Many (dietary) bitter compounds, e.g. flavonoids, activate bitter receptor hTAS2R39 in cell-based assays. Several flavonoids, amongst which some flavanones, are known not to activate this receptor. As certain flavanones are known to mask bitter taste sensorially, flavanones might act as bitter receptor antagonists. Fourteen flavanones were investigated for their potential to reduce activation of hTAS2R39 by epicatechin gallate (ECG), one of the main bitter compounds occurring in green tea. Three flavanones showed inhibitory behavior towards the activation of hTAS2R39 by ECG: 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone, 6,3′-dimethoxyflavanone, and 6-methoxyflavanone (in order of decreasing potency). The 6-methoxyflavanones also inhibited activation of hTAS2R14 (another bitter receptor activated by ECG), though to a lesser extent. Dose-response curves of ECG at various concentrations of the full antagonist 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone and wash-out experiments indicated reversible insurmountable antagonism. The same effect was observed for the structurally different agonist denatonium benzoate.
Citation: Roland WSU, Gouka RJ, Gruppen H, Driesse M, van Buren L, Smit G, et al. (2014) 6-Methoxyflavanones as Bitter Taste Receptor Blockers for hTAS2R39. PLoS ONE 9(4): e94451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094451
Editor: Johannes Reisert, Monell Chemical Senses Center, United States of America
Received: December 5, 2013; Accepted: March 16, 2014; Published: April 10, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Roland et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was financially supported by the Food & Nutrition Delta of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Netherlands (FND 08019, http://www.agentschapnl.nl/subsidies-regelingen/innovatieprogramma-food—nutrition). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors were asked to include amended statements of competing interests and financial disclosure that declare the affiliation of the companies Unilever and Valio. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Even though bitter taste can be appreciated in some food products, such as beer, coffee, dark chocolate and red wine , in most cases bitterness in food is unwanted and efforts are taken to reduce bitter taste . One approach for masking bitter taste is the use of so-called bitter receptor blockers, which inhibit the taste receptor activation caused by the bitter compound. On the human tongue, bitterness is perceived by human bitter taste receptors (hTAS2Rs, TAS2Rs or T2Rs). The in-vitro activation of these hTAS2Rs by bitter compounds has been studied intensively during the last decade. For 21 of the 25 the bitter receptors, an agonist, or in some cases dozens of agonists, have been identified , . On the contrary, bitter receptor antagonists are still quite rare.
The small molecule (4-(2,2,3-trimethylcyclopentyl)butanoic acid (or GIV 3727) has been reported as inhibitor of six bitter taste receptors . It was able to decrease the sensory perception of bitter aftertaste of the sweeteners acesulfame K and saccharin, as well as the activation of hTAS2R31 and hTAS2R43, the bitter receptors activated by these two compounds. Another compound, the decreased bitter receptor activation of which could be linked to sensory perception, was p-(dipropylsulfamyl)benzoic acid (better known as probenecid). It has been reported to inhibit activation of hTAS2R16, hTAS2R38, and hTAS2R43, and to suppress the bitter taste perception of salicin in sensory tests . It has been reported that a compound can act as an agonist towards one subset of bitter receptors, whereas it can act as an antagonist towards another subset of bitter receptors. This has been described for the two sesquiterpene lactones 3β-hydroxydihydrocostunolide (3HDC) and 3β-hydroxypelenolide (3HP) .
Recently, a pharmacophore model for maskers of the bitter taste of caffeine has been developed . This pharmacophore was docked into a homology model of hTAS2R10 (one of the bitter receptors activated by caffeine). Docking of the two substances enterolactone and enterodiol predicted their bitterness modulating activities, which could be confirmed by sensory tests. Docking was also applied for the compound GIV 3727 in a model of hTAS2R31, and the presence of a single binding pocket was reasoned , in which both agonist and antagonist can bind.
