Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Repression of CC16 by Cigarette Smoke (CS) Exposure

  • Lingxiang Zhu,

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States of America

  • Peter Y. P. Di,

    Affiliation Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, United States of America

  • Reen Wu,

    Affiliation Center for Comparative Respiratory Biology and Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, United States of America

  • Kent E. Pinkerton,

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, United States of America

  • Yin Chen

    ychen@pharmacy.arizona.edu

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States of America

Repression of CC16 by Cigarette Smoke (CS) Exposure

  • Lingxiang Zhu, 
  • Peter Y. P. Di, 
  • Reen Wu, 
  • Kent E. Pinkerton, 
  • Yin Chen
PLOS
x

Abstract

Club (Clara) Cell Secretory Protein (CCSP, or CC16) is produced mainly by non-ciliated airway epithelial cells including bronchiolar club cells and the change of its expression has been shown to associate with the progress and severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). In an animal model, the lack of CC16 renders the animal susceptible to the tumorigenic effect of a major CS carcinogen. A recent population-based Tucson Epidemiological Study of Airway Obstructive Diseases (TESAOD) has indicated that the low serum CC16 concentration is closely linked with the smoke-related mortality, particularly that driven by the lung cancer. However, the study of CC16 expression in well-defined smoke exposure models has been lacking, and there is no experimental support for the potential causal link between CC16 and CS-induced pathophysiological changes in the lung. In the present study, we have found that airway CC16 expression was significantly repressed in COPD patients, in monkey CS exposure model, and in CS-induced mouse model of COPD. Additionally, the lack of CC16 exacerbated airway inflammation and alveolar loss in the mouse model. Therefore, CC16 may play an important protective role in CS-related diseases.

Introduction

CC16 (also called CC10 or CCSP) is a homodimeric protein that was initially attributed to Club cells (formerly, Clara cells), but has since been found to be produced by other non-ciliated epithelial cells in the airway [15]. Besides its abundant presence in the airway lung fluids and sputum, CC16 can also be readily detected in the circulation [68]. The biological functions of CC16 and its affected molecular pathways have not been completely elucidated, but growing evidence indicates that CC16 has anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor functions [68] presumably via the inhibitions of PLA2 [9], proinflammatory prostaglandins[10,11], chemotaxis [1216], and cytokine production [17,18]. Consistently, CC16 knockout (KO) mice had markedly enhanced inflammation and tissue remodeling in the lung when exposed to a variety of insults [1927]. Thus, CC16 appears to play an important protective role in inflammatory lung diseases.

Recently, CC16 has raised considerable interest in smoke-related lung diseases such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Although COPD is phenotypically and pathologically heterogeneous, it is now well established that chronic inflammation is at its root and generates mucus overproduction, bronchial epithelial injury, airway obstruction, and progressive deterioration in lung function. Thus, markers of systemic inflammation such as C-reactive protein (CRP) have been consistently associated with COPD morbidity and subsequent mortality [28,29]. Acute environmental exposures can cause a transient increase in CC16 level, but repeated exposures (e.g., smoking) result in chronically decreased numbers of Club cells and serum CC16 levels [3036]. In these clinical studies, lower levels of CC16 in serum and airways have also been associated with prevalence and severity of COPD. In a recent longitudinal report from the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE), serum CC16 was the only biomarker associated with a slower subsequent decline of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) over 3 years [37]. This observation has been recently confirmed by another group [38]. Additionally, the recently-published long-term Tucson Epidemiological Study of Airway Obstructive Diseases (TESAOD) further indicates that low serum concentration of CC16 was strongly associated with the mortality caused by CS-related cancers, particularly lung cancer[39].

However, despite the abundant clinical data suggesting a protective role of CC16 in smoke-related lung diseases, there is no evidence to support the potential causal link between CC16 and smoke-induced pathophysiological changes. Furthermore, the present CC16 expression profile has been largely derived from the measurement of secretory CC16 in body fluids (i.e. serum, bronchoalveolar lavage, and sputum), while the studies on CC16 expression at tissue/cellular level are lacking. Thus, in the present study, we seek to fill in these gaps by examining CC16 expression in human subjects, monkey and rodent models of CS exposure, and by measuring the inflammation and alveolar destruction in mouse model of CC16 deficiency.

