Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Novel Loci for Non-Syndromic Coarctation of the Aorta in Sporadic and Familial Cases

  • Julia Moosmann ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Julia Moosmann, Steffen Uebe

    Affiliation Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Loschgestraße 15, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

  • Steffen Uebe ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Julia Moosmann, Steffen Uebe

    Affiliation Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Institute of Human Genetics, Schwabachanlage 10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

  • Sven Dittrich,

    Affiliation Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Loschgestraße 15, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

  • André Rüffer,

    Affiliation Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Loschgestraße 15, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

  • Arif B. Ekici,

    Affiliation Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Institute of Human Genetics, Schwabachanlage 10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

  • Okan Toka

    okan.toka@uk-erlangen.de

    Affiliation Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Loschgestraße 15, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

Abstract

Backround

Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) accounts for 5-8% of all congenital heart defects. CoA can be detected in up to 20% of patients with Ullrich-Turner syndrome (UTS), in which a part or all of one of the X chromosomes is absent. The etiology of non-syndromic CoA is poorly understood. In the present work, we test the hypothesis that rare copy number variation (CNV) especially on the gonosomes, contribute to the etiology of non-syndromic CoA.

Methods

We performed high-resolution genome-wide CNV analysis using the Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarray platform for 70 individuals with sporadic CoA, 3 families with inherited CoA (n=13) and 605 controls. Our analysis comprised genome wide association, CNV burden and linkage. CNV was validated by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Results

We identified a significant abundance of large (>100 kb) CNVs on the X chromosome in males with CoA (p=0.005). 11 out of 51 (~ 22%) male cases had these large CNVs. Association analysis in the sporadic cohort revealed 14 novel loci for CoA. The locus on 21q22.3 in the sporadic CoA cohort overlapped with a gene locus identified in all familial cases of CoA (candidate gene TRPM2). We identified one CNV locus within a locus with high multipoint LOD score from a linkage analysis of the familial cases (SEPT9); another locus overlapped with a region implicated in Kabuki syndrome. In the familial cases, we identified a total of 7 CNV loci that were exclusively present in cases but not in unaffected family members.

Conclusion

Of all candidate loci identified, the TRPM2 locus was the most frequently implicated autosomal locus in sporadic and familial cases. However, the abundance of large CNVs on the X chromosome of affected males suggests that gonosomal aberrations are not only responsible for syndromic CoA but also involved in the development of sporadic and non-syndromic CoA and their male dominance.

Introduction

Recent studies of sporadic, non-syndromic congenital anomalies implicated rare de novo variants and copy number variation (CNV) as their etiology [13]. Several groups associated CNVs with the pathogenesis of congenital heart disease (CHD), including pulmonary atresia, tetralogy of Fallot, and left-sided outflow tract obstruction [48]. Left-sided outflow tract obstruction represents the most severe cardiac malformation syndrome, including bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), aortic valve stenosis (AS), coarctation of the aorta (CoA), and hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS).

In this study we focus on CoA, which represents the third most frequent cardiac malformation with a prevalence of ~8% of all CHD. The Mendelian inheritance of CoA is very rare with only 1–2% of cases; in ~90% congenital CoA presents as a sporadic and non-syndromic congenital malformation [9, 10]. CoA can also be part of a syndrome, mainly the Ullrich-Turner syndrome (UTS) and the Kabuki syndrome (KS) [11, 12]. The prevalence of CoA in UTS is 7–18% and in KS 23% respectively [1215]. The genetic basis of KS is poorly understood, except for cytogenetic abnormalities that have been associated with KS. In the majority of cases, changes on the gonosomes were identified, particularly on the X chromosome with ring X, monosomy X, and mosaic mutations; ring Y has also been associated with KS [16, 17]. Recently, a locus on 8p22-23.1 was implicated in to the pathogenesis of KS [1822].

The most common chromosomal aberration in UTS is a complete monosomy X (50–75%) resulting from meiotic nondisjunction [2325]. To a lesser degree, a partial or complete deletion of the short arm of the X chromosome has been implicated [2327]. Strikingly, deletions of the short arm of the Y chromosome (Yp) can also lead to the complete phenotype of UTS including CoA [23, 24]. Such deletions usually involve the sex-determining region on Yp (SRY). Individuals with SRY deletions are clinically indistinguishable from female patients with UTS. This phenomenon has been attributed to haploinsufficiency of gonosomal homologue genes (GHG) that are non-recombinant gene pairs encoded on the X and Y chromosome analogous to autosomal gene pairs [23, 24, 2830]. As GHG escape X-inactivation in females, two copies of each gene are expressed both in males and females [29]. Previously we hypothesized that loss-of-function mutations in selected GHG are involved in the development of non-syndromic CoA by a reduced gene dosage effect. We investigated a cohort of patients with sporadic CoA by a quite focused screening approach (gonosomal candidate gene approach) and identified transducin (beta)-like 1, Y-linked (TBL1Y), a gonosomal homologue gene associated with the Notch signaling pathway, to be involved in non-syndromic CoA by loss of function mutations[31]. In our current work we investigated a second and new cohort of 70 individuals with sporadic CoA and 3 families with inherited non-syndromic CoA by a wider screening concept (genome wide analyses of copy number variation). We tested the hypothesis that CNVs, particularly on the gonosomes, contribute not only to the development of syndromic CoA (like in UTS) but also to the development of non-syndromic sporadic CoA with male dominance.

