BCAS2 Regulates Delta-Notch Signaling Activity through Delta Pre-mRNA Splicing in Drosophila Wing Development

Meng-Hsuan Chou; Yi-Chen Hsieh; Chu-Wei Huang; Po-Han Chen; Shih-Peng Chan; Yeou-Ping Tsao; Hsiu-Hsiang Lee; June-Tai Wu; Show-Li Chen

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130706

Abstract

Previously, we showed that BCAS2 is essential for Drosophila viability and functions in pre-mRNA splicing. In this study, we provide strong evidence that BCAS2 regulates the activity of Delta-Notch signaling via Delta pre-mRNA splicing. Depletion of dBCAS2 reduces Delta mRNA expression and leads to accumulation of Delta pre-mRNA, resulting in diminished transcriptions of Delta-Notch signaling target genes, such as cut and E(spl)m8. Furthermore, ectopic expression of human BCAS2 (hBCAS2) and Drosophila BCAS2 (dBCAS2) in a dBCAS2-deprived fly can rescue dBCAS2 depletion-induced wing damage to the normal phenotypes. These rescued phenotypes are correlated with the restoration of Delta pre-mRNA splicing, which affects Delta-Notch signaling activity. Additionally, overexpression of Delta can rescue the wing deformation by deprivation of dBCAS2; and the depletion of dBCAS2 can restore the aberrant eye associated with Delta-overexpressing retinas; providing supporting evidence for the regulation of Delta-Notch signaling by dBCAS2. Taken together, dBCAS2 participates in Delta pre-mRNA splicing that affects the regulation of Delta-Notch signaling in Drosophila wing development.

Citation: Chou M-H, Hsieh Y-C, Huang C-W, Chen P-H, Chan S-P, Tsao Y-P, et al. (2015) BCAS2 Regulates Delta-Notch Signaling Activity through Delta Pre-mRNA Splicing in Drosophila Wing Development. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0130706. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706

Academic Editor: Edward Giniger, National Institutes of Health (NIH), UNITED STATES

Received: November 6, 2014; Accepted: May 23, 2015; Published: June 19, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Chou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Council (NSC102-2320-B-002-033-MY3, NSC99-3112-B-002-037, NSC99-2628-B-002-023-MY3), National Taiwan University (98R0066-13; 99R311001, 98F008-201). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The product of breast carcinoma amplified sequence 2 (BCAS2), a 26 kD small nuclear protein, was initially identified as a transcriptional co-activator involved in the transcriptional regulation of the estrogen receptor (ER) [1]. The increased BCAS2 expression is correlated with the aggressive breast cancer cells [2]; and prostate cancer [3]. Recently, we showed that BCAS2 interacts directly with the tumor suppressor p53, regulating its stability and transcriptional activity. Depletion of BCAS2 induces apoptosis in p53 wild-type cancer cell lines (such as MCF7 and A549), but leads to G2/M growth arrest in p53-null H1299 cells and p53 mutant C33A cells. This evidence indicates that beyond p53, BCAS2 may be involved in other mechanisms of cell growth regulations.

BCAS2 is also named as SPF27 that was potentially associated with splicing [4]. The spliceosomal core complex including Prp19 (PSO4, human orthlog), Cef1 (CDC5L), Prp46 (PLRG1), and Snt309 (BCAS2), contributes RNA splicing in yeast and human cells [5–17]. The yeast Prp19p-associated complex forms the stable complexes with the U5 and U6 snRNP, after dissociating from U4 snRNP during RNA splicing process [7, 8]. Hence, interference of the yeast BCAS2 ortholog (Cwf7 and Snt309) using genetic methods can cause the accumulation of pre-mRNA [9, 10, 15, 17]. Recently, we showed that Drosophila BCAS2 (CG4980, human BCAS2 ortholog) is essential for the viability of Drosophila melanogaster. The ubiquitous depletion of dBCAS2 in Drosophila leads to larval lethality, and the deprivation of dBCAS2 in wing formation causes wing deformities which are correlated with impaired pre-mRNA splicing. More importantly, overexpression of human BCAS2 rescues these defects, indicating that Drosophila and human BCAS2 share a similar function in RNA splicing, which affects cell viability [11].

Recent evidence shows that the Prp19 core complex may be involved in the developmental process. For example, hPrp19 (PSO4)- and PLRG1-knockout mice suffer early embryonic lethality at the blastocyst stage [12]. PLRG1 also is an essential regulator of cell proliferation, p53-dependent apoptosis during embryonic development and adult tissue homeostasis [14]. Moreover, CDC5L also takes part in the regulation of G2/M progression [6]. Our recent study showed that BCAS2 is a member of the hPrp19 core complex and depletion of dBCAS2 in Drosophila results in larval lethality and deformity of adult wings [11]. All the above studies suggest that the core members of the hPrp19 complex are important for the developmental process. However, the effect of hPrp19-mediated pre-mRNA splicing on development remains unknown. Current report demonstrated that BCAS2 gene linkage region (1p13.2) is associated with autism [18]. It is very interesting to investigate the role of BCAS2 in development process.

Delta-Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved developmental signaling pathway, and is involved in cell fate determination and patterning interaction in Drosophila [19]. The short-range communication between cells by Delta-Notch signaling begins with the binding of Delta ligand from one cell to the Notch receptor on the membrane of an adjacent cell. This binding can activate a series of proteolytic enzymes to cleave Notch and generate the Notch intracellular domain (NICD), which then travels into the nucleus to trigger the expression of the target genes, such as Enhancer of split m8 ([E(spl)]bHLH) and cut (a homeobox-containing transcription factor) [20]. Therefore, in this study, we sought to explore how BCAS2 regulates Delta pre-mRNA splicing, resulting in the regulation of Delta-Notch signaling during Drosophila wing development.

Results

BCAS2 is involved in the regulation of Delta-Notch signaling

BCAS2 is essential for Drosophila viability because depletion of dBCAS2 in the entire body, driven by Act5C-GAL4, leads to no adult fly survival [11]. We speculated that BCAS2 might play a role in the development process and explored the signaling regulated by BCAS2. Interestingly, we found that when dBCAS2 was depleted in the region of the wing imaginal disc by the C96-GAL4 driver [21], which affects the dorsal-ventral wing margin, the adult wing in C96>dBCAS2^dsRNA showed loss of margin bristles (Fig 1B arrow) and wing notching (Fig 1B arrow head). These phenotypes are similar to those caused by a reduction of Delta-Notch signaling activity, as reported previously [22–24]. Therefore, we examined the expression of genes involved in Delta-Notch signaling when dBCAS2 expression was reduced in Drosophila model systems. We chose engrailed-GAL4 (en-GAL4) to drive the expression of dBCAS2^dsRNA in the posterior compartment of the wing disc in third instar larvae [25]. The results were that normal expression patterns of Delta and Notch in presumptive vein and intervein territories, respectively, in the anterior compartment of late-third instar wing discs (Fig 1C and 1F) were consistent with a previous report [26]. But when dBCAS2 was depleted in the posterior compartment, the proteins level of Delta (Fig 1D) and NICD (Fig 1G) were decreased. Taken together, dBCAS2 may regulate Delta-Notch signaling.

Download:

Fig 1. BCAS2 is involved in the regulation of Delta-Notch signaling.

