Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Association of CDH13 Genotypes/Haplotypes with Circulating Adiponectin Levels, Metabolic Syndrome, and Related Metabolic Phenotypes: The Role of the Suppression Effect

  • Ming-Sheng Teng,

    Affiliations Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, Department of Research, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Lung-An Hsu,

    Affiliation The First Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan

  • Semon Wu,

    Affiliations Department of Research, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan, Department of Life Science, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Yu-Chen Sun,

    Affiliation Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

  • Shu-Hui Juan ,

    yulinkotw@yahoo.com.tw (YLK); juansh@tmu.edu.tw (SHJ)

    Affiliation Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Yu-Lin Ko

    yulinkotw@yahoo.com.tw (YLK); juansh@tmu.edu.tw (SHJ)

    Affiliations The Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Medical Center, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan

Association of CDH13 Genotypes/Haplotypes with Circulating Adiponectin Levels, Metabolic Syndrome, and Related Metabolic Phenotypes: The Role of the Suppression Effect

  • Ming-Sheng Teng, 
  • Lung-An Hsu, 
  • Semon Wu, 
  • Yu-Chen Sun, 
  • Shu-Hui Juan, 
  • Yu-Lin Ko
PLOS
x

Abstract

Objective

Previous genome-wide association studies have indicated an association between CDH13 genotypes and adiponectin levels. In this study, we used mediation analysis to assess the statistical association between CDH13 locus variants and adiponectin levels, metabolic syndrome, and related metabolic phenotypes.

Methods and results

A sample population of 530 Taiwanese participants was enrolled. Four CDH13 gene variants in the promoter and intron 1 regions were genotyped. After adjustment for clinical covariates, the CDH13 genotypes/haplotypes exhibited an association with the adiponectin levels (lowest P = 1.95 × 10−11 for rs4783244 and lowest P = 3.78 × 10−13 for haplotype ATTT). Significant correlations were observed between the adiponectin levels and the various metabolic syndrome-related phenotypes (all P ≤ 0.005). After further adjustment for the adiponectin levels, participants with a minor allele of rs12051272 revealed a considerable association with a more favorable metabolic profile, including higher insulin sensitivity, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, lower diastolic blood pressure, circulating levels of fasting plasma glucose, and triglycerides, and as a lower risk of metabolic syndrome (all P < 0.05). The mediation analysis further revealed a suppression effect of the adiponectin levels on the association between CDH13 genotypes and metabolic syndrome and its related phenotypes (Sobel test; all P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The genetic polymorphisms at the CDH13 locus independently affect the adiponectin levels, whereas the adiponectin levels exhibit a suppressive effect on the association between CDH13 locus variants and various metabolic phenotypes and metabolic syndrome. In addition, these results provide further evidence of the association between the CDH13 gene variants and the risks of metabolic syndrome and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Introduction

Adiponectin is one of the most abundant gene products expressed in adipose tissues and plays a crucial role in the metabolic regulation of obesity, insulin sensitivity, and atherosclerosis [1]. Several studies have indicated many metabolic actions of adiponectin, such as antidiabetic, antiinflammatory, and antiatherosclerotic actions [2]. Animal studies and cell culture experiments revealed that a direct stimulation of nitric oxide synthesis is responsible for the antiinflammatory and antiatherogenic effects of adiponectin [3]. Decreased levels of plasma adiponectin have been associated with an increased risk of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [47]. Genetic factors have also been suggested to regulate adiponectin levels, as demonstrated by the twin study [8], family study [9], and genome-wide linkage scans [10], which indicated moderate to high estimates of heritability (30%–70%) [11]. In addition, a recent family-based study reported a shared heritability between adiponectin levels and metabolic syndrome [12].

