Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Crystal Structures of the Novel Cytosolic 5′-Nucleotidase IIIB Explain Its Preference for m7GMP

  • Thomas Monecke ,

    Affiliation Abteilung für Molekulare Strukturbiologie, Institut für Mikrobiologie und Genetik, Göttinger Zentrum für Molekulare Biowissenschaften, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

  • Juliane Buschmann,

    Affiliation Institut für Biochemie und Biotechnologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany

  • Piotr Neumann,

    Affiliation Abteilung für Molekulare Strukturbiologie, Institut für Mikrobiologie und Genetik, Göttinger Zentrum für Molekulare Biowissenschaften, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

  • Elmar Wahle,

    Affiliation Institut für Biochemie und Biotechnologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany

  • Ralf Ficner

    Affiliation Abteilung für Molekulare Strukturbiologie, Institut für Mikrobiologie und Genetik, Göttinger Zentrum für Molekulare Biowissenschaften, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

Crystal Structures of the Novel Cytosolic 5′-Nucleotidase IIIB Explain Its Preference for m7GMP

  • Thomas Monecke, 
  • Juliane Buschmann, 
  • Piotr Neumann, 
  • Elmar Wahle, 
  • Ralf Ficner


5′-nucleotidases catalyze the hydrolytic dephosphorylation of nucleoside monophosphates. As catabolic enzymes they contribute significantly to the regulation of cellular nucleotide levels; misregulation of nucleotide metabolism and nucleotidase deficiencies are associated with a number of diseases. The seven human 5′-nucleotidases differ with respect to substrate specificity and cellular localization. Recently, the novel cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase III-like protein, or cN-IIIB, has been characterized in human and Drosophila. cN-IIIB exhibits a strong substrate preference for the modified nucleotide 7-methylguanosine monophosphate but the structural reason for this preference was unknown. Here, we present crystal structures of cN-IIIB from Drosophila melanogaster bound to the reaction products 7-methylguanosine or cytidine. The structural data reveal that the cytosine- and 7-methylguanine moieties of the products are stacked between two aromatic residues in a coplanar but off-centered position. 7-methylguanosine is specifically bound through π-π interactions and distinguished from unmodified guanosine by additional cation-π coulomb interactions between the aromatic side chains and the positively charged 7-methylguanine. Notably, the base is further stabilized by T-shaped edge-to-face stacking of an additional tryptophan packing perpendicularly against the purine ring and forming, together with the other aromates, an aromatic slot. The structural data in combination with site-directed mutagenesis experiments reveal the molecular basis for the broad substrate specificity of cN-IIIB but also explain the substrate preference for 7-methylguanosine monophosphate. Analyzing the substrate specificities of cN-IIIB and the main pyrimidine 5′-nucleotidase cN-IIIA by mutagenesis studies, we show that cN-IIIA dephosphorylates the purine m7GMP as well, hence redefining its substrate spectrum. Docking calculations with cN-IIIA and m7GMP as well as biochemical data reveal that Asn69 does not generally exclude the turnover of purine substrates thus correcting previous suggestions.


Nucleoside monophosphate phosphohydrolases or 5′-nucleotidases (EC are enzymes catalyzing the hydrolytic dephosphorylation of nucleoside monophosphates to nucleosides and orthophosphate (nucleoside monophosphate+H2O→nucleoside+PO43–) [1]. As catabolic enzymes, nucleotidases participate in the regulation of nucleotide levels in living cells [2], [3]. In humans, seven different 5′-nucleotidases have been characterized differing with respect to their substrate specificity, subcellular localization, oligomerization state and size [4]. Five of them, namely cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase IA (cN-IA), cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase IB (cN-IB), cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase II (cN-II), cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase IIIA (cN-IIIA; previously called cN-III) and cytosolic 5′(3′)-deoxyribonucleotidase (cdN) are located in the cytosol whereas one is mitochondrial (mitochondrial-5′(3′)-deoxyribonucleotidase, mdN) and one is an extracellular enzyme (ecto-5′-nucleotidase, eN). Crystal structures are available for five of the seven nucleotidases including the mitochondrial (mdN) [5][7] and the extracellular nucleotidase (eN) [8], [9] as well as the cytosolic nucleotidases cdN [7], cN-II [10][12] and cN-IIIA [13], [14]. Although the intracellular 5′-nucleotidases generally share a low sequence similarity, all enzymes are magnesium-dependent and belong to the haloacid dehalogenase (HAD) superfamily [15]. They are characterized by a modular architecture, containing a structurally conserved HAD core domain, which contains the catalytic residues, and an enzyme-specific cap domain consisting of one or more cap insertions. The various substrate specificities of intracellular 5′-nucleotidases are mainly achieved by different cap domains, which contain the substrate specificity motif S, while the catalytic platform is provided by the conserved HAD core domain [15].

Within the HAD core domain, the canonical motifs I-III include the residues for magnesium ion coordination and catalysis [15][17]. During catalysis of cytosolic 5′-nucleotidases, the first aspartate of motif I (DXDX[T/V]) performs a nucleophilic attack on the phosphate moiety of the bound substrate involving a pentavalent phosphate transition state [18][20]. Consequently, the phosphoryl group is transferred to the carboxyl group of this aspartate forming a covalent phospho-enzyme intermediate, which is subsequently resolved by hydrolysis. For that purpose, the second aspartate of this motif is thought to coordinate the attacking water molecule [13]. During the reaction, a serine or threonine residue from motif II (ΦΦΦ[S/T]), preceded by 3 hydrophobic Φ-residues, interacts with the phosphate group and stabilizes the pentavalent phosphate transition state. The conserved catalytic motif III (K(X)xD(X)0–4D) contains a lysine and two aspartate residues that stabilize the phosphorylated intermediate and coordinate the magnesium ion, respectively [5]. Although the catalytic mechanism of 5′-nucleotidases has been characterized in detail due to a number of available crystal structures and biochemical data, the structural basis for substrate recognition and discrimination remains elusive for some of them.

Recently, a novel member of the family of cytosolic 5′-nucleotidases, the cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase III-like protein, has been characterized in humans and in Drosophila [21] and subsequently renamed cN-IIIB (UniProt IDs Q969T7 and Q9W197). Human cN-IIIB (HscN-IIIB) exhibits a sequence identity and similarity of 59% and 80% to the human cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase IIIA (HscN-IIIA). Interestingly, although both enzymes share significant sequence similarity they appear to have different substrate specificities [21]. HscN-IIIA is the main pyrimidine 5′-nucleotidase in erythrocytes; its activity was thought to be restricted to (d)CMP, (d)UMP and dTMP [22]. A lack of this enzyme in human erythrocytes results in hemolytic anemia, which probably is due to the accumulation of pyrimidine nucleotides and precipitation of unhydrolyzed ribosomal RNA [23][25]. In contrast to human cN-IIIA, human cN-IIIB has a broad substrate specificity, efficiently converting CMP and UMP and, with significantly lower efficiency, GMP and AMP [21]. Remarkably, cN-IIIB dephosphorylates the modified purine 7-methylguanosine monophosphate (m7GMP) with the lowest Km among all substrates tested. Due to the presence of the mRNA cap structure, 7-methylguanosine nucleotides are released during degradation of all eukaryotic mRNAs: Either Dcp2 and related enzymes cleave off m7GDP, which is further converted to m7GMP, or m7GMP is released directly by the scavenger decapping enzyme DcpS [26][28]. Additionally, 7-methylguanosine was shown to be present in several tRNA and rRNA species of archaea, bacteria and eukarya [29]. Until recently, it was not known by which enzymatic activity m7GMP is further degraded after RNA decay. As a potential alternative to decay, accumulation of m7GMP in the cytosol and subsequent incorporation into nucleic acids seems possible but biologically highly undesirable [26], [30][32].

