Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Establishment of Nature Reserves in Administrative Regions of Mainland China

Establishment of Nature Reserves in Administrative Regions of Mainland China

  • Ziliang Guo, 
  • Guofa Cui
PLOS
x

Abstract

Nature reserves are widely considered as one available strategy for protecting biodiversity, which is threatened by habitat fragmentation, and wildlife extinction. The Chinese government has established a goal of protecting 15% of its land area by 2015. We quantitated the characteristics and distribution of nature reserves in mainland China and evaluated the expansion process for national nature reserves. National nature reserves occupy 64.15% of the total area of nature reserves. Steppe and meadow ecosystem, ocean and seacoast ecosystem, and wild plant nature reserves represent lower percentages, particularly in national nature reserves, in which they comprised 0.76%, 0.54%, and 0.69%, respectively, of the area. Furthermore, medium and small nature reserves compose 92.32% of all nature reserves. The land area under any legal protection has reached 14.80%, although only 9.78% is strictly protected. However, if 9 super-large national nature reserves, located in Southwest and Northwest China were removed, the percentage of strictly protected area decreases to 2.66% of the land area of China. The areas contained in nature reserves in each province are not proportional to the areas of the provinces, particularly for national nature reserves, with higher protection rates in Southwest and Northwest China than in other regions. Of the 31 provinces, 22 provinces feature strict protection of less than 4% of their areas by national nature reserves; these provinces are mainly located in East, Central, South, and North China. Moreover, the unevenness indexes of the distribution of nature reserves and national nature reserves are 0.39 and 0.58, respectively. The construction of nature reserves has entered a steady development stage after a period of rapid expansion in mainland China. In recent years, the total area of national nature reserves has increased slowly, while the total area of nature reserves has not increased, although the number of nature reserves continues increase.

Introduction

Natural ecosystems destruction, wildlife extinction, and habitat fragmentation have increased seriously since the 19th century, due to rapid population growth, the expansion of human activities and the accelerating use of natural resources [16]. Global interest in biodiversity conservation has increased accordingly [79]. Protected areas (PAs) are one available strategy for protecting biodiversity and natural ecosystems [8], [1013]. Since the establishment of Yellowstone National Park, the first modern PA, in 1872, PAs have been rapidly established and expanded in many countries [5], [8], [14], [15]. Protected areas covered approximately 13% of global land area by 2010 [8], [16]. Nevertheless, the 2010 biodiversity target to effectively preserve “at least 10% of each ecological region” is far from accomplished, resulting from the preference of PAs in high elevation, low productivity ecosystems, or biodiversity hotspots, etc [8], [16], [17].

There are many forms of PAs with many titles. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has developed a protected area management categories system, that includes strict nature reserve, wilderness area, national park, natural monument, habitat/species management area, protected landscape/seascape, and managed resource protected area [18]. However, the Chinese classification is very different from that of the IUCN. The formal protected areas are known as nature reserves (NRs) with specific restrictions on human activities in mainland China [8], [10], [19]. NRs are classified on the basis of their constructed administrative grades, administrative departments, and major protected objects [20], [21]. NRs are divided into the national NRs (NNRs), provincial NRs, municipal NRs and county NRs in mainland China, according to their constructed administrative ranks [20]. Compared with other levels of NRs, the establishment of NNRs is much stricter and must be approved by the State Council of China. In the aspect of the management, the exploitations and construction projects of NNRs must be permitted by the administrative departments of the State Council of China. In terms of their ecosystem characteristics and their major protected objects, NRs are also classified into 3 major categories, including natural ecosystem NRs, wildlife NRs and natural monument NRs, which are further subdivided into 9 types in mainland China (Table 1). Natural ecosystem NRs are divided into forest ecosystem NRs, inland wetland and water area ecosystem (inland wetland) NRs, steppe and meadow ecosystem (steppe and meadow) NRs, desert ecosystem NRs, ocean and seacoast ecosystem (ocean and seacoast) NRs. Wildlife NRs include wild animal NRs and wild plant NRs, while ancient organism remains NRs and geological formation NRs are types of natural monument NRs [20].

