Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

DNA Base Pair Resolution Measurements Using Resonance Energy Transfer Efficiency in Lanthanide Doped Nanoparticles

DNA Base Pair Resolution Measurements Using Resonance Energy Transfer Efficiency in Lanthanide Doped Nanoparticles

  • Aleksandra Delplanque, 
  • Dominika Wawrzynczyk, 
  • Pawel Jaworski, 
  • Katarzyna Matczyszyn, 
  • Krzysztof Pawlik, 
  • Malcolm Buckle, 
  • Marcin Nyk, 
  • Claude Nogues, 
  • Marek Samoc


Lanthanide-doped nanoparticles are of considerable interest for biodetection and bioimaging techniques thanks to their unique chemical and optical properties. As a sensitive luminescence material, they can be used as (bio) probes in Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) where trivalent lanthanide ions (La3+) act as energy donors. In this paper we present an efficient method to transfer ultrasmall (ca. 8 nm) NaYF4 nanoparticles dispersed in organic solvent to an aqueous solution via oxidation of the oleic acid ligand. Nanoparticles were then functionalized with single strand DNA oligomers (ssDNA) by inducing covalent bonds between surface carboxylic groups and a 5’ amine modified-ssDNA. Hybridization with the 5’ fluorophore (Cy5) modified complementary ssDNA strand demonstrated the specificity of binding and allowed the fine control over the distance between Eu3+ ions doped nanoparticle and the fluorophore by varying the number of the dsDNA base pairs. First, our results confirmed nonradiative resonance energy transfer and demonstrate the dependence of its efficiency on the distance between the donor (Eu3+) and the acceptor (Cy5) with sensitivity at a nanometre scale.


Lanthanide-doped nanoparticles (La-NPs) are of interest in nanoscience because of their unique chemical and optical properties, including large effective Stokes shift, long luminescence lifetimes, narrow emission bands and high photochemical stability [1,2]. Additionally, their low toxicity and high detection sensitivity make them a perfect candidate for biosensing and bioimaging applications [35], as well as a promising alternative to well established bioprobes such as organic dyes or quantum dots. Currently, La-NPs are successfully implemented in bioassays [6], drug delivery [7], imaging of cells, tissues and small animals [8], and photodynamic therapy [9]. Since excitation and emission of La-NPs can occur in visible and NIR regions, the problems of biological tissue autofluorescence or phototoxicity can be easily overcome [10]. Although, the NIR excitation through the up-conversion process seems to be more advantageous, the down converted emission has higher quantum yield making the results of spectroscopic measurements less susceptible to the fluctuation in sample concentration or excitation power. One of the main drawbacks, regarding biological applications of La-NPs is their hydrophobicity. Their synthesis usually requires the presence of a hydrophobic organic ligand to stabilize the crystal structure [11]. However, the presence of these ligands on the surface of NPs causes their low solubility in water and unfavorable surface properties. Therefore, an efficient method of transferring La-NPs into aqueous solution is essential to work with biomolecules [12]. A large number of techniques that alleviate the hydrophobic character of La-NPs and simultaneously provide biologically functional moieties, such as carboxyl, hydroxyl, amine or thiol groups have been developed [1]. These techniques can be divided into those making use of ligand oxidation [12], exchange [1316] or the attraction of molecules with a functional group [1719] and those that involve the deposition of a functionalized silane layer on the La-NPs surface [20,21]. In the particular case of NaYF4 La-NPs synthesized using thermal decomposition reactions [22], oleic acid molecules serve as capping ligands and produce a protective monolayer around the NPs [11,23]. An efficient method to modify surface properties of NaYF4-NPs involves selective oxidation of a C-C double bond of oleic acid to produce two carboxylic acids [12,24,25]. Carboxylic groups on the NaYF4-NPs surface increase the hydrophilicity of the system and allow biomolecules such as nucleic acids, proteins or antibodies to be immobilized. These may then be conjugated with fluorescent tags and used as luminescence probes for detection of biomolecules and their interactions or bioimaging of cells and tissues [8]. NaYF4-NPs doped with various lanthanide ions can be used in Förster/Fluorescence or Luminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET or LRET) as sensitive and selective luminescence probes [26], where trivalent lanthanide ions serve as energy donors [2731]. The LRET approach usually employed in experiments is an extension of the well-known FRET [32,33] characterized by energy transfer from an excited donor to an acceptor placed in its direct vicinity. However, as a luminescence strong reabsorption process, LRET is independent of the relative distance between donor and acceptor molecules, thus obviating the need for their physical proximity. Thus, to detect intermolecular interactions and to measure distances between fluorescent (bio) molecules [5,6] FRET is more appropriate. The principles of FRET require partial overlapping between the emission spectrum of the donor and absorption spectrum of the acceptor. As FRET is a distance-dependent phenomenon, a short distance between donor and acceptor is crucial and depends on the Förster radius (R0—the distance at which 50% of energy is transferred to the acceptor). In the case of lanthanide ions acting as donors, the value of R0 can be extended to 7.5 nm because of their spectral properties and thus allows efficient energy transfer in the range of 10–20 nm [27].

