Myxoid/round-cell liposarcoma (MLS/RCLS) is characterized by either the fusion gene FUS-DDIT3 or the less commonly occurring EWSR1-DDIT3 and most cases carry few or no additional cytogenetic changes. There are conflicting reports concerning the status and role of TP53 in MLS/RCLS. Here we analysed four MLS/RCLS derived cell lines for TP53 mutations, expression and function. Three SV40 transformed cell lines expressed normal TP53 proteins. Irradiation caused normal posttranslational modifications of TP53 and induced P21 expression in two of these cell lines. Transfection experiments showed that the FUS-DDIT3 fusion protein had no effects on irradiation induced TP53 responses. Ion Torrent AmpliSeq screening, using the Cancer Hotspot panel, showed no dysfunctional or disease associated alleles/mutations. In conclusion, our results suggest that most MLS/RCLS cases carry functional TP53 genes and this is consistent with the low numbers of secondary mutations observed in this tumor entity.
Citation: Ståhlberg A, Kåbjörn Gustafsson C, Engtröm K, Thomsen C, Dolatabadi S, Jonasson E, et al. (2014) Normal and Functional TP53 in Genetically Stable Myxoid/Round Cell Liposarcoma. PLoS ONE 9(11): e113110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113110
Editor: Philipp J. Kahle, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Germany
Received: July 9, 2014; Accepted: October 20, 2014; Published: November 13, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Ståhlberg et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by grants from: ALF Västra Götalandsregionen, Swedish Cancer Society, Assar Gabrielssons Research Foundation, Johan Jansson Foundation for Cancer Research, Swedish Society for Medical Research, BioCARE National Strategic Research Program at University of Gothenburg, Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Foundation for Scientific Research, and the Swedish Research Council (2367). AS has a collaborative research grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors (CYL, DR, SMC), but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the “author contributions” section.
Competing interests: AS declares stock ownership in TATAA Biocenter. CYL has been employed by Life Technologies and has patent applications pending at Thermo Fisher Scientific. DR has been employed by Life Technologies and is currently employed by Fluidigm, patent applications pending at both Thermo Fisher Scientific and Fluidigm, stock ownership in Fluidigm. SMC is employed by Thermo Fisher Scientific and has patent applications pending at Thermo Fisher Scientific. The authors confirm that these competing interests do not alter their adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
A majority of common human sarcoma entities carry complex and heterogeneous chromosome aberrations typical for tumors with genomic instability. A smaller group contain few chromosome aberrations and are typically characterized by simple recurrent chromosome rearrangements that result in formation of tumor type specific fusion oncogenes . Most sarcomas carrying FET (FUS, EWSR1, TAF15, also known as TET) family fusion oncogenes have few or no cytogenetic changes except for the rearrangements that generate the fusion oncogenes . Myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MLS/RCLS) characterized by either the t(12;16) or the t(12;22) translocation, is one of the most common FET oncogene carrying sarcomas. The specific fusion oncogenes consist of the 5′partners FUS (also known as TLS) or more rarely EWSR1, fused to the transcription factor gene DDIT3 (also known as CHOP or GADD153) , . The chimeric FUS-DDIT3 and EWSR1-DDIT3 encoded proteins are believed to function as abnormal DNA binding transcription factors that interfere with differentiation and growth control –. The importance of this function is further supported by the effect of Trabectedin treatment leading to detachment of FUS-DDIT3 from specific DNA binding sites –. More than 30% of the cases carry the translocation as the only cytogenetic aberration at diagnosis –. Besides of the fusion oncogene, mutations in PIK3CA or loss of PTEN expression is seen in 10–15% of the cases and these changes are associated with poor prognosis . TP53 mutations have also been reported and associated with progressive disease , –. The vast majority of the tumors carry normal TP53 genes and secondary changes are few and rare even when relapses occur . In contrast to genetically complex sarcomas, MLS/RCLS is highly sensitive to irradiation and chemotherapy , supporting the view that the tumor cells maintain a functional and responding TP53 system. A recent study shows however, that a FUS-DDIT3 transgene fails to induce tumors in mice if not introduced into a TP53 deficient genetic background . This indicates that impaired TP53 function could be of importance in MLS/RCLS development.
