Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Phylogeographic Structure in Benthic Marine Invertebrates of the Southeast Pacific Coast of Chile with Differing Dispersal Potential

  • Pilar A. Haye ,

    Affiliations Laboratorio de Diversidad Molecular, Departamento de Biología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte & Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA), Coquimbo, Chile, Interdisciplinary Center for Aquaculture Research (INCAR), Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile

  • Nicolás I. Segovia,

    Affiliations Laboratorio de Diversidad Molecular, Departamento de Biología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte & Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA), Coquimbo, Chile, Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

  • Natalia C. Muñoz-Herrera,

    Affiliations Laboratorio de Diversidad Molecular, Departamento de Biología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte & Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA), Coquimbo, Chile, Interdisciplinary Center for Aquaculture Research (INCAR), Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile

  • Francisca E. Gálvez,

    Affiliation Laboratorio de Diversidad Molecular, Departamento de Biología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte & Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA), Coquimbo, Chile

  • Andrea Martínez,

    Affiliation Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

  • Andrés Meynard,

    Affiliation Centro de Conservación Marina, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

  • María C. Pardo-Gandarillas,

    Affiliations Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, Centro de Conservación Marina, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

  • Elie Poulin,

    Affiliation Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

  • Sylvain Faugeron

    Affiliation Centro de Conservación Marina, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

Phylogeographic Structure in Benthic Marine Invertebrates of the Southeast Pacific Coast of Chile with Differing Dispersal Potential

  • Pilar A. Haye, 
  • Nicolás I. Segovia, 
  • Natalia C. Muñoz-Herrera, 
  • Francisca E. Gálvez, 
  • Andrea Martínez, 
  • Andrés Meynard, 
  • María C. Pardo-Gandarillas, 
  • Elie Poulin, 
  • Sylvain Faugeron


The role of dispersal potential on phylogeographic structure, evidenced by the degree of genetic structure and the presence of coincident genetic and biogeographic breaks, was evaluated in a macrogeographic comparative approach along the north-central coast of Chile, across the biogeographic transition zone at 30°S. Using 2,217 partial sequences of the mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase I gene of eight benthic invertebrate species along ca. 2,600 km of coast, we contrasted dispersal potential with genetic structure and determined the concordance between genetic divergence between biogeographic regions and the biogeographic transition zone at 30°S. Genetic diversity and differentiation highly differed between species with high and low dispersal potential. Dispersal potential, sometimes together with biogeographic region, was the factor that best explained the genetic structure of the eight species. The three low dispersal species, and one species assigned to the high dispersal category, had a phylogeographic discontinuity coincident with the biogeographic transition zone at 30°S. Furthermore, coalescent analyses based on the isolation-with-migration model validate that the split between biogeographic regions north and south of 30°S has a historic origin. The signatures of the historic break in high dispersers is parsimoniously explained by the homogenizing effects of gene flow that have erased the genetic signatures, if ever existed, in high dispersers. Of the four species with structure across the break, only two had significant albeit very low levels of asymmetric migration across the transition zone. Historic processes have led to the current biogeographic and phylogeographic structure of marine species with limited dispersal along the north-central coast of Chile, with a strong lasting impact in their genetic structure.


It has long been established that the geographical structure of the genetic diversity of benthic species is strongly shaped by life history traits. Among the main life history attributes, mode of larval development, duration and characteristics of larval life, have been highlighted as features that influence the maximum distance of dispersal in many benthic marine species [1][3]. Similarly it has been recognized that dispersal potential in terms of the pelagic larval duration (PLD) is an important determinant of the genetic structure of benthic marine species. Many of these taxa have planktonic larvae that can spend up to several months and even over a year in the water column; others spend only hours or few days in the water column, theoretically preventing long distance dispersal and eventually reducing population connectivity [4].

In the recent years however, the correlation between pelagic larval duration (PLD) and the spatial scale of genetic differentiation has been repeatedly questioned by meta-analyses and comparative studies of benthic and coastal marine species [5][10]. These studies have consistently shown a low to null correlation, suggesting that PLD is a poor predictor of connectivity between marine populations. This conclusion, however, has to be considered with caution, as it seems to be largely influenced by the kind of markers, sampling scheme and genetic parameters used to determine the genetic structure [11]. Alternative determinants of spatial genetic structure have been proposed, such as vicariant effects of historic patterns of oceanic circulation (e.g. Plio–Pleistocene), physical barriers and contemporary restrictions to dispersal, including modern patterns of oceanographic circulation and the distribution of suitable habitat ([12] and references therein). There are also mechanisms that enhance connectivity such as anthropogenic transport (e.g. [13][14]) or rafting on floating objects [15][16], allowing connectivity between distant geographic areas.

Among the different alternatives, biogeographic transitions have been considered as ideal situations to study the historical and contemporary processes that affect the distribution and abundance of species. Indeed, depending on the species ability to disperse and survive in different environmental conditions, biogeographic breaks often reflect species range limits [17]. In fact, three main patterns are observed: a) species that end their geographic range within this limited geographic area, b) species that cross the transitional zone, but their population density and structure changes dramatically, leading to major changes in dominance within local communities, and c) species that cross the boundary and do not seem to “perceive” any discontinuity as reflected in their homogeneous abundance. An increasing number of reports are evidencing strong phylogeographic structure associated to biogeographic breaks in these latter species, allowing the inference of the origin and the persistence of the biogeographic structure (e.g. [18][20]). For example, the southeast Australian coast bears a major biogeographic transition between two different oceanographic conditions and coincides with the Pleistocene land-bridge formation between Australia and Tasmania. This transition is therefore the result of both a historical and a contemporary barrier to dispersal, and coincides with deep phylogeographic differentiation and/or restricted gene flow [21][24]. The different studies conducted so far suggest that both the historical barrier and the contemporary oceanic circulation have caused genetic lineages to diverge and remain geographically separated [25]. In this region, potential dispersal inferred from larval type is less correlated with the presence of a phylogeographic break than habitat specificity [12]. However, other studies are consistent with the hypothesis that dispersal potential is determinant to the presence or location of phylogeographic breaks [18], [26]. Pelc et al. [26] analyzed datasets of marine fauna of the southwest and southeast coast of the USA to compare concordance among phylogeographic and biogeographic breaks. Dispersal potential appeared to be a strong determinant of the magnitude and position of phylogeographic discontinuities, associated to biogeographic breaks. These results strongly emphasize that phylogeographic breaks of species with low dispersal potential reflect primarily historical processes whereas those of species with high dispersal potential reflect more recent or current gene flow restrictions [26][29]. The rational behind these patterns is that phylogeographic structure can persist many generations for species with restricted gene flow, whereas high gene flow species can bear a phylogeographic break only if a local barrier is currently restricting dispersal, whatever the history of the barrier [30].

This study further tests these predictions by undertaking a comparative phylogeographic analysis across a biogeographic boundary along the coast of Chile. The lineal coast of Chile, north of 42°S, encompasses approximately 2,600 km with a natural temperature gradient associated to latitude, but with neither apparent geographic barriers to dispersal nor any sharp environmental discontinuity. The cold and rich nutrient Humboldt Current influences the coastal area between 18 and 42°S, with upwelling as the dominant feature influencing coastal communities [31]. In spite of this, a marine biogeographic break has been reported at 30°S based on the distribution ranges of most benthic species (for review see [31][32]). The origins of this marine discontinuity as well as the environmental factors that ensure its persistence are largely unknown. One question that is still open is if there is a present-day disruption in the ecological characteristics of the coastal ecosystems, or if the biogeographic break results from some historic vicariant or disruptive event that no longer persist. Three phylogeographic studies conducted so far have evidenced a strong phylogeographic break coinciding with the 30°–33°S region: the kelp Lessonia nigrescens [33], the red alga Mazzaella laminarioides [34], and the brooding muricid gastropod Acanthina monodon [35], suggesting the existence of an old divergence between lineages north and south of 30°S. Three other species, the muricid gastropod Concholepas concholepas, and the squat lobster Pleuroncondes monodon and the cephalopod Dosidicus gigas, did not show genetic structure at a macrogeographic scale across 30°S [36][38]. Taxa with low dispersal that lack the break correspond to species that are likely to disperse by alternative means, the algal-dwelling genus Limnoria by rafting on macroalgae [39] and the biofouling tunicate Pyura chilensis on boat and ship hulls [40]. Even though these studies have important differences in the sampling effort, the dispersal potential of these species seems tightly related to the magnitude of phylogeographic breaks and their concordance with the biogeographic transition at ca. 30°S. Lessonia nigrescens and A. monodon have planktonic dispersive stages that last a few hours to a few days, whereas C. concholepas, J. cirratus, P. monodon and D. gigas can spend weeks to several months in the water column. Thus, these studies strongly suggest that the biogeographic break is the result of a past discontinuity that is currently not perceivable in the macrogeographic genetic structure of species with high dispersal potential.

