Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Comparison of Bile Acids and Acetaminophen Protein Adducts in Children and Adolescents with Acetaminophen Toxicity

  • Laura James ,

    Affiliations Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, United States of America, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Little Rock, AR 72202, United States of America

  • Ke Yan,

    Affiliation Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States of America

  • Lisa Pence,

    Affiliation Division of Systems Biology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR 72079, United States of America

  • Pippa Simpson,

    Affiliation Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States of America

  • Sudeepa Bhattacharyya,

    Affiliations Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, United States of America, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Little Rock, AR 72202, United States of America

  • Pritmohinder Gill,

    Affiliations Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, United States of America, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Little Rock, AR 72202, United States of America

  • Lynda Letzig,

    Affiliations Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, United States of America, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Little Rock, AR 72202, United States of America

  • Gregory Kearns,

    Affiliation Division of Pediatric Pharmacology, Medical Toxicology and Therapeutic Innovation, The Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States of America

  • Richard Beger

    Affiliation Division of Systems Biology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR 72079, United States of America

Comparison of Bile Acids and Acetaminophen Protein Adducts in Children and Adolescents with Acetaminophen Toxicity

  • Laura James, 
  • Ke Yan, 
  • Lisa Pence, 
  • Pippa Simpson, 
  • Sudeepa Bhattacharyya, 
  • Pritmohinder Gill, 
  • Lynda Letzig, 
  • Gregory Kearns, 
  • Richard Beger


Metabolomics approaches have enabled the study of new mechanisms of liver injury in experimental models of drug toxicity. Disruption of bile acid homeostasis is a known mechanism of drug induced liver injury. The relationship of individual bile acids to indicators of oxidative drug metabolism (acetaminophen protein adducts) and liver injury was examined in children with acetaminophen overdose, hospitalized children with low dose exposure to acetaminophen, and children with no recent exposure to acetaminophen. Nine bile acids were quantified through targeted metabolomic analysis in the serum samples of the three groups. Bile acids were compared to serum levels of acetaminophen protein adducts and alanine aminotransferase. Glycodeoxycholic acid, taurodeoxycholic acid, and glycochenodeoxycholic acid were significantly increased in children with acetaminophen overdose compared to healthy controls. Among patients with acetaminophen overdose, bile acids were higher in subjects with acetaminophen protein adduct values > 1.0 nmol/mL and modest correlations were noted for three bile acids and acetaminophen protein adducts as follows: taurodeoxycholic acid (R=0.604; p<0.001), glycodeoxycholic acid (R=0.581; p<0.001), and glycochenodeoxycholic acid (R=0.571; p<0.001). Variability in bile acids was greater among hospitalized children receiving low doses of acetaminophen than in healthy children with no recent acetaminophen exposure. Compared to bile acids, acetaminophen protein adducts more accurately discriminated among children with acetaminophen overdose, children with low dose exposure to acetaminophen, and healthy control subjects. In children with acetaminophen overdose, elevations of conjugated bile acids were associated with specific indicators of acetaminophen metabolism and non-specific indicators of liver injury.


Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is a major cause of acute liver failure and acute liver injury in the western world [1]. Hepatic metabolism of APAP is known to be a critical factor in the development of hepatotoxicity. Following low dose exposure, APAP is primarily metabolized through conjugation reactions, and oxidation reactions play a relatively minor role. However, following exposure to large doses of APAP, conjugation pathways are saturated and a relatively greater proportion of the drug undergoes oxidative metabolism. Oxidation, which occurs through the cytochrome P450 enzymes located in the centrilobular regions of the liver, generates the reactive metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI), which, along with the depletion of hepatic glutathione, is recognized to be a critical initiating step in the development of hepatotoxicity [2]. NAPQI binds to cysteine groups on proteins to form APAP protein adducts, which are released from the centrilobular hepatocytes, in addition to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and enter the peripheral circulation during hepatocyte lysis [3]. Previous experimental and clinical studies suggest that serum levels of APAP protein adducts can serve as biomarkers of APAP-related hepatotoxicity, reflecting the oxidative metabolism of the drug [46]. Other mechanisms are known to contribute to the toxicity and include oxygen and nitrogen stress [7], mitochondrial permeability transition [8,9], and intracellular signaling mechanisms involving c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase activation [10].

Over the last decade, “omics”-based approaches have been increasingly used to investigate mechanisms of drug induced liver injury, including APAP toxicity. Metabolomics-based approaches have been used to examine the relationship of intermediates of fatty acid oxidation, energy production, and redox balance to the overall toxicity response [1114]. For example, Clayton et al. showed that variability in the diet could influence conjugation reactions and modulate the overall toxicity response in the rat model of APAP toxicity [11]. In addition, metabolomic approaches have further demonstrated the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in APAP toxicity by showing the elevation of circulating long chain acylcarnitines, substrates of β-oxidation, in experimental and clinical studies [13,1517].

