Commonly used visible markers for transgenesis use fluorescent proteins expressed at the surface of the body, such as in eyes. One commonly used marker is the 3xP3-EGFP cassette containing synthetic binding sites for the eyeless/Pax6 conserved transcription factor. This marker cassette leads to fluorescent eyes in a variety of animals tested so far. Here we show that upon reaching adulthood, transgenic Bicyclus anynana butterflies containing this marker cassette exponentially loose fluorescence in their eyes. After 12 days, transgenic individuals are no longer distinguishable from wild type individuals. The decreased eye fluorescence is likely due to significantly decreased or halted eyeless/Pax6 expression observed in wild type animals upon adult emergence. Implications from these findings include care in screening transgenic animals before these reach adulthood, or shortly thereafter, and in using adult animals of the same age for quantitative screening of likely homozygote and heterozygote individuals.
Citation: Das Gupta M, Chan SKS, Monteiro A (2015) Natural Loss of eyeless/Pax6 Expression in Eyes of Bicyclus anynana Adult Butterflies Likely Leads to Exponential Decrease of Eye Fluorescence in Transgenics. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0132882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132882
Editor: Efthimios M. C. Skoulakis, Alexander Fleming Biomedical Sciences Research Center, GREECE
Received: March 10, 2015; Accepted: June 22, 2015; Published: July 14, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Das Gupta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This research was funded by the Singapore Ministry of Education grant R-154-000-602-112. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Transgenesis is a powerful technique to study the function or the regulatory information contained in DNA. Commonly, genomic insertions of test candidate DNA sequences are accompanied by the insertion of a marker gene that helps in the identification of transgenic individuals. Some of the most widely used markers of transgenesis are fluorescent proteins, such as Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein (EGFP), Ds Red and others. These are inert proteins that are clearly visualized upon light excitation in live organisms once expressed, and allow the clear identification of a transgenic organism [1–3].
For fluorescent proteins to be expressed they need to be driven by an enhancer or a promoter sequence. Arguably, an ideal regulatory sequence should lead to fluorescent marker gene expression early during development, at the surface of the body, in a small region of the body, and continuously throughout development and adulthood. These marker expression characteristics allow for 1) early discard of non-transgenic organisms, saving time and resources in the rearing and screening process; 2) easy visibility and flexibility in the exact moment of screening and later maintenance of the line; and they 3) minimize conflict of fluorescent signals if tissues from the transgenic line are later going to be targeted with other fluorescent markers, such as in experiments involving antibody stainings using secondary antibodies labeled with fluorescent proteins.
One of the most common markers for transgenesis is a “cassette” consisting of a synthetic 3xP3 promoter driving EGFP . This promoter contains three binding sites for the conserved eyeless (Pax6) transcription factor, and drives gene expression in the eyes and central nervous of many animals tested so far. These include flies, mosquitoes, butterflies, moths, beetles, crustaceans, and planarians [4–10]. In addition, this marker cassette meets most of the requirements for an ideal transgenic marker mentioned above. Eyes and the central nervous system are differentiated early during embryogenesis, hence allowing for early screening; eyes, in particular, differentiate on the surface of the body, and grow over the course of development, allowing for high visibility of the marker and flexibility in moment of screening; and eyes and central nervous tissue make up a small portion of the overall cells/tissue in a body, allowing most tissue in the body to be non-fluorescent and subject to further characterization with fluorescent probes.
Recently, however, we noticed that a transgenic line of Bicyclus anynana butterflies, containing a 3xP3-EGFP-marker cassette [11, 12], was showing variable patterns of EGFP fluorescence in adult eyes. Some adult eyes, in fact, appeared almost as dim as wild type eyes. Here we investigate the cause of such adult eye brightness variability.
Several studies have assumed that eyeless (Pax6) is required to drive the expression of genes containing the P3 binding element during the later stages of compound eye development in Drosophila melanogaster [13, 14]. However, the precise function of eyeless during these stages of eye development has not been established. Furthermore, recently it was also shown that the combined function of two transcription factors in flies, namely PvuII-PstI homology 13 (Pph13) and orthodenticle, was required for proper development of eyes in the later stages . Importantly, Pph13 was shown to be necessary and sufficient to drive the expression of a reporter placed under the 3xP3 promoter. It was also shown that Pph13 and eyeless recognize the same consensus binding sequence . Therefore, we hypothesized that the reduction in EGFP expression in adult eyes in B. anynana could be explained by the reduction in the expression of either eyeless, Pph13, or both of these regulatory genes during late pupal stages and/or early adults of this species.