The current study aims at contributing to the knowledge of phylogeographic patterns of marine benthic organisms along the Chilean coast under the influence of the Humboldt Current focusing on eight species with high and low dispersal potential. More broadly, the role of dispersal potential on the population genetic diversity and differentiation is addressed. We predict that species with low dispersal potential will have greater genetic structure, lower genetic diversity than high dispersers and the presence of a historic phylogeographic break around 30°S, coincident with the biogeographic transition zone.

The species chosen for this study are all very abundant in the intertidal of the Chilean coast in the two biogeographic regions at the vicinity of 30°S, and none of them has commercial value. For categorization purposes, the average number of days that larvae spend in the water column was used as a proxy of PLD (see Materials and Methods) with reflects an upper bound of dispersal rather than a mean dispersal time [10]. Species that do not have free-living larvae or with PLD in the water column of less than two weeks were considered as low dispersers while those whose larvae spend 15 or more days in the water column were considered as high dispersers. Based on this, five of the model species fell in the long dispersal potential category. These include two species of the Order Decapoda (Infraorder Anomura), Emerita analoga (Stimpson) (Hippidae) and Petrolisthes violaceus Stimpson (Porcellanidae); two starfishes of the class Asteroidea (order Forcipulatida), Heliaster helianthus (Lamarck) (Heliasteridae) and Stichaster striatus Müller and Troschel (Asteriidae); and the sea urchin Tetrapygus niger (Molina) (Echinoidea, Arbaciidae). The remaining three species were considered as having low dispersal potential: the peracarid Orchestoidea tuberculata Nicolet (Amphipoda, Talitroidea) that broods its embryos, and the gastropods Scurria scurra (Lesson) (Patellogastropoda, Lottidae) and Tegula atra (Lesson) (Vestigastropoda, Trochoidea, Turbinidae, Tegulinae) (see Materials & Methods section; Table 1).

Table 1. Species analyzed and the corresponding depth range in meters that they inhabit, and dispersal potential (DP) as number of days that larvae spend in the water column.


COI gene sequences were obtained from 2,217 individuals of eight species (Table 2), covering at least 16 and up to 23 degrees of latitude along the coast of Chile (Fig. 1). Sequences were deposited in the GenBank database with the following accession numbers: Emerita analoga JX130229 - JX130344; Heliaster helianthus JX130054 - JX130098; Orchestoidea tuberculata JX129929 - JX129953; Petrolisthes violaceus KC543356 - KC543409; Scurria scurra JX130193 - JX130212; Stichaster striatus JX129954 - JX130053; Tegula atra JX130156 - JX130192; Tetrapygus niger JX130099 - JX130155.

Figure 1. Map of the study area along the coast of Chile indicating the sampling sites and the sample size per site for each of the analyzed species.

Table 2. Latitudinal range analyzed in degrees for each species (Lat); number of localities (NL); number of sequences analyzed per species (NS); length of final truncated alignment (LA); percentage of variable sites (%V); average haplotype (h) and nucleotide (π) diversities; Snn; global ΦST, and Mantel correlation coefficient (MCC).

All truncated alignments lacked indels and their final length varied from 546 nucleotides in T. niger to 672 in S. scurra. Variable sites varied between 2.7% in S. scurra to 23.2% in O. tuberculata, with an average of 10.5% (Table 2). Most substitutions corresponded to transitions; only O. tuberculata exhibited average transversions greater than zero, with 37.5% of substitutions corresponding to transversions. Percentage of variable sites, as well as haplotype and nucleotide diversities, were in general high in high PLD species while low dispersers showed lower values (Table 2). Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) consistently revealed that dispersal potential was the variable that best explained genetic diversity patterns (Fig. 2; Table 3). In the case of nucleotide diversity, biogeographic region (north or south of 30°S) was also a significant explanatory variable, as well as its interaction with dispersal potential (Table 3).

Figure 2. Box-plots of global (a and b) and per population (c and d) haplotype (a and c) and nucleotide (b and d) diversities for high and low dispersers.

Table 3. GLMMs performed to compare genetic structure in species with high and low dispersal potential and biogeographic regions (north and south of 30°S), with respect to haplotype diversity, nucleotide diversity, number of substitutions, and genetic differentiation (global ΦST).

Snn, average pairwise ΦST, and Mantel’s correlation coefficient for isolation by distance were significant in all low dispersers and for the starfish S. striatus; the other species showed non-significant values (Table 2). The low dispersers O. tuberculata and S. scurra had the highest Snn values, 0.93 and 0.33, respectively, indicating that most individuals that were genetically similar occurred in the same locality. Likewise, the highest ΦST values were found in S. scurra and O. tuberculata (Table 2), and overall, low dispersers showed greater genetic differentiation than high dispersers (Fig. 3). Mantel’s correlation coefficients were highest for the three low dispersers, which also showed significant isolation by distance in each biogeographic region. Isolation by distance was also significant in S. striatus, however analyses per biogeographic region indicated a significant Mantel’s correlation coefficient only in the southern biogeographic region. Similarly S. striatus had significant ΦST only in the southern region, while for the three low dispersers ΦST values were significant in both biogeographic regions (data not shown). The genetic structure detected for S. striatus was weaker than on the three low dispersers.

Figure 3. Box-plots of global (a) and average population-pairwise (b) ΦST for high and low dispersers.

Overall, GLMMs indicated that pairwise ΦST values were significantly associated with the interaction of dispersal potential and biogeographic differentiation (i.e., genetic differentiation among or within biogeographic regions; Table 3). When excluding separately the brooder O. tuberculata and the starfish S. striatus, GLMMs of genetic diversity and differentiation yielded overall similar results, giving support to the robustness of the detected patterns. The exclusion of O. tuberculata was aimed at testing the effects of non-pelagic dispersal (see [5]) on the results. If its removal from analyses resulted in a non-significant relationship between dispersal potential and genetic differentiation, then dispersal potential would poorly correlate with genetic differentiation of species with free larval development, i.e. broadcasters. On the opposite, since S. striatus had more genetic structure than expected given the dispersal potential that was assigned based on a congener, we evaluated the effects of this species on the GLMM results. However, none of the exclusions led to a change in the association between dispersal potential and measures of genetic diversity and differentiation (data not shown), suggesting that differences detected between low and high dispersers were not biased by the inclusion of O. tuberculata and S. striatus.

AMOVA performed grouping populations by biogeographic region indicated that low dispersers had the highest percentages of variation between biogeographic regions, while high dispersers had the highest percentages of variation within populations (Table 4). Tegula atra and S. striatus showed a very similar pattern; although there was greater structure in T. atra both species had a significant and high portion of the total variance within populations (63.7% and 74.1%, respectively), and a considerable amount explained by biogeographic region (29.6 and 23.8%, respectively, although non-significant for S. striatus). Overall, GLMMs revealed significant differences between high and low dispersers for each of the AMOVA’s Φ-statistics (Table 5).

Table 5. GLMMs performed to compare species with high and low dispersal potential (DP) in AMOVA’s F statistics among groups (ΦCT), among populations within groups (ΦSC), and within populations (ΦST).