Apart from in-vitro studies on bitter receptor blocking, several molecules are reported to mask bitter taste in-vivo , amongst which the flavanones homoeriodictyol, its Na-salt, and eriodictyol. They reduced the bitter taste of different chemical classes of bitter molecules up to 40% with unknown mechanism . Their sensorial bitter masking effect has not been proven to be caused by inhibition of bitter taste receptor activation. Two other flavanones (sakuranetin and 6-methoxysakuranetin) have been described as antagonists for hTAS2R31 . Hence, flavanones seem to be of importance in reduction of bitter taste and bitter taste receptor activation.
The human bitter taste receptor hTAS2R39 seems to be a bitter receptor for dietary compounds, as many agonists are dietary compounds, such as thiamine (vitamin B1), quinine  used in tonic water, catechins from green tea , wine tannin precursors , small peptides from casein hydrolysates  and cheese , isoflavones from soy bean , and many other flavonoids from several plant sources . Hence, it is of interest to identify a bitter blocker for this receptor. It is likely that an antagonist might have similar structural elements to an agonist in order to fit into the same binding pocket. In our previous study on (iso)flavonoid agonists of hTAS2R39, several of the compounds tested, amongst which flavanones, did not activate the bitter receptor despite structural similarity to active compounds . The aim of the present study was to investigate whether these and other flavanones could act as antagonists towards hTAS2R39. It was demonstrated that some flavanones showed antagonistic behavior, while others did not.
Materials and Methods
Compounds tested were obtained from Extrasynthese (Genay, France), Indofine Chemical Company (Hillsborough, NJ, USA), Interbioscreen (Moscow, Russia), and Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). The majority of compounds were ≥99% or ≥98% pure; compound (4) was 95% pure and compound (6) was 92–95% pure. Each compound was dissolved in DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) to a 100 mM stock concentration. Trypan blue solution (0.4% w/v) and isoproterenol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Tyrode's buffer (140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 10 mM glucose, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, and 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4) with 0.5 mM probenecid (Sigma-Aldrich) was used for dilution of compound-DMSO stock solutions and for calcium imaging assays. The presence of probenecid in the buffer did not lead to inhibition of hTAS2R14 or hTAS2R39. Comparisons of assays with and without the use of probenecid are shown in File S1. All compounds were tested for autofluorescence and toxic effects on the cells (File S2) used at a concentration of 1 mM as described before .
Expression of hTAS2R39 and hTAS2R14 in HEK293 cells
For functional expression of the human bitter taste receptor hTAS2R39, HEK293 T-Rex Flp-In cells (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) were used, stably expressing the chimeric G-protein α-subunit Gα16-gust44 (cloned into pcDNA4 (Invitrogen))  and the human bitter receptor genes for hTAS2R39 (cloned into pcDNA5/FRT (Invitrogen)). The bitter receptor gene contained a DNA sequence encoding the first 45 amino acids of rat somatostatin receptor type 3 at its 5′ end (the receptor expression was achieved according to  with exception of the HSV-tag), in order to improve membrane targeting of the receptor protein. The same procedure was applied for stable expression of hTAS2R14. Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) and 10% (v/v) tetracycline-free FBS (both Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) supplemented with blasticidin (5 μg/mL), geneticin (400 μg/mL) and hygromycin (100 μg/mL) (all from Invitrogen). Cells were grown and maintained at 37 °C and 5% (v/v) CO2.
Monitoring bitter receptor activation by intracellular calcium release
Cells were seeded into poly-L-lysine-coated (Sigma-Aldrich) 96-well plates (black wall, clear bottom, Greiner bio-one, Frickenhausen, Germany) at a density of 7*103 cells in 100 μL/well and cultured for 24 h. Transcription of the receptors was induced by adding 0.25 μg/mL doxycycline (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were induced for 24 h and then loaded with the calcium-sensitive fluorescent dye Fluo-4-AM (2.5 μM, Invitrogen), which was dissolved in Tyrode's buffer containing 5% (v/v) tetracycline-free FBS (Lonza). One hour after loading, cells were washed with Tyrode's buffer and taken up in Tyrode's buffer. Stock solutions of test compounds were prepared in DMSO and diluted to the appropriate concentration in Tyrode's buffer, not exceeding a DMSO concentration of 1% (v/v).
