Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genome-Wide Association Mapping for Seedling and Adult Plant Resistance to Stripe Rust in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat

  • Habtemariam Zegeye ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Habtemariam Zegeye, Awais Rasheed

    Affiliation Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Awais Rasheed ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Habtemariam Zegeye, Awais Rasheed

    Affiliations Crop Science Research Institute/National Wheat Improvement Centre, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, China, Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

  • Farid Makdis,

    Affiliations Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syria, Research Program, Grains Research and Development Corporation, Barton, Australian Capital Territory, Canberra, Australia

  • Ayele Badebo,

    Affiliation Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Francis C. Ogbonnaya

    Affiliations International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria, Research Program, Grains Research and Development Corporation, Barton, Australian Capital Territory, Canberra, Australia


Use of genetic diversity from related wild and domesticated species has made a significant contribution to improving wheat productivity. Synthetic hexaploid wheats (SHWs) exhibit natural genetic variation for resistance and/or tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Stripe rust caused by (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici; Pst), is an important disease of wheat worldwide. To characterise loci conferring resistance to stripe rust in SHWs, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) with a panel of 181 SHWs using the wheat 9K SNP iSelect array. The SHWs were evaluated for their response to the prevailing races of Pst at the seedling and adult plant stages, the latter in replicated field trials at two sites in Ethiopia in 2011. About 28% of the SHWs exhibited immunity at the seedling stage while 56% and 83% were resistant to Pst at the adult plant stage at Meraro and Arsi Robe, respectively. A total of 27 SNPs in nine genomic regions (1BS, 2AS, 2BL, 3BL, 3DL, 5A, 5BL, 6DS and 7A) were linked with resistance to Pst at the seedling stage, while 38 SNPs on 18 genomic regions were associated with resistance at the adult plant stage. Six genomic regions were commonly detected at both locations using a mixed linear model corrected for population structure, kinship relatedness and adjusted for false discovery rate (FDR). The loci on chromosome regions 1AS, 3DL, 6DS and 7AL appeared to be novel QTL; our results confirm that resynthesized wheat involving its progenitor species is a rich source of new stripe (yellow) rust resistance that may be useful in choosing SHWs and incorporating diverse yellow rust (YR) resistance loci into locally adapted wheat cultivars.


Stripe (yellow) rust (YR), caused by Puccinia striiformis tritici (Pst), is a major threat to wheat production in many areas. A recent experience is the stripe rust of near - epidemic proportions in the Central West Asia and North Africa (CWANA) and Sub-Saharan Africa regions in 2010 [1]. Previous YR epidemics have occurred in some major wheat producing regions including China, Europe, Australia, Ethiopia, South Africa, the US and South Asia [2]. In 2010, the breakdown in resistance conferred by Yr27 and the absence of resistant cultivars in Ethiopia led to an expenditure of more than US$3.2 million on fungicides, and over 400 000 ha of wheat were estimated to have been infected by YR [1]. Similar epidemics were reported in Iran, Morocco, Syria and Turkey in the same year. Despite the concerted efforts to control the disease using fungicides, substantial losses were prevalent on highly susceptible cultivars in areas with high disease pressure. Breeding resistant cultivars is the most economical and environmentally best approach to reduce the use of fungicides and to reduce crop losses due to this disease.

To date, 54 YR resistance genes have been formally designated in wheat [3]. Most of these are race-specific, produce hypersensitive reactions, and interact with the pathogen in a gene-for-gene manner [4]. Such qualitative resistance is usually short-lived, owing to frequent changes in the pathogen population. Due to the rapid break down of commercially deployed resistance genes, characterization of diverse sources of resistance is continuously needed to replace the defeated genes. The alternate option is to deploy adult plant resistance (APR) genes conferring quantitative resistance, and in some cases APR genes are durable and confer resistance to multiple pathogens. Disease resistance can be transferred from cultivars and even from wild relatives of wheat by direct recombination or via bridge crosses or synthetic wheats [5].

Synthetic hexaploid wheat [(2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD), SHWs] obtained by the artificial crossing of durum wheat, Triticum turgidum L.ssp. durum (Desf.) Husn. (2n = 4x = 28, AABB) and Aegilops tauschii Coss. (2n = 2x = 14, DD) possess genetic diversity for resistance to several biotic (karnal bunt (Tilletia indica Mitra), cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae Woll.), root knot nematode (Meloidogyne naasi Franklin), and green bug (Schizaphis graminum (Rondani)); and abiotic stresses as observed upon screening of the AABBDD SHWs [6], [7], [8], [9]. Resistance genes for leaf rust such as Lr21, Lr22, Lr32, Lr39, Lr41 [10]; YR resistance gene Yr28 [11] and Hessian fly resistance genes: H13, H22, H23, H24 [12] were derived from Ae. tauschii. Aegilops tauschii is also known to have contributed three stem rust resistance genes: Sr33, Sr45, and Sr46 which confer resistance to race Ug99 [13].

Recently, Rosewarne et al. [14] in a review article reported that about 140 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) have been identified in 49 chromosomal regions conferring resistance to YR. The QTLs were mapped using bi-parental populations that typically involve two or at most several parental accessions and, therefore, evaluated only a small fraction of the natural variation in a species [15]. QTL mapping and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) offer complementary approaches to understanding natural variation [16]. GWAS generally combine phenotype and genotype data from 100 or more accessions to identify loci with allele frequency correlations to phenotypic variation or environment [17]. This approach can thus incorporate a relatively large portion of natural variation in a species and localize associations to much smaller genomic regions, because the sampled diversity incorporates many more recombination events than traditional recombinant inbred lines and/or doubled haploid populations [18]. However, potential disadvantages of GWAS are the appearance of false-positives resulting from population structure, or associations that arise from multiple testing of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) markers, as well as the potential to miss signal (false negatives) because of low power to detect small genetic effects and limitations due to allelic heterogeneity and non-additive effects among loci [18]. The recent development and availability of 9K SNP array in wheat which was used to characterize a wide array of hexaploid cultivars from many parts of the world is facilitating the use of SNPs in GWAS [19]. This SNP array have been used in genome wide association studies to identify genomic regions and/or markers for grain asparagine contents [20], resistance to Hessian fly [21], grain yield [22] and frost tolerance [23]. Association mapping thus offers the unique opportunity of linking diversity analysis, identification of marker-trait associations and molecular breeding.

This study was conducted to address the following three objectives: (1) to assess the diversity of disease resistance in SHWs to prevailing YR races in Ethiopia, (2) to carry out a genome wide search in SHWs for resistance loci to the prevailing YR races and identify SNP markers associated with such YR resistance which could be deployed in marker-assisted selection (MAS) and (3) to determine whether some SHWs contain yet un-characterized genes for YR resistance in wheat.

Materials and Methods

Genetic resources

A total of 192 genotypes were used for this study including 181 SHWs and eleven bread wheat cultivars (Kubsa, Galama, ET13A2, Meraro, Kenya Kudu, Dashen, Digelu, Enkoy, KBG-01, Simba and Morocco) as checks (Table S1). The check cultivars are known to show variable reaction to YR under field conditions in areas endemic for YR occurrence in Ethiopia. The SHWs were obtained from ICARDA, Aleppo – Syria and comprised of genotypes from CIMMYT, Mexico and Department of Primary Industries, Victoria, Australia. The check cultivars were obtained from Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Kulumsa Experimental Station, Ethiopia.


Seedling stage.

Five to six seeds of each SHW were grown in a 7 cm×7 cm×7 cm plastic pots. Each pot was filled with a potting mix which comprised of: compost, soil and sand at a ratio of 1∶1∶1 (v/v/v). When the first leaves were fully expanded, the seedlings were inoculated by spraying the most virulent Kubsa/Attila isolate urediospores suspended in light mineral oil (Soltrol 170) using an automizer. The Kubsa/Attila isolate is the most virulent and predominant isolate in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Inoculated plants were allowed to dry for 5 minutes and were fine-misted with water and placed in a wet plastic cage with a small amount of water at the bottom. The inoculated seedlings were incubated at 10°C for 24 hours in a dew chamber with relative humidity close to 100%. Seedlings were transferred to a greenhouse with mean temperature of about 18°C at the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural research, Kulumsa experimental station. A week after inoculation, 2 grams of nitrogen fertilizer per 100 ml was added as liquid fertiliser to each pot. Disease assessment was carried out twice: on the 15th and 18th days after inoculation using 0–4 scale [24] based on the infection types. Low infection types (LITs = 0–2) were considered resistant, and infection type  = 2+ as intermediate while high infection types (HITs =  3–4) were rated susceptible. The check cultivars Dashen, Galama, Kenya Kudu, Kusba, Morocco and Wabe were susceptible, Enkoy, ETA 13-A2 and Simba were moderate and, Digelu and KBG-01 were resistance to YR at seedling stage.

Adult plant stage.

Twenty seeds of each SHWs including the checks were planted in two rows of 20 cm spacing and 1 m length in two sites namely: Meraro (07°41′N 39°25′E) with an elevation of 3,030 meters and Arsi Robe (09°36′′′) with an elevation of 2435 meters above sea level, in Ethiopia in 2011. Six bread wheat check cultivars (Kubsa, Galama, ET 13-A2, K62954-4A, Meraro and Kenya Kudu) were planted within intervals of ten entries in the field that included the spreader row of the yellow rust susceptible cultivar Morocco. Kubsa and Galama are known to be susceptible, ET-13A2 as moderately susceptible and Meraro and Kenya Kudu are moderately resistant to resistant cultivars. Disease assessment started from the first incidence and continued at least four times at ten day intervals. Disease severity was assessed according to the modified Cobb's scale [25]. After the last disease score when the disease progress ceased, the field severity data was converted to Coefficient of Infection (CI) and the area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) was calculated following the method used by Wilcoxson et al. [26].

