Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Patterns of Gene Expression Associated with Pten Deficiency in the Developing Inner Ear

  • Hyung Jin Kim,

    Affiliation Division of Intractable Diseases, Center for Biomedical Sciences, National Institute of Health, Chungcheongbuk-do, South Korea

  • Jihee Ryu,

    Affiliation Division of Intractable Diseases, Center for Biomedical Sciences, National Institute of Health, Chungcheongbuk-do, South Korea

  • Hae-Mi Woo,

    Affiliation Division of Intractable Diseases, Center for Biomedical Sciences, National Institute of Health, Chungcheongbuk-do, South Korea

  • Samuel Sunghwan Cho,

    Affiliation Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

  • Min Kyung Sung,

    Affiliation Korean BioInformation Center (KOBIC), Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, South Korea

  • Sang Cheol Kim,

    Affiliation Korean BioInformation Center (KOBIC), Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, South Korea

  • Mi-Hyun Park,

    Affiliation Division of Intractable Diseases, Center for Biomedical Sciences, National Institute of Health, Chungcheongbuk-do, South Korea

  • Taesung Park,

    Affiliations Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

  • Soo Kyung Koo

    Affiliation Division of Intractable Diseases, Center for Biomedical Sciences, National Institute of Health, Chungcheongbuk-do, South Korea

Patterns of Gene Expression Associated with Pten Deficiency in the Developing Inner Ear

  • Hyung Jin Kim, 
  • Jihee Ryu, 
  • Hae-Mi Woo, 
  • Samuel Sunghwan Cho, 
  • Min Kyung Sung, 
  • Sang Cheol Kim, 
  • Mi-Hyun Park, 
  • Taesung Park, 
  • Soo Kyung Koo


In inner ear development, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is necessary for neuronal maintenance, such as neuronal survival and accurate nerve innervations of hair cells. We previously reported that Pten conditional knockout (cKO) mice exhibited disorganized fasciculus with neuronal apoptosis in spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs). To better understand the genes and signaling networks related to auditory neuron maintenance, we compared the profiles of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using microarray analysis of the inner ear in E14.5 Pten cKO and wild-type mice. We identified 46 statistically significant transcripts using significance analysis of microarrays, with the false-discovery rate set at 0%. Among the DEGs, expression levels of candidate genes and expression domains were validated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and in situ hybridization, respectively. Ingenuity pathway analysis using DEGs identified significant signaling networks associated with apoptosis, cellular movement, and axon guidance (i.e., secreted phosphoprotein 1 (Spp1)-mediated cellular movement and regulator of G-protein signaling 4 (Rgs4)-mediated axon guidance). This result was consistent with the phenotypic defects of SGNs in Pten cKO mice (e.g., neuronal apoptosis, abnormal migration, and irregular nerve fiber patterns of SGNs). From this study, we suggest two key regulatory signaling networks mediated by Spp1 and Rgs4, which may play potential roles in neuronal differentiation of developing auditory neurons.


The inner ear is derived from a simple patch of otic placode adjacent to the hind brain. After formation of the otic cup and vesicle, otic neuroblasts delaminate from the otic epithelium around E9.0 by initiating neurogenic gene-mediated programs, such as neurogenin1. These neural precursors generate otic neurons, which are also known as cochleovestibular ganglion (CVG) cells [1]. After CVG complexes are separated into the spiral and vestibular ganglion, developing spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) promote neuronal outgrowth between E12.5 and E15.5, and regulate peripheral axon guidance to synapse with their target hair cells [2], [3]. This process of auditory neurogenesis depends on well-organized complex signaling networks comprised of trophic factors such as phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/Akt and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), as well as morphogens, including the Wnt family, cell adhesion molecules and transcriptional regulators [4][8]. Several studies of knockout mice and in vitro cultures have provided evidence of their important roles in neural survival, neurite outgrowth and nerve innervations to target hair cells of the inner ear [6], [9], [10]. However, spatiotemporal gene expression and the complex molecular networks in neuronal development in the inner ear are not yet fully understood.

Phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN), a lipid phosphatase, is negatively regulated by PI3K signaling and contributes to cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation and migration [11][14]. Many studies have investigated the function of Pten loss in mice, which causes profound alterations in the regulation of cellular maintenance in a cell-type specific manner in various organs [15][17]. Recently, we characterized the phenotype of inner-ear-specific Pten conditional knockout (cKO) mice, which demonstrated abnormal phenotypes (e.g., ectopic hair cells in the cochlear sensory epithelium and neuronal defects) [15]. In particular, mouse inner ear lacking Pten had neuronal deficits such as disorganized nerve fibers with apoptosis of spiral ganglion. Thus, Pten is believed to be one of the functional regulators that maintain differentiation of SGNs during inner ear development.

Understanding of the signaling networks during inner ear development may provide molecular information regarding the pathways underlying the maintenance of sensory cells and neurons to prevent hearing impairment. Microarray analysis may provide information that allows prediction of novel signaling networks by analyzing the spatiotemporal pattern of gene expression during inner ear neurogenesis [18][20]. Thus, analysis of changes in gene expression profiles and signaling networks obtained from Pten mutants may identify potential novel targets and regulatory mechanisms associated with neuronal maintenance during inner ear development. In this study, we explored otic neuron-specific targets of Pten signaling to further understand its function in the development of SGNs and the causes of aberrant neural differentiation associated with the Pten-deficient inner ear. Our results suggest that secreted phosphoprotein 1 (Spp1) and G-protein signaling 4 (Rgs4)-mediated networks maintain the neuronal differentiation underlying spiral ganglion development in Pten-deficient mice.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

All mouse procedures were performed according to the guidelines for the use of laboratory animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC-018-12-1A).

Tissue dissection and RNA extraction

The generation and characterization of inner ear-specific Pten cKO (Pax2Cre/+; PtenloxP/loxP) and wild-type (PtenloxP/+ or PtenloxP/loxP) mice was described previously [15]. Pten cKO and littermate wild-type mice were used on E14.5 (60 embryos from each group). The entire inner ear tissues including the cochlea and vestibule, as well as the surrounding otic capsule, were micro-dissected in sterile, chilled phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) under a stereomicroscope (Olympus SZ61, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Three independent pools of inner ear tissues from each group were homogenized with a tissue grinder (Kimble Chase, Vineland, NJ, USA). Total RNA from three independent pools of inner ears was extracted with TRIzol following the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). To eliminate DNA contamination, total RNA was treated with DNase I (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) before use in the microarray analysis or real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The concentration and purity of extracted total RNA were measured using both the spectrophotometric method at 260 and 280 nm, and RNA electrophoresis.

Microarray data analysis

Gene expression profiles were generated using the Illumina MouseRef-8 version 2.0 Expression BeadChip (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Three biological replicates (three chips for wild-type samples and three chips for Pten cKO samples) were performed for microarray hybridization experiments. Biotinylated cRNA was prepared from 550 ng total RNA using the Illumina TotalPrep RNA Amplification kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). Following fragmentation, 750 ng of cRNA was hybridized to the Illumina MouseRef-8 version 2.0 Expression Beadchip according to the manufacturer's instructions. Array chips were scanned using the Illumina Bead Array Reader Confocal scanner. Microarray data were analyzed using Illumina GenomeStudio Gene expression Module (version 1.5.4) and deposited in NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus Database (GEO, (#GSE49562) in agreement with the MIAME requirements. The significance analysis microarrays (SAM) software was used with the false-discovery rate (FDR) set at 0 or 0.05. SAM (FDR = 0) allowed the identification of genes whose expression varied significantly between the wild-type and Pten cKO groups [21]. Hierarchical clustering was carried out using the R software [22]. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA; Ingenuity Systems, tools were used to analyze possible functional relationships between selected differentially expressed genes (DEGs).

Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to validate the microarray data. Each pooled RNA sample was converted to cDNA using random hexanucleotide primers with a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The list of PCR primer sequences for selected genes is provided in Table S1. 18S rRNA was used as an endogenous control for normalization. The PCR reaction was performed in quadruplicate using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix and an ABI 7500 machine with the version 2.0.6 software under the following conditions (Applied Biosystems): denaturation at 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 1 min). The relative expression level of each target gene in an experimental sample compared with the wild-type sample was analyzed using SDS Relative Quantification (RQ) Manager software as described by the manufacturer (Applied Biosystems). RQ levels were calculated using the comparative CT (2−ΔΔCT) method [23]. Relationships between the microarray data and qRT-PCR were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) from GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software,

In Situ hybridization

For E14.5 embryos, pregnant mice were sacrificed by decapitation and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight at 4°C, dehydrated in 30% sucrose in PBS overnight at 4°C, placed in embedding medium (Tissue Tek OCT compound; Torrance, CA, USA), and stored at −80°C until use. Tissues were sectioned at 10-µm thickness for in situ hybridization, which was performed as described previously, with minor modifications [24]. At least three embryos were tested for each selected gene at E14.5. Sense RNA probes were also included as controls, which showed no signal in the inner ear. All primers for RNA probes for otoancorin (Otoa), β-tectorin (Tectb), parvalbumin (Pvalb), Spp1, and Rgs4 are listed in Table S1.

Results and Discussion

Identification of genes differentially expressed between wild-type and Pten cKO mice at E14.5

Recently, we reported that Pten cKO mice showed severe abnormalities in neuronal maintenance with increased production of hair cells during inner ear development [15]. To identify the changes caused by Pten deficiency-induced regulation of genes in the developing inner ear, we analyzed DEGs within inner ears at E14.5. Using SAM analysis, we identified a total of 46 transcripts with an FDR = 0 that significantly distinguished the wild-type and Pten cKO groups. Among the transcripts, 45 genes were upregulated and one was downregulated in Pten cKO mice, and are listed in Table 1. While the patterns of gene expression between Pten cKO and wild-type samples were highly similar according to pair-wise comparisons with correlation coefficients (data not shown), 46 DEGs were significantly selected, and their segregation was clearly shown by clustering analysis of a heat map (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Microarray analysis identifies novel Pten targets.

Heat maps for relative gene expression of interest (FDR = 0) obtained from three microarrays comparing Pten cKO to wild-type embryos. Green and red indicate decreased and increased expression, respectively, in Pten cKO mice.

Table 1. Differentially expressed genes in wild-type and Pten cKO mice at E14.5.

Validation of the microarray by quantitative RT-PCR

Among the DEGs, 16 candidate genes were selected to validate by qRT-PCR; the DEGs were chosen for either their fold changes (>1.5) and/or potential roles associated with inner ear development (Table 2). These genes included Tectb, Otoa, and Esrrb, the mutations of which are associated with hearing loss [25][30]. In addition, peptide YY (Pyy) and integrin beta 6 (Itgb6) were identified; these have not been previously reported in the mammalian inner ear. For all analyzed upregulated genes in Pten cKO compared to wild-type mice, the average fold change from the qRT-PCR results showed a significant correlation of gene expression changes, as revealed by the microarray data (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.876). This result indicates that changes in the expression of selected DEGs were validated by qRT-PCR while confirming the gene expression results obtained by microarray analysis.

In situ expression patterns for selected candidates

To confirm the changes in expression of DEGs in the inner ear, we performed in situ hybridization for the selected DEGs, i.e., Otoa, Tectb, Pvalb, Spp1, and Rgs4 (Figs. S1 and 2). Higher expression of Otoa and Tectb was observed in the cochlea of Pten cKO mice than in the cochlea of wild-type mice (Fig. S1A–D). Many studies have reported that mutations in Otoa and Tectb cause hearing loss [25], [26], [28][30]. Inner ear-specific Otoa is reportedly expressed on the surface of the spiral limbus and greater epithelial ridge in the cochlea. Mutant mice lacking Otoa showed that otoancorin is required for the attachment of the tectorial membrane (TM) to the surface of the spiral limbus [28], [29]. The TM is composed of collagen proteins, and other non-collagen proteins such as α-tectorin and β-tectorin, and all essential for auditory function. Tectb-null mutant mice develop deafness as well as mutation of Tecta [30], [31]. Further functional characterization is needed to determine whether a Pten deficiency-induced upregulated pattern of Otoa and Tectb expression leads to abnormal function of the TM.