Materials and Methods

1. Antibodies, Chemicals and Kits

CC16 antibody for human and monkey staining were purchased from BioVendor (Asheville, NC). CC16 antibody for mouse staining was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Mouse KC ELISA kit was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN).

2. Human tissue procurement

Normal or human COPD tissues were either purchased from National Disease Research Interchange (NDRI) or obtained from the left-over autopsy samples from University of California (Davis, CA) Medical Center with previously approved protocols. All human subjects gave the consent for the tissues being used for research purposes. All tissues were de-identified and were sent to the laboratory labelled with random code without any traceable link to the individual identity. Thus, the present study does not involve human subjects as defined under HHS regulations. Normal subjects are non-smokers without diagnosed lung diseases. All moderate and severe COPD patients are current or former smokers.

3. Monkey model of CS exposure

All monkey tissue sections were obtained from the study as described in the previous publication [40]. Briefly, rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) from the California National Primate Research Center (Davis, CA) were selected and obtained based on the approved protocol by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of California Davis. Aged and diluted side-stream smoke from research cigarettes (2R4F, Tobacco Research Institute at the University of Kentucky) was produced in a smoking apparatus and was used as a surrogate for environmental smoke exposure as previously described [40]. Exposure to smoke occurred for 6 hours per day, 5 days per week at a total suspended particulate concentration of 1 mg/m3. Controls were exposed to filtered air (FA) and the rest of monkeys were exposed to smoke from 6 months of age to 13 months of age. At the end of the experiment, monkeys were sacrificed and lungs were fixed, embedded in paraffin and sectioned.

4. Mouse model of CS exposure

Both wild-type (WT) mice or CC16-deficient mice [41] (5–6 for each group) were either exposed to filtered air (FA) or to side-stream smoke generated by unfiltered cigarettes (1R3F research-reference cigarettes from the Tobacco Research Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky) at 150 mg/m3, 6 hours per day, 5 days per week for 4 months following the same protocol as described by others [42]. The present animal study has been approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) at the University of Arizona or at the University of Pittsburgh.

5. Measurement of tissue expression of CC16 by immunofluorescence staining

For immunofluorescence, the tissue sections were incubated with 1:100 diluted anti-CC16 antibody overnight at 4°C. Alexa 488 conjugated secondary antibody (Life Technology, Grand Island, NY) was used to obtain the fluorescence images. The images were acquired by confocal microscopy (LSM 510 meta; Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY).

6. Broncho alveolar lavage (BAL), differential cell counts, and cytokine measurement

Mice were euthanized and the trachea was then isolated via blunt dissection. Small caliber tubing was inserted and secured in the airway. Three successive volumes of PBS with 0.1% bovine serum albumin were then instilled and gently aspirated. All BAL samples collected were aliquoted and stored in three bar-coded Eppendorf tubes. The cells in the BAL were cytocentrifuged, air dried, stained with a modified Wright’s stain (Diff-Quik) and the proportion of macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes determined by counting using light microscopy. Slides were coded and be counted in a blinded manner by at least two researchers to ensure an objective evaluation. Total or differential cell numbers were presented as lavaged cells x1000. Cytokine concentrations were determined by ELISA.

7. Measurement of alveolar enlargement

For the qualitative assessment of the severity of emphysema, lungs were perfused and fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde at 30 cm water pressure for 1h and followed by storage of the inflation-fixed lung immersed fixatives for overnight. Morphometry was used to quantify emphysema as described previously [4348]. Briefly, microscopic fields were chosen by a systematic random method, and emphysema was assessed in these fields with computer-aided measurements using the same software as described above. The most commonly used indicator of alveolar airspace size, the mean linear intercept (Lm, in μm), was calculated. The Lm was corrected for histoprocessing shrinkage by dividing it by the group-average linear shrinkage factor.

