Figures
Abstract
Salvia miltiorrhiza is one of the most popular traditional medicinal herbs in Asian nations. Its dried root contains a number of tanshinones, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B and rosmarinic, and is used for the treatment of various diseases. The finding of microRNAs (miRNAs) and their target genes will help understand their biological role on the biosynthesis of tanshinones in S. miltiorrhiza. In the present study, a total of 452 known miRNAs corresponding to 589 precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs), and 40 novel miRNAs corresponding to 24 pre-miRNAs were identified in different tissues of S. miltiorrhiza by high-throughput sequencing, respectively. Among them, 62 miRNAs express only in root, 95 miRNAs express only in stem, 19 miRNAs express only in leaf, and 71 miRNAs express only in flower, respectively. By the degradome analysis, 69 targets potentially cleaved by 25 miRNAs were identified. Among them, acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase was cleaved by miR5072, and involved in the biosynthesis of tanshinones. This study provided valuable information for understanding the tissue-specific expression patterns of miRNAs in S. miltiorrhiza, and offered a foundation for future studies of the miRNA-mediated biosynthesis of tanshinones.
Citation: Xu X, Jiang Q, Ma X, Ying Q, Shen B, Qian Y, et al. (2014) Deep Sequencing Identifies Tissue-Specific MicroRNAs and Their Target Genes Involving in the Biosynthesis of Tanshinones in Salvia miltiorrhiza. PLoS ONE 9(11): e111679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111679
Editor: Rogerio Margis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Received: July 17, 2014; Accepted: September 29, 2014; Published: November 3, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Xu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus database under the accession number GSE60757.
Funding: This study was supported by the open foundation (ZK-14) of the Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province Medicinal Plants Germplasm Improvement and Quality Control Technology. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge, known as dan shen or tan shen, is one of the important traditional Chinese medicinal herbs. Its dried root is used for the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases, menstrual disorders, blood circulation disturbances, inflammation, apoplexy, and tumor growth [1], [2]. More than 70 components have been isolated and structurally identified from S. miltiorrhiza [3]. The main constituents are a number of tanshinones, such as the tanshinone I, tanshinone IIA and tanshinone IIB, and hydrophilic phenolics like the protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B and rosmarinic. Tanshinone IIA has effective antioxidant activities, which can inhibit the association of lipid peroxidation products with DNA in liver cells [4], and is widely used to treat various cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases [5]. Salvianolic acid B possesses significant antioxidant activities [6], can decrease malondialdehyde level and attenuate brain and heart damages in mice and rabbits [7], [8]. Due to the medicinal importance, S. miltiorrhiza becomes one of the most popular traditional herbal medicines in Asian nations, and also is widely accepted as a health supplement in western countries [3], [9]. It has estimated that 20 million kilograms of S. miltiorrhiza was needed in China each year. With the growth of annual demand, the amount is still increasing. Hence, enhance yield of S. miltiorrhiza or improve content of active constituents in S. miltiorrhiza becomes one of the crucial work.
Recent years, small RNAs (sRNAs) are getting more and more attention for their key roles in post-transcriptional or translational gene regulation [10]–[14]. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) are two major groups of sRNAs. MiRNAs are short, single strand and endogenous sRNAs that negatively regulate gene expressions at post-transcriptional level by repressing gene translation or degrading target mRNAs [12], [15]. They are encoded by independent transcriptional units in intergenic regions and transcribed by RNA polymerase II or III to form primary miRNA (pri-miRNA). The pri-miRNA is processed by ribonuclease III enzymes into a stem-loop miRNA::miRNA* duplex of precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA) [16]. In plants, the stem-loop region of pre-miRNAs is cut by Dicer-like (DCL) endonuclease, forming small double stranded RNA (dsRNA) miRNA: miRNA* [12], [16]. The mature miRNA is incorporated in the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) with endonuclease AGO and guide the cleavage or translational repression of the target mRNA by complementary base-pairing [17]. MiRNAs are involved in multiple crucial plants biological processes, such as organ development and plant responses to environmental stresses [18]–[20]. They also participate in regulating plant secondary metabolism. For example, cis- and trans-regulation of miR163 and its target genes confers natural variation of secondary metabolites in two Arabidopsis species and their allopolyploids [21].