In particular, changed expression levels of several genes were detected in the Pten-deficient SGNs; i.e., Pvalb, Spp1, and Rgs4. We found that the levels of Pvalb, a neuronal marker [32], were downregulated (Fig. S1E, F). Reduced levels of Pvalb expression may be explained by the loss of Pvalb-expressing neurons in Pten-deficient mice. We observed increased levels of Spp1 (also known as osteopontin, Opn) and Rgs4 expression in Pten-deficient SGNs compared to the wild-type (Fig. 2). In the cochlea and vestibular dark cells, Spp1 may be responsible for regulation of ions in the inner ear fluid. The role of Spp1 in SGNs may be associated with regulation of nitric oxide production, which is considered to be associated with auditory neurotransmission in adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-induced Ca2+ signaling [33], [34]. Functionally, several lines of evidence have shown that Spp1 may play a role in neurodegeneration [35], [36]. Upregulation of SPP1 was detected in lesions or within the cerebral or spinal fluid in patients with neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Spp1-knockout mice showed reduced neurodegeneration induced by MPTP [37]. Following crush injury to the optic nerve, strongly expressed Spp1 by macrophages may have inhibitory effects on axon growth [38]. Therefore, inhibition of axon outgrowth described in Pten cKO mice (i.e., shortened length of spiral ganglion toward the modiolus) may be at least partly explained by the dysregulation of Spp1 expression in SGNs.

Figure 2. Expression patterns of Spp1 and Rgs4 during inner ear development.

Expression levels of Spp1 (A, B) and Rgs4 (C, D) were examined by in situ hybridization at E14.5. Both Spp1 and Rgs4 expression were observed in SGNs. Consistent with the microarray results, expression levels of Spp1 and Rgs4 were increased in the Pten cKO compared to wild-type mice. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Inhibitory regulators of G protein signaling 4 (RGS4), a schizophrenia susceptibility gene, is one of the RGS that includes the Gαi/o and Gαq families and is required for modulation of neurotransmission in the nervous system [39], [40]. In mice, the expression of Rgs4 is observed in peripheral and central neuronal precursors [41], [42]. In the chicken spinal cord, Rgs4 has been suggested to play a role in neuronal differentiation in cooperation with paired-like homeodomain protein PHOX2b and the basic helix-loop-helix protein MASH1 [41]. Thus, our data suggest that the increased expression of Rgs4 in the Pten-deficient SGNs compared to wild-type mice may play a role in neurogenesis.

Network analysis

To examine signaling networks during neuronal maintenance in the Pten-deficient inner ear, networks were subjected to IPA analysis with 82 DEGs (FDR<0.05) (Fig. 3). IPA analysis identified significant biological functions, including auditory disease, cell death and survival, and cellular movement (data not shown). Auditory diseases included Otoa, Tectb, estrogen-related receptor beta (Esrrb), and solute carrier family 26 member 4 (Slc26A4), which may explain the functional defects of the developing inner ear. Cell death and survival-related genes were enriched, including phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B beta2 (Ppp2r2b), S100 calcium-binding protein A8 (S100A8), S100A9, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (Igfbp7), and cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (Camp).

Figure 3. Functional network analysis associated with Pten-deficient inner ear.

Network analysis using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software was conducted using selected genes that were differentially expressed and their close relationships. IPA results show two core networks consisted of Spp1-(red line) and Rgs4-associated interactions (blue line). Genes that were differentially expressed are indicated in pink, and predicted interacting genes (not contained in the microarray data) are indicated in white. Axon guidance signaling pathway-related genes are outlined in magenta. Molecular interactions between connected genes represent direct (solid line) or indirect (dotted line) functional relationships based on the IPA database. Green indicates negative fold changes, while red denotes positive fold changes, according to color intensity.

