Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Vegetative Characters, Growth Habit and Microsporangiate Strobilus of Lycopsid Minostrobus chaohuensis

Vegetative Characters, Growth Habit and Microsporangiate Strobilus of Lycopsid Minostrobus chaohuensis

  • Mei-Cen Meng, 
  • De-Ming Wang, 
  • Jian-Xin Yao


Late Devonian Minostrobus chaohuensis is one of the earliest monosporangiate-strobilate isoetaleans. Based on new material of this plant, the vegetative axis and microsporangiate strobilus are studied in detail, and the whole plant knowledge is summarized. The vegetative axis is isotomously branched. The stem is up to 55 mm in diameter with helically arranged leaf cushions. Stems and thick branches bear long fusiform leaf cushions and interareas with vertical linear ornamentations. A ligule pit, oblanceolate leaf scar, and vascular bundle scar appear on the leaf cushion. Distal axes have persistent lanceolate leaves and rhombic leaf bases. The microsporangiate strobilus is cylindrical in shape, possesses sporophyll with alate pedicel and long triangular lamina, uniseriate sporangial wall, subarchesporial pad inside the sporangium, and microspore with cingulum. Based on comparisons with other isoetaleans, the usage of the terms “leaf cushion” and “leaf base” is discussed, and Minostrobus chaohuensis is considered as a tree-like lycopsid. It suggests that arborescent isoetaleans with monosporangiate strobili had appeared and diversified in the Late Devonian. The multi-dichotomous branching system of Minostrobus provides new data on the evolution of growth architecture in rhizomorphic lycopsids.


Arborescent lycopsids of Isoëtales sensu lato Meyen, especially the relatively derived clade with monosporangiate strobili (Dichostrobiles DiMichele and Bateman), are the most conspicuous plants of the Carboniferous landscape around the world [1], [2]. Sublepidodendron (Nathorst) Hirmer as a member of Dichostrobiles flourished in the Late Devonian of South China [35]. In this study, another isoetalean with monosporangiate strobili, Minostrobus Wang, is suggested to have arborescent habit. Detailed research on this plant adds to our knowledge of the evolution of lycopsids in the Devonian.

Minostrobus chaohuensis Wang was reported from the Upper Devonian Wutong (Wutung) Formation of Chaohu City, Anhui Province, South China, and was established on the basis of strobili containing megaspores [6]. Subsequent studies revealed the megasporangiate strobilus characters in detail and assigned this plant to Dichostrobiles [7, 8]. Although the vegetative axis and microsporangiate strobilus have been described [8], some important characters are still not clear. Now, we obtained some well-preserved specimens containing permineralized microsporangiate strobili from the same formation and locality. Based on the new material and sections, we emend the morphology of vegetative leaf, leaf cushion and microspore, describe the anatomy of microsporangiate strobilus. We also debate the usage of terms “leaf cushion” and “leaf base” among lycopsids, discuss the growth habit of M. chaohuensis and its evolutionary significance.

Materials and Methods

New material was collected from the Fenghuangshan Section, about 3.0 km north of Chaohu City, Anhui Province, China. The specific location of this section (31°37′51″N and 117°50′54″E) was illustrated by Meng et al. [7]. The fossil-bearing bed belongs to the middle part of the Leigutai Member (upper member of the Wutong Formation). This stratum includes lower and upper clay layers intercalated with quartz sandstone, which represents the boundary between Devonian and Carboniferous sediments based on spore, plant and invertebrate assemblage [9]. Specimens in this study are the latest Devonian in age, some of them occur in the same layer with those described by Meng et al. [7], while the others were collected from a higher horizon. No specific permission was required for the field study in the location, and the field study did not involve endangered or protected species.

The plant is mostly preserved as impressions and compressions in black-gray mudstone, with some strobili permineralized by limonite. We used steel needles to expose the morphology. The permineralized microsporangiate strobili were embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned, grinded, and polished to make slides for examination under light microscopy (LM). Before embedding, we selected masses of microspores for observation under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All specimens and slides are housed at Department of Geology, Peking University, Beijing, China.



The stems are 25–55 mm wide (Fig. 1A–C), and branch isotomously at the top (Fig. 1C). Long fusiform leaf cushions are 6.0–9.0 mm long and 1.0–1.6 mm wide (Fig. 1B, F, G, I, J), helically arranged on stems and branches that are at least 8.0 mm wide. Parastichies cross at nearly right angles, whereas orthostichy and horizontal rows are absent (Fig. 1A–G). Evident interareas with vertical linear ornamentations among the leaf cushions exist on axes thicker than 10 mm (Fig. 1B, F, H), and their area is in proportion to the width of axes (Fig. 1A, C, F). An oblanceolate leaf scar is located at the middle part of the leaf cushion, occupying half the length and almost all the width of the cushion (Figs. 1B, G, I, J and 2). An evident and depressed ligule pit (Lp) appears on the top of the leaf scar, and an oval or linear vascular bundle scar (Vs) exists on the upper part of the leaf scar (Figs. 1B, G, K and 2). In some specimens, the leaf cushion can’t be recognized but the oblanceolate leaf scar and depressed ligule pit (Lp) were observed (Fig. 1B, D, L). Distal axes are 2.0–3.0 mm wide, with persistent vegetative leaves arranged helically (Fig. 3A, B, H). The leaf is inserted at acute angle onto the axis, with a decurrent base and a linear profile in lateral view (Fig. 3A, B, H). From face view, however, the leaf is lanceolate in outline, 5.0–7.0 mm long and about 1.5 mm wide at the base (Fig. 3B–D, G). Leaf bases were exposed when the leaves broke off, and they are rhombic in shape, adjacent with each other, and about 2.5 mm long and 1.3 mm wide (Fig. 3H).