DNA extraction and SNPs marker genotyping and Molecular analyses

Five seeds of each SHW were planted in 5 cm diameter pots filled with peat moss in a plastic house at ICARDA. Fresh leaf samples were collected from 17 day old seedlings and used for DNA extraction. DNA extraction was carried out according to Ogbonnaya et al. [27]. Subsequently, aliquots of DNA concentration of 50–100 ng/µl per sample were sent in a 96-well plate format to the Department of Primary Industries, Victoria – Australia for genotyping with high-density SNP markers, using the Wheat 9K SNP array [19].

Genetic diversity, PIC, MAF and genetic map.

Genetic similarities between wheat lines were calculated with Dice coefficient based on the proportion of shared alleles using PowerMarker v. 3.0 [28]. Polymorphism information content (PIC) assessed the genetic diversity at each locus. P =  the number of polymorphic loci/the total number of loci. PIC was calculated as described by Anderson et al. [29]. PIC = 1-ΣPij2, where the relative frequency of the jth allele for the ith locus was summed across all the alleles for the locus over all lines. The position of SNP markers along chromosomes in terms of genetic distance (cM) was based on the map reported by Cavanagh et al. [19], however, 111 markers remained unmapped. The integrated map of SNPs, SSRs, DArTs and genotyping by sequencing (GBS) markers [30] was used to identify physical position of SNPs associated with YR resistance.

Population structure.

Population structure was estimated with 200 unlinked SNP markers using STRUCTURE software 2.3.3, which implements a model based Bayesian cluster analysis [31]. The number of subpopulations (K) was set from 2–20 based on admixture and correlated allele frequencies models. For each K, 10 runs were performed separately. Each run was carried out with 50 000 iteration and 500 000 burn-in period. A value of K was selected where the graph of InPr (X/K) peaked in the range of 2–20 sub-populations. For the selected K, 10 runs were performed again each with 100 000 iteration and 500 000 burn-in period.

Linkage disequilibrium (LD).

Genome-wide LD analysis was performed across A, B and D genomes for the complete association mapping set. LD was estimated as squared allele-frequency correlations (r2) between pairs of SNP markers according to Weir [32] using the GGT v 2.0 software. To depict the extent of LD between pairs of loci, r2 values were plotted against inter-marker genetic distance (cM). Locally weighed polynomial regression (LOESS) curves were then fitted into the scatter plot using function ‘smooth.spline’ of R (R Development Core Team, 2011). Specifically, the 95th percentile in the distributions of r2 of the selected loci was estimated as the threshold r2 [33] on the assumption that LD was attributable to linkage. At its points of intersection with the LD decay curves, the threshold r2 was plotted as a horizontal line in the LD scatterplot which provided estimates of the extent of LD. LD along chromosomes was assessed by a sliding window approach with 5 cM windows at 500 positions along the chromosomes.

Association analysis.

Genomic regions associated with YR resistance were identified using the compressed mixed linear model (MLM) implemented in TASSEL v.3.0 [34]. A P-value was generated by fitting each SNP marker into the MLM that has the form, y = Xβ+Qv+u+e, where y is the vector of the phenotypic values (BLUPs), X is the vector of SNP marker genotypes, β is the vector of marker fixed effects to be estimated, Q is population structure matrix (derived from Structure analysis), v is a vector of fixed effects due to population structure, u is the vector of random effects and e is the vector of residuals. The variance of u is derived as, Var (u) = 2KVg, where K represents the relative kinship matrix inferred from genotypes based on the proportion of shared alleles and Vg is the genetic variance. The variance of e is derived as Var (e) = VR, where VR is the residual variance.

The critical P-values for assessing the significance of marker-trait associations in the MLM were calculated based on positive false discovery rate (pFDR; Q values), a multiple test correction method proposed by Storey [35]. These FDR-adjusted P-values were found to be highly stringent, probably owing to the use of all markers as independent tests in the correction. Considering the likelihood of over adjustment of the P-values owing to the mutual dependency of SNP in LD [36], and the potential risk of type II error, a more liberal criterion was used to determine threshold P-values for marker-trait association. We followed the approach of Pasam et al. [37] who suggested that the bottom 0.1 percentile of the distribution of P-values obtained can be considered as significant. As a consequence, a threshold P-values of ≤0.005 or ≤0.05 which roughly corresponds to the bottom 0.1 percentile in the present GWAS was used to declare significant QTL for Yr resistance. To provide a complimentary summary of declared putative QTL, Manhattan plots were generated using a script written in R (R Development Core Team, 2011). Significant markers were also inspected for correspondence with genomic regions known to harbour QTL for Yr resistance genes based on consensus maps in the CMap database ( and those reported in Rosewarne et al. [14].


Phenotypic variations for stripe rust resistance in SHWs

Reaction to YR in SHWs at the seedling and adult plant stages at Meraro and Arsi Robe Ethiopia are summarized (Figure 1, Table S4). Continuous variation was observed for reaction to YR at the adult plant stage (Figure S1) across both locations.

Figure 1. Frequency distribution of response to stripe rust in synthetic hexaploid wheat and bread wheat cultivars.

The estimated variance components for genotype were highly significant (P<0.0001) at both seedling and adult plant stages (Table 1). Similarly, the genotype × environment interaction effect was also highly significant (P<0.0001). Higher disease severity was observed at the Meraro location compared to the Arsi Robe. However, the coefficient of correlation for the infection type to YR between both locations was high (r = 0.711). At the seedling stage, 28%, 22% and 50% SHWs exhibited resistant response, intermediate and susceptible responses, respectively. Similarly, 56% and 83% of the SHWs were resistant to YR at the adult plant stage at Meraro and Arsi robe, respectively. Forty-six percent of the SHWs at Arsi Robe and 32% at Meraro scored resistant at the adult plant stages were found to be susceptible to Pst at the seedling stage. Twenty-two percent of these were common in both locations (Table S2). A very high level of broad sense heritability (h2bs = 0.88) was observed over the two locations of adult plant YR evaluations.

Table 1. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for reaction to stripe rust in synthetic hexaploid wheat and bread wheat cultivars.

Analysis of SNP markers

All wheat lines were genotyped using wheat 8 244 9k Illumina Infinium SNP assay [19]. However, 1 402 (17%) of the SNPs were monomorphic. Three hundred and eighty-eight (4.7%) SNPs were of poor quality and thus were excluded from analysis. The remaining 5 768 (70%) SNPs were further reduced to 2 590 by eliminating markers with minor allele frequency (MAF) ≤0.05. Thus, 2 590 (31.4%) high quality SNPs (Table S5) were used in association analysis for YR resistance using the Q+K MLM method adjusted for false discovery rate P<0.05.

A genetic framework map of all 21 wheat chromosomes was constructed using the 2 590 polymorphic SNPs based on the consensus SNP map previously produced by Cavanagh et al. [19] resulting in an average of 123.2 markers per chromosome. However, the marker density for the D genome was relatively poor at 24.14 markers per chromosome. In total, the markers spanned a genetic distance of 3309.5 cM with an average density of 1.27 cM per marker (Table 2). Of the 2 590 SNPs, 2 479 were assigned to 303 unique positions in the wheat genome [19]. The average PIC value for mapped SNPs was 0.25 and 0.30 for unmapped SNPs. A similar trend was observed for diversity (H) index.

Table 2. Basic statistics of SNP marker polymorphism in synthetic hexaploid wheat.

Population structure

Analysis of population structure showed that the logarithm of the data likelihood (Ln P(D)) on average continued to increase with increasing numbers of assumed subpopulations (K) from 2 to 20 with exception of the depression at K11, K14 and K16 (Figure 2b). However these significant changes at higher K values do not truly reflect the actual number of sub-populations. The ad hoc quantity based on the second order rate of change in the log probability (ΔK) showed a clear peak at K = 8 (Figure 2c), which confirmed that a K value of eight was the most probable prediction for the number of subpopulations. The number of individual SHW lines ranged from 8 in K8 to 50 in K5. The average distance between sub-populations ranged from 0.08 to 0.34, while mean Fst value was 0.25.

Figure 2. Estimation of number of sub-populations (K) in synthetic hexaploid wheat based on unlinked SNP markers.

a) Population structure of synthetic hexaploid wheats. The genotype of each line on the figure is represented by a colored line where each color reflects the membership of a cultivar in one of the K clusters. The proportion of the colored segment indicates the proportion of the genome drawn from the K clusters. b) The log probability of data as a function of K for unlinked SNP markers. Means log probability of data Ln P (D) for each value of K were calculated from 10 independent runs of structure. c) Estimation of number of sub-populations (K) in synthetic hexaploids using deltaK values.

Linkage disequilibrium

LD was estimated by r2 at P≤0.001 from all pairs of SNPs along each chromosome. On a genome-wide level, 59.68% of all pairs of loci were in significant LD (Table 3) with an average of 0.55. The average r2 of genome-wide LD was 0.19.

