Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Quantitative Measurements in the Human Hippocampus and Related Areas: Correspondence between Ex-Vivo MRI and Histological Preparations

Quantitative Measurements in the Human Hippocampus and Related Areas: Correspondence between Ex-Vivo MRI and Histological Preparations

  • José Carlos Delgado-González, 
  • Francisco Mansilla-Legorburo, 
  • José Florensa-Vila, 
  • Ana María Insausti, 
  • Antonio Viñuela, 
  • Teresa Tuñón-Alvarez, 
  • Marcos Cruz, 
  • Alicia Mohedano-Moriano, 
  • Ricardo Insausti, 
  • Emilio Artacho-Pérula


The decrease of volume estimates in different structures of the medial temporal lobe related to memory correlate with the decline of cognitive functions in neurodegenerative diseases. This study presents data on the association between MRI quantitative parameters of medial temporal lobe structures and their quantitative estimate in microscopic examination. Twelve control cases had ex-vivo MRI, and thereafter, the temporal lobe of both hemispheres was sectioned from the pole as far as the level of the splenium of the corpus callosum. Nissl stain was used to establish anatomical boundaries between structures in the medial temporal lobe. The study included morphometrical and stereological estimates of the amygdaloid complex, hippocampus, and temporal horn of the lateral ventricle, as well as different regions of grey and white matter in the temporal lobe. Data showed a close association between morphometric MRI images values and those based on the histological determination of boundaries. Only values in perimeter and circularity of the piamater were different. This correspondence is also revealed by the stereological study, although irregular compartments resulted in a lesser agreement. Neither age (< 65 yr and > 65yr) nor hemisphere had any effect. Our results indicate that ex-vivo MRI is highly associated with quantitative information gathered by histological examination, and these data could be used as structural MRI biomarker in neurodegenerative diseases.


The medial temporal lobe (MTL) is considered to comprise the Hippocampal Formation (HF) and the parahippocampal region (PHR). The HF is subdivided into Dentate Gyrus, CA1, CA2 and CA3 fields, Subiculum, Presubiculum, Parasubiculum and Entorhinal cortex. The PHR is composed of the temporopolar, perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices, which lie adjacent to the HF and surround it as a cortical strip. The MTL is crucial in the network supporting encoding and consolidation of declarative memory [1]. MTL lesions in humans produces memory deficits; moreover, experimental studies in animals demonstrate the pivotal role of limbic medial temporal structures in memory [2]. The PHR is activated during recognition judgments [3, 4], and is considered as the anatomical substrate of relational memory by linking individual stimuli to context [5].

The MTL in general shows atrophy from the eight decade on [6], and in particular, the HF is affected. For instance, while the entorhinal cortex (EC) decreases 5% in volume, in subjects under 70 years, it reaches 20% over 70 years [7]. Furthermore, the number of neurons in the HF [8] is an important indicator to assess brain changes related to memory functions in aging and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This neurodegenerative disease affects differentially regions of the MTL in a distinct pattern: while rostromedial EC shows a scarce neuronal loss, the caudal portion of the EC presents an important reduction in neuron number, as well as in perirhinal cortex, subiculum and dentate gyrus [9, 10]. In addition to the neurodegeneration pattern, global changes, as well as hemispheric differences have been also reported in other neurological diseases such as temporal lobe epilepsy, postraumatic stress disorder, depressive disorders, Down syndrome, or autism [1113]. More concerted comparison with pathological findings in particular in AD [6, 14] can be achieved through the comparison of morphological parameters between ex-vivo MRI images and histological sections of the same cases, also helpful to estimate quantitative features of the MTL and their variability. The effect of age and sex and intra-subject hemispheric asymmetry in different structures of the MTL are also evaluated. The normative values would provide a useful tool for quantitative assessment of structural MRI, in order to help in the diagnosis of neurological diseases in which a variation in MTL volume is produced.

The present study aims at finding both morphometrical and stereological estimates of the MTL as well as the remainder of temporal cortex and amygdaloid complex in a series of control cases, both at ex-vivo MRI and histological examination as a means of validation of in-vivo MRI examination. Thereby, a simple procedure would facilitate a clear, unbiased, and efficient method for neuroradiological examinations in the MTL structures.

Materials and Methods


The study consisted of twelve human brains (five men and seven women, age range, 40 to 90 years) obtained from routine autopsies performed between the years 2001–2002 at the Pathology Department Hospital Complex of Navarre (Spain), according to the local Ethical Committee (Table 1). Informed consent to perform autopsy and study of organic tissues for research use was obtained verbally by the pathologist from the next of kin. Prior to 2004 no written informed consent was required for routine autopsies, but verbal consent was obtained from the next of kin by the pathologist who performed the autopsies, based on the lack of regulation of written informed consent and the research purposes of the project. After the year 2004, written informed consent is mandatory and archived at the Hospital or Brain Bank. Furthermore, the specific research project was approved by the Clinical Investigation Ethical Committee (CEIC), available at the website Study requirements (with an in-depth analysis of the objectives of the study, proofs and preparation, benefits and risks, confidentiality and data protection, and others) comply with the Helsinki Declaration. The Ethical Committee approved the study as all cases were prior to the year 2004, and the use of biological organs or tissue for scientific research is ethically legitimated, as it is the case in the present study. The Ethical Committee approved this research project.