Receptor activation or inhibition was measured via intracellular Ca2+ release  in a FlexStation II 384 or FlexStation III (Molecular Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) by measuring fluorescence (excitation 485 nm/emission 520 nm) for either 90 s or 240 s at 37°C. Two methods of compound administration were applied: simultaneous and stepwise addition of potential antagonist and agonist. The first 17 s before compound addition were used for baseline determination. For the simultaneous method, agonist and potential antagonist were pre-mixed, administered after 17 s, and fluorescence was measured for in total 90 s. For the stepwise method, after 17 s, the potential antagonist was added, fluorescence was measured until 120 s, and after 120 s the agonist was added and measured for another 120 s, in total 240 s. Non-induced cells, which did not express the taste receptor, were measured in parallel to verify specificity of receptor activation. Each experiment was performed at least in duplicate in separate experiments (as indicated for each figure).
Calcium assay data processing
Data processing was done as reported previously . In brief, SoftMax Pro 5.4 software (Molecular Devices Corporation) was used to plot the fluorescence signals. The fluorescence value (ΔF/F0), representing receptor activity, was calculated by subtracting the baseline fluorescence (F0) prior to loading from the maximum fluorescence (F) after compound addition, divided by the signal of the baseline in order to normalize background fluorescence . Dose-response curves were established as non-linear regression curves using Graph Pad Prism (version 4 for Windows, Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Half-maximal effective concentrations (EC50) and half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were calculated. Error bars reflect the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed in Graph Pad Prism (one-way ANOVA at 5% risk level, followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test).
Investigation of inhibitory behavior of flavanones
Measuring dose-response curves of ECG on hTAS2R39 under the conditions used in this study revealed an EC80 concentration of 200 μM. Screening for hTAS2R39 inhibition by flavanones was performed with simultaneous application of agonist (200 μM ECG) and putative antagonist (250 μM flavanone). Inhibition was indicated when . In case of indicated inhibition, flavanones were applied at different concentrations, in order to test for dose-dependent inhibition, at the EC80 concentration of the agonist. Another agonist of hTAS2R39, denatonium benzoate, was used in inhibition experiments at 1.7 mM (EC80). hTAS2R14 inhibition was tested with 640 μM ECG or 70 μM genistein as agonists, representing their respective EC80 concentrations. To investigate the specificity of flavanones for inhibition of hTAS2R39 and hTAS2R14, another bitter taste receptor, hTAS2R16 (not known to be activated by flavonoids), was used in inhibition experiments (File S3) towards its agonist salicin.
To determine whether inhibition was specific for the bitter taste receptor, the effect of the antagonists was tested on the β2-adrenergic receptor agonist isoproterenol (50 μM). To this end, the antagonists were applied at ∼IC50 concentrations (100 μM 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone, 500 μM 6,3′-dimethoxyflavanone, and 500 μM 6-methoxyflavanone). To distinguish between reversible and irreversible inhibition, washout experiments were performed. Cells were stimulated with 200 μM ECG in the absence and in the presence of each antagonist (∼IC50 concentrations), washed with Tyrode's buffer (80 μL/well), and again stimulated with 200 μM ECG.
Identification and characterization of hTAS2R39 inhibitors
Epicatechin gallate (ECG) (Figure 1A), one of the main bitter compounds in green tea , was chosen as agonist of hTAS2R39. In a previous study we identified nine flavanones as agonists of hTAS2R39, whereas three other flavanones did not activate this receptor . As some flavanones have been reported as bitter blockers , , it was investigated whether the three inactive flavanones, as well as other flavanones, might have antagonistic properties towards hTAS2R39. Fourteen flavanones (Table 1 and Figure 1B) were screened for their ability to reduce the activation of hTAS2R39 by ECG. Inhibition was indicated when the ratio between ECG response in the presence of a flavanone and the ECG response in the absence of a flavanone was <1 (Figure 2). In this figure, it can be seen that three compounds showed reduction of ECG responses on hTAS2R39: 6,3′-dimethoxyflavanone (3), 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (6), and 6-methoxyflavanone (11). The inhibitory effects of (3) and (6) at screening concentrations were significant. The effect of (11) was not significant, but as there was a trend of reduced ECG responses visible, also (11) was selected for investigation of dose-response behavior.