Alteration of bile acid transport is a known mechanism of drug induced liver injury [18,19]. Elevations of bile acids have been reported for a number of hepatotoxins regardless of the specific pattern of liver injury (necrosis, steatosis, cholestatic, and idiosyncratic). In experimental models of drug induced liver injury, the most significant alterations in bile acid homeostasis were shown for toxins that cause either necrosis or cholestasis [20]. In addition, in mice treated with toxic doses of APAP, it was shown that dietary modulations that alter the existing bile acid pool changed the sensitivity of mice to APAP toxicity [21].

In the following study, targeted bile acid analysis was performed in serum samples from children and adolescents with APAP overdose, healthy children with no recent APAP exposure and hospitalized children receiving APAP per standard of care. Bile acids were compared to APAP protein adducts, an indicator of the oxidative metabolism of APAP [6,22] and ALT, the most widely used clinical indicator of liver injury.

Patients and Methods

The study was a multicenter study of APAP toxicity in children ages 2–18 years and was approved by the institutional review boards of all participating institutions, in accordance with the guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Written, parental consent was obtained for all participating subjects and written assent was obtained in subjects over 7 years of age. Informed consent (and assent) documents were approved by the UAMS Institutional Review Board as well as the institutional review boards of all participating sites: Akron Children's Hospital Institutional Review Board, Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board, Children's Mercy Hospital Institutional Review Board, Children's National Medical Center Institutional Review Board, Cook Children's Hospital Institutional Review Board, ProMedica Health Systems Institutional Review Board, and The University of Louisville Institutional Review Board. Following informed consent and assent when age appropriate, blood samples were collected from study subjects classified into three subject groups defined as Group A (Therapeutic APAP dose, consisting of hospitalized children with various medical conditions receiving APAP per standard of care); Group B (Controls, healthy children with no use of APAP in the preceding 14 days); and Group C (APAP Overdose, consisting of children requiring hospitalization for treatment of APAP overdose, based on an assessment of history of ingestion and quantitation of APAP in peripheral blood [23]). For subjects in Group A, timed blood samples were collected prior to receipt of the first APAP dose “on study” and thereafter at 8 and 24 h after the first dose of APAP, followed by convenience sampling throughout the period of hospitalization. A single blood sample was collected in Group B subjects and admission and daily morning blood samples were collected in subjects in Group C. Blood samples were centrifuged within 30 minutes of collection and the serum was stored at -80°C.

Clinical data collection

Clinical and demographic data were collected prospectively using a study-specific electronic data base that included subject age, gender, weight, height, body mass index, past medical history, and relevant history concerning recent APAP dosing and concomitant medications. Data on dose (mg/kg), frequency, route of administration (oral, rectal, intravenous) were collected for APAP (Group A) and for N-acetylcysteine (NAC), the clinical antidote for APAP overdose (Group C). Clinical laboratory data recorded in the data base included determinations of APAP and ALT performed by participating hospital clinical laboratories. APAP and NAC dosing, route, and frequency were at the discretion of the treating physician.

APAP protein adduct assay

APAP protein adducts in serum were analyzed using a previously published and validated assay [6,22,24]. Serum was gel filtered using 96 well desalting plates (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and hydrolyzed with protease (Sigma, St Louis, MO) to release APAP-cysteine from APAP protein adducts [6,22]. After precipitation and extraction, samples were injected onto a high performance with liquid chromatography system (ESA Corp, Chelmsford, MA) and resolved on a 150 mm C18 column (Symmetry, Waters, Milford, MA). APAP cysteine was detected using a coulometric electrochemical detector and quantified relative to a standard curve of authentic APAP cysteine using Coularray Software (Thermo Scientific, Chelmsford, MA). Final APAP cysteine adduct values were reported as nmol APAP protein adduct/ml serum.

Metabolomic analysis of bile acids

Targeted metabolomic analysis of nine bile acids was performed using ultra performance liquid chromatography with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry as previously described [25]. Bile acids measured included Cholic acid (CA); Chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA); Deoxycholic acid (DCA); Taurocholic acid (TCA); Taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA); Tauchenodeoxycholic acid (TCDCA); Glycocholic acid (GCA); Glycodeoxycholic acid (GDCA); Glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA). Serum samples (50 μl) were thawed and spiked with isotope labeled individual bile acid standards. The samples were then de-proteinized, dried, reconstituted in methanol:water (50:50, v/v) and subjected to UPLC separation using an Acquity UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA) equipped with an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm particle size). A Waters Xevo Triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operated in ESI-negative mode was used for absolute quantitation of bile acids in serum using stable isotope standards. Multiple Reaction Monitoring transitions for bile acids were optimized by direct infusion of standards.