The cases were grouped according to the age as LT (lower than), less or equal to 65 years, and GT (greater than), 65 years, based on the study of Insausti et al. [6]. The cause of death of the cases was not related to neurological or psychiatric disorders that may have affected the parameters under study.

The brains were cut in several slabs of approximately 1 cm-thick in the coronal plane, orthogonal to the intercommissural line (according to the standard procedure of [15] (Fig 1); samples were obtained for neuropahological examination. Brain slabs were fixed by immersion in 10% buffered formalin, and subsequently in 4% paraformaldehyde during at least eight weeks. Thereafter, the brain slabs were hold together in a gauze for MRI study using 1.5T magnetic resonance scanner (Gyroscan Intera, Phillips); a gradient SE coronal T1 high resolution sequence was used once brains were placed on the head matrix coil; consecutive MRI sections of the brain were carried out with a thickness of 1.2 mm and an acquisition matrix of 512x512; the effective pixel size was of 0.29 mm.

Fig 1.

(a) Representation of an hemisphere showing the intercommissural line (A-B line) and the perpendicular sections to obtain consecutive slabs with a thickness of t. (b) A MRI at the level of the amygdala, caudal to the limen insulae. (c) MRI depicting the outline the temporal lobe structures. (d) Histological delineation of structures at same level as in panel c. WM: White matter; GM: Grey matter; A: Amygdala; Hp: Hippocampus; LV: Temporal horn of the lateral ventricle; ThEC: scheme with the five measurements of the entorhinal cortex; ThTL: similar representation of the five measurements in the temporal cortex.

After MRI study, each temporal lobe was dissected and immersed in a cryoprotectant solution of 10% glycerol with 2% dimethylsulfoxide in phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 3 days, and 20% glycerol for 5 additional days. Each slab was serially sectioned in the coronal plane at a thickness of 50 μm in a sliding microtome coupled to a freezing unit. Every 10th section was mounted on gelatin-coated slides and stained with thionin for Nissl histological examination of the different MTL structures analyzed.

Quantitative study

The quantitative study of the MTL structures was performed in both MRI and histological series of sections. The morphometric and stereological study was carried out with tools of the free software ImageJ which allows the overlap of test systems. MTL structures were identified, first in histological sections and subsequently in MRI series of images. Afterwards, the delimitation of the different structures in the MTL was prepared in series of images arranged in a rostral to caudal sequence, from the temporal pole to the caudal extreme of the hippocampus. The piamater was taken as the outer limit of the temporal cortex. The inner limit was the line between the grey and white matter in the HF and PHR [16].

The amygdaloid complex limits were taken from the level of the limen insulae (rostral limit) to the hippocampal—amygdaloid transitional area (HATA), as the most caudal part of the amygdaloid complex [17]. The subiculum, which forms the anterior limit of the hippocampus in the coronal plane, was recognized as an ovoid mass at the rostral tip of the lateral ventricle, under the amygdaloid complex. The caudal limit of the hippocampus was set at the posterior limit of the posterior parahippocampal cortex, as a mass of ovoid grey matter, at the level of the fimbria, tangentially cut at this level, and in continuation with the posterior crus of the fornix, according to our previous published work [18]. Finally, the measurement of the lateral ventricle started at the onset of the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle, where the amygdaloid complex is ahead to the beginning of the subiculum. The temporal horn measurement ended at the level of the atrium (confluence of the frontal, temporal and occipital horns of the lateral ventricle).

The morphometric parameters obtained in our study were area, perimeter, maximal and minimal Feret’s diameters, and shape descriptors: (1) FFPE (circularity form factor, obtained from: 4 • π • area / perimeter2), where values of 1 represented a perfect circle, and lower than 1 for an ellipse and irregular structures, (2) FFEll (elliptic form factor-aspect ratio-, obtained from major axis / minor axis) with values of 1 for a circle and more than 1 for elliptical structures; and (3) FFAR (harmonic form factor—roundness-, obtained by 4 • area / (π • (major axis)2)) where a value of 1 represents a circle and an ellipse, and lower than 1 represents irregular structures. These estimators were used in the assessment of (1) the outline of the temporal lobe, (2) white matter outline, (3) amygdaloid complex, (4) HF, and (5) temporal horn of the lateral ventricle. Furthermore, the cortical thickness in each of the gyri of the temporal lobe as far as the PRC, that makes the EC boundary, was assessed in five systematic measurements (Fig 1); the EC was measured from 2 mm behind the limen insulae as far as the EC caudal limit, approximately 1.5 mm behind the last slice containing the gyrus intralimbicus (end of the uncus), just rostral to the lateral geniculate nucleus [16]; the sulcus semiannularis and the collateral sulcus respectively were the landmarks of the medial and lateral boundaries of the EC.

