Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Development of a Lozenge for Oral Transmucosal Delivery of Trans-Resveratrol in Humans: Proof of Concept


Resveratrol provides multiple physiologic benefits which promote healthspan in various model species and clinical trials support continued exploration of resveratrol treatment in humans. However, there remains concern regarding low bioavailability and wide inter-individual differences in absorption and metabolism in humans, which suggests a great need to develop novel methods for resveratrol delivery. We hypothesized that oral transmucosal delivery, using a lozenge composed of a resveratrol-excipient matrix, would allow resveratrol to be absorbed rapidly into the bloodstream. We pursued proof of concept through two experiments. In the first experiment, the solubility of trans-resveratrol (tRES) in water and 2.0 M solutions of dextrose, fructose, ribose, sucrose, and xylitol was determined using HPLC. Independent t-tests with a Bonferroni correction were used to compare the solubility of tRES in each of the solutions to that in water. tRES was significantly more soluble in the ribose solution (p = 0.0013) than in the other four solutions. Given the enhanced solubility of tRES in a ribose solution, a resveratrol-ribose matrix was developed into a lozenge suitable for human consumption. Lozenges were prepared, each containing 146±5.5 mg tRES per 2000 mg of lozenge mass. Two healthy human participants consumed one of the prepared lozenges following an overnight fast. Venipuncture was performed immediately before and 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes following lozenge administration. Maximal plasma concentrations (Cmax) for tRES alone (i.e., resveratrol metabolites not included) were 325 and 332 ng⋅mL−1 for the two participants at 15 minute post-administration for both individuals. These results suggest a resveratrol-ribose matrix lozenge can achieve greater Cmax and enter the bloodstream faster than previously reported dosage forms for gastrointestinal absorption. While this study is limited by small sample size and only one method of resveratrol delivery, it does provide proof of concept to support further exploration of novel delivery methods for resveratrol administration.


Resveratrol is a stilbene polyphenol found in grapes and other plant products which has received considerable attention in the past decade for its potential to improve health and combat age-related diseases [1]. A considerable number of in vitro and animal model studies have revealed trans-resveratrol (tRES) has a plethora of potential beneficial effects, including prevention of atherosclerosis, improving glucose tolerance, enhancing endurance capacity, and reducing inflammation [1], [2]. Full discussions of physiological effects and their mechanisms have been reviewed elsewhere and are beyond the scope of this paper. Multiple published papers have described the results of tRES treatment in humans, and most research suggests that tRES is safe and could indeed improve cardiometabolic health, especially in individuals with chronic disease [3].

One of the chief limitations in developing mainstream clinical applications for tRES is overcoming the limited bioavailability to consistently achieve concentrations which have been demonstrated to be effective in laboratory models, and there is a need to improve bioavailability of tRES [4]. The dose and concentration of tRES in blood in human trials are often below the doses used in animal and cell culture studies [5][8], even with multiple daily oral doses [9]. Although some studies have shown beneficial effects following low-dose tRES treatment in clinical populations [10], there is evidence that some of the beneficial physiologic effects of tRES treatment require large dosages [11]. However, high oral dosages may result in mild to severe side effects, depending on the patient population. For instance, at doses higher than 2,500 mg, tRES has been shown to cause gastrointestinal upset and diarrhea in healthy individuals [11] and exacerbate gastrointestinal ulcers in laboratory models [12]. Additionally, there is concern regarding high doses of tRES in certain clinical populations. A 5,000 mg daily dose of a proprietary tRES formulation has been associated with renal failure in multiple myeloma patients [13], where existing renal dysfunction may have been exacerbated by a large quantity of resveratrol metabolites. These side effects have limited the oral dose in most human trials to 1,000 mg or lower [14]. In fact, most commercially available supplements contain ≤500 mg tRES [15].

Human bioavailability studies utilizing gastrointestinal absorption of resveratrol (i.e., ingestion of powders, capsules, caplets, etc.) have found wide inter-individual variability in tRES absorption, plasma concentration of free tRES, and resveratrol metabolite profile [5], [6], [8], [9]. This is in part due to extensive metabolism of tRES. First-pass metabolism, the modification of drug during initial absorbance in the small intestine and liver, greatly limits the plasma concentrations of tRES attained following absorption of a standard oral dose [6], [8], [16]. It has long been known that tRES is extensively glycosolated and sulfalated during absorption in the small intestine [17][20]. Recent evidence suggests that gut microbiota may also play a role in metabolism of tRES before it reaches the bloodstream, contributing to inter-individual variability in bioavailability and metabolite profile [21]. Like other molecules absorbed through the intestinal tract, resveratrol is then transported to the liver, where it is further metabolized before it enters the systemic circulation [17], [18], [22]. Indeed, it is possible that unmodified tRES may demonstrate significant physiological effects once it reaches the plasma, but the magnitude of these effects may be limited if absorption and metabolism limit plasma concentration and bioavailability. Thus, oral transmucosal (OTM) delivery, which circumvents the gut and first-pass hepatic metabolism may increase the absorption of tRES and substantially reduce inter-individual variability in peak plasma concentration and metabolite profile to allow for greater clinical utility.

