Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Serum Uric Acid Levels in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis

  • Xueping Chen,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, China

  • Xiaoyan Guo,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, China

  • Rui Huang,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, China

  • Yongping Chen,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, China

  • Zhenzhen Zheng,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, China

  • Huifang Shang

    hfshang@yahoo.com

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, China

Serum Uric Acid Levels in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis

  • Xueping Chen, 
  • Xiaoyan Guo, 
  • Rui Huang, 
  • Yongping Chen, 
  • Zhenzhen Zheng, 
  • Huifang Shang
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Serum uric acid (UA) could exert neuro-protective effects against Alzheimer's disease (AD) via its antioxidant capacities. Many studies investigated serum UA levels in AD patients, but to date, results from these observational studies are conflicting.

Methods

We conducted a meta-analysis to compare serum UA levels between AD patients and healthy controls by the random-effects model. Studies were identified by searching PubMed, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library databases from 1966 through July 2013 using the Medical Subject Headings and keywords without restriction in languages. Only case-control studies were included if they had data on serum UA levels in AD patients and healthy controls. Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test were applied to assess the potential publication bias. Sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were conducted to explore possible explanations for heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria including 2708 participants were abstracted. Serum UA levels were not significantly different in AD patients compared to healthy controls (standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.23 to 0.22). Little evidence of publication bias was observed. Sensitivity analyses showed that the combined SMD was consistent every time omitting any one study, except only one study which greatly influenced the overall results. Meta-regression showed that year of publication, race, sample size, and mean age were not significant sources of heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis of case-control studies suggests that serum UA levels do not differ significantly in AD patients, but there may be a trend toward decreased UA in AD after an appropriate interpretation. More well-designed investigations are needed to demonstrate the potential change of serum UA levels in AD patients.

Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative dysfunction of the central nervous system, characterized by brain atrophy and accumulation of amyloid-plaques and neurofibrillary tangles throughout the cortex by the end of the disease [1]. The clinical symptoms of AD include progressive short-term memory loss, impaired linguistic function, alternations in neuroendocrine functions, emotional dysfunction, declining cognition, and dementia [2]. By 2050 the world will have about 100 million people suffering from AD [3]. Many studies support the theory that oxidative stress and impaired energy metabolism play an important role in the pathogenesis of AD [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Cerebral tissue seems to be particularly vulnerable to oxidative damage, because of its high oxygen consumption, low content of antioxidants and high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids of neuronal membranes [13], [14], [15]. The β-amyloid protein itself and other lesion-associated proteins have been reported to cause oxidative damage to neurons [16]. Mitochondrial dysfunction in AD could cause an increased generation of free radicals, and damage the major cell components, including DNA, protein and lipid [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Isoprostanes, as a marker of lipid peroxidation, were increased in the brain of AD animal models [24]. Elevated isoprostanes in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of AD patients could be used to monitor the disease progression and the response to therapeutic [25], [26]. In addition, high levels of isoprostanes were also found in plasma and urine, suggesting a possible relationship between central and peripheral markers of oxidative damage [27], [28]. Furthermore, peripheral antioxidants, including uric acid (UA), bilirubin and albumin are strong free radical scavengers. UA is an endogenously produced water-soluble antioxidant [29], [30], accounting for up to 60% of the free radical scavenging capacity in the peripheral system by quenching superoxide and singlet oxygen [31], [32]. These qualities make UA an attractive CNS antioxidant, and its potential protective effects on AD have been reported in prior studies. Some studies suggested that UA levels tend to be low in AD [33], [34], [35], but another report found no difference of UA concentrations in Parkinson's disease (PD), AD and healthy controls [36]. In addition, some studies suggest that patients with higher serum UA levels have a markedly lower risk of progressing from impaired cognitive function to dementia [37], [38], while some studies found that even mild elevation of UA might enhance the risk of cognitive decline in older adults [39]. Other study revealed that patients with normal cognitive function have higher serum UA levels than AD patients [40]. Considering these inconsistent possibilities, we tried to establish what consensus could be reached from various studies by examining the change of serum UA levels in AD patients compared to healthy controls with meta-analytic techniques.

Methods

Search strategy

Our systematic review was conducted according to the Meta analysis of Observational Studies in epidemiology (MOOSe) guidelines [41] and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) [42] (Checklist S1). We searched four major electronic databases, including PubMed, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library from 1966 until July 2013 for studies that reported the change of serum UA level in AD patients. No language restrictions and the medical subject heading (MeSH) terms for “Alzheimer's disease” and “urate” or “uric acid” were included in the search strategy. All the articles were retrieved and potentially relevant articles were searched to fulfill the reference lists. Additionally, we also tried to find unpublished datasets, but no studies were suitable for inclusion. The final search was carried out on July 10, 2013.

Eligibility criteria

All the articles were carefully read and evaluated. Studies were included if they fulfill the following criteria: 1) from case-control studies which compared the serum UA levels between AD patients and healthy controls; 2) defined UA measured at laboratories as exposure factor; 3) clearly stated AD diagnostic criteria; 4) met at least six points of Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria, which is used for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysis. If the same or similar population was used in more than one studies, we selected the one with the most complete and relevant data for analysis.

