Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Radiation Effects on the Flow of Powell-Eyring Fluid Past an Unsteady Inclined Stretching Sheet with Non-Uniform Heat Source/Sink

  • Tasawar Hayat,

    Affiliations Department of Mathematics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

  • Sadia Asad ,

    Affiliation Department of Mathematics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

  • Meraj Mustafa,

    Affiliation School of Natural Sciences (SNS), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan

  • Ahmed Alsaedi

    Affiliation Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia


This study investigates the unsteady flow of Powell-Eyring fluid past an inclined stretching sheet. Unsteadiness in the flow is due to the time-dependence of the stretching velocity and wall temperature. Mathematical analysis is performed in the presence of thermal radiation and non-uniform heat source/sink. The relevant boundary layer equations are reduced into self-similar forms by suitable transformations. The analytic solutions are constructed in a series form by homotopy analysis method (HAM). The convergence interval of the auxiliary parameter is obtained. Graphical results displaying the influence of interesting parameters are given. Numerical values of skin friction coefficient and local Nusselt number are computed and analyzed.


The study of boundary layer flow and heat transfer over a stretching sheet has gained considerable attention due to its numerous practical applications such as paper production, hot rolling, drawing of plastic films, annealing and tinning of copper wires and metal spinning. Wang [1] proposed the problem of unsteady two-dimensional boundary layer flow of liquid film on unsteady stretching sheet. Later Andersson et al. [2] extended Wang's problem for heat transfer effects by considering time-dependent wall temperature. Further Elbashbeshy and Bazid [3] investigated the thermal boundary layer in the time dependent flow (occupying a semi-infinite domain) over an unsteady stretching surface. Ishak et al. [4] studied heat transfer over an unsteady stretching permeable surface with prescribed wall temperature. Radiation effects on the flow and heat transfer over an unsteady stretching surface with internal heat generation were analyzed by Abd El-Aziz [5]. Shateyi and Motsa [6] examined the radiation effects on the time dependent flow of liquid film on unsteady stretching sheet with heat and mass transfer. They obtained an analytic solution of the resulting problem by Chebyshev pseudo-spectral collocation method. Tsai et al. [7] investigated the flow and heat transfer over an unsteady stretching surface with non-uniform heat source. Mukhopadhyay [8] numerically analyzed the flow over unsteady permeable stretching sheet with variable suction and time-dependent surface temperature. In this study, the fluid with variable viscosity and variable thermal conductivity was taken into consideration. Analytic solutions for radiation effects on mixed convection flow of Jeffrey fluid and heat transfer past an unsteady stretching sheet were provided by Hayat et al. [9]. Three dimension elastico-viscous flow over an unsteady stretching sheet has been discussed by Hayat et al. [10]. Mukhopadhyay [11] extended the work [8] for flow near a stagnation-point with variable free stream. MHD stagnation-point flow of an electrically conducting Casson fluid past an unsteady stretching surface was explored by Bhattacharyya [12]. Yang and Baleanu [13] investigated the fractal heat conduction problem. They solved by using local fractional variation iteration method. Yang et al. [14] presented local fractional Fourier series solutions for non-homogeneous heat equations arising in fractal heat flow with local fractional derivative.

It has now been widely recognized that in industrial and engineering applications, non-Newtonian fluids are more suitable than Newtonian fluids. Due to the flow diversity in nature, the rheological features of non-Newtonian fluids cannot be captured by a single constitutive relationship between stress and shear rate. For this reason, a variety of non-Newtonian fluid models (exhibiting different rheological effects) are available in the literature [15], [16]. Amongst those is the Powell-Eyring fluid [17] which although mathematically complex has tendency to describe the flow behavior at low and high shear rates. It can be used to formulate the flows of modern industrial materials such as powdered graphite and ethylene glycol. Unidirectional flow of Powell-Eyring fluid between parallel plates with couple stresses was studied by Eldabe et al. [18]. Pulsatile flow of Powell-Eyring fluid was examined by Zueco and Beg [19]. Homotopy perturbation analysis of slider bearing lubricated with Powell-Eyring fluid was presented by Islam et al. [20]. Three-dimensional flow of Powell-Eyring fluid past a wedge was discussed by Patel and Timol [21]. Boundary layer flow of Powell-Eyring fluid over a moving flat plate was analyzed by Hayat et al. [22]. Recently steady flow of Powell-Eyring fluid over an exponentially stretching sheet was numerically investigated by Mushtaq et al. [23]. It has been noted that literature is scarce for unsteady flow of Powell-Eyring fluid. To our information, the flow and heat transfer of the Powell-Eyring fluid thin film over an unsteady stretching sheet are examined by Khader and Megahed [24]. Impact of uniform suction/injection in unsteady Couette flow of Powell-Eyring fluid is explored by Zaman et al. [25].