The stereological study included the estimation of the surface area and volume of the structures analyzed (Fig 2). The volume of both the grey and white matter, amygdaloid complex, HF, as well as the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle was estimated using Cavalieri’s principle [19]. This method allows an efficient and precise volume estimation of a structure regardless of its size and shape, through a series of parallel planes spaced at a constant distance “t”. The final estimation of the volume is obtained according to the following equation: in which, A1, A2, … An denote the outline sectional area of each structure, and t, is the section interval for the n consecutive sections. Also, we superimposed an overlay made up of test points regularly spaced for the volume estimation; thus, the sum of points ΣP hitting the structure of interest, multiplied by the section interval, t, and the area associated with each test point a/p, is a useful estimation of the volume. This estimation is expressed as:

Fig 2.

(a) MRI of the temporal lobe. A test system of regularly spaced points is superimposed for the estimation of volume of different structures. The number of points that hit the structure result in the volume, according to the formulae presented in Methods. The area associated to test point is showed (a/p). (b) Histological section stained with thionin at a roughly the same level as in a MRI image, where horizontal lines were superimposed to estimate the intercepts between test lines and each structure of interest (outline of the white matter, grey matter-surface area of the temporal lobe-, profiles of the amygdala, hippocampus and lateral ventricle). The length of test line associated with a test point is also represented.

The study included an analysis of the accuracy of volume estimates using Cavalieri’s principle and the counting point method according to Cruz-Orive [20]. We also estimated the counting point contribution to the overall estimation of the coefficient of error (CE (est(V))) that is, in general, negligible relative to the contribution of areal measurement between sections.

In addition, the study includes the surface area estimation according to the following equations in which, l/p is the length of test line per grid point, ΣI is the sum of intersections between the test lines and the profile of the structure and ΣP the sum of points hitting the structure. We found limitations in this estimation since test lines must have isotropic orientation and random position in the 3D space.

Once volume and surface area were estimated, the cortical thickness in the 3D space was estimated according to the Eq (67) from Cruz-Orive et al. [21], as the ratio of grey matter volume and the average between grey matter and white matter surface areas.

Statistical study

The quantitative data were statistically analyzed using SPSS/PC+ Statistical Software Package 19.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.). The mean value, SD, SEM, and coefficient of variation of each item were computed. The study included a comparison of the mean values for right and left hemispheres, as well as for MRI and histological examination. For this reason, a normal distribution of data was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Moreover, a paired t-test was employed to determine the significance between hemispheres and between both set of data, MRI and histological data. Differences related to age’s group and sex using independent t-tests was also examined. A Pearson correlation study was used to correlate quantitative estimators. Also, a multivariate Anova (MANOVA) was carried out with R®, independent for volume and surface area parameters. The observations made on each case were conceived as a random vector with five components, corresponding to white and grey matter of temporal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus and temporal horn of the lateral ventricle, respectively. These parameters are robust and meaningful because they are defined in 3D and estimated by stereology. Although the measurements in each case were made separately on every hemisphere, the corresponding data pairs were added up in order to get total brain quantities, mainly because a high correlation among the two hemisphere variables would render them redundant and would thereby impair the MANOVA analysis. Three non-random factors, with two levels each were considered, namely, the method (MRI and physical sections), sex, and age. Separate univariate ANOVA analyses were performed for the study of the cortical thickness.


The morphometric results obtained for piamater, white matter boundary and profiles of the amygdala, HF and lateral ventricle are shown in Figs 3 and 4 (size and shape descriptors, respectively). None of the descriptors showed statistical differences between hemispheres for both MRI and histological studies (mean and SD values are shown in Figs 3 and 4).

Fig 3. Plot of the size descriptors for the piamater, white matter, amygdala, hippocampus and temporal horn of the lateral ventricle sorted by groups of age (LT, lower than 65 years, and GT, greater than 65 years, see text) in both MRI and histological studies, as well as for both right and left hemispheres.

Data represent mean and standard deviation.

Fig 4. Size descriptors plot of the piamater, white matter, amygdala, hippocampus and temporal horn of the lateral ventricle by age group (LT and GT), in both MRI and histological studies, and for both right and left hemispheres.

Data are mean and standard deviation.

The average area per section (profile of the temporal lobe, piamater) was about 11 cm2 per hemisphere irrespectively of the method employed, MRI or histology (Fig 3). MRI perimeter values showed a significant decrease in both hemispheres relative to the histological analysis; this decrease appeared in both LT and GT groups. Minimal Feret’s diameters resulted in a small differences (p<0.05) between MRI and histology in the left hemisphere for both LT and GT groups. The piamater appeared more elliptical and irregular in histological sections than in MRI; besides, the circularity factor was significantly lower in histological sections than MRI values (Fig 4), and the aspect ratio (FFEll) and roundness changed significantly between age groups (p<0.05).

The white matter area presented values of about 4 cm2, while the perimeter was 20 cm (Fig 3). No significant differences were found between MRI and histology values. A small difference in the white matter (p<0.05) in minimal Feret’s diameters between LT and GT groups was found. Circularity values in the white matter were clearly lower than those of the piamater in both methods of study, age groups and hemispheres (Fig 4).