We demonstrate that ultra small (ca. 8 nm) NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs can be efficiently transferred into water through oxidation of oleic acid ligands with the Lemieux—van Rudloff reagent (5.7 mM KMnO4 and 0.105 M NaIO4) [12,24] and its ruthenium III salt analogue (1.57 mM RuCl3·x H2O and 0.105 M NaIO4) [25]. Carboxylic groups on the surface of hydrophilic NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs were functionalized and conjugated with 5’ amine tagged single strand DNA by the formation of covalent bonds at the interface between the La-NPs and the DNA strand. Fluorophore (Cy5) placed at the 5’ extremity of the complementary ssDNA led to the assembly of the energy-acceptor couple for the energy transfer process to take place. Different lengths of DNA (26 bp, 31 bp, 41 bp, 50 bp) were examined in order to optimize the distance for an efficient FRET. Measurements of emission spectra and luminescence lifetime values confirmed the dependence of the FRET efficiency with the donor-acceptor distance; the optimum distance being for the 26bp DNA double strand. In addition, digestion of dsDNA by a restriction enzyme (BamHI) allowed the controlled release of Cy5 from the complex to the solution, leading to the extension of the FRET signal, demonstrating thereby the specificity and functionality of such bio-probes.

Materials and Methods

Reagents and Oligonucleotides

All experiments were performed with double distilled water; buffers were filtered before use. N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and GE. Oligonucleotides were purchased from Eurofins Genomics and Sigma.

Synthesis of NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs and their Transfer to Water

Synthesis of small (ca. 8 nm) NaYF4-NPs doped with 10% of Eu3+ ions was carried out essentially as described in [11,26]. In order to transfer synthesized NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs into water, we used two protocols: (i) Oxidation with the Lemieux—van Rudloff reagent: a mixture of 2 ml synthesized NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs in cyclohexane, 10 ml cyclohexane, 7 ml tert-butanol, 1 ml water and 0.5 ml K2CO3 aqueous solution (5%) wt was placed in a round-bottom flask and stirred at room temperature for 20 min. 2 ml of the freshly prepared Lemieux—van Rudloff reagent (5.7 mM KMnO4 and 0.105 M NaIO4) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at 40°C for 48 hours, centrifuged and then washed with water, acetone and ethanol respectively, then twice with water. NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs were then dispersed in 6 ml water. (ii) Oxidation with RuCl3/NaIO4: a mixture of 2 ml synthesized NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs in cyclohexane and 21 ml water/ethyl acetate/acetonitrile (3/2/2) was placed in a round-bottom flask and stirred at room temperature. 2 ml of the freshly prepared reagent 1.57 mM RuCl3·x H2O and 0.105 M NaIO4 was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 hours then the aqueous fraction was purified with chloroform several times. The final product was stored at 4°C or used directly for further experiments.

Bio-conjugation of NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs

NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs previously transferred to water were activated with a mixture of EDC/NHS (ratio 1:1; 0.4 M EDC, 0.1 M NHS) from 30 min to overnight to facilitate the coupling of carboxyl groups to amine-tagged DNA. 8–10 μM ssDNA-NH2 was then added to the aqueous solution of NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs and incubated for 2–48 hours. Next, 8–10 μM of the complementary DNA strand in PBS buffer was incubated for additional 2 to 8 hours. Covalent binding of oligonucleotides to the NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs surface was examined with DNA strands labeled with α [32P]. Additionally, samples containing dsDNA were digested by the restriction enzyme BamHI for 1–2 hours at 37°C. DNA sequences are listed in S1 Table.