China is one of the 8 countries with the richest biodiversity in the world after Brazil, Indonesia, Colombia, Mexico, Australia, Madagascar and Philippines [22]. There are a large number of endemic species in China [2224]. Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities and Global Biodiversity Hotpots cover much of South China and Southwest China [1], [2527]. Hence, the construction and management of the NR system of China has had a substantial influence on global biodiversity conservation. Since the establishment of NRs in 1956, the number and area of NRs has increased rapidly in mainland China [2832]. Moreover, a short-term biodiversity target maintaining the area of territorial NRs at 15% of the land area and conserving 90% of the national key protected species by 2015 in mainland China was proposed [33]. How close are we to achieving this goal? How do the proportions of protected area vary among different regions and categories? Here, we present results on the structure of NRs and a comprehensive assessment of the areas protected within various administrative regions in mainland China.

Materials and Methods

We collected data and established a database of NRs in mainland China, that includes area, type, protected object, date of establishment and other information. The database of the Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China was used as our primary source for NRs (http://222.28.119.57/files/6083000000048A85/sts.mep.gov.cn/zrbhq/zrbhq/201309/P020130927386454626867.pdf). The data of NRs were primarily obtained from the NR administrations of all provinces. This data acquisition process began in 2013. After a promotion campaign, data on the distribution of all 2,671 NRs in mainland China were finally obtained. We also gathered the geographical boundary and attribute information of the existing 407 NNRs with higher conservation value and more representative ecosystems and wildlife than other levels of NRs from the Scientific Survey Report and General Plan of NRs. Data on NRs in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan were missing due to the difficulty of obtaining these data.

We analyzed the size of NRs and NNRs in mainland China, and established the grade standards of NR sizes based on the existing classification scheme in mainland China (Table 1).

In addition, we used Sigmplot10.0 and GIS10.0 to assess the distribution pattern of NRs and the expansion process of NNRs in mainland China. In this study, we developed an unevenness index of the spatial distribution of NRs (E) based on the Gini coefficient, which was proposed as a measure of inequality of income or wealth [3436], as follows: (1) where wi is the cumulative protected ratio from region 1 to region I as a percentage of the total protected ratio in each region. The regions were ranked from small to large according to the protected ratio. The term n is the number of regions involved in the calculation. Theoretically, the unevenness index is between 0–1. The higher the unevenness index, the more uneven the spatial distribution of NRs. A value of 0.3 is usually used as the critical value of the unevenness index [34], [35]; for the NRs, E > 0.3, indicating relative district unevenness.

Results

NR levels

The number, area, and average area of NRs vary greatly among different levels (Table 2). The proportion of municipal and county NRs (53.46%) is greater than that of NNRs, whereas the total area of these NRs only represents 9.89% of all NRs. As of 2013, there are 407 NNRs with a total area (950,571.77 km2), accounting for 64.15% of the total area of all NRs (Table 2). Moreover, the average area of the NNRs is 2,335.56 km2, significantly higher than that of other NRs. Thus, NNRs seem to be more critical in biodiversity conservation than other levels of NRs in China.

NR types

In mainland China, areas covered by forest ecosystem, inland wetland, desert ecosystem and wild animal NRs, represent high percentages of the total area, at 21.19%, 19.45%, 27.62%, and 27.39%, respectively. However, the number and areas of other types of NRs are lower (Table 3). For instance, the areas covered by steppe and meadow, ocean and seacoast, and wild plant NRs are relatively smaller, accounting for less than 2% of the total NR area.

thumbnail
Table 3. Statistics for NR and NNR types in mainland China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119650.t003

Compared with NRs, the difference in areas covered by various types of NNRs is more notable. The areas covered by steppe and meadow, ocean and seacoast, and wild plant NNRs occupy a lower proportion of the total NNR area, less than 1%. By contrast, desert ecosystem and inland wetland NNRs represent 38.62% and 20.72% respectively, of the total NNR area (Table 3).