The average data of sectional area for the amygdala, HF and lateral ventricle were 0.85 cm2, 1 cm2, and 0.12 cm2, respectively (Fig 3). Descriptors of size and shape of amygdala and HF in the right and left hemispheres were not statistically significant; likewise, no statistical differences in both MRI and histological sections were observed. In contrast, the lateral ventricle showed the largest variability among all the regions analyzed, and presented shape descriptors with significant difference between MRI and histological sections in both LT and GT groups (Fig 4). The circularity index showed a decrease in histology relative to MRI.

Sex had no effect neither on size or shape descriptors in any of the MTL structures studied. Likewise, sex had no effect either in MRI or histological sections.

Table 2 shows the cortical thickness of the entorhinal and temporal cortices. No effect of age or sex on cortical thickness or hemispheres was observed. Moreover, the MRI study of the temporal lobe cortices showed a thickness smaller than in the histological study (12% of decrease, not statistically significant). The cortical thickness of the EC was 18% greater than temporal cortex although, it did not reach statistical differences.

Table 2. Entorhinal and temporal lobe cortices thickness in both, hemispheres and series.

Sex, age or hemisphere presented no statistical differences in the stereological estimates of the volume and surface area of the white and grey matter of temporal cortex, amygdala, HF and temporal horn of the lateral ventricle as shown in Tables 3 and 4 (age groups and sex, respectively). On average, MRI volume was 31 cm3 for the grey matter, and 25 cm3 for white matter. Histological measurements resulted in higher volume in grey matter (40 cm3) whereas white matter reached only 28 cm3. The variability of grey and white matter among cases, as well as temporal lobe volume was higher in histological sections than in the MRI study (on average, the coefficient of variation was 25.9% and 17.8%, respectively). The volume of amygdala, HF and lateral ventricle were, on average, 1.26 cm3, 3.28 cm3, and 1.02 cm3, respectively. The histological series had greater values in both hippocampi and lateral ventricle relative to MRI (with differences in the hippocampus that were statistically significant in some cases, see Table 3). The largest variability was found in the lateral ventricle. The surface area was also higher in histological measurements compared to MRI especially in the most irregular structures; moreover, these differences were more evident in the right hemisphere.

Table 3. Volume and surface area estimations for all structures analyzed in the temporal lobe of both hemispheres and series for age’s group (LT and GT cases).

Table 4. Volume and surface area estimations for all structures analyzed in the temporal lobe of both hemispheres and series for sex group (Men and Women cases).

Overall, the study of correlation between parameters demonstrates correlation between quantitative estimators, although with high variability due to the high number of parameters in both groups. The results indicate greater association between hemispheres in both, size and form estimators than the MRI and histology methods of study (Fig 5). However, for each parameter type (namely volume and surface area) the multivariate analysis revealed a significant difference only for the factor method employed (no significant differences were detected in sex and age factors). Separate ANOVA analyses indicated that differences in the method affected mainly the hippocampus (p<0.01), and to a lesser degree the lateral ventricle (p<0.05), whereas in grey matter, white matter, and amygdala no significant difference was detected between the two methods. A separate univariate ANOVA was performed on the cortical thickness with no significant effects of any of the three factors considered.

Fig 5. Plot of the volume (a-f), circularity form factor (g-k), and thickness (l) for the twelve studied cases; regression equation, correlation significance, and regression lines that fits the data are displayed.

Hemispheric correlation (right and left) are shown in top, for MRI study. Correlation between MRI and histological measurements are shown at bottom, for right hemisphere. GM: Grey matter; WM: White matter; A: Amygdala; Hp: Hippocampus; LV: Lateral ventricle; TL: Temporal lobe; Th: Thickness (entorhinal cortex).


The importance of quantitative analysis of the MTL has been demonstrated in a large quantity of studies of the human temporal lobe in normal and pathological conditions [9, 2224]. However, studies are generally restricted to either MRI or neuroanatomical evaluation based on histological sections, but seldom combined [18]. We deemed interesting the study of the comparison of quantitative data obtained from MRI with data obtained by histological analysis of the MTL in the same subjects. Nowadays, non-invasive MRI methods are highly used in clinical practice to interpret morphologic changes in the brain, capable to detect neurodegenerative disorders at an early stage. In addition, our results show that in control cases, the quantitative data of the MTL are similar between hemispheres, sex, and age groups. Earlier studies [6] show a decrease in the calculated area of two-dimensional, unfolded maps in subjects over 80 years old, but in our series the number of cases of this age is too small to detect differences. It would be interesting to analyze more complete series of subjects older and younger than 80 years. Likewise, it would be interesting to establish hemispheric differences when neurodegenerative processes are diagnosed [4, 25].

