Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Three Huntington’s Disease Specific Mutation-Carrying Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Have Stable Number of CAG Repeats upon In Vitro Differentiation into Cardiomyocytes

  • Laureen Jacquet,

    Affiliation Stem Cell Laboratory, Assisted Conception Unit, Division of Women’s Health, King’s College London, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom

  • Andreas Neueder,

    Affiliation Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom

  • Gabor Földes,

    Affiliation National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, ICTEM, 4th Floor, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Rd, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom

  • Panagiotis Karagiannis,

    Affiliation Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom

  • Carl Hobbs,

    Affiliation Histology Laboratory, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, United Kingdom

  • Nelly Jolinon,

    Affiliation Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom

  • Maxime Mioulane,

    Affiliation National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, ICTEM, 4th Floor, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Rd, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom

  • Takao Sakai,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom

  • Sian E. Harding,

    Affiliation National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, ICTEM, 4th Floor, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Rd, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom

  • Dusko Ilic

    Affiliation Stem Cell Laboratory, Assisted Conception Unit, Division of Women’s Health, King’s College London, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom

Three Huntington’s Disease Specific Mutation-Carrying Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Have Stable Number of CAG Repeats upon In Vitro Differentiation into Cardiomyocytes

  • Laureen Jacquet, 
  • Andreas Neueder, 
  • Gabor Földes, 
  • Panagiotis Karagiannis, 
  • Carl Hobbs, 
  • Nelly Jolinon, 
  • Maxime Mioulane, 
  • Takao Sakai, 
  • Sian E. Harding, 
  • Dusko Ilic


Huntington disease (HD; OMIM 143100), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, is caused by an expanded trinucleotide CAG (polyQ) motif in the HTT gene. Cardiovascular symptoms, often present in early stage HD patients, are, in general, ascribed to dysautonomia. However, cardio-specific expression of polyQ peptides caused pathological response in murine models, suggesting the presence of a nervous system-independent heart phenotype in HD patients. A positive correlation between the CAG repeat size and severity of symptoms observed in HD patients has also been observed in in vitro HD cellular models. Here, we test the suitability of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines carrying HD-specific mutation as in vitro models for understanding molecular mechanisms of cardiac pathology seen in HD patients. We have differentiated three HD-hESC lines into cardiomyocytes and investigated CAG stability up to 60 days after starting differentiation. To assess CAG stability in other tissues, the lines were also subjected to in vivo differentiation into teratomas for 10 weeks. Neither directed differentiation into cardiomyocytes in vitro nor in vivo differentiation into teratomas, rich in immature neuronal tissue, led to an increase in the number of CAG repeats. Although the CAG stability might be cell line-dependent, induced pluripotent stem cells generated from patients with larger numbers of CAG repeats could have an advantage as a research tool for understanding cardiac symptoms of HD patients.


Huntington’s disease (HD; OMIM 143100) is an autosomal, dominantly inherited progressive neurodegenerative disorder usually with a late onset. It is caused by an expanded polymorphic polyglutamine (polyQ) trinucleotide (CAG) motif in the first exon of the HTT gene. HTT encodes huntingtin (HTT), a large 348 kD protein ubiquitously expressed, with highest levels found in the brain and testis [14]. HTT endogenous function is still not completely understood as it has very little homology to other known proteins [1].

In healthy individuals, the CAG repeat number ranges from 11 to 34 while numbers greater than 36 are causative of HD. The number of repeats generally determines age of disease onset [1, 5, 6]. Individuals with over 55 CAG repeats tend to develop Juvenile Huntington’s Disease (JHD), a more severe form, with slightly different clinical manifestations that develop in their youth instead of in their third to fifth decade. HD patients bearing homozygous mutations do not automatically have a lower age of onset, but do have a more severe phenotype and disease progression.6 The mutation shows anticipation, with both decreases and increases in repeat length occurring upon parent to offspring transmission [1, 7]. Instability of the CAG repeat length has also been reported in somatic tissues, with the largest expansion being observed in the brain [8, 9]. Cognitive decline, irritability and depression are often the first signs of disease, preceding clinical diagnosis and the development of motor symptoms [10]. Uncontrollable movements, difficulty in speech and swallowing lead to progressive physical deterioration, total dependency and need for full nursing care. Death is usually the result of secondary illness.

HTT is ubiquitously expressed. Neurodegeneration is the main HD phenotype, however, non-central nervous system HD-associated pathologies have also been reported [1113]. Orthostatic hypotension, tachycardia, impaired modulation of cardiovascular tone and attenuated heart rate responses to stress, often present in early stage HD patients, have been ascribed to dysfunction of the autonomous nervous system [1419]. Cardiac pathology, including atrophy, has been, however, described in HD murine models [13, 2022]. In addition, cardiomyocyte-autonomous expression of 83 polyQ peptide in mouse model led to reduced cardiac function and dilatation by 5 months followed by death by 8 months. On the contrary, a 9-fold higher expression of 19 polyQ peptide in control animals had no effect on murine cardiac function or lifespan [23]. Taken together, the data from animal models suggest that the cardiac phenotype seen in HD patients is not exclusively a result of dysautonomia; and that the expression of mutant HTT in cardiomyocytes may also be cardiotoxic.