Fig 1. Compressions of vegetative axes of Minostrobus chaohuensis.

(A) The widest stem. Rectangle indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 1E. PKUB12138. Scale bar = 10 mm. (B) Stem with the lower left part without epidermis, showing leaf cushions. Arrow indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 1K. PKUB12145. Scale bar = 10 mm. (C) Stem dichotomizing two times. PKUB12101. Scale bar = 10 mm. (D) Vegetative axis with leaf cushions arranged in helix. Arrow indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 1L. PKUB12137. Scale bar = 10 mm. (E) Enlargement of Fig. 1A (rectangle), showing parastichies of leaf cushions. PKUB12138. Scale bar = 5 mm. (F) Vegetative axis with leaf cushions arranged in helix. Rectangle indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 1I. PKUB12135. Scale bar = 5 mm. (G) Vegetative axis with long fusiform leaf cushions, showing leaf scars, ligule pits (Lp) and vascular scars (Vs). PKUB12171. Scale bar = 5 mm. (H) Vegetative axis showing interareas with vertical linear ornamentations among leaf cushions. PKUB12163. Scale bar = 2 mm. (I) Enlargement of Fig. 1F (rectangle), showing long fusiform leaf cushion and ornamentations on the interareas. PKUB12135. Scale bar = 1 mm. (J) Vegetative axis with leaf cushions, showing the oblanceolate leaf scars. PKUB12148. Scale bar = 2 mm. (K) Enlargement of Fig. 1B (arrow), showing leaf scar, ligule pit (Lp) and vascular scar (Vs). PKUB12145. Scale bar = 1 mm. (L) Enlargement of Fig. 1D (arrow), showing leaf scar and ligule pit (Lp). PKUB12137. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig 2. Diagram of the leaf cushion of Minostrobus chaohuensis.

Oblanceolate leaf scar, ligule pit (Lp) and vascular scar (Vs). Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig 3. Compressions of leafy axes and leaves (A-D, G, H), limonite permineralized strobili (E, F, I-K) of Minostrobus chaohuensis.

(A) Dichotomous vegetative axes with persistent leaves. Rectangle indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 3H. PKUB12124. Scale bar = 10 mm. (B) Distal part of vegetative axis with persistent leaves. Rectangle indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 3C. PKUB12139. Scale bar = 10 mm. (C) Enlargement of Fig. 3B (rectangle), showing the lanceolate leaf in face view. PKUB12139. Scale bar = 2 mm. (D) Lanceolate vegetative leaf in face view. PKUB12159. Scale bar = 2 mm. (E) Limonite permineralized megasporangiate strobilus. Rectangle indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 3J. PKUB12188. Scale bar = 5 mm. (F) Limonite permineralized microsporangiate strobilus. Arrow indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 3I. Rectangle indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 3K. PKUB12189. Scale bar = 10 mm. (G) Detached vegetative leaves in the matrix. PKUB12160. Scale bar = 2 mm. (H) Enlargement of Fig. 3A (rectangle), showing vegetative leaves in lateral view and rhombus leaf bases. PKUB12124. Scale bar = 5 mm. (I) Enlargement of Fig. 3F (arrow), showing laminae of microsporophyll. PKUB12189. Scale bar = 2 mm. (J) Enlargement of Fig. 3E (rectangle). Arrow indicating megaspores. PKUB12188. Scale bar = 2 mm. (K) Enlargement of Fig. 3F (rectangle), showing strobilar axis and microsporangia on the adaxial surface of sporophyll pedicel. PKUB12189. Scale bar = 2 mm.