Mitochondrial DNA diversity was high (Fig. 4). Most species had a most frequent haplotype shared between biogeographic regions. The exception was the amphipod O. tuberculata that showed divergent haplogroups separated by up to 18 mutational steps and lacked shared haplotypes. For the other seven species, the percentage of shared haplotypes between biogeographic regions ranged from 13.5% in T. atra to 37.8% in H. helianthus; the maximum number of mutational steps was 5 in S. striatus and most haplotypes were separated by one mutational step (Fig. 4). In general low dispersers have less shared haplotypes and more private haplotypes in each biogeographic region. Even though the most frequent shared haplotypes were rarely unique of individuals of one biogeographic region, low dispersal species had greater differences on the haplotype frequencies between regions. For example, the most common haplotype of T. atra was most often encountered on individuals north of 30°S, and the second most common haplotype was largely composed of individuals from the south of 30°S.

Figure 4. Median joining haplotype networks of eight species analyzed of the Chilean coast.

Insert with map details the biogeographic regions north and south of 30°S in the analyzed coast section and shades associated with each of them that were used to mark the geographic location of haplotypes. All haplotype networks are standardized in such way that small circles represent haplotypes present in one individual. Mutational steps (lines between circles) were kept the same length excepting for the network of Emerita analoga where mutational steps arising from the most common haplotype were kept to the minimum length to allow accommodating all derived haplotypes.

SAMOVA analyses were undertaken on species that displayed significant genetic structure (Table 2) (Fig. 4), i.e. all low dispersers and S. striatus, to better characterize the spatial genetic structure. The optimal k, that defines the most probable number of geographic subdivisions, ranged between 2 for S. striatus and T. atra, indicating a low substructure, to 17 for the brooder O. tuberculata (Table 6), revealing a strong subdivision of the genetic diversity. For O. tuberculata small sample size could lead to overestimation of divergence, but haplotype networks also validate that SAMOVA results reflect degree of divergence between localities. The limpet S. scurra had k = 4 (Table 6). For both O. tuberculata and S. scurra, when k is set to 2, individuals were grouped to the north and south of 30°S (the locality at 31.8°S belonged to the southern group; Table 6). On the other hand, the two groups formed for S. striatus and of T. atra were located north and south of 31.8°S. Tegula atra showed a slightly peculiar pattern: the locality at 34.4°S was included in the northern group while the northern locality at 31.8°S was part of the southern group. In Table 6 this is expressed as a range of latitudes where the discontinuity occurs.

The coalescent approach of isolation-with-migration implemented in IMa2 revealed overall low levels of gene flow across the 30°S transition zone in all taxa that displayed significant genetic differentiation between biogeographic regions (north and south of 30°S) (Fig. 5A). In general, the model predicted a most likely pattern of asymmetric migration with greater migration from south to north (Table 7). Similarly, effective population sizes, inferred from Θ-estimates, were generally smaller in the south than in the north of 30°S, except for S. striatus (Table 7; Fig. 5B). Estimated divergence times varied among taxa. The analyses recovered a most likely divergence time for each of the four taxa analyzed, yet 95% HPD confidence intervals were broad, except for T. atra. This is also the species for which estimated divergence time was the most recent (Fig. 5C), confirming that the 30°S phylogeographic break is a historic signature. A common pattern was observed in two of the four species, which had the lowest genetic differentiation of the species analyzed with IMa2, S. striatus and T. atra. For both species the model predicted asymmetric migration from south to north (and for T. atra low but significant migration from north to south) and divergence times were >0, indicating that not all shared haplotypes are a consequence of gene flow but there is also ancestral polymorphism (Fig. 5D; Table 7). As opposed to the other species, the 95% highest posterior density (HPD) of Θ from the north and south do not overlap in S. striatus and T. atra (Table 7). Altogether the results for these two species do not allow pinpointing a unique cause for the genetic differentiation and the shared alleles among biogeographic regions. The two most differentiated species, O. tuberculata and S. scurra, showed different results. For O. tuberculata migration rates were not significantly differentiated from zero and the degree of differentiation seems best explained by the old splitting (Fig. 5D). Scurria scurra does not have significant migration and estimated divergence time is an order of magnitude more recent than for O. tuberculata (Table 7). Given that there was no significant inferred migration, the shared haplotypes between biogeographic regions for S. scurra are likely due to shared ancestral polymorphism. Scurra scurra had the lowest inferred Ne, with Θ-values of 2.08 and 0.81 for the north and south respectively.

Figure 5. Isolation-with-migration analysis of four species with significant structure across the 30°S biogeographic break.

(a) Marginal posterior probability distribution of migration rate estimates in each direction for each species. (b) Estimated Θ (2 Ne) values for each biogeographic region (north and south) as well as the ancestral Θ against genetic differentiation (global ΦST). Asterisks denote estimated Θ 95% HPD that do not overlap with either ancestral Θ or the estimated Θ in the other biogeographic region. (c) Marginal posterior probability distributions of divergence time (t) estimates expressed in thousands of years (Kyr). Divergence time estimates were scaled using 2% and 10% per million year substitution rates. (d) Highest probability value of estimated migration rates (m) in each direction, and divergence times (t) expressed in thousands of years (Kyr) scaled using 2% per million year substitution rate, versus genetic differentiation (global ΦST). Asterisks indicate significant values based on the likelihood ratio test.

Table 7. Estimates of migration rates (m) in each direction across 30°S, time of divergence (t) between biogeographic regions, and genetic diversities (Θ) (north = ΘN; south = ΘS; ancestral = ΘA), based on the isolation-with-migration model implemented in IMa2.


Reinforcing the Marine Connectivity Paradigm

Our results suggest that the phylogeographic patterns of marine benthic organisms of the Chilean intertidal have been strongly influenced by their dispersal potential. Compared to other regions of the world, such as the northeast Pacific [8], southeast Australian coast [12], southeast Africa [41], Hawaii [42], for the southeast Pacific coast under the influence of the Humboldt Current, dispersal potential was significantly associated to genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and the concordance between phylogeographic and biogeographic breaks, adjusting to the predictions of the marine connectivity paradigm. Four of the five species categorized with high dispersal potential had low genetic differentiation, high genetic diversity at a macrogeographic scale and lacked phylogeographic discontinuities. In contrast, brooders and species with short-lived planktonic larvae had a strong phylogeographic discontinuity at 30°S coincident with the biogeographic break for marine benthic species [31][32].

Several studies have explored the determinants of the geographic structure of the genetic diversity of marine species. Among them, Weersing & Toonen [6] tested the general connectivity paradigm, but contrary to the results obtained herein, when including and excluding the brooder from their analyses, they found no support for the general predictions of the marine connectivity paradigm. They found that when excluding brooders, dispersal potential was not correlated with genetic differentiation and concluded that among taxa with free-living larvae, dispersal potential does not predict genetic structure. When we eliminated the one brooder for analyses, differences between contrasting dispersal potentials continued to be significant, albeit lower statistical power when eliminating one of the few low dispersers. In the study of Weersing & Toonen [6], variance between genetic markers explained most of the genetic variability detected, rather than dispersal potential. This is an expected result when markers analyzed between species differ both in quantity and quality of information. In our study, the same portion of the mitochondrial COI gene was used for analyzing all species, reducing the effect of marker choice from the interpretation of results. Similarly, Kelly & Palumbi [8] found that when considering only species with pelagic larvae for analyses, dispersal potential was not a predictor of population genetic differentiation in the northeast Pacific, and that, in some cases, there was a correlation between habitat (high to low intertidal) and genetic differentiation. Likewise, Ayre et al. [12] determined that habitat explained the presence of a biogeographic break for the southwest Australian coast better than dispersal potential. To avoid this bias, we analyzed species inhabiting a similar bathymetric stretch and substrata. The exceptions are E. analoga and O. tuberculata that inhabit sandy beaches. All the rest are all found in the mid-intertidal rocky shore. The species with the most divergent habitat is O. tuberculata that inhabits the supralittoral (Table 1), however, eliminating it from the analyses did not change the contrasting phylogeographic patterns between high and low dispersers. Moreover, the studied region is relatively homogeneous in terms of environmental conditions, with the major influence of the Humboldt Current system that maintains upwelling conditions between 42°S and 6°S [31], therefore reducing the potential environmental bias likely occurring in studies covering long stretches of coast (more than 2,600 km). Recently Dawson [43] showed a strong correlation between dispersal potential and genetic differentiation at a regional scale when analyzing co-distributed species. Therefore, when sources of errors are avoided (i.e., same marker and sampling scheme of co-distributed species to enable comparative analyzes), PLD seems to reflect scales of dispersal on the basis of its good fit with genetic differentiation (FST) [10]. The phylogeographic patterns detected herein are robust in spite of having used a single mitochondrial marker. There was a consistent association between dispersal potential and genetic structure, suggesting that dispersal potential is a strong determinant of genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and presence of a genetic discontinuity coincident with a biogeographic transition zone of coastal benthic species along the HCS. Additionally for genetic differentiation the significant interaction of dispersal with the differentiation between biogeographic regions suggests that dispersal alone cannot explain the detected pattern of genetic differentiation, and that the break at 30°S has an important effect.