8. Statistical analysis

Experimental groups were compared using a two-sided Student's t test, with significance level set as P < 0.05. When data were not distributed normally, significance was assessed with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, and P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

1. CC16 was downregulated in the airways of human COPD patients

Based on the previously reported epidemiological data regarding the reduction of CC16 in serum and lung BAL in smokers and COPD subjects [3036], we further looked at the tissue-level expression of CC16 in diagnosed COPD patients. Consistently, there was a progressive decrease of epithelial CC16 expression that was correlated with the severity of COPD (Fig. 1D). Although abundant CC16 expression was observed in the normal airway (Fig. 1A), its expression was significantly reduced in the moderate COPD patients (Fig. 1B). Strikingly, CC16 almost completely disappeared from the airways of severe COPD patients (Fig. 1C). Although we could not link the level of CC16 and the severity of COPD due to the small sample size in each category, it is clear that cellular expression of CC16 was significantly downregulated in the lungs of COPD, which is consistent with the clinical studies using serum or BAL samples [3036].

thumbnail
Figure 1. CC16 was downregulated in human COPD.

Tissue sections from 5 normal subjects (A), 4 moderate (B) and 3 severe COPD patients (C) were stained with CC16 antibody (Green) and counter-stained with DAPI for nuclei (Blue). For each slide, the images were taken and quantified from at least 5 different regions of each tissue slides (D). (&: p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116159.g001

2. CC16 was downregulated in the airways of non-human primates exposed to CS

Because smoke is one of key factors of COPD pathogenesis and CC16 expression has been shown to be repressed in smokers, we tried to establish a causal link between CC16 expression and CS exposure. We examined non-human primate model of CS exposure. 7-month CS exposure significantly reduced CC16 expression in the lung (Fig. 2B-C) as compared to the filtered air (FA)-exposed controls (Fig. 2A, C).

thumbnail
Figure 2. CC16 was repressed in non-human primates exposed to CS.

Rhesus monkey was exposed to CS as described in Material and Method Section. Tissue sections from A) 3 filtered air (FA)- and B) 6 CS-exposed monkeys were stained with CC16 antibody (Green) and counter-stained with DAPI for nuclei (Blue). For each slide, the images were taken and quantified from at least 5 different regions of each tissue slides (C). (&: p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116159.g002

3. The lack of CC16 exacerbated CS-induced inflammation and lung destruction

CC16 has a broad range of anti-inflammatory functions [918]. In the lung, CC16 KO mice had markedly enhanced inflammation and tissue remodeling when exposed to a variety of insults [1925]. However, the effect of CC16 deficiency has not been established in the models of smoke exposure or smoke-induced COPD. Thus, we examined CS-induced pathophysiological changes in both WT and CC16 KO mice. As shown in Fig. 3, WT mice had similar CC16 reduction in their lungs when exposed to CS as the primates (Fig. 2), suggesting CS-repressed CC16 expression may be an evolutionarily conserved response. As expected, CS significantly elevated total inflammatory cell counts in BAL from WT mice, and most of these cells were macrophages and neutrophils (Table 1). As compared to WT mice, KO mice had much worse inflammatory responses as demonstrated by much higher total cell counts, differential cell counts and proinflammatory cytokine (KC) production (Table 1). Thus, the lack of CC16 exacerbated CS-induced inflammatory responses. Furthermore, we measured alveolar regions of these mice, and found out that the mice exposed to CS had significantly enlarged alveolar airspace (measured by the mean linear intercept) as compared to the mice exposed to filtered air (FA) (Fig. 4). Additionally, the alveolar airspace of KO mice was even more enlarged than WT mice, indicating more alveolar loss induced by CS exposure. Taken together, the lack of CC16 severely exacerbates CS-induced inflammation and alveolar pathology, suggesting that CC16 may play an indispensable protective role in smoke-related diseases such as COPD.

thumbnail
Figure 3. CC16 was downregulated in WT mouse when exposed to CS.

Both WT and CC16 KO mice were exposed to CS. CC16 staining (Green) was performed on lung tissues from WT or KO mice exposed to FA or CS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116159.g003

thumbnail
Figure 4. Enlargement of Alveolar Space (represented by the mean linear intercept, μm)

*: p<0.05, CS vs. FA. $: p< 0.05, KO+CS vs. WT +CS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116159.g004