Sample characterization

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were performed with a FEI Tecnai G2 20 X-TWIN microscope. Emission spectra of samples were recorded with a SPEX FluoroLog-3 (Horiba-Jobin-Yvon) spectrofluorimeter. In order to measure the FRET efficiency we used a home-built system consisting of a commercial tunable Ti:Sapphire laser pumped by a Nd:YAG LOTIS TII laser (Belarus). Luminescence signals, after excitation with 394 nm laser line from second harmonic of Nd:YAG LOTIS TII laser, were detected using a Synapse CCD camera (Horiba-Jobin-Yvon). Fluorescence decay curves, after 394 nm excitation, were recorded for with a photomultiplier (HAMAMATSU R928) output fed into a LeCroy Wave Surfer 425 digital oscilloscope. The decay curves were recorded for the 5D07F2 emission band in Eu3+ ions at 612 nm with wavelength selection performed by a JobinYvon THR1000 monochromator. All the decay curves were fitted with the double exponential model

Results and Discussion

All experiments were performed with NaYF4-NPs doped with 10% Eu3+ [11]. Analysis of TEM images showed that the NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs before transfer to water were uniform in size with a very narrow size distribution and had a regular round shape. According to TEM images and data from DLS (Dynamic Light Scattering) (see S1 Fig. and S2 Fig.) their average size was 8 nm. The small size of NPs increases the surface—volume ratio and thus more ions of the doped NPs structure are exposed on their surface [11]. As a consequence doped ions are more easily available for potential interactions with ligands or molecules of interest attached to the surface. This also facilitates the positioning of the ions and their involvement in FRET with bound (bio) molecules. Moreover, the small size of the synthesized NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs improves specificity for binding biomolecules and provides higher control for further applications.

Transfer to water

Transfer of hydrophobic NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs to water was essential to carry out further experiments with biological molecules. Amongst a range of available and tested methods, we chose transfer into water via oxidation of a hydrophobic ligand that caps NPs [12]. Oleic acid which stabilized the structure of NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs, was oxidized in order to break double C-C bonds into dicarboxylic ligand (azelaic acid). Oxidation was performed either with the Lemieux—van Rudloff reagent (KMnO4/NaIO4) in a mixture of cyclohexan/tert-butanol/water or with the reagent RuCl3/NaIO4 in a mixture of water/ethyl acetate/acetonitrile [25]. During the reaction changes of color were observed indicating that oxidation had occurred. The reaction with the Lemieux—van Rudloff reagent changed the colour from purple to dark orange. Initial changes were observed after 4–5 hours. Oxidation by the RuCl3/NaIO4 reagent changed the colour from bright brown at the beginning to dark green at the end of the incubation period (2 hours).

After the purification steps, NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs oxidized with the Lemieux—van Rudloff reagent remained yellow and were not very stable in water, probably due to the presence of manganate ions that had not been completely removed. Therefore, to avoid the possible presence of remaining oxidant in water, we introduced 10 mM ascorbic acid, to reduce the contaminant in one of the purification steps. When transfer to water was performed with RuCl3/NaIO4 as a catalyst, the final product after complete oxidation was transparent and did not sediment. NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs were well dispersed and they did not aggregate. Therefore, all the following experiments were carried out with NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs oxidized with RuCl3/NaIO4 reagent.

To control the efficiency of the oxidation reaction, luminescence measurements were performed. Fig. 1 presents the comparison of Eu3+ characteristic emission before and after the transfer of NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs in water. NaYF4:10% Eu+3-NPs in cyclohexane showed intense peaks at 592, 615, 651 and 696 nm when excited at 394 nm (Fig. 1a). Those bands could be attributed to the consecutive 5D07FJ = 1,2,3,4 f-f electronic transitions in Eu3+ ions [11,34]. It is of interest that after the oxidation reaction two separate fractions were distinguished—the organic and the aqueous phases. To control if all the NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs were transferred to water during the reaction, emission spectra of both fractions were measured. Fig. 1b presents the emission spectrum of the aqueous fraction excited at 394 nm. We observed again four characteristic emission bands of Eu3+ ions, as was observed in the case of synthesized hydrophobic NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs (Fig. 1a). Moreover, measurement of the emission spectra of the organic fraction after 394 nm excitation (Fig. 1c) did not show any luminescence signals from NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs, indicating that NPs were efficiently transferred into the aqueous fraction. As this fraction did not contain hydrophobic elements, oxidation of oleic acid ligands present on the NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs surface was therefore completed. However, the intensity of the peaks before and after oxidation (Fig. 1a and 1b) decreased most probably due to the loss of material during the purification steps.

