O. sativa, respectively. These signatures uniquely recognize specific gene, which show a perfect match (100% identity over the tag length), and signify a quantitative estimation of expression of that gene. These MPSS tags further confirmed transcript abundance of SAGA protein encoding genes in different plant parts (S7 and S8 Tables). Transcript differences are generally presented by the total number of tags (TPM, transcripts per million), low expression if smaller than 25 TPM, moderate expression if 26 to 250 TPM, while highly expressed in case of >250 TPM. Based on these signatures/tags, five Arabidopsis genes viz., AtAda3, AtAda1b, AtTaf12, AtTra1a and AtSgf29 were expressed at low levels, whereas AtTaf10 expressed at a higher level in leaf, root, siliques and callus (S7 Table). Other Arabidopsis SAGA genes exhibited a moderate level of transcript accumulation. MPSS analysis in O. sativa showed that OsAda2b, OsTaf10 and OsTra1 expressed at higher levels (>250 TPM). The maximum transcript abundance was observed for OsAda2b in mature leaves and for OsTaf10 in young leaves, ovary and mature stigma and callus, whereas OsTra1 was significantly expressed in most of the plant parts, except germinating seed and stem. The SAGA genes, OsGcn5, OsAda1a, OsSpt20, OsSgf11, OsTaf9b and OsTaf12 expressed at low levels, whereas others at moderate levels (S8 Table).

Co-expression analysis for gene pairs and gene network analysis of the SAGA complex

The expression profiles of SAGA components in Arabidopsis and O. sativa using Genevestigator and MPSS revealed that many of the components have distinct tissue-specific expressions. We further examined whether these genes co-express during plant development or in any other physiological condition. The co-expression data for each SAGA component gene pairs were generated from ATTED-II database, which includes 1388 microarray experimental data [43]. The strength of co-expression for the interconnecting gene pairs was determined by Mutual Rank (MR) process using these microarray data. Forty-two significant co-expression patterns (Table 4) were obtained between SAGA components from 171 co-expressing gene pairs (S9 Table). These co-expression patterns were identified under different biotic, abiotic, hormonal and tissue conditions, for example, co-expression analysis of gene pairs data showed that Ada2b was strongly co-expressed with Taf6, Taf13 and Spt20 genes in all the developmental and environmental stress conditions. Likewise, Ubp22 co-expressed with Sgf29b and Taf1b with Tra6 and Taf13, at high MR values. The significant MR values for Taf1b, Spt20, Tra1, Taf9, Gcn5, Ada2b and Ada3 suggest their co-expression at the tissue level. The genes, Spt20, Ada2b, Taf12b, Chr5, Taf9 and Taf10 showed co-expression in abiotic stress conditions (Table 4). Under hormonal condition, Ada2b, Ada3, Chr5, Taf6, Taf10, Taf12b, Taf13 and Tra1a exhibited a substantial level of co-expression strength, whereas Spt20 was found to be co-expressed with Chr5 in biotic stress condition (Table 4).

Table 4. Co-expression analysis of SAGA component genes in Arabidopsis.

The co-expressed gene network analysis was done to identify the genes, which co-regulate with the SAGA complex (S5 Fig). Co-expressed gene network provides the evidence of highly interconnected expression modules of a subset of genes, which additionally show another layer of regulation, and consequently the complementary evidences to understand gene function network. A total of 181 proteins was found to be co-regulated with SAGA complex components (S10 Table). Approximately 36% of 181 proteins are recognized to be involved with regards to abiotic or biotic stimulus or stress, developmental processes, transcription regulation, signal transduction and other biological processes (S6 Fig). This analysis further indicates a potential role of the SAGA complex in regulating plant development and responses to various physiological stresses.

Expression analysis of the SAGA complex subunit during developmental stages and stress conditions

We performed a quantitative gene expression analysis of ten representative SAGA components by QRT-PCR in different Arabidopsis tissues: flowers, mature leaves, siliques, six-day-old seedlings, stems and roots (Fig 8A). The gene expression profile of the SAGA complex components was plotted with reference to the expression of ubiquitin. The genes of the SAGA complex, although expressing at a lower level compared with Ubiquitin, showed consistent expression in almost all the examined plant parts (Fig 8A). These indicate the involvement of the SAGA complex in gene regulation throughout the plant body. However, there were certain components that showed spatial preference, for example, the expression of Spt20 was relatively higher in root and leaf, whereas, Sgf11 in leaves and seedlings than other examined tissues.

Fig 8. Real time PCR for Arabidopsis SAGA complex subunits in different development tissues and stress conditions.

(A) The expression pattern of the SAGA complex subunits in different tissues. Relative expression analysis of each was plotted with reference to the expression of ubiquitin (either 6-day-old light-grown seedlings 16 / 8hr, mature leaves, stems, flowers, siliques and roots). (B) The expression pattern of Arabidopsis SAGA complex subunits in response to abiotic salt stress conditions. Arabidopsis Col-0 leaves treated with MS liquid medium (as a control) and NaCl (150 mM in MS media). (C) The expression pattern of Arabidopsis SAGA complex subunits in response to high temperature conditions. Arabidopsis Col-0 leaves kept in MS liquid medium at 22°C (as a control) and 37°C (2 hr in MS media). The asterisks (*) denote P ≤ 0.01.

The effect of high temperature and salt concentrations was also examined on the expression pattern of the SAGA components in Arabidopsis. The excised leaves of Arabidopsis were either exposed to a high temperature at 37°C for 2 hr or 150 mM NaCl for a period of 24 hr for high salt stress condition, and the gene expression of the SAGA components was compared with their respective controls. The gene expression of the most of selected components of the SAGA complex was induced under elevated salt concentration (Fig 8B) and high temperature (Fig 8C); however, the fold of induction varies for different components. Interestingly, Sgf29b expression was suppressed in salt treatment condition (Fig 8B). Thus, the qRT-PCR results suggested the significance of SAGA components gene expression in plants during abiotic stresses.