To totally make clear the function of miRNAs on the diverse biological processes, it is essential to exactly identify their target genes and explore their interactions. The recent development of degradome sequencing provided a new method for validation of the splicing targets on a whole genome scale, which revolutionized the traditional computational target prediction and was successfully employed on identifying miRNA targets in plants [22]–[24].
Up to now, miRBase database (20.0, http://www.mirbase.org/) contains 24, 521 miRNA loci from 206 species and 30, 424 mature miRNA products. However, there is still no report of miRNAs from S. miltiorrhiza. Identification of the tissue-specific miRNAs and their target genes will help understand their role in a variety of metabolic pathways. Therefore, the goal of this study is to identify tissue-specific miRNAs and their potential targets in S. miltiorrhiza, and provide valuable information for future studies of the miRNA-mediated biosynthesis of tanshinones.
Results
Analysis of sRNA library data sets
To identify the tissue-specific miRNAs in S. miltiorrhiza, four independent sRNA libraries from root, stem, leaf and flower were generated and single-end sequencd (36 bp) on an Illumina Hiseq2500, respectively. The four sRNA libraries yielded a total of 12,385,534, 9,243,928, 9,628,136 and 8,465,920 raw reads, respectively (Table 1). After filtering out the adapter sequences as well as sequences with low quality or low-copy, and further removing mRNA, rRNAs, tRNAs, snoRNAs, snRNAs and other Rfam RNA, a total of 1,524,510, 1,373,067, 553,741 and 601,590 clean mappable sRNA sequences were obtained, respectively (Table 1). The cloning frequency of different sized sRNAs (15–32 nt) was similar among the four libraries. The majority of the sRNAs were 20–24 nt in size (Fig. 1A and B).
(A) Total mappable reads. (B) Unique mappable reads.
Identification of miRNAs
To identify the known miRNAs in S. miltiorrhiza, the mappable sRNAs were compared with the currently known plant precursor or mature miRNA sequences in miRbase database (20.0, http://www.mirbase.org/). A total of 452 known miRNAs corresponding to 589 pre-miRNAs were identified (Table S1). Among these identified miRNAs, most are highly homologous with that of other plants, such as Glycine max, Zea mays, Populus trichocarpa, Oryza sativa, Manihot esculenta, Malus domestica and Sorghum bicolor. In particular, 182 identified miRNAs in S. miltiorrhiza are homologous with that of G. max (Fig. 2). Base on the sequence similarity, these identified miRNAs could be grouped into 62 miRNA families. Some of the miRNA families, such as miR156, miR159, miR160, miR166, miR169, miR171, miR172, miR319 and miR396, were conserved in 43, 34, 35, 40, 31, 26, 31, 31 and 37 kinds of plant species, respectively (Table S2). Most of the non-conserved miRNAs (miR403, miR408, miR423, miR425, miR436, miR447, miR482, miR528, miR529, miR535, miR812, miR815, miR827, miR845, miR858, miR894, miR951, miR1028, miR1128, miR1509, miR1510, miR1862, miR1863, miR1873, miR1876, miR2111, miR2118, miR2275, miR2673, miR3522, miR3630, miR4243, miR4996, miR5054, miR5059, miR5072, miR5077, miR5139, miR5141, miR5144, miR5145, miR5527, miR5538, miR6173 and miR6478) found in S. miltiorrhiza only have been previously identified from a few plant species (Table S2).