In particular, cellular movement included Spp1-mediated cell adhesion or migration, which was connected to S100a8, S100a9, Integrin, focal adhesion kinase (Fak), lipocalin2 (Lcn2), Camp, and FMS-related tyrosine kinase 1 (Flt1). The chemoattractant activity of SPP1 has been reported in various cell types, some of which interact with integrins such as ανβ3 [43][45]. Dysregulated levels of SPP1 have been implicated in cellular migration; i.e., SPP1 produced by macrophages and microglia induces lateral migration of neuroblasts after focal cerebral ischemia [46]. Furthermore, SPP1 directly induces migration of human lung cancer cells (A549cells) through activation of ανβ3 integrins, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), p85 subunit of PI3K, serin 473 of AKT and ERK, and the NF-κB-dependent signaling pathway [47]. In our recent study, we detected abnormal neuronal migration with increases in Akt phosphorylation at the Ser473 residue in SGNs of Pten cKO mice. Taken together, our results suggest that elevation of Spp1 produced by SGNs may affect neuronal cell movement in Pten-deficient mice compared with wild-type mice. Further experiments are required to elucidate the mechanism by which altered Spp1 expression induces disturbance of neuronal migration through Akt activation in SGNs.

Regarding the significance of the canonical pathway (data not shown), IPA identified that the Gαq signaling pathway (p<0.05) is associated with Rgs4 (Fig. 3). Gαq signaling is related to axon outgrowth, which is supported by the results from RGS4 mutant models [48], [49]. Although Rgs4-deficient mice exhibit a normal neuronal phenotype, their behavioral abnormality suggests defects in axonogenesis [42]. In zebrafish, an rgs4−/− mutant showed defects in motility and axonogenesis and attenuation of the phosphorylated Akt1 level in the spinal cord [49]. This evidence indicates a novel role for rgs4 in regulating Akt1-mediated axonogenesis. We suggest that increased expression of Rgs4 in the Pten-deficient SGNs, compared with the wild-type, may affect axon outgrowth regulation functionally mediated by the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway due to the increased levels of phosphorylated Akt in SGNs of Pten cKO mice. While the biological function of the Rgs4-Akt signaling pathway in the developing SGNs is not fully understood, we suggest that Rgs4-Akt-mediated signaling networks may be associated with neuronal defects in the Pten-deficient SGNs (e.g., abnormal path-finding of neurites and irregularly gathered radial bundles).

Finally, IPA analysis revealed two core gene (Spp1; red line and Rgs4; blue line)-mediated networks in SGNs of the Pten-deficient inner ear (Fig. 3). These networks were also associated with the axonal guidance signaling pathway, which includes several mediators, such as G protein, frizzled homolog 6 (Drosophila) (Fzd6), protein kinase C (Pkc), Akt, PI3K, Erk1/2, Fak, and Pkc theta (Prkcq). Therefore, we suggest that partially modulated functions of the axonal guidance signaling pathway are involved in axonal development in Pten cKO mice [50][53].


In this study, we investigated profiles of significantly differentially expressed transcripts and their respective networks associated with Pten deficiency in the developing inner ear at E14.5. We suggest the presence of core signaling networks mediated by upregulated expression of Spp1 and Rgs4, which also include several key factors associated with apoptosis, cellular movement, and axon guidance. This may be explained in terms of phenotypic defects implicated in neuronal differentiation of Pten-deficient SGNs during inner ear development (e.g., neuronal apoptosis, shortened axon length, abnormal cell movement, and irregular neurite path-finding of SGNs). Our gene expression profiles will facilitate understanding of the neuronal maintenance in developing spiral ganglion. However, the functional roles of these candidates should be examined in future studies.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Expression patterns of Otoa, Tectb, and Pvalb during inner ear development at E14.5. Expression levels of Otoa (A, B), Tectb (C, D), and Pvalb (E, F) were determined by in situ hybridization at E14.5. Otoa transcripts were identified on the surface of the spiral limbus and greater epithelial ridge in the cochlea (A, B). Expression domains of Tectb were observed in the sensory epithelium of the cochlea (C, D). The neuronal marker Pvalb was expressed in SGNs (E, F). Consistent with the microarray data, the expression levels of Otoa (B) and Tectb (D) were higher, and that of Pvalb (F) was lower, in Pten cKO mice than in wild-type mice. Scale bars: 100 µm.