The permineralized strobili are cylindrical in shape and slightly curved, with both ends missing (Fig. 3E, F). The megasporangiate strobilus is about 40 mm long and has megaspores preserved (Fig. 3E, J, arrow). The microsporangiate strobilus is about 30 mm long and 6.0 mm wide excluding distal part of sporophylls (Fig. 3F). The strobilar axis is about 1.0 mm in diameter, with an exarch primary xylem about 0.3 mm in diameter (Figs. 3K; 4C, E, F and 5). The protoxylem tracheids are about 5.0 μm in diameter, and the metaxylem tracheids with scalariform thickenings are about 20 μm in diameter (Fig. 4F, J). The microsporophyll pedicel is about 2.5 mm in length, perpendicular to the strobilar axis (Fig. 3K), and expands laterally to be at least 1.7 mm wide and form alations (Al, Fig. 4A, B). The upturned lamina is long triangular in outline, about 5.0 mm long and 3.0 mm wide at the base (Fig. 3I). In transverse section, the lamina is about 0.1–0.2 mm thick and tapers laterally (Fig. 4G, arrows). Single spherical to ellipsoidal microsporangium, about 2.5 mm long and 1.5 mm high, occurs on the adaxial surface of the sporophyll pedicel (Figs. 3K; 4A–C; 5). The sporangial wall is about 25 μm thick and consists of a single layer of columnar cells (Figs. 4H and 5). Inside the wall, subarchesporial pad containing polygonal parenchyma cells can be observed (Fig. 4D, I). The parenchyma cells are 10–15 μm in diameter and associated with microspores (Fig. 4D, I). Each microsporangium contains numerous microspores (Figs. 4A–D and 5). Four microspores in a tetrad configuration are arranged tetrahedrally (Figs. 4H, K and 6A–C). The trilete microspores with narrow cingulum are 20–30 μm in diameter and circular in equatorial shape (Figs. 4K and 6B–D). Round inner body exists in some microspores (Fig. 4I, K). The exospore with two layers (Fig. 6E) is 2.0–4.0 μm thick (Fig. 4K). No ornamentation was observed on the foveolate surface of outer exospore (Fig. 6F), possibly resulted by leaching. The microspores are similar with Lycospora (Ibrahim) Schopf et al. in size and existence of cingulum [10].

Fig 4. Sections of the permineralized microsporangiate strobilus of Minostrobus chaohuensis in Fig. 3F, under LM.

(A) Longitudinal section of strobilus, showing sporophylls and sporangia. Arrow indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 4B. PKUB12189-3-4. Scale bar = 2 mm. (B) Enlargement of Fig. 4A (arrow), showing microsporangium with numerous microspores and alations (Al) of sporophyll. PKUB12189-3-4. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. (C) Radial section of strobilus, showing strobilar axis, sporophylls and microsporangia. Arrows indicating portions enlarged in Fig. 4D and Fig. 4J. PKUB12189-3-3. Scale bar = 2 mm. (D) Enlargement of Fig. 4C (upper arrow), showing sporangium containing microspores and subarchesporial pad. Rectangle indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 4I. PKUB12189-3-3. Scale bar = 0.2 mm. (E) Transverse section of strobilus, showing strobilar axis and microsporangia. Arrow indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 4F. PKUB12189-2-3. Scale bar = 1 mm. (F) Enlargement of Fig. 4E (arrow), showing exarch primary xylem of strobilar axis. PKUB12189-2-3. Scale bar = 0.1 mm. (G) Transverse section of strobilus. Arrows indicating transverse view of sporophylls. PKUB12189-1-4. Scale bar = 1 mm. (H) Transverse section of uniseriate sporangial wall, showing columnar cells and microspores in the sporangium. Rectangle indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 4K. PKUB12189-2-5. Scale bar = 0.1 mm. (I) Enlargement of Fig. 4D (rectangle), showing subarchesporial pad and microspores in sporangium. PKUB12189-3-3. Scale bar = 50 μm. (J) Enlargement of Fig. 4C (lower arrow), showing xylem strand of strobilar axis and metaxylem tracheids with scalariform thickenings. PKUB12189-3-3. Scale bar = 0.1 mm. (K) Enlargement of Fig. 4H (rectangle), showing microspore tetrads and the inner body. PKUB12189-2-5. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Fig 5. Line drawing of Fig. 4C.

Radial section of microsporangiate strobilus of Minostrobus chaohuensis. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig 6. SEM observations of microspores of Minostrobus chaohuensis.

(A) Tetrads of microspores. Arrow indicating portion enlarged in Fig. 6B. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Enlargement of Fig. 6A (arrow), showing a tetrad with four visible microspores. Scale bar = 10 μm. (C) A tetrad with one of the microspores broken in the distal face. Scale bar = 10 μm. (D) A microspore showing the trilete and cingulum. Scale bar = 10 μm. (E) A microspore showing the inner and outer exospores. Scale bar = 5 μm. (F) Foveolate outer exospore of the microspore. Scale bar = 5 μm.


Class: Lycopsida Pichi-Sermolli 1958

Order: Isoёtales sensu lato Meyen 1987

Suborder: Dichostrobiles DiMichele et Bateman 1996

Family: Incertae sedis

Genus: Minostrobus Wang 2001 emend.

Emended diagnosis: Arborescent lycopsid with monosporangiate-strobilus, possibly monoecious. Aerial axes multi-dichotomous. Leaf with single mid-vein abscised from stem and thick branch. Long fusiform leaf cushion with ligule pit and oblanceolate leaf scar. Among leaf cushion with evident interareas possessing linear ornamentations. Axis with solid exarch primary xylem. Protoxylem confined to ridges at periphery of primary xylem strands. Metaxylem tracheids bearing Williamson’s striations. Single spherical to elliptical sporangium inserted to adaxial side of sporophyll with smooth margin, pointed apex and alate pedicel. Sporangial wall comprising one layer of columnar cells. Subarchesporial pad along inner surface of sporangial wall. Megasporangium connected to sporophyll by narrow attachment, with sporangial base surrounded by alations. Each megasporangium with four megaspores.

Type species: Minostrobus chaohuensis Wang 2001 emend.

Holotype: PB18751 (Fig. 8 in Wang, 2001 [6])

Type locality: The south slope of Beishan hill, Shizikou Section, 3 km north of Chaohu City, Anhui Province, China.