Various genome-wide association studies conducting meta-analysis have reported numerous candidate gene loci for adiponectin levels [1316]. T-cadherin, belonging to the cadherin superfamily of the transmembrane proteins that mediate calcium-dependent intercellular adhesion, is the receptor for hexameric and high-molecular-weight (HMW) adiponectin expressed in the vasculature [17] and cardiac myocytes [18]. The CDH13 gene, encoding T-cadherin, is localized at chromosome 16q23.3, spans 1.2 Mb, and contains 14 exons. A meta-analysis revealed the CDH13 gene region to be the most crucial locus associated with adiponectin levels [16]. By contrast, other studies have reported a marked association between CDH13 gene variants and various metabolic phenotypes but with controversial results [14, 15, 19]. In a Taiwanese study, the adiponectin-lowering T allele was paradoxically associated with a reduced risk of diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and stroke [14]. Two recent reports on East Asian populations have revealed that CDH13 intron 1 polymorphisms were associated with metabolic phenotypes only after an adjustment for adiponectin levels [15, 19]. In the present study, we used mediation analysis to further elucidate the relationships of CDH13 gene variants with circulating adiponectin levels, metabolic phenotypes, and metabolic syndrome.

Participants and Methods

Study population

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation (IRB number: 02-XD56-120). A total of 617 Han Chinese subjects (327 men, 290 women) responded to a questionnaire on their medical history and lifestyle characteristics were recruited during routine health examinations between October 2003 and September 2005 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. All of the participants provided written informed consent. The exclusion criteria included cancer, current renal or liver disease, and a history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischemic attacks. After initial recruitment, 87 individuals were further excluded from the analysis in this investigation, with either participants aged < 18 years (5 subjects), or with a history of regular use of medications for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and/or lipid-lowering drugs (82 subjects). In total, 530 study participants were enrolled for analysis (mean ± standard deviation [SD]): 270 men, age = 43.9 ± 9.3 years; 260 women, age = 45.9 ± 9.3 years. Table 1 summarizes the clinical and biometric features of the study group. The participants responded to a questionnaire on their medical history and lifestyle characteristics and underwent a physical examination that involved measurement of height, weight, waist and hip circumference, and blood pressure (BP) in the sitting position after a 15-min rest period. Fasting blood samples were obtained from each participant. Metabolic syndrome characteristics were based on the recent update of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III) criteria [20]. According to the ATP-III criteria, subjects with 3 or more of the following attributes are typically defined as having MetS: (1) BP of at least 130/85 mm Hg and/or taking medication for hypertension; (2) triglycerides of at least 150 mg/dL; (3) HDL-C less than 40 mg/dL for men and less than 50 mg/dL for women; (4) fasting plasma glucose of at least 100 mg/dL and/or taking medication for diabetes mellitus; and, (5) waist circumference greater than 90 cm for men and greater than 80 cm for women (modified criteria for Asians) [21]. Hypertension was defined as a systolic BP≥140 mm Hg, a diastolic BP≥90 mm Hg, or both, or the regular usage of antihypertensive drugs. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting plasma glucose levels before a meal of ≥7.0 mmol/l or the regular use of medication for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2, according to the Asian criteria [21]. Current smoker was defined as smoking at least 1 cigarette per day at the time of survey.

thumbnail
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the health examination participants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122664.t001

Genomic DNA extraction and genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted as reported previously [22]. Four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promoter and intron 1 regions of the CDH13 gene, which were previously reported to exhibit strong associations with adiponectin levels or metabolic syndrome, were examined in this study (Table A in S1 File). Genotyping were performed using TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays obtained from Applied Biosystems (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA).