Table S1.

Primer sets for qRT-PCR and in situ hybridization probe.



This research was assisted in part by the Korean BioInformation Center (KOBIC) research support program.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: HJK SKK. Performed the experiments: HJK JR HMW. Analyzed the data: HJK SSC MKS TP SKK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MKS SCK MHP. Wrote the paper: HJK SKK.


  1. 1. Coate TM, Kelley MW (2013) Making connections in the inner ear: Recent insights into the development of spiral ganglion neurons and their connectivity with sensory hair cells. Semin Cell Dev Biol 24: 460–469.
  2. 2. Bell D, Streit A, Gorospe I, Varela-Nieto I, Alsina B, et al. (2008) Spatial and temporal segregation of auditory and vestibular neurons in the otic placode. Dev Biol 322: 109–120.
  3. 3. Appler JM, Goodrich LV (2011) Connecting the ear to the brain: Molecular mechanisms of auditory circuit assembly. Prog Neurobiol 93: 488–508.
  4. 4. Sanchez-Calderon H, Milo M, Leon Y, Varela-Nieto I (2007) A network of growth and transcription factors controls neuronal differentiation and survival in the developing ear. Int J Dev Biol 51: 557–570.
  5. 5. Aburto MR, Magarinos M, Leon Y, Varela-Nieto I, Sanchez-Calderon H (2012) AKT signaling mediates IGF-I survival actions on otic neural progenitors. PLoS One 7: e30790.
  6. 6. Camarero G, Villar MA, Contreras J, Fernandez-Moreno C, Pichel JG, et al. (2002) Cochlear abnormalities in insulin-like growth factor-1 mouse mutants. Hear Res 170: 2–11.
  7. 7. Charron F, Tessier-Lavigne M (2007) The Hedgehog, TGF-beta/BMP and Wnt families of morphogens in axon guidance. Adv Exp Med Biol 621: 116–133.
  8. 8. Salinas PC (2012) Wnt signaling in the vertebrate central nervous system: from axon guidance to synaptic function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4..
  9. 9. Yang T, Kersigo J, Jahan I, Pan N, Fritzsch B (2011) The molecular basis of making spiral ganglion neurons and connecting them to hair cells of the organ of Corti. Hear Res 278: 21–33.
  10. 10. Appler JM, Lu CC, Druckenbrod NR, Yu WM, Koundakjian EJ, et al. (2013) Gata3 is a critical regulator of cochlear wiring. J Neurosci 33: 3679–3691.
  11. 11. Myers MP, Pass I, Batty IH, Van der Kaay J, Stolarov JP, et al. (1998) The lipid phosphatase activity of PTEN is critical for its tumor supressor function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 13513–13518.
  12. 12. Cantley LC, Neel BG (1999) New insights into tumor suppression: PTEN suppresses tumor formation by restraining the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 4240–4245.
  13. 13. Groszer M, Erickson R, Scripture-Adams DD, Lesche R, Trumpp A, et al. (2001) Negative regulation of neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation by the Pten tumor suppressor gene in vivo. Science 294: 2186–2189.
  14. 14. Li L, Liu F, Salmonsen RA, Turner TK, Litofsky NS, et al. (2002) PTEN in neural precursor cells: regulation of migration, apoptosis, and proliferation. Mol Cell Neurosci 20: 21–29.
  15. 15. Kim HJ, Woo HM, Ryu J, Bok J, Kim JW, et al. (2013) Conditional deletion of pten leads to defects in nerve innervation and neuronal survival in inner ear development. PLoS One 8: e55609.
  16. 16. Kazdoba TM, Sunnen CN, Crowell B, Lee GH, Anderson AE, et al. (2012) Development and characterization of NEX- Pten, a novel forebrain excitatory neuron-specific knockout mouse. Dev Neurosci 34: 198–209.