A principal finding of this study is the high correlation between MRI and histological sections in quantitative measurements of size and shape descriptors. While it is possible that variability could change according to the number of images used for quantification (probably higher when fewer sections are employed) the values of area, perimeter and Feret’s diameters were roughly similar between both MRI and histology; only the perimeter of the white matter and, in particular of the piamater showed a statistically significant increase in histological sections relative to MRI. This fact could be explained by a more clear outlines of histological sections that would allow a more accurate tracing of brain sulci. MRI, as it has been applied here, showed partial volume effect and did not give clear definition of the depth of some sulci, although no significant changes in area measurements were obtained despite an increase in the perimeter. Likewise, the lateral ventricle had more clear limits on histological material than on MRI sections, what resulted in an increased perimeter, especially in LT group. Both cases (piamater and lateral ventricle) had the value of the circularity index significantly reduced, thus indicating higher irregularity.

The importance of simple and easy to perform measurements of the cortical thickness to differentiate controls from neurodegenerative disorders patients has been reported in many studies [2629]. Our results deal exclusively with control cases, in which EC thickness values are in the range of other reports [26, 30]. However, the temporal cortex thickness is a bit smaller than the EC. We found a notable, but not significant decrease of the cortical thickness measured in histological sections compared to MRI studies; this fact could be explained, in part, by the lack of contrast of the cortex in MRI images, as the close contact between adjacent banks of the sulci results in a fused mass of tissue, where precise limits cannot be seen (partial volume effect), thereby the outlines are better identified on histology than in 1.5T MRI. Some studies found an increase of the cortical thickness of the MTL, whose values were slightly greater in perirhinal, parahippocampal and fusiform gyrus cortices relative to EC [26], although several authors report a thickness decrease in regions outside the EC [27, 30, 31].

Much larger left hemisphere regional brain volume has been described [32], thus indicating a clear asymmetry, including temporal regions. Our results show the temporal lobe volume estimation similar in both hemispheres, with values in accordance to other studies using 1.5T MR images [33, 34]. Moreover we found that sex and age groups did not present a significant influence on volume estimations for any of the temporal lobe regions analyzed. Sex differences were reported in several studies after analysis of volume and size distribution of neocortical neurons, as well as neuron numbers in brain regions [3538]. Different reports exist dealing with sex influence, mainly related with brain region studied, normalization of the brain size, and methodology, as Keeley et al. report [36]. Our study shows data variability when different compartments were measured that, in addition to the scarce number of cases studied, resulted in no sex differences, being in accordance with the more exhaustive study of Insausti et al. [6] on the no influence of sex when analyzing temporal cortices after normalization of volumetric data.

Our study shows an increase of roughly 13% of the temporal lobe volume estimation using histological material relative to MRI, which was more evident in grey than in white matter. Surface area had more clear-cut, statistically significant value differences in histological analysis relative to MRI (16% and 30% of increase in white and grey matter, respectively); these findings could be due to a more accurate identification of boundaries, whereas MRI images, at least with 1.5T scanners, present poor contrast of boundaries in temporal lobe structures. Surface area estimation on post-mortem brains gave similar values [39]. Smaller values of surface area in MRI relative to histology are more pronounced in the outer, pial surface, and our results are confirmatory [39].

The volumetric data of hippocampus, amygdala, and lateral ventricle show almost no variability between hemispheres. Only the hippocampus presented in some cases statistically significant differences between MRI studies and histology. While hemispheric asymmetry, mainly using MRI has been reported extensively, fewer studies exist in which the effect of sex is included [14, 4045]. Our results indicate that no effect on morphometric and volumetric data are due to sex.

The volume of hippocampus is around 3–4 cm3 (range 2 to 8.5 cm3) in most studies [4649]. The amygdala varies between 1–2 cm3 (range 0.6–4 cm3). Only a few studies report the volume of the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle (values around 0.3 cm3) [50]. Finally, the resulting surface area values showed that histological studies provide higher values relative to MRI, especially in the hippocampus and lateral ventricle, where higher inter-individual variability was found. Consequently, it results in statistically significant differences, likely due to the number of intercepts between structures and test lines. The surface area estimation requires isotropy to obtain unbiased data; however, although in our study only coronal sections were used (what produces a non-random orientation, and therefore non-unbiased data), we think, such as Chareyron et al. [51] and Jabés et al. [52], that since the analysis of the brain structures under study was made in the same way in both MRI, and histology, data collected in the study would allow the assessment of surface area measurements.

The correlation and the multivariate studies revealed that an association exists between quantitative data of MRI and histological material, with no influence of sex and age groups. However, this association was not extremely significant, perhaps due to the small number of human cases analyzed and the individual variability. The MANOVA analysis reveals a significant difference between both methods for volume and surface area estimations in the hippocampus and lateral ventricle that are also in concordance with the fact that MTL structures with irregular morphology tend to be influenced in a larger degree than those with less variability.

We found that the use of test points for volume estimation is more efficient (i.e., 1/(coefficient of variation•time)) than the use of regions of interest, usually obtained by manual tracing and the subsequent product of surface by number of sections; however, more advanced methods such as statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and FreeSurfer software systems for automatic tracing improve the delineation of regions of interest and, thus, increase the efficiency due to reduction of time. We tested this methodology in other studies with promising results [53, 54], and Lehman et al. [22] demonstrate the accuracy of FreeSurfer software to identify atrophy and distinguish temporal lobe structures between groups such as AD, semantic dementia, and control subjects [22]. However, in spite of these results with this software, we used simple count of test points or linear intersections due to the proven efficacy in stereology.