Statistical analysis

Non-parametric statistical tests (Kruskal-Wallis) were used to compare clinical and laboratory data among the three groups of subjects (p<0.05) and the Mann-Whitney test was used for pairwise comparisons between two groups (p<0.05). Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated for comparison of peak measurements of bile acids to peak APAP protein adducts. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was conducted to identify “cut points” of bile acid measurements that best discriminated subject samples with peak APAP protein adduct values of ≥ 1.0 vs. peak adduct < 1.0 nmol/mL, a previously determined “toxicity threshold” for APAP protein adducts in patients with APAP liver injury [6,24].


Clinical and demographic data

A total of 88 children (Group A, 15; Group B, 19; Group C, 64) completed the study. Demographic and clinical data characteristics by group are summarized in Table 1. Children in Groups A and C were older than those of Group B and had higher body weights. More females (68.37%) than males participated in the study as a whole, but there were more males (73.33%) than females in Group A. No significant differences in race were detected among the groups (data not shown), but there were more Hispanics in Group B (5 of 15; p = 0.033), compared to Group A (0 of 19) and Group C (5 of 63).

The median (range) daily dose of APAP for subjects in Group A was determined for the initial 24 and 48 h of the study. The daily dose of APAP was higher (p = 0.014) in the initial 24 h (31.0 [6.2–100.6] mg/kg APAP) compared to the initial 48 h (20.5 [3.1–57.5] mg/kg APAP), indicating a decline in the median daily dose between study day 1 and day 2. Daily doses were within the recommended dose range for APAP use in children [26].

APAP overdose patients may be relatively asymptomatic during the initial 24 hours following APAP overdose, as the development of overt toxicity may not be apparent until 24 to 48 hours after the time of ingestion. Thus, patients are evaluated for the potential risk of hepatotoxicity through the use of a nomogram (ie, Rumack nomogram [27]) based on quantified levels of APAP plotted as a function of the time elapsed since the occurrence of the APAP ingestion. Among the 64 Group C patients, 40 were judged to be “at risk” for liver injury on the basis of the Rumack nomogram [27]. Additional clinical factors which prompted hospitalization and NAC treatment were the elevation of ALT values at the time of presentation to the hospital (n = 5 subjects), and the co-ingestion of antihistamines (n = 2 subjects), which may alter gastric motility and thus limit utility of the nomogram [28]. The time of the ingestion could not be determined for one subject. Thus, overall, 73% of Group C patients were viewed to be “at risk” for the development of liver injury. There were no deaths or liver transplants in the study cohort.

Group C Treatment Data

All children in Group C received treatment with NAC. Since the efficacy of NAC in preventing hepatic injury is a function of the time it is administered relative to the time of the drug overdose [29], the data analysis was stratified by time to the first dose of NAC relative to the reported time of the APAP ingestion. Time data was known for 60 of 64 subjects in Group C. Distribution of time to first dose of NAC was <10 h for 34 (56.7%) subjects, 10–24 h for 12 (20%) subjects, and ≥24 h for 14 (23.3%) subjects, and was consistent with published studies in APAP toxicity in children [30]. Eleven of the 64 (17.2%) subjects in Group C had ALT values > 1000 IU/L.

Toxicity and metabolism data

Table 2 provides summary data of descriptive statistics for serum ALT (IU/L) and serum APAP protein adducts (nmol/mL). Since multiple measures were obtained for the study subjects in Groups A and C, the data were analyzed by peak measured value for ALT and APAP protein adducts. Peak ALT differed among the three groups (p = 0.003) and was higher in Groups A (p = 0.003) and C (p = 0.001) than in Group B. However, peak ALT for Group C was not higher than Group A, likely as a function of the large subset of patients within Group C that received early treatment with NAC and thus did not develop toxicity. In contrast, APAP protein adducts differed among the three groups and were statistically different between each group.

Table 2. Summary data for peak alanine aminotransferase values (ALT), acetaminophen (APAP) protein adducts, and bile acids by group.

Bile acid metabolites

Summary data, presented as peak values, for bile acids by subject group are presented in Table 2. Significant differences were detected among the three groups for serum levels of 6 of the 9 bile acids (excluding TCDCA, CDCA, and DCA, **three way comparison). As shown in Table 2, pair-wise comparisons between groups showed that the greatest differences in bile acids were observed for subjects in Group C (overdose) compared to Group B (healthy controls). TDCA, GDCA, and GCDCA were elevated in Group C compared to values in healthy controls. In contrast, TCA and CA were decreased in Group C compared to Group B (healthy controls). However, comparison of bile acids in Group C (overdose) to Group A (therapeutic exposure) revealed fewer differences among the bile acids. Only CDCA was higher in Group C than in Group A subjects (p<0.05), while TCA and GCA were lower in Group C than in Group A. Comparison between Groups A and B showed greater variability among bile acids in Group A than Group B, possibly as a function of the heterogeneous nature of disease among the subjects in Group A.