Fig 1. Luminescent properties of NaYF4:10%Eu+3 NPs.

a) emission spectrum of synthesized NaYF4:10%Eu+3 NPs in cyclohexane b) emission spectrum of NaYF4:10%Eu+3 NPs after transfer to water—aqueous fraction c) emission spectrum of the organic fraction remaining after NPs transferred to water. All emission spectra were carried out with the excitation wavelength of 394 nm at room temperature.


The carboxylic groups created on the surface of NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs upon transfer into water were activated by EDC/NHS to facilitate the covalent binding of 5’ amine-tagged ssDNA [35]. To confirm the formation of amide bonds at the interface, we used DNA radiolabeled at its 3’ extremity. An image and description of agarose gel electrophoresis of NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NP and DNA complexes can be found in Supporting Information (S3 Fig.).

NaYF4:10%Eu+3 NPs conjugated with ssDNA-NH2 were incubated in PBS buffer with the complementary DNA strand labeled with the fluorescent Cy5 dye at the 5’ end. The length of the complementary DNA strand determined the distance separating the NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NP surface from the Cy5 fluorophore. Assuming that after hybridization the double strand was a B-DNA tertiary structure, the distance between two base pairs (bp) should correspond to 0.34 nm. Furthermore, the ssDNA-NH2 used in all experiments contained additional 5 thymine bases that served as a spacer and an ‘aminolinker’ with six-carbon chain of a total length of around 1 nm. Therefore using oligonucleotides of 26, 31, 41 and 50 base pairs, we obtained a distance range between 11 nm for 26 bp DNA and nearly 20 nm for 50 bp DNA. The estimated distance between the donor and the acceptor, imposed by the length of the complementary DNA strand was further used for comparison with values obtained based on spectroscopic measurements and FRET formalism [27].

Energy transfer efficiency measurements

Cy5 as a DNA end labelling dye was chosen because its absorption band overlaps two main emission bands of NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs (5D07F2 and 5D07F1) (Fig. 2). The laser light used for this experiment (λ = 394 nm) to excite the Eu3+ ions luminescence did not cause absorption from Cy5 molecules. Based on the spectroscopic features of separate components of the systems studied, conditions should be sufficient for NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs → Cy5 dye FRET or energy reabsorption to occur. In order to draw conclusions about the dominating mechanism we performed a detailed spectroscopic investigation of the prepared hybrid systems.

Fig 2. Luminescence spectra of NaYF4:10%Eu3+ NPs-ssDNA-NH2 complex excited with 394 nm laser light (red curve).

The absorption (αCy5, grey shaded curve) and emission (I(λ)Cy5, blue shaded curve) spectra under 650 nm excitation for Cy5 fluorophore are presented for comparison.

First, we measured the luminescence spectra of hybrid systems having Cy5 dye molecules at different fixed distances from NPs surfaces. It must be borne in mind, that we could not fully exclude DNA bending and such a situation most probably occurred in the systems under study, and may have introduced some degree of inaccuracy in estimating distances between NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs and Cy5 molecules. Additionally, we assumed an equal concentration of the NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs in samples containing dsDNA-Cy5. The results of luminescence spectra measurements are presented in Fig. 3.

Fig 3. Luminescence spectra of NaYF4:10%Eu3+ NP-DNA hybrid systems.

The ssDNA@NaYF4:Eu3+ sample (red curve) is considered as a reference. The 26bp@NaYF4:Eu3+ (green), 31bp@NaYF4:Eu3+ (blue), 41bp@NaYF4:Eu3+ (magenta) and 50bp@NaYF4:Eu3+ (yellow) samples correspond respectively to luminescence spectra of the complexes NaYF4:10%Eu3+NP- with 26bp, 31bp, 41bp and 50 bp dsDNA.