The present work considers the boundary layer flow of Powell-Eyring fluid over an unsteady stretching sheet. The stretching sheet is considered inclined. In addition the effects of radiation and non-uniform heat source/sink are also taken into account. Radiative heat transfer in the boundary layer flow is very important from application point of view, because the quality of the final product is very much dependent on the rate of heat transfer of the ambient fluid particles. Such radiative effects are also important in many non-isothermal cases whereas the heat generation/absorption in moving fluids is significant in the applications involving heat removal from nuclear fuel debris, underground disposal of radioactive waste material, storage of food stuffs, dislocating of fluids in packed bed reactors and several others. Similar situations prevail during the manufacture of plastic and rubber sheets where it is often necessary to blow a gaseous medium through the not-yet solidified material, and where the stretching force may be varying with time. The dimensionless mathematical problems are solved analytically by homotopy analysis method (HAM) [26][40]. Homotopy analysis method (HAM) is one of the most efficient methods in solving different type of nonlinear equations such as coupled, decoupled, homogeneous and non-homogeneous. Many previous analytic methods have some restrictions in dealing with non-linear equations. For illustration, in contrast to perturbation method, HAM is independent of any small or large parameters and or the existence of auxiliary parameter provides us with a simple way to control and adjust the convergence region which is a main lack of previous techniques. Also, HAM provides us with great freedom to choose different initial guesses to express solutions of the nonlinear problem. Numerical values of wall velocity and temperature gradient are computed and examined.

Mathematical Formulation

We consider unsteady two-dimensional incompressible flow of Powell-Eyring fluid past a stretching sheet. The sheet makes an angle with the vertical direction. The x - and y-axes are taken along and perpendicular to the sheet respectively. In addition the effects of thermal radiation and non-uniform heat source/sink are considered (see Fig. 1). The Cauchy stress tensor in Powell-Eyring fluid is given by [17]:

where μ is the viscosity coefficient, β and C are the material fluid parameters. The boundary layer equations comprising the balance laws of mass, linear momentum and energy can be written as [19][26] (1)(2)(3)

In the above expressions t is the time, is the kinematic viscosity, k is the thermal conductivity of the fluid, is the fluid density, T is the fluid temperature, is the specific heat, is the acceleration due to gravity, is the volumetric coefficient of thermal exponential, [36][38] is the linearized radiative heat flux, is the mean absorption coefficient, is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, is the non-uniform heat generated or absorbed per unit volume. The non-uniform heat source/sink, is modeled by the following expression [39][40].(4)

in which A and B are the coefficient of space and temperature-dependent heat source/sink, respectively. Here two cases arise. For internal heat generation A>0 and B>0 and for internal heat absorption, we have A<0 and B<0.

The surface velocity is denoted by whereas the surface temperature . Here b (stretching rate) and a are positive constants having dimension time Also is a constant reference temperature. We note that the temperature of stretching sheet is larger than the free stream temperature

The boundary conditions are taken as follows:(5)


Eq. (1) is identically satisfied and Eqs. (2)–(5) become(7)(8)(9)

where prime denotes differentiation with respect to , is the dimensionless stream function, is the dimensionless temperature and the dimensionless numbers are (10)

Here Г and are dimensionless material fluid parameters, R is the radiation parameter, is the unsteady parameter and is the Prandtl number.

Local Nusselt number is defined as(11)

where is the local Reynolds number.

Solution Methodology

Most of the problems occurring in the field of science and engineering are non-linear. Specifically most of the problems encountered in fluid mechanics are highly non-linear. To find the exact solution of these non-linear problems is very difficult and some times even impossible. Thus several numerical and analytical techniques have been developed to solve such kind of problems. Among these HAM is the most used analytical technique. Convergent series solutions of non-linear equations are obtained.