As discussed above, in silico co-expression analysis of the SAGA complex subunits suggested that these subunits were co-expressed in the tissues, hormones and stress conditions. Notably, the quantitative gene expression analysis of selected SAGA components further supported the co-expression analysis, such as Spt20 and Chr5, Taf13 and Tra1, Spt20 and Chr5 showed high co-expression with significant MR value in tissue; while Spt20 and Ubp22, Sgf11 and Tra1, Spt20 and Chr5, Gcn5 and Taf6 were co-expressed and considerable MR value in abiotic stress. The qRT-PCR analysis is in agreement with the in silico co-expression profile (Table 4, Fig 8 and S9 Table).

SAGA complex regulates expression of heat, salt and light-induced genes

SAGA complex facilitates the PIC assembly in the core promoter region of yeast and human genes [7074]. Little is known about how SAGA complex facilitates gene regulation in plants. To address this, RNA was isolated from seven homozygous T-DNA SAGA subunit Arabidopsis mutants and wild type plants, grown under different conditions such as light/dark, high salt or heat stress (Fig 9 and S7 Fig). The gene expression of light induced (At1g67090 and At4g02770) [2, 75], salt induced (At2g40140 and At1g56600) [76, 77] and heat induced (At1g71000 and At5g12030) [78] genes was examined in these mutant in comparison to the wild type plants by qRT-PCR (Fig 9A). The expression of both the light activated genes was considerably reduced in all the mutants, except in sgf11⁻ for both the genes and in gcn5⁻ for At4g02770, in which the relative expression values were not statistically significant (Fig 9B). In the case of salt stress, the expression level of both the salt induced genes declined in mutants as compared to the wild type, except At1g56600 in taf13⁻, which was statistically not significant (Fig 9C). Under heat stress, expression of the heat activated genes was decreased in mutants, except At5g12030 in gcn5⁻ and taf13⁻ and At1g71000 in sgf11⁻ mutant which were not statistically significant (Fig 9D). These results anticipated that SAGA complex plays significant roles in the transcription regulation of stress inducible genes.

Fig 9. The effect of the SAGA complex on light and stress induced gene expression.

For light condition, RNA was isolated from seedling grown for 5 days and then transfer into light for 4 hr. For salt condition, RNA was isolated from leaves kept in either in 0.5 x MS media (as a control) or in 0.5 x MS media with 150mM NaCl solution for 24 hr. For heat condition, RNA was isolated from Arabidopsis Col-0 leaves kept in MS liquid medium at 22°C (as a control) and 37°C (2 hr in MS medium). Ubiquitin used as internal control. The mark symbols denote (*)—P ≤ 0.001; (#)—P ≤ 0.01. (A) Real time PCR for different selected induced responsive genes in light, salt and heat conditions. (B) The effect of Arabidopsis SAGA complex subunit mutants on light activated gene expression. (C) The effect of Arabidopsis SAGA complex mutant subunits on salt-induced gene expression. (D) The effect of Arabidopsis SAGA complex subunits on heat-induced gene expression.


The SAGA complex has been previously shown to be associated with transcriptional regulation of ~10% RNA polymerase II-dependent S. cerevisiae genes, which contribute in response to DNA damage and other stress conditions such as heat, oxidation, and metabolic starvation [71, 72, 79]. A recent report indicates that SAGA complex regulates all active genes and present at their promoters and transcribed regions [80]. With the computational approach, we identified 18 putative SAGA complex subunits in Arabidopsis and O. sativa. The protein similarities among Arabidopsis and S. cerevisiae SAGA complex subunits are low (17%) to medium (51%), as observed between S. cerevisiae and human SAGA complex (15% to 56%; S2 Table). Since the SAGA complex is involved in the fine-tuning of gene expression, this could be one of the reasons for the poor protein similarities. Our results on in silico expression, GO analysis and qRT-PCR of plant SAGA complex representative genes suggested their role in various cellular, physiological and molecular processes. The previous reports on the functions of ADA2b, GCN5, TAF10, TAF6 and SGF29 in plants are in accordance with our study, suggesting conservation of the SAGA complex throughout evolution [28, 46, 61, 8183]. Thus, the presence of conserved domain is helpful in identifying most of the putative members of plant SAGA complexes in different plant organism databases. Beside the low level similarity in full protein sequence (S2 Table), most of the domains present in plant SAGA complex encoding genes were found conserved among different organisms (Figs 2 and 3; Table 2). The similarity between conserved domain’s amino acid sequences of Arabidopsis SAGA was observed higher, i.e. from 30% to 97% (Table 2 and S1 Fig). Notably, similar range of similarities was found between the key domains of the SAGA complex in S. cerevisiae and human (Table 2 and S1 Fig). On the basis of protein or conserved domain similarity and phylogenetic analysis, our results altogether suggested that plant SAGA complex was observed to be closer to the human than that to the yeast SAGA complex (Figs 2 and 3; Table 2 and S2 Table).

Our analysis of protein alignment, phylogenetic tree and chromosomal distribution suggested that many plant SAGA complex representative genes might have duplicated during evolution (Figs 2 and 3; S2 Fig). For example, Taf6, Taf9, Taf12, Ada1, Tra1 and Sgf29 have been found duplicated in either O. sativa or Arabidopsis. Besides these genes, other SAGA subunit genes are also found duplicated in other lower and higher plant groups (Table 3). This duplication event may also lead to variability in the SAGA complex components in plants like Ada2a-containing (ATAC), SLIK/SALSA or STAGA [74], or sometimes shares subunits with other complexes like TFIID [68]. The protein interactome analysis suggested that Arabidopsis SAGA complex proteins interact with each other and thus further suggested their conservation in plants (Fig 5). The structural integrity of the SAGA complex is dependent on the protein-protein interactions as evident in our study, and also discussed in previous reports; such as TAF10 and TAF12 associate directly via their histone fold domains with SPT7 and ADA1, establishing SPT7-TAF10 and ADA1-TAF12 heterodimer, respectively [84, 85], whereas TAF5 interact with ADA1, ADA3 and SPT7 [69].