Hybridization of complementary DNA strands tagged with Cy5 dye resulted in an overall decrease of Eu3+ luminescence and in the appearance of an additional band in the emission spectra. This broad band in the range of 640–680 nm was attributed to Cy5 emission. The increasing distance between NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs and Cy5 fluorophore molecules resulted in a decrease of Cy5 luminescence. In other words, the observed decreased intensity of NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs emission together with the appearance of the Cy5 emission band in the spectra should be due to energy transfer between the donor and the acceptor. However, measurements of only luminescence spectra are inconclusive concerning the dominant mechanism present in the system. Additionally, some degree of concentration fluctuation of optically active species in investigated samples, as well as fluctuation of the excitation intensity needs to be taken into account. These factors can greatly influence the results of luminescence spectra measurements, and thus make the experimental data insufficient to clearly confirm FRET based energy transfer. The luminescence lifetime values of NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs with bound ssDNA-NH2, as well as those for hybridized complementary fluorescent-tagged DNA strands of different length should provide more detailed information concerning the dominant mechanism. The measured luminescence decays were double exponential. The presence of Cy5 molecules resulted in a decrease of both long and short components (Fig. 4a and 4b respectively) of the 5D0 excited state lifetime of Eu3+ doped NaYF4-NPs. The representative decay curves for ssDNA@NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs, 26bp@NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs, 31bp@NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs, 41bp@NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs and 50bp@NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs are [Apex: for all instances “YF4” subscript 4; for “Eu3+” superscript 3+] presented in Supporting Information (S4 Fig.). This can be taken as direct evidence of nonradiative energy transfer. Additionally, the shortening of the lifetime was most effective for the shortest dsDNA (26 bp), in which the Cy5 fluorophore was closest to the surface of Eu3+ doped NPs. Increasing the Eu3+ doped NP→Cy5 distance resulted in a smaller luminescence lifetime change. Based on FRET formalism and luminescence lifetime measurements, we were able to calculate the energy transfer efficiencies: where τD is the lifetime of the donor in the presence of the acceptor, and τD is the lifetime of the donor in the absence of the acceptor molecules.[36] As can be seen from data shown in Fig. 4 the highest energy transfer efficiency was observed for the shortest dsDNA-Cy5 (26 bp).

Fig 4. Luminescence lifetime.

a) Long and b) short components of luminescence lifetime values measured at 612 nm for the 5D07F2 emission band in Eu3+ ions in hybrid systems consisting of 10% Eu3+ doped NaYF4 NPs and DNA molecules bound to the NPs surface. The wavelength selection was performed with a JobinYvon THR1000 monochromator. Included numbers are the energy transfer efficiencies, η calculated based on the FRET mechanism.

In order to estimate the distance range over which energy transfer was most efficient we calculated the Förster radius (Ro [Å]), at which η = 50%. Details concerning the calculation can be found in S2 Supporting Information. Taking extreme values of the R0 (S5 Fig.) and the measured energy transfer efficiencies (η) for short lifetime components, we calculated theoretical distances between NaYF4:10%Eu3+ and Cy5 dye molecules (r) [36].

These fell in the ranges: 8.4 nm < r26bp > 16.3 nm, 10.6 nm < r31bp > 17.7 nm, 10.9 nm < r41bp > 18.1 nm and 11.0 nm < r50bp > 18.4 nm. The results of calculations of r values could be compared with the estimated real nano-scale distances from NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs surfaces to Cy5 dye. Assuming that donor and acceptor were separated with azelaic acid, ‘amino linker’, 5 thymines and dsDNA of lengths 26 bp, 31 bp, 41 bp and 50 bp, the distances were ~11 nm, ~13 nm, ~17 nm and ~20 nm, respectively, which is in good agreement with the values obtained from FRET based calculations. The experimental results converge with the performed calculations confirming a nonradiative energy transfer mechanism in these systems.

Finally, we suggest that ultra-small Eu3+ doped NaYF4-NPs may be useful as nano-rulers for measuring distances on a nanometric scale.