Comparison of bile acids to toxicity parameters

Due to the limited subject sampling scheme of this pediatric study, relative comparison of temporal changes in bile acids, APAP protein adducts and ALT in the early hours after the APAP overdose was not possible. As an alternative, the time to reach peak measurement for individual bile acids was examined and compared as a function of APAP protein adduct concentrations. APAP protein adduct values ≥ 1.0 nmol/mL have been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity (97 and 95%, respectively) in patients with APAP liver injury (defined as an ALT value of > 1000 IU/L) [6,24]. As shown in Fig 1, time to reach peak measure for each bile acid was shorter in subjects with APAP protein adducts < 1.0 nmol/mL, compared to subjects with APAP protein adducts ≥ 1.0 nmol/mL. Correlation analysis was also performed for peak APAP protein adducts versus peak bile acid levels. The highest correlations were noted for TDCA (R = 0.604; p<0.001), GDCA (R = 0.581; p<0.001), and GCDCA (R = 0.571; p<0.001).

Fig 1. Comparison of time to reach peak bile acid, presented as a function of peak APAP protein adduct < or ≥ 1.0 nmol/mL APAP protein adduct.

*denotes > 2.0 times the 25–75th percentile; Odenotes > 1.5 times the 25–75th percentile. GCA, Glycocholic acid; GDCA, Glycodeoxycholic acid; TDCA, Taurodeoxycholic acid.

In subsequent analysis, ROC analysis was conducted to identify bile acid cut points that maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity for discriminating patients with peak adducts < 1.0 nmol/mL or ≥ 1.0 nmol/mL. TDCA values > 0.56 uM had the highest area under the curve value for discriminating subjects at the adduct toxicity cut point of 1.0 nmol/mL (Fig 2), followed by GDCA.

Fig 2. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis of bile acids (BA) that best distinguished subjects with acetaminophen protein adducts < 1 versus ≥ 1.0 nmol/mL.

TDCA, Taurodeoxycholic acid; GCDA, Glycodeoxycholic acid.

In previous work, APAP protein adducts and ALT were shown to be higher in patients with greater delays in receiving treatment with NAC [31]. Thus, the relationship of bile acids to initiation of treatment with NAC was examined and compared to that of APAP protein adducts and ALT. Table 3 provides correlations between individual parameters in relationship to time to NAC treatment. None of the bile acids were highly correlated with time to NAC treatment; ALT and APAP protein adducts were modestly correlated with time to NAC treatment.

Table 3. Correlation analysis of peak biomarker versus time to treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC)*.

Thus, overall, the data suggest that several of the conjugated bile acids associate with toxicity severity in APAP overdose, as defined by both ALT values and APAP protein adduct concentrations.


Bile acids are formed during the biotransformation of cholesterol through two metabolic pathways known as the “classical” or neutral pathway and the “alternative” or acidic pathway. The classical pathway produces primary bile acids and involves microsomal cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1), while the alternative pathway involves biotransformation of cholesterol through mitochondrial sterol 27-hydroxylase (CYP27A1) followed by oxysterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7B1) [32]. More than 90% of bile acids in humans are derived from the classical pathway, represented by cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), which are conjugated by either taurine or glycine for secretion into bile. Deoxycholic acid is a secondary bile acid that is formed through dehydroxylation by intestinal bacteria and is reabsorbed through enterohepatic recirculation to maintain a constant pool of bile acids [33].