In the present investigation we examined the TP53 protein in four MLS/RCLS derived cell lines, three with normal and one with a known mutated TP53 gene. Functional TP53 analysis was performed using irradiation experiments with downstream western blot and immunofluorescence analyses. We also screened three MLS/RCLS derived cell lines for commonly occurring mutations using Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel.
Materials and Methods
Cells and cell line characteristics are shown in Table 1. All cell lines were published before and cultured in RPMI1640 GlutaMAX medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin at 37°C in 5% CO2. The FUS-DDIT3-EGFP transfected HT1080 cells  were cultured with 500 µg/ml of Geneticin until 24 hours before experiments. All media and supplements were obtained from Life Technologies. DL 221 cultured tumor cells, explanted from tumor tissues of an MLS/RCLS patient, were provided by Dr. Alexander Lazar. Acquisition of the tissue specimen was approved by the institutional review board of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC), and performed in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act regulations.
Protein extraction, SDS-PAGE and western blot
Cells were washed with ice-cold Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS, Life Technologies) and collected in RIPA buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% IGEPAL, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) (Pierce); supplemented with 1X Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Scientific). Samples were incubated on ice for 10 min and cleared by centrifugation at 14000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The protein concentrations of samples were determined with the DC Protein Assay (BioRad) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Samples were stored at −20°C.
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting was performed with the Novex NuPAGE system (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The protocol is described in detail elsewhere . The following primary antibodies were used: anti TP53 central parts (Pab240, diluted 1∶200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti TP53 N-terminal (DO-1, diluted 1∶200, Calbiochem Merck), anti TP53 C-terminal (Pab421, diluted 1∶200, Calbiochem Merck), anti DDIT3 (15204-1-AP, diluted 1∶266, Proteintech) and anti GAPDH (mAbcam 9484, diluted 1∶200, Abcam)
Paraffin embedded sections from seven MLS/RCLS cases and one endometrial carcinoma were obtained from our pathology department in conformity with Swedish legislation (approved by the Ethical Board associated with the University of Gothenburg). Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously  using the TP53 specific antibody OP43A (Calbiochem Merck) at a dilution of 1∶100.
The histological specimens were examined and evaluated in a blinded fashion by two examiners. Stained tumor cells were counted at 200× magnification. Cells with nuclear and cytoplasmic expression were counted avoiding inflammatory cells, endothelial cells and necrotic areas. Three different areas in each slide were counted and a mean value was calculated. To assess weakly or strongly stained cells 500 cells in five different areas or more were analyzed.
Immune precipitation and mass spectrometry
Cells where washed once with PBS and collected in ice-cold lysis buffer (25 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1% CHAPS, 100 mM NaCl) supplemented with HALT Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Pierce). The cell suspension was cleared by centrifugation at 1000 rcf for 10 min at 4°C. Protein extracted from approximately 107 cells was incubated with 5 µg of anti TP53 antibody (Pab1620, Abcam) in 1100 µl lysis buffer at 4°C for 1 h under gentle shake. Forty µl of pre-equilibrated DynaBeads Protein-A (Invitrogen) was added and the mixture was incubated for 1 h followed by washing in DynaMag-Spin (Invitrogen) with 750 µl lysis buffer (twice) and with 750 µl dilution buffer diluted 1∶2 (once). Captured proteins were eluted from the immobilized beads by adding 20 µl 0.2% acetic acid and incubating for 5 min at room temperature. Sample preparation and mass spectrometry analysis was performed at The Proteomics Core Facility at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg as described .
Cells were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS, pH 7.2 at 37°C, washed in PBS and stained against TP53 (FL-393, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or P21 (EA10, Merck), both diluted 1∶100 in PBS supplied with 2% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.2% Triton X-100 (Merck). Bound primary antibodies were detected using Cy3 secondary antibodies (PA43002 respective PA43004, Amersham). Slides were mounted using Prolong Gold anti-fade with DAPI (Invitrogen). Cellular fluorescence was imaged using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss).