Material and Methods

Ethics Statement

The study and particularly the collection and processing of the human tissue samples have been approved by the ethics committee of the University of Erlangen (Re.-No. 3818). Written informed consent was obtained from all participating individuals. All samples used have been de-identified for the study.

Patient cohort

Our cohort included 70 individuals with isolated CoA (19 females; 51 males), 3 families (n = 13; 1 affected female, 5 affected males), and 605 controls; all individuals were of European genetic background. CoA was diagnosed by both echocardiography and aortic angiography. In some patients, an MR imaging study was also performed. Twenty-two individuals with CoA (31.4%) showed no other cardiac anomalies. Additional structural abnormalities in CoA including bicuspid aortic valve and septal defects are very common. Our cohort represents a typical distribution of concomitant structural abnormalities. Twenty-five (35.7%) of our patients had bicuspid aortic valve, 17 (24.2%) had a ventricular septal defect, 5 (7.1%) had persistent ductus arteriosus and 1 (1.4%) presented with Wolff Parkinson White syndrome, a common disorder of the conduction system. Individuals with genetically confirmed syndromic disorders, including UTS and KS, were excluded from the study. At the time of inclusion in our study, individuals were between 5 days and 48 years of age (average ~14.4 years) with a male-to-female ratio of 2.6 to 1. The control cohort included 605 individuals (382 males; 223 females) with no known heart disease. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral venous blood lymphocytes by QIAamp DNA Blood Kit (Qiagen). Quality assessments for DNA extraction and array preparation were performed before genotyping.

DNA sequence variation and CNV genotyping

All sporadic cases and families with CoA (n = 83) were genotyped with the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNPArray 6.0. single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) genotypes were called with the birdseed-v2 algorithm as implemented in the Affymetrix Power Tools. Segments with CNVs were called using birdseye, as implemented in the birdsuite software [32]. By implementation, this algorithm searches for novel, therefore rare CNV loci also outside known copy number polymorphism (CNP) sites. The same procedure was applied to all individuals from the 3 families with CoA. A group of 605 individuals with psoriatic arthritis, which had previously been genotyped using the procedure mentioned above, were used as controls [33]. A liftover to hg19 coordinates was carried out with the data from the 605 control individuals, as they had been genotyped using hg18 coordinates. At the beginning of birdsuite genotyping, individual arrays with poor quality were routinely removed by a standardized QC algorithm [32]. Segments from the sporadic cases and the 605 controls were then combined and translated into 379,666 pseudo-markers (start/endpoints of segments) to be used for association analysis using PLINK. For CNV burden analysis, the difference of the median and the minimum number of CNV segments within a cohort was added to the median, defining a cutoff value (For PSA, this was done after the liftover). All samples with more CNV segments than this cutoff value were excluded from the burden analysis. Both raw and processed copy number data haven been submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and are available through the accession number GSE67929 (sporadic cases) and GSE67930 (familial samples).

Genome-wide SNP association

SNP genotypes, as determined by birdseed-v2 (part of the birdsuite algorithms), were filtered to exclude SNPs with more than 5% missing genotypes, a minor allele frequency of less than 1% and a marked deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE p-value < 0.001), reducing the original 909622 SNP markers to 722,556. A standard chi-square-based association analysis was then performed using PLINK.

Linkage Analysis

We performed genome-wide linkage analysis in three non-related families. All DNA samples were genotyped with the Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif., USA). Genotypes were called by the Genotyping Console software v4.0 (Affymetrix). Simulation analysis for expected LOD scores (ELOD) for the given family pedigrees was performed with a parametric 2-point analysis with the software FastSLink [34]. Relationships of family members were verified by checking the genotype data with the software Graphical Representation of Relationships (GRR) [35]. Mendelian errors due to genotype errors were checked with the software Pedcheck and erroneous genotypes were removed from the data file [36]. Parametric multipoint linkage analysis and haplotype construction were done with the program Allegro [3739]. Data handling was done with the software easyLinkage-Plus under the assumption of an autosomal-recessive and autosomal-dominant mode of inheritance with 100% penetrance, disease allele frequency of 0.01% and at least 0.01 cM intermarker distance [40]. Visualization of haplotype data was performed using the software haplopainter [41].