Discussion

CC16 has emerged as an important clinical biomarker in various inflammatory lung diseases including COPD [3036]. The significant repression of CC16 in the serum of COPD patients and its inverse relationship with the decrease of lung function raise considerable interest of using this protein as a peripheral biomarker for the COPD progression [37,38]. In serum, CC16 concentration is determined by both the production mainly form the lung and the clearance by kidney [49] due to its small size. In the lung, two major processes appear to determine the intrapulmonary pool of CC16. First, CC16 is produced from club cells and other non-ciliated airway epithelial cells [15]. Second, the leakage or active transportation moves CC16 from lung compartment to the circulation [7]. In chronic diseases such as COPD, the epithelial barrier function is generally compromised which leads to high lung permeability[50]. Thus, when both systems (i.e. pulmonary and peripheral) are combined, decreased serum CC16 level is most likely caused by the reduced CC16 production and/or the increase of renal function. Interestingly, some studies [31,33] indicates that CC16 levels in BAL were also decreased in these patients, suggesting that a significant part of serum CC16 decrease was perhaps the result of reduced intrapulmonary CC16 pool. Consistent with these reports, our data indicates that the tissue CC16 expression was markedly decreased in the airway epithelia of human COPD and of the CS-exposed animal models of monkey and mouse. The significant reduced CC16 expression in airway epithelium may also be caused by the loss of a specific cell type that expresses CC16. In the past, club cells have been thought to be the main source of lung CC16 production. However, CC16 expression has later been found to occur in many other non-ciliated airway epithelial cells that are morphologically different from club cells [1]. Thus, the most likely explanation is that CS exposure may repress CC16 expression in many different cell types, rather than merely eliminate the club cells. Recently, CC16 has been found to be one of the top hypermethylated genes in airway epithelial cells from smokers as compared with nonsmokers [51], which supports the idea that chronic CS-exposure shuts down CC16 expression possibly via an epigenetic mechanism.

Although the epidemiological data convincingly link the expression of CC16 with the severity of COPD, the evidence supporting the potential causality between the two has been lacking. Smoking or environmental smoke exposure has been considered as one of the dominant factors for COPD. When exposed to smoke-derived carcinogen, the mice lacking CC16 had higher incidence of airway epithelial hyperplasia, lung adenoma and elevated level of MAP Kinase activation [23] supporting the role of CC16 in chemoprevention. Because MAP kinase pathway is critically involved in smoke induced lung inflammation [52], this finding [23] also implies that CC16 may play a role in airway inflammation. Indeed, we have demonstrated in the present study that the lack of CC16 substantially exacerbated CS-induced airway inflammation and alveolar loss. Our finding is also in line with the previous reports about markedly heightened inflammation and airway remodeling in a variety of other lung disease models [1927] when CC16 was knocked out. Surprisingly, one recent study has found no significant difference between WT and CC16 KO mice after being exposed to CS [38]. The cause of this discrepancy between the two studies is currently unknown. It may have to do with the status of KO mouse, the CS exposure protocol or the assays. Nonetheless, we have provided the positive evidence supporting the anti-inflammatory role of CC16 in smoke-related airway disease model.

CC16 protein and its truncated C-terminal peptide have been proposed to treat a variety of inflammatory lung diseases (i.e., neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (nRDS), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), asthma and CF) [53]. Recombinant human CC16 (rhCC16) has been evaluated in clinical trials for treating nRDS [54,55] and allergic rhinitis [56] with some success. Interestingly, a single intratracheal dose (5mg/kg) of rhCC16 resulted in a significant reduction of neutrophil and total cell counts and lung protein concentration in nRDS, confirming the anti-inflammatory function of CC16 in human subjects [54,55]. In the literatures, the function of CC16 has been attributed to its inhibition of PLA2 activity[9], pro-inflammatory prostaglandins [10,11][10,11], chemotaxis [1216], and cytokine production [17,18]. However, whether or not any of these molecular pathways is responsible for the protective function of CC16 in smoke-related diseases including COPD has not been proved. Our results as demonstrated here will provide important rationale and the useful models for the future study of CC16 function. It is our opinion that CC16 is not only an important peripheral disease marker, but also a valuable druggable target. Therefore, further understanding of the biological function of CC16 in the context of COPD and other CS-associated diseases is warranted and the progress at this front is vital to our endeavor to develop therapeutics for the treatment of these chronic airway diseases.

.

Supporting Information

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YC PYPD. Performed the experiments: LZ PYPD. Analyzed the data: YC LZ PYPD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RW KEP. Wrote the paper: YC.