PCR and DNA sequence analysis
PCR fragments for TP53 splice variants were amplified from cDNA of the cell lines and confirmed by sequencing as described . The following PCR primers were used: TP53exon1_4 (forward: 5′-GGAGGAGCCGCAGTCAGAT-3′, reverse: 5′-TTCAATATCGTCCGGGGA-3′), TP53exon4_6 (forward: 5′-TCCCTTCCCAGAAAACCTACC-3′, reverse: 5′-ACCACACTATGTCGAAAAGTGTTTC-3′), TP53exon5_8 (forward: 5′-AAGCAGTCACAGCACATGAC-3′, reverse: 5-GCGGAGATTCTCTTCCTCTGT-3′), TP53exon8_10 (forward: 5′-TTTGTGCCTGTCCTGGGA-3′, reverse: 5′-TGGGCATCCTTGAGTTCC-3′) and TP53exon10_11 (forward: 5′-GAGCAGGGCTCACTCCAG-3′, reverse: 5′-TATGTCCTACTCCCCATCCTCC-3′)
Mutation screening was made using an Ion Torrent PGM sequencer with Ion 318 Chip and Life Technologies Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 (Life Technologies). The CHPv2.0 panel consists of 207 amplicons. The Ion AmpliSeq protocol for library preparation was used. The amplicon coordinates are documented at the vendor web site.
Data Analysis – Ion PGM data
The DNA AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 PGM data were aligned to the hg19 genome sequence and mapped to the CHPv2.0 bed file coordinates. The variants were called using the Torrent VariantCaller plugin in the Torrent Suite software. The variants were manually curated against the BAM file and only positive variants were reported.
Results and Discussion
Most MLS/RCLS tumors are considered genetically stable and many cases carry the characteristic fusion gene associated translocation as the only chromosome aberration even when investigated in tumor recurrence after many years of remission. A limited number of MLS/RCLS derived established cell lines are available. Here, we investigated the TP53 function in four of these cell lines, all carrying the characteristic fusion oncogene FUS-DDIT3 (Table 1).
Next generation sequencing and mutation analysis showed that MLS 402-91, 2645-94 and 1765-92 cell lines contained no dysfunctional or pathogenic alleles among the 50 genes, covering ∼2800 COSMIC mutations in the AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel (Table 2 and S1). This low mutation frequency is remarkable considering that these cell lines have a history with more than 20 years of passages. The DL 221 cells carry mutated TP53 (personal communication with Dr. Alexander Lazar), which was confirmed by our sequence analysis (data not shown). Detailed sequence analysis of the DL 221 cells will be described elsewhere.
TP53 is central in genomic maintenance and recent large scale sequencing of MLS/RCLS cases showed no TP53 mutations among twenty-seven samples . Mutations in TP53 often results in overexpression of the mutated protein that can be visualized by immunohistochemistry analysis . Hence, we analyzed seven cases and only sporadic TP53 expressing cells were detected, suggesting normal TP53 function (Figure 1A).
(A) Immunohistochemistry analysis of TP53 expression in a representative MLS/RCLS case. Inset shows TP53 mutated endometrial carcinoma as positive control. Brown precipitate indicates TP53 expression. Scale bar shows 100 µm. (B) Western blot analysis of TP53 in MLS and HT1080 cell lines. Three different antibodies directed against the core (central transcription factor part), N- and C-terminal parts were used. Two distinct bands (53 and 56 kD, respectively) were detected for the core part of TP53, while only the shorter 53 kD band was detected using antibodies against N- and C-terminal part of TP53. (C) Schematic map of eleven exons in TP53. The translated region is shown as dotted line, and only the translated part of exon eleven is shown. Transcripts detected by reverse transcription PCR and sequencing are shown as black lines. Protein fragment analyses by mass spectroscopy for MLS 402-91 are shown as grey lines. (D) Irradiation effect on TP53 and P21 (CDKN1A) expression in four MLS/RCLS cell lines, wild type HT1080 cells and HT1080 cells expressing FUS-DDIT3 (HT1080 FUS-DDIT3). Antibody against core TP53 part was used. The 68 KD band corresponds to post-translationally modified TP53. MLS 402-91 and 1765-92 carry simian virus 40 large T antigen, while MLS 2645-94 was established using the complete SV40 virus. GAPDH is used as loading control, +/− indicate irradiated and control cell samples, respectively. Positions and sizes of reference proteins are indicated.