NR sizes

In mainland China, the sizes of most NRs are less than 200 km2, and there are 1,732 small NRs, accounting for 64.84% of the total number of NRs (Table 4). Furthermore, large NRs only account for 5.13% of all NRs. Compared with desert ecosystem NRs, the number of large NRs of other types is lower, particularly for ocean and seacoast, and wild plant NRs. Among NNRs, the number of medium NNRs is the highest representing 54.05% of the total number of NNRs. There are 98 large, extra-large and super-large NNRs, accounted for 24.08% of the total number, but 92.58% of the total area protected by NNRs (Table 5).

Approximately 91.98% of the total area of NNRs is covered by only 39 extra-large and super-large NNRs in mainland China (Table 5). The distribution of extra-large and super-large NNRs is extremely uneven across the country. They are mainly distributed over Southwest China, Northwest China, and Northeast China. Of the 31 provinces assessed, 67.74% have no extra-large or super-large NNRs. The Super-large and extra-large NNRs in mainland China are listed in S1 Table.

NR distribution in administrative regions

NRs are divided into terrestrial NRs and marine NRs. Terrestrial NRs cover an area of 1,421,158.40 km2 and formally protect 14.80% of the terrestrial area of mainland China. Moreover, there are 132 marine NRs, covering approximately 60,101.70 km2 in mainland China, including mangrove forests and seacoasts.

NRs are geographically widespread in mainland China, but unevenly distributed in different administrative regions (Fig. 1). The percentages of protected area in East China (4.75%), Central China (5.30%), and South China (6.23%) are significantly lower than the national protection rate (14.8%). When considering only NNRs, less than 10% of the area is protected in most regions; Southwest China (17.93%) and South China (1.25%) are the most and least protected regions, respectively (Fig. 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Proportion of land area covered by NRs and NNRs in different administrative regions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119650.g001

Among the 31 provinces of mainland China, Tibet has the highest proportion ratio at 34.30%, closely followed by Qinghai at 29.53% (Fig. 2). However, the protection rates are less than 10% in 67.74% of the 31 provinces; these provinces are mainly located in East China, Central China, South China, and North China.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Proportion of land area covered by NRs and NNRs in different provinces.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119650.g002

Taking NNRs into consideration only, the protection rates are less than 10% in most provinces with the exception of Tibet (30.79%), Qinghai (28.14%), Gansu (15.76%), and Shanghai (10.44%) (Fig. 2). Of the 31 provinces, 22 provinces strictly protect less than 4% of their areas in NNRs. Zhejiang and Anhui provinces in East China, Tianjin and Shanxi provinces in North China, and Guangdong province in South China have the least protection with less than 1% of their areas in NNRs.

Super-large NNRs have great influence on assessing the total protected percentage of the land area. Hence, 9 super-large NNRs with areas greater than 10,000 km2 were removed in order from large to small, and the accumulative protected percentage of the land area was calculated (Fig. 3). The proportion of the national terrestrial area protected by NNRs declined from 9.78% to 2.26% in mainland China when the 9 super-large NNRs were excluded, revealing that 7.12% of the land area is covered by the 9 super-large NNRs. We used the unevenness index to evaluate the degree of unevenness of the distribution of NRs and NNRs in mainland China, which revealed that the distribution of NRs is uneven, with an unevenness index of 0.39, and that the distribution of NNRs is very biased, with an unevenness index of 0.58.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Accumulative percentages of land area protected by NNRs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119650.g003

Growth of the NNRs

The establishment of NRs began in the 1950s in mainland China, and the total number and area of NNRs were small and continued to increase slowly until the 1980s. By the end of 1985, only 15 NNRs had been established, and 0.10% of the national terrestrial area was formally protected by NNRs, covering an area of less than 10,000 km2 in mainland China.