Human pluripotent stem cells, bearing the endogenous HTT mutation, can be differentiated into multiple cell lineages and kept in culture ad infinitum, circumventing the limitations associated with primary cell culture or immortalized cell lines with exogenously expressed mutant HTT. The aim of this study was to test the stability of CAG repeats in cardyomyocytes differentiated in vitro from three HD-hESC lines [24], KCL027, KCL028 and KCL036.


2.1. hESC derivation, culture, expression of pluripotency markers and in vivo differentiation (teratoma)

HD-hESCs were derived from fresh embryos diagnosed with HD following Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD). The work was done under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA; research license number R0133) and local ethical approval (UK National Health Service Research Ethics Committee Reference 06/Q0702/90) following the written informed consent from the donors. All hESC lines have been approved for deposit in the UK Stem Cell Bank by the Medical Research Council’s Steering Committee. All the lines are also listed in the NIH hESC Registry as ethically derived and eligible for use in NIH funded research. The methods describing hESC derivation, culture, expression of pluripotency markers and in vivo differentiation are reported in detail previously [25, 26].

2.2. Genotyping

Genotyping was performed as previously described [25]. Briefly, DNA was extracted from hESC cultures using a Chemagen DNA extraction robot, quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer, and amplified using two multiplexes, one of 17 PCR primer pairs for markers on chromosomes 13, 18 and 21, and one of 14 primer pairs for markers on the X and Y chromosomes. PCR products, separated on an ABI3100 capillary genetic analyser, were analyzed using ABI Genotyper software. Allele sizes represent a unique fingerprint of each cell line.

2.3. Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)

Array CGH was performed as previously described [25]. Briefly, 1 μg DNA was labelled using a CGH labelling kit (Enzo Life Sciences, USA) and purified post-labelling using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, USA). Labelling efficiency and yield was assessed by spectrophotometry (Nanodrop, USA). We used an Agilent (USA) 4 × 44 K platform with either Wessex NGRL design 017457 or design 028469. The data were processed using Feature Extraction and DNA Analytics software packages (Agilent, USA); 95% of array data was required to pass QC. For aberration calling, we used ADM-2 algorithm at threshold 6 (with a 3 probe sliding window providing a mean detection interval of 200 kb).

2.4. Cardiac differentiation

Directed cardiac differentiation was based on the work published by Laflamme et al [27]. Briefly, undifferentiated hESCs, maintained on Matrigel (BD) in Nutristem (Stemgent), were dissociated into a single-cell suspension by a 3–5 min incubation with accutase (STEMCELL Technologies). Cells were then centrifuged, resuspended, counted and seeded in Nutristem onto growth factor reduced Matrigel coated 24-well plates at a density of 2 x 105 cells/cm2, with the addition of 10 μM Y-27632 (Source Bioscience) to support cell survival and attachment. This marked Day -5 of the differentiation protocol. Until Day 0, cells were fed daily with 2 ml/well of Nutristem. At Day 0, cardiac differentiation was induced by feeding the cells with 0.5 ml/well Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI)-B27 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 100 ng/ml of human recombinant Activin A (Miltenyi). The following day, the medium was replaced by 1.5 ml/well RPMI-B27 supplemented with 10 ng/ml human recombinant BMP4 (Miltenyi) and left unchanged for four days. The medium was then exchanged for unsupplemented RPMI-B27 every two days for up to 60 days.

2.5. Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and quantitative (q) PCR

Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer’s instructions. A 20 min DNAse I (27 Kunitz units final) (Qiagen) treatment step at room temperature was included to eliminate potential genomic DNA contamination. cDNA was generated by reverse-transcription of total RNA (500 ng) in a 20-μl reaction using the Precision nanoScript Reverse Transcription kit (PrimerDesign) following the manufacturer’s instruction. The qPCR reaction consisted of 5 μL of cDNA diluted 1:10 in water, 10 μl of Precision 2X qPCR Mastermix (PrimerDesign) and 300 μM final of each primer for a final volume of 20 μl. qPCR cycling conditions were as follow: 1 cycle 95°C for 10 min; 40 cycles 95°C for 15 s, 61°C for 30 sec followed by melt curve acquisition from 59°C to 95°C with 0.5°C increment. To select the best housekeeping gene, we tested a panel of 12 different housekeeping genes on undifferentiated hESCs and hESC-derived cardiomyocytes. GeNorm analysis was then performed via the qbasePLUS software in order to determine the two most stable ones, which were EIF4A2 and SDHA. The POUF51 (also known as OCT4), NANOG, TNNT2, EIF4A2 and SDHA primers were designed by PrimerDesign Ltd and the HTT primers were designed using the Primer3 website ( Primers are listed in S1 Table. All samples were analyzed in triplicate, Ct values were determined, and the expression was calculated by the 2-ΔΔCt method. EIF4A2 and SDHA were used for internal normalisation (S2 Table).

