Plant mitochondrial transcription termination factor (mTERF) genes comprise a large family with important roles in regulating organelle gene expression. In this study, a comprehensive database search yielded 31 potential mTERF genes in maize (Zea mays L.) and most of them were targeted to mitochondria or chloroplasts. Maize mTERF were divided into nine main groups based on phylogenetic analysis, and group IX represented the mitochondria and species-specific clade that diverged from other groups. Tandem and segmental duplication both contributed to the expansion of the mTERF gene family in the maize genome. Comprehensive expression analysis of these genes, using microarray data and RNA-seq data, revealed that these genes exhibit a variety of expression patterns. Environmental stimulus experiments revealed differential up or down-regulation expression of maize mTERF genes in seedlings exposed to light/dark, salts and plant hormones, respectively, suggesting various important roles of maize mTERF genes in light acclimation and stress-related responses. These results will be useful for elucidating the roles of mTERF genes in the growth, development and stress response of maize.
Citation: Zhao Y, Cai M, Zhang X, Li Y, Zhang J, Zhao H, et al. (2014) Genome-Wide Identification, Evolution and Expression Analysis of mTERF Gene Family in Maize. PLoS ONE 9(4): e94126. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094126
Editor: Rogerio Margis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Received: December 5, 2013; Accepted: March 12, 2014; Published: April 9, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Zhao et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This research was supported by Project No.91335205 supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (2012AA101104) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2014CB138203). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts possess their own genetic materials containing a few dozen genes required for gene expression, photosynthesis and the electron transport chain, since most genes of these organelles have been either lost or transferred to the nucleus during evolution from their bacterial progenitors in different plant species . Most of approximately 2000 and 2600 proteins located in plant mitochondria and chloroplasts, respectively, are encoded in the nuclear genome . Despite their small genomes, the mitochondria and plastids in higher plant have complex transcription machineries. Several components of the transcriptional machinery have been reported, such as nuclear-encoded phage-type RNA polymerases for mitochondria and chloroplasts, and plastid-encoded cyanobacterial-type RNA polymerases and nuclear-encoded sigma-like factors for chloroplasts; however, additional unidentified auxiliary factors are required for organellar transcription , .
Recently, mTERF homologs predicted to be imported in both chloroplasts and mitochondria were identified in Arabidopsis thaliana ,  as putative organellar transcription factors, since mTERF is a transcription terminator in animal mitochondria. The mitochondrial Transcription tERmination Factor (mTERF) family consists of a group of proteins in human. These proteins have a modular architecture based on repetitions of a 32-amino acid (aa) mTERF motif which contains three leucine zipper-like elements , , and this has been suggested to be the basis of their ability to bind DNA . The molecular function of mTERFs has so far only been described for metazoan members of the protein family. Vertebrates have four mTERF paralogs. In humans, mTERF1 is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein responsible for mitochondrial transcription termination at the 3′-end of the 16S rRNA gene, promoting termination of transcripts from the first transcription initiation site (H1) , . mTERF2 can bind to mitochondrial DNA  and, at least in mouse, seems to influence transcription . mTERF3 acts as a specific repressor of mammalian mtDNA transcription initiation in vivo . mTERF3 binds to the mtDNA promoter region, and depletion of mTERF3 increases transcription initiation on both mtDNA strands. mTERF4 can form a stoichiometric complex with the ribosomal RNA methyltransferase NSUN4 to directly control mitochondrial ribosomal biogenesis and translation , .
mTERF genes have been found in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous nuclear genomes, in the moss Physcomitrella patens, but are apparently absent in fungi and prokaryotes , , . Flowering plants have the highest number of mTERF genes among eukaryotes, and most annotated Arabidopsis mTERFs are targeted to mitochondria or chloroplasts , . To date, only five mTERF genes from plants have been characterized: MOC1 (mterf-like gene of Chlamydomonas 1) from Chlamydomonas reinhardtti , , and SOLDAT10 (SINGLET OXYGEN-LINKED DEATH ACTIVATOR 10) , BELAYA SMERT/RUGOSA2(BSM/RUG2) , , MDA1 (MTERF DEFECTIVE IN Arabidopsis1)  and SHOT1 (suppressor of hot1-4 1)  from Arabidopsis.
In the unicellular green alga C. reinhardtii, MOC1 binds specifically to an octanucleotide sequence within the mitochondrial rRNA-coding module S3, and a loss of MOC1 increases read-through transcription at the S3-binding site thereby causing elevated antisense RNA levels in the mutant stm6, suggesting that MOC1 possesses the evolutionarily-conserved transcription termination activity as for mTERF1 in human . SOLDAT10, the first mTERF gene characterized in higher plants, is localized to chloroplasts and its loss reduces plant growth and pigmentation while complete inactivation of SOLDAT10 is apparently lethal. The soldat10 mutant has decreased levels of plastid-specific rRNAs and affects protein synthesis in plastids, which subsequently activates retrograde signaling to the nucleus and leads to overexpression of stress-related nuclear genes . Another Arabidopsis mTERF, dubbed MDA1, is targeted to chloroplast, and mda1 mutant exhibit altered chloroplast morphology and plant growth. Additionally, the mda1 mutations enhance salt and osmotic stress tolerance and alter sugar responses during seedling establishment via perturbing abscisci acid (ABA) retrograde signaling . BSM or RUG2, encoding a dual-targeted mTERF protein, has a broader function, and is essential for normal plant development. Its loss affects levels of transcripts in both mitochondria and chloroplasts , . SHOT1 is characterized as one suppressor of Arabidopsis hot1-4 mutant and resides in mitochondria. The shot1 mutant can suppress the hot1-4 heat-hypersensitive phenotype via changing mitochondrial function and increasing transcripts of other heat shock protein (HSP) genes. Expression alteration of other HSPs and redox-related genes in shot1-2 are involved in retrograde signaling from mitochondria to nucleus . Taken together, mTERF genes are required for organelle gene expression regulation and play important roles in plant growth, development and abiotic stress tolerance, at least in Arabidopsis and possibly other higher plants. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms of mTERF that control transcription of the mitochondrial and chloroplastic genomes. More mTERF genes require characterization in diverse plants, especially crop plants.
In this report, 31 putative mTERF genes were identified in the maize genome. Most maize mTERF proteins are predicted to reside in mitochondria or plastids. Phylogenetic analysis of mTERF genes in maize, rice, and Arabidopsis indicates mitochondria- and plastid-targeting mTERF proteins form two divergent clades. Expression of mTERF genes are regulated in maize seedlings treated with light/dark, plant hormones and salts, showing their important roles in abiotic stress response. Our work will provide a basic biochemical characterization of maize mTERFs, paving the way for future functional studies and certainly contributing to improving knowledge of their role in plant biology.
Identification and Nomenclature of mTERF Genes in Maize
Using keyword and homology searches, we obtained 90 maize mTERF proteins from the NCBI Protein Database, 26 maize mTERF unigenes from the NCBI Unigene Database, 26 mTERF cDNA sequences from the Maize Full Length cDNA Library Database, and 30 mTERF genes from maize genomes that were identical to maize mTERF genes identified by HMMER 3.0  with mTERF PFAM file (PF02636) (Table S1). Sequence comparison for the above putative mTERF cDNAs and proteins indicated that all mTERF cDNA sequences and unigenes (except Zm#S48278749) were derived from 27 of 30 mTERF genes annotated in the maize genome and 87 of 90 maize mTERF proteins from GenBank were encoded by 26 of 30 mTERF genes identified in the maize genome; while the remaining three proteins and Zm#S48278749 were assumed to be from two undiscovered mTERF genes in maize (Table S1). Two mTERF genes, GRMZM2G426154 and GRMZM2G175930, were located in AC217966.3-Contig20 (forward strand) and AC205479.3-Contig45 (reverse strand), respectively, which were about 38 kb apart in the maize genome, and matched distinct parts of one mTERF cDNA (Figure S1). Therefore, GRMZM2G426154 and GRMZM2G175930 could be mis-annotated and could be two parts of one mTERF gene separated by unsequenced genomic gaps (Figure S1). Finally, 31 unique mTERF genes were identified in maize and designated ZmTERF1–ZmTERF31 according to the order of these genes localizing in the chromosomes except for ZmTERF30 and -31 (Table S2); and ZmTERF23 was the gene derived from GRMZM2G426154 and GRMZM2G175930 (Table 1). SMART  database searching revealed that each of the 31 maize mTERF gene products had at least one mTERF motif. ZmTERF1–ZmTERF29 were selected for further study in this work since they had known genomic DNA sequences.
Our results showed that the maize, rice and Arabidopsis genomes encoded a similar number of mTERF proteins, which comprises 34 members identified in rice (Oryza sativa subsp. japonica) and 35 members in Arabidopsis , . RT-PCR assay was carried out to validate cDNA sequences of the mTERF genes with gene-specific primers listed in Table S3. Except for ZmTERF4, -7 and -20, which had undetectable expression in B73 seedling leaves, most cDNA sequences of the 29 maize mTERF genes were obtained (Figure S2) and were identical to corresponding gene models annotated in MaizeGDB (http://www.maizegdb.org/). All identified mTERF genes encode proteins varying from 118 (ZmTERF7) to 649 aa (ZmTERF2), in which protein sizes of ZmTERF4, -7 and -20 were <150 aa (Table 1). Isoelectric points of most maize mTERF proteins were similar and >8.0, except for those of ZmTERF25 (6.48) and ZmTERF27 (5.70) (Table 1).
