Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations in Healthy Children Aged 1-18 Months

  • Feng Li,

    Affiliation Department of Children and Adolescents Health Care, MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environmental Health, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

  • Jingqiu Ma,

    Affiliation Department of Children and Adolescents Health Care, MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environmental Health, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

  • Shanshan Geng,

    Affiliation Department of Children and Adolescents Health Care, MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environmental Health, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

  • Junli Wang,

    Affiliation Department of Children and Adolescents Health Care, MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environmental Health, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

  • Jinrong Liu,

    Affiliation Department of Children and Adolescents Health Care, MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environmental Health, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

  • Jie Zhang,

    Affiliation Department of Children and Adolescents Health Care, MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environmental Health, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

  • Xiaoyang Sheng

    Affiliation Department of Children and Adolescents Health Care, MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environmental Health, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations in Healthy Children Aged 1-18 Months

  • Feng Li, 
  • Jingqiu Ma, 
  • Shanshan Geng, 
  • Junli Wang, 
  • Jinrong Liu, 
  • Jie Zhang, 
  • Xiaoyang Sheng



Fecal calprotectin (FC) is an established biomarker of gut inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate FC concentrations in healthy children between 1 and 18 months of age.


Healthy children aged 1-18 months were enrolled in this study at the Department of Children's Health Care in Shanghai, China. Children’s stool samples were collected and analyzed, and FC concentration was determined using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The children's weights and lengths were measured. Parents were asked to complete a brief questionnaire regarding several clinical and sociodemographic factors.


The FC concentrations were unevenly distributed; the median FC concentration was 174.3 μg/g (range: 6.0-1097.7 μg/g) or 2.241 log10 μg/g (range: 0.775-3.041 log10 μg/g) for all 288 children. The children were divided into several age groups: 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-9 months, 9-12 months and 12-18 months. The median FC concentrations for these age groups were 375.2 μg/g (2.574 log10 μg/g), 217.9 μg/g (2.338 log10 μg/g), 127.7 μg/g (2.106 log10 μg/g), 96.1 μg/g (1.983 log10 μg/g) and 104.2 μg/g (2.016 log10 μg/g), respectively. A significant correlation between age and FC concentration was found (r=-0.490, p<0.001). A simple correlation analysis of weight-for-length Z-scores or weight-for-age Z-scores vs. FC concentrations showed that these variables were negatively correlated (Spearman’s rho=-0.287, p<0.001; Spearman’s rho=-0.243, p<0.001, respectively).


The FC levels of children aged 1-18 months exhibit a downward trend with increasing age and are greater than the normal levels observed in healthy adults. In healthy children aged <6 months, FC levels are high. In children aged 6-18 months, FC concentrations are relatively low but are still higher than those of children aged >4 years.


Calprotectin is a calcium- and zinc-binding protein and a member of the S100 family of proteins. It has a molecular mass of 36.5 kDa [1], and it has both bactericidal and fungicidal properties [2]. Calprotectin is secreted extracellularly from stimulated neutrophils [3], eosinophils [4] and monocytes [5] and is expressed in some mucosal epithelial cells [6, 7]; it is also released during cell disruption and death [8]. When bound to calcium, calprotectin has a high heat resistance and is stable in stool samples for up to one week at room temperature [9, 10]. These properties allow calprotectin to be eliminated intact in the feces and give it an advantage as a noninvasive biochemical marker for the screening of intestinal inflammation, compared with other markers that are currently used (lactoferrin, neutrophil elastase, and leukocyte esterase)[11]. Fecal calprotectin (FC) most likely originates from the transepithelial migration of granulocytes (neutrophils and eosinophils) [4, 12], and FC levels are quantitatively related to granulocytes migration towards the gastrointestinal tract [1315]; this migration correlates with endoscopic and histological activity scores in inflammatory bowel diseases [16, 17]. Thus, FC, in particular, has long been regarded as a promising marker of gastrointestinal pathology [18] and a reliable and valuable marker for the detection of gastrointestinal tract inflammatory activity [9, 1921] and cystic fibrosis [22], and FC measurements can be used to screen for intestinal disease [23].