2.6. Isolation of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) teratoma tissue

Eight serial 6-μm sections from each paraffin block with embedded teratoma tissue were processed for the analysis. The first and the last section were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and the tissue types spanning both sections were determined. We purified DNA from the remaining six sections and determined number of CAG repeats using human-specific primers. The wild-type (WT) allele was used as an internal control.

Isolation of DNA from FFPE tissue was adapted from Campos and Gilbert [29]. The FFPE tissue samples were digested in 500 μl alkali digestion buffer (0.1 M NaOH with 1% SDS, pH 12) for 40 min at 100°C. After a 5 min of cooling down period, 500 μl of 25:24:1 phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol was added to the samples, followed by a 5 min agitation at room temperature and 5 min centrifugation at 10,000 x g. The upper aqueous layer was then removed and added to a new tube containing 500 μl choloroform. A second agitation and centrifugation step was performed before adding the aqueous layer to 1 volume of isopropanol and 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate pH 5. The samples were then centrifuged 30 min at 10,000 x g. Liquid was then decanted and the DNA pellet washed twice with 1 ml 85% ethanol. After ethanol decantation, the DNA pellet was allowed to dry before resuspension in TE buffer.

2.7. CAG repeats

Preimplantation genetic haplotyping (PGH) for HD was performed as described previously [24, 25]. CAG repeat size determination of the cell (wells with predominantly beating cells) and tissue samples (teratoma sections) was performed by PCR as published [30]. Briefly, 5–50 ng DNA amplification was performed in 10 μl reactions containing: 0.2 mM dNTPs, 10% DMSO, AM buffer (67 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.8; 16.6 mM (NH4)SO4; 2 mM MgCl2; 0.17 mg/ml BSA), 0.8 pmol FAM-labelled forward primer (GAGTCCCTCAAGTCCTTCCAGCA) and reverse primer (GCCCAAACTCACGGTCGGT) and 0.5 U AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems). Cycling conditions were: 90 sec at 94°C, 35 × (30 sec at 94°C; 30 sec at 65°C; 90 sec at 72°C) and 10 min at 72°C. After the PCR, for each sample, 1 μl of PCR product was mixed with 9 μL of HiDi Formamide (Applied Biosystems) and 0.03 μl l MegaBACE ET900-R Size standards (GE Healthcare) and denatured at 95°C for 5 min. Samples were then run on an ABI3730 sequencer and analysed using GeneMapper v5.2- 3730XL software (Applied Biosystem).

Sensitivity of CAG assay was determined by mixing at different ratio KCL034 (clinical grade wild-type hESC line) and KCL027 (HD-hESC line) genomic DNA, each diluted exactly to 50 ng/ml (S1 Fig).


3.1. Characterization of HD-hESC lines

The purpose of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is to identify and exclude embryos that carry the familial mutation. Such embryos are never destined for use in treatment and are routinely discarded as soon as an affected status is diagnosed. If the patients decide to donate these embryos to research, they give consent at the time of treatment. In our center we identify HD specific mutation-carrying embryos by haplotyping using polymorphic markers flanking and intragenic to the HTT gene on chromosome 4p16.3. Primers designed for 15 microsatellite markers enable testing for inheritance of the at-risk HD allele. Three HD-hESC lines, KCL027, KCL028 and KCL036, were derived in our center from embryos carrying HD-specific mutation from two donor couples. One couple had eight affected embryos from which two lines, KCL027 and KCL028, were derived and the other donor couple had one affected embryo, from which KCL036 was derived [24].

All three lines were assessed for a number of parameters that are part of standard hESC lines characterization [26, 31]. The identity of the cell lines was confirmed by genotyping; amplification of polymorphic microsatellite markers was carried out, giving a unique fingerprint for each cell line (Fig 1A). The data confirmed that KCL027 and KCL028 are clonal related and are both unrelated to KCL036. The presence of pluripotency markers in all three lines was demonstrated by immunostaining using a panel of antibodies against transcription factors NANOG and OCT4 and cell surface antigens TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81. The HD-hESC colonies were also positive for alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity using a commercially available kit (Fig 1B). They had a typical morphology of normal healthy hESC colonies (Fig 1C). As the first line test for genomic stability, we used array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) as described previously [25]. aCGH is an oligonucleotide platform with 60,000 probes that can detect regions of imbalance down to approximately 25kb [32]. No genetic imbalance was detected during extended periods of culture (data not shown).