Since 1984, the total number and area of NNRs has increased rapidly (Figs. 4 and 5). The number and area of NNRs grew faster in mainland China after the “National Wildlife Protection and Nature Reserve Construction” began in 2001. By 2005, 242 NNRs with approximately 730,000 km2 were protected, covering 7.6% of the land area in mainland China. Subsequently, the establishment of NNRs slowed, and the total area of NNRs gradually stabilized. All types of NNRs have continued to increase in number, although the timelines of their establishment have differed for the various types of NNRs. The area of inland wetland and desert ecosystem NNRs increased quickly at the end of the 20th century due to increasing concerns about wetlands and deserts. The construction of NNRs has been inconsistent in different regions and periods (Fig. 5). Many super-large and extra-large NNRs were established between 1996 and 2005 in Southwest China and Northwest China. The largest, the Tibet Qiangtang NNR (298,000 km2), is larger than most provinces in mainland China. However, the total area of NNRs is smaller in East China, South China and Central China, despite the presence of many NNRs in these regions.

The mean area of all types of NNRs increased initially and then decreased over time, with the exception of ancient organism remains and geological formation NNRs (Fig. 6). The periods of the maximum mean area for each type of NNR differ. The period of the maximum mean area for forestry ecosystem NNRs occurred earlier than that of other NNR types.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Average areas of different types of NNRs in different periods.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119650.g006

Discussion and Conclusion

NNRs occupied 64.15% of the total area protected by NRs, a greater proportion than that reported in previous analyses of mainland China due to an increase in NNRs and a decrease in NRs (Table 6) [28], [31], [37]. The total area of NRs and the size of each NR have a direct impact on the protection effectiveness for wildlife and their habitat [38]. Hence, NNRs could play more significant role in biodiversity and natural ecosystem conservation in mainland China. NNRs with administrative organization, adequate managers, and fixed funding sources for protection are considered as strict NRs and the main providers of biodiversity conservation in most parts of mainland China [3941].

thumbnail
Table 6. Expansion of NRs and NNRs in mainland China in recent years.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119650.t006

In parts of China, the number and area of NRs are inadequate, and some types of NRs cannot adequately conserve their ecosystems, species, or other resources. There is still a lack of wild plant, steppe and meadow, ocean and seacoast NRs, particularly NNRs. For example, many rare and endangered wild plants have not been sufficiently protected [23], [24], although a large number of rare and endangered wild plants persist in mainland China [42], [43]. The number of NRs in each size category is also highly unbalanced. A small number of extra-large and super-large NRs, mainly distributed in Southwest China, Northwest China, and Northeast China with lower population density, represent more than 90% of the total area of NNRs. Whereas, in East China, Central China, and South China, most NNRs are medium and small NRs. Thus, some NRs with higher conservation value should be promoted as NNRs in these regions.

However, there is an unusual bias for the distribution of NRs in mainland China. In North China, East China, Central China and South China, the percentages of protected area are widespread lower, even less than 5%. Considering NNRs only, the proportion of protected area in the 13 provinces in East China, South China and North China, is lower than 2%. To ensure that NRs more effectively conserve biodiversity, the network of NRs should be constructed in concentrated zones of NRs in these regions. Subsequently, biological corridors could be also created among the NRs in the network, to enhance the ability of wildlife to adapt to climate change and human disturbances.

We determined that the unevenness index of the spatial distribution was 0.39 for NRs, and 0.58 for NNRs, both of which are higher than 0.3, also indicating that the distribution pattern of NRs and NNRs is extremely spatially unbalanced, particularly for NNRs. The unevenness index objectively reflects the degree of bias in protected areas. The geographical layout of NNRs should focus more on the provinces with lower protection ratios. We should promote the establishment of NRs and NNRs in Shanxi and Hebei provinces of North China, Zhejiang, Anhui, Fujian, Jiangxi and Shandong provinces of East China, Guangdong and Guangxi provinces of South China, and Guizhou province of Southwest China. Further analyses should be implemented in smaller scale, because the bias of protection could be more clear and specifical as the scale of analysis decreases [8].