(A, B) Depletion of dBCAS2, driven by the wing margin C96-GAL4 driver, generates a phenotype similar to reduction of Delta-Notch signaling activity. (A) Control wing (C96>+). (B) dBCAS2-depleted wing (C96>dBCAS2^dsRNA). Arrow, loss of margin bristles; arrow head, wing notching. Scale bar, 0.5 mm. (C to M) Depletion of dBCAS2 decreases the activity of Delta-Notch signaling that can be restored by dBCAS2. The late third instar larval wing discs were driven under the control of engrailed-GAL4 and immunostained with the indicated antibodies. (C, F, I, L) Control (en>GFP); (D, G, J, M) dBCAS2-depletion (en>GFP, dBCAS2^dsRNA); (E, H, K) Coexpression of dBCAS2 with dBCAS2^dsRNA (en>GFP, dBCAS2^dsRNA, dBCAS2). (C, D, E) Anti-Delta antibody. The normal pattern of Delta (red) can be seen in the cells of presumptive veins and on either side of the D/V boundary; (F, G, H) Anti-NICD antibody. The Notch expression can be observed in the presumptive intervein territories; (I, J, K) Anti-Cut antibody. The Cut expression is located in the stripe of D/V boundary; and (L, M) E(spl)m8-lacZ. LacZ reporter of E(splm8), a Delta-Notch signaling target gene is expressed along the D/V boundary. Left of the panel: red stain with the indicated antigen expression in the anterior and posterior compartments. Right of the panel: the merged images reveal the simultaneous expression of the protein of interest (red) and GFP fluorescence (green) in the posterior. Images were taken by confocal microscopy, scale bar, 50 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706.g001

To corroborate dBCAS2-regulation of Delta-Notch signaling further, we measured the expression of Cut in a stripe along the dorsal/ventral (D/V) boundary in the wing disc [27]. When dBCAS2 expression was reduced under the control of en-GAL4, the expression level of Cut decreased (Fig 1J), indicating that the reduced expression of Delta and Notch by dBCAS2 affects the expression of down-stream target genes. To confirm that dBCAS2 regulates Delta-Notch signaling activity, we examined a LacZ reporter of E(splm8), another Delta-Notch signaling target gene [28], expression of which is along the D/V boundary (Fig 1L). The expression of E(spl)m8-lacZ decreased in the posterior compartment of which dBCAS2 was down regulated (Fig 1M). Taken together, disruption of Delta-Notch signaling may be one of the reasons for the wing deformation mediated by depletion of dBCAS2.

Drosophila and human BCAS2 rescues wing deformation induced by depletion of dBCAS2 via Delta-Notch signaling

Previously, we showed that hBCAS2 and dBCAS2 have sequence similarity and hBCAS2 plays a similar role as dBCAS2 in the fly. hBCAS2 can rescue the wing deformation induced by depletion of dBCAS2. In this study, we generated a dBCAS2 transgenic fly. When the expression of dBCAS2 was driven by ms1096-GAL4, which is expressed in the pouch region of wing discs [29], the morphology of adult wings did not change (S1Aa and S1Ab Fig), and dBCAS2 protein expression was confirmed in the protein extracted from the third instar larvae of dBCAS2 transgenic flies (en>GFP, dBCAS2) (S1B Fig). Hence, dBCAS2 transgenic fly, like hBCAS2, presents the normal wing phenotypes. To determine whether dBCAS2 could rescue dBCAS2^dsRNA-induced wing deformation, dBCAS2^dsRNA and dBCAS2 were simultaneously expressed under the control of ms1096-GAL4 to monitor the morphology of adult wings. Similar to the rescue effects of hBCAS2 on dBCAS2^dsRNA expressing flies, dBCAS2 could restore the wing deformation in flies expressing dBCAS2^dsRNA (S1Cc Fig) and the restored wing phenotypes resembled the control (S1Ca Fig).

To confirm that dBCAS2 rescues the wing deformation via Delta-Notch signaling, the dBCAS2^dsRNA and dBCAS2 were co-expressed in the posterior compartment of the wing disc under the control of the engrailed promoter, as mentioned above. The results were that the levels of Delta, NICD and Cut were rescued in en>dBCAS2^dsRNA, dBCAS2 flies (Fig 1E, 1H and 1K), compared to those expressed in dBCAS2-depleted wing discs (Fig 1D, 1G and 1J). Additionally, the transgenic flies of hBCAS2 [11] and dBCAS2 (S1Ab Fig) showed the normal wing morphology. The expression level of Delta, NICD and Cut in either hBCAS2 (S2 Fig) or dBCAS2 transgenic fly (data not shown) was the same as the control fly. Similar to the rescue effects of dBCAS2 on dBCAS2^dsRNA expressing flies (Fig 1E, 1H and 1K), hBCAS2 also restored the expression levels of Delta, NICD and Cut from dBCAS2^dsRNA (S3C, S3F and S3I Fig). Due to dBCAS2 or hBCAS2 transgenic fly can restore the declination of Delta gene expression and wing deformation caused by dBCAS2^dsRNA fly. To explain why dBCAS2^dsRNA construct does not interfere with UAS-BCAS2, it may be the reason that high amount BCAS2 expression from ectopic expressing dBCAS2 or hBCAS2 can compromise the reducing BCAS2 expression by RNAi effect. In summary, dBCAS2^dsRNA–induced wing deformation could be due to the reduced Delta-Notch signaling activity.

BCAS2 regulates the expression of Delta through pre-mRNA splicing

BCAS2 is a core component of the hPrp19/CDC5L splicing complex and functions in pre-mRNA splicing. Accordingly, dBCAS2 might be speculated to regulate the expression of Delta through the transcriptional process in the nucleus. Gene transcription could be modulated in two ways, promoter regulation and RNA splicing. The Delta gene transcription initiation assay was examined using Delta-lacZ as a reporter gene to determine whether the initiation of Delta transcription was impeded by the deprivation of dBCAS2. The expression level of β-galactosidase located at the stripe of the dorsal-ventral boundary in the dBCAS2-depleted fly (en>GFP, dBCAS2^dsRNA) (Fig 2B) was the same as control (Fig 2A). Moreover, the β-galactosidase expression did not differ between the anterior and posterior compartments of the wing discs of the dBCAS2-depleted fly (Fig 2B). To rule out a consequence of β-galactosidase protein stability rather than the continued transcription, we conducted β-galactosidase RNA by RT-PCR. As shown in Fig 2C, RNA expression level of the control and dBCAS2-depleted fly was the same. Thus, dBCAS2 regulating Delta transcription initiation is excluded. We then determined whether the pre-mRNA splicing efficiency of Delta was affected by reduction of dBCAS2. The three Delta mRNAs in Drosophila differ only in the 3’UTR and encode an identical protein [30] (GenBank: NT_033777.2). Therefore, three pairs of primers to detect the processed mRNA and two pairs of primers targeting the intron-containing precursor mRNA of Delta were designed (Fig 2D). To obtain RNA from dBCAS2-depleted tissues, the Act5C-GAL4 driving dBCAS2^dsRNA was generated. We then harvested RNA from the imaginal wing discs of Act5C-GAL4 driving dBCAS2^dsRNA. The results were that, when dBCAS2^dsRNA was expressed, the mRNA level of Delta decreased and pre-mRNA of Delta accumulated (Fig 2E, black bars). The increase in the pre-mRNA/mRNA ratio indicated that the pre-mRNA splicing efficiency of Delta decreased when dBCAS2 was depleted. In addition, dBCAS2 could also rescue the reduced pre-mRNA splicing efficiency caused by lower expression of dBCAS2 (Fig 2E, grey bars); similar results also showed by hBCAS2 rescue (S4 Fig). In conclusion, deprivation of dBCAS2 indeed results in the down-regulation of Delta-Notch signaling through regulation of Delta pre-mRNA splicing.

Download:

Fig 2. BCAS2 does not regulate the transcription initiation of Delta but is involved in Delta pre-mRNA splicing.