Our results suggested that the SAGA complex encoding genes expressed in most of the plant parts and playing an essential role in plant development. Previous reports in Arabidopsis, gcn5⁻ exhibit pleiotropic developmental abnormalities, such as abnormal meristem role, dwarfism, loss of apical dominance, defects in floral organ identity [28, 29, 31, 8688]. An insertion of T-DNA elements in the Arabidopsis Ada2b produces a dwarf phenotype with defects in root and shoot development [28, 87, 89]. Arabidopsis sgf29a⁻ shows a little delay in leaf and flower development [61]. Importantly, some reports on plant TAFs (TAF5, 6 and 10) indicated their indispensable role in plant development [81, 83, 90]. Notably, SAGA complex is also critically involved in developmental aspects and is indispensable for viability in metazoan [11]. Recently, ubiquitin protease activity of the SAGA complex showed significant regulation of the expression of the tissues specific genes and developmental processes in Drosophila [91]. In Drosophila, loss of SAGA subunit functions, such as ADA2b, SGF11 and Nonstop protein (homolog of ENY2), display photoreceptor axon targeting defects, whereas, GCN5 has an essential role in the development of eye and wing disc [92, 93]. While, mice TAF9b and GCN5 are required for the regulation of genes during neuronal and mesoderm development [94, 95]. These accumulating evidences indicate that the functions of the SAGA complex in higher organisms involve more sophisticated mechanisms in regulation of gene expression than unicellular counterpart like S. cerevisiae during development processes.

SAGA complex expedites the gene expression that anticipates to various environmental cues such as DNA damage and abiotic stress conditions [12]. Many reports, as discussed above, reveal that the SAGA complex is directly or indirectly contributing in various developmental and stress regulated processes, for example, arsenite stress conditions [52] osmotic stress [96] and ultraviolet induced [97]. The yeast SAGA complex also takes part in the up-regulation of several genes during environmental stress, including carbon starved condition [71]. Our results support the stress inducible expression of several SAGA components in Arabidopsis. Interestingly, the promoter sequence analysis of the SAGA components revealed several stress responsive cis-motifs (S11 Table), indicating their involvement in transcription regulation activities in response to stress. Nevertheless, further experimentation is needed to validate the involvement of these motifs in the regulation of the SAGA component genes. The expression analysis of the SAGA subunits supports its potential roles in response to environmental cues (Figs 6 and 7). These results are in accordance with the earlier published reports on plant ADA2b, GCN5 and SGF29a [26, 28, 46, 61]. Arabidopsis ada2b-1⁻ mutant displays enhanced hypersensitivity to salt and abscisic acid stress than wild-type plants [26, 61]. Although, loss of SGF29a function displays salt stress tolerance, the gene expression level of stress-related genes markers such as COR78 (cold regulated 78), RAB18 (responsive to aba 18), and RD29b (responsive to desiccation 29b) are lower in sgf29a⁻ mutant after 3 hr of NaCl treatment [61]. Arabidopsis HAT protein GCN5 and co-activator ADA2b proteins play significant roles in cold responses and loss of functions of these proteins showed a decline in the expression of several cold-regulated genes [27, 28, 98]. Altogether, the property of the SAGA complex in the regulation of stress genes is not only well maintained within plants, but also comparable to S. cerevisiae or human [71, 74].

In conclusion, we identified 18 subunits of the SAGA complex in Arabidopsis and O. sativa. The protein similarities at the level of conserved domain indicate that the SAGA complex is conserved in eukaryotes such as S. cerevisiae, plants and mammals. The expression analysis of the SAGA components indicates that the networks of SAGA complex are involved in various biological processes in plants, including development, physiology and response to environmental stresses via gene regulation. This study advances our understanding about SAGA components and their different functions in plants.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Domain similarity between human, S. cerevisiae, Arabidopsis and O. sativa SAGA complex encoding genes.

Sequence alignments of the representative domains of each protein of the SAGA complex were done by using Clustal X.


S2 Fig. The phylogenetic relationship of the TAFs group of the SAGA complex.

SAGA complex subunit protein sequences were used from At, A. thaliana (red circle); Dm, D. melongaster; Hs, H. sapiens (red square); Os, O. sativa (red diamond shape); Mm, M. musculus; Rn, R. norvegicus; Sc, S. cerevisiae (red triangle); Sp, S. pombe; Zm, Z. mays; Rc, R. communis; Pt, P. trichocarpa; Vv, V. vinifera; Al, A. lyrta; Mt, M. truncatula; Bd, B. distachyon; Sb, S. bicolor; Sm, S. moellendorffii; Pp, P. patens; Cr, C. reinhardtii and Ol, O. lucimarinus. Phylogeny reconstruction was analyzed by neighbour-joining statistical method based on the JTT matrix-based model. Test of phylogeny was analyzed by the bootstrap method (1,000 replicates). Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA 6.06.


S3 Fig. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of domains of the SAGA complex components.

Amino acid sequences of domains of the SAGA complex subunits were used from At, A. thaliana; Dm, D. melongaster; Hs, H. sapiens; Os, O. sativa; Mm, M. musculus; Sc, S. cerevisiae. (A) Protein domain of ADAs group; (B) Protein domain of SPTs group; (C) Protein domain of DUBm group; (D) Protein domain of CHD subunit; (E) Protein domain of SGF29 subunit; (F) Protein domain of TRA1 subunit; (G) Protein domain of TAFs group.


S4 Fig. Chromosomal distribution of the SAGA subunit genes in the Arabidopsis genome.

SAGA encoding genes are plotted on the five Arabidopsis chromosomes according to their sequence spots. The chromosome number is shown at the top of each chromosome and the centromeric regions by constriction on chromosome line bar. Each identical duplicated chromosomal segment is marked by same line colour. The scale is in mega bases (Mb).


S5 Fig. Co-expressed gene network analysis for Arabidopsis SAGA complex.

The co-expressed gene networks are drawn based on their rank of correlation from ATTED-II database. Orange line displays conserved co-expressed which is inferred from the comparison with mammalian co-expression data provided from COXPRESdb; Red dotted line display protein-protein interaction information that is provided from TAIR and IntAct. The octagon shape indicates transcription factor genes. White circles shape indicates SAGA complex genes which were used to give input for generating gene network. Gray circle shape indicates other genes in co-expressed gene networks.