To gain insight into the broad substrate specificity of cN-IIIB and especially its unusual preference for m7GMP, we determined crystal structures of Drosophila melanogaster cN-IIIB (DmcN-IIIB) bound to different reaction products. The overall structure of DmcN-IIIB is similar to cN-IIIA, however, critical residues conferring substrate specificity and determining the size of the substrate-binding pocket are different. The co-crystallized reaction product, 7-methylguanosine or cytidine, is bound in a deep cavity formed by the cap domain and the HAD core domain and is surrounded by three aromatic amino acids forming an aromatic slot. The structures explain why cN-IIIB prefers m7GMP over GMP as substrate but also efficiently converts pyrimidines. In combination with biochemical data from mutagenesis experiments of cN-IIIA and cN-IIIB and molecular docking calculations we define the structural basis for m7GMP dephosphorylation by 5′-nucleotidases.

Results and Discussion

Crystallization and Structure Determination of DmcN-IIIB

DmcN-IIIB was crystallized in the presence of the reaction products 7-methylguanosine (m7G) or cytidine, and a mixture of AlCl3 and NaF. The crystallographic phase problem was solved by means of molecular replacement using the crystal structure of mouse cN-IIIA as starting model [13] (PDB ID 2G08). The structure model of DmcN-IIIB bound to m7G was refined at a resolution of 1.65 Å to R and Rfree values of 15.9% and 19.4%, respectively. Diffraction data and refinement statistics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. X-ray diffraction data and structure refinement statistics of Drosophila melanogaster cN-IIIB bound to different reaction products.

The final model of the DmcN-IIIB m7G complex contains two molecules in the asymmetric unit with one continuous segment encompassing residues 13–311 of molecule A as well as residues 13–312 of molecule B, both superposing with a root mean square deviation (rmsd) of 0.86 Å for 288 common Cα atoms (residues 13–103 and 115–311). After all amino acids had been placed, additional density was observed in the active center, which, based on its shape, could be assigned as an octahedrally coordinated magnesium ion, the co-crystallized product nucleoside m7G as well as a metal fluoride transition state analog. It was shown that for pH values higher than 7.0, enzyme-MgF3 complexes rather than enzyme-AlF3 complexes are formed [33], [34]. Since both aluminum and magnesium were present during crystallization, we interpreted the density as MgF3.

Overall Structure of DmcN-IIIB

The overall structure of DmcN-IIIB consists of two domains: the globular core domain and a smaller cap domain. The globular core domain is a haloacid dehalogenase domain (HAD domain) and resembles a Rossmannoid-like α/β structure with a central seven-stranded β-sheet exhibiting the topology β1↓β9↑β8↑β7↑β2↑β3↑β4↑ (Figure 1). Between two consecutive β-strands, one or more α-helices build right-handed crossover connections generating a β-sheet flanked by several α-helices on either side. The β-sheet is twisted in a way that the two outermost strands are arranged in an almost perpendicular orientation with respect to each other. The HAD core is distinguished from other Rossmannoid folds by two additional structural key features. The “squiggle” (amino acids Phe56-Thr61, Figure S1) is a single helical turn (in some structures resembling a π-helix) located immediately downstream of the first core β-strand (β2) and is followed by the “flap” – a short β-turn (amino acids Thr65-Gly68). Both structural motifs provide the structural flexibility required for nucleotidases to switch between open (substrate binding) and closed (catalytically active) conformations. The sequence of the HAD domain in DmcN-IIIB includes two insertions, the caps, at two distinct sites. The first one lies between β2 and α-helix 9 and, due to its location, is termed C1-type cap [15]. It comprises the α-helices 5–8 (amino acids 74–143) (Figure 1). The second insertion is named C2-type cap, compasses β5 and β6 (amino acids 195–216) and is positioned between β4 and α-helix 11. These two insertions protrude from the α/β Rossmannoid core of the structure and form the cap domain, which serves as a movable lid for the active site of the enzyme as suggested by different orientations of the domain in crystal structures of cN-IIIA [13], [14] and cN-IIIB (reported here). Moreover, it represents the main substrate specificity determinant of cN-IIIB as it harbors critical residues for substrate binding (see below).

Figure 1. Overall structure of Drosophila melanogaster cN-IIIB.

DmcN-IIIB consists of the conserved central HAD core domain (grey β-strands and white α-helices) and a cap domain. The cap domain packs against the top of the HAD core and is composed of two regions, a C1-type cap (red) and a C2-type cap (blue). The “squiggle” and the “flap”, both structural key features of 5′-nucleotidases, are marked with an asterisk and a black star, respectively. Secondary structure elements as well as termini and the bound magnesium ion (green sphere) are labeled. The co-crystallized reaction product 7-methylguanosine (m7G) is bound between the cap domain and the HAD core and is represented as stick model (carbon in yellow, nitrogen in blue, oxygen in red). The lower panel shows a schematic representation of DmcN-IIIB with the canonical 5′-nucleotidase motifs I-III and S as well as the positions of the cap insertions highlighted as boxes and labeled.

Catalytic Motifs and Active site of DmcN-IIIB

DmcN-IIIB contains all canonical sequence motifs typically present in cytosolic 5′-nucleotidases, namely motifs I, II, III as well as motif S. A sequence alignment of the canonical catalytic motifs for all intracellular 5′-nucleotidases completed by the new member cN-IIIB is shown in Figure 2. Motif I (55DFDYTI60 in DmcN-IIIB) is located in the loop connecting β-strand 2 and α-helix 5 (Figure 1 and Figure S1) and contains two aspartate residues separated by a hydrophobic amino acid. In homologous enzymes, the first aspartate was shown to be the nucleophile responsible for the in-line attack on the α-phosphate of the bound nucleoside monophosphate. In the reaction, the cleaved-off phosphate is transferred to this aspartate, initially generating a pentavalent transition state and, later, a covalent phosphoenzyme intermediate. During subsequent hydrolysis of the phosphoenzyme intermediate, the side chain carboxyl of Asp57 is likely to be involved in donation of a proton to the bound phosphate, thus acting as the general acid-base residue in this reaction [13]. In fact, this state is represented in the crystal structures with the transition state analog MgF3 coordinated by Asp55 and the attacking water occupying the second apical coordination site (Figure 3). The transferred proton may originate from the water molecule, which is further bound by the side chains of Asp57 (motif I) and Ser171 belonging to motif II in the crystal structure (see below). Alternatively, the proton may stem from the 5′-hydroxyl of another bound nucleoside, which results in a phosphotransferase activity observed in some members of the cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase family [22], [35]. Motif II is a four amino acid stretch with the sequence 168LVFS171 and is located in β-strand 3 of DmcN-IIIB (Figure 1). Motif III is of variable length in the different nucleotidases and includes a highly conserved lysine residue as well as two invariant aspartates (219K(X)25 DSIGD249 in DmcN-IIIB).