In conclusion, we show that a simple, easy to implement, unbiased method for volumetric assessment of MRI images, can be applied to clinical studies, in particular to the MTL and structures therein, with an overall accuracy of a histopathological estimation of the same volumes as morphometric parameters.


The authors are indebted to Dr. Tomás Cros and Ms. Francisca Cortés, from the Radiology Service at the Albacete University Hospital (CHUA), for their valuable assistance with the MRI acquisition procedures, and Mr. Dionisio Santillana, from the Radiology Service of the Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos (Toledo, Spain). They are also grateful to Ms Maria Luisa Ramos-Herrera and Ms Mercedes Iñíguez de Onzoño for excellent technical assistance. EAP and RI acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation I+D+i Project BFU-2009-14705, and from the Education, Culture and Sports of Castilla-La Mancha Autonomic Government Project PPII-2014-013-A.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JCDG RI EAP. Performed the experiments: JCDG AMM EAP. Analyzed the data: JCDG AMI MC AMM EAP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FML JFV AV TTA EAP. Wrote the paper: JCDG RI EAP.


  1. 1. Squire LR, Stark CE, Clark RE. The medial temporal lobe. Annual review of neuroscience. 2004;27:279–306. pmid:15217334.
  2. 2. Manns JR, Eichenbaum H. Evolution of declarative memory. Hippocampus. 2006;16(9):795–808. pmid:16881079.
  3. 3. Gabrieli JD, Brewer JB, Desmond JE, Glover GH. Separate neural bases of two fundamental memory processes in the human medial temporal lobe. Science. 1997;276(5310):264–6. pmid:9092477.
  4. 4. Binney RJ, Parker GJ, Lambon Ralph MA. Convergent connectivity and graded specialization in the rostral human temporal lobe as revealed by diffusion-weighted imaging probabilistic tractography. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2012;24(10):1998–2014. pmid:22721379.
  5. 5. Davachi L. Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. Current opinion in neurobiology. 2006;16(6):693–700. pmid:17097284.
  6. 6. Insausti R, Juottonen K, Soininen H, Insausti AM, Partanen K, Vainio P, et al. MR volumetric analysis of the human entorhinal, perirhinal, and temporopolar cortices. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 1998;19(4):659–71. pmid:9576651.
  7. 7. Insausti R, Insausti AM, Sobreviela MT, Salinas A, Martinez-Penuela JM. Human medial temporal lobe in aging: anatomical basis of memory preservation. Microscopy research and technique. 1998;43(1):8–15. pmid:9829453.
  8. 8. Price JL, Ko AI, Wade MJ, Tsou SK, McKeel DW, Morris JC. Neuron number in the entorhinal cortex and CA1 in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Archives of neurology. 2001;58(9):1395–402. pmid:11559310.
  9. 9. Artacho-Perula E, Insausti R. Quantitative estimations of the entorhinal cortex in Alzheimer's disease. Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology / the International Academy of Cytology [and] American Society of Cytology. 2007;29(1):1–16. pmid:17375870.
  10. 10. Gomez-Isla T, Price JL, McKeel DW Jr., Morris JC, Growdon JH, Hyman BT. Profound loss of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons occurs in very mild Alzheimer's disease. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1996;16(14):4491–500. pmid:8699259.
  11. 11. Aylward EH, Li Q, Honeycutt NA, Warren AC, Pulsifer MB, Barta PE, et al. MRI volumes of the hippocampus and amygdala in adults with Down's syndrome with and without dementia. The American journal of psychiatry. 1999;156(4):564–8. pmid:10200735.
  12. 12. Schumann CM, Hamstra J, Goodlin-Jones BL, Lotspeich LJ, Kwon H, Buonocore MH, et al. The amygdala is enlarged in children but not adolescents with autism; the hippocampus is enlarged at all ages. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2004;24(28):6392–401. pmid:15254095.
  13. 13. Winter H, Irle E. Hippocampal volume in adult burn patients with and without posttraumatic stress disorder. The American journal of psychiatry. 2004;161(12):2194–200. pmid:15569889.
  14. 14. Goncalves-Pereira PM, Oliveira E, Insausti R. [Quantitative volumetric analysis of the hippocampus, amygdala and entorhinal cortex: normative database for the adult Portuguese population]. Revista de neurologia. 2006;42(12):713–22. pmid:16775796.
  15. 15. Insausti R, Tunon T, Sobreviela T, Insausti AM, Gonzalo LM. The human entorhinal cortex: a cytoarchitectonic analysis. The Journal of comparative neurology. 1995;355(2):171–98. pmid:7541808.
  16. 16. Insausti R, Amaral DG. Hippocampal formation. In: Mai JK, Paxinos G, editors The Human Nervous System, 3rd ed Amsterdam; Elsevier pp. 2012:896–942.
  17. 17. Pitkanen A, Kelly JL, Amaral DG. Projections from the lateral, basal, and accessory basal nuclei of the amygdala to the entorhinal cortex in the macaque monkey. Hippocampus. 2002;12(2):186–205. pmid:12000118.
