To compare the different serum peptidome patterns between twins with and without non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in order to help understand the pathogenesis of NAFLD and to identify potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets.
The peptidomics patterns of 63 cases with NAFLD were compared with their twin healthy controls in Qingdao, China. Peptides between 800Da and 3500Da were captured and concentrated using C18 reversed-phase columns, followed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. The sequences of peptides associated with NAFLD were further identified by MALDI-TOF-TOF. Further validation studies were conducted. One hundred additional serum samples were detected by commercially available ELISA kits to calculate the concentrations of complement C3f and fibrinopeptide A, respectively. The differences of these two peptides in the NAFLD and control groups were compared using SPSS 17.0, respectively.
Compared with healthy controls, eleven peaks (861.1, 877.07, 904.5, 1206.57, 1350.64, 1518.7, 1690.9, 1777.94, 2931.29, 3190.4, 3261.4) were up-regulated and 7 peaks (942.44, 1020.47, 1060.06, 1211.7, 1263.63, 1449.76, 2768.3) were down-regulated in the NAFLD group. Two peptides derived from complement C3f and fibrinopeptide A, respectively, had the highest ROC values indistinguishing NAFLD cases from their normal controls. In the validation group, the concentrations of complement C3f and fibrinopeptide A (1466.929±78.306 pg/ml, 4.189±0.326 ng/ml, respevtively) in NAFLD group was higher than in control group (complement C3f 1159.357±99.624 pg/ml, FPA 3.039±0.483 ng/ml; P<0.05).
Citation: Xin Y-N, Geng N, Lin Z-H, Cui Y-Z, Duan H-P, Zhang M, et al. (2014) Serum Complement C3f and Fibrinopeptide A Are Potential Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Study in Qingdao Twins. PLoS ONE 9(9): e108132. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108132
Editor: Ming-Lung Yu, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan
Received: March 1, 2014; Accepted: August 25, 2014; Published: September 24, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Xin et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 81170337 (http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a cause of chronic liver disease that has gained increasing recognition over the past decade. The condition most commonly associated with NAFLD is chronic over nutrition with consequent obesity – and, often, insulin resistance , . NAFLD progresses to cirrhosis within 10 years in approximately 5% of patients and has been projected to become the most common indication for liver transplantation in the next 10–20 years –. The biological basis for the wide histological spectrum that occurs in NAFLD remains poorly defined.
New genomic and proteomic technologies have the potential to understand the complex pathogenic mechanisms of NAFLD –. For example, simultaneous assessment of gene expression in a large number of genes and protein peaks can help identify molecular pathways that are active in NAFLD –. Proteomic analyses have been limited by poor sensitivity in detecting low-abundance proteins as well as difficulties with maintaining sample stability and data management. Recent advances in protein separation and improvements in both detection and identification of peptides and proteins have facilitated detailed characterization of complex biological samples, including the liver domain. Proteomic analysis may identify hepatic proteins that contribute to the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with progressive fibrosis. As reported by Muir et al. , novel candidate targets for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were identified by applying proteomic profiling approaches in PTEN-null NASH liver and tumor samples. Furthermore, differential abundance of hepatic proteins can be confirmed and further studied in a second phase of experiments, including immunohistochemical analysis of samples and a tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) approach. Simultaneous analysis of the relative expression of a large number of proteins in a sensitive manner may help to determine the relative expression of hepatic proteins across the histologic spectrum of NAFLD.
In our study, we used the above-mentioned advanced proteomic technologies and sample selection based on disease-discordant monozygotic twins to identify NAFLD diagnostic markers. A matched co-twin analysis is a powerful method to detect biomarker profiles for medical conditions as compared with traditional case–control studies . Considering the subtle distinction in protein levels and the influence of genetic variation among experimental and control subjects , a disease-discordant monozygotic twin study is a highly efficient way to mitigate the potentially confounding effects of human genetic polymorphisms . In the present study, we utilized this combined technological and clinical approach to find possible novel diagnostic markers of NAFLD.
Materials and Methods
1 Patients selection criteria
1.1. Ethics Statement.
All of the subjects understood the study procedures and signed the informed consents. This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qingdao Municipal Hospital and was in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.