Figure 2. Conserved catalytic sequence motifs of the intracellular human 5′-nucleotidases and cN-IIIB.

Sequence conservation of catalytic motifs of 5′-nucleotidases completed by the new member cN-IIIB. The respective motifs of HscN-IIIB and DmcN-IIIB have been deduced from the crystal structure and sequence analyses. Shading indicates the different degrees of conservation from absolutely conserved (black) to partly conserved (grey). Motif I, II and III contain conserved catalytic residues and motif S contains residues involved in substrate recognition. Amino acids are numbered and consensus sequences are given above the alignment.

Figure 3. Organization of the catalytic center of DmcN-IIIB.

The magnesium ion (green sphere) is octahedrally coordinated by several residues of DmcN-IIIB shown as stick model (carbon in yellow, nitrogen in blue, oxygen in red) as well as several water molecules (red). One equatorial coordination position of Mg2+ is occupied by a fluorine atom of the co-crystallized metal fluoride MgF3 (magnesium in green; fluorine in light blue). MgF3 is coordinated by Asp55, Asp57, Lys219, Ser171 as well as water molecules. Note that the coordination of MgF3 represents the pentavalent phosphate transition state in the nucleotidase reaction cycle. Contacts are represented by dashed lines and the model is defined by a representative 2 mFo – DFc electron density map (blue mesh) contoured at a sigma level of 2.0.

In the crystal structure of DmcN-IIIB bound to m7G, the magnesium ion is octahedrally coordinated by the side chain carboxyls of Asp55 and Asp245 (motif I and III) as well as by a water molecule and a fluorine atom occupying the four equatorial positions (Figure 3). The two apical coordination sites are occupied by one water molecule and the main chain carbonyl of Asp57, respectively. The magnesium ion of MgF3 makes an apical contact to the remaining oxygen of the Asp55 carboxyl group confirming the predicted role of this amino acid in the reaction (Figure 3). The three fluoride ions are in contact with the side chains of Ser171 of motif II, Lys219 of motif III and the magnesium ion, respectively. The position and function of Lys219 of DmcN-IIIB is reminiscent of the basic residues termed arginine fingers that stabilize the negative charge on reaction intermediates in many other phosphohydrolases [15]. Finally, the invariant residues Asp245 and Asp249 of motif III coordinate the magnesium ion (see above).

7-methylguanosine Binding by DmcN-IIIB

It has recently been shown that the Michaelis constant (Km) for the DmcN-IIIB-mediated dephosphorylation of m7GMP (Km = 13 µM) is significantly lower than for AMP (32 µM), CMP (48 µM), UMP (91 µM) and GMP (102 µM). For the human ortholog HscN-IIIB, the preference for m7GMP in terms of the Km value is even more pronounced [21]. At least to some extent, this also reflects a higher binding affinity for m7GMP compared to the unmodified purines and pyrimidines. However, the structural basis for this preference, unusual among 5′-nucleotidases, and the broad substrate specificity in general has so far been unknown.

Overall, the C1-type cap containing the substrate specificity motif (motif S) together with the HAD core domain generates a substrate-binding pocket which neatly accommodates the bound 7-methylguanosine in a deep binding cleft (Figure 1). Both the base and the ribose moiety of m7G are in contact with diverse protein residues. In detail, the 7-methylguanine moiety of the nucleoside is stacked in a parallel displaced orientation between the aromatic side chains of Trp120 and Phe75, bridging typical stacking distances of 3.5 Å between the side chains and the base (Figure 4A). Besides a π-π stacking interaction resulting from the parallel orientation of the π-electron systems of the purine ring and the aromatic amino acid side chains, there is also a cation-π stacking coulomb interaction between the side chain π-electrons of Trp120 or Phe75 and the positive charge of m7G. It has been shown that the positive charge of m7G mainly localizes to nitrogen 7 [36], which interestingly is positioned above the center of the indole ring of the stacking Trp120. The cation-π stacking thus seems to be a major contribution and one of the structural reasons for the high affinity of DmcN-IIIB for the monomethylated m7GMP and the discrimination against the unmethylated GMP. Notably, the binding pocket is completed by another aromatic side chain of Trp121, which packs by T-shaped edge-to-face stacking perpendicular against the methylated purine ring, bridging a distance of 3.8 Å between the methyl group of m7G and the plane of Trp121. This binding pattern results in the formation of an aromatic slot by Trp120, Phe75 and Trp121 neatly enclosing the base and shielding it from surrounding charged amino acids and water molecules (Figure 4A and 5A). This binding mode is reminiscent of 5′-cap dinucleotide binding by the nuclear import adapter Snurportin 1 [37], where the hypermethylated 5′-guanine of the snRNA is stacked between a tryptophan side chain and the second RNA base while it is shielded from the aqueous surrounding by a second tryptophan. Moreover, in DmcN-IIIB the residues Ser124, Phe209, Trp120, Trp121 and Phe75 form a cavity that harbors the N7-methyl group of the modified base (Figure 5A). In addition, residues Phe78, Thr128, Leu199, Phe209 and Leu174 form a deep and elongated second cavity near O6 of the m7G, which would be able to accommodate diverse alkylated adenine nucleotides such as N6-isopentyladenosine, N6-glycinylcarbamoyladenosine or N6-N6-dimethyladenosine that have been found in different RNA species [29]. Thus, cN-IIIB may not only convert m7GMP but also a number of additional modified or alkylated nucleotides derived from the degradation of various RNA species.

Figure 4. Detail view on the substrate-binding pocket of DmcN-IIIB.

(A) The co-crystallized reaction product 7-methylguanosine is shown in ball-and-stick mode (carbon in grey, nitrogen in blue, oxygen in red) and is defined by an mFo – DFc omit-electron density map (blue mesh) contoured at a sigma level of 3.0. m7G is stacked in a coplanar but off-centered fashion by Phe75 and Trp120 (colors as in Figure 3). Trp121 packs by T-shaped edge-to-face stacking against the bound product and binding is additionally supported by numerous direct or water-mediated hydrogen bonds (dashed lines with distances) to various protein residues of DmcN-IIIB. (B) Binding of the reaction product cytidine by DmcN-IIIB. In contrast to m7G, the nucleobase moiety of cytidine makes only a hydrogen bond to Ser124.