The commonly applied ring-nomenclature for flavonoids (A-, B-, and C-ring) is shown in the general structure formula for flavanones.
Screening was performed with simultaneous application of agonist (200 μM ECG) and putative antagonist (250 μM flavanone). Inhibition was indicated when . Data are presented as mean ±SD of n separate experiments conducted in duplicate. Compounds 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 10: n = 2, compounds 8, 9, 12, 13, 14: n = 3, compound 3: n = 4, compound 6, 11: n = 5. Significance of signal reduction is indicated by ** (p≤0.01) and * (p≤0.05).
They were further investigated by two different ways of compound addition: simultaneous and stepwise addition. Simultaneous addition of agonist and antagonist to the receptor reflects the situation of ideal blocker application in food products. Stepwise addition of agonist and antagonist is commonly applied in pharmaceutical research when examining pharmacodynamics of receptor-antagonist interaction . Figure 3 illustrates the different ways of compound administration for representative examples. Figure 3A shows simultaneous addition of agonist and antagonist, which implies that after baseline fluorescence measurement, agonist and antagonist were added simultaneously (indicated with the arrow “1st addition”). Figure 3B shows stepwise addition of agonist and antagonist, which implies that after baseline fluorescence measurement, first the antagonist (or buffer) was added (indicated with the arrow “1st addition”), and subsequently the agonist was added (indicated with the arrow “2nd addition”). In both examples, calcium signals elicited by ECG decreased in the presence of the 6-methoxyflavanones.
A: Simultaneous addition of agonist (ECG 200 μM) and antagonist (4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (6) 16 μM) (□) versus the signal elicited by ECG (antagonist replaced by buffer, final concentration ECG 200 μM) (◊). Non-induced cells: ECG 200 μM and 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (6) 16 μM (○) and ECG 200 μM (Δ). B: Stepwise addition of first antagonist (arrow “1st addition”), and then agonist (arrow “2nd addition”) (1st 6-methoxyflavanone (11) 500 μM, 2nd ECG 200 μM) (□)) versus agonist (1st buffer, 2nd ECG 200 μM) (◊). Non-induced cells: 1st 6-methoxyflavanone (11) 500 μM, 2nd ECG 200 μM (○) versus 1st buffer, 2nd ECG 200 μM (Δ).
The inhibitory properties of the compounds 6,3′-dimethoxyflavanone (3), 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (6), and 6-methoxyflavanone (11) towards hTAS2R39 were investigated using both ways of compound addition. The compound 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (6) showed inhibitory activity towards ECG on hTAS2R39 both after simultaneous (Figure 4A) and after stepwise addition (Figure 4B). Application of (6) prior to addition of ECG led to 100% receptor blocking (Figure 4B). For this full receptor blocker, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 102 μM. An overview of inhibition thresholds and IC50 values is given in Table 2. When (6) was added simultaneously with ECG, it had a lower inhibition threshold than when added in the stepwise way. Upon simultaneous addition, a maximal signal reduction of 65% was reached at 63 μM, and further signal reduction could not be observed due to non-specific signals of the compound itself. The same holds for the simultaneous addition of 6,3-dimethoxyflavanone (3) (Figure 4C), where a maximal signal reduction of 55% was reached at 500 μM. Due to increasing non-specific signals of (3), the full efficacy upon simultaneous addition could not be established. As shown in Figure 4D, a maximal reduction of ∼85% at 1000 μM was reached by (3) after stepwise addition. In contrast to (6) and (3), the compound 6-methoxyflavanone (11) showed negligible inhibitory activity against ECG on hTAS2R39 when applied simultaneously (Figure 4E), whereas it showed inhibitory activity when applied stepwise (ca. 50% reduction of activation at 500 μM) (Figure 4F). When investigating the inhibitory behavior of the compounds identified, it thus became clear that the way of antagonist addition influenced the efficacy of the antagonist.
Data are presented as mean ±SEM of n separate experiments conducted in duplicate.