1.2. A total of 178 pairs of twins with a mean age of 40 were enrolled in 5 districts in the Qingdao municipality. From this sample, 63 pairs of eligible adult twins were recruited from the Qingdao Twin Registry . Zygosity of all same-sex twin pairs was determined by 16 multiple short tandem repeats  at the central laboratory in the Qingdao Blood Bank. Between each pair, one was diagnosed with fatty liver disease (disease group, n = 63) and the other was considered the control (control group, n = 63). Subjects were excluded as follows: history of viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and other forms of chronic liver disease including hepatic injury caused by substance abuse; and a current or past history of consumption of more than 20 g of alcohol daily. Moreover a twin-pair was excluded if one of the co-twins declined participation.
In our study, the disease group fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of NAFLD as defined by the Chinese Liver Disease Association . Weight and height were measured with the subject in lightweight clothes with their shoes removed. Weight was measured using a standing beam scale to the nearest 0.1 kg, and height was measured using a vertical scale with a horizontal moving headboard to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by square of height (m). Waist circumference (cm) was measured on a standing subject using a soft tape midway between the lowest rib and iliac crest to the nearest cm. Hip circumference was measured over the widest part of the gluteal region to the nearest cm, and the waist/hip ratio (WHR) was calculated as well. Blood pressure was measured using standard procedures. Abdominal (hepatic) liver ultrasound was performed in all the subjects. No liver biopsies were obtained in the frame of the present study.
2 Blood sampling management
Fasting blood samples were obtained, and supernatants were extracted after 2 rounds of centrifugations at 1,000 g for 5 min and at 12000 g for 5 min, respectively. Then, 500 µlof supernatant of each sample was sub-packaged into collecting pipes and frozen at –80°C until further use. No serum samples were submitted to repeat freeze-thawing more than twice. Liver function tests included serum transaminases (AST: asparate aminotransferase and ALT: alanine aminotransferase), Gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and prothrombin index. Serum glucose was also measured using a Semi-automatic Analyzer (Hitachi 7600).
3 Affinity Chromatography
To abstract and purify the target peptides from the supernatant, different affinity chromatography methods were conducted, including ZipTip with C18 resin, ZipTip with C4 resin and PepClean C-18 Spin Columns. All processes were according to the manufacturer's protocols. After analyzing the samples via Peptide Mass Fingerprinting (PMF), we found that ZipTip with C18 resin was the most efficient method.
An aliquot of extracts (0.3 µl) was mixed with saturated alpha-cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid (CHCA) matrix, deposited on the MALDI plate, and air-dried at room temperature. To identify the most discriminating serum peptide profiles between subjects with and without NAFLD, we used MALDI-TOF MS (ABI, 4700 TOF/TOF) with the reflective mode. Introducing the batch mode, the mass spectra of peptides was generated at the 800–3500 Da optimization range by using an average of 1000 laser shots at a laser intensity of 5000 arbitrary units. Angiotensin I (Molecular Weight: 1296), Glu1-Fibrinopeptide B (Molecular Weight: 1570), ACTH (clip 1–17) (Molecular Weight: 2093) and ACTH (clip 18–39) (Molecular Weight: 2466) were used as the standard substances to normalize and minimize the error under 10 ppm.
5 Bioinformationanalysisof the serum peptide profiles
5.1 Data Mining.
All of the preliminary spectrograms were analyzed with Data Explorer software, and the data were output as a peak trace (ASCII format) with monoisotopic peaks and the intensity of the detected peptides. Each crest value represented a free peptide shown with the relative intensity versus the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) values.
The Metalab bioinformatics software package was used to compare the mean intensity of two groups (disease and control). Each isotopic peak and discriminatory peptide peaks were selected. A Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to further validate the significant difference of specific peptide peaks between the two groups. A p<0.01 was considered statistically significant. MSight software (Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Switzerland) was employed to construct the figure of discriminatory peaks.
5.3 Systemic Cluster, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) Curve.
SPAA 16.5 was used to normalize the discriminatory peak intensity of each peptide and to subsequently analyze the PCA based on the normalized data. To demonstrate the intensity of splitting, thermography and dendrograms were conducted via systemic cluster analysis with Cluster 3.0 software (Version 1.33, University of Tokyo, Human Genome Center). The concrete cluster method was performed using Centroid linkage analysis. The discriminatory peptide diagnostic value for the diagnosis of NAFLD was assessed by determining the area under the curve (AUC) with ROC.