Controlled decrease of FRET—enzymatic digestion of DNA

The presence of an additional band at around 670 nm (Fig. 3) and lifetime measurements (Fig. 4) confirmed that nonradiative energy transfer occurred. However, in order to demonstrate both the specificity of DNA binding to the surface, and the accessibility/integrity of bound DNA, complexes were incubated with BamHI restriction enzyme. As a result, the dsDNA was cut and the fluorescent fragment released into the solution. A complex of NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs-ssDNA-NH2 incubated with a non-complementary ssDNA-Cy5 (sequences are listed in S1 Table) was taken as a control. Comparison of emission spectra before and after digestion (Fig. 5) indicated that the wide band (at around 670 nm) disappeared after digestion. Complete loss of this peak after digestion of dsDNA-Cy5 by BamHI and lack of the signal at 670 nm in the case of the control sample confirmed that dsDNA attached to the surface was accessible for further biological reactions.

Fig 5. Emission spectra of the 26bp hybrid system upon enzymatic digestion.

a) before digestion, b) after enzymatic digestion with BamHI. NaYF4:10%Eu3+ NPs conjugated with ssDNA-NH2 and the complementary (red curve) and non-complementary (black curve) DNA strand with Cy5 tag. Samples were excited at the wavelength of 394 nm.


We have demonstrated an efficient method to transfer ultra-small Eu3+ doped NaYF4 NPs dispersed in organic solvent to an aqueous environment via oxidation of the oleic acid ligand by using Lemieux—van Rudloff reagent and its analogue. We present an easy and efficient means of functionalizing NaYF4:10%Eu3+-NPs with DNA by inducing covalent bonds between COOH groups on the La-NPs surface and NH2 tagged DNA. Our results demonstrate that nonradiative energy transfer occurs between Eu3+ ions doped in the crystal nanostructure of NaYF4-NPs and Cy5 fluorophores placed at the end of dsDNA strands. Different lengths of DNA were chosen in order to show the dependence of energy transfer efficiency on the distance between the donor and the acceptor in a range from 11 to 20 nm. A new approach based on results presented in this paper clearly indicates that efficient FRET using Eu3+ ions as donor energy is a robust technique giving accurate and reproducible results [2831]. Enzymatic digestion of restriction sites of NP bound dsDNA additionally confirmed the functionality of probes and the stability of the complexes. This study provides a foundation for the development of biodetecting systems for advanced biophotonics applications.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) image of NaYF4:10%Eu+3 NPs.

a) in chloroform, b) after transfer to water.


S2 Fig. Size distribution of NaYF4:10%Eu+3 NPs.

a) in chloroform, b) after transfer to water. Each of the results presented represents an average of 6 repeated measurements.


S3 Fig. 1% agarose electrophoresis gel of complexes of NaYF4:10%Eu+3 NPs and radioactive labeled DNA.

1- NPs conjugated with ssDNA-NH2, 2- NPs conjugated with ssDNA-NH2 + 50bp-Cy5 Complementary ssDNA, 3- NPs conjugated with ssDNA-NH2 + 50bp-Cy5 non-complementary ssDNA.


S4 Fig. Luminescence decay curves of NaYF4:10%Eu+3 NPs conjugated.

With ssDNA-NH2 (a) and complexes of NaYF4:10%Eu+3 NPs and Cy5 fluorescent tag placed at the end of 26 bp dsDNA (b), 31 bp dsDNA (c), 40 bp dsDNA (d) and 51 bp dsDNA (e). The decay curves were measured at 612 nm for the 5D07F2 emission band in Eu3+ ions, with the wavelength selection was performed by a JobinYvon THR1000 monochromator.


S5 Fig. Förster distances as a function of NaYF4:10%Eu3+ NPs quantum yield.

(QY), calculated for different relative molecular orientation of donor and acceptor: κ2.


S1 Table. Sequences of oligonucleotides

Consensus recognition sites for BamHI are underlined. Sequences numbered 2-5 and 6 correspond respectively to complementary and non-complementary single stranded DNA with respect to the ssDNA attached to the NaYF4:10%Eu+3-NPs surface.