Below we detail a series of experiments that test these hypotheses. We then discuss the implications of our results regarding the identified shortcoming of the 3xP3-EGFP marker cassette, and propose ways to overcome it.
Materials and Methods
B. anynana were reared at 26°C, and 60–80% humidity. Larvae were fed on young corn plants. Adults were fed on moist banana slices. Animals were monitored for day of emergence, day 1, and given a unique number on their wings with a sharpie marker. Wild type as well as transgenic B. anynana butterflies containing the 3xP3-EGFP marker cassette were used for comparisons of eye brightness across time. Transgenic butterflies belonged to a Ultrabithorax over-expression line which also expresses EGFP under control of the eyeless gene via the 3xP3 promoter. The making and characterization of this line is described elsewhere [11, 12].
Eye brightness analysis
Transgenic and wild-type butterflies were repeatedly imaged for eye brightness over the course of their lives in order to detect changes in eye brightness levels with age. Butterflies were held by their wings with flexible forceps, and the head was placed under a stereo fluorescent microscope (Leica M165 FC) in a lateral position. Right eyes of adult animals were imaged and photographed under blue light illumination using a GFP filter set (excitation filter ET470/40 nm—emission filter ET525/50 nm). Frequency of imaging of the same animal varied between 2 and 3 days. On a single day, left eyes from all animals of different ages were also photographed. Digital images of eyes were analyzed for brightness levels using Adobe Photoshop. First the eye was delineated with the lasso tool, then the pixels inside the lasso tool were averaged, the image was converted to Grey Scale, and the K-values (darkness) of the pixels were obtained using the color picker tool (K value range: 0–100). We obtained brightness levels by subtracting K from 100.
Differences in brightness levels across left and right eyes of individuals of different ages were tested using a paired-samples T-test using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 21.
Graphs were plotted in Microsoft Excel for Mac 2011, version 14.4.4.
RNA extraction from heads and semi-quantitative RT-PCR
Optic lobes were separated from brains, and total RNA was extracted separately from these two brain regions from pupae and adults of different ages using TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies). Two sets of animals (with the same exact ages) were used for these experiments. In brief, tissue was homogenized in 500 μl TRIzol using metal beads, phase separated using 100 μl chloroform followed by precipitation of RNA from the aqueous phase using an equal volume of iso-propanol. Precipitated RNA was rinsed with 75% ethanol, dried, dissolved in RNase free water and stored at -20°C. The RNA was treated with DNase I (Thermo Scientific) to remove any genomic DNA contamination before proceeding with cDNA synthesis. First strand cDNA was synthesized from 2μg of total RNA and random primers using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific) following manufacturer's recommendations.
A full length B. anynana eyeless sequence was identified from an adult head transcriptome dataset (a few hours upon emergence; Macia Munoz, unpublished) (S1 File). Forward and reverse primers flanking the paired domain and homeodomain (Table 1) were used to study eyeless expression in wild type individuals (S1 File). PCR was run for EGFP in transgenic individuals, as well as eyeless in wild type individuals, and the housekeeping gene Elongation factor-1 alpha (EF1a) in both sets of individuals, using these and other primer sets (Table 1). PCR was performed using Taq DNA Polymerase (NEB) following manufacturer's recommendations. An annealing temperature of 57°C was used in all cases. The number of PCR cycles required for keeping the amplification in the exponential phase was determined empirically for each gene separately. A total of 29 amplification cycles were performed for all reactions.
GFP fluorescence decreases exponentially in the adult flies post emergence
We observed that fluorescent levels in transgenic adult individuals decreased with time in an exponential fashion (Fig 1A). Eye brightness of wild-type individuals, however, remained constant and low throughout. By day 12 after adult emergence, the brightness levels of transgenic and wild-type animals were overlapping (Fig 1B), indicating that reliable identification of a transgenic animal of this age was no longer possible. Imaging the eyes multiple times did not have a significant effect on eye brightness levels. Left eyes, imaged once, had comparable brightness levels to right eyes, imaged a variable number of times (t = 0.93, p = 0.366, df = 16). The correlation between the two measurements was also high and significant (r = 0.879, p<0.001, n = 17).
A) Brightness of right eyes of the same representative transgenic and wild type individuals over the course of 14 days. B) Quantitative variation in mean eye brightness over the course of 15 days for 3xP3-EGFP (n = 45) and Wt (n = 22) individuals. Error bars represent 1 SD.