Repository: Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.

Stratigraphy: Leigutai Member of the Wutong Formation.

Specimens examined herein: PKUB12101, PKUB12124, PKUB12135, PKUB12137–PKUB12139, PKUB12145, PKUB12148, PKUB12159, PKUB12160, PKUB12163, PKUB12171, PKUB12188 and PKUB12189 (see Figs. 1, 3, 4, and 6).

Repository: Department of Geology, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Locality: Fenghuangshan Section, Chaohu City, Anhui Province, China.

Stratigraphy: Leigutai Member of the Wutong Formation.

Age: Late Devonian (Famennian).

Emended diagnosis: As for generic diagnosis. Aerial axes dichotomizing at least eight times. Lanceolate sterile leaves with smooth margin. Long fusiform leaf cushions about 6.0–9.0 mm long and 1.0–1.6 mm wide, with oblanceolate leaf scar located at the middle part and occupying half the length and almost all the width of the cushion. Ligule pit located on the top of leaf scar. Axis with single, solid exarch primary xylem. Twelve protoxylem ridges with annular tracheids around the metaxylem core. Polygonal metaxylem tracheids about 20–40 μm in diameter, with scalariform and reticulate thickenings. Cortical cells rectangular in outline. Separate monosporangiate strobili attached at apices of the axes. Microsporangiate strobilus over 80 mm long and about 6.0 mm wide. Microsporophyll pedicel about 2.5 mm long, with alations up to 1.7 mm wide. Long triangular upturned lamina about 5.0 mm long and 3.0 mm wide at the base. Smooth microsporangium about 2.5 mm long and 1.5 mm high. Microspores Lycospora-type, about 20–30 μm in diameter, with circular amb, inner body and narrow cingulum. Microspore exospore with two layers. Megasporangiate strobilus about 5.0 mm wide. Megasporophyll trace arising from stele at acute angles. Megasporophylls arranged in 2/9 helix, with angles between parastichies and horizontal line being about 35°. Pedicel about 1.8 mm long, proximally “V” form in transverse view, distally expanding to form alations. Lamina long-triangular in face view. Smooth megasporangium about 2.0 mm long, 1.5 mm wide and 1.5 mm high. Attachment between megasporangium and megasporophyll about 1.0 mm long and 0.2 mm wide. Megaspores Lagenicula-type, from about 370 μm to about 1490 μm in diameter, with distinct gula and spiny ornamentation, more or less circular amb, pear shape in equatorial view. Spiny ornamentation about 20 μm wide at base. Megaspore wall with thin inner exospore and spongy outer exospore.

Comparisons with Minostrobus chaohuensis described by Wang et al. (2012)

Material in this study was collected over areas of several square meters from two bedding planes. In these areas, only one type of stem, branch, leafy axis, and microsporangiate strobilus were found. Therefore, they most probably represent portions of a single type of lycopsid. In addition, these fossils are preserved together with megasporangiate strobili of Minostrobus chaohuensis, and similar with M. chaohuensis described by Wang et al. [8] in characters as follows: 1) size and branching pattern of axis; 2) length of vegetative leaf and width of leaf cushion; 3) size and type of microspore (Table 1). We thus conclude that they are assignable to M. chaohuensis. However, some important characters of vegetative axis and microsporangiate strobilus are emended (Table 1). Wang et al. considered M. chaohuensis as a lycopsid with persistent linear vegetative leaves, and interpreted the fusiform structure on the axis as “leaf base” [8]. From evident leaf scars on the axis and scattered leaves in the matrix, we deduce that vegetative leaves on wider axes have abscised and those fusiform structures should be defined as “leaf cushion”. Based on face view of the vegetative leaf and microsporophyll lamina, we emend their shape as lanceolate and long triangular, respectively. Besides, we recognize some new vegetative and fertile traits of this plant, e.g., existence of ligule pit, leaf scar, microsporophyll alations, and subarchesporial pad in the microsporangium. Microsporangium and microspore with their wall structures/layers have also been discovered and clearly illustrated (Table 1).

Table 1. Comparisons of main characters of Minostrobus chaohuensis (vegetative axis and microsporangiate strobilus) described by Wang et al. [8] and this study.

Comparisons with other isoetaleans

Longostachys latisporophyllus Zhu et al. from the Middle Devonian (Givetian) of South China is a small arborescent lycopsid [11]. It has lobed secondary xylem and spindle-shaped leaf cushions without leaf scar. Furthermore, the linear vegetative leaves with spiny margin are much longer (20–70 mm) than those of Minostrobus chaohuensis.

Leptophloeum rhombicum Dawson has been widely reported from the Upper Devonian, and considered as a lycopsid tree with thick trunk and developed secondary tissue [1214]. As in Minostrobus chaohuensis, L. rhombicum is believed to possess a ligule. Nevertheless, this plant has rhombic or fan-shaped leaf cushions, small ovate leaf scars, and thicker strobili (20–30 mm in diameter) [14].