Next, it was investigated whether the activation of hTAS2R39 by another agonist could also be reduced by the inhibitors identified. Denatonium benzoate (Figure 1C) was selected as well known agonist of hTAS2R39, which is different from ECG, in terms of structure and activation concentrations. Dose-response curves of denatonium benzoate were measured, and an EC50 of 711 μM, and an EC80 of 1.7 mM were established (data not shown). Figure 5 shows the inhibitory behavior of 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (6) towards 1.7 mM denatonium benzoate on hTAS2R39. The same trends as for ECG combined with antagonists were observed. The receptor activation of denatonium benzoate was reduced upon simultaneous addition of (6) up to a concentration of 63 μM (not further reduced due to increasing non-specific signals), leading to maximal signal reduction of 58%. Stepwise application of (6) led to 100% receptor blocking, as already seen with ECG. The IC50 was calculated to be 55 μM. The results of all antagonists applied with denatonium benzoate are summarized in Table 2. Due to the fact that structurally different agonists were inhibited in a similar manner, we conclude that the reduced receptor response was not achieved by interaction between agonist and inhibitor, but by actual receptor antagonism.
Specificity of hTAS2R39 inhibitors
It was investigated whether the antagonists identified specifically inhibit hTAS2R39, or also hTAS2R14, as many flavonoids behave similarly towards these two receptors . As agonist for hTAS2R14, ECG was used. Figure 6 shows that no blocking of hTAS2R14 occurred upon simultaneous application of 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (6) and ECG (here at 640 μM, EC80 on hTAS2R14). The increase of signal at increasing concentrations of (6) is of non-specific nature, which can also be seen in the increase of response of non-induced cells, in which the bitter receptor is not expressed. Upon stepwise application, an inhibitory effect was observed. The three methoxyflavanones were also tested with genistein, another agonist of hTAS2R14, at 70 μM (EC80). The results were similar to the results obtained with ECG. An overview of inhibition thresholds and IC50 values on hTAS2R14 is given in Table 3. It is remarkable that none of the three methoxyflavanones blocked hTAS2R14, when applied simultaneously with one of the agonists.
In order to further investigate the specificity of the antagonists identified towards taste receptors, isoproterenol responses were measured. Inhibition of isoproterenol response would indicate non-specific inhibition of β2-adrenergic receptors, endogenous to HEK293 cells. The results (Figure 7) show that the isoproterenol responses were not reduced and therewith the inhibition is concluded to be specific for taste receptors. Furthermore, the specificity of the antagonists was further investigated by measuring their activity on another bitter taste receptor, hTAS2R16. No blocking of salicin responses on hTAS2R16 was observed, neither during simultaneous, nor stepwise addition (File S3).
Pharmacological characterization of 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone
Due to full elimination of agonistic responses by 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (6) on hTAS2R39, this molecule seemed to be the most effective antagonist identified in this study. The mechanism of antagonism was further clarified by measuring dose-response curves of ECG (Figure 8A) and denatonium benzoate (Figure 8B) in the presence of various concentrations of (6). Two effects were observed upon increasing antagonist concentrations: the dose-response curves shifted to the right, and the signal amplitudes decreased. The dose-response curves for the inhibition of ECG and denatonium benzoate showed the same pattern. EC50 values at all antagonist concentrations were calculated and are given in Table 4.
Antagonist and agonist were added in the stepwise way. Data are presented as mean ±SEM of n separate experiments conducted in duplicate. Wash-out experiments (n = 2) (C). Cells were stimulated with 200 μM ECG in the absence (open bars) and in the presence (filled bars) of 100 μM 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (6), or 500 μM 6,3′-dimethoxyflavanone (3), or 500 μM 6-methoxyflavanone (11), washed with Tyrode's buffer, and again stimulated with 200 μM ECG (hatched bars; control: grey bar). Antagonist and agonist were added in the stepwise way. Data are presented as mean ±SEM of n separate experiments conducted in quadruplicate. Significance of signal reduction is indicated by *** (p≤0.001), ** (p≤0.01), and n.s. (not significant, p>0.05).
To distinguish between reversible and irreversible inhibition, washout experiments were performed. In Figure 8C it can clearly be seen that the inhibition was reversible.