(A) Control of Dl-lacZ (red) in the en>GFP wing disc stained with anti-β-gal antibody. (B) en>GFP, dBCAS2^dsRNA. In the dBCAS2-depleted posterior compartment, marked by GFP, the expression of Dl-lacZ (red) gives a signal of similar strength as the normal anterior compartment. The expression of GFP and β-galactosidase were merged and displayed in the right panel. Images were taken by confocal microscopy, scale bar, 50 μm. (C). RNA expression of β-galactosidase. RNAs were extracted from wing discs of third instar larvae and subjected to RT-PCR to confirm the RNA expression of β-galactosidase driven by Dl promoter in Act>dBCAS2^dsRNA (lane 2) compared with the control (lane 1). The internal control, rp49. (D) Schematic diagram of primer design for detecting the intron-containing precursor mRNA (upper) and mRNA of Delta (lower). Primers, exons and introns are denoted with arrowheads, boxes and lines, respectively. (E) Coexpression of dBCAS2 and dBCAS2^dsRNA in larvae can rescue the phenotypes of mRNA decrease and pre-mRNA accumulation caused by dBCAS2^dsRNA. The pre-mRNA and mRNA of Delta were analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR and described in the Materials and Methods. Each genotype was under the control of Act5c-GAL4 driver. White bar: Act5c>+; black bar: Act5c>dBCAS2^dsRNA; gray bar: Act5c>dBCAS2^dsRNA, dBCAS2. Data are shown as means and SD relative to the controls from three independent experiments. The P-values was measured by the Student’s t-test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706.g002

The dBCAS2^dsRNA diminishing Delta-Notch activity is apoptosis-independent

The deletion of BCAS2 in cells and fly can induce p53 expression [11] To rule out the apoptosis effect on the deprivation of BCAS2 could diminish Delta-Notch activity (Fig 1D, 1G, 1J and 1M), the apoptotic suppressor-p35 expressed fly (en>GFP, p35) was crossed with dBCAS2^dsRNA fly. The protein p35, a baculoviral protein, can inhibit caspase-3 activity to reduce cell apoptosis [31, 32]. Hence the caspase-3 acts as an indicator of apoptosis and Cut as a BCAS2-targeted gene expression. As shown in Fig 3, the expression patterns of caspase 3 and Cut in p35 fly (en>GFP, p35) (Fig 3B and 3F) showed the same as control (en>GFP) (Fig 3A and 3E). But when dBCAS2 expression was reduced in dBCAS2^dsRNA fly, the expression of caspase-3 was observed; indicating that deprivation of BCAS2 indeed causes apoptosis (Fig 3C and 3G). However the fly (en>GFP, dBCAS2^dsRNA,p35) revealed the low caspase-3 that coupled with the decreased Cut level (Fig 3D and 3H) compared to control; implying that the decreased Cut expression in dBCAS2-depletion fly is not caused by cell death. In sum, the down regulation of Delta-Notch activity by deprivation of BCAS2 is apoptosis-independent, when both p35 and dBCAS2^dsRNA expressed.

Download:

Fig 3. Deprivation of BCAS2 diminishing Delta-Notch activity is apoptosis-independent.

The late third instar larval wing discs of each genotype were isolated and immunostained with anti-Caspase-3 antibody (blue; A-D); anti-Cut antibody (red, E-H); the expression of GFP, Cut and Caspase-3 were merged (I-L). Images were taken by confocal microscopy, scale bar, 50 μm. (A, E, I) Control (en>GFP). (B, F, J) The p35 over expression wing disc (en>GFP, p35). (C, G, K) The dBCAS2-depleted wing disc (en>GFP, dBCAS2^dsRNA). (D, H, L) The coexpression of p35 and dBCAS2^dsRNA (en>GFP, dBCAS2^dsRNA, p35).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706.g003

Overexpression of Delta can rescue the deformation of wing margin in dBCAS2-deprivation fly

To investigate whether BCAS2 regulated Delta gene expression and in turn involved in fly wing development process, we generated the co-expressing dBCAS2^dsRNA and Dl fly by crossing C96 >Dl with dBCAS2^dsRNA fly. Due to the Delta gene in UAS-Dl is cDNA construct, there is no effect by dBCAS2^dsRNA splicing. Except for missing of stout mechanosensory organs and shortening of wing vein [33], the Delta overexpressing fly (C96 >Dl) showed the normal wing margin morphology (Fig 4B). As mentioned in Fig 1B, the adult C96 >dBCAS2^dsRNA showed a notched wing margin (Fig 4C). But the wing margin morphology in fly co-expressing dBCAS2^dsRNA and Dl was recovered to normal (Fig 4D), indicating that the Delta expression driven by C96-GAL4 can compensate the reduced expression of endogenous Delta caused by deprivation of dBCAS2 and thus rescue the wing margin morphology. Taken together, BCAS2 may regulate Drosophila wing formation through Delta-Notch signaling pathway.

Download:

Fig 4. Overexpression of Delta can rescue the defected wing margin in deprived dBCAS2 fly.

The coexpression of dBCAS2^dsRNA and Dl fly was generated under the control of C96-GAL4. (A) Control adult wing (C96>+). (B) Overexpression of Delta (C96>Dl). Arrow: sparse bristles; arrowhead: shortened wing vein. (C) The deformation of wing margin in (C96>dBCAS2^dsRNA). Arrowhead: sparse bristles; arrow: notched margin. (D) Overexpression of Delta with dBCAS2^dsRNA (C96 >dBCAS2^dsRNA, Dl). Scale bar, 0.5 mm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706.g004

Depletion of dBCAS2 can rescue the eye aberration resulted from overexpression of Delta

To further characterize BCAS2-regulating Delta, we used Delta-overexpressing eye, a genetic background sensitive to the level of Delta, to elucidate this issue. Delta-Notch signaling is required for induction of cone cell and primary pigment cell fates in Drosophila eye development, a classic model for studying the mechanism of Delta-Notch signaling [34–36]. The organization of the ommatidial array and the average number of cone cells per ommatidium are taken as indicators of Delta-Notch signaling activity by staining with Cut antibody in after puparium formation (APF) retinas [36, 37]. When a high level of Delta is expressed only in photoreceptor cells by Elav-GAL4, the number of cone cells increases [38]. In contrast, when a high level of Delta is expressed in all types of differentiated cells in the eye by GMR-GAL4, the number of cone cells decreased, suggesting a dominant negative effect of the GMR-GAL4 driven Delta in specifying the cone cell fate [33]. To confirm BCAS2-regulation of Delta-Notch signaling, we used this genetic approach to determine whether the depletion of dBCAS2 in the GMR-driven, Delta-overexpressing eye could reduce total amount of Delta by reducing the endogenous Delta expression and thus rescue the number of cone cells [38, 39]. As shown in Fig 5, GMR>dBCAS2 retinas (Fig 5B) revealed orderly ommatidia and four cone cells per ommatidium (normal average number) as for the control (Fig 5A). On the other hand, reduced dBCAS2 expression in the retinas (GMR>dBCAS2^dsRNA) (Fig 5C) led to a normal average number of cone cells per ommatidium but a disorganized array of ommatidia and irregular ommatidia spacing were observed. The retinas overexpressing Delta (GMR>Dl) had a lower number of cone cells per ommatidium, disorganized ommatidia and irregular ommatidia spacing, the average number of cone cells per ommatidium being 3.28 (Fig 5D and 5G). This is significantly lower than the constant number of four cone cells per ommatidium in control retina (Fig 5A) and indicates the down-regulation of Delta-Notch signaling activity, similar to a previous report[33]. However, the organized ommatidia and four cone cells per ommatidium were restored in the GMR>Dl, dBCAS2^dsRNA retina (Fig 5F) from the disordered phenotypes of the GMR>Dl retina (Fig 5D). To confirm that the rescue effect of dBCAS2^dsRNA in the Dl-overexpressing retina was not the result of a dilution effect of the GAL4 activator, the UAS-GFP; GMR-GAL4 strain was crossed with UAS-Dl to simultaneously express Delta and GFP (GMR>Dl, GFP). As shown in Fig 5E, the GMR>Dl, GFP retina had a similar phenotype to that of the GMR>Dl retina (Fig 5D). These results provide additional evidence that dBCAS2 is involved in the regulation of Delta-Notch signaling in the fly, through the regulation of Delta pre-mRNA splicing.

Download:

Fig 5. BCAS2 regulates the expression of Delta in developing eye.