Reduction in GFP fluorescence correlates with reduced expression of eyeless in adults
To test whether the reduced levels of eye fluorescence in the transgenic line were due to reduced expression of EGFP, we extracted mRNA from heads of transgenic pupae and adults of different ages and performed RT-PCR on these samples. EGFP was strongly expressed in the head during all the pupal stages while the expression started decreasing post emergence and was markedly reduced by day 5 of adulthood (Fig 2). After observing the decline of EGFP expression in the transgenic adults we tested whether this decline could be explained by the decrease in the expression of regulatory genes eyeless or Pph13 in wild type eye development.
Levels of EGFP and the house-keeping gene Elongation Factor 1-alpha cDNA, present in head samples of transgenic pupae and adults of different ages inferred with semi-quantitative RT-PCR. PD- Pupal Day and AD- Adult Day.
An analysis of orthologous genes across 57 species of arthropods using D. melanogaster Pph13 gene as the query in OrthoDB (http://cegg.unige.ch/orthodb7)  showed that 41 out of the 57 species have at least one copy of this gene. Interestingly, an ortholog of this gene was specifically missing in the lepidopteran clade (Fig 3). Additionally, searching the genome databases of B. anynana (www.bicyclus.org) and other lepidopterans like Danaus plexippus (MonarchBase, http://monarchbase.umassmed.edu/home.html), Bombyx mori (SilkDB, http://www.silkdb.org/silkdb/) and other butterflies (Heliconius Genome Project, http://www.butterflygenome.org/), using the same query sequence, did not yield any significant matches outside the conserved homeodomain. On the other hand, the orthologs of eyeless and orthodenticle were present in all the 57 arthropod species listed in OrthoDB (not shown). Therefore, we reasoned that the reduction in EGFP levels in the adult butterfly eyes could be the result of reduced eyeless expression. Since eyeless is known to be expressed in the optic lobes as well as the central nervous system in flies [13, 14], we separated the brain from the optic lobes of pupae and adult wild type butterflies before extracting the total RNA from these structures.
Out of the 57 species, 41 showed the presence of at least one copy of Pph13 in their genomes (indicated by red rectangle). A clear ortholog of Pph13 was specifically missing in the lepidopteran clade. Blue arrow shows the point of probable loss of this gene in this clade. The phylogenetic tree was adapted from OrthoDB (http://cegg.unige.ch/orthodb7).
At least two different isoforms of eyeless are expressed in the developing eye discs of Drosophila due to alternative splicing . The protein isoforms differ in length by 60 amino acids and bind to the same target sites with different affinities. It has been suggested that an equilibrium in the levels of these two isoforms may be necessary for proper eye development . Both isoforms contain the conserved DNA-binding homeodomain and the paired-domain. Since the latter is necessary for binding to the 3xP3 promoter [13, 14], we designed primers around the paired domain of the gene to study the expression levels of eyeless in B. anynana optic lobes (Fig 4B). In addition, we also investigated eyeless expression using primers that amplify the homeodomain (Fig 4B).
(A) Dissected brain and optic lobes of a 2-day old pupa of B. anynana. (B) Schematic of the B. anynana eyeless gene and the size and position of the three amplicons (I, II, and III), and respective primers, used to monitor eyeless expression levels. (C) Expression levels of the three eyeless amplicons in the optic lobes and brain of pupae and adult butterflies of different ages inferred with semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Elongation Factor 1-alpha (ef-1) was used as the internal control. PD- Pupal Day and AD- Adult Day.
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed strong expression of eyeless in the optic lobes as well as the brain of wild type animals during the pupal stages but showed a significant reduction in adult optic lobes starting on day 1 post emergence and in brains starting a little later (Fig 4C). This result was observed with primer pairs flanking both the paired domain and homeodomain (Fig 4C). By the 5th day post emergence, eyeless expression was almost undetectable in the optic lobes. Since the expression pattern of EGFP closely matches that of eyeless in the optic lobes, we propose that the reduction of fluorescence in the adult eyes of B. anynana is due to the reduction in eyeless expression upon emergence of the butterflies.
Here we discover that the 3xP3-EGFP marker cassette, which has been widely used as a marker for transgenesis in a variety of organisms [4–10] has one shortcoming in butterflies: it does not effectively mark older transgenic animals. The transgenic line tested here had very high levels of eye fluorescence in freshly emerged adults but eye brightness became comparable to that of wild type eyes after 12 days. This reduction in fluorescence levels is likely due to the substantial reduction or arrest in eyeless (Pax6) gene expression that is known to drive the 3xP3 synthetic promoter. This likely led to low EGFP mRNA production, and likely low EGFP protein levels. The half-life of (E)GFP proteins in mammalian cell culture is around 26 hours . This explains the exponential decay of fluorescence starting at day 1. These findings, while specific for the study organism described here, may be more generally applicable to other animals.