Elevated TP53 expression in MLS derived cell lines
In contrast to tumor tissues, the MLS/RCLS derived in vitro cultured cell lines MLS 402-91, 2645-94, 1765-92 and DL 221tumor cells all expressed TP53 protein as shown by our western blot (Figure 1B and 1D) and immune fluorescence analyzes (Figure 2). The reason for the elevated TP53 expression in cultured MLS/RCLS cells is not known. Cell stress caused by the in vitro culture conditions is one plausible explanation and is supported by the fact that freshly explanted cells from MLS/RCLS tissues rapidly start to express the TP53 protein, entering senescent stage within a few passages (data not shown). Transfection with SV40 large T antigen encoding vectors allowed for establishment of MLS cell lines, except DL221 . The two MLS cell lines 402-91 and 1765-92 were stably transfected with expression vectors carrying simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen , . MLS 2645-94 was established by infection with the complete SV40 virus (Table 1) . The SV40 encoded proteins are reported to bind TP53 and interfere with its function , . This is likely contributing to the survival and continued growth of the MLS cell lines in spite of high TP53 levels.
Percentage of (A) TP53 and (B) P21 positive cells are shown. Mean ± SEM of three experiments are shown. * and ** indicate 95% and 99% significance using student's t-test. The number of strongly TP53 stained cells was assessed for one experiment, marked with dot (•) in respective bar. Representative immunofluorescence images for MLS 402-91 are shown. Scale bar shows 50 µm. (C) Western blot analysis of FUS-DDIT3 in MLS cell lines are shown. Different sizes correspond to Type I (MLS 402-91 and DL 221), II (MLS 2645-94) and VI (MLS 1765-92) fusion proteins. GAPDH is used as internal control between samples when calculating the relative FUS-DDIT3 expression level. The lowest FUS-DDIT3 expression value (DL 221) was arbitrarily set to a value of one.
Normal TP53 protein is produced in MLS derived cell lines
Western blot analysis showed a 53 kD band using three different antibodies directed against the TP53 N-terminal, core (DNA binding) and C-terminal domains in MLS 402-91 and 2645-94 (Figure 1B). A 56 kD band reacted with the TP53 core specific antibody, but not or very faintly with antibodies directed against the N- and C-terminal parts. HT1080 cells, reported to contain normal and functional TP53 alleles, expressed the larger 56 kD protein detected with the TP53 core antibody . The N- and C-terminal specific TP53 antibodies showed weak reactivity in HT1080 (Figure 1B). MLS 1765-92 mainly expressed the 53 kB band, while DL 221 expressed the larger 56 kB band (Figure 1D).
The observation of several sized TP53 proteins prompted further investigation as TP53 isoforms may be produced from alternative splicing or translation, and their sizes are modified by post translational modifications . Furthermore, the FUS-DDIT3 protein has been reported to influence alternative splicing of some transcripts and the normal FUS is involved in translational control –. Reverse transcription PCR and partial exon border sequence analysis of TP53 transcripts from MLS cell lines showed however, normal sized cDNA fragments, indicating that normal TP53 transcripts (similar to ENST00000269305) were produced (Figure 1C). Furthermore, mass spectrometry analysis of immune precipitated TP53 protein from MLS 402-91 showed the expected peptides of the normal protein (Figures 1C and S1). The N- and C-terminal parts were not represented among the analysed fragments due to few trypsin sites in these protein regions. Antibodies directed against N-terminal, central and C-terminal epitopes reacted however, with the MLS derived proteins showing that all major parts were present. In summary, MLS cell lines expressed normal TP53 proteins detected as bands at 53 and 56 kD. The differences in TP53 size and antibody reactivity observed between MLS and HT1080 cells can best be explained by post translational modifications resulting in the 56 kD protein, which was most prominent in the HT1080 cell line (Figure 1B and 1D). Post translational modifications such as phosphorylation and methylation may lead to masking of N- and C-terminal epitopes and this can explain the low reactivity of the 56 kD band with the N- and C- terminal antibodies (Figure 1B) , , .