Phylogenetic Analysis and Classification of ZmTERF Genes
To evaluate the evolutionary relationships among the mTERF genes in maize, rice and Arabidopsis, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of the 98 mTERF protein sequences to construct an unrooted ML inference-based tree with RAxML . The defined multiple alignment sequences for phylogenetic tree construction are found in File S1. The phylogenetic tree also included known mTERF genes identified in human and C. reinhardtii. The best ML scoring tree is shown in Figure 1. From the tree topology resembling that from Arabidopsis phylogenetic trees constructed previously  including lower plants, it was apparent that there were nine groups (groups I–IX) despite the low bootstrap values for deep nodes (Figure 1). Group IX contained 11 mTERF maize genes while the other groups had 1–5 members. It is noteworthy that all functionally identified Arabidopsis mTERF genes belonged to groups II, IV and VI with SOLDAT10 (AT2G03050) in group II, MDA1 (AT4G14605) and BSM/RUG2 (AT4G02990) both in group IV, and SHOT1 (AT3G60400) in group VI.
Phylogeny tree was constructed using RAxML with Arabidopsis, maize and rice mTERF protein sequences. The numbers associated with the branches indicate the bootstrap values (%) for 500 bootstrap replicates and only bootstrap values of >60% are shown. The scale bar represents the number of amino acid substitutions per site. Nine groups designated I–IX are shown outside. Subcellular localization of mTERF proteins is shown in red for mitochondria, in green for chloroplasts and in black for other places or a discrepancy in prediction by TargetP  and Predotar .
Relationship analysis of intragroup members with well-supported bootstrap values revealed that seven groups (group I–VII) included both proteins from eudicots and monocots (Figure 1). This suggested that nearly 80% of the groups here defined were already present in the common ancestor of both groups, and evolved before divergence of monocots and dicots. Therefore, these mTERF genes might play conservatively important roles in mediating expression of organellar genes as do corresponding characterized Arabidopsis mTERF genes. Group IX comprised monocot-specific genes and its members were of similar protein length, except for ZmTERF4 and ZmTERF20. Another clade containing exclusive Arabidopsis mTERF proteins was found in the evolutionary tree and diverged from group VIII mTERF genes. This result suggests that group IX formed after divergence of monocots and dicots, and expansion of subgroups of group IX in monocots took place before divergence of rice and maize. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that rice-specific subgroups in group IX evolved after species formation of rice (Figure 1), because syntenic orthologs of several maize mTERF genes were not be found in rice genome (Table S2). Putative paralogous genes were identified with the criterion that two mTERF proteins were clustered pairwisely and supported by >95% bootstrap values, leading to formation of three pairs of maize mTERF paralogs, including ZmTERF15 vs. ZmTERF16, ZmTERF4 vs. ZmTERF5, and ZmTERF11 vs. ZmTERF20.
Prediction of Potential Subcellular Location for ZmTERF Proteins
Unlike human mTERF proteins which all reside in mitochondria, GFP fusion transient expression experiments showed that most members of Arabidopsis mTERF proteins were targeted to mitochondria or chloroplasts . To investigate the subcellular location of ZmTERF proteins, we performed in silico prediction using TargetP  and Predotar . Totally, 25 of 31 ZmTERF proteins were predicted to enter mitochondria or chloroplast in either TargetP or Predotar (Table 1), and three mTERF proteins ZmTERF19, -20 and -30 could be secretory proteins, while four mTERF proteins (ZmTERF4, -12, -28 and -31) were predicted to localize to any other location (Table 1). In this result, six maize mTERF proteins (ZmTERF6, -7, -18, -20, -21, and -29) were targeted to different organelles predicted by the two programs. In the six proteins, ZmTERF18 and ZmTERF29 proteins possibly have dual transit peptides for mitochondria and chloroplasts.
Mitochondrial and plastid proteomic database identification provide another way to survey the compartmentalization of the proteins of interest. Here we used the maize mTERF proteins to screen PPDB , and found that ten mTERF proteins (ZmTERF1, -8, -9, -17, -18, -19, -23, -24, -27 and -29) were detected in maize plastid nucleoid  and ZmTERF6 was observed in maize chloroplast stroma (Table 1 and Table S2) . Of these mTERF proteins, ZmTERF8 and ZmTERF9 are not consistent with the prediction produced by TargetP  and Predotar  (Table 1). Subcellular targeting of rice mTERF proteins were also predicted using TargetP  and Predotar  (Table S3). By mapping the subcellular location information of plant mTERF proteins on the evolutionary tree (Figure 1), we found that the mTERF genes can group according to targeting predictions in the evolutionary tree (Figure 1). Intragroup mTERF proteins localize to the same organelles with several exceptions, such as ZmTERF9 in group I, ZmTERF13 in group II, and LOC_Os01g27690 in group IX. Groups I, II, IV and VII targeted to the chloroplast, and groups III, V, VI, VIII and IX targeted to the mitochondria. Surprisingly, there was a mitochondria-targeted subgroup in group IV, including AT2G44020, ZmTERF14 and LOC_Os02g54200.
Gene Structure and Conserved Motifs of ZmTERF Genes
Studying the structure of genes of interest is crucial in biology and can provide important clues concerning gene evolution. The exon–intron organization of maize mTERF genes was obtained by comparing the cDNA sequences of maize mTERF genes with the corresponding genomic DNA sequences. The maize mTERF cDNA sequences were derived from sequenced PCR products (Figure S2), which were amplified from B73 seedling leaf total RNA with gene-specific primers (Table S4) except for three genes ZmTERF4, -7 and -20 which were not detected in this study and of which cDNA sequences were extracted from corresponding gene models annotated in MaizeGDB (http://www.maizegdb.org/). The genomic DNA sequences were retrieved from MaizeGDB (http://www.maizegdb.org/). This result showed that quite a large number of mTERF genes (79%) were intron-free (Figure S3). Six mTERF genes containing introns belonged to groups I, III, IV and VII, of which only group IV had multiple members. ZmTERF12 (group III) had a 5′-UE (Untranslated Exon) in 5′-UTR (UnTranslated Region) and had no intron in the coding sequence, while ZmTERF6 (group VII) had multiple 5′-UEs in 5′-UTR and only one intron in the coding sequence. There were two different transcripts for ZmTERF6, nevertheless, the alternative splicing event occurs in 5′-UTR and had no effect on the coding sequence (Figure S3). Most intron-free mTERF groups contained multiple members, particularly group IX, implying that ancestors of these groups were evolved via retrotransposition.
Conserved mTERF motifs containing 32 aa residues have been characterized in human mTERF proteins and are thought to be DNA-binding modules . To identify any possible known motifs in maize mTERF proteins, we carried out SMART and PFAM database searches and revealed that, except for mTERF motifs (approximately 38-aa SM00733 in SMART and 345-aa PF02536 in PFAM), no other known motifs were identified (Figure S4). This result suggested that these genes play conserved biological roles. For SM00733 mTERF motifs, maize mTERF proteins had 1–11 mTERF motifs. The intragroup members had similar protein architecture, for example group IX mTERF proteins had 4–6 mTERF motifs except for two putative pseudogenes, ZmTERF7 and ZmTERF20 (Figure S4), and group IV proteins with 9–11 mTERF motifs. To determine sequence features of maize mTERF motifs, 37 motif sequences within seven mTERF proteins from different groups were aligned with ClustalW 2.0  and mTERF motif aa residues were graphically represented (Figure 2A). Three repeats of leucine zipper-like heptad X3LX3 identified in human mTERF proteins previously were also observed in maize mTERF motifs (Figure 2B). These results indicate that maize mTERF proteins harbor conserved mTERF motifs and these motifs contain conserved leucine resides like those in human mTERF motifs (Figure 2B) , implying plant mTERF proteins might possess similar structures and functions to human proteins.
(A) Multiple sequence alignment of maize mTERF motifs. Alignment of the conserved maize mTERF motifs was conducted with CLUSTALW2.0, and displayed using GeneDoc with the conserved residue shading mode. The conserved secondary structure was predicted by MINNOU  and shown under the alignment panel. (B) Sequence representation LOGO derived from multiple sequence alignment of the mTERF motifs and three leucine zipper-like X3LX3 repeats are highlighted. (C) Overlay between human mTERF1 model (PDB 3MVA) and ZmTERF27 structure developed by I-TASSER . The 3D structures of HsmTERF1 and ZmTERF27 proteins are indicated by blue and red stricks, respectively. The matched regions are represented by double red stricks. (D) ZmTERF27 model is displayed in cartoon and nine mTERF motifs are indicated in different colors. (E) Electrostatic surface potential of ZmTERF27. Only basic amino acid residues (histidine, arginine and lysine) and acidic residues (aspartic and glutamic acids) were analyzed and are shown on the surface of ZmTERF27 model in light blue and red, respectively. (F) DNA-binding mode of ZmTERF27. The dsDNA (red) derived from human mitochondrial DNA was predicted to be docked in the groove formed by ZmTERF27 model (blue) using TM-align program .