Laboratory examinations and assays

The laboratory examinations and assays were performed in accordance with the methods described by Hsu et al. [22]. The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index, used as the measurement for insulin resistance, was calculated by using the following formula: fasting serum insulin (μU/ml) × fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) /22.5 [23]. Insulin resistance was recognized when the HOMA index reached the upper quartile. Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), used as the measurement for insulin sensitivity, is defined as follows: QUICKI = 1/[(log(I0)+log(G0)], where I0 is the fasting plasma insulin level (μU/ml) and G0 is the fasting blood glucose level (mg/dl) [24]. Serum adiponectin levels were measured by an in-house sandwich enzyme immunoassay. Our kits compared well with the commercial kits for adiponectin (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), with correlation coefficients of 0.98. The within-day precision and day-to-day precision were 7.7% and 7.0% for adiponectin.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed as previously described [25]. The analysis of deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, an estimation of the linkage disequilibrium between polymorphisms, was performed using the Golden Helix SVS Win32 7.3.1 software. The values of the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and adiponectin levels were logarithmically transformed prior to statistical analysis to adhere to a normality assumption. In addition, stepwise linear regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors of the adiponectin levels with age, sex, body mass index, and current smoking status as confounding covariates. To explore the mediation effects of the adiponectin levels on the association between CDH13 gene variants and the metabolic phenotypes, a conceptual model was hypothesized for the test, and four criteria were suggested to evaluate the suppression effects of adiponectin levels [25]. Criterion one, independent variable (CDH13 genotype) must predict the mediator (adiponectin level). Criterion two, the mediator (adiponectin level) must predict the dependent variable when adjusting for independent variable. The mediation effect was calculated as the product of the two regression coefficients from criterion one and criterion two, and reflected the intermediate pathways from independent variable to mediator and in turn to dependent variable. The regression coefficient relating independent variable to dependent variable adjusting for the mediator was expressed as direct effect. Criterion three, independent variable must have a significant effect on dependent variable, which was expressed as total effect. The total effect can also be obtained by summation of direct and mediation (indirect) effects. Criterion four, the mediation effect must be significant using the procedure outlined by Sobel [26, 27]. In addition, a suppression effect may be indicated in a situation when the direct effect is larger than the total effect [28]. In this situation, the direct and indirect effects often have fairly similar magnitudes and opposite signs, which may entirely or partially cancel each other out and result in zero or a nonzero but insignificant total effect [29]. Sobel test [30] is the most commonly employed method for examining the statistical significance of mediation effect. We further used the β coefficients and standard errors from the model above to conduct a Sobel test for mediation. The Sobel test was performed using a tool for mediation tests (http://www.quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm), in which the null hypothesis H0: αβ = 0 is tested. The test statistic S, which is approximately distributed as Z (Eq 2), is obtained by dividing the estimated mediation effect (αβ) by the standard error (δ) in Eq 1. The reported p-values are drawn from the unit normal distribution under the assumption of a Z value of the hypothesis that the mediated effect equals to zero in the population. +/- 1.96 are the critical values of the test ratio which contain the central 95% of the unit normal distribution.

Equation 1Equation 2

SQRT: square root

Results

Clinical and biochemical characteristics

Table 1 summarizes the demographic features, clinical profiles, and levels of biomarkers for all of the studied health examination participants. No considerable deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was detected for the studied polymorphisms (Table A in S1 File). All of the four studied polymorphisms were in strong pairwise linkage disequilibrium (Table B in S1 File).

Associations between CDH13 genotypes/haplotypes and circulating adiponectin levels

After adjustment for clinical covariates, significant associations were observed between the adiponectin levels and the studied polymorphisms (Table 2).

A dominant inheritance model revealed a significant association between the minor alleles of rs12444338, rs4783244, and rs12051272 and lower adiponectin levels (P = 2.23 × 10−11, P = 1.95 × 10−11, and P = 1.57 × 10−10, respectively) and between the minor alleles of rs11646213 and higher adiponectin levels (P = 0.001). In addition, haplotype analysis revealed an association among the three haplotypes AGGG, ATTT, and TGGG, accounting for 97.73% of all of the inferred haplotypes, and the adiponectin levels (P = 1.25 × 10−4, P = 3.78 × 10−13 and P = 7.67 × 10−5, respectively) (Table C in S1 File). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed the two promoter gene variants rs12444338 and rs11646213 to be independent predictors of the adiponectin levels (P = 2.22 × 10−7 and P = 0.01, respectively) (Table D in S1 File).