Exclusion criteria, Data extraction and Quality assessment

Review articles, editorials, commentaries, hypothesis papers, letters that reported no new data, meta-analyses, and abstracts were excluded. The exclusion criteria for this study were clarified as follow: 1) reported on treatment and management of AD; 2) reported associations with dementia occurring before onset of AD; 3) included cases of dementia with Lewy bodies; 4) did not set a control group or provide adequate details on the control group; 5) If control groups >1, the control group most representative of the healthy general population was used; 6) reported on a disease other than AD. Two authors independently evaluated the eligibility of all retrieved studies and extracted the relevant data using a unified form. Finally, discrepancies were discussed until an agreement was reached. A quality score was calculated to assess the quality of the studies according to the NOS criteria. Three major components were collected: selection of the study groups (0–4 points), ascertainment for the exposure of interest in the studies (0–3 points) and quality of the adjustment for confounding (0–2 points). A higher score represents better quality in methodology.

Data analysis

From each primary study we extracted the data on the study characteristics, including first author's last name, year of publication, country where the study was performed, sample size, mean age, proportion of men, serum UA levels and adjusted covariates. UA values were expressed in International System of Units (umoles/liter). We therefore performed the conversion, from μmol/L to the conventional units (mg/dl), using a rate of 16.81 (1 mg/dl = 59.48 μmol/L).

We examined the presence of heterogeneity across studies using the I2 statistic to quantify the percentage of variability that can be attributed to the between-study differences. Heterogeneity among studies was also evaluated using the Chi-square test based on Cochran's Q statistic. If the P-value for heterogeneity is less than 0.10 or I2 statistic is greater than 50%, the homogeneous of the studies is rejected. When substantial heterogeneity was detected, the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model was used to compare the change of serum UA levels in AD patients with healthy controls across the studies. The DerSimonian and Laird technique was considered an appropriate pooling method due to the relative heterogeneity generated from the source population in each study. This method weighs individual studies by sample size and variance and generates a pooled point estimate and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the influence of individual result on the pooled estimate. Meta-regression was conducted to explore possible explanation for heterogeneity, especially the effect of four study-level characteristics (year of publication, race, sample size, and mean age) on the serum UA levels in AD. We performed the Egger's test and the Begg's test to assess the potential publication bias, and constructed funnel plots to visualize a possible asymmetry. Two-tailed P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All data analyses were done using Stata 10 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

Results

Literature search

The electronic search identified 50 potentially relevant articles. One initial screening, 28 were excluded based on titles and abstracts, and they were studies with nonclinical studies, case reports, or lack of comparison group. Full-text evaluation were conducted in the remaining 21 articles, and 10 articles were excluded for not fulfilling our inclusion criteria: 3 articles reported insufficient data on serum UA levels; 3 articles did not apply well-accepted diagnosis standard for AD; 2 articles used CSF, not blood as specimen; 1 article was excluded due to no original data reported; 3 studies were based on the same population, the one containing the most complete and relevant data was used. Eventually, 11 studies were included in this analysis. The selecting process is listed in a flow diagram (Figure 1).

Study characteristics

Eleven studies comparing the serum UA levels between AD patients and healthy controls, representing data from 2708 participants were included in the analysis. The characteristics of the studies and of their participants were shown in Table 1. All the eleven studies included both men and women. 1 studies reported gender-specific change of serum UA levels in their participants [43]. Of the 11 trials, 3 were conducted primarily in Italy [44], [45], [46], 1 was conducted in the United States [47] and 1 was performed in United Kingdom [48]. Three studies were done in Asian countries [35], [40], [49] and five studies were from European countries [44], [45], [46], [50], [51]. All the eleven studies applied the criteria “National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association” (NINCDS-ADRDA) for AD. Four studies used the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 4th edition for dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DSM-IV) [35], [40], [48], [49]. Two study applied 3rd edition for dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DSM-III) [47], [51]. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was performed in 9 studies for cognitive assessment [35], [40], [44], [45], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51]. Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) was used in 2 studies to quantify the severity of dementia symptoms [40], [49]. Seven trials have additional experimental group (mild cognitive impairment group or vascular dementia group) plus control group [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [50], [51]. The details of the characteristics of included studies were summarized in Table 1. The overall quality of studies was good, ranging from 6 to 9 (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Quality assessment of included studies based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094084.t002

Risk of Bias in Included Studies

The funnel plot for the included 11 studies comprising AD patients and healthy controls was visually examined, and the shape of this lot was presented essentially symmetrical (Figure 2). There was no statistical evidence of a publication bia among studies either from the result of Egger's (p = 0.57) or Begg's (p = 0.42) tests.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Publication bias from studies on assessment of serum UA levels in AD patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094084.g002

Sensitivity Analyses

In sensitivity analysis, we recalculated the combined standardized mean difference (SMD) by omitting one study per iteration. The study-specific combined SMDs ranged from a low of −0.78 (95% CI, −1.29,−0.27) via omission of the study by Cervellati et al, to a high of −0.55 (95% CI, −1.49,0.39) via omission of the study by Cankurtaran et al. When the study by Cervellati et al was included, the SMDs from the remaining studies yielded consistent negative results without great fluctuations, and the range of the combined SMDs was narrow. When this study was excluded, the 95% CI did not contain 0, a statistically significant difference was identified.