To discover putative motifs shared among related proteins within the maize mTERF family, the MEME program  was used. Overall, 15 highly significant motifs (<1e-50) were mined among these 29 proteins, and designated as motifs 1–15 (Figure 3). Of these motifs, motifs 1, 3, 4 and 5 were common to all maize mTERF proteins. Sequence comparison with PFAM mTERF seed alignment indicated that motifs 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 and 12 overlaid with the PFAM mTERF domain (PF02536) (Table 2). Motifs 2, 6, 7, 8, 13 and 14 were specific to mitochondria-targeting mTERF proteins, especially to the group IX mTERF proteins (Figure 3). It is possible that group-specific motifs contribute to distinct functions of these mTERF genes.
Putative conserved motifs shared by maize mTERF proteins were mined in MEME program. Fifteen motifs are indicated by different colored boxes and the regular motif sequences are shown in the Table 2.
Higher Structure Analysis of ZmTERF Proteins
Human mTERF proteins regulate mitochondrial gene expression via binding to mitochondrial DNA (hsmTERF1–hsmTERF3) or RNA (hsmTERF4) –, . The structure of three of four mTERF proteins have been determined by X-ray diffraction in human , , . The mTERF protein structure shows they are modular proteins, and the mTERF module comprises two or three tandem α-helixes –. There are eight modules in hsmTERF1 , seven in hsmTERF3  and six in hsmTERF4 . Human mTERF1 adopts a fold similar to HEAT ,  and PUM/PUF proteins  and forms a positively charged groove in the protein surface where dsDNA is docked , . The overall structure of mTERF proteins are very different from previously proposed models , ; however, no structure has been resolved for plant mTERF proteins yet. Arabidopsis BSM/RUG2 protein was shown to bind to dsDNA in a nonspecific manner, and the structure of the protein was modeled based on homology to human mTERF1 .
Here, the structure of ZmTERF27 protein without N-terminal transit peptide, a maize mTERF protein homologous to hsmTERF1 and BSM/RUG2, was developed using I-TASSER program . The 3D structure modeling of maize mTERF protein (Figure 2C) was similar to the structure of hsmTERF1. ZmTERF27 contains nine mTERF modules which differ from the mTERF motifs mined by SMART  (Figure 2D and Figure S5). ZmTERF27 protein structure can fold to form a positively charged groove (Figure 2E), suggesting that it could bind to dsDNA as does human mTERF1, and the 3D structure complex including ZmTERF27 and human mitochondrial DNA was developed using the TM-align program . This result indicates that plant mTERF genes, or at least parts of them, play conserved roles in regulating organellar gene expression by DNA-binding activity similar to human mTERF genes. Compared with hsmTERF1, however, ZmTERF27 contained two excess domains in N- and C-termini, respectively (Figure 2). Even in the homologous region, the mTERF modules of ZmTERF27 cannot match those modules in hsmTERF1 very well due to unaligned aa residues (Figure 2 and Figure S5). These variations demonstrate that ZmTERF27 has specialized biological function in plants. Other maize mTERF proteins containing >4 mTERF motifs can also be modeled to form 3D structures like that of ZmTERF27 except for ZmTERF2 and -25 (data not shown).
Chromosomal Location and Gene Duplication Analysis of ZmTERFs
To investigate the genomic organization of ZmTERF genes, the positions of the mTERF loci on maize chromosomes were mapped. The distribution of 29 ZmTERF genes on nine of ten maize chromosomes was uneven (Figure 4). Chromosomes 1 and 5 have six and seven ZmTERF genes and only one mTERF gene was observed in chromosomes 6 and 9, respectively. Analysis of maize mTERF genes in SyMAP  and PLAZA  revealed four (i.e. two pairs) mTERF genes could be assigned to maize segmental duplication and five mTERF genes could be involved in tandem duplication (Figure 4). The five tandemly duplicated mTERF genes were localized on chromosomes 1 and 5, respectively, and fell into two clusters, one for ZmTERF4 and ZmTERF5 and the other for ZmTERF18, -19 and -20 (Figure 4). The duplicated genes were inconsistent with those identified in the phylogenetic tree because two ZmTERF genes (ZmTERF11 and ZmTERF20) were not in homologous regions. All of these duplicated genes exhibited high sequence similarity, especially ZmTERF15 and ZmTERF16 which shared a 343-aa peptide. Three pairs of homologs involving two tandem duplication events and one segmental duplication event belonged to group IX, while two other pairs were of groups II and IV, respectively. It is worth noting that in three pairs of duplicated mTERF genes, ZmTERF4, -7 and -20 genes encoding truncated redundant peptides were silent in maize compared with their corresponding paralogous copies. These findings suggest tandem and segmental duplication events both contributed to the current complexes of the maize mTERF gene family unlike Arabidopsis mTERF genes which were duplicated mainly by tandem duplication events , .
(A) Distribution of ZmTERF genes in maize chromosomes. Twenty-nine ZmTERF genes were mapped on the nine maize chromosomes. Segmentally duplicated paralogs are connected by dotted magenta line, and tandemly duplicated homologs are marked by blue bars before the genes. The centromere of each chromosome is indicated with a white circle, and chromosome numbers are indicated at the top of each chromosome. (B) Duplicated blocks in maize chromosomes. The circular image retrieved from PLAZA database  show inter-chromosome homologous regions connected by bands in different colors. The chromosome numbers and mTERF genes are indicated outside.
Analysis of cis-elements in Promoters of ZmTERFs
The cis-elements are important molecular switches involved in the transcriptional regulation of genes during plant growth and development, and abiotic stress responses –. The 2-kb promoter sequences upstream from the translation start codon of 23 maize mTERF genes were retrieved from maize genome sequences in MaizeSequence (http://www.maizesequence.org/index.html) and used for stress-related cis-element analysis in the PlantPAN server . All of putative environment stimulus-responsive cis-elements were identified in mTERF gene promoters and divided into eight classes: including Auxin-responsive element (ARE), Light-regulated element (LRE), Drought/dehydration-responsive element (DRE), Gibberellic acid (GA) responsive element (GARE), ABA-responsive element (ABRE), Ethylene-responsive element (ERE), Anaerobically induced element (AIE) and Low-temperature responsive element (LTRE). Some cis-elements may respond to multiple plant hormones or environment stimuli – for instance LTRECOREATCOR15 (CCGAC) is induced by ABA, drought and low-temperature . Only the cis-elements in positive strands were collected and displayed in Figure 5. The detailed information of stress-related cis-element sequences and annotation is found in Table S5, and the position and abundance of all cis-elements predicted to localize in promoter regions of maize mTERF genes are shown in Table S6.
Putative LTRE, DRE, ARE, LRE, GARE, ABRE, ERE, AIRE and LTRE core sequences in the 2000-bp promoter regions of maize mTERF genes were predicted using PlantPAN . The lines denote promoter sequences. Only the elements represented by different color boxes and located in the forward strand (sense strand of the gene) are indicated above the lines.
All 23 mTERF promoters were highly enriched with LREs, and the average number of the LRE sequences in these promoters was 19.5, of which only five genes had <15 LRE boxes (Figure 5). Of 23 mTERF promoters, 17 were rich in DREs with >10 DREs per promoter, in which ZmTERF25 had 25 DREs. There were nine mTERF promoters containing >5 ABREs per promoter – especially ZmTERF19, -2 and -3, with 25, 14 and 14 ABREs, respectively. We also found that many EREs appeared in maize mTERF promoters, and eight mTERF promoters each contained >5 EREs. In addition, ZmTERF25 and -19 contained 12 and six LTREs, respectively, in their promoters, and others had <4. The two mTERF genes also possessed multiple abiotic stress-responsive elements. There were 19 cold-, drought- and ABA-regulated elements in ZmTERF25; and 11 drought-, high-salt- and cold-responsive elements in ZmTERF19 (Figure 5). Notably, six mTERF genes had 3–5 AIEs, suggesting these genes were probably induced by anaerobic conditions, such as waterlogging stress. Therefore, expression of maize mTERF genes would be regulated by various environmental factors.
Expression Pattern Analysis of Maize mTERF Genes in Different Tissues
The gene expression patterns can provide important clues for the gene function. Two approaches were applied to analyze the expression patterns of the maize mTERF genes in different tissues and organs, including expressed sequence tag (EST) profiles and microarray data.
For analysis of EST profiles, the maize ESTdb in NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbEST/) was searched using BLASTN program. Most maize mTERF genes were expressed – except for ZmTERF4, -7 and -20 with no EST sequence detected (Table S7), providing strong indication for expression of most mTERF genes; However, the frequency and source of ESTs for mTERF genes varied, indicating their differential expression patterns. The EST sequences for mTERF genes were mainly from six single different tissues (root, shoot, ear embryo, endosperm and tassel) and several cDNA libraries derived from multiple mixed tissues. ZmTERF6 and -8 showed high expression in all tissues and organs used here, and several maize mTERF genes have tissue-specific expression patterns: ZmTERF1 in embryo, and ZmTERF11, -21 and -29 in shoot. Additionally, EST hits for ZmTERF13, -18, -19, -23 and -28 were only from mixed tissues.