Figure 5. Structural comparison of DmcN-IIIB and MmcN-IIIA.

Detail view on the substrate-binding pockets of DmcN-IIIB bound to m7guanosine in red (A) and MmcN-IIIA bound to UMP in dark blue (B). The left panel shows the binding pocket with labeled residues and substrates represented as sticks. Note that Phe75 of DmcN-IIIB is replaced by a histidine in HscN-IIIA while the Trp121 of DmcN-IIIB is replaced by a tyrosine in HscN-IIIA. In the right panel the substrate-binding pockets are shown as surfaces, which were calculated using a probe radius of 1.65 Å and for clarity reasons were clipped at the level of the nucleobases. Note that the substrate-binding pocket for m7G (cN-IIIB, red surface) is significantly larger than the UMP binding pocket of cN-IIIA (blue surface), which was thought to be the structural reason for its purine substrate exclusion. (C) Orientation of substrate binding residues and the corresponding pocket after docking m7GMP to MmcN-IIIA (light blue). Note that Asn69 (marked by an asterisk) rotates by 180 degrees in comparison to (B) and adopts another common rotamer thus enlarging the binding pocket and neatly accommodating the m7GMP.

In addition to the base, the 2′ and 3′ hydroxyls of the ribose make polar contacts to the carboxyl group of Glu103 (Figure 4A). The ribose 5′ hydroxyl makes contacts with the side chain of Asp57 as well as two water molecules, one of which would be in the position for the in-line attack on the phospho-aspartate 55 (see above). Moreover, O6 of the purine ring is in close contact with Ser124 of motif S as well as with two conserved water molecules. Furthermore, nitrogens N1, N2 and N3 of the base are in contact with several water molecules coordinated by protein residues.

In summary, m7GMP is converted with a ∼10-fold lower Km compared to GMP for DmcN-IIIB and with a 45-fold lower Km for the human ortholog. The different Km values for GMP and m7GMP underline the importance of the contribution of the cation-π interaction between the methylated base and the aromatic side chains. Moreover, the slightly higher affinity of human cN-IIIB for m7GMP compared to DmcN-IIIB could be explained by the fact that one of the stacking residues in the Drosophila protein, Phe75, is replaced by a tyrosine (Tyr60) in the human counterpart (Figure S1). It has been shown for a viral m7G-cap binding methyltransferase (VP39) that the exchange of such a stacking tyrosine in the binding pocket by phenylalanine reduces the affinity for the m7G-cap by a factor of four [38]. Whereas the human enzyme, compared to DmcN-IIIB, has a 2-fold higher apparent affinity for m7G, it shows reduced affinities for the substrates CMP (2-fold higher Km), GMP (4-fold higher Km), AMP (14-fold higher Km) and UMP (5-fold higher Km). This may, at least in part, be a result of hydrogen bonding between the nucleobase and Ser124 of DmcN-IIIB; this serine residue is replaced by an alanine in the human protein.

Cytidine Binding by DmcN-IIIB

In contrast to other cytosolic 5′-nucleotidases, cN-IIIB dephosphorylates both pyrimidines and purines (see above). To compare binding of purines and pyrimidines and explain this broad substrate specificity, we crystallized DmcN-IIIB in complex with cytidine and solved the crystal structure by means of molecular replacement using the structure of the DmcN-IIIB m7G complex as starting model. Remarkably, there was no density for MgF3 in the active site of the cytidine bound structure. The overall conformation of DmcN-IIIB in complex with cytidine is highly similar to the m7G-bound structure with an rmsd of 0.32 Å for 293 common Cα atoms of the molecules A. Differences between both structures are mainly restricted to the flap (amino acid Thr65-Gly68), which is not defined in the cytidine bound structure and thus most likely disordered. In contrast to the m7G-bound structure, several amino acids in the C1-type cap have poorly defined side chains, however all main chain atoms as well as the important residues for substrate binding are well defined in the electron density map.

DmcN-IIIB binds cytidine in a similar fashion as m7G, using the same substrate-binding pocket, however the hydrogen-bonding pattern is different (Figure 4B). The pyrimidine ring is stacked in an almost coplanar fashion between Phe75 and Trp120, bridging plane distances of 3.5 and 3.4 Å, respectively. The side chain of Trp121 packs in an edge-to-face fashion with a distance of 3.5 Å to the C5 atom of cytidine. When superimposed to m7G, the centroid of the pyrimidine ring is in close proximity to the methylated nitrogen 7 of the guanine base, thus the cytosine ring captures the position of the 5-membered imidazole ring of m7G.

Besides the described stacking interactions, the cytidine makes only one direct hydrogen bond to Ser124, which is in contact to the N4 of the base (Figure 4B). Consequently, the water-mediated interactions of Asn79, Thr92, Trp120 and Ser171 of DmcN-IIIB bound to m7G are missing in the cytidine-bound structure, partly explaining the lower affinity of the enzyme for pyrimidines.

Comparison of Open and Closed States of cN-IIIB and cN-IIIA

Although all cytosolic 5′-nucleotidases share similar HAD core folds, overall the structures are different due to the structural variability of their cap domains, which confer substrate specificity (Figure S3). The modular architecture of nucleotidases, with the conserved HAD core domain as catalytic platform and the structurally variable cap domain, allows different substrate specificities while maintaining catalytic efficiency. The closest nucleotidase homolog to cN-IIIB is the cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase IIIA (former cN-III, sequence alignment in Figure S2), which has been structurally and functionally characterized in detail [13], [14]. HscN-IIIA (originally called pyrimidine-specific 5′-nucleotidase 1) catalyzes the hydrolysis of CMP and UMP [25]. Several crystal structures of cN-IIIA in complex with the substrate UMP [14] or representing different states of the reaction mechanism [10], [13] have been solved showing the molecular basis for substrate binding and catalysis. Superposition of the HAD core domains of cN-IIIA and cN-IIIB shows that the orientation of the cap domains with respect to the HAD core are slightly different (Figure 6). The crystal structures of the cN-IIIA UMP complex and the cN-IIIB m7G complex superpose with an rmsd of 1.19 Å for 218 common Cα atoms. In the crystal structure of the cN-IIIA UMP complex, the enzyme completely encloses the substrate in a deep cavity between the HAD core and the cap domain [14]. In contrast, in cN-IIIB bound to m7G, the tip of the cap domain (loop between α-helices 6 and 7) is shifted by 4 Å away from the HAD core representing a more open state (Figure 6 and Movie S1). This structural difference in the orientation of the cap domain relative to the HAD core may be due to the fact that cN-IIIA is bound to the reaction substrate including the phosphate (UMP), while cN-IIIB is bound to a reaction product missing the phosphate (7-methylguanosine). Notably, there are several direct contacts of the UMP phosphate with Lys213, Ser164 and Asp51 of the HAD core domain as well as with the active site magnesium ion, which stabilize the closed conformation of cN-IIIA. Instead, the corresponding residues Ser171, Lys219 and Asp55 in cN-IIIB are in direct contact with the transition state analog MgF3, which mimics the phosphate moiety already transferred to Asp55 (Figure 3). As a consequence, bond cleavage between the α-phosphate, coordinated in part by the HAD core, and the nucleoside, which is tightly bound by the cap domain, allows both domains to move away from each other and to subsequently release the reaction products (Movie S1).