We thank Nicolas Bogliotti for his remarks concerning NPs transfer methodology and the PPSM (UMR8531) Laboratory for the use of their spectrofluorimeter.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KM KP MB MN CN MS. Performed the experiments: AD DW PJ KM MN CN. Analyzed the data: AD DW KM MN CN MS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MB MS. Wrote the paper: AD DW KM MB MN CN MS.


  1. 1. Gnach A, Bednarkiewicz A (2012) Lanthanide-doped up-converting nanoparticles: Merits and challenges. Nano Today 7: 532–563.
  2. 2. Wang GF, Peng Q, Li YD (2011) Lanthanide-Doped Nanocrystals: Synthesis, Optical-Magnetic Properties, and Applications. Accounts of Chemical Research 44: 322–332. pmid:21395256
  3. 3. Wang F, Liu XG (2009) Recent advances in the chemistry of lanthanide-doped upconversion nanocrystals. Chemical Society Reviews 38: 976–989. pmid:19421576
  4. 4. Lin M, Zhao Y, Wang SQ, Liu M, Duan ZF, et al. (2012) Recent advances in synthesis and surface modification of lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biotechnology Advances 30: 1551–1561. pmid:22561011
  5. 5. Liu YS, Tu DT, Zhu HM, Ma E, Chen XY (2013) Lanthanide-doped luminescent nano-bioprobes: from fundamentals to biodetection. Nanoscale 5: 1369–1384. pmid:23223801
  6. 6. Eliseeva SV, Bunzli JCG (2010) Lanthanide luminescence for functional materials and bio-sciences. Chemical Society Reviews 39: 189–227. pmid:20023849
  7. 7. Wang C, Cheng LA, Liu ZA (2011) Drug delivery with upconversion nanoparticles for multi-functional targeted cancer cell imaging and therapy. Biomaterials 32: 1110–1120. pmid:20965564
  8. 8. Yao CZ, Tong YX (2012) Lanthanide ion-based luminescent nanomaterials for bioimaging. Trac-Trends in Analytical Chemistry 39: 60–71.
  9. 9. Shimoyama A, Watase H, Liu Y, Ogura SI, Hagiya Y, et al. (2013) Access to a novel near-infrared photodynamic therapy through the combined use of 5-aminolevulinic acid and lanthanide nanoparticles. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy 10: 607–614. pmid:24284118
  10. 10. Hemmer E, Venkatachalam N, Hyodo H, Hattori A, Ebina Y, et al. (2013) Upconverting and NIR emitting rare earth based nanostructures for NIR-bioimaging. Nanoscale 5: 11339–11361. pmid:23938606
  11. 11. Wawrzynczyk D, Bednarkiewicz A, Nyk M, Strek W, Samoc M (2013) Ligand-dependent luminescence of ultra-small Eu3+-doped NaYF4 nanoparticles. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 15.
  12. 12. Chen ZG, Chen HL, Hu H, Yu MX, Li FY, et al. (2008) Versatile synthesis strategy for carboxylic acid-functionalized upconverting nanophosphors as biological labels. Journal of the American Chemical Society 130: 3023–3029. pmid:18278910
  13. 13. Boyer JC, Manseau MP, Murray JI, van Veggel F (2010) Surface Modification of Upconverting NaYF4 Nanoparticles with PEG-Phosphate Ligands for NIR (800 nm) Biolabeling within the Biological Window. Langmuir 26: 1157–1164. pmid:19810725
  14. 14. Zhang QB, Song K, Zhao JW, Kong XG, Sun YJ, et al. (2009) Hexanedioic acid mediated surface-ligand-exchange process for transferring NaYF4:Yb/Er (or Yb/Tm) up-converting nanoparticles from hydrophobic to hydrophilic. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 336: 171–175. pmid:19428023
  15. 15. Xiong LQ, Yang TS, Yang Y, Xu CJ, Li FY (2010) Long-term in vivo biodistribution imaging and toxicity of polyacrylic acid-coated upconversion nanophosphors. Biomaterials 31: 7078–7085. pmid:20619791
  16. 16. Li D, Dong BA, Bai X, Wang Y, Song HW (2010) Influence of the TGA Modification on Upconversion Luminescence of Hexagonal-Phase NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+ Nanoparticles. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 114: 8219–8226.