Expression patterns of maize mTERF genes were examined in different organs by estimating their transcript levels determined by Nimblegen maize microarray experiments encompassing 60 tissues at different developmental stages of maize: including germinating seed, primary root, whole seedling, stem and shoot apical meristem, internodes, cob, tassel and anthers, silk, leaf, husk and seed . The detailed information for the tissues and organs was described by Sekhon et al . The expression data for only 24 maize mTERF genes were collected, excluding ZmTERF4, -7, -16, -20, and -28. The signal values for all these maize mTERF genes are given in Table S8. The hierarchical clustering of microarray expression data using Cluster 3.0  revealed expression patterns for 24 maize mTERF genes in diverse tissues and organs covering the whole life of maize, but no clearly distinct expression pattern groups emerged (Figure 6). The coefficient of variation (CV = sd/mean, where sd and mean represent the standard deviation and mean expression level of a gene across all the tissues, respectively) value of each mTERF gene was calculated to estimate the expression variation. This result showed that expressions of 18 mTERF genes were relatively stable across all tissues (CV<10%) (Table S8), implying that these genes were likely involved in basal metabolic or ‘housekeeping’ functions. In these genes, ZmTERF2, -5, -6, -14, -15, -22, -25, -26 and -27 were highly expressed throughout the 60-tissue panel and ZmTERF1, -3 and -13 genes were less expressed (Figure 6). The remaining eight stably expressed genes showed slight expression variation in certain tissues. ZmTERF8 and -10 showed similar expression patterns, with low expression in anther, root, pericarp and several types of leaves (Figure 6). ZmTERF9 showed low expression in root and silk compared to other tissues. ZmTERF24 was relatively less expressed in root, pericarp and germinating seed. ZmTERF11 showed low expression in pericarp, silk, germinating seed and most types of leaves. The CV values of the other six genes (ZmTERF12, -17, -18, -19, -23 and -29) were >10%, in which ZmTERF17 and -29 showed large expression variation with CV value >15%. The expression of ZmTERF19 and -29 was specific to leaf. ZmTERF12 and -17 were remarkably expressed in leaf and moderately expressed in embryo. The expression pattern of ZmTERF23 is similar to that of ZmTERF24, and its expression level in leaf, endosperm, immature tassel and cob was higher than in other tissues or organs. Notably, ZmTERF18 was lowest expressed over the whole life of maize plants. The chloroplast-targeting mTERF proteins, ZmTERF6, -9, -23, -24, -27 and -29 were highly expressed in leaves, especially ZmTERF29 with leaf-specific expression, suggesting that these genes played important roles in chloroplast development and biogenesis.
Dynamic expression profiles of maize mTERF genes in maize different tissues were derived from Nimblegen Maize Microarray data deposited in PLEXdb . Relative expression level is denoted by intensity of red color (higher) or green color (lower). Two pairs of duplicated paralogs are marked by lowercase letters.
To confirm the expression variations of maize mTERF genes, qRT-PCR was performed to measure the expression of eight mTERF genes in five different tissues, including mature seed, immature tassel, unpollinated silk, seedling leaf and root. In the eight genes, only ZmTERF11 was targeted to mitochondria while the rest were all imported to chloroplasts. Of the senven chloroplast ZmTERFs, four mTERF genes (ZmTERF19, -23, -27 and -29) exhibited similar expression patterns in the five tissues, and they were expressed predominantly in leaf. For other four mTERF genes, ZmTERF6 was highly expressed in seed and leaf; ZmTERF9 and -24 showed high expression levels in seed, silk and leaf; and ZmTERF11 was abundantly expressed in root (Figure S6). Additionally, all of the selected ZmTERFs showed lower expression levels in tassel compared to other tissues. These results were consistent with the observation in macroarray data.
Expression pattern shifts of the duplicated paralogous genes can reflect the maintenance of duplicate genes through nonfunctionalization, subfunctionalization or neofunctionalization . For duplicated mTERF genes, two pairs (segmentally duplicated ZmTERF1 and ZmTERF29, and tandemly duplicated ZmTERF18 and ZmTERF19) both showed divergent expression profiles for duplicate genes. ZmTERF1 and ZmTERF18 showed low expression levels in all detected tissues or organs; whereas their paralogs, ZmTERF29 and ZmTERF19, were preferentially expressed in leaf. This result indicates the fate of two ZmTERF pairs could be described as neofunctionalization since the expression of one copy of the paralog had an obvious increase in leaf (Figure 6).
Expression Analysis of Maize mTERF Genes During Leaf Development
Corn is an important cereal and a typical C4 plant. In addition, plant mTERF genes can regulate chloroplast gene expression. It is speculated that maize mTERF genes may be involved in chloroplast biogenesis and development, and C4 photosynthesis occurring in the chloroplast. To validate this hypothesis, expression levels of maize mTERF genes during the development of C4 photosynthesis were extracted from RNA-seq data deposited in the eFP browser . The RNA-seq data were derived from a leaf continuous developmental gradient and mature bundle sheath and mesophyll cells . The leaf gradient comprises four representative zones of the leaf blade, including a basal zone (Base: sink tissue where cell division is active, cell-fates are being determined and proplastid appears), a transitional zone (Ligule+4: undergoing the sink–source transition), a maturing zone (Ligule+9: with strong light-mediated development and formation of mature chloroplast) and a mature zone (Tip-1: fully differentiated and active C4 photosynthetic zone) . RPKM (reads per kilobase per million mapped reads) values were determined for 25 maize mTERF genes in each of the zones and cells tested (Figure S7). In these genes, six genes showed higher expression levels with maximum RPKM >20 compared to ZmTERF2, -3, -8, -9, -10, -13, -14, -15, -16, -21, -25 and -26 with maximum RPKM<10. Of 25 maize mTERF genes, 16 were significantly differentially expressed along the leaf developmental gradient with CV >50% and ZmTERF2, -10, -11, -12, -13, -15, -16, -21, -22, -26 and -27 were down-regulated from the Base to Tip-1 zones. The result indicates that the mTERF genes were involved in leaf development and chloroplast biogenesis, especially required for early development of chloroplast. Ten mTERF genes (ZmTERF2, -9, -10, -11, -13, -14, -15, -18, -25 and -29) were differentially expressed by >2-fold between bundle sheath and mesophyll cells. Notably, in the ten genes, only ZmTERF29 was highly expressed with RPFM >20. These genes with different expression levels between bundle sheath and mesophyll cells are speculated to participate in coordination of chloroplast gene expression for C4 photosynthesis.
Expression Profile of Maize mTERF Genes under Abiotic Stress
Previous reports on Arabidopsis mTERF genes have shown that loss of mTERF genes affect expression of stress-related genes , , phytohormone signal tranduction , and salt and osmotic stress tolerance , as well as organellar gene expression regulation. It was therefore envisioned that the maize mTERF genes may also be influenced by environmental signals. To examine the expression patterns of maize mTERF genes under various conditions including abiotic stress, several representative maize mTERF genes were selected for quantitative RT-PCR analysis under light/dark, salt and phytohormone treatments. Seven mTERF genes (ZmTERF8, -15, -19, -21, -23, -25 and -27) were investigated under light and dark conditions – all these genes were up-regulated under light with peaks at 4 h after illumination and conversely, they were all down-regulated in darkness (Figure 7). In these genes, two chloroplast-targeting genes, ZmTERF23 and -27, were largely up-regulated under light; and were also as well as ZmTERF8, heavily down-regulated in darkness by >2-fold (Figure 7). Plastids will develop from etioplasts to chloroplasts during de-etiolation of maize seedlings under illumination and photosynthetic apparatus will be developed. The result implied that mTERF genes are generally required for chloroplast development and photosynthesis in maize.
For the light treatment, total RNA was isolated from etiolated two-leaf seedling at 0, 1, 4 and 8 h after exposure to light (A). For the dark treatment, two-leaf seedlings cultured under 16 h light/8 h dark were used and placed in darkness after 24 h of continuous illumination (B). The expression levels were normalized against maize Actin1 gene and the expression in the corresponding samples at 0 h was set as 1 using 2–ΔΔCT method . Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Asterisk (*) on top of error bar indicate the significant difference (α = 0.05, n = 3) compared with control (0 h).
Expression profiles of six maize mTERF genes at early stages (0–4 h) of response to salts (NaCl and AlCl3) and phytohormones (ABA and NAA) were analyzed (Figure 8). Of these six genes, ZmTERF12 and ZmTERF28 gene products were targeted to neither chloroplast nor mitochondria, while the remaining four genes (ZmTERF2, -5, -11 and -13) all resided in mitochondria, with ZmTERF5 and ZmTERF11 of group IX. The expression changes of six ZmTERFs in response to salts and plant hormones were all less than 2 folds except ZmTERF28 which was remarkably up-regulated with four stimuli (Figure 8). Expression levels of ZmTERF2, -5 and -11 were not affected by NaCl, AlCl3 and ABA treatments except those at certain time spots. For the ZmTERFs involved in stress response, ZmTERF12 and -13 showed similar expression patterns in response to NaCl and AlCl3, in which they were up-regulated up to 1 h followed by suppression in expression. For ABA treatment, ZmTERF12 was down-regulated at first one hour after treatment and it was up-regulated thereafter, while the expression of ZmTERF13 was suppressed after ABA treatment. For NAA treatment, the expression of all ZmTERF genes tested here were slightly changed at 2–3 time spots (Figure 8). These results suggested that maize mTERF genes, at least for these ZmTERF genes investigated here, had a limited role in response of maize to stress conditions.