Associations between adiponectin levels or the CDH13 gene variant rs12051272 and metabolic syndrome-related phenotypes

Table 3 presents the associations of the adiponectin levels and the CDH13 gene variant rs12051272 with metabolic syndrome and its related phenotypes.

thumbnail
Table 3. Association of CDH13 rs12051272 genotypes, serum adiponectin levels and metabolic syndrome-related phenotypes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122664.t003

The rs12051272 SNP was used for analysis because of the nearly complete linkage between the two studied intron 1 polymorphisms. After adjustment for age and sex, significant correlations were observed between the adiponectin levels and all of the metabolic syndrome-related phenotypes (all P < 0.01) (Table 3). After further adjustment for body mass index (BMI) and current smoking status, significant associations with adiponectin levels remained in most metabolic phenotypes, except the BP status.

After adjustments for age and sex or further adjustments for BMI and current smoking status, no significant correlations were observed between rs12051272 and the related metabolic phenotypes, whereas a borderline significant association was observed between rs12051272 and diastolic BP (Table 3). After further adjustment for adiponectin levels, significant associations were observed between a minor allele of rs12051272 with a more favorable metabolic profile, including higher insulin sensitivity and HDL cholesterol levels and lower diastolic BP and circulating levels of fasting plasma glucose, and triglycerides (P = 0.019, 0.001, 0.025, 0.039 and 2.39 × 10−4, respectively).

The serum adiponectin levels were significantly lower in participants with diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance (Table 3 and Table E in S1 File). For the analysis between the rs12051272 genotypes in the dominant model and metabolic syndrome, a significant association was evident only after further adjustment for adiponectin levels (P = 3.34 × 10−4, odds ratio = 0.32, and 95% confidence interval = 0.17–0.60) (Table 3). However, no significant association was observed between the rs12051272 genotypes and the other risk factors (Table E in S1 File).

Adiponectin levels suppress the associations of CDH13 genotypes and metabolic profiles with biomarker levels and metabolic syndrome

Four criteria were used for establishing the mediation and suppression effects (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Mediation tests for adiponectin levels on the association between CDH13 genotypes and metabolic phenotypes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122664.t004

Only diastolic BP did not match the criteria for the suppression effect conferred by the adiponectin levels. In brief, the CDH13 genotypes exhibited significant associations with the adiponectin levels (criterion 1), which in turn, conferred considerably positive effects on the fasting plasma glucose levels, QUICKI, HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels and metabolic syndrome (criterion 2). The total effects of the CDH13 genotypes on each metabolic phenotype were −0.005, 0.001, 0.005, −0.030, and −0.492, respectively, with all nonsignificant P values (criterion 3). The Sobel tests for mediation on the results of each metabolic phenotype revealed the following: z = 3.47, 4.7, 5.62, 4.78 and 4.47 (P = 5.2 × 10−4, 1.0 × 10−5, 7.0 × 10−8, 5.2 × 10−7, and 8.24× 10−6, respectively) (criterion 4). Moreover, the direct effects (γ’) of rs12051272 on each metabolic phenotype, except diastolic BP, were greater than their total effects (αβ + γ’) and revealed similar magnitudes and opposite signs than those of the mediation effects (αβ), thereby demonstrating a suppression effect in this model (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. A three-variable mediation model.

Adiponectin levels as a mediator of the association between the CDH13 genotype and the metabolic syndrome and metabolic syndrome-related phenotypes. Linear or binary regression models were used to assess the following path associations: in Fig 1 (F): (α) relationship between the CDH13 genotype and adiponectin, (β) relationship between adiponectin and metabolic syndrome, (αβ + γ’) relationship between the CDH13 genotype and metabolic syndrome, and (γ’) relationship between the CDH13 genotype and metabolic syndrome after adjustment for adiponectin levels. Each estimate along the path represents the unstandardized β coefficient from the regression model. The results indicate that after adjustment for adiponectin levels, the CDH13 genotype exhibited a stronger association with the metabolic syndrome. The direct effects (γ’) of the CDH13 genotype on the metabolic syndrome (−1.136) were greater than the total effects (αβ + γ’) (−0.492) and revealed similar magnitudes and opposite signs than those of the mediation effects (αβ) (0.541), suggesting significant mediation (suppression) by the adiponectin levels. All of the models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and current smoking status. °P < 0.05. In addition, the other metabolic syndrome-related phenotypes exhibited similar suppression effects (B, C, D, and E). #CDH13 genotypes: dominant inheritance model was used (GG vs. GT + TT for rs12051272).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122664.g001