  18. 18. Franko E, Insausti AM, Artacho-Perula E, Insausti R, Chavoix C. Identification of the human medial temporal lobe regions on magnetic resonance images. Human brain mapping. 2014;35(1):248–56. pmid:22936605.
  19. 19. Gundersen HJ, Jensen EB. The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. Journal of microscopy. 1987;147(Pt 3):229–63. pmid:3430576.
  20. 20. Cruz-Orive LM. Systematic sampling in stereology. In: Inst BIS ed Proceedings 49th session, Florence, pp. 1993:451–68.
  21. 21. Cruz-Orive LM, Gelsvartas J, Roberts N. Sampling theory and automated simulations for vertical sections, applied to human brain. Journal of microscopy. 2014;253(2):119–50. pmid:24422975.
  22. 22. Lehmann M, Douiri A, Kim LG, Modat M, Chan D, Ourselin S, et al. Atrophy patterns in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia: a comparison of FreeSurfer and manual volumetric measurements. NeuroImage. 2010;49(3):2264–74. pmid:19874902.
  23. 23. Clerx L, van Rossum IA, Burns L, Knol DL, Scheltens P, Verhey F, et al. Measurements of medial temporal lobe atrophy for prediction of Alzheimer's disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiology of aging. 2013;34(8):2003–13. pmid:23540941.
  24. 24. Yin X, Liu C, Gui L, Zhao L, Zhang J, Wei L, et al. Comparison of medial temporal measures between Binswanger's disease and Alzheimer's disease. PloS one. 2014;9(1):e86423. pmid:24466084; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3900523.
  25. 25. Cloutman LL, Binney RJ, Drakesmith M, Parker GJ, Lambon Ralph MA. The variation of function across the human insula mirrors its patterns of structural connectivity: evidence from in vivo probabilistic tractography. NeuroImage. 2012;59(4):3514–21. pmid:22100771.
  26. 26. Burggren AC, Zeineh MM, Ekstrom AD, Braskie MN, Thompson PM, Small GW, et al. Reduced cortical thickness in hippocampal subregions among cognitively normal apolipoprotein E e4 carriers. NeuroImage. 2008;41(4):1177–83. pmid:18486492; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2601686.
  27. 27. Dickerson BC, Feczko E, Augustinack JC, Pacheco J, Morris JC, Fischl B, et al. Differential effects of aging and Alzheimer's disease on medial temporal lobe cortical thickness and surface area. Neurobiology of aging. 2009;30(3):432–40. pmid:17869384; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3703585.
  28. 28. Westlye ET, Hodneland E, Haasz J, Espeseth T, Lundervold A, Lundervold AJ. Episodic memory of APOE epsilon4 carriers is correlated with fractional anisotropy, but not cortical thickness, in the medial temporal lobe. NeuroImage. 2012;63(1):507–16. pmid:22796460.
  29. 29. Karnik-Henry MS, Wang L, Barch DM, Harms MP, Campanella C, Csernansky JG. Medial temporal lobe structure and cognition in individuals with schizophrenia and in their non-psychotic siblings. Schizophrenia research. 2012;138(2–3):128–35. pmid:22542243; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3372633.
  30. 30. Augustinack JC, Huber KE, Stevens AA, Roy M, Frosch MP, van der Kouwe AJ, et al. Predicting the location of human perirhinal cortex, Brodmann's area 35, from MRI. NeuroImage. 2013;64:32–42. pmid:22960087; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3508349.
  31. 31. Lemaitre H, Goldman AL, Sambataro F, Verchinski BA, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger DR, et al. Normal age-related brain morphometric changes: nonuniformity across cortical thickness, surface area and gray matter volume? Neurobiology of aging. 2012;33(3):617 e1–9. pmid:20739099; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3026893.
  32. 32. Pujol J, Lopez-Sala A, Deus J, Cardoner N, Sebastian-Galles N, Conesa G, et al. The lateral asymmetry of the human brain studied by volumetric magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage. 2002;17(2):670–9. pmid:12377142.
  33. 33. Hallahan BP, Craig MC, Toal F, Daly EM, Moore CJ, Ambikapathy A, et al. In vivo brain anatomy of adult males with Fragile X syndrome: an MRI study. NeuroImage. 2011;54(1):16–24. pmid:20708694.
  34. 34. Dolan MC, Deakin JF, Roberts N, Anderson IM. Quantitative frontal and temporal structural MRI studies in personality-disordered offenders and control subjects. Psychiatry research. 2002;116(3):133–49. pmid:12477598.
  35. 35. Free SL, Bergin PS, Fish DR, Cook MJ, Shorvon SD, Stevens JM. Methods for normalization of hippocampal volumes measured with MR. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 1995;16(4):637–43. pmid:7611015.
  36. 36. Keeley RJ, Burger DK, Saucier DM, Iwaniuk AN. The size of non-hippocampal brain regions varies by season and sex in Richardson's ground squirrel. Neuroscience. 2015;289:194–206. pmid:25595988.
  37. 37. Pakkenberg B, Gundersen HJ. Neocortical neuron number in humans: effect of sex and age. The Journal of comparative neurology. 1997;384(2):312–20. pmid:9215725.