An OTM formulation such as a lozenge could circumvent the physiological factors limiting absorption and bioavailability of tRES which normally occur following administration of a pill, food, or liquid [5], [23], [24]. Resveratrol has mixed potential as a candidate for OTM absorption. Favorable properties include relatively small molecular weight of tRES (228 g⋅mol−1). Additionally, tRES is uncharged at physiological pH which will allow passive diffusion across the buccal mucosa [25], [26]. This is experimentally supported where tRES has been shown to have high flux in cultured oral epithelial tissue [27]. The aqueous solubility is a limiting factor in exploring OTM dosing, where transcellular rate of diffusion is based on the concentration of drug in solution or free form. The other limiting factor for OTM formulations of tRES is dose size, which is restricted to approximately 100–150 mg for a lozenge [25]. This may be sufficient to achieve a physiologic effect if absorption is sufficiently high. Other OTM delivery forms, such as films and sprays are limited to a much smaller dose size.

We hypothesized that incorporation of tRES into a simple lozenge would allow its adequate absorption through the oral mucosa of humans. Thus, the first purpose of our study was to determine if the aqueous solubility of tRES would be affected by combining it with selected excipients to optimize the likelihood of significant OTM absorption. The second purpose of the study was to determine the maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) of tRES following administration of a tRES lozenge to healthy human volunteers. The results of these initial experiments provide proof-of-concept for the development of a tRES lozenge using appropriate excipients, which could lead to greater exploration of novel delivery methods for tRES administration and ultimately lead to new clinical applications.


This study included two components: 1) a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of tRES solubility in various concentrations of different sugar/sugar alcohol excipients, and 2) a human pilot study to determine the peak plasma concentration of tRES achieved following administration of an optimized tRES lozenge.

Solubility of Trans-resveratrol

Stock tRES solution was made with a ratio of 5 mg of tRES dissolved in 0.50 mL of methanol. Directly after making stock solution, 12 µL of tRES/Methanol was transferred to a 2 mL microcentrifuge tube. The methanol was allowed to evaporate completely (approximately 6 hours) while shielded from light and loosely covered with aluminum foil leaving 12 µg of dry tRES in the tube. This was qualitatively confirmed visually by the remaining yellowish residue, consistent with that of dry resveratrol. Dry tubes were stored overnight at 4°C and allowed to warm to room temperature before addition of 2.0 M solutions or dH20 to measure tRES solubility.

Twenty milliliter 2.0 M solutions of dextrose, fructose, ribose, sucrose, and xylitol were prepared using measured quantities of dry reagents purchased from Sigma Aldrich and de-ionized water. Solutions were mixed over low heat until fully dissolved the evening before the study and stored at 4°C in glass vials. The respective stock solutions were transferred to the prepared microcentrifuge tubes containing dry tRES and diluted with de-ionized water in an appropriate ratio for a final concentration of sugar or polyalcohol of 2 M and a volume of 1 ml. The tubes were sealed, vortexed, and stored protected from light for approximately 18 hours at room temperature.

To measure aqueous tRES concentrations, each sample was first centrifuged for 3 minutes at 16.1 k×g to pellet excess tRES, leaving all dissolved tRES in the supernatant. Extra care was taken not to disturb the loose, off white/yellow pellet. To prepare sample for HPLC, 200 µl of each sample was transferred to a fresh tube diluted with 400 µl methanol, and then filtered for injection on the chromatography column.

Chromatography was performed on a C18 column (250 mm×4.6 mm, 3 µm). Trans-resveratrol was detected by UV at 214 nm and eluted at 3∶00 min. Running buffer was 20 mM phosphate buffer (6.8 pH):methanol at a 25%:75% ratio. A volume of 150 µL of each prepared sample was analyzed by HPLC. This method was adapted from Singh et al [28]. Solubility of tRES was measured in at least triplicate for water and each of the other solutions.

Statistical analysis.

Mean and standard deviation for tRES solubility in water and each of the solutions were computed. Independent t-tests were used to compare the solubility of tRES between water, and each of the excipient solutions. Statistical significance was set a priori with α = 0.050. A Bonferroni correction was then applied to reduce Type I error, and given the three comparisons, p≤0.010 was considered statistically significant (0.050/5 = 0.010).

Bioavailability of Resveratrol Lozenge with Ribose to Improve Aqueous Solubility

Ethics statement.

All procedures relating to human experimentation in the human bioavailability study were approved by the Institutional Review Board at High Point University. Human participants underwent written informed consent.

Lozenge preparation and content verification.

Based on the results of the first experiment, ribose was chosen as an excipient to enhance solubility of tRES in a lozenge. The preparation of a 2000 mg lozenge containing approximately 46% ribose, 46% (fructose/sucrose mixture), and 8% tRES was adapted from hard lozenge techniques from using published recommendations from a university pharmaceutics and compounding laboratory [29] and traditional jewel candy recipes [30]. Trans-resveratrol was purchased from Biotivia Longevity Pharmaceuticals, LLC (New York, NY, USA). All ingredients measured from dry weight. Lozenges were stored in lozenge molds wrapped in aluminum foil and a sealed plastic bag at −20°C.