S6 Fig. Analysis of the biological process of co-expressed gene network.

A biological process is analyzed by TAIR database using 181 co-expressed genes obtained from ATTED-II database.


S7 Fig. Characterization of Arabidopsis mutant lines.

Characterization of Arabidopsis chr5‾, gcn5 ‾, sgf11‾, sgf29b‾, taf12b‾, taf13‾ and tra1a‾ T-DNA insertion homozygous mutants were done by qRT-PCR. RNA was isolated from homozygous T-DNA insertion mutants and Col-0 leaves or seedlings.


S1 Table. Query sequences from S. cerevisiae and human used to search Arabidopsis and O. sativa genome for SAGA gene families.


S2 Table. Protein similarities of SAGA encoding gene in Arabidopsis, O. sativa, human and S. cerevisiae.


S4 Table. Gene Ontology list of Arabidopsis and O. sativa for SAGA complex gene.


S5 Table. List of Arabidopsis SAGA complex subunits known and predicted protein interactions from STRING database.


S6 Table. List of S. cerevisiae SAGA complex subunits known and predicted protein interactions from STRING database.


S7 Table. MPSS data for Arabidopsis SAGA complex encoding genes showing different tissue-specific abundance.


S8 Table. MPSS data for O. sativa SAGA complex encoding genes showing different tissue-specific abundance.


S9 Table. List of co-expression genes in Arabidopsis.


S10 Table. List of genes obtained from ATTED-II for Arabidopsis SAGA complex co-expressed gene network analysis.


S11 Table. Analysis of cis-regulatory element in 1000bp upstream promoter sequences from TSS in SAGA complex subunit genes using PlantCARE and PLACE database.



The authors are thankful to the CSIR, India for funding under the Institutional and CSIR-EMPOWER (OLP79) project. Rakesh Srivastava is obliged to the CSIR for fellowship support.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RS SVS. Performed the experiments: RS KMR BP. Analyzed the data: RS SVS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RS KMR BP SPS. Wrote the paper: RS KMR SPS SVS.