Meta-regression

Since significant heterogeneity was found among individual studies, a meta-regression was performed to explore the predefined possible source of heterogeneity. None of the regression coefficients was statistically significant (Table 3), suggesting that year of publication, race, sample size, and mean age were no significant source of heterogeneity.

Serum UA levels in AD patients and healthy controls

A significant heterogeneity across studies was found (I2 = 58%, p<0.01), thus the random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect size. Using all available data to compare serum UA levels among AD patients compared with controls, there were no significant differences between these two groups. The pooled SMD for the eleven studies on the random-effects model was (−0.50; 95% CI: −1.23, 0.22) (Figure 3).

thumbnail
Figure 3. The serum UA levels in AD patients compared with healthy controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094084.g003

Discussion

In the meta-analysis derived from 11 case-control studies comparing serum UA levels between AD patients and healthy controls, we found that serum UA levels in AD patients did not differ significantly from that in healthy controls. However, some meta-analysis showed that serum UA levels were significantly lower in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) [52], Serum UA levels were lower in PD patients than in controls [53], and higher serum UA levels were associated with lower PD incidence [54]. Many previous studies observed a trend toward decreased UA level in AD [35], [40], [44], [47], [49], [50], [51]. Based on these studies, it has been postulated that lower serum UA levels were associated with a higher risk of AD, since UA may play an antioxidant role. However, some recent studies found that serum UA levels were significantly higher in AD patients compared with controls [43], [45], [46]. In the present meta-analysis, serum UA levels in AD patients were not significantly different from those in healthy controls. This finding was consistent with the results from a present meta-analysis. They found that non-enzymatic antioxidants were significantly reduced in serum of AD patients, except for UA. They only identified a trend toward a decrease of serum UA levels in AD patients (p<0.1) [55]. There are several factors, which may contribute to the lack of a clear link between serum UA level and AD. First, the different methods to examine the serum UA level and varying test sensitivities among different studies. Also, most of the included studies had a small sample size. Thus, the statistical power may be insufficient to detect the difference of serum UA levels between AD patients and healthy controls. In addition, sensitivity is a major concern in meta-analysis. A possible low sensitivity was observed throughout our study. The result from the study conducted by Cervellati et al greatly influenced the overall results, thus the results of the meta-analysis couldn't be regarded with higher degree of certainty. When this study was excluded, significantly lower serum UA levels were identified in AD patients. We checked the original study from Cervellati et al, and found that controls were significantly younger than AD patients (mean age, 65.7 vs 77.9). Serum UA levels were strongly correlated with aging [56], and it steadily increased with advancing age in both men and women [57]. The age of AD patients in Cervellati's study may partly influence serum UA levels in AD patients. Another interference factor is hypertension. 66.5% AD patients in Cervellati's study had hypertension, while only 36.5% healthy controls carried hypertension, and the difference was significant. An independent positive correlation between serum UA levels and the occurrence of hypertension has known for some time [58]. Hypertension can cause local tissue ischemia, which can then lead to an increase in the synthesis of UA [59]. Furthermore, it is well established that that hypertension in the elderly is a potential risk factor to AD [60], [61], [62], [63]. It was hypothesized that chronic brain hypoperfusion generated by vessel stiffness and increased vascular resistance could be a key factor linking high blood pressure and AD [64], [65]. In addition, in Cervellati's study, compared to control group, the AD group had a higher proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and history of smoking habit. It was reported that newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus was associated with increased risk of AD [66]. The presence of CVD was also reported to promote progressive cognitive decline leading to AD in the elderly population [67]. In particular, atherosclerosis, stiffening of central elastic arteries and endothelial dysfunction have been shown to associate with AD [68]. A variety of CAD-related risk factors, including hypertension, metabolic syndrome, smoking, high serum lipid/cholesterol levels, high serum homocysteine, physical inactivity, and unhealthy diet have been reported to play a role in the etiology of AD [69]. Serum UA levels were found to be significantly higher in patients with CAD compared with healthy controls [70]. Increased UA levels were also considered to be an independent risk factor for overall CAD mortality [71]. Thus, hyperuricemia may also be a risk factor for CAD [72], [73]. The positive association between serum UA levels and the risk of CAD may be due to the role of UA as an antioxidant [31], [74]. Increased UA levels, with an attempt to block lipid peroxidation and other related phenomena, could be a defense mechanism against atherosclerosis. On the other hand, increased UA levels may contribute to the development of CAD by exerting a negative influence on the endothelium. It was reported that serum UA could possibly promote oxygenation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipid peroxidation, lead to an increase in platelet adhesiveness and thrombus formation, and contribute to the development of atherosclerosis [75]. Increased UA levels can also stimulate the release of free radicals, and result in endothelial injury, increasing the likelihood of the development of CAD [76]. Elevated UA levels, as CAD-related risk factors, could play a role in the pathogenesis of AD in Cervellati's study. Thus, the higher presence the risk factors, including aging, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and smoking in AD group tends to increase the probability of acquiring AD, and these factors may be related to the increased serum UA levels in AD patients. Considering these factors, we recommend that the overall results must be interpreted with an appropriate degree of caution.