Total RNA was extracted from two-leaf seedlings at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 h after exposure to sodium chloride (A), aluminum chloride (B), NAA (C) and ABA (D), respectively. The expression levels were normalized against maize Actin1 gene and the expression in the untreated control samples was set as 1 using 2–ΔΔCT method . Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Asterisk (*) on top of error bar represent the significant difference (α = 0.05, n = 3) compared with control (0 h).
To fully understand the role of mTERF genes in plants, it is therefore essential to characterize more mTERF genes in diverse plant species, particularly in crops. In this study, we report the systematic characterization of maize mTERF genes using bioinformatics and molecular biological approaches.
Evolution of ZmTERF Genes
We carried out comprehensive searches for putative ZmTERF genes and found 29 mTERF genes in the sequenced maize genome, including a spliced gene model by genomic gap, and two extra mTERF genes identified in the NCBI Protein Database and cDNA library (Table S1). The two ZmTERF genes could not be mapped onto maize chromosomes. The number of ZmTERF genes was slightly less than for rice and Arabidopsis despite maize having a much larger genome. Therefore, the number of ZmTERF genes would be likely underestimated due to unsequenced genomic gaps or mis-annotation of gene models in MaizeGDB (http://www.maizegdb.org/) . However, flowering plants have more mTERF genes than lower plants and mammals . Given the complicated regulation of organellar genome transcription in higher plants , , ,  and the conserved roles of Arabidopsis and C. reinhardtii mTERF genes in control of mitochondrial gene expression , expansion of the mTERF gene family in higher plants could be driven by complexity of organellar genomes.
Arabidopsis mTERF genes have been classified into eight groups based on phylogenetic relationships . The phylogenetic tree including the mTERF proteins from maize, rice and Arabidopsis had similar topological structure to the tree constructed with mTERF genes of lower plants (Figure 1) . Based on phylogenetic relationships, ZmTERF genes were divided into nine groups. All information about gene structure, motif distribution, subcellular location and protein size of ZmTERF genes support the conserved ZmTERF genes in the same groups shown in Figure 1. Group IX members shared group-specific motifs 2, 6, 7, 8 and 14, which confer novel functional characters compared with other groups. Only group IX was species-specific while the other groups were all composed of orthologs in various organisms used here, even including lower plants . We conclude that group IX as well as VIII is newly generated before the divergence of angiosperms and have adopted a different evolutionary route from the other groups in plants; however, the other groups mainly containing chloroplast-targeting mTERF genes represent the ancestral family composition as supposed . Sequence and evolutionary conservation leads to functional identification of Arabidopsis mTERF genes belonging to the ancestral groups (except for groups VIII and IX), since they are required for organellar gene expression as described for hsmTERFs.
It is largely accepted that the maize genome has undergone several rounds of genome duplication, including the latest whole genome duplication (WGD) about 5–12 million years ago (mya) after divergence from sorghum . However, the WGD would not increase the amount of ZmTERF genes compared with sorghum, in which 38 members have been identified , suggesting that extension of the maize mTERF family cannot be explained by WGD alone. It is reported that nine Arabidopsis mTERF genes involved in tandem duplication were localized on chromosome 1 and formed a single cluster for these paralogs , whereas in the maize genome there were two tandemly duplicated mTERF gene clusters in chromosomes 1 and 5. The two clusters only contained five ZmTERF genes, representing 17% of ZmTERF genes, and are comparative with the four homologs generated by segmental duplication (Figure 4). Both segmental and tandem duplication are important for mTERF gene family expansion in maize, unlike for rice and Arabidopsis where tandem duplication played a predominant role in gene duplication , . Duplicated genes may have three different evolutionary fates nonfunctionalization, subfunctionalization or neofunctionalization . Sequence homology and gene expression analysis revealed that ZmTERF4, -7 and -20 were pseudogenes encoding truncated mTERF peptides and showed no expression in microarray data (Figure 6) and RT-PCR assay (Figure S2). This result showed that the three genes underwent nonfunctionalization by degenerative mutations during maize evolution. Two pairs of duplicates (ZmTERF1 and -29, and ZmTERF18 and -19) were stably preserved since they differ in their functions – such as differential spatial and temporal gene expression (Figure 6). The duplicated genes showed divergent expression patterns and have undergone neofunctionalization.
Expression Divergence of ZmTERF Genes in Different Tissues or Organs
To establish organ and tissue-specific expression patterns of ZmTERF genes, NCBI ESTdb, available microarray and RNA-seq data were used. As shown in Figures 6, S5 and Table S7, most ZmTERF genes were actively transcribed as for Arabidopsis mTERF genes , and nine ZmTERFs were ubiquitously expressed in all organs and most tissues (Figure 6). In general, the temporal and tissue-specific expression of plastid-targeting ZmTERF genes was correlated with chloroplast development and photosynthesis proceeding, e.g. for ZmTERF6,-9, -23, -24, -27 and -29. Expression divergence of ZmTERFs along the leaf developmental gradient and between mature bundle sheath and mesophyll cells were explored using RNA-seq data. The result reveals that quite a number of ZmTERFs showed differential expression levels among the four zones representing differentially developed chloroplasts, derived from developmental leaf, and ten ZmTERFs were differentially expressed between mature bundle sheath and mesophyll cells. Together, maize mTERF genes may have important roles in controlling organellar gene expression for chloroplast development and C4 photosynthesis.
Arabidopsis BSM/RUG2 is essential for chloroplast biogenesis and development . T-DNA insertion in SOLDAT10 causes lethal, whereas point mutation of SOLDAT10 shows lighter green cotyledons . SOLDAT10 can abrogate 1O2-mediated cell death of flu seedlings under illumination by perturbing chloroplast homeostasis and subsequently affecting the chloroplast-to-nucleus retrograde signaling pathway. The retrograde signals that adjust acclimation to light intensity are proposed to contribute to the signaling pathways that control photoperiodic acclimation of leaves . Expression alteration of several ZmTERF genes in response to light and dark was investigated by qRT-PCR. Largely induced expression of chloroplast-targeting ZmTERF23 and -27 in response to light is understandable because these genes were probably requisite for transformation of plastid from etioplast to chloroplast during de-etiolation of maize seedling under illumination. The result is consistent with the presence of plentiful LREs in the corresponding promoters (Figure 5). Nevertheless, mitochondrial ZmTERF genes also show up-regulated expression in response to light. These genes might be required to optimize photosynthetic efficiency via coordinating the expression of mitochondrial genes and regulating the composition of the mitochondrial respiratory chain in the light, like MOC1 in C. reinhardtii . This hypothesis is also consistent with the down-regulated expression of these genes under dark treatment (Figure 7).
Selected ZmTERF genes show differential expression patterns under salt, ABA and NAA treatments. In Arabidopsis, most mTERF genes were heavily down-regulated in response to ABA, salt or mannitol . In maize, however, ZmTERF genes showed different expression profiles to Arabidopsis mTERF genes, although several ZmTERF genes were down-regulated at certain periods after ABA treatment. This difference between Arabidopsis and maize mTERF genes might be due to the short-term response to ABA monitored in our study. Conversely, a few ZmTERF genes were up-regulated under salt treatments (AlCl3 and NaCl) to a substantial extent (Figure 8). The result may reflect the differences in response of monocots and dicots to salts. All of ZmTERF genes checked here were up or down-regulated with NAA at more than one time spot (Figure 8). This expression alteration is not consistent with the fact there were no known GREs in the promoters of these ZmTERF genes, and thus other unidentified elements in the promoter regions could account for the NAA-induced expression.
Molecular Function of Plant mTERF Genes
In human, the biological roles of mTERF genes in controlling mitochondrial replication, transcription and translation have been well documented , –. Detailed molecular characterizations have shown that hsmTERF1 binds to mitochondrial DNA as a monomer ,  and hsmTERF4 binds to mitochondrial rRNA within a protein complex containing NSUN4 , . In C. reinhardtii, MOC1 protein can bind to the mitochondrial DNA specifically as does hsmTERF1 . The conserved transcriptional factor-like function shared by mTERF genes in C. reinhardtii and human is probably responsible for the similar mechanism for mitochondrial genome transcription by which the mitochondrial genomes of human and C. reinhardtii are transcribed bidirectionally to produce two long primary transcripts, which are further processed to yield the mature mRNAs . Increased mTERF members in higher plants may account for complicated regulation of mitochondrial genome as mtDNA transcription regulators besides chloroplast genome. Arabidopsis mTERF genes are required for normal expression of organellar genes , –. Moreover, plant mTERF proteins share conserved mTERF motif and similar 3D structure with human mTERF proteins (Figure 2) . Arabidopsis mTERF protein, BSM/RUG2, has been shown to nonspecifically bind the chloroplast DNA segments . It is envisaged that mTERF genes of higher plants have similar roles to hsmTERFs and MOC1. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that mTERF proteins of higher plants require auxiliary factors for specific DNA-binding because of existence of mTERF complex in chloroplast nucleoid , or these mTERF proteins have evolved the specialized property for RNA-binding, as has hsmTERF4 protein , , since Arabidopsis mTERF genes show co-expression with pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) genes and might regulate mitochondrial RNA metabolism .