Confident annotation of novel species-specific miRNAs requires dcl1 or dcl4 knockout mutants [23], [24]. In the absence of these mutants, the ability of the miRNA flanking sequences to fold-back into a stable hairpin structure is an important criterion for the annotation of novel miRNAs. By mapping all sRNA sequences and predicting the secondary structures of the miRNA precursors, 24 pre-miRNAs corresponding to 40 novel miRNAs were first reported in this experiment, of which most were 18, 20 and 21 nt in length (Table S1).
Among all the identified known and novel miRNAs, besides 224 miRNAs express in all the tissues, 62 miRNAs express only in root, 95 miRNAs express only in stem, 19 miRNAs express only in leaf, and 71 miRNAs express only in flower (Fig. 3, Table S3), and most of them presenting at a low expression level. Moreover, there are still many miRNAs express in 2 or 3 different tissues, respectively (Fig. 3).
Differential expression of miRNAs in S. miltiorrhiza
To further identify the tissue-specific miRNAs in S. miltiorrhiza, the differential expression of miRNAs was analyzed by selectively using Chi-squared test and ANOVA test based on normalized deep-sequencing counts. The significance threshold was set to be 0.01. The Z-value of miRNAs higher than 1 was designated as up-regulated, and less than −1 was designated as down-regulated. As shown in figure 4, 17, 7, 28 and 25 miRNAs were up-regulated in root, stem, leaf, and flower, respectively, and 8, 3, 8 and 5 miRNAs were down-regulated in root, stem, leaf, and flower, respectively.
The expression of miRNAs was shown as Z-value. The significance threshold was set to be 0.01. The Z-value of miRNAs higher than 1 was designated as up-regulated, and less than −1 was designated as down-regulated.
To validate the sequencing results and the expression level of miRNAs, four known and four novel miRNAs displaying differential expression pattern in different tissues of S. miltiorrhiza from the high-throughput sequencing were selected for quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis. As shown in figure 5, although some of the miRNAs were identified in low reads, such as PC-3p-115345_10 and PC-5p-92321_13, the eight miRNAs RT-qPCR qualitative results was consistent with the data from high-throughput sequencing (Table S1).
The amount of expression was normalized by the level of actin in RT-qPCR. All reactions of RT-qPCR were repeated three times for each sample.
Identification of targets cleaved by miRNAs
To further understand the biological function of these identified miRNAs in S. miltiorrhiza, the high-throughput degradome sequencing approach was adopted to perform a genome-wide analysis of the mRNAs potentially cleaved by the miRNAs. In total, 13,381,623 raw reads were obtained from the S. miltiorrhiza degradome library (mixture of root, stem, leaf and flower) (data not shown). After removing the reads without the CAGCAG adaptor, 2,287,895 unique raw reads were mapped to the genome database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The CleaveLand 3.0 was adopted to identify the sliced targets. The cleavage signature for most of the miRNAs was not detectd in this degradome library, only a total of 69 targets potentially cleaved by 25 miRNAs were identified (Table S4). Based on the ‘height’ of the degradome peak at each occupied transcript position, these targets were classified into categories 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 according to our previous criteria [24], respectively. Among these identified targets, there were 6, 0, 37, 12 and 14 fell into categories 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (Table S4). Most miRNAs cleaved two or more different transcription targets, and only five miRNAs cleaved one target. Based on the BLASTX analysis, 29 targets were homologous with the genes that have already been found in other plants (Table 2), including S-adenosylmethionine synthetase, peroxidase, myb proto-oncogene protein, etc.
To better understand the function of these identified miRNA, their targets obtained from degradome library were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway analysis. As shown in figure 6, these targets were involved in 26 biological process, 22 kinds of cellular component, and 22 kinds of molecular function, including binding, peroxidase activity, hydrolase activity, ammonia transmembrane transporter activity, etc. Among these targets, acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase (gi51953064gbCV163924.1CV163924), cleaved by osa-miR5072_L-4_1ss13GA, is involved in the biosynthesis of terpenoid backbone and tanshinone (Fig. 7, Table S5).