Final concentration of tRES in lozenges were measured by the Biological Psychiatry Analytical Labs at The University of Texas at San Antonio. A 1 mg sample was collected from random prepared lozenges and the concentration of tRES was quantified for each lozenge using the HPLC methods described previously. The mass of the remaining lozenge was then measured and multiplied by the tRES concentration to compute the total tRES dose for each lozenge.


Individuals at least 18 years of age with no history of cardiorespiratory, neurological, or metabolic disease were eligible to participate in this pilot study. Individuals regularly taking any type of medication or a recent history of supplements containing material derived from grapes (e.g., resveratrol, grape seed extract) or other polyphenols were excluded from the study.

Lozenge administration procedures.

Participants arrived to the laboratory in a fasted state, such that they did not ingest anything besides water since the previous midnight. After undergoing informed consent, a fasting blood sample was obtained from the antecubital vein. Participants were provided the tRES-ribose lozenge and verbally instructed how to ingest it. Participants were told to keep the lozenge placed between their gum and cheek until it was completely dissolved and minimize swallowing any of their saliva or pieces of the lozenge.

The time at which the lozenge was initially administered was recorded. A venous blood sample was then obtained every fifteen minutes thereafter for one hour. Only one hour of data were obtained because oral trans-mucosal absorption would be expected to be rapid and occur within this time frame [25]. All blood samples were collected into EDTA tubes, which were then placed in an ice bath before being centrifuged to separate red blood cells from plasma. The retained plasma was stored at −80°C until the time of analysis (<2 weeks).

Participants were asked to report any unusual or adverse events.

Peak plasma concentration analysis.

Resveratrol was quantified in plasma using HPLC with UV detection. Briefly, 200 µL of calibrators and unknown samples were mixed with 10 µL of 100 µg/mL flurbiprofen (internal standard) and 2 mL of 50∶50 acetonitrile:methanol. The samples were vortexed vigorously and then centrifuged at 1500 g for 15 min. Supernatants were transferred to glass test tubes and dried to residue under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The residues were redissolved in 250 µL of mobile phase and then filtered using a microfilterfuge tube. Then, 150 µL of the calibrators, controls, and final samples were injected into the HPLC. The ratios of the peak area of resveratrol to that of the internal standard flurbiprofen were compared against a linear regression of calibrators at concentrations of 0, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 ng/ml to quantify resveratrol in the samples. Resveratrol concentration in plasma was reported in ng/mL.

The HPLC system consisted of an Alltima C18 column (4.6×150 mm, 5 µm), Waters 2487 UV detector, Waters 717 autosampler, Waters 515 HPLC pump. The mobile phase was 35% acetonitrile, 64.9% Milli-Q water, and 0.1% phosphoric acid (pH 2.5). The flow rate of the mobile phase was 1.5 mL/min and the wavelength of absorbance was 214 nm.

Statistical analysis.

Given that Cmax data were only obtained from two human subjects using only one treatment (lozenge comparing tRES-ribose matrix), data are reported from each subject and no other formal statistical comparisons were possible.


Solubility of Trans-resveratrol

Solubility of tRES in water and across the 2.0M concentrations of the dextrose, fructose, ribose, sucrose, and xylitol solutions are presented in TABLE 1. The solubility of tRES was significantly enhanced in the 2.0M ribose solution (p = 0.0013), but not in fructose (p = 0.0950), dextrose (p = 0.2284), sucrose (p = 0.5824), or xylitol (p = 0.3330).

Table 1. Solubility of resveratrol in different aqueous solutions (Mean ± Standard Deviation).


Four lozenges were successfully created using the basic techniques described in the methods. The tRES content of each is displayed in TABLE 2, with a mean ± SD of 146.2±5.5 mg tRES per 2000 mg lozenge mass.

Table 2. Trans-resveratrol content of four individual lozenges created.

Bioavailability of Optimized Lozenge

Human participants.

Two healthy male individuals received the tRES-ribose matrix lozenge and had their plasma Cmax for tRES quantified. A summary of the participant data is present in TABLE 3. Both participants reported the lozenge had a mild pepper-like taste and that they were able to follow the administration procedures properly. Neither participant reported noticing anything unusual or any adverse events following the optimized tRES lozenge administration.

Peak plasma concentration and time to maximal concentration.

At baseline, plasma concentration of tRES was below detectable limits and therefore presumed to be zero. Plasma concentrations peaked 15 minutes following lozenge administration (Participant 1: Cmax = 325 ng⋅mL−1; Participant 2: Cmax = 332 ng⋅mL−1). Trans-resveratrol concentrations were below detectable limits at the 30, 45, and 60 post-administration time points. A comparison of these data in reference to previously reported data are presented in FIGURE 1 and FIGURE 2.

Figure 1. Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of tRES following administration of a lozenge in reference to previously reported data.