6 Identification of the discriminatory peptides
To trace the sources of discriminatory peptides and the specific amino acid sequences, second order mass spectrography was conducted using MALDI- TOF- TOF(ABI 4700) based on the data from PMF analysis. The mass spectrum values were set as follows: reflective mode; batch mode; laser intensity: 6800; and laser shots: 2000 times. The MS/MS fragment data were exported as Sequest files and were used for database searches with the MASCOT search engine using the GSP Explore software (ABI. Inc). The parameters were set according to the following list (Table 1).
1 Patient Demographics and Clinical Data
Table 2 presents the clinical, biochemical and ultrasound data observed in the studied population. It should be emphasized that no environmental factors could be found to explain the differences between the twins with and without NAFLD. The clinical data(BMI, waist circumference and WHR) and the biochemical data(AST, ALT, GGT and total bilirubin) were statistically significantly different between the 2 groups (P<0.01). There was no difference in the prothrombin index (p>0.05).
2 Extraction and purification of serum low molecular weight free polypeptides
Theoretically, ZipTip with C18 resin can bind and purify polypeptide components with a molecular weight less than 5000Da. Of the three methods of affinity chromatography that we tested, PMF with ZipTip with C18 resin (Figure 1) was more effective and reproducible. In addition, the intensity and distribution of the peptides were superior to the other two methods. The abundant mass spectrum peaks were used for the second order mass spectrography to identify the specific amino acid sequences. Figure 2 shows that the amount and intensity of the peptides purified by ZipTip with C4 resin were too low to conduct second order mass spectrography. Though PepClean C18 Spin Columns could abstract peptides from much more serum samples, it resulted in poor MS spectra. Thus, the optimal technique used in this study was affinity chromatography using Ziptip C18 and MALDI-TOF with reflective mode, which resulted in PMFs between 800–3500Da.
(A) MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of the twin in the disease group. (B) MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of the twin in the control group.
3 Screening the discriminatory peptides
The initial mass spectrum was transferred to ASCII format via Data Explorer software and stored as a peak list file. After comparing the intensities of the same isotopic peaks in the two groups using Metalab software, we screened 18 MS peaks that had significant differences. Among them, 11 peaks (861.1, 877.07, 904.5, 1206.57, 1350.64, 1518.7, 1690.9, 1777.94, 2931.29, 3190.4, 3261.4) were up-regulated, whereas 7 peaks (942.44, 1020.47, 1060.06, 1211.7, 1263.63, 1449.76, 2768.3) were down-regulated in the disease group as compared to the control group. Table 3 shows the mean intensities of the discriminatory peptides and Figure 3 shows the Box-blot of the discriminatory peptide signal-intensities. Mass spectra comparing the signal-intensities of the discriminatory peaks are shown in Figure 4.
(A), (B), (C), (D) refer to signal-intensities of peaks1, 2, 4 and 5, respectively.
(A) MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of peak1 (861Da) in the disease group. (B) MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of peak1 (861Da) in the control group.
4 System cluster
As shown in the clustering for variables results (Figure 5), the up-regulated peaks (N1 = 11) and the down-regulated peaks (N2 = 7) resulted in 18 discriminatory peptides plit. All of the samples in the disease (A) and normal (B) groups were successfully separated following the clustering for individuals (Figure 6).
(N1) The 11 up-regulated peaks in the disease group. (N2) The 7 down-regulated peaks in the disease group.
5 Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
Figure 7 showed the principal components of the samples and the principal components of indexes. All 126 samples were clearly classified into two groups: the disease group (A) and the control group (B). Charged with the selected index, the 18 discriminatory peaks were also classified into two groups: the up-regulated peaks (C) and the down-regulated peaks (D). All of the peaks were separated explicitly.
6 ROC analysis
For each of the 18 discriminatory peptide peaks, the AUC value was calculated (Table 4). Only the components of peak 10, 12, and 14 were identified successfully by our MALDI-TOF-TOF analysis. Then, for these three discriminatory peaks whose AUC values were higher than 0.9, we conducted ROC curves (Figure 8) to compare their diagnostic efficacy. As shown, peak 14 had the highest diagnostic efficacy.
7 Identification of the discriminatory peaks
Besides using MALDI-TOF-TOF to trace the sources of discriminatory peptides and their specific amino acid sequences, we also referred to previously published records – (Table 5). Peaks 10, 12, and 14 were up-regulated peaks and corresponded to the peptide family Fibrinopeptide A and Complement C3f, respectively. According to the ROC analysis, Fibrinopeptide A and C3fhad the highest ROC values for distinguishing NAFLD cases from their normal controls.