Discussion

The present study data indicated a significant association between CDH13 genotypes/haplotypes and adiponectin levels. In addition, the CDH13 genotypes exhibited a significant association with insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and related metabolic phenotypes. As observed in the mediation analysis, adiponectin levels suppress the association between the CDH13 genotypes and the various metabolic phenotypes and metabolic syndrome. Overall, a complex relationship was observed among the CDH13 locus variants and metabolic syndrome, and these results suggested that the CDH13 gene variants play a crucial role in the genetic determinants of metabolic syndrome and related metabolic phenotypes. In addition, this investigation further supports the speculation that the suppression effect may play a crucial role in biological science.

Evidence suggesting association of adiponectin levels and adiponectin-related gene variants with metabolic phenotypes and metabolic syndrome

The metabolic syndrome is a complex syndrome with clustering of multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Central obesity has been suggested to be the cardinal feature of the metabolic syndrome, and a newer model for the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome has revealed that this syndrome is associated with dysregulated adipose tissues and inflammatory cytokine overexpression [31, 32]. Several studies, including the present study, have indicated a negative correlation between plasma adiponectin levels and insulin resistance measures in addition to the risk of metabolic syndrome [5, 19]. Recent genome-wide association studies evaluating the genetic determinants of adiponectin levels, including ADIPOQ, CDH13 and WDR11-FGFR2 gene variants, have reported considerable associations with various metabolic phenotypes, including insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease [10, 1416, 19]. These results emphasize the importance of adiponectin-related genes as genetic risk factors for metabolic abnormalities and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disorders.

Evidence and possible mechanisms of the associations between CDH13 genotypes/haplotypes and adiponectin levels

A recent meta-analysis revealed the CDH13 gene region to be the most crucial locus associated with adiponectin levels [16]. In addition, the CDH13 rs4783244 polymorphism has been demonstrated to be the strongest statistically associated SNP with adiponectin levels in several investigations conducted in East Asia [14, 15, 19]. The present data revealed nearly complete linkage between the CDH13 promoter region SNP rs12444338 polymorphism and the two studied CDH13 intron 1 polymorphisms. The above 3 studied polymorphisms revealed decrease adiponectin levels in the participants with minor alleles of the polymorphisms. Morisaki et al. suggested that the phenotype-affecting haplotype tagged by SNP rs12051272 may affect the T-cadherin baseline levels in the tissues that capture the free adiponectin molecules in the plasma, thereby reducing the plasma HMW adiponectin levels [19]; this is consistent with other studies, which have demonstrated that the ablation of the T-cadherin receptor increases the plasma adiponectin levels in mice [17, 18]. However, based on a reporter assay, Jee et al. reported that the major allele of the promoter SNP rs12444338 leads to a 2.2-fold increase in the CDH13 expression [13]; this allele also increased the adiponectin levels in the present investigation. These contradictory results raise questions regarding the role of changes in CDH13 gene expression with CDH13 genotypes as the major mechanism affecting the adiponectin levels. Another possibility is that the effects of CDH13 genotypes may be related to the increased binding of the HMW adiponectin to CDH13 receptors, which in turn, reduced the circulating adiponectin levels, as hypothesized by Gao et al. [15]. Alternatively, a possibility can not be excluded that the association of the studied CDH13 SNPs with adiponectin levels may be due to the linkage disequilibrium with other polymorphisms or mutations that are responsible for these associations.

Mediation analysis and suppression effects

Suppression effects have been seldom reported in biological science. In mediation hypotheses, a suppression effect may be suggested if the statistical removal of a mediational effect could increase the magnitude of the relationship between the independent and the dependent variables. A recent study revealed that CRP mediates the effects of apolipoprotein E on cytomegalovirus infection, demonstrating that CRP is a key suppressor of the relationship between the ε4 and the cytomegalovirus antibody levels [33]. Our previous study revealed that sE-selectin levels exhibit a suppression effect on the association between the ABO blood-group genotypes and the triglyceride to HDL cholesterol ratio [25], which strengthens the importance of the relationship between ABO and atherogenesis. The present study indicated that the adiponectin levels act as a suppressor of the association between CDH13 variants and various metabolic phenotypes. Overall, these findings indicate the crucial role of the mediation effect in biological science, and additional mediation analysis may elucidate further genetic associations in the biomarker levels or disease relationship.