  1. 1. Thomas MC, Chiang CM. The general transcription machinery and general cofactors. Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology. 2006;41(3):105–78. Epub 2006/07/25. pmid:16858867.
  2. 2. Srivastava R, Rai KM, Srivastava M, Kumar V, Pandey B, Singh SP, et al. Distinct role of core promoter architecture in regulation of light-mediated responses in plant genes. Mol Plant. 2014;7(4):626–41. Epub 2013/11/02. doi: sst146 [pii] pmid:24177688.
  3. 3. Kiran K, Ansari SA, Srivastava R, Lodhi N, Chaturvedi CP, Sawant SV, et al. The TATA-box sequence in the basal promoter contributes to determining light-dependent gene expression in plants. Plant physiology. 2006;142(1):364–76. pmid:16844831; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1557599.
  4. 4. Lodhi N, Ranjan A, Singh M, Srivastava R, Singh SP, Chaturvedi CP, et al. Interactions between upstream and core promoter sequences determine gene expression and nucleosome positioning in tobacco PR-1a promoter. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1779(10):634–44. pmid:18723134.
  5. 5. Shandilya J, Roberts SG. The transcription cycle in eukaryotes: from productive initiation to RNA polymerase II recycling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1819(5):391–400. Epub 2012/02/07. pmid:22306664.
  6. 6. Srivastava R, Srivastava R, Singh UM. Understanding the patterns of gene expression during climate change. Climate Change Effect on Crop Productivity: CRC Press; 2014. p. 279–328.
  7. 7. Naar AM, Lemon BD, Tjian R. Transcriptional coactivator complexes. Annual review of biochemistry. 2001;70:475–501. Epub 2001/06/08. pmid:11395415.
  8. 8. Sermwittayawong D, Tan S. SAGA binds TBP via its Spt8 subunit in competition with DNA: implications for TBP recruitment. The EMBO journal. 2006;25(16):3791–800. Epub 2006/08/05. pmid:16888622; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1553190.
  9. 9. Weake VM, Workman JL. Inducible gene expression: diverse regulatory mechanisms. Nature reviews Genetics. 2010;11(6):426–37. pmid:20421872.
  10. 10. Samara NL, Wolberger C. A new chapter in the transcription SAGA. Current opinion in structural biology. 2011;21(6):767–74. Epub 2011/10/22. pmid:22014650; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3232345.
  11. 11. Weake VM, Workman JL. SAGA function in tissue-specific gene expression. Trends in cell biology. 2012;22(4):177–84. Epub 2011/12/27. pmid:22196215; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3322277.
  12. 12. Baker SP, Grant PA. The SAGA continues: expanding the cellular role of a transcriptional co-activator complex. Oncogene. 2007;26(37):5329–40. Epub 2007/08/19. pmid:17694076; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2746020.
  13. 13. Koutelou E, Hirsch CL, Dent SY. Multiple faces of the SAGA complex. Current opinion in cell biology. 2010;22(3):374–82. Epub 2010/04/07. pmid:20363118; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2900470.
  14. 14. Sterner DE, Grant PA, Roberts SM, Duggan LJ, Belotserkovskaya R, Pacella LA, et al. Functional organization of the yeast SAGA complex: distinct components involved in structural integrity, nucleosome acetylation, and TATA-binding protein interaction. Molecular and cellular biology. 1999;19(1):86–98. Epub 1998/12/22. pmid:9858534; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC83868.
  15. 15. Govind CK, Zhang F, Qiu H, Hofmeyer K, Hinnebusch AG. Gcn5 promotes acetylation, eviction, and methylation of nucleosomes in transcribed coding regions. Molecular cell. 2007;25(1):31–42. Epub 2007/01/16. pmid:17218269.
  16. 16. Grant PA, Duggan L, Cote J, Roberts SM, Brownell JE, Candau R, et al. Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: characterization of an Ada complex and the SAGA (Spt/Ada) complex. Genes & development. 1997;11(13):1640–50. Epub 1997/07/01. pmid:9224714.
  17. 17. Daniel JA, Grant PA. Multi-tasking on chromatin with the SAGA coactivator complexes. Mutat Res. 2007;618(1–2):135–48. Epub 2007/03/06. pmid:17337012; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1892243.
  18. 18. Han Y, Luo J, Ranish J, Hahn S. Architecture of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SAGA transcription coactivator complex. The EMBO journal. 2014. Epub 2014/09/14. pmid:25216679.
  19. 19. Larschan E, Winston F. The S. cerevisiae SAGA complex functions in vivo as a coactivator for transcriptional activation by Gal4. Genes & development. 2001;15(15):1946–56. Epub 2001/08/04. pmid:11485989; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC312753.
  20. 20. Bhaumik SR, Green MR. Differential requirement of SAGA components for recruitment of TATA-box-binding protein to promoters in vivo. Molecular and cellular biology. 2002;22(21):7365–71. Epub 2002/10/09. pmid:12370284; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC135674.
  21. 21. Burgess RJ, Zhou H, Han J, Zhang Z. A role for Gcn5 in replication-coupled nucleosome assembly. Molecular cell. 2010;37(4):469–80. Epub 2010/03/02. pmid:20188666; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2954627.
  22. 22. Kohler A, Schneider M, Cabal GG, Nehrbass U, Hurt E. Yeast Ataxin-7 links histone deubiquitination with gene gating and mRNA export. Nature cell biology. 2008;10(6):707–15. Epub 2008/05/20. pmid:18488019.
  23. 23. Garcia-Oliver E, Garcia-Molinero V, Rodriguez-Navarro S. mRNA export and gene expression: the SAGA-TREX-2 connection. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1819(6):555–65. Epub 2011/12/20. pmid:22178374.
  24. 24. Jacobson S, Pillus L. The SAGA subunit Ada2 functions in transcriptional silencing. Molecular and cellular biology. 2009;29(22):6033–45. pmid:19737915; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2772568.
  25. 25. Gunderson FQ, Johnson TL. Acetylation by the transcriptional coactivator Gcn5 plays a novel role in co-transcriptional spliceosome assembly. PLoS genetics. 2009;5(10):e1000682. pmid:19834536; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2752994.
  26. 26. Hark AT, Vlachonasios KE, Pavangadkar KA, Rao S, Gordon H, Adamakis ID, et al. Two Arabidopsis orthologs of the transcriptional coactivator ADA2 have distinct biological functions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1789(2):117–24. Epub 2008/10/22. pmid:18929690.
  27. 27. Stockinger EJ, Mao Y, Regier MK, Triezenberg SJ, Thomashow MF. Transcriptional adaptor and histone acetyltransferase proteins in Arabidopsis and their interactions with CBF1, a transcriptional activator involved in cold-regulated gene expression. Nucleic acids research. 2001;29(7):1524–33. Epub 2001/03/27. pmid:11266554; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC31267.