8 ELISA-based validation experiment for serum Complement C3f and Fibrinopeptide A
To assess the clinical usefulness of these two candidate biomarkers, we conducted further validation studies by commercially available ELISA kits using 100 additional serum samples (50 NAFLD patients and 50 healthy controls from the Center of Health Examination, Qingdao Municipal Hospital) (Table 2). Prior to ELISA analysis, serum samples were diluted 5-fold with sample dilution, the final volume of test samples was 50 µl, respectively. All procedures were according to the manufacturer's instructions. Spectrometer was used to test the OD values at the 450 µm of the spectrum band. The serum levels of these two candidate biomarker peptides were calculated on the basis of standard curves, respectively. We compared the concentrations of the Complement C3f (1466.929±78.306 pg/ml) and Fibrinopeptide A (4.189±0.326 ng/ml) in NAFLD group with in control group (C3f 1159.357±99.624 pg/ml; FPA 3.039±0.483 ng/ml) by independent-samples T test, respectively. The results revealed that peptides showed significant differences in their serum levels between the two groups (P<0.05) as shown in figure 9. This validation experiment further indicated that FPA and Complement C3f may be potential diagnostic markers for NAFLD.
Although most NAFLD patients are clinically asymptomatic, they are at an increased risk for hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis and HCC , . Liver biopsy represents the traditional gold standard for NAFLD diagnosis , . Nevertheless, liver biopsy has limitations due to high cost, sampling error, and possible procedure-related morbidity and mortality , . The worldwide prevalence of NAFLD ranges from 6.3% to 33% with a median of 20% , and thus liver biopsy would not be a practical and available approach for diagnosing NAFLD in a large population . In addition, noninvasive diagnosis of NAFLD remains difficult. Serum aminotransferase levels and imaging tests such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are primarily used to assess steatosis and possibly cirrhosis in patients with NAFLD, ;however, they are not completely reliable. Serum aminotransferases levels can remain within normal ranges despite established NAFLD. For examples, NASH was diagnosed in up to 59% of NAFLD patients despite normal ALT levels , . Imaging tests lack sensitivity when steatosis affects less than 30% of the hepatocytes . Also, imaging tests are expensive and cumbersome as screening procedures. Therefore, reliable noninvasive methods for assessing the presence of NAFLD are urgently needed. Developing clinical prediction rules and non-invasive biomarkers for identifying NAFLD would represent major advances in the field.In this respect, different high throughput ‘‘unbiased’’ approaches for biomarkers identification have emerged , .
In our study, using a highly sensitive and specific approach which combines MALDI-TOF-MS and bioinformatics analyses , we successfully established a peptidomics pattern that could distinguish NAFLD patients from their twin controls. Specifically, our results indicate that complement C3f and Fibrinopeptide A (FPA) are potentially noninvasive biomarkers for identifying patients with NAFLD. Though complement C3f and FPA have been found to be associated with some diseases, such as cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients and breast cancer, , and complement C3f has been reported to be associated with HCC, the association between these two complements and the risk for incidental NAFLD have not yet been reported. Without data concerning the severity (in terms of inflammation and fibrosis) of NAFLD in our patients, the possible role of complement C3f and FPA cannot be completely documented. Further studies, coupled with histological classification, which characterizes NAFLD into simple steatosis, NASH or cirrhosis, need to be conducted.
Despite these shortcomings, our study used two technologies with high technical specificity and sensitivity and was based on a disease-discordant monozygotic twin approach, and thus avoided many confounders. In addition, discordant monozygotic twin studies are a powerful method to identify DNA sequence variants, epigenetic variation and metabolites associated with disease and can aid in the detection of biomarker profiles for medical conditions , .
In this study, applying sophisticated bioinformatics tools to analyze the complex data obtained from MALDI-TOF-MS analyses, we established a peptidomics pattern that could distinguish NAFLD patients from their twin controls. The differentially-regulated peptides identified in our study, especially Fibrinopeptide A and Complement C3f, may be potential diagnostic markers or therapeutic targets for NAFLD. However, further studies on the relationship between these biomarkers and NAFLD are warranted
Conceived and designed the experiments: SYX YNX. Performed the experiments: YNX NG ZHL YZC HPD MZ. Analyzed the data: YNX NG YZC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YZC. Wrote the paper: YNX NG ZHL.