Mechanisms of association of CDH13 genotypes/haplotypes with metabolic phenotypes and metabolic syndrome

The data from several previous studies and our research have consistently demonstrated the association of a minor allele of CDH13 gene variants with lower adiponectin levels and, contrarily, with a more favorable metabolic profile. Previous studies have suggested that almost all of the metabolic effects of adiponectin are conferred by adiponectin R1/R2 receptor [34]. By contrast, the binding of adiponectin to T-cadherin can activate the nuclear factor-kB signaling pathway, which plays a key role in inflammation and serves as a link between obesity and vascular disease [35]. T-cadherin not only competes with the adiponectin R1/R2 receptors for adiponectin binding but also interferes with the coupling of both receptors to their downstream intracellular targets [36]. Thus, a minor allele of the intron 1 polymorphisms, through close linkage to promoter polymorphisms, may decrease the CDH13 gene and T-cadherin expressions, which result in decreased competition with other adiponectin receptors and increase the coupling of adiponectin R1/R2 receptors with downstream intracellular targets as well as the metabolic effects of adiponectin. As proposed previously [15], chronic low levels of adiponectin may be associated with increased adiponectin sensitivity and adiponectin R1/R2 expression, which also increase the metabolic effects of adiponectin. Consistent with the proposed mechanisms, a previous study reported that chronic elevation of plasma adiponectin levels downregulated the AdipoR2 expression in murine adipose tissues [37]. Reportedly, the adiponectin R1/R2 expression was upregulated in insulin-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome [38], who were expected to exhibit low circulating adiponectin levels. This hypothesis can be supported by the mediation analysis performed in this study, which indicates that adiponectin acts as a suppressor of the association between the CDH13 genotypes/haplotypes and the various metabolic phenotypes and metabolic syndrome.

Limitations

Only four CDH13 SNPs were analyzed in this investigation, and the incomplete genotyping may not be representative of all CDH13 gene haplotypes. A stringent application of Bonferroni correction for multiple tests marginalized the statistical significance of a part of our results. Therefore, cautious and conservative data interpretation is warranted. However, the consistent association of favorable metabolic phenotypes and a lower risk of metabolic syndrome in the allele with lower adiponectin levels, which is compatible with previous reports, suggested that the association may not be due to chance. In addition, our study was obtained from only one sample population. The biology of the mediation effect remains somewhat speculative since supportive experiment is difficult. Therefore, replication in a second cohort with larger sample size and Mendelian randomization design would improve strength of the analysis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our data reveal a significant association of CDH13 locus variants with not only adiponectin levels but also metabolic phenotypes and metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, adiponectin levels acts as a suppressor on the association between CDH13 variants and various metabolic phenotypes. These results suggest that the suppression effect may be crucial in biological science and provide further evidence of the association between CDH13 and the risks of metabolic syndrome and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Supporting Information

S1 File. Table A, Primer sequences.

Table B, Linkage disequilibrium between CDH13 genetic polymorphisms. Table C, CDH13 haplotypes and adiponectin levels. Table D, Adiponectin levels: stepwise linear regression analysis, including genotypes. Table E, Association of the CDH13 gene variant rs12051272 and circulating adiponectin levels with cardiovascular risk factors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122664.s001

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the technical support from the Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation Core Laboratory.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YLK SHJ. Performed the experiments: MST YCS. Analyzed the data: MST LAH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SW. Wrote the paper: YLK SHJ MST.