Note that the maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) is that for trans-resveratrol (tRES) alone and therefore does not include any resveratrol metabolites.

Figure 2. Time to peak plasma concentration of tRES following administration of a lozenge in reference to previously reported data.


The results of this study demonstrate that the aqueous solubility of tRES can be enhanced using ribose, and that OTM absorption of tRES using a lozenge is possible. The OTM delivery method appears to elevate peak plasma level of tRES above that previously reported following GI absorption (e.g., powder, caplets) in humans. Given the limited number of excipients tested, limited dosage forms, and the small number of human participants this should be considered a proof of concept study which provides the first evidence to support further pursuit towards development of a resveratrol lozenge optimized for human OTM absorption.

Solubility of Trans-resveratrol

The first aim of our study was to determine if the aqueous solubility of tRES would be affected by dextrose, fructose, ribose, sucrose, or xylitol. Major factors determining a successful drug candidate for OTM dosing is amount of drug which is in solution in the aqueous environment of the mouth with absorption being due to passive diffusion [25], [31]. As stated by Zhang et al “The effective formulation must not only release the drug to the mucosal surface, but do so with the drug in its free form.” Any compound which increases resveratrol’s aqueous solubility and form a strong complex with resveratrol, such as is possible with detergents or cyclodextrins, could prevent or slow absorption and we’re not considered for this study [25]. With the low aqueous solubility tRES, any change in the aqueous solubility of resveratrol may have a significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of an OTM dose.

It is difficult to predict the effect of sugars as cosolvents on the aqueous solubility of solutes, such as tRES, where increases or decreases with differing concentration may occur with little clear explanation [32]. Sugars are understood to create order within an aqueous solution, and that there can be a “sugaring out” effect on aromatic organic molecules [32][34]. If an excipient, such as sucrose, were to decrease the aqueous solubility of tRES, its inclusion in an OTM dosage would slow absorption across the oral mucosa. This would reduce the concentration of free tRES in solution in the oral cavity, reduce the rate of flux of tRES across the mucous membrane and increase the amounts being swallowed and undergoing the less efficient gastrointestinal absorption. However, there were no statistically significant observed effects on the aqueous solubility tRES solubility for the tested excipients such as dextrose, fructose, sucrose, and xylitol (TABLE 1).

Sugars may also increase the solubility for poorly soluble aromatic organic molecules such as biphenyl, hexane, naphthalene, and adenine [35], [36]. Ribose was shown to be the strongest solubolizer of the aforementioned hydrocarbons [35], and we discovered that 2.0M ribose did significantly increase the aqueous solubility of tRES (TABLE 1). The α-D-ribopyranose isomer of ribose has all hydroxyl group on a single face, leaving the opposing face largely non-polar [35], [37]. This dual-faced nature of the pyranose form of ribose has been credited to enhance biphenyl’s and benzene’s aqueous solubility [35], [38], as well as enhance ribose’s permeation across lipid bilayers [37]. The increase in aqueous solubility of tRES by ribose may be due to this same mechanism. Future research may explore the use of other excipients, alone or in combination, to determine if the aqueous solubility of resveratrol can be further increased, and the impact of increased solubility on OTM dosing.

A number of other studies have attempted to increase the oral bioavailability of resveratrol by combining it with other related molecules. For instance, piperine (a polyphenol found in black pepper) has been found to improve the GI bioavailability of resveratrol in mice [39]. Likewise, there has been success in substantially increasing bioavailability by improving solubility of resveratrol, as recently demonstrated through the use of highly soluble GI caplets, though this is complicated by greater inter-individual variability compared to standard tRES powder [4]. While these matrices do increase plasma bioavailability compared to resveratrol powder and may cause synergistic or additive effects, they still are subject to the limitations of gastrointestinal absorption, including metabolism, dose size from, wide inter-individual variability in absorption, and GI side effects.

Oral Transmucosal Absorption of Trans-resveratrol in Humans

With limited resources, we focused on developing only one lozenge formulation, using a matrix of approximately 140 mg resveratrol with ribose. In the two participants tested, lozenge administration resulted in a Cmax of free unmodified tRES of 328.5±5.0 ng⋅mL−1 at 15 minutes after administration of the OTM lozenge, which is a considerably higher Cmax than that reported from administration of a similar or greater oral dosages utilizing gastrointestinal absorption (e.g. [6], [9], FIGURE 1). For example, Nunes et al [40] tested the pharmacokinetics for a single 200 mg oral dose in humans and the mean Cmax was measured to be approximately 25 ng⋅ml−1 at 0.8 hours. A dosage of 500 ng⋅ml−1 by Brown et al [11], the Cmax of unalterated resveratrol was 43.8 ng/ml at one hour. The primary contributing factor to the increased unmodified tRES Cmax compared those previously reported for standard oral dosing is likely the avoidance of GI tract, which allowed the relatively low dose of tRES in the lozenge to be sufficiently absorbed into the bloodstream via the oral mucous membrane without first being glycosolated and sulfalated in the intestines followed by first pass hepatic metabolism [8].