- 1. Toshimitsu K, Matsuura B, Ohkubo I, Niiya T, Furukawa S, et al. (2007) Dietary habits and nutrient intake in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Nutrition 23: 46–52.
- 2. Musso G, Gambino R, Pacini G, De Michieli F, Cassader M (2009) Prolonged saturated fat-induced, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide elevation is associated with adipokine imbalance and liver injury in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: dysregulatedenteroadipocyte axis as a novel feature of fatty liver. Am J ClinNutr 89: 558–567.
- 3. Nomura K, Yamanouchi T (2012) The role of fructose-enriched diets in mechanisms of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J NutrBiochem 23: 203–208.
- 4. Sanyal AJ, Campbell-Sargent C, Mirshahi F, Rizzo WB, Contos MJ, et al. (2001) Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: association of insulin resistance and mitochondrial abnormalities. Gastroenterology 120: 1183–1192.
- 5. Yang HY, Tzeng YH, Chai CY, Hsieh AT, Chen JR, et al. (2011) Soy protein retards the progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis via improvement of insulin resistance and steatosis. Nutrition 27: 943–948.
- 6. Adams LA, Lymp JF, St Sauver J, Sanderson SO, Lindor KD, et al. (2005) The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a populationbased cohort study. Gastroenterology 129: 113–121.
- 7. Charlton M (2004) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a review of current understanding and future impact. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2: 1048–1058.
- 8. Kim WR, Poterucha JJ, Porayko MK, Dickson ER, Steers JL, et al. (1996) Recurrence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis following liver transplantation. Transplantation 62: 1802–1805.
- 9. Angulo P (2006) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 12: 523–534.
- 10. Guttmacher AE, Collins FS (2002) Genomic medicine–a primer. NEngl J Med 347: 1512–1520.
- 11. Xiao Z, Prieto D, Conrads TP, Veenstra TD, Issaq HJ (2005) Proteomic patterns: their potential for disease diagnosis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 230: 95–106.
- 12. Bell LN, Theodorakis JL, Vuppalanchi R, Saxena R, Bemis KG, et al. (2010) Serum proteomics and biomarker discovery across the spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 51: 111–120.
- 13. Issaq HJ, Veenstra TD, Conrads TP, Felschow D (2002) The SELDI-TOF MS approach to proteomics: protein profiling and biomarker identification. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 292: 587–592.
- 14. Melle C, Kaufmann R, Hommann M, Bleul A, Driesch D, et al. (2004) Proteomic profiling in microdissected hepatocellular carcinoma tissue using ProteinChip technology. Int J Oncol 24: 885–891.
- 15. Rodríguez-Suárez E, Duce AM, Caballería J, Arrieta FM, Fernández E, et al. (2010) Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Proteomics. Proteomics Clin Appl 4(4): 362–371.
- 16. Honda M, Kaneko S, Kawai H, Shirota Y, Kobayashi K (2001) Differential gene expression between chronic hepatitis B and C hepatic lesion. Gastroenterology 120: 955–966.
- 17. Muir K, Hazim A, He Y, Peyressatre M, Kim DY, et al. (2013) Proteomic and Lipidomic Signatures of Lipid Metabolism in NASH-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Res 73: 4722–4731.
- 18. van Dongen J, Slagboom PE, Draisma HH, Martin NG, Boomsma DI (2012) The continuing value of twin studies in the omics era. GENETICS 13: 640–653.
- 19. De Franceschi L, Bosello S, Scambi C, Biasi D, De Santis M, et al. (2011) Proteome analysis of biological fluids from autoimmune-rheumatological disorders. Prot. Clin. Appl 5: 78–89.
- 20. O'Hanlon TP, Li Z, Gan L, Gourley MF, Rider LG, et al. (2011) Plasma proteomic profiles from disease-discordant monozygotic twins suggest that molecular pathways are shared in multiple systemic autoimmune diseases. Arthritis Research & Therapy 13: R181.
- 21. Pang Z, Ning F, Unger J, Johnson CA, Wang S, et al. (2006) The Qingdao Twin Registry: a focus on chronic disease research. Twin Res Hum Genet 9(6): 758–62.
- 22. Tomsey CS, Kurtz M, Kist F, Hockensmith M, Call P (2001) Comparison of PowerPlex 16, PowerPlex 1.1/2.1, and ABI ampfistr profiler plus/cofiler for forensic use. Croat Med J 42: 239–243.