  17. 17. Marino S, Krimpenfort P, Leung C, van der Korput HA, Trapman J, et al. (2002) PTEN is essential for cell migration but not for fate determination and tumourigenesis in the cerebellum. Development 129: 3513–3522.
  18. 18. Lu CC, Appler JM, Houseman EA, Goodrich LV (2011) Developmental profiling of spiral ganglion neurons reveals insights into auditory circuit assembly. J Neurosci 31: 10903–10918.
  19. 19. Sanchez-Calderon H, Rodriguez-de la Rosa L, Milo M, Pichel JG, Holley M, et al. (2010) RNA microarray analysis in prenatal mouse cochlea reveals novel IGF-I target genes: implication of MEF2 and FOXM1 transcription factors. PLoS One 5: e8699.
  20. 20. Milo M, Cacciabue-Rivolta D, Kneebone A, Van Doorninck H, Johnson C, et al. (2009) Genomic analysis of the function of the transcription factor gata3 during development of the mammalian inner ear. PLoS One 4: e7144.
  21. 21. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 5116–5121.
  22. 22. Dudoit S, Gentleman RC, Quackenbush J (2003) Open source software for the analysis of microarray data. Biotechniques Suppl: 45–51.
  23. 23. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402–408.
  24. 24. Morsli H, Choo D, Ryan A, Johnson R, Wu DK (1998) Development of the mouse inner ear and origin of its sensory organs. J Neurosci 18: 3327–3335.
  25. 25. Richardson GP, de Monvel JB, Petit C (2011) How the genetics of deafness illuminates auditory physiology. Annu Rev Physiol 73: 311–334.
  26. 26. Lee K, Chiu I, Santos-Cortez R, Basit S, Khan S, et al.. (2012) Novel OTOA mutations cause autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing impairment in Pakistani families. Clin Genet.
  27. 27. Ben Said M, Ayedi L, Mnejja M, Hakim B, Khalfallah A, et al. (2011) A novel missense mutation in the ESRRB gene causes DFNB35 hearing loss in a Tunisian family. Eur J Med Genet 54: e535–541.
  28. 28. Zwaenepoel I, Mustapha M, Leibovici M, Verpy E, Goodyear R, et al. (2002) Otoancorin, an inner ear protein restricted to the interface between the apical surface of sensory epithelia and their overlying acellular gels, is defective in autosomal recessive deafness DFNB22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 6240–6245.
  29. 29. Lukashkin AN, Legan PK, Weddell TD, Lukashkina VA, Goodyear RJ, et al. (2012) A mouse model for human deafness DFNB22 reveals that hearing impairment is due to a loss of inner hair cell stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 19351–19356.
  30. 30. Ghaffari R, Aranyosi AJ, Richardson GP, Freeman DM (2010) Tectorial membrane travelling waves underlie abnormal hearing in Tectb mutant mice. Nat Commun 1: 96.
  31. 31. Russell IJ, Legan PK, Lukashkina VA, Lukashkin AN, Goodyear RJ, et al. (2007) Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane. Nat Neurosci 10: 215–223.
  32. 32. Huang EJ, Liu W, Fritzsch B, Bianchi LM, Reichardt LF, et al. (2001) Brn3a is a transcriptional regulator of soma size, target field innervation and axon pathfinding of inner ear sensory neurons. Development 128: 2421–2432.
  33. 33. Sakagami M (2000) Role of osteopontin in the rodent inner ear as revealed by in situ hybridization. Med Electron Microsc 33: 3–10.
  34. 34. Davis RL, Lopez CA, Mou K (1995) Expression of osteopontin in the inner ear. Ann N Y Acad Sci 760: 279–295.
  35. 35. Comi C, Carecchio M, Chiocchetti A, Nicola S, Galimberti D, et al. (2010) Osteopontin is increased in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer's disease and its levels correlate with cognitive decline. J Alzheimers Dis 19: 1143–1148.