One species, S. striatus, was assumed to have high dispersal potential based on the estimated PLD of its congener S. australis [44]. This species did not show a consistent pattern with the other four high dispersers analyzed, yet it is not as structured as the three species considered as low dispersers. Analyzes excluding S. striatus did not change the implications of results, i.e. dispersal potential was still a strong predictor of genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and of the presence of a phylogeographic break at 30°S. Of the four species with structure across 30°S, S. striatus had the least structure. For example, ΦCT (among groups) was non-significant for S. striatus while it was for all low dispersers. When analyzing genetic differentiation and isolation by distance of S. striatus at each side of the break, only the northern biogeographic region had significant differentiation and isolation by distance. The southern region showed non-significant differentiation and lack of an isolation by distance pattern. Contrastingly, all low dispersers had significant genetic differentiation and isolation by distance in both biogeographic regions. There was a tremendous difference between the genetic diversity (2 Ne) of the northern and southern biogeographic regions for S. striatus. Presumably the genus Stichaster has cold-water affinities [45] and has colonized the Chilean coast from south to north in the presence of a biogeographic barrier that has nonetheless allowed significant migration. Until its larval duration is properly studied, there are at least two plausible explanations to the detected patterns in S. striatus: (1) S. striatus is a true high disperser and its spatial genetic structure is the result of the effects of strong local genetic drift, or (2) it is a medium to low disperser, in which case observed results would be consistent with the marine connectivity paradigm. The effective size inferred from isolation-with-migration model is comparable to the two most structured species (O. tuberculata and S. scurra) and much smaller than the other low dispersal species, T. atra, suggesting that genetic drift may indeed have been strong in S. striatus. On the other hand, PLD is highly variable within the order Forcipulatidae, with a minimum of zero days (e.g. [46][48]), an intermediate value of 80 days [49] and a maximum of 150 days [50]. Larval development of forcipulatids may be abbreviated in response to feeding, habitat [51][52], and temperature [49], [53][54]. Settlement can be selective, in which case metamorphosis is avoided until the adequate substrate or settling signal is encountered [44], [53], [55][56]. On the other hand, the highly productive Humboldt Current System that includes several upwelling regions [57] could favor the fast settlement and metamorphosis of larvae by providing the adequate environmental cues [58][59]. Given the high variability of PLD within Forcipulatidae, and the results obtained herein, it is likely that S. striatus has a shorter PLD than assigned based on the congener’s planktonic larval duration. For S. scurra and T. atra, PLD was also assumed based on related species, however, PLD’s are conserved for these gastropod groups. For confamilials of the genus Scurra the minimum PLD is 3 days [60] and the maximum 7 days [61], while among the genus Tegula, the minimum PLD is 4 days and the maximum 7 days [62][63].

There is an interesting contrast between our results and those of Kelly & Palumbi [8] for the genus Tegula, probably due to the contrasting sampling scale. We found significant genetic structure in T. atra along 21 degrees of latitude while the congener T. funebralis from California did not show structure in 8 degrees analyzed [8]. We performed exploratory analyses of the COI data of T. atra, considering distances of ca. 8 latitudinal degrees, to better match the spatial scale considered for T. funebralis. If sub-samples were drawn from the area north of 30°S, without crossing the 30°S biogeographic break, genetic differentiation was zero and non-significant, mimicking the lack of structure detected for T. funebralis in California. As was emphasized by Pelc et al. [26] in a meta-analysis, it is very important to consider the spatial scale at which processes such as phylogeographic discontinuities and genetic differentiation may occur with respect to dispersal potential.

Indirect Consequences of Reduced Dispersal on Genetic Diversity and Divergence

Species with low dispersal potential had consistently and significantly lower genetic diversity (i.e., the lowest values for haplotype and nucleotide diversity). The main way in which populations and species loose genetic diversity at neutral markers is by genetic drift. However, the actual influence of genetic drift depends on its interaction with other evolutionary forces, such as gene flow: reduced dispersal may allow local populations to demographically fluctuate and increase extinction-recolonization rates [64]. Therefore, at a same population density, high gene flow species will retain more alleles than low gene flow species. Consequently, dispersal potential is a major determinant of genetic diversity when comparing species with similar population densities. In addition, population dynamics may also have a strong influence on the effective population size, and therefore on the accumulation of new alleles. For instance, demographic dynamics differ between brooders and broadcasters leading to disparate changes in nucleotide substitution rates [65][67]. The accelerated molecular evolution of low dispersers, as a consequence of greater population turnover at various temporal scales can thus also partly explain the contrasting evolutionary patterns between high and low dispersers.

Finally, because low dispersers have subdivided populations they are prone to metapopulation dynamics, i.e. extinction and recolonization [64]. Extinction rates, as well as speciation rates are high in the geologic record of low dispersers [68][72]. These processes are likely reinforcing the role of drift and contribute to explaining why low dispersers are more susceptible to accumulate genetic divergence between local lineages, and overall retain less genetic diversity through time than high dispersers.

The 30°S Biogeographic Break in the Coast of Chile is a Historic Discontinuity

Bayesian analyses based on the isolation-with-migration model take full advantage of the data by using a coalescent approach to jointly estimate migration, time of divergence and effective population size. Ideally, when using coalescent approaches such as those implemented in IMa2, several polymorphic and unlinked loci should be used for a robust estimation of parameters and to deal with phylogenetic uncertainty [73][77]. Herein, albeit using a single locus, isolation-with-migration analyses shed important light into the historic nature of the phylogeographic break. Of the four species with a phylogeographic break at ca. 30°S, three species (S. scurra, T. atra and S. striatus) showed similar and relatively recent divergence times, suggesting that the genetic discontinuity originated either during the last glacial period (based on t 2%) or just after (when based in t 10%). However, O. tuberculata had a divergence time between biogeographic regions of an order of magnitude higher and overlaps those estimated for other reported genetic discontinuities in the same region, such as the kelp Lessonia nigrescens with estimated divergence at 3095 ky ±1200 ky [78]. These results strongly suggest that the 30°S biogeographic break has an ancient origin. The biogeographic break likely disrupted connectivity between biogeographic regions in the past, rather than in present days, with low dispersers retaining genetic signatures that are geographically concordant with the biogeographic break, while those signatures have been erased in high dispersers by gene flow across the 30° region.

Migration estimations suggested low yet significant northward migration across the 30°S break in two of the four species that had genetic structure among biogeographic regions, S. striatus and T. atra. Both species showed a greater contribution from the southern to the northern region. Likely these two species have been able to achieve a low yet significant connectivity between biogeographic regions (probably enhanced by the Humboldt Current), slightly eroding the historic signature, which is anyhow strong in both species. Concordantly, shared haplotypes of S. striatus and T. atra between biogeographic regions are best explained by a combination of migration, shared ancestral polymorphism and drift. For the northeast Pacific coast, Wares et al. [28] described a similar scenario of migration in the direction of the main currents and across the Point Conception biogeographic break, for four benthic species with planktonic development. Similarly, along the northern Chilean coast (25°–28°S), asymmetric dispersal linked to the direction of the Humboldt Current has been detected for one non-neutral microsatellite locus of the mussel Perumytilus purpuratus [79], and with RAPD data for the intertidal algae Mazzaella laminarioides [80].