Figure 6. Overall structural comparison of DmcN-IIIB bound to m7G with MmcN-IIIA bound to UMP.

Superposition of DmcN-IIIB (HAD core in white; cap domain in red) and cN-IIIA (HAD core in grey; cap domain in blue) showing the overall structural similarity of both enzymes. Note that the cap domain of cN-IIIB is shifted by 4 Å when the structures are superposed via their the HAD core. Thus, the substrate-bound cN-IIIA adopts a closed conformation while the product-bound cN-IIIB represents an open conformation. A movie of the trajectory from the open-to-closed state is shown in Movie S1.

Substrate Specificities of cN-IIIA and cN-IIIB

On the basis of structural data and mutagenesis experiments, it was suggested that the substrate-binding pocket of cN-IIIA is too small to accommodate purines and Asn69 would sterically clash with such substrates (Figure 5B), thus limiting the substrate spectrum of cN-IIIA to pyrimidine nucleotides [14]. To characterize the different substrate specificities of cN-IIIA and cN-IIIB and to explain them by structural data we performed mutagenesis studies and activity assays. Our preliminary experiments with a SUMO-tagged version of HscN-IIIA were hampered by solubility problems, but suggested that m7GMP could be dephosphorylated, although with a much lower efficiency compared to CMP [21]. With a modified purification procedure, we have now been able to obtain soluble untagged full-length HscN-IIIA, and steady-state kinetic parameters for the dephosphorylation of CMP and m7GMP could be determined (Table 2). While CMP was the preferred substrate, m7GMP was converted with a surprisingly high efficiency, with kcat/Km only 6-fold lower than the specificity constant for CMP. The Km for m7GMP was about 5-fold lower than for CMP and only about 2-fold higher than the Km of HscN-IIIB. Overall, the substrate specificities of HscN-IIIA and -B are more similar than previously thought, especially with respect to the efficient conversion of m7GMP by both enzymes.

Table 2. Kinetic properties of the cytosolic 5′-nucleotidases IIIA and IIIB.

The ability of HscN-IIIA to dephosphorylate m7GMP with high efficiency is inconsistent with the proposed role of Asn69 in preventing binding of purine nucleotides [14]. This proposal was further tested by mutagenesis studies. For the enzyme variants, the following code was used: Amino acids Phe75-Gly76-Trp120-Trp121 of DmcN-IIIB, forming the binding pocket for the nucleobase, are abbreviated FGWW (Figure 5). Asn69 in HscN-IIIA corresponds to Gly76 in DmcN-IIIB, and the amino acids of HscN-IIIA corresponding to the FGWW motif were abbreviated HNWY (His68-Asn69-Trp113-Tyr114). When Gly76 of the Drosophila enzyme was replaced by an asparagine (variant FNWW), the specificity constants for CMP and m7GMP changed very little, but the apparent affinity for m7GMP was increased rather than decreased (Table 3). Introduction of the entire HNWY motif into DmcN-IIIB had modest effects, partially converting the substrate preferences of the Drosophila enzyme to those of its human counterpart. When, in this context, Asn was replaced by Gly (variant HGWY), the Km for both CMP and m7GMP was decreased and kcat/Km was strongly increased only for m7GMP due to different effects on kcat (Table 3). In a comparison of FNWY and FGWY, the glycine variant lowered Km and increased kcat for both substrates, leading to a preference for m7GMP (Table 3). Thus, the effect of the amino acid occupying the position corresponding to HscN-IIIA Asn69 is context-dependent; a general function of this asparagine in this position to exclude purine substrates is not supported by the data.

Table 3. Kinetic properties of the cytosolic 5′-nucleotidases IIIA, IIIB and variants of DmcN-IIIB.

To further test the hypothesis that Asn69 of cN-IIIA does not discriminate against purine substrates and explain the ability of cN-IIIA to convert m7GMP, molecular docking calculations were performed. The crystal structure of Mus musculus cN-IIIA (PDB ID 4FE3) was used to dock the potential substrate m7GMP as well as UMP into the “side-chain flexible” substrate-binding pocket, while UMP served as a control of the docking procedure since it is the co-crystallized substrate (see Materials and Methods for details). As expected, docking of UMP to MmcN-IIIA led to a model that was virtually identical to the one revealed by the complex crystal structure. It had been suggested previously that Asn69 of cN-IIIA prevents binding of purine substrates for sterical reasons because it restricts the size of the substrate-binding pocket. However, when m7GMP was docked into the substrate-binding pocket of cN-IIIA, the side chain of Asn69 rotated by 180 degrees, adopting the conformation of another common rotamer (Figure 5C). Due to this movement, the size of the binding pocket was significantly increased, neatly accommodating the purine ring of m7GMP. Taken together, the results from activity assays and the docking analyses strongly suggest that Asn69 of cN-IIIA is not discriminating against purine nucleotides.

A second important residue in the substrate-binding pocket of cN-IIIB is Phe75, which is one of the aromates stacking against the nucleobase. Phe75 is replaced by a histidine (His68) in cN-IIIA decreasing the contribution of the π-π stacking interaction significantly although this position is occupied by a tyrosine or histidine in cN-IIIB orthologs of other species as well. Our set of mutants contains three pairs differing in the presence of phenylalanine or histidine at this position: FGWW versus HGWW; FGWY versus HGWY; and FNWY versus HNWY. In all three pairs, and with both CMP and m7GMP as substrates, the apparent affinities were consistently higher with the variants containing a phenylalanine at this position (Table 3). This fact underlines the importance of π-π stacking in substrate binding by 5′-nucleotidases and may explain in part the generally lower affinities of cN-IIIA for its substrates.

Materials and Methods

Protein Expression and Purification for Crystallization

The cDNA of Drosophila melanogaster cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase IIIB (DmcN-IIIB) (CG3362 on encoding the full-length protein (amino acids 1–319) was cloned into the pET-SUMOadapt vector as described [21]. The SUMO-DmcN-IIIB fusion construct was expressed in Escherichia coli Rosetta 2(DE3) (Merck) at 24°C in kanamycin- and chloramphenicol-containing 2YT-medium. Expression was induced at an OD600 of 1.0 by addition of 0.6 mM IPTG. The cells were harvested after 4 hours of induction (5,000×g, 20 min, 4°C) and resuspended in lysis buffer (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM imidazole, 5 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol). Cells were disrupted using a microfluidizer 110S (Microfluidics) and the lysate, which was clarified by centrifugation (30,000×g, 30 min, 4°C), was loaded onto a HisTrap column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with lysis buffer. The column was washed with 2 column volumes (CV) of lysis buffer and eluted with a linear gradient of lysis buffer containing 500 mM imidazole. Afterwards, imidazole was removed from the solution by passing the eluate over a 50 ml desalting column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in desalting buffer (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol). For cleavage, the SUMO-DmcN-IIIB fusion-protein was incubated with SUMO protease (Invitrogen) overnight at 4°C and in a 1∶ 100 molar ratio of protease : fusion protein. In order to remove the His6-SUMO tag as well as the protease, the solution was passed through a second HisTrap column. The flow through of this column, mainly containing DmcN-IIIB, was finally purified using a Superdex S75 (26/60) gel filtration column (GE Healthcare) in a buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol. The pure protein was concentrated to 15 mg/ml using Millipore concentrators with a molecular weight cut-off of 10,000 Da (Merck) and aliquots were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.