Peak plasma concentration was observed in both of the participants fifteen minutes following lozenge administration, which is substantially faster than reported using traditional oral supplements using gastrointestinal absorption (FIGURE 2). This is likely due elimination of the time necessary for a capsule to travel to the intestines and for the contents of a capsule to be released and absorbed. Since blood samples were collected at fifteen minute intervals, it is possible that the actual peaks may have been achieved slightly earlier or slightly later (yet before the 30 minute sample). Nonetheless, this is considerably quicker than time to peak concentration reported following that of a traditional oral tRES supplement [6], [9] or a highly soluble caplet [4]. However, it must be noted that plasma free tRES concentration was not measurable at the 30 minute time point. Thus, it was not possible to compute the area under the curve (AUC) for tRES, and therefore the total tRES exposure could not be determined and compared to that reported previously.

Given this was a proof of concept study rather than a full-scale bioavailability study, resveratrol metabolites were not measured. It remains unknown whether OTM absorption influences metabolite profile. It remains unclear how biologically relevant these metabolites are in humans, but there is evidence that these metabolites have physiologic effects in laboratory models [41][44]. Therefore, it is too early to determine whether it is advantageous, deleterious, or inconsequential to avoid metabolism of tRES in the gut. However, given previous reports of limited absorption, OTM delivery does provide a potential avenue to maximize absorption, thereby making tRES administration more cost effective, and also reduce inter-individual variability in plasma concentration. Additionally, the lozenge may be advantageous in reducing the risk of gastrointestinal side effects.

The concept of using a lozenge to deliver a therapeutic compound via OTM absorption is well established [25], [31], [45], yet the pursuit of this delivery method has been largely neglected for tRES administration. Notable therapeutic advances are rooted in implementation of OTM dosage when oral dosages of the same drug were less effective [25], [31]. For instance, sublingual tablets of nitroglycerine are used to provide rapid relief from angina by increasing cardiovascular blood flow, and have been in use for over 100 years [46]. Likewise, various formulations for OTM delivery of opioid analgesic drugs (e.g., fentanyl citrate) have provided a significant advantage in pain management over their oral counterparts [47]. Further, this is not the first report to suggest an OTM administration for resveratrol [48]. Asensi et al [49] briefly report that a 50 ml solution of unspecified fluid containing ∼1 mg of resveratrol retained in the mouth for 60 seconds and achieved maximum plasma concentration comparable to a 250 mg oral dose in humans, though further details of the methods and results are not provided.

Future Applications of Oral Transmucosal Delivery of Trans-resveratrol

It remains unknown whether the benefits of tRES are dependent on intermittent peaks or sustained elevation in plasma tRES concentration, given that both exposure time to tRES and concentration influences cellular response [50]. Recent evidence from cancer cells and animal models suggests that resveratrol metabolites may be enzymatically converted back into parent compound (“recycling”) which may allow for a sustained release of trans-resveratrol [51]. However, it is not known whether this occurs in all types of tissue (e.g., healthy and cancerous human breast tissue does not have measurable levels of SULT1A1 [52], which plays a major role in resveratrol metabolism [22]). We hypothesize that the rapid clearance of free tRES resulted from metabolism of the parent compound, such that the later samples likely contained high concentrations of resveratrol metabolites. Indeed, these metabolites could potentially be recycled back into parent compound, similar to that from standard oral dosages.

Although limited, our results provide some encouraging data to suggest that OTM administration may allow for more rapid absorption of tRES, which may have strong clinical applications. Regardless of absorption into other tissues, endothelial cells would receive rapid bolus of tRES. This suggests there is potential for tRES to be used in medical management of ischemic events (e.g., angina), given its ability to acutely improve blood flow and vascular function in humans [53], [54] and protect from or attenuate ischemic injuries in laboratory models [55][57]. Likewise, a rapidly deliverable form of tRES may be beneficial in treating acute trauma to counter the development of oxidative stress and inflammation (e.g., concussion or spinal cord injury), which has also been supported through animal models [58][61]. It must be stated that these concepts of using rapid-delivery of tRES are based on sound theory which are supported with our bioavailability data from two human participants, but further validation of these data is required before initiating human clinical trials in this realm.

Study Limitations

Although our data is novel and may have implications in the development of future tRES products, we acknowledge a number of limitations to this study. First and foremost, the limited number of human participants and solubility measurements requires that measurements must be considered proof of concept, rather than a full bioavailability study. While ribose was found to be the excipient which resulted in the greatest solubility, this is not necessarily the optimal formulation. Further research must be conducted to determine if different molecules, alone or in combination, can further enhance the solubility of resveratrol. While it is clear that ribose increases aqueous solubility of tRES, it is not yet certain whether this actually enhances OTM absorption. As such, future studies should compare lozenges composed of different resveratrol matrices. Further, only free tRES plasma concentration was measured, and the plasma metabolite profile was not measured. Thus, future research exploring OTM absorption of resveratrol should investigate whether the bioavailability of tRES is truly greater compared to standard or other novel delivery methods. Future studies should also include a dose curve, as 140 mg is a very large OTM dose and may not be the most efficient dosage. Lastly, these data demonstrate high peak plasma concentrations achieved very quickly, but do not provide information about total resveratrol absorption, as measured by area under the curve. Nonetheless, the data provides a proof-of-concept that it is possible to reach plasma levels which have elicited physiological effects through OTM dosage form of resveratrol.