Table 3. An overview of LD among whole panel of synthetic hexaploid wheat.

SNP markers assigned to their map position were further used to estimate intra-chromosomal LD. About 34.61% of intra-chromosomal pairs of loci were in significant LD with r2of >0.2 while 5644 SNP pairs were in perfect LD (r2 = 1). The extent and distribution of LD were graphically displayed by plotting intra-chromosomal r2 values for loci in significant LD at P≤0.001 against the genetic distance in centi Morgans and a second-degree LOESS curve was fitted (Figure 3). The critical value for significance of r2 was estimated at 0.22 according to Breseghello and Sorrells [33], and thus all values of r2>0.22 were estimated to be due to genetic linkage. The baseline intersection with the LOESS curve was at 11 cM, which was considered as the estimate of the extent of LD in the SHWs population used for this study, although in a few cases high levels of LD were observed over longer distances (r2 = 1 at a genetic distance of 39.77 cM). LD decays to an average r2 of 0.14 from 0.22 as the genetic distance increased to >10 cM and the markers in complete LD also reduced to 17 from 255 (Table 3). Thus the map coverage of 8–9 cM was deemed appropriate to perform a genome-wide association analysis on the SHWs population since the SNP coverage in this study was at an average density of 1.27 cM per marker.

Figure 3. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay as a function of genetic distance.

LOESS curve was fitted by robust locally fitted regression and shows that LD decays with genetic map distance and dashed line indicates the derived threshold for LD due to linkage.

Marker-trait associations

SNP markers associated with resistance to YR at the seedling and adult plant stages were determined by MLM analysis using kinship relationship (K matrix) and population structure (Q matrix) as covariate at FDR-adjusted P<0.05. A total of 27 SNPs in nine genomic regions (1BS, 2AS, 2BL, 3BL, 3DL, 5A, 5BL, 6DS and 7A) were identified to be associated with YR resistance at the seedling stage with phenotypic variation (R2) which ranged from 5.4% to 8.8% (Table 4, Figure 4a). The allele present in cultivar Morocco accounts for susceptibility, therefore, the alternate allele was taken as the resistant allele for YR. The resistance allele frequency (RAF) in SHWs ranged from 9.38 to 93.75%. A haplotype block of 15 SNPs on chromosome 1BS covering a genetic distance from 32 to 40 cM was identified as a major YR resistance gene cluster. Thirteen marker pairs within this block were in perfect LD with an average LD r2 of 0.43. Three more haplotype blocks on chromosomes 2BL, 5AL and 6DS in perfect LD were associated with YR resistance at the seedling stage. The haplotype block of two SNPs (wsnp_Ku_c5071_9049540- and wsnp_Ku_c5071_9050628 (r2 = 1) on 5AL is located at 138 cM. Further, the SNP marker, wsnp_Ex_c53442_56678505 on 7AL was also associated with seedling resistance to YR with R2 and RAF of 6% and 26%, respectively. Since no major YR resistance gene has previously been mapped to chromosome 7A, this may be a novel locus that confers resistance to YR.

Figure 4. Manhattan plots for statistical significance P values across 21 wheat chromosomes for SNP markers associated with stripe rust resistance a) at seedling stage b) At adult plant stage (Meraro) c) Adult plant stage (Arsi Robe).

Horizontal line represents the highly significant threshold at P 1E-06.

Table 4. Marker-trait associations for seedling resistance to stripe rust resistance in synthetic hexaploid wheat.

At the adult plant stage, 38 SNPs in 18 different genomic regions were associated with YR resistance at both locations (Table 5, Figure 4b, c). Of these, 15 SNPs in 3 genomic regions (1BS, 3AL, and 5AS) were associated with resistant reaction to Pst evaluated at Meraro and 29 SNPs in 18 genomic regions were associated with APR reaction to Pst evaluated at Arsi Robe. Six SNPs on chromosomes 1BS, 3AL and 5AS were commonly detected at both locations. The phenotypic variation explained by the SNPs at Meraro ranged from 7.7% for wsnp_Ku_c35386_44598937 on 5AS, to 18.4% for wsnp_Ku_c62848_63784645 on 1BS; while at Arsi robe, R2 ranged from 5.1% for wsnp_Ku_c30982_40765341 on 1BS, to 10% for wsnp_Ku_c8927_15048149 on 2AS.

Table 5. Marker-trait associations for adult plant resistance to stripe rust resistance in synthetic hexaploid wheat.

The haplotype block spanning a genetic distance of 34–40 cM on1BS which showed association with YR resistance at the seedling stage, was also associated with adult plant resistance (Figure 5). Similarly, the SNP marker, wsnp_Ex_c2153_4043746, on 2BL was associated with YR resistance at both seedling and adult plant growth stages. The rare allele frequency (RAF) ranged from 8.3% to 90.1%, and in most cases a major allele was associated with resistance in these SHWs, however for 9 SNPs on chromosomes 1BS, 3AL, 5AS, 6AS and 7BS, a minor allele was associated with YR resistance (Table 5). Two additional haplotype blocks associated with YR resistance were identified on chromosomes 3BS and 4AL, each with three SNP pairs that were in perfect LD (r2 = 1). In addition to the major haplotype block on the 1BS chromosome, three other haplotype blocks on 2AS, 3BS and 4AL each with a minimum of two SNPs were associated with YR resistance at the adult plant stage at Arsi Robe.

Figure 5. Haplotype block on chromosome 1BS comprising nine SNP markers significantly associated with Yr resistance at seedling and adult plant stage (left) aligned with 1BS physical map (right) based on the integrated mapping information (Saintenac et al 2013).

In silico functional annotation of SNPs associated with resistance to stripe rust

Putative biological functions were determined for SNPs associated with resistance to YR, except for one SNP at chromosome 4AS, two at 2BL and one at 2AS. Owing to the incomplete genome sequencing information of bread wheat, the annotations of the syntenic regions were identified in other cereal crops. These annotations were described for the syntenic regions in DNA and protein sequences of rice, sorghum and Brachypodium (Table S3). Putative biological function was redundant for several SNPs within same haplotype block even those with high LD. For example, the closely linked SNPs on chromosome 1BS have similar biological functions.

The emphasis was on the SNPs with important biological functions that have previously been validated and linked with response to disease resistance. The SNPs on 1BS and 7BS were found to correspond to Serine/threonine-protein kinase-like domain disease resistance protein, while the SNPs identified on 5AS, and 7AL corresponded to NBS-LRR proteins, and the SNP on 3AL mapped to an adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family protein. Some regions also encoded transcription factors (TFs) like MADS box TFs (5A) and TFIIE (3DL). One SNP at chromosome 1BS and three at 3BS encoded the important glucosyltransferase family proteins which have been implicated in disease resistance. Similarly, three different SNPs at chromosome 1BS, 2BL and 7BS encoded receptor like kinase proteins which are also an important family of proteins with multiple functions, one of which is disease resistance.


Phenotypic variability for resistance to stripe rust

One of the main objectives of the current study was to identify SHWs with an adequate spectrum of genetic diversity for resistance against the prevailing YR-virulent races in Ethiopia following the 2010 YR epidemic. Such SHWs could then be crossed with adapted breeding lines to transfer YR resistance into locally adapted wheat cultivars. About 50% of the SHWs in the current study showed intermediate to resistant responses to YR at the seedling stage. Similarly, a high proportion of the SHWs exhibited high level of resistance at adult plant growth stages in Meraro (56%) and Arsi Robe (83%) under field conditions in Ethiopia. Of these, 40 (22%) were common for both locations. The higher disease severity observed at Meraro compared to Arsi Robe may be attributed to environmental effects that affect the incidence and level of disease expressions at different locations. Nevertheless, a high correlation coefficient was observed for YR response data collected between the two locations (r = 0.77), thus the adult stage field nursery used in this study provided highly repeatable and reliable phenotypic data for GWAS.

In this study, results from seedling evaluation of SHWs with the Kubsa/Attila isolate that possesses a broad virulence spectrum indicated that 28% of the SHWs were resistant while 22% displayed intermediate resistance while 50% were susceptible indicating the presence of a relatively large number of single major genes in the SHWs which may include uncharacterized major YR resistance genes. Numerous studies have reported that SHWs exhibits natural genetic variation and provide effective sources of resistance against many biotic stresses including fungal and root diseases [7], [8], [9], [38].

The pedigree analysis of SHWs revealed that 26 SHWs developed from durum cultivar, 68.111/RGB-U//WARD RESEL/3/STIL/4, possess better genetic potential to resist Pst because none of them exhibited a susceptible response at Meraro while only four displayed an intermediate response at Arsi Robe. Similarly, two SHWs developed from durum cultivar, STY-US/CELTA//PALS/3/SRN-5/4, showed complete resistance to Pst at both seedling and adult stages. Ahmed et al. [39] reported the susceptibility of durum varieties Decoy1 and Altar84 to YR at seedling and adult plant stages. In the current study, 25 and 3 SHWs derived from Decoy1 and Altar84 exhibited moderately resistant to resistant response, respectively. Moderately resistant to resistant reaction of the three SHWs derived from Altar84 suggests that the putative source of resistance is likely to be from the Ae. tauschii accessions used in producing the SHWs. Similarly, 12 moderate to resistant SHWs derived from Decoy1 possibly acquired their resistance from Ae. tauschii accessions. Owing to the absence of disease notes on either the durum or Ae. tauschii parents in the current study, it is difficult to pinpoint if the source of resistance is from the durum or Ae. tauschii parents in some of the SHWs. For example, Ae. tauschii (1016) is the possible source of resistance in SHW117 (DOY1/AE. SQUARROSA (1016)) due to the susceptibility of durum parent (Decoy1), but the same Ae tauschii accession in SHW118 (CETA/AE.SQUARROSA (1016)) failed to provide protection to YR. Several SHWs with same durum or Ae. tauschii accession displayed variable reaction to YR at both seedling and adult-plant stages. This may be attributed to modulation of gene expression which sometimes occurs when resistance genes are introgressed from species of lower ploidy to higher ploidy. The possibilities of suppression of phenotypic effects in wide crosses of wheat at both interspecific and intergeneric categories have previously been reported [9], [39], [40], [41].