Crystallization and Structure Determination

Full-length DmcN-IIIB (amino acids 1–319) was crystallized by vapor diffusion in 24-well sitting drop crystallization plates at 20°C. Plate-shaped crystals were obtained in a condition containing 26% (w/v) PEG 4,000, 0.1 M HEPES/NaOH pH 7.5 and 0.2 M NaCl at a protein concentration of 12 mg/ml and when the protein was previously mixed with 5 mM AlCl3, 30 mM NaF and with a 15-fold molar excess of m7G or cytidine, respectively. The crystals belong to space group P21 and were flash cooled in liquid nitrogen after soaking in reservoir solution containing additionally 8% (w/v) PEG 4,000 as cryo protectant. Diffraction images from crystals containing m7G or cytidine were collected at the beamline BL14.1 of the Berliner Elektronenspeicherring-Gesellschaft für Synchrotronstrahlung (BESSY II, Berlin) [39]. The datasets were integrated, scaled and merged using XDS and XSCALE [40], respectively. The structure of the DmcN-IIIB m7G complex was solved by means of molecular replacement using MOLREP [41] as implemented in CCP4 [42] and the crystal structure of mouse pyrimidine 5′-nucleotidase type 1 (P5N-1 =  cN-IIIA, PDB ID 2G08) as starting model [13]. Full-length mouse cN-IIIA and DmcN-IIIB possess a sequence identity and similarity of 33% and 54%, respectively. Atomic coordinates of magnesium trifluoride as well as solvent molecules and the co-crystallized product 7-methylguanosine were added to the model, which was refined by iterative cycles of PHENIX [43] and manual building in Coot [44] to R and Rfree values of 15.91% and 19.42%. The crystal structure of the DmcN-IIIB cytidine complex was solved by molecular replacement (MOLREP) using the previously solved DmcN-IIIB m7G complex structure as starting model but with the nucleoside and MgF3 omitted. Interestingly, there was no density for MgF3 in this crystal structure, thus it was not modeled. Atomic coordinates of the cytidine were added to the model and the structure was refined (PHENIX) to R and Rfree values of 22.24% and 25.47% (see Table 1).

Structure figures were generated using PyMOL (DeLano, W.L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (2002), DeLanoScientific, USA) or Chimera 1.8 [45].

Site-directed Mutagenesis

The expression plasmid coding for DmcN-IIIB [21] was mutated by site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene QuikChange protocol) with specific oligonucleotides listed in Table S1. Mutations were verified by sequencing and by MALDI-TOF mass-spectrometric analysis of the purified proteins.

Purification of Proteins for Enzyme Assays

The expression clone containing the cDNA of HscN-IIIA (transcript variant 1; NM_001002010.2) in a pET-SUMOadapt expression vector [46] has been described [21]. Escherichia coli Rosetta 2(DE3) cells (Novagen) were transformed with the plasmid and cultured in 800 ml TB medium [47] including kanamycin (30 µg/ml) at 37°C to an OD600 of 0.9. Expression was induced by mixing the culture with 800 ml ice-cold TB medium including kanamycin (30 µg/ml) and IPTG (1 mM), and incubation was continued at 16°C for 5 hours. After harvesting, cells were resuspended in 25 ml lysis buffer (20 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.6, 20 mM imidazole, 500 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 5% (w/v) glycerol) and incubated for 1 h at 8°C with 10 mg of lysozyme, 5 mg of DNase I and 30 mg PMSF. The cells were disrupted twice with a French Press and centrifuged at 30,000×g for 75 minutes. The supernatant was loaded onto a 2 ml Ni2+-NTA-agarose column (Qiagen) equilibrated in lysis buffer. After washing with lysis buffer, including a step with lysis buffer containing 2 M KCl, bound protein was eluted stepwise with lysis buffer containing increasing concentrations of imidazole (50–500 mM). Fractions containing His6-SUMO-cN-IIIA were identified by SDS-PAGE analysis and pooled. For SUMO-cleavage, 1.5 mg recombinant Ulp1 protease (expression plasmid obtained from Christopher D. Lima [48]), 5 mM DTT and 1 mM EDTA were added, and the mixture was dialysed for 4 h at 0°C against lysis buffer containing 10% (w/v) sucrose instead of glycerol. Cleaved protein was again applied to a Ni2+-NTA-agarose column, and the flow-through fraction was loaded onto a Heparin column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in buffer A (20 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.6, 75 mM KCl, 10% (w/v) sucrose). Bound proteins were eluted with 7 CV of a linear gradient from buffer A to buffer B (as buffer A, but containing 2 M KCl). Fractions containing HscN-IIIA were identified by SDS-PAGE analysis and pooled for dialysis against 20 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 200 mM potassium acetate, 3 mM magnesium acetate and 10% (w/v) sucrose. Aliquots were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C. Protein concentration was determined by densitometry of a coomassie-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel compared to a BSA calibration curve.

DmcN-IIIB variants were purified as described [21].

Biochemical Analysis and Colorimetric Activity Assay of cN-IIIB and cN-IIIA

Colorimetric nucleotidase assays were performed as reported [21]. Substrates were from Jena Bioscience (m7GMP) and Sigma Aldrich (CMP). Substrate concentrations were varied between 1 µM and 2 mM. Human enzymes were assayed at 37°C, Drosophila enzymes at 25°C. In the case of HscN-IIIA and HscN-IIIB, enzymes were preincubated with 5 mM DTT for 5 minutes at room temperature. The reaction was started by enzyme addition and stopped by mixing an aliquot (2.5–100 µl per time point) with malachit green oxalate/ammonium molybdate reagent. A calibration curve with phosphate concentrations from 1–30 µM was used to estimate orthophosphate released in the enzymatic reaction. Enzymatic steady state parameters were determined as described [21]. The measurements were repeated twice, with kinetic constants varying by up to ±22%. R-values for the hyperbolic Michaelis-Menten fit ranged from 0.9703–0.9962 with 8–16 points per fit.