References

  1. 1. Coppens JT, Van Winkle LS, Pinkerton K, Plopper CG (2007) Distribution of Clara cell secretory protein expression in the tracheobronchial airways of rhesus monkeys. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 292: L1155–1162. pmid:17237148
  2. 2. Engelhardt JF, Zepeda M, Cohn JA, Yankaskas JR, Wilson JM (1994) Expression of the cystic fibrosis gene in adult human lung. J Clin Invest 93: 737–749. pmid:7509347
  3. 3. Singh G, Singh J, Katyal SL, Brown WE, Kramps JA, et al. (1988) Identification, cellular localization, isolation, and characterization of human Clara cell-specific 10 KD protein. J Histochem Cytochem 36: 73–80. pmid:3275712
  4. 4. Singh G, Katyal SK (1992) Secretory proteins of Clara cells and type II cells. In: Parent RA, editor. Comparative Biology of the Normal Lung. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. pp. 93–108.
  5. 5. Boers JE, Ambergen AW, Thunnissen FB (1999) Number and proliferation of clara cells in normal human airway epithelium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159: 1585–1591. pmid:10228131
  6. 6. Broeckaert F, Bernard A (2000) Clara cell secretory protein (CC16): characteristics and perspectives as lung peripheral biomarker. Clin Exp Allergy 30: 469–475. pmid:10718843
  7. 7. Mukherjee AB, Zhang Z, Chilton BS (2007) Uteroglobin: a steroid-inducible immunomodulatory protein that founded the Secretoglobin superfamily. Endocr Rev 28: 707–725. pmid:17916741
  8. 8. Lakind JS, Holgate ST, Ownby DR, Mansur AH, Helms PJ, et al. (2007) A critical review of the use of Clara cell secretory protein (CC16) as a biomarker of acute or chronic pulmonary effects. Biomarkers 12: 445–467. pmid:17701745
  9. 9. Levin SW, Butler JD, Schumacher UK, Wightman PD, Mukherjee AB (1986) Uteroglobin inhibits phospholipase A2 activity. Life Sci 38: 1813–1819. pmid:3084897
  10. 10. Mandal AK, Ray R, Zhang Z, Chowdhury B, Pattabiraman N, et al. (2005) Uteroglobin inhibits prostaglandin F2alpha receptor-mediated expression of genes critical for the production of pro-inflammatory lipid mediators. J Biol Chem 280: 32897–32904. pmid:16061484
  11. 11. Mandal AK, Zhang Z, Ray R, Choi MS, Chowdhury B, et al. (2004) Uteroglobin represses allergen-induced inflammatory response by blocking PGD2 receptor-mediated functions. J Exp Med 199: 1317–1330. pmid:15148333
  12. 12. Antico G, Lingen MW, Sassano A, Melby J, Welch RW, et al. (2006) Recombinant human uteroglobin/CC10 inhibits the adhesion and migration of primary human endothelial cells via specific and saturable binding to fibronectin. J Cell Physiol 207: 553–561. pmid:16453303
  13. 13. Geerts L, Jorens PG, Willems J, De Ley M, Slegers H (2001) Natural inhibitors of neutrophil function in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 29: 1920–1924. pmid:11588452
  14. 14. Lesur O, Bernard A, Arsalane K, Lauwerys R, Begin R, et al. (1995) Clara cell protein (CC-16) induces a phospholipase A2-mediated inhibition of fibroblast migration in vitro. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152: 290–297. pmid:7541278
  15. 15. Ray R, Zhang Z, Lee YC, Gao JL, Mukherjee AB (2006) Uteroglobin suppresses allergen-induced TH2 differentiation by down-regulating the expression of serum amyloid A and SOCS-3 genes. FEBS Lett 580: 6022–6026. pmid:17046755
  16. 16. Vasanthakumar G, Manjunath R, Mukherjee AB, Warabi H, Schiffmann E (1988) Inhibition of phagocyte chemotaxis by uteroglobin, an inhibitor of blastocyst rejection. Biochem Pharmacol 37: 389–394. pmid:3337740
  17. 17. Dierynck I, Bernard A, Roels H, De Ley M (1995) Potent inhibition of both human interferon-gamma production and biologic activity by the Clara cell protein CC16. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 12: 205–210. pmid:7865218
  18. 18. Hung CH, Chen LC, Zhang Z, Chowdhury B, Lee WL, et al. (2004) Regulation of TH2 responses by the pulmonary Clara cell secretory 10-kd protein. J Allergy Clin Immunol 114: 664–670. pmid:15356574