(A) T-plots show the distribution of the degradome tag along the full-length of acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase mRNA sequence (bottom). The red line represents the sliced target transcripts. The alignments show the miRNA with a portion of its target sequence. Two dots indicate matched RNA base pairs; one dot indicates a GU mismatch. The arrow shows the cleavage site. (B) Acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase was negatively regulated by miR5072 and involved in the biosynthesis of tanshinones.
Discussion
In the present study, four sRNA libraries from the tissues of root, stem, leaf and flower of S. miltiorrhiza were constructed, respectively. A total of 452 known miRNAs corresponding to 589 pre-miRNAs and 40 novel miRNAs corresponding to 24 pre-miRNAs were identified, respectively (Table S1). Most of the identified known miRNA families are highly evolutionarily conserved in a variety of plant species (Table S2), suggesting their conserved roles in plant kingdom. Most of the non-conserved miRNAs, found only in a few plant species, were also identified in S. miltiorrhiza (Table S2). It seems likely that these miRNAs relatively recently evolved [25]. They might play important roles in more species-specific characteristics in plant growth and development [26].
Analyzing the temporal and spatial expression patterns of miRNAs would provide useful information about their molecular functions. In plants, more and more evidence showed that miRNAs have differential expression in specific developmental stages and tissues [27]. For example, miR159 mainly expressed in the leaf of potato, and were considered to have crucial function in leaf development [28]. MiR164 mainly expressed in roots of several plant species, and showed essential role in plant root development through their NAC transcription factor targets-mediated downstream pathways [29], [30]. In addition, recent studies also showed that miR166 mainly expressed in barley roots, miR171 mainly expressed in opium poppy roots, miR397 mainly expressed in opium poppy leaves, and miR156 and miR408 mainly expressed in barley leaves [31], [32], which indicated their important roles in plant specific tissues growth and development [26]. In the present study, based on the deep sequencing counts, many miRNAs showed tissue-specific expression in S. miltiorrhiza. Among them, 62, 95, 19 and 71 miRNAs only express in root, stem, leaf and flower, respectively (Fig. 3). In addition, miR156 and miR167 were highly abundant in flower and leaf, miR164 were highly abundant in flower and root, and miR166 were highly abundant in all tissues, especially in flower (Table S1), which were quite different from the patterns found in other plants [23], [31]. These suggested that besides some common mechanism sharing with different plant species, there were species-specific miRNA regulatory mechanisms in S. miltiorrhiza.
Identification of the targets of these identified miRNAs will help understand their role in a variety of metabolic pathways. By the degradome analysis, 69 targets potentially cleaved by 25 miRNAs were identified, and 29 were homologous with the genes that have already been found in other plants (Table 2). Fortunately, one target of miR5072, acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase, was identified in S. miltiorrhiza, and related to the biosynthesis of terpenoid compounds and tanshinones in plant (Fig. 7). Tanshinones are abietane-type norditerpenoid quinones identified in root of S. miltiorrhiza, which mainly including tanshinone I, tanshinone IIA, dihydrotanshinone I and cryptotanshinone, and showing diverse pharmacological activities, such as antibacterial, antioxidant, antiinflammatory, cytotoxic, neuroprotective, cardioprotective, antiplatelet, and antitumor effects [2], [33]. In plant, diterpenoids are generated from geranylgeranyl diphosphate, which is synthesized from isopentenyl diphosphate and its allylic isomer dimethylallyldiphosphate via two different pathways, the mevalonic acid (MVA) pathway in the cytosol and the 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate (DXP) pathway in cellular plastids [34]–[36]. Generally, the main MVA derived isoprenoid end-products are certain sesquiterpenes, sterols and the side chain of mitochondrial ubiquinones, whereas monoterpenes, certain sesquiterpenes and photosynthesis-related isoprenoids, are derived from the DXP pathway [37]. The two pathways are not separated absolutely. In some extents, there are some forms of crosstalk between them. The isoprenoids generated from MVA can get into the plastid carried by membrane and form monoterpene or diterpene [38]. In the MVA pathway, two units of acetyl-CoA are first catalyzed to acetoacetyl-CoA by acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase, and then catalyzed to mevalonate by 3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGR) [39]. Considering the important role of acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase in the initial reaction of MVA pathway, miR5072 must have involved in regulating the biosynthesis of tanshinones in S. miltiorrhiza. In addition, acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase was also involved in the biosynthesis of a variety of products [40]–[42], indicating the other crucial role of miR5072 in S. miltiorrhiza.