Consistently dispersal potential was the variable that always best explained the contrasting genetic structure of low and high dispersers. Genetic structuring measures that are more associated with genetic divergence (i.e., nucleotide diversity and genetic differentiation), not only were determined by dispersal potential but also significantly by its interaction with biogeographic region. Based on isolation-with-migration analyses, the biogeographic regions have been completely or partially isolated in recent times. Isolation has led to differentiation, which in some cases is likely to have been enhanced by low effective population size. Genetic diversity was estimated to be unequal between biogeographic regions and species, such that some species (such as O. tuberculata and S. scurra) and biogeographic regions (the north for S. striatus and the south for T. atra) may have stronger effects of genetic drift. Concomitantly, biogeographic regions carry within their structure the signatures of historic effective population size, low migration and historic isolation, which probably leads to the significant interaction of dispersal potential and biogeographic region in models associated to nucleotide diversity and genetic differentiation between low and high dispersers.

The current study contributes significantly to the knowledge of COI phylogeography of benthic marine species along the 30°S biogeographic transition zone on the coast of Chile. Previous studies had shown that there was a strong association between the spatial structure of the genetic diversity around 30°S and dispersal potential. Tellier et al. [33] and Montecinos et al. [34], found sharp genetic discontinuities at 30°S the algae Lessonia spp. and Mazzaella laminarioides, respectively, evidencing cryptic species at each side of the break. In the former, there is also evidence of reproductive isolation in natural populations [81]. Likewise, studies on animal species also show the consistency of the pattern. The low dispersing gastropods Acanthina monodon and Crepipatella dilatata have a phylogeographic discontinuity at 30°S [35], [82]. Moreover, there is evidence of gene flow restrictions in the barnacle Notochthamalus scabrosus around 30°S, in particular of the two haplogroups present, one has very low abundance north of 30°S [83]. These examples added to the three low dispersers reported herein that have a coincident phylogeographic discontinuity, and the lack of such phylogeographic break in most high dispersal species [36][38], [83], give strong support to consistency of the pattern and the validity of the marine connectivity paradigm for the biogeographic break at 30°S on the coast of Chile.

Concluding Remarks

When designing comparative phylogeographic analyses it should not be assumed, as much of the literature has suggested recently, that compared to other factors, dispersal potential is a weak explanatory variable for spatial genetic structure at macrogeographic scales. Herein we showed that along the coast of Chile under the influence of the Humboldt Current, there is concordance between phylogeographic and biogeographic discontinuities on low dispersing taxa and that these taxa have significantly lower genetic diversity and greater genetic differentiation than species with long planktonic larval duration. Thus, dispersal potential is a robust predictor of the genetic structure of benthic species for the coastline analyzed. This result calls for caution with generalizations as to which are the main factors structuring genetic diversity, and to not extrapolate from studies performed in other regions. This comparative study of species along ca. 2,600 km and other studies of benthic species along the central-northern coast of Chile, support the conclusion that on the coast of Chile, the general marine connectivity paradigm, based on dispersal potential, is met and that phylogeographic patterns could be used as a proxy of dispersal capacity and vice versa.

Materials and Methods

Estimation of the Dispersal Potential of Model Species

Amphipods, as all peracarids, brood their embryos up to a crawl-away stage. Thus, O. tuberculata has zero days of PLD. Both gastropods analyzed, S. scurra and T. atra, theoretically have relatively short-lived larvae. Since there are no direct estimations of larval duration of these species, the larval durations considered herein are based on reported larval durations of taxa phylogenetically close to them. For S. scurra the estimated PLD considered (7 to 10 days) is based on reports that show that PLD is short and very conserved in the Patellogastropoda [84], [60][61]. Similarly, species of the genus Tegula have conserved PLD’s of 6 to 7 days [63], [85], which was herein considered as the dispersal potential for T. atra.

Of the analyzed species, the ones with longest planktonic larval duration of over 90 days are E. analoga [86] and T. niger [87]. Unpublished data (S. Navarrete, personal communication) indicates that under laboratory conditions, larvae of H. helianthus can persist for at least 2 months without reaching metamorphosis. The New Zealand starfish Stichaster australis, the only congener of S. striatus from the southeast Pacific coast, has larvae that spend 38 days in the water column [52], [55]. This larval duration was used as for S. striatus; albeit it is possible this extrapolation is wrong given that PLD is highly variable in asteroids (e.g. [48][50]). Larval development of Petrolisthes violaceus lasts 25 days under laboratory conditions at 19°C [88], akin to what has been observed for other members of the genus at similar temperatures [89].

Data Collection

Individuals of each species were collected from the intertidal zone from Arica (18°S) to Chiloé (42°S) along the coast of Chile. The intertidal areas are not privately owned in Chile, however, there are areas of restricted access (management or protected areas) where we did not sample. All sampling was performed in free access areas for which no permit was required. Also no permits were required for the sampling as species studied did not involve commercially important species or species endangered or protected.

Organisms were processed a few hours after being extracted from nature, obtaining from them a piece of tissue. In most cases tissues corresponded to skeletal muscle. From starfishes (H. helianthus and S. striatus) and the urchin (T. niger), ambulacral feet and gonad tissue were sampled, respectively. Tissues were placed in absolute ethanol and stored at −20°C. Total DNA was extracted using standard phenol/chloroform protocol [90].

A partial sequence of COI was obtained using the universal HCO and LCO primers [91] for O. tuberculata, S. scurra, and T. atra. For other taxa specific primers were used to amplify COI gene: for starfishes primers COIceR and COIceF [92]; for E. analoga primers ECL1-ECH1 [93]; for Petrolisthes violaceus primers COif [94] and COIa1 [95]; and for the urchin the de novo designed primers ArbaF (5′ TTTCTACAAACCATAAGGATATTGG′3) and ArbaR (5′TATACTTCAGGGTGTCCAAAGAATCA′3). These latter primers were designed for this study in GENEIOUS 5.5.4 [96] using COI sequences from other echinoids obtained from GenBank as references. PCR’s were performed in a total volume of 10 µl, which included 1 µl of total genomic DNA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 µM of each primer, 0.22 mM of each dNTP, 1.5 mg ml−1 of bovine serum albumin, and 1.5 U of Taq polymerase. Cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 10 min followed by 35 cycles of 1 min denaturing, 1 min annealing at 50°C, and a 2 min extension at 72°C.

Data Analyses

For each species, sequences were aligned and then truncated on both extremes using GENEIOUS. DnaSP 5.0 [97] was used for the estimation of per population and global haplotype and nucleotide diversities, as well as the Snn statistic [98] and its significance that was evaluated with 1000 permutations. Snn or the nearest neighbor statistic [98] is a genetic distance measure based on how frequently the nearest haplotypes are in the same sampling locality. It is particularly suitable when data shows high diversity and small or unequal sample size between sites or regions; it outperforms other measures when sample size is small.

Pairwise and global population genetic differentiation values based on sequence data (ΦST) were calculated in ARLEQUIN 3.5 [99]. ARLEQUIN was also used for testing for Isolation by Distance using a Mantel test with 1000 permutations, to determine the correlation between the Slatkin’s linearized population pairwise genetic differentiation [100] and the lineal geographic distance (Km) between populations. Pairwise linear distance matrixes were calculated using the package FOSSIL in R 2.14.0 [101]. Tests for Isolation by Distance were also performed separately north and south of 30°S for species that displayed significant Snn and ΦST.