GMR>Dl retinas reveal an aberrant phenotype. After coexpression of dBCAS2^dsRNA and Dl, the phenotype of Dl-overexpressing retinas could be rescued. Twenty-four hours after puparium formation (APF) retina were isolated and stained with anti-Cut antibody to analyze the formation of cone cells. Scale bar, 20 μm. (A) Retina in the control (GMR>+) eye. Control retina has an organized array of ommatidia and the average number of cone cells in each ommatidium is four. (B) GMR> dBCAS2. Ectopic expression of dBCAS2 in retina (GMR>dBCAS2) resulted in the phenotypes similar to the control (A). (C) GMR>dBCAS2^dsRNA. The dBCAS2-depleted retina had a regular average number of cone cells per ommatidium, but exhibited disorganized and irregularly spaced ommatidia. (D) GMR>Dl. (E) GMR>Dl, GFP eye. (F) GMR>Dl, dBCAS2^dsRNA. The retinas of coexpression of dBCAS2^dsRNA and Dl revealed more orderly array of ommatidia, compared to GMR>Dl retina. (G) Quantitation of the average number of cone cells per ommatidium. For cone cell analysis in each genotype, the number of cone cells per ommatidium (drawn by white dot line) was counted from 20 ommatidia per retina and total 10 retinas were measured; and statistically analyzed by unpaired two-tailed Student's t test **p<0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706.g005

Discussion

In this study, we show that BCAS2 is involved in regulating Delta pre-mRNA splicing, which then affects the Delta-Notch signaling and causes wing deformation. The decreased BCAS2 expression in Drosophila reduces Delta and Notch expression and Notch target genes, [E(spl)]bHLH and Cut. The reduced expression of Delta-Notch signaling related genes is correlated with wing deformation and the impairment of Delta pre-mRNA splicing function but not with the initiation of transcription of Delta (Figs 1 and 2). In addition, BCAS2 overexpression can not only rescue the wing damage phenotype induced by depletion of BCAS2 but also restore Delta pre-mRNA splicing and Delta-Notch signaling activity (Fig 1 and S3 Fig), consistent with previous reports which demonstrated that the aberrant Delta-Notch signaling can lead to abnormal wing development [22].

BCAS2-deprived cell can cause apoptosis due to the p53 activation [11, 40]. To exclude the apoptosis-causing declination of Delta-Notch signaling, the apoptosis inhibitor-p35 was expressed simultaneously with BCAS2 deprivation in fly (en>GFP, dBCAS2^dsRNA, p35). Even though the apoptosis effect was eliminated, the Delta-Notch signaling still declined. It indicates that the decreased Delta-Notch signaling caused by BCAS2-deprivation is apoptosis-independent (Fig 3). In addition, the wing margin morphology defection in depletion of dBCAS2 can be recovered to normal by Delta-overexpressing (Fig 4); plus depletion of dBCAS2 can restore the aberrant eye associated with Delta-overexpressing retinas (Fig 5); providing supporting evidences for the regulation of Delta-Notch signaling by BCAS2.

BCAS2 can regulate Delta-Notch signaling, which is a developmental signaling pathway conserved through evolution and is involved in cell fate determination and patterning interaction in Drosophila [19]. Abnormal Delta-Notch signaling can lead to early embryonic lethality [41, 42] and may be the reason for the lethality of the Drosophila BCAS2 ubiquitously deprived fly [11]. In this study, we used the Drosophila adult wing and imaginal wing disc to investigate the effect of BCAS2-induction on Delta-Notch signaling, which is involved in the development of the adult wing, hinge and notum through lateral inhibition, lineage decisions and boundary formation [43]. Within a wing disc, compartments and wing primordium are formed under the expression regulation of selector genes, including posterior-specific transcription factor engrailed (en), dorsal-specific transcription factor apterous (ap) and vestigial (vg), which defines the region of wing primordium (wing pouch). The temporally and spatially precise expressions of selector genes and the developmental signaling molecules, including Notch (N), Decapentaplegic (Dpp), Wingless (Wg) and Hedgehog (Hh), make up the delicate adult wing. The formation of wing margin and veins also requires the activity of Delta-Notch signaling on dorsal/ventral (D/V) boundary and provein cells in the fly wing primordium, respectively [20, 43]. To study wing morphology in this and our previous study, we used ms1096-GAL4, which is expressed in the pouch region of wing discs [29], to drive the expression of dBCAS2^dsRNA to reduce dBCAS2 expression. All of the progeny carrying UAS-dBCAS2^dsRNA driven by ms1096-GAL4 exhibits twisted and shrunken wings (S1Cb Fig). However, for clear illustration and comparison of molecular mechanisms regulated by BCAS2, we used engrailed-GAL4 to drive the expression of dBCAS2^dsRNA in the posterior compartment of the wing disc in third instar larvae. The results illustrate an obvious defect of Delta-Notch signaling activity in the posterior part, but not in the anterior part, this being correlated with the depletion of BCAS2 expression (Fig 1).

On the other hand, ommatidial development in the Drosophila compound eye is paradigm for addressing the molecular mechanism of lateral inhibition, the prominent characteristic of Delta-Notch signaling. Delta-Notch interaction within the same cell leads to cis-inhibition of Notch by Delta [44]. Because the differentiation of cone cells requires the activation of Delta-Notch signaling [45], a reduction of Delta-Notch signaling causes a decrease in the number of cone cells per ommatidium [33, 44, 46, 47]. Hence, the Delta-overexpressing fly exhibits an aberrant retina with a lower number of cone cells, but this aberration can be rescued to normal in cone cell number and organized ommatidia when the Delta-overexpressing fly is crossed with the dBCAS2^dsRNA transgenic fly (Fig 5). The results of these two systems, wing (Fig 4) and eye (Fig 5), corroborate further that BCAS2 regulates Delta-Notch signaling. In addition to Delta-Notch signaling, Dpp, Wg, and Hh also are essential for the temporally and spatially precise expression of the developmental signaling molecules to make up the delicate adult wing and eye [48].

Here we show that BCAS2 regulates Delta-Notch signaling. It will be worth for further investigating the specificity or dose effect of Delta-Notch signaling-induced phenotypes by BCAS2. Delta-Notch signaling is initially derived from ligand Delta of one cell interacting with Notch of the neighbor cell and in turn Notch can be cleavage into NCID. Then the cytoplasm NCID translocates into nucleus to stimulate the targeted genes’ expression in a variety of context. Hence the regulation of Delta-Notch signaling can be happened on several different levels those remain unanswered questions; for examples, the ligand activation effect, Notch receptor cleavage proteins, Notch receptor down-regulation etc [49–52]. Hence, the different reducing amount of endogenous BCAS2 via RNAi and the threshold declination level of BCAS2 in fly can affect Delta-Notch signaling that resulted in the wing deformation those will be interesting for further examination. Moreover, BCAS2 is a member of hPrp19 complex and functions for pre-mRNA splicing. It still needs to answer whether BCAS2 is specific for Delta gene splicing or there are more candidate genes to be targeted. Further comprehensive investigation will be required to understand whether other developmental related genes are regulated by BCAS2.

Materials and Methods

Fly genetics and fly stocks

Drosophila stocks were kept and crossed at 25°C and supplied with cornmeal medium. The generation of UAS-dBCAS2^dsRNA/T (2; 3) SM6-TM6B, ms1096-GAL4, Act5C-GAL4, engrailed (en)-GAL4, and w¹¹¹⁸ had been described previously [11]. C96-GAL4 (stock no. 257575), GMR-GAL4 (stock no. 27617), UAS-Dl-LacZ⁰⁵¹⁵¹ (stock no. 11651), UAS-m8-LacZ (stock no. 26786), UAS-p35 (stock no. 5073), and UAS-Delta (stock no. 26695) were obtained from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center and maintained by the Fly Core Facility in the College of Medicine, National Taiwan University. The UAS-dBCAS2^dsRNA was purchased from Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center (stock no. 26676) and balanced over T(2;3)SM6-TM6B, a translocated chromosome 2–3 balancer [11]. The UAS-dBCAS2 was generated in Taiwan Fly Core by microinjection of pUAST-dBCAS2 using the standard procedure as UAS-hBCAS2 strain described previously [11]. The UAS-dBCAS2^dsRNA, UAS-dBCAS2/T (2;3) SM6-TM6B was generated by recombination of UAS-dBCAS2^dsRNA with UAS-dBCAS2 balancing over T (2;3) SM6-TM6B (14); either the UAS-hBCAS2^dsRNA, UAS-dBCAS2/T (2;3) SM6-TM6B, was generated. The UAS-dBCAS2^dsRNA; Dl-LacZ⁰⁵¹⁵¹/T (2;3) SM6-TM6B was established by balancing UAS-dBCAS2^dsRNA and Dl-LacZ⁰⁵¹⁵¹, on chromosome II and III respectively, over T (2;3) SM6-TM6B, enabling co-segregation of UAS-dBCAS2^dsRNA and Dl-LacZ⁰⁵¹⁵¹ in offspring. The UAS-dBCAS2^dsRNA; UAS-Dl/T (2;3) SM6-TM6B was generated with similar method as that was used to generate UAS-dBCAS2^dsRNA; Dl-LacZ⁰⁵¹⁵¹/T (2;3) SM6-TM6B.