Most importantly in the current study, 22% of SHWs were susceptible at the seedling stage and exhibited moderately resistant to resistant response at adult plant stage at both locations. These accessions may possess adult-plant resistance (APR) against YR. This type of resistance, unlike seedling resistance, is race non-specific and durable [42] and is an important genetic resource for the improvement of wheat against YR. SHWs combine the genomes of tetraploid and diploid wheat progenitors and relatives [6], [7], [9], [43], and they may carry a reservoir of novel genes for resistance to YR. The result obtained in this study lays the foundation for more extensive and in depth studies on the genetic characterization of such potentially novel source of resistance to YR. Another important aspect of the multi-location testing is the identification of loci with broad-spectrum effectiveness across environments. No doubt there are complicated interactions with prevailing environmental conditions including the timing and severity of an epidemic [14]. The chromosomal regions identified in this and earlier studies are likely to contain important loci that are effective across multiple environments.

Analysis of SNP markers

In this study, only 2,590 of the 8,244 SNPs were selected for genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and association mapping studies. The considerable amount of monomorphic SNPs (17%) and SNPs with <0.05 MAF (44.9%) may reflect the different genetic background of the germplasm panel than that of used of SNP marker development. The SNPs present on the array were discovered in a diverse set of 27 wheat lines originating from the US and Australia [19]. The SNP array must therefore be expected to show a higher degree of ascertainment bias when used on SHWs germplasm. However, the quantity of polymorphic SNPs was comparable and more densely saturated compared to the other available marker technologies. For example, Crossa et al. [44] used 813 DArT and 530 SSR and sequence tagged site (STS) markers on 170 lines of CIMMYT wheat germplasm for association mapping (AM) studies, Neumann et al. [45] used 574 DArT markers for AM studies on 96 winter wheat germplasm accessions, Emebiri et al. [46] employed 395 DArT markers for AM studies using 91 SHWs, Rasheed et al. [47] used 895 DArT markers on 231 SHWs, Mulki et al. [48] used 667 DArT markers to identify known and potentially new genomic regions associated with resistance to soil-borne pathogens in SHWs and Tadesse et al. [49] used 1,586 DArT markers to identify MTAs for YR resistance in winter and facultative wheats. Wurschum et al. [50] used the same SNP 9k array to genotype 172 European winter wheat cultivars and found very few SNPs mapped to the D genome in contrast to the results from this study. This may be attributed to the use of SHWs which were derived from a wide array of Ae. tauschii accessions which resulted to comparatively more polymorphism compared to conventional bread wheat germplasm. Owing to the comparatively low genetic diversity of the D genome of common wheat [51], [52], the number of markers mapped to the D genome is usually three- to fivefold lower compared to the A and B genomes [19], [53], [54]. The draft genome of Ae. tauschii [55], physical map of D-genome [56] and re-sequencing of some SHWs will facilitate the saturation of available SNP assay and future gene discovery studies in SHWs.

Population structure of synthetic hexaploids

The power of association studies depends on levels of genetic variation, LD and population structure [57]. The existence of population structure can influence association mapping results and lead to false positive trait-marker associations [58], [59]. Identifying and taking into consideration population structure (Q matrix) as a fixed effect and differences in genetic relatedness among lines within the subpopulations (Kinship or K matrix) as random effects reduces the number of false positives [58]. Our results indicated that eight substructures were appropriate in delineating the population structure within the SHWs used in this study. The assignment of the SHWs to the eight subgroups was largely in agreement with their Ae. tauschii parent and less so with the durum parent. Two subpopulations were revealed in Ae. tauschii [60] using STRUCTURE based on DArT markers. This further validated that the two genetic lineages (L1 and L2) in Ae. tauschii accessions have little genetic contact [61]. In SHWs major proportions of genomic diversity are contributed by different accessions of durum varieties and 2 lineages of the D-genome are further influenced by the polymorphisms in A- and B-genomes, resulting in 8 subpopulations. However, the current study analysis carried with STRUCTURE based on only D-genome markers, resulted in only 2 subpopulations (data not shown) consistent with the results of earlier studies [60].

The frequency of Ae. tauschii accessions amongst the SHW varied from one to a maximum of four while the durum elite lines ranged from 1 to 26, an indication of the complexity of the crosses. It has been suggested that the STRUCTURE algorithm does not converge to an optimal K when complex genetic structures exist, such as strong relatedness within some germplasm [62]. Our results are within the range of the results obtained by Emebiri et al. [46] who reported that values of K = 8 and/or 9 were sufficient in the grouping of 91 SHW genotypes. Similarly, Mulki et al. [48] reported the value of K = 7 in a collection of 321 SHW genotypes.

Linkage disequilibrium in synthetic hexaploids

The effectiveness of whole genome association studies for rust resistance as with other traits depends on the decay of LD initially present in a population at a rate determined by the genetic distance between loci and the number of generations since it arose [63]. Numerous studies suggest that LD is not consistent across the whole genome, or along single chromosomes. LD can occur over large distances but may also decrease for nearby loci [45]. Extensive amounts of LD (182 458 SNP pairs) were detected with the 9K wheat SNP platform in this study. A scatter plot of r2 values versus genetic distances between all markers across the genome abruptly declined to 0.2 within 10 cM when all mapped SNPs with chromosome position were analyzed. This result is expected for self-pollinated crop species such as wheat. The estimated genome-wide LD decay in this study ranged from 0–20 cM (Table 3). A very low level of LD (r2 = 0.04) was observed for 6105 SNP pairs.

The quality and estimate LD value is highly conditioned by the distribution of markers and vary according to wheat types and marker systems (e.g., microsatellites and DArT) used. Thus comparison of LD decay values cannot be generalized. LD decay from 10 to 40 cM was detected when advanced breeding lines or wild wheat populations were analyzed by microsatellite and DArT markers [44], [46]. Overall, the extensive LD observed in the present mapping panel corroborates that reported for self-pollinated plants which exhibit considerably high levels of LD. This has been estimated to be about three orders of magnitude higher in wheat, a self-pollinating species, than in maize (Zea mays L.), an outcrossing species [33]. The consensus including the results from the present study is that variation in LD patterns in hexaploid wheat are a function of population, genomic region and marker type but generally decay over fairly long genetic distances. Chao et al. [64] suggested that observed divergence in the extent of LD between eight subpopulations of spring wheat was attributed to unique breeding histories and selection pressures targeted to genes located in the different genomes during the process of cultivar development. The SHWs and their derivatives have increased genetic diversity than the hexaploid wheat, particularly in the D-genome [65]. A similar case is observed in these SHWs where unusual patterns of LD, rate of LD decay and lower pairwise r2 values are attributed to the genomic constitution of the germplasm. It is well known that the introduction of new haplotypes from divergent population can increase the extent of LD [57].

Alignment of QTLs to previously identified YR genes/QTLs

This study identified nine and eighteen different genomic regions associated with YR resistance at the seedling and adult plant stages, respectively using MLM corrected for population structure and familial relatedness adjusted for false discovery rate at P-values of ≤0.005 or ≤0.05. To date, 84 YR resistance genes have been designated in wheat out of which 36 have temporary designations [3]. There are several YR resistance genes derived from wild relatives including Yr5 from T. spelta [66], Yr8 from Ae. comosa [67], Yr9 from Secale cereale [68], Yr28 from Ae. tauschii [69], Yr37 from Ae. kotschyi [70], Yr38 from Ae. sharonensis [71], Yr40 from Ae. geniculata [72] and Yr42 from Ae. neglecta [73]. Several studies have identified and in some cases mapped YR resistance genes in SHWs [8], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78]. The YR resistance gene, Yr28, on chromosome 4DS was derived from a synthetic hexaploid [69]. Another YR resistance gene, YrCH42, was derived from Chinese wheat cultivar ‘Chuanmai 42’ which was a synthetic derived germplasm from CIMMYT wheat program. YrCh42 mapped to 1BS and was reported as allelic with Yr24 and Yr26 [79] and they were later shown to be the same gene [80]. Recently, Lowe et al. [78] reported the mapping and validation of YR resistance gene, Yr48 on chromosome 5AL, that confers partial resistance to broadly virulent post-2000 North American races of YR in wheat which is derived from SHWs. Similarly, Bux et al. [81] postulated the likely presence of YR seedling resistance genes; Yr3, Yr5, Yr10, Yr15, YrSP and YrCV amongst 95 SHWs evaluated for seedling resistance and under field conditions at two hot spot locations in Pakistan.