To test the influence of dispersal capacity and the 30°S transition zone on the genetic diversity and differentiation Generalized Lineal Mixed Models (GLMMs) were performed using the package lme4 in R. These models are appropriate for data influenced both fixed and random effects. In the models population-specific data of genetic diversity were grouped into biogeographic regions (north and south of 30°S). For models of genetic differentiation data was grouped according to biogeographic differentiation (ΦST among and within regions). All models were constructed nesting the species as a random factor. The syntax of the diversity models was: Genetic Diversity = Dispersal X Biogeographic Region+Species (Dispersal). For the differentiation model the syntax was: Genetic Differentiation = Dispersal X Biogeographic Differentiation+Species (Dispersal).

Haplotype networks for each species were constructed using NETWORK 4.6 (Fluxus Technology 2010). To evaluate the presence of a genetic discontinuity coincident with the biogeographic break at 30°S, ARLEQUIN software was used to perform AMOVA by grouping individuals a priori north and south of 30°S. The difference between the percentages of the genetic variation explained by groups, populations within groups or within populations, between high and low dispersers were evaluated with GLMMs.

Two further analyses were conducted for species that displayed genetic structure with AMOVA, i.e., those that had less than 95% of the variation within populations. The clustering method implemented by SAMOVA 1.0 [102] was executed to define the most likely number of groups of populations, based on the proportion of the total molecular variance explained by differences between groups (FCT). The number of groups was denoted as k. In each species, statistical variance was evaluated with 1000 random permutations running repeatedly SAMOVA from 2 to 1-n populations, where n was the total number of sampled localities. The k value that maximized FCT was interpreted as the most likely geographic subdivision. A genetic break coincident with the biogeographic transition was inferred if when k = 2 the clustering FCT was significant and the groups of individuals were located north and south of 30°S.

The second analytical approach applied only on species with structure across 30°S, consisted in the evaluation of asymmetric migration and time of divergence across 30°S using the isolation-with-migration demographic model [103] in a Bayesian context implemented in the software IMa2 [73]. This model does not assume equilibrium conditions for the populations and allows to estimates demographic parameters in recently separated populations that share haplotypes as consequence of gen flow or incomplete lineage sorting [74]. The estimated demographic parameters are t (splitting time), effective population sizes (Θ = 2 Ne), and migration rates in each direction across the biogeographic break. For each analyzed species, we generated a random balanced subsample of individuals per biogeographic region with a double goal of having equal number of individuals per biogeographic region and reducing the number of sequences analyzed, which is recommended when using the model of isolation-with-migration with information from a single locus [73]. To estimate the best set of priors that ensure mixing and convergence of parameters we carried out several preliminary runs in the M mode (MCMC mode) of IMa2. All runs were carried out using the HKY model of substitution. Chain length ranged from 50,000,000 to 150,000,000 generations until convergence was achieved. Chains were sampled every 100 generations with the first 10 to 30% discarded as burn-in. When convergence could not be reached, long runs with Metropolis Couples MCMC (MC3) algorithm [104] were carried out setting 20 chains with geometric heating (a = 0.96, b = 0.9). After achieving convergence in the M-mode, we used the same simulated genealogies in the L-Mode (Load Tree mode) of full isolation-with-migration model, to calculate the log maximum-likelihood and credibility intervals based on the 95% highest posterior density (95% HPD) for each parameter. The significance of migration patterns was estimated using a likelihood ratio test (LTR) [105]. Splitting time parameter was re-scaled into years (t/μ) using two substitution rates, 2 and 10% per My. Even though 2% per My is a high substitution rate for invertebrates, according to the time dependency of molecular evolution [106], rates of substitution at the population level are several times higher than the ones inferred from interspecies analyses [106][107], thus we used two rates and obtained a temporal range for the divergence across 30°S.


Marcelo Rivadeneira, Bernardo Broitman and John Wares gave us inspiring conversations and suggestions. We greatly thank Raúl Vera for general assistance in the project. Paula Ayerdi (RIP), Florence Tellier, and Jhon Gajardo, kindly helped with sampling.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PH EP SF. Performed the experiments: NIS NCM FEG A Martínez A Meynard MCP-G. Analyzed the data: NIS NCM FEG A Martínez A Meynard MCP-G. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PH EP SF. Wrote the paper: PH SF NIS.