The establishment of NNRs was inconsistent among different regions and periods for different types of NNRs. Although the increase in the total amount of NNRs was relatively constant from 1996 to 2013, the increase in the total area covered by NNRs slowed between 2006 and 2013, after the establishment of many super-large and extra-large NNRs. The area of NNRs has since increased extremely slowly, while that of NRs has not increased growth, although the number of NRs has continued to increase in recent years (Table 6) [44].

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Super-large and extra-large NNRs in mainland China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119650.s001

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Shaohua Xing, Kimberly Y., Dawn S., and anonymous reviewers for providing advice that greatly improved the manuscript. The authors are grateful for the support of the Special Research Funds of Forestry Industry for Public Welfare of China, Grant. NO.201104029.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GC ZG. Performed the experiments: ZG GC. Analyzed the data: ZG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZG. Wrote the paper: GC ZG. Contributed computer mapping: GC ZG.

References

  1. 1. Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, et al. Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines. Science. 2010; 328: 1164–1168. pmid:20430971
  2. 2. Ferretti V, Pomarico S. An integrated approach for studying the land suitability for ecological corridors through spatial multicriteria evaluations. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2013; 15: 859–885.
  3. 3. Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Goldewijk KK. Habitat conversion and global avian biodiversity loss. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 2003; 1521: 1293–1300. pmid:12816643
  4. 4. Li YM, Niu D, Zhang ZQ, Qu JS. Review of international scientific programmes and frontiers of biodiversity research. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2009; 29: 2115–2122.
  5. 5. Cantu C, Gerald WR, Michael SJ, Strand E. Assessment of current and proposed nature reserves of Mexico based on their capacity to protect geophysical features and biodiversity. Biological Conservation. 2004; 115: 411–417.
  6. 6. Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C. Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecology letters. 2005;8: 23–29.
  7. 7. Mendel LC, Kirkpatrick JB. Historical Progress of Biodiversity Conservation in the Protected-Area System of Tasmania, Australia. Conservation Biology. 2002; 16: 1520–1529.
  8. 8. Jenkins CN, Joppa L. Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system. Biological Conservation. 2009; 142: 2166–2174.
  9. 9. Ma K. Strategic targets for biodiversity conservation in 2011–2020. Biodiversity Science. 2011; 19: 1–2.
  10. 10. Ma JZ, Rong K, Cheng K. Research and practice on biodiversity in situ conservation in China: progress and prospect. Biodiversity Science. 2012; 20: 551–558.
  11. 11. Tang ZY, Fang JY, Sun JY, Gaston KJ. Effectiveness of Protected Areas in Maintaining Plant Production. PLOS ONE. 2011 April 28.
  12. 12. Tang XP. Analysis of the current situation of Chinese nature reserve network and a draft plan for its optimization. Biodiversity Science. 2005; 13: 81–88.
  13. 13. Cui GF, Wang XF. The present situation and facing tasks of the world conservation. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. 2000; 22: 123–125.
  14. 14. Evans D. Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 network. Nature conservation. 2012; 1: 11–26.
  15. 15. Jongman RHG, Pungetti G. Ecological Networks and Greenways: Concept, Design, Implementation. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
  16. 16. United Nations. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2011. United Nations. 15 June 2011. Available: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/reports.shtml. Accessed 24 June 2014.
  17. 17. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010 Biodiversity Target. Convention on Biological Diversity. 12 May 2014. Available: http://www.cbd.int/2010-target/default.shtml. Accessed 15 October 2014.