  17. 17. Jiang GC, Pichaandi J, Johnson NJJ, Burke RD, van Veggel F (2012) An Effective Polymer Cross-Linking Strategy To Obtain Stable Dispersions of Upconverting NaYF4 Nanoparticles in Buffers and Biological Growth Media for Biolabeling Applications. Langmuir 28: 3239–3247. pmid:22250577
  18. 18. Cao TY, Yang Y, Gao YA, Zhou J, Li ZQ, et al. (2011) High-quality water-soluble and surface-functionalized upconversion nanocrystals as luminescent probes for bioimaging. Biomaterials 32: 2959–2968. pmid:21262531
  19. 19. Yi GS, Chow GM (2007) Water-soluble NaYF4: Yb,Er(Tm)/NaYF4/polymer core/shell/shell nanoparticles with significant enhancement of upconversion fluorescence. Chemistry of Materials 19: 341–343.
  20. 20. Stober W, Fink A, Bohn E (1968) Controlled Growth of Monodisperse Silica Spheres in Micron Size Range. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 26: 62-&.
  21. 21. Kong DY, Wang ZL, Lin CK, Quan ZW, Li YY, et al. (2007) Biofunctionalization of CeF3: Tb3+ nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 18.
  22. 22. Chen GY, Ohulchanskyy TY, Kumar R, Agren H, Prasad PN (2010) Ultrasmall Monodisperse NaYF4:Yb3+/Tm3+ Nanocrystals with Enhanced Near-Infrared to Near-Infrared Upconversion Photoluminescence. Acs Nano 4: 3163–3168. pmid:20509664
  23. 23. Chen J, Zhao JX (2012) Upconversion Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Mechanism, and Applications in Sensing. Sensors 12: 2414–2435. pmid:22736958
  24. 24. Lemieux RU, Vonrudloff E (1955) Periodate-Permanganate Oxidations. 1. Oxidation of Olefins. Canadian Journal of Chemistry-Revue Canadienne De Chimie 33: 1701–1709.
  25. 25. Zimmermann FO, Meux E, Mieloszynski JL, Lecuire JM, Oget N (2005) Ruthenium catalysed oxidation without CCl4 of oleic acid, other monoenic fatty acids and alkenes. Tetrahedron Letters 46: 3201–3203.
  26. 26. Zeng SJ, Ren GZ, Xu CF, Yang QB (2011) High uniformity and monodispersity of sodium rare-earth fluoride nanocrystals: controllable synthesis, shape evolution and optical properties. Crystengcomm 13: 1384–1390.
  27. 27. Selvin PR (1996) Lanthanide-based resonance energy transfer. Ieee Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2: 1077–1087.
  28. 28. Wang LY, Li YD (2007) Luminescent nanocrystals for nonenzymatic glucose concentration determination. Chemistry-a European Journal 13: 4203–4207. pmid:17323396
  29. 29. Zhang P, Rogelj S, Nguyen K, Wheeler D (2006) Design of a highly sensitive and specific nucleotide sensor based on photon upconverting particles. Journal of the American Chemical Society 128: 12410–12411. pmid:16984179
  30. 30. Kumar M, Zhang P (2009) Highly Sensitive and Selective Label-Free Optical Detection of DNA Hybridization Based on Photon Upconverting Nanoparticles. Langmuir 25: 6024–6027. pmid:19400568
  31. 31. Gu JQ, Shen J, Sun LD, Yan CH (2008) Resonance energy transfer in steady-state and time-decay fluoro-immunoassays for lanthanide nanoparticles based on biotin and avidin affinity. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 112: 6589–6593. pmid:23977403
  32. 32. Forster T (1948) *Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung Und Fluoreszenz. Annalen Der Physik 2: 55–75.
  33. 33. Wu PG, Brand L (1994) Resonance Energy-Transfer—Methods and Applications. Analytical Biochemistry 218: 1–13. pmid:8053542
  34. 34. Ghosh P, Patra A (2008) Tuning of crystal phase and luminescence properties of Eu3+ doped sodium yttrium fluoride nanocrystals. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 112: 3223–3231.
  35. 35. Fischer ME (2010) Amine Coupling Through EDC/NHS: A Practical Approach, in Surface Plasmon Resonance. Humana Press 55–73. pmid:20217613
  36. 36. Lakowicz JR (2006) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. 954 p.