Arborescent lycopsid Sublepidodendron with monosporangiate strobili was widespread from the Late Devonian to the Early Carboniferous [1517]. Two well-studied species, Sublepidodendron songziense Chen and Sublepidodendron grabaui (Sze) Wang and Xu, occur in the Upper Devonian of South China [3, 4, 18, 19]. As in Minostrobus chaohuensis, both of these two species possess fusiform leaf cushions/bases and vertical ornamentations on the interareas among leaf cushion/bases. S. songziense also has Lycospora-type microspores and Lagenicula-type megaspores. However, persistent vegetative leaves of Sublepidodendron are linear in shape, neither ligule nor ligule pit is found, and no leaf scar presents. Different with the microsporangiate strobilus of M. chaohuensis, that of S. songziense is thicker (8.0–12 mm wide), and S. grabaui has elongate sporangia (4.0 mm long and 0.8 mm high).

Changxingia longifolia Wang et al. from the Upper Devonian (Famennian) of South China is an isoetalean with monosporangiate strobili possessing four Lagenicula-type megaspores in each megasporangium [20]. Leaf cushions of this plant and Minostrobus chaohuensis are similar in shape and both bear ligule pit on the top of leaf scar. However, the leaf scar of C. longifolia is oval-oblanceolate in shape, the vegetative leaf is linear, the megasporangiate strobilus is shorter (20–50 mm long), the megasporophyll is reflexed, and the megasporangium is not surrounded by sporophyll.

Lepidostrobus (Brongniart) Brack-Hanes and Thomas represents a group of microsporangiate strobili bearing Lycospora-type spores [21]. Species of this organ genus mostly occur in the Carboniferous strata, while one species—Lepidostrobus xinjiangensis Wang—was described from the Upper Devonian of Northwest China [22]. The microsporangiate strobilus of Minostrobus chaohuensis meets the definition of Lepidostrobus in many respects, including phyllotaxy, anatomy of axis, alations (lateral laminae) and microspore type. Nevertheless, some characteristics of Lepidostrobus such as heel, abaxial keel of pedicel and microsporangium attachment are not clear in M. chaohuensis.

Lepidodendron is one of the representative arborescent lycopsids that are widely distributed in the Carboniferous floras and persisted into the Late Permian in China [15, 23]. This genus was found to attain 40 m in height and 2.0 m in diameter [24]. Lepidodendron species clearly show vertically elongated leaf cushions (height-width ratio > 1) with evident leaf scar and ligule pit, and possess Lycospora-type microspores [25]. In contrast to Minostrobus, the leaf cushion is more complex (with two or four parichnos scars), and the ligule pit may be located at some distance from the leaf scar [25].

Species of Diaphorodendron DiMichele and Synchysidendron DiMichele and Bateman once included within the genus Lepidodendron have been separated and assigned to the Diaphorodendraceae DiMichele and Bateman [26, 27]. These plants resemble Minostrobus in the vertically elongate leaf cushion. In some species, e.g., Diaphorodendron selerotecum (Pannell) DiMichele [23, 26] and Synchysidendron dicentricum (Felix) DiMichele and Bateman [2729], the aperture of ligule pit is also immediately above the leaf scar. Nevertheless, they consistently possess two parichnos scars in the leaf scar and have Achlamydocarpon Schumacker-Lambry type microsporangiate strobilus with Granasporites Alpern microspore. This kind of microsporangiate strobilus is thicker (about 13 mm in diameter) than that of Minostrobus, has heeled sporophyll and elongated sporangium [27, 30].


Term usage of “leaf cushion” and “leaf base”

Characters of the leaf cushion (e.g., phyllotaxy, leaf scar, ligule pit, parichnos) play an important role in the classification of lycopsids, and the generally accepted definition of the term “leaf cushion” is “the lowermost part of the leaf which is usually widened and remaining on the stem after leaf abscission” [31, 32]. Correspondingly, the term “leaf scar” is defined as the abscission layer area on the leaf cushion [32]. In some cases, the leaves do not abscise but break off from the leaf bases during fracturing the rock, forming the “false leaf scar”. Such breakage has been interpreted and illustrated clearly in the description of Archaeosigillaria Kidston, Tomiodendron (Radczenko) Meyen, and Eskdalia Kidston (Thomas) [3335]. Shape of the breakage changes a lot when rock is split open along different planes [33]. The false leaf scar also occurs on axes with dried and collapsed leaves, and presents as a slit on the leaf base [3, 32, 36]. The third occasion forming the false leaf scar is when the abscission layer occurs in the leaf blade instead of the attachment point [32]. On stems and thick branches of Minostrobus chaohuensis, we have not found any indication of persistent leaves or the basal part of leaf blades, but have observed consistent oblanceolate scars (not slit) on leaf cushions and abscised leaves in the matrix. Therefore, we believe that leaves on these axes of M. chaohuensis had abscised, forming leaf scars on leaf cushions.

Although the terms “leaf cushion” and “leaf scar” have been precisely defined, they are still used indiscriminately at times. Especially, the term “leaf cushion” has been frequently used to describe species or specimens with persistent leaves [3, 37, 38]. To avoid confusion, we suggest more strict correspondences with these terms. “Leaf cushion” should constantly indicate the bulge on the axis whose leaf blade had abscised before been buried in the sediments, it usually bears a true “leaf scar”. “Leaf base” should be used to describe specimens with persistent leaves. When the leaf broke by exogenic force, a “false leaf scar” may be formed on the leaf base. In some conditions, a plant has both thick axes with leaves having abscised and slender axes bearing persistent leaves, e.g., Minostrobus (this study) and Changxingia Wang [20]. We propose that “leaf cushion” and “leaf base” can be used to describe a single species in order to precisely figure out the different parts of the plant.