The 12-day “grace” period identified in this study may also be specific to this line of transgenic butterflies. Previous transgenic lines for B. anynana had substantially lower starting levels of eye fluorescence relative to the line examined here [7, 18, 19]. Variation in fluorescent levels across transgenic lines is commonplace and often attributed to regulatory sequences flanking the exact genomic insertion site of the marker cassette. Two new transgenic lines recently established in the lab have an even shorter grace period for screening. Larval and pupal eyes are extremely bright, but green fluorescence becomes extremely reduced by the last day of pupation and transgenic and wild-type animals look alike upon emergence.
eyeless is a conserved transcription factor involved in eye development across metazoans . It is still unclear whether this gene has a function in the maintenance of gene expression in adult eyes, once development is complete. Our results suggest that strong eyeless expression is maintained in the optic lobes throughout the pupal stages of wild type animals and the reduction in expression starts in recently emerged adults (day 1; Fig 4C). No detectable levels of eyeless mRNA were present in day 6 wild type adults (Fig 4C). The pupal stages coincide with the differentiation of adult compound eyes and the loss of smaller simpler larval eyes, the stemmata. Overall, our data indicate that eyeless may be important for eye development but not eye maintenance in adult butterflies.
In D. melanogaster, the development of the adult eye structures seem to be regulated by a combined activity of Pph13 and otd . Since a clear ortholog of Pph13 could not be detected in the sequenced lepidopteran species, it is possible that these species combine the activities of eyeless and otd in the generation of the adult eye structures.
Our finding highlights important precautions that should be taken when creating or maintaining transgenic lines that rely on the 3xP3 promoter as well as other promoters that rely on eyeless/Pax6 to drive gene expression in the eyes. An example of the latter includes a lens crystalline enhancer driving the expression of fluorescent proteins in the eyes of transgenic mice [22, 23]. These precautions assume that, as in B. anynana, eyeless/Pax6 is down regulated in eyes as the animals reach adulthood, but should obviously be verified in each individual system. The precautions are:
- To not rely exclusively on screening transgenic lines during adulthood. If adulthood is the most convenient stage for screening, then ensure the animals are screened in the first few days after reaching adulthood.
- To use adult individuals of exactly the same age to quantify fluorescent levels to distinguish homozygotes from heterozygotes. A few studies, including previous work from this lab, have relied on quantifying the intensity of eye fluorescence in adults to establish homozygous lines [11, 22]. We suggest that age be kept constant otherwise no reliable identification of genotype can be done.
S1 File. Bicyclus anynana eyeless sequences and the primers used in the RT-PCR experiments.
(A) Bicyclus anynana eyeless mRNA sequence. The regions coding for the paired domain and the homeodomain are highlighted in green and yellow, respectively. The positions of the primers are underlined. F and R refer to forward and reverse primers, respectively. (B) Sequence of amplicons using the primers used in the study. (C) Alignment of the sequenced regions to the eyeless mRNA highlighting the paired domain and homeodomain.
We thank Nesibe Özsu for first noticing that fluorescent levels of transgenic individuals were variable in the Ubx over-expression line, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Conceived and designed the experiments: MDG AM. Performed the experiments: MDG SKSC. Analyzed the data: MDG SKSC AM. Wrote the paper: MDG AM.
- 1. Chiu WL, Niwa Y, Zeng W, Hirano T, Kobayashi H, Sheen J. Engineered GFP as a vital reporter in plants. Curr Biol. 1996;6(3):325–30. WOS:A1996UC44000027. pmid:8805250
- 2. Ikawa M, Kominami K, Yoshimura Y, Tanaka K, Nishimune Y, Okabe M. Green fluorescent protein as a marker in transgenic mice. Development Growth & Differentiation. 1995;37(4):455–9. WOS:A1995RQ62500012.