- 23. Farrell GC, Chitturi S, Lau GK, Sollano JD, Asia–Pacific Working Party on NAFLD (2007) Guidelines for the assessment and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Asia–Pacific region: executive summary. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22: 775–7.
- 24. Pierson NA, Valentine SJ, Clemmer DE (2010) Evidence for a Quasi-Equilibrium Distribution of States forBradykinin [M+3H]3+ Ions in the Gas Phase. J PhysChem B 114(23): 7777–7783.
- 25. Liu J, Jiang T, Wei L, Yang X, Wang C, et al. (2013) The discovery and identification of a candidate proteomic biomarker of active tuberculosis. BMC Infectious Diseases 13: 506.
- 26. Zhang Q, Li SZ, Feng CS, Qu XD, Wang H, et al. (2012) Serum proteomics of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients. Chin Med J 125(14): 2455–2461.
- 27. Bugianesi E, Leone N, Vanni E, Marchesini G, Brunello F, et al. (2002) Expanding the natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 123: 134–40.
- 28. Yasui K, Hashimoto E, Komorizono Y, Koike S, Arli S, et al. (2011) Characteristics of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis who develop hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9: 428–433.
- 29. Talwalkar JA (2002) Motion-All Patients with NASH need to have a liver biopsy: arguments for the motion. Can J Gastroenterol 16: 718–21.
- 30. Vuppalanchi R, Chalasani N (2009) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Selected practical issues in their evaluation and management. Hepatology 49: 306–317.
- 31. Cadranel JF, Rufat P, Degos F (2000) Practices of Liver Biopsy in France: Results of a Prospective Nationwide Survey. Hepatology 32: 477–481.
- 32. Poynard T, Ratziu V, Bedossa P (2000) Appropriateness of liver biopsy. Can J Gastroenterol 14: 543–8.
- 33. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, et al. (2012) The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology 55: 2005–2023.
- 34. Poynard T, Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Messous D, Munteanu M, et al. (2006) Diagnosis value of biochemical markers (NASHTest) for the Predietion of nonaleoholsteatohepatitis in Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Gastroenterol 6: 34.
- 35. Clark JM (2006) The epidemiology of nonaleoholic fatty liver disease in adults. J Clin Gastroenterol 40: S5–S10.
- 36. Mazhar SM, Shiehxllorteza M, Sirlin CB (2009) Noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(2): 135–40.
- 37. Fracanzani AL, Valenti L, Bugianesi E, Andreoletti M, Colli A, et al. (2008) Risk of severe liver disease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with normal aminotransferase levels: a role for insulin resistance and diabetes. HEPATOLOGY 48: 792–798.
- 38. Mofrad P, Contos MJ, Haque M, Sargeant C, Fisher RA, et al. (2003) Clinical and histologic spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease associated with normal ALT values. HEPATOLOGY 37: 1286–1292.
- 39. Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G (2011) Meta-analysis: Natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann Med 43(8): 617–49.
- 40. Yilmaz Y, Ulukaya E, Dolar E (2009) Serum M30 levels: A potential biomarker of severe liver disease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and normal aminotransferase levels. Hepatology 49: 697.
- 41. Yu C, Xu C, Xu L, Yu J, Miao M, et al. (2012) Serum proteomic analysis revealed diagnostic value of hemoglobin for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 56: 241–247.
- 42. Zhang Q, Li SZ, Feng CS, Qu XD, Wang H, et al. (2012) Serum proteomics of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients. Chin Med J 125(14): 2455–2461.
- 43. Profumo A, Mangerini R, Rubagotti A, Romano P, Damonte G, et al. (2013) Complement C3f serum levels may predict breast cancer risk in women with gross cystic disease of the breast. Journal of Proteomics 85: 44–52.
- 44. An Y, Bekesova S, Edwards N, Goldman R (2010) Peptides in low molecular weight fraction of serum associated with hepatocellular carcinoma. Disease Markers 29: 11–20.
- 45. O'Hanlon TP, Li Z, Gan L, Gourley MF, Rider LG, et al. (2011) Plasma proteomic profiles from disease-discordant monozygotic twins suggest that molecular pathways are shared in multiple systemic autoimmune diseases. Arthritis Research & Therapy 13: R181.
- 46. Vinberg M, Miskowiak K, Kessing LV (2013) Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) levels as a possible predictor of psychopathology in healthy twins at high and low risk for affective disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology 39: 179–184.