We also want to emphasize that vascular disease and its risk factors, mainly affecting the elderly population, have become an important risk factor in the development of cognitive decline and AD. These factors might also play a vital role in the initiation of dementia in AD by possibly sharing common pathological pathways. Chronic brain hypoperfusion leads to a neuronal energy crisis, which may be responsible for protein synthesis abnormalities, resulting in the formation of amyloid-beta plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in AD [67]. In this way, AD could be considered as a primary vascular disorder [77]. Moreover, the therapeutic implications of identifying and treating all modifiable risk factors may thus help lower the rising prevalence of AD [78]. In fact, the manipulation of serum UA levels has been investigated for the treatment of several diseases. Human studies have shown that systemic administration of UA increased the serum antioxidant capacity in healthy volunteers [79]. In various models of ischemic brain injury, UA could reduce ischemia-induced tyrosine nitration and infarct volume. In patients with acute stroke, administration of UA could reduce several biomarkers of oxidative stress and provide neuroprotection synergistically with thrombolytic therapies [80], [81]. In a mouse model of MS, UA could delay the onset and improve the clinical symptoms of disease by inhibiting peroxynitrite-mediated oxidation [82], [83]. UA could protect cultured rat spinal cord neurons against glutamate toxicity, and UA treatment could increase total glutathione (GSH) synthesis both in vitro and in vivo to fight against oxidant insult [79], [84], [85]. In animal models and in vitro cell models of PD, UA could suppress oxidative stress, inhibit dopamine-induced apoptotic cell death, and prevent membrane depolarization and cell degeneration [86]. In a 6-OHDA rat model of PD, UA injection significantly improved dopamine depletion and related behavioral responses [87]. In PD patients, phase II clinical trial known as SURE-PD (Safety and Ability to Elevate Urate in Early Parkinson Disease) is in progress at 16 clinical sites, which will test inosine as UA precursor to modify PD progression [86].

The pathogenetic role of UA in AD was still unknown. UA, the main end product of purine metabolism, is synthesized by xanthine oxidoreductase from its purine precusors [76]. Primarily through its actions as a potent antioxidant, UA scavenges singlet oxygen, hydroxyl radicals, and superoxide. UA is also capable to bind iron and inhibit iron-dependent ascrobate oxidation, preventing the generation of free radicals [74]. UA is effective in inhibiting peroxynitrite through nitrating the tyrosine residues of proteins [88]. Peroxynitrite, in particular, is believed to have a significant negative impact on cellular function and survival [89]. Thus, reduced serum UA level may weaken the body's ability to inhibit the toxicity exerting by reactive oxygen, nitrogen species, and peroxynitrite.

The limitations of this meta-analysis fall into four categories: First, as our results were based on observational studies, and we must be aware of potential bias or confounding in these studies. Second, we were unable to stratify these individual studies by the gender due to the lack of sex-specific study data. Previous studies suggested the gender-related association between serum UA levels and hypertension [90], type 2 diabetes [91], CAD [92], PD [93], MS [94], and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [95]. Estrogen has an impact on the renal tubular handling of UA [96]. Study has found that menopause was associated with higher serum UA levels, and that postmenopausal hormone replacement was linked with lower serum UA levels among postmenopausal women [97]. These findings suggested that estrogen plays a key role in protecting women from hyperuricemia and gout [97]. In addition, administration of estrogen could decrease serum UA levels in men [98]. One possible explanation for the gender difference of UA in a variety of diseases could be caused by different estrogen levels in men and women. Therefore, whether the change of serum UA levels in AD patients is affected by gender difference still needs further more sex-specific studies. Third, several residual confounding variables may affect the overall results. For example, high intake of purine-rich food [99] and fructose [100] may promote the development of hyperuricemia, and the use of medications such as diuretics was not considered in some included studies. Thus, further studies related to diet, nutrition profile, systemic diseases, and drug-taking history will be needed to validate the relationship of serum UA to AD. Finally, regarding the strict inclusion criteria which only include case-control studies, our study contains a limited number of studies. Because meta-analyses are inherently vulnerable to publication bias, we cannot exclude the possibility of this bias. We try to minimize publication bias by searching four major databases with no language restriction; Egger's and Begg's tests reveal no statistical evidence for significant publication bias.