Moreover, osa-miR5072_L-4_1ss13GA was also found to target carboxymethylenebutenolidase (Table 2), which known as 4-carboxymethylenebut-2-en-4-olide lactonohydrolase, maleylacetate enol-lactonase, dienelactone hydrolase, and carboxymethylene butenolide hydrolase, belonging to the family of hydrolases. It mainly acts on carboxylic ester bonds and involves in biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. In S. miltiorrhiza, it must also have involved in the biosynthesis of active constituents.
In conclusion, for the first time, we obtained 452 known miRNAs and 40 novel miRNAs in S. miltiorrhiza, and identified their tissue-specific expression patterns. By degradome analysis, 69 targets potentially cleaved by 25 miRNAs were identified. Among them, acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase was cleaved by miR5072 and involved in the biosynthesis of tanshinones. This study provided valuable information for understanding the tissue-specific expression patterns of miRNAs in S. miltiorrhiza, and offered a foundation for future studies of the miRNA-mediated biosynthesis of tanshinones.
Materials and Methods
Plant material
S. miltiorrhiza was cultivated in the experimental field of the Xiasha campus, Hangzhou normal university, China. The root, stem, leaf and flower were collected, immediately frozen and stored at −80°C. No specific permissions were required for these locations/activities, and this study was supported by the open foundation (ZK-14) of the Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province Medicinal Plants Germplasm Improvement and Quality Control Technology. We confirm that this study did not involve endangered or protected species.
SRNA library construction and sequencing
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s procedure. The total RNA quantity and purity were confirmed with Bioanalyzer 2100 and RNA 6000 Nano LabChip Kit (Agilent, CA, USA) with RIN number >7.0. Approximately 1 ug of total RNA were used to prepare sRNA library according to protocol of TruSeq Small RNA Sample Prep Kits (Illumina, San Diego, USA). And then performed the single-end sequencing (36 bp) on an Illumina Hiseq2500 at the LC-BIO (Hangzhou, China) following the recommended protocol.
Analysis of sequencing data
The raw reads were subjected to the Illumina pipeline filter (Solexa 0.3), and then the dataset was further processed with an in-house program, ACGT101-miR (LC Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA) to remove adapter dimers, junk, low complexity, common RNA families (rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA) and repeats. Subsequently, unique sequences with length in 18–25 nt were mapped to specic species precursors in miRBase 20.0 (http://www.mirbase.org/) by BLAST search to identify known miRNAs and novel 3p- and 5p- derived miRNAs. Length variation at both 3′ and 5′ ends and one mismatch inside of the sequence were allowed in the alignment. The unique sequences mapping to specific species mature miRNAs in hairpin arms were identified as known miRNAs. The unique sequences mapping to the other arm of known specific species precursor hairpin opposite to the annotated mature miRNA-containing arm were considered to be novel 5p- or 3p-derived miRNA candidates. The remaining sequences were mapped to other selected species precursors (with the exclusion of specific species) in miRBase 20.0 by BLAST search, and the mapped pre-miRNAs were further BLASTed against the specific species genomes to determine their genomic locations. The above two we defined as known miRNAs. The unmapped sequences were BLASTed against the specific genomes, and the hairpin RNA structures containing sequences were predicated from the flank 120 nt sequences using RNAfold software (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAfold.cgi). The criteria for secondary structure prediction were: (1) number of nucleotides in one bulge in stem (< = 12) (2) number of base pairs in the stem region of the predicted hairpin (> = 16) (3) cut off of free energy (kCal/mol < = 15) (4) length of hairpin (up and down stems + terminal loop > = 50) (5) length of hairpin loop (< = 200). (6) number of nucleotides in one bulge in mature region (< = 4) (7) number of biased errors in one bulge in mature region (< = 2) (8) number of biased bulges in mature region (< = 2) (9) number of errors in mature region (< = 4) (10) number of base pairs in the mature region of the predicted hairpin (> = 12) (11) percent of mature in stem (> = 80).