Despite the large volume of literature on calprotectin in recent years, insufficient data on FC in children are available; most studies of FC in children have been case-control studies that included healthy children as controls, and these had a variety of limitations, including small sample sizes and an undefined reference range for healthy children. There are conflicting data concerning appropriate reference values in children [2434]. Despite the small sample sizes of these studies, because of the disparities in the presentation of the data (means, together with standard deviations, standard errors of the mean, or 95% confidence intervals, in some studies and medians and ranges in others), pooling the data in these studies is not practical[35]. Thus, Sykora et al. have suggested that further studies investigating FC reference ranges are required to allow routine measurements to be made, especially in subjects younger than 12 months of age [21]. Further research is needed to study the normal development of FC levels in infants and the functional importance of FC in infancy [26]. Reference values for FC in children have not been defined for many populations worldwide, and in particular, reference values for FC in Chinese children are not known. Thus, the aim of our study was to describe the concentrations of FC in healthy full-term children aged 1–18 months.

Subjects and Methods


This study was performed at the Department of Children and Adolescent’s Health Care of Xinhua Hospital, which is affiliated with the Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine; the study participants received routine physical examination at the Department of Children and Adolescent’s Health Care of Xinhua Hospital. The subjects, aged 1–18 months, were consecutively recruited from April 2013 to March 2014. At enrollment, the parents of the children were asked to complete a brief health questionnaire regarding several clinical and sociodemographic factors. Clinical features, including gestational age, birth weight, sex, Apgar score, postnatal age, neonatal diseases, symptoms, physical examination findings, weight and length, were recorded prior to the collection of each stool sample. All children recruited to participate in this study met the following inclusion criteria: age 1 month to 18 months; gestational age >37 completed weeks; 5-minute Apgar score >7; birth weight appropriate for gestational age (2,500–4,000 g); and no illnesses in the month prior to enrollment, and thus no known underlying chronic inflammatory disease. The exclusion criteria were the following: any intake of steroidal or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gastric acidity inhibitors, antibiotics or any other drug during the 2 weeks prior to recruitment; nasal bleeding during the final week before the study; or a history of signs or symptoms of infection or gastrointestinal disease (diarrhea, vomiting, hematochezia, fever).

A total of 315 children were invited to participate in the study; 15 (4.8%) families declined to participate, and 12 (3.8%) potential subjects were excluded due to vomiting (3), acute upper respiratory tract infection (3), incomplete data (2), nasal bleeding (1) or other medical conditions (3). Ultimately, 288 healthy, eligible children were included in the final analysis. We categorized the children into six age groups: 1–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–9 months, 9–12 months and 12–18 months. Fecal samples were obtained from these 288 healthy children.

Anthropometric measurements and calculations

The children’s weights and supine lengths were measured using standard techniques. Anthropometric measurements of the infants were performed in duplicate by a trained member of the research team, as described in our previous study [29]. Length-for-age Z-scores (LAZ), weight-for-age Z-scores (WAZ), and weight-for-length Z-scores (WLZ) were calculated using Anthro software (version 3.1) based on the World Health Organization Child Growth Standards.

Stool collection

The parent of each child was provided with a plastic container and was instructed on how to collect stool samples. Parents removed the fecal sample from their child’s diaper, and the sample was brought or sent in screw-capped containers to the hospital. All fecal samples were frozen and stored at-80°C immediately following receipt until analysis.

Fecal calprotectin measurements

The calprotectin concentration in each sample was determined using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that quantitatively measures calprotectin levels (Bühlmann Laboratories AG, Schönenbuch, Switzerland), as previously described in our study[29] and another study[36]. The total coefficient of variation for this analysis was 15%, including the extraction procedure, with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of 4.7% and 4.1%, respectively [36]. Included in each sample run were blanks, standards and controls. Prior to analysis, frozen stool samples were thawed at room temperature. If the sample yielded a reading greater than the maximum calibrated level (600 μg/g), the remaining extract of the sample was further diluted 1:6 with incubation buffer, and the assay was repeated. Calprotectin levels are expressed as μg/g of feces.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Xinhua Hospital (XHEC-D-2012–015) and conducted in accordance with the revised Declaration of Helsinki. Written, informed consent was obtained from the parents of all of the children who participated in this study prior to their enrollment.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). LAZ, WAZ and WLZ were compared using t-tests. FC concentrations are presented as median, percentages and range. FC concentrations were also transformed to their base 10 logarithm (log10). FC values in the different age groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Differences between variables were considered statistically significant when p<0.05. A simple regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation between FC concentration and age. Spearman’s correlation test was used to evaluate the relationship between selected variables and FC values.