Our meta-analysis has several important strengths. This meta-analysis is based on case-control studies in many different countries. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the serum UA levels between AD patients and healthy controls. We assessed the quality of each study using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and all of them were high quality. The majority of the included studies had adjustments for other risk factors. However, heterogeneity between studies was found, and it was affected by one study in the sensitivity analysis. Although studies differed by publication of year, race, sample size, and mean age, meta-regression analysis did not find any significant association with these factors. Nonetheless, the observed heterogeneity could be attributable to differences in countries, environmental factors, methodological factors in design, and clinical features. As mentioned before, the presence of heterogeneity calls for caution in interpreting the present meta-analysis findings.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis of case-control studies suggests that serum UA levels do not differ significantly between AD patients and healthy controls, but there may be a trend toward decreased UA in AD after an appropriate interpretation. Future research should be well-designed to investigate serum UA concentrations in AD patients, and more attention should be paid on confirming the pathogenetic mechanisms of UA as well as examining the role of UA-manipulating therapy in AD.

Supporting Information

Checklist S1.

PRISMA Checklist for systematic review and meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094084.s001

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the authors of the original research studies included in this meta-analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XC HS. Performed the experiments: YC ZZ. Analyzed the data: XG RH XC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZZ XG RH. Wrote the paper: XC HS.