The increased availability of metabolomics technology has enabled investigations of the relationship between small molecules of endogenous metabolism and the development of liver injury in experimental models of APAP toxicity [11,13,25,34]. A 1975 publication found that a composite measure of bile acids was more sensitive than serum AST for detecting APAP liver injury verified by liver biopsy [35]. Using a multicenter, prospective sample collection design, serum bile acids were compared among hospitalized children and adolescents with APAP overdose, low dose APAP exposure, and healthy children with no recent APAP exposure. Multiple differences in individual bile acids were observed among the three groups (Table 2). Elevations of conjugated bile acids (e.g., GDCA, TDCA and GCDCA) were observed in the APAP overdose group compared to the healthy control group. However, differences in the conjugated bile acids were less pronounced between the two APAP exposure groups (Groups A and C), possibly as a function of the disease heterogeneity of the subjects in Group A, or the relatively low morbidity of the pediatric cohort of the study [32]. Conjugated bile acid elevation was associated with the severity of toxicity (Fig 1), which we defined on the basis of APAP protein adduct levels based on our previous data [6,24]. Comparison of bile acids (Fig 2) in patients with an APAP protein adduct level > 1.0 nmol/mL, a previously identified “cut-point” value with high sensitivity and specificity for APAP toxicity in patients with an ALT values above 1000 IU/L, showed modest, but statistically significant correlations between peak measurements of adducts and peak measurements of TDCA (R = 0.604; p<0.001), GDCA (R = 0.581; p<0.001), and GCDCA (R = 0.571; p<0.001). Similar to our study, a recent report examined specific bile acids in adults (median [range] of age, 34 [18–61 years]) with APAP-related acute liver failure and found that GCDCA, TCDCA, GCA, TCA, GDCA, and TDCA were elevated in patients above the values found in controls and that GDCA was significantly higher in APAP non-survivors, compared to survivors [36]. Of note, the authors found that GDCA values were higher in the APAP liver failure group than in patients with cholestatic liver injury. Our study differed from this earlier study in that our study population was younger and had lower morbidity and no mortality and thus comparison of individual bile acids to survival was not possible.

Examination of the primary bile acids showed that CA was lower in the APAP overdose group (compared to Group B), while CDCA was only reduced in Group A when compared to Group B. The lower levels of CA in the APAP overdose subjects could be consistent with a protective mechanism of the liver and a shift from the classical to the alternative pathway of metabolism, as has been shown for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [32].

The mechanistic significance of elevated bile acids in children with APAP overdose and liver injury is unclear. Previous studies in rodent models of APAP toxicity [25,37] found elevations of taurocholic and deoxycholic acid in blood samples of rats treated with APAP and noted correlations among bile acids and serum ALT and among bile acids and necrosis scores [25]. In addition, genes regulating bile acid synthesis (Cyp7A1 and Cyp8B1) and cholesterol transport (Abcd1) were down-regulated, while genes that increased bile acid transport (Mrp2, Mrp3, Mrp4) were up-regulated [37]. Thus, data in the experimental model of APAP toxicity (ie., bile acid perturbations and changes in gene regulation) indicated the occurrence of transient intrahepatic cholestasis [25]. During bile acid metabolism, bile acids are conjugated by taurine or glycine at the carboxyl position to form metabolites that are more hydrophilic and thus less toxic to hepatocytes [33]. Treatment with taurine (2-aminoethanesulfonic acid), a conditionally essential organic acid formed as an end-product of methionine and cysteine metabolism [38], was protective in a number of organ injury models, including experimental studies of APAP toxicity [39]. Taurine also has anti-oxidant effects in vitro [40]. The taurine conjugates of bile salts (e.g., ursodeoxycholic acid) are hepatoprotective and stimulate bile acid excretion by evoking signaling mechanisms involving intracellular calcium [41]. Thus, the pattern of increased levels of conjugated bile acids in subjects with APAP overdose could be consistent with a regulatory, protective response of the liver. In a metabolomic profiling study conducted in rodents, the upregulation of primary bile acids and their conjugates was observed for toxins that had primarily either a necrotic pattern of liver injury (APAP, bendazac, methapyrilene, and ticlopidine) or a cholestatic liver injury pattern (eg., DL-ethionine) [20]. Bile acids were not increased in response to nephrotoxins or muscular toxins. Thus, it was postulated that bile acids may represent very sensitive markers of drug induced liver injury and be tested as potential candidate biomarkers for future application in liver screening panels.

APAP protein adducts reflect the contribution of oxidative metabolism to APAP toxicity [42] and are specific to APAP exposure [5]. In addition, the sensitivity of the analytical assay for quantitation of APAP protein adducts is such that very low levels of adducts can be quantified in subjects receiving APAP in the clinical setting [43]. As shown in Table 2, differences in adduct levels between “therapeutic” exposure (Group A) and “toxic” (Group C) were apparent in this study. The elevation of bile acids is not specific to APAP toxicity and it is likely that bile acids are elevated in other forms of drug-induced liver injury in man [22], as well as other disease conditions, including NAFLD and cholestatic liver disease. Further study of bile acids as potential predictors of survival, as suggested by others [36], appears warranted. Our data demonstrate that understanding bile acid profiles in the context of other medical conditions and exposure to “low dose” APAP is also an important component of biomarker examination (Table 3). In previous work, we found observed a relationship of peak adduct levels to treatment delay with NAC. [31] The relationship of biomarker profiles to the initiation of treatment with NAC is also an important consideration in studies of biomarkers in APAP toxicity (Table 3).