  38. 38. Stark AK, Toft MH, Pakkenberg H, Fabricius K, Eriksen N, Pelvig DP, et al. The effect of age and gender on the volume and size distribution of neocortical neurons. Neuroscience. 2007;150(1):121–30. pmid:17988801.
  39. 39. Furlong C, Garcia-Finana M, Puddephat M, Anderson A, Fabricius K, Eriksen N, et al. Application of stereological methods to estimate post-mortem brain surface area using 3T MRI. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2013;31(3):456–65. pmid:23238418.
  40. 40. Pruessner JC, Li LM, Serles W, Pruessner M, Collins DL, Kabani N, et al. Volumetry of hippocampus and amygdala with high-resolution MRI and three-dimensional analysis software: minimizing the discrepancies between laboratories. Cerebral cortex. 2000;10(4):433–42. pmid:10769253.
  41. 41. Maller JJ, Anstey KJ, Reglade-Meslin C, Christensen H, Wen W, Sachdev P. Hippocampus and amygdala volumes in a random community-based sample of 60–64 year olds and their relationship to cognition. Psychiatry research. 2007;156(3):185–97. pmid:17988837.
  42. 42. Teipel SJ, Pruessner JC, Faltraco F, Born C, Rocha-Unold M, Evans A, et al. Comprehensive dissection of the medial temporal lobe in AD: measurement of hippocampus, amygdala, entorhinal, perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices using MRI. Journal of neurology. 2006;253(6):794–800. pmid:16511646.
  43. 43. Morey RA, Gold AL, LaBar KS, Beall SK, Brown VM, Haswell CC, et al. Amygdala volume changes in posttraumatic stress disorder in a large case-controlled veterans group. Archives of general psychiatry. 2012;69(11):1169–78. pmid:23117638; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3647246.
  44. 44. Wisse LE, Gerritsen L, Zwanenburg JJ, Kuijf HJ, Luijten PR, Biessels GJ, et al. Subfields of the hippocampal formation at 7 T MRI: in vivo volumetric assessment. NeuroImage. 2012;61(4):1043–9. pmid:22440643.
  45. 45. Takahashi T, Suzuki M, Zhou SY, Tanino R, Hagino H, Niu L, et al. Temporal lobe gray matter in schizophrenia spectrum: a volumetric MRI study of the fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, and middle and inferior temporal gyri. Schizophrenia research. 2006;87(1–3):116–26. pmid:16750349.
  46. 46. Schmahl CG, Vermetten E, Elzinga BM, Douglas Bremner J. Magnetic resonance imaging of hippocampal and amygdala volume in women with childhood abuse and borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry research. 2003;122(3):193–8. pmid:12694893.
  47. 47. Noble KG, Grieve SM, Korgaonkar MS, Engelhardt LE, Griffith EY, Williams LM, et al. Hippocampal volume varies with educational attainment across the life-span. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2012;6:307. pmid:23162453; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3494123.
  48. 48. Starcevic A, Postic S, Radojicic Z, Starcevic B, Milovanovic S, Ilankovic A, et al. Volumetric analysis of amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex in therapy-naive PTSD participants. BioMed research international. 2014;2014:968495. pmid:24745028; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3972941.
  49. 49. Machado-de-Sousa JP, Osorio Fde L, Jackowski AP, Bressan RA, Chagas MH, Torro-Alves N, et al. Increased amygdalar and hippocampal volumes in young adults with social anxiety. PloS one. 2014;9(2):e88523. pmid:24523911; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3921212.
  50. 50. Bigler ED, Blatter DD, Anderson CV, Johnson SC, Gale SD, Hopkins RO, et al. Hippocampal volume in normal aging and traumatic brain injury. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 1997;18(1):11–23. pmid:9010515.
  51. 51. Chareyron LJ, Banta Lavenex P, Amaral DG, Lavenex P. Stereological analysis of the rat and monkey amygdala. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2011;519(16):3218–39. pmid:21618234; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4342351.
  52. 52. Jabes A, Lavenex PB, Amaral DG, Lavenex P. Postnatal development of the hippocampal formation: a stereological study in macaque monkeys. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2011;519(6):1051–70. pmid:21344402; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4021602.
  53. 53. Insausti R, Rincón M, González-Moreno C, Artacho-Perula E, Díez-Peña A, García-Saíz T. Neurobiological significance of automatic segmentation: application to the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. In: Jea Mira, editor. Bioinspired Applications in Artificial and Natural Computation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2009. p. 134–41.
  54. 54. Insausti R, Rincón M, Díaz E, Artacho-Perula E, Mansilla F, Florensa J, et al. FreeSurfer automatic brain segmentation adaptation to medial temporal lobe structures: volumetric assessment and diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. In: Fernández JMea, editor. New Challenges on Bioinspired Applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011. p. 112–9.