References

  1. 1. Stern Y (2012) Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol 11: 1006–1012.
  2. 2. Barnes DE, Yaffe K (2011) The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer's disease prevalence. Lancet Neurol 10: 819–828.
  3. 3. Brookmeyer R, Johnson E, Ziegler-Graham K, Arrighi HM (2007) Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 3: 186–191.
  4. 4. Yan MH, Wang X, Zhu X (2013) Mitochondrial defects and oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease. Free Radic Biol Med 62: 90–101.
  5. 5. Lee HP, Pancholi N, Esposito L, Previll LA, Wang X, et al. (2012) Early induction of oxidative stress in mouse model of Alzheimer disease with reduced mitochondrial superoxide dismutase activity. PLoS One 7: e28033.
  6. 6. Clark TA, Lee HP, Rolston RK, Zhu X, Marlatt MW, et al. (2010) Oxidative Stress and its Implications for Future Treatments and Management of Alzheimer Disease. Int J Biomed Sci 6: 225–227.
  7. 7. Butterfield DA (2011) Oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease: synergy between the Butterfield and Markesbery laboratories. Neuromolecular Med 13: 19–22.
  8. 8. Gella A, Durany N (2009) Oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease. Cell Adh Migr 3: 88–93.
  9. 9. Moreira PI, Siedlak SL, Aliev G, Zhu X, Cash AD, et al. (2005) Oxidative stress mechanisms and potential therapeutics in Alzheimer disease. J Neural Transm 112: 921–932.
  10. 10. Maiese K, Chong ZZ (2004) Insights into oxidative stress and potential novel therapeutic targets for Alzheimer disease. Restor Neurol Neurosci 22: 87–104.
  11. 11. Mecocci P (2004) Oxidative stress in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: a continuum. J Alzheimers Dis 6: 159–163.
  12. 12. Christen Y (2000) Oxidative stress and Alzheimer disease. Am J Clin Nutr 71: 621S–629S.
  13. 13. Martinez-Finley EJ, Avila DS, Chakraborty S, Aschner M (2011) Insights from Caenorhabditis elegans on the role of metals in neurodegenerative diseases. Metallomics 3: 271–279.
  14. 14. Sayre LM, Perry G, Atwood CS, Smith MA (2000) The role of metals in neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 46: 731–741.
  15. 15. Smith MA, Nunomura A, Zhu X, Takeda A, Perry G (2000) Metabolic, metallic, and mitotic sources of oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 2: 413–420.
  16. 16. Zhu X, Raina AK, Lee HG, Casadesus G, Smith MA, et al. (2004) Oxidative stress signalling in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res 1000: 32–39.
  17. 17. Gu XM, Huang HC, Jiang ZF (2012) Mitochondrial dysfunction and cellular metabolic deficiency in Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Bull 28: 631–640.
  18. 18. Lunnon K, Ibrahim Z, Proitsi P, Lourdusamy A, Newhouse S, et al. (2012) Mitochondrial dysfunction and immune activation are detectable in early Alzheimer's disease blood. J Alzheimers Dis 30: 685–710.
  19. 19. Eckert A, Schmitt K, Gotz J (2011) Mitochondrial dysfunction - the beginning of the end in Alzheimer's disease? Separate and synergistic modes of tau and amyloid-beta toxicity. Alzheimers Res Ther 3: 15.
  20. 20. Bobba A, Petragallo VA, Marra E, Atlante A (2010) Alzheimer's proteins, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction interplay in a neuronal model of Alzheimer's disease. Int J Alzheimers Dis 2010.
  21. 21. Muller WE, Eckert A, Kurz C, Eckert GP, Leuner K (2010) Mitochondrial dysfunction: common final pathway in brain aging and Alzheimer's disease—therapeutic aspects. Mol Neurobiol 41: 159–171.
  22. 22. Moreira PI, Santos MS, Oliveira CR (2007) Alzheimer's disease: a lesson from mitochondrial dysfunction. Antioxid Redox Signal 9: 1621–1630.
  23. 23. Mancuso M, Siciliano G, Filosto M, Murri L (2006) Mitochondrial dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease: new developments. J Alzheimers Dis 9: 111–117.
  24. 24. Pratico D (2010) The neurobiology of isoprostanes and Alzheimer's disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1801: 930–933.
  25. 25. Montine TJ, Quinn J, Kaye J, Morrow JD (2007) F(2)-isoprostanes as biomarkers of late-onset Alzheimer's disease. J Mol Neurosci 33: 114–119.
  26. 26. Montine TJ, Peskind ER, Quinn JF, Wilson AM, Montine KS, et al. (2011) Increased cerebrospinal fluid F2-isoprostanes are associated with aging and latent Alzheimer's disease as identified by biomarkers. Neuromolecular Med 13: 37–43.
  27. 27. Kim KM, Jung BH, Paeng KJ, Kim I, Chung BC (2004) Increased urinary F(2)-isoprostanes levels in the patients with Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res Bull 64: 47–51.
  28. 28. Pratico D, V MYL, Trojanowski JQ, Rokach J, Fitzgerald GA (1998) Increased F2-isoprostanes in Alzheimer's disease: evidence for enhanced lipid peroxidation in vivo. FASEB J 12: 1777–1783.
  29. 29. Choi HK, Liu S, Curhan G (2005) Intake of purine-rich foods, protein, and dairy products and relationship to serum levels of uric acid: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arthritis Rheum 52: 283–289.
  30. 30. Gao X, Chen H, Choi HK, Curhan G, Schwarzschild MA, et al. (2008) Diet, urate, and Parkinson's disease risk in men. Am J Epidemiol 167: 831–838.
  31. 31. Ames BN, Cathcart R, Schwiers E, Hochstein P (1981) Uric acid provides an antioxidant defense in humans against oxidant- and radical-caused aging and cancer: a hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78: 6858–6862.
  32. 32. Waugh WH (2008) Inhibition of iron-catalyzed oxidations by attainable uric acid and ascorbic acid levels: therapeutic implications for Alzheimer's disease and late cognitive impairment. Gerontology 54: 238–243.
  33. 33. Euser SM, Hofman A, Westendorp RG, Breteler MM (2009) Serum uric acid and cognitive function and dementia. Brain 132: 377–382.
  34. 34. Polidori MC, Mecocci P (2002) Plasma susceptibility to free radical-induced antioxidant consumption and lipid peroxidation is increased in very old subjects with Alzheimer disease. J Alzheimers Dis 4: 517–522.
  35. 35. Kim TS, Pae CU, Yoon SJ, Jang WY, Lee NJ, et al. (2006) Decreased plasma antioxidants in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 21: 344–348.