Molecular Docking Calculations

Protein and ligand preparation was done using AutoDockTools 1.5.6 [49] and molecular docking studies were carried out with AutoDock Vina [50]. The substrates m7GMP and UMP were docked to the active site of the crystal structure of Mus musculus cN-IIIA (PDB ID 4FE3). Water molecules and the substrate UMP were omitted and polar hydrogens as well as Gastiger charges were added prior to docking calculations for both docked molecules and the receptor. The charge of the active site magnesium ion was set to +1.2. Calculations were done using a box size of 18×22×22 Å encompassing the ligand binding site as well as all residues that were kept flexible during docking (Thr66, His68, Asn69, Lys89, Trp113, Tyr114, Ser117). Exhaustiveness and energy range of the calculations were set to 1000 and 4, respectively, and docking calculations were repeated twice in order to verify reproducibility of results.

Accession Numbers

Coordinates and structure factors of the crystal structures of DmcN-IIIB bound to 7-methylguanosine or cytidine have been deposited within the protein data bank (PDB) with the PDB IDs 4NV0 and 4NWI, respectively.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Multiple sequence alignment of cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase IIIB from Drosophila melanogaster, Xenopus laevis, Gallus gallus, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus and Homo sapiens. Identical residues are shown on red background, while similar ones are represented in red on white background. Secondary structure elements from the crystal structure of DmcN-IIIB are shown above the alignment. Note that important residues from motifs I-III (marked with a black triangle) as well as both tryptophans necessary for substrate binding in DmcN-IIIB are strictly conserved among all species while the second stacking residue Phe75 can be conservatively replaced by a tyrosine or histidine residue (residues are marked with an asterisk).


Figure S2.

Sequence alignment of Homo sapiens and Drosophila melanogaster cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase IIIB with Homo sapiens cN-IIIA (isoform 2). Identical residues are shown in white on red background, while similar ones are represented in red on white background. Secondary structure elements from the crystal structure of DmcN-IIIB are shown above the alignment and residues are marked as in Figure S1. Note that Phe75 of DmcN-IIIB is replaced by a tyrosine in HscN-IIIB and remarkably by a histidine in HscN-IIIA while the Trp121 of DmcN-IIIB is replaced by a tyrosine in HscN-IIIA.


Figure S3.

Overall structural comparison of substrate bound intracellular 5′-nucleotidases with known crystal structures. The cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase II bound to IMP (PDB ID 2XCV), cN-IIIA bound to UMP (PDB ID 4FE3) and cN-IIIB bound to m7G (this study; PDB ID 4NV0) as well as the cytosolic 5′(3′)-deoxyribonucleotidase (cdN bound to dGMP; PDB ID 2JAO) and the mitochondrial-5′(3′)-deoxyribonucleotidase (mdN bound to dUMP; PDB ID 1Z4I) are shown. The HAD core domains are shown in blue colors (β-strands in light blue and α-helices in dark blue) and the cap domains in orange and yellow, respectively. Green spheres represent the magnesium ions and the bound substrates or products are shown as sticks (coloring as in Figure 4). Note that the HAD core domains are structurally similar in all of the structures while the cap domains are highly variable.


Table S1.

Oligonucleotides used for site-directed mutagenesis.


Movie S1.

Dynamic structural changes between open and closed conformations of cN-IIIA and cN-IIIB. Trajectory connecting the crystal structures of the closed state of cN-IIIA bound to the substrate UMP (beginning of movie) and the open state of cN-IIIB bound to the reaction product 7-methyl guanosine (end of movie). The structure is shown in cartoon mode with substrates and products as well as the conserved Trp120 (cN-IIIB) or Trp113 (cN-IIIA) as sticks.



We thank Jessica Nehls and Maren Müller for technical assistance, Bodo Moritz for helpful advice and discussions and Angelika Schierhorn for MS analysis of purified proteins. We are most grateful to Christopher D. Lima for the Ulp1 expression plasmid and Achim Dickmanns for critically reading the manuscript and helpful discussions. We thank the Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin (HZB, Germany) for the allocation of synchrotron radiation beamtime.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TM JB EW RF. Performed the experiments: TM JB PN. Analyzed the data: TM JB PN EW RF. Wrote the paper: TM JB EW RF.