  28. 28. Vlachonasios KE, Thomashow MF, Triezenberg SJ. Disruption mutations of ADA2b and GCN5 transcriptional adaptor genes dramatically affect Arabidopsis growth, development, and gene expression. The Plant cell. 2003;15(3):626–38. Epub 2003/03/05. pmid:12615937; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC150018.
  29. 29. Benhamed M, Bertrand C, Servet C, Zhou DX. Arabidopsis GCN5, HD1, and TAF1/HAF2 interact to regulate histone acetylation required for light-responsive gene expression. The Plant cell. 2006;18(11):2893–903. Epub 2006/11/07. pmid:17085686; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1693931.
  30. 30. Benhamed M, Martin-Magniette ML, Taconnat L, Bitton F, Servet C, De Clercq R, et al. Genome-scale Arabidopsis promoter array identifies targets of the histone acetyltransferase GCN5. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology. 2008;56(3):493–504. Epub 2008/07/23. pmid:18644002.
  31. 31. Bertrand C, Bergounioux C, Domenichini S, Delarue M, Zhou DX. Arabidopsis histone acetyltransferase AtGCN5 regulates the floral meristem activity through the WUSCHEL/AGAMOUS pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278(30):28246–51. Epub 2003/05/13. pmid:12740375.
  32. 32. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, Shinn P, et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003;301(5633):653–7. Epub 2003/08/02. [pii]. pmid:12893945.
  33. 33. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic acids research. 1997;25(24):4876–82. Epub 1998/02/28. doi: gka797 [pii]. pmid:9396791.
  34. 34. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–9. pmid:24132122; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3840312.
  35. 35. Lamesch P, Berardini TZ, Li D, Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Sasidharan R, et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic acids research. 2012;40(Database issue):D1202–10. pmid:22140109; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3245047.
  36. 36. Blanc G, Hokamp K, Wolfe KH. A recent polyploidy superimposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome. Genome Res. 2003;13(2):137–44. Epub 2003/02/05. pmid:12566392; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC420368.
  37. 37. Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, et al. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic acids research. 2002;30(1):325–7. Epub 2001/12/26. pmid:11752327.
  38. 38. Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, Korenaga T. Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic acids research. 1999;27(1):297–300. Epub 1998/12/10. doi: gkc003 [pii]. pmid:9847208.
  39. 39. Zimmermann P, Hirsch-Hoffmann M, Hennig L, Gruissem W. GENEVESTIGATOR. Arabidopsis microarray database and analysis toolbox. Plant physiology. 2004;136(1):2621–32. Epub 2004/09/18. [pii]. pmid:15375207; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC523327.
  40. 40. Meyers BC, Lee DK, Vu TH, Tej SS, Edberg SB, Matvienko M, et al. Arabidopsis MPSS. An online resource for quantitative expression analysis. Plant physiology. 2004;135(2):801–13. Epub 2004/06/03. pmid:15173564; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC514116.
  41. 41. Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic acids research. 2013;41(D1):D808–D15.
  42. 42. Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Su Z. agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic acids research. 2010;38(Web Server issue):W64–70. Epub 2010/05/04. pmid:20435677; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2896167.
  43. 43. Obayashi T, Hayashi S, Saeki M, Ohta H, Kinoshita K. ATTED-II provides coexpressed gene networks for Arabidopsis. Nucleic acids research. 2009;37(Database issue):D987–91. Epub 2008/10/28. pmid:18953027; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2686564.
  44. 44. Singh SP, Pandey T, Srivastava R, Verma PC, Singh PK, Tuli R, et al. BECLIN1 from Arabidopsis thaliana under the generic control of regulated expression systems, a strategy for developing male sterile plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010;8(9):1005–22. pmid:21050365.
  45. 45. Servet C, Conde e Silva N, Zhou DX. Histone acetyltransferase AtGCN5/HAG1 is a versatile regulator of developmental and inducible gene expression in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2010;3(4):670–7. Epub 2010/05/12. doi: ssq018 [pii] pmid:20457643.
  46. 46. Vlachonasios KE, Kaldis A, Nikoloudi A, Tsementzi D. The role of transcriptional coactivator ADA2b in Arabidopsis abiotic stress responses. Plant Signal Behav. 2011;6(10). Epub 2011/09/08. doi: 17695 [pii]. pmid:21897124.
  47. 47. Rodriguez-Navarro S. Insights into SAGA function during gene expression. EMBO reports. 2009;10(8):843–50. Epub 2009/07/18. pmid:19609321; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2726681.
  48. 48. Bonnet J, Wang YH, Spedale G, Atkinson RA, Romier C, Hamiche A, et al. The structural plasticity of SCA7 domains defines their differential nucleosome-binding properties. EMBO reports. 2010;11(8):612–8. Epub 2010/07/17. doi: embor201098 [pii] pmid:20634802; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2920448.
  49. 49. Gangloff YG, Werten S, Romier C, Carré L, Poch O, Moras D, et al. The Human TFIID Components TAFII135 and TAFII20 and the Yeast SAGA Components ADA1 and TAFII68 Heterodimerize to Form Histone-Like Pairs. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(1):340–51. pmid:10594036
  50. 50. Birck C, Poch O, Romier C, Ruff M, Mengus G, Lavigne AC, et al. Human TAF(II)28 and TAF(II)18 interact through a histone fold encoded by atypical evolutionary conserved motifs also found in the SPT3 family. Cell. 1998;94(2):239–49. Epub 1998/08/08. doi: S0092-8674(00)81423-3 [pii]. pmid:9695952.
  51. 51. Yu J, Madison JM, Mundlos S, Winston F, Olsen BR. Characterization of a human homologue of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factor spt3 (SUPT3H). Genomics. 1998;53(1):90–6. Epub 1998/10/27. doi: S0888-7543(98)95500-8 [pii] pmid:9787080.
  52. 52. Nagy Z, Riss A, Romier C, le Guezennec X, Dongre AR, Orpinell M, et al. The human SPT20-containing SAGA complex plays a direct role in the regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced genes. Molecular and cellular biology. 2009;29(6):1649–60. Epub 2008/12/31. doi: MCB.01076-08 [pii] pmid:19114550; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2648226.
  53. 53. Winston F, Allis CD. The bromodomain: a chromatin-targeting module? Nat Struct Biol. 1999;6(7):601–4. Epub 1999/07/15. pmid:10404206.
  54. 54. Dhalluin C, Carlson JE, Zeng L, He C, Aggarwal AK, Zhou MM. Structure and ligand of a histone acetyltransferase bromodomain. Nature. 1999;399(6735):491–6. Epub 1999/06/12. pmid:10365964.
  55. 55. Ladurner AG, Inouye C, Jain R, Tjian R. Bromodomains mediate an acetyl-histone encoded antisilencing function at heterochromatin boundaries. Molecular cell. 2003;11(2):365–76. Epub 2003/03/07. doi: S1097276503000352 [pii]. pmid:12620225.