Plasmid construction

The dBCAS2 coding sequence (CDS) from a Drosophila S2 cell cDNA library was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and cloned into the pOSI-T vector (pOSI-T PCR Cloning Kit, GeneMark). UAS-3xFLAG-dBCAS2 strain was generated by insertion of the dBCAS2 CDS into pUAST-3xFLAG vector. The XhoI and XbaI sites were added to the 5’ and 3’ ends, respectively, of the dBCAS2 CDS before insertion into the pUAST-3xFLAG vector. The constructed pUAST-3xFLAG-dBCAS2 was checked by sequencing. Primers used to construct pUAST-3xFLAG-dBCAS2 are listed in S2 Table.

Immunofluorescence

The wing imaginal discs and pupal retinas were dissected from late third instar larvae and twenty-four hours after puparium formation (APF) pupae, respectively, then fixed for 17 min in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 4% paraformaldehyde and then blocked in PBS with 0.3% Triton X and 5% BSA (bovine serum albumin) for 30 min at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washed with PBS-Triton X three times, the wing discs were incubated with secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The stained wing discs were then mounted on the slides with glycerol. Primary antibodies: mouse anti-Cut (2B10, 1:200, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB), Iowa City, IA, USA), mouse anti-Delta (C594.B9, 1:200, DSHB), mouse anti-Notch (C17.9C6, 1:100, DSHB), mouse anti-β-gal (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), rabbit anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:200; Abcam). Secondary antibodies [anti-mouse Cy3 (1:1000), anti- rabbit Cy5 (1:1000)] were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA, USA). The fluorescent images were acquired by confocal microscope TCS SP5 (Imaging Core, First Core Labs, National Taiwan University College of Medicine) and Axio Imager A1 Microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA). Leica LAS AF Lite and Adobe Photoshop were used to analyze and process images.

Adult wing image processing and analysis

The phenotype of adult wings were examined by immersed adult flies in 100% isopropanol for at least 24 hours, then the wings were isolated and mounted on slides with Hoyer’s mounting medium (50 cc distilled water, 30 g gum arabic (U. S. P. Flake), 200 g chloral hydrate, 20 cc glycerin) [53]. Images of adult wing were obtained by using Dino-Lite Digital Microscope.

In vivo splicing assays

For the detection of mRNA and pre-mRNA in Drosophila, total RNA from imaginal wing discs in 20 third instar larvae was isolated by using TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich). 1 microgram of total RNA was treated with DNase (RQ1, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) before reverse transcription (SuperScript III, Invitrogen). The cDNA was synthesized using random hexamers (Invitrogen) and oligo dT (Invitrogen) for detection of pre-mRNA and mRNA respectively. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses (KAPA SYBR Fast, KAPA Biosystem, Woburn, MA, USA,) were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System quantified the amount of mRNA and pre-mRNA. To determine the amount of Delta pre-mRNA, primers of Delta I3-E4 were targeted to the sequence spanning from the 3’ end of intron 3 to the 5’ end of exon 4; Delta I5 recognized the sequence within intron 5 (Fig 2C). To measure the amount of Delta mRNA, primers of Delta E2-E3 amplified the sequence spanning from the 3’ end of exon 2 to the 5’ end of exon 3; Delta E2-E4 targeted to the sequence extending across from the 3’ end of exon 2 to the 5’ end of exon 4; Delta E4-E5 amplified the sequence spanning from the 3’ end of exon 4 to the 5’ end of exon 5. Other primer sequences are given in S2 Table.

Western Blotting

The cell lysates from the late third instar larvae were harvested and performed western blotting with mouse anti-FLAG M2 (1:10000, Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit anti-hBCAS2 (1: 10000, Bethyl Laboratories), mouse anti-tubulin (1:10000, Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA), and mouse anti-Actin (Sigma); separately.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. The dBCAS2 transgenic fly shows normal wing morphology.

The ms1096-GAL4 was used to drive the ectopic expression of dBCAS2, whose 5’ end was tagged with 3xFLAG. (a) Control adult wing (ms1096>+). (b) The dBCAS2 transgenic fly (ms1096>dBCAS2). (B) BCAS2 protein expression in dBCAS2 transgenic flies. BCAS2 protein was analyzed from the body extract of third instar larvae by western blot with anti-Flag antibody. (C) Coexpression of dBCAS2^dsRNA and dBCAS2, driven by ms1096-GAL4, yields a rescued wing that resembles the control. (Ca) Control wing; (Cb) The dBCAS2-depleted wing (ms1096>dBCAS2^dsRNA); (Cc) The rescued wing (ms1096>dBCAS2^dsRNA, dBCAS2). Scale bar, 0.5 mm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The hBCAS2 transgenic fly shows normal Delta-Notch signaling.

(A, C, E) Control (en>GFP). (B, D, F) The hBCAS2 transgenic fly (en>GFP, hBCAS2). Wing discs were stained with the indicated antibody. The images were taken by fluorescent microscope. The expression of Delta (red), Notch (white in the left panel; red in the right panel), and Cut (red) in the GFP-marked posterior compartment of wing discs could be observed. (A, B) Delta; (C, D) NICD; (E, F) Cut. Scale bar 50 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. The hBCAS2 can rescue the elimination of Delta, Notch and Cut expression caused by the depletion of dBCAS2.

(A, D, G) Control (en>GFP). (B, E, H) The dBCAS2 depleted wing discs (en>GFP, dBCAS2^dsRNA). (C, F, I) The Rescued wing discs (en>GFP, dBCAS2^dsRNA, hBCAS2). (A, B, C) Anti-Delta antibody; (D, E, F) Anti-NICD antibody; (G, H, I) Anti-Cut antibody. The expression of (C) Delta (red), (F) Notch (red) and (I) Cut (red) in the GFP-marked posterior compartment of wing discs could be rescued.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. RT-PCR analysis of Delta pre-mRNA and mRNA in coexpression of hBCAS2 and dBCAS2^dsRNA.

Coexpression of hBCAS2 and dBCAS2^dsRNA (gray bar) could rescue the phenotypes of Delta pre-mRNA splicing inefficiency in dBCAS2-depleted larvae (black bar). Data are shown as means and SD relative to the controls from three independent experiments. The p-values was measured by the Student’s t-test. **p<0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706.s004

(TIF)

S1 Table. Genotypes of Drosophila analyzed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706.s005

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Primer sequences used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130706.s006

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Appreciate the technical support of the staff of the Sixth Core Lab and DNA Sequencing Facility, Department of Medical Research, NTUH. We thank the Taiwan Fly Core Facility and Fly Core Facility in NTU for microinjection and maintaining fly strains; and the staff of the Imaging Core at the First Core Labs, in College of Medicine (NTU), for technical assistance. We thank Dr. Tim J. Harrison for editing our English.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SLC JTW YCH MHC. Performed the experiments: YCH MHC. Analyzed the data: SLC JTW HHL SPC YPT MHC YCH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JTW PHC CWH. Wrote the paper: MHC YCH SLC.