  36. 36. Iczkiewicz J, Jackson MJ, Smith LA, Rose S, Jenner P (2006) Osteopontin expression in substantia nigra in MPTP-treated primates and in Parkinson's disease. Brain Res 1118: 239–250.
  37. 37. Maetzler W, Berg D, Schalamberidze N, Melms A, Schott K, et al. (2007) Osteopontin is elevated in Parkinson's disease and its absence leads to reduced neurodegeneration in the MPTP model. Neurobiol Dis 25: 473–482.
  38. 38. Kury P, Zickler P, Stoll G, Hartung HP, Jander S (2005) Osteopontin, a macrophage-derived matricellular glycoprotein, inhibits axon outgrowth. Faseb j 19: 398–400.
  39. 39. Hains MD, Siderovski DP, Harden TK (2004) Application of RGS box proteins to evaluate G-protein selectivity in receptor-promoted signaling. Methods Enzymol 389: 71–88.
  40. 40. Ding J, Guzman JN, Tkatch T, Chen S, Goldberg JA, et al. (2006) RGS4-dependent attenuation of M4 autoreceptor function in striatal cholinergic interneurons following dopamine depletion. Nat Neurosci 9: 832–842.
  41. 41. Grillet N, Dubreuil V, Dufour HD, Brunet JF (2003) Dynamic expression of RGS4 in the developing nervous system and regulation by the neural type-specific transcription factor Phox2b. J Neurosci 23: 10613–10621.
  42. 42. Grillet N, Pattyn A, Contet C, Kieffer BL, Goridis C, et al. (2005) Generation and characterization of Rgs4 mutant mice. Mol Cell Biol 25: 4221–4228.
  43. 43. Mi Z, Guo H, Wai PY, Gao C, Kuo PC (2006) Integrin-linked kinase regulates osteopontin-dependent MMP-2 and uPA expression to convey metastatic function in murine mammary epithelial cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 27: 1134–1145.
  44. 44. Das R, Philip S, Mahabeleshwar GH, Bulbule A, Kundu GC (2005) Osteopontin: it's role in regulation of cell motility and nuclear factor kappa B-mediated urokinase type plasminogen activator expression. IUBMB Life 57: 441–447.
  45. 45. Wai PY, Kuo PC (2004) The role of Osteopontin in tumor metastasis. J Surg Res 121: 228–241.
  46. 46. Yan YP, Lang BT, Vemuganti R, Dempsey RJ (2009) Osteopontin is a mediator of the lateral migration of neuroblasts from the subventricular zone after focal cerebral ischemia. Neurochem Int 55: 826–832.
  47. 47. Fong YC, Liu SC, Huang CY, Li TM, Hsu SF, et al. (2009) Osteopontin increases lung cancer cells migration via activation of the alphavbeta3 integrin/FAK/Akt and NF-kappaB-dependent pathway. Lung Cancer 64: 263–270.
  48. 48. Katoh H, Aoki J, Yamaguchi Y, Kitano Y, Ichikawa A, et al. (1998) Constitutively active Galpha12, Galpha13, and Galphaq induce Rho-dependent neurite retraction through different signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 273: 28700–28707.
  49. 49. Cheng YC, Scotting PJ, Hsu LS, Lin SJ, Shih HY, et al. (2013) Zebrafish rgs4 is essential for motility and axonogenesis mediated by Akt signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci 70: 935–950.
  50. 50. Ratnaparkhi A, Banerjee S, Hasan G (2002) Altered levels of Gq activity modulate axonal pathfinding in Drosophila. J Neurosci 22: 4499–4508.
  51. 51. Aviles EC, Wilson NH, Stoeckli ET (2013) Sonic hedgehog and Wnt: antagonists in morphogenesis but collaborators in axon guidance. Front Cell Neurosci 7: 86.
  52. 52. Shah SM, Kang YJ, Christensen BL, Feng AS, Kollmar R (2009) Expression of Wnt receptors in adult spiral ganglion neurons: frizzled 9 localization at growth cones of regenerating neurites. Neuroscience 164: 478–487.
  53. 53. Stuebner S, Faus-Kessler T, Fischer T, Wurst W, Prakash N (2010) Fzd3 and Fzd6 deficiency results in a severe midbrain morphogenesis defect. Dev Dyn 239: 246–260.