  1. 1. Siegel DA, Kinlan BP, Gaylord B, Gaines SD (2003) Langrangian descriptions of marine larval dispersion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 260: 83–96.
  2. 2. Kinlan BP, Gaines SD (2003) Propagule dispersal in marine and terrestrial environments: a community perspective. Ecology 84: 2007–2020.
  3. 3. Shanks AL (2009) Pelagic larval duration and dispersal distance revisited. Biol Bull 216: 373–385.
  4. 4. Shanks AL, Grantham BA, Carr MH (2003) Propagule dispersal distance and the size and spacing of marine reserves. Acol Appl 13: S159–S169.
  5. 5. Bradbury IR, Laurel B, Snelgrove PVR, Bentzen P, Campana SE (2008) Global patterns in 431 marine dispersal estimates: the influence of geography, taxonomic category and life history. P Roy Soc B 275: 1803–1809.
  6. 6. Weersing K, Toonen RJ (2009) Population genetics, larval dispersal, and connectivity in marine systems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 393: 1–12.
  7. 7. Ross PM, Hogg ID, Pilditch CA, Lundquist CJ (2009) Phylogeography of New Zealand’s coastal benthos. N Z J Mar Freshwarer Res 43: 1009–1027.
  8. 8. Kelly RP, Palumbi SR (2010) Genetic structure among 50 species of the Northeastern Pacific rocky intertidal community. PLoS ONE 5: e8594
  9. 9. Riginos C, Douglas KE, Jin Y, Shanahan DF, Treml EA (2011) Effects of geography and life history traits on genetic differentiation in benthic marine fishes. Ecography 34: 566–575.
  10. 10. Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ (2011) Marine connectivity: a new look at pelagic larval duration and genetic metrics of dispersal. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 436: 291–305.
  11. 11. Bohonak AJ (1999) Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Q Rev Biol 74: 21–45.
  12. 12. Ayre DJ, Minchinton TE, Perrin C (2009) Does life history predict past and current connectivity for rocky intertidal invertebrates across a marine biogeographic barrier? Mol Ecol 18: 1887–1903.
  13. 13. Carlton JT, Geller JB (1993) Ecological roulette: the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261: 78–82.
  14. 14. Carlton JT, Hodder J (1995) Biogeography and dispersal of coastal marine organisms: experimental studies on a replica of a 16th century sailing vessel. Mar Biol 121: 721–730.
  15. 15. Janson K (1987) Allozyme and shell variation in two marine snails (Littorina, Prosobranchia) with different dispersal abilities. Biol J Linn Soc 30: 245–256.
  16. 16. Watts PC, Thorpe JP, Taylor PD (1998) Natural and anthropogenic dispersal mechanisms in the marine environment: a study using cheilostome Bryozoa. Phil Trans R Soc B 353: 453–464.
  17. 17. Lomolino MV, Riddle BR, Whittaker RJ, Brown JH (2010) Biogeography. Fourth edition. Sunderland, U S A: Sinauer.
  18. 18. Dawson MN (2001) Phylogeography in coastal marine animals: a solution from California? J Biogeo 28: 723–736.
  19. 19. Kuo CH, Avise J (2005) Phylogeographic breaks in low-dispersal species: the emergence of concordance across gene trees. Genetica 124: 179–186.
  20. 20. Goldstein SJ, Schiel DR, Gemmell NJ (2006) Comparative phylogeography of coastal limpets across a marine disjunction in New Zealand. Mol Ecol 15: 3259–3268.
  21. 21. Dawson MN (2005) Incipient speciation of Catostylus mosaicus (Scyphozoa, Rhizostomeae, Catostylidae), comparative phylogeography and biogeography in south-east Australia. J Biogeo 32: 515–533.
  22. 22. Waters JM, Roy MS (2004) Phylogeography of a high-dispersal New Zealand sea-star: does upwelling block gene-flow? Mol Ecol 13: 2797–2806.
  23. 23. Waters JM, King TM, O’Loughlin PM, Spencer HG (2005) Phylogeographical disjunction in abundant high-dispersal littoral gastropods. Mol Ecol 14: 2789–2802.
  24. 24. Waters JM, McCulloch GA, Eason JA (2007) Marine biogeographical structure in two highly dispersive gastropods: implications for trans-Tasman dispersal. J Biogeo 34: 678–687.
  25. 25. Waters JM (2008) Marine biogeographical disjunction in temperate Australia: historical landbridge, contemporary currents, or both? Div Distr 14: 692–700.
  26. 26. Pelc RA, Warner RR, Gaines SD (2009) Geographical patterns of genetic structure in marine species with contrasting life histories. J Biogeo 36: 1881–1890.
  27. 27. Hellberg ME, Burton RS, Neigel JE, Palumbi SR (2002) Genetic assessment of connectivity among marine populations. Bull Mar Sci 70, 273–290.
  28. 28. Wares JP, Gaines SD, Cunningham CW (2001) A comparative study of asymmetric migration events across a marine biogeographic boundary. Evolution 55: 295–306.
  29. 29. Galindo HM, Olson DB, Palumbi SR (2006) Seascape genetics: a coupled oceanographic-genetic model predicts population structure of Caribbean corals. Curr Biol 16: 1622–1626.
  30. 30. Irwin DE (2002) Phylogeographic breaks without geographic barriers to gene flow. Evolution 56: 2383–2394.
  31. 31. Thiel M, Macaya EC, Acuña E, Arntz W, Bastias H, et al. (2007) The Humboldt Current System of Northern and Central Chile: oceanographic processes, ecological interactions and socioeconomic feedback. Annu Rev Oceanogr Mar Biol 45: 195–344.
  32. 32. Camus PA (2001) Biogeografía marina de Chile continental. Rev Ch Hist Nat 74: 587–617.
  33. 33. Tellier F, Meynard AP, Correa JA, Faugeron S, Valero M (2009) Phylogeographic analyses of the 30°S south-east Pacific biogeographic transition zone establish the occurrence of a sharp genetic discontinuity in the kelp Lessonia nigrescens: vicariance or parapatry? Mol Phylogenet Evol 53: 679–693.
  34. 34. Montecinos A, Broitman B, Faugeron S, Haye PA, Tellier F, et al. (2012) Species replacement along a lineal coastal habitat: phylogeography and speciation in the red alga Mazzaella laminarioides along the south east Pacific. BMC Evol Biol 12: 97.
  35. 35. Sánchez R, Sepúlveda RD, Brante A, Cárdenas L (2011) Spatial pattern of genetic and morphological diversity in the direct developer Acanthina monodon (Gastropoda: Mollusca). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 434: 121–131.
  36. 36. Cárdenas L, Castilla JC, Viard F (2009) A phylogeographical analysis across three biogeographical provinces of the south-eastern Pacific: the case of the marine gastropod Concholepas concholepas. J Biogeo 36: 969–981.
  37. 37. Haye PA, Salinas P, Acuña E, Poulin E (2010) Heterochronic phenotypic plasticity with lack of genetic differentiation in the southeastern Pacific squat lobster Pleuroncodes monodon. Evol Dev 12: 627–633.
  38. 38. Ibáñez CM, Cubillos LA, Tafur R, Argüelles J, Yamashiro C, et al. (2011) Genetic diversity and demographic history of Dosidicus gigas (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in the Humboldt Current System. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 431: 163–171.
  39. 39. Haye PA, Varela AI, Thiel M (2012) Genetic signatures of rafting dispersal in algal-dwelling brooders Limnoria spp. (Isopoda) along the SE Pacific (Chile). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 455: 111–122.
  40. 40. Haye PA, Muñoz-Herrera NC (2013) Isolation with differentiation followed by expansion with admixture in the tunicate Pyura chilensis. BMC Evol Biol 13: 252.
  41. 41. Teske PR, Papadopoulos I, Mmonwas L, Matumba TG, McQuaid CD, et al. (2011) Climate-driven genetic divergence of limpets with different life histories across a southeastern African marine biogeographic disjunction. Mol Ecol 20: 5025–5041.
  42. 42. Bird CE, Holland BS, Bowen BW, Toonen RJ (2007) Contrasting phylogeography in three endemic Hawaiian limpets (Cellana spp.) with similar life histories. Mol Ecol 16: 3173–3186.
  43. 43. Dawson MN (2013) Natural experiments and meta-analyses in comparative phylogeography. J Biogeogr doi:
  44. 44. Barker ME (1977) Observations on the settlement of the brachiolaria larvae of Stichaster australis (Verrill) and Coscinasterias calamaria (Gray) (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) in the laboratory and on the shore. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 30: 95–108.
  45. 45. Mah CL, Foltz DW (2011) Molecular phylogeny of the Forcipulatacea (Asteroidea: Echinodermata): Systematics & biogeography. Zool J Linn Soc 162: 646–660.
  46. 46. Chia FS (1966) Brooding behavior of a six rayed starfish, Leptasterias hexactis. Biol Bull 130: 304–315.
  47. 47. Komatsu M, O’Loughlin PM, Bruce B, Yoshizawa H, Tanaka K, et al. (2006) A gastric brooding asteroid, Smilasterias multipara. Zool Sci 23: 699–705.
  48. 48. Pearse JS, Mooi R, Lockhart SJ, Brandt A (2009) Brooding and species diversity in the Southern Ocean: selection for brooders or speciation within brooding clades? In: Krupnik I, Lang MA, Miller SE, editors. Smithsonian at the poles: contributions to international polar year science. Washington: Smithsonian Institution. 181–196.
  49. 49. Barker MF, Nichols D (1983) Reproduction, recruitment and juvenile ecology of the starfish, Asterias rubens and Marthasterias glacialis. J Mar Biol Ass UK 63: 745–765.
  50. 50. Kitazawa C, Komatsu M (2001) Larval development and asexual development of the sea star, Distolasterias nipon (Doderlein). In: Barker M, editor. Echinoderms 2000. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger. 177.
  51. 51. McEdward LR (1992) Morphology and development of a unique type of pelagic larva in the starfish Pteraster tesselatus (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Biol Bull 182: 177–187.
  52. 52. Byrne M (1995) Changes in larval morphology in the evolution of benthic development by Patiriella exigua (Asteroidea: Asterinidae), a comparison with the larvae of Patiriella species with planktonic development. Biol Bull 188: 293–305.