In summary, the results of this study demonstrate that ribose increases the aqueous solubility of tRES compared to its solubility in water alone. Further, OTM administration of a lozenge containing a mixture of ribose with resveratrol results in a very high peak plasma concentration compared to that reported from similar dosages of free resveratrol administered as a traditional oral supplement. Likewise, peak plasma concentration of free resveratrol was achieved approximately 15 minutes following lozenge administration, which is considerably quicker than the 60–120 minutes reported using traditional free resveratrol tablets. As human clinical trials investigate the benefits of tRES treatment on human health, it will become especially important to develop effective delivery methods which are cost effective, produce minimal side effects, and limit inter-individual bioavailability. Future research must be conducted to determine if the high plasma levels attained from the optimized resveratrol lozenge hold true across multiple individuals and whether the metabolite profile differs considerably from that obtained from an oral supplement.


The authors would like to acknowledge Robert D. Renthal, PhD within the Department of Biology at the University of Texas at San Antonio for his contributions to the HPLC study. The authors would also like to acknowledge Linda Sekhon, PAC, PhD within the Department of Physician Assistant Studies at High Point University for her contributions to the human bioavailability study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JMS OLB. Performed the experiments: JMS GF MAJ. Analyzed the data: JMS GF MAJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: OLB MAJ GF. Wrote the paper: JMS OLB MAJ. Statistical Analysis: JMS.