Irradiation induced post translational modification of TP53 in MLS cell lines
Activation of TP53 by irradiation induced DNA-damage is known to involve protein modifications such as phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitinylation and sumoylation , , . These modifications lead to TP53 activation as a transcription factor and expression of downstream genes, including CDKN1A/P21 , . Western blot analysis of TP53 with the core reactive antibody revealed a 69 kD band that was highly upregulated in irradiated MLS 402-91 and 1765-92, and slightly upregulated in DL 221 (Figure 1D). This band represented a substantial proportion of the total TP53 amount and the size shift is in agreement with reported irradiation induced post-translational modification of TP53 . The MLS 2645-94 cells expressed the same 69 kD band, but with no or small detected regulation. Immunofluorescence analysis of MLS cell lines 402-91, 1765-92 and 2645-94 showed expression of TP53 in almost all of the cells with weaker staining in MLS 2645-94 (Figure 2A). Consequently, only minor changes in the number of TP53 expressing cells were detected after irradiation. Detailed analysis showed that most irradiated MLS 402-91 and 1765-92 cells were strongly stained for TP53 compared to control cells, while MLS 2645-94, HT1080 and HT1080 FUS-DDIT3 cells showed few strongly TP53 stained cells in both control and irradiated cells (Figure 2A). We conclude that MLS cell lines 402-91 and 1765-92 responded as expected for normal cells with accumulation of modified TP53 protein after irradiation, whereas DL-221 and MLS 2645-94 cells responded weakly (Figures 1D and 2A). DL 221 cells express mutated TP53, but our sequence analysis failed to detect dysfunctional TP53 mutations in MLS 2645-94. The latter cell line differ, however, from MLS 402-91 and 1765-92 by the expression of a shorter FUS-DDIT3 fusion protein (type II) and by the fact that it was established by infecting the primary tumor cells with SV40 virus . Thus, MLS 2645-94 is capable of expressing the full range of SV40 T antigens whereas 402-91 and 1765-92 cells express only the large T antigen .
The two cell lines with highest FUS-DDIT3 expression (MLS 402-91 and MLS 1765-92) showed strongest TP53 activation (Figures 1D and 2C). To test whether the FUS-DDIT3 fusion protein could interfere with TP53 expression and function, we analysed HT1080 cells with and without stably transfected FUS-DDIT3 type II protein (HT1080 FUS-DDIT3). The immunofluorescence analysis showed weak TP53 expression but substantial increase of positive cells in HT1080 FUS-DDIT3 cells (p<0.01, Figure 2A). This increase may be explained by stress effects of the oncoprotein in the transfected cells and also mirrors the high background expression of TP53 in the MLS cell lines. Irradiation of parental HT1080 cells induced increased number of TP53 positive cells (p<0.05). Most HT1080 FUS-DDIT3 cells expressed TP53 before irradiation, consequently small effects were observed after irradiation. However, irradiation increased accumulation of post-translationally modified TP53 protein in both wild type and HT1080 FUS-DDIT3 cells (Figure 1D). These data show that the irradiation induced TP53 modification was not compromised by the FUS-DDIT3 fusion protein. Consequently, the weak TP53 response observed in MLS 2645-94 can therefore most likely be explained by the SV40 infection of this cell line , .
Irradiation induced P21 expression in MLS cells
Expression of P21 (also known as CDKN1A, WAF1 or CIP1) is induced by activated and functional TP53 after irradiation damage , . Expression of P21 was elevated in all irradiated MLS cell lines although the induction was weaker in DL 221 cells and MLS 2645-94 (Figures 1D and 2B). HT1080 cells showed high background expression of P21 and irradiation increased P21 expression further (Figure 1D). No major difference between the parental and the FUS-DDIT3 expressing HT1080 cells was observed, showing that the fusion protein caused no inhibitory effect on TP53 induced P21 expression. Again, the failure of MLS 2645-94 to respond can be explained by the SV40 infection of this cell line.
We conclude that three commonly used SV40 T antigen or SV40 virus transformed long term passaged MLS cell lines are genetically stable on the molecular level and that they produce normal TP53 proteins. Irradiation induced normal TP53 modification and P21 expression in two SV40 T antigen transformed MLS cell lines, while one SV40 virus infected cell line and one cell line with a knownTP53 mutation failed to respond. The FUS-DDIT3 fusion protein showed no effect on irradiation induced modifications of TP53 or TP53 induced P21 expression. The infrequent mutations and normal TP53 function in MLS/RCLS explains the genetic stability of this tumor entity. In the few cases where TP53 mutations occur, this is associated with progressive disease –.
Amino acid sequence of TP53 in MLS 402-91. Mass spectrometry detected amino acids detected from immune precipitated materials are shown in shaded gray. Lack of representation from N- and C-terminal ends may be explained by the absence of trypsin sites in these parts of TP53. Alternating black and blue amino acids indicate exons.