In this paper we describe, to our knowledge for the first time, the identification of antagonists for hTAS2R39. For hTAS2R39, 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (6), 6,3′-dimethoxyflavanone (3), and 6-methoxyflavanone (11) were identified as antagonists (in decreasing order of potency), amongst which (6) fully eliminated the agonistic response. This was observed both for the bitter tea flavonoid ECG and for the synthetic bitter compound denatonium benzoate. The activation of hTAS2R14, another bitter receptor recognizing ECG , was also inhibited by the three flavanones, though to a lesser extent. A mechanistic explanation for different effects observed after simultaneous and stepwise application, remains to be established.
In view of the fact that the application of (11) and (3) did not lead to full inhibition of the ECG signal on hTAS2R39, the question arises whether these two compounds are antagonists or partial agonists. They were tested for hTAS2R39 agonism as well, but none of them activated the receptor (File S4). Hence, they probably act as real antagonists.
Structural requirements for hTAS2R39 antagonists
Several flavanones similar to the antagonists identified did not show inhibitory activity towards bitter receptor hTAS2R39. It turned out that only flavanones with a methoxy group on the 6-position of the A-ring, and various B-ring configurations were able to act as antagonists of hTAS2R39, as flavanone (5) (substitution of flavanone crucial for inhibition), 6-hydroxyflavanone (8) (methoxy-substitution crucial for inhibition), 4′-methoxyflavanone (13) (A-ring methoxylation crucial for inhibition), and 7-methoxyflavanone (12) (6-position crucial for inhibition) did not show inhibitory activity. Additionally, the compound 6-methoxyflavone was unable to inhibit hTAS2R39 activation (data not shown), which indicated that absence of a double bond in the C-ring is essential for inhibition.
Amongst the antagonists identified for hTAS2R39, the difference in substitution of the B-ring determined the blocking potency. Compound (11), which is unsubstituted on the B-ring, showed poor blocking behavior compared to (6) and (3). It might be speculated that size, electronegativity and/or electron withdrawing effect of the B-ring substituent influences the potency of antagonists.
Pharmacological characterization of 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone
Due to full elimination of agonistic responses (at their EC80 concentrations) by 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (6) on hTAS2R39, this molecule was investigated further with respect to a possible antagonistic mechanism. Two effects were observed when increasing 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone concentrations: the dose-response curves shifted to the right, and the signal amplitudes decreased. These phenomena suggest that it can be classified as insurmountable antagonist . This curve pattern can be an indication for three different mechanisms: (i) irreversible antagonism, (ii) reversible non-competitive orthosteric antagonism, in which an equilibrium is not reached, and (iii) reversible insurmountable allosteric antagonism . Washout experiments (Figure 8C) clearly showed that the ECG responses after washing-out the antagonist were similar to the ECG responses prior to application of the antagonist. It can thus be concluded that the interaction was reversible. In order to distinguish between (ii) and (iii), two aspects can be studied: (a) whether the antagonist is probe dependent, meaning that its antagonistic characteristics (reflected in curve shapes) are different towards structurally different agonists, and (b) whether the effect of the antagonist is saturable, meaning that no antagonist concentration can lead to full agonist signal elimination. Probe dependence (a) and saturability (b) indicate mechanism (iii) . When the inhibition behavior of 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone was studied with two structurally different agonists, it was observed that the synthetic hTAS2R39 agonist denatonium benzoate was also inhibited by 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone (Figure 8B), and exhibited a curve pattern almost alike that by ECG (Figure 8A) upon different blocker concentrations. These analogous results for the two structurally different agonists might on the one hand indicate orthosteric antagonism, but on the other hand they do not completely exclude allosteric antagonism. If the antagonist would have been unable to inhibit a structurally different agonist, it would strongly suggest allosteric antagonism. However, determination of allosterism by observing probe dependence is a one-way relationship , meaning that the absence of probe dependence is no definite proof for orthosterism. The same holds for saturability, which was not examined.