Fig 1. HD-hESC lines characterization.

(A) Genotyping: Microsatellite markers specific for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y were amplified. The allele sizes in bp for markers on chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 are listed in the table. (B) Pluripotency markers: alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity, TRA-1–60, TRA-1–81, OCT4, and Nanog were detected in undifferentiated cells of all three hESC lines. (C) HD-hESC colonies have a typical morphology of normal hESC colonies.

3.2. HD-hESC-derived cardiomyocytes have a stable number of CAG repeats

Next, we asked whether directed differentiation into cardiomyocytes would result in a change in the number of CAG repeats. We differentiated the HD-hESCs in a monolayer following a directed differentiation protocol [27]. All three differentiated HD-hESC lines presented beating cardiomyocytes (Fig 2A). Using qPCR, we confirmed that 30 days after the start of differentiation, expression of pluripotency-associated genes NANOG and OCT3/4 had diminished in all three hESC lines, whereas the expression of cardiac-associated gene TNNT2 increased. HTT expression remained similar between undifferentiated hESCs and the cultures containing hESC-derived cardiomyocytes (Fig 2B). The CAG repeat number of all three HD-hESC lines in affected and non-affected alleles remained stable throughout differentiation (Fig 2C). We then extended culture of differentiated cardiomyocytes for an additional 30 days and showed that the number of CAG repeats in cells derived from two lines, KCL027 and KCL036, still remained unchanged (Fig 2C). To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of differentiation of HD-mutation-carrying human pluripotent stem cells, either hESC or human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC), into cardiomyocytes, and assessment of the effect on the number of the CAG repeats.

Fig 2. All three HD-hESC lines have stable number of CAG repeats upon directed cardiomyocyte differentiation in vitro.

(A) Beating cardiomyocytes were present in all three HD hESC lines examined in 2 independent rounds of differentiation. (B) Upon differentiation into cardiomyocytes for 30 days, expression of the pluripotency markers NANOG and OCT4 is nearly undetectable, whereas the cardiomyocyte marker TNNT2 was increased. There is no change in HTT expression. Data are given by normalised mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3); statistical significance was calculated by an unpaired homoscedastic one-tailed Student's t-test. NS, p ≥ 0.5 (non-significant); *p = 0.01–0.05 (significant); ***p ≤ 0.05 (extremely significant). (C) Top: Analysis of CAG repeats in undifferentiated KCL027 cells at the start of differentiation [day 0] and 60-day after. Bottom: Number of CAG repeats in allele carrying HD mutation has not increased after 30–60 days differentiation into cardiomyocytes.

3.3. Number of CAG repeats remains stable in multiple in vivo differentiated tissues

Since CAG stability might differ from one tissue to another, we allowed the hESC to differentiate spontaneously in vivo in order to mimic more closely a physiological environment. Different techniques of generating teratomas, encapsulated tumors with tissue derivatives of all three germ layers, have previously been described [3335]. We injected cells embedded in Matrigel from each of three HD-hESC lines (KCL027, KCL028 and KCL036) subcutaneously into immunocompromized NOD-SCID mice (total n = 9 mice) and harvested them 10 weeks later. Animals homozygous for the SCID mutation have impaired T and B cell lymphocyte development, whereas the NOD background additionally results in deficient natural killer cell function. Teratomas in all lines consisted of tissue derivatives from all three germ layers (Fig 3A). All tumors contained glandular epithelium, immature neural epithelium, immature mesenchyme, cartilage and endothelium. In addition, KCL027 and KCL028 teratomas contained pigmented epithelium and arachnoidal tissue. We assessed the number of CAG repeats in DNA isolated from sections of FFPE teratoma tissue samples. We found no increase in the number of CAG repeats in the mutated allele in any of the lines examined (Fig 3B). However, we detected a slight decrease in the number of CAG repeats in both the WT and HD allele of line KCL027. Such short truncations have been reported previously [36, 37]. Taken together the data suggest that the CAG repeat length remains the same following two different differentiation techniques. To understand the molecular mechanisms of cardiac pathology in HD patients, HD-hESC and-hiPSC with a moderate increase in the number of CAG repeats may not be the best in vitro cellular model.

Fig 3. All three HD-hESC lines have stable number of CAG repeats upon spontaneous in vivo differentiation.

(A) Differentiation into the three germ layers in vivo: Teratomas were encapsulated and did not invade surrounding tissue. Sections are counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin and specific stains are either light blue (Alcian blue) or brown (all immunohistochemistry). Germ layer markers: Alcian blue—and periodic acid–Schiff (PAS)-stained cartilage and desmin for mesoderm, neuron-specific β-III tubulin and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for ectoderm, GATA4 and α- fetoprotein for endoderm. (B) Number of CAG repeats in allele carrying HD mutation did not increase during 10-week teratoma formation.