It has also possible that perturbations of bile acid profiles may be useful in the future to examine the homeostatic integrity of the liver in the recovery and regeneration stages of liver injury. This concept has been tested in a previous clinical study in which bile acid profiles in biliary fluid were examined pre- and post- liver transplant as a functional indicator of metabolic capacity [44]. The limited sampling nature of the present study did not allow full comparison of the predictive toxicity potential of APAP protein adducts versus bile acids. An important question to address in future studies would be whether or not elevation of bile acids proceeded or followed APAP protein adduct elevations and the relative temporal relationships of these biomarkers to ALT elevations in patients with APAP overdose and resulting toxicity.

Several additional limitations of the present study merit consideration. The three subject groups differed somewhat by age and by distribution of gender (Table 2). In addition, the doses of APAP administered in Group A were not controlled by the study and were administered on an as needed basis due to the age group of the study. Group A subjects were heterogeneous with respect to the medical conditions requiring hospitalization which may have contributed to the variability of bile acid profiles in this group. In addition, bile acids may be influenced by diet and other environmental effects. The subjects in Group C represent a previously healthy cohort of patients with minimal pre-existing morbidity and no mortality. A particular advantage of the pediatric population is the relative lack of pre-existing liver disease as would be anticipated to be more common in older populations. In addition, co-ingestions with other drugs, such as opioids, are relatively rare in pediatric APAP toxicity [30], as opposed to adults with APAP overdoses resulting in severe liver injury and liver failure [1].

The data provided herein have application to other studies of drug induced liver injury and suggests a potential role for bile acid profiles as sensitive determinants of liver injury in drug development. Additional research to further understand the mechanistic significance of bile acid elevations in APAP exposure and toxicity is of interest, especially in light of recent studies that have illustrated the role of bile acids as signaling molecules that are important in lipid and glucose metabolism. Finally, this study illustrates how metabolomic approaches can be used as a tool for biomarker discovery and hypothesis generation in the clinical setting of drug toxicity and liver injury.


We are indebted to our medical and nursing colleagues and the children and their parents who agreed to take part in this study. The following site coordinators participated in this study: Lee Howard, RN, CCRC, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Arkansas Children’s Hospital; Missi Thomas, RN, CCRC, Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit/University of Louisville/Kosair Children’s Hospital; Michael Venneman, RN, MSN, MBA, CCRC Children’s Mercy Hospital and Clinics; Elaine Williams, RN, MSN Children’s National Medical Center; Amanda Hodge, RD, LD and Tonia Polanski, RN, BSN, CPN Akron Children’s Hospital; Juli Kidd, RN, CCRC Cook Children’s Health Care System; Evan R. Hempel, Project Manager KAI Research, Inc, an Altarum Company.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LJ RB. Performed the experiments: LP LL. Analyzed the data: PS KY SB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SB PG. Wrote the paper: LJ SB GK PG RB.