MLPA validation of CNVs

All detected CNV regions were reviewed for gene content or gene proximity. From those we validated exemplarily eight region detected by SNP arrays by multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA, MRC Holland) in up to 58 samples. We selected these regions according to technical MLPA assay design criteria. These eight regions contain the genes GSTM1, DEFB cluster on chromosome 8, NF1P2, ERVV1, FAM115C, SEPT9, TPTE and TRPM2, respectively. For all regions we could validate the copy number status in the analyzed samples except for the region containing NF1P2. In this region eight of 32 samples showed duplication instead of the deletion from the array data, possibly due to the highly variable pericentromeric structural variation region on chromosome 15q (S1 Table).

Cardiac gene list

A cardiac gene list from CHDwiki was used to match with CNV loci from association analysis of sporadic cohort, overlapping regions from familial analysis and linkage regions. The cardiac gene list consists of 290 genes, which represents a set of most currently known gene-phenotypes linked with 139 cardiac defects. The use of this specialized ontology maximizes the relevance of the collected information to the CHD community and improves the consistency of this information. Each gene was reported to be involved in a cardiac phenotype in at least two independent publications [42].

Results

CNV burden analysis sporadic cohort

We included 70 individuals with sporadic CoA and 490 of the 605 PSA controls, as well as 3 families with 2 affected individuals per family with CoA (Fig 1) for a separate burden analysis in familial cases. All samples met in-house quality criteria. Overall, we detected 7,160 CNVs with >10kb (3,127 deletions and 4,033 duplications) in CoA individuals and a total of 17,990 CNVs larger than 10kb (8,600 deletions and 9,390 duplications) in the control cohort. We determined a size threshold at 100kb and distinguished between autosomes and gonosomes. The optimal size threshold for this type of analysis has been demonstrated previously to be around 100kb [43]. Ninety-three CNVs > 100kb were identified in CoA (~1.33/individual) and 2,151 in the control cohort (~4.39/individual). We then tested for a possible abundance of large CNVs in cases versus controls, both in autosomes and on the X chromosome, the latter being tested separately for males (definition of a CNV to have a copy number count other than one and be outside of the pseudo-autosomal regions) and females (definition of a CNV as in autosomes). Hereby we tested for a higher proportion of large CNV segments which might be present in cases compared to controls, as shown previously in a study concerning the genetics of short stature [43]. Addressing our hypothesis that CNVs particularly on the gonosomes contribute to sporadic and non-syndromic CoA we were able to identify a significant abundance (p = 0.005, with a Bonferroni corrected significance threshold of 0.0167) of large (>100 kb) X-chromosomal CNVs in males by applying a one-sided Fisher’s exact test with the alternative hypothesis being an odds ratio greater than 1 (Table 1). Of the 51 male cases, 11 had CNV segments >100kb on the X chromosome. Just a subset of this CNV segments are localized in coding regions. Genes contained within these CNV segments are SPACA5, ZNF630, SSX6 (all Xp11.23) and PCDH11X (Xq21.3). Comparison of autosomal CNV burden in cases versus controls showed no significant enrichment of large CNVs in cases.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Family-tree of all families 1–3.

Each family with 2 affected CoA patients. Family 1: grandfather 3683 and grandchild 3634; Family 2: patient 3661 and 3658. Sibling 3670 had a VSD; Family 3: dizygotic twins 3628 and 3631.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126873.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. CNV burden analysis of large (>100 kb) CNVs on gonosomes and autosomes in the sporadic CoA cohort.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126873.t001

CNV association analysis in sporadic samples

The pseudo-markers from the 70 sporadic cases and 605 control individuals were tested for association using a one-sided permutation-based approach as implemented in PLINK, with 100,000 permutations. Only segments with at least 5 markers and spanning 10 kb or more were evaluated. Of the associated loci, 5 exceeded the significance threshold of 5E-05 as deletions and 9 as duplications (Table 2). The duplication locus on chromosome 17 did not quite pass the significance threshold, but was retained due to overlap with a linkage region (Table 3). The DEFB4 cluster on chromosome 8 is a known CNP locus also present in PSA cases. Since one-sided tests were used, and due to the previous literature (see discussion), this locus was also retained. X-chromosomal association analysis was carried out for males and females separately, but showed no significantly associated loci.

thumbnail
Table 3. Match between linkage loci and genes of cardiac gene list.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126873.t003

SNP analysis in sporadic CoA cohort

A SNP association using 722,556 SNPs in the unrelated cases and controls was performed, and showed no evidence of association past the genome-wide significance threshold (data not shown).

CNV burden in familial cases

CNV burden analysis for large CNVs >100 kb was performed analogous to the analysis in sporadic cases. It revealed no difference in gonosomal CNV burden. However, a difference was seen for the autosomes (Table 4). Familial CoA cases showed significantly more large deletions >100 kb (p<0.01) and less large duplications >100 kb (p<0.01) compared to controls.

thumbnail
Table 4. CNV burden analysis of large (>100kb) CNVs on gonosomes and autosomes in familial cases versus healthy individuals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126873.t004

Linkage analysis in families with CoA

Even though we did not expect to achieve significant LOD scores due to small pedigrees, we performed a linkage analysis. 521,435 SNPs with perfect call rate were used in a multipoint linkage analysis assuming dominant or recessive inheritance for all pedigrees, producing a union of all regions with a LOD score raising above the background. This approach yielded a total of 19 linkage regions with LOD scores of up to 1.62 (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. LOD-Plot showing genome wide linkage analysis in all three families.