To date, only four mTERF genes of flowering plants have been functionally identified by a reverse genetic approach and all were Arabidopsis mTERF genes. Furthermore, three of the four genes are targeted to chloroplast , ,  while only one (SHOT1) is targeted to mitochondria . No known mutations have been reported so far for Arabidopsis groups VIII and IX genes (Figure 1). It is possible that these genes are functionally redundant or their mutations are lethal or conditional. Further biochemical evidence for the function of plant mTERF genes is still required to address these hypotheses. The biological functions of maize mTERF genes will be interpreted through mutant analysis, which is now accessible in the UniformMu Resource (http://www.maizegdb.org/documentation/uniformmu/) and the Mu Insertion Database (http://teosinte.uoregon.edu/mu-illumina/). Recently, several chloroplast-targeting mTERF mutants showing abnormal development of chloroplasts were observed and reported in the Photosynthetic Mutant Library (PML) (http://pml.uoregon.edu/pml_table.php) in which ZmTERF27 cloned by Hammani and Brakan very recently is orthologous to Arabidopsis BSM/RUG2 and plays an important role in group II intron splicing in maize chloroplasts . In Arabidopsis, absence of BSM/RUG2 causes abortion of embryo development, while in maize, mutants of ZmTERF27 (Zm-mterf4-1 and Zm-mterf4-3 in PML) only causes disturbed leaf development of seedlings after seed germination, showing that in maize the effect of ZmTERF27 mutation on embryo development can be alleviated . This result may be due to variation of malonyl-coA synthase in maize and Arabidopsis .
This is the first study of genome-scale analysis of mTERF genes in maize. We identifed 31 putative ZmTERFs, sorted them into nine groups based on their phylogenetic relationship, mined 15 conserved motifs, found contributions of gene duplications to the expansion of mTERF gene family in maize, and explored spatio-temporal and abiotic stress-responsive expression patterns of ZmTERFs. The results presented in this study provide basic information on maize mTERF genes and form the foundation for future functional studies of these proteins. Future functional analyses of maize mTERF genes identified in this study would eventually elucidate the biological mechanisms controlling organellar gene expression mediated by ZmTERF genes.
Materials and Methods
Identification of mTERF Genes in Maize
To obtain all putative mTERF family genes in maize, three approaches were used to mine maize expression and annotation databases. First, the keywords ‘maize’ and ‘mTERF’ were used to search the NCBI Protein database. Second, the reported sequences of the mTERF1-mTERF4 genes in human , , , , C. reinhardtti MOC1  and Arabidopsis mTERFs  were collected and used as query sequences to search the maize filtered-gene set (ZmB73_5b_FGS_translations.fasta downloaded from www.maizesequence.org) in local BLASTP program  with E-value<1e-10. Additional local TBLASTN  was performed to query the Maize Full Length cDNA database (downloaded from http://www.maizecdna.org/)  and Unigene database of NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) with the above known mTERF proteins. Third, conserved mTERF domains were used to query the maize filtered-gene set with mTERF HMM file (PF02536) from the Pfam database  using the HMMER 3.0 package , and the mTERF proteins were collected in terms of default inclusion threshold. Unique maize mTERF proteins were collected by manually eliminating redundant repeats. The maize mTERF proteins were confirmed within SMART . Information about chromosomal localization, coding sequence length and aa length was obtained for each gene from MaizeGDB (http://maizegdb.org/). The molecular weight and theoretical isoelectric point (pI) value of the maize mTERFs were investigated within Expasy online tools (http://expasy.org/tools/).
Gene Structure and Alternative Splicing
DNA and transcript sequences of maize mTERF genes were obtained from MaizeSequence (www.maizesequence.org) and MaizeGDB (http://maizegdb.org/) databases. There was more than one alternatively spliced transcript for most maize mTERFs annotated in the MaizeGDB database. Conserved gene structures of maize mTERFs were identified by comparing with their homologs in other higher plants in the CoGe program  and Phytozome v8.0 (http://www.phytozome.net). These conserved gene structures were drawn and displayed by Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS) .
To confirm the gene models of maize mTERFs, PCR amplification of maize mTERFs was performed with transcript specific primers (Table S2), and the DNA and cDNA derived from total RNA of B73 seedlings as a PCR template. PCR products were purified and sequenced in an ABI3730 sequencer (Sunny Bio., Shanghai). By comparing cDNA with DNA sequences, putative gene models were validated in the B73 inbred line.
Motif and Conserved Sequence Analysis
Pfam  and SMART  database searching was carried out to identify known conserved motifs in maize mTERF proteins, and the Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME) program v4.9.0  was used to predict the potential motifs in the putative mTERF family gene sequences with the following parameters: zero or one per sequence for distribution of a single motif, 6≤ optimum width of each motif ≤50, and maximum number of motifs to find = 15. mTERF motifs in maize mTERF proteins were collected and clustered using the ClustalW 2.0 program , and graphical representation of aa residues was made using WebLogo .
Subcellular Location and Chromosomal Location of Maize mTERFs
TargetP  and Predotar  were used to predict subcellular location of maize mTERF proteins. Additionally, experimental proteomic data in the Plant Proteome DataBase (PPDB) for Arabidopsis thaliana and maize  were queried for validating the prediction results on the basis of appearance of mTERF proteins in specific organelle proteomes. Maize mTERF genes were mapped onto the corresponding maize chromosomes by identifying their chromosomal positions given in the MaizeGDB (http://maizegdb.org). Using MapChart software , the distribution of maize mTERF genes on chromosomes was drawn and modified manually with annotation information in MaizeGDB (http://maizegdb.org).
Synteny Analysis and Gene Duplication
To compare the genomic context of maize mTERF genes with that in other grass species, information on their patterns of microsynteny was retrieved from the database Phytozome v8.0 (www.phytozome.net). Orthologs of maize mTERF genes in other grasses were investigated in the CoGe database . Duplication analysis of maize mTERF genes was carried out in the Synteny Mapping and Analysis Program (SyMAP) v4.0  and WGMapping program in the PLAZA v2.5 platform . Two mTERFs placed on the synteny blocks in maize genome were designated as segmental duplicated paralogs, and two mTERFs separated by five or fewer gene loci were regarded as tandem duplicated paralogs as described .
Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Tree Construction
A total of 98 aa sequences (Table S3) of the mTERF genes were aligned with the program MUSCLE . The resulting alignment was manually optimized by removing unaligned residues in CINEMA 5 (http://aig.cs.man.ac.uk/research/utopia/cinema/cinema.php). A Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was constructed using RAxML v7.2.8  with the JTT aa substitution model. Bootstrap testing was performed with 500 re-sampling to search for the best tree. The ML phylogenetic tree was depicted by FigTree v1.4.0 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/-figtree/).
Secondary Structure and 3D Structure Analysis
To interpret the responsibility of conserved higher structure for roles of mTERF genes in plant organellar gene expression regulation, the secondary structures of mTERF proteins were analyzed using MINNOU , and their 3D structures were remodeled using the I-TASSER program  on the basis of crystal structure of previously resolved human mTERFs , –, . Superimposing 3D structures of maize mTERFs with that of human mTERFs was performed in the TM-align program . PyMOL v184.108.40.206  was used to display and analyze the tertiary structure of maize mTERFs.
Cis-Regulatory Elements in Promoter
Promoter sequences (2-kb upstream of the translation start codon) for maize mTERF genes were obtained from the MaizeSequence database (http://www.maizesequence.org/-index.html) and subjected to prediction of cis-acting regulatory DNA elements using PlantPAN  with the transcription factors selected from rice, maize and Arabidopsis. The regulatory DNA elements were displayed in Argo Genome Browser v1.0.26 (http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/argo/).
Gene Expression Profile Analysis
Spatio-temporal expression regulation of maize mTERFs was investigated using the microarray data (ZM37) for a genome-wide gene expression altas of the entire life cycle of B73 maize  from PLEXdb . Robust Multi-array Average (RMA) normalized and log2-transformed expression data of maize mTERFs was retrieved from ZM37 and median expression values were loaded into Cluster 3.0  for hierarchical clustering analysis. Clustered expression data of maize mTERFs were depicted using Java TreeView v1.1.5 . eFP browser  was used to analyze the expression regulation of maize mTERFs during seedling leaf development as well as in bundle sheath and mesophyll cells.