Growth habit

Minostrobus chaohuensis has been interpreted as a small herbaceous lycopsid [6], or regarded as “a distal shoot of pseudo-herbaceous or arborescent lycopsids” [8]. In this study, the widest stem is up to 55 mm in diameter (see Description). It was proposed that the deformation of plants was just took place in the vertical dimension during the diagenetic process [39], which has been proved by experiment [40]. Therefore, the size of plants didn’t change horizontally and this widest compression axis represents a stem 55 mm in diameter, approaching that of arborescent lycopsid Sublepidodendron songziense (55–70 mm) [3].

Wrinkles on the interareas among leaf cushions are generally interpreted as the result of secondary growth of axes [41, 42]. In M. chaohuensis, this structure at least occurred on stems and branches thicker than 10 mm, represents the distribution of secondary tissue. Different with this plant, distribution of secondary tissue in pseudoherbaceous and shrubby lycopsids are always very restricted [38], e.g., in rhizomorph, stem and primary branches of Oxroadia Alvin [4345], in rhizomorph and stem base of Paurodendron Fry [4648] and Chaloneria Pigg and Rothwell [49].

In arborescent lycopsids, the secondary xylem is not as thick as that in some euphyllophyte trees, but the secondary cortex (periderm) provides the major mechanical support [1, 2, 50]. Therefore, it has been proposed that the proportion of cortex area to axis area in cross section can be used as an index of the growth architecture of the lycopsids [51]. The cortex proportion of M. chaohuensis is estimated to be 88.7%, exceeding the value of pseudoherbaceous lycopsid Paurodendron (75.2%—80.0%), but approaching that of arborescent Sublepidodendron (90.7%) [51].

The above evidences suggest that Minostrobus chaohuensis is similar to arborescent lycopsids rather than pseudoherbaceous and shrubby species in stem size, secondary tissue and cortex proportion. Therefore, M. chaohuensis is probably an arborescent lycopsid.

Whole-plant knowledge and evolutionary significance

Till now, Minostrobus chaohuensis has been studied several times [68]. Morphology and anatomy of the vegetative axis, both kinds of strobili and spores are now clearly known. Although the root system has not yet been found, we assume that this plant may have stigmarian-type rhizomorph, like other Dichostrobiles members such as Sublepidodendron and Lepidodendron [3, 52]. M. chaohuensis is suggested to be a tree-like lycopsid, with a stem at least 55 mm in diameter and multi-dichotomous branching system. The plant is possibly monoecious, with mega- and micro-sporangiate strobili attached to the apex of vegetative axes, bearing Lagenicula-type megaspores and Lycospora-type microspores [7, 8].

The earliest isoetaleans with monosporangiate strobili have been described from the Late Devonian: Lepidostrobus xinjiangensis, Changxingia longifolia, Sublepidodendron songziense and Minostrobus chaohuensis. The latter two species are comparatively more completely known plants and have been proved to be arborescent. The presence of Sublepidodendron and Minostrobus demonstrates that tree-like Dichostrobiles members already diversified from the bisporangiate-strobilate ancestor and diversified in the Late Devonian. Among rhizomorphic lycopsids, the multi-dichotomous branching system of Minostrobus also occurred in the highly derived group Lepidodendraceae and primitive pseudoherbs Oxroadia and Paurodendron. As DiMichele et al. proposed, the branches of these two groups are possibly nonhomologous because they are separated in the phylogenetic tree by lycopsids with lateral branches on the trunk [53]. In view of the relatively derived reproductive structure of Minostrobus [7], we suppose that this plant is phylogeneticly close with Lepidodendraceae rather than Oxroadia and Paurodendron. This study of Late Devonian Minostrobus provides new data on the evolution of growth architecture in rhizomorphic lycopsids.


We thank Shou-Gang Hao, Jin-Zhuang Xue, Le Liu, Pu Huang, Tuo Liu (Peking University), and Lian-Da Gao (Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences) for their helpful discussions, Dun-Lun Qi (Anhui Geological Survey, Hefei) and Yun Guo (Yunnan University) for their help in field work, De-Bao Ni and Qiu-Yue Jia (Peking University) in preparing the sections.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: M-CM D-MW. Performed the experiments: M-CM. Analyzed the data: M-CM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: D-MW J-XY. Wrote the paper: M-CM D-MW J-XY.