  18. 18. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). IUCN Protected Areas Categories System. IUCN. 15 Jan 2014. Available: http://www.iucn.org/about/work/programmes/gpap_home/gpap_quality/gpap_pacategories/. Accessed 15 October 2014.
  19. 19. Wang Z, Jiang MK, Zhu GQ, Tao SM, Zhou HL. Comparison of Chinese nature reserve classification with IUCN protected area categories. Rural Eco-Environment. 2004; 20: 72–76.
  20. 20. Xue DY, Jiang MK. A study on categoring standard of nature reserves in China. China environmental science. 1994; 14: 246–251.
  21. 21. Liu CL. Present status and analysis of category and type construction of natural reserves in China. Journal of Nanjing forestry university(natural sciences edition). 2008; 32: 138–142.
  22. 22. Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Mittermeier CG. Megadiversity: Earth’s Biologically Wealthiest Nations. 1st ed. CEMEX: Mexico City; 1997.
  23. 23. Purugganan MD, Fuller DQ. The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature. 2009; 457: 843–848. pmid:19212403
  24. 24. Huang H. Plant diversity and conservation in China: planning a strategic bioresource for a sustainable future. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2011; 166: 282–300. pmid:22059249
  25. 25. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GA, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, et al. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science. 2006; 313: 58–61. pmid:16825561
  26. 26. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GA, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000; 403: 853–858. pmid:10706275
  27. 27. Myers N. Biodiversity hotspots revisited. Bioscience. 2003; 53: 916–917.
  28. 28. Chen WL. Nature reserves of China. Bulletin of Biology. 2012; 47: 1–4.
  29. 29. Chen YH, Tang ZY, Fang JY. Distribution of nature reserves and status of biodiversity protection in China. Biodiversity Science. 2009; 17: 664–674.
  30. 30. Lu AG, Wang SJ. Analysis on the development of nature preserves of China. Journal of arid land resources and environment. 2010; 24: 7–11.
  31. 31. Wang YS, Li HX. Layout problems of China’s nature conservation areas. Environmental protection. 2003; 5: 19–21.
  32. 32. Yan X. The present status problems and development of China nature reserves. Journal of Northeast Forestry University. 1989; 17: 79–83.
  33. 33. <China National Biodiversity Conservation Strategy and Action Plan(2011–2030)> writing group. China national biodiversity conservation strategy and action plan(2011–2030). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press; 2011.
  34. 34. Zang RH. Economics. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press; 2002.
  35. 35. Zhang JH. An convenient method to calculate Gini coefficient. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Social Science Edition). 2007; 6: 275–283.
  36. 36. Kakwani NC. Applications of Lorenz Curves in Economic Analysis. Econometrica. 1977; 3: 719–728.
  37. 37. Fan ZM, Zhang X, Li J, Yue TX, Liu JY, Xiang B, et al. Land-cover changes of national nature reserves in China. Journal of Geographical sciences. 2013; 23: 258–270.
  38. 38. Diamond JM. The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biological Conservation. 1975; 7: 129–146.
  39. 39. Liu WJ, Bai J, Ma J, Song WM, Xu JL, Li Z. Current status of management capability of nature reserves in China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. 2011; 33: 49–53.
  40. 40. Wang LL. Management Problems of Natural Reserves in China and Its Countermeasures. Journal of EMCC. 2012; 22: 19–21.
  41. 41. Han NY. A policy study on sustainable management for China’s nature reserves. Journal of Natural Resources. 2000; 15: 201–207.
  42. 42. Yuan H. The in situ conservation of state key protected wild plants in national nature reserves in China. Biodiversity Science. 2009; 17: 280–287.
  43. 43. Peng L, Chen SB, Peng PH, Zhou KX. Geographic Distribution at the County Level and on-site Conservation of National Key Protected Wild Plants in China. Forestry Resources Management. 2013; 5: 31–35.
  44. 44. The People’s Republic of China Ministry of Environmental Protection. Work presentation of nature reserves. 2014. http://sts.mep.gov.cn/zrbhq/zrbhqgzjb/. Accessed 17 April 2014.