19 linkage regions with a maximum LOD-score of 1.62 were identified, which are illustrated by multipoint LOD scores above background.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126873.g002

CNV analysis in families with CoA

CNV calling with the birdseye software produced 1783 CNV segments larger than 10 kb (444 deletions, 1339 duplications), which were checked for overlap in the affected 6 individuals of the 3 families. One duplication locus was present in all 6 affected individuals but not in the unaffected controls, one locus in 5 cases / 0 controls and 5 loci with 4 cases / 0 controls (Table 5). The duplication locus on chromosome 6 shared by 4 cases and 0 controls partially overlaps with a linkage region.

thumbnail
Table 5. Overlapping CNV segments in familial CoA with candidate gene.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126873.t005

Cardiac gene list

A list with 290 cardiac candidate genes was compared with all CNV segments of the sporadic and familial CoA cohort as well as the linkage regions of the familial cases [42].

An overlap between calculated linkage regions with this cardiac gene list identified 22 cardiac genes located within the linkage regions as novel candidate genes for CoA (Table 3).

Discussion

Due to the high incidence of CoA in UTS an KS patients and the male dominance of CoA in non-syndromic sporadic cases we previously screened for mutation in GHG by a gonosomal candidate gene approach[31]. To follow up on our idea of gonosomal abnormalities in sporadic non-syndromic CoA we now extended our mutation detection from single gene analyses (candidate gene approach by Sanger sequencing) to a genome wide CNV analysis. Our hypothesis was to evaluate whether CNV, particularly on the gonosomes, contribute to the development of sporadic and non-syndromic CoA.

CNV have been associated with the pathogenesis of complex congenital heart disease and left sided outflow tract obstruction [58]. To our knowledge our study is the first genome wide CNV analysis in CoA cohorts. Our comprehensive genotype analyses contained sporadic and familial cases with CoA and addressed gender- specific genetic modifier. We performed CNV association and burden analysis. CNV burden was evaluated after assigning a size threshold of >100kb and distinguishing between autosomes and gonosomes. Analysis was performed separately for sporadic CoA cases versus controls and familial CoA cases vs. healthy family members. Gonosomes were tested separately for males and females. Additionally, a list with 290 cardiac candidate genes was compared with all CNV segments of the sporadic and familial CoA cohorts as well as the linkage regions of the familial cases to assess the overlap of gene content (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Overview of workflow of CNV analysis in sporadic CoA patients and families with CoA.

Genotyping was performed in 70 individuals with sporadic CoA, 605 healthy controls, and 3 families with 6 CoA cases and 7 healthy individuals. CNV calling was performed using Birdseye and Birdseed software. CNV burden analysis in sporadic cohort and familial CoA samples was performed for autosomes and gonosomes separately. Association analysis was performed in the sporadic CoA cohort and revealed 14 CNV loci. Overlap of CNVs in familial patients was assessed and revealed 7 CNVs shared in >4 patients, overlapping with one CNV locus in the sporadic CoA cohort. Linkage analysis in familial samples revealed 19 linked regions, one overlapping with the CNV locus on chromosome 17, which did not pass the threshold of significance in the association analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126873.g003

Regarding the CNV burden in the group of sporadic CoA cases, a significant gonosomal abundance (p = 0.005) for large X-chromosomal CNVs (>100 kb) in males was observed. This abundance of large X-chromosomal CNVs in sporadic male CoA cases can be correlated with the clinical finding of a 2:1 male-to-female incidence in CoA. Males cannot compensate for alterations of X-chromosomal gene dosage. Only a subset of the X-chromosomal CNV segments were within coding regions of chromosome X. However, we still have limited knowledge on intronic regulators of gene activity, particularly on the X chromosome. We could identify 4 genes within these chromosomal segments; SPACA5 (Sperm Acrosome-Associated Protein 5), ZNF630 (zinc finger protein 630), SSX6 (synovial sarcoma, X breakpoint 6), and PCDH11X (protocadherin 11 X-linked). In a comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) array analysis a duplication of SPACA5 (and ZNF81/ZNF182) has been described in a boy with developmental delay, autistic features, and growth and speech delay [44]. SSX6 belongs to the SSX gene family, whereas SSX1, 2 and 4 have found to be involved in synovial sarcomas, SSX6 is expressed in melanoma cell lines [45]. ZNF630 resides on an area of chromosome X that hast been implicated in non-syndromic X-linked mental retardation [46]. PCDH11X belongs to the protocadherin gene family of calcium-dependent cell adhesion and recognition proteins and is located in a major X/Y block of homology [47]. The PCDH11X protein is thought to play a fundamental role in cell-cell recognition essential for the segmental development of the central nervous system. Alternative splicing in PCDH11X results in multiple transcript variants. It has been speculated as a potential candidate gene for late-onset Alzheimer disease [48, 49]. However, the main interacting partners and pathways of PCDH11X as well as its distinct genotype-phenotype correlations are unknown.