  1. 1. Taylor TN, Taylor EL, Krings M. Paleobotany: the biology and evolution of fossil plants, 2nd ed. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 2009.
  2. 2. Stewart WN, Rothwell GW. Paleobotany and the evolution of plants. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
  3. 3. Wang Q, Hao S-G, Wang D-M, Wang Y, Denk T. A Late Devonian arborescent lycopsid Sublepidodendron songziense Chen emend. (Sublepidodendraceae Kräusel et Weyland 1949) from China, with a revision of the genus Sublepidodendron (Nathorst) Hirmer 1927. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2003; 127: 269–305.
  4. 4. Wang Y, Xu H-H. Sublepidodendron grabaui comb. nov., a lycopsid from the Upper Devonian of China. Bot J Linn Soc. 2005; 149: 299–311.
  5. 5. Cai C-Y. Devonian non-marine facies of China. In: Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, editor. Stratigraphical studies in China (1979–1999). Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press; 2000. pp. 95–127 (in Chinese).
  6. 6. Wang Y. A new lycopsid megaspore cone from the Upper Devonian of Chaohu, China. Bot J Linn Soc. 2001; 136: 439–448.
  7. 7. Meng M-C, Wang D-M, Xue J-Z, Zhu X. New insights and evolutionary significance of the megasporangiate strobilus of Minostrobus chaohuensis (Lycopsida) from the Upper Devonian of South China. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2013; 190: 20–40.
  8. 8. Wang Y, Xu H-H, Wang Q. Re-study of Minostrobus chaohuensis Wang (Lycopsida) from the Upper Devonian of Anhui, South China. Palaeoworld. 2012; 21: 20–28. pmid:22781086
  9. 9. Hou M-J, Qi D-L. New views on the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary stratigraphy of the Chaohu Region, Anhui Province. J Stratigr. 2006; 30: 157–170 (in Chinese, with English abstract).
  10. 10. Willard DA. Source plants for Carboniferous microspores: Lycospora from permineralized Lepidostrobus. Amer J Bot. 1989; 76: 820–827.
  11. 11. Cai C-Y, Chen L-Z. On a Chinese Givetian lycopod, Longostachys latisporophyllus Zhu, Hu and Feng, emend.: its morphology, anatomy and reconstruction. Palaeontogr Abt B. 1996; 238: 1–43.
  12. 12. Wang Q, Geng B-Y, Dilcher DL. New perspective on the architecture of the Late Devonian arborescent lycopsid Leptophloeum rhombicum (Leptophloeaceae). Amer J Bot. 2005; 92: 83–91.
  13. 13. Cai C-Y, Qin H-Z. First discovery of a stem with internal structure referable to Leptophloeum rhombicum from the Upper Devonian, Xinjiang. Acta Palaeontol Sin. 1986; 25: 516–524 (in Chinese, with English abstract).
  14. 14. Li X-X, Dou Y-W, Sun Z-H. The genus Leptophloeum Dawson based on a recent study of new material from the Junggar Basin, Xinjiang. Acta Palaeontol Sin. 1986; 25: 349–379 (in Chinese, with English abstract).
  15. 15. Gu Zhi. Palaeozoic plants of China (Institute of Botany, and Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences). Beijing: Science Press; 1974 (in Chinese).
  16. 16. Li X-X. The origin, evolution and distribution of the Cathaysian flora in East Asia. Acta Palaeontol Sin. 1997; 36: 411–422 (in Chinese, with English abstract).
  17. 17. Chaloner WG, Lacey WS. The distribution of late Palaeozoic floras. Sp Palaeont. 1973; 12: 271–289.
  18. 18. Wang Q, Hao S-G, Wang D-M, Dilcher DL. An anatomically preserved arborescent lycopsid, Sublepidodendron songziense (Sublepidodendraceae), from the Late Devonian of Hubei, China. Amer J Bot. 2002; 89: 1468–1477. pmid:21665748
  19. 19. Meng M-C, Wang D-M, Tian T. New insights on the megasporangiate strobilus of Sublepidodendron songziense from the Late Devonian of Hubei Province. Acta Palaeontol Sin. 2014; 53: 180–190 (in Chinese, with English abstract).
  20. 20. Wang D-M, Meng M-C, Xue J-Z, Basinger JF, Guo Y, Liu L. Changxingia longifolia gen. et sp. nov., a new lycopsid from the Late Devonian of Zhejiang Province, South China. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2014; 203: 35–47.
  21. 21. Brack-Hanes SD, Thomas BA. A re-examination of Lepidostrobus Brongniart. Bot J Linn Soc. 1983; 86: 125–133.
  22. 22. Wang Q, Li C-S, Geng B-Y, Chitaley S. A new species of Lepidostrobus from the Upper Devonian of Xinjiang, China and its bearing on the phylogenetic significance of the order Isoëtales. Bot J Linn Soc. 2003; 143: 55–67.
  23. 23. DiMichele WA. Arborescent lycopods of Pennsylvanian age coals: Lepidodendron, with description of a new species. Palaeontogr Abt B. 1981; 175: 85–125.
  24. 24. Thomas BA, Watson J. A rediscovered 114-foot Lepidodendron from Bolton, Lancashire. Geol J. 1976; 11: 15–20.
  25. 25. DiMichele WA. Lepidodendron hickii and generic delimitation in Carboniferous lepidodendrid lycopods. Syst Bot. 1983; 8: 317–333.