  1. 1. Baur JA, Sinclair DA (2006) Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: the in vivo evidence. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5: 493–506.
  2. 2. Baur JA, Ungvari Z, Minor RK, Le Couteur DG, de Cabo R (2012) Are sirtuins viable targets for improving healthspan and lifespan? Nat Rev Drug Discov 11: 443–461.
  3. 3. Smoliga JM, Baur JA, Hausenblas HA (2011) Resveratrol and health–a comprehensive review of human clinical trials. Mol Nutr Food Res 55: 1129–1141.
  4. 4. Amiot MJ, Romier B, Dao TM, Fanciullino R, Ciccolini J, et al. (2013) Optimization of trans-Resveratrol bioavailability for human therapy. Biochimie 95: 1233–1238.
  5. 5. Vitaglione P, Sforza S, Galaverna G, Ghidini C, Caporaso N, et al. (2005) Bioavailability of trans-resveratrol from red wine in humans. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research 49: 495–504.
  6. 6. Boocock DJ, Faust GES, Patel KR, Schinas AM, Brown VA, et al. (2007) Phase I dose escalation pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers of resveratrol, a potential cancer chemoprotective agent. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 16: 1246–1252.
  7. 7. Chow HH, Garland LL, Hsu CH, Vining DR, Chew WM, et al. (2010) Resveratrol modulates drug- and carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes in a healthy volunteer study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 3: 1168–1175.
  8. 8. Walle T, Hsieh F, DeLegge MH, Oatis JE Jr, Walle UK (2004) High absorption but very low bioavailability of oral resveratrol in humans. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 32: 1377–1382.
  9. 9. Almeida L, Vaz-da-Silva M, Falcao A, Soares E, Costa R, et al. (2009) Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of transresveratrol in a rising multiple-dose study in healthy volunteers. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research 53: S7–15.
  10. 10. Brasnyo P, Molnar GA, Mohas M, Marko L, Laczy B, et al.. (2011) Resveratrol improves insulin sensitivity, reduces oxidative stress and activates the Akt pathway in type 2 diabetic patients. Br J Nutr: 1–7.
  11. 11. Brown VA, Patel KR, Viskaduraki M, Crowell JA, Perloff M, et al. (2010) Repeat Dose Study of the Cancer Chemopreventive Agent Resveratrol in Healthy Volunteers: Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Effect on the Insulin-like Growth Factor Axis. Cancer Res 70: 9003–9011.
  12. 12. Guha P, Dey A, Chatterjee A, Chattopadhyay S, Bandyopadhyay SK (2010) Pro-ulcer effects of resveratrol in mice with indomethacin-induced gastric ulcers are reversed by L-arginine. Br J Pharmacol 159: 726–734.
  13. 13. Popat R, Plesner T, Davies F, Cook G, Cook M, et al. (2013) A phase 2 study of SRT501 (resveratrol) with bortezomib for patients with relapsed and or refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 160: 714–717.
  14. 14. Patel KR, Scott E, Brown VA, Gescher AJ, Steward WP, et al. (2011) Clinical trials of resveratrol. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1215: 161–169.
  15. 15. Rossi D, Guerrini A, Bruni R, Brognara E, Borgatti M, et al. (2012) trans-Resveratrol in nutraceuticals: issues in retail quality and effectiveness. Molecules 17: 12393–12405.
  16. 16. Wenzel E, Somoza V (2005) Metabolism and bioavailability of trans-resveratrol. Mol Nutr Food Res 49: 472–481.
  17. 17. DeSanti C, Pietrabissa A, Mosca F, Pacifici GM (2000) Glucuronidation of resveratrol, a natural compound present in wine, in the human liver. Xenobiotica 30: 1047–1054.
  18. 18. DeSanti C, Pietrabissa A, Spisni R, Mosca F, Pacifici GM (2000) Sulphation of resveratrol, a natural compound present in wine, and its inhibition by natural flavonoids. Xenobiotica 30: 857–866.
  19. 19. Maier-Salamon A, Hagenauer B, Wirth M, Gabor F, Szekeres T, et al. (2006) Increased transport of resveratrol across monolayers of the human intestinal Caco-2 cells is mediated by inhibition and saturation of metabolites. Pharm Res 23: 2107–2115.
  20. 20. Kuhnle G, Spencer JP, Chowrimootoo G, Schroeter H, Debnam ES, et al. (2000) Resveratrol is absorbed in the small intestine as resveratrol glucuronide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 272: 212–217.
  21. 21. Bode LM, Bunzel D, Huch M, Cho GS, Ruhland D, et al. (2013) In vivo and in vitro metabolism of trans-resveratrol by human gut microbiota. Am J Clin Nutr 97: 295–309.
  22. 22. Miksits M, Maier-Salamon A, Aust S, Thalhammer T, Reznicek G, et al. (2005) Sulfation of resveratrol in human liver: evidence of a major role for the sulfotransferases SULT1A1 and SULT1E1. Xenobiotica 35: 1101–1119.
  23. 23. Vaz-da-Silva M, Loureiro AI, Falcao A, Nunes T, Rocha JF, et al. (2008) Effect of food on the pharmacokinetic profile of trans-resveratrol. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 46: 564–570.
  24. 24. Goldberg DM, Yan J, Soleas GJ (2003) Absorption of three wine-related polyphenols in three different matrices by healthy subjects. Clinical Biochemistry 36: 79–87.
  25. 25. Zhang H, Zhang J, Streisand JB (2002) Oral mucosal drug delivery: clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic applications. Clin Pharmacokinet 41: 661–680.
  26. 26. Lopez-Nicolas JM, Garcia-Carmona F (2008) Aggregation state and pKa values of (E)-resveratrol as determined by fluorescence spectroscopy and UV-visible absorption. J Agric Food Chem 56: 7600–7605.
  27. 27. Walle T, Walle UK, Sedmera D, Klausner M (2006) Benzo [A] pyrene-induced oral carcinogenesis and chemoprevention: studies in bioengineered human tissue. Drug Metab Dispos 34: 346–350.
  28. 28. Singh G, Pai RS, Pandit V (2012) Development and validation of a HPLC method for the determination of trans-resveratrol in spiked human plasma. Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research 3: 130–135.
  29. 29. The Pharmaceutics and Compounding Laboratory ESoP, University of North Carolina Lozenges and Medication Sticks.
  30. 30. Better Homes and Gardens (1978) Better homes and gardens complete step-by-step cook book. Des Moines, Iowa: Meredith Corp. 384 p.
  31. 31. Madhav NV, Shakya AK, Shakya P, Singh K (2009) Orotransmucosal drug delivery systems: a review. J Control Release 140: 2–11.