  1. 1. Larson AM, Polson J, Fontana RJ, Davern TJ, Lalani E, Hynan LS, et al. Acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure: results of a United States multicenter, prospective study. Hepatology 2005; 42: 1364–1372. pmid:16317692
  2. 2. Mitchell JR, Jollow DJ, Potter WZ, Davis DC, Gillette JR, Brodie BB Acetaminophen-induced hepatic necrosis. I. Role of drug metabolism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1973; 187: 185–194. pmid:4746326
  3. 3. Roberts DW, Bucci TJ, Benson RW, Warbritton AR, McRae TA, Pumford NR, et al. Immunohistochemical localization and quantification of the 3-(cystein-S-yl)-acetaminophen protein adduct in acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Am J Pathol 1991; 138: 359–371. pmid:1992763
  4. 4. Pumford NR, Roberts DW, Benson RW, Hinson JA Immunochemical quantitation of 3-(cystein-S-yl)acetaminophen protein adducts in subcellular liver fractions following a hepatotoxic dose of acetaminophen. Biochem Pharmacol 1990; 40: 573–579. pmid:2200409
  5. 5. Davern TJ 2nd, James LP, Hinson JA, Polson J, Larson AM, Fontana RJ, et al. Measurement of serum acetaminophen-protein adducts in patients with acute liver failure. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 687–694. pmid:16530510
  6. 6. Khandelwal N JL, Sanders C, Larson AM, Lee WM and The Acute Liver Failure Study Group. Unrecognized Acetaminophen Toxicity as a Cause of ‘Indeterminate’ Acute Liver Failure Hepatology 2011; 53: 567–576. pmid:21274877
  7. 7. Gardner CR, Heck DE, Yang CS, Thomas PE, Zhang XJ, DeGeorge GL, et al. Role of nitric oxide in acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in the rat. Hepatology 1998; 27: 748–754. pmid:9500703
  8. 8. Kon K, Kim JS, Jaeschke H, Lemasters JJ Mitochondrial permeability transition in acetaminophen-induced necrosis and apoptosis of cultured mouse hepatocytes. Hepatology 2004; 40: 1170–1179. pmid:15486922
  9. 9. Chaudhuri S, McCullough SS, Hennings L, Letzig L, Simpson PM, Hinson JA, et al. Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity and HIF-1alpha induction in mice occur without hypoxia. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2010; 252: 211–220.
  10. 10. Hanawa N, Shinohara M, Saberi B, Gaarde WA, Han D, Kaplowitz N Role of JNK translocation to mitochondria leading to inhibition of mitochondria bioenergetics in acetaminophen-induced liver injury. J Biol Chem 2008.
  11. 11. Clayton TA, Lindon JC, Cloarec O, Antti H, Charuel C, Hanton G, et al. Pharmaco-metabonomic phenotyping and personalized drug treatment. Nature 2006; 440: 1073–1077. pmid:16625200
  12. 12. Clayton TA, Baker D, Lindon JC, Everett JR, Nicholson JK Pharmacometabonomic identification of a significant host-microbiome metabolic interaction affecting human drug metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 14728–14733. pmid:19667173
  13. 13. Chen C, Krausz KW, Shah YM, Idle JR, Gonzalez FJ Serum metabolomics reveals irreversible inhibition of fatty acid beta-oxidation through the suppression of PPARalpha activation as a contributing mechanism of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Chem Res Toxicol 2009; 22: 699–707. pmid:19256530
  14. 14. Schnackenberg LK, Beger RD Monitoring the health to disease continuum with global metabolic profiling and systems biology. Pharmacogenomics 2006; 7: 1077–1086. pmid:17054417
  15. 15. Bhattacharyya S PL, Beger R, Chaudhuri S, McCullough S, Yan K, Simpson P, Hennings L, Hinson J, James L Acylcarnitine profiles in acetaminophen toxicity in the mouse: comparison to toxicity, metabolism, and hepatocyte regeneration. Metabolites 2013; 3: 1–15. pmid:24957887
  16. 16. Bi H, Li F, Krausz KW, Qu A, Johnson CH, Gonzalez FJ Targeted metabolomics of serum acylcarnitines evaluates hepatoprotective effect of wuzhi tablet (schisandra sphenanthera extract) against acute acetaminophen toxicity. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013; 2013: 985257. pmid:23431354
  17. 17. Bhattacharyya S, Yan K, Pence L, Simpson PM, Gill P, Letzig LG, et al. Targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of serum acylcarnitines in acetaminophen toxicity in children. Biomark Med 2014; 8: 147–159. pmid:24521011
  18. 18. Kostrubsky VE, Strom SC, Hanson J, Urda E, Rose K, Burliegh J, et al. Evaluation of hepatotoxic potential of drugs by inhibition of bile-acid transport in cultured primary human hepatocytes and intact rats. Toxicol Sci 2003; 76: 220–228. pmid:12944587
  19. 19. Luo L, Schomaker S, Houle C, Aubrecht J, Colangelo JL Evaluation of serum bile Acid profiles as biomarkers of liver injury in rodents. Toxicol Sci 2014; 137: 12–25. pmid:24085190
  20. 20. Yamazaki M, Miyake M, Sato H, Masutomi N, Tsutsui N, Adam KP, et al. Perturbation of bile acid homeostasis is an early pathogenesis event of drug induced liver injury in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2013; 268: 79–89. pmid:23360887
  21. 21. Bhushan B, Borude P, Edwards G, Walesky C, Cleveland J, Li F, et al. Role of bile acids in liver injury and regeneration following acetaminophen overdose. Am J Pathol 2013; 183: 1518–1526. pmid:24007882
  22. 22. Muldrew KL, James LP, Coop L, McCullough SS, Hendrickson HP, Hinson JA, et al. Determination of acetaminophen-protein adducts in mouse liver and serum and human serum after hepatotoxic doses of acetaminophen using high- performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Drug Metab Dispos 2002; 30: 446–451. pmid:11901099