The current study identified a major haplotype block on chromosome 1BS with 15 SNPs associated with resistance to YR at seedling stage. Nine SNPs within this haplotype block were also associated with YR resistance at adult plant stage suggesting the possible presence of more than one gene/locus conferring resistance to YR within this genomic region. Previously, seven major YR resistance genes (Yr10, Yr15, Yr24/Yr26/YrCH42, YrH52, and YrC142) have been mapped to chromosome 1BS out of which 3 are temporarily designated [3]. Wen et al. [80] previously mapped Yr24/Yr26/YrCh42 to chromosome 1BS and its source was a Chinese wheat cultivar Chuanmai42 which is a D genome synthetic derivative [79]. It is most likely that the region on 1BS identified in the current study may be Yr24/Yr26/YrCh42 [80] or an allelic form of this combination. However, there is also the possibility of other genes or QTLs within proximity of this haplotype block.

Another haplotype of two SNPs on chromosome 2AS associated with Pst was identified in the proximity of the previously mapped gene, Yr32 [82]. This gene is still effective and confers resistance to YR isolates collected in Kenya [83]. Yr1 is also located on chromosome 2AS but the virulence analysis of Pst isolates suggested that these genes are no longer effective against YR [83]. Similarly, a haplotype block with two SNPs on chromosome 2BL identified in the current study may be within proximity of the Yr5 gene. Yr5 is one of major genes for which no virulent Pst isolate has been found worldwide [83] and is effective against all races of Pst. This gene is allelic with Yr7 and YrSp (Spalding Prolific) [84]. Yr7 is ineffective against the Yr27 virulent race but YrSp is resistant against this race [85]. Given that the breakdown of resistance to Yr27 is the major cause of near epidemic proportions of YR experienced in Ethiopia in 2010, it is likely that the markers identified in the current study on 2BL may be associated with the resistance conferred by Yr5 and/or YrSp. This needs to be furthered investigated.

Two D-genome encoded regions associated with YR are important because they might have novel alleles due to the use of untapped Ae. tauschii accessions. It is most likely that a single SNP on chromosome 3DL associated with reaction to Pst identified in the current study is linked to Yr45. Yr45 is the only gene reported on 3DL [86], and integrated genetic map information strongly suggests that Yr45-linked SSR markers close to the SNP identified in this study are linked to YR resistance on 3DL [30].

Yr34 and Yr48 are major Yr genes mapped to chromosome 5AL where two SNPs were associated with resistance to YR in the current study. No information is available in the literature about the virulence in Pst to these genes. However, we were unable to align these SNPs with either of the genes using the integrated genetic map [30]. It is most likely that this region may be Yr48 because this gene is derived from synthetic hexaploids [78]. The current study identified an SNP on chromosome 5BL linked with seedling resistance to YR, which appears to co-locate with genomic regions of catalogued YR resistance genes. Genes mapped to chromosome 5BL include Yr19 [87], YrDu [88] and YrExp2 [89]. Sharma-Poudyal et al. [83] reported that all Pst isolates from Kenya were found to be virulent to YrExp2.

MacGene catalogued more than 100 QTLs conferring resistance to YR in bread and durum wheats [3]. Rosewarne et al. [14] surveyed QTLs for YR resistance and reported that 140 QTLs on 49 genomic regions have been identified in various studies. Earlier, Crossa et al. [44] used GWAS to map rust resistance loci in 170 wheat lines with 813 DArT markers. They identified a total of 275 DArTs (63 for stem rust, 90 for leaf rust and 122 for yellow rust) to be associated with disease resistance which were spread across all wheat chromosomes except 6D. The positions of SNP markers declared significant in the present study were compared to the YR QTLs reported in wheat consensus maps ( Thirteen out of 18 genomic regions co-locate with known genes and/or QTL for YR resistances (Table 5). The alignment of QTL with catalogued YR resistance genes further validates the accuracy of the association mapping approach used in the current study. The chromosomal regions identified in numerous studies are likely to contain important loci that are effective across multiple environments and may warrant a greater focus for future research. QRYr2A.1 was identified in seven studies and appeared to be a gene rich region containing several seedling resistances and, as well as some minor QTLs. QRYr2A.1 also corresponds to a region with several translocations. The pleiotropic adult plant resistance (PAPR) feature is an important component of resistance to biotrophic fungi. An important region identified to be associated with YR is 5AL (138 cM) which has been associated with both stem and YR resistance [90], suggestive of pleiotropic gene effects. Similarly, QTL on 2BS in this study can be aligned to QYrlo.wpg-2BS [91] and QYr.ucw-2BS [78], the latter being derived from SHWs and encode partial resistance to a mixture of broadly virulent Pst races. Both reported QTLs are strongly linked to the same SSR marker (wmc474) which may indicate that they may be allelic. Additionally, another QTL, QRYr2B.4 [92] is likely to be the same region based on the consensus Yr QTL mapping information [14]. The consistent detection of this QTL across diverse environments is an indication of its versatility in providing resistance to not only the post 2010 Pst races but of its potential utility in transferring resistance to YR susceptible cultivars in Ethiopia.

New loci for YR resistance

A single SNP on chromosome 7AL at the 145 cM position is most probably a new gene as there is no major YR gene in literature present on chromosome 7AL. The resistance allele for this SNP is present in 26.4% SHWs. Similarly, the SNP identified on chromosome 6DS may be new since the previously mapped genes viz. Yr20, Yr23, YrTy2 and YrTr1 [87], on this chromosome are virulent to Pst isolates from Kenya [83]. This warrants further investigation and confirmation through bi-parental mapping. No APR QTL is reported within proximity of the 1BS haplotype block consisting of 12 SNPs and its association with APR may be due to some major gene/s or a new QTL. Similarly, the remaining four regions (1AS-12cM; 1BS-8,10 cM; 3AL-70 cM; 6AS-179 cM) were not aligned to any previously published QTLs, hence these are most likely novel QTLs. These QTLs are on located on the A and B genomes contributed by the durum parents of SHWs and can be important sources to introduce novel durum genomic diversity to bread wheat.

In silico analysis of SNPs associated with stripe rust resistance

The exponential availability of sequence information for crops species is facilitating more effective study of target loci underlying important traits. In the current study, putative biological functions were identified for 46 SNPs associated with YR resistance (Table S3). The gene and protein families include R (resistance) superfamily, encoding nucleotide binding site leucine-rich repeats (NBS-LRR) domains flanked by the two SNPs, wsnp_Ex_c807_1586396-5AS and wsnp_Ex_c22383_31576342-7AL. The SNP on 5AS is noteworthy since it is associated with YR resistance at the adult plant stage across both locations. Similarly, an ABC transporter is another important gene family associated with the SNP, wsnp_RFL_Contig4814_5829093, on 3AL which conferred YR resistance at adult plant stage across both locations. The ABC transporter gene family is known to confer durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat [93]. The other important gene families include protein kinase (wsnp_Ex_c7071_12171619-7AS; wsnp_Ex_c5653_9937062-7BS; wsnp_Ku_c13229_21142792-1BS; wsnp_Ex_c2153_4043746-2BL; wsnp_Ku_c28266_38201643-2BL), transporters (wsnp_RFL_Contig2794_2564017-1BS; wsnp_Ex_c38116_45719983-1BS; wsnp_Ex_c6660_11526924-2AS; wsnp_Ku_c8927_15048149-2AS; wsnp_Ex_c4267_7700267-3BS) and proteases (wsnp_Ex_c29623_38630871-3BS; wsnp_RFL_Contig3501_3652740-4AL). Previously, Marone et al. [94] conducted a wide survey by in silico analysis of sequences of wheat specific DArT markers and identified the same gene families frequently associated with DArT loci known to be associated with disease resistance. Similarly, Marone et al. [95] identified the receptor like protein kinase corresponding to powdery mildew resistance in wheat. Joukhadar et al. [96] identified DArT loci associated with pest resistance encoding Ser-Thr kinase domain. Qamar et al. [97] reported that the tomato resistance gene TPK1b is required for resistance to insect feeding and this gene contains the Ser-Thr kinase domain. These proteins are likely involved in lipid metabolism, amino-acid biosynthesis or cell wall modifications upon the attack of rust pathogen. In particular, receptor like kinase proteins (7AS, 7BS, 1AL, and 1BS) are involved in cell wall modifications, NBS-LRR proteins (5AS and 7AL) are involved in ‘secretion and transportation’, and transcription factors (3AL) and transporter proteins (1BS, 2AS and 3BS) are involved in amino acid and lipid metabolisms.

Recently, Fu et al. [98] characterized actin-depolymerizing factor, TaADF7, family which was mapped on group 1 chromosomes and regulates actin cytoskeleton dynamics and encodes hypersensitive response against wheat stripe rust. The 1BS encoded copy of TaADF7 was localized to wheat contig IWGSC_3442815 through in silico approach, while several SNPs on1BS (32–35 cM) were developed within this contig. This strongly suggests the function of potential candidate gene within this region may be actin-depolymerizing factor. The successful detection of this region by forward GWAS could further be validated by reverse genetic approach to identify specific genes involved.