  53. 53. Vickery MS, McClinton JB (2000) Effects of food concentration and availability on the incidence of cloning in planktotrophic larvae of the sea star Pisaster ochraceus. Biol Bull 199: 298–304.
  54. 54. Paik SG, Park HS, Yi SK, Yun SG (2005) Developmental duration and morphology of the sea star Asterias amurensis, in Tongyeong, Korea. Ocean Sci J 40: 65–70.
  55. 55. Barker MF (1978) Descriptions of the larvae of Stichaster australis (Verril) and Coscinasterias calamaria (Gray) (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) from New Zealand, obtained from Laboratory Culture. Biol Bull 154: 32–46.
  56. 56. Johnson CR, Sutton DC (1994) Bacteria on the surface of crustose coralline algae induce metamorphosis of the crown of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci. Mar Biol 120: 305–310.
  57. 57. Daneri G, Dellarossa V, Quinones R, Jacob B, Montero P, et al. (2000) Primary production and community respiration in the Humboldt Current System of Chile and associated oceanic areas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 197: 41–49.
  58. 58. Birkeland C, Chia FS, Strathmann RR (1971) Development, substratum selection, delay of metamorphosis and growth in the seastar Mediaster aequalis Stimpson. Biol Bull 141: 99–108.
  59. 59. Young CM, Sewell MA, Tyler PA, Metaxas A (1997) Biogeographic and bathymetric ranges of Atlantic deep-sea echinoderms and ascidians: the role of larval dispersal. Biodivers Conserv 6: 1507–1522.
  60. 60. Kolbin KG, Kulikova VA (2011) Reproduction and larval development of the limpet Lottia persona (Rathke, 1833) (Gastropoda: Lottiidae). Russ J Mar Biol 37: 239–242.
  61. 61. Page LR (2002) Apical sensory organ in larvae of the patellogastropod Tectura scutum. Biol Bull 202: 6–22.
  62. 62. Sasaki R (1985) Larval identification and occurrence of Ezo abalone, Haliotis discus hannai, in the adjacent waters of Kensennuma Bay, Miyagi Prefecture. Aquiculture 32: 199–206.
  63. 63. Kulikova VA, Omel’yanenko VA (2000) Reproduction and larval development of the gastropod mollusk Tegula rustica in Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Russ J Mar Biol 26: 128–130.65.
  64. 64. Kritzer JP, Sale PF (2006) Marine metapopulations, Elsevier, The Netherlands.
  65. 65. Foltz DW (2003) Invertebrate species with nonpelagic larvae have elevated levels of nonsynonymous substitutions and reduced nucleotide diversity. J Mol Evol 57: 607–612.
  66. 66. Foltz DW, Hrincevich AW, Rocha-Olivares A (2004) Apparent selection intensity for the cytochrome oxidase I gene varies with mode of reproduction in echinoderms. Genetica 122: 115–125.
  67. 67. Foltz DE, Mah CL (2010) Difference in larval type explains patterns of nonsynonymous substitutions in two ancient paralogs of the histone H3 gene in sea stars. Evol Dev 12: 222–230.
  68. 68. Hansen TA (1978) Larval dispersal and species longevity in Lower Tertiary gastropods. Science, 199, 885–887.
  69. 69. Hansen TA (1983) Modes of larval development and rates of speciation in early Terciary neogastropods. Science, 220, 501–502.
  70. 70. Jablonski D, Lurtz RA (1983) Larval ecology of marine benthic invertebrates: paleobiological implications. Biological Review of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 58, 21–89.
  71. 71. Jablonski D (1986) Larval ecology and macroevolution in marine invertebrates. Bull Mar Sci 39: 565–587.
  72. 72. Grantham TA (1995) Hierarchical approaches to macroevolution: recent work on species selection and the ‘effect hypothesis’. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 26: 301–321.
  73. 73. Hey J (2010) Isolation with migration models for more than two populations. Mol Biol Evol 27: 905–920.
  74. 74. McGovern TM, Keever CC, Saski CA, Hart MW, Marko PB (2010) Divergence genetics analysis reveals historical population genetic processes leading to contrasting phylogeographic patterns in co-distributed species. Mol Ecol 19: 5043–5060.
  75. 75. Plouviez S, Le Guen D, Lecompte O, Lallier FH, Jollivet D (2010) Determining gene flow and the influence of selection across the equatorial barrier of the East Pacific Rise in the tube-dwelling polychaete Alvinella popejana. BMC Evol Biol 10: 220.
  76. 76. Marko PB, Hart MW (2011) The complex analytical landscape of gene flow inference. Trends Ecol Evol 26: 448–456.
  77. 77. Marko PB, Hart MW (2012) Retrospective coalescent methods and the reconstruction of metapopulation histories in the sea. Evol Ecol 26: 291–315.
  78. 78. Martin P, Zuccarello GC (2012) Molecular phylogeny and timing of radiation in Lessonia (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales). Phycol Res 60: 276–287.
  79. 79. Briones C, Presa P, Pérez M, Pita A, Guiñez R (2013) Genetic connectivity of the ecosystem engineer Perumytilus purpuratus north to the 32°S southeast Pacific ecological discontinuity. Mar Biol DOI10.1007/s00227-013-2301-x.
  80. 80. Faugeron S, Valero M, Destombe C, Martínez EA, Correa JA (2001) Hierarchical spatial structure and discriminant analysis of genetic diversity in the red alga Mazzaella laminarioides (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta). J Phycol 37: 705–716.
  81. 81. Tellier F, Tapia J, Destombe C, Valero M, Faugeron S (2011) The Lessonia nigrescens species complex (Laminariales. Phaeophyceae) shows strict parapatry and complete reproductive isolation in a secondary contact zone. J Phycol 47: 894–903.
  82. 82. Brante A, Fernández M, Viard F (2012) Phylogeography and biogeography concordance in the marine gastropod Crepipatella dilatata (Calyptraeidae) along the Southeastern Pacific coast. J Hered 103: 630–637.
  83. 83. Zakas C, Binford J, Navarrete SA, Wares JP (2009) Restricted gene flow in Chilean barnacles reflects an oceanographic and biogeographic transition zone. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 394: 165–177.
  84. 84. Strathmann MF (1897) Reproduction and development of marine invertebrates of the northern Pacific coast. Washington, U S A: University of Washington Press.
  85. 85. Grantham BA, Eckert GL, Shanks AL (2003) Dispersal potential of marine invertebrates in diverse habitats. Ecol Appl 13: S108–S116.
  86. 86. Johnson MW (1939) The correlation of water movements and dispersal of pelagic larval stages of certain littoral animals, especially the Sand crab, Emerita. J Mar Res 2: 236–245.
  87. 87. Fuentes I, Barros C (2000) Larval development and metamorphosis of cultured Tetrapygus niger (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). An uncommon form of echinoplutei. Inv Rep Dev 37: 201–209.
  88. 88. Wehrtmann IS, Albornoz L, Pardo LM, Véliz D (1997) The larval development of Petrolisthes violaceus (Guérin, 1831) (Decapoda, Anomura, Porcellanidae) from Chilean waters, cultivated under laboratory conditions. Crustaceana 70: 562–583.
  89. 89. Gore RH (1971) Petrolisthes tridentatus: the development of larvae from a Pacific specimen in laboratory culture with a discussion of larval characters in the genus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Porcellanidae). Biol Bull 141: 485–501.
  90. 90. Sambrook J, Fristch E, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
  91. 91. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrikenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotech 3: 294–299.
  92. 92. Hoareau TB, Boissin E (2010) Design of phylum-specific hybrid primers for DNA barcoding: addressing the need for efficient COI amplification in the Echinodermata. Mol Ecol Res 10: 960–967.
  93. 93. Dawson MN, Barber PH, González-Guzmán LI, Toonen RJ, Dugan JE, et al. (2011) Phylogeography of Emerita analoga (Crustacea, Decapoda, Hippidae), an eastern Pacific Ocean sand crab with long-lived pelagic larvae. J Biogeo 38: 1600–1612.
  94. 94. Palumbi SR, Benzie J (1991) Large mitochondrial DNA differences between morphologically similar Penaeid shrimp. Mol Mar Biol Biotech 1: 27–34.
  95. 95. Werding B, Hiller A, Misof B (2001) Evidence of paraphyly in the neotropical Porcellanid genus Neopisosoma (Crustacea: Anomura: Porcellanidae) based on molecular characters. Dev Hydrobiol 154: 105–110.
  96. 96. Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S (2011) Geneious. Biomatters Ltd.
  97. 97. Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinf 25: 1451–1452.
  98. 98. Hudson RR (2000) A new statistic for detecting genetic differentiation. Genetics 155: 2011–2014.
  99. 99. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Res 10: 564–567.
  100. 100. Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139: 457–462.
  101. 101. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, Available:
  102. 102. Dupanloup I, Schneider S, Excoffier L (2002) A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol Ecol 11: 2571–2581.
  103. 103. Hey J, Nielsen R (2007) Integration within the Felsenstein equation for improved Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in population genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104: 2785–2790.
  104. 104. Geyer CJ (1991) Markov chain Monte Carlo likelihood. In: Keramidas, EM, editor. Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on the Interface. Fairfax Station: Interface Foundation. 156–163.
  105. 105. Nielsen R, Wakeley J (2001) Distinguishing migration from isolation. A Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 158: 885–96.
  106. 106. Ho STW, Phillips MJ, Cooper A, Drummond A (2005) Time dependency of molecular rate estimates and systematic overestimation of recent divergence times. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1561–1568.
  107. 107. Ho SYW, Lanfear R, Bromham L, Phillips MJ, Soubrier J, et al. (2011) Time-dependent rates of molecular evolution. Mol Ecol 20: 3087–3101.