Contrary to the sporadic cases of CoA, the CNV burden for gonosomes was not different in familial cases. Here we could identify a significantly different CNV burden for the autosomes, with more deletions and less duplications on autosomes in the familial cases of CoA. This different pattern of CNV burden may indicate that the pathogenesis of sporadic and familial cases could be different. However, the number of families we investigated in this study was small compared to the number of patients in the sporadic cohort.

In the association analyses of the sporadic cohort we identified 14 CNV loci (threshold of 5E-05) derived from segments in 5–58 of 70 patients, which are mostly novel and therefore not common copy number variations (CNPs). One region on chromosome 8p23.1 was deleted in 9 patients and strikingly the same region was duplicated in 11 patients, only one control showed a deletion in this area. The ratio of the CoA subgroups (CoA only, CoA with BAV or VSD) within those 20 individuals did not significantly differ from the primary cohort of 70 individuals although the majority of patients had isolated CoA (10 patients = 50% with CoA only, 7 patients = 35% with additional BAV, 3 = 15% with additional VSD, see Table 6). This locus contains the genes DEFB4B, DEFB103A, SPAG11B, DEFB104A, DEFB106A, DEFB105A, DEFB107A, SPAG11A, DEFB4A. Various studies described copy number changes at this locus in patients with KS or Kabuki-like syndromes’ some of these patients have been reported to have hypoplastic left ventricle and aorta. However, whether copy number changes on 8p22–23.1 are associated with KS or not is debated in the literature [1822, 50]. Hypoplastic aortic arch or CoA is only an intermediate phenotype of KS. In our analyses 20 individuals of the 70 sporadic cases with CoA had large CNVs on 8p22–23.1. Thus, we suggest that the region 8p22–23.1 is a candidate region for CoA regardless of additional phenotypic features of KS. While we are aware of the significance of this locus for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis[51], we have used one-sided tests throughout, therefore our findings do not reflect any CNVs possibly present in the PSA controls, but instead have a higher relative abundance in our patients.

thumbnail
Table 6. Distribution of CNV on 8p23.1 in all affected patients according to their phenotype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126873.t006

The CNV analyses in the familial cases revealed 7 rare (non-CNP) CNVs, which overlapped within affected individuals from all 3 families. One CNV locus (TRPM2; transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 2) was present in all 6 affected individuals of the 3 CoA families and absent in all unaffected individuals. Another CNV locus (PLA2G6, phospholipase A2, group VI) was present in 5 of 6 familial CoA cases and none of the unaffected individuals. Five CNV loci (SMTN, smoothelin; ARHFEF1, Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 1; SCYL1, S. cerevisiae1-like1; CCND3, cyclin d3; EML6, echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 6) were present in 4 of 6 familial CoA cases and none of the unaffected individuals (Table 5). Our association analyses considered sporadic cases only due to the limited number of familial cases. However, we tested for overlap between the groups, comparing association loci of sporadic CoA cases with overlapping loci of familial CoA cases,—and with the linkage regions of the familial CoA cases.

The CNV locus of TRPM2 was not only detected in all 6 affected individuals of the familial CoA cases but also in 6 individuals of the sporadic CoA cohort, providing us a potentially important new candidate or modifier genes for the CoA phenotype. TRPM2 is a well-known oxidant-sensitive Ca2+ permeable channel implicated in mediating endothelial apoptosis and in promoting vascular injury and inflammation [52]. TRPM2 also contributes to production of vasoactive nitric oxide via the p38/JNK pathway [53]. In an established mouse model, cardiac TRPM2 channel activity protected the heart from ischemia/reperfusion injury by ameliorating mitochondrial dysfunction and reducing reactive oxygen species levels [54]. So far there are no data on alteration of TRPM2 activity in a model of endovascular stenosis or even coarctation of the aortic isthmus. Endovascular stenosis can augment sheer stress-induced endothelial cell apoptosis and inflammation [55]. The cause of CoA is certainly heterogeneous, polygenic and pleiotropic. Altered oxidant-sensitive Ca2+ permeable channel activity involved in endovascular apoptosis and inflammation and regulation of vascular tone via nitric oxide may represent a component of the primary structural defect in CoA. The TRMP2 pathway could also be only an associated component for vascular stiffness and progressive arterial hypertension in CoA patients without involvement in this etiology. Further studies are needed.

Due to the limited number of familial cases, we decided to decrease the threshold for relevant linkage loci and highlighted in a first step all loci above background. The analyses revealed 19 linkage regions with LOD scores of up to 1.62 (Fig 2). We filtered the number of candidate genes by matching them with a list of known cardiac genes involving 139 cardiac defects. Of these 19 loci, 9 contained 22 overlapping cardiac genes listed in Table 3.