Plant Stress Treatment
To verify the expression regulation of mTERF genes in maize under hormone and salt [sodium chloride (NaCl, 200 mM) and aluminum chloride (AlCl3, 200 mM)] treatments, the two-leaf B73 seedlings were cultured in water under the following chemical treatments, ABA (100 μM) and 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA, a synthetic plant hormone in the auxin family) (100 μM) (Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai), respectively. Samples were collected at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 h after the above treatment, with three biological replicates per sample. To investigate effects of light on expression of maize mTERFs, etiolated B73 seedlings cultured in darkness were placed under continuous light, while normal-cultured B73 seedlings cultured under 16 h light/8 h dark were placed in darkness after 24 h of continuous light. Samples were collected at 1, 2, 4 and 8 h after light or dark treatment, with three biological replicates per sample. Total RNAs of collected samples were isolated with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified by NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher, USA) before cDNA synthesis.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis
For real-time PCR analysis, first-strand cDNA was synthesized from RNase-free DNase I (Fermentas, USA)-treated total RNA using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR was performed in an optical 96-well plate with a BioRad CFX96 Real-time PCR System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) with the gene-specific primers (Table S9). Each reaction contained 12.5 μl of 2×SYBR Green Master Mix Reagent (Applied Biosystems, USA), 5 μl of diluted cDNA sample and 500 nM of each primer (Table S2) in a final volume of 25 μl. The thermal cycle used was as follows: 95°C for 5 min; 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 15 s. The maize Actin1 gene (GenBank accession number, J01238) was used as the internal control . The relative expression levels were determined using 2–ΔΔCT method as described previously . The SAS v9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., USA) was used for the statistical analysis and the Dunnett’s t test was used to compare the significant difference of all stress treatments against their controls.
Correction of ZmTERF23 gene model. (A) Multiple sequence alignment for GRMZM2G426154, GRMZM2G175930 and BT084020 was performed in Clustal Omega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). Identical nucleotides are denoted by asterisks under the alignment. (B) BAC contigs were rearranged to produce correct ZmTERF23.
Exon–intron organization of maize mTERF genes. The gene structures of maize mTERF genes were generated by comparing the transcript sequences with corresponding DNA sequences in GSDS . Classification and subcellular localization information of maize mTERF genes shown in this picture were derived from Figure 1 and Table 1, respectively.
Schematic structure of maize mTERF proteins. mTERF motifs identified in SMART  are boxed in black. Light gray boxes denote mTERF motifs with lower reliability.
Validation of maize mTERF gene models by RT-PCR and DNA sequencing. DNA and cDNA derive from total RNA isolated from B73 seedling leaf were used as templates to amplify the maize mTERF genes with transcript-specific primers listed in. Each of maize mTERF genes was amplified and surveyed in 1% agarose gel followed by EB (ethidium bromide) staining.
Multiple sequence alignment of ZmTERF27 and its homologs in Arabidopsis, rice and human. MUSCLE program  was used to align the amino acid sequences of ZmTERF27, BSM/RUG2, LOC_Os05g33500 and HsmTERF1. The secondary structure of ZmTERF27 protein displayed under the aligned sequences was predicted in MINNOU . mTERF motifs (M1–M9) are shown as black bars under their conserved residues. Putative mTERF structure modules with two or three α-helices are represented by red bars. Conserved arginine residues are highlighted by red asterisks.
Expression patterns of maize mTERF genes in different tissues analyzed by realtime RT-PCR. Total RNA was isolated from seedling leaf, root, unpollinated silk, mature seed and immature tassel of B73 maize. Three biological replicates per sample were conducted. The expression levels of each gene were normalized against Actin1 gene using 2–ΔCt methods . Duncan’s multiple range test (MRT) was used to statistically analyze the expression in different tissues and significant differences were marked by little letter on the top of bars (α = 0.05, n = 3). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Expression levels of maize mTERF genes in B73 seedling leaf. Transcript abundance of maize mTERF genes in different developmental gradients and cells of B73 seedling leaf were retrieved from eFP browser (http://bar.utoronto.ca/efp_maize/cgi-bin/efpWeb.cgi) . Base, base of the leaf; Ligule+4, –1 cm from ligule; Ligule+9, +4 cm from ligule; Tip_–1, –1 cm from tip; Tip_BS, bundle sheath cells of Tip_–1; Tip_ME, mesophyll cells of Tip_–1. Expression levels (RPKM) of maize mTERF genes are represented on y-axis.
List of maize mTERF genes identified from three databases.
Characterization of maize mTERF genes and proteins in detail.
mTERF genes of rice and Arabidopsis thaliana and other known mTERF genes used for construction of the phylogenetic tree in this study.
Transcript-specific primers used for gene model validation of maize mTERF genes.
Annotation of cis-regulatory elements involved in phytohormone and abiotic stress response of plants.
Cis-regulatory elements found in the 2-kb upstream regions of maize mTERF genes.
Digital expression analysis of maize mTERF genes.
Spatio-temporal expression levels of maize mTERF genes.
Gene-specific primers used for qRT-PCR analysis of maize mTERF genes.
We thank Liwei Wang and Pengcheng Yin for plant treatments and RNA isolation, and Dr. Jianyi Yang (University of Michigan) for his helpful suggestion on protein structure analysis.
Conceived and designed the experiments: YXZ XBZ FZQ. Performed the experiments: YXZ XBZ MJC YRL JHZ HLZ FK. Analyzed the data: YXZ XBZ MJC FZQ. Wrote the manuscript: YXZ FZQ YLZ.
- 1. Gray MW, Burger G, Lang BF (1999) Mitochondrial evolution. Science 283: 1476–1481.
- 2. Binder S, Brennicke A (2003) Gene expression in plant mitochondria: transcriptional and post-transcriptional control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358(1429): 181–188.
- 3. Liere K, Weihe A, Börner T (2011) The transcription machineries of plant mitochondria and chloroplasts: composition, function, and regulation. J Plant Physiol 168(12): 1345–1360.
- 4. Kühn K, Bohne AV, Liere K, Weihe A, Börner T (2007) Arabidopsis single-polypeptide RNA polymerases: accurate in vitro transcription of organellar genes. Plant Cell 19: 959–971.
- 5. Robles P, Micol JL, Quesada V (2012) Unveiling plant mTERF functions. Mol Plant 5(2): 294–296.
- 6. Linder T, Park CB, Asin-Cayuela J, Pellegrini M, Larsson NG, et al. (2005) A family of putative transcription termination factors shared amongst metazoans and plants. Curr Genet 48: 265–269.
- 7. Roberti M, Bruni F, Polosa PL, Gadaleta MN, Cantatore P (2006) The Drosophila termination factor DmTTF regulates in vivo mitochondrial transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 34(7): 2109–2116.
- 8. Roberti M, Bruni F, Loguercio Polosa P, Manzari C, Gadaleta MN, et al. (2006) MTERF3, the most conserved member of the mTERF family, is a modular factor involved in mitochondrial protein synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1757(9–10): 1199–11206.
- 9. Roberti M, Polosa PL, Bruni F, Manzari C, Deceglie S, et al. (2009) The MTERF family proteins: Mitochondrial transcription regulators and beyond. Biochim Biophys Acta 1787(5): 303–311.
- 10. Kruse B, Narasimhan N, Attardi G (1989) Termination of transcription in human mitochondria: identification and purification of a DNA binding protein factor that promotes termination. Cell 58(2): 391–397.
- 11. Fernandez-Silva P, Martinez-Azorin F, Micol V, Attardi G (1997) The human mitochondrial transcription termination factor (mTERF) is a multizipper protein but binds to DNA as a monomer, with evidence pointing to intramolecular leucine zipper interactions. EMBO J 16(5): 1066–1079.
- 12. Pellegrini M, Asin-Cayuela J, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Larsson NG, et al. (2009) MTERF2 is a nucleoid component in mammalian mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1787(5): 296–302.
- 13. Wenz T, Luca C, Torraco A, Moraes CT (2009) mTERF2 regulates oxidative phosphorylation by modulating mtDNA transcription. Cell Metab 9(6): 499–511.
- 14. Park CB, Asin-Cayuela J, Cámara Y, Shi Y, Pellegrini M, et al. (2007) MTERF3 is a negative regulator of mammalian mtDNA transcription. Cell 130(2): 273–285.
- 15. Cámara Y, Asin-Cayuela J, Park CB, Metodiev MD, Shi Y, et al. (2011) MTERF4 regulates translation by targeting the methyltransferase NSUN4 to the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome. Cell Metab 13(5): 527–539.
- 16. Spåhr H, Habermann B, Gustafsson CM, Larsson NG, Hallberg BM (2012) Structure of the human MTERF4-NSUN4 protein complex that regulates mitochondrial ribosome biogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(38): 15253–15258.
- 17. Babiychuk E, Vandepoele K, Wissing J, Garcia-Diaz M, De Rycke R, et al. (2011) Plastid gene expression and plant development require a plastidic protein of the mitochondrial transcription termination factor family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(16): 6674–6679.
- 18. Kleine T (2012) Arabidopsis thaliana mTERF proteins: evolution and functional classification. Front Plant Sci 3: 233.
- 19. Schönfeld C, Wobbe L, Borgstädt R, Kienast A, Nixon PJ, et al. (2004) The nucleus-encoded protein MOC1 is essential for mitochondrial light acclimation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Biol Chem 279(48): 50366–50374.