Verification of miRNAs by RT-qPCR in S. miltiorrhiza
To validate the presence and expression of the identified miRNAs, four known and four novel miRNAs were assayed by RT-qPCR, respectively. Total RNA was extracted from the different tissues of S. miltiorrhiza with Trizol reagent following the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, CA, USA). The total RNA (2.5 µg) was treated with DNase I (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) to remove the genomic DNA and reverse-transcribed using miRNA specific primers (Table S6). The forward primers of eight selected miRNAs were designed according to the sequence of miRNA itself, and the universal primer was used as reverse primer (Table S6). 1 µl of cDNA was used as the template in 25 µl PCR reactions which contained 12.5 µl 2×SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 1 µl each of forward and reverse primer (10 µM) and 9.5 µl water. Reactions were performed using the iCycler iQ real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad). Each sample contained three replicates of 15 plant tissues. All reactions were performed in triplicate for each sample and actin7 was used as an internal reference. The threshold value was empirically determined based on the observed linear amplification phase of all primer sets. Sample cycle threshold (Ct) values were standardized for each template based on an actin7 control reaction. The comparative Ct method (2−ΔΔCt) was used to determine the relative transcript abundance of each miRNA [43].
Degradome library construction, sequencing and target identification
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s procedure. The total RNA quantity and purity were confirmed with Bioanalyzer 2100 and RNA 6000 Nano LabChip Kit (Agilent, CA, USA) with RIN number >7.0. Approximately 20 ug of total RNA were used to prepare Degradome library. The method of Ma et al. [44] was followed with some modification. (1) Approximately 150 ng of poly (A) + RNA was used as input RNA and annealing with Biotinylated Random Primers. (2) Strapavidin capture of RNA fragments through Biotinylated Random Primers. (3) 5′ adaptor ligate to only those RNAs containing 5′-monophosphates. (4) Reverse transcription and PCR (5) Libraries were sequenced using the 5′ adapter only, resulting in the sequencing of the first 36 nucleotides of the inserts that represented the 5′ ends of the original RNAs. Then the single-end sequencing (36 bp) on an Illumina Hiseq2500 at the LC-BIO (Hangzhou, China) was performed following the vendor’s recommended protocol. A Public software package, CleaveLand3.0 was used for analyzing sequencing data.
Supporting Information
Table S1.
Profile of known and novel microRNAs identified in S. miltiorrhiza.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111679.s001
(XLS)
Table S2.
Conservation of the identified known miRNAs in S. miltiorrhiza.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111679.s002
(XLS)
Table S3.
The tissue-specific miRNAs in S. miltiorrhiza.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111679.s003
(XLS)
Table S4.
Information of miRNA target genes identified in S. miltiorrhiza by degradome sequencing.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111679.s004
(XLS)
Table S5.
The KEGG pathway annotation of the target genes identified in S. miltiorrhiza.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111679.s005
(XLS)
Table S6.
Primers of miRNAs used in this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111679.s006
(XLS)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: XBX HMS. Performed the experiments: XBX HMS QHJ XYM QCY. Analyzed the data: XBX HMS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HZW BS QCY YSQ. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: XBX HMS.
References
- 1. Wu SJ, Shi M, Wu JY (2009) Cloning and characterization of the 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase gene for diterpenoid tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza (Chinese sage) hairy roots. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 52: 89–95.