  1. 1. Bianchi V, Spychala J (2003) Mammalian 5′-nucleotidases. J Biol Chem 278: 46195–46198.
  2. 2. Rampazzo C, Miazzi C, Franzolin E, Pontarin G, Ferraro P, et al. (2010) Regulation by degradation, a cellular defense against deoxyribonucleotide pool imbalances. Mutat Res 703: 2–10.
  3. 3. Reaves ML, Young BD, Hosios AM, Xu Y-F, Rabinowitz JD (2013) Pyrimidine homeostasis is accomplished by directed overflow metabolism. Nature 500: 237–241.
  4. 4. Hunsucker SA, Mitchell BS, Spychala J (2005) The 5′-nucleotidases as regulators of nucleotide and drug metabolism. Pharmacol Ther 107: 1–30.
  5. 5. Rinaldo-Matthis A, Rampazzo C, Reichard P, Bianchi V, Nordlund P (2002) Crystal structure of a human mitochondrial deoxyribonucleotidase. Nat Struct Biol 9: 779–787.
  6. 6. Walldén K, Ruzzenente B, Rinaldo-Matthis A, Bianchi V, Nordlund P (2005) Structural basis for substrate specificity of the human mitochondrial deoxyribonucleotidase. Structure/Folding and Design 13: 1081–1088.
  7. 7. Walldén K, Rinaldo-Matthis A, Ruzzenente B, Rampazzo C, Bianchi V, et al. (2007) Crystal Structures of Human and Murine Deoxyribonucleotidases: Insights into Recognition of Substrates and Nucleotide Analogues. Biochemistry 46: 13809–13818.
  8. 8. Knapp K, Zebisch M, Pippel J, El-Tayeb A, Müller CE, et al. (2012) Crystal structure of the human ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73): insights into the regulation of purinergic signaling. Structure 20: 2161–2173.
  9. 9. Heuts DPHM, Weissenborn MJ, Olkhov RV, Shaw AM, Gummadova J, et al. (2012) Crystal structure of a soluble form of human CD73 with ecto-5′-nucleotidase activity. Chembiochem 13: 2384–2391.
  10. 10. Walldén K, Stenmark P, Nyman T, Flodin S, Gräslund S, et al. (2007) Crystal structure of human cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase II: insights into allosteric regulation and substrate recognition. J Biol Chem 282: 17828–17836.
  11. 11. Walldén K, Nordlund P (2011) Structural basis for the allosteric regulation and substrate recognition of human cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase II. J Mol Biol 408: 684–696.
  12. 12. Jordheim LP, Marton Z, Rhimi M, Cros-Perrial E, Lionne C, et al. (2013) Identification and characterization of inhibitors of cytoplasmic 5′-nucleotidase cN-II issued from virtual screening. Biochem Pharmacol 85: 497–506.
  13. 13. Bitto E, Bingman CA, Wesenberg GE, McCoy JG, Phillips GN (2006) Structure of pyrimidine 5′-nucleotidase type 1. Insight into mechanism of action and inhibition during lead poisoning. J Biol Chem 281: 20521–20529.
  14. 14. Grobosky CL, Lopez JB, Rennie S, Skopelitis DJ, Wiest AT, et al. (2012) Structural basis of substrate specificity and selectivity of murine cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase III. J Mol Biol 423: 540–554.
  15. 15. Burroughs AM, Allen KN, Dunaway-Mariano D, Aravind L (2006) Evolutionary genomics of the HAD superfamily: understanding the structural adaptations and catalytic diversity in a superfamily of phosphoesterases and allied enzymes. J Mol Biol 361: 1003–1034.
  16. 16. Allegrini S, Scaloni A, Careddu MG, Cuccu G, D’Ambrosio C, et al. (2004) Mechanistic studies on bovine cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase II, an enzyme belonging to the HAD superfamily. Eur J Biochem 271: 4881–4891.
  17. 17. Aravind L, Galperin MY, Koonin EV (1998) The catalytic domain of the P-type ATPase has the haloacid dehalogenase fold. Trends Biochem Sci 23: 127–129.
  18. 18. Allegrini S, Scaloni A, Ferrara L, Pesi R, Pinna P, et al. (2001) Bovine cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase acts through the formation of an aspartate 52-phosphoenzyme intermediate. J Biol Chem 276: 33526–33532.
  19. 19. Collet JF, Stroobant V, Pirard M, Delpierre G, Van Schaftingen E (1998) A new class of phosphotransferases phosphorylated on an aspartate residue in an amino-terminal DXDX(T/V) motif. J Biol Chem 273: 14107–14112.
  20. 20. Lahiri SD, Zhang G, Dunaway-Mariano D, Allen KN (2003) The pentacovalent phosphorus intermediate of a phosphoryl transfer reaction. Science 299: 2067–2071.
  21. 21. Buschmann J, Moritz B, Jeske M, Lilie H, Schierhorn A, et al. (2013) Identification of Drosophila and Human 7-Methyl GMP-specific Nucleotidases. J Biol Chem 288: 2441–2451.
  22. 22. Amici A, Magni G (2002) Human erythrocyte pyrimidine 5′-nucleotidase, PN-I. Arch Biochem Biophys 397: 184–190.
  23. 23. Rees DCD, Duley JAJ, Marinaki AMA (2003) Pyrimidine 5′ nucleotidase deficiency. Br J Haematol 120: 375–383.
  24. 24. Hokari S, Miyazaki T, Hasegawa M, Komoda T (1998) Enhanced activity of pyrimidine 5′-nucleotidase in rat red blood cells during erythropoiesis. Biol Chem 379: 329–333.
  25. 25. Valentine WNW, Fink KK, Paglia DED, Harris SRS, Adams WSW (1974) Hereditary hemolytic anemia with human erythrocyte pyrimidine 5′-nucleotidase deficiency. J Clin Invest 54: 866–879.
  26. 26. van Dijk EE, Cougot NN, Meyer SS, Babajko SS, Wahle EE, et al. (2002) Human Dcp2: a catalytically active mRNA decapping enzyme located in specific cytoplasmic structures. EMBO J 21: 6915–6924.
  27. 27. Wang Z, Jiao X, Carr-Schmid A, Kiledjian M (2002) The hDcp2 protein is a mammalian mRNA decapping enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 12663–12668.
  28. 28. Song M-G, Bail S, Kiledjian M (2013) Multiple Nudix family proteins possess mRNA decapping activity. RNA 19: 390–399.
  29. 29. Machnicka MA, Milanowska K, Osman Oglou O, Purta E, Kurkowska M, et al. (2013) MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways–2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res 41: D262–D267.
  30. 30. Wang ZZ, Kiledjian MM (2001) Functional Link between the Mammalian Exosome and mRNA Decapping. Cell 107: 12–12.
  31. 31. Hendler S, Fürer E, Srinivasan PR (1970) Synthesis and chemical properties of monomers and polymers containing 7-methylguanine and an investigation of their substrate or template properties for bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid or ribonucleic acid polymerases. Biochemistry 9: 4141–4153.
  32. 32. Reichard P (2010) Ribonucleotide reductases: Substrate specificity by allostery. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 396: 5–5.
  33. 33. Cliff MJ, Bowler MW, Varga A, Marston JP, Szabó J, et al. (2010) Transition state analogue structures of human phosphoglycerate kinase establish the importance of charge balance in catalysis. J Am Chem Soc 132: 6507–6516.
  34. 34. Baxter NJ, Blackburn GM, Marston JP, Hounslow AM, Cliff MJ, et al. (2008) Anionic charge is prioritized over geometry in aluminum and magnesium fluoride transition state analogs of phosphoryl transfer enzymes. J Am Chem Soc 130: 3952–3958.
  35. 35. Amici A, Ciccioli K, Naponelli V, Raffaelli N, Magni G (2005) Evidence for essential catalytic determinants for human erythrocyte pyrimidine 5′-nucleotidase. Cell Mol Life Sci 62: 1613–1620.
  36. 36. Ruszczynska K, Kamienska-Trela K, Wojcik J, Stepinski J, Darzynkiewicz E, et al. (2003) Charge distribution in 7-methylguanine regarding cation-pi interaction with protein factor eIF4E. Biophys J 85: 1450–1456.
  37. 37. Strasser A, Dickmanns A, Luhrmann R, Ficner R (2005) Structural basis for m3G-cap-mediated nuclear import of spliceosomal UsnRNPs by snurportin1. EMBO J 24: 2235–2243.
  38. 38. Hsu PC, Hodel MR, Thomas JW, Taylor LJ, Hagedorn CH, et al. (2000) Structural requirements for the specific recognition of an m7G mRNA cap. Biochemistry 39: 13730–13736.
  39. 39. Mueller U, Darowski N, Fuchs MR, Förster R, Hellmig M, et al. (2012) Facilities for macromolecular crystallography at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin. J Synchrotron Radiat 19: 442–449.
  40. 40. Kabsch W (2010) XDS. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 125–132.
  41. 41. Vagin A, Teplyakov A (2010) Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 22–25.
  42. 42. Winn MD, Ballard CC, Cowtan KD, Dodson EJ, Emsley P, et al. (2011) Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67: 235–242.
  43. 43. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkóczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, et al. (2010) PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 213–221.
  44. 44. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 486–501.
  45. 45. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, et al. (2004) UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25: 1605–1612.
  46. 46. Bosse-Doenecke E, Weininger U, Gopalswamy M, Balbach J, Knudsen SM, et al. (2008) High yield production of recombinant native and modified peptides exemplified by ligands for G-protein coupled receptors. Protein Expr Purif 58: 114–121.
  47. 47. Sambrook JJ, Russell DDW (2001) Molecular cloning. CSHL Press. 1 pp.
  48. 48. Mossessova E, Lima CD (2000) Ulp1-SUMO crystal structure and genetic analysis reveal conserved interactions and a regulatory element essential for cell growth in yeast. Mol Cell 5: 865–876.
  49. 49. Sanner MF (1999) Python: a programming language for software integration and development. J Mol Graph Model 17: 57–61.
  50. 50. Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31: 455–461.