- 20. Wobbe L, Nixon PJ (2013) The mTERF protein MOC1 terminates mitochondrial DNA transcription in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Nucleic Acids Res 41(13): 6553–6567.
- 21. Meskauskiene R, Würsch M, Laloi C, Vidi PA, Coll NS, et al. (2009) A mutation in the Arabidopsis mTERF-related plastid protein SOLDAT10 activates retrograde signaling and suppresses 1O2-induced cell death. Plant J 60(3): 399–410.
- 22. Quesada V, Sarmiento-Mañús R, González-Bayón R, Hricová A, Pérez-Marcos R, et al. Arabidopsis RUGOSA2 encodes an mTERF family member required for mitochondrion, chloroplast and leaf development (2011) Plant J. 68: 738–753.
- 23. Robles P, Micol JL, Quesada V (2012) Arabidopsis MDA1, a nuclear-encoded protein, functions in chloroplast development and abiotic stress responses. PLoS One 7(8): e42924.
- 24. Kim M, Lee U, Small I, des Francs-Small CC, Vierling E (2012) Mutations in an Arabidopsis mitochondrial transcription termination factor-related protein enhance thermotolerance in the absence of the major molecular chaperone HSP101. Plant Cell 24(8): 3349–3365.
- 25. Eddy SR (1996) Hidden Markov models. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6(3): 361–365.
- 26. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P (2012) SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res 40(Database issue): D302–D305.
- 27. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22(21): 2688–2690.
- 28. Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H (2007) Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nat Protoc 2(4): 953–971.
- 29. Small I, Peeters N, Legeai F, Lurin C (2004) Predotar: A tool for rapidly screening proteomes for N-terminal targeting sequences. Proteomics 4(6): 1581–1590.
- 30. Sun Q, Zybailov B, Majeran W, Friso G, Olinares PD, et al. (2009) PPDB, the Plant Proteomics Database at Cornell. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Database issue): D969–D974.
- 31. Majeran W, Friso G, Asakura Y, Qu X, Huang M, et al. (2011) Nucleoid-enriched proteomes in developing plastids and chloroplasts from maize leaves: a new conceptual framework for nucleoid functions. Plant Physiol 158(1): 156–189.
- 32. Friso G, Majeran W, Huang M, Sun Q, van Wijk KJ (2010) Reconstruction of metabolic pathways, protein expression, and homeostasis machineries across maize bundle sheath and mesophyll chloroplasts: large-scale quantitative proteomics using the first maize genome assembly. Plant Physiol 152(3): 1219–1250.
- 33. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23(21): 2947–2948.
- 34. Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, et al. (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Web Server issue): W202–W208.
- 35. Martin M, Cho J, Cesare AJ, Griffith JD, Attardi G (2005) Termination factor-mediated DNA loop between termination and initiation sites drives mitochondrial rRNA synthesis. Cell 123(7): 1227–1240.
- 36. Spåhr H, Samuelsson T, Hällberg BM, Gustafsson CM (2010) Structure of mitochondrial transcription termination factor 3 reveals a novel nucleic acid-binding domain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 397(3): 386–390.
- 37. Yakubovskaya E, Mejia E, Byrnes J, Hambardjieva E, Garcia-Diaz M (2010) Helix unwinding and base flipping enable human MTERF1 to terminate mitochondrial transcription. Cell 141(6): 982–993.
- 38. Yakubovskaya E, Guja KE, Mejia E, Castano S, Hambardjieva E, et al. (2012) Structure of the essential MTERF4: NSUN4 protein complex reveals how an MTERF protein collaborates to facilitate rRNA modification. Structure 20(11): 1940–1947.
- 39. Groves MR, Hanlon N, Turowski P, Hemmings BA, Barford D (1999) The structure of the protein phosphatase 2A PR65/A subunit reveals the conformation of its 15 tandemly repeated HEAT motifs. Cell 96(1): 99–110.
- 40. Sibanda BL, Chirgadze DY, Blundell TL (2010) Crystal structure of DNA-PKcs reveals a large open-ring cradle comprised of HEAT repeats. Nature 463: 118–121.
- 41. Edwards TA, Pyle SE, Wharton RP, Aggarwal AK (2001) Structure of Pumilio reveals similarity between RNA and peptide binding motifs. Cell 105(2): 281–289.
- 42. Zhang Y (2008) I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 40.
- 43. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2005) TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 33(7): 2302–2309.
- 44. Soderlund C, Bomhoff M, Nelson WM (2011) SyMAP v3.4: a turnkey synteny system with application to plant genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 39(10): e68.
- 45. Van Bel M, Proost S, Wischnitzki E, Movahedi S, Scheerlinck C, et al. (2012) Dissecting plant genomes with the PLAZA comparative genomics platform. Plant Physiol 158(2): 590–600.
- 46. Nakashima K, Ito Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2009) Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiol 149(1): 88–95.
- 47. Khong G, Richaud F, Coudert Y, Pati PK, Santi C, et al. (2008) Modulating rice stress tolerance by transcription factors. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 25: 381–403.
- 48. Baker SS, Wilhelm KS, Thomashow MF (1994) The 5′-region of Arabidopsis thaliana cor15a has cis-acting elements that confer cold-, drought- and ABA-regulated gene expression. Plant Mol Biol 24(5): 701–713.
- 49. Chang WC, Lee TY, Huang HD, Huang HY, Pan RL (2008) PlantPAN: Plant promoter analysis navigator, for identifying combinatorial cis-regulatory elements with distance constraint in plant gene groups. BMC Genomics 9: 561.
- 50. Sekhon RS, Lin H, Childs KL, Hansey CN, Buell CR, et al. (2011) Genome-wide atlas of transcription during maize development. Plant J 66(4): 553–563.
- 51. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D (1998) Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(25): 14863–14868.
- 52. Duarte JM, Cui L, Wall PK, Zhang Q, Zhang X, et al. (2006) Expression pattern shifts following duplication indicative of subfunctionalization and neofunctionalization in regulatory genes of Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Evol 23(2): 469–478.
- 53. Winter D, Vinegar B, Nahal H, Ammar R, Wilson GV, et al. (2007) An “Electronic Fluorescent Pictograph” browser for exploring and analyzing large-scale biological data sets. PLoS One 2(8): e718.
- 54. Li P, Ponnala L, Gandotra N, Wang L, Si Y, et al. (2010) The developmental dynamics of the maize leaf transcriptome. Nat Genet 42(12): 1060–1067.
- 55. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, et al. (2009) The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326: 1112–1115.
- 56. Forner J, Weber B, Thuss S, Wildum S, Binder S (2007) Mapping of mitochondrial mRNA termini in Arabidopsis thaliana: t-elements contribute to 5′ and 3′ end formation. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 3676–3692.
- 57. Gagliardi D, Binder S (2007) Expression of the plant mitochondrial genome. In D Logan, ed, Plant Mitochondria. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA, 50–95.
- 58. Lynch M, Conery JS (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151–1155.
- 59. Hammani K, Barkan A (2014) An mTERF domain protein functions in group II intron splicing in maize chloroplasts. Nucleic Acids Res In press.
- 60. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215(3): 403–410.
- 61. Soderlund C, Descour A, Kudrna D, Bomhoff M, Boyd L, et al. (2009) Sequencing, mapping, and analysis of 27,455 maize full-length cDNAs. PLoS Genet 5(11): e1000740.
- 62. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, et al. (2012) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 40(Database issue): D290–D301.
- 63. Schnable JC, Lyons E (2011) Comparative genomics with maize and other grasses: from genes to genomes! Maydica. 56: 183–200.
- 64. Guo AY, Zhu QH, Chen X, Luo JC (2007) GSDS: a gene structure display server. Yi Chuan 29(8): 1023–1026.
- 65. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE (2004) WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14(6): 1188–1190.
- 66. Voorrips RE (2002) MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered 93(1): 77–78.
- 67. Peng X, Zhao Y, Cao J, Zhang W, Jiang H, et al. (2012) CCCH-type zinc finger family in maize: genome-wide identification, classification and expression profiling under abscisic acid and drought treatments. PLoS One 7(7): e40120.
- 68. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32(5): 1792–1797.
- 69. Cao B, Porollo A, Adamczak R, Jarrell M, Meller J (2006) Enhanced recognition of protein transmembrane domains with prediction-based structural profiles. Bioinformatics 22(3): 303–309.
- 70. Jiménez-Menéndez N, Fernández-Millán P, Rubio-Cosials A, Arnan C, Montoya J, et al. (2010) Human mitochondrial mTERF wraps around DNA through a left-handed superhelical tandem repeat. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17(7): 891–893.
- 71. Schrodinger L (2013) The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 220.127.116.11. Portland, OR, USA.
- 72. Dash S, Van Hemert J, Hong L, Wise RP, Dickerson JA (2012) PLEXdb: gene expression resources for plants and plant pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res 40(Database issue): D1194–D1201.
- 73. Saldanha AJ (2004) Java Treeview–extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20(17): 3246–3248.
- 74. Haring M, Offermann S, Danker T, Horst I, Peterhansel C, et al. (2007) Chromatin immunoprecipitation: optimization, quantitative analysis and data normalization. Plant Methods 3: 11.
- 75. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4): 402–408.