  32. 32. Etman M, Naggar V (1990) Thermodynamics of paracetamol solubility in sugar-water cosolvent systems. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 58: 177–184.
  33. 33. Lakshmi T, Nandi P (1976) Effect of sugar solutions on the activity coefficients of aromatic amino acids and their N-acetyl ethyl esters. Journal of Physical Chemistry 80: 249–252.
  34. 34. Rub M, Asiri A, Kumar D, Khan A, Kahn A, et al. (2012) Effect of Organic Additives on the Phase Separation Phenomenon of Amphiphilic Drug Solutions. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents 15: 765–775.
  35. 35. Janado M, Yano Y (1985) The Nature of the Cosolvent Effects of Sugars on the Aqueous Solubilities of Hydrocarbons. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan 58: 1913–1917.
  36. 36. Lakshmi T, Nandi P (1978) Interaction of adenine and thymine with aqueous sugar solutions. Journal of Solution Chemistry 7: 283–289.
  37. 37. Sacerdote MG, Szostak JW (2005) Semipermeable lipid bilayers exhibit diastereoselectivity favoring ribose. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 6004–6008.
  38. 38. Yano Y, Tanaka K, Doi Y, Janado M (1988) The CH-Surface Area of Sugar Molecules as a Measure of Their Potential Hydrophobicity. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan 61: 2963–2964.
  39. 39. Johnson JJ, Nihal M, Siddiqui IA, Scarlett CO, Bailey HH, et al. (2011) Enhancing the bioavailability of resveratrol by combining it with piperine. Mol Nutr Food Res 55: 1169–1176.
  40. 40. Nunes T, Almeida L, Rocha JF, Falcao A, Fernandes-Lopes C, et al. (2009) Pharmacokinetics of trans-resveratrol following repeated administration in healthy elderly and young subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 49: 1477–1482.
  41. 41. Eseberri I, Lasa A, Churruca I, Portillo MP (2013) Resveratrol Metabolites Modify Adipokine Expression and Secretion in 3T3-L1 Pre-Adipocytes and Mature Adipocytes. PLoS One 8: e63918.
  42. 42. Petyaev IM, Bashmakov YK (2012) Could cheese be the missing piece in the French paradox puzzle? Med Hypotheses 79: 746–749.
  43. 43. Polycarpou E, Meira LB, Carrington S, Tyrrell E, Modjtahedi H, et al. (2013) Resveratrol 3-O-d-glucuronide and resveratrol 4′-O-d-glucuronide inhibit colon cancer cell growth: Evidence for a role of A3 adenosine receptors, cyclin D1 depletion, and G1 cell cycle arrest. Mol Nutr Food Res 57: 1708–1717.
  44. 44. Lu DL, Ding DJ, Yan WJ, Li RR, Dai F, et al. (2013) Influence of glucuronidation and reduction modifications of resveratrol on its biological activities. Chembiochem 14: 1094–1104.
  45. 45. Shojaei AH (1998) Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. J Pharm Pharm Sci 1: 15–30.
  46. 46. Zhang H, Zhang J, Streisand JB (2002) Oral Mucosal Drug Delivery: Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutic Applications. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 41: 661–680.
  47. 47. Elsner F, Zeppetella G, Porta-Sales J, Tagarro I (2011) Newer generation fentanyl transmucosal products for breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant cancer patients. Clin Drug Investig 31: 605–618.
  48. 48. Ansari KA, Vavia PR, Trotta F, Cavalli R (2011) Cyclodextrin-Based Nanosponges for Delivery of Resveratrol: In Vitro Characterisation, Stability, Cytotoxicity and Permeation Study. AAPS PharmSci 12: 279–286.
  49. 49. Asensi M, Medina I, Ortega A, Carretero J, Bano MC, et al. (2002) Inhibition Of Cancer Growth By Resveratrol Is Related To Its Low Bioavailability. Free Radical Biology & Medicine 33: 387–398.
  50. 50. Peltz L, Gomez J, Marquez M, Alencastro F, Atashpanjeh N, et al. (2012) Resveratrol exerts dosage and duration dependent effect on human mesenchymal stem cell development. PLoS One 7: e37162.
  51. 51. Patel KR, Andreadi C, Britton RG, Horner-Glister E, Karmokar A, et al. (2013) Sulfate metabolites provide an intracellular pool for resveratrol generation and induce autophagy with senescence. Sci Transl Med 5: 205ra133.
  52. 52. Miksits M, Wlcek K, Svoboda M, Thalhammer T, Ellinger I, et al. (2010) Expression of sulfotransferases and sulfatases in human breast cancer: impact on resveratrol metabolism. Cancer Lett 289: 237–245.
  53. 53. Kennedy DO, Wightman EL, Reay JL, Lietz G, Okello EJ, et al. (2010) Effects of resveratrol on cerebral blood flow variables and cognitive performance in humans: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover investigation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 91: 1590–1597.
  54. 54. Wong RH, Howe PR, Buckley JD, Coates AM, Kunz I, et al. (2011) Acute resveratrol supplementation improves flow-mediated dilatation in overweight/obese individuals with mildly elevated blood pressure. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 21: 851–856.
  55. 55. Clark D, Tuor UI, Thompson R, Institoris A, Kulynych A, et al. (2012) Protection against recurrent stroke with resveratrol: endothelial protection. PLoS One 7: e47792.
  56. 56. Robich MP, Chu LM, Burgess TA, Feng J, Han Y, et al. (2012) Resveratrol preserves myocardial function and perfusion in remote nonischemic myocardium in a swine model of metabolic syndrome. J Am Coll Surg 215: 681–689.
  57. 57. Shen M, Wu RX, Zhao L, Li J, Guo HT, et al. (2012) Resveratrol attenuates ischemia/reperfusion injury in neonatal cardiomyocytes and its underlying mechanism. PLoS One 7: e51223.
  58. 58. Kesherwani V, Atif F, Yousuf S, Agrawal SK (2013) Resveratrol protects spinal cord dorsal column from hypoxic injury by activating Nrf-2. Neuroscience 241: 80–88.
  59. 59. Liu C, Shi Z, Fan L, Zhang C, Wang K, et al. (2011) Resveratrol improves neuron protection and functional recovery in rat model of spinal cord injury. Brain Res 1374: 100–109.
  60. 60. Gatson JW, Liu MM, Abdelfattah K, Wigginton JG, Smith S, et al. (2013) Resveratrol decreases inflammation in the brain of mice with mild traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74: 470–474 discussion 474–475.
  61. 61. Singleton RH, Yan HQ, Fellows-Mayle W, Dixon CE (2010) Resveratrol attenuates behavioral impairments and reduces cortical and hippocampal loss in a rat controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 27: 1091–1099.