To complement HD in vivo models, HD in vitro models have been developed from mouse, rat and human cells. These are in general immortalized cell lines with a genome-integrating viral delivery system carrying a mutated HTT exon 1, expression of which is driven by an exogenous promoter. These cell lines recapitulated some of the hallmarks features of HD, notably an increased cell death and the formation of aggregates. Similar phenotypes have also been found in primary cell models. However, it is not until recently that stem cells have been used to model HD (Table 1).

Since the first disease-specific hESC line was derived from patients undergoing PGD for cystic fibrosis [38], more than 20 HD-hESC lines have been derived worldwide. However, only a few of them have been thoroughly characterized or used as research tools. Two HD-hESC lines carrying 37 and 51 CAG repeats were indistinguishable morphologically from normal control cell lines in the undifferentiated state and during differentiation into forebrain neurons. However, neural differentiation induced instability of CAG repeats and lines were gaining five to six CAG repeats upon differentiation [39]. The expression of those genes that are deregulated in HD remained unperturbed throughout differentiation. The only phenotype observed was an elevated glutamate-evoked response in neurons differentiated from an HD-hESC line with 51 CAG repeats [40]. A marked increase in the number of CAG repeats from 46 to 70 upon differentiation into astroglial precursors was found in one HD-hESC line derived in our laboratory [41]. On the other hand, two other groups reported that 40–48 CAG repeats were stable in five undifferentiated and differentiated HD-hESCs [42, 43]. A later study involving these five HD-hESC lines reported a down-regulation of the HTT gene itself in HD neural cells and dysregulation of three genes, of which two, CHCHD2 and TRIM4, were also dysregulated in blood cells from the HD patient [44]. In contrast, we could not detect any change in the levels of HTT gene expression in the cell exposed to our cardiac differentiation protocol (Fig 2B), indicating that this phenomenon might be either cell line-related or specific to HD neurons but not to other cell types. We also found that the number of CAG repeats was stable in cells that underwent undirected in vivo differentiation, and those that underwent directed in vitro differentiation towards a cardiac lineage. Taking together the reports from different groups to date, it seems that some lines are prone to CAG expansion in vitro and others are not. Molecular mechanisms behind these differences are still unknown. Although cell culture conditions might play a role, genetic background of each individual line is likely to be more important. It would be interesting to see how unstable CAG repeats in cell lines correlate with anticipation in the families that donated the embryos. However, confidentiality surrounding human embryo donation makes such comparison problematic.

Reprogramming of somatic cells into iPSC, discovered by Takahashi and Yamanaka [45], could circumvent these issues. Derivation of HD-iPSC lines will enable comparison of disease-in-the-dish phenotypes with clinical findings in somatic cell donors and affected members of their families, leading to a better understanding of the role of genetic background and molecular mechanisms in development of HD-associated symptoms. The HD iPSC consortium recently published findings showing that the positive correlation between the sizes of CAG repeats and the severity of symptoms observed in HD patients could also be observed in vitro in HD-iPSC derived neurons [46]. A significant increase in lysosomal activity both during self-renewal and in iPSC-derived neurons has been noted in the iPSC lines derived from two homozygotes carrying 42/44 and 39/42 CAG repeats and one heterozygote carrying 17/45 CAG repeats [47]. The number of CAG repeats remained stable during the extended period of culture. Another HD-iPSC line with 72 CAG repeats did not show any phenotype when cultured in vitro or differentiated into neural precursors. However, when either subjected to oxidative stress [48], proteasome inhibitor or engrafted into neonatal brains for 33 weeks, the HD-iPSCs exhibited signs of HD pathology [49]. Elevated caspase activity in HD-iPSCs was also detected in derived neurons of HD-iSPC line with 72 repeats [50].

The CAG-repeat expansion associated phenotypes already reported in transgenic models of HD are the result of exogenous mutation, whereas phenotypes in HD-hESC and HD-iPSC would be caused by endogenous mutation, more closely modeling in vivo disease. Our data further highlight the need to generate HD-iPSCs with a wider range of repeats and to correlate the repeat instability in different tissue types with the medical history of donors and affected members of their families.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. The assay that we were using to detect abnormal number of CAG repeats in one HTT allele could detect the mutation present in 1 μl of DNA from HD-hESC line KCL027 at concentration 50 ng/ml mixed with 39 μl of normal wild-type hESC line KCL034 of the identical concentration, which would equal 1 out of 40 cells (2.5%).


S1 Table. Sense and Antisense primers of target genes used for hESC-derived cardiomyocytes characterization.