Conclusion

Our study provides new insight into the genetic basis of non-syndromic CoA by identifying new candidate genes through CNV association and burden analysis. Of all candidate loci identified, the TRPM2 gene locus was the most frequently implicated autosomal locus in both, sporadic and familial cases. The abundance of large CNVs on the X-Chromosome of affected males, suggests that gonosomal aberrations are not only involved in the development of syndromic CoA, like in UTS or KS, but also likely responsible for sporadic and non-syndromic CoA and the male dominance observed in this malformation. Further studies are needed and subject to our current efforts to better understand the genetic but also the epigenetic factors leading to CoA.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. MLPA validation

From all detected CNVs eight with gene content were chosen for validation with MLPA. Only those DNA samples with an aberrant CNV in the particular region were analyzed with a MLPA assay. All CNVs from the microarray analysis could be validated (+), except for the CNV status of the NF1P2 region in eight of 32 samples (duplications instead of deletions); n/a = not applicable because of absent CNV in microarray data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126873.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), FKZ 01GI0601. The support was non-financial and included the allocation of human tissue samples only.

We would like to express our gratitude to all CoA patients who have participated in this investigation.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: OT. Performed the experiments: JM SU AE OT. Analyzed the data: JM SU AE OT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AR SD JM SU AE OT. Wrote the paper: JM SU AE OT.