References

  1. 1. Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Ito Y, Tsuchida A, Yokomizo T, Kita S, et al. Cloning of adiponectin receptors that mediate antidiabetic metabolic effects. Nature. 2003; 423:762–769. pmid:12802337
  2. 2. Matsuzawa Y, Funahashi T, Kihara S, himomura I. Adiponectin and metabolic syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:29–33. pmid:14551151
  3. 3. Antoniades C, Antonopoulos AS, Tousoulis D, Stefanadis C. Adiponectin: from obesity to cardiovascular disease. Obes Rev. 2009; 10:269–279. pmid:19389061
  4. 4. Weyer C, Funahashi T, Tanaka S, Hotta K, Matsuzawa Y, Pratley RE, et al. Hypoadiponectinemia in obesity and type 2 diabetes: close association with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86:1930–1935. pmid:11344187
  5. 5. Kondo H, Shimomura I, Matsukawa Y, Kumada M, Takahashi M, Matsuda M, et al. Association of adiponectin mutation with type 2 diabetes: a candidate gene for the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes. 2002; 51:2325–2328. pmid:12086969
  6. 6. Pischon T, Girman CJ, Hotamisligil GS, Rifai N, Hu FB, Rimm EB. Plasma adiponectin levels and risk of myocardial infarction in men. JAMA. 2004; 291:1730–1737. pmid:15082700
  7. 7. Li S, Shin HJ, Ding EL, van Dam RM. Adiponectin levels and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009; 302:179–188. pmid:19584347
  8. 8. Liu PH, Jiang YD, Chen WJ, Chang CC, Lee TC, Sun HS, et al. Genetic and environmental influences on adiponectin, leptin, and BMI among adolescents in Taiwan: a multivariate twin/sibling analysis. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2008; 11:495–504. pmid:18828732
  9. 9. Menzaghi C, Trischitta V, Doria A. Genetic influences of adiponectin on insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007; 56(5):1198–209. pmid:17303804
  10. 10. Yang WS, Chuang LM. Human genetics of adiponectin in the metabolic syndrome. J Mol Med (Berl). 2006; 84(2):112–21. pmid:16389553
  11. 11. Cesari M, Narkiewicz K, De Toni R, Aldighieri E, Williams CJ, Rossi GP. Heritability of plasma adiponectin levels and body mass index in twins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 92:3082–3088. pmid:17535986
  12. 12. Henneman P, Aulchenko Y.S, Frants R.R, Zorkoltseva I.V, Zillikens M.C, Frolich M, et al. Genetic architecture of plasma adiponectin overlaps with the genetics of metabolic syndrome-related traits. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33:908–913. pmid:20067957
  13. 13. Jee SH, Sull JW, Lee JE, Shin C, Park J, Kimm H, et al. Adiponectin concentrations: a genome-wide association study. Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 87(4):545–52. pmid:20887962
  14. 14. Chung CM, Lin TH, Chen JW, Leu HB, Yang HC, Ho HY, et al. A genome-wide association study reveals a quantitative trait locus of adiponectin on CDH13 that predicts cardiometabolic outcomes. Diabetes. 2011; 60(9):2417–23. pmid:21771975
  15. 15. Gao H, Kim YM, Chen P, Igase M, Kawamoto R, Kim MK, et al. Genetic variation in CDH13 is associated with lower plasma adiponectin levels but greater adiponectin sensitivity in East Asian populations. Diabetes. 2013; 62(12):4277–83. pmid:24009259
  16. 16. Wu Y, Gao H, Li H, Tabara Y, Nakatochi M, Chiu YF, et al. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for adiponectin levels in East Asians identifies a novel locus near WDR11-FGFR2. Hum Mol Genet. 2014; 23(4):1108–19. pmid:24105470
  17. 17. Hebbard LW, Garlatti M, Young LJ, Cardiff RD, Oshima RG, Ranscht B, et al. T-cadherin supports angiogenesis and adiponectin association with the vasculature in a mouse mammary tumor model. Cancer Res. 2008; 68(5):1407–16. pmid:18316604
  18. 18. Denzel MS, Scimia MC, Zumstein PM, Walsh K, Ruiz-Lozano P, Ranscht B. T-cadherin is critical for adiponectin-mediated cardioprotection in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(12):4342–52. pmid:21041950