  19. 19. Mango GW, Johnston CJ, Reynolds SD, Finkelstein JN, Plopper CG, et al. (1998) Clara cell secretory protein deficiency increases oxidant stress response in conducting airways. Am J Physiol 275: L348–356. pmid:9700096
  20. 20. Plopper CG, Mango GW, Hatch GE, Wong VJ, Toskala E, et al. (2006) Elevation of susceptibility to ozone-induced acute tracheobronchial injury in transgenic mice deficient in Clara cell secretory protein. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 213: 74–85. pmid:16226776
  21. 21. Snyder JC, Reynolds SD, Hollingsworth JW, Li Z, Kaminski N, et al. (2010) Clara cells attenuate the inflammatory response through regulation of macrophage behavior. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 42: 161–171. pmid:19423773
  22. 22. Johnston CJ, Mango GW, Finkelstein JN, Stripp BR (1997) Altered pulmonary response to hyperoxia in Clara cell secretory protein deficient mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 17: 147–155. pmid:9271302
  23. 23. Yang Y, Zhang Z, Mukherjee AB, Linnoila RI (2004) Increased susceptibility of mice lacking Clara cell 10-kDa protein to lung tumorigenesis by 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, a potent carcinogen in cigarette smoke. J Biol Chem 279: 29336–29340. pmid:15148323
  24. 24. Wang SZ, Rosenberger CL, Bao YX, Stark JM, Harrod KS (2003) Clara cell secretory protein modulates lung inflammatory and immune responses to respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Immunol 171: 1051–1060. pmid:12847279
  25. 25. Harrod KS, Mounday AD, Stripp BR, Whitsett JA (1998) Clara cell secretory protein decreases lung inflammation after acute virus infection. Am J Physiol 275: L924–930. pmid:9815110
  26. 26. Wang SZ, Rosenberger CL, Espindola TM, Barrett EG, Tesfaigzi Y, et al. (2001) CCSP modulates airway dysfunction and host responses in an Ova-challenged mouse model. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 281: L1303–1311. pmid:11597923
  27. 27. Wendt CH, Tram KV, Price AP, England KA, Stiehm A, et al. (2013) Club Cell Secretory Protein improves Survival in a Murine Obliterative Bronchiolitis Model. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol.
  28. 28. Gan WQ, Man SF, Senthilselvan A, Sin DD (2004) Association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and systemic inflammation: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Thorax 59: 574–580. pmid:15223864
  29. 29. Sin DD, Man SF (2007) Systemic inflammation and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 85: 141–147. pmid:17487253
  30. 30. Lomas DA, Silverman EK, Edwards LD, Miller BE, Coxson HO, et al. (2008) Evaluation of serum CC-16 as a biomarker for COPD in the ECLIPSE cohort. Thorax 63: 1058–1063. pmid:18757456
  31. 31. Bernard A, Marchandise FX, Depelchin S, Lauwerys R, Sibille Y (1992) Clara cell protein in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage. Eur Respir J 5: 1231–1238. pmid:1486970
  32. 32. Pilette C, Godding V, Kiss R, Delos M, Verbeken E, et al. (2001) Reduced epithelial expression of secretory component in small airways correlates with airflow obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163: 185–194. pmid:11208645
  33. 33. Braido F, Riccio AM, Guerra L, Gamalero C, Zolezzi A, et al. (2007) Clara cell 16 protein in COPD sputum: a marker of small airways damage? Respir Med 101: 2119–2124. pmid:17624750
  34. 34. Ye Q, Fujita M, Ouchi H, Inoshima I, Maeyama T, et al. (2004) Serum CC-10 in inflammatory lung diseases. Respiration 71: 505–510. pmid:15467329
  35. 35. Sin DD, Leung R, Gan WQ, Man SP (2007) Circulating surfactant protein D as a potential lung-specific biomarker of health outcomes in COPD: a pilot study. BMC Pulm Med 7: 13. pmid:17922919
  36. 36. Tsoumakidou M, Bouloukaki I, Thimaki K, Tzanakis N, Siafakas NM (2010) Innate immunity proteins in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Exp Lung Res 36: 373–380. pmid:20653472