References

  1. 1. Younkin SG, Scharpf RB, Schwender H, Parker MM, Scott AF, Marazita ML, et al. A genome-wide study of de novo deletions identifies a candidate locus for non-syndromic isolated cleft lip/palate risk. BMC genetics. 2014;15:24. pmid:24528994
  2. 2. Lindstrand A, Davis EE, Carvalho CM, Pehlivan D, Willer JR, Tsai IC, et al. Recurrent CNVs and SNVs at the NPHP1 locus contribute pathogenic alleles to Bardet-Biedl syndrome. American journal of human genetics. 2014;94(5):745–54. pmid:24746959
  3. 3. Du X, An Y, Yu L, Liu R, Qin Y, Guo X, et al. A genomic copy number variant analysis implicates the MBD5 and HNRNPU genes in Chinese children with infantile spasms and expands the clinical spectrum of 2q23.1 deletion. BMC medical genetics. 2014;15:62. pmid:24885232
  4. 4. Soemedi R, Wilson IJ, Bentham J, Darlay R, Topf A, Zelenika D, et al. Contribution of global rare copy-number variants to the risk of sporadic congenital heart disease. American journal of human genetics. 2012;91(3):489–501. pmid:22939634
  5. 5. Greenway SC, Pereira AC, Lin JC, DePalma SR, Israel SJ, Mesquita SM, et al. De novo copy number variants identify new genes and loci in isolated sporadic tetralogy of Fallot. Nature genetics. 2009;41(8):931–5. pmid:19597493
  6. 6. Xie L, Chen JL, Zhang WZ, Wang SZ, Zhao TL, Huang C, et al. Rare de novo copy number variants in patients with congenital pulmonary atresia. PloS one. 2014;9(5):e96471. pmid:24826987
  7. 7. Silversides CK, Lionel AC, Costain G, Merico D, Migita O, Liu B, et al. Rare copy number variations in adults with tetralogy of Fallot implicate novel risk gene pathways. PLoS genetics. 2012;8(8):e1002843. pmid:22912587
  8. 8. Hitz MP, Lemieux-Perreault LP, Marshall C, Feroz-Zada Y, Davies R, Yang SW, et al. Rare copy number variants contribute to congenital left-sided heart disease. PLoS genetics. 2012;8(9):e1002903. pmid:22969434
  9. 9. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B. Familial coarctation of the aorta in three generations. Annales de genetique. 1999;42(3):174–6. pmid:10526662
  10. 10. Gerboni S, Sabatino G, Mingarelli R, Dallapiccola B. Coarctation of the aorta, interrupted aortic arch, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome in three generations. Journal of medical genetics. 1993;30(4):328–9. pmid:8487284
  11. 11. Wellesley DG, Slaney S. Kabuki make-up and Turner syndromes in the same patient. Clinical dysmorphology. 1994;3(4):297–300. pmid:7894734
  12. 12. Digilio MC, Marino B, Toscano A, Giannotti A, Dallapiccola B. Congenital heart defects in Kabuki syndrome. American journal of medical genetics. 2001;100(4):269–74. pmid:11343317
  13. 13. Sybert VP. Cardiovascular malformations and complications in Turner syndrome. Pediatrics. 1998;101(1):E11. pmid:9417175
  14. 14. Volkl TM, Degenhardt K, Koch A, Simm D, Dorr HG, Singer H. Cardiovascular anomalies in children and young adults with Ullrich-Turner syndrome the Erlangen experience. Clinical cardiology. 2005;28(2):88–92. pmid:15757080
  15. 15. Gotzsche CO, Krag-Olsen B, Nielsen J, Sorensen KE, Kristensen BO. Prevalence of cardiovascular malformations and association with karyotypes in Turner's syndrome. Archives of disease in childhood. 1994;71(5):433–6. pmid:7826114
  16. 16. McGinniss MJ, Brown DH, Burke LW, Mascarello JT, Jones MC. Ring chromosome X in a child with manifestations of Kabuki syndrome. American journal of medical genetics. 1997;70(1):37–42. pmid:9129739
  17. 17. Stankiewicz P, Thiele H, Giannakudis I, Schlicker M, Baldermann C, Kruger A, et al. Kabuki syndrome-like features associated with a small ring chromosome X and XIST gene expression. American journal of medical genetics. 2001;102(3):286–92. pmid:11484209
  18. 18. Milunsky JM, Huang XL. Unmasking Kabuki syndrome: chromosome 8p22–8p23.1 duplication revealed by comparative genomic hybridization and BAC-FISH. Clinical genetics. 2003;64(6):509–16. pmid:14986831
  19. 19. Shieh JT, Hudgins L, Cherry AM, Shen Z, Hoyme HE. Triplication of 8p22–8p23 in a patient with features similar to Kabuki syndrome. American journal of medical genetics Part A. 2006;140(2):170–3. pmid:16353235
  20. 20. Hoffman JD, Zhang Y, Greshock J, Ciprero KL, Emanuel BS, Zackai EH, et al. Array based CGH and FISH fail to confirm duplication of 8p22-p23.1 in association with Kabuki syndrome. Journal of medical genetics. 2005;42(1):49–53. pmid:15635075
  21. 21. Turner C, Lachlan K, Amerasinghe N, Hodgkins P, Maloney V, Barber J, et al. Kabuki syndrome: new ocular findings but no evidence of 8p22-p23.1 duplications in a clinically defined cohort. European journal of human genetics: EJHG. 2005;13(6):716–20. pmid:15785777
  22. 22. Sanlaville D, Genevieve D, Bernardin C, Amiel J, Baumann C, de Blois MC, et al. Failure to detect an 8p22–8p23.1 duplication in patients with Kabuki (Niikawa-Kuroki) syndrome. European journal of human genetics: EJHG. 2005;13(5):690–3. pmid:15770228
  23. 23. Marino B, Digilio MC. Congenital heart disease and genetic syndromes: specific correlation between cardiac phenotype and genotype. Cardiovascular pathology: the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology. 2000;9(6):303–15. pmid:11146300
  24. 24. Ranke MB, Saenger P. Turner's syndrome. Lancet. 2001;358(9278):309–14. pmid:11498234
  25. 25. Lacka K. [Turner's syndrome—correlation between karyotype and phenotype]. Endokrynologia Polska. 2005;56(6):986–93. pmid:16821224
  26. 26. Boucher CA, Sargent CA, Ogata T, Affara NA. Breakpoint analysis of Turner patients with partial Xp deletions: implications for the lymphoedema gene location. Journal of medical genetics. 2001;38(9):591–8. pmid:11546827
  27. 27. Ogata T, Muroya K, Matsuo N, Shinohara O, Yorifuji T, Nishi Y, et al. Turner syndrome and Xp deletions: clinical and molecular studies in 47 patients. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2001;86(11):5498–508. pmid:11701728
  28. 28. Tzancheva M, Kaneva R, Kumanov P, Williams G, Tyler-Smith C. Two male patients with ring Y: definition of an interval in Yq contributing to Turner syndrome. Journal of medical genetics. 1999;36(7):549–53. pmid:10424817