The study population included 288 children (115 females and 173 males) ranging in age from 1 to 18 months. The subjects were born at a median gestational age of 39 weeks (range 37–42 weeks), with a median birth weight of 3302 g (range 2500–4000 g). The numbers of children in each of the 5 age groups were 75 (1–3 months), 61 (3–6 months), 51 (6–9 months), 51 (9–12 months) and 50 (12–18 months). The mean values of LAZ, WAZ and WLZ were similar in all of the subgroups (p>0.05; Table 1). The FC concentrations were unevenly distributed, with a median FC concentration of 174.3 μg/g [range: 6.0–1097.7 μg/g; interquartile range (IQR): 76.3–333.6 μg/g] or 2.241 log10 μg/g (range: 0.775–3.041 log10 μg/g; IQR: 1.882–2.523 log10 μg/g) in all the subjects aged 1–18 months. The median values in the 5 age groups were 375.2 μg/g (1–3 months, range: 51.8–1097.7 μg/g, IQR: 229.0–575.1 μg/g; median: 2.574 log10 μg/g, range: 1.714–3.041 log10 μg/g, IQR: 2.360–2.760 log10 μg/g), 217.9 μg/g (3–6 months, range: 47.0–895.4 μg/g, IQR: 124.0–324.7 μg/g; median: 2.338 log10 μg/g, range: 1.672–2.952 log10 μg/g, IQR: 2.092–2.535 log10 μg/g), 127.7 μg/g (6–9 months, range: 10.0–557.2 μg/g, IQR: 65.1–214.3 μg/g; median: 2.106 log10 μg/g, range: 1.000–2.746 log10 μg/g, IQR: 1.814–2.331 log10 μg/g), 96.1 μg/g (9–12 months, range: 10.0–545.4 μg/g, IQR: 47.5–200.7 μg/g; median: 1.983 log10 μg/g, range: 1.000–2.737 log10 μg/g, IQR: 1.677–2.303 log10 μg/g) and 104.2 μg/g (12–18 months, range: 6.0–937.5 μg/g, IQR: 39.9–211.9 μg/g; median: 2.016 log10 μg/g, range: 0.775–2.972 log10 μg/g, IQR: 1.600–2.326 log10 μg/g). These results are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1. In each age group, no difference in FC concentration was observed between genders (median FC, males: 154.3 μg/g, females: 212.4 μg/g; p = 0.087). Males and females also had similar calprotectin concentrations in all of the subgroups (p>0.05). Among the subjects aged <12 months (238 children), 90 children (38%) were breastfed, and 148 children (62%) were not breastfed. The median FC concentration was significantly higher in breastfed children (323.5 μg/g) than in formula-fed children (148.3 μg/g, p<0.001).

Table 1. Fecal calprotectin concentrations, LAZ, WAZ and WLZ in apparently healthy children.

Fig 1. Fecal calprotectin concentrations in six age groups of healthy children.

When the five age groups were analyzed simultaneously, a significant between-group difference was found (p<0.001). Fecal calprotectin levels were significantly higher in healthy children aged 1–3 months than in healthy children aged 3–6 months (375.2 μg/g vs. 217.9 μg/g, p<0.001). Younger children (1–6 months) had substantially higher levels of FC (median: 282.7 μg/g; range: 47.0–545.4 μg/g; IQR: 156.3–483.1 μg/g) compared to healthy older children (6–18 months, median: 114.9 μg/g; range: 6.0–937.5 μg/g; IQR: 54.9–203.0 μg/g; p<0.001). No statistically significant difference in FC level was found among the children aged 6–18 months (6–9 months vs. 9–12 months, 6–9 months vs. 12–18 months and 9–12 months vs. 12–18 months, p>0.05). We found that the younger children exhibited a trend towards higher concentrations of FC (Table 1 and Fig. 1), and a statistically significant correlation was found between age and FC concentration (Spearman’s rho = -0.490, p< 0.001).

Twenty-seven percent of the subjects (78 cases) and 25% of the subjects aged <12 months (59 cases) had an FC concentration >350 μg/g, which has been reported as an upper limit of a normal range during the first year of life [37]. A simple correlation analysis of WLZ or WAZ with FC showed that these variables were negatively correlated (Spearman’s rho = -0.287, p<0.001; and Spearman’s rho = -0.243, p<0.001, respectively; Figs. 2 and 3).

Fig 2. Correlations between weight-for-length Z-scores and fecal calprotectin concentrations.

Fig 3. Correlations between weight-for-age Z-scores and fecal calprotectin concentrations.