References

1. Qi C, Zhu YT, Chang J, Yeldandi AV, Sambasiva Rao M, Zhu Y-J. Potentiation of estrogen receptor transcriptional activity by breast cancer amplified sequence 2. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2005;328(2):393–8. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.187. pmid:15694360
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Sengupta S, Banerjee S, Lahiri S, Dutta T, Dhar TK, Ghosh AK. Purification, characterization, sequencing and molecular cloning of a novel cysteine methyltransferase that regulates trehalose-6-phosphate synthase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—General Subjects. 2014;1840(6):1861–71. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.01.005.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Kuo PC, Huang CW, Lee CI, Chang HW, Hsieh SW, Chung YP, et al. BCAS2 Promotes Prostate Cancer Cells Proliferation by Enhancing AR mRNA Transcription and Protein Stability. British Journal of Cancer. 2014.
4. Neubauer G, King A, Rappsilber J, Calvio C, Watson M, Ajuh P, et al. Mass spectrometry and EST-database searching allows characterization of the multi-protein spliceosome complex. Nature Genetics. 1998;20(1):46. pmid:8816473.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Ajuh P, Kuster B, Panov K, Zomerdijk JCBM, Mann M, Lamond AI. Functional analysis of the human CDC5L complex and identification of its components by mass spectrometry. The EMBO Journal. 2000;19(23):6569–81. pmid:PMC305846.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Boudrez A, Beullens M, Groenen P, Van Eynde A, Vulsteke V, Jagiello I, et al. NIPP1-mediated Interaction of Protein Phosphatase-1 with CDC5L, a Regulator of Pre-mRNA Splicing and Mitotic Entry. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275(33):25411–7. pmid:10827081
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Chan S-P, Cheng S-C. The Prp19-associated Complex Is Required for Specifying Interactions of U5 and U6 with Pre-mRNA during Spliceosome Activation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280(35):31190–9. pmid:15994330
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Chan S-P, Kao D-I, Tsai W-Y, Cheng S-C. The Prp 19p-Associated Complex in Spliceosome Activation. Science. 2003;302(5643):279–82. pmid:11166920.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Chen H-R, Jan S-P, Tsao TY, Sheu Y-J, Banroques J, Cheng S-C. Snt309p, a Component of the Prp19p-Associated Complex That Interacts with Prp19p and Associates with the Spliceosome Simultaneously with or Immediately after Dissociation of U4 in the Same Manner as Prp19p. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1998;18(4):2196–204. pmid:9528791
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Chen H-R, Tsao TY, Chen C-H, Tsai W-Y, Her L-S, Hsu MM-T, et al. Snt309p modulates interactions of Prp19p with its associated components to stabilize the Prp19p-associated complex essential for pre-mRNA splicing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999;96(10):5406–11. pmid:10318896
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Chen P-H, Lee C-I, Weng Y-T, Tarn W-Y, Tsao Y-P, Kuo P-C, et al. BCAS2 is essential for Drosophila viability and functions in pre-mRNA splicing. RNA. 2013;19(2):208–18. pmid:23249746
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Fortschegger K, Wagner B, Voglauer R, Katinger H, Sibilia M, Grillari J. Early Embryonic Lethality of Mice Lacking the Essential Protein SNEV. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2007;27(8):3123–30. pmid:17283042
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Grote M, Wolf E, Will CL, Lemm I, Agafonov DE, Schomburg A, et al. Molecular Architecture of the Human Prp19/CDC5L Complex. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2010;30(9):2105–19. pmid:20176811
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Kleinridders A, Pogoda H-M, Irlenbusch S, Smyth N, Koncz C, Hammerschmidt M, et al. PLRG1 Is an Essential Regulator of Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis during Vertebrate Development and Tissue Homeostasis. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2009;29(11):3173–85. pmid:19307306
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Ohi MD, Gould KL. Characterization of interactions among the Cef1p-Prp19p-associated splicing complex. RNA. 2002;8(6):798–815. pmid:12088152
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Ohi MD, Kooi CWV, Rosenberg JA, Ren L, Hirsch JP, Chazin WJ, et al. Structural and Functional Analysis of Essential pre-mRNA Splicing Factor Prp19p. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2005;25(1):451–60. pmid:15601865
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Ohi MD, Link AJ, Ren L, Jennings JL, McDonald WH, Gould KL. Proteomics Analysis Reveals Stable Multiprotein Complexes in Both Fission and Budding Yeasts Containing Myb-Related Cdc5p/Cef1p, Novel Pre-mRNA Splicing Factors, and snRNAs. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2002;22(7):2011–24. pmid:11884590
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Xia K, Guo H, Hu Z, Xun G, Zuo L, Peng Y, et al. Common genetic variants on 1p13.2 associate with risk of autism. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19(11):1212–9. pmid:24189344
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Andersson ER, Sandberg R, Lendahl U. Notch signaling: simplicity in design, versatility in function. Development. 2011;138(17):3593–612. pmid:21828089
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Bray SJ. Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(9):678–89. pmid:16921404
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Gustafson K, Boulianne GL. Distinct expression patterns detected within individual tissues by the GAL4 enhancer trap technique. Genome. 1996;39(1):174–82. pmid:8851804
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Guruharsha KG, Kankel MW, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. The Notch signalling system: recent insights into the complexity of a conserved pathway. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(9):654–66. doi: https://doi.org/http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v13/n9/suppinfo/nrg3272_S1.html. pmid:22868267
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Kankel MW, Hurlbut GD, Upadhyay G, Yajnik V, Yedvobnick B, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Investigating the Genetic Circuitry of Mastermind in Drosophila, a Notch Signal Effector. Genetics. 2007;177(4):2493–505. pmid:PMC2219471.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Saj A, Arziman Z, Stempfle D, van Belle W, Sauder U, Horn T, et al. A Combined Ex Vivo and In Vivo RNAi Screen for Notch Regulators in Drosophila Reveals an Extensive Notch Interaction Network. Developmental Cell. 2010;18(5):862–76. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.03.013. pmid:20493818
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Brower DL. Engrailed gene expression in Drosophila imaginal discs. The EMBO Journal. 1986;5(10):2649–56. pmid:PMC1167165.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. de Celis JF, Bray S. Feed-back mechanisms affecting Notch activation at the dorsoventral boundary in the Drosophila wing. Development. 1997;124(17):3241–51. pmid:9310319
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. de Celis JF, Garcia-Bellido A, Bray SJ. Activation and function of Notch at the dorsal-ventral boundary of the wing imaginal disc. Development. 1996;122(1):359–69. pmid:8565848
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Lecourtois M, Schweisguth F. The neurogenic suppressor of hairless DNA-binding protein mediates the transcriptional activation of the enhancer of split complex genes triggered by Notch signaling. Genes & Development. 1995;9(21):2598–608.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Milán M, Diaz-Benjumea FJ, Cohen SM. Beadex encodes an LMO protein that regulates Apterous LIM–homeodomain activity in Drosophila wing development: a model for LMO oncogene function. Genes & Development. 1998;12(18):2912–20.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Haenlin M, Kramatschek B, Campos-Ortega JA. The pattern of transcription of the neurogenic gene Delta of Drosophila melanogaster. Development. 1990;110(3):905–14. pmid:2128477
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Crook NE, Clem RJ, Miller LK. An apoptosis-inhibiting baculovirus gene with a zinc finger-like motif. Journal of Virology. 1993;67(4):2168–74. pmid:8445726
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Hay BA, Wolff T, Rubin GM. Expression of baculovirus P35 prevents cell death in Drosophila. Development. 1994;120(8):2121–9. pmid:7925015
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Shalaby NA, Parks AL, Morreale EJ, Osswalt MC, Pfau KM, Pierce EL, et al. A Screen for Modifiers of Notch Signaling Uncovers Amun, a Protein With a Critical Role in Sensory Organ Development. Genetics. 2009;182(4):1061–76. pmid:19448274
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Nagaraj R, Banerjee U. Combinatorial signaling in the specification of primary pigment cells in the Drosophila eye. Development. 2007;134(5):825–31. pmid:17251265
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Tomlinson A, Struhl G. Delta/Notch and Boss/Sevenless Signals Act Combinatorially to Specify the Drosophila R7 Photoreceptor. Molecular Cell. 2001;7(3):487–95. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00196-4. pmid:11463374
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Tsuda L, Nagaraj R, Zipursky SL, Banerjee U. An EGFR/Ebi/Sno Pathway Promotes Delta Expression by Inactivating Su(H)/SMRTER Repression during Inductive Notch Signaling. Cell. 2002;110(5):625–37. pmid:12230979
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Blochlinger K, Jan LY, Jan YN. Postembryonic patterns of expression of cut, a locus regulating sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Development. 1993;117(2):441–50. pmid:8330519
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Nagaraj R, Banerjee U. Regulation of Notch and Wingless signalling by phyllopod, a transcriptional target of the EGFR pathway. The EMBO Journal. 2009;28(4):337–46. pmid:19153610
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Miller AC, Lyons EL, Herman TG. cis-Inhibition of Notch by Endogenous Delta Biases the Outcome of Lateral Inhibition. Current Biology. 2009;19(16):1378–83. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.042. pmid:19631544
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Kuo P-C, Tsao Y-P, Chang H-W, Chen P-H, Huang C-W, Lin S-T, et al. Breast Cancer Amplified Sequence 2, a Novel Negative Regulator of the p53 Tumor Suppressor. Cancer Research. 2009;69(23):8877–85. pmid:19903847
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Bolós V, Grego-Bessa J, Pompa JLdl. Notch Signaling in Development and Cancer. Endocrine Reviews. 2007;28(3):339–63. pmid:17409286.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Leong KG, Karsan A. Recent insights into the role of Notch signaling in tumorigenesis. Blood. 2005;107(6):2223–33. pmid:16291593
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Blair SS. Wing Vein Patterning in Drosophila and the Analysis of Intercellular Signaling. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2007;23(1):293–319. pmid:17506700.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. del Álamo D, Rouault H, Schweisguth F. Mechanism and Significance of cis-Inhibition in Notch Signalling. Current Biology. 2011;21(1):R40–R7. pmid:21215938
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Roignant JY, Treisman JE. Pattern formation in the Drosophila eye disc. Int J Dev Biol. 2009;53(5–6):795–804. Epub 2009/06/27. pmid:19557685; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2713679.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Huppert SS, Jacobsen TL, Muskavitch MA. Feedback regulation is central to Delta-Notch signalling required for Drosophila wing vein morphogenesis. Development. 1997;124(17):3283–91. pmid:9310323
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Micchelli CA, Rulifson EJ, Blair SS. The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of Drosophila: Notch, Wingless and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate. Development. 1997;124(8):1485–95. pmid:9108365
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Perrimon N, Pitsouli C, Shilo BZ. Signaling mechanisms controlling cell fate and embryonic patterning. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(8):a005975. Epub 2012/08/03. pmid:22855721.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Brou C. Intracellular trafficking of Notch receptors and ligands. Experimental Cell Research. 2009;315(9):1549–55. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.09.010. pmid:18845146
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Chitnis A. Why is delta endocytosis required for effective activation of notch? Developmental Dynamics. 2006;235(4):886–94. pmid:16425217
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Le Borgne R. Regulation of Notch signalling by endocytosis and endosomal sorting. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2006;18(2):213–22. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2006.02.011. pmid:16488590
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Nichols JT, Miyamoto A, Weinmaster G. Notch Signaling–Constantly on the Move. Traffic. 2007;8(8):959–69. pmid:17547700
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Anderson LE. Hoyer's Solution as a Rapid Permanent Mounting Medium for Bryophytes. The Bryologist. 1954;57(3):242–4.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Qi C, Zhu YT, Chang J, Yeldandi AV, Sambasiva Rao M, Zhu Y-J. Potentiation of estrogen receptor transcriptional activity by breast cancer amplified sequence 2. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2005;328(2):393–8. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.187. pmid:15694360
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Sengupta S, Banerjee S, Lahiri S, Dutta T, Dhar TK, Ghosh AK. Purification, characterization, sequencing and molecular cloning of a novel cysteine methyltransferase that regulates trehalose-6-phosphate synthase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—General Subjects. 2014;1840(6):1861–71. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.01.005.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Kuo PC, Huang CW, Lee CI, Chang HW, Hsieh SW, Chung YP, et al. BCAS2 Promotes Prostate Cancer Cells Proliferation by Enhancing AR mRNA Transcription and Protein Stability. British Journal of Cancer. 2014.