  29. 29. Lahn BT, Page DC. Functional coherence of the human Y chromosome. Science. 1997;278(5338):675–80. pmid:9381176
  30. 30. Ogata T, Matsuo N. Sex chromosome aberrations and stature: deduction of the principal factors involved in the determination of adult height. Human genetics. 1993;91(6):551–62. pmid:8340109
  31. 31. Tagariello A, Breuer C, Birkner Y, Schmidt S, Koch AM, Cesnjevar R, et al. Functional null mutations in the gonosomal homologue gene TBL1Y are associated with non-syndromic coarctation of the aorta. Current molecular medicine. 2012;12(2):199–205. pmid:22280357
  32. 32. Korn JM, Kuruvilla FG, McCarroll SA, Wysoker A, Nemesh J, Cawley S, et al. Integrated genotype calling and association analysis of SNPs, common copy number polymorphisms and rare CNVs. Nature genetics. 2008;40(10):1253–60. pmid:18776909
  33. 33. Huffmeier U, Uebe S, Ekici AB, Bowes J, Giardina E, Korendowych E, et al. Common variants at TRAF3IP2 are associated with susceptibility to psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. Nature genetics. 2010;42(11):996–9. pmid:20953186
  34. 34. Weeks DE, Lehner T, Squires-Wheeler E, Kaufmann C, Ott J. Measuring the inflation of the lod score due to its maximization over model parameter values in human linkage analysis. Genetic epidemiology. 1990;7(4):237–43. pmid:2227370
  35. 35. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR. GRR: graphical representation of relationship errors. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(8):742–3. pmid:11524377
  36. 36. O'Connell JR, Weeks DE. PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. American journal of human genetics. 1998;63(1):259–66. pmid:9634505
  37. 37. Gudbjartsson DF, Jonasson K, Frigge ML, Kong A. Allegro, a new computer program for multipoint linkage analysis. Nature genetics. 2000;25(1):12–3. pmid:10802644
  38. 38. Gudbjartsson DF, Thorvaldsson T, Kong A, Gunnarsson G, Ingolfsdottir A. Allegro version 2. Nat Genet. 2005;37(10):1015–6. pmid:16195711
  39. 39. Greenberg DA, Abreu PC. Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics. Genetic epidemiology. 2001;21(4):299–314. pmid:11754466
  40. 40. Hoffmann K, Lindner TH. easyLINKAGE-Plus—automated linkage analyses using large-scale SNP data. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(17):3565–7. pmid:16014370
  41. 41. Thiele H, Nurnberg P. HaploPainter: a tool for drawing pedigrees with complex haplotypes. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(8):1730–2. pmid:15377505
  42. 42. Barriot R, Breckpot J, Thienpont B, Brohee S, Van Vooren S, Coessens B, et al. Collaboratively charting the gene-to-phenotype network of human congenital heart defects. Genome medicine. 2010;2(3):16. pmid:20193066
  43. 43. Zahnleiter D, Uebe S, Ekici AB, Hoyer J, Wiesener A, Wieczorek D, et al. Rare copy number variants are a common cause of short stature. PLoS genetics. 2013;9(3):e1003365. pmid:23516380
  44. 44. Alesi V, Bertoli M, Barrano G, Torres B, Pusceddu S, Pastorino M, et al. 335.4 kb microduplication in chromosome band Xp11.2p11.3 associated with developmental delay, growth retardation, autistic disorder and dysmorphic features. Gene. 2012;505(2):384–7. pmid:22634100
  45. 45. Gure AO, Wei IJ, Old LJ, Chen YT. The SSX gene family: characterization of 9 complete genes. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2002;101(5):448–53. pmid:12216073
  46. 46. Lugtenberg D, Zangrande-Vieira L, Kirchhoff M, Whibley AC, Oudakker AR, Kjaergaard S, et al. Recurrent deletion of ZNF630 at Xp11.23 is not associated with mental retardation. American journal of medical genetics Part A. 2010;152A(3):638–45. pmid:20186789
  47. 47. Yoshida K, Sugano S. Identification of a novel protocadherin gene (PCDH11) on the human XY homology region in Xq21.3. Genomics. 1999;62(3):540–3. pmid:10644456
  48. 48. Veerappa AM, Saldanha M, Padakannaya P, Ramachandra NB. Genome-wide copy number scan identifies disruption of PCDH11X in developmental dyslexia. American journal of medical genetics Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics: the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics. 2013;162B(8):889–97.
  49. 49. Carrasquillo MM, Zou F, Pankratz VS, Wilcox SL, Ma L, Walker LP, et al. Genetic variation in PCDH11X is associated with susceptibility to late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Nature genetics. 2009;41(2):192–8. pmid:19136949
  50. 50. Kimberley KW, Morris CA, Hobart HH. BAC-FISH refutes report of an 8p22–8p23.1 inversion or duplication in 8 patients with Kabuki syndrome. BMC medical genetics. 2006;7:46. pmid:16709256
  51. 51. Hollox EJ, Huffmeier U, Zeeuwen PL, Palla R, Lascorz J, Rodijk-Olthuis D, et al. Psoriasis is associated with increased beta-defensin genomic copy number. Nature genetics. 2008;40(1):23–5. pmid:18059266
  52. 52. Hecquet CM, Zhang M, Mittal M, Vogel SM, Di A, Gao X, et al. Cooperative interaction of trp melastatin channel transient receptor potential (TRPM2) with its splice variant TRPM2 short variant is essential for endothelial cell apoptosis. Circulation research. 2014;114(3):469–79. pmid:24337049
  53. 53. Miyake T, Shirakawa H, Kusano A, Sakimoto S, Konno M, Nakagawa T, et al. TRPM2 contributes to LPS/IFNgamma-induced production of nitric oxide via the p38/JNK pathway in microglia. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2014;444(2):212–7. pmid:24462864
  54. 54. Miller BA, Hoffman NE, Merali S, Zhang XQ, Wang J, Rajan S, et al. TRPM2 channels protect against cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury: role of mitochondria. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2014;289(11):7615–29. pmid:24492610
  55. 55. Liu XF, Yu JQ, Dalan R, Liu AQ, Luo KQ. Biological factors in plasma from diabetes mellitus patients enhance hyperglycaemia and pulsatile shear stress-induced endothelial cell apoptosis. Integrative biology: quantitative biosciences from nano to macro. 2014;6(5):511–22.