This is the first survey of FC concentrations in an apparently healthy population aged 1 to 18 months in China. In our study, the median FC concentration was 174.3 μg/g in 288 healthy children. Higher values have previously been found in infants compared to older children [20, 24, 30, 38]. Consistent with previous results [25, 27, 39], our data confirm that infants in the first months of life have higher calprotectin concentrations than do healthy older children; the median values were 375.2 μg/g (1–3 months) and 217.9 μg/g (3–6 months) in the younger infants, after which the values dropped to approximately 100 μg/g (6–18 months) in the older infants and toddlers. Thus, the FC levels of 1–18-month-old children showed a downward trend with age. In our study, we provided the range of measured FC concentrations for subjects aged less than 18 months; these data could be of use in clinical practice as reference ranges for FC levels in children in between 1 and 18 months of age.

In the present study, FC levels varied with age and showed a significant and negative correlation with age. Children in the first months of life have high calprotectin levels; several underlying mechanisms and possible explanations [21] for this finding exist. First, FC levels may be high in the first months of life due to ongoing developmental processes occurring in the digestive tract during this stage of life. A high calprotectin concentration in feces appears to be a normal phenomenon in infants and may be related to the immaturity of adaptive immunity in infancy [26]. The high levels of FC in infants may reflect increased transepithelial migration of either granulocytes or newly recruited macrophages, and this migration could be related to intestinal mucosal immaturity [25, 40]. A second reason why FC levels may be high in the months after birth is that intestinal epithelial barrier function is immature during this time, and infants’ bodies have not developed the ability to regulate the microbial flora in the gut. High FC levels have been identified in healthy neonates in previous studies, and the findings of these studies have suggested that intestinal permeability is increased during the first weeks of life [25, 27, 41]. Because calprotectin is primarily derived from granulocytes, its concentration is directly proportional to the extent of granulocyte migration to the intestinal tract [14]. Thus, these high basal calprotectin levels could be due to higher intestinal permeability, the establishment of gut flora, and a response to alimentary antigens, as well as to the colonization of the gut by commensal microbes, which help to prevent infections with enteric pathogens and block interactions between pathogens and host cells [31, 39, 42, 43]. It has been hypothesized that intestinal colonization during the first weeks of life and potent chemotactic agents (such as formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine) have an important role in stimulating the transepithelial migration of granulocytes through the mucosal membrane during the development of oral tolerance and the regulation of the microbial flora[9], leading to a higher FC concentrations[44]. A third reason why FC concentrations may be high in the months after birth is that subclinical physiological inflammation may be present in the digestive tract, and such inflammation could result in the migration of granulocytes into the gut lumen [15, 21, 32]. Because calprotectin exhibits many biological activities, including bactericidal and fungicidal activities and immunomodulatory properties, it may be postulated that this protein could exert a beneficial effect on host defense in physiologically normal environments such as the intestinal ecosystem in healthy children during the first weeks of life [39]. We found that the type of feeding influences the FC concentration and that breastfed infants (<12 months) have higher FC levels than non-breastfed ones in the first months of life. This may reflect the fact that immunomodulatory factors in human milk influence the gut mucosa, as we described previously [45]. In the present study, we found that FC and anthropometric indices were negatively correlated, consistent with the findings of a previous study that age-corrected growth in both weight and height was negatively related to intestinal permeability (r = -0.41, p<0.001), i.e., that growth was poorer with higher permeability values[46]. Thus, children exhibiting poor growth may have higher intestinal permeability, leading to a higher FC concentration. In this study, the wide range of inter- and intra-individual variation in calprotectin excretion in feces may also be explained by normal biological variability, with day-to-day variations as have been described previously in adults and children [30, 47, 48].