  56. 56. Pandey R, Muller A, Napoli CA, Selinger DA, Pikaard CS, Richards EJ, et al. Analysis of histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase families of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests functional diversification of chromatin modification among multicellular eukaryotes. Nucleic acids research. 2002;30(23):5036–55. Epub 2002/12/06. pmid:12466527.
  57. 57. Mishra A, Puranik S, Prasad M. Structure and regulatory networks of WD40 protein in plants. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;21(1):32–9.
  58. 58. Nagy Z, Tora L. Distinct GCN5/PCAF-containing complexes function as co-activators and are involved in transcription factor and global histone acetylation. Oncogene. 2007;26(37):5341–57. pmid:17694077.
  59. 59. Lago C, Clerici E, Mizzi L, Colombo L, Kater MM. TBP-associated factors in Arabidopsis. Gene. 2004;342(2):231–41. Epub 2004/11/06. doi: S0378-1119(04)00515-3 [pii] pmid:15527982.
  60. 60. Marfella CG, Imbalzano AN. The Chd family of chromatin remodelers. Mutat Res. 2007;618(1–2):30–40. Epub 2007/03/14. doi: S0027-5107(07)00030-9 [pii] pmid:17350655; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1899158.
  61. 61. Kaldis A, Tsementzi D, Tanriverdi O, Vlachonasios KE. Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptional co-activators ADA2b and SGF29a are implicated in salt stress responses. Planta. 2011;233(4):749–62. Epub 2011/01/05. pmid:21193996.
  62. 62. Saleh A, Schieltz D, Ting N, McMahon SB, Litchfield DW, Yates JR 3rd, et al. Tra1p is a component of the yeast Ada.Spt transcriptional regulatory complexes. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1998;273(41):26559–65. Epub 1998/10/03. pmid:9756893.
  63. 63. Pray-Grant MG, Schieltz D, McMahon SJ, Wood JM, Kennedy EL, Cook RG, et al. The novel SLIK histone acetyltransferase complex functions in the yeast retrograde response pathway. Molecular and cellular biology. 2002;22(24):8774–86. Epub 2002/11/26. pmid:12446794.
  64. 64. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000;408(6814):796–815. Epub 2000/12/29. pmid:11130711.
  65. 65. Pavangadkar K, Thomashow MF, Triezenberg SJ. Histone dynamics and roles of histone acetyltransferases during cold-induced gene regulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2010;74(1–2):183–200. Epub 2010/07/28. pmid:20661629.
  66. 66. Bond DM, Dennis ES, Pogson BJ, Finnegan EJ. Histone acetylation, VERNALIZATION INSENSITIVE 3, FLOWERING LOCUS C, and the vernalization response. Mol Plant. 2009;2(4):724–37. Epub 2009/10/15. doi: ssp021 [pii] pmid:19825652.
  67. 67. Durso RJ, Fisher AK, Albright-Frey TJ, Reese JC. Analysis of TAF90 mutants displaying allele-specific and broad defects in transcription. Molecular and cellular biology. 2001;21(21):7331–44. pmid:11585915; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC99907.
  68. 68. Eberharter A, John S, Grant PA, Utley RT, Workman JL. Identification and analysis of yeast nucleosomal histone acetyltransferase complexes. Methods. 1998;15(4):315–21. Epub 1998/09/19. pmid:9740719.
  69. 69. Kirschner DB, vom Baur E, Thibault C, Sanders SL, Gangloff YG, Davidson I, et al. Distinct mutations in yeast TAF(II)25 differentially affect the composition of TFIID and SAGA complexes as well as global gene expression patterns. Molecular and cellular biology. 2002;22(9):3178–93. pmid:11940675; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC133751.
  70. 70. Ghosh S, Pugh BF. Sequential recruitment of SAGA and TFIID in a genomic response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular and cellular biology. 2011;31(1):190–202. Epub 2010/10/20. doi: MCB.00317-10 [pii] pmid:20956559.
  71. 71. Huisinga KL, Pugh BF. A genome-wide housekeeping role for TFIID and a highly regulated stress-related role for SAGA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular cell. 2004;13(4):573–85. Epub 2004/03/03. doi: S1097276504000875 [pii]. pmid:14992726.
  72. 72. Bhaumik SR. Distinct regulatory mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional activation by SAGA and TFIID. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1809(2):97–108. Epub 2010/08/31. doi: S1874-9399(10)00112-4 [pii] pmid:20800707.
  73. 73. Zanton SJ, Pugh BF. Changes in genomewide occupancy of core transcriptional regulators during heat stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(48):16843–8. Epub 2004/11/19. doi: 0404988101 [pii] pmid:15548603.
  74. 74. Spedale G, Timmers HT, Pijnappel WW. ATAC-king the complexity of SAGA during evolution. Genes & development. 2012;26(6):527–41. Epub 2012/03/20. doi: 26/6/527 [pii] pmid:22426530.
  75. 75. Ranjan A, Ansari SA, Srivastava R, Mantri S, Asif MH, Sawant SV, et al. A T9G mutation in the prototype TATA-box TCACTATATATAG determines nucleosome formation and synergy with upstream activator sequences in plant promoters. Plant physiology. 2009;151(4):2174–86. pmid:19812181; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2785982.
  76. 76. Sun J, Jiang H, Xu Y, Li H, Wu X, Xie Q, et al. The CCCH-type zinc finger proteins AtSZF1 and AtSZF2 regulate salt stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48(8):1148–58. Epub 2007/07/05. doi: pcm088 [pii] pmid:17609218.
  77. 77. Taji T, Ohsumi C, Iuchi S, Seki M, Kasuga M, Kobayashi M, et al. Important roles of drought- and cold-inducible genes for galactinol synthase in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology. 2002;29(4):417–26. Epub 2002/02/16. doi: 1227 [pii]. pmid:11846875.
  78. 78. Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shuman J, Shulaev V, Davletova S, Mittler R. When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant physiology. 2004;134(4):1683–96. Epub 2004/03/30. pp.103.033431 [pii]. pmid:15047901.
  79. 79. Lee TI, Causton HC, Holstege FC, Shen WC, Hannett N, Jennings EG, et al. Redundant roles for the TFIID and SAGA complexes in global transcription. Nature. 2000;405(6787):701–4. Epub 2000/06/23. pmid:10864329.
  80. 80. Bonnet J, Wang CY, Baptista T, Vincent SD, Hsiao WC, Stierle M, et al. The SAGA coactivator complex acts on the whole transcribed genome and is required for RNA polymerase II transcription. Genes & development. 2014;28(18):1999–2012. pmid:25228644; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4173158.
  81. 81. Furumoto T, Tamada Y, Izumida A, Nakatani H, Hata S, Izui K. Abundant expression in vascular tissue of plant TAF10, an orthologous gene for TATA box-binding protein-associated factor 10, in Flaveria trinervia and abnormal morphology of Arabidopsis thaliana transformants on its overexpression. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005;46(1):108–17. Epub 2005/01/22. doi: pci006 [pii] pmid:15659449.