For hTAS2R46, hTAS2R31, hTAS2R43 , hTAS2R16 , and hTAS2R38 , docking simulations into homology models, validated by site-directed mutagenesis, have predicted the presence of a single binding pocket in the respective bitter receptors. Furthermore, the mechanism of antagonism of GIV3727 on hTAS2R31 was described as orthosteric, insurmountable antagonism , supported by docking the antagonist into the same binding pocket as the agonist. In contrast, one study suggests allosteric antagonism as mechanism for inhibition of hTAS2R16 and hTAS2R38 by probenecid . No information has been reported yet on the binding pocket of hTAS2R39. As the majority of studies suggests the presence of a single binding pocket in different bitter receptors, and the relatively small extracellular domain of bitter receptors offers little space for another binding site (in contrast to sweet receptors, where a second binding site is present in the large N-terminal extracellular domain ), an orthosteric mechanism seems more likely for explaining our observations. However, at the antagonist concentrations tested, no full signal elimination was reached, and thus the possibility of an allosteric mechanism cannot be ruled out.
Application of bitter receptor blockers
For application of blockers in food products, several requirements should be met. (i) The blocker should be functional at a low dose. Therefore, an antagonist that has to be applied in equimolar or higher quantity to the agonist, is not efficient. (ii) In order to block the bitter taste of dietary compounds, for practical reasons, it is necessary that a bitter receptor blocker is also functional when applied simultaneously with the bitter compound. Therefore, compounds like (3) and (6) seem to be more suitable than (11). (iii) In order to achieve a sensorial effect, blocking of all bitter receptors activated by one compound is desirable. A blocker, that can only inhibit hTAS2R39, but not hTAS2R14, might be too specific to effectively reduce bitterness of ECG. On the other hand, it is not known yet whether these two receptors have an equally important role in the mouth. (iv) The blocker should preferably be of natural origin, and should be available in sufficient quantity. We could not find any natural source of the three inhibitors described in this study, and assume that they are only available synthetically. (v) Only compounds that are known as safe for consumption are of interest for food applications. Due to unknown safety of 4′-fluoro-6-methoxyflavanone, we abstained from sensory tests, which might confirm the function as bitter taste blocker in-vivo. As not all criteria are met by the blockers discovered in the present study, they might not be applicable to food products. Nevertheless, a 6-methoxy substituent on the A-ring of a flavanone has been identified as important for inhibition of hTAS2R39, which might form the basis for other, more suitable, blockers.
Investigation of identified inhibitors on hTAS2R16.
We thank Dr. Guus Duchateau (Unilever R&D, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands) for constructive discussions about bitter receptor pharmacology.
Conceived and designed the experiments: WSUR RJG HG MD LVB GS JPV. Performed the experiments: WSUR RJG MD. Analyzed the data: WSUR RJG MD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LVB. Wrote the paper: WSUR RJG HG MD LVB GS JPV.
- 1. Drewnowski A, Gomez-Carneros C (2000) Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: A review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72: 1424–1435.
- 2. Ley JP (2008) Masking taste by molecules. Chemosens. Percept. 1: 58–77.
- 3. Meyerhof W, Batram C, Kuhn C, Brockhoff A, Chudoba E, et al. (2010) The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. Chem. Sens. 35: 157–170.
- 4. Thalmann S, Behrens M, Meyerhof W (2013) Major haplotypes of the human bitter taste receptor TAS2R41 encode functional receptors for chloramphenicol. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 435: 267–273.
- 5. Slack JP, Brockhoff A, Batram C, Menzel S, Sonnabend C, et al. (2010) Modulation of bitter taste perception by a small molecule hTAS2R antagonist. Curr. Biol. 20: 1104–1109.
- 6. Greene TA, Alarcon S, Thomas A, Berdougo E, Doranz BJ, et al. (2011) Probenecid inhibits the human bitter taste receptor TAS2R16 and suppresses bitter perception of salicin. PLoS ONE 6: e20123.
- 7. Brockhoff A, Behrens M, Roudnitzky N, Appendino G, Avonto C, et al. (2011) Receptor agonism and antagonism of dietary bitter compounds. J. Neurosci. 31: 14775–14872.