S2 Table. Housekeeping genes designed and synthesized by PrimerDesign Ltd used for hESC-derived cardiomyocyte characterisation amplicon context.

The primer sequences are commercially sensitive information but the details provided in this table are MIQE compliant [28].



This work was supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) grants G0701172 and G0801061. L.J. had MRC studentship. We thank hESC line derivation team: Emma Stephenson, Victoria Wood, Neli Kadeva, Glenda Cornwell, and Stefano Codognotto. We also thank Dr Yacoub Khalaf, Director of the Assisted Conception Unit of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and his staff for supporting the research program. We are especially indebted to patients who donated embryos. We thank Prof Gillian Bates (King’s College London) for her input and advice, Liani Devito for technical assistance and Prof Caroline Ogilvie (Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust) for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LJ AN GF SEH DI. Performed the experiments: LJ AN GF PK CH NJ MM. Analyzed the data: LJ AN GF PK CH NJ MM TS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CH SEH DI. Wrote the paper: LJ AN GF SEH DI.


  1. 1. The Huntington Disease Collaborative Research Group. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. Cell 1993;72:971–983.
  2. 2. Li SH, Schilling G, Young WS 3rd, Li XJ, Margolis RL, Stine OC, et al. Huntington's disease gene (IT15) is widely expressed in human and rat tissues. Neuron 1993;11:985–993. pmid:8240819
  3. 3. Strong TV, Tagle DA, Valdes JM, Elmer LW, Boehm K, Swaroop M, et al. Widespread expression of the human and rat Huntington's disease gene in brain and nonneural tissues. Nat Genet 1993;5:259–265.
  4. 4. Sharp AH, Loev SJ, Schilling G, Li SH, Li XJ, Bao J, et al. Widespread expression of Huntington's disease gene (IT15) protein product. Neuron 1995;14:1065–1074. pmid:7748554
  5. 5. Trottier Y, Biancalana V, Mandel JL. Instability of CAG repeats in Huntington's disease: relation to parental transmission and age of onset. J Med Genet 1994;31:377–382.
  6. 6. Squitieri F, Gellera C, Cannella M, Mariotti C, Cislaghi G, Rubinsztein DC, et al. Homozygosity for CAG mutation in Huntington disease is associated with a more severe clinical course. Brain 2003;126:946–955.
  7. 7. Duyao M, Ambrose C, Myers R, Novelletto A, Persichetti F, Frontali M, et al. Trinucleotide repeat length instability and age of onset in Huntington's disease. Nat Genet 1993;4:387–392. pmid:8401587
  8. 8. Telenius H, Kremer B, Goldberg YP, Theilmann J, Andrew SE, Zeisler J, et al. Somatic and gonadal mosaicism of the Huntington disease gene CAG repeat in brain and sperm. Nat Genet 1994;6:409–414. pmid:8054984
  9. 9. Kennedy L, Evans E, Chen CM, Craven L, Detloff PJ. Ennis M, et al. Dramatic tissue-specific mutation length increases are an early molecular event in Huntington disease pathogenesis. Hum Mol Genet 2003;12:3359–3367. pmid:14570710
  10. 10. Epping EA, Paulsen JS. Depression in the early stages of Huntington disease. Neurodegener Dis Manag 2011;1:407–414. pmid:22942903
  11. 11. van der Burg JM, Björkqvist M, Brundin P. Beyond the brain: widespread pathology in Huntington's disease. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:765–774. pmid:19608102
  12. 12. Sassone J, Colciago C, Cislaghi G, Silani V, Ciammola A. Huntington's disease: the current state of research with peripheral tissues. Exp Neurol 2009;219:385–397. pmid:19460373
  13. 13. Sathasivam K, Hobbs C, Turmaine M, Mangiarini L, Mahal A, Bertaux F, et al. Formation of polyglutamine inclusions in non-CNS tissue. Hum Mol Genet 1999;8:813–822. pmid:10196370
  14. 14. Abildtrup M, Shattock M. Cardiac dysautonomia in Huntington’s disease. J Huntingtons Dis 2013;2:251–261.
  15. 15. Kobal J, Melik Z, Cankar K, Bajrovic FF, Meglic B, Peterlin B, et al. Autonomic dysfunction in presymptomatic and early symptomatic Huntington’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand 2010;121:392–399. pmid:20047567
  16. 16. Kobal J, Meglic B, Mesec A, Peterlin B. Early sympathetic hyperactivity in Huntington’s disease. Eur J Neurol 2004;11:842–48. pmid:15667417
  17. 17. Bar KJ, Boettger MK, Andrich J, Epplen JT, Fischer F, Cordes J, et al. Cardiovagal modulation upon postural change is altered in Huntington’s disease. Eur J Neurol 2008;15:869–871. pmid:18484985