Homotopy analysis method

HAM was proposed by means of homotopy, a fundamental concept of topology. Two functions are said to be homotopic if one function can be deformed continuously into the other function. If and are two continuous maps from the topological space X into the topological space Y then is homotopic to if there exist a continuous map F

such that for each xX

The map F is called homotopy between and

It should be noted that there is a great freedom to choose initial guess and auxiliary linear operator £. Beside such a great freedom there are some fundamental rules which direct us to choose the mentions parameters in more efficient way. Therefore, initial guesses for the velocity and temperature fields are taken in such a way that they satisfy the boundary conditions given in Eq. (9). And we choose linear operator specified in Eq. (13) that must satisfy the properties given in Eq. (14).(12)

subject to the properties (13)

where (i = 1–5) are the constants.

The deformation problems subjected to zeroth order(14)(15)(16)

If p [0,1] indicates the embedding parameter, and the non-zero auxiliary parameters then the nonlinear differential operators and are given by (17)(18)

We have for p = 0 and p = 1 the following equations(19)

It is noticed that when p varies from 0 to 1 then and approach from to and The series of and through Taylor's expansion are chosen convergent for p = 1 and thus(20)(21)

The resulting problems at order can be presented in the following forms (22)(23)(24)(25)

The general solutions comprising the special solutions are(26)(27)

Convergence of the homotopy solutions

It is now a well established argument that the convergence of series solutions (22) and (23) depends upon the auxiliary parameters . The admissible range of values of and (for some fixed values of parameters) lie along the line segment parallel to and axes. For example in Figs. 2 and 3 the permissible range of values of and are and respectively when . This series solutions converge for the whole region of when −0.9 and −0.8. Table 1. shows the convergence of HAM solution for different order of approximations. It is clear from this table that order of approximations are sufficient for convergent solutions up to six decimal place.

Table 1. Convergence of series solutions for different order of approximations when α = π/4, β = 0.5, Г = 0.2, R = 0.2,  = 0.6, G = 0.3, Pr = 1.0, A = B = 0.1, h–f = −0.8 and h–e = −0.7.

Results and Discussion

This section examines the effects of different physical parameters on the velocity and temperature fields. Hence Figs. (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) are plotted. Fig. 4 elucidates the behavior of inclination angle on the velocity and the boundary layer thickness. 0 shows the corresponding velocity profiles in the case of a vertical sheet for which the fluid experiences the maximum gravitational force. On the other hand when changes from 0 to i.e. when the sheet moves from vertical to horizontal direction, the strength of buoyancy force decreases and consequently the velocity and the boundary layer thickness decrease. Fig. 5 indicates that velocity field is an increasing function of . This is because a larger value of accompanies a stronger buoyancy force which leads to an increase in the component of velocity. The boundary layer thickness also increases with an increase in Variation in with an increase in can be seen from Fig. 6. It is noticed that decreases and boundary layer thins when is increased. Influence of unsteady parameter on the velocity field is displayed in Fig. 7. Increasing values of indicates smaller stretching rate in the x - direction which eventually decreases the boundary layer thickness. Interestingly the velocity increases by increasing at sufficiently large distance from the sheet. Variation in the x-component of velocity with an increase in the fluid parameter can be described from Fig. 8. In accordance with Mushtaq et al. [25], the velocity field increases with an increase in .

Radiation effects on the velocity and temperature distributions are perceived from Figs. 9 and 10. An increase in R enhances the heat flux from the sheet which gives rise to the fluid's velocity and temperature. Wall slope of the temperature function therefore increases with an increase in R. Fig. 11 portrays the effect of Prandtl number on the thermal boundary layer. From the definition of given in Eq. (10), it is obvious that increasing values of decreases conduction and enhances pure convection or the transfer of heat through unit area. That is why temperature and the thermal boundary layer thickness decrease with an increase in . This reduction in the thermal boundary layer accompanies a larger heat transfer rate from the sheet. Temperature profiles for different values of are shown in Fig. 12. It is seen that temperature is an increasing function of . Fig. 13 indicates that an increase in the strength of buoyancy force due to temperature gradient decreases the temperature and the thermal boundary layer thickness. Influence of heat source/sink parameters on the thermal boundary layer are presented in Figs. 14 and 15. As expected the larger heat source (corresponding to A>0 and B>0) rises the fluid's temperature above the sheet. While the non-uniform heat sink corresponding to A<0 and B<0 can contribute in quenching the heat from stretching sheet effectively. Fig. 16 depicts that temperature is a decreasing function of the unsteady parameter .