  19. 19. Morisaki H, Yamanaka I, Iwai N, Miyamoto Y, Kokubo Y, Okamura T, et al. CDH13 gene coding T-cadherin influences variations in plasma adiponectin levels in the Japanese population. Hum Mutat. 2012; 33(2):402–10. pmid:22065538
  20. 20. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005; 11: 2735–52.
  21. 21. Tan CE, Ma S, Wai D, Chew SK, Tai ES. Can we apply the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel definition of the metabolic syndrome to Asians? Diabetes Care. 2004; 27:1182–6. pmid:15111542
  22. 22. Hsu LA, Ko YL, Wu S, Teng MS, Chou HH, Chang CJ, et al. Association of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 with insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome in Taiwanese. Metabolism. 2009; 58(7):983–8. pmid:19394054
  23. 23. Bonora E, Targher G, Alberiche M, Bonadonna RC, Saggiani F, Zenere MB, et al. Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity: studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23:57–63. pmid:10857969
  24. 24. Katz A, Nambi SS, Mather K, Baron AD, Follmann DA, Sullivan G, et al. Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 85: 2402–10. pmid:10902785
  25. 25. Teng MS, Hsu LA, Wu S, Chou HH, Chang CJ, Sun YZ, et al. Mediation analysis reveals a sex-dependent association between ABO gene variants and TG/HDL-C ratio that is suppressed by sE-selectin level. Atherosclerosis. 2013; 228(2):406–12. pmid:23623010
  26. 26. Baron R, Kenny D. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Personality Soc Psychol. 1986; 51:1173–1182.33. pmid:3806354
  27. 27. MacKinnon DP. Analysis of mediating variables in prevention and intervention research. NIDA Res Monogr. 1994; 139: 127–153. pmid:8742555
  28. 28. Sobel ME. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. Sociol Methods Res. 1987; 15: 151–176.
  29. 29. MacKinnon D, Krull JL, Lockwood CM. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci. 2000; 1: 173–181. pmid:11523746
  30. 30. Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology. 1982; 13: 290–312.
  31. 31. Després JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006; 444(7121):881–7. pmid:17167477
  32. 32. de Luca C, Olefsky J.M. Inflammation and insulin resistance. FEBS Lett. 2008; 582(1):97–105. pmid:18053812
  33. 33. Aiello AE, Nguyen HO, Haan MN. C-reactive protein mediates the effect of apolipoprotein E on cytomegalovirus infection. J Infect Dis. 2008; 197(1):34–41. pmid:18171282
  34. 34. Yamauchi T, Nio Y, Maki T, Kobayashi M, Takazawa T, Iwabu M, et al. Targeted disruption of AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 causes abrogation of adiponectin binding and metabolic actions. Nat Med. 2007; 13(3):332–9. pmid:17268472
  35. 35. Ouchi N, Kihara S, Arita Y, Okamoto Y, Maeda K, Kuriyama H, et al. Adiponectin, an adipocyte-derived plasma protein, inhibits endothelial NF-kappaB signaling through a cAMP-dependent pathway. Circulation. 2000; 102(11):1296–301. pmid:10982546
  36. 36. Lee MH, Klein RL, El-Shewy HM, Luttrell DK, Luttrell LM. The adiponectin receptors AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 activate ERK1/2 through a Src/Ras-dependent pathway and stimulate cell growth. Biochemistry. 2008; 47(44):11682–92. pmid:18842004
  37. 37. Bauche IB, Ait El Mkadem S, Rezsohazy R, Funahashi T, Maeda N, Miranda LM, et al. Adiponectin downregulates its own production and the expression of its AdipoR2 receptor in transgenic mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006; 345(4):1414–24. pmid:16729974
  38. 38. Tan BK, Chen J, Digby JE, Keay SD, Kennedy CR, Randeva HS, et al. Upregulation of adiponectin receptor 1 and 2 mRNA and protein in adipose tissue and adipocytes in insulin-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetologia. 2006; 49(11):2723–8. pmid:17001470