Further insight into TaAbc1 and TaLSD1 genes encoding hypersensitive resistance to stripe rust and possible exploitation in SHWs

Plant hypersensitivity response (HR) as function of rapid cell death at the site of infection, is regarded as one of the most efficient defense response to microbial pathogens. Recently, Wang et al. [99] reported the cloning of TaAbc1 gene from the wheat cultivar Suwon11. This gene is reportedly a rust-pathotype specific HR mediator and is only triggered by avirulent YR pathotypes. The demonstrated ability of this gene to encode YR resistance provides opportunities to search for its homoeologues in different wheat genomes. The recent availability and access to relatively complete genome sequence of bread wheat (wheat genome survey sequence), and draft genome sequence of Ae. tauschii [55] will allow more in-depth and comprehensive studies for putative wheat homoeologs of large gene families. In the current study, the SNP wsnp_RFL_Contig4814_5829093 on 3AL encode ABC transporter protein, however its sequence homology with TaAbc1 genes was very low (>50% with E = 3e-40) which diminishes the likely of this region as candidate TaAbc1 homolog. However, the sequence of conserved ABC1 protein family domain was used to query and blast the wheat genome survey sequence database (, accessed 10 March 2014). A significant hit was found on chromosome 5DL (overall 75% similarity, E = 1e-21) making this region an important candidate to explore and functionally validate the effect of this gene on YR resistance. SHWs and their derived advanced lines may offer required variability to validate the role of this gene compared to conventional bread wheats.

Similarly, TaLSD1 is another recently cloned gene in wheat [100] which is a lesion stimulating disease 1 (lsd1) gene that belongs to zinc finger subfamily that exhibits a runaway cell death phenotype once initiated by superoxidase-dependent signals. In the current study, flanking sequence of SNP, wsnp_Ex_c2582_4804223-5BL, associated with seedling Pst resistance had synteny to zinc finger domain in Brachypodium (Table S3), however, this domain is different to zf-LSD1 domain. The complete coding sequence of TaLSD1 was used as a query and blasted to survey sequence database and a significant hit was found on chromosome 1DL (scaffold 2251473) with high similarity (93%, 540bp, E = 4e-148) (Figure S2). The pfam annotation of this scaffold region transcribed into zf-LSD1.3 (ID: PF06943). This significant higher identity makes this region important candidate for validation and subsequent functional analysis of TaLSD1 gene family members in Ae. tauschii through characterizing SHWs.

The QTLs and SNPs identified in the current study will be of considerable interest to the wheat community. However, it is, essential to validate these QTLs by using bi-parental populations or near-isogenic lines (NILs) and testing their utility across multiple environments.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Frequency distribution of synthetic hexaploids evaluated to stripe rust at seedling stage (a) and adult plant stage at Meraro (b) and Arsi Robe (c).


Figure S2.

Alignment of hypersensitive response (HR) mediated programmed cell death (PCD) encoding genes involved in stripe rust resistance, with sequences from wheat D-genome. (a) Alignment of TaAbc1 gene with highest similar sequence from chromosome 5DL contig 4570425. (b) Alignment of TaLSD1 gene with highest similar sequence from chromosome 1DL scaffold 2251473.


Table S1.

Pedigree information of synthetic hexaploids and bread wheat cultivars used to evaluate resistance to stripe rust.


Table S2.

List of synthetic hexaploids putatively possessing adult plant resistance (APR) to stripe rust.


Table S3.

In silico functional analysis of SNPs associated with stripe rust resistance in synthetic hexaploids.


Table S4.

Stripe rust terminal disease scores, AUDPC of SHWs at Meraro and Arsi Robe and seedling test in green house during 2011.


Table S5.

High quality SNPs used for GWAS for stripe rust resistance in synthetic hexaploid wheats.


Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: FCO HZ AB AR. Performed the experiments: HZ AB FM FCO. Analyzed the data: HZ AR FM AB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HZ AR FM AB FCO. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: HZ AR AB FCO.