  26. 26. DiMichele WA. Diaphorodendron, gen. nov., a segregate from Lepidodendron (Pennsylvanian age). Syst Bot. 1985; 10: 453–458.
  27. 27. DiMichele WA, Bateman RM. Diaphorodendraceae, fam. nov. (Lycopsida: Carboniferous): systematics and evolutionary relationships of Diaphorodendron and Synchysidendron, gen. nov. Amer J Bot. 1992; 79: 605–617.
  28. 28. Felix CJ. A study of the arborescent lycopods of southeastern Kansas. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 1952; 39: 263–288.
  29. 29. DiMichele WA. Arborescent lycopods of Pennsylvanian age coals: Lepidodendron, with description of a new species. Palaeontogr Abt B. 1981; 175: 85–125.
  30. 30. Leisman GA, Phillips TL. Megasporangiate and microsporangiate cones of Achlamydocarpon varius from the Middle Pennsylvanian. Palaeontogr Abt B. 1979; 168: 100–128.
  31. 31. Meyen SV. Carboniferous and Permian lepidophytes of Angaraland. Palaeontogr Abt B. 1976; 157: 112–157.
  32. 32. Thomas BA, Meyen SV. A system of form-genera for the Upper Palaeozoic lepidophyte stems represented by compression-impression material. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 1984; 41: 273–281.
  33. 33. Thomas BA, Purdy HM. Additional fossil plants from the Drybrook Sandstone, Forest of Dean, Gloucestershire. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Geol. 1982; 36: 131–142.
  34. 34. Thomas BA, Meyen SV. A reappraisal of the Lower Carboniferous lepidophyte Eskdalia Kidston. Palaeontology. 1984; 27:707–718.
  35. 35. Mensah MK, Chaloner WG. Lower Carboniferous lycopods from Ghana. Palaeontology. 1971; 14: 357–367.
  36. 36. Chaloner WG. Lycophyta. In: Boureau E, Jovet-Are S, Hoeg O, Chaloner WG, editors. Traité de paléobotanique. Paris: Mason et Cie; 1967. pp. 435–802.
  37. 37. Berry CM, Wang Y, Cai C-Y. A lycopsid with novel reproductive structures from the Upper Devonian of Jiangsu, China. Int J Plant Sci. 2003; 164: 263–273.
  38. 38. Bateman RM, DiMichele WA. Hizemodendron, gen. nov., a pseudoherbaceous segregate of Lepidodendron (Pennsylvanian): phylogenetic context for evolutionary changes in lycopsid growth architecture. Syst Bot. 1991; 16: 195–205.
  39. 39. Schopf JM. Modes of fossil preservation. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 1975; 20: 27–53.
  40. 40. Rex GM, Chaloner WG. The experimental formation of plant compression fossils. Palaeontology. 1983; 26: 231–252.
  41. 41. Thomas BA. Epidermal studies in the interpretation of Lepidodendron species. Palaeontology. 1970; 13: 145–173.
  42. 42. Eggert DA. The ontogeny of Carboniferous arborescent Lycopsida. Palaeontogr Abt B. 1961; 108: 43–92.
  43. 43. Bateman RM. Palaeobotany and palaeoenvironments of Lower Carboniferous floras from two volcanigenic terrains in the Scottish Midland Valley. Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK; 1988.
  44. 44. Bateman RM. Morphometric reconstruction, palaeobiology and phylogeny of Oxroadia gracilis Alvin emend. and O. conferta sp. nov.: anatomically-preserved rhizomorphic lycopsids from the Dinantian of Oxroad Bay, SE Scotland. Palaeontogr Abt B. 1992; 228: 29–103.
  45. 45. Long AG. Observations on the Lower Carboniferous lycopod Oxroadia gracilis Alvin. Trans Roy Soc Edinb Earth Sci. 1986; 77: 127–142.
  46. 46. Phillips TL, Leisman GA. Paurodendron, a rhizomorphic lycopod. Amer J Bot. 1966; 53: 1086–1100.
  47. 47. Schlanker CM, Leisman GA. The herbaceous Carboniferous lycopod Selaginella fraiponti comb. nov. Bot Gaz. 1969; 130: 35–41.
  48. 48. Rothwell GW, Erwin DM. The rhizomorph apex of Paurodendron; implications for homologies among the rooting organs of Lycopsida. Amer J Bot. 1985; 72: 86–98.
  49. 49. Pigg KB, Rothwell GW. Chaloneria gen. nov.; Heterosporous lycophytes from the Pennsylvanian of North America. Bot Gaz. 1983; 144: 132–147.
  50. 50. Dilcher DL, Lott TA, Wang X, Wang Q. A history of tree canopies. In: Lowman MD, Rinker HB, editors. Forest canopies. Armsterdam: Academic Press; 2004. pp. 118–137.
  51. 51. Liu L, Wang D-M, Xue J-Z, Meng M-C. Reinvestigation of the lycopsid Minarodendron cathaysiense from the Middle Devonian of South China. N Jb Geol Paläont Abh. 2013; 268: 325–339.
  52. 52. Bateman RM, DiMichele WA, Willard DA. Experimental cladistic analysis of anatomically preserved arborescent lycopsids from the Carboniferous of Euramerica: an essay on paleobotanical phylogenetics. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 1992; 79: 500–559.
  53. 53. DiMichele WA, Elrick SD, Bateman RM. Growth habit of the late Paleozoic rhizomorphic tree-lycopsid family Diaphorodendraceae: phylogenetic, evolutionary, and paleoecological significance. Amer J Bot. 2013; 100: 1604–1625. pmid:23935114