[ref4] 4. Neubauer G, King A, Rappsilber J, Calvio C, Watson M, Ajuh P, et al. Mass spectrometry and EST-database searching allows characterization of the multi-protein spliceosome complex. Nature Genetics. 1998;20(1):46. pmid:8816473.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Ajuh P, Kuster B, Panov K, Zomerdijk JCBM, Mann M, Lamond AI. Functional analysis of the human CDC5L complex and identification of its components by mass spectrometry. The EMBO Journal. 2000;19(23):6569–81. pmid:PMC305846.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Boudrez A, Beullens M, Groenen P, Van Eynde A, Vulsteke V, Jagiello I, et al. NIPP1-mediated Interaction of Protein Phosphatase-1 with CDC5L, a Regulator of Pre-mRNA Splicing and Mitotic Entry. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275(33):25411–7. pmid:10827081
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Chan S-P, Cheng S-C. The Prp19-associated Complex Is Required for Specifying Interactions of U5 and U6 with Pre-mRNA during Spliceosome Activation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280(35):31190–9. pmid:15994330
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Chan S-P, Kao D-I, Tsai W-Y, Cheng S-C. The Prp 19p-Associated Complex in Spliceosome Activation. Science. 2003;302(5643):279–82. pmid:11166920.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Chen H-R, Jan S-P, Tsao TY, Sheu Y-J, Banroques J, Cheng S-C. Snt309p, a Component of the Prp19p-Associated Complex That Interacts with Prp19p and Associates with the Spliceosome Simultaneously with or Immediately after Dissociation of U4 in the Same Manner as Prp19p. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1998;18(4):2196–204. pmid:9528791
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Chen H-R, Tsao TY, Chen C-H, Tsai W-Y, Her L-S, Hsu MM-T, et al. Snt309p modulates interactions of Prp19p with its associated components to stabilize the Prp19p-associated complex essential for pre-mRNA splicing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999;96(10):5406–11. pmid:10318896
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Chen P-H, Lee C-I, Weng Y-T, Tarn W-Y, Tsao Y-P, Kuo P-C, et al. BCAS2 is essential for Drosophila viability and functions in pre-mRNA splicing. RNA. 2013;19(2):208–18. pmid:23249746
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Fortschegger K, Wagner B, Voglauer R, Katinger H, Sibilia M, Grillari J. Early Embryonic Lethality of Mice Lacking the Essential Protein SNEV. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2007;27(8):3123–30. pmid:17283042
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Grote M, Wolf E, Will CL, Lemm I, Agafonov DE, Schomburg A, et al. Molecular Architecture of the Human Prp19/CDC5L Complex. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2010;30(9):2105–19. pmid:20176811
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Kleinridders A, Pogoda H-M, Irlenbusch S, Smyth N, Koncz C, Hammerschmidt M, et al. PLRG1 Is an Essential Regulator of Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis during Vertebrate Development and Tissue Homeostasis. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2009;29(11):3173–85. pmid:19307306
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Ohi MD, Gould KL. Characterization of interactions among the Cef1p-Prp19p-associated splicing complex. RNA. 2002;8(6):798–815. pmid:12088152
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Ohi MD, Kooi CWV, Rosenberg JA, Ren L, Hirsch JP, Chazin WJ, et al. Structural and Functional Analysis of Essential pre-mRNA Splicing Factor Prp19p. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2005;25(1):451–60. pmid:15601865
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Ohi MD, Link AJ, Ren L, Jennings JL, McDonald WH, Gould KL. Proteomics Analysis Reveals Stable Multiprotein Complexes in Both Fission and Budding Yeasts Containing Myb-Related Cdc5p/Cef1p, Novel Pre-mRNA Splicing Factors, and snRNAs. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2002;22(7):2011–24. pmid:11884590
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Xia K, Guo H, Hu Z, Xun G, Zuo L, Peng Y, et al. Common genetic variants on 1p13.2 associate with risk of autism. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19(11):1212–9. pmid:24189344
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Andersson ER, Sandberg R, Lendahl U. Notch signaling: simplicity in design, versatility in function. Development. 2011;138(17):3593–612. pmid:21828089
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Bray SJ. Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(9):678–89. pmid:16921404
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Gustafson K, Boulianne GL. Distinct expression patterns detected within individual tissues by the GAL4 enhancer trap technique. Genome. 1996;39(1):174–82. pmid:8851804
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Guruharsha KG, Kankel MW, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. The Notch signalling system: recent insights into the complexity of a conserved pathway. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(9):654–66. doi: https://doi.org/http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v13/n9/suppinfo/nrg3272_S1.html. pmid:22868267
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Kankel MW, Hurlbut GD, Upadhyay G, Yajnik V, Yedvobnick B, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Investigating the Genetic Circuitry of Mastermind in Drosophila, a Notch Signal Effector. Genetics. 2007;177(4):2493–505. pmid:PMC2219471.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Saj A, Arziman Z, Stempfle D, van Belle W, Sauder U, Horn T, et al. A Combined Ex Vivo and In Vivo RNAi Screen for Notch Regulators in Drosophila Reveals an Extensive Notch Interaction Network. Developmental Cell. 2010;18(5):862–76. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.03.013. pmid:20493818
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Brower DL. Engrailed gene expression in Drosophila imaginal discs. The EMBO Journal. 1986;5(10):2649–56. pmid:PMC1167165.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. de Celis JF, Bray S. Feed-back mechanisms affecting Notch activation at the dorsoventral boundary in the Drosophila wing. Development. 1997;124(17):3241–51. pmid:9310319
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. de Celis JF, Garcia-Bellido A, Bray SJ. Activation and function of Notch at the dorsal-ventral boundary of the wing imaginal disc. Development. 1996;122(1):359–69. pmid:8565848
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Lecourtois M, Schweisguth F. The neurogenic suppressor of hairless DNA-binding protein mediates the transcriptional activation of the enhancer of split complex genes triggered by Notch signaling. Genes & Development. 1995;9(21):2598–608.
View Article
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Milán M, Diaz-Benjumea FJ, Cohen SM. Beadex encodes an LMO protein that regulates Apterous LIM–homeodomain activity in Drosophila wing development: a model for LMO oncogene function. Genes & Development. 1998;12(18):2912–20.
View Article
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Haenlin M, Kramatschek B, Campos-Ortega JA. The pattern of transcription of the neurogenic gene Delta of Drosophila melanogaster. Development. 1990;110(3):905–14. pmid:2128477
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Crook NE, Clem RJ, Miller LK. An apoptosis-inhibiting baculovirus gene with a zinc finger-like motif. Journal of Virology. 1993;67(4):2168–74. pmid:8445726
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Hay BA, Wolff T, Rubin GM. Expression of baculovirus P35 prevents cell death in Drosophila. Development. 1994;120(8):2121–9. pmid:7925015
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Shalaby NA, Parks AL, Morreale EJ, Osswalt MC, Pfau KM, Pierce EL, et al. A Screen for Modifiers of Notch Signaling Uncovers Amun, a Protein With a Critical Role in Sensory Organ Development. Genetics. 2009;182(4):1061–76. pmid:19448274
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Nagaraj R, Banerjee U. Combinatorial signaling in the specification of primary pigment cells in the Drosophila eye. Development. 2007;134(5):825–31. pmid:17251265
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Tomlinson A, Struhl G. Delta/Notch and Boss/Sevenless Signals Act Combinatorially to Specify the Drosophila R7 Photoreceptor. Molecular Cell. 2001;7(3):487–95. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00196-4. pmid:11463374
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Tsuda L, Nagaraj R, Zipursky SL, Banerjee U. An EGFR/Ebi/Sno Pathway Promotes Delta Expression by Inactivating Su(H)/SMRTER Repression during Inductive Notch Signaling. Cell. 2002;110(5):625–37. pmid:12230979
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Blochlinger K, Jan LY, Jan YN. Postembryonic patterns of expression of cut, a locus regulating sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Development. 1993;117(2):441–50. pmid:8330519
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Nagaraj R, Banerjee U. Regulation of Notch and Wingless signalling by phyllopod, a transcriptional target of the EGFR pathway. The EMBO Journal. 2009;28(4):337–46. pmid:19153610
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Miller AC, Lyons EL, Herman TG. cis-Inhibition of Notch by Endogenous Delta Biases the Outcome of Lateral Inhibition. Current Biology. 2009;19(16):1378–83. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.042. pmid:19631544
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Kuo P-C, Tsao Y-P, Chang H-W, Chen P-H, Huang C-W, Lin S-T, et al. Breast Cancer Amplified Sequence 2, a Novel Negative Regulator of the p53 Tumor Suppressor. Cancer Research. 2009;69(23):8877–85. pmid:19903847
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Bolós V, Grego-Bessa J, Pompa JLdl. Notch Signaling in Development and Cancer. Endocrine Reviews. 2007;28(3):339–63. pmid:17409286.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Leong KG, Karsan A. Recent insights into the role of Notch signaling in tumorigenesis. Blood. 2005;107(6):2223–33. pmid:16291593
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Blair SS. Wing Vein Patterning in Drosophila and the Analysis of Intercellular Signaling. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2007;23(1):293–319. pmid:17506700.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. del Álamo D, Rouault H, Schweisguth F. Mechanism and Significance of cis-Inhibition in Notch Signalling. Current Biology. 2011;21(1):R40–R7. pmid:21215938
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Roignant JY, Treisman JE. Pattern formation in the Drosophila eye disc. Int J Dev Biol. 2009;53(5–6):795–804. Epub 2009/06/27. pmid:19557685; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2713679.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Huppert SS, Jacobsen TL, Muskavitch MA. Feedback regulation is central to Delta-Notch signalling required for Drosophila wing vein morphogenesis. Development. 1997;124(17):3283–91. pmid:9310323
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Micchelli CA, Rulifson EJ, Blair SS. The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of Drosophila: Notch, Wingless and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate. Development. 1997;124(8):1485–95. pmid:9108365
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] PubMed/NCBI