  1. 1. Solh M, Nazari K, Tadesse W, Wellings CR (2012) The growing threat of stripe rust worldwide Borlaug Global Rust Initiative (BGRI) conference. Beijing, China.
  2. 2. Wellings CR (2011) Global status of stripe rust: A review of historical and current threats. Euphytica 179: 129–141.
  3. 3. McIntosh R, Dubcovsky J, Rogers J, Morris C, Appels R, et al.. (2013) Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat. 12th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Yokohama, Japan.
  4. 4. Flor HH (1942) Inheritance of pathogenicity in Melampsora lini. Phytopathology 32: 653–669.
  5. 5. Knott DR (1989) The wheat rusts-breeding for resistance. Springer-Verlag.
  6. 6. Mujeeb-Kazi A, Rosas V, Roldan S (1996) Conservation of the genetic variation of Triticum tauschii (Coss.) Schmalh.(Aegilops squarrosa auct. non L.) in synthetic hexaploid wheats (T. turgidum L. s. lat. x T. tauschii; 2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD) and its potential utilization for wheat improvement. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43: 129–134.
  7. 7. van Ginkel M, Ogbonnaya F (2007) Novel genetic diversity from synthetic wheats in breeding cultivars for changing production conditions. Field Crops Research 104: 86–94.
  8. 8. Ogbonnaya FC, Imtiaz M, Bariana HS, McLean M, Shankar MM, et al. (2008) Mining synthetic hexaploids for multiple disease resistance to improve bread wheat. Crop and Pasture Science 59: 421–431.
  9. 9. Ogbonnaya FC, Abdalla O, Mujeeb-Kazi A, Kazi AG, Xu SS, et al. (2013) Synthetic hexaploids: Harnessing species of the primary gene pool for wheat improvement. Plant Breeding Reviews 37: 35–122.
  10. 10. Cox TS, Raupp WJ, Gill BS (1994) Leaf rust-resistance genes Lr41, Lr42, and Lr43 transferred from Triticum tauschii to common wheat. Crop Science 34: 339–343.
  11. 11. Singh RP, Nelson JC, Sorrells ME (1998) Mapping Yr28 and other genes for resistance to stripe rust in wheat. Crop Science 40: 1148–1155.
  12. 12. Raupp WJ, Amri A, Hatchett JH, Gill BS, Wilson DL, et al. (1993) Chromosomal location of hessian fly–resistance Genes H22, H23, and H24 derived from Triticum tauschii in the D Genome of Wheat. Journal of Heredity 84: 142–145.
  13. 13. Singh RP, Hodson DP, Huerta-Espino J, Jin Y, Bhavani S, et al. (2011) The emergence of Ug99 races of the stem rust fungus is a threat to world wheat production. Annual Review of Phytopathology 49: 465–481.
  14. 14. Rosewarne GM, Herrera-Foessel SA, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Lan CX, et al. (2013) Quantitative trait loci of stripe rust resistance in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126: 2427–2449.
  15. 15. Rakshit S, Rakshit A, Patil JV (2012) Multiparent intercross populations in analysis of quantitative traits. Journal of Genetics 91: 111–117.
  16. 16. Verslues PE, Lasky JR, Juenger TE, Liu TW, Kumar MN (2014) Genome-wide association mapping combined with reverse genetics identifies new effectors of low water potential-induced proline accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 164: 144–159.
  17. 17. Huang X, Han B (2014) Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035715
  18. 18. Nordborg M, Weigel D (2008) Next-generation genetics in plants. Nature 456: 720–723.
  19. 19. Cavanagh CR, Chao S, Wang S, Huang BE, Stephen S, et al. (2013) Genome-wide comparative diversity uncovers multiple targets of selection for improvement in hexaploid wheat landraces and cultivars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 8057–8062.
  20. 20. Emebiri LC (2013) Genetic variation and possible SNP markers for breeding wheat with low-grain asparagine, the major precursor for acrylamide formation in heat-processed products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6434
  21. 21. Li C, Chen M, Chao S, Yu J, Bai G (2013) Identification of a novel gene, H34, in wheat using recombinant inbred lines and single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126: 2065–2071..
  22. 22. Zhang J, Dell B, Biddulph B, Drake-Brockman F, Walker E, et al.. (2013) Wild-type alleles of Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 as independent determinants of thousand-grain weight and kernel number per spike in wheat. Molecular Breeding DOI 10.1007/s11032-013-9905-1
  23. 23. Zhao Y, Gowda M, Würschum T, Longin CFH, Korzun V, et al. (2013) Dissecting the genetic architecture of frost tolerance in Central European winter wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 64: 4453–4460.
  24. 24. McIntosh RA, Wellings CR, Park RF (1995) Wheat rusts: an atlas of resistance genes. 200pp. CSIRO Publishes, Australia.
  25. 25. Peterson RF, Campbell AB, Hannah AE (1948) A diagrammatic scale for estimating rust intensity on leaves and stems of cereals. Canadian Journal of Research 26: 496–500.
  26. 26. Wilcoxson RD, Skovmand B, Atif AH (1975) Evaluation of wheat cultivars for ability to retard development of stem rust. Annals of Applied Biology 80: 275–281.
  27. 27. Ogbonnaya FC, Subrahmanyam NC, Moullet O, De Majnik J, Eagles HA, et al. (2001) Diagnostic DNA markers for cereal cyst nematode resistance in bread wheat. Crop and Pasture Science 52: 1367–1374.
  28. 28. Liu K, Muse SV (2005) PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21: 2128–2129.
  29. 29. Anderson LH, Christenson LK, Christenson RK, Ford SP (1993) Investigations into the control of litter size in swine: II. Comparisons of morphological and functional embryonic diversity between Chinese and American breeds. Journal of Animal Science 71: 1566–1571.
  30. 30. Saintenac C, Jiang D, Wang S, Akhunov E (2013) Sequence-based mapping of the polyploid wheat genome. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 3: 1105–1114.
  31. 31. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959.
  32. 32. Weir BS (1996) Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer, Sunderland.
  33. 33. Breseghello F, Sorrells ME (2006) Association mapping of kernel size and milling quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Genetics 172: 1165–1177.
  34. 34. Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai CQ, Todhunter RJ, Tiwari HK, et al. (2010) Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics 42: 355–360.
  35. 35. Storey JD (2002) A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 64: 479–498.
  36. 36. Johnson RC, Nelson GW, Troyer JL, Lautenberger JA, Kessing BD, et al. (2010) Accounting for multiple comparisons in a genome-wide association study. BMC Genomics 11: 724.
  37. 37. Pasam RK, Sharma R, Malosetti M, van Eeuwijk FA, Haseneyer G, et al. (2012) Genome-wide association studies for agronomical traits in a worldwide spring barley collection. BMC Plant Biology 12: 16.
  38. 38. Trethowan RM, Mujeeb-Kazi A (2008) The use of novel germplasm resources to improve the environmental stress tolerance of hexaploid wheat. Crop Science 48: 1255–1265.
  39. 39. Ahmed S, Bux H, Rasheed A, Kazi AG, Rauf A, et al. (2014) Stripe rust resistance in Triticum turgidum - T. monococcum and T. turgidum and T. urartu apmphiploids. Australasian Plant Pathology 43: 109–113..
  40. 40. Ma H, Singh RP, Mujeeb-Kazi A (1995) Suppression/expression of resistance to stripe rust in synthetic hexaploids wheat (Triticum turgidum x T. tauschii). Euphytica 83: 87–93.
  41. 41. McIntosh RA, Zhang P, Cowger C, Parks R, Lagudah ES, et al. (2011) Rye-derived powdery mildew resistance gene Pm8 in wheat is suppressed by the Pm3 locus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 123: 359–367..
  42. 42. Chen XM, Moore MK (2002) Epidemics and races of Puccinia striiformis in North America in 2001. Phytopathology 92: S14–15..
  43. 43. Yang W, Liu D, Li J, Zhang L, Wei H, et al. (2009) Synthetic hexaploid wheat and its utilization for wheat genetic improvement in China. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 36: 539–546.
  44. 44. Crossa J, Burgueno J, Dreisigacker S, Vargas M, Herrera-Foessel SA, et al. (2007) Association analysis of historical bread wheat germplasm using additive genetic covariance of relatives and population structure. Genetics 177: 1889–1913.
  45. 45. Neumann K, Kobiljski B, Denčić S, Varshney RK, Börner A (2011) Genome-wide association mapping: a case study in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Molecular Breeding 27: 37–58.
  46. 46. Emebiri LC, Oliver JR, Mrva K, Mares D (2010) Association mapping of late maturity α-amylase (LMA) activity in a collection of synthetic hexaploid wheat. Molecular Breeding 26: 39–49.
  47. 47. Rasheed A, Xia XC, Ogbonnaya FC, Zhang ZW, Mahmood T, et al.. (2014) Genome-wide association for grain morphology in D-genome synthetic hexaploids. BMC Plant Biology (In press).
  48. 48. Mulki MA, Jighly A, Ye G, Emebiri LC, Moody D, et al. (2013) Association mapping for soilborne pathogen resistance in synthetic hexaploid wheat. Molecular Breeding 31: 299–311.
  49. 49. Tadesse W, Ogbonnaya FC, Jighly A, Nazari K, Rajaram S, et al. (2014) Association mapping of resistance to yellow rust in winter wheat cultivars and elite genotypes. Crop Science 54: 607–616.
  50. 50. Würschum T, Langer SM, Longin CFH, Korzun V, Akhunov E, et al. (2013) Population structure, genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium in elite winter wheat assessed with SNP and SSR markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126: 1477–1486.
  51. 51. Caldwell KS, Dvorak J, Lagudah ES, Akhunov E, Luo MC, et al. (2004) Sequence polymorphism in polyploid wheat and their D-genome diploid ancestor. Genetics 167: 941–947.
  52. 52. Chao S, Zhang W, Akhunov E, Sherman J, Ma Y, et al. (2009) Analysis of gene-derived SNP marker polymorphism in US wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Molecular Breeding 23: 23–33.
  53. 53. Allen AM, Barker GL, Berry ST, Coghill JA, Gwilliam R, et al. (2011) Transcript-specific, single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery and linkage analysis in hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal 9: 1086–1099.
  54. 54. Allen AM, Barker GL, Wilkinson P, Burridge A, Winfield M, et al. (2013) Discovery and development of exome-based, co-dominant single nucleotide polymorphism markers in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal 11: 279–295..
  55. 55. Jia JZ, Zhao SC, Kong XY, Li YR, Zhao GY, et al. (2013) Aegilops tauschii draft genome sequence reveals a gene repertoire for wheat adaptation. Nature 496: 91–95.
  56. 56. Luo MC, Gu YQ, You FM, Deal KR, Ma Y, et al. (2013) A 4-gigabase physical map unlocks the structure and evolution of the complex genome of Aegilops tauschii, the wheat D-genome progenitor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 7940–7945.
  57. 57. Pritchard JK, Przeworski M (2001) Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. The American Journal of Human Genetics 69: 1–14.
  58. 58. Yu J, Buckler ES (2006) Genetic association mapping and genome organization of maize. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 17: 155–160.
  59. 59. Zhu C, Gore M, Buckler ES, Yu J (2008) Status and prospects of association mapping in plants. The Plant Genome 1: 5–20.
  60. 60. Sohail Q, Shehzad T, Kilian A, Eltayeb AE, Tanaka H, et al. (2012) Development of diversity array technology (DArT) markers for assessment of population structure and diversity in Aegilops tauschii. Breeding Science 62: 38–45.
  61. 61. Wang J, Luo MC, Chen Z, You FM, Wei Y, et al. (2013) Aegilops tauschii single nucleotide polymorphisms shed light on the origins of wheat D-genome genetic diversity and pinpoint the geographic origin of hexaploid wheat. New Phytologist 198: 925–937..
  62. 62. Camus-Kulandaivelu L, Veyrieras JB, Gouesnard B, Charcosset A, Manicacci D (2007) Evaluating the reliability of outputs in case of relatedness between individuals. Crop Science 47: 887–890.
  63. 63. Mackay I, Powell W (2007) Methods for linkage disequilibrium mapping in crops. Trends in Plant Science 12: 57–63.
  64. 64. Chao S, Dubcovsky J, Dvorak J, Luo MC, Baenziger SP, et al. (2010) Population-and genome-specific patterns of linkage disequilibrium and SNP variation in spring and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Genomics 11: 727.