  36. 36. Ahlskog JE, Uitti RJ, Low PA, Tyce GM, Nickander KK, et al. (1995) No evidence for systemic oxidant stress in Parkinson's or Alzheimer's disease. Mov Disord 10: 566–573.
  37. 37. Irizarry MC, Raman R, Schwarzschild MA, Becerra LM, Thomas RG, et al. (2009) Plasma urate and progression of mild cognitive impairment. Neurodegener Dis 6: 23–28.
  38. 38. Rinaldi P, Polidori MC, Metastasio A, Mariani E, Mattioli P, et al. (2003) Plasma antioxidants are similarly depleted in mild cognitive impairment and in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 24: 915–919.
  39. 39. Schretlen DJ, Inscore AB, Jinnah HA, Rao V, Gordon B, et al. (2007) Serum uric acid and cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults. Neuropsychology 21: 136–140.
  40. 40. Cankurtaran M, Yesil Y, Kuyumcu ME, Ozturk ZA, Yavuz BB, et al. (2013) Altered levels of homocysteine and serum natural antioxidants links oxidative damage to Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 33: 1051–1058.
  41. 41. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, et al. (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283: 2008–2012.
  42. 42. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 8: 336–341.
  43. 43. Cascalheira JF, Joao SS, Pinhancos SS, Castro R, Palmeira M, et al. (2009) Serum homocysteine: interplay with other circulating and genetic factors in association to Alzheimer's type dementia. Clin Biochem 42: 783–790.
  44. 44. Carantoni M, Zuliani G, Munari MR, D'Elia K, Palmieri E, et al. (2000) Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia: relationships with fasting glucose and insulin levels. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 11: 176–180.
  45. 45. Iuliano L, Monticolo R, Straface G, Spoletini I, Gianni W, et al. (2010) Vitamin E and enzymatic/oxidative stress-driven oxysterols in amnestic mild cognitive impairment subtypes and Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 21: 1383–1392.
  46. 46. Cervellati C, Cremonini E, Bosi C, Magon S, Zurlo A, et al. (2013) Systemic oxidative stress in older patients with mild cognitive impairment or late onset Alzheimer's disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 10: 365–372.
  47. 47. Maesaka JK, Wolf-Klein G, Piccione JM, Ma CM (1993) Hypouricemia, abnormal renal tubular urate transport, and plasma natriuretic factor(s) in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 41: 501–506.
  48. 48. Foy CJ, Passmore AP, Vahidassr MD, Young IS, Lawson JT (1999) Plasma chain-breaking antioxidants in Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and Parkinson's disease. QJM 92: 39–45.
  49. 49. Can M, Varlibas F, Guven B, Akhan O, Yuksel GA (2013) Ischemia modified albumin and plasma oxidative stress markers in Alzheimer's disease. Eur Neurol 69: 377–380.
  50. 50. Polidori MC, Mattioli P, Aldred S, Cecchetti R, Stahl W, et al. (2004) Plasma antioxidant status, immunoglobulin g oxidation and lipid peroxidation in demented patients: relevance to Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 18: 265–270.
  51. 51. Zafrilla P, Mulero J, Xandri JM, Santo E, Caravaca G, et al. (2006) Oxidative stress in Alzheimer patients in different stages of the disease. Curr Med Chem 13: 1075–1083.
  52. 52. Liu B, Shen Y, Xiao K, Tang Y, Cen L, et al. (2012) Serum uric acid levels in patients with multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Neurol Res 34: 163–171.
  53. 53. Ikeda K, Nakamura Y, Kiyozuka T, Aoyagi J, Hirayama T, et al. (2011) Serological profiles of urate, paraoxonase-1, ferritin and lipid in Parkinson's disease: changes linked to disease progression. Neurodegener Dis 8: 252–258.
  54. 54. Shen C, Guo Y, Luo W, Lin C, Ding M (2013) Serum urate and the risk of Parkinson's disease: results from a meta-analysis. Can J Neurol Sci 40: 73–79.
  55. 55. Schrag M, Mueller C, Zabel M, Crofton A, Kirsch WM, et al. (2013) Oxidative stress in blood in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis. Neurobiol Dis 59C: 100–110.
  56. 56. Kawamoto R, Tabara Y, Kohara K, Kusunoki T, Abe M, et al. (2013) Synergistic influence of age and serum uric acid on blood pressure among community-dwelling Japanese women. Hypertens Res 36: 634–638.
  57. 57. Kuzuya M, Ando F, Iguchi A, Shimokata H (2002) Effect of aging on serum uric acid levels: longitudinal changes in a large Japanese population group. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57: M660–664.
  58. 58. Jossa F, Farinaro E, Panico S, Krogh V, Celentano E, et al. (1994) Serum uric acid and hypertension: the Olivetti heart study. J Hum Hypertens 8: 677–681.
  59. 59. Puig JG, Ruilope LM (1999) Uric acid as a cardiovascular risk factor in arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 17: 869–872.
  60. 60. Kumari U, Heese K (2010) Cardiovascular dementia - a different perspective. Open Biochem J 4: 29–52.
  61. 61. Stewart R, Xue QL, Masaki K, Petrovitch H, Ross GW, et al. (2009) Change in blood pressure and incident dementia: a 32-year prospective study. Hypertension 54: 233–240.
  62. 62. Skoog I, Lernfelt B, Landahl S, Palmertz B, Andreasson LA, et al. (1996) 15-year longitudinal study of blood pressure and dementia. Lancet 347: 1141–1145.
  63. 63. Kivipelto M, Helkala EL, Laakso MP, Hanninen T, Hallikainen M, et al. (2001) Midlife vascular risk factors and Alzheimer's disease in later life: longitudinal, population based study. BMJ 322: 1447–1451.
  64. 64. de la Torre JC (1997) Cerebromicrovascular pathology in Alzheimer's disease compared to normal aging. Gerontology 43: 26–43.
  65. 65. O'Rourke MF, Hashimoto J (2007) Mechanical factors in arterial aging: a clinical perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 1–13.
  66. 66. Huang CC, Chung CM, Leu HB, Lin LY, Chiu CC, et al. (2014) Diabetes mellitus and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One 9: e87095.
  67. 67. de la Torre JC (2012) Cardiovascular risk factors promote brain hypoperfusion leading to cognitive decline and dementia. Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol 2012: 367516.
  68. 68. Tarumi T, Zhang R (2014) Cerebral hemodynamics of the aging brain: risk of Alzheimer disease and benefit of aerobic exercise. Front Physiol 5: 6.