- 2. Zhou L, Zuo Z, Chow MS (2005) Danshen: an overview of its chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use. J Clin Pharmacol 45: 1345–1359.
- 3. Li YG, Song L, Liu M, Hu ZB, Wang ZT (2009) Advancement in analysis of Salviae miltiorrhizae Radix et Rhizoma (Danshen). J Chromatogr A 1216: 1941–1953.
- 4. Cao EH, Liu XQ, Wang JJ, Xu NF (1996) Effect of natural antioxidant tanshinone II-A on DNA damage by lipid peroxidantion in lives cells. Free Radical Biol Med 20: 801–806.
- 5. Yan XM, Zhang L, Wang J, Liao P, ZhangY, et al (2009) Molecular characterization and expression of 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR) gene from Salvia miltiorrhiza. Acta Physiol Plant 31: 1015–1022.
- 6. Kang DG, Oh H, Sohn EJ, Hur TY, Lee KC, et al. (2004) Lithospermic acid B isolated from Salvia miltiorrhiza ameliorates ischemia/reperfusion-induced renal injury in rats. Life Sci 75: 1801–1816.
- 7. Chen YH, Du GH, Zhang JT (2000) Salvianolic acid B protects brain against injuries caused by ischemia-reperfusion in rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin 21: 463–466.
- 8. Du GH, Qiu Y, Zhang JT (2000) Salvianolic acid B protects the memory functions against transient cerebral ischemia in mice. J Asian Nat Prod Res 2: 145–152.
- 9. Zhong GX, Li P, Zeng LJ, Guan J, Li DQ, et al. (2009) Chemical characteristics of Salvia miltiorrhiza (Danshen) collected from different locations in China. J Agric Food Chem 57: 6879–6887.
- 10. Hamilton AJ, Baulcombe DC (1999) A species of small antisense RNA in posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants. Science 286: 950–952.
- 11. Carrington JC, Ambros V (2003) Role of microRNAs in plant and animal development. Science 301: 336–338.
- 12. Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116: 281–297.
- 13. Brodersen P, Sakvarelidze-Achard L, Bruun-Rasmussen M, Dunoyer P, Yamamoto YY, et al. (2008) Widespread translational inhibition by plant miRNAs and siRNAs. Science 320: 1185–1190.
- 14. Lanet E, Delannoy E, Sormani R, Floris M, Brodersen P, et al. (2009) Biochemical evidence for translational repression by Arabidopsis microRNAs. Plant Cell 21: 1762–1768.
- 15. Llave C, Kasschau KD, Rector MA, Carrington JC (2002) Endogenous and silencing-associated small RNAs in plants. Plant Cell 14: 1605–1619.
- 16. Kurihara Y, Watanabe Y (2004) Arabidopsis micro-RNA biogenesis through Dicer-like 1 protein functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 12753–12758.
- 17. Baumberger N, Baulcombe DC (2005) Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE1 is an RNA slicer that selectively recruits microRNAs and short interfering RNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 11928–11933.
- 18. Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP (2004) Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress-induced miRNA. Mol Cell 14(6): 787–799.
- 19. Mallory AC, Vaucheret H (2006) Functions of microRNAs and related small RNAs in plants. Nat Genet 38(Suppl): S31–S36.
- 20. Sunkar R, Kapoor A, Zhu JK (2006) Posttranscriptional induction of two Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase genes in Arabidopsis is mediated by downregulation of miR398 and important for oxidative stress tolerance. Plant Cell 18(8): 2051–2065.
- 21. Ng DW, Zhang C, Miller M, Palmer G, Whiteley M, et al. (2011) Cis- and trans-Regulation of miR163 and target genes confers natural variation of secondary metabolites in two Arabidopsis species and their allopolyploids. Plant Cell 23(5): 1729–1740.
- 22. Addo-Quaye C, Eshoo TW, Bartel DP, Axtell MJ (2008) Endogenous siRNA and miRNA targets identified by sequencing of the Arabidopsis degradome. Curr Biol 18: 758–762.