  65. 65. Warburton ML, Crossa J, Franco J, Kazi M, Trethowan R, et al. (2006) Bringing wild relatives back into the family: recovering genetic diversity in CIMMYT improved wheat germplasm. Euphytica 149: 289–301.
  66. 66. Kema GHJ (1992) Resistance in spelt wheat to yellow rust I. Formal analysis and variation for gliadin patterns. Euphytica 63: 207–217.
  67. 67. Riley R, Chapman V, Johnson R (1968) Introduction of yellow rust resistance of Aegilops comosa into wheat by genetically induced homoeologous recombination. Nature 217: 383–384.
  68. 68. Zeller FJ (1973) 1B/1R wheat-rye chromosome substitutions and translocations. Proceedings of the 4th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Columbia, Missouri, USA (Sears ER & Sears LMS eds.): 209–221.
  69. 69. Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Rajaram S, Barna B, Kiraly Z (2000) Achieving near-immunity to leaf and stripe rusts in wheat by combining slow rusting resistance genes. In Proceedings of the 10th Cereal Rusts and Powdery Mildews Conference, Budapest, Hungary, 28 August-1 September 2000 pp. 133–139.
  70. 70. Marais GF, McCallum B, Snyman JE, Pretorius ZA, Marais AS (2005) Leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes Lr54 and Yr37 transferred to wheat from Aegilops kotschyi. Plant Breeding 124: 538–541.
  71. 71. Marais GF, McCallum B, Marais AS (2006) Leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes derived from Triticum sharonense. Euphytica 149: 373–380.
  72. 72. Kuraparthy V, Chunneja P, Dhaliwal HS, Kaur S, Bowden RL, Gill BS (2007) Charactertization and mapping of cryptic alien introgression from Aegilops geniculata with new leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes Lr57 and Yr40 in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 114: 1379–1389.
  73. 73. Marais F, Marais A, McCallum B, Pretorius Z (2009) Transfer of leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes Lr62 and Yr42 from Aegilops neglecta Req. ex Bertol. to common wheat. Crop Science 49: 871–879.
  74. 74. Ma H, Singh RP, Mujeeb-Kazi A (1995) Resistance to stripe rust in Triticum turgidum, T. tauschii and their synthetic hexaploids. Euphytica 82: 117–124.
  75. 75. Yang WY, Lu BR, Yu Y, Hu XR (2001) Genetic evaluation of synthetic hexaploid wheat resistant to the physiological strain CYR30 and CYR31 of wheat stripe rust in China. Journal of Genetics and Molecular Biology 12: 190–198.
  76. 76. McIntosh RA, Lagudah ES (2000) Cytogenetical studies in wheat. XVIII. Gene Yr24 for resistance to stripe rust. Plant Breeding 119: 81–93.
  77. 77. Badebo A, Fehrmann H (2005) Resistance to yellow rust in Aegilops tauschii (Coss.), Triticum durum and their synthetic amphiploids. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 18: 129–135..
  78. 78. Lowe I, Jankuloski L, Chao S, Chen X, See D, et al. (2011) Mapping and validation of QTL which confer partial resistance to broadly virulent post-2000 North American races of stripe rust in hexaploid wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 123: 143–157.
  79. 79. Li GQ, Li ZF, Yang WY, Zhang Y, He ZH, et al. (2006) Molecular mapping of stripe rust resistance gene YrCH42 in Chinese wheat cultivar Chuanmai 42 and its allelism with Yr24 and Yr26. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112: 1434–1440.
  80. 80. Wen WE, Li GQ, He ZH, Yang WY, Xu ML, et al. (2008) Development of an STS marker tightly linked to Yr26 against wheat stripe rust using the resistance gene-analog polymorphism (RGAP) technique. Molecular Breeding 22: 507–515.
  81. 81. Bux H, Ashraf M, Hussain F, Rattu AUR, Fayyaz M (2012) Characterization of wheat germplasm for stripe rust (Puccini striiformis f. sp. tritici) resistance. Australian Journal of Crop Science 6: 116–120..
  82. 82. Eriksen L, Afshari F, Christiansen MJ, McIntosh RA, Jahoor A, et al. (2004) Yr32 for resistance to yellow rust present in the wheat cultivar Carstens V. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 567–575..
  83. 83. Sharma-Poudyal D, Chen XM, Wan AM, Zhan GM, Kang ZS, et al. (2013) Virulence characterization of international collections of the wheat stripe rust pathogen, Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Plant Disease 97: 379–386.
  84. 84. Zhang P, McIntosh RA, Hoxha S, Dong CM (2009) Wheat stripe rust resistance genes Yr5 and Yr7 are allelic. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 120: 25–29.
  85. 85. Singh RP, Duveiller E, Huerta-Espino J (2012) Virulence to yellow rust resistance gene Yr27: a new threat to stable wheat production in Asia. In: Meeting the Challenge of Yellow Rust in Cereal Crops pp. 25.
  86. 86. Li Q, Chen XM, Wang MN, Jing JX (2011) Yr45, a new wheat gene for stripe rust resistance on the long arm of chromosome 3D. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 122: 189–197.
  87. 87. Chen XM, Jones SS, Line RF (1995) Chromosomal location of genes for stripe rust resistance in spring wheat cultivars Compair, Fielder, Lee, and Lemhi and interactions of aneuploid wheats with races of Puccinia striiformis. Phytopathology 85: 375–381.
  88. 88. Chen X, Jones SS, Line RF (1996) Chromosomal location of genes for resistance to Puccinia striiformis in seven wheat cultivars with resistance genes at the Yr3 and Yr4 loci. Phytopathology 86: 1228–1233.
  89. 89. Lin F, Chen XM (2008) Molecular mapping of genes for race-specific overall resistance to stripe rust in wheat cultivar Express. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 116: 797–806.
  90. 90. Macharia KG (2013) Molecular diversity, linkage disequilibrium and genetic mapping in East Africa wheat. PhD dissertation. University of Minnesota, USA.
  91. 91. Carter AH, Chen XM, Garland-Campbell K, Kidwell KK (2009) Identifying QTL for high-temperature adult-plant resistance to stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) in the spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar ‘Louise’. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 119: 1119–1128..
  92. 92. Rosewarne GM, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Rebetzke GJ (2008) Quantitative trait loci for slow-rusting resistance in wheat to leaf rust and stripe rust identified with multi-environment analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 116: 1027–1034..
  93. 93. Krattinger SG, Lagudah ES, Spielmeyer W, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, et al. (2009) A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. Science 323: 1360–1363.
  94. 94. Marone D, Panio G, Ficco DBM, Russo MA, De Vita P, et al. (2012) Characterization of wheat DArT markers: genetic and functional features. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 287: 741–753.
  95. 95. Marone D, Russo MA, Laidò G, De Vita P, Papa R, et al. (2013) Genetic basis of qualitative and quantitative resistance to powdery mildew in wheat: from consensus regions to candidate genes. BMC Genomics 14: 562.
  96. 96. Joukhadar R, El-Bouhssini M, Jighly A, Ogbonnaya FC (2013) Genome-wide association mapping for five major pest resistances in wheat. Molecular Breeding 32: 943–960.
  97. 97. Qamar MA, Liu ZH, Faris JD, Chao S, Edwards MC, et al. (2008) A region of barley chromosome 6H harbors multiple major genes associated with net type net blotch resistance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117: 1261–1270.
  98. 98. Fu Y, Duan X, Tang C, Li X, Voegele RT, et al.. (2014) TaADF7, an actin-depolymerizing factor, contributes to wheat resistance against Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. The Plant Journal 78: , 16–30.
  99. 99. Wang X, Wang X, Duan Y, Yin S, Zhang H, et al. (2013) TaAbc1, a member of Abc1-like family involved in hypersensitive response against the stripe rust fungal pathogen in wheat. PloS One 8: e58969.
  100. 100. Guo J, Bai P, Yang Q, Liu F, Wang X, et al. (2013) Wheat zinc finger protein TaLSD1, a negative regulator of programmed cell death, is involved in wheat resistance against stripe rust fungus. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 71: 164–172.
  101. 101. Wang L, Ma J, Zhou R, Wang X, Jia J (2002) Molecular tagging of the yellow rust resistance gene Yr10 in common wheat, PI 178383 (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 124: , 71–73.
  102. 102. Sun GL, Fahima T, Korol AB, Turpeinen T, Grama A, et al. (1997) Identification of molecular markers linked to the Yr15 stripe rust resistance gene of wheat originated in wild emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 622–628.
  103. 103. Murphy LR, Santra D, Kidwell K, Yan G, Chen X, et al. (2009) Linkage maps of wheat stripe rust resistance genes and for use in marker-assisted selection. Crop Science 49: 1786–1790.
  104. 104. Ma J, Zhou R, Dong Y, Wang L, Wang X, et al.. (2001). Molecular mapping and detection of the yellow rust resistance gene Yr26 in wheat transferred from Triticum turgidum L. using microsatellite markers. Euphytica. 120: , 219–226.
  105. 105. Rosewarne GM, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, William HM, Bouchet S, et al. (2006) Leaf tip necrosis, molecular markers and β1-proteasome subunits associated with the slow rusting resistance genes Lr46/Yr29.". Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112: 500–508.
  106. 106. Sun Q, Wei Y, Ni Z, Xie C, Yang T (2002) Microsatellite marker for yellow rust resistance gene Yr5 in wheat introgressed from spelt wheat. Plant Breeding 121: 539–541.
  107. 107. Khlestkina EK, Röder MS, Unger O, Meinel A, Börner A (2007) More precise map position and origin of a durable non-specific adult plant disease resistance against stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis) in wheat. Euphytica 153: 1–10.
  108. 108. Bariana HS, Parry N, Barclay IR, Loughman R, McLean RJ, et al. (2006) Identification and characterization of stripe rust resistance gene Yr34 in common wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112: 1143–1148.
  109. 109. Dedryver F, Paillard S, Mallard S, Robert O, Trottet M, et al. (2009) Characterization of genetic components involved in durable resistance to stripe rust in the bread wheat ‘Renan’. Phytopathology 99: 968–973..
  110. 110. Boukhatem N, Baret PV, Mingeot D, Jacquemin JM (2002) Quantitative trait loci for resistance against yellow rust in two wheat derived recombinant inbred line populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 111–118..
  111. 111. Mallard S, Gaudet D, Aldeia A, Abelard C, Besnard AL, et al. (2005) Genetic analysis of durable resistance to yellow rust in bread wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110: 1401–1409..
  112. 112. Bariana HS, Bansal UK, Schmidt A, Lehmensiek A, Kaur J, et al. (2010) Molecular mapping of adult plant stripe rust resistance in wheat and identification of pyramided QTL genotypes. Euphytica 176: 251–260..
  113. 113. Vazquez MD, Peterson CJ, Riera-Lizarazu O, Chen X, Heesacker A, et al. (2012) Genetic analysis of adult plant, quantitative resistance to stripe rust in wheat cultivar ‘Stephens’ in multi-environment trials. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124: 1–11..
  114. 114. Lan C, Liang S, Zhou X, Zhou G, Lu Q, et al. (2010) Identification of genomic regions controlling adult-plant stripe rust resistance in Chinese landrace Pingyuan 50 through bulked segregant analysis. Phytopathology 100: 313–318.
  115. 115. Zwart RS, Thompson JP, Milgate AW, Bansal UK, Williamson PM, et al. (2010) QTL mapping of multiple foliar disease and root-lesion nematode resistances in wheat. Molecular Breeding 26: 107–124..
  116. 116. Rosewarne GM, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Herrera-Foessel SA, Forrest KL, et al. (2012) Analysis of leaf and stripe rust severities reveals pathotype changes and multiple minor QTLs associated with resistance in an Avocet × Pastor wheat population. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124: 1283–1294..
  117. 117. Ren Y, He ZH, Li J, Lillemo M, Wu L, et al. (2012) QTL mapping of adult-plant resistance to stripe rust in a population derived from common wheat cultivars Naxos and Shanghai 3/Catbird. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 125: 1211–1221..