  69. 69. Villeneuve S, Belleville S, Massoud F, Bocti C, Gauthier S (2009) Impact of vascular risk factors and diseases on cognition in persons with mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 27: 375–381.
  70. 70. Torun M, Yardim S, Simsek B, Burgaz S (1998) Serum uric acid levels in cardiovascular diseases. J Clin Pharm Ther 23: 25–29.
  71. 71. Fang J, Alderman MH (2000) Serum uric acid and cardiovascular mortality the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study, 1971–1992. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA 283: 2404–2410.
  72. 72. Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Gunter EW, Byers T (1995) Relation of serum uric acid to mortality and ischemic heart disease. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am J Epidemiol 141: 637–644.
  73. 73. Bos MJ, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Witteman JC, Breteler MM (2006) Uric acid is a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke: the Rotterdam study. Stroke 37: 1503–1507.
  74. 74. Davies KJ, Sevanian A, Muakkassah-Kelly SF, Hochstein P (1986) Uric acid-iron ion complexes. A new aspect of the antioxidant functions of uric acid. Biochem J 235: 747–754.
  75. 75. De Scheerder IK, van de Kraay AM, Lamers JM, Koster JF, de Jong JW, et al. (1991) Myocardial malondialdehyde and uric acid release after short-lasting coronary occlusions during coronary angioplasty: potential mechanisms for free radical generation. Am J Cardiol 68: 392–395.
  76. 76. Waring WS, Webb DJ, Maxwell SR (2000) Uric acid as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. QJM 93: 707–713.
  77. 77. de la Torre JC (2004) Is Alzheimer's disease a neurodegenerative or a vascular disorder? Data, dogma, and dialectics. Lancet Neurol 3: 184–190.
  78. 78. de la Torre JC (2010) Basics of Alzheimer's disease prevention. J Alzheimers Dis 20: 687–688.
  79. 79. Waring WS, Webb DJ, Maxwell SR (2001) Systemic uric acid administration increases serum antioxidant capacity in healthy volunteers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 38: 365–371.
  80. 80. Amaro S, Chamorro A (2011) Translational stroke research of the combination of thrombolysis and antioxidant therapy. Stroke 42: 1495–1499.
  81. 81. Logallo N, Naess H, Idicula TT, Brogger J, Waje-Andreassen U, et al. (2011) Serum uri acid: neuroprotection in thrombolysis. The Bergen NORSTROKE study. BMC Neurol 11: 114.
  82. 82. Hooper DC, Spitsin S, Kean RB, Champion JM, Dickson GM, et al. (1998) Uric acid, a natural scavenger of peroxynitrite, in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 675–680.
  83. 83. Scott GS, Spitsin SV, Kean RB, Mikheeva T, Koprowski H, et al. (2002) Therapeutic intervention in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by administration of uric acid precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 16303–16308.
  84. 84. Scott GS, Cuzzocrea S, Genovese T, Koprowski H, Hooper DC (2005) Uric acid protects against secondary damage after spinal cord injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 3483–3488.
  85. 85. Du Y, Chen CP, Tseng CY, Eisenberg Y, Firestein BL (2007) Astroglia-mediated effects of uric acid to protect spinal cord neurons from glutamate toxicity. Glia 55: 463–472.
  86. 86. Chen X, Wu G, Schwarzschild MA (2012) Urate in Parkinson's disease: more than a biomarker? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 12: 367–375.
  87. 87. Gong L, Zhang QL, Zhang N, Hua WY, Huang YX, et al. (2012) Neuroprotection by urate on 6-OHDA-lesioned rat model of Parkinson's disease: linking to Akt/GSK3beta signaling pathway. J Neurochem 123: 876–885.
  88. 88. Kutzing MK, Firestein BL (2008) Altered uric acid levels and disease states. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 324: 1–7.
  89. 89. Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L (2007) Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol Rev 87: 315–424.
  90. 90. Matsumura K, Ohtsubo T, Oniki H, Fujii K, Iida M (2006) Gender-related association of serum uric acid and left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension. Circ J 70: 885–888.
  91. 91. Lv Q, Meng XF, He FF, Chen S, Su H, et al. (2013) High serum uric acid and increased risk of type 2 diabetes: a systemic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. PLoS One 8: e56864.
  92. 92. Rodrigues SL, Baldo MP, Capingana P, Magalhaes P, Dantas EM, et al. (2012) Gender distribution of serum uric acid and cardiovascular risk factors: population based study. Arq Bras Cardiol 98: 13–21.
  93. 93. Jain S, Ton TG, Boudreau RM, Yang M, Thacker EL, et al. (2011) The risk of Parkinson disease associated with urate in a community-based cohort of older adults. Neuroepidemiology 36: 223–229.
  94. 94. Zoccolella S, Tortorella C, Iaffaldano P, Direnzo V, D'Onghia M, et al. (2012) Low serum urate levels are associated to female gender in multiple sclerosis patients. PLoS One 7: e40608.
  95. 95. Paganoni S, Zhang M, Quiroz Zarate A, Jaffa M, Yu H, et al. (2012) Uric acid levels predict survival in men with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 259: 1923–1928.
  96. 96. Sumino H, Ichikawa S, Kanda T, Nakamura T, Sakamaki T (1999) Reduction of serum uric acid by hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with hyperuricaemia. Lancet 354: 650.
  97. 97. Hak AE, Choi HK (2008) Menopause, postmenopausal hormone use and serum uric acid levels in US women—the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arthritis Res Ther 10: R116.
  98. 98. Stockl D, Doring A, Thorand B, Heier M, Belcredi P, et al. (2012) Reproductive factors and serum uric acid levels in females from the general population: the KORA F4 study. PLoS One 7: e32668.
  99. 99. Villegas R, Xiang YB, Elasy T, Xu WH, Cai H, et al. (2012) Purine-rich foods, protein intake, and the prevalence of hyperuricemia: the Shanghai Men's Health Study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 22: 409–416.
  100. 100. Johnson RJ, Perez-Pozo SE, Sautin YY, Manitius J, Sanchez-Lozada LG, et al. (2009) Hypothesis: could excessive fructose intake and uric acid cause type 2 diabetes? Endocr Rev 30: 96–116.