DL 221tumor cells were generously provided by Dr. Alexander Lazar. Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel is for research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
Conceived and designed the experiments: PÅ AS. Performed the experiments: AS CKG KE CT SD EJ CYL DR SMC PÅ. Analyzed the data: AS CKG KE CT SD EJ CYL DR SMC PÅ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AS DR SMC PÅ. Wrote the paper: AS PÅ.
- 1. Mertens F, Panagopoulos I, Mandahl N (2010) Genomic characteristics of soft tissue sarcomas. Virchows Arch 456: 129–139.
- 2. Aman P (1999) Fusion genes in solid tumors. Semin Cancer Biol 9: 303–318.
- 3. Åman P, Ron D, Mandahl N, Fioretos T, Heim S, et al. (1992) Rearrangement of the transcription factor gene CHOP in myxoid liposarcomas with t(12;16)(q13;p11). Genes Chromosom Cancer 5: 278–285.
- 4. Panagopoulos I, Höglund M, Mertens F, Mandahl N, Mitelman F, et al. (1996) Fusion of the EWS and CHOP genes in myxoid liposarcoma. Oncogene 12: 489–494.
- 5. Engström K, Willén H, Kåbjörn-Gustafsson C, Andersson C, Olsson M, et al. (2006) The myxoid/round cell liposarcoma fusion oncogene FUS-DDIT3 and the normal DDIT3 induce a liposarcoma phenotype in transfected human fibrosarcoma cells. Am J Pathol 168: 1642–1653.
- 6. Sanchez Garcia I, Rabbitts TH (1994) Transcriptional activation by TAL1 and FUS-CHOP proteins expressed in acute malignancies as a result of chromosomal abnormalities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 7869–7873.
- 7. Zinszner H, Albalat R, Ron D (1994) A novel effector domain from the RNA-binding protein TLS or EWS is required for oncogenic transformation by CHOP. Genes Dev 8: 2513–2526.
- 8. Zinszner H, Immanuel D, Yin Y, Liang FX, Ron D (1997) A topogenic role for the oncogenic N-terminus of TLS: nucleolar localization when transcription is inhibited. Oncogene 14: 451–461.
- 9. Di Giandomenico S, Frapolli R, Bello E, Uboldi S, Licandro SA, et al. (2013) Mode of action of trabectedin in myxoid liposarcomas. Oncogene
- 10. Forni C, Minuzzo M, Virdis E, Tamborini E, Simone M, et al. (2009) Trabectedin (ET-743) promotes differentiation in myxoid liposarcoma tumors. Mol Cancer Ther 8: 449–457.
- 11. Frapolli R, Tamborini E, Virdis E, Bello E, Tarantino E, et al. (2010) Novel models of myxoid liposarcoma xenografts mimicking the biological and pharmacologic features of human tumors. Clin Cancer Res 16: 4958–4967.
- 12. Barretina J, Taylor BS, Banerji S, Ramos AH, Lagos-Quintana M, et al. (2010) Subtype-specific genomic alterations define new targets for soft-tissue sarcoma therapy. Nature Genet 42: 715–721.
- 13. Pilotti S, Lavarino C, Mezzelani A, Della Torre C, Minoletti F, et al. (1998) Limited role of TP53 and TP53-related genes in myxoid liposarcoma. Tumori 84: 571–577.
- 14. Mandahl N, Mertens F, Aman P, Rydholm A, Brosjo O, et al. (1994) Nonrandom secondary chromosome-aberrations in liposarcomas with t(12, 16). Int J Oncol 4: 307–310.
- 15. Antonescu CR, Tschernyavsky SJ, Decuseara R, Leung DH, Woodruff JM, et al. (2001) Prognostic impact of P53 status, TLS-CHOP fusion transcript structure, and histological grade in myxoid liposarcoma: a molecular and clinicopathologic study of 82 cases. Clin Cancer Res 7: 3977–3987.
- 16. Oda Y, Yamamoto H, Takahira T, Kobayashi C, Kawaquchi K, et al. (2005) Frequent alteration of p16(INK4a)/p14(ARF) and p53 pathways in the round cell component of myxoid/round cell liposarcoma: p53 gene alterations and reduced p14(ARF) expression both correlate with poor prognosis. J Pathol 207: 410–421.