  18. 18. Andrich J, Schmitz T, Saft C, Postert T, Kraus P, Epplen JT, et al. Autonomic nervous system function in Huntington’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:726–731. pmid:12023413
  19. 19. Sharma KR, Romano JG, Ayyar DR, Rotta FT, Facca A, Sanchez-Ramos J. Sympathetic skin response and heart rate variability in patients with Huntington disease. Arch Neurol 1999;56:1248–1252. pmid:10520941
  20. 20. Mihm MJ, Amann DM, Schanbacher BL, Altschuld RA, Bauer JA, Hoyt KR. Cardiac dysfunction in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington's disease. Neurobiol Dis 2007;25:297–308. pmid:17126554
  21. 21. Wood NI, Sawiak SJ, Buonincontri G, Niu Y, Kane AD, Carpenter TA, et al. Direct evidence of progressive cardiac dysfunction in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington's disease. J Huntington’s Dis 2012;1:57–74.
  22. 22. Kiriazis H, Jennings NL, Davern P, Lambert G, Su Y, Pang T, et al. Neurocardiac dysregulation and neurogenic arrhythmias in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington's disease. J Physiol 2012;590:5845–5860.
  23. 23. Pattison JS, Sanbe A, Maloyan A, Osinska H, Klevitsky R, Robbins J. Cardiomyocyte expression of a polyglutamine preamyloid oligomer causes heart failure. Circulation 2008, 117:2743–2751. pmid:18490523
  24. 24. Jacquet L, Stephenson E, Collins R, Patel H, Trussler J, Al-Bedaery R, et al. Strategy for the creation of clinical grade hESC line banks that HLA-match a target population. EMBO Mol Med 2013;5:10–17. pmid:23996934
  25. 25. Ilic D, Stephenson E, Wood V, Jacquet L, Stevenson D, Petrova A, et al. Derivation and feeder-free propagation of human embryonic stem cells under xeno-free conditions. Cytotherapy 2012;14:122–128. pmid:22029654
  26. 26. Stephenson E, Jacquet L, Miere C, Wood V, Kadeva N, Cornwell G, et al. Derivation and propagation of human embryonic stem cell lines from frozen embryos in an animal product-free environment. Nat Protoc 2012;7:1366–1381. pmid:22722371
  27. 27. Laflamme MA, Chen KY, Naumova AV, Muskheli V, Fugate JA, Dupras SK, et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:1015–1024. pmid:17721512
  28. 28. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, et al. Primer sequence disclosure: a clarification of the MIQE guidelines. Clin Chem 2011;57:919–921. pmid:21421813
  29. 29. Campos PF, Gilbert TM. DNA extraction from formalin-fixed material. Methods Mol Biol 2012;840:81–85. pmid:22237525
  30. 30. Sathasivam K, Lane A, Legleiter J, Warley A, Woodman B, Finkbeiner S, et al. Identical oligomeric and fibrillar structures captured from the brains of R6/2 and knock-in mouse models of Huntington's disease. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:65–78. pmid:19825844
  31. 31. Martí M, Mulero L, Pardo C, Morera C, Carrió M, Laricchia-Robbio L, et al. Characterization of pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc 2013;8:223–253. pmid:23306458
  32. 32. Stephenson E, Ogilvie CM, Patel H, Cornwell G, Jacquet L, Kadeva N, et al. Safety paradigm: genetic evaluation of therapeutic grade human embryonic stem cells. J R Soc. Interface 2010, 7 Suppl 6, S677–688. pmid:20826474
  33. 33. Hentze H, Soong PL, Wang ST, Phillips BW, Putti TC, Dunn NR. Teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells: evaluation of essential parameters for future safety studies. Stem Cell Res 2009;2:198–210. pmid:19393593
  34. 34. Prokhorova TA, Harkness LM, Frandsen U, Ditzel N, Schrøder HD, Burns JS, et al. Teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells is site dependent and enhanced by the presence of Matrigel. Stem Cells Dev 2009;18:47–54. pmid:18393673
  35. 35. Cooke MJ, Stojkovic M, Przyborski SA. Growth of teratomas derived from human pluripotent stem cells is influenced by the graft site. Stem Cells Dev 2006;15:254–259. pmid:16646671
  36. 36. Manley K, Pugh J, Messer A. Instability of the CAG repeat in immortalized fibroblast cell cultures from Huntington’s Disease transgenic mice. Brain Res 1999;835:74–79. pmid:10448198
  37. 37. Lee JM, Zhang J, Su AI, Walker JR, Wiltshire T, Kang K, et al. A novel approach to investigate tissue-specific trinucleotide repeat instability. BMC Syst Biol 2010;4:29. pmid:20302627
  38. 38. Pickering SJ, Minger SL, Patel M, Taylor H, Black C, Burns CJ, et al. Generation of a human embryonic stem cell line encoding the cystic fibrosis mutation deltaF508, using preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:390–397. pmid:15820050