[182] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Perrimon N, Pitsouli C, Shilo BZ. Signaling mechanisms controlling cell fate and embryonic patterning. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(8):a005975. Epub 2012/08/03. pmid:22855721.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] PubMed/NCBI

[186] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Brou C. Intracellular trafficking of Notch receptors and ligands. Experimental Cell Research. 2009;315(9):1549–55. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.09.010. pmid:18845146
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] PubMed/NCBI

[190] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Chitnis A. Why is delta endocytosis required for effective activation of notch? Developmental Dynamics. 2006;235(4):886–94. pmid:16425217
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] PubMed/NCBI

[194] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Le Borgne R. Regulation of Notch signalling by endocytosis and endosomal sorting. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2006;18(2):213–22. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2006.02.011. pmid:16488590
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Nichols JT, Miyamoto A, Weinmaster G. Notch Signaling–Constantly on the Move. Traffic. 2007;8(8):959–69. pmid:17547700
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[200] View Article

[201] PubMed/NCBI

[202] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Anderson LE. Hoyer's Solution as a Rapid Permanent Mounting Medium for Bryophytes. The Bryologist. 1954;57(3):242–4.
View Article
Google Scholar

[204] View Article

[205] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Results

BCAS2 is involved in the regulation of Delta-Notch signaling

Drosophila and human BCAS2 rescues wing deformation induced by depletion of dBCAS2 via Delta-Notch signaling

BCAS2 regulates the expression of Delta through pre-mRNA splicing

The dBCAS2dsRNA diminishing Delta-Notch activity is apoptosis-independent

Overexpression of Delta can rescue the deformation of wing margin in dBCAS2-deprivation fly

Depletion of dBCAS2 can rescue the eye aberration resulted from overexpression of Delta

Discussion

Materials and Methods

Fly genetics and fly stocks

Plasmid construction

Immunofluorescence

Adult wing image processing and analysis

In vivo splicing assays

Western Blotting

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. The dBCAS2 transgenic fly shows normal wing morphology.

S2 Fig. The hBCAS2 transgenic fly shows normal Delta-Notch signaling.

S3 Fig. The hBCAS2 can rescue the elimination of Delta, Notch and Cut expression caused by the depletion of dBCAS2.

S4 Fig. RT-PCR analysis of Delta pre-mRNA and mRNA in coexpression of hBCAS2 and dBCAS2dsRNA.

S1 Table. Genotypes of Drosophila analyzed.

S2 Table. Primer sequences used in this study.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

The dBCAS2^dsRNA diminishing Delta-Notch activity is apoptosis-independent

S4 Fig. RT-PCR analysis of Delta pre-mRNA and mRNA in coexpression of hBCAS2 and dBCAS2^dsRNA.