- 23. Mao W, Li Z, Xia X, Li Y, Yu J (2012) A combined approach of high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis reveals tissue specific expression of microRNAs and their targets in cucumber. PLoS ONE 7(3): e33040.
- 24. Xu XB, Yin LL, Ying QC, Song HM, Xue DW, et al. (2013) High-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis identify miRNAs and their targets involved in fruit senescence of Fragaria ananassa. PLoS ONE 8: e70959.
- 25. Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Bartel B (2006) MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57: 19–53.
- 26. Zhang BH, Pan XP, Cox SB, Cobb GP, Anderson TA (2006) Evidence that miRNAs are different from other RNAs. Cell Mol Life Sci 63: 246–254.
- 27. Sunkar R, Girke T, Jain PK, Zhu JK (2005) Cloning and characterization of microRNAs from rice. Plant Cell 17: 1397–1411.
- 28. Yang WZ, Liu X, Zhang JG, Feng JL, Li C, et al. (2010) Prediction and validation of conservative microRNAs of Solanum tuberosum L. Mol Biol Rep. 37: 3081–3087.
- 29. Guo HS, Xie Q, Fei JF, Chua NH (2005) MicroRNA directs mRNA cleavage of the transcription factor NAC1 to downregulate auxin signals for Arabidopsis lateral root development. Plant Cell 17: 1376–1386.
- 30. Mallory AC, Dugas DV, Bartel DP, Bartel B (2004) MicroRNA regulation of NAC-domain targets is required for proper formation and separation of adjacent embryonic, vegetative, and floral organs. Curr Biol 14: 1035–1046.
- 31. Unver T, Parmaksız I, Dundar E (2010) Identification of conserved micro-RNAs and their target transcripts in opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.). Plant Cell Rep 29: 757–769.
- 32. Kantar M, Unver T, Budak H (2010) Regulation of barley miRNAs upon dehydration stress correlated with target gene expression. Funct Integr Genomics 10: 493–507.
- 33. Yuan Y, Liu Y, Lu D, Huang L, Liang R, et al. (2009) Genetic stability, active constituent, and pharmacoactivity of Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots and wild plant. Z Naturforsch C64: 557–563.
- 34. Rohmer M, Knani M, Simonin P, Sutter B, Sahm H (1993) Isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria: a novel pathway for the early steps leading to isopentenyl diphosphate. Biochem J 295: 517–524.
- 35. Buhaescu I, Izzedine H (2007) Mevalonate pathway: a review of clinical and therapeutical implications. Clin Biochem 40: 575–584.
- 36. Hunter WN (2007) The non-mevalonate pathway of isoprenoid precursor biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 282: 21573–21577.
- 37. Lichtenthaler HK (1999) The 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50: 47–65.
- 38. Laule O, Fürholz A, Chang HS, Zhu T, Wang X, et al. (2003) Crosstalk between cytosolic and plastidial pathways of isoprenoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 6866–6871.
- 39. Chappell J (1995) The biochemistry and molecular biology of isoprenoid metabolism. Plant Physiol 107: 1–6.
- 40. Thompson SL, Krisans SK (1990) Rat liver peroxisomes catalyze the initial step in cholesterol synthesis. The condensation of acetyl-CoA units into acetoacetyl-CoA. J Biol Chem 265: 5731–5735.
- 41. Hiser L, Basson ME, Rine J (1994) ERG10 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase. J Biol Chem 269: 31383–31389.
- 42. Pereto J, Lopez-Garcia P, Moreira D (2005) Phylogenetic analysis of eukaryotic thiolases suggests multiple proteobacterial origins. J Mol Evol 61: 65–74.
- 43. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25: 402–408.
- 44. Ma ZR, Coruh C, Axtell MJ (2010) Arabidopsis lyrata small RNAs: transient mIRNA and small interfering RNA loci within the Arabidopsis genus. Plant Cell 22: 1090–1103.