  39. 39. Niclis J, Trounson AO, Dottori M, Ellisdon A, Bottomley SP, Verlinsky Y, et al. Human embryonic stem cell models of Huntington disease. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;19:106–113. pmid:19573298
  40. 40. Niclis JC, Pinar A, Haynes JM, Alsanie W, Jenny R, Dottori M, et al. Characterization of forebrain neurons derived from late-onset Huntington's disease human embryonic stem cell lines. Front. Cell Neurosci 2013;7:37. pmid:23576953
  41. 41. Stephenson EL, Braude PR. Derivation of the King's College London human embryonic stem cell lines. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2010;46:178–185. pmid:20178004
  42. 42. Bradley CK, Scott HA, Chami O, Peura TT, Dumevska B, Schmidt U, et al. Derivation of Huntington's disease-affected human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells Dev 2011;20:495–502. pmid:20649476
  43. 43. Seriola A, Spits C, Simard JP, Hilven P, Haentjens P, Pearson CE, et al. Huntington's and myotonic dystrophy hESCs: down-regulated trinucleotide repeat instability and mismatch repair machinery expression upon differentiation. Hum Mol Genet 2010;20:176–185.
  44. 44. Feyeux M, Bourgois-Rocha F, Redfern A, Giles P, Lefort N, Aubert S, et al. Early transcriptional changes linked to naturally occurring Huntington's disease mutations in neural derivatives of human embryonic stem cells. Hum Mol Genet 2012;21:3883–2895. pmid:22678061
  45. 45. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006;126:663–676.
  46. 46. The HD iPSC Consortium. Induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with Huntington's disease show CAG-repeat-expansion-associated phenotypes. Cell Stem Cell 2012;11:264–278. pmid:22748968
  47. 47. Camnasio S, Delli Carri A, Lombardo A, Grad I, Mariotti C, Castucci A, et al. The first reported generation of several induced pluripotent stem cell lines from homozygous and heterozygous Huntington's disease patients demonstrates mutation related enhanced lysosomal activity. Neurobiol Dis 2012;46:41–51. pmid:22405424
  48. 48. Chae JI, Kim DW, Lee N, Jeon YJ, Jeon I, Kwon J, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of induced pluripotent stem cells derived from a human Huntington's disease patient. Biochem J 2012;446:359–371. pmid:22694310
  49. 49. Jeon I, Lee N, Li JY, Park IH, Park KS, Moon J, et al. Neuronal properties, in vivo effects, and pathology of a Huntington's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 2012;30:2054–2062. pmid:22628015
  50. 50. Zhang N, An MC, Montoro D, Ellerby LM. Characterization of Human Huntington's Disease Cell Model from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. PLoS Curr 2010;2:RRN1193. pmid:21037797
  51. 51. Ritch JJ, Valencia A, Alexander J, Sapp E, Gatune L, Sangrey GR, et al. Multiple phenotypes in Huntington disease mouse neural stem cells. Mol Cell Neurosci 2012;50:70–81. pmid:22508027
  52. 52. Park IH, Arora N, Huo H, Maherali N, Ahfeldt T, Shimamura A, et al. Disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell 2008;134:877–886.
  53. 53. Lorincz MT, Zawistowski VA. Expanded CAG repeats in the murine Huntington's disease gene increases neuronal differentiation of embryonic and neural stem cells. Mol Cell Neurosci 2009;40:1–13.
  54. 54. Jonson I, Ougland R, Klungland A, Larsen E. Oxidative stress causes DNA triplet expansion in Huntington's disease mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res 2013;11:1264–1271. pmid:24041806
  55. 55. Jacobsen JC, Gregory GC, Woda JM, Thompson MN, Coser KR, Murthy V, et al. HD CAG-correlated gene expression changes support a simple dominant gain of function. Hum Mol Genet 2011;20:2846–60. pmid:21536587
  56. 56. Laowtammathron C, Cheng ECh, Cheng PH, Snyder BR, Yang SH, Johnson Z, et al. Monkey hybrid stem cells develop cellular features of Huntington's disease. BMC Cell Biol 2010;11:12. pmid:20132560
  57. 57. Putkhao K, Kocerha J, Cho IK, Yang J, Parnpai R, Chan AW. Pathogenic cellular phenotypes are germline transmissible in a transgenic primate model of Huntington's disease. Stem Cells Dev 2013;22:1198–1205. pmid:23190281
  58. 58. Lu B, Palacino J. A novel human embryonic stem cell-derived Huntington's disease neuronal model exhibits mutant huntingtin (mHTT) aggregates and soluble mHTT-dependent neurodegeneration. FASEB J 2013;27:1820–1829.