Table 2 shows comparison of present work with Tsai et al. in a special case. A very good agreement is found between the results of wall temperature gradient. Table 3 shows the effect of embedded parameters on heat transfer characteristics at the wall . Since in the present case the sheet is hotter than the fluid i.e thus heat flows from the sheet to the fluid and hence is negative. From this table we observe that with an increase in , and R the wall heat transfer rate decreases. However it increases when and are increased.

Table 2. Comparison between numerical solution Tsai et. al. [7] and HAM solution in a special case when

Table 3. Values of heat transfer characteristics at wall for different emerging parameters when h–f = −0.8 and h–θ  = −0.7.


This article addressed the radiation effects in the unsteady boundary layer flow of Powell-Eyring fluid past an unsteady inclined stretching sheet with non-uniform heat source/sink. Homotopy analysis method (HAM) was used to obtain approximate analytic solutions of the governing nonlinear problem. The important findings are listed below.

  1. The strength of gravitational force can be varied by changing the inclination angle which the sheet makes with the vertical direction. The velocity decreases with an increase in
  2. Velocity field and temperature are decreasing function of the unsteady parameter
  3. Velocity increases and temperature decreases when the fluid parameter is increased.
  4. Increase in the radiation parameter R enhances the heat flux from the plate which increases the fluid's velocity and temperature.
  5. The analysis for the case of viscous fluid can be obtained by choosing Further the results for horizontal stretching sheet are achieved for

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TH SA MM AA. Performed the experiments: TH SA MM AA. Analyzed the data: TH SA MM AA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TH SA MM AA. Wrote the paper: TH SA MM AA.