- 8. Ley JP, Dessoy M, Paetz S, Blings M, Hoffmann-Lücke P, et al. (2012) Identification of enterodiol as a masker for caffeine bitterness by using a pharmacophore model based on structural analogues of homoeriodictyol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60: 6303–6311.
- 9. Ley JP, Krammer G, Reinders G, Gatfield IL, Bertram HJ (2005) Evaluation of bitter masking flavanones from Herba Santa (Eriodictyon californicum (H. & A.) Torr., Hydrophyllaceae). J. Agric. Food Chem. 53: 6061–6066.
- 10. Fletcher JN, Kinghorn AD, Slack JP, McCluskey TS, Odley A, et al. (2011) In vitro evaluation of flavonoids from Eriodictyon californicum for antagonist activity against the bitterness receptor hTAS2R31. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59: 13117–13121.
- 11. Narukawa M, Noga C, Ueno Y, Sato T, Misaka T, et al. (2011) Evaluation of the bitterness of green tea catechins by a cell-based assay with the human bitter taste receptor hTAS2R39. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 405: 620–625.
- 12. Soares S, Kohl S, Thalmann S, Mateus N, Meyerhof W, et al. (2013) Different phenolic compounds activate distinct human bitter taste receptors. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61: 1525–1533.
- 13. Ueno Y, Sakurai T, Okada S, Abe K, Misaka T (2011) Human bitter taste receptors hTAS2R8 and hTAS2R39 with differential functions to recognize bitter peptides. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 75: 1188–1190.
- 14. Kohl S, Behrens M, Dunkel A, Hofmann T, Meyerhof W (2013) Amino acids and peptides activate at least five members of the human bitter taste receptor family. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61: 53–60.
- 15. Roland WSU, Vincken JP, Gouka RJ, van Buren L, Gruppen H, et al. (2011) Soy isoflavones and other isoflavonoids activate the human bitter taste receptors hTAS2R14 and hTAS2R39. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59: 11764–11771.
- 16. Roland WSU, van Buren L, Gruppen H, Driesse M, Gouka RJ, et al. (2013) Bitter taste receptor activation by flavonoids and isoflavonoids: Modeled structural requirements for activation of hTAS2R14 and hTAS2R39. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61: 10454–10466.
- 17. Ueda T, Ugawa S, Yamamura H, Imaizumi Y, Shimada S (2003) Functional interaction between T2R taste receptors and G-protein α subunits expressed in taste receptor cells. J. Neurosci. 23: 7376–7380.
- 18. Behrens M, Brockhoff A, Kuhn C, Bufe B, Winnig M, et al. (2004) The human taste receptor hTAS2R14 responds to a variety of different bitter compounds. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 319: 479–485.
- 19. Chandrashekar J, Mueller KL, Hoon MA, Adler E, Feng L, et al. (2000) T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors. Cell 100: 703–711.
- 20. Kuhn C, Bufe B, Winnig M, Hofmann T, Frank O, et al. (2004) Bitter taste receptors for saccharin and acesulfame K. J. Neurosci. 24: 10260–10265.
- 21. Kenakin T (2006) A Pharmacology Primer. Theory, Applications and Methods. 2 ed.; Academic Press: New York.
- 22. Kenakin T, Jenkinson S, Watson C (2006) Determining the potency and molecular mechanism of action of insurmountable antagonists. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap 319: 710–723.
- 23. Brockhoff A, Behrens M, Niv MY, Meyerhof W (2010) Structural requirements of bitter taste receptor activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 11110–11115.
- 24. Sakurai T, Misaka T, Ishiguro M, Masuda K, Sugawara T, et al. (2010) Characterization of the β-D-glucopyranoside binding site of the human bitter taste receptor hTAS2R16. J. Biol. Chem. 285: 28373–28378.
- 25. Biarnés X, Marchiori A, Giorgetti A, Lanzara C, Gasparini P, et al. (2010) Insights into the binding of phenyltiocarbamide (PTC) agonist to its target human TAS2R38 bitter receptor. PLoS ONE 5: e12394.
- 26. Xu H, Staszewski L, Tang H, Adler E, Zoller M, et al. (2004) Different functional roles of T1R subunits in the heteromeric taste receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 14258–14263.