Simple and noninvasive tests are needed in pediatric care. The Bühlmann calprotectin assay (Bühlmann Laboratories AG, Schönenbuch, Switzerland) yields the following threshold values for adults and children 4 to 17 years of age: normal values, FC values <50 μg/g; mild organic disease, FC values between 50 and 200 μg/g; and active organic disease, FC values >200 μg/g. However, these threshold values are not applicable to children 1 to 18 months of age. A large volume of literature concerning normal FC values in children exists. Olafsdottir et al. [26] found that mean FC levels were significantly higher in healthy infants than in healthy children aged >1 year (278 μg/g vs. 40 μg/g). Hestvik et al. [33] analyzed FC levels in healthy children and found that the median FC concentrations were 249 μg/g in children <1 year old, 75 μg/g in 1–4-year-olds and 28 μg/g in 4–12-year-olds. Berni et al. [49] reported that the median FC value was 28 μg/g in healthy children (age range 13–216 months), and Ezri et al. suggested that normal values vary with age, with higher cut-off values for children during the first year of life (<350 μg/g) than for older children (<275 μg/g) or adults (<50 μg/g) [37]. Although FC levels are considered to vary with age, 50 μg/g is considered to be useful a cut-off for individuals more than 4 years old [30, 33, 50, 51]. While 50 μg/g has thus been proposed as a cutoff that can be used for screening purposes, different cut-off values have been suggested for different patient groups. Some studies have investigated the measurement of FC levels as a diagnostic test in children. In a meta-analysis of prospective studies performed by von Roon et al., which included a total of 5,983 patients, the pooled sensitivities and specificities of FC levels in differentiating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from non-IBD diagnoses were 86% and 81%, respectively, with the higher precision at a cut-off of 100 μg/g[52]. FC may also be a useful marker for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), as an FC value of 792 μg/g was found to be 76% sensitive and 92% specific for the diagnosis of NEC [53]. The optimal cut-off value for FC to discriminate between neonates with NEC and those with suspected NEC and alternative final diagnoses was 286.2 μg/g, which resulted in a specificity of 93% and sensitivity of 86% for this test [54]. Moreover, it has been found that FC levels decrease as NEC resolves [55]. However, the usefulness of FC as a marker of disease may be controversial because high inter-individual variations occur in healthy infants [55]. In the current study, the observed FC levels in healthy children 0 to 6 months of age (median: 282 μg/g) were higher than those found in some previous studies [25, 27, 28, 32] and similar to those reported in other studies [24, 26, 33]; the differences in FC levels in across these studies may be influenced by genetic and environmental factors or a combination of both [56]. Due to inter-individual variability, sequential measurements of calprotectin should also be considered as an alternative to using defined cut-off levels; it would also be useful to investigate the utility of sequential FC measurements in a prospective study [51]. Fecal calprotectin levels should be evaluated carefully in younger children, especially during the first year of life [57]. Kapel et al. reviewed data on 1180 term and preterm neonates examined in twenty studies and found that an FC value greater than approximately 350 μg/g may indicate the presence of a digestive disease, when 350 μg/g was used as the upper reference limit, as recommended in the literature [39]. In our study, 27% (78) of children had an FC concentration greater than this upper limit; however, they displayed no symptoms of intestinal infection, such as vomiting, diarrhea, fever, or other specific symptoms, and the potential association between their high FC level and the presence of intestinal infection should be investigated further. FC levels should be investigated in larger cohorts of children (especially <12 months of age), and the periods surrounding intestinal development and digestive distress, in particular, should be analyzed.


Our study has several limitations. First, a potential weakness is that stool samples were collected from children’s diapers. Olafsdottir et al. [26] reported that this method of collection increases FC concentration by up to 30% because water is absorbed into the diaper. This could yield higher FC levels to be measured than are actually present, and therefore, direct stool collection at emission may be more practical[21]. Second, we did not further investigate the children with elevated FC concentrations to evaluate whether these concentrations normalized over time. Therefore, we are unable to provide an explanation for the FC levels that were higher than 350 μg/g. Third, we did not determine the FC concentration in healthy children aged 1.5–4 years in China; we anticipate undertaking this task in future work.


The FC levels of children aged 1–18 months show a downward trend with age and are greater than the normal levels observed in healthy adults and older children. In healthy children of age <6 months, FC levels are high. In children aged 6 to 18 months, FC concentrations are lower than those of children of age <6 months, but they are still higher than those of children of age >4 years. The ranges of FC values found in this study could be of use in future studies exploring the feasibility of using FC measurements to investigate gastrointestinal disorders in children. The possible relationship between FC levels and the health of the intestinal mucosa in children (especially <12 months) should be studied further.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XYS FL. Performed the experiments: XYS FL JQM SSG JLW JRL JZ. Analyzed the data: FL XYS JQM JLW JRL JZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SSG JRL JZ. Wrote the paper: XYS FL.