  1. 1. Wang CY (1990) Liquid film on an unsteady stretching surface. Q. Appl. Math 48: 601–10.
  2. 2. Andersson HI, Aarseth JB, Dandapat BS (1996) Heat transfer in a liquid film on an unsteady stretching surface. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 62: 1–8.
  3. 3. Elbashbeshy EMA, Bazid MAA (2004) Heat transfer over an unsteady stretching surface. Heat Mass Transfer 41: 1–4.
  4. 4. Ishak A, Nazar R, Pop I (2009) Boundary layer flow and heat transfer over an unsteady stretching vertical surface. Meccanica 44: 369–75.
  5. 5. Abd El-Aziz M (2009) Radiation effect on the flow and heat transfer over an unsteady stretching sheet. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 36: 521–524.
  6. 6. Shateyi S, Motsa SS Thermal radiation effects on heat and mass transfer over an unsteady stretching surface. Mathem. Prob. Eng. DOI 10.1155/2009/965603.
  7. 7. Tsai R, Huang KH, Huang JS (2008) Flow and heat transfer over an unsteady stretching surface with non-uniform heat source. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 35: 1340–1343.
  8. 8. Mukhopadhyay S (2009) Unsteady boundary layer flow and heat transfer past a porous stretching sheet in presence of variable viscosity and thermal diffusivity. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 52: 5213–5217.
  9. 9. Hayat T, Mustafa M (2010) Influence of thermal radiation on the unsteady mixed convection flow of a Jeffrey fluid over a stretching sheet. Z. Naturforsch 65a: 711–719.
  10. 10. Hayat T, Mustafa M, Hendi AA (2011) Time-dependent three-dimensional flow and mass transfer of elastico-viscous fluid over unsteady stretching sheet. Appl. Math. Mech 32: 167–178.
  11. 11. Mukhopadhyay S (2013) Effects of thermal radiation and variable fluid viscosity on stagnation point flow past a porous stretching sheet. Meccan 48: 1717–1730.
  12. 12. Bhattacharyya K (2013) MHD stagnation-point flow of Casson fluid and heat Transfer over a stretching sheet with thermal radiation. J. Thermodyn. DOI:
  13. 13. Yang X-J, Baleanu D (2013) Fractal heat conduction problem solved by local fractional variation iteration method. Thermal Sci 17: 625–628.
  14. 14. Yang Ali-Min, Cattani C, Zhang Ce, Xie G, Yang X-J (2014) Local Fractional Fourier Series Solutions for Non-homogeneous Heat Equations Arising in Fractal Heat Flow with Local Fractional Derivative. Advan. Mech. Eng 2014: 5.
  15. 15. Harris J (1977) Rheology and non-Newtonian flow, Longman.
  16. 16. Bird RB, Curtiss CF, Armstrong RC, Hassager O (1987) Dynamics of polymeric liquids. Wiley.
  17. 17. Powell RE, Eyring H (1944) Nature, London.
  18. 18. Eldabe NTM, Hassan AA, Mohamed MAA (2003) Effect of couple stresses on the MHD of a non-Newtonian unsteady flow between two parallel porous plates. Z. Naturforsch 58a: 204–210.
  19. 19. Zueco J, Beg OA (2009) Network numerical simulation applied to pulsatile non-Newtonian flow through a channel with couple stress and wall mass effects. Int. J. Appl. Math. and Mech 5: 1–16.
  20. 20. Islam S, Shah A, Zhou CY, Ali I (2009) Homotopy perturbation analysis of slider bearing with Powell-Eyring fluid. Z. Angew. Math. Phys 60: 1178–1193.
  21. 21. Patel M, Timol MG (2009) Numerical treatment of Powell—Eyring fluid flow using method of satisfaction of asymptotic boundary conditions. Appl. Num. Math 59: 2584–2592.
  22. 22. Hayat T, Iqbal Z, Qasim M, Obaidat S (2012) Steady flow of an EyringPowell fluid over a moving surface with convective boundary conditions. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 55: 1817–1822.
  23. 23. Mushtaq A, Mustafa M, Hayat T, Rahi M, Alsaedi A (2013) Exponentially stretching sheet in a Powell-Eyring fluid: Numerical and series solutions. Z. Naturforsch 68a: 791–798.
  24. 24. Khader MM, Megahed AM (2013) Numerical studies for flow and heat transfer of the Powell-Eyring fluid thin film over an unsteady stretching sheet with internal heat generation using the chebyshev finite difference method. J. Applied Mechanics Technical Phys 54: 440–450.
  25. 25. Zaman H (2013) Unsteady Incompressible Couette Flow Problem for the Eyring-Powell Model with Porous Walls. American J. Computational Math 3: 313–325.
  26. 26. Liao S (2010) An optimal homotopy-analysis approach for strongly nonlinear differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Num. Simul 15: 2003–2016.
  27. 27. Abbasbandy S, Shivanian E, Vajravelu K (2011) Mathematical properties of ħ-curve in the frame work of the homotopy analysis method. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 16: 4268–4275.
  28. 28. Hashmi MM, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2012) On the analytic solutions for squeezing flow of nanofluid between parallel disks. Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control 17: 418–430.
  29. 29. Mustafa M, Hina S, Hayat T, Ahmad B (2013) Influence of induced magnetic field on the peristaltic flow of nanofluid. Meccan. DOI:
  30. 30. Mustafa M, Farooq MA, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2013) Numerical and series solutions for stagnation-point flow of nanofluid over an exponentially stretching sheet. PLoS ONE. DOI:
  31. 31. Mustafa M, Hayat T, Obaidat S (2013) Boundary layer flow of a nanofluid over an exponentially stretching sheet with convective boundary conditions. Int. J. Num. Meth. Heat & Fluid Flow 23: 945–959.
  32. 32. Rashidi MM, Abelman S, Mehr FN (2013) Entropy generation in steady MHD flow due to a rotating disk in a nanofluid. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 62: 515–525.
  33. 33. Rashidi MM, Bég OA, Kavyani N, Islam MN Entropy generation in hydromagnetic convective Von Karman swirling flow: Homotopy Analysis. Int. J. Applied Math. Mech, (In press).
  34. 34. Turkyilmazoglu M, Pop I (2013) Heat and mass transfer of unsteady natural convection flow of some nanofluids past a vertical infinite flat plate with radiation effect. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 59: 167–171.
  35. 35. Turkyilmazoglu M, Pop I (2013) Exact analytical solutions for the flow and heat transfer near the stagnation point on a stretching/shrinking sheet in a Jeffrey fluid. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 57: 82–88.
  36. 36. Brewster MQ (1972) Thermal radiative transfer properties. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  37. 37. Sparrow EM, Cess RD (1978) Radiation heat transfer, Hemisphere, Washington.
  38. 38. Raptis A (1998) Radiation and free convection flow through a porous medium. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 25: 289–295.
  39. 39. Rahman MM, Uddin MJ, Aziz A (2009) Effect of variable electrical conductivity and non-uniform heat source (or sink) on convective micropalor fluid flow along an inclined flat plate with surface heat flux. Int. J. Therm. Sci 48: 2331–2340.
  40. 40. Nandeppanavar MM, Vajravelu K, Abel MS, Ng C (2011) Heat transfer over a nonlinearly stretching sheet with non-uniform heat source and variable wall temperature. Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer 54: 4960–4965.