- 3. Yeh E, Gustafson K, Boulianne GL. Green fluorescent protein as a vital marker and reporter of gene-expression in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(15):7036–40. WOS:A1995RJ89200077. pmid:7624365
- 4. Berghammer AJ, Klingler M, Wimmer EA. A universal marker for transgenic insects. Nature. 1999;402:370–1. pmid:10586872
- 5. Gonzalez-Estevez C, Momose T, Gehring WJ, Salo E. Transgenic planarian lines obtained by electroporation using transposon-derived vectors and an eye-specific GFP marker. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(24):14046–51. WOS:000186803800055. pmid:14615580
- 6. Kokoza V, Ahmed A, Wimmer EA, Raikhel AS. Efficient transformation of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti using the piggyBac transposable element vector pBac 3xP3-EGFP afm. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2001;31(12):1137–43. WOS:000172111700001. pmid:11583926
- 7. Marcus JM, Ramos DM, Monteiro A. Germ line transformation of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Proc R Soc B. 2004;271:S263–S5. pmid:15503989
- 8. Pavlopoulos A, Averof M. Establishing genetic transformation for comparative developmental studies in the crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(22):7888–93. WOS:000229531000021. pmid:15911760
- 9. Thomas J-L, Rocha MD, Besse A, Mauchamp B, Chavancy G. 3xP3-EGFP marker facilitates screening for trasngenic silkworm Bombyx mori L. from the embryonic stage onwards. Insect Biochem Molec Biol. 2002;32:247–53.
- 10. Warren IA, Fowler K, Smith H. Germline transformation of the stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni. BMC Mol Biol. 2010;11. WOS:000285192700001.
- 11. Chen B, Hrycaj S, Schinko JB, Podlaha O, Wimmer EA, Popadic A, et al. Pogostick: A new versatile piggyBac vector for inducible gene over-expression and down-regulation in emerging model systems. PLoS One. 2011;6 (4):e18659. pmid:21533190
- 12. Tong X, Hrycaj S, Podlaha O, Popadic A, Monteiro A. Over-expression of Ultrabithorax alters embryonic body plan and wing patterns in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Dev Biol. 2014;394(2):357–66. WOS:000342395400015. pmid:25169193
- 13. Papatsenko D, Nazina A, Desplan C. A conserved regulatory element present in all Drosophila rhodopsin genes mediates Pax6 functions and participates in the fine-tuning of cell-specific expression. Mech Dev. 2001;101(1–2):143–53. pmid:11231067.
- 14. Sheng G, Thouvenot E, Schmucker D, Wilson DS, Desplan C. Direct regulation of rhodopsin 1 by Pax-6/eyeless in Drosophila: evidence for a conserved function in photoreceptors. Genes Dev. 1997;11(9):1122–31. pmid:9159393.
- 15. Kriventseva EV, Tegenfeldt F, Petty TJ, Waterhouse RM, Simao FA, Pozdnyakov IA, et al. OrthoDB v8: update of the hierarchical catalog of orthologs and the underlying free software. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D250–6. pmid:25428351.
- 16. Fic W, Juge F, Soret J, Tazi J. Eye Development under the control of SRp55/B52-Mediated Alternative Splicing of eyeless. Plos One. 2007;2(2). WOS:000207444600013.
- 17. Corish P, Tyler-Smith C. Attenuation of green fluorescent protein half-life in mammalian cells. Protein Engineering. 1999;12(12):1035–40. WOS:000084683000005. pmid:10611396
- 18. Monteiro A, Chen B, Ramos DM, Oliver JC, Tong X, Guo M, et al. Distal-less regulates eyespot patterns and melanization in Bicyclus butterflies. J Exp Zool Part B. 2013;320(5):321–31.
- 19. Ramos DM, Kamal F, Wimmer EA, Cartwright AN, Monteiro A. Temporal and spatial control of transgene expresson using laser induction of the hsp70 promoter. BMC Dev Biol. 2006;6:55. pmid:17116248
- 20. Gehring WJ, Ikeo K. Pax 6—mastering eye morphogenesis and eye evolution. Trends Genet. 1999;15(9):371–7. ISI:000082263900012. pmid:10461206
- 21. Mishra M, Oke A, Lebel C, McDonald EC, Plummer Z, Cook TA, et al. Pph13 and orthodenticle define a dual regulatory pathway for photoreceptor cell morphogenesis and function. Development. 2010;137(17):2895–904. pmid:20667913; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2938920. pmid:20667913
- 22. Cornett JC, Landrette SF, Xu T. Characterization of Fluorescent Eye Markers for Mammalian Transgenic Studies. Plos One. 2011;6(12). WOS:000300676300061.
- 23. Yang Y, Stopka T, Golestaneh N, Wang Y, Wu K, Li A, et al. Regulation of alpha A-crystallin via Pax6, c-Maf, CREB and a broad domain of lens-specific chromatin. EMBO J. 2006;25(10):2107–18. WOS:000237590000007. pmid:16675956