  1. 1. Berntzen HB, Fagerhol MK. L1, a major granulocyte protein; isolation of high quantities of its subunits. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1990; 50: 769–774. pmid:2293338
  2. 2. Steinbakk M, Naess-Andresen CF, Lingaas E, Dale I, Brandtzaeg P, Fagerhol MK. Antimicrobial actions of calcium binding leucocyte L1 protein, calprotectin. Lancet. 1990; 336: 763–765. pmid:1976144
  3. 3. Boussac M, Garin J. Calcium-dependent secretion in human neutrophils: a proteomic approach. Electrophoresis. 2000; 21: 665–672. pmid:10726775
  4. 4. Bjerke K, Halstensen TS, Jahnsen F, Pulford K, Brandtzaeg P. Distribution of macrophages and granulocytes expressing L1 protein (calprotectin) in human Peyer's patches compared with normal ileal lamina propria and mesenteric lymph nodes. Gut. 1993; 34: 1357–1363. pmid:8244101
  5. 5. Rammes A, Roth J, Goebeler M, Klempt M, Hartmann M, Sorg C. Myeloid-related protein (MRP) 8 and MRP14, calcium-binding proteins of the S100 family, are secreted by activated monocytes via a novel, tubulin-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 9496–9502. pmid:9083090
  6. 6. Brandtzaeg P, Dale I, Fagerhol MK. Distribution of a formalin-resistant myelomonocytic antigen (L1) in human tissues. II. Normal and aberrant occurrence in various epithelia. Am J Clin Pathol. 1987; 87: 700–707. pmid:3296737
  7. 7. Striz I, Trebichavsky I. Calprotectin—a pleiotropic molecule in acute and chronic inflammation. Physiol Res. 2004; 53: 245–253. pmid:15209531
  8. 8. Voganatsi A, Panyutich A, Miyasaki KT, Murthy RK. Mechanism of extracellular release of human neutrophil calprotectin complex. J Leukoc Biol. 2001; 70: 130–134. pmid:11435495
  9. 9. Roseth AG, Fagerhol MK, Aadland E, Schjonsby H. Assessment of the neutrophil dominating protein calprotectin in feces. A methodologic study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992; 27: 793–798. pmid:1411288
  10. 10. Roseth AG, Aadland E, Jahnsen J, Raknerud N. Assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis by faecal calprotectin, a novel granulocyte marker protein. Digestion. 1997; 58: 176–180. pmid:9144308
  11. 11. Bonnin Tomas A, Vila Vidal M, Rosell Camps A. Fecal calprotectin as a biomarker to distinguish between organic and functional gastrointestinal disease. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2007; 99: 689–693. pmid:18290691
  12. 12. Gaya DR, Lyon TD, Duncan A, Neilly JB, Han S, Howell J, et al. Faecal calprotectin in the assessment of Crohn's disease activity. QJM. 2005; 98: 435–441. pmid:15879440
  13. 13. Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P. Laboratory markers in IBD: useful, magic, or unnecessary toys? Gut. 2006; 55: 426–431. pmid:16474109
  14. 14. Silberer H, Kuppers B, Mickisch O, Baniewicz W, Drescher M, Traber L, et al. Fecal leukocyte proteins in inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Lab. 2005; 51: 117–126. pmid:15819166
  15. 15. Roseth AG, Schmidt PN, Fagerhol MK. Correlation between faecal excretion of indium-111-labelled granulocytes and calprotectin, a granulocyte marker protein, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999; 34: 50–54. pmid:10048733
  16. 16. Sipponen T, Savilahti E, Karkkainen P, Kolho KL, Nuutinen H, Turunen U, et al. Fecal calprotectin, lactoferrin, and endoscopic disease activity in monitoring anti-TNF-alpha therapy for Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008; 14: 1392–1398. pmid:18484671
  17. 17. Sipponen T, Savilahti E, Kolho KL, Nuutinen H, Turunen U, Farkkila M. Crohn's disease activity assessed by fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin: correlation with Crohn's disease activity index and endoscopic findings. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008; 14: 40–46. pmid:18022866
  18. 18. Poullis A, Foster R, Mendall MA, Fagerhol MK. Emerging role of calprotectin in gastroenterology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003; 18: 756–762. pmid:12795745
  19. 19. Tibble J, Teahon K, Thjodleifsson B, Roseth A, Sigthorsson G, Bridger S, et al. A simple method for assessing intestinal inflammation in Crohn's disease. Gut. 2000; 47: 506–513. pmid:10986210