- 17. Perrone F, Tamborini E, Suardi S, Lagonigro MS, Pilotti S (2006) Re: Oda et al. Frequent alteration of p16INK4a/p14ARF and p53 pathways in the round cell component of myxoid/round cell liposarcoma: p53 gene alterations and reduced p14ARF expression both correlate with poor prognosis. J Pathol 2005;207: 410–421 J Pathol 209: 281; author reply 282.
- 18. Engström K, Bergh P, Cederlund CG, Hultborn R, Willen H, et al. (2007) Irradiation of myxoid/round cell liposarcoma induces volume reduction and lipoma-like morphology. Acta Oncol 46: 838–845.
- 19. Rodriguez R, Rubio R, Gutierrez-Aranda I, Melen GJ, Elosua C, et al. (2011) FUS-CHOP fusion protein expression coupled to p53 deficiency induces liposarcoma in mouse but not in human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. Stem Cells 29: 179–192.
- 20. Thomsen C, Grundevik P, Elias P, Ståhlberg A, Åman P (2013) A conserved N-terminal motif is required for complex formation between FUS, EWSR1, TAF15 and their oncogenic fusion proteins. FASEB J 27: 4965–4974.
- 21. Göransson M, Elias E, Ståhlberg A, Olofsson A, Andersson C, et al. (2005) Myxoid liposarcoma FUS-DDIT3 fusion oncogene induces C/EBP beta-mediated interleukin 6 expression. Int J Cancer 115: 556–560.
- 22. Würl P, Taubert H, Meye A, Berger D, Lautenschläger C, et al. (1997) Prognostic value of immunohistochemistry for p53 in primary soft-tissue sarcomas: a multivariate analysis of five antibodies. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 123: 502–508.
- 23. Classon M, Henriksson M, Sumegi J, Klein G, Hammarskjold ML (1987) Elevated c-myc expression facilitates the replication of SV40 DNA in human lymphoma cells. Nature 330: 272–274.
- 24. Thelin-Jarnum S, Lassen C, Panagopoulos I, Mandahl N, Åman P (1999) Identification of genes differentially expressed in TLS-CHOP carrying myxoid liposarcomas. Int J Cancer 83: 30–33.
- 25. Pipas JM, Levine AJ (2001) Role of T antigen interactions with p53 in tumorigenesis. Semin Cancer Biol 11: 23–30.
- 26. Technau A, Wolff A, Sauder C, Birkner N, Brandner G (2001) p53 in SV40-transformed DNA-damaged human cells binds to its cognate sequence but fails to transactivate target genes. Int J Oncol 18: 281–286.
- 27. Sharma S, Schwarte-Waldhoff I, Oberhuber H, Schafer R (1993) Functional interaction of wild-type and mutant p53 transfected into human tumor cell lines carrying activated ras genes. Cell Growth Differ 4: 861–869.
- 28. Khoury MP, Bourdon JC (2010) The isoforms of the p53 protein. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a000927.
- 29. Andersson MK, Ståhlberg A, Arvidsson Y, Olofsson A, Semb H, et al. (2008) The multifunctional FUS, EWS and TAF15 proto-oncoproteins show cell type-specific expression patterns and involvement in cell spreading and stress response. BMC Cell Biol 9: 37.
- 30. Law WJ, Cann KL, Hicks GG (2006) TLS, EWS and TAF15: a model for transcriptional integration of gene expression. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 5: 8–14.
- 31. Fujii R, Takumi T (2005) TLS facilitates transport of mRNA encoding an actin-stabilizing protein to dendritic spines. J Cell Sci 118: 5755–5765.
- 32. Gu B, Zhu WG (2012) Surf the post-translational modification network of p53 regulation. Int J Biol Sci 8: 672–684.
- 33. Hollstein M, Hainaut P (2010) Massively regulated genes: the example of TP53. J Pathol 220: 164–173.
- 34. Wu L, Levine AJ (1997) Differential regulation of the p21/WAF-1 and mdm2 genes after high-dose UV irradiation: p53-dependent and p53-independent regulation of the mdm2 gene. Mol Med 3: 441–451.
- 35. Chin PL, Momand J, Pfeifer GP (1997) In vivo evidence for binding of p53 to consensus binding sites in the p21 and GADD45 genes in response to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 15: 87–99.