  37. 37. Vestbo J, Edwards LD, Scanlon PD, Yates JC, Agusti A, et al. (2011) Changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second over time in COPD. N Engl J Med 365: 1184–1192. pmid:21991892
  38. 38. Park HY, Churg A, Wright JL, Li Y, Tam S, et al. (2013) Club cell protein 16 and disease progression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188: 1413–1419. pmid:24245748
  39. 39. Guerra S, Vasquez MM, Spangenberg A, Halonen M, Martinez FD (2013) Serum concentrations of club cell secretory protein (Clara) and cancer mortality in adults: a population-based, prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 1: 779–785. pmid:24461757
  40. 40. Wang L, Joad JP, Zhong C, Pinkerton KE (2008) Effects of environmental tobacco smoke exposure on pulmonary immune response in infant monkeys. J Allergy Clin Immunol 122: 400–406, 406 e401–405. pmid:18502491
  41. 41. Stripp BR, Lund J, Mango GW, Doyen KC, Johnston C, et al. (1996) Clara cell secretory protein: a determinant of PCB bioaccumulation in mammals. Am J Physiol 271: L656–664. pmid:8897914
  42. 42. Hautamaki RD, Kobayashi DK, Senior RM, Shapiro SD (1997) Requirement for macrophage elastase for cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in mice. Science 277: 2002–2004. pmid:9302297
  43. 43. Massaro GD, Massaro D (1997) Retinoic acid treatment abrogates elastase-induced pulmonary emphysema in rats. Nat Med 3: 675–677. pmid:9176496
  44. 44. Hind M, Maden M (2004) Retinoic acid induces alveolar regeneration in the adult mouse lung. Eur Respir J 23: 20–27. pmid:14738226
  45. 45. Stinchcombe SV, Maden M (2008) Retinoic acid induced alveolar regeneration: critical differences in strain sensitivity. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 38: 185–191. pmid:17717321
  46. 46. Belloni PN, Garvin L, Mao CP, Bailey-Healy I, Leaffer D (2000) Effects of all-trans-retinoic acid in promoting alveolar repair. Chest 117: 235S–241S. pmid:10843926
  47. 47. Massaro GD, Massaro D (2000) Retinoic acid treatment partially rescues failed septation in rats and in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 278: L955–960. pmid:10781425
  48. 48. Tepper J, Pfeiffer J, Aldrich M, Tumas D, Kern J, et al. (2000) Can retinoic acid ameliorate the physiologic and morphologic effects of elastase instillation in the rat? Chest 117: 242S–244S. pmid:10843928
  49. 49. Hermans C, Bernard A (1999) Lung epithelium-specific proteins: characteristics and potential applications as markers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159: 646–678. pmid:9927386
  50. 50. Ganesan S, Comstock AT, Sajjan US (2013) Barrier function of airway tract epithelium. Tissue Barriers 1: e24997. pmid:24665407
  51. 51. Buro-Auriemma LJ, Salit J, Hackett NR, Walters MS, Strulovici-Barel Y, et al. (2013) Cigarette smoking induces small airway epithelial epigenetic changes with corresponding modulation of gene expression. Hum Mol Genet 22: 4726–4738. pmid:23842454
  52. 52. Mossman BT, Lounsbury KM, Reddy SP (2006) Oxidants and signaling by mitogen-activated protein kinases in lung epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 34: 666–669. pmid:16484683
  53. 53. Pilon AL (2000) Rationale for the development of recombinant human CC10 as a therapeutic for inflammatory and fibrotic disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 923: 280–299. pmid:11193764
  54. 54. Levine CR, Gewolb IH, Allen K, Welch RW, Melby JM, et al. (2005) The safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-inflammatory effects of intratracheal recombinant human Clara cell protein in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Res 58: 15–21. pmid:15774846
  55. 55. Abdel-Latif ME, Osborn DA (2011) Intratracheal Clara cell secretory protein (CCSP) administration in preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD008308. pmid:21563168
  56. 56. Widegren H, Andersson M, Greiff L (2009) Effects of Clara cell 10 (CC10) protein on symptoms and signs of allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 102: 51–56. pmid:19205286