  20. 20. Bunn SK, Bisset WM, Main MJ, Golden BE. Fecal calprotectin as a measure of disease activity in childhood inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001; 32: 171–177. pmid:11321388
  21. 21. Sykora J, Siala K, Huml M, Varvarovska J, Schwarz J, Pomahacova R. Evaluation of faecal calprotectin as a valuable non-invasive marker in distinguishing gut pathogens in young children with acute gastroenteritis. Acta Paediatr. 2010; 99: 1389–1395. pmid:20412103
  22. 22. Pang T, Leach ST, Katz T, Jaffe A, Day AS, Ooi CY. Elevated faecal M2-pyruvate kinase in children with cystic fibrosis: A clue to the increased risk of intestinal malignancy in adulthood? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov 5.
  23. 23. Summerton CB, Longlands MG, Wiener K, Shreeve DR. Faecal calprotectin: a marker of inflammation throughout the intestinal tract. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002; 14: 841–845. pmid:12172403
  24. 24. Rugtveit J, Fagerhol MK. Age-dependent variations in fecal calprotectin concentrations in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002; 34: 323–324; author reply 324–325. pmid:11964964
  25. 25. Campeotto F, Butel MJ, Kalach N, Derrieux S, Aubert-Jacquin C, Barbot L, et al. High faecal calprotectin concentrations in newborn infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004; 89: F353–355. pmid:15210674
  26. 26. Olafsdottir E, Aksnes L, Fluge G, Berstad A. Faecal calprotectin levels in infants with infantile colic, healthy infants, children with inflammatory bowel disease, children with recurrent abdominal pain and healthy children. Acta Paediatr. 2002; 91: 45–50. pmid:11883817
  27. 27. Nissen AC, van Gils CE, Menheere PP, Van den Neucker AM, van der Hoeven MA, Forget PP. Fecal calprotectin in healthy term and preterm infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004; 38: 107–108. pmid:14676607
  28. 28. Baldassarre ME, Altomare MA, Fanelli M, Carbone D, Di Bitonto G, Mautone A, et al. Does calprotectin represent a regulatory factor in host defense or a drug target in inflammatory disease? Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2007; 7: 1–5. pmid:17346198
  29. 29. Liu JR, Sheng XY, Hu YQ, Yu XY, Westcott J, Miller LV, et al. Fecal calprotectin levels are higher in rural than in urban Chinese infants and negatively associated with growth. BMC Pediatr. 2012; 12: 129. pmid:22917269
  30. 30. Fagerberg UL, Loof L, Merzoug RD, Hansson LO, Finkel Y. Fecal calprotectin levels in healthy children studied with an improved assay. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003; 37: 468–472. pmid:14508218
  31. 31. Savino F, Castagno E, Calabrese R, Viola S, Oggero R, Miniero R. High faecal calprotectin levels in healthy, exclusively breast-fed infants. Neonatology. 2010; 97: 299–304. pmid:19887860
  32. 32. Dorosko SM, Mackenzie T, Connor RI. Fecal calprotectin concentrations are higher in exclusively breastfed infants compared to those who are mixed-fed. Breastfeed Med. 2008; 3: 117–119. pmid:18564000
  33. 33. Hestvik E, Tumwine JK, Tylleskar T, Grahnquist L, Ndeezi G, Kaddu-Mulindwa DH, et al. Faecal calprotectin concentrations in apparently healthy children aged 0–12 years in urban Kampala, Uganda: a community-based survey. BMC Pediatr. 2011; 11: 9. pmid:21284894
  34. 34. Kukkonen K, Kuitunen M, Haahtela T, Korpela R, Poussa T, Savilahti E. High intestinal IgA associates with reduced risk of IgE-associated allergic diseases. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010; 21: 67–73. pmid:19566584
  35. 35. Josefsson S, Bunn SK, Domellof M. Fecal calprotectin in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007; 44: 407–413. pmid:17414135
  36. 36. Manz M, Burri E, Rothen C, Tchanguizi N, Niederberger C, Rossi L, et al. Value of fecal calprotectin in the evaluation of patients with abdominal discomfort: an observational study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012; 12: 5. pmid:22233279
  37. 37. Ezri J, Nydegger A. Pediatrics. Fecal calprotectin in children: use and interpretation. Rev Med Suisse. 2011; 7: 69–70. pmid:21309180
  38. 38. Bunn SK, Bisset WM, Main MJ, Gray ES, Olson S, Golden BE. Fecal calprotectin: validation as a noninvasive measure of bowel inflammation in childhood inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001; 33: 14–22. pmid:11479402