  23. 23. Rumack BH Acetaminophen overdose in children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am 1986; 33: 691–701. pmid:3714342
  24. 24. James LP, Letzig L, Simpson PM, Capparelli E, Roberts DW, Hinson JA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen-protein adducts in adults with acetaminophen overdose and acute liver failure. Drug Metab Dispos 2009; 37: 1779–1784. pmid:19439490
  25. 25. Sun J, Ando Y, Ahlory-Dieker D, Schnackenberg LK, Yang X, Greenhaw J, Pence L, Qian F, Salminen W, Mendrick DL, Beger RD Systems biology investigation to discover metabolic biomarkers of acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury using integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics. J Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis 2013; S1.
  26. 26. Sullivan J, Farrar HC, and the Section on Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics and Committee on Drugs Clinical Report: Fever and Antipyretic Use in Children. Pediatrics 2011;
  27. 27. Rumack BH, Matthew H Acetaminophen poisoning and toxicity. Pediatrics 1975; 55: 871–876. pmid:1134886
  28. 28. Schwartz EA, Hayes BD, Sarmiento KF Development of hepatic failure despite use of intravenous acetylcysteine after a massive ingestion of acetaminophen and diphenhydramine. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 54: 421–423. pmid:18986731
  29. 29. Smilkstein MJ, Knapp GL, Kulig KW, Rumack BH Efficacy of oral N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of acetaminophen overdose. Analysis of the national multicenter study (1976 to 1985). N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1557–1562. pmid:3059186
  30. 30. Alander SW, Dowd MD, Bratton SL, Kearns GL Pediatric acetaminophen overdose: risk factors associated with hepatocellular injury. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154: 346–350. pmid:10768670
  31. 31. James LP, Capparelli EV, Simpson PM, Letzig L, Roberts D, Hinson JA, et al. Acetaminophen-associated hepatic injury: evaluation of acetaminophen protein adducts in children and adolescents with acetaminophen overdose. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008; 84: 684–690. pmid:18923390
  32. 32. Lake AD, Novak P, Shipkova P, Aranibar N, Robertson D, Reily MD, et al. Decreased hepatotoxic bile acid composition and altered synthesis in progressive human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2013; 268: 132–140. pmid:23391614
  33. 33. Chiang JY Bile acid metabolism and signaling. Compr Physiol 2013; 3: 1191–1212. pmid:23897684
  34. 34. Sun J, Schnackenberg LK, Holland RD, Schmitt TC, Cantor GH, Dragan YP, et al. Metabonomics evaluation of urine from rats given acute and chronic doses of acetaminophen using NMR and UPLC/MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2008.
  35. 35. James O, Lesna M, Roberts SH, Pulman L, Douglas AP, Smith PA, et al. Liver damage after paracetamol overdose. Comparison of liver-function tests, fasting serum bile acids, and liver histology. Lancet 1975; 2: 579–581. pmid:51407
  36. 36. Woolbright BL, McGill MR, Staggs VS, Winefield RD, Gholami P, Olyaee M, et al. Glycodeoxycholic acid levels as prognostic biomarker in acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure patients. Toxicol Sci 2014; 142: 436–444. pmid:25239633
  37. 37. Aleksunes LM, Slitt AL, Maher JM, Augustine LM, Goedken MJ, Chan JY, et al. Induction of Mrp3 and Mrp4 transporters during acetaminophen hepatotoxicity is dependent on Nrf2. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2008; 226: 74–83. pmid:17935745
  38. 38. Waters E, Wang JH, Redmond HP, Wu QD, Kay E, Bouchier-Hayes D Role of taurine in preventing acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury in the rat. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2001; 280: G1274–1279. pmid:11352821
  39. 39. Das J, Ghosh J, Manna P, Sil PC Taurine protects acetaminophen-induced oxidative damage in mice kidney through APAP urinary excretion and CYP2E1 inactivation. Toxicology 2010; 269: 24–34. pmid:20067817
  40. 40. Redmond HP, Wang JH, Bouchier-Hayes D Taurine attenuates nitric oxide- and reactive oxygen intermediate-dependent hepatocyte injury. Arch Surg 1996; 131: 1280–1287; discussion 1287–1288. pmid:8956769
  41. 41. Milkiewicz P, Roma MG, Elias E, Coleman R Hepatoprotection with tauroursodeoxycholate and beta muricholate against taurolithocholate induced cholestasis: involvement of signal transduction pathways. Gut 2002; 51: 113–119. pmid:12077103
  42. 42. James LP, Mayeux PR, Hinson JA Acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Drug Metab Dispos 2003; 31: 1499–1506. pmid:14625346
  43. 43. James LP, Chiew A, Abdel-Rahman SM, Letzig L, Graudins A, Day P, et al. Acetaminophen protein adduct formation following low-dose acetaminophen exposure: comparison of immediate-release vs extended-release formulations. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2012.
  44. 44. Legido-Quigley C, McDermott L, Vilca-Melendez H, Murphy GM, Heaton N, Lindon JC, et al. Bile UPLC-MS fingerprinting and bile acid fluxes during human liver transplantation. Electrophoresis 2011; 32: 2063–2070. pmid:21732555