  82. 82. Tamada Y, Nakamori K, Nakatani H, Matsuda K, Hata S, Furumoto T, et al. Temporary expression of the TAF10 gene and its requirement for normal development of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48(1):134–46. Epub 2006/12/07. doi: pcl048 [pii] pmid:17148695.
  83. 83. Lago C, Clerici E, Dreni L, Horlow C, Caporali E, Colombo L, et al. The Arabidopsis TFIID factor AtTAF6 controls pollen tube growth. Dev Biol. 2005;285(1):91–100. Epub 2005/07/26. doi: S0012-1606(05)00398-2 [pii] pmid:16039640.
  84. 84. Gangloff YG, Sanders SL, Romier C, Kirschner D, Weil PA, Tora L, et al. Histone folds mediate selective heterodimerization of yeast TAF(II)25 with TFIID components yTAF(II)47 and yTAF(II)65 and with SAGA component ySPT7. Molecular and cellular biology. 2001;21(5):1841–53. pmid:11238921; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC86751.
  85. 85. Gangloff YG, Werten S, Romier C, Carre L, Poch O, Moras D, et al. The human TFIID components TAF(II)135 and TAF(II)20 and the yeast SAGA components ADA1 and TAF(II)68 heterodimerize to form histone-like pairs. Molecular and cellular biology. 2000;20(1):340–51. pmid:10594036; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC85089.
  86. 86. Cohen R, Schocken J, Kaldis A, Vlachonasios KE, Hark AT, McCain ER. The histone acetyltransferase GCN5 affects the inflorescence meristem and stamen development in Arabidopsis. Planta. 2009;230(6):1207–21. Epub 2009/09/23. pmid:19771450.
  87. 87. Kornet N, Scheres B. Members of the GCN5 histone acetyltransferase complex regulate PLETHORA-mediated root stem cell niche maintenance and transit amplifying cell proliferation in Arabidopsis. The Plant cell. 2009;21(4):1070–9. Epub 2009/04/21. doi: tpc.108.065300 [pii] pmid:19376933.
  88. 88. Long JA, Ohno C, Smith ZR, Meyerowitz EM. TOPLESS regulates apical embryonic fate in Arabidopsis. Science. 2006;312(5779):1520–3. Epub 2006/06/10. doi: 312/5779/1520 [pii] pmid:16763149.
  89. 89. Sieberer T, Hauser MT, Seifert GJ, Luschnig C. PROPORZ1, a putative Arabidopsis transcriptional adaptor protein, mediates auxin and cytokinin signals in the control of cell proliferation. Curr Biol. 2003;13(10):837–42. Epub 2003/05/16. doi: S0960982203003270 [pii]. pmid:12747832.
  90. 90. Mougiou N, Poulios S, Kaldis A, Vlachonasios K. Arabidopsis thaliana TBP-associated factor 5 is essential for plant growth and development. Molecular Breeding. 2012;30(1):355–66.
  91. 91. Weake VM, Dyer JO, Seidel C, Box A, Swanson SK, Peak A, et al. Post-transcription initiation function of the ubiquitous SAGA complex in tissue-specific gene activation. Genes & development. 2011;25(14):1499–509. pmid:21764853; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3143940.
  92. 92. Weake VM, Lee KK, Guelman S, Lin CH, Seidel C, Abmayr SM, et al. SAGA-mediated H2B deubiquitination controls the development of neuronal connectivity in the Drosophila visual system. The EMBO journal. 2008;27(2):394–405. pmid:18188155; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2234343.
  93. 93. Carre C, Szymczak D, Pidoux J, Antoniewski C. The histone H3 acetylase dGcn5 is a key player in Drosophila melanogaster metamorphosis. Molecular and cellular biology. 2005;25(18):8228–38. pmid:16135811; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1234334.
  94. 94. Herrera FJ, Yamaguchi T, Roelink H, Tjian R. Core promoter factor TAF9B regulates neuronal gene expression. eLife. 2014;3:e02559. pmid:25006164; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4083437.
  95. 95. Xu W, Edmondson DG, Evrard YA, Wakamiya M, Behringer RR, Roth SY. Loss of Gcn5l2 leads to increased apoptosis and mesodermal defects during mouse development. Nature genetics. 2000;26(2):229–32. pmid:11017084.
  96. 96. Zapater M, Sohrmann M, Peter M, Posas F, de Nadal E. Selective requirement for SAGA in Hog1-mediated gene expression depending on the severity of the external osmostress conditions. Molecular and cellular biology. 2007;27(11):3900–10. Epub 2007/04/04. doi: MCB.00089-07 [pii] pmid:17403898.
  97. 97. Pankotai T, Komonyi O, Bodai L, Ujfaludi Z, Muratoglu S, Ciurciu A, et al. The homologous Drosophila transcriptional adaptors ADA2a and ADA2b are both required for normal development but have different functions. Molecular and cellular biology. 2005;25(18):8215–27. Epub 2005/09/02. doi: 25/18/8215 [pii] pmid:16135810.
  98. 98. Mao Y, Pavangadkar KA, Thomashow MF, Triezenberg SJ. Physical and functional interactions of Arabidopsis ADA2 transcriptional coactivator proteins with the acetyltransferase GCN5 and with the cold-induced transcription factor CBF1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1759(1–2):69–79. Epub 2006/04/11. doi: S0167-4781(06)00036-4 [pii] pmid:16603259.
  99. 99. Vlachonasios KE, Kaldis A, Nikoloudi A, Tsementzi D. The role of transcriptional coactivator ADA2b in Arabidopsis abiotic stress responses. Plant Signal Behav. 2011;6(10):1475–8. pmid:21897124; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3256374.
  100. 100. Lindner M, Simonini S, Kooiker M, Gagliardini V, Somssich M, Hohenstatt M, et al. TAF13 interacts with PRC2 members and is essential for Arabidopsis seed development. Developmental biology. 2013;379(1):28–37. pmid:23506837
  101. 101. Endo M, Tanigawa Y, Murakami T, Araki T, Nagatani A. PHYTOCHROME-DEPENDENT LATE-FLOWERING accelerates flowering through physical interactions with phytochrome B and CONSTANS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(44):18017–22. pmid:24127609; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3816489.
  102. 102. Endo M, Kudo D, Koto T, Shimizu H, Araki T. Light-dependent destabilization of PHL in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9(3):e28118. pmid:24614229; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4091566.
  103. 103. Gao X, Ren F, Lu YT. The Arabidopsis mutant stg1 identifies a function for TBP-associated factor 10 in plant osmotic stress adaptation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006;47(9):1285–94. pmid:16945932.
  104. 104. Kubo M, Furuta K, Demura T, Fukuda H, Liu YG, Shibata D, et al. The CKH1/EER4 gene encoding a TAF12-like protein negatively regulates cytokinin sensitivity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52(4):629–37. pmid:21357579.
  105. 105. Robles LM, Wampole JS, Christians MJ, Larsen PB. Arabidopsis enhanced ethylene response 4 encodes an EIN3-interacting TFIID transcription factor required for proper ethylene response, including ERF1 induction. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(10):2627–39. pmid:17526916.
  106. 106. Shen Y, Devic M, Lepiniec L, Zhou DX. Chromodomain, Helicase and DNA-binding CHD1 protein, CHR5, are involved in establishing active chromatin state of seed maturation genes. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015. pmid:25581843.