  39. 39. Kapel N, Campeotto F, Kalach N, Baldassare M, Butel MJ, Dupont C. Faecal calprotectin in term and preterm neonates. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010; 51: 542–547. pmid:20818270
  40. 40. Rouge C, Butel MJ, Piloquet H, Ferraris L, Legrand A, Vodovar M, et al. Fecal calprotectin excretion in preterm infants during the neonatal period. PLoS One. 2010; 5: e11083. pmid:20552029
  41. 41. van Elburg RM, Fetter WP, Bunkers CM, Heymans HS. Intestinal permeability in relation to birth weight and gestational and postnatal age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003; 88: F52–55. pmid:12496227
  42. 42. Weaver LT, Laker MF, Nelson R. Intestinal permeability in the newborn. Arch Dis Child. 1984; 59: 236–241. pmid:6424583
  43. 43. Splichal I, Fagerhol MK, Trebichavsky I, Splichalova A, Schulze J. The effect of intestinal colonization of germ-free pigs with Escherichia coli on calprotectin levels in plasma, intestinal and bronchoalveolar lavages. Immunobiology. 2005; 209: 681–687. pmid:15804046
  44. 44. Nash S, Stafford J, Madara JL. Effects of polymorphonuclear leukocyte transmigration on the barrier function of cultured intestinal epithelial monolayers. J Clin Invest. 1987; 80: 1104–1113. pmid:3116044
  45. 45. Li F, Ma J, Geng S, Wang J, Ren F, Sheng X. Comparison of the different kinds of feeding on the level of fecal calprotectin. Early Hum Dev. 2014; 90: 471–475. pmid:25025530
  46. 46. Campbell DI, Elia M, Lunn PG. Growth faltering in rural Gambian infants is associated with impaired small intestinal barrier function, leading to endotoxemia and systemic inflammation. J Nutr. 2003; 133: 1332–1338. pmid:12730419
  47. 47. Husebye E, Ton H, Johne B. Biological variability of fecal calprotectin in patients referred for colonoscopy without colonic inflammation or neoplasm. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96: 2683–2687. pmid:11569695
  48. 48. Caplan A, Walker L, Rasquin A. Validation of the pediatric Rome II criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders using the questionnaire on pediatric gastrointestinal symptoms. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005; 41: 305–316. pmid:16131985
  49. 49. Berni Canani R, Rapacciuolo L, Romano MT, Tanturri de Horatio L, Terrin G, Manguso F, et al. Diagnostic value of faecal calprotectin in paediatric gastroenterology clinical practice. Dig Liver Dis. 2004; 36: 467–470. pmid:15285526
  50. 50. Ton H, Brandsnes , Dale S, Holtlund J, Skuibina E, Schjonsby H, et al. Improved assay for fecal calprotectin. Clin Chim Acta. 2000; 292: 41–54. pmid:10686275
  51. 51. Campeotto F, Baldassarre M, Butel MJ, Viallon V, Nganzali F, Soulaines P, et al. Fecal calprotectin: cutoff values for identifying intestinal distress in preterm infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009; 48: 507–510. pmid:19322064
  52. 52. von Roon AC, Karamountzos L, Purkayastha S, Reese GE, Darzi AW, Teare JP, et al. Diagnostic precision of fecal calprotectin for inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal malignancy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 803–813. pmid:17324124
  53. 53. Aydemir O, Aydemir C, Sarikabadayi YU, Canpolat FE, Erdeve O, Biyikli Z, et al. Fecal calprotectin levels are increased in infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012.
  54. 54. Thuijls G, Derikx JP, van Wijck K, Zimmermann LJ, Degraeuwe PL, Mulder TL, et al. Non-invasive markers for early diagnosis and determination of the severity of necrotizing enterocolitis. Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 1174–1180. pmid:20485148
  55. 55. Vaos G, Kostakis ID, Zavras N, Chatzemichael A. The role of calprotectin in pediatric disease. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013: 542363. pmid:24175291
  56. 56. Tamboli CP, Richard F, Colombel JF. Fecal calprotectin in Crohn's disease: new family ties. Gastroenterology. 2003; 124: 1972–1974. pmid:12806631
  57. 57. Chen CC, Huang JL, Chang CJ, Kong MS. Fecal calprotectin as a correlative marker in clinical severity of infectious diarrhea and usefulness in evaluating bacterial or viral pathogens in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012; 55: 541–547. pmid:22699836